WEBVTT - Sabotage Drop Season!

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Speculation and advice.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Now along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's your host, Paul Jargian.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 4>We are limping into week number eleven.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly, an injury ravaged edition. I am

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Jarchi and co hosts say are Matt Harrison and

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 4>Hey, guys, I'm not injured, are you?

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>No, my heart hurts for my various teams with Mark Andrews,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of which there were several, okay, And I had Joe

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Burrow in a couple, I had Jamar Chason a couple

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of y Yeah.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 5>You don't. You don't get the limp wrists a whole lot. No,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 5>you don't get it comes to Joe Burrow. No, those

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 5>who don't know it sounds.

0:00:55.280 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Season over for Joe Burrow, for Mark Andrews, and before

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we dive into the matchups and three tough questions and

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me and premature speculation. I think

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we're still gonna have starting grades on Jamar Chase Joe Mixon.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>They're just not gonna be a's and b's, They're gonna

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be sees. I think Jake Browning looked okay, m.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Hmm, passable.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not the worst quarterback in the league.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>That's Tommy DeVito.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 6>So oh.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 7>I got a new nickname for him, the Cutlet King,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 7>the Cutlet King.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>I like it.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I don't know it's sad, but I don't think.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's zero value.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 4>Left in those guys in that.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Offense, and I think there's there's gonna be some There's

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some angles there.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 7>You would think that with Browning coming in, he's going

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.279
<v Speaker 7>to focus more often on Jamar Chase. Yeah, some backup

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 7>quarterbacks tend to do that. They get there will be

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 7>and they just go to that first read more often.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jake Browning trying to carve out, like you know,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some career in the NFL, and I have Jamar Chase.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I could throw two. I'm doing it. Yeah, why not?

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Why not? Let's dive into the matchups.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Arizona takes on Houston, Brian, Let's get right into it here.

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We had the return of James Connor last week, Houston's

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>been a very good overall defense and better against the

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>run this year than last year. Like the worst run

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>defense in the league. They're not half bad this year.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of James Connor?

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you set me up quite nicely there. Connor came

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 5>back last week, like you said, saw eighty four percent

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 5>of Arizona's running back carry saw an eighty percent snap

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 5>rate in the red zone. So the belcow is back

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 5>in James Connor. But like you said, charge it's a

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 5>bad matchup, but at worst it's neutral. Opposing backs are

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 5>averaging just seventy four rushing yards per game against Houston,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 5>but they are averaging five catches and Houston has surrendered

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 5>three running back touchdowns over their last two games. So

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 5>I have a c on James Connor. A word to

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 5>the passing game. I'm starting with Trey McBride. Why not

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 5>who I've dubbed now Trey McBride or die I like

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>it a portray McBride this week last week, the first

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Cardinals tight end to have one hundred yards receiving any game.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 6>Since nineteen eighty nine.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 4>What sounds not accurate? Really?

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 6>The Internet told me this, So.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 4>I think I gave him an A grade last week too. TJ.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Hockinson did it the first half of last week.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 5>So over the last three weeks, and this is with

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>three different quarterbacks for Arizona, Josh Jobs Clayton Tune Clayton.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Turned through for fifty eight yards. A lad A lad,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 4>I'll ass.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 6>Oh okay, sorry, I was like, I'm I'm a lad Aladdin.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 5>But McBride over the last three weeks with those three

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>different quarterbacks, it's a first read target share, so he

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 5>was the first read on his targets more than thirty

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 5>percent of the time, which is massive for context. Travis

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Kelcey leads all tight ends on the season with a

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 5>roughly twenty eight percent first red target share and the

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Texans allowing seven catches sixty four yards per game to

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 5>opposing tight ends. They've sitt undered three touchdowns to the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 5>positions are to the position over their last three So

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 5>the A from McBride my favorite option on the pass game.

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 4>I will mention this is a double sounder here.

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Trey McBride was a premature speculation player on this show

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about I don't know five six weeks ago, so hopefully

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you took action.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 5>He's top five tight end moving forward might be top three.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 5>With the Mark Andrews injury over to the wide receivers,

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 5>I'm only giving a starting grade to Mark. He's Brown

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 5>for those who forgot. Brown got off to an awesome

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 5>start last year with Kyler Murray as his quarterback. Before

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Brown got hurt, he was a top ten wide receiver.

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 5>A lot has changed since then in Arizona, including the

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 5>head coach. But I like Brown this week, even though

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 5>I only caught one pass on four targets last week

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 5>with Kyler Murray back, but they just missed on what

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 5>could have been a thirty plus yard touchdown to this week.

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 5>Over the last four games, the Texans are allowing more

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 5>than two hundred yards per game to wide receivers. So

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 5>I got to see on Brown, but I can't go

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 5>there with Ryan del Moore or Michael Wilson there on

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 5>the bench. They're like DFS starts this week, but Kyler.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Murray is not.

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 5>I'll give I'm a starting grade of the Sea. He

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 5>looked pretty good last week against Atlanta.

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought he looked so much better than I ever

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>would have drowned. It looked if you'd have picked up

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>if you just showed me Kyler Murray's play from last week.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Without knowing the context, I would have guess I could

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have guessed it was any any game of his whole career.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Did not look at all like first game off.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 7>He thought I was nuts for giving him a starting

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 7>grade last week.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 5>Geez, come on, Charch just the softest of starts. This

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 5>week he gets at the Sea. It's a tougher matchup

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 5>on the road in Houston. The Texans rank eighth and

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 5>pass coverage by Pro Football Focus and first and pass

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 5>rush win rate, which means Murray will be under duress

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 5>most of the day. But Houston also allowing an average

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 5>of one passing touchdown per game. Not great, but we'll

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 5>take that for Murray. The real thing here is that

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Texans have surrounded multiple touchdown passes and back to that game,

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 5>so the pass defense trending downwards. I'm starting Murray with

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 5>the Sea over to the Texans side. Devin Singletary, assuming

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 5>Damian Peers is out, I believe he's a grade for

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 5>Devn Singletary. Monster game for Singletary against Cincinnati last week.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Smash spot here. The Cardinals allowed these sixth most rushing

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 5>rushing yards in the third most touchdowns per game to

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 5>opposing running backs. Arizona has allowed or yielded seventy four

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 5>red zone touches to running backs. The next highest team

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 5>is the New York Giants with fifty two geez red

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 5>zone touches.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>He yielded ton.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Percent increase over the next so the next worst team.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>A grade for Devn Singletary. He should not be available anywhere,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 5>but if he is snatched, him up immediately Over to

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 5>the wide receivers. I had an A on Tank Dell

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 5>until Nico Collins practice today. I'm sorry on Friday, so

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 5>a B for Dell and Collins. The Cardinals are allowing

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>a healthy one hundred and sixty yards and a touchdown

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 5>per game to opposing wideouts. The Cardinals are one of

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 5>ten teams to yield more than twenty five red zone

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 5>targets to wide receivers, so a good matchup for Dell

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 5>and Collins.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 4>They get the B.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 5>I'll give Robert Woods a C. He will be back.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Noah Brown has been ruled. I can't believe we're discussing

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 5>this many wide receivers for the Texans. It's insane, but

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 5>it's all because the C. J.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 6>Stroud.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 5>We will get to in a minute, real quick. Dlphin Schultz,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 5>he gets a see unlike previous years. Like many years,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the Cardinals aren't giving up big numbers to opposing tight

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 5>ends less than four catches and forty yards per game.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 5>But Daltin Schultz, he's been great, great as of late

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 5>as a CJ.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 6>Stroud. So Schultz gets the C and a B for CJ. Stroud.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm not gonna get into it, get into it too much.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Rookie of the Year already that's locked up MVP candidate

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 5>as of right now. Easy B for CJ against the Cardinals.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia takes on Kansas City. We are once again going

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to our Monday night game right out of the gate.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 4>What do you do?

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 4>It's just it's worked out this way for reasons. We're

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>not going to bore people. But I hate it.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I want Monday Night to be the last game, but

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we can't always do it for boring reasons.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Here we go. Jalen Hurts and AJ Brown are obvious

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 4>as for Philadelphia. Super Bowl.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, who thinks this is Super Bowl preview

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and rematch all at once?

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 4>It could be. I think that's the favorite, right.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably your favorite, can be the Bengals anymore.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift comes in with a B grade. He's seen

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>at least seventeen touches in every game since Week two,

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which we love. He's topped seventy four yards or scored

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in every game, which we love. Casey has allowed at

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>least seventy four yards or a touchdown to a runner

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in three straight games, so I like the seventy four

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>yard mark.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 4>At least.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City is the second worst team in run stuff

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>win rate by ESPN and Philadelphia's the number one run

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>block win rate, So it's hit all lines up for

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift here. You know, yes, Jalen Hurts eats all

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the easy goal line touchdowns and that limits Swift's upside,

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's still a candidate to get some of Dallas

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Goddard's missing receptions. That is, six targets a game that

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Goddard leaves behind, and I think Swift probably gets one

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or two of those. Devanta Smith's the only other egle

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that we really haven't accounted for. He posted seven catches

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred yards against Kansas City in the Super Bowl.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Now he goes up against outside cornerback Lagerious sneed a

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>lot in this game. He projects to who could well

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>wait hold on le Jerry Snead is their best quarterback.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He could shadow aj Brown in this game. That would

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>put Smith on the more favorable coverage against rookie Jalen

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Watson over the past five week weeks, Watson allowing three

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and a passer rating of one hundred and nineteen

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>over that span. And again no Dallas Goddard. Those targets

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>need to go somewhere. DeVonta Smith a candidate for that

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and to be great for him. It's cover to Kansas City.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelsey are a grades now. They

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>do enter the game having struggled in the last two

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>before the bye week. Fortunately, the Eagles have been slaughtered

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>by Dak Prescott and Sam Howell in their previous two games.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Those two combined for seven hundred and seventy one yards

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and seven touchdowns.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Holy cow, that's almost the ultimate four to seven jackpot

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 5>right there.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>That actually just seven to seven to one and seven. Yeah,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>not been most by the way. We're heading into Week eleven.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howell leads the league. You've been waiting for this

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>in passing yards and passing completions.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 7>Baby, I still hate this wolf.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 4>I know we need a better wolf.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 6>He sounds like he's in pain.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, we had a listener, Dave, who sent in his

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>dog doing a wolf howl. Maybe what we see is

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>every week we used to have a listener send in

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>their bad howls, and then we'll just play your bad.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 4>Howl and different.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 7>I like this idea.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's our angle right there. I'm gonna go capture

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 4>sound at the idea around.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Isaiah Pachecko toughest matchup of his year.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles are allowing only twenty touches for eighty four

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>total yards per game to opposing running backs both league flows.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles are allowing only zero point two touchdowns per

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing running back, second fewest, and they have

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourth best run stop win rate per ESPN. It's

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all bad for Pachecko, who comes in with a C grade.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And I will tell you more about Rasi Rice in

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the next segment. Chicago takes on Detroit. Matt, let's go

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Chicago side. We're just in fields expected to

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>come back for this game. Do you dare put him

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup right away.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 7>He's been a full participant in practice all week and

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 7>should start in Detroit this Sunday. The injury was to

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 7>his thumb on his throwing hand, so the legs shouldn't

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 7>be in question, and the legs are what we've signed

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 7>up for on Justin Fields. Last year in two matchups

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 7>with Detroit, Fields ran for one hundred and thirty two

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 7>yards in one game and one hundred and forty seven

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 7>yards and two scores in the other game.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Is insane.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 7>Now, no quarterbacks have put up days like that against

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 7>the Lions since Fields did it last year, but Lamar

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 7>Jackson had thirty six rushing yards in a score and

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 7>a blowout win in Week seven. Patrick Mahomes had forty

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 7>five rushing yards in Week one. Three quarterbacks have thrown

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 7>for three or more touchdown passes against the Lions in

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 7>the last five games, and prior to the injury, Fields

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 7>had two straight games with four touchdown passes and at

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 7>least two hundred and eighty yards.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Justin Fields gets an A grade wow coming back. Oh jeez, okay.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 7>DJ Moore hasn't scored a touchdown since Field's injured his thumb,

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 7>but had five scores in the three previous games that

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 7>Field started and finished, and it looks like more will

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 7>match up most often with Cameron Sutton. Sutton was targeted

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 7>nine times last week in the Chargers.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Game, nine times, nine times.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 7>And he allowed six catches eighty eight yards and two touchdowns.

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 7>A grade for DJ Moore in this one.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Wow okay.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 7>Cole Comet had three touchdown receptions in Field's last two

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 7>completed games as well. He put up better numbers than

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 7>DJ Moore in the Bag and Orange games, but right

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 7>now he's the number five tight end in PPR leagues.

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 7>The Lions have faced exactly one tight end in the

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 7>top twelve this year. That was Mark Andrews. He had

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 7>four catches, sixty three yards and two touchdowns. Comet gets

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 7>a very solid B grade here. Deonta Foreman is the

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 7>bell cow here. Roshawn Johnson is just the change of

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 7>pace guy as of right now.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, but Khalil Herbert coming back MUCKs up that works.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I dropped Foreman in my league.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 7>Really. He had twenty and twenty one carries in the

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 7>last two weeks. And by the way, Foreman has played

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 7>the Lions exactly once in his career. It was last

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 7>year on Christmas Eve as a member of the Panthers.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 7>He had twenty one carries one hundred and sixty five

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 7>yards in a score in that game, and lead backs

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 7>against the Lions over the past three games have had

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 7>a minimum of sixteen PPR points. So I'm giving Foreman

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 7>a B in this gradeing this one.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see it differently. I think Herbert goes right

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the top of the depth chart. He's going

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to get most of the work. It's going to wash

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>out for him, and I believe maybe.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 7>Let's talk about the running backs on the other side.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 7>That's David Montgomery, and how about the starter Khalil Herbert.

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's Foreman's job. Man. They're force feeding him

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the ball right now.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 5>So this is gonna be a Roshawn Johnson game, though

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 5>totally all right.

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 7>We view it differently. I don't think the ground bear

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 7>is back.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Herbert was running really, really well pre injury, full week of.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Practice, ready to roll. I think he goes right back

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 4>to the top of the dept chart. I don't think so.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 7>David Montgomery and Jamier Gibbs, we specifically talked last week

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 7>about how David Montgomery returned, he'd just resume his role

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 7>as the inside the five back. But evidently Gibbs was

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 7>stopped last week inside the five, and Montgomery was going

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 7>to be sent in, but then he asked Jamiir Gibbs,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 7>do you want it? And he gave Jamiir Gibbs the

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 7>inside the five and then Gibbs got three carries from

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 7>inside the five last week.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Don't ever do that again, David Montgomery. Never again.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 7>Montgomery still had two himself, so I think it's still

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 7>clear that that's his role. But it's a warm, fuzzy story.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 7>The snap split last week was thirty seven to twenty

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 7>four in favor of Gibbs, and rush attempts were almost

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 7>split evenly. The Bears have improved exponentially against the runs

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 7>since they traded for Montes Sweat. In the two games

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 7>since Sweat arrived, they held Alvin Kamara to twenty six

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 7>rushing yards and the Panthers backs to a combined twenty

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 7>five yards on thirteen carries. So I'll give a B

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 7>grade to Gibbs on the pass catching side alone, because

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 7>the Bears have still had issues with that.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Just a C grade for Montgomery right now.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 6>In a revenge game.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 7>In a revenge game, I think he needs to convert

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 7>a score here. Jared Goff gets an A grade, though

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 7>the Bears are allowing two undred and fifty five yards

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 7>and two passing scores per game, both are bottom four

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 7>in the league. Goff has been over the two hundred

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 7>and fifty five yard mark in each of his last

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 7>four games, plus, I think this game has a little

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 7>bit of a shootout to it. Amon Ra Saint Brown

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 7>and Sam Laporta are both A grades. Not worth getting

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 7>too far into it, but the Bears are the worst

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 7>tight end defense in the league, and when Goff needs

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 7>a first down a mon Ra has seen twenty three

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 7>targets on third or fourth down in the last six games.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Jeez, that's a lot. They just keep.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Targeting him on those short, short ones right there. And

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 7>Josh Reynolds is the other guy you'd consider here, but

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 7>he's losing snaps to Jamison Williams and for some reason,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 7>Khalif Raymond plus Donovan People's Jones should be active for

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 7>the lines this week. So I'm going to take away

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 7>and see approach on the secondary wide receiver for the

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Lions for the time being.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Bears run defense has turned really, really good over the

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks. They are the best run defense in

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the league by yards allowed. It's amazing and.

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 7>Montes made them even better because I highlighted the last

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 7>two weeks it's been they've been unstoppable.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, unbelievable. How how they've turned that around, or.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 7>They've been stopping people, but unstoppable It is not the right.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Word perspective from the Chicago perspective, unstoppable. When we come back,

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we won't stop giving you players upon.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Whom you can take it home. Good one. Well, actually

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be exactly what will stop at nine.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be exactly nine times when we come back.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Take a chance at me. Stay tuned Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Nine players upon whom you can take a chance, but

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>begin at the quarterback position, and Matt Harrison, who you got.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 7>It's come to this, Trevor Lawrence is now a take

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 7>a chance on me player.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 4>To Liz.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 7>When you've thrown seven touchdown passes in your last eight

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 7>games and only top three hundred yards once in that span,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 7>that's what you get. We'll talk more about Trevor in

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 7>the next hour, but this week he's startable.

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Against the Titans.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 7>Lawrence does average about twenty five rushing yards per game,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 7>which is sadly helping his numbers more than anything this year,

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 7>and the Titans have allowed an average of thirty eight

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 7>rushing yards per game to the quarterback position in the

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 7>last month, and some of those quarterbacks include Desmond Ritter,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 7>Taylor Heineke, Baker Mayfield. They also allowed Mayfield to go

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 7>for two seventy eight and two last week through the air.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>So like Lawrence this week, all right, Brian, you take

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 4>a chance with me quarterback.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 5>He's been a mainstay on takeom, but I think he's

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 5>hit every time. But this is his toughest matchup and

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 5>that's Baker Mayfield at San Francisco.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We've got I think I bet he's more than every

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>other week at this stage.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Just to take a chance, I mean, quarterbacks.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 5>I feel like this is the week where most people

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 5>won't listen to us, though, but there is an angle

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 5>here at San Francisco. Baker has thrown for multiple touchdown

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 5>passes in three straight games, and over the forty nine

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 5>ers last three games, they've surrendered five passing touchdowns, not

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 5>a ton, but that includes the goose egg from the

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 5>aforementioned Trevor Lawrence.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 6>Last week.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 5>They serdered five touchdowns across their two games prior.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 6>And this is all about volume for Mayfield, who's playing well.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 6>They're not gonna run at all. They're not going to

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 6>run at all.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Mayfield has a nice set of wideouts and Chris Godwin

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 5>and Mike Evans. The Bucks will surely be trailing, which

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 5>means Baker will be throwing. San Francisco is yielding more

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 5>than thirty eight pass attempts per game, which is a

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 5>healthy number. So I'm going Baker and I'm hoping he

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 5>pulls off this upset in Cleveland.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 6>Is this back home? Like, what have we done to ourselves?

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>So I let just Josh Dobbs go, yeah, piling on

0:18:58.240 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns a little bit.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Love take on the Chargers.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Love, coming off probably the best total game of his career,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>now faces the most favorable matchup of his career. Chargers

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>allow the most passing yards three hundred and sixteen per game,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>even Zach Wilson put up two sixty three. If Zach

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilson can do it, yeah that was just two weeks ago.

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All other quarterbacks besides Wilson have found their way into

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the end zone, including by ground, where the Chargers have

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed four quarterback rushing touchdowns. Most of the league love

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>his fleet of foot.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 4>He can do some.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Damage on the ground here as well. Let's go to

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the running back position.

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 7>I've got Zach Sharbonay another mainstay.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe this is either three or four straight weeks. Yeah,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>probas Zach Sharboney.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 7>Let it be known that Zach Charbonay has been on

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 7>the field for more snaps than Ken Walker in three

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 7>straight weeks.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Walker is still.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 7>Leading the touch totals in each of those weeks, but

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 7>the targets are going to Sharbonay eight to five in

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 7>that time span, and he's run sixty eight passing routes

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 7>compared to thirty five for Walker in that time I

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 7>don't think sharbon is about to take over, but he

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 7>did have ten touches last week, and that included four receptions.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 7>The Rams haven't been tested a lot through the air

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 7>by running backs, but every running back who's caught just

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 7>three balls against them has managed double digit PPR points.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Brian, you take a chance with me running back.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 5>I've got Cowboys backup running back Rico Dowdell at Carolina.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 5>That means Tony Pollard is fine. He will be playing

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 5>and starting this game. But there's gonna be enough meat

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 5>on the bone for both of these backs in this

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 5>matchup against Carolina, who is allowing the second most rushing

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 5>yards per game to running backs, They've surrendered the most

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 5>rushing scores to the position, so it should be no

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>surprise that Carolina has yielded the third most red zone

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 5>touches to running backs and the second most in goal

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 5>to go situations.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 6>So I like Dowdell in a backup role.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Would you call him Rico suave?

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 5>No, because I used to call Nego Collins Nico suave.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 5>But I'm gonna stick that with me.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too easy. It could be a blowout

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and they go to Dowdell one sided game too.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I've been way in no long time for this.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Really, ty Chandler, Baby, Yeah, you remember in the pre

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, he was my premature speculation player. Obviously had

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>no idea Alexander Madison was going to be concussed.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 7>Don't give yourself a little peacock for that.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I'll I'll take a mini peacock.

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So we don't want to make it sound like I'm

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>happy Alexander Madison's concussed because clearly that's not what we

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>want here, but we do want ty Chandler to get

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the majority of carries now.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Kevin O'Connell seems to have been very sheepish about.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Giving him a lot of work, but I don't think

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got a choice now, and it's Denver now. Denver's

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>much improved in basically every area except against the run.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 6>Would you say Kevin O'Connell is tied down this week? No?

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 4>Tied? Oh t yes, his hands are tied.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 6>There we go. That would have been better is better.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>In the last five weeks, Denver allowing five and a

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>half yards per carry, one hundred and one rushing yards

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>per game, and that includes giving up a buck eighty

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Bills last week. Hardly a rushing powerhouse team.

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Chandler is a better receiver than Madison or Acres, and

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings could deploy him through the air copiously as well.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Ty Chandlernos, I'm glad we're not using the Broncos seventy

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>points stats against them, and we've wiped that out and

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they're still bad at the rush at.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 4>This they are. Let's go to the receivers.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 7>Matt I'm going way deep on this one. Diami Brown

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 7>versus the Giants. Curtis Samuel has been battling a toe

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 7>injury for like two weeks. He played through it last

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 7>week but was ineffective, and then Diami Brown popped in

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 7>out of nowhere. Had two targets, two catches, forty one

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 7>yards and a score in Seattle. Brown is the deep

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 7>threat with an average depth of target currently sitting at

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 7>a pretty nice seventeen yards downfield. That's six yard is

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 7>higher than Terry McLaurin.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 7>Last week, this Giants team faced off against the Cowboys

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 7>and the third wide receiver on that roster was Michael Gallup.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Gallup had an a dot last week of thirty five

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 7>yards down til and ended up with seventy yards in

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 7>a score, So they targeted deep. The Giants have one

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 7>good corner that's Cordial Flot He's most likely the slot corner,

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 7>Uh and Samuel in the slot flat in the slot.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 7>Samuel runs from the slot most often, but when he's

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 7>been out it's been a mix of John Dotson and

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 7>Jamison Crowder moving to the slot and then Diami Brown

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 7>flexes to the outside. Where it's a good matchup for him.

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 7>I like Brown as just the DFS deep dart throw

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 7>this week?

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Does Flot in the slot own an elf on the shelf? Probably?

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean maybe you could get a flot and put

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 7>it in a.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 6>What's the A dot when targeting Flot in the slot?

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 4>Not that good because he's their only good corner.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You're taking chance with me receiver if you like exhausted

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this whole lot of questioning.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 5>I got tight end Jets tight end Tyler Conklin aka

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Tyler Gronklin at Buffalo. Conklin only had one catch for

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 5>two yards when these teams met in week win, but

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 5>but Buffalo had a healthy Matt Mulano. They're all pro

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 5>winebacker arguably that the heart of their defense. He is

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 5>on IR now, and Conklin has been solid over the

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 5>last two games, securing all thirteen of his targets for

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and thirty six yards. The Bills have surrendered

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 5>big games to tight ends in recent weeks. The Bengals

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 5>tight ends combined for ten catches one hundred and one

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 5>yards and two touchdowns, and the Patriots tight ends combined

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 5>for six catches eighty three yards in a touchdown recently,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 5>Conklin shouldn't be doing any combining with cj Uzoma, who

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 5>has totaled just four catches over his last four games.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 5>So Tyler Gronklin at Buffalo and.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>A tight end Wasteland made worse by the Mark Anders injury. Yeah,

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he's absolutely rosterable and startable this week. I there is

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a chance this week Monday Night is the Rashi Rice

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>breakout party against the Eagles. The Eagles have allowed the

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>most wide receiver receptions, the third most wide receiver yards,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and the most wide receiver touchdowns. Rice sat a career

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>high in routes run in his last game before the bye,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>forty one of them. He's scored in three the past

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>five games. Now, Rice primarily runs from the slot, and

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the primo matchup against Philadelphia that allows him to

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>avoid the outside corners James Bradberry and Darius Sleigh Ride.

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Sleigh Reich will face backup corner Bradley Roby, who's got

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a shoulder injury, or if he can't go, even better

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>rookie Eli Rix. Now Roby has barely played this year,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>but last year he was so bad he ranked his

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus one hundred and twenty second cornerback. Now

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if he can't go, and it's the rookie Eli Rix,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>he's so bad this year. He ranks his cornerback one

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty six among quarterbacks. And here is some

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>irrefutable math. Rice has scored all four of his touchdowns

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in odd numbered weeks.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 4>And here we are we gleven. Oh wow, here we are.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 4>That's the kind of math you can't argue with.

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 7>Glad he took Week ten as his bye week.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas takes on Carolina. Brian he already told us Ricote

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Dowdell is your take chance with me running back. But

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Tony Pollard. If you like Dowdell, you

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>must like Tony Pollard.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 6>This is it.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 5>This is it for Tony Pollard. Like I said, doubt

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 5>all might take on running back. But Pollard gets the

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 5>A against Carolina. I'm not gonna go through the stats again.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 5>There's given up a ton of running backs. Pollard has

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 5>gone like one hundred and ninety ish touches without a touchdown.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 6>It's been a brutal stretch for Pollard.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 5>He did get stopped twice at the one yard line

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 5>last week on separate drive, so I'm gonna roll him

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 5>out here one more time. Pollard ranks second in overall

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 5>red zone touches and second and carries inside the five

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 5>yard line among all running backs. Carolina will also be

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 5>without all Pro linebacker Brian Burns, So Tony Pollard gets

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 5>an A. Come on, Tony LFG one time over to

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 5>CD Lamb, he gets an A. Lamb's target totals over

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 5>the last three games fourteen, sixteen, fourteen, in his catch

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 5>total over the during that same span twelve, eleven and

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 5>eleven just on an absolute heater, you gotta give him

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 5>an A. But I feel I'm a little worried about

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 5>this matchup because the Panthers have yielded these second fewest

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 5>targets to wide receivers and as a result, they are

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 5>averaging as a whole less than eleven catches and one

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 5>hundred and thirty yards per game against Carolina. Teams don't

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 5>throw a ton against the Panthers. But you got to

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>give Ceedee Lamb the A. And if he doesn't get

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 5>the goods, I'm giving Brandon Cooks and Michael Gallup to

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 5>see just in case. But this game is all about

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 5>the running backs. But I do have to see on

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 5>Jake Ferguson. It's basically the same story for Fergie as

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 5>it is for the wideouts the Panthers that yielded the

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 5>third fewest targets to opposing tight ends and as a result,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 5>they are averaging three and a half catches and thirty

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 5>yards per game against Carolina with just two total touchdowns

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 5>all season. So just as see for Ferguson, but I

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 5>will give Dak Prescott a B.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 6>He should get enough done through the air.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Dak Prescott right now, top five quarterback whose plays.

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So much better Now for all of us that poop pood,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the move it offensive coordinator that Dallas did.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 6>That's great towards right now, big me, Yeah, Da.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott's really never looked better than he has over

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the last three games that he's played, with four three

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and four touchdowns in all games over three hundred yards.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Now over the Carolina side, I'm just going to talk

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 5>about one player, the only player worth starting, and that's

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 5>Adam Thielen. Of course I'm gonna give him a be

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Carolina head coach Frank Reich did not call the plays

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 5>for Carolina over the last two games, and those have

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 5>been Feelin's worst games, even though we still scored double

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 5>digit points. But Frank Reike has reclaimed those duties, which

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 5>is great news for Theelan and Carolina will be behind

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 5>in this game. They'll be throwing a ton and Cowboys

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 5>slot corner Jordan Lewis has struggled mightily over the last

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 5>five weeks. He's allowed a passer rating of one hundred

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 5>and forty in the slot, third highest during that span.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Letry, I'm gonna try to sneak in one more matchup,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>which we don't normally do right here, but I'm gonna try.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this one is short enough that we can

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>do with Chargers in Green Bay. For the Chargers, Keenan Allen,

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Austin Eckler obvious as they're running at a great clip.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 4>In the Packers defense is nothing to worry about here.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Justin Herbert, who's posted four explosive games

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and this feels like a fifth coming now. The Packers

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>traded away their best cornerback, Russell Douglas Jarrah Alexander.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 4>If he plays at all, we'd be playing hurt.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The Packers pass defense looks great on paper, but they

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>faced Kenny Pickett Brett Rippen, Desmond Ritter, Jamis Winston.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it has been.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>A cavalcade of backup grade quarterbacks against the against the Packers.

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The only Herbert level quarterback to face the Packers all

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>year was Kirk Cousins, who was eviscerating them before he

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>got hurt three weeks ago. Justin Herbert A grade in

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this game, Quinn Johnson comes into the C grade three

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>straight games of at least thirty routes run all season

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>highs for him. He scored his first touchdown last week,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and at six foot three, two hundred and fifteen pounds,

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Johnson should be an end zone target and at least

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>more often than he has been there. Starting to use

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>him more in the red zone, Packers have been forced

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>into using backup cornerbacks Corey Ballantine and seventh round rookie

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Carrington Valentine. So we got a Valentine Valentine connection.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 4>You totally made that up.

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I know you'd think so, right, maybe all the maybe

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that's their new strategy in Green Bay is nothing but

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>rhyming cornerbacks.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 7>And they got Steve Gallentine on the practice squad right now,

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 7>so that's good.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnston can beat both of those guys, We're gonna give

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade in this one. If Gerald Everett

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>does not go, put Donald Parum in as a flyer

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>with a seat. Gerald Everett is not going, then let's

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>give Donald Parum a C grade in this game as well.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to Green Bay. Jordan Loves might take

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance to be quarterbacks, so I most like some

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of his receivers. And by the way, see grade on

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love, se Grad and Romeo Dobbs. Over the past

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, quarterback of Sante Samuel has allowed the third

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>most yards of any cornerback, and the other side, Michael

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Davis has been serviceable. But this is a very beatable

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>overall unit. Detroit as Miles had a Green Bay offensively,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and they dominated the Chargers in every fast of the

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>passing game last week. And I still think Packer's gonna

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>get Attle something done here, Romeo Dubs see grade. Jayden

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Reed coming off his best game catching all five passes

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for eighty four yards in a score running from the slot,

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he draws a unique Chargers matchup.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Now, the Chargers don't have a true slot defender.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So they mix pieces together to try to the slot,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times it doesn't work. A full

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of wide receiver fantasy points allowed by the

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers go to slot receivers. So Jaden Reid in play.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 4>In this one.

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson, I just can't do it. He's not healthy.

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not a factor in this passing game at all.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the most favorable matchup he's going to have.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe if you're still your roster and you're

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for some dart throw.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Maybe we never had a dad. His dad has been

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 5>the squeaky wheel.

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 6>How about that past week? What do we call that?

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Eli Apple's wife or mom used to be a squeaky

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>wheel too.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 7>They did just drop Christian Watson off of the injury report.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, hopefully he plays in this one. He's averaging

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen yards per pass, which is great, second longest in

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the league. Totally invisible. But you know, if not, now

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>when I'm not putting a C grade on him. But

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if you want to ever throw a dart on Christian Watson,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>this is it. We haven't talked enough about the bust

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>season that is Christian Watson. Remember, but he go off

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the board like round three four of drafts in August.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 6>He's on the All Bus team for right now.

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 7>You know we mentioned it last week invisibility. Good trade

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 7>for running back, bad for wide receiver. That is, that's

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 7>a fact. Yeah, uh, loose mutton.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>About the loose.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Mutton, man, do we have no out? We don't have

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 1>a sheep anymore.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 4>We don't need a sheep. We've got you. We don't

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 4>need the sheep. Loose Mutton.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers are getting rocked by tight ends. Four straight

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>opponents tight ends have combined to top sixty three yards,

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>including guys like Cole Comet, Tyler Conklin Musgrave has posted

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and sixty four yards the past two weeks.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely startable here, a C grade on the loose Mutton,

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and then lastly Aaron Jones.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 4>He's led the team in stankan great, good job, Robbie.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He's led the team in touches and snaps for three

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks, helping to finally dagger any temptation to start

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>AJ Dillon, But his upside totally capped here. Jones has

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>only scored once since Week one. Charges gave up three

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rushing scores of the Lions last week. But Troit's so

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>much better and so much more persistent at the run.

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Per Next Gen Stats, Joan is the fifth least of

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>efficient runner all year. Green Bay's got the fourth worst

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>run block win rate. It's not great and I can

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>only get you to a C.

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Gray.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 7>I feel like he's like the third oldest running back

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 7>in the league too.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>It feels that way. He's not, but I'm sure he's not,

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but it feels that way. When we come back Giants

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, is there anybody to start on the Giants?

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Including sa Kwon Barkley? Find out when we.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you'd like to follow us on x formerly known

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter. I'm Paul at Paul Jarchian, Matt Harrison is

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that explosive output. Brian Johnson is at b t x J.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And you can follow Guillotine Leagues. We never talked about

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>that at g L chop. Do you want to follow

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the Guillotine Leagu's Twitter account for your Guotine league?

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Needs?

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 6>You called it Twitter?

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I did.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 6>It's always Twitter. It's it's always gonna be Twitter.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 4>I know, don't.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't understand.

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would HBO go to Max You've spent like forty

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>years and billions of dollars building your brand. No, don't

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be HBO anymore. Why everybody knows and likes

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>HBO so dumb?

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 7>The answer is it has an X in it, and

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 7>people really like x's I guess, I guess I don't

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 7>understand it.

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 6>That's why b DXJ exists.

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 4>You just we're throwing a random ax. Yeah.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 6>No, I've told the story. I won't go back and

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 6>do it.

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Though. Giants taking on Washington. Matt not much to like

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>here for the Giants offense, and I think you can

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>question whether or not Saquon Barkley's even startable in a

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>very favorable matchup. Otherwise, against Washington, I'm.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Not gonna question it that much.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 7>He's the only starter on the Giants, but he still

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 7>gets an A grade in my and he's been limited

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 7>in practice this week as they keep an eye on

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 7>the anklely injured about a month ago and only saw

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 7>thirteen carries last week in the blowout loss to the Cowboys,

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 7>but he was still running at five yards per carry

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 7>in that game and they just sat him down after

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 7>a while because the game was out of hand. In

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 7>the last five weeks, Washington's run defense has fallen apart.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 7>Seven different running backs in that time have seen over

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 7>fifty yards, and they're allowing six receptions per game to

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:26.919
<v Speaker 7>opposing backs during that time.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>That's fourth worst.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 3>In the league.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 7>Also, in Week seven they met each other, Saquon managed

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and eighteen total yards in a score in

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 7>that one. On the other well, if I trusted the

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 7>Cutlet King Tommy DeVito at all, there'd be someone else

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 7>to start in this passing game. But Cutlet is now

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 7>at two hundred and sixty total passing yards and two starts.

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 7>That's one thirty per game.

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 4>That's not good. And Waller still on IR.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 7>And in the past four games, only one Giants wide

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 7>receiver has topped sixty yards in four games.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 6>I've got an amazing nickname for him, real quick, okay,

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 6>and J Cutt.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 7>And Jay Cutlet, I get it, I don't get new

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 7>jersey jersey.

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 4>And also Jay Cutler in there a little bit.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>And J Cutlet alright, okay, fine, let me mention how

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about smoking tummy to be.

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Giants offensive line.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be without right tackle Evan Neil has been

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ruled out and we're the game time decisioning left tackle

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Thomas. I'm I don't want even Barkley. I've got

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>him in my rankings way down to like running back

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty five guys.

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't. I don't trust that.

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust that offensive line, and I don't if

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>you're as bad as the commanders aren't defense, they only

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>got one job stop Sakua Barklay.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's still twenty touches going his way and he's

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 7>still making do with it. So on the commander's side,

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Sam Howell, he's an A grade over three hundred yards

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 7>and three straight games. The last time he was held

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 7>under three hundred yards it was against the Giants.

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 4>But this Giants defense is really banged up.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 7>Just gave up four hundred and seventy two passing yards

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 7>to the Cowboys last week.

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Terry mcclaurin gets an.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 7>A grade baby, given Johan and a Bee and Diami Brown,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 7>who might take a chance on me wide receiver, Three

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 7>different Cowboys wide receivers top seventy yards and scored last week.

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 7>Seven different wide receivers have hit the hundred yard mark

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 7>against the Giants this year. McLaurin has seen seven or

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 7>more targets in five straight games and Dotson put up

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 7>a goose egg last week, but was targeted eight times

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 7>or more in each of the prior three games and

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 7>scored in two of them. Gonna leave Logan Thomas on

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 7>the bench this week. The Giants are allowing the third

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 7>fewest receptions to tight ends and Thomas only had one

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 7>target and zero catches in the first meeting. And then

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 7>finally Brian Robinson. He gets an A grade in this one.

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 7>Antonio Gibson is going to be missing this one too.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 7>Hasn't hit one hundred yards on the ground this year,

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 7>but he managed one hundred and nineteen receiving yards last

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 7>week in Seattle, and he scored five times on the

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 7>ground and three times through the air this year. In

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 7>the first meeting, he only managed eight carries for twenty

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 7>three yards and a score, But it looks like he's

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 7>turned a corner. In the past few weeks. The Giants

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 7>have allowed the second most rushing yards and the third

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 7>most rushing tds this year, at an average of one

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 7>to eleven and just over a score per game. Like

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 7>Brian Robinson a lot here.

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dude, this is the only week where I think

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd roll in with an A grade on Robinson all year.

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I also mentioned this Giants have ruled out their cornerback

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of Dori Jackson.

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 4>Is another reason to love the passing game.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 5>There was the picture of that one guy that went

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 5>viral who drafted Brian Robinson instead of Bejon Robinson in

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the first round, and that was the play.

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I turned out. He didn't get it.

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 6>He overpaid a little bit, of course, but he's happy now.

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>We had a premature speculation I think three weeks ago

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about Chris Rodriguez running back for Washington. Keep your eyes

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on him. He's gonna get a butt. He's gonna get

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>extra time in this game. Let's see what he does.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Here is a deep stash in leagues with long benches.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas takes on Miami Brian In the two games

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Pierce has been head coach for they have been

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a dominating offensive, particularly on through the running game and

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs. So let's start with Jacobs, who's starting to

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like just in every week a grade.

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Antonio Pierce loves him some Josh Jacobs. Like you said.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Over the last two weeks, Jacobs has played more than

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent of the snaps while averaging twenty.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 6>Eight touches per game.

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I love it.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 5>So there will be volume here. Las Vegas likely to

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 5>be trailing, but Jacobs can't catch the ball. This is

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 5>not a great matchup on the with the Dolphins coming

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 5>off their by It's not the worst either. Opposing backs

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 5>are averaging one hundred and fourteen combo yards per game

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 5>against Miami, but they've scored just seven total touchdowns. Would

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 5>still a B for Jacobs based on that insane volume.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 5>Over to the passing game, DeVante Adams against the Sea.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 5>Adams has seen a thirty three percent target share with

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 5>aid and O'Connell under center.

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 6>We like that.

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 5>The problem is O'Connell was a rookie and he just

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 5>doesn't that good. But I'll still start Adams with the Sea.

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 5>Miami is allowing more than fourteen catches, one hundred and

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 5>fifty five yards and a touchdown per game to opposing wideouts.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Those are pretty good numbers, and for those reasons, I

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 5>will also give Jacobe Myers a see but the softest

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 5>of seas for Jacobe. For the rest of the Raiders,

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Michael Mayer and Aidan O'Connell, they are on the bench.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Over to the Dolphins side, a for Tyreek Hill, that's obvious.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Waddle Tua, they both get a B. It's really

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 5>all about the running backs now with Devin a Chan

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 5>making his return, so we're looking at likely a fifty

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 5>to fifty split.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 4>See and I don't agree.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I'm worried it's going to be like thirty

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty fifteen. Yep, well out, Jeff Wilson is Jeth Wilson

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and salvn Ackmann were they were not healthy at the

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the season to get into the mix. And

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike McDaniel loves his committees of backs, and so I'm

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>worried that he eases in a Chan here and we're

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.479
<v Speaker 1>looking at like a eight touch game and he better

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be magic on those eight touches.

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 6>He has been in the past.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 5>I know he has eight chan has he has that

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 5>going for him, but I just to see for mostart

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 5>in e Chan. I do have Wilson on the bench,

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 5>but he will factor in. Like you said, this is

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 5>an easy a for any of these backs if they

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 5>were in a bell cow role against the Raiders, who

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 5>are yielding thirty touches per game to the position for

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and forty five combo yards.

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 6>But again, way too much of a platoon.

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Here, So just a see for most and ah Chan

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 5>and uh Wilson on the bench for now and Durham

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 5>smythe my boy. Lastly for Miami's not happening. He plays

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 5>a ton of snaps. Though we need to get in

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 5>that league. He's getting in some Plardio snap league. Did

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 5>you see the stat during the Colts and Patriots game

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 5>in Germany last year? It was about Alec Pearce has

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 5>traveled the most among any player miles. Yeah, miles, so

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 5>he's burned the most calories in the NFL with like

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 5>three catches.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 6>They decided to show this. Y.

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 4>You don't mean airline miles. You mean like he just.

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Running around, running around, not getting targeted.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, must like the distance on routes run.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Then he's in great shape.

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 4>But I like it. I like it.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember you You may recall Tyreek Hillwin asked

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago about being the best player,

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the best like the best player in the NFL. He said,

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even the best player on the team. The

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>best player in our team is our fullback.

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Well that's nice of him, That is awfully nice of him.

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Isaiah Likely. Is he a priority AD

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and do you expect him how you won't be Mark Andrews.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Can he be seventy percent of Mark Andrews, which would

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>make him startable for most of us if he was?

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think so.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 7>He did that last year in spurts for the Ravens,

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 7>and I think that he's very likely to be wo.

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He had two official starts last year. One of them

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was a one catch game with a touchdown on that

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>one catch. The other one he was targeted twelve times

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and had eight catches in the other start.

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 5>Isaiah likely He's not deployed like a stereotypical tight end.

0:42:58.800 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 6>He's more of a wide receiver.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Really, He's way way thinner than a typical tight end

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lankyer. He's six foot four, so yeah, he

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that tight end build.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 7>Really.

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 4>He looks more like just a heavy set wide out.

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 5>And Odell Beckham suffered a shoulder injury on Thursday night.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 5>He might miss some time. So yeah, likely likely you

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 5>should break the bank on him, especially if you're a

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 5>Mark Andrews manager.

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 4>You're trying to find somebody.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I think Conklin is a priority AD I think likely

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is a priority ad for.

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Those looking for tight ends. Those might be the guys

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 4>here you got to turn to in this situation.

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>When we come back a game we like to call

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions, you can play along.

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 4>You see if you can go three and oher with

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 4>our panel of experts.

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Also, if you hear this before Sunday morning, it's your

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>last chance, the final few hours to join a new

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine league for this year. We're still making new ones.

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Eight team leagues being created every day, usually several times

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a day. You can still join a fresh new Guillotine

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>league at Guillotine leagues dot com, but only until Sunday morning,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it's all over. We'll be back for our

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 1>number two Fantasy Football Weekly in moments, Welcome back Fantasy

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Paul Chargie and Matt Harrison, Brian Johnson with you.

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.879
<v Speaker 1>This is a game we call three tough questions.

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number one.

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, I don't normally have a big long explanation before

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we get into the questions, Okay, but I gotta do

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it here.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 4>We are entering sabotage drop season.

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 7>We took the sabotage off the soundboard, didn't.

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 4>We yeah, we did. Unfortunately we needed we got to

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 4>get that back.

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go back through the premise game

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>because people really I can tell on Twitter because people

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 1>ask me, somebody insert player name here had.

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 4>A bad game last week? You shortye sabotage dropping.

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's re explain the nuances of the ballsiest

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>move in the history of fantasy football, the sabotage drop.

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>The premise is this, you drop brand name players who

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your opponents will pick up and start, and then that

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>player is gonna flop in your opponent's games, harming your

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>opposing team and costing them waiver wire capital as well.

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You usually want to drop on a Tuesday, so opponents

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have to spend waiver equity. They have to spend bidding

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>or their waiver priority.

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 4>With Monday night.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday Monday, right, So you want to do that in

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>time for people to spend some equity on it. Don't

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do it now. Don't do like Saturday is not the

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>day to do it, because let me just pick them

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>up for free. You want people to spend on it.

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So this move takes nards of steal eight out of

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>ten of you do not have the ability to do

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 1>this correctly. You will drop a player that people don't

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 1>really care about. You will not drop a brand name play,

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and you will never truly consider a sabotage drop. But

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for the two out of ten we are talking to.

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 7>You, maybe the best league to do it in his

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 7>a guillotine league too.

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 4>By the way, yeah you could. Somebody could get chopped

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 4>out of this.

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I successfully executed it on my I didn't know who

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to pick him up. As it turned out,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it was good friend Nando Delfino. I dropped Lamar Jackson

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>last year. Nando picked him up, bit a bunch of

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>money on him, so he spent a bunch of money

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>picked him up two weeks later. Lamar Jackson does what

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson does sometimes, the big flop games chopped.

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 6>That was the end of it, good friend Nando, that

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 6>you're throwing under the.

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, that's right. So now back to.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 3>This tough question number one.

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Should you sabotage drop Tony Pollard? We've already we've already

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>talked around this subject many different ways.

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 4>We begin with Matt.

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 7>We can point at Rico Dowdle's good game in an

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 7>absolute blowout last week against the Giants, but Cooper Rush

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 7>was also in that game at the end, and Pollard

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 7>still led the Snaps fifty three to twenty two and

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 7>touches fifteen to eleven. They didn't need to put mileage

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 7>on Tony Pollard last week, and then they get the

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 7>Panthers this week. They're one of the worst run defenses

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 7>in the league. After that, it's a struggling Washington defense

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 7>in a very mediocre Seattle defense. There's not really a

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 7>stopper on the schedule until Week seventeen against Detroit, and

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 7>they've been kind of struggling a little bit in the

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 7>last couple of weeks. They're not as tough as they

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 7>were earlier in the season. If you sabotage drop guys

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 7>who averaged nineteen touches per game with a good schedule ahead,

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 7>I think you're doing it wrong. So no, don't sabotage

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 7>drop him.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Brian, Should you sabotage drop Tony Pollard?

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Matt and I are in full agreement.

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 5>I will say though, in Week fourteen at Philly or

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 5>the Cowboys at Philly at home, I don't like that.

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 5>That is a tough matchup. But this is a fair question.

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 5>But we wouldn't be asking it. If Pollard had not

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 5>been stopped at the two yard line twice last week

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.240
<v Speaker 5>at least once the week before, you would have some touchdowns, obviously,

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 5>if he was not stopped at the one. But the

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.439
<v Speaker 5>matchups too good this weekend next week, Like Matt said,

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 5>too much draft capital sunk into Tony Pollard.

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 6>It's not like he's not playing. As Matt also said,

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 6>So I'm at no too. I'm not sabotage dropping.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>If I told you nothing else about a team's roster

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>except this, somebody picked at the end of the first

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>round or the beginning of the second round, Tony Pollard,

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you think their record is.

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I have been a few leagues, but my

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 7>record's okay.

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:30.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm a great fantasy mind.

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Three and seven, three and seven, Tony Pollard has delivered

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you losses. Let's talk about the numbers. Pro Football Focus

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is sixty first ranked runner is Tony Pollard. He ranks

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty second in yards over expectation at negative point three yards.

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>He ranks thirty sixth in yards after contact. Tony Pollard

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>ranks fifty fourth in Pro Football Focus's exclusive Elusiveness rating.

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>For a guy who did nothing but break long runs.

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Last year, he has six runs of over fifteen yards

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. That's it, and he's not catching as well

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and not as often. He ranks thirty thirty yards per

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>route run. Who ranks better than Pollard and almost all

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>stats well for one, Ezekiel Elliott, two Rico Dutel, who

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we already talked about. Yeah, and we'll talk about more later.

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:28.399
<v Speaker 1>The schedule is easy, you're right about that. And if

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:32.439
<v Speaker 1>he goes off against Carolina, you're not gonna sabotage drop

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>him if he doesn't absolutely make the move. Is the

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two out of ten of you that have the stones

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it. If he can't do it against Carolina,

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this is your time.

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Isn't at the ultimate sabotage if you drop him after

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 5>a monster Carolina's a That's.

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>A great point. You're actually you're absolutely right about that.

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's way ballsier. I like that better.

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 7>In most leagues, you can still get something for him

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 7>in trade unless your trade deadline is passed. You have

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 7>a very early trade deadline in your league, you can

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 7>get something for Pollard.

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 4>You set our trade deadline in our Empire league for

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 4>last week. It was too early. I was disappointed by that,

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 4>and you just called it too early.

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:13.399
<v Speaker 7>I said it to what we decided on fifteen years ago.

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 4>And we started the.

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number two.

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Should you drop? This isn't a sabotage anymore. This used

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a sabotage drop. It's not anymore. Should you

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>drop Trevor Lawrence? And originally I had this question a

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop. He's not good enough to be a sabotage anymore?

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Should you drop Trevor Lawrence?

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 4>We begin with Brian.

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Lawrence was outscored by Arizona's Clayton Tune last week,

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 5>who played one snap at quarterback and.

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Threw a touchdown.

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 4>That's fantastic.

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Outscore Trevor Lawrence.

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 5>Yes, here are some quarterbacks with more passing touchdowns than

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Lawrence as of right now. Mac Jones, the thrice

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 5>benched Mac Jones Justin Fields, who has played six games.

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Lawrence has played nine. I mean, the quarterbacks becoming a wasteland.

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 5>They're sort of dropping like flies. Not sort of they are,

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 5>but Tennessee not a favorable schedule moving forward. The Titans,

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 5>they were giving up a lot through the air early

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 5>on the season, not so much anymore. Then he got

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 5>the Texans bad matchup Bengals neutral, but then Brown's Ravens.

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 5>You're not starting rutal Larrence then, so yeah, I'm dropping.

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 5>And for some reason, Jay Jones like the missing link

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 5>for this offense because when he's been missing, they're.

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Like, I don't know, that can't be.

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 5>It's been a awful it's probably Dan Arnold just his

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 5>presence alone. But no, yes, I'm dropping Trevor Lawrence. One

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 5>quarterback leagues, we're talking, of course, right, yeah, dropsolutely?

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 4>All right, Matt should you drop Trevor Lawrence? Brian kind

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 4>of nailed it.

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 7>I will add, I mean he was might take a

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 7>chance on me quarterback this week. So I do like

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 7>his matchup this week against Tennessee. But after this week,

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 7>I think if he goes off this week, it might

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:57.319
<v Speaker 7>actually kind of revert back to the sabotage drop for Trevor.

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence, and Brian alluded to it.

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Houston coming up next, their neutral, Sinsey neutral, Cleveland hard,

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 7>Baltimore Baltimore hard, Tampa easy, and Carolina hard to end

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:12.879
<v Speaker 7>the season. So yeah, you can drop him or sabotage

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 7>drop him after he goes off this week.

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is a yes. If you're not.

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're gonna especially if you're not gonna

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>start Trevor Lawrence this week, then we may as well

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just drop him. But if not, then let's wait for Tuesday.

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's do the drop. And you're right, let's hope he

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has a good game. Let's drop him.

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 7>Then the game against Tampa in Week sixteen is if

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.360
<v Speaker 7>you're mixing and matching quarterbacks because you lost Joe Burrow

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 7>or Kirk Cousins or one of the other quarterbacks and

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:37.760
<v Speaker 7>you've just kind of been pasting it together.

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>If I'm alive in week sixteen, it ain't because I

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>got Trevor Lawrence, you're not thinking.

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately.

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number three.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Who will score more Fantasy points the rest of the season.

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Is it Raheem Mostert or teammate Devon a Chad Matt eighth.

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 7>Chan just looked so much better than Moster to when

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 7>they were both on the field. He's just so fast,

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 7>and I think that they do split backfield touches, So

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 7>in that case, I lean toward talent, which I think

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 7>is a Chan, and then the inside the five touches,

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 7>which in the three weeks that a Chan and Moster

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 7>were both active and kind of getting full workloads. They

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:20.839
<v Speaker 7>tied at three apiece. So I think it's a Chan,

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 7>but I mean it is close, But I think it's

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 7>Devon ah Chan.

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Brian, who will score more Fantasy points the rest

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Is it Rickey Mostert or teammate Devon

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>A Chan?

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Can I say the exact same amount?

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, precisely.

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:37.319
<v Speaker 6>Man, this is tough.

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna to the hundredth place.

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna lean Moster.

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 5>By the way, you're leading touchdowns scorer among running backs

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.279
<v Speaker 5>on the ground well overall thirteen total.

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Touchdowns, tied with Christian McCaffrey.

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, but man, most it's averaging like six yards

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.800
<v Speaker 5>per carry. H Chan has missed the last four games.

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 5>As we all know, he's averaging like thirteen yards per carry.

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 5>He was putting up ridiculous numbers on a per touch basis.

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't seem sustainable when healthy. He's still going to be

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 5>startable for sure. But I think Mostard gets the lean

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 5>near the stripe. So I'm going to lean Mostar as well,

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 5>or you you and a Chan.

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Now he's a I'm going this is a this is

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 4>a hard question. You actually did a tough question this week.

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a very tough you're.

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 6>Gonna say, Jeff Wilson, aren't you.

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I used to do a lot of trick questions in

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the segment. I guess maybe as I've gotten older, I've

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 1>done less of that. It's PFF's number one ranked runner

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:36.760
<v Speaker 1>against PFF's number three ranked runner. This is a tough

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:41.800
<v Speaker 1>tough spot. Now you can debate who's the bigger injury risk.

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>They both have got injury pedigree. Both of them do.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But Mostar it feels like a ticking time bomb a

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:50.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit because he's played all these games and a

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Chan hasn't.

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 4>Still, it's it's it's hard to.

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Feel like a Chan can carry an offense the way

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that Mostard has only because he has a done it yet. Now,

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>as I was tempted to go back, like you did, Matt,

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you went back and looked at the three the three

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>games that they played together week two, Week three, Week four,

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>when they played together. But I was a little bit

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>worried that might not be that valid, just because a

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Chan was such a fresh faced rookie at that time,

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and there was no Jeff Wilson money up the works,

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:19.919
<v Speaker 1>there was no seal on docmed work in the works.

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 4>At that point, most Art's running so well.

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got a much bigger total sample size on Moster

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:28.840
<v Speaker 1>than we do on a Chan who's just got the

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>three games. I know Mostart's going to get a fair

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>amount of work. I don't know how much a chan

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get. The lean goes to Mostard, But

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that was hard, hard question. The answer is you want

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 1>them both?

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 4>It could very well be Yeah, we'd be happy to

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 4>have both. Let's go back to the matchups. I believe

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 4>we're on, Oh, Minnesota Denver. Hey, that's me.

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's find the sheet of paper for that. Sorry, a

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 1>little ruffling of paper in the background.

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.479
<v Speaker 5>And if you have most at NHAN, you just start

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.400
<v Speaker 5>them both in that offense, right, some people do, I

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 5>mean they're gonna There are some of the listeners out

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 5>there that a both.

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 4>You just start them both every week, just see what happens, and.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 6>Then during it.

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:06.759
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's any other backfields in the.

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:09.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL where we'd say just start both guys every week.

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But Miami would be that this is a Sunday night

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:17.320
<v Speaker 1>football game. We begin with my guy, ty Chandler. I

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>already gave you he was my take a chance on

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>me running back. I want you to know B grade

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on ty Chandler in this opportunity under the assumption Madison

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>does not go in this game. We don't know for

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that that's going to be the case, but ninety

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>percent of players who suffer concussions do not play the

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>next week. So the presumption is Madison will not go

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game. All right, So let's go to the

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>passing game, including TJ. Hawkinson valiantly playing through clearly brutally

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>painful ri rib injuries in Dobbs's last three games. And

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to So this is Arizona, Minnesota, Minnesota,

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs has thrown forty one passes to his tight ends.

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson leads all tight ends in targets and receptions. It's

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not close and volume tight ends get paid. Against Denver,

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he averages almost an insane ten targets per game. Tight

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Ends against Denver with just six targets are averaging eighty

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and almost a full touchdown per game. So it

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is an A grade on TJ. Hockinson. Let's go to

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the other receivers, including Jordan Addison. I let me say this,

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think George Justin Jefferson's gonna play. I was optimistic,

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic earlier in the week, but he never got

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in a full practice. He got in limited limited, and

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they've always said we're not playing Jefferson until he's basically

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. So I'm assuming he's not gonna go.

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And if he doesn't go, that hurts Jordan Addison, particularly

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup because star cornerback Patrick certain will have

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability to largely shadow Addison.

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 4>That's not a great matchup.

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And Denver's engineered a remarkable turnaround from its early season woes.

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Over the last five weeks, Denver's allowed the fifth fewest

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 1>reconceptions and the fifth fewest yards per game to opposing

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers.

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Really impressive turnaround.

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 1>So and by the way, and Addison was a deep

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ball guy, Denver allowing the fourth shortest a dot in

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the league, just six point five yards on average depths

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of throw. So I can only get you to a

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Jordan Addison without Justin Jefferson on the field.

0:58:20.720 --> 0:58:22.440
<v Speaker 5>Would it be a great game for Jefferson to come

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 5>back just to be a decoy?

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Though I don't think they do it. And I don't

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 4>think he would do it either. I don't think Justin

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Jefferson's got decoy.

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 6>In his DNA. No, but you'd be a good one

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 6>because you get a lot of attention.

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Would be a good one here.

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>The slot position has been something of a problem for

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Denver if kJ Osbourne ends up going. We not clear

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 1>if he's going to go get through the concussion protocol either,

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But if he does, he does run a fair amount

0:58:44.920 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>from the slot, and he would be a potential start

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for you here as well with a C grade. If

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he does end up going. Brandon Powell's an emergency guy.

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Could be a punt but I can't give him a

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:56.920
<v Speaker 1>letter grade in this one. All right, let's go to

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh Josh Dobbs almost forgot Josh Dobbs B grade. Oh,

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 1>where's my Dobby Sounder? We love Dobby?

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Where'd he go?

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Toby E's.

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The last two quarterbacks to face Denver, Patrick Mahomes and

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen.

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 4>I heard they're pretty good, yeah.

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Josh Allen. I don't know.

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They've combined in these two games against Denver. They combined

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for one touchdown and four picks, and they averaged two

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine yards.

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Neither of those guys are Josh Dobbs. Though they're not

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Josh Dobbs.

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That is astounding, astounding turnaround for Denver. Last week, in

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 1>his first full game with the Vikings, Dobbs looked up.

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I would say more efficient than explosive. I

0:59:39.880 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>expect just modest passing success for Dobbs in this game,

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but he has run for touchdowns in four straight games

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:49.439
<v Speaker 1>going back to Arizona. Six straight opposing quarterbacks have topped

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty rushing yards or scored a rushing touchdown against Denver,

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but none have been explosive ground games. I think we

0:59:55.520 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>can give a B grade to Josh Dobbs in totality. Here,

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Denver side. Javonte Williams has turned

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>into basically the Denver offense. Denver has the third best

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>run blocking grade according to Pro Football Focus, the third

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>best run block win rate according to ESPN, and during

1:00:14.840 --> 1:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this Broncos three game winning streak, Javonte Williams averaging twenty

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>four touches one hundred and three total yards per game.

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But here's where he gets thorny. The Vikings are allowing

1:00:27.600 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the fifth fewest total yards and the eighth fewest touchdowns

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing running backs, and over the past

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, Christian McCaffrey, Aaron Jones, Bijon Robinson, Alvin Kamara

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>good running backs. None have topped fifty one rushing yards

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. Wow, Javonte Williams b grade in this one.

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the passing game. I love Courtland Sutton

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And how about that touchdown last week,

1:00:56.080 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the best touchdowns.

1:00:57.520 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Of the year.

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>He's at a four this week. Yeah, he is cortlans Y, CARLTT.

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Sutton is a He is a good.

1:01:03.480 --> 1:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Were you at practice watching it, Brian, which but.

1:01:07.400 --> 1:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>The concern is only that he's a low volume, touchdown

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>dependent receiver. Now, fortunately he scores almost every game, so

1:01:14.280 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't worked out. It hasn't been a problem most

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the time. And I think Sutton carries touchdown upside again.

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>This week, the Vikings are going to be without their

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>number one cornerback of Caleb Evans, ruled out of this

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>game and replaced not even replace him. The other starter

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is Byron Murphy, who's given up the second most touchdowns

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the league, six in his coverage. So it's all good.

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>For Courtland Sutton with an A grade. What about Jerry Judy?

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>You might ask, barely startable due to his low catch volume,

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>his lack of touchdowns. But the Vikings secondary has allowed

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the second most receptions eighth most yards per game, so

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think he's got an opportunity to put together

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>five six catches fifty sixty yards. C level grade for

1:01:56.880 --> 1:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy, And where does that leave Russell Wilson. I've

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>given you an A and a C grade, so we'll

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>put Russell right in the middle with.

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>A B grade.

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Playing really well. But the thing on Wilson is lack

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of volume. Denver's thirtieth and pass right and Wilson only

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>averaging nineteen completions per game. Get this, five straight games,

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilson hasn't topped one hundred and ninety six yards.

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, low pass yards, decent touchdowns.

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:22.240
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Somehow, He's throwing a touchdown in every game all year

1:02:24.720 --> 1:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and as the third.

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Most touchdowns on the season.

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Despite that, Minnesota's ranked sixth in pass coverage by Pro

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus, They've surrendered multiple touchdown passes in just one

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of their last five games. Russell Wilson comes in with

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. When we come back, Tennessee takes on Jacksonville.

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Dereck Henry d railed last week? Do we like him

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>better in this matchup? Matt Harrison will guide us through

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Will Levis led Tennessee Titans offense. When we return

1:02:54.920 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. We continue

1:03:22.120 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on as we break down every matchup of the week

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>eleven slate, including Tennessee taking on Jacksonville. Matt for Tennessee,

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis has been very inconsistent so far. Do you

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like his chances against a Jacksonville team that just got

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>drubbed by Dallas and Dak Prescott?

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 7>Inconsistent? He looked like hot garbage last week against the Bucks.

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:45.600
<v Speaker 7>Maybe it's now because we've got three weeks of tape

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 7>on him. Last week's matchup was easy, he totally failed.

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 7>This week's matchup still good. The Jags are allowing two

1:03:51.680 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 7>or seventy eight yards per game, that's seventh most in

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 7>the league, and they've allowed the tenth most passing scores.

1:03:57.160 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 7>I considered him to take a chance on me player,

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:02.400
<v Speaker 7>but I liked Lawrence this week. I'll give Levis a

1:04:02.480 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 7>super flex C grade, But in single quarterback leagues. I'd

1:04:05.880 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 7>keep him on the bench. The only receiver you can

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:11.919
<v Speaker 7>start is DeAndre Hopkins. He's had quite a long history

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 7>against Jacksonville. In fifteen career games against Jacksonville, he's only

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 7>top to one hundred yards twice, and he's only done

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:23.360
<v Speaker 7>that once since the twenty fifteen season. Wow, it's crazy,

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 7>but he's seeing a target on about a quarter of

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 7>Will Levis's passes this year, and since Levis took over

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 7>hopkins a dot has extended to eighteen point six yards downfield.

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:38.000
<v Speaker 7>Corner Tyson Campbell looks like he's out this week, so

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 7>little used. Back up Gregory Junior, whose name sounds like

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 7>a stuffed animal my kids have.

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 4>What happens if he names his kid Gregory Gregory Junior Junior.

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I totally do it, and then he'd be Gregory

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Junior Senior.

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I would absolutely do that if I am so.

1:04:56.920 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Gregory Junior Senior is covering the right side of the field.

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 7>He's only been on the field for eight snaps this year,

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 7>and I like DeAndre Hopkins in that kind of situation.

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 7>Hopkins gets a B grade the running backs. This is

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 7>interesting because the Titans couldn't get anything going offensively last

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.920
<v Speaker 7>week against Tampa, and that might be because they were

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 7>basically handing them their playbook. Dereck Henry was only on

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:22.880
<v Speaker 7>the field for twenty four snaps. He touched the ball

1:05:22.920 --> 1:05:23.640
<v Speaker 7>twelve times.

1:05:24.400 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Ty J.

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Spears was on the field for thirty six snaps, but

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 7>he only had five carries. So the Bucks knew that

1:05:29.880 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 7>there was a fifty percent chance of a run if

1:05:31.840 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 7>Henry was on the field, and an eighty six percent

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:36.000
<v Speaker 7>chance of a pass and Spears was on.

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>The field tipping your hand a bit.

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 7>If they do that again, they'll get destroyed. So they're

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 7>going to go back to Henry. Henry will be on

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:43.479
<v Speaker 7>the field more this week, and history says it should

1:05:43.520 --> 1:05:46.080
<v Speaker 7>work out. Five of the last six times he's faced

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:48.600
<v Speaker 7>the Jaguars, he's put up at least one hundred yards

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 7>on the ground. The one he didn't, he went for

1:05:50.680 --> 1:05:53.560
<v Speaker 7>eighty four yards. So I'll give both backs.

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>A b this week.

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 7>I think Spears should be heavily involved in the receiving game,

1:05:57.440 --> 1:05:59.960
<v Speaker 7>and the Jags have allowed the most running back receptions

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 7>in the league at almost eight per game.

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Remember the days when it was just a lock that

1:06:03.840 --> 1:06:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Henry was going to have two hundred yards and three

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 5>touchdowns against the Jaguars.

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, pretty much were the days. On the other side.

1:06:09.760 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 7>I already told you that I like Trevor Lawrences, might

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 7>take a chance in me quarterback, But what about his

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:17.520
<v Speaker 7>wide receiver as well, Calvin Ridley and Christian Kirk.

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's a little bit more of a

1:06:19.560 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Kirk week.

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 7>This week he'll line up in the slot against backup

1:06:23.240 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 7>slot corner Eric Garrer. Wow, yeah, okay, who's a rookie

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 7>and a converted safety.

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:29.920
<v Speaker 4>All right.

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:33.360
<v Speaker 7>Garrer has seen limited snaps this year and has only

1:06:33.360 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 7>been active for the last three weeks, but already allowed

1:06:36.160 --> 1:06:38.080
<v Speaker 7>a touchdown in his coverage in a QB rating of

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 7>ninety four in his coverage so far. Ridley gets Christian

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 7>Fulton on the right side, and he's allowing a one

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 7>to fifteen passer rating in his coverage, including a touchdown

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:50.440
<v Speaker 7>to Mike Evans that week last week. On the left side,

1:06:50.480 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 7>when Ridley goes over there, he sees Roger McCreery, who's

1:06:53.240 --> 1:06:56.640
<v Speaker 7>not yet allowed a touchdown this season. So Kirk gets

1:06:56.640 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 7>the B and Ridley since he's kind of switching off

1:06:58.600 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 7>between the two, I'll give him Evan Ingram. I want

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 7>to put him on the bench, but he gets seven

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:07.320
<v Speaker 7>targets every week. It's the lowest, lowest volume c I

1:07:07.320 --> 1:07:10.080
<v Speaker 7>can give him. As the matchup's pretty tough. The Titans

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:13.200
<v Speaker 7>rank in the top four in receptions and yards allowed

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 7>to tight ends. They've not allowed a tight end score

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 7>the season, and then again, Ingram hasn't scored a touchdown.

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, so you want to call your shot right here. Nope.

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Travis Etn did nothing last week, but the Jags got

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 7>absolutely destroyed by the forty nine ers in game. Scripts

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:31.960
<v Speaker 7>just kind of worked him out of the game. He

1:07:32.040 --> 1:07:34.920
<v Speaker 7>only had eleven touches. I think he's back to seventeen

1:07:34.960 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 7>plus this week, and that's good for this matchup. The

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.440
<v Speaker 7>Titans started the year really good against running backs, but

1:07:40.640 --> 1:07:43.680
<v Speaker 7>have regressed recently. In the last five games they've played,

1:07:44.160 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 7>six different running backs have had double digit carries, and

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:49.760
<v Speaker 7>five of them have put up at least twelve PPR points,

1:07:49.840 --> 1:07:53.320
<v Speaker 7>including Najie Harris, Jalen Warren, and Rashad White in just

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:56.920
<v Speaker 7>the last two weeks. So Etn solid B grade here.

1:07:57.840 --> 1:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a rematch from Week one as the Jets and

1:07:59.880 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the the Bills face off In that Week one game,

1:08:02.360 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers started the game, played blat on all.

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Like three snaps.

1:08:05.680 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 6>How do you do?

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, not not.

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Great, But Breece Hall rumbled for one hundred twenty seven

1:08:11.560 --> 1:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>yards chipped in another twenty through the air in that game.

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Breece Hall as he takes

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on a Bills run defense that's been pretty.

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Good of late.

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he had only ten carries in that game and

1:08:24.680 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 5>he had those one hundred and twenty seven yards. He

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:28.080
<v Speaker 5>had like an eighty yard touchdown run. Yeah, that was

1:08:28.080 --> 1:08:29.599
<v Speaker 5>a lot of it, but he was coming off injury,

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>still is, but his workload has rammed up a lot

1:08:31.720 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 5>since Week one.

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 6>I got a border I got borderline A on.

1:08:35.160 --> 1:08:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Presall im to stick with the safe be Since Week won,

1:08:38.880 --> 1:08:41.439
<v Speaker 5>the Bills I've had had had significant injuries on defense,

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 5>including their leader, linebacker Matt Mulano. Bills are allowing the

1:08:45.160 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 5>eighth most combo yards per game to opposing running backs.

1:08:48.120 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 5>The last four running backs to face Buffalo up topped

1:08:50.720 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 5>one hundred combo yards and scored a touchdown. Not monster numbers,

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:57.600
<v Speaker 5>but certainly serviceable. So a B for Breeze Hall, but

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:00.639
<v Speaker 5>no great on Dalvin Cook or is he a Boni

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Conda who might see some usage now that Michael Carter

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:05.360
<v Speaker 5>has been let go. But Cook the only I'm sorry, haul,

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:07.320
<v Speaker 5>the only startable running back for the Jets. The only

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:10.280
<v Speaker 5>startable wide receiver for the Jets is Garrett Wilson. He

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:12.600
<v Speaker 5>had five catches thirty four yards and a touchdown in

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 5>the Week one game against Buffalo, who had all Pro

1:09:15.960 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 5>cornerback tra Davius White. Then he too is now gone

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:22.320
<v Speaker 5>and on ir so you can start Wilson per usual.

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Wilson has seen twelve or more targets in five of

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 5>his last six games, and over their last four games,

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:32.280
<v Speaker 5>the Bills EPs surrendered touchdown receptions who Kendrick Bourne, Chris Godwin,

1:09:32.640 --> 1:09:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Mike Evans and Courtland Sutton. So Garrett Wilson can certainly

1:09:35.880 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>do the same. I don't think Alan lazardken he is

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:41.000
<v Speaker 5>on the bench. Tyler Conklin is not on the bench.

1:09:41.240 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 5>He was might take a chance on me receiver. He's

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:45.840
<v Speaker 5>a tight end, of course, love him this week. Do

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 5>not love Zach Wilson. I am not a milth so

1:09:48.360 --> 1:09:50.879
<v Speaker 5>he is on the bench. Over to the Buffalo side,

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 5>James Cook, don't love him but I'm going to start

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:55.800
<v Speaker 5>him with a C. He had sixty three combo yards

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:59.000
<v Speaker 5>when these teams met in Week one, saw season high

1:09:59.320 --> 1:10:03.559
<v Speaker 5>six targets in that game, had sixteen touches overall. Hopefully

1:10:03.560 --> 1:10:06.759
<v Speaker 5>he sees that kind of usage. His snapshare has decreased

1:10:06.800 --> 1:10:09.519
<v Speaker 5>over the last three weeks. He didn't get benched for

1:10:09.560 --> 1:10:11.680
<v Speaker 5>more than a quarter last week after fumbling on the

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:13.800
<v Speaker 5>first drive for the Bills, but he did come back

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:16.200
<v Speaker 5>into the game. The Jets allowed these seventh most combo

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>yards per game to opposing running backs, So a sea

1:10:18.840 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 5>on Cook, but Latavious Murray and Leonard Fournett are on

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>the bench. Stefan Diggs not on the bench, but just

1:10:24.120 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 5>a bee for him. He did have ten catches, one

1:10:26.520 --> 1:10:29.120
<v Speaker 5>hundred and two yards and a touchdown in the opener. Yeah,

1:10:29.160 --> 1:10:32.480
<v Speaker 5>that's really a ceiling though in this matchup with Sauce Gardner.

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:34.759
<v Speaker 1>And DJ Reid might be better than sauce Gardner. Nobody

1:10:34.800 --> 1:10:35.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about that.

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:39.960
<v Speaker 5>He's awesome, possibly, But you can't bench Digs in any matchup,

1:10:40.000 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 5>So he gets the B. But you can bench Gabe Davis.

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Two catches for thirty two scoreless yards in Week one.

1:10:46.720 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 5>That was his fourth straight game.

1:10:48.560 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Gust in your voice when you said, Gabe Davis.

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 8>He's just been I've been benching him in the wrong spots.

1:10:56.439 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 8>So this is probably one to start him because it's

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 8>not good on paper. This is probably the I'll play

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:02.639
<v Speaker 8>him in daily, but I'm going to start him in seasonal.

1:11:03.400 --> 1:11:06.160
<v Speaker 8>Four straight games under forty yards against the Jets for Davis.

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Davis has never scored against the Jets in his career,

1:11:09.479 --> 1:11:11.600
<v Speaker 8>so maybe it's coming, but I'm not betting on that.

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 5>He's on the bench. Tight End Dalton Kincaid is not,

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:18.040
<v Speaker 5>though he gets a be. Kincaid and Dawson Knox combined

1:11:18.040 --> 1:11:20.800
<v Speaker 5>for seven catches fifty one yards in the opener. Knox

1:11:20.920 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 5>is now an IR so hopefully that's a safe floor

1:11:23.600 --> 1:11:26.920
<v Speaker 5>for Kincaid. That whole total, the Jets have surrendered the

1:11:27.120 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 5>most tight end touchdowns so far this season, so a

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 5>be on Kincaid and just a be on Josh Allen.

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:35.559
<v Speaker 5>In Week one, Allen had just two hundred and thirty

1:11:35.600 --> 1:11:38.920
<v Speaker 5>six passing yards and a touchdown with thirty six scoreless

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:41.880
<v Speaker 5>rushing yards against the Jets. Not great, but the Jets

1:11:41.920 --> 1:11:45.400
<v Speaker 5>have surrendered multiple touchdown passes only twice the season.

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 6>I should have said, but that's not good.

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:47.760
<v Speaker 4>That isn't good.

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:50.759
<v Speaker 5>The butt is here, but they have allowed rushing touchdowns

1:11:50.760 --> 1:11:53.599
<v Speaker 5>to quarterbacks in recent weeks, Jalen Hurts and Tommy DeVito

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Aka and j cutlet Ah.

1:11:56.880 --> 1:11:58.439
<v Speaker 4>The butt is here. The butt is here.

1:11:58.680 --> 1:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Did you give a letter grade and Garrett Wilson or

1:12:00.680 --> 1:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>di just misses see Wilson.

1:12:02.479 --> 1:12:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm a little more optimistic than you are. We'll

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 4>find out.

1:12:04.800 --> 1:12:06.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, you know what i'd give him if

1:12:06.640 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 5>I was allowed, you charge one of two things.

1:12:08.760 --> 1:12:10.280
<v Speaker 4>How about a B minus.

1:12:10.640 --> 1:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>No Pittsburgh takes on Cleveland. I'm gonna try to zip

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>through this quickly.

1:12:14.640 --> 1:12:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Here.

1:12:15.520 --> 1:12:18.000
<v Speaker 4>The passing game is in the hands for Cleveland.

1:12:18.000 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The passing game is in the hands of Dorian Thompson Robinson.

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we don't have a lot of starters here.

1:12:24.360 --> 1:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Amari Cooper, who's logged at least eighty nine yards

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in four of the last five games, including ninety yards

1:12:30.040 --> 1:12:33.599
<v Speaker 1>in the Week two matchup against Pittsburgh. I'd be more

1:12:33.600 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>worried if Ricky cornerback Joey Porter was going to shadow him.

1:12:36.200 --> 1:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But Porter sticks to one side of the field, and

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not the side Cooper usually runs from. Instead, he'll

1:12:40.360 --> 1:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>see more of veteran Patrick Peterson, who ranks his cornerback

1:12:43.280 --> 1:12:46.639
<v Speaker 1>eighty four by Pro Football Focus. So Amari Cooper still

1:12:46.720 --> 1:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>barely startable with a C grade. That's it for the

1:12:50.040 --> 1:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>receiving game. Uh, David a joke?

1:12:51.840 --> 1:12:53.519
<v Speaker 4>Who's is?

1:12:55.200 --> 1:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe tight end Wasteland? You could consider him.

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Dorian Thompson Robinson peppered him with seven targets in the

1:13:01.760 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>one game that he started before, so maybe get some

1:13:04.840 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>extra usage here. And Djoko currently averaging eight targets per

1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>game and only fIF and almost fifty four yards over

1:13:10.720 --> 1:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>his last four It's a lot of volume. Steelers have

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one tight end score though.

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:17.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm just benching him.

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting him on the bench until Drian Thompson Robinson

1:13:20.240 --> 1:13:21.639
<v Speaker 1>proves he can do a little something.

1:13:21.760 --> 1:13:22.519
<v Speaker 4>How about Jerome Ford.

1:13:22.520 --> 1:13:24.759
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna run a lot back to being the team's

1:13:24.800 --> 1:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>workhorse runner, averaging a whopping twenty two carries over the

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks, and he posted a career high one

1:13:30.520 --> 1:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty one yards when he faced the Steelers

1:13:32.720 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>in Week two. Steelers allowing one hundred and forty one

1:13:35.560 --> 1:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>total yards per game to opposing running backs. That's the

1:13:38.000 --> 1:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth most lots of runs coming Jerome Ford B grade

1:13:42.960 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in this one, and I.

1:13:44.120 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Guess you could. Let's dust off this.

1:13:46.120 --> 1:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time since we've heard from the

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>FFW vulture. Right there, there is a touchdowns and five

1:13:54.960 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>straight games despite only getting one third of the snap

1:13:58.040 --> 1:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>count of Ford.

1:13:59.240 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Basically, you need a touchdown from him.

1:14:01.280 --> 1:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers have only a lot five rushing scores all year,

1:14:03.880 --> 1:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's plenty of downside from Hunt.

1:14:05.800 --> 1:14:07.559
<v Speaker 4>But if all you need, if you're.

1:14:07.439 --> 1:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Like touchdown only league, do you throwback to nineteen ninety,

1:14:11.720 --> 1:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>consider him startable.

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:14.280
<v Speaker 4>But otherwise we're not going there.

1:14:14.320 --> 1:14:15.960
<v Speaker 7>Do you ever feel like you want to play in

1:14:15.960 --> 1:14:18.439
<v Speaker 7>one of those old school leagues that's touched down only

1:14:18.520 --> 1:14:20.360
<v Speaker 7>and you score it by paper.

1:14:21.120 --> 1:14:23.599
<v Speaker 4>I lived that nightmare once before and I don't miss

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:24.040
<v Speaker 4>it at all.

1:14:24.720 --> 1:14:28.879
<v Speaker 1>But I will give a shout out to Greenwood Elementary. Yeah, Plymouth, Minnesota.

1:14:28.880 --> 1:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I visited the fifth grade after school fantasy football class,

1:14:32.240 --> 1:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing all of it by hand.

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Because it's a math class.

1:14:35.080 --> 1:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>After school math class that's all about fantasy football. On Tuesdays,

1:14:39.439 --> 1:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they score the previous week on Thursdays, they assemble their

1:14:43.040 --> 1:14:46.719
<v Speaker 1>lineups DFS style, trying to figure out they pop powl

1:14:46.760 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>together DFS style lineups.

1:14:48.600 --> 1:14:49.719
<v Speaker 6>So in no time my hand.

1:14:49.720 --> 1:14:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Don't realize they can drop out of school and professional gamblers.

1:14:53.320 --> 1:14:53.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm just kidding.

1:14:54.000 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Kids.

1:14:54.240 --> 1:14:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Don't do that.

1:14:54.920 --> 1:14:55.639
<v Speaker 6>Don't do that.

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Pittsburgh side. Jalen Warren officially the

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>starter for Pittsburgh. He's seen a increase in touches in

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>four straight weeks. Browns are allowing the sixth fewest total

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>yards the ninth fewest touchdowns per game to opposing backs.

1:15:06.960 --> 1:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You new is you know the Browns are really good defense.

1:15:09.680 --> 1:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Steelers have the seventh worst run block rate. The Browns

1:15:12.880 --> 1:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have the number one run stop win rate, so it

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't add up much here. He might be able to

1:15:18.840 --> 1:15:20.639
<v Speaker 1>help through the air, even though the Browns are excellent

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>against pass catching backs. Warren posted sixty six receiving yards

1:15:24.040 --> 1:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Week two matchup between these teams, So.

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Still startable with the C grade.

1:15:28.240 --> 1:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But not Naji Harris dead to us now that he's

1:15:30.760 --> 1:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the backup and behind Frankly a better player in Jalen Warren.

1:15:35.040 --> 1:15:36.519
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to the passing game.

1:15:36.680 --> 1:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The only startable grade I can give you is Deontay Johnson,

1:15:39.520 --> 1:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's only on volume, averaging eight targets a game,

1:15:42.880 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>although just five catches on those eight targets, which tells

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:49.599
<v Speaker 1>you plenty about Kenny Pickett. He missed the earlier matchup

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>between these teams, but averaged sixty one scoreless yards against

1:15:52.439 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Browns last year and rarely scores anyway. So if

1:15:55.160 --> 1:15:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that really fits here, since Cleveland's only allowed six wide

1:15:57.479 --> 1:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns all year, look, if you're cool with like

1:15:59.800 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>six sketches in sixty yards, start Deante Johnson. But I

1:16:02.240 --> 1:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think you can find something a little more interesting and

1:16:04.320 --> 1:16:06.439
<v Speaker 1>all other parts of the Pittsburgh passing game around the bench.

1:16:06.479 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland's defense ranks number one in passing yards allowed, and

1:16:09.000 --> 1:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Kenny Pickett. So that's all you need to know

1:16:10.680 --> 1:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. It is that we're not monkeying with any

1:16:13.680 --> 1:16:17.799
<v Speaker 1>other part of Pat Fryarmoth coming back move Horay.

1:16:18.120 --> 1:16:20.599
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna wait and see what he can produce here.

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a promising season that's gone wrong, and Kenny

1:16:22.960 --> 1:16:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Pickett hasn't improved. We're gonna we're gonna wait and see

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and not start him against Cleveland first game back.

1:16:29.000 --> 1:16:31.479
<v Speaker 4>That sounds like a recipe for disaster. Hey, when we

1:16:31.520 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 4>come back, final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, and that means.

1:16:36.400 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The FFW time machine, stay tuned to find out who

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you can pick up this week that everybody else is

1:16:42.120 --> 1:16:44.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to pick up next week. When we come back,

1:17:06.520 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>final segment Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Georgi, Matt Harrison, Brian

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson with you. This segment we call premature speculation. We

1:17:14.960 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>give you players to pick up now that others are

1:17:16.720 --> 1:17:18.599
<v Speaker 1>going to try to pick up next week, but they're

1:17:18.600 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>already on your team.

1:17:19.960 --> 1:17:21.160
<v Speaker 4>We begin with Matt Harrison.

1:17:21.520 --> 1:17:25.160
<v Speaker 7>I've got Israel Abana Konda. Don't want none unless you've

1:17:25.160 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 7>got buns hun. The Jets dropped Michael Carter this week,

1:17:29.320 --> 1:17:31.800
<v Speaker 7>and Dalvin Cook is not good at football anymore. So

1:17:31.840 --> 1:17:33.639
<v Speaker 7>the next man up on the depth chart is fifth

1:17:33.720 --> 1:17:36.479
<v Speaker 7>round rookie. Is he a Bana Conda called up our

1:17:36.520 --> 1:17:39.559
<v Speaker 7>friend Thorne Eistrom asked, asked what his draft comp was,

1:17:40.000 --> 1:17:42.200
<v Speaker 7>He called him discount Tevin Coleman.

1:17:42.520 --> 1:17:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that does not exactly a ringing endorsement right there? Well,

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:48.240
<v Speaker 4>how about this who doesn't like a discount?

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:52.240
<v Speaker 7>And Tevin Coleman had a couple of good years in Atlanta,

1:17:52.400 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 7>especially pass catching out of the backfield. Breese Hall has

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:57.120
<v Speaker 7>seen a lot of touches this year, and if they

1:17:57.120 --> 1:17:59.040
<v Speaker 7>need a change of pace, Guy or Hall goes down

1:17:59.120 --> 1:18:03.080
<v Speaker 7>for some reason, Bona Konda suddenly becomes very interesting and I'll.

1:18:02.880 --> 1:18:03.799
<v Speaker 4>Give you another angle.

1:18:04.800 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>At some point, the Jets may be mathematically eliminated or

1:18:07.439 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>effectively eliminated for this season, and they just wind down

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Breese Hall. Yeah, that's the best part of that offense

1:18:12.680 --> 1:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>outside of Garre Wilson. They just want to take some

1:18:14.880 --> 1:18:17.519
<v Speaker 1>miles off him. Sure, I like that angle. When you

1:18:17.560 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when you slacked us that that was going to be

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your choice, it didn't entirely add up to me. But

1:18:22.040 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>now that we're talking it through, I like that Izzy

1:18:25.760 --> 1:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Bona Konda decision his full name.

1:18:29.120 --> 1:18:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Don't want not unless you got buns on. I don't

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:33.320
<v Speaker 4>get the right. So I don't know anything. You've never

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:34.400
<v Speaker 4>heard baby got Back.

1:18:34.600 --> 1:18:37.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't get it either, and I've certainly heard that song.

1:18:38.400 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 6>You can do sit ups.

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:45.519
<v Speaker 4>Ryan. You're taking your premature speculation. Player, Please somewhat related.

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:48.280
<v Speaker 5>I have former Jet running back Michael Carter who is

1:18:48.400 --> 1:18:51.120
<v Speaker 5>uh related by the Cardinals.

1:18:51.160 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 6>I believe the Vikings also put into college.

1:18:53.040 --> 1:18:54.920
<v Speaker 4>They and people suspected they.

1:18:54.920 --> 1:18:58.599
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, he's an Arizona Cardinal, and I suspect it might

1:18:58.600 --> 1:19:00.679
<v Speaker 5>not happen this week, but he's gonna leap frog Keanta

1:19:00.840 --> 1:19:04.240
<v Speaker 5>Ingram and Amari de McCart de Marcado as the backup

1:19:04.320 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 5>running back to James Connor and Carter as he can play.

1:19:08.200 --> 1:19:10.839
<v Speaker 6>He's shown he can play. Cardinals aren't making the playoffs.

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:13.439
<v Speaker 5>They might want to just give him some extra run

1:19:13.479 --> 1:19:15.799
<v Speaker 5>towards the end of the year. He fits in the system.

1:19:15.840 --> 1:19:18.120
<v Speaker 5>If something were to happen to James Connor, I'd presume

1:19:18.120 --> 1:19:19.960
<v Speaker 5>you'd be the starter. So Michael Carter is my guy.

1:19:20.040 --> 1:19:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:19:20.320 --> 1:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Or again, they may want to wind down James Connor

1:19:23.080 --> 1:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>at some point and I run him into the ground.

1:19:26.080 --> 1:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Mine is the now frequently mentioned rico' doddle, who's okay again.

1:19:30.200 --> 1:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>When I slacked him at the beginning of the week,

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this was a fresh new take. But now we talked

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about him like nine times over the course of this show. Really,

1:19:37.120 --> 1:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to repeat myself other than to say

1:19:39.560 --> 1:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a very real chance he's the best running back

1:19:42.000 --> 1:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Cowboys roster, and at some point they're going

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to give him more carries than Tony Pollard.

1:19:47.240 --> 1:19:49.800
<v Speaker 6>So it's official. Go ad Rico Dowdell is what we

1:19:49.840 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 6>are saying.

1:19:50.240 --> 1:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right now, eight different ways of the course of

1:19:52.200 --> 1:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this show, Tampa Bay takes on San Francisco. Brian, we

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>already talked a little bit about Baker Mayfield. You take

1:19:58.080 --> 1:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me quarterback. So do you like his

1:20:01.080 --> 1:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>receiving options?

1:20:02.000 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:20:02.200 --> 1:20:03.360
<v Speaker 6>I like Mike Evans and god When.

1:20:03.400 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I like Evans a little more, considering Godwin hasn't scored

1:20:07.400 --> 1:20:09.400
<v Speaker 5>an eight of nine games and has top and has

1:20:09.439 --> 1:20:12.240
<v Speaker 5>top sixty six yards just twice during that span, But

1:20:12.280 --> 1:20:14.240
<v Speaker 5>I still love to see on Godwin. You you have

1:20:14.280 --> 1:20:16.680
<v Speaker 5>to throw copiously against the forty nine ers. I got

1:20:16.800 --> 1:20:19.800
<v Speaker 5>to be on Mike Evans. It's not an awful spot

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:21.600
<v Speaker 5>for Evans at all. Not The forty nine ers have

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:24.559
<v Speaker 5>allowed these sixth most wide receiver receptions and they've surrendered

1:20:24.560 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 5>five scores to the position over their last three games.

1:20:27.240 --> 1:20:29.479
<v Speaker 5>So again, like both receivers, but I got to be

1:20:29.560 --> 1:20:32.280
<v Speaker 5>on Evans. See on Godwin tight end. Kate otten is

1:20:32.280 --> 1:20:35.080
<v Speaker 5>on the bench, he plays all the snaps. He doesn't

1:20:35.120 --> 1:20:37.320
<v Speaker 5>really do much, As you said, Baker Mayfield might take

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:38.240
<v Speaker 5>a chance on me quarterback.

1:20:38.439 --> 1:20:42.400
<v Speaker 6>And lastly, Richard White more like Richard White.

1:20:42.200 --> 1:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Hot lately much better. But this is a brutal matchup.

1:20:46.120 --> 1:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It is just to see for White. But by the way,

1:20:48.760 --> 1:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>players who have more RB one games than White and

1:20:51.720 --> 1:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a top twelve running back performance this year, that's

1:20:54.240 --> 1:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

1:20:55.400 --> 1:20:56.200
<v Speaker 6>No, really not.

1:20:56.320 --> 1:20:59.519
<v Speaker 5>It's Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, and Travis Etn at the

1:20:59.600 --> 1:21:04.120
<v Speaker 5>end of now, way, yes, way, top twelve finishes for

1:21:04.240 --> 1:21:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Chad White.

1:21:05.200 --> 1:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm shocked by that. Okay, I will email

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you as finishing twelfth. But like you said, a brutal matchup.

1:21:11.640 --> 1:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine ers are only allowing sixty three rushing yards

1:21:14.080 --> 1:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>per game to running backs, but they do allow more

1:21:15.680 --> 1:21:17.599
<v Speaker 1>than five catches per game to the position, and White

1:21:17.680 --> 1:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can catch the ball, so as ce on White over

1:21:20.040 --> 1:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to the forty nine ers side. It's all pretty obvious.

1:21:22.200 --> 1:21:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Here A on.

1:21:23.120 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Christian McCaffrey and not getting into that, I have a

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:28.000
<v Speaker 5>b on Brandon Ayuk and Deebo Samuel. The Bucks are

1:21:28.000 --> 1:21:30.800
<v Speaker 5>allowing fourteen catches, one hundred and ninety seven yards and

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:33.639
<v Speaker 5>more than a touchdown per game to opposing wide receivers.

1:21:33.680 --> 1:21:36.320
<v Speaker 5>They both have a potential they might eat each other's lunch.

1:21:36.320 --> 1:21:38.600
<v Speaker 5>So just a bee on Ayuk and Samuel and a

1:21:38.600 --> 1:21:41.599
<v Speaker 5>B on George Kittle. The Bucks are allowing six catches

1:21:41.640 --> 1:21:44.400
<v Speaker 5>fifty eight yards per game to opposing tight ends, and

1:21:44.439 --> 1:21:47.640
<v Speaker 5>it's a tight end Wasteland and Kittle's bike weeks come

1:21:47.680 --> 1:21:49.599
<v Speaker 5>at any time, and then there's a chance this could

1:21:49.640 --> 1:21:51.320
<v Speaker 5>be one of them. So a be on him and

1:21:51.400 --> 1:21:54.519
<v Speaker 5>an A on Brock Perty against his past final defense

1:21:54.640 --> 1:21:58.120
<v Speaker 5>allowing the second most passing yards this year. Perty as

1:21:58.120 --> 1:21:59.840
<v Speaker 5>all as toys healthy A grade.

1:22:00.320 --> 1:22:01.400
<v Speaker 6>I'll give them the Bonzi.

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Because well it's your last one, so it's your last chance.

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You got to use it. Samuel takes on the La Rams. Matt,

1:22:10.120 --> 1:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you gave Zach Charbona as your take a chance.

1:22:12.240 --> 1:22:15.799
<v Speaker 4>On running back. So what does that mean for Kenneth Walker?

1:22:16.280 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I gave him a very solid B grade.

1:22:18.160 --> 1:22:21.080
<v Speaker 7>Here. The Rams have allowed four point three yards per carry,

1:22:21.080 --> 1:22:23.599
<v Speaker 7>a mark that's ninth worst in the league, and the

1:22:23.600 --> 1:22:26.639
<v Speaker 7>Packers trio of running backs managed one hundred and fifty

1:22:26.720 --> 1:22:30.200
<v Speaker 7>six rushing yards against this defense in their last game

1:22:30.240 --> 1:22:35.320
<v Speaker 7>before the bye week. So like that, the last quarterback

1:22:35.560 --> 1:22:38.640
<v Speaker 7>to not throw for at least two hundred yards. Of

1:22:38.680 --> 1:22:42.519
<v Speaker 7>the Rams against the Rams was Geno Smith in Week one,

1:22:42.600 --> 1:22:45.519
<v Speaker 7>and hey, this is a Geno Smith stat. Over their

1:22:45.600 --> 1:22:47.720
<v Speaker 7>last four games, the Rams are allowing an average of

1:22:47.720 --> 1:22:50.280
<v Speaker 7>two hundred and fifty passing yards per game, thirteenth most

1:22:50.320 --> 1:22:54.360
<v Speaker 7>during that span. Grouped in with struggling pass defenses like

1:22:54.439 --> 1:22:57.639
<v Speaker 7>the Giants and Patriots, we were speculating that Gino could

1:22:57.720 --> 1:22:59.960
<v Speaker 7>be on the verge of losing his job. But while

1:23:00.040 --> 1:23:02.559
<v Speaker 7>Washington as a get well party for any quarterback right now,

1:23:02.640 --> 1:23:04.160
<v Speaker 7>he threw for three to sixty nine and.

1:23:04.120 --> 1:23:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Two last week.

1:23:05.320 --> 1:23:07.880
<v Speaker 7>He's had multiple passing scores in three of his last four,

1:23:07.960 --> 1:23:10.240
<v Speaker 7>So I'm sensing like two hundred and fifty yards and

1:23:10.280 --> 1:23:12.160
<v Speaker 7>two scores this week. That's a good enough for a

1:23:12.200 --> 1:23:16.479
<v Speaker 7>B grade for me. His wide receivers, they're tricky. Prior

1:23:16.520 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 7>to facing the Packers before the bye, the Rams were

1:23:18.920 --> 1:23:22.559
<v Speaker 7>turning into a passing sieve, with five wide receivers going

1:23:22.600 --> 1:23:25.040
<v Speaker 7>for at least sixty yards in the prior four games,

1:23:25.320 --> 1:23:28.320
<v Speaker 7>and three of those topping one hundred yards. Tyler Lockett

1:23:28.320 --> 1:23:31.799
<v Speaker 7>hasn't practiced at all this week with a lingering hamstring injury,

1:23:32.240 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 7>but He's done that this like every week since Week eight.

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:38.599
<v Speaker 7>He's ended up playing in each of those games. He's

1:23:38.600 --> 1:23:41.640
<v Speaker 7>managed ten targets, eight catches, ninety two yards in a

1:23:41.680 --> 1:23:45.120
<v Speaker 7>score last week against Washington if he's active starting with

1:23:45.160 --> 1:23:48.400
<v Speaker 7>a B grade, DK Metcalf has had double digit targets

1:23:48.400 --> 1:23:51.240
<v Speaker 7>and three of his last four, but hasn't scored since

1:23:51.280 --> 1:23:53.760
<v Speaker 7>Week four and hasn't hit one hundred yards since Week three.

1:23:54.160 --> 1:23:58.240
<v Speaker 7>But I like his matchup against converted slot corner Kobe Durant,

1:23:58.800 --> 1:24:02.160
<v Speaker 7>where he has four inches fifty pound advantage. So Metcalf

1:24:02.200 --> 1:24:06.519
<v Speaker 7>gets a B. Jackson Smith and Jigba will go from

1:24:06.560 --> 1:24:10.559
<v Speaker 7>the slot against converted safety Quenton Lake. If he saw

1:24:10.640 --> 1:24:13.040
<v Speaker 7>more targets, I'd really like this matchup even more. But

1:24:13.160 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 7>as is, he's only seeing four to five targets per

1:24:15.560 --> 1:24:19.320
<v Speaker 7>week and his average depth of target get this, four

1:24:19.360 --> 1:24:22.400
<v Speaker 7>point five yards downfield.

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Rows there, So I'm gonna leave him on the bench

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 4>now for.

1:24:24.960 --> 1:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The Rams, which I think you're gonna gave the Rams game. Yeah,

1:24:27.200 --> 1:24:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Well what about Jake Bobo yah Me? Since Cooper Cup return,

1:24:34.000 --> 1:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford hasn't topped two hundred and twenty six yards

1:24:39.080 --> 1:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in a game.

1:24:39.760 --> 1:24:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, how about this.

1:24:41.760 --> 1:24:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Stafford is going to be back. Carson Wentz is gonna

1:24:44.240 --> 1:24:46.719
<v Speaker 7>have to wait a little bit longer. The Rams changed

1:24:46.760 --> 1:24:50.320
<v Speaker 7>their philosophy in about week six, and Cooper Cup came

1:24:50.360 --> 1:24:54.120
<v Speaker 7>back in week five. In the first five weeks, Stafford

1:24:54.160 --> 1:24:56.240
<v Speaker 7>was throwing the ball on average of forty one times

1:24:56.280 --> 1:24:58.639
<v Speaker 7>per game when was averaging two hundred and ninety yards

1:24:58.640 --> 1:25:02.839
<v Speaker 7>per game. Since then, he's only averaging twenty six passing

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:06.559
<v Speaker 7>attempts per game. That's fifteen down, yeah, and two hundred

1:25:06.560 --> 1:25:09.320
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight yards per game. Now, maybe the bye week

1:25:09.360 --> 1:25:12.200
<v Speaker 7>help Sean McVay see this issue, or maybe they remembered

1:25:12.240 --> 1:25:14.880
<v Speaker 7>that they beat these Seahawks in Week one on three

1:25:14.960 --> 1:25:18.120
<v Speaker 7>hundred and thirty four yards of Stafford passing. So I'm

1:25:18.160 --> 1:25:21.000
<v Speaker 7>going to give Stafford a B grade here. The Seahawks

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:24.360
<v Speaker 7>have been bottom ten in nearly every passing category all

1:25:24.439 --> 1:25:27.479
<v Speaker 7>the season, and with two healthy, good wide receivers and

1:25:27.520 --> 1:25:29.679
<v Speaker 7>a good thumb for Stafford, I think we're okay here.

1:25:29.920 --> 1:25:32.679
<v Speaker 5>It's the absence of Kyraen Williams. He was the glue

1:25:32.760 --> 1:25:34.800
<v Speaker 5>that held that offense together and he's still going to.

1:25:34.800 --> 1:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Be absent for at least one more week.

1:25:37.200 --> 1:25:40.160
<v Speaker 7>Cooper Cup and Poka Nakua had Brett Rippan and a

1:25:40.200 --> 1:25:42.320
<v Speaker 7>bye week the last two so that didn't work out

1:25:42.360 --> 1:25:44.720
<v Speaker 7>for you. The bye week was probably better for you

1:25:44.800 --> 1:25:47.599
<v Speaker 7>than Brett Rippon, It probably was. And the Rams thought

1:25:47.680 --> 1:25:50.320
<v Speaker 7>so much of Brett Rippon that they cut him immediately

1:25:50.400 --> 1:25:52.280
<v Speaker 7>and they told him you could never start again in

1:25:52.320 --> 1:25:52.799
<v Speaker 7>the league.

1:25:52.840 --> 1:25:54.920
<v Speaker 4>That's right. And where do he go? I don't remember

1:25:54.960 --> 1:25:56.639
<v Speaker 4>where did Seattle? Did he go to Seattle?

1:25:56.840 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 7>Oh? Just to get the whole playbook?

1:25:59.479 --> 1:26:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Huh?

1:25:59.680 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 7>After a great first month of his career, Devin Witherspoon

1:26:04.000 --> 1:26:06.600
<v Speaker 7>has allowed a passer rating of one sixteen in his

1:26:06.680 --> 1:26:10.000
<v Speaker 7>coverage over the past two weeks. He gets Cooper Cup

1:26:10.040 --> 1:26:12.519
<v Speaker 7>most often, and he didn't see him in Week one.

1:26:12.840 --> 1:26:16.360
<v Speaker 7>Tarik Woolan and his mittens will match up against Puka Nakua,

1:26:16.800 --> 1:26:19.400
<v Speaker 7>who's never had fewer than ten catches in one hundred

1:26:19.400 --> 1:26:22.479
<v Speaker 7>and nineteen yards in a game against Seattle. That's the

1:26:22.560 --> 1:26:25.600
<v Speaker 7>only game he's played against Seattle. Woolan has allowed a

1:26:25.640 --> 1:26:28.560
<v Speaker 7>score in his coverage in four of the last six games.

1:26:28.840 --> 1:26:30.679
<v Speaker 4>I want to give a grades for both.

1:26:31.160 --> 1:26:33.719
<v Speaker 7>I'm a little nervous that the philosophy thing is still

1:26:33.720 --> 1:26:37.680
<v Speaker 7>an issue, So it's like the lowest A grade or

1:26:37.720 --> 1:26:39.719
<v Speaker 7>the highest B grade somewhere right in there.

1:26:40.520 --> 1:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>You and I see slot cornerback Devin Witherspoon differently. I

1:26:43.479 --> 1:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>mean he's a defensive Rookie of the Year candidate.

1:26:45.640 --> 1:26:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah he is, but giving up.

1:26:47.040 --> 1:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>A forty six percent completion rate, fourth best in the

1:26:50.600 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>entire league. I think Cooper Cup's actually got a sneaky

1:26:53.560 --> 1:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup.

1:26:54.280 --> 1:26:56.879
<v Speaker 7>This is last two weeks, haven't been good, won sixteen

1:26:56.960 --> 1:27:00.719
<v Speaker 7>passer rating. There, Tyler Higbee isn't in any lineups anymore.

1:27:00.760 --> 1:27:02.840
<v Speaker 7>So let's talk about the run game. It's probably a

1:27:02.840 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 7>good split between Darryl Henderson and Royce Freeman for this one.

1:27:06.640 --> 1:27:09.559
<v Speaker 7>We call that a bad split, Yeah, pretty much. It's

1:27:09.680 --> 1:27:12.240
<v Speaker 7>worth looking ahead to Week twelve. That's when the Rams

1:27:12.320 --> 1:27:15.680
<v Speaker 7>expect Kyron Williams to return. So somebody dropped him in

1:27:15.720 --> 1:27:18.040
<v Speaker 7>your league. Maybe you don't have ir spots. It's a

1:27:18.080 --> 1:27:20.680
<v Speaker 7>good time to pick up Kyrin Williams. But for now,

1:27:20.680 --> 1:27:23.639
<v Speaker 7>it's a split backfield going against a Seahawks defense that's

1:27:23.960 --> 1:27:27.040
<v Speaker 7>average against the run and very below average to pass

1:27:27.080 --> 1:27:30.720
<v Speaker 7>catching backs. If that's the case, Henderson gets more of

1:27:30.760 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 7>the nod here. The Rams have targeted Henderson seven times

1:27:34.160 --> 1:27:37.880
<v Speaker 7>in his three games, and Royce Freeman has seen exactly

1:27:38.240 --> 1:27:39.080
<v Speaker 7>zero targets.

1:27:39.080 --> 1:27:41.880
<v Speaker 4>So that'd be Royce drop the organ, Freeman.

1:27:42.240 --> 1:27:47.760
<v Speaker 7>The piano, the organ, the keyboard, the ukulele, the what's

1:27:47.800 --> 1:27:50.880
<v Speaker 7>the key tar? Maybe I don't know. Henderson gets a

1:27:50.880 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 7>C grade, Freeman's on the bench.

1:27:52.479 --> 1:27:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Come back soon, Kyroen, miss you.

1:27:54.360 --> 1:27:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one more week, one more.

1:27:56.280 --> 1:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>You know when you've add into you go on IR

1:27:57.960 --> 1:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for four games and you add in a bye way.

1:28:00.120 --> 1:28:01.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a long time away.

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Kien Williams was awfully good before and hopefully we'll be again.

1:28:07.000 --> 1:28:08.519
<v Speaker 1>If you miss any part of the show. Get all

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:12.559
<v Speaker 1>my player rankings available for free Guillotine leagues dot com.

1:28:12.600 --> 1:28:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Also your final hours to join a fresh new guillotine league.

1:28:16.560 --> 1:28:17.360
<v Speaker 4>We are still.

1:28:17.160 --> 1:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Drafting all the time, day night, all the way up

1:28:19.920 --> 1:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>until kickoff Sunday, basically for fresh new guillotine leagues at

1:28:23.880 --> 1:28:27.599
<v Speaker 1>guillotine leagues dot com. Best of luck a week eleven

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>heartfelt sories to those with Joe Burrow, Mark Andrews. Hopefully

1:28:32.920 --> 1:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a better weekend ahead for you, Best elect everybody, talk

1:28:36.439 --> 1:28:38.559
<v Speaker 1>to you a week how about? Tannessey Football Weekly is

1:28:38.560 --> 1:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

1:28:42.280 --> 1:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:28:45.800 --> 1:28:46.679
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.