WEBVTT - Do protons live forever?

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, I'm worried about how long I'm going to live? Man,

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't we all these days? I know, but I mean

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like down to the particle level, Like, are my who

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>electrons going to be around forever? Well, we actually have

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>good news there. We do think that electrons can live forever.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's cool. What about my protons? I got

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some tough news there. Didn't last very long. Currently we

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think protons live for only a trillion trillion trillion years.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Well, that's good. I guess even my protons

0:00:41.240 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 1>are procrastinators. They are professional protonic procrastinators. I am more

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>handmade cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics. Hi. I'm Daniel.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist, but I might one day decay

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>into something else, into a lighter Daniel or a lower

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>energy state. Unfortunately, I seem to be violating the laws

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of physics and decaying into a heavier Daniel as to

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all humans. Unfortunately that seems to be the direction. But

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio in which we take

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe and crack it in half and pour all

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>those little explain eons into your brain. We take you

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on a tour of all the amazing, the massive, the enormous,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the crazy and all the tiny, mysterious, weird quantum stuff

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the universe and explain it all to you. That's right,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so it lives in your head, possibly forever. Hopefully you

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>won't forget us. Will always be there in your brain,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>because we all know that once you've understood something in physics,

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know it forever. I have never forgotten a single

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that matter where Really it's hard to unlearn. Huh No,

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the opposite of true. I'm the kind of

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>person that can learn something fairly quickly and then forget

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it fairly quickly. I guess, um, does the information decay

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in your brain or it dissipates or I think it

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just gets replaced by all the stuff on Twitter that

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I scroll through and shoves it back out the other

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>side of my brain, pushes it out the other ear.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Information understanding decay. Yeah. We like to talk

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about science and the cosmos and the universe and everything

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in between, and including all the things that are out

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there and all the things that are not yet out there,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and all the things that will not be out there

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future. That's right because everything that you wonder

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about the universe are the same things that scientists wonder

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. Where did it come from, how did

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it get here? How long will it last? And how

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>long will you last? Yeah, so big question is how

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>long do particles stay around? Do they live forever? Or

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point are they not around? That's right because

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>particles are these weird, fleeting quantum objects, and I don't

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>always obey the same rules that you and I obey

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're from earlier with that makes sense to us,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and yet we are made out of them. Everything in

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe is made out of particles. So it's essential

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>that we understand how they work and the rules under

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which they operate, because they might very well determine our future,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you have to wait a trillion trillion trillion

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>years to find out. Yeah, because we know that. You know,

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>as humans, we don't live forever, at least not yet.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I've never died so far. How about you.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I think, probabilistically speaking, you are unlikely to be around

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for a few years. Yeah, But it's mostly because the

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>arrangement of our particles and our atoms at some point

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work and it dissipates in our particles go back

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>into the soil and back into dust. And so I

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think an interesting question is, like how long do your

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>particles last? That's right? Like the particles that you're made

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>out of right now, are they gonna be there at

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of the universe? That's right? Even if that

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>arrangement that makes you isn't around anymore. With that little

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of your fingernail and that tip of your knows

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>will it be around inside some starr and get fused

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into a piece of gold someday and get blown out

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in a supernova and have trillions and trillions more cycles,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>or will it only last a few more years and

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>decay into something totally unrecognizable? Right? Because I guess particles

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>come from nothing, right, Like you know, at some point

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there weren't any particles and then they suddenly sort of

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>popped down, And we know that particles pop into existence

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>all the time in the vacuum, and so, but the

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>question is, once you form a particle, does it stay

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>around forever as a particle or do things happen to

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it to make it disappear? Yeah, particles certainly were formed

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the very early universe. We had this hot, dense state,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>all this energy stored in the fields, and then as

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe cooled, that energy sort of isolated into these

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>discrete packets that we now call particles. And we'd like

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to play this mental game as particle physicists say, you

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had just one particle in the universe, what would it do?

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Would it sit there forever or would it eventually spontaneously

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>break into lighter particles? And so that's the game we

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>play with electrons, and we think a single universe filled

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with just one electron would stay that way forever. But

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the open question is is that also true for proton

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So to be on the podcast will be asking the

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>question do protons live forever? And if so, how do

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they plan for their retirements? Right? Do they have professional

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>protonic um retirement accountant? I hope they've been proactive in

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>saving Yeah, I hope that there is paraded. If you

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>live forever, you would have like an infinite number of grandchildren,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose could support you in your old old age.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>There you think they still like you after an infinite

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>number of years, Great great great great great Grandpa die

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>already and give us all your stuff. Now you have

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to go great trade for infinity. Nobody wants to call you.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I ran at a time there. Yeah, alright, So electrons

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>live forever, we know that. That's like fact number one.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They never what does that mean? They never decayed or

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they never like spontaneously disappear. It's an important distinction. Like

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>an electron, you can destroy it. You throw an electron

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>against a positron, you can turn that energy into something else.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You can turn it into a photon. Right, that kind

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff happens. But so you can kill an electron, yes,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but they just don't die on the that's right. And

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know in some superhero movies that is the definition

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of immortal, like elves or in fantasy novels are often

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>immortal but can be killed in battle, which always confused me.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But electrons are sort of like elves. They will sit

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>around forever. Like you put an electron in its own universe,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it will just sit there forever, you know, learning how

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to sing valid essentially, but never turning into anything else,

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or not even spontaneously like you know, some particles just

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting around, they can split into other particles, right,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Almost every particle decays. It's only the ones

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that are the lightest ones that can turn into anything

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>else that are sort of stuck. Those are the ones

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that we call stable. So an electron is a stay

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>able particle. A single electron universe will stay a single

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>electron universe basically forever. Like it can't break down into

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>something else spontaneously, or it probably won't know if it could,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it will eventually. So this is a statement about like,

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not a statement about probability, but about possibility. If an

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>electron is really alone in the universe, if there's not

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not even any like weird quantum positrons popping out of

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum to annihilate it, it will sit there forever,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>has zero chance of decaying into anything else, because what

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>could it decay into. There is no particle lighter than

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the electron that the electron can turn into that follows

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all the rules, and we'll dig into all of that. Okay,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So electrons are like elves, probably l ron or electron.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>What would be his elf name or her name? Elvin,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>elvin name Sorrylfish elfish or Elvin. Oh man, I'm way

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on my depth here. So we're made out of electrons

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and also protons. Under the question is do protons live forever?

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and this is one of the deepest open

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>questions in modern physics. Does a proton sitting in the

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>universe by itself eventually turn into something else? Or will

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it last forever? So that's an awesome question, and so

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>as usual, Daniel went out there and ask people on

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the internet if they thought protons lived forever. So, as usual,

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>before you hear these answers, think about it for a second.

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think protons live forever? Here's what people had

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to say. I don't really understand what living forever means

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for protons, but I do understand that they are converted

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into different forms. Seeing a bita plas t K where

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the proton gets converted into a neutron and a positroon

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is released. I believe protons, if kind of like left alone,

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>just by themselves, they probably could live till the end

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of the eternity, till the end of the universe, unless

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>some external effects can either destroy them or change them

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like maybe you know fusion or fish, and protons can

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>change from one to another, but they are still protos.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe they live forever. I know electrons

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>live forever because you guys covered that in a previous podcast.

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But I believe protons can be broken down obviously, you

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>guys do it as certain by smashing them and creating

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>new particles. Intitively, I would say that, um, we know

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that like prodom is made up of two upquarks and

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one dunk parks. I think so that I would think

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that a prodom may not live forever in a form

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of a proto. I have no idea about this. I

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>would say that they probably do not live forever, because

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense that they would not decay at

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>some point. I would have to assume that protons don't

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>live forever, because before the Big Bang, we think the

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>universe was a big, hot, dense ball of energy, and

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so I would have to guess that the universe could

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>return to such a state. I guess that decaying all

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of time, and if the next holiday destination is Geneva,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>then they really have a short time left. I don't

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>think so, alright. I feel like it's a lot of

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence here in these answers. People are like no, and

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>some people are like yes, and some people are like

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on what you mean living forever exactly. Got some

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>legalistic answers also, but it's fair because it's a bit

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of a vague question, Like it's possible obviously to destroy

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a proton. We do it every twenty five nanoseconds the

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>large change on collider by smashing them together. But really

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the deep physics question is if you leave a proton alone,

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>will it decay into something else? Can you turn it

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>into something else? And that has deep implications for our

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the very beginning of the universe, why our

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>universe is made out of matter, and also for like

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of the fundamental theory of everything, how it

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>all links together. It turns out proton decay is really

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>little lynch pin for a lot of big questions. Wow,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of stuff to hang on one simple question.

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, And it turns out proton decays really really

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>frustrating for particle theorist. Right, So it seems like we

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can kill protons, but the question is do they spontaneously

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>die at some point or breakdown or did you have

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>a proton does it sit around forever? So maybe, Daniel,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>let's step through it one thing at a time. First,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of all, let's talk about particles dying in the first place,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or I guess you use the term decay. That's right.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>We prefer the term decay. Or you have transformed into

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>something else, something lighter and more femoral. We don't like

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>to talk about them dying. We call it passing, not dying.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You're graduating to the next phase of your particle existence,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you're leveling up. But yes, in general, particles do like

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to decay, and that's just a function of time moving

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>forward and entropy. You know, the same way that you

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can't have a bunch of gas particles in the corner

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of a box and have them to stay there. They

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>like to spread out because energy likes to diffuse. That

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>increases entropy and disorder in the universe. You can't have

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that much energy isolated in a quantum field, so that

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a particle is in a really heavy state. They like

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to decay down to the lowest state. They like to

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>spread that energy out. They give off a photon or

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they eject another particle. They turned into multiple particles, and

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they just essentially stepped down the ladder as far as

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they and again we're not talking about like particles disassembling

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like if if I build a lego in

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>my house, you know, with my kids, it's not gonna

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>last very long. It's kind of eventually get dissembled. We're

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>talking really about like quantum transformation, like a particle literally

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like transforms into other things. Yeah, let's take an example

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the muan. The muan is a heavy version of

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the electron, and the muan turns into an electron and

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of neutrinos to satisfy some conservation laws.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But the muan doesn't last very long at all, last

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for micro seconds and it just turns into the electron.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, it's not like the muan is

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>just the electron with a couple of neutrinos bound together,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and then it breaks apart and those little internal pieces

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>fly out. This really is like alchemy. Like the muon

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is an excited state of the muan field and then

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it transforms into an excited state of the electron field

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and to neutrino fields. And so that's our current understanding

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of how this muon decay happens. You have isolated heavy

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>particle turns into three lighter particles. Right, it's not a

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>rearrangement and it just it doesn't spontaneously like it's just

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting there. A muon is just sitting there and then

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>suddenly pop, it just turns into an electron and two neutrinus. Yeah,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the real quantum randomness is in our universe,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Like it has a probability at any moment to decay.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>When an individual muan actually decays is determined by some

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>random quantum toss of the dice. If you have like

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a thousand muons in a bottle, then half of them

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>will decay after a certain time, then another half after

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>another certain time, etcetera. On average, but each individual one

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>is determined by a random toss of the dice. It's

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just like radioactive decay of a nucleus, which is exactly

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of process. I see. It's not that

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's delicate and like you know, you're stacking blocks and

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly when passed by or you push a little

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bit and it topples over it. It's literally like you know,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in its fabric of its existence, to just spontaneously turn

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>into something else. Yeah. The picture I have in my

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>head is that it's like you know, flipping a coin

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>or rolling a die, every microsecond, and if it gets

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the right answer, boom, it decays, and if it doesn't,

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it sticks around it a new one for a while. Um.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And so it's just like keeps rolling that die or

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>picking a random number until it gets the right one

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and then it decides. All right, now it's time for

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>me to become an electron and a couple of neutrinos. Right,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're telling me that it needs to have like

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a path for the decay, like it has to have,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of a solution for its decay. Yeah,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't just turn into anything, right. A muan can't

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just like say, hey, I'm going to become a photon. Cool,

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like fun. The universe has rules, and these

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>rules determine what particles can decay into other particles. The

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>important thing to understand about these rules is that mostly

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we have no idea where they come from. They're just

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like our description. It's like you watch a bunch of particles,

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you see what happens. You try to notice patterns, and

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you codify those patterns into rules. That doesn't mean you

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>know why that rule exists. So when we say, like,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, charge is conserved, doesn't mean we know why

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's conserved. It just means that we've never seen this

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>rule broken, so we think it's a fundamental rule of

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And so that's one of them. Right. Why

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can't a muan just turn into a photon. Well, muan

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has electric charge and a photon doesn't, so to do

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that would break that rule of conserving electric charge. Right,

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a decay that makes sense to

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Okay, it's not like a total magic like

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an el can just turn into a dwarf, that's right.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to like fill out a big application and

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>submitted to the universe's lawyers and they have to check

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>all the boxes and they say, all right approved. It's

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>more like getting a bank loan than magically transforming, all right.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And if there's nothing for you to decay to, like

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in according to the laws of the universe, then you

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can't decay. You're like stuck, that's right. And that's the

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>situation with the electron. There's nothing lighter than the electron,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like the muon can decay to electron because the muon

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is heavier than the electron. It can go down, but

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to go up. It's not spontaneous decay. The electron can't

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>decay up into the muan. There's nothing for it to

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>go down to. It's the lightest thing on its ladder. Now,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there are other lower mass particles, like a photon for example,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but again an electron can't get to be a photon

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>because that would violate the conservation of electric charge. Okay,

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so then there are rules. And if there's no step

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>down for you to go down to, then you're stuck.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And you know, there's another particle that's very

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to the proton. It's the neutron. And the neutron

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is almost the same as a proton. It's a slightly

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>different arrangement of quarks. Like the proton is made out

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of these smaller particles called quarks, and the proton is

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>two ups and and down. The neutron is two downs

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and an up. Now, the neutron is slightly heavier than

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the proton, a tiny bit more mass, so the neutron

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can turn into a proton, no problem. And it also

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>shoots off an electron to conserve electric charge. So that happens.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>And if you have like a neutron sitting around and

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on average, after about nine hundred seconds, it will turn

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>into a proton. But because the proton is lighter than

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the neutron, there's nowhere for the proton to go. Because

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>there's this weird rule we have observed that says you

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have to keep constant the number of cork triplets, like

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the number of particles made out of three quarks cannot change,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, And there's kind of a rule that says

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that when you decayed down into something, you need like

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a force to help you do it. That's right. All

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>these decays happen through some force, right, Like when the

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>muon decays into the electron, he uses the weak force.

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean, Like like the weak force has

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to be involved or you actually need to like inject

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>some weak force into it. It means that the weak

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>force is involved. What actually happens when it decays is

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that the mu and turns into immuon neutrino and a

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>w boson, and that w boson then turns into an

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>electron and a second neutrino, so it like mediates the decay.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like every time you feel a force the wall

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is pushing back on you for example, Really that's happening

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>by the exchange of energy from photons, and so all interactions.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Every time particles talk to each other, it happens through

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the forces. Okay, so then when you decay,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you need this force to kind of like pass the

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>energy around between the resulting bits. Yeah, exactly. And so

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, another example is a particle called the pion.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Pion is two corks, a cork and an anti cork,

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and this thing can turn into two photons, and that

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>happens via electromagnetism. Essentially, the cork and the anti cork

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and decide to annihilate each other and turn into these

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>two photons. And so that there's something for it to

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>turn into doesn't break any of the rules, and there's

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a force to make it happen. All right, So we

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>know that particles can decay if there's thing, you know,

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>less energetic that they can decay into, and if you

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>follow the rules of the universe. So now the question

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is do protons de case So mostly you and I

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are now to protons and electrons and neutrons, and so

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is due protons decay? So let's get into that.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break, all right, Dianiel,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about whether protons live Forever, and I feel

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.719
<v Speaker 1>like that's like an eighties song or something. Do Protons

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Live Forever? Sounds like a heavy metal you know, hair band,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a love The protons of my love will

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be here to the end of the universe. That's probably

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the next bill. There you go, Yeah, you have

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a rock band in your garage with other physicists. No,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely not, And if I did, I would not admit

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>it here on the podcast. How I see you do

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it under an alias another particle name. That's right exactly.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The rock and electrons, all right, So we're all made

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>out of electrons, protons and neutrons, and so the question

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is do protons a because we know electrons cannot decay

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>spontaneously into someone else, but do protons decay? And so

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the protons are different than electrons because protons are made

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>out of other particles. Right, Protons are made out of quarks.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So you take a proton, you look inside it, deep

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>inside it, and you find three particles. You find two

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>up corks and a down cork, and that means that

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>like it's made out of these three particles. It's just

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>an arrangement of those particles, right, But we have this

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>rule in the universe that we don't understand. And this

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>rule says that there's a fixed number of these cork triplets.

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We call this a barrion. It's just three quirks together,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can make three qurks together and loss of

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>different arrangements. And for some reason, every time you have

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>an interaction, the number of baryons doesn't change. What do

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you mean, like interactions, but corks always have and three. No,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but if you do have a triplet of quarks involved,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>then you'll have the same number of triplets when you're done. So,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, a neutron decays to a proton. He started

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with one triplet the neutron, which is an up down down,

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and you ended up with one triplet the proton up

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>up down. Like, you can't go from one barrion to

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>zero baryons, or from ten burrions to eight burrions. You

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>have to have the same number of burrions when you

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>start and when you finish, which is not something we

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>understand at all. So it's not related to threes, like

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if I start with two, I have to end up

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with two as well. No, there's no conservation on cork pairs.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Cork triplets have this special property. If you have a

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>qurk triplet, you have to end up with a cork triplet.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And so, for example, when we smash protons together at

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the large change on collider, two protons come in. We

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>destroy those two protons. We always make at least two

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>baryons that come out. Okay, So then neutrons, which were

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>also made out of those don't live forever. You're saying,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like a neutron, if you just leave it alone in

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe, it's gonna not be a neutron for law.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It only lasts about eight hundred and eighty

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>seconds on its own. Now, the neutrons in your body

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>are much more stable because the environment in your body

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>keeps them sort of stuck together. But if you had

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a neutron by itself in the universe, after about eight

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty seconds, it would turn into a proton and

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an electron. And you notice that keeps the number of

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>baryons a number of cork triplets constant, because the neutron

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is one and the proton is one. Oh, I see,

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>so alright, So a neutron by itself candycy, but it

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>turns into a proton basically turns into a proton plus

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>an electron to carry off the other half of the

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. To follow that one rule. And so what

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>happens there for the neutron, like the quarks inside just

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of flipped and then it becomes something else. Yeah,

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the down corks becomes an up cork, and

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>it gives off a w boson, which is where you

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 1>get the electron and actually a little neutrino, which is

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>how neutrinos were discovered. But these arrangements of quarks, like

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>one arrangement of quarks and up down, down, it gives

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you a neutron, a different set of quarks up up,

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>down that gives you a proton. The proton is the

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lowest mass arrangement of quarks, Like, there's no way to

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>make an arrangement of quarks that has a lower mass

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in the protons. So it's sort of like the lightest

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thing on the ladder of bury on. But for quark triplet, Yes,

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>for quark, you can make something out of two quarks.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>You can make something out of two quarks, like a

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>pion has lower mass. But the cork triplet ladder, for

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>some reason, it's on its own. It's like a special

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>thing in the universe. And if you're on that ladder,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to stay on that ladder, and the proton

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is the bottom rung of that ladder. There's no lighter

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>arrangement of three quarks than the proton. So that's why

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the proton seems to be stuck unless you can somehow

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>jump off this ladder. I see, it's like once he

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>has three quarks, instead of stuck having three quarts, exactly,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>you can do something, make a different arrangement of three quarks.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>You can move up or down the ladder by injecting energy.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>You're waiting for it to decay. But you have to

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>have something on the ladder. Once you have something on

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the ladder. But couldn't I like, you know, split up

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that triplet. Can't three quarts make up a proton just

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, when they decide to go their separate ways,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>then you destroy the proton. Basically, you can do that

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you create a larger system, right, so you like

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>involve it in some other bonds and some other configurations,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>then you can destroy a proton, for example. But a

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>proton on its own will never decay. We think it

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>might be stable. We've never seen a proton jump off

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the ladder, and every interaction we've ever seen keeps the

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>same number of these barrier I see. But I mean,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like can quarks exists on their own, you can't have

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>quirks on their own. They have such a strong interaction

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with other corks, and the strength of that interaction gets

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>stronger and stronger as quirks get further and further apart,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>which creates so much energy around them that they create

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>particles out of the vacuum to make these pairs and triplets.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So you never see corks by themselves. They're always in

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>these pairs or triplets or maybe in weird exotic larger

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>combinations tetra corks and hexa corks. But there's a special

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship that the universe has with these triplets of quirks

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that we don't understand. We've never seen a proton decay,

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and so we think there might be some special rule

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that protects these cork triblets. On the other hand, we

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have very good reason to think that protons might decay

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or that they should, So it's not for certain. It's

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.959
<v Speaker 1>definitely not for certain. No, it's something we don't understand

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a core mystery at the heart of physics. All right,

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So you've never seen a proton spontaneously decay, and what

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Like, have we actually like put a

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>proton on their microscope and left it there for a

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours or days or years. Yeah? Actually we

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>put like ten to the thirty four protons under a

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>microscope and we waited a few years to see if

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>any of them decay. What do you mean, like you

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>actually put them in a little container and left them

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>there a really big container. Right. One way to do this,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>one way to ask, like does a proton decay? Can

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we measure it? Is to take a single proton and wait.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you think that a proton might take like

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a trillion trillion trillion years to decay, then your experiment's

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>going to take the trillion trillion trillion years. Instead, what

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do is say, well, I'm gonna take a

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion trillion trillion protons, which is not that hard to

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>make because every piece of matter has a lot of

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>protons and see if any of them decay. Because if

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>none of them decay within a year or two years,

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then I can make a statistical argument about how long

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>they live. Oh, I see, So that's what you have

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the large hattern collider, not in the

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>large hedge and collider. That's not where we study proton decay.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But in big underground experiments like super Commo Conda and

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming do and experiment are perfect for looking for

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>proton decays. All right, So you don't think that they

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can decay, but do you think they might? What makes

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you think they might decay? Well, the universe sort of

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense if protons can't decay. Like, if protons

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>could decay, the whole universe would make a lot more sense,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which makes us want them to decay, even though we've

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>never seen them. And the reason it is that, well,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have more baryons in the universe than

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>anti barions. Well, we talked about earlier how you have

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to have the same umber of barrions in the universe.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the opposite for anti berrions. Like you can actually

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>create a burrion and anti berion together because it keeps

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the number of burrions the same because anti berrions count

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for minus one. And again, a barion is a triplet

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of court that's right. Yeah, And so we think that

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe started off with no particles, as you said,

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and then particles were made, which must have made the

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>same number of burions and anti burions, but somehow we

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up with a lot more protons than anti protons. Like,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we think there are almost no antiberians out there, so

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there must be something out there which lets us either

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>create burions on their own or destroy anti berions preferentially.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>There's something out there to explain why we have so

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>much more matter than anti matter. Something allows us to

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>make these buryons. Right, But isn't it just sort of

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like electrons to like, you know, you can create and

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>destroy electrons. What makes us think that then electrons can't

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>decay but protons might be able to so, right, the

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>same argument goes for electrons that we think, you know,

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>why do we have more electrons in the universe than positrons? Right?

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>This is this whole question of antimatter. But there are

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>other reasons that we think that protons might decay, and

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that comes from like looking at the patterns of the forces.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>We have the electromagnetism, which is a force. We have

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the weak force, we have the strong force, and we

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>have gravity. And people like to try to put these together,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>they say, well, it's weird to have like four different

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>forces or five different forces. Can we fit these together

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>into a larger pattern that has just one overarching you know,

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ring to rule them all, so to force. And every

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>time the theorists do this, every time they put those

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>pieces together, it always ends up predicting a new little

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>force that we haven't seen very much anymore, that hasn't

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>been around since the beginning the universe, that can decay protons,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that turns protons into a pion and a pository. What So,

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>when you try to, you know, kind of squish all

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the forces together like you think they're radically Like if

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I try to come up with a like a super

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>megaporce that includes all the other forces, you're saying, I

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have to come up with a new fifth force. Yeah, well,

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like it's a part of this megaporce

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't happen very much anymore. So put all these

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>forces together into one megaphorce. And that megaphorce because it

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>was around in the early universe, before the universe cooled

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and the forces broke into these different forces that we

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>know today, it would have treated all the particles equally

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like quarks and electrons and all those stuff. And so

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this force should be able to turn quirks into leptons

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, and back and forth. And currently our forces

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, Like, none of the forces that we

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.239
<v Speaker 1>have today are capable of turning quirks into leptons. They

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't capable of doing that. But this leftover force, there

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>might be a particle which exists in the universe but

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>requires so much energy to create that we hardly ever

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>see it, which means it's very unlikely for it to

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>do anything. But it might vary occasionally every true brillion

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>trillion trillion years be responsible for the decay of a proton.

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I see, maybe protons have this secret weakness, that this

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is hidden force that hasn't been around since the beginning

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of time. Yeah, and maybe that's the key, right, because

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>every time they put one of these theories together, it

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>always predicts that protons will decay. It's just like a

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>natural consequence of making this megaphorce. It has this symmetry

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>where it treats the quarks and the leftons in the

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>same way. It always predicts this new X particle. The

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>X particle would take like the two up corks inside

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the proton and turn them into like a positron and

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a down cork, and that gives you a proton turning

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>into a pion and a positron. And so it's just inescapable.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And every time the theorists make one of these theories,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they're like, darn it, my theory predicts proton decay. It's

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating for them that I can't escape this prediction.

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I say, all right, well, let's get into how we

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>might be looking experimentally for evidence that the proton case

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and when we can expect an answer. But first let's

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. All right, Daniel, do protons and

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>love live forever? It's the question, But I guess we're

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>only tackling the proton partire today. Yeah, don't come to

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a particle physicist for questions about love unless it's about

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>love of particles. A right. So, um, there are reasons

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to think maybe the proton does decay. One is that,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it might explain antimatter, and the other one

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the theory set of point to maybe a

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>possible kind of new force which would allow protons to decay.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Second of the idea, Yeah, and remember this is all theoretical.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>This is like, we look at the way the universe

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is arranged, and we think it would make more sense

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>if we added this one other piece, but that piece

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>would mean that protons should decay. So then we go

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>when we look for it, we said, well, maybe they do,

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't noticed. Maybe it takes a long long time,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we just need to be really patient. Okay,

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So it is that theoretically we don't think that the

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>proton can decay, but if it does, it kind of

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>means the existence of a new force. Is that kind

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the significance of this decay. Yeah, so we have

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to invent this rule. This number of barriyons is fixed rule,

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which we don't really like because it doesn't really make

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>any sense and it violates our understanding of matter and

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>antimatter asymmetry, and it keeps us from having this new

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mega force, etcetera. So we'd love to get rid of

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that and replace it with this new force and allow

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>protons to decay. But for that to be true, we

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have to actually see one decay, and we have to

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 1>prove that they can, because nobody's ever seen. So if

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you see one decay, then it's like you have to

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>break the laws of physics. Kind yes, if you see

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one decay, that's guaranteed Nobel Prize because you get to

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>rewrite the laws of physics in a way that makes

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much more sense to everybody, that like fits together with

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some real symmetry and beauty. And so everybody's sort of

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hoping that protons will decay. I mean not your protons,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not my protons, but some proton somewhere we hope will

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually decay. Did they already print that Nobel Prize? Like

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize for the decay of the proton. It's just

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the shelf waiting for people to claim it.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's one of those experiments out there that

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>if you make it work, if you see this thing,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a guaranteed Nobel Prize. There are a few

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>things like that, you know, find the Higgs boson, see

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves, find a magnetic monopole. These things that people

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have been looking for forever. They think should exist, but

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody's ever seen one. If you found and it would

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>really you know, fill in a missing box in our

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the universe. So yeah, go look for one.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Exposed the proton get a prize. That's right, This is

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>particle is ten most wanted list, right, So then there

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of experiments out there that are actually

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to win this Nobel prize. They're trying to see

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if protons decay and and so what's involved here, Daniel?

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they just put a bunch in a box and

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>then stare at them or or do you shake it?

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you shake the box? What do you have to do?

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>He's trying not to shake the box. And in fact,

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can play a sort of simple calculation

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with any blob of protons like you. You know, you,

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, have like ten to the twenty eight protons,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>something like a trillion quadrillion protons in your body, so

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know already that protons lived for more than, you know,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years, because people don't tend to die of

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>proton decay, you know, like people just like suddenly disintegrate,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like Thanos snapping his thumbs. But also, I mean you

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>said that the protons in my body are kind of

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bound together with other protons and neutrons, and that helps

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>him live longer. Yeah, but unfortunately that's the only kind

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of proton we can really study like, we can't take

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>pure individual free protons and study them on their own.

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>All we can do is study protons that exist in matter,

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which are in bound states. And so that's a big

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>asterisk on all of the results that we're going to

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about today that none of them actually involves studying

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>free protons. Okay, So then stepping through, what are these

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>experiments and what are they doing? Well, the most powerful

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>result right now, the one that tells us the most

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about proton decay, comes from this experiment in Japan. It's

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>super Commoo Conda, and they basically have a thirteen story

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>stack of water and it's just a huge container filled

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with water, and it's surrounded by cameras essentially, and it's

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>totally dark and it's underground. And this is an experiment

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's mostly designed to look for neutrinos coming from the

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Sun or coming from deep space or from supernovas, but

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>it's also good for looking for proton decay because if

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>proton decays in this tank, they think they will see it. Oh,

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I see so, but it's filled with water. I guess

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>water has hydrogen oxygen, and those all have protons and

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they have something like ten to the thirty two protons

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>basically sitting in the tank, and so if none of

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>them decay in a year, then you know that the

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>half life of the proton is more than ten to

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the thirty two years. But these are not isolated protons.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>They're in these bound states within the atoms. That doesn't

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that protect them, it does protect them potentially. And so

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>as we were saying early here, like this is a

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>big asterisk in all of these results. We would love

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to have ten to the thirty two free protons in

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the container that we could study and then we could

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>directly understand this question. But we don't all the protons

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we have our inbound states, and we don't have ionized

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen gas in large enough containers that we build cameras around,

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we just have to sort of like make

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the measurement on bound protons and assume that it also

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>works for free protons. But it's a big assumption, but

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also all we can do currently. All right, So,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>staring at water, what expery went you make? Particle physics

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds so exciting. I mean, look for variations and the

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>loss of physics in violations of symmetry of matter and

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>antimatter otherwise known as staring at water. If it happened,

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be kind of dramatic because you would have

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>this special signature because you would get a pion on

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one side, which turns into two photons. You get these

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>two little splashes in your camera, and on the other

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>side you would get a positron, which makes a little splash.

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>So they've simulated exactly what this would look like in

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>their cameras and it's very weird and unusual and different

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from anything they've ever seen before. And so they've been

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>running this thing for years and years and years and

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they've never seen a single one, and so that means

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that they can pretty confidently say that the lifetime of

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the proton is more than ten to the thirty four years,

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge number because remember the universe, the

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>entire universe is only thirteen billion years old, so like,

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this is many orders of magnitude longer than the history

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the universal But again, these are in bound states,

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you calibrate for that as well? These are

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in bound states. No, we can't really calibrate for that.

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know how to extrapolate from bound state

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>protons to unbound protons to free protons. We just sort

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of like assume it's going to be something similar. Okay,

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So then that's one experiment. The super Cameo super co

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Neo Conda Conda all right, sounds like superhero or something.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Is an awesome experiment in Japan, and then we're building

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>one here in the United States that we talked about

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on a recent episode called Dune Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And these neutrino experiments essentially for free, you get a

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>proton decay experiment because the same thing they can be

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>used to look for neutrinos in Dune's case from a

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>neutrino beam or from the Sun or from supernovas, can

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>also look for decays of protons. And this is kind

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of a similar idea to write, like you have a

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>big vat of stuff and you wait for it to change. Yeah, exactly.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of Dune is not water, it's

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>liquid argone. They're pioneering a new technology to take this

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>noble gas argone and they cool it down until it's

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a liquid, but it has the same property that it's

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>very quiet. So mostly if you have a huge several

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ton container of liquid argone underground and you put cameras

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on it, it'll stay dark. But if you see an

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>interaction like a new trino or or a proton decaying,

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to spot that, because it's like

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>taking a picture of a single tiny flash of light

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>in a very dark room. Since it's camera can pick

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that up. Cool, and so far they haven't seen it.

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But again, this one is also you're looking at argons,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so you're looking at protons in a bound state inside

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of the nucleus of the argon at them. That's right,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But hey, that's all we can do. Dune hasn't turned

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on yet. They're still building it. It's gonna be turning

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>on in a few years. But because it's a much

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>larger volume, they have many more tons. It will provide

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>even more stringent limits on the lifetime of the proton.

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they'll get lucky, maybe they'll see one decay.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But I guess, why can't you just like isolate a

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>proton and look at it. Is that hard? I mean,

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>you guys do it at the large hattern collider. Yeah,

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you can isolate a proton and you can look at it,

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>But a single proton will not tell you much about

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the lifetime of the proton unless you wait a very

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>very long time. So you either need a lot of

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>protons or a lot of time, and a lot of

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>protons are very hard to keep isolated. I mean, could

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have a gas of protons. We do that the hydrunk glider,

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know we have like tend of the twelve

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>protons tend to thirteen protons. You need to keep these

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>things isolated. You need to watch them and then you

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>need to instrument it, right, You need to be watching

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for them to decay. And so that's much easier to

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do when you have a neutral substance, something which is quiet,

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't otherwise make lots of flashes of light. Oh,

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I see, it's like you can isolate a whole bunch

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of protons, but then you actually have to notice if

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like one of them the kids. Yeah, because a bunch

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of protons together, it's called the plasma, and a plasma

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a quiet thing to instrument, right, That's like

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>where we try to do fusion and stuff like that.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a pretty trick the experiment to do for

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>actual free protons, which is why we only ever do

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it for protons in a bound state. But you're right

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't actually tell us about free proton. All right,

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So there are people looking for this decay of the proton.

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Then there's people staring at water and argon waiting for

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one of these protons to suddenly die. That's right, staring

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at water waiting for a Nobel prize to about out

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of a little tiny proton. Hey, if I told you

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>stare at this tank, a Nobel prize might appear. You know,

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you might devote a couple of years to that. Yeah,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>shorter than a PhD. A couple of trillion years, why not?

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Or you might not see anything. Unfortunately, that's usually the

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>case in particle physics. You're looking for something crazy. You're

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hoping you might see something spectacular, but you see nothing.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is that most of our experiments

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are still interesting even if you don't see anything, because

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you can still say something. You can say, we didn't

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>see the proton decay. Therefore we know it doesn't decay

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on average in less than tend of the thirty four

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>tend of the thirty five years. So you still get

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to say something interesting about physics. Alright. So it sounds

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>like you're pretty confident then that we can say that

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the proton does not decay or won't die, or we'll

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>live for at least ten to the thirty four years,

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty much forever, right, it's almost forever. I mean,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot longer than our universe has been around

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>so far. But it's also still a real problem for

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicists when they try to construct their grain unified theories,

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>their theories of everything, when they want to understand what

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to the very beginning of the universe, they have

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it in a way that keeps the proton

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from decaying, and that's theoretically very tricky. It's like, you know,

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they have to pass through the eye of a needle

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>to keep the proton from decaying in their theory. And

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so everybody would be very happy to see a proton decay, oh,

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I see, because it would make the equations easier to solve.

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It would mean that all the theories which predict proton

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>decay might actually be correct. And those equations are beautiful

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and they make a lot of sense, and they answer

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other questions about like matter and antimatter

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and the forces being unified. But those equations can't be

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>right if the proton doesn't decay. If the proton doesn't decay,

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>those equations are just wrong, even though they're beautiful and

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>they're simple and they're attractive. So then we need to

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>find some other way to solve those problems. And theoretically

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just much harder without proton decay. So it's not

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>just a whole bunch of physicists looking staring at water.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You're staring at water waiting for the proton to die, hoping, hoping.

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You're hoping for the proteon to die here. That's right,

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the big twist. You thought we would be rooting

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for the proteon to lift forever, but instead we're anti protons.

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You're like, just die already. We're cheering on its demise

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to retire and win my noble pride. That's right. Somebody

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in a very future universe will finally see a proton

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>decay in a trillion trillion trillion years. I hope they're

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 1>still giving out Nobel prizes. Then I hope our protons

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are still around. All right. Well, we hope you enjoyed

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that and got a little bit of a sense of

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>how long things live in the universe. Apparently, some things do,

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>some things don't, and it's amazing the cosmic importance of

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one little proton, a single proton in a vat of

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>water in Japan, decaying could crack open the answer to

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>these deep mysteries about the beginning of our universe, the

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>balance between matter and antimatter, how everything fits together. It's

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly import And then it just really highlights the connection

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>between particle physics and cosmology and astrophysics, and really, particle

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>physics is basically the whole universe. That's what I'm saying.

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>She's saying, give us more money. We're studying everything that's right.

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what everything I say translates to effectively. All right, Well,

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope that give you some stuff to think about.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>The protons in your body and the electrons might live forever,

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 1>but particle physicists are hoping they don't see you next time.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio. Or

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. Yea