1 00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:12,639 Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, I'm worried about how long I'm going to live? Man, 2 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:15,880 Speaker 1: aren't we all these days? I know, but I mean 3 00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 1: like down to the particle level, Like, are my who 4 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:21,959 Speaker 1: electrons going to be around forever? Well, we actually have 5 00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:25,720 Speaker 1: good news there. We do think that electrons can live forever. 6 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 1: All right, that's cool. What about my protons? I got 7 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:33,440 Speaker 1: some tough news there. Didn't last very long. Currently we 8 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:37,720 Speaker 1: think protons live for only a trillion trillion trillion years. 9 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,200 Speaker 1: I don't. Well, that's good. I guess even my protons 10 00:00:41,240 --> 00:01:00,639 Speaker 1: are procrastinators. They are professional protonic procrastinators. I am more 11 00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 1: handmade cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics. Hi. I'm Daniel. 12 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:07,640 Speaker 1: I'm a particle physicist, but I might one day decay 13 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 1: into something else, into a lighter Daniel or a lower 14 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: energy state. Unfortunately, I seem to be violating the laws 15 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:18,520 Speaker 1: of physics and decaying into a heavier Daniel as to 16 00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:21,240 Speaker 1: all humans. Unfortunately that seems to be the direction. But 17 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:24,080 Speaker 1: welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, 18 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 1: a production of I Heart Radio in which we take 19 00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: the universe and crack it in half and pour all 20 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:32,760 Speaker 1: those little explain eons into your brain. We take you 21 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 1: on a tour of all the amazing, the massive, the enormous, 22 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: the crazy and all the tiny, mysterious, weird quantum stuff 23 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:42,360 Speaker 1: of the universe and explain it all to you. That's right, 24 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: so it lives in your head, possibly forever. Hopefully you 25 00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 1: won't forget us. Will always be there in your brain, 26 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:50,160 Speaker 1: because we all know that once you've understood something in physics, 27 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 1: you know it forever. I have never forgotten a single 28 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 1: thing that matter where Really it's hard to unlearn. Huh No, 29 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: that's exactly the opposite of true. I'm the kind of 30 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,000 Speaker 1: person that can learn something fairly quickly and then forget 31 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 1: it fairly quickly. I guess, um, does the information decay 32 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 1: in your brain or it dissipates or I think it 33 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 1: just gets replaced by all the stuff on Twitter that 34 00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:15,119 Speaker 1: I scroll through and shoves it back out the other 35 00:02:15,160 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 1: side of my brain, pushes it out the other ear. 36 00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:20,119 Speaker 1: That's right. Information understanding decay. Yeah. We like to talk 37 00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: about science and the cosmos and the universe and everything 38 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,200 Speaker 1: in between, and including all the things that are out 39 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 1: there and all the things that are not yet out there, 40 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 1: and all the things that will not be out there 41 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:34,440 Speaker 1: in the future. That's right because everything that you wonder 42 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: about the universe are the same things that scientists wonder 43 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:40,079 Speaker 1: about the universe. Where did it come from, how did 44 00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 1: it get here? How long will it last? And how 45 00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:45,959 Speaker 1: long will you last? Yeah, so big question is how 46 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 1: long do particles stay around? Do they live forever? Or 47 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 1: at some point are they not around? That's right because 48 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,880 Speaker 1: particles are these weird, fleeting quantum objects, and I don't 49 00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:59,240 Speaker 1: always obey the same rules that you and I obey 50 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 1: that we're from earlier with that makes sense to us, 51 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:04,520 Speaker 1: and yet we are made out of them. Everything in 52 00:03:04,520 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: the universe is made out of particles. So it's essential 53 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:10,519 Speaker 1: that we understand how they work and the rules under 54 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 1: which they operate, because they might very well determine our future, 55 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:16,520 Speaker 1: even if you have to wait a trillion trillion trillion 56 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:18,800 Speaker 1: years to find out. Yeah, because we know that. You know, 57 00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:22,160 Speaker 1: as humans, we don't live forever, at least not yet. 58 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: I don't know. I've never died so far. How about you. 59 00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:30,959 Speaker 1: I think, probabilistically speaking, you are unlikely to be around 60 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: for a few years. Yeah, But it's mostly because the 61 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:37,840 Speaker 1: arrangement of our particles and our atoms at some point 62 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 1: doesn't work and it dissipates in our particles go back 63 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: into the soil and back into dust. And so I 64 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 1: think an interesting question is, like how long do your 65 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:49,560 Speaker 1: particles last? That's right? Like the particles that you're made 66 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: out of right now, are they gonna be there at 67 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 1: the end of the universe? That's right? Even if that 68 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 1: arrangement that makes you isn't around anymore. With that little 69 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 1: bit of your fingernail and that tip of your knows 70 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:03,240 Speaker 1: will it be around inside some starr and get fused 71 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,120 Speaker 1: into a piece of gold someday and get blown out 72 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 1: in a supernova and have trillions and trillions more cycles, 73 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 1: or will it only last a few more years and 74 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: decay into something totally unrecognizable? Right? Because I guess particles 75 00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:18,160 Speaker 1: come from nothing, right, Like you know, at some point 76 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:20,560 Speaker 1: there weren't any particles and then they suddenly sort of 77 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 1: popped down, And we know that particles pop into existence 78 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:26,160 Speaker 1: all the time in the vacuum, and so, but the 79 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: question is, once you form a particle, does it stay 80 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 1: around forever as a particle or do things happen to 81 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 1: it to make it disappear? Yeah, particles certainly were formed 82 00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 1: in the very early universe. We had this hot, dense state, 83 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 1: all this energy stored in the fields, and then as 84 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: the universe cooled, that energy sort of isolated into these 85 00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 1: discrete packets that we now call particles. And we'd like 86 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:49,400 Speaker 1: to play this mental game as particle physicists say, you 87 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:52,040 Speaker 1: had just one particle in the universe, what would it do? 88 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,920 Speaker 1: Would it sit there forever or would it eventually spontaneously 89 00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:58,919 Speaker 1: break into lighter particles? And so that's the game we 90 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:01,799 Speaker 1: play with electrons, and we think a single universe filled 91 00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:04,960 Speaker 1: with just one electron would stay that way forever. But 92 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: the open question is is that also true for proton 93 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:10,120 Speaker 1: So to be on the podcast will be asking the 94 00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:19,039 Speaker 1: question do protons live forever? And if so, how do 95 00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 1: they plan for their retirements? Right? Do they have professional 96 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:28,440 Speaker 1: protonic um retirement accountant? I hope they've been proactive in 97 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: saving Yeah, I hope that there is paraded. If you 98 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:36,600 Speaker 1: live forever, you would have like an infinite number of grandchildren, 99 00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:39,400 Speaker 1: which I suppose could support you in your old old age. 100 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,600 Speaker 1: There you think they still like you after an infinite 101 00:05:42,640 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 1: number of years, Great great great great great Grandpa die 102 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 1: already and give us all your stuff. Now you have 103 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: to go great trade for infinity. Nobody wants to call you. 104 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:54,720 Speaker 1: I ran at a time there. Yeah, alright, So electrons 105 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: live forever, we know that. That's like fact number one. 106 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 1: They never what does that mean? They never decayed or 107 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:04,960 Speaker 1: they never like spontaneously disappear. It's an important distinction. Like 108 00:06:05,279 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 1: an electron, you can destroy it. You throw an electron 109 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:12,159 Speaker 1: against a positron, you can turn that energy into something else. 110 00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:14,880 Speaker 1: You can turn it into a photon. Right, that kind 111 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:18,120 Speaker 1: of stuff happens. But so you can kill an electron, yes, 112 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:20,280 Speaker 1: but they just don't die on the that's right. And 113 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:22,720 Speaker 1: you know in some superhero movies that is the definition 114 00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 1: of immortal, like elves or in fantasy novels are often 115 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 1: immortal but can be killed in battle, which always confused me. 116 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: But electrons are sort of like elves. They will sit 117 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 1: around forever. Like you put an electron in its own universe, 118 00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:38,720 Speaker 1: it will just sit there forever, you know, learning how 119 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:41,880 Speaker 1: to sing valid essentially, but never turning into anything else, 120 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: or not even spontaneously like you know, some particles just 121 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:49,360 Speaker 1: they're sitting around, they can split into other particles, right, 122 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:52,920 Speaker 1: that's right. Almost every particle decays. It's only the ones 123 00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: that are the lightest ones that can turn into anything 124 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:57,719 Speaker 1: else that are sort of stuck. Those are the ones 125 00:06:57,760 --> 00:06:59,960 Speaker 1: that we call stable. So an electron is a stay 126 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,440 Speaker 1: able particle. A single electron universe will stay a single 127 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 1: electron universe basically forever. Like it can't break down into 128 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 1: something else spontaneously, or it probably won't know if it could, 129 00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:15,000 Speaker 1: it will eventually. So this is a statement about like, 130 00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:18,960 Speaker 1: not a statement about probability, but about possibility. If an 131 00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,520 Speaker 1: electron is really alone in the universe, if there's not 132 00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:24,800 Speaker 1: not even any like weird quantum positrons popping out of 133 00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 1: the vacuum to annihilate it, it will sit there forever, 134 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 1: has zero chance of decaying into anything else, because what 135 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 1: could it decay into. There is no particle lighter than 136 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,760 Speaker 1: the electron that the electron can turn into that follows 137 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: all the rules, and we'll dig into all of that. Okay, 138 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:44,360 Speaker 1: So electrons are like elves, probably l ron or electron. 139 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 1: What would be his elf name or her name? Elvin, 140 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 1: elvin name Sorrylfish elfish or Elvin. Oh man, I'm way 141 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:55,640 Speaker 1: on my depth here. So we're made out of electrons 142 00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: and also protons. Under the question is do protons live forever? 143 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:01,800 Speaker 1: That's right, and this is one of the deepest open 144 00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:05,320 Speaker 1: questions in modern physics. Does a proton sitting in the 145 00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 1: universe by itself eventually turn into something else? Or will 146 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:11,920 Speaker 1: it last forever? So that's an awesome question, and so 147 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 1: as usual, Daniel went out there and ask people on 148 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 1: the internet if they thought protons lived forever. So, as usual, 149 00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 1: before you hear these answers, think about it for a second. 150 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 1: Do you think protons live forever? Here's what people had 151 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: to say. I don't really understand what living forever means 152 00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:32,080 Speaker 1: for protons, but I do understand that they are converted 153 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:36,160 Speaker 1: into different forms. Seeing a bita plas t K where 154 00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:40,280 Speaker 1: the proton gets converted into a neutron and a positroon 155 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:44,680 Speaker 1: is released. I believe protons, if kind of like left alone, 156 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 1: just by themselves, they probably could live till the end 157 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:51,800 Speaker 1: of the eternity, till the end of the universe, unless 158 00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:57,440 Speaker 1: some external effects can either destroy them or change them 159 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:01,360 Speaker 1: like maybe you know fusion or fish, and protons can 160 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:05,080 Speaker 1: change from one to another, but they are still protos. 161 00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 1: I do not believe they live forever. I know electrons 162 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:12,079 Speaker 1: live forever because you guys covered that in a previous podcast. 163 00:09:12,679 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 1: But I believe protons can be broken down obviously, you 164 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,840 Speaker 1: guys do it as certain by smashing them and creating 165 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:24,280 Speaker 1: new particles. Intitively, I would say that, um, we know 166 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 1: that like prodom is made up of two upquarks and 167 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 1: one dunk parks. I think so that I would think 168 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:34,880 Speaker 1: that a prodom may not live forever in a form 169 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:37,800 Speaker 1: of a proto. I have no idea about this. I 170 00:09:37,840 --> 00:09:40,959 Speaker 1: would say that they probably do not live forever, because 171 00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 1: it doesn't make sense that they would not decay at 172 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:46,560 Speaker 1: some point. I would have to assume that protons don't 173 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:49,760 Speaker 1: live forever, because before the Big Bang, we think the 174 00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:54,720 Speaker 1: universe was a big, hot, dense ball of energy, and 175 00:09:54,760 --> 00:09:56,960 Speaker 1: so I would have to guess that the universe could 176 00:09:56,960 --> 00:09:59,920 Speaker 1: return to such a state. I guess that decaying all 177 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:03,440 Speaker 1: of time, and if the next holiday destination is Geneva, 178 00:10:03,480 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 1: then they really have a short time left. I don't 179 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 1: think so, alright. I feel like it's a lot of 180 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 1: confidence here in these answers. People are like no, and 181 00:10:11,880 --> 00:10:14,800 Speaker 1: some people are like yes, and some people are like 182 00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,800 Speaker 1: depends on what you mean living forever exactly. Got some 183 00:10:17,920 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: legalistic answers also, but it's fair because it's a bit 184 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 1: of a vague question, Like it's possible obviously to destroy 185 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:28,599 Speaker 1: a proton. We do it every twenty five nanoseconds the 186 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:31,840 Speaker 1: large change on collider by smashing them together. But really 187 00:10:31,880 --> 00:10:34,560 Speaker 1: the deep physics question is if you leave a proton alone, 188 00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:38,080 Speaker 1: will it decay into something else? Can you turn it 189 00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:41,200 Speaker 1: into something else? And that has deep implications for our 190 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 1: understanding of the very beginning of the universe, why our 191 00:10:43,840 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 1: universe is made out of matter, and also for like 192 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:48,800 Speaker 1: our understanding of the fundamental theory of everything, how it 193 00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:52,280 Speaker 1: all links together. It turns out proton decay is really 194 00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 1: little lynch pin for a lot of big questions. Wow, 195 00:10:55,679 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: that's a lot of stuff to hang on one simple question. 196 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:02,199 Speaker 1: It's amazing, And it turns out proton decays really really 197 00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:05,120 Speaker 1: frustrating for particle theorist. Right, So it seems like we 198 00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 1: can kill protons, but the question is do they spontaneously 199 00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 1: die at some point or breakdown or did you have 200 00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:15,199 Speaker 1: a proton does it sit around forever? So maybe, Daniel, 201 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,480 Speaker 1: let's step through it one thing at a time. First, 202 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,760 Speaker 1: of all, let's talk about particles dying in the first place, 203 00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 1: or I guess you use the term decay. That's right. 204 00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:26,360 Speaker 1: We prefer the term decay. Or you have transformed into 205 00:11:26,400 --> 00:11:29,720 Speaker 1: something else, something lighter and more femoral. We don't like 206 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:32,319 Speaker 1: to talk about them dying. We call it passing, not dying. 207 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 1: You're graduating to the next phase of your particle existence, 208 00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:39,800 Speaker 1: you're leveling up. But yes, in general, particles do like 209 00:11:39,880 --> 00:11:42,480 Speaker 1: to decay, and that's just a function of time moving 210 00:11:42,520 --> 00:11:45,520 Speaker 1: forward and entropy. You know, the same way that you 211 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 1: can't have a bunch of gas particles in the corner 212 00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 1: of a box and have them to stay there. They 213 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:53,319 Speaker 1: like to spread out because energy likes to diffuse. That 214 00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 1: increases entropy and disorder in the universe. You can't have 215 00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 1: that much energy isolated in a quantum field, so that 216 00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 1: a particle is in a really heavy state. They like 217 00:12:03,280 --> 00:12:05,760 Speaker 1: to decay down to the lowest state. They like to 218 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 1: spread that energy out. They give off a photon or 219 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: they eject another particle. They turned into multiple particles, and 220 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: they just essentially stepped down the ladder as far as 221 00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 1: they and again we're not talking about like particles disassembling 222 00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:21,240 Speaker 1: you know, like if if I build a lego in 223 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:23,160 Speaker 1: my house, you know, with my kids, it's not gonna 224 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:27,400 Speaker 1: last very long. It's kind of eventually get dissembled. We're 225 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 1: talking really about like quantum transformation, like a particle literally 226 00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:34,920 Speaker 1: like transforms into other things. Yeah, let's take an example 227 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:37,680 Speaker 1: of the muan. The muan is a heavy version of 228 00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: the electron, and the muan turns into an electron and 229 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 1: then a couple of neutrinos to satisfy some conservation laws. 230 00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:47,160 Speaker 1: But the muan doesn't last very long at all, last 231 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:50,440 Speaker 1: for micro seconds and it just turns into the electron. 232 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:53,520 Speaker 1: And as you said, it's not like the muan is 233 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 1: just the electron with a couple of neutrinos bound together, 234 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:59,080 Speaker 1: and then it breaks apart and those little internal pieces 235 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:02,160 Speaker 1: fly out. This really is like alchemy. Like the muon 236 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:05,840 Speaker 1: is an excited state of the muan field and then 237 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:09,320 Speaker 1: it transforms into an excited state of the electron field 238 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:13,040 Speaker 1: and to neutrino fields. And so that's our current understanding 239 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:16,160 Speaker 1: of how this muon decay happens. You have isolated heavy 240 00:13:16,280 --> 00:13:19,640 Speaker 1: particle turns into three lighter particles. Right, it's not a 241 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 1: rearrangement and it just it doesn't spontaneously like it's just 242 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: sitting there. A muon is just sitting there and then 243 00:13:25,800 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 1: suddenly pop, it just turns into an electron and two neutrinus. Yeah, 244 00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 1: it's one of the real quantum randomness is in our universe, 245 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:36,800 Speaker 1: Like it has a probability at any moment to decay. 246 00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 1: When an individual muan actually decays is determined by some 247 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 1: random quantum toss of the dice. If you have like 248 00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:47,120 Speaker 1: a thousand muons in a bottle, then half of them 249 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:49,640 Speaker 1: will decay after a certain time, then another half after 250 00:13:49,679 --> 00:13:53,880 Speaker 1: another certain time, etcetera. On average, but each individual one 251 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:56,079 Speaker 1: is determined by a random toss of the dice. It's 252 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 1: just like radioactive decay of a nucleus, which is exactly 253 00:13:59,280 --> 00:14:01,120 Speaker 1: the same kind of process. I see. It's not that 254 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,520 Speaker 1: it's delicate and like you know, you're stacking blocks and 255 00:14:03,559 --> 00:14:06,760 Speaker 1: then suddenly when passed by or you push a little 256 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:10,000 Speaker 1: bit and it topples over it. It's literally like you know, 257 00:14:10,120 --> 00:14:14,960 Speaker 1: in its fabric of its existence, to just spontaneously turn 258 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 1: into something else. Yeah. The picture I have in my 259 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:19,440 Speaker 1: head is that it's like you know, flipping a coin 260 00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:22,680 Speaker 1: or rolling a die, every microsecond, and if it gets 261 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: the right answer, boom, it decays, and if it doesn't, 262 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,120 Speaker 1: it sticks around it a new one for a while. Um. 263 00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: And so it's just like keeps rolling that die or 264 00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 1: picking a random number until it gets the right one 265 00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:35,320 Speaker 1: and then it decides. All right, now it's time for 266 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:38,080 Speaker 1: me to become an electron and a couple of neutrinos. Right, 267 00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,960 Speaker 1: but you're telling me that it needs to have like 268 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:43,840 Speaker 1: a path for the decay, like it has to have, 269 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:47,680 Speaker 1: you know, kind of a solution for its decay. Yeah, 270 00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:50,280 Speaker 1: you can't just turn into anything, right. A muan can't 271 00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:52,760 Speaker 1: just like say, hey, I'm going to become a photon. Cool, 272 00:14:52,840 --> 00:14:56,760 Speaker 1: that sounds like fun. The universe has rules, and these 273 00:14:56,840 --> 00:15:00,520 Speaker 1: rules determine what particles can decay into other particles. The 274 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:03,240 Speaker 1: important thing to understand about these rules is that mostly 275 00:15:03,520 --> 00:15:05,720 Speaker 1: we have no idea where they come from. They're just 276 00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:09,240 Speaker 1: like our description. It's like you watch a bunch of particles, 277 00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:12,280 Speaker 1: you see what happens. You try to notice patterns, and 278 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:15,400 Speaker 1: you codify those patterns into rules. That doesn't mean you 279 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:17,960 Speaker 1: know why that rule exists. So when we say, like, 280 00:15:18,400 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: you know, charge is conserved, doesn't mean we know why 281 00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:24,440 Speaker 1: it's conserved. It just means that we've never seen this 282 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:27,360 Speaker 1: rule broken, so we think it's a fundamental rule of 283 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:30,560 Speaker 1: the universe. And so that's one of them. Right. Why 284 00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:33,600 Speaker 1: can't a muan just turn into a photon. Well, muan 285 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,720 Speaker 1: has electric charge and a photon doesn't, so to do 286 00:15:36,760 --> 00:15:39,440 Speaker 1: that would break that rule of conserving electric charge. Right, 287 00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:41,560 Speaker 1: it has to be a decay that makes sense to 288 00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 1: the universe. Okay, it's not like a total magic like 289 00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 1: an el can just turn into a dwarf, that's right. 290 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 1: You have to like fill out a big application and 291 00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 1: submitted to the universe's lawyers and they have to check 292 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,680 Speaker 1: all the boxes and they say, all right approved. It's 293 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: more like getting a bank loan than magically transforming, all right. 294 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 1: And if there's nothing for you to decay to, like 295 00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:03,160 Speaker 1: in according to the laws of the universe, then you 296 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 1: can't decay. You're like stuck, that's right. And that's the 297 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:08,920 Speaker 1: situation with the electron. There's nothing lighter than the electron, 298 00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 1: like the muon can decay to electron because the muon 299 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:14,240 Speaker 1: is heavier than the electron. It can go down, but 300 00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:17,600 Speaker 1: to go up. It's not spontaneous decay. The electron can't 301 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 1: decay up into the muan. There's nothing for it to 302 00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:23,720 Speaker 1: go down to. It's the lightest thing on its ladder. Now, 303 00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 1: there are other lower mass particles, like a photon for example, 304 00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 1: but again an electron can't get to be a photon 305 00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:35,240 Speaker 1: because that would violate the conservation of electric charge. Okay, 306 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:37,920 Speaker 1: so then there are rules. And if there's no step 307 00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: down for you to go down to, then you're stuck. 308 00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:43,120 Speaker 1: That's right. And you know, there's another particle that's very 309 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 1: similar to the proton. It's the neutron. And the neutron 310 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 1: is almost the same as a proton. It's a slightly 311 00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:51,920 Speaker 1: different arrangement of quarks. Like the proton is made out 312 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:56,120 Speaker 1: of these smaller particles called quarks, and the proton is 313 00:16:56,160 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 1: two ups and and down. The neutron is two downs 314 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 1: and an up. Now, the neutron is slightly heavier than 315 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: the proton, a tiny bit more mass, so the neutron 316 00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 1: can turn into a proton, no problem. And it also 317 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,960 Speaker 1: shoots off an electron to conserve electric charge. So that happens. 318 00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:15,399 Speaker 1: And if you have like a neutron sitting around and 319 00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:18,760 Speaker 1: on average, after about nine hundred seconds, it will turn 320 00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:21,840 Speaker 1: into a proton. But because the proton is lighter than 321 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,879 Speaker 1: the neutron, there's nowhere for the proton to go. Because 322 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:27,359 Speaker 1: there's this weird rule we have observed that says you 323 00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 1: have to keep constant the number of cork triplets, like 324 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 1: the number of particles made out of three quarks cannot change, 325 00:17:34,840 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 1: all right, And there's kind of a rule that says 326 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:40,159 Speaker 1: that when you decayed down into something, you need like 327 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,040 Speaker 1: a force to help you do it. That's right. All 328 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 1: these decays happen through some force, right, Like when the 329 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:49,440 Speaker 1: muon decays into the electron, he uses the weak force. 330 00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:51,720 Speaker 1: What does that mean, Like like the weak force has 331 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:54,119 Speaker 1: to be involved or you actually need to like inject 332 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:56,000 Speaker 1: some weak force into it. It means that the weak 333 00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 1: force is involved. What actually happens when it decays is 334 00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:03,000 Speaker 1: that the mu and turns into immuon neutrino and a 335 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,399 Speaker 1: w boson, and that w boson then turns into an 336 00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 1: electron and a second neutrino, so it like mediates the decay. 337 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:14,200 Speaker 1: It's like every time you feel a force the wall 338 00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:17,240 Speaker 1: is pushing back on you for example, Really that's happening 339 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:21,960 Speaker 1: by the exchange of energy from photons, and so all interactions. 340 00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:24,280 Speaker 1: Every time particles talk to each other, it happens through 341 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:26,760 Speaker 1: one of the forces. Okay, so then when you decay, 342 00:18:27,160 --> 00:18:29,840 Speaker 1: you need this force to kind of like pass the 343 00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 1: energy around between the resulting bits. Yeah, exactly. And so 344 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:37,040 Speaker 1: you know, another example is a particle called the pion. 345 00:18:37,600 --> 00:18:40,320 Speaker 1: Pion is two corks, a cork and an anti cork, 346 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:43,879 Speaker 1: and this thing can turn into two photons, and that 347 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,480 Speaker 1: happens via electromagnetism. Essentially, the cork and the anti cork 348 00:18:47,520 --> 00:18:49,960 Speaker 1: and decide to annihilate each other and turn into these 349 00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:52,919 Speaker 1: two photons. And so that there's something for it to 350 00:18:53,040 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 1: turn into doesn't break any of the rules, and there's 351 00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 1: a force to make it happen. All right, So we 352 00:18:57,640 --> 00:19:00,879 Speaker 1: know that particles can decay if there's thing, you know, 353 00:19:01,040 --> 00:19:03,760 Speaker 1: less energetic that they can decay into, and if you 354 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:06,399 Speaker 1: follow the rules of the universe. So now the question 355 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:08,919 Speaker 1: is do protons de case So mostly you and I 356 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:12,600 Speaker 1: are now to protons and electrons and neutrons, and so 357 00:19:12,680 --> 00:19:15,560 Speaker 1: the question is due protons decay? So let's get into that. 358 00:19:15,840 --> 00:19:30,720 Speaker 1: But first let's take a quick break, all right, Dianiel, 359 00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:34,120 Speaker 1: we're talking about whether protons live Forever, and I feel 360 00:19:34,119 --> 00:19:37,719 Speaker 1: like that's like an eighties song or something. Do Protons 361 00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 1: Live Forever? Sounds like a heavy metal you know, hair band, 362 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:45,560 Speaker 1: sounds like a love The protons of my love will 363 00:19:45,600 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 1: be here to the end of the universe. That's probably 364 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:53,280 Speaker 1: in the next bill. There you go, Yeah, you have 365 00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 1: a rock band in your garage with other physicists. No, 366 00:19:56,119 --> 00:19:58,600 Speaker 1: definitely not, And if I did, I would not admit 367 00:19:58,680 --> 00:20:01,919 Speaker 1: it here on the podcast. How I see you do 368 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:05,640 Speaker 1: it under an alias another particle name. That's right exactly. 369 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:07,960 Speaker 1: The rock and electrons, all right, So we're all made 370 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:11,080 Speaker 1: out of electrons, protons and neutrons, and so the question 371 00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:14,600 Speaker 1: is do protons a because we know electrons cannot decay 372 00:20:14,680 --> 00:20:18,879 Speaker 1: spontaneously into someone else, but do protons decay? And so 373 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:21,680 Speaker 1: the protons are different than electrons because protons are made 374 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: out of other particles. Right, Protons are made out of quarks. 375 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:27,280 Speaker 1: So you take a proton, you look inside it, deep 376 00:20:27,320 --> 00:20:31,359 Speaker 1: inside it, and you find three particles. You find two 377 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:35,080 Speaker 1: up corks and a down cork, and that means that 378 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:36,919 Speaker 1: like it's made out of these three particles. It's just 379 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:40,119 Speaker 1: an arrangement of those particles, right, But we have this 380 00:20:40,240 --> 00:20:42,639 Speaker 1: rule in the universe that we don't understand. And this 381 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 1: rule says that there's a fixed number of these cork triplets. 382 00:20:46,720 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 1: We call this a barrion. It's just three quirks together, 383 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:51,000 Speaker 1: and you can make three qurks together and loss of 384 00:20:51,040 --> 00:20:54,080 Speaker 1: different arrangements. And for some reason, every time you have 385 00:20:54,119 --> 00:20:57,679 Speaker 1: an interaction, the number of baryons doesn't change. What do 386 00:20:57,680 --> 00:21:00,879 Speaker 1: you mean, like interactions, but corks always have and three. No, 387 00:21:01,040 --> 00:21:03,680 Speaker 1: but if you do have a triplet of quarks involved, 388 00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:06,600 Speaker 1: then you'll have the same number of triplets when you're done. So, 389 00:21:06,680 --> 00:21:10,080 Speaker 1: for example, a neutron decays to a proton. He started 390 00:21:10,119 --> 00:21:13,000 Speaker 1: with one triplet the neutron, which is an up down down, 391 00:21:13,440 --> 00:21:15,920 Speaker 1: and you ended up with one triplet the proton up 392 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:19,440 Speaker 1: up down. Like, you can't go from one barrion to 393 00:21:19,600 --> 00:21:22,600 Speaker 1: zero baryons, or from ten burrions to eight burrions. You 394 00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:24,679 Speaker 1: have to have the same number of burrions when you 395 00:21:24,720 --> 00:21:27,119 Speaker 1: start and when you finish, which is not something we 396 00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:29,960 Speaker 1: understand at all. So it's not related to threes, like 397 00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:31,520 Speaker 1: if I start with two, I have to end up 398 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:34,399 Speaker 1: with two as well. No, there's no conservation on cork pairs. 399 00:21:34,760 --> 00:21:37,679 Speaker 1: Cork triplets have this special property. If you have a 400 00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:40,000 Speaker 1: qurk triplet, you have to end up with a cork triplet. 401 00:21:40,359 --> 00:21:42,960 Speaker 1: And so, for example, when we smash protons together at 402 00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 1: the large change on collider, two protons come in. We 403 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,720 Speaker 1: destroy those two protons. We always make at least two 404 00:21:48,720 --> 00:21:53,320 Speaker 1: baryons that come out. Okay, So then neutrons, which were 405 00:21:53,359 --> 00:21:55,879 Speaker 1: also made out of those don't live forever. You're saying, 406 00:21:56,160 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 1: like a neutron, if you just leave it alone in 407 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:00,880 Speaker 1: the universe, it's gonna not be a neutron for law. 408 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:03,240 Speaker 1: That's right. It only lasts about eight hundred and eighty 409 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:05,919 Speaker 1: seconds on its own. Now, the neutrons in your body 410 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:08,639 Speaker 1: are much more stable because the environment in your body 411 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:11,399 Speaker 1: keeps them sort of stuck together. But if you had 412 00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:14,040 Speaker 1: a neutron by itself in the universe, after about eight 413 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:17,720 Speaker 1: hundred eighty seconds, it would turn into a proton and 414 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: an electron. And you notice that keeps the number of 415 00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:23,720 Speaker 1: baryons a number of cork triplets constant, because the neutron 416 00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:26,240 Speaker 1: is one and the proton is one. Oh, I see, 417 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:29,280 Speaker 1: so alright, So a neutron by itself candycy, but it 418 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: turns into a proton basically turns into a proton plus 419 00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:34,399 Speaker 1: an electron to carry off the other half of the 420 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:36,760 Speaker 1: electric charge. To follow that one rule. And so what 421 00:22:36,840 --> 00:22:39,439 Speaker 1: happens there for the neutron, like the quarks inside just 422 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:41,880 Speaker 1: kind of flipped and then it becomes something else. Yeah, 423 00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:44,720 Speaker 1: one of the down corks becomes an up cork, and 424 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:46,919 Speaker 1: it gives off a w boson, which is where you 425 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:49,719 Speaker 1: get the electron and actually a little neutrino, which is 426 00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:53,399 Speaker 1: how neutrinos were discovered. But these arrangements of quarks, like 427 00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:56,880 Speaker 1: one arrangement of quarks and up down, down, it gives 428 00:22:56,880 --> 00:23:00,240 Speaker 1: you a neutron, a different set of quarks up up, 429 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:03,680 Speaker 1: down that gives you a proton. The proton is the 430 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:06,760 Speaker 1: lowest mass arrangement of quarks, Like, there's no way to 431 00:23:06,840 --> 00:23:09,480 Speaker 1: make an arrangement of quarks that has a lower mass 432 00:23:09,480 --> 00:23:11,720 Speaker 1: in the protons. So it's sort of like the lightest 433 00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:15,000 Speaker 1: thing on the ladder of bury on. But for quark triplet, Yes, 434 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:17,240 Speaker 1: for quark, you can make something out of two quarks. 435 00:23:17,280 --> 00:23:18,639 Speaker 1: You can make something out of two quarks, like a 436 00:23:18,680 --> 00:23:21,800 Speaker 1: pion has lower mass. But the cork triplet ladder, for 437 00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:23,960 Speaker 1: some reason, it's on its own. It's like a special 438 00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:26,840 Speaker 1: thing in the universe. And if you're on that ladder, 439 00:23:26,840 --> 00:23:28,880 Speaker 1: you have to stay on that ladder, and the proton 440 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:32,120 Speaker 1: is the bottom rung of that ladder. There's no lighter 441 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:35,640 Speaker 1: arrangement of three quarks than the proton. So that's why 442 00:23:35,680 --> 00:23:38,800 Speaker 1: the proton seems to be stuck unless you can somehow 443 00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:42,399 Speaker 1: jump off this ladder. I see, it's like once he 444 00:23:42,480 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 1: has three quarks, instead of stuck having three quarts, exactly, 445 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:47,959 Speaker 1: you can do something, make a different arrangement of three quarks. 446 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:50,680 Speaker 1: You can move up or down the ladder by injecting energy. 447 00:23:50,680 --> 00:23:52,919 Speaker 1: You're waiting for it to decay. But you have to 448 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:55,199 Speaker 1: have something on the ladder. Once you have something on 449 00:23:55,240 --> 00:23:58,239 Speaker 1: the ladder. But couldn't I like, you know, split up 450 00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:01,080 Speaker 1: that triplet. Can't three quarts make up a proton just 451 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 1: like you know, when they decide to go their separate ways, 452 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,200 Speaker 1: then you destroy the proton. Basically, you can do that 453 00:24:06,320 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: if you create a larger system, right, so you like 454 00:24:09,920 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 1: involve it in some other bonds and some other configurations, 455 00:24:13,920 --> 00:24:16,800 Speaker 1: then you can destroy a proton, for example. But a 456 00:24:16,800 --> 00:24:19,840 Speaker 1: proton on its own will never decay. We think it 457 00:24:19,920 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: might be stable. We've never seen a proton jump off 458 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:26,600 Speaker 1: the ladder, and every interaction we've ever seen keeps the 459 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:29,360 Speaker 1: same number of these barrier I see. But I mean, 460 00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:31,760 Speaker 1: like can quarks exists on their own, you can't have 461 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:34,320 Speaker 1: quirks on their own. They have such a strong interaction 462 00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 1: with other corks, and the strength of that interaction gets 463 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:40,040 Speaker 1: stronger and stronger as quirks get further and further apart, 464 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:43,439 Speaker 1: which creates so much energy around them that they create 465 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:47,160 Speaker 1: particles out of the vacuum to make these pairs and triplets. 466 00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:49,480 Speaker 1: So you never see corks by themselves. They're always in 467 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:53,119 Speaker 1: these pairs or triplets or maybe in weird exotic larger 468 00:24:53,119 --> 00:24:56,760 Speaker 1: combinations tetra corks and hexa corks. But there's a special 469 00:24:56,800 --> 00:24:59,840 Speaker 1: relationship that the universe has with these triplets of quirks 470 00:24:59,880 --> 00:25:03,800 Speaker 1: that we don't understand. We've never seen a proton decay, 471 00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 1: and so we think there might be some special rule 472 00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:10,520 Speaker 1: that protects these cork triblets. On the other hand, we 473 00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:14,200 Speaker 1: have very good reason to think that protons might decay 474 00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:18,120 Speaker 1: or that they should, So it's not for certain. It's 475 00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:20,959 Speaker 1: definitely not for certain. No, it's something we don't understand 476 00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:23,239 Speaker 1: it's a core mystery at the heart of physics. All right, 477 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:27,359 Speaker 1: So you've never seen a proton spontaneously decay, and what 478 00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:29,600 Speaker 1: does that mean? Like, have we actually like put a 479 00:25:29,680 --> 00:25:31,720 Speaker 1: proton on their microscope and left it there for a 480 00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:34,520 Speaker 1: couple of hours or days or years. Yeah? Actually we 481 00:25:34,600 --> 00:25:37,399 Speaker 1: put like ten to the thirty four protons under a 482 00:25:37,400 --> 00:25:40,520 Speaker 1: microscope and we waited a few years to see if 483 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:42,199 Speaker 1: any of them decay. What do you mean, like you 484 00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:44,439 Speaker 1: actually put them in a little container and left them 485 00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:47,719 Speaker 1: there a really big container. Right. One way to do this, 486 00:25:47,800 --> 00:25:50,360 Speaker 1: one way to ask, like does a proton decay? Can 487 00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:53,040 Speaker 1: we measure it? Is to take a single proton and wait. 488 00:25:53,440 --> 00:25:55,359 Speaker 1: But if you think that a proton might take like 489 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:59,280 Speaker 1: a trillion trillion trillion years to decay, then your experiment's 490 00:25:59,280 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 1: going to take the trillion trillion trillion years. Instead, what 491 00:26:02,640 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 1: you can do is say, well, I'm gonna take a 492 00:26:04,359 --> 00:26:07,600 Speaker 1: trillion trillion trillion protons, which is not that hard to 493 00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:10,280 Speaker 1: make because every piece of matter has a lot of 494 00:26:10,280 --> 00:26:14,200 Speaker 1: protons and see if any of them decay. Because if 495 00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:16,639 Speaker 1: none of them decay within a year or two years, 496 00:26:16,920 --> 00:26:19,520 Speaker 1: then I can make a statistical argument about how long 497 00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:22,119 Speaker 1: they live. Oh, I see, So that's what you have 498 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,320 Speaker 1: in the in the large hattern collider, not in the 499 00:26:24,359 --> 00:26:26,840 Speaker 1: large hedge and collider. That's not where we study proton decay. 500 00:26:26,920 --> 00:26:30,560 Speaker 1: But in big underground experiments like super Commo Conda and 501 00:26:30,600 --> 00:26:33,600 Speaker 1: the upcoming do and experiment are perfect for looking for 502 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:36,480 Speaker 1: proton decays. All right, So you don't think that they 503 00:26:36,520 --> 00:26:38,840 Speaker 1: can decay, but do you think they might? What makes 504 00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:40,800 Speaker 1: you think they might decay? Well, the universe sort of 505 00:26:40,840 --> 00:26:44,360 Speaker 1: doesn't make sense if protons can't decay. Like, if protons 506 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:47,200 Speaker 1: could decay, the whole universe would make a lot more sense, 507 00:26:47,440 --> 00:26:49,960 Speaker 1: which makes us want them to decay, even though we've 508 00:26:49,960 --> 00:26:52,399 Speaker 1: never seen them. And the reason it is that, well, 509 00:26:52,760 --> 00:26:55,840 Speaker 1: you know, we have more baryons in the universe than 510 00:26:55,960 --> 00:26:59,119 Speaker 1: anti barions. Well, we talked about earlier how you have 511 00:26:59,160 --> 00:27:01,480 Speaker 1: to have the same umber of barrions in the universe. 512 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:05,360 Speaker 1: That's the opposite for anti berrions. Like you can actually 513 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:09,520 Speaker 1: create a burrion and anti berion together because it keeps 514 00:27:09,560 --> 00:27:12,440 Speaker 1: the number of burrions the same because anti berrions count 515 00:27:12,480 --> 00:27:15,160 Speaker 1: for minus one. And again, a barion is a triplet 516 00:27:15,160 --> 00:27:17,800 Speaker 1: of court that's right. Yeah, And so we think that 517 00:27:17,840 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 1: the universe started off with no particles, as you said, 518 00:27:20,680 --> 00:27:23,240 Speaker 1: and then particles were made, which must have made the 519 00:27:23,280 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 1: same number of burions and anti burions, but somehow we 520 00:27:26,680 --> 00:27:30,280 Speaker 1: ended up with a lot more protons than anti protons. Like, 521 00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:32,960 Speaker 1: we think there are almost no antiberians out there, so 522 00:27:33,359 --> 00:27:36,840 Speaker 1: there must be something out there which lets us either 523 00:27:37,040 --> 00:27:41,240 Speaker 1: create burions on their own or destroy anti berions preferentially. 524 00:27:41,480 --> 00:27:44,199 Speaker 1: There's something out there to explain why we have so 525 00:27:44,359 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: much more matter than anti matter. Something allows us to 526 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:50,520 Speaker 1: make these buryons. Right, But isn't it just sort of 527 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:52,840 Speaker 1: like electrons to like, you know, you can create and 528 00:27:52,920 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 1: destroy electrons. What makes us think that then electrons can't 529 00:27:56,760 --> 00:28:00,359 Speaker 1: decay but protons might be able to so, right, the 530 00:28:00,359 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 1: same argument goes for electrons that we think, you know, 531 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:07,440 Speaker 1: why do we have more electrons in the universe than positrons? Right? 532 00:28:07,480 --> 00:28:09,800 Speaker 1: This is this whole question of antimatter. But there are 533 00:28:09,800 --> 00:28:12,520 Speaker 1: other reasons that we think that protons might decay, and 534 00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:15,160 Speaker 1: that comes from like looking at the patterns of the forces. 535 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:18,679 Speaker 1: We have the electromagnetism, which is a force. We have 536 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:21,159 Speaker 1: the weak force, we have the strong force, and we 537 00:28:21,240 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 1: have gravity. And people like to try to put these together, 538 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:27,679 Speaker 1: they say, well, it's weird to have like four different 539 00:28:27,680 --> 00:28:30,880 Speaker 1: forces or five different forces. Can we fit these together 540 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:35,040 Speaker 1: into a larger pattern that has just one overarching you know, 541 00:28:35,240 --> 00:28:38,360 Speaker 1: ring to rule them all, so to force. And every 542 00:28:38,360 --> 00:28:40,160 Speaker 1: time the theorists do this, every time they put those 543 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:43,680 Speaker 1: pieces together, it always ends up predicting a new little 544 00:28:43,720 --> 00:28:46,200 Speaker 1: force that we haven't seen very much anymore, that hasn't 545 00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:49,560 Speaker 1: been around since the beginning the universe, that can decay protons, 546 00:28:49,600 --> 00:28:55,440 Speaker 1: that turns protons into a pion and a pository. What So, 547 00:28:55,720 --> 00:28:57,760 Speaker 1: when you try to, you know, kind of squish all 548 00:28:57,800 --> 00:29:00,600 Speaker 1: the forces together like you think they're radically Like if 549 00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 1: I try to come up with a like a super 550 00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 1: megaporce that includes all the other forces, you're saying, I 551 00:29:06,320 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 1: have to come up with a new fifth force. Yeah, well, 552 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 1: it's sort of like it's a part of this megaporce 553 00:29:11,680 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: that doesn't happen very much anymore. So put all these 554 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:19,000 Speaker 1: forces together into one megaphorce. And that megaphorce because it 555 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:21,920 Speaker 1: was around in the early universe, before the universe cooled 556 00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 1: and the forces broke into these different forces that we 557 00:29:24,640 --> 00:29:27,600 Speaker 1: know today, it would have treated all the particles equally 558 00:29:27,640 --> 00:29:31,480 Speaker 1: like quarks and electrons and all those stuff. And so 559 00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:34,160 Speaker 1: this force should be able to turn quirks into leptons 560 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:37,040 Speaker 1: for example, and back and forth. And currently our forces 561 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:39,000 Speaker 1: can't do that, Like, none of the forces that we 562 00:29:39,040 --> 00:29:43,239 Speaker 1: have today are capable of turning quirks into leptons. They 563 00:29:43,280 --> 00:29:47,160 Speaker 1: aren't capable of doing that. But this leftover force, there 564 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 1: might be a particle which exists in the universe but 565 00:29:50,480 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 1: requires so much energy to create that we hardly ever 566 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:56,720 Speaker 1: see it, which means it's very unlikely for it to 567 00:29:56,760 --> 00:30:00,240 Speaker 1: do anything. But it might vary occasionally every true brillion 568 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 1: trillion trillion years be responsible for the decay of a proton. 569 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 1: I see, maybe protons have this secret weakness, that this 570 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:10,640 Speaker 1: is hidden force that hasn't been around since the beginning 571 00:30:10,640 --> 00:30:13,160 Speaker 1: of time. Yeah, and maybe that's the key, right, because 572 00:30:13,400 --> 00:30:15,800 Speaker 1: every time they put one of these theories together, it 573 00:30:15,920 --> 00:30:19,120 Speaker 1: always predicts that protons will decay. It's just like a 574 00:30:19,200 --> 00:30:22,920 Speaker 1: natural consequence of making this megaphorce. It has this symmetry 575 00:30:22,960 --> 00:30:25,280 Speaker 1: where it treats the quarks and the leftons in the 576 00:30:25,360 --> 00:30:28,880 Speaker 1: same way. It always predicts this new X particle. The 577 00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:32,280 Speaker 1: X particle would take like the two up corks inside 578 00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:35,680 Speaker 1: the proton and turn them into like a positron and 579 00:30:35,720 --> 00:30:39,040 Speaker 1: a down cork, and that gives you a proton turning 580 00:30:39,040 --> 00:30:43,400 Speaker 1: into a pion and a positron. And so it's just inescapable. 581 00:30:43,560 --> 00:30:46,600 Speaker 1: And every time the theorists make one of these theories, 582 00:30:46,640 --> 00:30:50,120 Speaker 1: they're like, darn it, my theory predicts proton decay. It's 583 00:30:50,200 --> 00:30:52,960 Speaker 1: very frustrating for them that I can't escape this prediction. 584 00:30:53,800 --> 00:30:56,120 Speaker 1: I say, all right, well, let's get into how we 585 00:30:56,240 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 1: might be looking experimentally for evidence that the proton case 586 00:31:00,640 --> 00:31:03,160 Speaker 1: and when we can expect an answer. But first let's 587 00:31:03,200 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 1: take another quick break. All right, Daniel, do protons and 588 00:31:18,920 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 1: love live forever? It's the question, But I guess we're 589 00:31:22,040 --> 00:31:24,360 Speaker 1: only tackling the proton partire today. Yeah, don't come to 590 00:31:24,400 --> 00:31:27,840 Speaker 1: a particle physicist for questions about love unless it's about 591 00:31:27,880 --> 00:31:31,000 Speaker 1: love of particles. A right. So, um, there are reasons 592 00:31:31,040 --> 00:31:34,600 Speaker 1: to think maybe the proton does decay. One is that, 593 00:31:34,680 --> 00:31:37,240 Speaker 1: you know, it might explain antimatter, and the other one 594 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:39,960 Speaker 1: is that the theory set of point to maybe a 595 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 1: possible kind of new force which would allow protons to decay. 596 00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:47,240 Speaker 1: Second of the idea, Yeah, and remember this is all theoretical. 597 00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 1: This is like, we look at the way the universe 598 00:31:49,560 --> 00:31:51,880 Speaker 1: is arranged, and we think it would make more sense 599 00:31:51,920 --> 00:31:54,760 Speaker 1: if we added this one other piece, but that piece 600 00:31:55,000 --> 00:31:57,720 Speaker 1: would mean that protons should decay. So then we go 601 00:31:57,720 --> 00:31:59,800 Speaker 1: when we look for it, we said, well, maybe they do, 602 00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:02,680 Speaker 1: we just haven't noticed. Maybe it takes a long long time, 603 00:32:03,040 --> 00:32:04,840 Speaker 1: and so we just need to be really patient. Okay, 604 00:32:04,840 --> 00:32:08,600 Speaker 1: So it is that theoretically we don't think that the 605 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:13,560 Speaker 1: proton can decay, but if it does, it kind of 606 00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:15,520 Speaker 1: means the existence of a new force. Is that kind 607 00:32:15,520 --> 00:32:17,960 Speaker 1: of the significance of this decay. Yeah, so we have 608 00:32:18,040 --> 00:32:21,600 Speaker 1: to invent this rule. This number of barriyons is fixed rule, 609 00:32:21,640 --> 00:32:23,400 Speaker 1: which we don't really like because it doesn't really make 610 00:32:23,440 --> 00:32:26,720 Speaker 1: any sense and it violates our understanding of matter and 611 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:29,880 Speaker 1: antimatter asymmetry, and it keeps us from having this new 612 00:32:29,920 --> 00:32:32,120 Speaker 1: mega force, etcetera. So we'd love to get rid of 613 00:32:32,120 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 1: that and replace it with this new force and allow 614 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:37,760 Speaker 1: protons to decay. But for that to be true, we 615 00:32:37,800 --> 00:32:39,920 Speaker 1: have to actually see one decay, and we have to 616 00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:43,479 Speaker 1: prove that they can, because nobody's ever seen. So if 617 00:32:43,520 --> 00:32:45,480 Speaker 1: you see one decay, then it's like you have to 618 00:32:45,600 --> 00:32:47,760 Speaker 1: break the laws of physics. Kind yes, if you see 619 00:32:47,760 --> 00:32:50,640 Speaker 1: one decay, that's guaranteed Nobel Prize because you get to 620 00:32:50,680 --> 00:32:52,760 Speaker 1: rewrite the laws of physics in a way that makes 621 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:55,600 Speaker 1: much more sense to everybody, that like fits together with 622 00:32:55,760 --> 00:32:59,400 Speaker 1: some real symmetry and beauty. And so everybody's sort of 623 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:02,120 Speaker 1: hoping that protons will decay. I mean not your protons, 624 00:33:02,160 --> 00:33:05,440 Speaker 1: not my protons, but some proton somewhere we hope will 625 00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:07,920 Speaker 1: eventually decay. Did they already print that Nobel Prize? Like 626 00:33:08,280 --> 00:33:10,960 Speaker 1: Nobel Prize for the decay of the proton. It's just 627 00:33:10,960 --> 00:33:13,120 Speaker 1: sitting on the shelf waiting for people to claim it. 628 00:33:13,240 --> 00:33:14,920 Speaker 1: You know. It's one of those experiments out there that 629 00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:16,760 Speaker 1: if you make it work, if you see this thing, 630 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:19,920 Speaker 1: it's basically a guaranteed Nobel Prize. There are a few 631 00:33:19,960 --> 00:33:22,400 Speaker 1: things like that, you know, find the Higgs boson, see 632 00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:26,600 Speaker 1: gravitational waves, find a magnetic monopole. These things that people 633 00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:29,480 Speaker 1: have been looking for forever. They think should exist, but 634 00:33:29,600 --> 00:33:32,440 Speaker 1: nobody's ever seen one. If you found and it would 635 00:33:32,520 --> 00:33:35,280 Speaker 1: really you know, fill in a missing box in our 636 00:33:35,360 --> 00:33:37,680 Speaker 1: understanding of the universe. So yeah, go look for one. 637 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:40,560 Speaker 1: Exposed the proton get a prize. That's right, This is 638 00:33:40,600 --> 00:33:43,440 Speaker 1: particle is ten most wanted list, right, So then there 639 00:33:43,440 --> 00:33:45,760 Speaker 1: are a couple of experiments out there that are actually 640 00:33:45,920 --> 00:33:48,160 Speaker 1: trying to win this Nobel prize. They're trying to see 641 00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:51,720 Speaker 1: if protons decay and and so what's involved here, Daniel? 642 00:33:51,760 --> 00:33:53,400 Speaker 1: Are they just put a bunch in a box and 643 00:33:53,400 --> 00:33:55,840 Speaker 1: then stare at them or or do you shake it? 644 00:33:55,880 --> 00:33:57,320 Speaker 1: Do you shake the box? What do you have to do? 645 00:33:58,040 --> 00:34:00,280 Speaker 1: He's trying not to shake the box. And in fact, 646 00:34:00,320 --> 00:34:02,920 Speaker 1: you know, you can play a sort of simple calculation 647 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:06,360 Speaker 1: with any blob of protons like you. You know, you, 648 00:34:06,480 --> 00:34:09,960 Speaker 1: for example, have like ten to the twenty eight protons, 649 00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:14,160 Speaker 1: something like a trillion quadrillion protons in your body, so 650 00:34:14,640 --> 00:34:17,920 Speaker 1: you know already that protons lived for more than, you know, 651 00:34:18,000 --> 00:34:20,080 Speaker 1: a hundred years, because people don't tend to die of 652 00:34:20,160 --> 00:34:23,600 Speaker 1: proton decay, you know, like people just like suddenly disintegrate, 653 00:34:23,640 --> 00:34:26,400 Speaker 1: like Thanos snapping his thumbs. But also, I mean you 654 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:28,839 Speaker 1: said that the protons in my body are kind of 655 00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:31,600 Speaker 1: bound together with other protons and neutrons, and that helps 656 00:34:31,680 --> 00:34:34,719 Speaker 1: him live longer. Yeah, but unfortunately that's the only kind 657 00:34:34,719 --> 00:34:36,879 Speaker 1: of proton we can really study like, we can't take 658 00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:40,359 Speaker 1: pure individual free protons and study them on their own. 659 00:34:40,719 --> 00:34:43,200 Speaker 1: All we can do is study protons that exist in matter, 660 00:34:43,239 --> 00:34:45,720 Speaker 1: which are in bound states. And so that's a big 661 00:34:45,960 --> 00:34:48,440 Speaker 1: asterisk on all of the results that we're going to 662 00:34:48,520 --> 00:34:51,760 Speaker 1: talk about today that none of them actually involves studying 663 00:34:51,840 --> 00:34:54,640 Speaker 1: free protons. Okay, So then stepping through, what are these 664 00:34:54,680 --> 00:34:57,280 Speaker 1: experiments and what are they doing? Well, the most powerful 665 00:34:57,320 --> 00:34:59,280 Speaker 1: result right now, the one that tells us the most 666 00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:02,520 Speaker 1: about proton decay, comes from this experiment in Japan. It's 667 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:06,880 Speaker 1: super Commoo Conda, and they basically have a thirteen story 668 00:35:07,080 --> 00:35:10,640 Speaker 1: stack of water and it's just a huge container filled 669 00:35:10,680 --> 00:35:14,520 Speaker 1: with water, and it's surrounded by cameras essentially, and it's 670 00:35:14,560 --> 00:35:17,640 Speaker 1: totally dark and it's underground. And this is an experiment 671 00:35:17,640 --> 00:35:20,680 Speaker 1: that's mostly designed to look for neutrinos coming from the 672 00:35:20,719 --> 00:35:24,120 Speaker 1: Sun or coming from deep space or from supernovas, but 673 00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:27,799 Speaker 1: it's also good for looking for proton decay because if 674 00:35:27,960 --> 00:35:31,560 Speaker 1: proton decays in this tank, they think they will see it. Oh, 675 00:35:31,600 --> 00:35:34,200 Speaker 1: I see so, but it's filled with water. I guess 676 00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:38,120 Speaker 1: water has hydrogen oxygen, and those all have protons and 677 00:35:38,200 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 1: they have something like ten to the thirty two protons 678 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:44,799 Speaker 1: basically sitting in the tank, and so if none of 679 00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:47,440 Speaker 1: them decay in a year, then you know that the 680 00:35:47,520 --> 00:35:50,319 Speaker 1: half life of the proton is more than ten to 681 00:35:50,400 --> 00:35:53,600 Speaker 1: the thirty two years. But these are not isolated protons. 682 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:56,480 Speaker 1: They're in these bound states within the atoms. That doesn't 683 00:35:56,480 --> 00:35:58,879 Speaker 1: that protect them, it does protect them potentially. And so 684 00:35:59,160 --> 00:36:00,719 Speaker 1: as we were saying early here, like this is a 685 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:03,960 Speaker 1: big asterisk in all of these results. We would love 686 00:36:04,320 --> 00:36:07,360 Speaker 1: to have ten to the thirty two free protons in 687 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:09,600 Speaker 1: the container that we could study and then we could 688 00:36:09,680 --> 00:36:13,080 Speaker 1: directly understand this question. But we don't all the protons 689 00:36:13,120 --> 00:36:16,240 Speaker 1: we have our inbound states, and we don't have ionized 690 00:36:16,280 --> 00:36:19,760 Speaker 1: hydrogen gas in large enough containers that we build cameras around, 691 00:36:20,160 --> 00:36:21,960 Speaker 1: and so we just have to sort of like make 692 00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:25,040 Speaker 1: the measurement on bound protons and assume that it also 693 00:36:25,120 --> 00:36:27,840 Speaker 1: works for free protons. But it's a big assumption, but 694 00:36:27,880 --> 00:36:30,600 Speaker 1: it's also all we can do currently. All right, So, 695 00:36:31,000 --> 00:36:35,880 Speaker 1: staring at water, what expery went you make? Particle physics 696 00:36:35,880 --> 00:36:41,960 Speaker 1: sounds so exciting. I mean, look for variations and the 697 00:36:42,000 --> 00:36:46,800 Speaker 1: loss of physics in violations of symmetry of matter and 698 00:36:46,840 --> 00:36:49,880 Speaker 1: antimatter otherwise known as staring at water. If it happened, 699 00:36:49,880 --> 00:36:51,840 Speaker 1: it would be kind of dramatic because you would have 700 00:36:51,960 --> 00:36:55,239 Speaker 1: this special signature because you would get a pion on 701 00:36:55,239 --> 00:36:58,000 Speaker 1: one side, which turns into two photons. You get these 702 00:36:58,160 --> 00:37:01,120 Speaker 1: two little splashes in your camera, and on the other 703 00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:03,880 Speaker 1: side you would get a positron, which makes a little splash. 704 00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:06,799 Speaker 1: So they've simulated exactly what this would look like in 705 00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:09,640 Speaker 1: their cameras and it's very weird and unusual and different 706 00:37:09,680 --> 00:37:12,480 Speaker 1: from anything they've ever seen before. And so they've been 707 00:37:12,560 --> 00:37:14,560 Speaker 1: running this thing for years and years and years and 708 00:37:14,600 --> 00:37:17,600 Speaker 1: they've never seen a single one, and so that means 709 00:37:17,600 --> 00:37:20,840 Speaker 1: that they can pretty confidently say that the lifetime of 710 00:37:20,840 --> 00:37:24,920 Speaker 1: the proton is more than ten to the thirty four years, 711 00:37:25,400 --> 00:37:29,200 Speaker 1: which is a huge number because remember the universe, the 712 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:34,200 Speaker 1: entire universe is only thirteen billion years old, so like, 713 00:37:34,480 --> 00:37:37,720 Speaker 1: this is many orders of magnitude longer than the history 714 00:37:37,800 --> 00:37:41,360 Speaker 1: of the universal But again, these are in bound states, 715 00:37:41,680 --> 00:37:43,600 Speaker 1: or do you calibrate for that as well? These are 716 00:37:43,640 --> 00:37:45,920 Speaker 1: in bound states. No, we can't really calibrate for that. 717 00:37:45,960 --> 00:37:49,799 Speaker 1: We don't really know how to extrapolate from bound state 718 00:37:49,880 --> 00:37:53,399 Speaker 1: protons to unbound protons to free protons. We just sort 719 00:37:53,440 --> 00:37:56,160 Speaker 1: of like assume it's going to be something similar. Okay, 720 00:37:56,200 --> 00:37:59,800 Speaker 1: So then that's one experiment. The super Cameo super co 721 00:38:00,000 --> 00:38:04,400 Speaker 1: Neo Conda Conda all right, sounds like superhero or something. 722 00:38:05,080 --> 00:38:08,240 Speaker 1: Is an awesome experiment in Japan, and then we're building 723 00:38:08,280 --> 00:38:10,239 Speaker 1: one here in the United States that we talked about 724 00:38:10,280 --> 00:38:15,080 Speaker 1: on a recent episode called Dune Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. 725 00:38:15,600 --> 00:38:19,360 Speaker 1: And these neutrino experiments essentially for free, you get a 726 00:38:19,400 --> 00:38:22,400 Speaker 1: proton decay experiment because the same thing they can be 727 00:38:22,480 --> 00:38:24,920 Speaker 1: used to look for neutrinos in Dune's case from a 728 00:38:24,920 --> 00:38:28,879 Speaker 1: neutrino beam or from the Sun or from supernovas, can 729 00:38:28,960 --> 00:38:32,160 Speaker 1: also look for decays of protons. And this is kind 730 00:38:32,160 --> 00:38:33,920 Speaker 1: of a similar idea to write, like you have a 731 00:38:33,960 --> 00:38:37,360 Speaker 1: big vat of stuff and you wait for it to change. Yeah, exactly. 732 00:38:37,560 --> 00:38:39,440 Speaker 1: And in the case of Dune is not water, it's 733 00:38:39,520 --> 00:38:43,279 Speaker 1: liquid argone. They're pioneering a new technology to take this 734 00:38:43,560 --> 00:38:46,520 Speaker 1: noble gas argone and they cool it down until it's 735 00:38:46,520 --> 00:38:48,600 Speaker 1: a liquid, but it has the same property that it's 736 00:38:48,719 --> 00:38:52,080 Speaker 1: very quiet. So mostly if you have a huge several 737 00:38:52,239 --> 00:38:56,200 Speaker 1: ton container of liquid argone underground and you put cameras 738 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:58,480 Speaker 1: on it, it'll stay dark. But if you see an 739 00:38:58,480 --> 00:39:01,680 Speaker 1: interaction like a new trino or or a proton decaying, 740 00:39:01,960 --> 00:39:04,080 Speaker 1: you should be able to spot that, because it's like 741 00:39:04,120 --> 00:39:07,000 Speaker 1: taking a picture of a single tiny flash of light 742 00:39:07,040 --> 00:39:09,839 Speaker 1: in a very dark room. Since it's camera can pick 743 00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:12,160 Speaker 1: that up. Cool, and so far they haven't seen it. 744 00:39:12,480 --> 00:39:15,440 Speaker 1: But again, this one is also you're looking at argons, 745 00:39:15,440 --> 00:39:18,240 Speaker 1: so you're looking at protons in a bound state inside 746 00:39:18,239 --> 00:39:20,120 Speaker 1: of the nucleus of the argon at them. That's right, 747 00:39:20,120 --> 00:39:22,520 Speaker 1: But hey, that's all we can do. Dune hasn't turned 748 00:39:22,560 --> 00:39:24,680 Speaker 1: on yet. They're still building it. It's gonna be turning 749 00:39:24,680 --> 00:39:27,239 Speaker 1: on in a few years. But because it's a much 750 00:39:27,440 --> 00:39:30,720 Speaker 1: larger volume, they have many more tons. It will provide 751 00:39:30,760 --> 00:39:33,960 Speaker 1: even more stringent limits on the lifetime of the proton. 752 00:39:34,320 --> 00:39:37,760 Speaker 1: Or maybe they'll get lucky, maybe they'll see one decay. 753 00:39:37,800 --> 00:39:40,120 Speaker 1: But I guess, why can't you just like isolate a 754 00:39:40,120 --> 00:39:41,920 Speaker 1: proton and look at it. Is that hard? I mean, 755 00:39:41,960 --> 00:39:43,759 Speaker 1: you guys do it at the large hattern collider. Yeah, 756 00:39:43,760 --> 00:39:45,680 Speaker 1: you can isolate a proton and you can look at it, 757 00:39:46,000 --> 00:39:48,799 Speaker 1: But a single proton will not tell you much about 758 00:39:48,800 --> 00:39:50,879 Speaker 1: the lifetime of the proton unless you wait a very 759 00:39:50,960 --> 00:39:53,600 Speaker 1: very long time. So you either need a lot of 760 00:39:53,640 --> 00:39:56,960 Speaker 1: protons or a lot of time, and a lot of 761 00:39:57,000 --> 00:40:00,239 Speaker 1: protons are very hard to keep isolated. I mean, could 762 00:40:00,239 --> 00:40:03,360 Speaker 1: have a gas of protons. We do that the hydrunk glider, 763 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:05,360 Speaker 1: but you know we have like tend of the twelve 764 00:40:05,400 --> 00:40:08,799 Speaker 1: protons tend to thirteen protons. You need to keep these 765 00:40:08,800 --> 00:40:11,759 Speaker 1: things isolated. You need to watch them and then you 766 00:40:11,800 --> 00:40:13,640 Speaker 1: need to instrument it, right, You need to be watching 767 00:40:13,640 --> 00:40:16,440 Speaker 1: for them to decay. And so that's much easier to 768 00:40:16,480 --> 00:40:19,360 Speaker 1: do when you have a neutral substance, something which is quiet, 769 00:40:19,400 --> 00:40:22,160 Speaker 1: which doesn't otherwise make lots of flashes of light. Oh, 770 00:40:22,280 --> 00:40:24,200 Speaker 1: I see, it's like you can isolate a whole bunch 771 00:40:24,239 --> 00:40:26,520 Speaker 1: of protons, but then you actually have to notice if 772 00:40:26,640 --> 00:40:29,040 Speaker 1: like one of them the kids. Yeah, because a bunch 773 00:40:29,080 --> 00:40:31,760 Speaker 1: of protons together, it's called the plasma, and a plasma 774 00:40:31,800 --> 00:40:34,040 Speaker 1: is not a quiet thing to instrument, right, That's like 775 00:40:34,239 --> 00:40:36,239 Speaker 1: where we try to do fusion and stuff like that. 776 00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:38,440 Speaker 1: So it's a pretty trick the experiment to do for 777 00:40:38,600 --> 00:40:41,640 Speaker 1: actual free protons, which is why we only ever do 778 00:40:41,719 --> 00:40:44,120 Speaker 1: it for protons in a bound state. But you're right 779 00:40:44,320 --> 00:40:47,440 Speaker 1: that doesn't actually tell us about free proton. All right, 780 00:40:47,480 --> 00:40:49,960 Speaker 1: So there are people looking for this decay of the proton. 781 00:40:50,040 --> 00:40:53,759 Speaker 1: Then there's people staring at water and argon waiting for 782 00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:57,640 Speaker 1: one of these protons to suddenly die. That's right, staring 783 00:40:57,640 --> 00:41:01,560 Speaker 1: at water waiting for a Nobel prize to about out 784 00:41:01,560 --> 00:41:04,200 Speaker 1: of a little tiny proton. Hey, if I told you 785 00:41:04,400 --> 00:41:06,640 Speaker 1: stare at this tank, a Nobel prize might appear. You know, 786 00:41:06,680 --> 00:41:08,600 Speaker 1: you might devote a couple of years to that. Yeah, 787 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:11,840 Speaker 1: shorter than a PhD. A couple of trillion years, why not? 788 00:41:13,360 --> 00:41:17,320 Speaker 1: Or you might not see anything. Unfortunately, that's usually the 789 00:41:17,360 --> 00:41:20,480 Speaker 1: case in particle physics. You're looking for something crazy. You're 790 00:41:20,480 --> 00:41:23,560 Speaker 1: hoping you might see something spectacular, but you see nothing. 791 00:41:23,880 --> 00:41:26,120 Speaker 1: But the good news is that most of our experiments 792 00:41:26,160 --> 00:41:29,080 Speaker 1: are still interesting even if you don't see anything, because 793 00:41:29,120 --> 00:41:31,760 Speaker 1: you can still say something. You can say, we didn't 794 00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:35,520 Speaker 1: see the proton decay. Therefore we know it doesn't decay 795 00:41:35,640 --> 00:41:38,080 Speaker 1: on average in less than tend of the thirty four 796 00:41:38,200 --> 00:41:40,640 Speaker 1: tend of the thirty five years. So you still get 797 00:41:40,680 --> 00:41:43,960 Speaker 1: to say something interesting about physics. Alright. So it sounds 798 00:41:43,960 --> 00:41:46,239 Speaker 1: like you're pretty confident then that we can say that 799 00:41:46,280 --> 00:41:49,799 Speaker 1: the proton does not decay or won't die, or we'll 800 00:41:49,800 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 1: live for at least ten to the thirty four years, 801 00:41:53,360 --> 00:41:56,440 Speaker 1: which is pretty much forever, right, it's almost forever. I mean, 802 00:41:56,440 --> 00:41:59,320 Speaker 1: it's a lot longer than our universe has been around 803 00:41:59,360 --> 00:42:02,440 Speaker 1: so far. But it's also still a real problem for 804 00:42:02,600 --> 00:42:07,160 Speaker 1: theoretical physicists when they try to construct their grain unified theories, 805 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:09,640 Speaker 1: their theories of everything, when they want to understand what 806 00:42:09,840 --> 00:42:12,600 Speaker 1: happened to the very beginning of the universe, they have 807 00:42:12,719 --> 00:42:15,000 Speaker 1: to do it in a way that keeps the proton 808 00:42:15,120 --> 00:42:19,000 Speaker 1: from decaying, and that's theoretically very tricky. It's like, you know, 809 00:42:19,040 --> 00:42:20,840 Speaker 1: they have to pass through the eye of a needle 810 00:42:21,080 --> 00:42:23,799 Speaker 1: to keep the proton from decaying in their theory. And 811 00:42:23,880 --> 00:42:27,200 Speaker 1: so everybody would be very happy to see a proton decay, oh, 812 00:42:27,280 --> 00:42:30,000 Speaker 1: I see, because it would make the equations easier to solve. 813 00:42:30,080 --> 00:42:32,920 Speaker 1: It would mean that all the theories which predict proton 814 00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:36,040 Speaker 1: decay might actually be correct. And those equations are beautiful 815 00:42:36,360 --> 00:42:38,160 Speaker 1: and they make a lot of sense, and they answer 816 00:42:38,200 --> 00:42:41,040 Speaker 1: a lot of other questions about like matter and antimatter 817 00:42:41,120 --> 00:42:45,040 Speaker 1: and the forces being unified. But those equations can't be 818 00:42:45,160 --> 00:42:47,920 Speaker 1: right if the proton doesn't decay. If the proton doesn't decay, 819 00:42:48,160 --> 00:42:51,120 Speaker 1: those equations are just wrong, even though they're beautiful and 820 00:42:51,160 --> 00:42:53,719 Speaker 1: they're simple and they're attractive. So then we need to 821 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:57,520 Speaker 1: find some other way to solve those problems. And theoretically 822 00:42:57,560 --> 00:43:00,480 Speaker 1: that's just much harder without proton decay. So it's not 823 00:43:00,520 --> 00:43:02,839 Speaker 1: just a whole bunch of physicists looking staring at water. 824 00:43:03,080 --> 00:43:07,720 Speaker 1: You're staring at water waiting for the proton to die, hoping, hoping. 825 00:43:07,840 --> 00:43:10,000 Speaker 1: You're hoping for the proteon to die here. That's right, 826 00:43:10,200 --> 00:43:12,439 Speaker 1: that's the big twist. You thought we would be rooting 827 00:43:12,480 --> 00:43:16,480 Speaker 1: for the proteon to lift forever, but instead we're anti protons. 828 00:43:19,120 --> 00:43:22,040 Speaker 1: You're like, just die already. We're cheering on its demise 829 00:43:22,480 --> 00:43:25,120 Speaker 1: to retire and win my noble pride. That's right. Somebody 830 00:43:25,120 --> 00:43:28,040 Speaker 1: in a very future universe will finally see a proton 831 00:43:28,080 --> 00:43:31,120 Speaker 1: decay in a trillion trillion trillion years. I hope they're 832 00:43:31,120 --> 00:43:33,720 Speaker 1: still giving out Nobel prizes. Then I hope our protons 833 00:43:33,760 --> 00:43:37,560 Speaker 1: are still around. All right. Well, we hope you enjoyed 834 00:43:37,600 --> 00:43:39,680 Speaker 1: that and got a little bit of a sense of 835 00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:42,120 Speaker 1: how long things live in the universe. Apparently, some things do, 836 00:43:42,200 --> 00:43:45,120 Speaker 1: some things don't, and it's amazing the cosmic importance of 837 00:43:45,200 --> 00:43:48,840 Speaker 1: one little proton, a single proton in a vat of 838 00:43:48,920 --> 00:43:52,160 Speaker 1: water in Japan, decaying could crack open the answer to 839 00:43:52,200 --> 00:43:55,279 Speaker 1: these deep mysteries about the beginning of our universe, the 840 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:59,200 Speaker 1: balance between matter and antimatter, how everything fits together. It's 841 00:43:59,200 --> 00:44:02,200 Speaker 1: incredibly import And then it just really highlights the connection 842 00:44:02,239 --> 00:44:06,640 Speaker 1: between particle physics and cosmology and astrophysics, and really, particle 843 00:44:06,680 --> 00:44:09,080 Speaker 1: physics is basically the whole universe. That's what I'm saying. 844 00:44:09,640 --> 00:44:12,799 Speaker 1: She's saying, give us more money. We're studying everything that's right. 845 00:44:12,920 --> 00:44:16,000 Speaker 1: That's what everything I say translates to effectively. All right, Well, 846 00:44:16,000 --> 00:44:17,800 Speaker 1: I hope that give you some stuff to think about. 847 00:44:18,040 --> 00:44:21,520 Speaker 1: The protons in your body and the electrons might live forever, 848 00:44:21,600 --> 00:44:24,879 Speaker 1: but particle physicists are hoping they don't see you next time. 849 00:44:32,880 --> 00:44:35,680 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and Jorge Explain 850 00:44:35,760 --> 00:44:38,719 Speaker 1: the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio. Or 851 00:44:38,800 --> 00:44:41,719 Speaker 1: more podcast from my Heart Radio, visit the I Heart 852 00:44:41,800 --> 00:44:45,399 Speaker 1: Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your 853 00:44:45,440 --> 00:44:51,879 Speaker 1: favorite shows. Yea