Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Channon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being one of those. Write down are
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, it's eight hundred nine to four
Speaker 1: one Sean if you'd like to join us. You know,
Speaker 1: it is amazing, but it is as predictable as the
Speaker 1: day is long. And that is the Left and their
Speaker 1: craziness and then their insanity, and how predictable it all is. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I don't know what that is. I think the TV
Speaker 1: was on. Sorry about that anyway. So if you look
Speaker 1: at what we now have the Atlantic and let me
Speaker 1: let me be very clear, let me start at the beginning,
Speaker 1: and I think that Caroline Levitt made the proper distinction.
Speaker 1: And the president we expected in an hour is going
Speaker 1: to have a press conference, will bring that information to
Speaker 1: you live, and I'm sure I'll have something to add
Speaker 1: add to it. There is a difference between sensitive information
Speaker 1: versus classified information. The warnings of potential attacks, for example,
Speaker 1: against countries in the region where the hoodies are were
Speaker 1: made publicly by the President and were pretty well known
Speaker 1: to all that this was a strong likelihood. None of
Speaker 1: this should be a surprise to anybody. Now. With that said,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to disagree and say that it wasn't unfortunate,
Speaker 1: because it was unfortunate, and it was obviously inadvertent the
Speaker 1: error to have accidentally included or somehow included a reporter,
Speaker 1: especially Jeffrey Goldberg, who nobody in their right mind and
Speaker 1: this administration would ever be talking to or wouldever put
Speaker 1: on a text chain about anything that is sensitive. And
Speaker 1: as reported, steps have already been taken to prevent this
Speaker 1: from ever happening in the future. And the distinction between
Speaker 1: sensitive and top secret classification information is very critical because
Speaker 1: we're dealing with sensitive information. The administration has reiterated no
Speaker 1: classified material was discussed, and more importantly, the mission was
Speaker 1: operation racially a complete success. Pete Hegseth just put up
Speaker 1: on X So let me get this straight. The Atlantic
Speaker 1: release the so called war plans, and those plans include
Speaker 1: no names, no targets, no locations, no units, no routes,
Speaker 1: no sources, no methods, and no classified information. Those are
Speaker 1: some real pretty adam schiffee war plans, which I thought
Speaker 1: was a pretty good response. And intelligence professionals, I guess,
Speaker 1: if they really want to, they can debate whether it
Speaker 1: would quote be classified, but nobody would disagree that it
Speaker 1: is sensitive and should be released to the public. At
Speaker 1: the Pentagon, it's called controlled unclassified information that you normally
Speaker 1: don't release to the public. Okay, Lesson learned. But this
Speaker 1: was seemingly a one off. And this is where the
Speaker 1: distinction and the difference comes in. And you know, in
Speaker 1: my analysis really needs to be put in perspective here
Speaker 1: because it is frustrating to me when you look at
Speaker 1: the democratic part. By the way, Mark Penn had an
Speaker 1: interesting take. I have no idea where he got this from.
Speaker 1: He believes the chance that this was done by an
Speaker 1: operative looking to embarrass the administration is about ninety percent.
Speaker 1: I'd love to talk to him about that, because I
Speaker 1: don't even know how somebody could possibly, you know, somehow
Speaker 1: get to get into a text message like that. The
Speaker 1: weird thing is is Mike Wallas, you know, took full
Speaker 1: ownership of it yesterday when he was on with l
Speaker 1: Laura Ingram, And he has no idea. He said he
Speaker 1: never spoke to this guy in his life. And CIA
Speaker 1: Director Ratcliffe testified that signal messaging that app is authorized
Speaker 1: for government use and was on his government phone when
Speaker 1: he became CIA director. And anyway, now, there's a lot
Speaker 1: to unpack here and a lot to get to in
Speaker 1: all of this. But the Democrats now represent a party
Speaker 1: that is been radicalized. They are definitely the crazy party
Speaker 1: versus the common sense agenda of Donald Trump. And they
Speaker 1: were Republicans, That's who they are. They're the party of
Speaker 1: you know, unhinged anger and resentment and intolerance and hatred
Speaker 1: for all things Trump, all things Elon Musk, and for
Speaker 1: all things anyone who dares to disagree with their radical worldview.
Speaker 1: As we've been pointing out, they're the party that now
Speaker 1: is putting the rights of illegal immigrants, even trendy Aragua
Speaker 1: gang members, over your safety and security. They're the party
Speaker 1: that is now championing the right of men to play
Speaker 1: in women's sports. They are the party that claims it's
Speaker 1: a constitutional crisis. If you identify hundreds of billions of
Speaker 1: dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse spent internationally on their
Speaker 1: radical Green New Deal, dei ism, wokeism and transgenderism and
Speaker 1: LGBTQ plus issues. This is money abroad. While the average
Speaker 1: America makes sixty six grand a year in the average
Speaker 1: you know, we now have. I've thirty seven trillion in
Speaker 1: debt headed to forty trillion because we're still living under
Speaker 1: the Biden Harris budget and they're not working to improve
Speaker 1: the life of America. They're obsessed. They want to go
Speaker 1: from one political lawfare smear campaign to another, even though
Speaker 1: now President Trump is in office. They want to use
Speaker 1: the courts and judicial activism as a means of thwarting
Speaker 1: the will of the American people and the agenda the
Speaker 1: President Trump has laid out the mandate he was given
Speaker 1: by the American people. And after this high level White
Speaker 1: House text exchange about strikes and Yemen, again, I make
Speaker 1: the distinction. I think it's sensitive information. Yeah, I would
Speaker 1: say it's a one off. But here's the point about this.
Speaker 1: And you can see, you know, everybody's now gone back.
Speaker 1: They revert to form and they go to what they
Speaker 1: know best. They ran a campaign on Hitler Stalin Mussolini
Speaker 1: a Nazi, fascist and racist. It didn't get him over
Speaker 1: the finish line, didn't even come close. Donald Trump wins
Speaker 1: all seven swing states, he wins the popular vote, and
Speaker 1: they're a party now that has created a circular firing squad.
Speaker 1: And now the seeming leaders of the party, the yard,
Speaker 1: Jasmine Crockett and AOC and Bernie Sanders, and that's pretty
Speaker 1: much who they are. And everyone bows at the altar.
Speaker 1: And if you don't think there's group think, I'll just
Speaker 1: go back to the joint session again. You don't stand
Speaker 1: for women, for mothers that lost their daughters. You don't
Speaker 1: stand for a young man to beat cancer. You don't
Speaker 1: stand for the first lady. You don't stand for a
Speaker 1: young woman who lost her hero husband who was in
Speaker 1: law enforcement. You don't stand for a young man who
Speaker 1: lost his father that it gets announced that he just
Speaker 1: got a commission to West Point. And you don't stand
Speaker 1: for the President of the United States. And in unison
Speaker 1: they pull out their Bingo cards and hold up signs
Speaker 1: as a means of showing quote resistance and acting like
Speaker 1: a bunch of Petel children that don't get their own way.
Speaker 1: But according to the Director of National Intelligence and everybody
Speaker 1: that has examined the text exchange, you know, there was
Speaker 1: no classified information that was shared. And then you've got
Speaker 1: to go back to Pete hegsa's you know, posting about this,
Speaker 1: and I think is exactly right. You know, the Atlantic
Speaker 1: releases war plans and those plans didn't include names, targets, locations, units, routes, sources, methods,
Speaker 1: and no classified information. Okay, so you know, yes, it
Speaker 1: shouldn't have happened, but it's a one off. It's not institutionalized. Now,
Speaker 1: let's make a comparison, and I think this is very important,
Speaker 1: and that is most Democrats and most members of the
Speaker 1: legacy media mob. And remember I proclaimed that they are
Speaker 1: dead after November fifth, because they threw everything, combined rats,
Speaker 1: legacy media through everything they had at Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: they were not able to beat him. They took him
Speaker 1: to court, they tried to put him in jail, They
Speaker 1: used lawfare, weaponization at a level this country has never
Speaker 1: seen before. None of it worked. The American people saw
Speaker 1: through this. So it's not it's pretty predictable that this
Speaker 1: is the only thing they know, because the only alternative
Speaker 1: would be a course correction and introspection and an analysis
Speaker 1: of how they were so out of touch with the
Speaker 1: American people and their egos couldn't handle such self reflection,
Speaker 1: you know, so they feigned more you know, phony moral
Speaker 1: superiority and outrage. And we know it's not the case.
Speaker 1: National security was not a top concern for the Democrats
Speaker 1: and the Democratic Party in the last number of years.
Speaker 1: They had no problem when Joe Biden created what was
Speaker 1: the biggest preventable national security crisis in our history. And
Speaker 1: that's when he opened the floodgates at our southern border.
Speaker 1: That's when he allowed in known terrorists, murderers, rapists, criminals,
Speaker 1: gang members, cartel members, and millions of other unvetted Biden
Speaker 1: Harris illegals. That is the biggest national security breach. We're
Speaker 1: just beginning the process of trying to clean up that mess,
Speaker 1: and I don't know if we're ever going to be
Speaker 1: fully successful. How do you identify all of these millions
Speaker 1: of unvetted Biden harrisy illegals. So this is the same
Speaker 1: Democratic radical party that's been more radicalized. This is the
Speaker 1: same legacy media mob that are pretending to care about
Speaker 1: national security breaches. They were the exact same people that
Speaker 1: combined flat out lied to you the American people, day
Speaker 1: in and day out for four years, and they told
Speaker 1: you that your border was secure and that you're border
Speaker 1: was closed. And meanwhile Fox and a few of us
Speaker 1: on the radio were telling you the truth and showing
Speaker 1: you the videos that contradicted every lie that they were telling.
Speaker 1: They also lied about Joe's obvious cognitive decline. That would
Speaker 1: be a national security problem. If the president of our
Speaker 1: country is in steep, significant cognitive decline, and he was,
Speaker 1: that represents a clear and present danger to national security.
Speaker 1: The radical left in Congress and the Senate, the radical
Speaker 1: left in the legacy media are the same people that
Speaker 1: didn't care because they all knew Joe was slipping. They
Speaker 1: all knew that he was in decline. They all hit it.
Speaker 1: They all knew our borders were wide open, they all
Speaker 1: knew that no vetting was taking place. They never covered it.
Speaker 1: They hit it up, you know. And remember why why
Speaker 1: didn't Robert hr charge Joe Biden with a crime? Because
Speaker 1: Joe was an elderly man with a very poor memory,
Speaker 1: unfit for trial. So if he's unfit for trial, that
Speaker 1: kind of means he's unfit for office. And Democrats they
Speaker 1: didn't care. The media didn't care. They weren't concerned about
Speaker 1: his disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in the horrific
Speaker 1: deaths of thirteen US service members, you know, and all
Speaker 1: of these refugees that also came out of Afghanistan. They
Speaker 1: didn't care about the billions of dollars in military equipment
Speaker 1: that Joe left behind because of his hasty exit from Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: and that weaponry went to the Taliban, the very same
Speaker 1: group that helped facilitate nine to eleven. Don't forget that
Speaker 1: he abandoned Bagram Air Base, which likely will end up
Speaker 1: if we don't do something about it, in the hands
Speaker 1: of China. And don't forget it. I brought this up yesterday,
Speaker 1: General Millie. He's one of the ones that got preemptive pardons,
Speaker 1: along with Liz Chaining and Kinzinger Kinzinger, whatever his name
Speaker 1: is and the congenital liar Adam Schiff. Well so too
Speaker 1: did the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and that
Speaker 1: is General Milly. And he was the one, if you
Speaker 1: go back to you know, promised and this was covered
Speaker 1: by the Washington Post. He promised this Chinese counterpart of
Speaker 1: heads up if the US plan to launch an attack.
Speaker 1: If we're going to attack, I'm going to call you,
Speaker 1: he said to his counterpart ahead of time. It's not
Speaker 1: going to be a surprise. Now that would be a
Speaker 1: huge scandal in a Trump administration. But the media mob,
Speaker 1: the Democratic party. They didn't care. They didn't care when
Speaker 1: he demanded that if there's ever any nuclear launch under
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, this was in the Woodword book, I believe
Speaker 1: it would have to go through him. And he pledged,
Speaker 1: he had these people involved in that command chain pledge
Speaker 1: allegiance to him. No wonder he needed a preemptive pardon,
Speaker 1: just like the Biden family syndicate. So what I'm telling
Speaker 1: telling you is they don't really care about what was
Speaker 1: an honest, one off mistake. Nobody's not acknowledging that there
Speaker 1: wasn't a mistake here. Mike Walls took ownership of it.
Speaker 1: But the outrage from the left over this incident is
Speaker 1: just a political show, and it's designed to distract the
Speaker 1: country from their incessant, petulant performance art and never ending
Speaker 1: in fighting and a battle for the soul of that party,
Speaker 1: which the left is going to win. They just want
Speaker 1: to smear Trump and take whatever political scalp they might
Speaker 1: be able to get out of this. And Republicans now
Speaker 1: have learned a valuable lesson fight back, and they're fighting
Speaker 1: back now. This hysteria, I promise you, is going to
Speaker 1: burn out on its own. They will move on to
Speaker 1: the next baseless smear. You know they will. You know
Speaker 1: they if they cared about national security, they would have
Speaker 1: spoken up about our borders. They would have spoken up
Speaker 1: about Joe's cognitive decline. They don't give a damn. And
Speaker 1: for them just using this as a political weapon to
Speaker 1: bludgeon Donald Trump and to try to hurt him and
Speaker 1: his national security team, they've already taken ownership of it.
Speaker 1: It really is just an unfortunate mistake on their part,
Speaker 1: and I doubt it's one that's going to be repeated.
Speaker 1: And if it is repeated, then anybody responsible will be
Speaker 1: held accountable. That would be my prediction. All right, twenty
Speaker 1: five now till the top of the hour. We expect
Speaker 1: the President to be speaking. At the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: I expect that he will address the signal issue. I
Speaker 1: think he's doing a press conference at the White House.
Speaker 1: Don't forget our Tesla contest. It's on Hannity dot com.
Speaker 1: You can register every day, once a day by going
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com and entering the word of the day.
Speaker 1: Today's word of the day would be constitution And you
Speaker 1: can register once a day every day, As I said,
Speaker 1: using the word of the day and then on April
Speaker 1: the eleventh, the contest will end and we will pick
Speaker 1: a winner, and the winner we'll get to pick the
Speaker 1: tesla of their choice that I will be buying for
Speaker 1: one lucky winner, which I'm excited to do. Listen, when
Speaker 1: it comes to firearms, everyone knows I believe in our
Speaker 1: Second Amendment. I believe in the right to self defense
Speaker 1: for you and your family. I urge all of you
Speaker 1: do your research, always put safety first, you do your training.
Speaker 1: Sig Sour is the world's leading manufacturer of firearms, optics,
Speaker 1: ammunition suppressors. It is one of the most respected training
Speaker 1: facilities in the entire industry. It's called the sig Sour Academy. Now.
Speaker 1: Sig Sour firearms are proudly made right here in the
Speaker 1: USA by American workers. Big Sour products are trusted by
Speaker 1: the US Military, countless law enforcement agencies, millions of Americans,
Speaker 1: and by our allies around the world. Why because of
Speaker 1: their un match quality and reliability. For example, their P
Speaker 1: three twenties are the official side arms of all branches
Speaker 1: of the US military, and that's currently in use by
Speaker 1: our forces at home and around the world, all in
Speaker 1: defense of freedom. You're going to love their firearms and
Speaker 1: I have the P three to twenty. It's a great firearm. Anyway,
Speaker 1: go to six hour today. I'm sorry six hour dot
Speaker 1: com today and find the dealer nearest you as we're
Speaker 1: going to the break. I just told you, I just
Speaker 1: saw this. The Trump hating anti deportation judge James Boseburg
Speaker 1: has now been picked to preside over a lawsuit on
Speaker 1: the leak signal chat ar plans after a lawsuit was
Speaker 1: brought by some leftist activist group anyway quote. Government watchdog
Speaker 1: group American Oversight filed the lawsuit earlier today, alleging that
Speaker 1: Pete Hegseth and others violated federal records laws by discussing
Speaker 1: the Houti attack plans in a signal group chat. The
Speaker 1: contest has been randomly signed to Boseburg, who serves on
Speaker 1: the US District Court for DC. I hope this now
Speaker 1: becomes the impetus for Republicans who now stand up and
Speaker 1: say these district court judges should not have the authority
Speaker 1: to thwart the Trump agenda. More than any other president,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is having the courts attacking them left, right,
Speaker 1: and sideways, all in an attempt to prevent Trump from
Speaker 1: implementing the agenda that the American people elected him to implement,
Speaker 1: and he has the constitutional authority and mandate to do so.
Speaker 1: But these liberal activist judges keep going. Now, Mike Johnson
Speaker 1: has threatened to eliminate US district courts after the judges
Speaker 1: try to hijack Trump's presidency. We do have the authority
Speaker 1: over the federal courts, as you know, we can eliminate
Speaker 1: the entire district court. We have the power of funding
Speaker 1: over the courts, and all these other things, Johnson said yesterday.
Speaker 1: But despite times, desperate times like these call for desperate measures,
Speaker 1: and Congress is going to act. Congress has eliminated courts
Speaker 1: in the past. In nineteen thirteen, for example, Congress abolished
Speaker 1: the Commerce Court and its judges were redistributed to the
Speaker 1: Federal Appeals Court, according to Congress dot gov. In nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty two, Congress passed legislation abolishing the Article three Court
Speaker 1: of Claims and the US Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
Speaker 1: And the House Judiciary Committee chairman who we had on
Speaker 1: this week, Jim Jordan, plans to hold a hearing on
Speaker 1: these district judges next week and he's speaking with GOP
Speaker 1: appropriators about what he called legislative remedies. We've got money
Speaker 1: spending appropriations process to help to address some of this
Speaker 1: without adding further detail. So we'll wait, watch and see
Speaker 1: what the Republicans and the Congress do. One interesting development
Speaker 1: I saw today the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in
Speaker 1: the past have been regarded as the most liberal in
Speaker 1: the US. Although Trump did get to replace one or
Speaker 1: two judges on that court, delivered an unexpected win for
Speaker 1: the Trump administration. A three judge panel there blocked a
Speaker 1: Seattle District court order that aimed to force the Trump
Speaker 1: administration to restart refugee admissions. I mean, this is what
Speaker 1: the left is now fighting for. They want to keep
Speaker 1: trendy Aragua gang members in our country, and now they
Speaker 1: want to fight for more open borders and stop Donald
Speaker 1: Trump from securing the borders, which is his constitutional duty.
Speaker 1: And these appeals, by the way, and justinews dot com
Speaker 1: at a good article on this, are just piling up
Speaker 1: for the Supreme Court. So I've got a hope and
Speaker 1: wonder that when John Roberts said, which was very you
Speaker 1: know it was it was not even solicited. But when
Speaker 1: he said, well, that's what appeals courts are for. When
Speaker 1: Donald when the people were talking about possibly impeaching judges
Speaker 1: at as a result of this judicial misconduct and judicial
Speaker 1: activism the Trump administration. This latest legal showdown with Boseburg,
Speaker 1: which is the chief judge of the Federal District Court
Speaker 1: of DC over the deportation of Venezuelan gang members, He's
Speaker 1: the idiot that said, yeah, if they're in the plane,
Speaker 1: now have them turn the plane around and bring them home.
Speaker 1: I mean little, you know, does anybody not read Supreme
Speaker 1: Court precedent, Because there was that nineteen forty eight decision
Speaker 1: that came out for prior presidents had used the Alien
Speaker 1: Enemies Act as a means of deporting people from this
Speaker 1: country and it was upheld by the UF Supreme Court
Speaker 1: as lawful. And in that decision they were very specific
Speaker 1: in saying that once a president makes that decision, it
Speaker 1: is not subject to judicial review. Bill Barr lasting the
Speaker 1: judges for usurping Donald Trump's national security authority on these
Speaker 1: deportation flights. He said, there's a pattern whereby the these
Speaker 1: district court judges are trying to assert the responsibility of
Speaker 1: the president in the national security arena. He went on
Speaker 1: to say, the President is absolutely right to be frustrated
Speaker 1: and concerned about the way the courts are handling this,
Speaker 1: and he's right. I mean, there's no other way to
Speaker 1: put it, because the Constitution gives the president the power
Speaker 1: to make judgments about how we deal with foreign nationals
Speaker 1: and when we're animated by national security concerns, it's not
Speaker 1: his call. It's not a district court judges call. It
Speaker 1: is that simple. Just turn the planes around and then
Speaker 1: of course it goes to the d C Circuit Court
Speaker 1: or the DC Appeals Court. Nazis got better treatment under
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemies Act. I mean that was the Obama judge,
Speaker 1: and that happened on Monday this week. It just the
Speaker 1: madness never ends. I mean, it's a disgusting claim that
Speaker 1: Nazis got better treatment than deported Venezuelans, most of which
Speaker 1: were pretty certain have ties to Trende Arragua. Know. Greg
Speaker 1: Jarrett had a calumn. Today. Trump is now president, but
Speaker 1: dangerous Lawfair is still raging against him, and he's referring
Speaker 1: to the Nazi's got better treatment under the Alien Enemy
Speaker 1: Act than has happened here. I mean, that is Judge
Speaker 1: Patricia Millet was appointed by Obama and appears to have
Speaker 1: fully embrace this tactic of the left. Never miss an
Speaker 1: opportunity to use the word Nazi. You know it used
Speaker 1: to be. You don't use Nazi analogies, you just don't
Speaker 1: because of the horror of the Holocaust. That word is
Speaker 1: thrown around by the left in this country as if
Speaker 1: it's meaningless. No, it has deep meaning, profound meaning in life.
Speaker 1: And yet oh, this is Nazi like. Everything's Nazi like, fascist, racist.
Speaker 1: But anyway, it was not an accident, and probably the
Speaker 1: disguise potential weakness and or reasoning that members of a
Speaker 1: violent Venezuelan gang do not have an absolute right to
Speaker 1: do process had this act had been upheld by the
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court, and you know, yeah, it's an old law.
Speaker 1: But again, the last president that I know that used
Speaker 1: it was Harry Truman, and that's when the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: case came in. Instead of precedent, I would think that
Speaker 1: John Roberts, would you know, as Supreme Court Chief Justice,
Speaker 1: believe in court precedents. They ask every single person that's
Speaker 1: up for the Supreme Court that question, do you believe
Speaker 1: in precedents? Yes, they all do. I've given a long
Speaker 1: list of President Trump over three trillion dollars. Everyone's squeamish
Speaker 1: about President Trump and his threats of tariffs. Well after
Speaker 1: meeting the United with President Trump, the United Arab Emirates
Speaker 1: announced one point four trillion dollars in investments in the US.
Speaker 1: Trump also plans to sign a one trillion dollar investment
Speaker 1: deal with Saudi Arabia. That's on top of every other company, Nissan, Honda,
Speaker 1: the Taiwanese chipcum that's on top of Apple five hundred
Speaker 1: billion dollars. It is now like probably getting close to
Speaker 1: four trillion dollars. India is now rethinking their tariffs in
Speaker 1: light of the April second deadline that President Trump pledged
Speaker 1: to implement reciprocal tariffs. Our friends in India don't want
Speaker 1: to be tariffed back. And just like the European Union,
Speaker 1: just like Canada, you know, our so called friendly nation,
Speaker 1: they tariff us to death and we just haven't done
Speaker 1: anything about it. My hope is is that we have
Speaker 1: free and fair trade. My hope is also that the
Speaker 1: United States of America does not get taken advantage of
Speaker 1: by countries that claim to be allies of ours. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump also signed an executive order requiring people to provide
Speaker 1: proof of American citizenship when they register to vote, demanding
Speaker 1: that all ballots be reviewed by election day. That order
Speaker 1: requires government issued proof of US citizenship on its voter
Speaker 1: registration forms. That would direct the Attorney General to enter
Speaker 1: the information share enter into information sharing agreements with state
Speaker 1: election officials who identify cases of election fraud or other
Speaker 1: election violations. Why would anybody be against this? Why are
Speaker 1: Democrats against voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
Speaker 1: updated voter rolls, partisan observers watching the vote voting all
Speaker 1: day and the vote counting all night. Why would anybody
Speaker 1: be against any of that? By the way, Vice President
Speaker 1: Vance is headed to Greenland. That's going to be pretty interesting,
Speaker 1: I think with the way that's going to play out,
Speaker 1: and the press would characterize it as, oh, the people
Speaker 1: of Greenland don't want to be pressured. They haven't been
Speaker 1: treated particularly well by Denmark. And if the president comes
Speaker 1: in with a better offer, a significantly better offer, why
Speaker 1: wouldn't the people of Greenland look at that offer? It
Speaker 1: might make every person and in Greenland rich. I mean
Speaker 1: they have about fifty four thousand people, They have a
Speaker 1: lot of natural resources that are not being tapped into.
Speaker 1: By the way, the National Institutes for Health continues to
Speaker 1: fund more than a billion dollars in diversity equity inclusion programs,
Speaker 1: even after the President ordered federal agencies to eliminate them.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that be illegal if I did it, or you
Speaker 1: did it, or anybody listening to mean right now did it.
Speaker 1: As part of the President's plan to get reckless spending
Speaker 1: under control, the Social Security now has been spending weeks
Speaker 1: cleaning out all this bad data that the President mentioned
Speaker 1: and is Joint Session speech. I mean the fact that
Speaker 1: you have all these millions of cases where Social Security
Speaker 1: number holders were over the age of one twenty. We
Speaker 1: don't know if any of we haven't confirmed that any
Speaker 1: of them are getting payments or their relatives are getting payments.
Speaker 1: But you would think for crying out loud. The Trump
Speaker 1: administration now is moving to freeze tens of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars in federal family planning grants to certain organizations while
Speaker 1: they investigate whether the money was used for diversity efforts.
Speaker 1: According to People, Planned Parenthood affiliates were set to get
Speaker 1: about one hundred and twenty million dollars this year. Why
Speaker 1: are we giving money to an organizations who seemingly you
Speaker 1: know they would take they would dispute this well, why
Speaker 1: why should taxpayers that don't share the view on being
Speaker 1: pro choice be funding organizations that are known in large
Speaker 1: part for being abortion providers. By the way, the Democrat
Speaker 1: that railed against the domestic terrorism, Democrats who railed against
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism, why are they silent as Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: floating a twenty year jail sentence for Tesla vandals and
Speaker 1: Pam Bondi is saying that they're going to get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it, as is cash pattel that is
Speaker 1: called domestic terrorism. I saw a congresswoman to leave other
Speaker 1: House Democrats they would not condemn acts of terror on
Speaker 1: these Tesla dealerships. Why not anyway? To Leeb, who claimed
Speaker 1: in an ex post that Musk is an unelected billionaire
Speaker 1: who's dismantling our democracy, on Tuesday, refused to answer a
Speaker 1: question from The Daily Caller and a reporter about whether
Speaker 1: or not she condemns these recent acts of vandalism at
Speaker 1: Tesla dealerships, instead asking him are they paying you well?
Speaker 1: Because I believe you should be paid a fair wage.
Speaker 1: What's so hard? I mean? Democrats. All they want to
Speaker 1: talk about is January six five years later, January sixth.
Speaker 1: They ignored the summer of twenty twenty five hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy four riots. Why can't they condemn shooting bullets into
Speaker 1: Tesla dealerships. Why can't they condemn firebombing Tesla vehicles. Why
Speaker 1: can't they condemn what's happening at Tesla true charging stations.
Speaker 1: Why why can't they condemn the assassination threats against Elon Musk?
Speaker 1: Why is that so hard for them? You know? Why
Speaker 1: is it that the left there are many radicals on
Speaker 1: the left. I'm not saying elected democrats, but radicals, leftists.
Speaker 1: Why have they embraced this Luigi Mangioni guy that assassinated
Speaker 1: the United Healthcare CEO. Why does the radical left, you know,
Speaker 1: seemingly embrace the rights of trendy or ragua over your safety?
Speaker 1: You know, why did the radical lefts a quiet well
Speaker 1: known terrorists, murderers, rapist cartel members, gang members were allowed
Speaker 1: into our country? You know? Why is the radical left
Speaker 1: seemingly okay with the reckless rhetoric of Jasmine Crockett. By
Speaker 1: the way, it's not working for them. I mean, the
Speaker 1: last three polls showed twenty a twenty percent approval for
Speaker 1: Democrats in Congress. They're failing and it's just not working.
Speaker 1: Sixty four percent of voters back Trump's plan to deport
Speaker 1: Venezuelan gang members, and Trump did yanks secret Service protection
Speaker 1: for Biden's open borders are Alejandro majorcas he doesn't deserve it.
Speaker 1: And the Trump administration moved to and federally subsidized housing
Speaker 1: for illegal immigrants. The President's moving at the speed of light.
Speaker 1: All of these things are getting fixed. If he's successful,
Speaker 1: it will be the most transformational presidency and consequential one
Speaker 1: in our lifetime. But the left wing Democrats, they are
Speaker 1: losing their mind. There's a House Republican move to censor
Speaker 1: Yasmin Crockett. We'll watch that closely, all right, We expect
Speaker 1: the president in the next hour. We'll monitor that. We'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls if he's not speaking eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one Sean. If you want to give us
Speaker 1: a buzz, and don't forget our Tesla giveaway, just go
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot Com. Today's word of the day. Constitution