WEBVTT - Mark and Dylan LeClair Talk Bitcoin Risk and The Big Picture

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark Ma Show,

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>where we're talking about the decentralized revolution, the way the

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>world's changing through our eyes, and of course we're trying

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to navigate this, and we're trying to navigate it um

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>not to survive this, but to profit from it. And

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>so I like to look at it, you know, from

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a news perspective, to change the way we look some

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of the headlines, we can see what's changing, and of

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>course bring to you some exciting guests, and that's what

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we have today. I have on with me a returning guest,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Leclair. He is a macro strategist. He is a

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst at the bitcoin magazine Pro and he is uh,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he's young, but he's years ahead of his age. This

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>kid is so smart. I love talking to him, and

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we cover a lot of ground. We're talking the big

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>macro picture, what's happening in the global macro, what's happening

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed, FED policy, liquid in the financial system.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>We talk about the potential risks of Japan them moving

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>up their yell curve control, which shows are potentially flinching.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Then we dive down into risk assets. We take a

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoin, we look at big potential risk with

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gray scale bitcoin trust, the tether situation, so and so

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>much more. Let's go ahead and just jump right in

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>with Dylan. All right, Dylan, here we go. Long overdue.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had you once on the show. I'm excited to

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have you back against so much stuff to discuss. Uh. So,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thanks for taking the time. Yeah, thanks

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for having me on Mark, it's going to connect again.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw each other in Los Angeles a couple of

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>months back, and uh, certainly a lot of a lot

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of transpired since then, so we got some stuff to

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>catch up on. It makes our jobs easier when there's

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>actually stuff to talk about, right. Um, I started making

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>content for bitcoin and twenty sixteen then I made crypto content.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I I'm not really ashamed to admit I did for

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a while twenty nineteen I kind of just got off

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that and just went back to bitcoin only. But I remember, um,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen like there was just nothing to talk about,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Like there was nothing going on, like in the depths

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bear market. Uh, this bear market has been fireworks.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty to talk about. Um, I want to talk

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about Let's let's start like macro macro and then let's

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like dive down into that. So let's start

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with the big macro picture, which it seems like regardless

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>of what any on chain data or technical analysis or

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>even fundamental analysis tells us, it seems like the macro

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pictures in charge. And when I say the macro, like

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, the FED. So let's let's start there. Um,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the Fed. You know, obviously they started

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they said they were going to raise rates. Well, first

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they said they weren't even thinking about thinking about Then

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they said they weren't gonna raise rates for four years.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Then they said, okay, we're gonna start raising rates in November,

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and risk assets have just continued to sell off. They've

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>raised rates at the fastest and most aggressive rate in history. Um.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems like they're about to break something, which Powell

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>said he's happy to break something because they can rebuild it. Um,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>which kind of shows what they're doing. UM. I tend

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of take them at their word. They're not

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>really trying to surprise the markets, are trying to really

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of project what they're doing. What's your view on

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this whole macro picture of what's going on? And kind

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>of where rat in the cycle have they? Have they

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>given us ultimate pain? Are we still got more pain

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to go? Yeah? I mean that's the that's a trillion

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar question. Uh. I I kind of ultimately believe that

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>there is more pain to go in this macrocycle into three.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't know the specifics obviously, Um. You know,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>equity bear markets, bear markets and financial assets in general

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>are characterized by you know, face ripping reversal rallies. But

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I really think that higher for longer is the reality.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>H and and everybody trying to front run you know,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this pivot, especially equity investors. Right, the more that financial

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>conditions loosen across the board, uh, the more rooms paradoxically,

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the more that people buy the dip and

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the more that people chase uh chase stocks here, that

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the more room it actually gives the FED to tighten

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the belt more. Um. And so we kind of see

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this play out, uh and kind of this uh this

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>uh like jigsaw pattern throughout two where you know, think

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it too bearish and then and then it reverses, Volatility

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>comes back in and Pala goes Nope, guys like just

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>pack it up, go home. Um. So I don't necessarily

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think that, like you know, UM, three thousand on the

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>SNP is going to happen tomorrow. But I do think

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that most of the of the kind of the repricing

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and global assets and in global financial markets was due

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to the discount rate rising rapidly obviously UM, and that

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was because of FED tightening, but also bond investors realizing, Okay,

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>if inflation, if we're out of this disinflationary regime and

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially entering a new one, what's what's this new cost

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of capital? How should I be you know, pricing the

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>discount rate ten years out, thirty years out. And so

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the SNP at four thousand, there's

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the equity risk premium if you look at say,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big word, but if you look at

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just say you know, because investing is relative, right, so

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.119
<v Speaker 1>if you look at bonds compared to equities, it's actually

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of paradoxically it's equities are more expensive here than

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they were at the beginning of two relative to bond markets.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's something that investors should keep

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in mind, UM, just so they're not surprised if we

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do see some more downside, because I I still think

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that until said otherwise, Right, the FED pivot is kind

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of this more and more so buzzword than anything, and

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a pivot is actually going to require some real pain

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to be felt an employment, housing, and more seven financial

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and financial markets. So that last piece that you said there,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's going to require more pain in the economy,

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the housing markets, etcetera. So, but you started out by

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that the stocks going up give the FED room

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>more room to tighten, and so it seems to me

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that the FED doesn't really care about your stocks. They

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>don't care about your house, they don't care about your retirement.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>They actually want to bring those downs, are trying to

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>crush demand. What they do probably care about is obviously

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>liquidity in the banking system. Uh, they care about the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe the economy unemployment, that's one of their dual mandates. Right, So, Um,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think stocks being high actually gives them room

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to tighten or do they not care about that and

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>really they're looking at again the employment and like bank

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>liquidity or do you see it more holistically? Yeah, I

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think that just you know, a lot of investors, um

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of haven't maybe not haven't realized but there was

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a regime change in May two, right where

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>for the past few decades investors were were rewarded with

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>buying the dip, and the FED and global central banks

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>could really inject an unlimited amount of liquidity and and uh,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't show up in consumer price inflation. Obviously. We

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we you know, saw cp I at forty year highs,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and the FED came out and said, all right, well,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we really got to get this lower. Um. You know,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation low inflation is one of our core mandates. And

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we see that not just in the FED, but the

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>euro Zone, the Bank of Japan, etcetera. Right, So, um,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>what that means? And they literally are telling you this,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>They say, we want employment unemployment higher. Right. So, so

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>even though it's part of their dual mandate, Um, they're

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they're honestly really like embarking on a on a mission

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to reverse engineer the wealth effect, lower assets, uh and

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>also higher unemployment to crush that demand. Like you said.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't think that job is finished. I

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>think inflation, uh is is stickier than a lot of

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>people expect, despite uh, you know, kind of the reversal

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in the year over year prince, we've seen over the

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>last five or six months, it's still a lot higher

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>than the two percent mandate, which is arbitrary. Yes, but

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these things, like core CPI is a lot

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>stickier than I think a lot of investors expect um.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So for that reason, I think that you know, we're

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>still in a tightening cycle. Until I said otherwise, And

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the history of of of FED pivots,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't pivot until things get bad, and actually things

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>often get worse after the pivot. So so we'll we'll

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>see here. But I think, uh, you know, for for

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the bulls that are chasing here, uh, they might be

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit blindsided by you know, macro conditionings, liquidity

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and real like economic data, not financial assets getting worse

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in so we'll see how that stands. Yeah, I mean,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously of us have a crystal ball and and and

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I constantly referenced the insanity that we all have to

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>sit around and try to read some guy's mind to

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>understand what's gonna happen with our money. I mean, it's

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just the stupidest thing in the world, but it's the

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the world that we have write the game. What

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>will what what's our fate? Let's all listen to Jerome Pal.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I I often liken it to, uh the insanity I'm

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in southern California, but the insanity of the uh punk

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>satani Phil or whatever. Right the groundhog, like if he

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>comes out and sees his own shadow, like spring goes

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>longer or whatever, and like everyone watches the groundhog and

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like that's kind of like we're all watching like

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Pal. Uh, but it is what it is, right,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we so we kind of have to navigate that.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, it seems like Jerome pal tries to be

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>very clear, like, hey, there's more pain ahead, pain pain, pain. Uh.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He finishes to me, He's like, hey, guys, you're not

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to me, like the stock markets rallying, but like

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you there's more pain, right, And it almost

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like, um, the markets are calling his bluff, like

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we get it. We get it, you're serious, and we

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>get it. You're committed to sticking with it, and we

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>get it. There's pain, and we get it. You're gonna

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We understand it, and we believe you, and we believe

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that you believe it. But we also see the constraint

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to run up against, and so we're

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>betting that we can hold on longer than you can

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>hang on. Maybe the markets are saying something like that.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think maybe there's like this little chicken and

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>egg or not a chick game of chicken going on

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>where the markets are like, Okay, we get it, we

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>get it, but we bet you the banking system the

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>quity is going to dry up before um that happens.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think it's just the people are stupid

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're just trying to buy the dip? Uh? Yeah,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think, um, you know, a big driver,

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a big driver, and equity markets is often just price

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>agnostic passive flows. Right. It's not actually like astute active

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>investors making you know, uh, really advanced financial decisions. It's

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>just pensions for owen Case, plowing money uh into broad

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>based equity and bond in disease. Right. And then and

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't even know what they're buying at what price.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't care right there, investing for the long term,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and often that's why you see like the severe dislocations um,

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>whether over the short term or or the long term. Right.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, active managers on the margin, whether

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's long, short, etcetera. Right, kind of have to clean

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>up this mess. But sometimes the tail lacks a dog.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So I do think there's excess liquidity still in the

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>banking system. Right, there's still two trillion dollars in the

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>reverse repo just parked. They're getting four four and a

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>half percent yield, right, So until that draws down meaningfully,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know there is excess liquidity in the banking system

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>at the very least um. But yeah, I think that.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Powell, he's literally said right like, there was

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this one I think it was a month or two

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>back when when uh someone incorrectly during the fom CN

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>beting said hey, bond and equity markets are rallying, and

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a lie, right, and Powell like almost like

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>shook his head like cheese and came out like super

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>aggressively hawkish and was like guys, listen up, like and

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was like, oh wow, he's just like he's serious.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think over the long term, right, everybody knows, Mark,

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you talked about it a lot. I talked about it

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. These debt dynamics, right, federal debt to GDP,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>global debt to GDP at you know three, these things

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are unsustainable and the only way out is financial oppression.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Monetary debasement, right, a sustained period of inflation higher than

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Um so so titaning can't be the game forever.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think to get there right, the pendulum almost

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>has a swing to the far extreme of Oh wow,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the easing is a must. And I don't

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're there yet. So is it a game of

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of of tea leaves and reading this magic ball? Yes? Right,

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately or fortunately that's the game. You know, we're

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>all we're all playing, Yeah, and and and again. I

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>take him at his word. I believe the FED tries

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to project out what they're doing. So he said in

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>November twenty one that they're gonna start raising rates. He

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't start raising rates until what March of so like

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they give you this long wide time frame. Now again

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he said we wouldn't raise rates for four years. He

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>did in two years. Now they're saying they're gonna keep

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>rates really high. But things change. But I think when

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>he said that would rather break things because we can

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>rebuild them. I think you have to take that part

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty seriously. And so to your point, there's a lot

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity in the system. He's prepared to see a break.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, and again this is just my whatever, my

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>opinion for what it's worth nothing, but I think that

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>probably this year we see it get worse faster than

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>he expects, and things do break, and then they need

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>jerk reaction and blow it back sky high again. UM,

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see, um if we go, If we go,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess even a little bit further. Although the FED

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of driving that, I know, UM big news.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like also I mean talking about like liquidity

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in the system, Japan being one of the largest holders

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of treasuries, UM has been selling treasuries right there, they're

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they're Japan is basically just like f t X right

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if you if you, if you look at it, like

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>a small microcosm like ft X, created a token and

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a thin air their ft T token. UM. Nobody really

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to buy the f t T token, but they

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>manipulated the market so it made it look like there

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was values, so people bought it. When nobody wanted to

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>hold the token anymore, they started dumping the f t

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>T token, and so then Japan then f t X

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was forced to try to prop it up by it,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're selling whatever asse is they could to prop

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>up the token, but it didn't matter. Nobody wanted to NFL.

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at that and then look at Japan,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Japan is the same thing, right, Japan is a as

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a yend token. Uh, nobody wants the end token. They

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the market to think it has value. Now they're

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>stuck selling treasuries to try to prop up the end token. UM.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But like it's just the only a matter of time, right,

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>And I think the big thing that I want to

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about was the yield curve control.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So what seems to kind of catch me about this

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>story is so for people that don't really understand, is

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that Japan basically manipulates their bond market to kind of

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>artificially peg the rates. And the thing that catches my

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>eyes that they had to change the rate they're pegging at.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like I've always said that pegs are

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>meant to be broken. Traders are always going to go

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>after the peg. George Soros got famously rich in today

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from breaking the you know, the peg and the Bank

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of England UM and once they've given once, the traders

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>are kind of like, Okay, now we know you're gonna

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>give in. Does that kind of open up the floodgates?

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think was that like you flinched first, now

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna lose kind of sign Yeah, I think

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly adjusting that policy rate, Uh, you know, kind of

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>a roads the credibility um and you know, people argue

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>back and forth whether central banks have any credibility left.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they, you know, somewhat they do, right and

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>given that right that the Bank of Japan has a

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars at their disposal. Yeah, so somewhat of an

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>FDx type situation, but they have all quite a big

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>war chest to keep this game going right now. Um

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of think I I like to explain

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>yield curve control, quantity of using like these kind of

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>big terms that that seem very complex. Um like quantity

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of using right is printing a fixed amount of money

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and buying bonds at any price. Right. Yield curve control

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is printing potentially an unlimited amount of money to keep

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the bonds at a fixed price. Right, so goes lower

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>than this price, it goes higher than this yield Right,

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because bond prices and yields are inverse of each other.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So if it if it goes above twenty five basis points,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which they switch to fifty basis points zero point five,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>will print any amount of money to keep this ten

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>year yield at this rate. And they have to do

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this why, because they're debt to GDP is the worst

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I believe it's right. So some mathematically

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to erode their real debt burdens. And how

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are they going to do that, Well, they need to

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>let inflation ramp, and they need to keep their bond

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>yields pinned, because otherwise the sovereign, the Japanese government goes

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>goes belly up essentially, right. So so speculators all over

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the market are saying, all right, well, if you're gonna

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>print this money, we're just gonna short the end. We're

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just gonna short the en and and and get dollars.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And so the Bank of Japan comes in uh and

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and and really to kind of stem this speculate the

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>speculators they sell a bunch of sell a bunch of dollars,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and button by the end. Right, So it's almost a

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>circular logic in a way, right, because they're printing en

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy their bonds and then they're selling selling dollars

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy the end, right, so they can keep this

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>game going for a while because they are one of

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest holders of treasuries. But eventually, right, the

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>speculators who are both shorting the bonds and the end

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are gonna, you know, maybe not break the Bank of

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Japan because they're you know, quite the titan in the market,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna, you know, they're gonna burn through that

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>treasure chest eventually. Um. So it's gonna be really interesting

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to follow that. So why do you think following that

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is even important? I mean, if it's if it's so

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>far off, well, I think one of the biggest things,

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>right is is you can see um and Bloomberg has

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>released a couple of stories on this. Right. So there's

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the bond, there's the bond yields, right, but there's also

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the swaps, so traders, there's derivatives, and

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's these swap rates are almost like kind of

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a bond futures. And so those swap rates while the

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>peg was at twenty five basis point zero point, those

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>swap traders had that that policy rate at like forty

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or fifty basis points, so they were already front running

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the move. And now those swap the swap rates for

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the for the ten year yield for the Bank of

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>uh for the Japanese government bonds are at about eighty

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>nine basis points, so eight zero point eight zero point

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent, right, so they're already front running that next

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of capitulation move um by by shorting these bonds.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think what the the key here is is

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that sovereign debt, rather whether whether it's the Eurozone or

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, U. S. Treasuries or or Japanese government bonds,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>right these are the biggest markets, sovereign debt is fungible

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>on a on a on a FX hedged basis. What

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that, it means that global debt, especially

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>from sovereigns, that that won't nominally default on their debt. Right,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a corporation may or may or may not default on

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>their debt. Well for a sovereign, you know, they're just

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna print the money essentially, so they're never gonna nominally

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>default on their debt. So there's derivatives that that you

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>can basically hedge out the currency risk, So investors of

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Japanese government bonds would say, hey, maybe I'll just hedge

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>my yen exposure and buy treasuries instead. So, so when

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Japan is printing a ton of money

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to keep their bond yields artificially suppressed, that actually affects

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the bond yields of every other market in the world.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And so you saw when they capitulated, and when they

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>went from twenty five basis points to fifty basis points,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>global bond yields immediately ratcheted upwards. Right, So bonds sold off.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's that's the kind of the

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>move here, is that you know, who knows what their

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>policy you will go to next? Right, They certainly have

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge treasure chest and are willing to burn through it,

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but the yen the and really that the Japanese government

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>bond market is basically one of the one of the

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>biggest currency is one of the biggest bond markets in

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the world, aside from the dollar and the treasury market.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, they own a whole bunch of it.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They own the government bonds. But depending on where those

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>yields go global markets could react quite quite meaniqually Okay, So, um,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting for traders. It maybe isn't as important

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>for the global macro picture because they have quite a

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>long runway of a trillion dollars worth of bonds in

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>front of them, So nothing really imminent there. It's more

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of interesting than it is potentially imminent imminent

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>moves for the rest of the global market. I think

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fair to say. I mean, certainly some good to

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on. Um, you know, maybe for the

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>average investor, uh, that's just you know, maybe passively holding

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>up a portfolio or investing for the long term. It's

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, following the yen or the Japanese government

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bond policy rate probably believe isn't you know, top of

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.479
<v Speaker 1>top of mind. But for for you know, macro traders

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and the weeds, this is certainly one of the bigger

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>variables in the market. Yeah, I think. I think when

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it eventually breaks, uh, then it will have massive impacts

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>through the global economy. But you know, maybe that doesn't

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>happen for a while. So now that we've kind of

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about the big macro, is there anything else big

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on the big macro before we maybe kind of start

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 1>diving down in anything on the ECB or Euro that

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is like maybe big and happening that you see. Yeah,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would just say, um, I expect you

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>despite the recent weakness. Um. And I don't really have

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>like a set timeline for this, for this thesis or

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>or for this this move, but I think that the

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>recent dollar weakness is something that I don't expect to

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>continue forever. Right. You know that everybody says I and

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree over the long term, the dollars is guaranteed

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to debase and value, right, But what's you're what you're

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>comparing it to when you're looking at like say the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the d X Y, the Dixie um or when you're

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>looking at you know, FX markets, you're comparing it to

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a basket other fiat currencies. Right. So uh, the Euro,

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the end, the pound, um, the Yuan right um uh,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Well the biggest component of the Dixie is the Euro. Right. Uh.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>These are these their economies, their demographics, and and their

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy is actually in a far worst position than

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the U S and the and the FED. Right. So,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know people say the FED is trapped, Well,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bank of Japan is a lot more

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>trapped than the FED ever was, and the and the

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ECB is a lot more trapped than the FED also

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was or is right, So um, I just suspect at

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>some point, whether it's you know, next week, next month,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>next quarter, next year, I think this the dollar pool

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>market against other currencies will continue against other currencies will

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>continue because there's just this massive global dollar short position. Right,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There's all this dollar denominated debt around the world. The

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>U S is um and has been for the last

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus years the world reserve currency, and so because

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, there's this natural global short position. Right. People

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that are familiar with short squeezes and stocks, right, whether

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like meme stocks like game stock up, or you know,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they're short squeezes in Tesla or whatever it may be, right,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest short position in the world is dollars.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So so I think that's kind of an important dynamic

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand as as we are in a tightening cycle,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>as the fat is tightening the belt, as rates an

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>interest expense around the world for variable rate debt goes up,

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know this game of musical chairs that is this

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>global debt based monetary system the music is slowly stopping, right,

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying the music is gonna outright halt,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>but as these you know, as these chairs fill up,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be interesting to see how it all

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>plays out for the dollar and for for risk assets. Yeah,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and risk assets have been catching a bid. Even specifically,

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>gold has been catching a bit. I mean, if you

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>look at the d X Y where it really started

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>breaking down, and I mean that's right when gold and

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>silver and pressures medals really caught a bit and done

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>really well in that same time frame. And if you

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>then go, well, DIXIE has only measured against these other

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>basket of currencies which are even more weak than potentially

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the dollar rallies again, and what does that do for

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>risk on assets? So typically you know, gold has moved

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>off of real rates. Um, but it seems to really

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be correlated with the Dixie for now, So I guess

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to kind of keep an eye on that.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But um, if we if we jump down even further

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>back into risk assets, I mean, risk assets have been

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>catching a bit. Specifically, bitcoin and cryptocurrency has been catching

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Bitcoin is trying to get to that nineteen

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>dollar level, which is pretty amazing. We've been kind of

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>stuck in this like sixteen thousand dollar range for for

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>months now. UM Bitcoin was kind of almost traded like

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin there for a minute. You know, I've

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about extensively, and I know you dig into the

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on chain data a lot, and you know, really simply,

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I've always believed that UM. I think I think a

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of economics can be really boiled down simply, right,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Like markets stopped going down when there's no more sellers,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>markets stopped going up and there's no more buyers, right,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the price is typically set by supplying demand, right, things

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>like that. And so if you look at like you know,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Tera Luna Domino through the three Arrows and

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Celsius all the way to UM and then and then

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we had Celsius and then we had the minor capitulation

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>where the miners basically dumped all their bitcoin and the

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin kind of hit that fifteen sixteen thousand dollar price point,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like we hit capitulation there. Then you

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>see like ft X happened and it didn't really push

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin down anymore. Of course, we found out bitcoin uh

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ft X had what one point four billion of a

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin on their books and didn't have any to sell,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it had something to do with it. There

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was no more sellers, And it seems like bitcoin kind

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of found that bottom massive buying volume when it tried

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to touch that, you know, just below the sixteen thousand

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen thousand dollar price point. Um, so it seems

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's found to bottom. It's now starting to catch

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a bid here. I'm just curious

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what you think about that potential bottom. Uh, do you

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's found a good bottom, is an intermediate bottom?

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think really back to this global macro

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>pictures still really in charge and we have to kind

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of see what happens there. Yeah, I think you know,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the amount of fourth selling that happened

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in two, it's gonna be extremely hard to I mean,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even impossible to replicate that again. Right. Uh, they're

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, especially for an absolutely scarce you know,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>fixed supply asset, the marginal seller does get exhausted. Right.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you haven't sold your bitcoin uh in the

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>latter months of one or two all two? Right, Uh,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what's going to get you to to

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to dump all of your bags here, right, and certainly

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like if if equity is reverse, if the dollar strengthens,

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>if global bonds sell off again, Uh, it's all off

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the table. But in terms of like bitcoin specific crypto

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>specific force de leveraging, I think we've seen the brunt

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of that. But I think there's a key distinction between

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the low is in or at least

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the low in terms of a range, right,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, the tick of fifteen five or

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, or just like this sixteen k

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen k, twenty k range, whatever it is. I

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's a real difference between Okay, maybe the lows

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in which I believe is a strong possibility, versus the

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 1>start of a new secular bull market. Right. So uh,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, I think we'll see but I think

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>three at least for bitcoin, at least for the start

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um, and maybe we see a nice you know,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bear bear market rally, but I think it's going to

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be kind of characterized by a lot of chop. Right. Uh,

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>There there are buyers a bitcoin here, and anecdotally and

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on via the data, I can see that there are

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>priced agnostic buyers a bitcoin at any price that just

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>continue to buy a hold and accumulate and not sell it. Right,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So there are those flows, But in terms of you know,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of this up only up only you know,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>generational bull market resuming at least today, I think that's

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a waste off. So I think

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>we got some time. I think bitcoin will consolidate for

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a while. Could certainly be wrong there, but I kind

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of expect just uh, you know, minimal volatility relative to

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe one up only bull market and relative to the

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>forced de leveraging of two I think, you know, somewhat

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of a calmer period um fortunately or not for for

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is ahead in sure. I mean that's what it

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>always happens, right, That's that's the cycle of a market, right,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So at the bottom you have you have the fouria

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at the top, right, the volatility of the top, and

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then the massive sell off. And so those are those

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>two are both um traits of that. All the people

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that came in at the top of the mania that

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>drove it higher are the ones that get out of

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the top and then force it back down and faster.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And then at the bottom, the pit of despair. Nobody

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>wants to touch it, and so you have to kind

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of sit there and wallow in this very slow uh

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>increase again until eventually it starts to catch onto people's

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>imagination and long before even that euphoria gets there. But

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the market cycle we'll see. But yeah,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like it could be there. And to

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>your point, I would agree, I don't. I wouldn't expect

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the big firework here, um. But then you have this

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>looming macro thing kind of hanging. So that seems to

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>be the big thing which I want to come back

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to before we wrap it up, and I'll ask you

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about that. UM. Bloomberg had put out a piece of

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>research at the end of last year and they said

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that they believe that bitcoin would um turn into a

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>risk off asset by Q three of me too if

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at the world from a bigger perspective, you know,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical perspective, and how the world's kind of breaking up,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, supply chains are being reshaped, and uh,

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe I talked about the time we're going into

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized world, We're going into a multipolar world. I

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think trade and supply chains is gonna suffer, right, It's

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to be reimagined. Um, a lot less trust.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's new payment networks being set up. Um.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be good for bitcoin, right, and

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of nations are buying massive amounts

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of gold. Gold doesn't really work very well in technological age.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, like Bloomberg that maybe we could see

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin kind of transform from this risk on asset to

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe more of a risk off asset and could that

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>be this year? Yeah, I think that's uh, you know,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a it's a it's a good narrative

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and and I would be delighted to see it actually

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>unfold um in the in the interim, I think that

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like bitcoin, like think of it as a fraction,

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>which it is all all financial assets arts, you know,

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the new murrator, the denominator of the numerators BTC. It

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly has its own wave of adoption speculation, uh, you know, buying, selling,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>forced to leveraging. And then there's the USD component, right,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and as bitcoin kind of monetizes across global balance sheets, uh,

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of nestling itself on the asset side

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of the global balance sheet. So there's assets you know, equities, bonds.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Bonds are both on the asset and liability side. Bitcoin

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is only an asset, it's not a liability of anybody,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to gold. And then on the liability side there's

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, dollar, zeros en all the currencies. And so

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's uh, you know, people necessarily are saying,

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when's the decoupling? Is is bitcoin ever going

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to not be a risk on asset? And and personally like,

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the correlation with global risk is actually

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. I think it's almost a good thing. Um,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. I think there's gonna be you know, momentary,

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>momentary periods of decoupling or you know, like for instance,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin could have an update due to a short squeeze

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a big buyer coming in while stocks

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are down and the dollars up. Um. But you know,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a sustained period of inverse correlation to global risk is

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not something that I really expect here, um, But again,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>would be delighted to see it happened because that would

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly be a really strong narrative shift. Now you one

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that you've been all over and you're getting quite

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the following for is uh is breaking down some of

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>these big moves you know, FTX, etcetera. And one you've

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>been following a lot is this whole gray Scale GBTC

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thing now we talked about, you know, has the market

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>bottomed as it has exhausted seller as you think that

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it has exhausted sellers sort of like I was

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of saying, but what is the risk of a

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>massive sell off in the GBTC thing? Why don't you

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of framed that that deal up for us? Yeah?

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, essentially gray Scale GBTC as a closed

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>end bitcoin trust. Um. Actually, Mark, do you want me

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to like kind of break down what GBTC is or

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>are you let's let's let's do that give it a

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a little over you Okay? Cool? Yeah. So so

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>GPTC as a trust offered by gray Scale. Gray Scale

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as as a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, a big

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>conglomerate in the crypto industry. Uh. It was kind of

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the first bitcoin trust that was offered via O t

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>C over the counter rails. Right, so, um, you know

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you could buy it in New Roth, Ira or you know,

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>uh in especially in one I was kind of a

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite of Wall Street to get bitcoin like exposure. This

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was before you know, the micro strategies of the world.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the bitcoin miners go public before future

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>z etf, right, so there wasn't really an easy vehicle

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin like exposure to be access So so GBDC

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was that product, right. And and because it was a

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>closed end trust, there was only creation of shares, no

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>no redemptions, right, so you could bring dollars or bitcoin

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to to gray Scale and they would give you a

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>shares of gptc um. And and because it was only

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>one way, there was traded at a premium for a

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>long period of time. So it was you know, say

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd you'd bring a dollar to gray Scale and they'd

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>give you GPDC shares that were locked for six months.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a big story. Uh. And and now those years

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a premium would say trade out a dollar twenty um.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So so there was a lot of investors that even

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have much like interest in getting bitcoin exposure

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that would that entered the g BTC trade just to

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of harvest that premium. And that was a huge, huge,

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>huge driver in the bull market. Right. So so everybody

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks of sailor Um, which he was a big driver

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of the bull market. But everyone thinks Sailor was the

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest catalyst um. Sailor bought, you know, hundred thousand bitcoin.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He has a hundred thirty thousand bitcoin micro strategy currently

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>does gray Scale from twenty two when they stopped buying

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin after the premium went to a discount, gray Scale

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bought like four hundred thousand bitcoin, right, So, so they

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>were a massive, massive driver of this bull run momentum um.

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And what happened was that premium um as a bunch

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, as it turns out, a bunch of

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>firms were levering up to take on this trade, and

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and a subsidiary of of DCGH, Genesis Global, a trading firm,

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was lending against these collateralized GBTC shares to to lever

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>up and and kind of repeat the trade. Right, So,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of people going in giving bitcoin to

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to gray Scale, getting GBDC shares. They'd give those shares

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Genesis borrow more money and do the trade again.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Three arrows. You know, one of the industry's biggest hedge

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>funds did this trade and made a whole lot of money.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, GBDC is not a very liquid

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>market at least relative to bitcoin and all that leverage.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>As that premium in February whittled to zero and actually

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>turned into a discount and net asset value, UH, the

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest cattles for the bull market actually

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>turned to be a big drag. And so right now

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that that premium or slash discount, the net asset value

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for GBDC shares is about thirty six percent discount that

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>reached as lowest fifty and as it turns out, yeah,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so so it has been getting a bid recently and

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some activist campaigns to organize shareholders um and

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so so we'll see what happens there. But those around

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand, six d eight thousand bitcoin wrapped in

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this trust and there's no kind of way out. It's

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like a hotel California of sorts UH and and

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a financial asset rapper. And so we'll see what happens.

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is one of the bigger stories

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and and genesis UH and and specifically d c G

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>as this big industry conglomerate UH is kind of in

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle of of some big issues with with liquidity

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially solvency, and you have big claims from you know,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>say the Winkelvost Twins running Gemini Exchange, calling calling for

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>fraud of of the CEO Barry Silbert of DCG. So

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. They owe Genesis a whole lot

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of money about nine hundred million dollars um for their

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>yield product, geminised yield product. There's a whole bunch of

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of crypto contagion that actually still hasn't played out.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a story of two and it's not yet finished.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think most of that for selling, that deleveraging

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and solvencies has taken place. But as it turns out,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that daisy chain of leverage has a few potentially a

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>few more victims to kind of washed ashore. So we'll

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>see how it resolve. But I think that's certainly one

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things to watch into. Yeah, that's the thing

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with leverage. It works really good on the way up,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and it works equally good on the way back down

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to destroy you. I often often call it like fire,

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>right where like I can use fire to warm my house,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>or it can burn my house down. You know, like

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be really careful with that leverage. But

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in regards to that, I mean back to the original question, Um,

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't see in your research, and you've done a

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of them, you're doing really well with it. Follow

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Dylan for that if you want it, Um, But

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't see I mean, so the company DCG at

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the top in genesis, you know, subsidies, etcetera. You don't

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>see any risk of like a forced liquidation. I mean,

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if anything, it would be returning the bitcoin back to

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the owners that are owners of the trust. There's no

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>reason why they would be like a forced liquidation or

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a mass dumping onto the market because of that, other

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>than maybe going back to the owners the holders and

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then they want to sell it. Yeah, there's I think

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of scenarios that can play out. I'm

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure how to how to quantify these things, um,

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's you know, I think that actually the smallest

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>probability is that the status quo is remains for the

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>next you know, two or three or four years. That's

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the smallest possibility. You know, maybe that's a bolt take, um,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>but I just you know, off of the allegations, off

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the recent momentum in shareholder activism, Uh, you know

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the stories that have come across the PR newswire about uh,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you know the sec uh and some other you know,

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially d o J looking into d c G S operations. UM.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's the real potential for this thing too,

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for the trust to be unwound or to be acquired

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>by new owner or manager of the trust. Um and

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 1>potentially you know. One of the biggest things that's dragging

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>out this uh, this discount, right is the fee structure.

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a two percent annual fee forever. Right. So so

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, similar to how you discount stocks earnings or

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a bond for you know, ten years, fifteen years, twenty years. Uh,

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the market is discounting is two percent fee in perpetuity, right.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So why would I hold GBTC shares at a two

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>percent feet forever when I could just hold bitcoin. So

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a big reason for the discount. Another big reason

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for the discount is like Genesis and DCG being levered

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>against GBTC shares. UM. So I mean, you know that

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>force selling that had to be absorbed didn't really have

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>any natural buyers. Um. But in terms like what's resolved,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a small, small chance. Um. And again

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to exactly quantify this. I would

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>love to if I could, UM, but I think there's

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a small chance that the trust is liquidated. I don't

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a six hundred thousand dollar you know,

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a six thousand bitcoin markets sell on coin base. I

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think there'd be a lot of interesting, uh interested OTC

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>buyers potentially, you know that the buyers that had GBTC

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>shares just stepping in with the cash they received. Um,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really unclear how it all works legally, but I

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>do know there's mounting pressure from regulatory bodies, from shareholders

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and and just you know, judging off some of the

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>names that I've heard through the through the grape vine

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that are kind of interested in this, in this activist play,

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some serious momentum here. So um, you know,

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>DCG potentially is on the ropes here. Uh. And I

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think that there's you know, potentially some change coming over

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the coming I don't know aboute like, I don't have

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>a specific timeline for it, but uh, you know, it's

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more momentum than there ever has been to get a

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>change to the structure. But the change, I guess the

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>point I was trying to clarify for myself and for

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone else, is that the change whether that be you know,

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking it apart from dcg S grip, you know, getting

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>silvered out of the way, putting somebody else there, or

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>even potentially unwinding it and given the bit went back

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to the owners. Uh, there's not a big liquidity event.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Most likely is not the base case that there's a

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>big liquidity event off of this, And there's change for sure,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't mean there's a mass liquidation. Yeah, okay,

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree there. Um, I think there's you know, there's

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a tail risk for everything. But also interestingly, Mark, Um,

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there's even the chance that and again, you know, unsure

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>how to quantify this, but I do know, just off

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of my own intuition and just some chatter. Uh you

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>know with some market participants that a popular trade that

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>has arisen recently give and you know, say GPTC is

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at a fifty discount to net asset value. Right, So

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a popular trade, um even at not maybe thirty thirty

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>six percent to net asset value is long GBTC short

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin futures, right, So if that has to be unwound,

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the result, and I think the result is

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to unwind that short leg um. So unsure

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>how of how it plays. I think, you know, it

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>could interestingly go both ways or it could just you know,

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of resolve without without a bang and just kind

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of a little murmur So, so we'll see what happens

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on a on a On a little bit of a

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>different note, but referencing the two percent premium on the GBDC,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a very healthy premium. I mean, it's kind

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of industry standard, but it is very healthy premium. And

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>why would they want unwind it when they're making so

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>much money? But I recently just did a video on

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on counterfeit capitalism and Ponzi finance, and um, I was

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at black Stone. So black Stone has become like

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the largest owner of real estate like in the world,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and they have this like sixty eight billion dollar breed.

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>They call it like a reat but they call it

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>a breat. Um. They charged three point six percent a year.

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>They're pulling in two billion a year just off of

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that alone. Uh So, anyway, put the two perspective, Blackstone

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is charging you three point six and and with black Stone, um,

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't you know, they it's a real estate portfolio.

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't mark to market it right, um, and they

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even bring an auditor, so they have their own

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>internal accounting team set the value of the portfolio that

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they then charged three point six percent on. So um

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at the investors of the breat have no control over

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what they're buying. So they're buying a bunch of probably

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>toxic assets at this point, shopping centers and business parks

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, for example, who knows. You don't even

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>know what you're getting. Um. And then you're getting uh

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not even being marked to market. Uh, they're setting it,

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they're controlling it, they're skimming three point six percent off

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of it. I mean, it's just a disaster, um.

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So Sign of the Times, right, that was the point

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of the video Sign of the Times, pondsy Finance time.

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna where we're mark. I think one of the

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>most interesting things, just to just add one little quick

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>tidbit to that point, is that you know, one of

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest, uh, one of the biggest beneficiaries of this,

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten twelve year up only bull market and

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.800
<v Speaker 1>everything has been private equity, right, and you know private

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>equity is this magical vehicle that has all of the

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>upside exposure to financial asset market beta with none of

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the downside volatility because these things aren't marked to market

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. And as you see with Blackstone

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and some other private equity funds, as the withdrawals start

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to come in, are those marks real? Uh? Is there

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>by side liquidity to to meet those withdrawals. I think that's,

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a potentially a big story in it's

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a real big story. Private equity is the

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>big ponds e that I believe is gonna collapse assuming

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the market kind of continued on the directory that it's on,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about before, If there's more pain ahead,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think private equity is going to take a massive hit.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I was reading this article by Matt Staller. He writes

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a substance act called Big and he talks about monopolies,

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about the private equity and how

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they've taken over like the medical industry, the hospital industry,

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're raising all this money. They're buying the hospitals

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they buy the they own the land separately,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and UH, private equity they do all these roll ups,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and they're not specialists in running these businesses. They bring

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in generalists to run a specialized business, and in most

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>cases they do a horrible job at it. So they've

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>rolled up these hospitals. They're having a horrible job. The

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hospitals aren't being run properly. Uh, they're going out of business.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>They can't afford the lease on the land that the

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>PE also owns, and the PE is the private equity

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is loaning money to the hospital so the hospital can

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.919
<v Speaker 1>continue to pay the land lease, which they also own.

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>So they're loaning money to get their payments back. But

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're separate entities, then private equity can go Look,

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we've never missed a payment. Oh look the revenues are

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>still coming in even though they're losing over on this side.

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's Ponzi finances. Is back to that kind of thing.

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, private equity is a disaster waiting to happen. Um,

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll reset like everything else. I guess. Um, Okay,

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what about what about tether fud. Let's talk about that

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Now, I got into this space in uh,

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>as long as I can remember, there's been tether fud. Uh,

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>tether prints you know, princes uh dollars to prop up bitcoin.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, bitcoins price wouldn't be where it was if

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for all these fake dollars. Which if that

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was the case, then why has it been sitting in

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen thousand? Like? Can't they can't they pump up

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>back up already? But you know, um, there's there's there's

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a there's a lot of there's a lot of fund

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>right fear, uncertainty and doubtcast on to tether a couple

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of things. I want to ask you one, um, what

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think the reality is of some of this danger?

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And then to the bigger one kind of back to this,

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>is there more mass liquidations in front of us? Does

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it even matter? Right people are hold a bunch of

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars that they lose their dollars, does that matter to bitcoin?

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about these two things? Yeah?

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the long term answer is no, it doesn't matter. Um.

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, like like bituoin is just this this machine

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that is unaware of any of us and how we

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>interact with it, and it will continue to just chug

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a new block every ten minutes, and it's just this

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>immutable network of value settlement and storage. Uh. In terms

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the dollar exchange rate, Tether is obviously a massive player. Uh.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, like I think I believe something like fifty

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion dollars in market capitalization. UM has a shoddy

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>pass for sure, potentially you know, some some kind of

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>commingling with bit fan x. Uh. They've you know, been

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sued by the New York A g Uh. All of

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>these things have you know passed question marks UM and

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly like maybe they like that. That's the reason, right

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't get an audit is because there's there's somewhat

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of a shady pass. So do I hold Tether? No,

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't do. I think tether is is going to

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>imminently collapse. No, I don't. Uh they I believe they

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>have a big portion, a big chunk of treasuries and

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just based on everything that's happened in two if that,

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if that wasn't enough to kind of topple Tether, UH

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>don't really see what's going to come that will. With

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that being said, Tether has had a history of saying, hey,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like we don't we you know, we hold just assets

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>backing our dollars. Right, and then Celsius when they go under. Uh,

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's revealed that Tether actually was lending Celsius collateralized loans,

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 1>was creating Tether's um through bitcoin collateralized loans. So Alex

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Maschinsky sent over some bitcoin over clatteralized of course, so

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Tether didn't actually sustain losses, but they printed Tether backed

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:41.439
<v Speaker 1>by bitcoin collateralized loans. So that was something that Tether

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>said they didn't do. So are there are the questions? Certainly, um,

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.280
<v Speaker 1>would that actually help support the price of bitcoin? Certainly,

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But at this point Tether has done you know, they

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>used to hold all this commercial paper, all of this.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>They are sitting on a on a portfolio mostly short

0:44:56.520 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>term treasuries at this point, um And so I think

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they're okay. I think that the yield that they're now

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>getting on this massive portfolio is certainly going to help

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bolster their reserves over the long term. UM And I

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a kind of an immediate doomsday prediction

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>on Tether, like I've you know, like I've called out

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of these yield products right like to

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>take off the box uh Celsius Voyager block five ft X,

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>right like I've um among others rights like called for

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all these things to collapse before they did. Um. Do

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's question marks about tether? Of course? Do

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that they, you know, are the next domino

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to collapse this entire industry and bitcoin is

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a a scam like all these all these you know

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>bears are saying for the last seven years, and now

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe so. Um, certainly it's a you know,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a big market player, so you know, the dominant trading

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>pairer on binance, right, But I think it's more so

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>propping up, if it is propping up anything, it's more

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so propping up the broad based crypto industry rather than

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin as a global as a global you know,

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>free float financial asset. Yeah, yeah, I mean that that's

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of my take. And and and I guess just

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of back to the question is that it it's

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 1>propping up the entire ecosystem to to the kind of

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>point that you made on Binance etcetera, crypto coins, etcetera.

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 1>But uh and and to your point, uh, and that's

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing that people should take from this is when

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you see that these like stable coins are percent reserved

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>well reserved in what like if you're reserved in ft

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>T token, your reservings up at zero, or like if

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you're like uh, um, Tara Luna was reserved in Tara token, right, Like,

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>well then it went to zero. So reserved and what

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And to your point about tether, a good majority of

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that is now in treasury, so it's like basically in cash. Um.

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the question is if if they were

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically um, you know, a bunch of stuff comes out,

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the reserves, there's a run on tether

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>orchestrated by whatever reason, and uh and tether were to

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>go to zero, would that really have a big effect

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoins specifically? I mean they're not dumping bitcoin. I

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>mean the people that had dollars there had those tether

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>tokens now can't redeem it for the dollars they hoped for.

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't really cause a mass liquidation of bitcoin necessarily. Nope,

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It would be really interesting to see happen

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>mark because um, again, like I don't think this is

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>a high probability, but we've seen temporary kind of like so,

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so tether trades free flow, right, it's it's it trades

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>against other stable coins it trades against, like bitcoin, BTC

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>U s D. Also there's there's BTC U s D

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>T right. And so we've seen in the momentary kind

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of periods of of market panic, whether it was a

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>collapse of terror Lune, at the collapse of ft X,

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen tether trade from you know, a dollar to

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven cents, right, and it was quickly bought back up.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of those traders, a lot of those

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>people that bought tethers at cents went to tether and

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>redeemed those redeemed them, right, so they got they got

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the cash, whether you know, through a bank wire or

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever the means. Maybe so uh And and at that time, right,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting to see on say a binance that

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the price of of bitcoin in in USD was like

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight thousand, and the price of bitcoin and U

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>s DT was like right, So it would be really

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see, uh, you know, bitcoin pump if if

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, the denominator of BTC U s DT was collapsing, right,

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>And it would be interesting to see kind of what

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:18.959
<v Speaker 1>percent or what share of global market value was set

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by by tether. Uh And and you know, what would

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be the resolution I don't know, and I don't think

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>really anybody knows. Um And and for some people, right,

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>for some people, they say Bitcoin is un investable until

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Tether is out of the ecosystem. That's why That's exactly

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I was thinking. Um I see, I think

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, you know, that's an interesting take. Um I.

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>The the problem with that is that they might be

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a very very, very very long time because

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a whole lot of vested interest in

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of keeping this game going. And I think, uh,

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the longer that that Tether is is around,

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they have now a very liquid portfolio

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 1>short term treas furies, uh, it's gonna be really hard

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to bank run uh or you know, to see that

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that unresolved. So I'm not making any like bold predictions

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>or not. Like, I'm not saying that there is absolutely

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a non zero percent chance that there's you know, bad

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 1>outcomes with with Tether and with their holdings and maybe

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>potentially with the prince of Bitcoin. But I think it's

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, not it's not certain either way.

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't and I like and I don't think it

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>would be really uh, I would really be in the

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in the right to come out here and make one

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>both claim either way. Okay, all right, Well, I think

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's definitely risk, as you said, certainly risk there.

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't I think the risk to actually bitcoins

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>prices maybe a little bit overblown. To your point, a

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people said it's un investable until we figure

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this out. It's like, why, Like, I don't see that, Like,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.359
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna sell it now. If they had said, hey,

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.439
<v Speaker 1>well you know, half of our collaterals in bitcoin will

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>shoot them that had be forced to dump the collateral,

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:54.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. So like, I just don't see

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>why anybody would make that assumption. But but to your point,

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people have I think a lot

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of people that are outside that are probably wouldn't buy

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin anyway. Uh, and they don't really understand how that works. Um.

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>One last potential big blow up kind of just going

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>back to are there any more sellers? Are there any

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>more forced liquidations? Um? Something you've been talking about quite

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit is silver Gate Bank. Now, there's a lot

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of problems with silver Game Bank, including potential legal problems

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because apparently they were handling wires for Alameda and f

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>t X and they weren't doing proper kyc and putting

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 1>money into the wrong accounts. Some who knows what will

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 1>come with that? Um, lots of other risks with silver Gate.

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing with risks with silver Gate? And

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess frame that up. Yeah, So I mean I

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>really I was aware of silver Gate and their role

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of the bitcoin crypto ecosystem dating back

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to one uh. There it was kind of big news

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>because they were, you know, a FED member bank that

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was giving clatteral lized loans to micro Strategy and Marathon, um,

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 1>some big public names. Right. It was the first FED

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>member bank to to extend USD credit against bitcoin collateral.

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's obviously a big story. Aside from that, like,

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 1>they had a really dominant role in the crypto ecosystem,

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin ecosystem due to the Send Network s e

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>N network silver Gate Exchange Network, that's what SCN stands for. Uh.

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 1>And and really that was just crypto firms. Bitcoin firms

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>could deposit to silver Gate and then transact with each

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>other seven uh kind of on dollar rails, so similar

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of a dollar stable coin, but not it

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a public ledger and and and unlike a stable

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>coin like tether or even a USDC, this was in

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an account at a FED member bank, so so they

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, their deposits grew massively. I believe it was

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>over tens of billions of dollars UH and and you

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>know some of these seven of these exchanges that had

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:51.399
<v Speaker 1>trouble getting you know, official dollar rails like an ft

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 1>X per se UH kind of leveraged silver Gates UH

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.879
<v Speaker 1>send network to do so and so UH. Post ft

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:01.800
<v Speaker 1>X collapse, there's been a ton of regulatory pressure. And

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that's when I really started to pay attention to them, was, Okay,

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what's their dollar rails? Because this is a massive fraud FTX,

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>al amita what they were doing, the commingling of funds.

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>This was a massive fraud. And it took about three

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to four minutes for me to just land on on

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.760
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate's website and you know, funny enough, uh FDx

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>collapsed on the eighth right. I went on silver Gate's website,

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the ninth and I posted this and

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:27.879
<v Speaker 1>on the main page they didn't even delete it yet

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>was a quote from SPF saying, like silver Gates really

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>revolutionized the role of for for for blockchain companies. It's

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's made this all so much easier, UM and so.

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>And I look in you know, silver Gate connects all

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of these counterparties through this send network. UM so. I

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>mean since then, the shares of silver Gate or down.

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Um they're down nine percent from the all time highs

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:52.800
<v Speaker 1>uh And I don't really know how it resolves. I

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just know that there's been a big run on their deposits, right,

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>so they've had to sell a lot of their their

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>bond and securities portfolios to stem that run. They now

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>have more excess cash than they do crypto deposits. So

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think like an insolvency is around the corner

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>per se. But what I do think is going to

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really intensifies the regulatory pressure, right not just for Silvergate,

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but also like say a signature bank. There's like really

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the only two crypto banks UH for for US UH,

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for US companies that that worked with US crypto firms

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:24.479
<v Speaker 1>at scale. And due to just like the Alameda ft

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>X money laundering situation, I think that the you know

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a m l Anti money laundering and you know, the

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the bank regulators are really going to clamp down hard here.

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I don't have a you know, bullish

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or bearish view on silver Gate stock here disclosure like

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I was short at the stock, I'm no longer um.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, I think that's just an interesting story

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>from a crypto native liquidity standpoint, is that there's only

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>so many dollar rails here on ramps, off ramps and

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at silver Gate you know Serves, Circle, coin Base, Gemini

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like all of these big names use silver Gate at

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>least partially for their dollar on and off ramps. So uh,

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>depending on what happens there, that could have an impact

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>on the on the crypto NATed liquidity. So I don't

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>have a strong stance of how it resolves, but I

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's something worth watching. Yeah. Uh if we put

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that aside, I mean, what what happens with silver Gate

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh do they stay in business or not? The

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>stock go up down whatever, put that at the side.

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But if they were to go down, what does that

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have effect on bitcoin? If any? Uh? Yeah, So I

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>mean there's uh really There's one one thing I think

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>of is that you know, micro Strategy has a two

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollar bitcoin collateralized line of credit with silver Gate. Uh,

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:34.320
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate doesn't hold the collateral, so it's not like

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a force force sell, but it would potentially,

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, there would be maybe a call of of

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>margin or a call to to to pay off that loan.

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm unsure. I can't speak with with certainty of of

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>how the loan documents work there, but that's a potential.

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that that USDC, who has like eight or

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nine banks but banking partners, but one of one of

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>their relationships is with silver Gate, so is potentially, uh

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 1>some some risk there. I mean, again, I'm not saying

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that USDC is unsafe, but I just think that you know,

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it would put it would just kind of be another

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>problem for a lot of these crypto company companies, and

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically the unregulated ones. Right. So we we've seen that

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate, uh and and and say even Signature right

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>have serviced Binance on and off ramps for dollars through

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like Shell Corps. Right, So they have a different name

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:28.759
<v Speaker 1>than than Binance because they're not a US institution, but

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they've you know, accessed dollar rails, same with like Huabi

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and other names. So who knows how many you know,

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto crypto relationships they have disclosed. They're not underneath the surface,

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and so if they blew up, like I don't know

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:43.439
<v Speaker 1>if it would have an immediate impact on the bitcoin market.

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Right bitcoins a three hundred four hundred billion dollar asset.

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Silver Gates market cap is like less than a billion,

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like a massive, massive thing at this

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>stage in the game, but just certainly, you know, something

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just maybe keeping the back of the mind. Yeah, yeah, good,

0:55:57.640 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>well man, we walked through a whole bunch of stuff.

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've done a pretty good job there.

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to just kind of circle back to where

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we started at the beginning and talking about this the

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.919
<v Speaker 1>big fed kind of macro Outlook, you threw out something

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask you out, but you said, uh you

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you you you mentioned the SMP going down to three thousand.

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.879
<v Speaker 1>We're at about four thousand now, going down to about

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>three thousand. Is that you're charted kind of a case

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of where you think it could go to this year? Uh? Yeah,

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I think that's certainly in the realm

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of possibility, probably more so than market participants expect um.

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that would that be would that be your

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>base case? Like above fifty chance that that happens. It's

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a tough question mark, you're putting me on the spot.

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I think I think we see a thirty

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 1>two at least UM, and maybe not even in three UM.

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I've been pleasantly surprised with

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is how strong and resilient the economy has been to

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the rate hikes. But in terms of you know, if

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you just think about the pricing of of stocks, right, um,

0:56:57.520 --> 0:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>whether you look at you know, market value to g

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:06.439
<v Speaker 1>DP historically over over bloated, overvalued in two UM, that's

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>reset a bit, but it's still historically overvalued in uh

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:13.359
<v Speaker 1>historical measures, and so something like that. I think really

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that's been discounted in equities has been

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the discount rate. Right. Earnings haven't really been revised lower

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. If we see a recession, that will happen.

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And also credit standards, right, So if you just think

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about one of the biggest drivers of the bull market

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for the last ten twelve years, then debt finance corporate buybacks. Right,

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So if that's done, if the boomers are retiring and

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>forced to liquidate, right, like two was the line in

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the sand for the boomers actually crossing the threshold of

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>average retirement age the biggest generation in history. So are

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>those boomers now and that buyers or sellers of equities

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>as they're retiring, right, So these are all things that

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think are more structural. I don't you know, I

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think making a call with a specific number line in

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the sand is like, is you know, not something that's

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's tough to do, right, But I'm

0:57:59.720 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not uber uber bullshe with SNP at fourth thousand, I'll

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>say that you throwout the number three thals and I

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was just circling back to that. That just for frame

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of reference, that's about where we were in twenty nineteen

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in uh so we'd kind of go back to a

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>level we kind of sat there for most of the year.

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Um In reference to what you were just saying about

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 1>our you know, the baby boomer generation, the largest secment

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population. They're all retiring. Will they be been

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>net buyers or net sellers? Will The answer is, actually

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they'll be net sellers because if you go back to

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a law that was passed in the nineteen seventies, which

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is called ARISA, which is basically allowed people to put

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>money into their pensions but they have to start selling

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 1>them when they retire so that the government can now

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>recoup that tax dollars. So they were able to put

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>money in tax free. The government knew that they would

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have to sell, and then they get the tax dollars back.

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So there will be they're they're forced to sell, uh,

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And they're certainly not buyers, right, They're gonna be moving

0:58:50.440 --> 0:58:51.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the market. They're forced to sell. They're not

0:58:51.880 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be buyers. So I think there's gonna be massive

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>downward pressure from that law. Unintended consequence of government intervention

0:58:58.280 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies is gonna come home to us now.

0:59:00.360 --> 0:59:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And then with the interest rates so high, these corporations

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have a very hard time rolling over debt

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and getting in getting financing at all. And over the

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, the majority of the stock buybacks

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 1>were being done with cheap, cheap access to credit exactly.

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And so you take away the cheap acts to credit,

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 1>then the then the buy backs go away, and then

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the force selling from the baby boomers. There's

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of downward pressure on stocks. I don't see

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>where the upward pressure is gonna come from. And so

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be a big trend to follow

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Yep, I think you nailed it on the head.

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>The biggest biggest trends for me in terms of equity

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>markets in three two was the year of duration. Right,

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>yields repriced higher, the valuations repriced lower. I think three

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the story it's earnings. We'll see how that, how that

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>plays out, and maybe that goes into four. And also

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:50.919
<v Speaker 1>we have credit standards, right, so credit, credit spreads, credit risk,

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>these are the things that really equity markets today have

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not experienced in the last in the last two decades,

0:59:57.280 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, if it comes throost, then you know,

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the pressure certainly remains skewed to the downside. Yeah, the

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one benefit that they might have is that inflation is

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna push up their earnings and it's gonna it's gonna

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>look like maybe maybe that might help them a little bit.

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:15.439
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. But anyway, man, Dylan, we've covered so much.

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we've we've hit it all, starting with a

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>big picture and kind of diving all the way down

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>into kind of bitcoin risk assets and and back out

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to Dylan's prediction of where the market's going. I'm just kidding.

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>We won't put that out but anyway, man, I appreciate

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it so much. Uh, you can check them out Dylan

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Leclair Underscore on Twitter and you certainly should give him

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a follow. Um anything else we missed, I think we

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>covered it all, Mark. This is a good written man,

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of a lot of action packed our Yeah. Well,

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining me man, always a pleasure.

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh look forward to seeing you sometime soon. And with

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that we'll go ahead and sign it off. Cheers. That's

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what I got. Thanks so much for listening.