WEBVTT - Trump's Big Tech Influence

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:05.039
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and Ed Lovelow.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York. I'm Caroline Hyde.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Mike Sheppard in Washington. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 3>coming up.

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 4>Tech CEO's flock to the inauguration of Donald Trump in Washington.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Plus President Trump gives a temporary reprieve to TikTok, granting

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 4>a seventy five day delay from a US ban. And

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 4>live from the World Economic Forum in Davos. We'll hear

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 4>from Bag of America Ceo'brian Wynihan later this hour, but

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 4>first we check in on these markets.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Look some anxiety.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Being shaken off as we see President Trump take office,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 4>then as that pushing up, and indeed the NASAK one

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred up about a tenth of a percent as many

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 4>looked perhaps the economic potential of this next administration. However,

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>on the downside hasn't been some key names. Bitcoin is

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 4>at one point three percent one hundred and three thousand

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>absolutely took off ahead of the inauguration. We'll get into

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 4>some of those mun coins in a moment, but let's

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 4>move on to some of the individual points drags or

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 4>indeed Apple being the key one. I want to focus

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>in on TSMC for a moment though. We're at one

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 4>point nine percent on its ADRs. This is its restored operations,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>that factories it evacuated after a six point four magnitude

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 4>earthquake struck at the island's south look at injured four people,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 4>key chip maker.

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Fabricator, to Nvidia and indeed to Apple. But Apple being drag.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Lower the worst day we've seen since September of last year,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 4>in fact, three point eight percent lower.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Why this is yet more downgrades.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Coming from Jeffrey's, coming from Luke Capital analyst worrying about

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 4>sales of the iPhone and in particular Chinese weakness. Look,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 4>this is going to be top of mind for Tim Cook,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>who yesterday was one of the who's who are.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>The world's wealthiest people in hech elite surrounding President Donald

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Trump as he took the oath of office, all gathering

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 5>and combined get this, Mike net Worth exceeding one point

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 5>three trillion dollars for the occasion, all sprinkled in among

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Trump's own family.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>They were not just sprinkled in, they were seated ahead

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>of Trump's incoming cabinet. It was striking to see how

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>prominently Elon Musk and others were occupying that space in

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>such a moment, and it really signals how much tech

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 3>has arrived with this new administration. And really something else

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>of note from yesterday was President Donald Trump scrapping the

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration sweeping executive order regulating artificial intelligence. Let's bring

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>in Bloomberg's balance of how our co host Kelley Lines

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to discuss this. Kelly, thanks for joining us and for

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>all the great reporting yesterday on the inauguration. Trump started

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>this with some shock and awe on the regulatory front.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Talk about the direction of travel that we see in

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 3>undoing this AI order.

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, the direction of travel certainly is fast. Trump yesterday

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 6>sent a modern day record for a number of executive

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 6>orders in one day. There were twenty six plus four

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 6>presidential memoranda, and of course as part of that, he

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 6>rescinded seventy eight executive actions from President Biden. The executive

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 6>action regulating AI. The sweeping order was one that was

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 6>part of it. This, of course, during the Biden administration,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 6>was intended to create safety and transparency guidelines around companies

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 6>developing this technology. It also created the AI Safety Institute

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 6>under the Department of Commerce that was essentially setting voluntary

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 6>guidelines for how the development of this technology should work.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>And now that goes away.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 6>The thing is the President, while repealing this, did not

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 6>say what is going to be replacing it, leaving a

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 6>bit of a question mark. Certainly, we could expect David Zachs,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 6>the venture capitalist who is now the AI cryptos are

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 6>in this White House, could be playing a role in

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 6>what happens next. But it also could speak to buy

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 6>and large a kind of hands off regulatory approach this

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 6>administration seems to take. And certainly that was a message

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 6>frequently by Donald Trump yesternight and throughout the campaign.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>And let's just talk about someone who's key to AI's

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>future is Elo Musk. And indeed it feels as though

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>he's been cementing his power over the last couple of

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>days as well well.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, in fact, it is now solidified through one of

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 6>these executive orders, Caroline, that he will be leading this

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Department of Government efficiency, and he will be doing so

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 6>by himself, as the person who was intended to be

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 6>his co head of vag Ramaswami is bowing out to

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 6>instead run for governor of Ohio in twenty twenty six.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 6>There's been some reporting that there was a bit of

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 6>consternation between Ramaswami and mar A Lago that may have

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 6>played a factor, But it does clear the road for

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk to essentially have the greatest degree of control

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 6>over this agency, which will actually be part of the

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 6>federal government. That was not the intent originally outlined by

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump back in November, but through the EO yesterday,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 6>he made this part of the Executive Office of the President.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Through an executive order that will rename the US Digital Service,

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 6>something that was created during the Obama administration back in

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty thirteen, to the United States Dode Service. That means

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk is getting an actual White House email address

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 6>space in the eisenhow Our office building. It raises some

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 6>ethics concerns given Elon Musk, of course, and his companies

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 6>do contract with the United States government, and already this

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 6>is drawing lawsuits Caroline, including from the largest union representing

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 6>federal workers, saying that the Office Budget and Management Management

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 6>Budget and the White House here are violating different rules

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 6>that are supposed to govern this. But certainly Elon Musk

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 6>is going to have a close year of the president

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 6>as this administration gets going.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 4>A controversial weekend for Edol Musk, which we'll get to

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a little bit later in the show.

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But Blue most Kaylee lines spectacular, thank you for joining us.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, TikTok Whiplash Fight Dances US services were restored after

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump acted to delay the band by seventy five days,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 4>proposing a US China joint venture, though it's unclear if

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 4>the APPS Chinese parent can or even wants to secure

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>a US backer. Not to mention if this is enough

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 4>to appease Congress's national security concerns, Well, let's bring in

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 4>a US representative, Jake Olkinlass from Massachusetts. Now, you served

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>on the House China Select Committee last Congress, and we're

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 4>original co lead to the TikTok divestment legislation. So I

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 4>ask you this, what do you make of the extension?

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 7>The extension appears to be illegal. The law allows for

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 7>one ninety day extension if the President can demonstrate that

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 7>a sale is underway and there needs to be more

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 7>time for the negotiations. In the administration, that is not

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 7>what's happened here. What's happened here is Trump has just

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 7>declared seventy five days of a free pass for TikTok,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 7>and there does not seem to be any statutory support

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 7>for that. This is an example of how the social

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 7>media corporations have really come to plunder the American town square.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 7>There's an old saying in tech that if you're not paying,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 7>you're the product. Well, big tech has productized Americans attention

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 7>spans and our social lives for the last fifteen years,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 7>and both parties have failed to rain them in. And

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 7>now TikTok. Excuse me, now, Trump is not only inviting

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 7>American corporate abuse of the town square, he's all allowing

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 7>Chinese communist abuse of it.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Congressman, the order that Trump signed yesterday called for a

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>review of the intelligence surrounding.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 8>The risk posed by TikTok.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Are you concerned at all that the incoming administration might

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>be glossing over or prepared to gloss over those risks

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>in its eagerness to try to strike a deal and

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>keep the app going.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 7>Yes, And there's two core risks. One is, of course,

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 7>american's personal data, geolocation data, personal contact information than a

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 7>social graph of their lives. But the second, I think

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 7>more concerningly actually is control over the algorithm itself. What

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 7>content is suppressed, what content is amplified, That is ultimately

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 7>dictated by the Chinese Communist Party, And we need to

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 7>be very clear about this. There's a lot of handwaving

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 7>around this. Xijingping makes those decisions, and what that means

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 7>is that Chinese kids see very different content, mostly educational,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 7>than American kids do. And I don't know why the

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 7>United States would want to outsource the education and ideological

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 7>cohesion of an entire generation to our greatest adversary. Now

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 7>you underlay this ignorance of that core risk with the

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 7>fact that Trump just issued a meme coin that basically

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 7>is the equivalent of him opening up a Swiss bank account,

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 7>inviting foreign adversaries and foreign individuals and corporate interests to

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 7>deposit money into it secretly and then show him the receipts.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 7>That opens up the way for monumental corruption in the

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 7>sale of TikTok.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk about Trump Coin and indeed Milania's meme coin

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 4>two a little bit later. But Congressman, I go back

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 4>to the fact that you said that this extension is

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 4>ultimately illegal. Now you've also said that there's hand waving

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 4>now bite dance in.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 2>And of itself.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 4>Would say, look, control does not lie in China or Shijiping,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 4>but up to TikTok in and of itself. But going

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 4>back to if indeed we did see some sort of

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 4>joint venture more US ownership of TikTok, with that in

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 4>any way a piece some of your national security consents.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 7>As with many things, he says, I have no idea

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 7>what Trump was talking about when he said like the

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 7>US government would have a fifty percent stake or something

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 7>like that. There's about seventy five unanswered questions in between

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 7>that statement and the actuality of it. Here's what we want, though,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 7>Here is the goal of the bill. First of all,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 7>we don't want to ban TikTok. We don't want to

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 7>ban any of the social media. They're here to stay,

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 7>just like radio and TV before them. But what we

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 7>do want to do is reclaim control of the digital

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 7>town square from this Chinese communist and American corporate malfeasance.

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 7>And to do that we need TikTok to answer to

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 7>US law. And then the second step is Congress needs

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 7>to pierce Section two thirty and establish a duty of

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 7>care for all of these social media corporations. That means

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 7>that we can allow them to host things like deep

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 7>fake pornography, which ninety eight percent of online deep fake

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 7>videos or pornographic content targeting women non consensually. These tech

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 7>CEOs don't care. They don't have to care. They're not

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 7>liable for it. Congress needs to end that.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 4>When we're thinking therefore about the next steps.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>You seem to be going more broadly.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 4>We've had steps being taken by the CEO of Matter

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 4>as well to reduce fact checking here in the United States.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 4>How has that been a cause of anxiety for you

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 4>or is that something that you feel. Ultimately, yes, we

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>could see more community focus on preserving what is said

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 4>on the internet or not.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 7>So, I'm actually sympathetic to Zuckerberg's claim that fact checking

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 7>was not proving effective. Now we can debate how accurate

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 7>the fact checking was, but the point is that people

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 7>didn't believe the fact checking, and ultimately truth has to

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 7>be communally acknowledged and so moving towards community notes, if

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 7>he can demonstrate that that's more effective and building trust

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 7>and building shared consensus about the facts, I'm receptive to that.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>But the underlying point here is that any Web two

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 7>point zero approach to doing this is ultimately going to

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 7>be ineffectual because these are walled gardens controlled by corporations,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 7>and ultimately, these corporations monetize the attention span of Americans

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 7>and sell off that product to the highest advertising bidder.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 7>And for so long as that is the case, they're

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 7>always going to amplify the seven Deadly sins, things that

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 7>foment pride and greed and lust and end be because.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 8>That's what people click on.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 7>We need a Web three point zero transition where people

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 7>have more custody of their personal data and where the

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 7>algorithms are answerable to communities in a pluralistic fashion, the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 7>way that Taiwan has done so under the leadership of

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 7>the Digital Minister.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Congressman, do you see any role for government in trying

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to help in this area of moderation? We've seen the

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 3>direction of travel in Washington move far away from that.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 8>What do you see.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 7>Government needs to revoke Section two thirty so the tech

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 7>industry will claim that Section two thirty protects free expression,

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 7>and it's just laughable. James Madison did not write Section

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 7>two thirty. It was wrapped in the nineteen nineties, and

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 7>it is an industry specific shield for the social media

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 7>corporations and not be liable for toxicity, for defamation, for cyberstocking,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 7>and intimate privacy violations.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Things that are already illegal.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 7>I want to be clear about this, things that are

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 7>already towards under civil and criminal law. They are not

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 7>susceptible for a duty of care. To prevent them, we

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 7>need to make them liable for it. And then we

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 7>need to bring in the blockchain industry under regulatory clarity

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 7>so that we can transition to a Web three point

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 7>zero approach to social media governance. Because what's working in

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Web two point zero has worked well for the tech CEOs,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 7>it has not worked well for American children.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Those are both pretty ambitious goals. Congressmen, do you see

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>enough of a consensus in this Congress between Democrats and

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Republicans to be able to get both of those things done,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Especially with respect to Section two thirty, which we've been

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 3>hearing about for so long.

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 7>You're certainly right to the tech lobby has been effective

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 7>at crushing even marginal steps towards revoking Section two thirty.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 7>I will note, though, that last Congress the chair and

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 7>ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee on which

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 7>I said, and which has jurisdiction over the tech industry,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 7>jointly wrote an outbed in The Wall Street Journal calling

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 7>for the sun setting of Section two thirty. Now it

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 7>didn't happen last term, but that is a significant step

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 7>forward where you see bipartisan leadership towards revoking it. I

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 7>think we are hitting an inflection point where Americans are

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 7>tired of having toxicity pumped into the national discourse by

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 7>people who get richer the more time their kids spend

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 7>scrolling on their smartphones. It is time for us to

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 7>move away from this phone based childhood towards a play

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 7>based childhood. But to do that, we've got to reclaim

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 7>ownership over how we talk to each other. Section two

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 7>thirty is the first step, and I do think we're

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 7>building bipartisan support for it.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 4>I hate you, but there was a lot of bipartisan

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>support to ban TikTok, and then suddenly, as the hour

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 4>drew near, we saw some real one eighties from across

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 4>the aisle. Congressman and I go back to the TikTok case,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 4>in particular because the fact they keep on talking about

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 4>web three point zero. You're talking about decentralization here, Well,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 4>we've heard that from a pitch of one of the

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 4>wanna be owners, Frank McCourt, and indeed, working with Kevin O'Leary,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 4>they want to be seeing potentially this project liberty. What

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 4>are you thinking more broadly about their particular offer, because

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 4>they don't want the algorithm.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 7>Web three point zero fundamentally is about open governance. It's

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 7>about creating pluralism and creating a sense of community ownership

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 7>over this. In the same way that Americans insist that

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 7>our actual town squares are places where communities have an

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 7>interest in upholding order and providing freedom of expression, we

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 7>need the same thing for our digital town square, because

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 7>that's where Americans are spending four to six hours every

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 7>day taking in news, information, and entertainment.

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 8>I think too many Americans just.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Assume that the status quo over the last fifteen years

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 7>is all that we can expect from social media. But

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 7>if you look back at every other media innovation from

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 7>the printing press in the fifteen hundreds all the way

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 7>through TV and radio, you will see that there was

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 7>a moment of disruption and then new norms, conventions, and

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 7>laws where established to help bring some harmony to this

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 7>new way of disseminating information. The challenge here with social

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 7>media is that we've had to digest this tech innovation

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 7>in a much shorter amount of time. We've had less

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>than half a generation to do it, and so the

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 7>disruption has been even greater. But I do think that

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 7>we are hitting an inflection point where we're going to

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 7>start to adopt new roles in governance structures.

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>US Representative Jacocinclaus from Massachusetts, Thank you. Coming up, we'll

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 3>hear from Bank of America's CEO, Brian moynihan out of Davos.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 8>Next, this is Bloomberg.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg is live at Davos, and Bloomberg's Jonathan Faraoh and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Lisa Bromwitz are sat down with the Bank of America's CEO.

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 10>Hey guys, great to be with you, day two of

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 10>the World Economic Forum here in Davos, Switzerland, minds firmly

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 10>elsewhere in Washington, d C.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 8>Isn't that right?

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Least twenty four hours of conversations about how great America

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 10>is and how the rest of the world will struggle

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 10>with the incoming President Donald Trump.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, station here at Davos has been what's America going

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 11>to do? How can I leverage myself to be in

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 11>the best position possible? And oh yeah, what's the latest headline?

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 10>Brom Monahan alongside us, the chairman of CEO of Bank

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 10>for America. We're going to cover all of that through

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 10>the next eight minutes or so. There's an important occasion

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 10>to mark fifteen years at the top of Bank for America.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 12>Now, it's been an honor lead to company and we've

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 12>had some fun and it was interesting to start. For

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 12>the last ten years or so, we've been on a

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 12>role just producing responsible growth and the team does a

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 12>great job and we can take pride we've put the

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 12>company to.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 13>Where it should be. Is one of the great companies

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 13>in the world.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 8>Beyond interesting.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 10>Fifteen years ago it was the absorption of Countrywide Financial.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 8>It was Meyril.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 10>It's a very very different bank and a very very

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 10>different moment. That phrase you use is one you've used

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 10>so many times, responsible growth. There is a feeling that

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 10>maybe we moved towards something house in the world of

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 10>banking over the next few years. Some might say it's

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 10>sort of reckless growth, which is going to go for it?

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 10>How would you describe the future.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 12>So what you're hearing is enthusiasm for in the investment

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 12>banking side, it particularly transactions. Right, for a long time,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 12>for last couple of years, it's been hard to get

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 12>a transaction through. And what stops a seller from selling

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 12>or buyer from buying is this thing is delayed.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 13>I'm exposed and so what they'll do is they'll push

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 13>it through. So there's a lot of.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 12>Enthusiasm that they'll be better growth United States. There a

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 12>lot of enthusiasm by the bankers saying these deals can

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 12>get done, so I can go have this future conversation.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 12>It's just not another idea that goes through the system

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 12>and everybody says, that's a great idea, But that can

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 12>be a great idea, let's go do it, or a

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 12>great idea, I don't.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 13>Want to do it.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 12>But it's a more of a substance space than it

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 12>is more of a worry about the environment.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 11>Are you basically saying that there's more enthusiasm, that there

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 11>is conviction and will to actually get stuff done.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think you saw some deals getting announced and

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 12>you'll see more deals getting announced in our sector in banking,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 12>especially in the United States. The consolidation is still far

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 12>away from being.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 13>Done.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 12>They'll always be big banks or always be small banks,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 12>but you'll let people make a decision what they.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 13>Want to do.

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 12>And there haven't been a lot of bank deals done.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 12>Bank to bank deals we can't do them, it's not legal,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 12>but as investment banking we can help other people do them,

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 12>and it haven't been a lot done because just uncertain

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 12>you're getting caught in a transaction and having issues. So

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 12>the belief that they should promote the banks consolidate and

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 12>getting more efficient, passing that through to customers, passing that

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 12>through to small businesses, et cetera is different.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 13>Will be a change.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, there's the banking sector specifically and some of the

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 11>deregulation and whether some of these mergers and consolidation will

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 11>be a looted, and.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 14>Then there's a broader corporate sector.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 11>As some of the enthusiasm we've seen and we've heard

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 11>from the cities, a head of banking from JP Morgan,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 11>how much do you see that being maybe a little

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 11>premature based on some of the policies coming down the

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 11>pike and the uncertainty around debt, deficit and rates.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think you have to divorce a little bit

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 12>some of the fiscal work that has to be done,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 12>and in coming Treasury or Secretary and others have to

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 12>take very seriously this question of how do we manage

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 12>the revenue stream, the expense stream, and the amount of

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 12>debt and get it all to work out. That one

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 12>of the ways that that becomes easier if you have

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 12>more activity and more things going on.

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 13>So I think the enthusiasm.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 12>Here from the bankers is more structurally. The belief is

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 12>that even starting yesterday, you don't have you don't have

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 12>the constraint that you have, so you can go. If

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 12>there's more that enables more, that's good stuff, but right

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 12>now it'll stop it going in the wrong direction and

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 12>look hard. Medium small sized businesses their biggest complaint last summer.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 13>Last time I was here and we.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 12>Talked to the administration about it was the biggest complaint

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 12>was you're in my pocket. You're slow me down. I

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 12>can't get things done. I want to permit to do something,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 12>it takes forever. I want your labor rules. All this

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 12>stuff was going on just over and over, and small

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 12>medium sized business don't have the thousands of people that

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 12>big companies have to figure it all out and they're

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 12>figuring out their own The same person's running the business

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 12>at nice sitting Anders say, so, what does this new

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 12>taxation strategy on so security mean to me?

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 13>How does it apply? How I have to change all

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 13>my systems?

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 12>And so they're just saying, if you just stop, you know,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 12>things will get better.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 10>So you're on the number one lene to small businesses

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 10>in the United States, give us the read on things

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 10>right now? Are they already making those decisions to make

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 10>a move to make those investments that they were on

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 10>hold over the last four years doing? Are they already

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 10>making that most so.

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 12>If you come over the last say, six eight months

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 12>or so that it went from regulation and inflation, the

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 12>inflation has kind of come down as their worry. Right now,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 12>what's actually interesting is they're going back to labor shortages

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 12>and rightly now the interesting thing about that that has

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 12>a question about immigration and all this stuff going on.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 13>But what they're feeling that is demand.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 12>I need people to do things, and so they're starting

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 12>to feel the demand steady. They remember when the Fed

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 12>was raising rates high, their cost of barring went up

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 12>a lot. They went from three hundred basis points over

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 12>an index that went up by five hundred basis points.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 12>That's a big number, and so that caused them to say,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 12>let me be careful and then if as the rates

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 12>come download but they feel a little better and now

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 12>let's say, Okay, I have the opportunity to grow, but

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 12>can I get the people? And remember that was the

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty one twenty two timeframe, so in there there's

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 12>got to be a solution this immigration. It doesn't constrain

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 12>those small medium sized business for growing or they're going

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 12>to start letting.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 10>Would you say, just to jump in, would you say

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 10>we are supply constrained? Do you think we are prone

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 10>to have these in flight?

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 13>Yes? And no, And.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 12>We don't know honestly because because the stimulus after the pandemic,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 12>there was so much more than there maybe had to

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 12>be by technical economic discussion, you know, it's hard to

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 12>say whether we're supply constrained and other things.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 13>And it were supply constraints because it.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 12>Cut off a supply and the stoppage of goods coming

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 12>in a country and shipping and all that stuff that

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 12>we went through. So you haven't gotten to a real

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 12>normalized side of that yet. But that's the blame for

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 12>the current thing. I think the supply shortages can mitigate.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 12>If you know, we got to be a little care

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 12>about labor supply, We've got to be a little care

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 12>for about the.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 13>Terriffs impacting supply and things.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 12>But I think people the second sourcing's gone on, people

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 12>are finding places to get stuff.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 13>So I'm not quite sure that's going to be the issue.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 12>But a lot of what we think it was the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 12>issue is actually the pandemic, the stimulus and the impact

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 12>the pandemic on supply that's worth the sort of system.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 11>So John started with the fact that you've been in

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 11>Bank of America for fifteen years. We keep hearing about

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 11>succession plans in different places. What's your success should plan?

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 13>But you're trying to throw me out, No.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 15>Not at all.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 11>I'm just wondering because this is something that we.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 10>Lost.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 12>Questions the way, the fascination with all this is interesting,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 12>and one just means we're all getting older.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 13>So what they're out is we run.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 12>We run across in our company through the top three layers,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 12>including for the CEO succession. Every six months, we go

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 12>through everything who the media successors for every one of

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 12>our teammates jobs, and we have a slate, and we

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 12>go from a slip because if we run a company,

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 12>people leave for a whole, they retire, they get another job, whatever,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 12>and you're always filling jobs.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 13>And so with the way the board will make a

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 13>choice at.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 12>Some point, I'm not going anywhere unless they throw me out.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 13>They know that.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 12>But my job, and one of the biggest jobs I have,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 12>is preparing people for the what it would be like

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 12>to run this company out there and and and then

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 12>and and that's important. So we do a lot with

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 12>our team to get them used to experiences and get

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 12>them to learn more about the trade offs you have

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 12>to make at the top of the house, because if

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 12>you come through a business or come through a function,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 12>you haven't made those trails. That's part of our general strategy.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 12>And so we talked to our board. But you'll never

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.239
<v Speaker 12>hear us discuss A is in and B is not.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 12>That to me is the worst thing you can do.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 12>I went through that process in the end of two

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 12>thousand and nine. Whether it's day to day speculation, that's.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 13>Not the way to do it.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for that very much.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 13>You'll be the first first one.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 14>Okay, thank you.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate that.

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 11>We only have about thirty seconds. You said something to

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 11>us when we were at Bank of America that AI

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 11>would basically keep the staff the same size but increase

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 11>the footprint of business.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 14>Do you stand by that?

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, there are two facts I'll give you. One is

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 13>we run the company.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 12>On the nominal amount of dollars of expenses we did

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 12>ten years ago almost now, nominal or not not inflation

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 12>just and we run it on thirty thousand less people.

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 12>That is all digitization, and AI is an extension of automation,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 12>digitization models, et cetera, automating work, taking out work and automated.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 13>Therefore you don't need and I think AI keeps going.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 12>The idea is, if we're good, we'll keep adjusting where

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 12>the teammates end up. So it might not be the

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 12>same two hundred twelve thousand people two hundred and thirteen

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 12>thousand people doing the same thing ten years from now. Yeah,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 12>but my guess is that our employment levels will stay

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 12>relatively said if you work towards stuff that can't be

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 12>replicated near turn by.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 10>Air Bran and you've been super generous with your time,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 10>and you show me up every year because you always

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 10>come out here with a suit jacket on and I'm

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 10>sitting here with like a winter jacket. Yeah, but yeah,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 10>I know, I know you've been influenced by Brian.

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 11>No, it's actually just a lot more Thanks for.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 10>America CEO and chairman. Bye, Thank you guys Banks.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 4>See you ending in artificial intelligence. We so appreciate it

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 4>out in Davos. Fantastic conversation. Welcome back to bluemog Technology.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York and.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm Mike Sheppard in Washington.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Quick check on these markets, Mike, because look, we've got

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a reprieve in the markets as

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 4>we try to digest a whole host of executive orders

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 4>and moves made by the new administration as Trump takes office.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 4>We're currently up two ten percent on the NASAK one hundred,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 4>investors wanting to see the growth potential rather than some

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 4>of the the trade hindrances for now. But Apple in

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 4>the spotlight down more than four point three percent. This

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 4>is the worst day since August of last year. It's

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 4>currently training in the lowest September twenty twenty four. This

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 4>again is China anxiety. Apple intelligence not really feeding through

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 4>in demand for the iPhone as much as analyst anticipated,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Loop Capital and Jeffrey's cut their overall view of Apple

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 4>from a hold or indeed one indeed saying to a

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 4>cell let's move on and have a look at what's

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 4>happening in the.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 2>World of crypto as well, because no executive order.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to bitcoin, I'm afraid we're up two

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>point nine percent, but we're still above one hundred and

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 4>five thousand dollars micro strategy.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 2>On the downside, a lot of the crypto exposed.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Names are on the fact that maybe we didn't get

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 4>an EO out the gate when it comes to the

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 4>approval of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies more broadly by.

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The new administration.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Microstratuy, you're by two when it's buying yet more bitcoin

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 4>as we know an eleventh consecutive week. But there was

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 4>good news over the weekend into the inauguration for many

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 4>crypto holders. Let's go to it, Blu MiGs Isabelle Lee,

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 4>is here an extraordinary announcement coming from the incoming at

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that point President Trump. Now is President Trump and Milania

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 4>both having a mean coin? What does this mean for

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 4>the space?

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 16>I really thought it was a joke when I saw

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 16>it online, because you see a lot of parodies, but

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 16>then it was real. I mean, now we don't know

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 16>yet if this is related to Trump or not. His

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 16>team is behind it, but we have his son Eric

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 16>Trump saying that this is quote, the greatest digital meme

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 16>on earth. So what to make of this?

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Two things?

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 16>Really, On one hand, it's a great thing. It's really

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 16>signifies a new regime, the fact that you have a

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 16>coin named after Trump and also Milania. When Milanna was

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 16>launch launch, by the way, it sucked some of the

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 16>air out of the Trump point, but still at one

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 16>point it was as high as sixty billion.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 14>That's great.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 2>But on the other you have if you're long in

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the space, it's great, yes, yes, But.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 16>On the other you have people saying this highlights the

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 16>memification of the industry. How will the traditional finance people

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 16>take us seriously? Because what is a meme coin? What

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 16>is a meme style? It's just really a joke. So

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 16>it has no underlying asset. They're speculative, they're volatile, it's

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 16>like what is doage coin? You know, but still the

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 16>whole market is one hundred million in valuation, so it's

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 16>an expensive joke. But well this last who knows? So

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 16>it's really interesting, but lots of activity and billions of

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 16>dollars changing hands at.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>That Isabelle, Are you sensing any bruise feelings in the

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 3>industry from not seeing an executive order on day one

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 3>from Trump on crypto or even a mention during his

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>inaugural address after being sworn in.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 16>We have bitcoin soaring to a record high on Monday,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 16>and then it paired back some of those gains from

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 16>one hundred and nine plus thousand, it became one hundred

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 16>and three. And I asked some of that analysts because

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 16>I was on on Monday. I was like, why is

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 16>bitcoin pairing its games? And they were like, because Trump

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 16>didn't mention.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>It in this speech.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 14>But take note of that.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 16>The fact that bitcoin faithful, their crypto enthusiasts are expecting

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 16>Trump and the incoming president at that point, the president

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 16>of the United States, they're expecting him to mention it

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 16>in his inaugural speech is already one thing that really

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 16>just means that crypto is becoming mainstream, or if it

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 16>isn't mainstream, t you just yet.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So it's really something.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 16>But you know, with Trump focused on tarriffs and energy

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 16>and trade, but they were really hoping and banking on

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 16>the fact that Trump will say something about bitcoin.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg isabell ye, thank you.

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Heading back to Dabos Now, where mistraw AI CEO Arthur

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Mench spoke with Bloomberg TV's Frendcine Lac about the company's

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.719
<v Speaker 3>expansion plans and about his thoughts on Europe's regulatory and

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>competitive landscape.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 17>I like to look at it from a positive point

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 17>of view. Europe has a lot of strength. In particular,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 17>the talent poolt has access to. The people that are

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 17>building AI, including in the US, are actually mostly Europeans,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 17>and so the opportunity we had, and that's also the

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 17>thing that we provide to our customers, is the expertise.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 17>And I think Europe can come together today and realize

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 17>that we've been innovators. We're continent of innovators. We need

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 17>to keep being innovators, and AI is an opportunity to

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 17>continuously innovate. There's a lot of other companies that are

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 17>building that. I'm thinking of ace Email and thinking of

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 17>all of the AI startups that we're working with in

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 17>France and in London, and so let's not look at

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 17>the bad things. Effectively, we have a tendency to play

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 17>a little too much referee in the trillion dollar raise.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 17>But we have the strength and we just need to

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 17>have the will to create in Europe and to innovate

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 17>and create value there.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 11>Do you think that there's a first mover advantage in

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 11>this industry or is it really execution and innovation.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 2>That will win.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 17>I mean, as in any industry, you have first move

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 17>or advantage. But the AI is going to be a revolution.

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 17>It's going to be long lasting revolution. It's going to

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 17>take decades to actually be rolled fully to enterprises role

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 17>fully to the way we actually behave and the way

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 17>we actually deal with computers, so and a lot of things.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 17>And we are realizing that enterprises are a bit struggling

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 17>with realizing the value of AI. And that's where you

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 17>need to partner deeply with someone that can help you

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 17>get the expertise, distill the expertise of your company into

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 17>AI systems that can then help you drive the productivity

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 17>that you're expecting. So the we're only we're only five

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 17>percent there, and so everything that is sitting on top

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 17>of model, all of the orchestration part, all of the

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 17>managing data, all of the customization part of things that

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 17>we still need to figure out, and I think we

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 17>have a very good headstart there.

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 4>I was mis Rasieo Arthur Mench along with Francin Laqua. Meanwhile,

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 4>another closely watched interview at Davos was the Open AI

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 4>CFO Sarah Fry. She's spent with Bluemoks showing Fari about

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 4>rising enterprise use of chatchipt and the company's growth.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Take listen.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 18>We have had to do an extraordinary amount of fundraising.

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 18>Luckily we also have a business model that supports it.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 18>I already talked about chat ChiPT for consumer over three

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 18>hundred million users today and it's a workhourse when it

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 18>comes to revenue, revenue growth and ultimately profitability. But we

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 18>are seeing now enterprises of every size embraces technology, and

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 18>we really see ourselves also as the enterprise company. There's

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 18>a really good symbiosis between those two areas because often

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 18>when I meet customers, and I'm meeting a lot of

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 18>them here in Davas, it's actually their personal experience they

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 18>start with. When I say, hey, how are you using

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 18>chat GPT, They'll actually give me a personal anecdote first.

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 18>And for those of you who sell into enterprises, you

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 18>know that if you've won your customer heart in just

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 18>their day to day, being able to go in and

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 18>then sell them into their enterprise environment gets an awful

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 18>lot easier. And so that enterprise model is really building

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 18>across every sector of the economy, every type of company,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 18>every scale of company, And I'd be happy to talk

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 18>through examples. Morgan Stanley is a great example, since we're

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 18>talking financing, and they're also a good partner in that front,

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 18>but they're using our technology and areas like wealth management,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 18>in areas like even their investment banking, and they've been

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 18>doing it now for multiple years. So in terms of

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 18>the future from a financing perspective, I suspect we will

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 18>continue to have to finance at pace, but we will

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 18>do that on the merits of our business as well.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 6>How about an IPO, what would that look like for

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 6>open ai?

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned profitability? You know, how far do you think

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>we are from that? What are you know? You're someone

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 2>who's taken two companies public. What would the steps be

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 2>for open ai to get there? And how far are

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>we from profitability?

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah?

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 18>So, as I've told every company I've been associated with

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 18>on an IPO, it's it's not a destination. An IPO

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 18>is just a marker on a journey, and if you

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 18>get wrapped around the idea that the IPO is a destination,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 18>is a very kind of dangerous world to live in

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 18>because there's a feeling of finality and maniland, going public

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 18>is just the beginning of another very interesting part of

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 18>your journey, like what are the positives?

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>And IPO number one.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 18>I think it's a very strong credentializing moment for any company.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 18>I love that moment of sunlight, of being able to

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 18>show your financials externally, to show how your business is building.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 18>It's the best disinfectant in any room. It's a great

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 18>way to fundraise because it opens the door not just

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 18>to equity and selling your equity in that moment, but

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 18>it also starts opening the door to many more areas

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 18>of financing, starting with mezzanine debt, structured debt, and so

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 18>on and again. In a world where we're buying a

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 18>lot of compute, we need to get there fast because

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 18>equity is an expensive way to raise capital and to

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 18>deploy capital. We need to make sure we continue to

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 18>bring down that weighted average cost of capital.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>That was open AICFO Sarah Freyer from Davos.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 19>So one of the things that we shared, as you

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 19>said at the beginning, is that we are moving away

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 19>from the way that we were utilizing third party independent

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 19>fact checkers and moving now to much more of a

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 19>community notes program. We're starting that in the US and

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 19>then we'll see how that goes as we move it

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 19>out over the years. So nothing changing in the rest

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 19>of the world at the moment. We're still working with

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 19>those fact checkers around the world, but in the US

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 19>that's that's the direction of.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Travel to start with Meta's head of Global Business Group,

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Nikola Mendelson in Davos, and as is, the company is

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 4>gearing up to remove third party fact checking here in

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 4>the United States.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 2>But Blue Mugs Kat Wagner is joining us now to talk.

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 4>About the timing of all of this, because just last

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 4>week a lawyer representing Meta quit accusing the CEO, Mark

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 4>Zuckerberg of what he called a descent into toxic masculinity

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and neo Nazi madness. Then there's a controversy swirling around

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 4>gestures made by Elon Musk this inauguration. We can this

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 4>feels as though conspiracy theories are kind of running wild

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 4>at the same time as fact checking is taking a

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:35.439
<v Speaker 4>stand back.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, and that's just unfortunately the reality of what's going

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 20>to happen. When you take away fact checking, you sort

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 20>of open the door for you know, inaccurate information to

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 20>spread pretty wildly on the platform, right, And so I

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 20>don't think that's going to be a coincidence. I don't

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 20>think this is the end of that reality for us, right,

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 20>I don't. I think community notes is sort of an

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 20>interesting concept. I don't think it is a fool proof

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 20>concept when it comes to fact checking at scale, and

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 20>so I'm sure the metal will learn that, you know,

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 20>if not already then certainly over time. I think the

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 20>interesting thing about this fact checking timing for them is

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 20>that you know, clearly they usually test things outside of

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 20>the US and then bring them to the US when

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 20>they are ready for prime time, because this is the

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 20>most valuable market. It's interesting that in this case they're

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 20>doing the test here in the US and leaving it

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 20>in the rest of the world. To me, that's a

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 20>signal that this is more of a political decision for

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 20>them right to appease the Trump administration than it is

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 20>a reality that the fact checking was a major problem

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 20>to begin with I see this more as you know,

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 20>something that they're doing to appease the Trump administration more

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 20>so than this was a huge ding or knock on

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 20>the you know, the platform's ability to thrive.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner, thank you. Sticking with Meta. Remember this

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 3>moment from a Facebook town hall back in twenty eleven.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 20>My name is Barack Obama, and I'm the guy who got.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 13>Mark to wear a jacket and time.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 3>That was former President Barack Obama joking with Meta CEO

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Mark Zuckerberg. Things certainly have changed for the Facebook founder

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and other tech leaders, as we saw during yesterday's inauguration.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 3>For more in the industry's relationship with politicians, we are

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 3>joined now by Margaret O'Mara, Professor of American History at

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the University of Washington. Margaret, I have to ask you,

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 3>how are we going to look back at this moment

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 3>yesterday where we saw such a lineup of tech leaders

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and billionaires at the inauguration, seated so prominently, what.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 14>Was really extraordinary?

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 15>I mean, it remains to be seen how the relationship

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 15>between tech and the Trump administration will evolve over time,

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 15>but we have never in American history seen a lineup

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 15>of business tycoons occupying a place of honor at a

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 15>presidential inauguration like we did yesterday.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 14>Silicon Valley has long had ties.

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 15>With Washington and different presidential administrations, but this does feel

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 15>like uncharted territory.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 3>And how does this translate into the priority list that

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 3>each of these CEOs may be bringing to the administration.

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 3>How much does that proximity count.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 14>It counts a lot.

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 15>And look, we've again we've seen Silicon Valley leaders have

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 15>very close relationships with the Obama administration, the Clinton administration,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 15>with other administrations other than Trump.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 14>So this again is not entirely unknown, but there are really.

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 15>High stakes, and we see both on the regulatory side

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 15>and in the spending and.

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 14>Tax policy side.

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 15>On the regulatory side, the promise to have a light

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 15>hand on AI regulation, as well as Trump's boosting of crypto,

0:37:55.560 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 15>underscored by his and the First Lady's personal involvement issuance

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 15>of their own coins in.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 14>The last couple of days, is something.

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 15>That is a real sea change for the industry, of

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 15>real difference in attitude than what the Biden administration had approached.

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 14>And then also we.

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 15>Have the promise of tax policy being corporate friendly generally,

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 15>and also things like defense contracting, which is the Defense

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 15>Department and the National Security Establishment does a lot of

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 15>business with Silicon Valley companies, and that only seems poised.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 4>To increase Margaret, take us back from a historical perspective,

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 4>have there been as many ethical questions when we've seen

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 4>such relationships, perhaps not so flamboyantly demonstrated, but certainly close

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 4>and previous administrations there haven't.

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 14>Well, there have been questions, but they have been resolved.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 15>And let me point to a really interesting example from

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 15>Silicon Valley's past. David Packard, the founder of Hewlett Packard

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 15>now HP, kind of a legendary Silicon Valley founder. He

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 15>actually joined the Nixon administry as Deputy Secretary of Defense

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 15>in nineteen sixty nine, and he was a very wealthy man,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 15>and he famously put his wealth in a blind trust

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.800
<v Speaker 15>while he was in office to resolve any ethical questions

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 15>there might be about HP profiting from defense contracts.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 14>Which it did have while he was at the Defense Department.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's just I.

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Mean, thinking of what you've written, in particular, the code

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley and the remaking of America is Silicon Valley

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 4>aren't the tech leaders that we see remaking America from

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 4>a political perspective right now, Margaret, I say that with

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the words of the previous administration still bringing on O

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 4>is that this is some sort of oligarchy.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think that they are trying to.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 15>I mean, what certainly is the case and hasn't been

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 15>the case in the past, is that the platforms that

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 15>they control just thinks solely about the people who were

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 15>on the inaugural dais yesterday in the Capitol rotunda, Mark Zuckerberg, Sunderbushai,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 15>Jeff bezo Elon Musk, that they have such an outsized

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 15>influence over online communication, on online commerce, that there already

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 15>is such an immense consolidation of power that again there

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 15>have been you know, big power structures and successful companies

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 15>in the valley before, but this.

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 14>Is the next level. You know, the influence is tremendous.

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Margaret, last question thirty seconds. These companies have a position

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 3>to shape history as we will be reading it later.

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 8>Talk about that unique role they.

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 15>Do, just as the history textbooks now have Andrew Carnegie

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 15>and John Rockefeller and them, and people around the world

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 15>know those names, you know, regardless of what happens next

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 15>we a century from now, probably people are going to

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 15>be reading about Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos and Elon

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 15>Musk And I think with great power comes from great responsibility.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 15>This is part of the criticism that has been levied

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 15>at tech over the last decade about what the you know,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 15>the ripple effects of their platforms might be.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 14>Now, again, these are businesses, these.

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 15>Are people in the you know, these are for profit companies,

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 15>and I think there also is a very important public

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 15>sector government regulatory role that has been absent.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 14>So that's one of the reasons that they have become

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 14>this large.

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 15>So I think it needs to be a balance and

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 15>we need to think more broadly about how this shakes out.

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Margaret Omara, Professor of American History at the University of Washington.

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 4>So appreciate your time coming up streaming jant Netflix and

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 4>set to report it results after the closing bell, and

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 4>look at what we can expect next, there's a bluemog

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 4>technology Netflix. Oh, it's set to report earnings after the bell.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 4>What can we expect? Let's bring in Lucas Shaw and

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 4>the shares had a phenomenal twenty twenty four. How was

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Q four from a profit and revenue perspective.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.439
<v Speaker 9>Well, we'll find out at the end of the day,

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 9>but people are expecting.

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 13>A very strong quarter.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, they had the Mike Tyson Jake Paul fight

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 9>in the quarter, which was the big live event they've

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 9>ever done, one of the most watched things they've ever

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 9>put out, and I believe due to according to some

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 9>third party researchers, led to the biggest one day of

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 9>spike and.

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 13>New customers they've had in years.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, they also had NFL on Christmas Day, they

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 9>had season two of Squid Game, they had new seasons

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 9>for a bunch of other hit shows. So most people

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 9>are expecting it to be a very strong quarter, which

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 9>will be, unfortunately for us, the last one in which

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 9>they report their subscriber numbers.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we suddenly have to read Teelee's in a whole

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 4>new way. We are expecting strength coming from the live

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 4>side of the equation, and I mean the market capitalization

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 4>reflects that.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>How much more strings.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Do they have to pull to outperform going into what

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 4>analysts are pretty buoyant on the company.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean it's pretty crazy to think that Netflix

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.439
<v Speaker 9>is now worth almost four hundred million dollars it's more

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 9>than Disney and several other big media companies combined, and

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 9>you have to figure that there should be some kind

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 9>of ceiling on this. But look, the Netflix position is

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 9>going to be you know, these live events were going

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 9>big into that area and it's going to boost our

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 9>advertising business, which is one of the reasons that they

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 9>want to stop reporting subscriber numbers because they believe that

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 9>their revenue growth and their profits are going to look

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.919
<v Speaker 9>really good going forward. It just won't be as many

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 9>new subscribers quarter after quarter.

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 4>And how technically robust has the live offering been.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, Look, they had well documented problems during the Tyson

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 9>Paul fag that was largely due to too much demand,

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 9>which is a good thing if you're trying to attract

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.240
<v Speaker 9>an audience. They didn't have a lot of problems during

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 9>the NFL match. I think, you know, these live events

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 9>on streaming tend to have the same life cycle where

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 9>there are issues early on where the company is newer

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 9>to it and they have some issues usually when they

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 9>put on something that people really want to watch, and

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:49.439
<v Speaker 9>then they figure it out over time.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 13>Right, you know, we stream all sorts.

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 9>Of things live these days, so I think long term,

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be fine for them. The question is

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 9>what are the events that they are going to collect

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 9>that deliver or attract a big enough audience if they're

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 9>not a major buyer of sports rights because they're trying

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 9>to create their own events. But look, they just had

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 9>the WWE debut. Everyone at Netflix is really happy with

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 9>it so far. We'll see in three, six, nine months

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 9>if that remains the case.

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Don't even get our producers started on her love for

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 4>all blimogs, Lucas Shaw brilliant.

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, meanwhile, look and unlikely win it in the TikTok

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 4>band saga of late has been JEWELINGO. Here's what the

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 4>CEO had to say earlier on belie their open interest.

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 13>We do have a good number of people learning Manderin.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 21>It's not our most popular language, but but it's definitely

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 21>a popular language. Is among the top eight languages that

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 21>people are learning, and we did see a huge spikes,

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 21>and it's mainly because people who are When they thought

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 21>that TikTok was going to be banned, they started trying

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 21>some Chinese apps like red Note, and as soon as

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 21>they showed up, most of the things were in Chinese,

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 21>so they came and wanted to learn Chinese undoolingo because

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 21>of that jewelingo CEO.

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 4>There are a reminder that many of the apps that

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 4>TikTok uses flocked to during the quick US ban and

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 4>turn around Mandarin based, so Luis van Hahn optimistic that

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 4>actually the users will stick around even though TikTok back online.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 4>We start with TikTok, we end with TikTok. That does

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 4>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Don't forget to

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 4>check out our podcast. You can find it on the

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.280
<v Speaker 4>terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, an iHeart.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology.