WEBVTT - U.S. Job Growth Slows in Mixed Labor Picture

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Clobal News. All right, let's get to it

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and the market Driver's report. Let's set the business week agenda, folks,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>let's go in on. Kreta Gupta in the house, Bloomberg

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Markets correspondent here at Bloomberg News. Carlberg and Donna also

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in the house. Welcome, Welcome back, chief industry economist at

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, both in our interactive broker studio. Bring out

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>some wine and we'll have a party. But I don't

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know should we be partying. Well, Carl, I'm going to

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>start with you, because let's start there. The jobs report.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I felt like really really smart people were like, m

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>some good news, some questionable news. Remember used to be

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a really strong jobs report back a long long time ago,

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>disappointing result today this was way below even the most

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic forecast is submitted to Bloomberg. So, you know, in

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a month when the case count was declining and we

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>thought that folks were becoming more comfortable with returning to

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the labor force and taking jobs and spending and whatnot,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the case. And and so what I'm concerned

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is this looks a lot like November of last year

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>when we had a big disappointment on jobs. Then over

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the course of November December the case counts skyrocketed. Sounds familiar, right,

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and then December was a real bust for payrolls. And

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this creates bad optics for a FIT

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's trying to accelerate the taper. At the December meeting,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>when the case counts rising, jobs are disappointing, we do

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's not all bad news. There was some There

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>were there were some silver linings in there. If you

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>call labor force participation running at the same level it

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>did when Jimmy Carter was president. I'm sure that's good news,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's a down road to come back here, and

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you're down a downer based on what demographic group you

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>fall into by age Cohort. So if we look at

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the very young, the new entrance to the labor force,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, young kids coming out of college, in high

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>school and whatnot. Um, that has basically fully rebounded. If

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we look at prime working age population, it's coming back,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's still got a ways to go. And if

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we look at kind of a fifty five plus type

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of crowd, and I well, I'll just stop there, are

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you looking? Know? I was gonna say, and I happened

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at you, But I'm not tying you

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>into the plus crowd. We know that that you know,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we know how old you are and much younger than

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>we but you know, fifty five plus crowd, it's it's

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>how you feel. It's how old you feel, Carol Um.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>If we look at that demographic, very very little recovery whatsoever.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the problem is is it the resignation or

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that folks still afraid to step off of the sidelines

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>into the labor market. A big concern of the FED

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is the scarring that could potentially happen to the economy.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at both prime age and older workers,

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not coming back. And if we look at it

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>slightly different way, if we go go industry by industry

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>by industry, almost every single sector is still operating below February.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is not just at leisure and hospitality story.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>This is broad based across the economy. Questions there, heretod

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to come on in here, and how is this manifesting

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in today's trade? Yeah, well, first off, I'm just gonna

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>add one eco thing, even though I'm not the eco

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>person in the room here, but November is supposed to

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be historically a very strong month for jobs, right Carl,

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And and to see a miss on this particular set

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of months data is extra bad. In addition to the

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>miss um why the market selling off that it might

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be partially because the payrolls report, although it's worth mentioning

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>when the headlines did drop, the initial reaction was the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what you're seeing right now. You saw features higher,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you saw the stock market open, all sectors in the

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>green bond yields were dipping, and then you saw the

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>sell off as the market open so a lot of

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is tech driven, a lot of this is just

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>pulling cash off the table. But remember it is Friday.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Volume is super low. This looks a lot like what

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw last Friday, where people just aren't at their

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>desk and they're de risking before the weekend. Huh. Jobs

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>came out at eight thirty, the market turned around at

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 1>nine thirty, right, So you can see that it wasn't

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really the job's catalyst necessarily that was driving the narrative

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. That's so, are you saying COVID or what. Well,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it really made the turn when President Biden had his

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>press conference and so I mean he was coughing in

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Hill and the you know, the press didn't care about

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the jobs report and cared more about his health and whatnot.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that drove it, but you know,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, the timing there. So you know,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had the time to review the full press

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>conference yet. Maybe he said some things that the markets

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't like as well. We should know too that we

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>did hear from the President's physician just does not do

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the flu, he said. The physicians said, this

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is what's referred to colloquially as a frog and once throat,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he's taking over the counter medication. This is Bloomberg Business

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. We've been talking about it, certainly one

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of our top stories on this Friday. Job's Friday. US

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>job growth registering its smallest game this year, while the

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate fell by more than fourcast to four point

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>two percent. That feels pretty low offering, though a mixed

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>picture that may nevertheless push the FED to quicken the

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>wind down a pandemic stimulus. And this is what we're

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all trying to figure out right now, Really, what does

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this all mean when it comes to monetary policy in

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the US. It's also happening at a time when that

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>survey didn't even cover the first the part of the

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>month where we even knew what the word on the

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>chron met exactly, and you do wonder how that might

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>impact things, which is why the next jobs report could

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be even more important. All right, Let's get to it, though,

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>because someone who sees a lot in terms of what

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is going on in the labor force real time, especially

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to millennials and Gen z uh individuals.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring and Katherine Minshew. She's CEO, co founder of

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the job placement career platform US. She's on the phone

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Catherine, great to have you here.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>How are you. I'm doing great, Thank you so much

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So how do you see the labor

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>market based on what you are seeing the type of

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>activity uh and volume that's going on in your on

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>your platform. You know, as you mentioned, it was a

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>mixed draw reports with both the payroll increasing by a

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>smaller percentage than forecast, but that dropping the unemployment rate

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to four point two. And I think, frankly, it's not

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge surprise, right there are a lot of contradictory

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>trends in the economy right now. So I think that

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that this was broadly as as expected by at least

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the folks in my corner of the

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>labor market. That's so interesting because it wasn't expected by economists.

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>We heard from Carl Rica Donna that the thousand number

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that we got, that headline number that we got in

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the change in non farm payrolls earlier today, that was

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>lower than even the lowest number that came from one

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. That's fair. That's fair.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think it was a little bit under predictions.

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think first of all, we did see some

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>additional jobs added to previous hollies in the September and October,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>which takes away a little bit of that sting. And

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what we are seeing is that people who entered the

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>labor force in November, um, they were hired really quickly.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we have certain industries and sectors

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>where there's whitehawk competition for talent. We're seeing that in technology,

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in warehousing and anything related to e commerce, and then

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously others that that are really struggling to add jobs

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and struggling to hire, so hospitality, travel, leisure, and even

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>frankly retail as I think a lot of a lot

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of shopping moves online. Hey, Katherine, you mentioned when we

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>just started going a lot of contradictory trends in the

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>economy right now. How do you what do you see

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as contradictory in particular? Well, I think that we're seeing

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>firstly that a lot of newer entrants into the workforce,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and particularly Gen Z and millennial job seekers, um, you know,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they entered in many cases they've just come out of

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this really tough employment market. U was a really hard

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>time for a lot of a lot of workers of

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all types frankly, to get a job, to to stay employed.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, people are much more choosy

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, and so we're seeing, you know, spikes in

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>worker pay. We're seeing a lot of people choose to

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>opt out of the workforce unless they find a job

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or an employer that meets certain criteria. So I think

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, um, you know, both big differences within industries

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and sectors of the economy, but also um some some

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very contradictory data coming out of again, particularly the demographic

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>that I spend most of my time with, which is

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>gen V and millennial. There's a lot of indications they're

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for more than compensation, but also at the same time,

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, salary remains important. A lot of things in

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the data that I think reflects the fact that there's

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty in the economy right now. What

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>were the similarities that you saw in today's jobs report

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that you also find in your work and on the

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on the platform the muse. Yeah, Well, um, I think

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the unemployment rate is so low, as

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly reflected in what we see on the mus um.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have so many employers that just literally

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot fill their roles fast enough and it's causing major

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>disruption to their businesses. I'm sure you're hearing about it

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>from other guests. But some of that is because some

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>workers are opting out. Some of that is because workers

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are raising their their standards, like I mentioned, and so

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've also been surveying a lot of workers

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about what factors are they considering when they're thinking about

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>whether to get back into the labor market, whether to

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>change companies or change jobs, um, and people are flagging

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>things like you know, they're looking for better person benefits

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>than they had in the past. They are looking for

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are committed to diversity, equity and inclusion. There's

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bursens on employers that weren't perhaps there too,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, two years ago before the pandemic started in

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the same way you know, Um, Katherine, I've been doing

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of reporting and research on just the growth

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of entrepreneurship, people starting up their own business. We saw

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this coming out of the financial crisis. We're seeing it

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.119
<v Speaker 1>once again coming out of the pandemic. Women in particular

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>are kind of I feel like, voting very clearly by saying,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe we don't want to go to the traditional establishment

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>stay in corporate America. We want the flexibility. You understand

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that you've started your own business, right and it's a

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure, it's a lot of stress, but you

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>do gain a lot of flexibility. What do you make

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of those trends and the significance that that maybe having

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>on our labor environment right now? Absolutely, I think you're

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>spot on. And in fact, when you look at some

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest technology companies that have have shaped our

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lives today, um, you know, a lot of them were

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>started back post the financial crisis between two thousand and

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>eight and two thousand ten. I think, uh, Uber, Airbnb,

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of household names, and so I'm I'm personally

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>excited to see what next massive companies you know, we

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>see started. And then you also have a lot of

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>people that are not starting high growth Silicon Valley businesses,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but are starting small businesses, are going freelance, and I

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, it is something that has become

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>easier than it was in the past due to all

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of the different off the shelf products and services that

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are designed to support entrepreneurs, to support small business owners. Um.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I I am not at all surprised that a lot

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of women looked at the way corporations responded to COVID

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and said, no, thanks, I'm going to set my own hours. Um.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do think some of those workers

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>will re enter the more traditional labor force in the

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>next few years. But but we will also see a

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who this was the push they needed

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to to get into entrepreneurship. And I think that's really

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think that's really great thing for the broader economy. Obviously,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm clearly by it. No, but you understand it, you

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. We've often seen and this year alone too,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of female founded companies I p O.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So that is sept thing tim that we've seen as well. Hey, Katherine,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>as as Americans have remained on the sidelines, how concerned

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are you and how concerned should the federal reserves be

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about scarring when it comes to this job market. The

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>idea that people who are out the sidelines for a

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>long period of time will have a lot of trouble

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>returning to the job market. Yeah, that's a it's a

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a really big issue, and I think it's exacerbated

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that these skills most in demand by

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>many employers today are not the ones that were taught

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>or prioritized, you know, ten twenty years ago. You have

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>incredible demand in a lot of digital technologies, data focused roles,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>UM and so I think that you know, as as

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a as a society, UM as as individual companies, I hear,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing retraining and reskilling. We talked about more and

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more because I do think that you have both just

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the natural scarring of people who have been out of

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the workforce for a while, but also the fact that

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the jargon and the skills that are most

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in demand change, and if you don't have programs and

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ways for people to to get that current again, I

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>think you have the risk that a lot of people

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>won't you won't be able to do it without support.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're gonna leave it there. Hey, Katherine, thank

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Great snapshot on what's going on, certainly

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>among the younger generation when it comes to today's labor force.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Katherine Minshew. She's founder and chief executive Officer of

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the News, joining us on the phone in New York City.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, this week,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we know, right, it's been all about the latest COVID variant.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>At least that's been one of our really main stories

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that certainly has impacted financial markets. In this week's issue

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine Bloomberg, Cynthia Coon's notes that

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's a game changer, Amikron is COVID's future,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and Tim gotta say, timely story considering what we've seen, uh,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and the spread of the latest variant. I mean, we've

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>heard from Anthony Fauci, We've heard from President Biden this

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>week about it. We're gonna hear from Dr Anthony Fauci

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>again a little bit later on. Let's hear from Cynthia

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Coon's US healthcare reporter at Bloomberg News. She joins us

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New Jersey, as well as Joel Webber,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He joins us on the

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>access line from Brooklyn. Joel, I want to toss it

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>over to you. Because if there's one theme that Caroline

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I have experienced when speaking with with doctors and experts

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>throughout the week about the omicron variant, it's weight and see,

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know yet. The data just aren't there. Yeah,

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and and I'll say that that goes for

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting as well, because all of our reporting is going

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to be based on this. So so what we can do,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>though is talk to as many people as we can

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in farmland and without about sort of what their approach

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. And that's sort of where where

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia came in here is like, look, we've actually seen

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>seen this game before. We've had multiple variants already, and

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to some extent that is really going to inform how

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>pharma approaches it and everyone else as well. But until

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we know a little bit more about this thing and

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in the data, I think everything is a little premature.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But Cynthia, based on what we do know, what can

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we expect. So the great news is that pharma companies

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>can move very quickly in actually assessing whether not the

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that we have taken are going to be effective

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>against O macron. And that's partly because of the work

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>they can do in the lab. They can actually take

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a look at how the UM variant performs against the

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in the lab, and that's that's data we could

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have soon. That data they've said within weeks, and they

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>started that work right away. And the reason they were

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>able to start that work right away is that they've

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>done this fire drill with beta with the South Africa

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>variant that was identified in South Africa prior to this one. UM.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They also did it with Delta, and they started making

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>boosters that were targeted for those variants previously, and so

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those actual tailored vaccines are also partly how they know

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what to do in this instance. And actually there are

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>some overlaps between O macron and beta that allow Maderna,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, is going to are going to test their

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>beta targeted vaccine as well to see if it works

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>against this mutation of the virus. But of course the

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>reason everyone's saying wait weeks, if not longer, to see

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how this actually developed is that we've had scares before.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you think back to Delta, I mean, Delta

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>took over, but it didn't take over as quickly as

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we might be remembering in retrospect. It actually became a

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>vary enough concern in India, and then it took over

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in India, and then it took over in the UK,

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and then it came here. So it could actually take

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>some time, and it has to be a mutation that's

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>strong enough to overtake delta, and so we don't know

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>any of that yet. So I think what a lot

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of people are trying to glean from a case here,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a case there is very premature because it's really a

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>matter of seeing help performs as a virus and a

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people and that's just going to take more

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>time than I think. You know, people don't want to wait,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately that's why people keep scientists keep saying you

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have to wait. Well, Cynthia, I want to drill in

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that the large pharmaceutical companies specifically Fazer

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and Maderna are working quickly to create vaccines or understand

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the effect that these are having on VEX on the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that exist right now. How much of this is

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that these are m R and A platforms,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily new technology, but new technology for vaccine delivery

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen that you really play out over the

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>last year Yeah, that's the really cool part about having

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>MR and A vaccines. They're able to sort of plug

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in the sequence once they have it. They don't have

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to grow the virus, which can take weeks or months,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and so in order to actually make a tailor made

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine takes much less time. Production is much faster. They

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>have facilities now ready all over the world, so if

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to switch to a new version

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine, they can do it in such a

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>wide scale in much more quickly than if it was

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a traditional vaccine. Like flu vaccines can take six to

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>nine months to make from identifying what streams of the

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>flu you're going after to actually having a vaccine and

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>put in somebody's arm. And this is just much faster

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>than that. Feiser has said a hundred days. It's just

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>remarkable how fast they'll be able to do this. But

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, it's it's a matter of not

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just making it, but also just knowing that you need

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it and so and also then also how do they

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>industry make the pivot between they a vaccine we have now,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>does a hiller made vaccine become a booster, doesn't replace

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine we have now? These are big questions that

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>need to be answered if this is deemed and necessity.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're still really far away from that. But I

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>think the mutation alone highlights the fact that this is

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going in the direction of the sort of flu vaccine model,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and we probably are going to need somewhat different vaccines

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis if coronavirus is going to linger

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>like this in the population. Cynthia. Wonder do we finally

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have as everybody finally gotten a memo that hey, folks, uh,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this was a really bad pandemic. We're probably gonna get more,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and we got to start preparing for things. So even

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>if a micron doesn't turn out to be and you

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>write about this in your story, doesn't turn out to

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>be maybe as problematic which fingers cross legs crossed, everything

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>cross that it it doesn't you know, we are developing

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>method methodologies, approaches, tools that will help us in the

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>future and that will be probably needed in the future.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope that's the case. I certainly anecdotally have heard

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot there's a lot of demand for booster shots now,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>which is great because it's all we have and boosting

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>immunity to what's circulating the community is still really important

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>public health tool, but we still do have a substantial

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of vaccine hesitancy in this country. And I've heard

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>from some experts that we really need to focus on

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>those completely unvaccinated populations because what we have seen from

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>O Macron is that it can infect someone who's already

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>had coronavirus, and we have parts of this country where

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccination rates are quite low and delta ripped through those populations,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and those people might be more vulnerable to OH macron.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>If that's how this plays out, then you know how

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>they gotten a vaccine. And I think there is some

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>perception in some parts of the population that having had

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>COVID is how you build your immunity, and unfortunately, with

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this virus, that just turned out to be the case.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are some encouraging signs, and the

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>booster campaign hopefully we'll continue to gain steam. But I

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think really focusing as a public health community on that

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>deeply entrenched unvaccinated population and trying to get to more

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>people is really going to be the answer here. Okay,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>so what about the global conundrum? Because worldwide there are

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer people who have had access to m RNA vaccines

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>than the other, than the other technologies. There's still like

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just millions upon millions of people who just don't have

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. As long as those people remain unvaccinated, we're

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see mutations that you know, there

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>will be things long after o MA run, right, And

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>since they just quick that twenty five seconds, sure. I

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think one of the really encouraging things so that we

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>don't talking of about is that there are other vaccines

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>coming down the pike that may not require the refrigeration

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>of the mRNA vaccines. And that's really important to get

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccine into parts of the world that may not have

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the facilities to store the m MARNI vaccines. So I

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>think we do need to keep an active eye on that.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a lot more vaccine coming

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and we do need to support that of the global community.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The countries that can afford to donate need to donate more,

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the only way we can get

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>finished with this. You hear it some leaders constantly. It's

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a global endemic, folks, which needs global solutions and cooperation.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Coon's You're amazing US healthcare reporter at Bloomberg News

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New Jersey, Joe Webber, have a

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>great weekend, Editor Bloomberg Business Week on the access line

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn. Check out the magazine. It's all about the

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg fifty. That story too in the magazine. This is

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovic on Bloomberg Radio. Are you hosting to Boomberg

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Business to Week, Carol Master along with Tim Stanovic and

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>our Interactive Broker studio streaming on YouTube. We mentioned some

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID headlines earlier. We are going to be

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>talking our David Weston with Dr Anthony Fauci a little

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bit later on, so we'll get the latest on how

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>he sees the amicronicron variant. In the meantimes, South Africa's

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>daily number of confirmed COVID nineteen cases almost quadrupling since

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday as that variant spreads across the country, and I

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>thanked him. I don't know if this is the latest.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the latest. I think according to our measurement,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at least six US states have on the KRON cases. Yeah,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's safe to say, given what we

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>know about this virus, that it's likely in other states

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Carol, Let's get into it with Dr Ian Lustbader.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He's clinical professor of medicine at n y U Langnes

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Medical Center. He joins us on the phone from New York.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr Lustbader, how are you hey? Happy Friday? Guys, nothing

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to panic about. Do not do not overreact, please please

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>go on why so? Uh? You know, in my opinion,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I think people are really overreacting to the news on

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>omarcron it uh. In my opinion, this is not going

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to have any material effect on the stock market, the economy,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>or likes in the United States unless we overreact with

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, lockdowns and travel bands and so forth, all

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of which really have been proven not effective. Um Kron

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>really is behaving like many viruses. Most or many respiratory

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>viruses evolve over time to become more contagious and really

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>less lethal, less virulent, and they adapt that to outcompete,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and that to me, it certainly looks like oh, Macron

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to outcompete Delta, both in people who have

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>either been vaccinated or have had Delta, or who have

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>had vaccines, and certainly in the unvaccinated. It's a very

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>efficient virus. The incubation period is longer. It's about attended

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>incubation period. It's more contagious and less lethal, which is

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>really how viruses evolved. And overall, there are many people

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>who feel this is actually good news because it probably

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>will end the pandemic a little bit sooner, since I

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to outrun any of the vaccines that

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be able to either develop or try

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to distribute to the rest of the world. That's my

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>take on it. Hey, listen um Dr Lesbia when you

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>say probably end the pandemic sooner, because what more will

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>create much more about global immunity. Is that what you're saying. Yes,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think more people this is highly contagious. I think

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's as Tim says, it's probably in many places we

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have not really been testing for it. We don't, especially

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. You know, we do testing COVID swabs,

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't routinely distinguish between any of the variants.

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So for all we know there are many places now

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to test for it. Uh that has it,

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't really change the way you manage it.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>If anything, it seems like the disease is more mild

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>um and this is really how viruses mutate. You know,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to kill the host because then they

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>die off. Now you know there are some you know,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>potential risks, meaning obviously there are a lot of mutations

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more uh, you know, more contagious. Could this be more

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>like a common cold now where you get reinfection and

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a seasonal variation and that it doesn't really

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>go away. That is a possibility. So how should you're saying,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>don't panic? You say it's likely that it could overwhelmed,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the world will spread quickly. Should we We've talked to

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you for We've talked to you for longer than I've

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>worked here. Okay, that's what I'll say. And I'm wondering

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>as long as the pandemic has been around, probably no

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>even longer, even longer. And I'm wondering Dr Lesbader, if

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if if we should change our behavior in any way

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>versus how we were behaving let's say, ten days ago

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>before this entered our lexicon. So I don't think so,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think prudence is always good. We certainly

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>know to some degree many respiratory infections are improved with masks.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not it's certainly somewhat helpful, don't uh, you know,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>push the envelope in very crowded, you know, areas. But

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I think, based on the way Delta behaved in the

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>way this is going to behave, I think everyone sooner

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or later is going to be coming down with macron.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>The good news is it's going to be for most people,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>very mild. It's not going to be lethal. It doesn't

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>seem to be killing more people or hospital atalizing more

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>people are raising the death rate. Um how that will

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>ultimately spill out when the rest of the world begins

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to get it is unclear. My sense is, like the

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>common cold virus, the rhinoviruses, you know, people get rhinoviruses

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and common cold viruses probably several times a year. That

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe what happens with this, But it is not going

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to affect our life anymore than getting a cold would be.

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And you don't go into the office if you're coughing

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>or sneezing. You don't want to infect other people. So

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it should affect us in any way

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>more than that. Does that mean we're out of the

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>woods of the possibility of a variant that is more

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>virulent uh and also really contagious. Well, this has over

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty mutations uh, and probably arose in someone who is

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>immuno compromised. You didn't really mount a good immune response.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Could theoretically another variant occur. I think it's possible. This

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one seems pretty efficient, spreads easily, doesn't kill the host.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't know they have it. It's really almost

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a very mild you know, caw for tickle in the

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>back of your throat. It does cause some fatigue, so

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>people after they're infect it often are somewhat fatigued. So

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to get a son of

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>omicron Darian. But I do think this is going to

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>spread around the world. And I think the worst thing

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to do would be to panic or overreact when there's

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>really no change that we need to do in a

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. Dr less better, what changes your mind? Uh?

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think if we get more data that

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this is again changing or killing more people, are hospitalizing

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>more people. Okay, that's a problem. I think by the

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>time we get a vaccine, and it is reasonable to

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>develop the vaccine, that's gonna be a couple of months.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to be so far behind the

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>spread that it's not going to be meaningful. We do

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>need to work on vaccines both flu For influenza, right,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we do a yearly influenza trying to catch up with

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the old one. There can be universal vaccines that focus

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not on the spike protein which mutates all the time.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We saw thirty mutations here just in the receptor binding

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>area of the spike, but in other areas of the virus. Said,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>don't mutate as much that antibodies to that might be

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more effective in eliminating this on a more permanent basis.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>We still don't have a universal flu shot. You take

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one flu shot, you're good for you know, the rest

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of your life. We do a yearly flu shot. We

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>may need something like that for COVID unless we develop

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a more universal antibrites to a different part of it.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, kinda run. Hey, have a good weekend. Dr

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Ian last Beata, Clinical professor of medicine and why you

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>land gown Medical Center. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. All right, let's get to it with Crypto

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Content creator crypto investor himself in Armstrong. He's founder a

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bit Boy Crypto and the YouTube channel that goes by

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the same name, a self proclaimed crypto millionaire. Because you've

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>got to show me that you are a crypto millionaire.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Who jose this on the phone in Atlanta. Um, Ben,

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just having some fun. Good to have you here with

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tim of myself. How are you? Yeah? Doing doing great

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>today despite the market drop today? UM, but yeah, doing great.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Glad to talk to you. UM. Well, let's talk about

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>what you know you have been doing in this world

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have developed your bit Boy Crypto YouTube channel. UM.

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what it tells us more broadly about crypto investing,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>who's getting into it and the interest that is out there. Yeah.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So we have the largest crypto community, um and all

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the interwebs as well. So we've got almost six million

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>total followers between YouTube, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, a few other

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>social channels. UM. And you know what we see is

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is we view ourselves as the mainstream channel where the

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>bridge to get people into crypto. So a lot of

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>times people will come to my community and come and

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>watch our educational videos are daily live streams, are our

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>topical videos. And they'll get real excited and they may

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>decide that they want to delve a little deep into

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe trading, we're deeper into n FPS, or deeper into

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, other spaces, and then sometimes they'll go to

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>other channels. But most of the people that are coming

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>into crypto today, at least with YouTube and other social

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>media is they're kind of using us to get there.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're very proud of that. We we've got very

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>beginner friendly content and you know, I think what we're

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing now when it comes to the people who are

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>getting into crypto, uh, is there hasn't been a huge

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>bump in retail interest here in the last few months.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're we were continuing to see a

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same people in the space that have

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>been in it for a while. Why do you think

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a huge bump in retail interest, Well,

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because when you look at the price, um, when you

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>go back to September, kind of like you were talking

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about with Facebook a little while ago. Um, you know,

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>September you know started off a pretty good time. In October,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we've really kind of evened off since then, and so

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who were came in early last year.

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They're in big profit and they've been here for a

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>while and they'll continue to be in big profit. But

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for those people who have came in in more recent times,

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>their profit with bitcoin is either non existent or it's

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>very small, depend on when they got in. So, you know,

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I think people aren't necessarily looking at bitcoin as the

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thing to really pull people into the markets. We've seen

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>n f t s and metaverse talk obviously over the

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks really continue to heat up. They have

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>team market is down a little bit, but the metaverse

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff has really been you know, pulling some retail people in.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But the average retail investor right now, like bitcoin just

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a giant opportunity. What about other cryptocurrencies?

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what can you tell from what's going on

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the conversations or the interest or what people are

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>searching on what they want to know about interest in

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>other digital currencies? Right So, obviously, anytime there are projects

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that continue to move upwards when the market is stagnant,

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>people become interested in those. Like I mentioned metaverse projects,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>decentraland Sandbox, those are two that people have really been

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at. We go with just some of the more

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>traditional projects that have been around for a while. I mean,

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>ethereum right now is starting to generate a lot of interest. Again.

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We're looking you know, one chart I like to look

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at is the ethereum versus bitcoin pair, and this is

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the value of one ethereum coin versus the value of

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>one bitcoin. And we finally have seen that break into

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a really large uptrend and a lot of analysts are

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>predicting it to go parabolic where one ethereum will be

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>over ten percent the value of one bitcoin. And we're

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at a place right now where the ethereum market dominance

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is rising in the bitcoin market dominance is falling. You know,

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a recipe where we could in the

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>next few months the etherium at least temporarily past bitcoin,

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something that's super excited to people.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm talking about the market cabin Yeah, not

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the price. The prices they're quite different right now. But

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking of price, bitcoin price right now, Ben is really

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>creating today. Uh it's down more than six point five

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>uh at fifty dollars. What do you make of the

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>volatility that we've seen and and how it could potentially

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>scare away people who haven't yet invested. Yeah, so the

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>volatility is something very terrifying to people. And that's why

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I've really been talking a lot different uh

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, speaking engagements that I've had and talking with

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>different people that you know, there are people that are

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be risk it first. They're going to be

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>scared away from bitcoin because of volatility. You can't really

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>talk someone in to being you know, risky. So there's

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>people that are risk at first. They're gonna look at

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the volatility of bitcoin and they're gonna be scared and

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna come into this market for a long

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>time until it stabilizes, maybe fifteen years from now. So

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the people that are in crypto today and I've reaped

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all the benefits, they've got a little bit of that

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>risk factor, a little bit of that risk gene and them.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're never gonna talk somebody into being risky in

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, you know, especially investors or savvy investors. They've

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>already got a plan. They're gonna stick with what works.

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why the newer generation is coming into crypto a

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>little more because you know, when you're younger, you're a

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>little riskier than you know, as you get a little

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bit older. So that's one thing we're seeing. But what's

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to me about the bitcoin price that we've

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>been noticing over the last you know, a week or so,

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is that it really has been following the stock market

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good and so today we get the jobs report.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin had actually recovered overnight and was going back up.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was above fifty eight thousand dollars or

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>very close, and then the job report came out and

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin shot back down because the traditional markets also felt

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the impact from that job's report. So I think that

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that's something we could continue to see for a little bit.

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I do believe that December will be a

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>big month for a bitcoin in spite of this uh,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know drop that we've had today. Okay, we'll talk

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about that a little more in just a second. But

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is a drop like today's where we see bitcoin at

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>around fifty two hundred, is that an entry point for you?

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Is at a buying opportunity? Well, the fifty three thousand

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar level has been extremely strong, and it has bounced

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off of that several times. Right now it is hovering

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>right at that number almost exactly. Um, But I do

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>think it is a pretty good price point um to

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>get in at. We we've seen the fifty two to

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty four thous all arrange, you know, very strong for bitcoin,

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's especially with the options the

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>futures expiring this morning, you know, I think that's you know,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>under rive it, which is the world's biggest you know,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin futures and etherorum features exchange. I think

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that frees up a little bit for us to possibly

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>get some upward movement over the weekend. I definitely think

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, Uh, it's possible. So um, yeah, it's definitely

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting times for a bitcoin. But fifty three dollars it

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be a good price point. Well, it's interesting too.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And I was just looking bitcoins off about from its

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>November ninth high, Ethereum off about from that moment as well.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>S and p hit a high back on November eighteen. Uh,

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's only down um a few percentage points I

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>think from that forgive me, I was just looking down

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>about four percent. So we've definitely have seen the cryptocurrency

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>world take it more on it. Chin, who should be

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>investing in cryptocurrencies in your view? Yeah, so you're a

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>biblid Crypto. Our mission is to empower people to find

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and financial freedom through crypto assets. So, if you're someone

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>who is looking to change your life financially, crypto has

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>shown over and over and over again that over the

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>long term, not over one months, not over two months,

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 1>you can find financial freedom through crypto assets. So if

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you're someone who's already found financial freedom, you know, if

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're Jeff Bezos and you made all your

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>money the old way, then why would you switch? Why

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>would you come over? But if you're someone that is

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>looking to change your investment strategy, looking to change your life,

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>looking to get out of that nine to five rat race,

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto offers that the numbers on it are very clear.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>While we get caught up in the short term moves

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of these assets, over the long term they've continued to

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>crush it, continue to set new all the time highs.

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Almost every project you know in the top one hundred

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>has set new all time highs or is very close

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to all the time highs this year. So because of that,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that there is there are a lot of

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>statistics at the point too. If you stay in crypto

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>for four years or more, you will make money in

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>this space. You will do very well. Oh. I always say,

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very easy to make money in crypto.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to make money in crypto day to day.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say, Ben, there's some regulators who might

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say differently, and that you've got to understand too, that

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of risk and not all cryptocurrencies are

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the same. Ben, come back. We would love to continue

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Ben Armstrong, foundering bit Boy Crypto, joining

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone in Atlanta. Thanks for listening to

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News