1 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:13,840 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast. 2 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:15,280 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. 3 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 2: And I'm Joe Wisenthal. 4 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: Joe, do you know what's coming up? 5 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:21,800 Speaker 2: The Odd Lots pub quiz? 6 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:25,600 Speaker 1: That's true? Also Valentine's Day? 7 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:27,800 Speaker 2: This a little bit later on. What else? What else 8 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:28,400 Speaker 2: do you have in mind? 9 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: Do you do you celebrate the anniversary of Vollmageddon. 10 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 2: Do I celebrate it? 11 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:34,480 Speaker 3: Yeah? 12 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 2: I mean who doesn't. No, I don't celebrate it. But 13 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 2: that was such a formative moment. So that was February when. 14 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: Was the twenty eighteen six year anniversary. 15 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:46,880 Speaker 2: That was one of our first like really good episodes 16 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:48,920 Speaker 2: where we sort of had a good We talked about 17 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:53,360 Speaker 2: what blew up the short vall etf XIV. I feel 18 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 2: like we go back through our history. That was like 19 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:56,400 Speaker 2: an important episode. 20 00:00:56,480 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 1: Wait, don't say that was one of the first good ones, 21 00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 1: because we're doing this for your years before twenty eighteen. 22 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 2: You're right, We've had many good I think that was 23 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,119 Speaker 2: like a it was a highlight. It was a highlight. 24 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: Okay, yes, okay, Well, I do in fact celebrate the 25 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 1: anniversary of Valmageddon because I always enjoy going back to 26 00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:17,680 Speaker 1: tweets around that time, because there are a lot of 27 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 1: volatility traders on social media who have very strong and 28 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 1: often erroneous opinions, and one of the opinions they were 29 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 1: holding around January twenty eighteen was that everything was fine. Yeah, 30 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 1: shortfall was this perpetual money maker, no issues with the 31 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,400 Speaker 1: two volatility exchange traded notes that eventually ended up blowing up, 32 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,679 Speaker 1: one of which was XIV, as you pointed out, and 33 00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:47,639 Speaker 1: I remember tweeting things in January of twenty eighteen, stuff 34 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:51,800 Speaker 1: like if the VICS curve inverts, which was about to happen, 35 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 1: this would be an absolute disaster for XIV, and I 36 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: had a bunch of people pushing back complaining about the 37 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:02,920 Speaker 1: axis on my chart, and lo and behold, about a 38 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 1: week later, XIV not only blew up, but was dead 39 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 1: within a couple of days and actually royaled the market 40 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: as well. 41 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:14,080 Speaker 2: I remember there it was very popular XIV, this vehicle, 42 00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 2: and there was a sound intuition about it, I think, 43 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:21,080 Speaker 2: which is that you know, is this basically betting against 44 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:23,720 Speaker 2: the VIX And you start with the assumption that Okay, 45 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:30,359 Speaker 2: people systematically and perpetually overpay for downside protection. Understandable people 46 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 2: pay for insurance and so you can harvest that premium 47 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 2: basically by taking the other side, and that by and large, 48 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 2: shorting VALL is a sort of like a good way 49 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:43,120 Speaker 2: to a way that people super charge their returns and 50 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 2: look like a core thing is that when we talk 51 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 2: about VALL, I think like we are mostly in life shortfall. 52 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,919 Speaker 2: Anyone who owned stocks for a long period or any 53 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 2: period is SHORTVALL, where sort of like VALL is bad 54 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:58,640 Speaker 2: for portfolios, et cetera. So like when we talk about 55 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 2: specifically shorting VALL though, then that's where it gets interesting. 56 00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, So this is one of the things that I 57 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 1: find very remarkable about our current moment, which is that 58 00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:13,359 Speaker 1: you know, shorting VALL post the two thousand and eight 59 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:17,200 Speaker 1: financial crisis became a very popular strategy because you had 60 00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:19,960 Speaker 1: low interest rates, so people wanted to pick up yield 61 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:23,480 Speaker 1: wherever they could. Yeah, you also had central banks out 62 00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 1: there in the market literally crushing volatility, So you knew 63 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: that there was the put that sort of existed over 64 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: the overall market, so why not try to monetize it. 65 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 1: There wasn't a lot going on up until twenty eighteen, 66 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,480 Speaker 1: so it made sense to bet on nothing, basically on 67 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: things not happening. But what I find really fascinating about 68 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: the current moment is we seem to be seeing a 69 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 1: return of that short volatility trade. So you and I 70 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 1: have discussed on this podcast these shorter dated options, one 71 00:03:55,360 --> 00:04:00,240 Speaker 1: or zero dated options becoming incredibly popular, absolutely exploded voting 72 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 1: in terms of volume. There's other types of derivatives that 73 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 1: are also becoming more popular. And yet when I look 74 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:09,720 Speaker 1: around at the market, it seems like there is so 75 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:12,880 Speaker 1: much potential for one off events. You know, the FED 76 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: is hiking rates, we have geopolitical risk, as you know 77 00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:20,000 Speaker 1: we always talk about, joke about on this show, supply 78 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:24,239 Speaker 1: chain disruptions. The chance of one off events actually happening 79 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 1: seems greater than ever, and yet shorting fall is popular 80 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:31,159 Speaker 1: and measures of aall itself remain pretty low. The VIX 81 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,600 Speaker 1: is pretty low, the volatility of the VIX index, the 82 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:37,120 Speaker 1: VVIX is really low. So I think we need to 83 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:41,800 Speaker 1: ask why is shortfall back, and why is it particularly 84 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:44,800 Speaker 1: popular at this moment in time, and what does it 85 00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 1: mean for the wider market. 86 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 2: Let's do it. 87 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 1: I am very happy to say that we do, in 88 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,280 Speaker 1: fact have the perfect guest. We're going to be speaking 89 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 1: to Chris Sidel. We've had him on the podcast before. 90 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 1: He is the co cio of Ambrose Group, and he 91 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 1: is now officially one of my favorite guests ever because 92 00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: he brought us donuts. And if I sound more energetic 93 00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 1: than normal, it's because I'm currently on a sugar rush. 94 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 1: And also I'm talking about volatility and you took us 95 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:11,680 Speaker 1: in this morning. I did not, although you tried to 96 00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:13,359 Speaker 1: get me on. Can you imagine if I had a 97 00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 1: donut ends in at the same time. 98 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:16,520 Speaker 2: That would be bad? 99 00:05:16,640 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: Okay, Chris, thank you so much for coming back. 100 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:20,919 Speaker 3: On odd Lots. Thank you so much for having me. 101 00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 3: So when we. 102 00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 1: Talk about short volatility, you know, Joe and I discussed 103 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: it a little bit in the intro, but what is 104 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: the expression of going short volatility? 105 00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:37,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, the expression of going short volatility is taking a 106 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:43,560 Speaker 3: bet that the normality will continue, right, So effectively, if 107 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:47,239 Speaker 3: you are betting on long volatility, you are pretty much 108 00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,279 Speaker 3: betting on the abnormality taking place. 109 00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:53,560 Speaker 2: So, I mean, I said it in the beginning, but 110 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 2: I sort of think that most life and investing is 111 00:05:56,839 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 2: implicitly short. Well, if you have spy in your retirement account, 112 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:04,039 Speaker 2: then you know you think it's just generally going to 113 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:06,880 Speaker 2: go up very time. That is normal. That is so 114 00:06:06,920 --> 00:06:09,960 Speaker 2: as you but per your definition, that is an implicit 115 00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 2: short volatility. How does it get expressed in the options market? 116 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:18,360 Speaker 2: And or maybe a question is why do people make 117 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,600 Speaker 2: that bet in the options market rather than just going 118 00:06:21,640 --> 00:06:23,799 Speaker 2: the implicit route of being long risk assets. 119 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:28,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, because I think it's something that generally pays off 120 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 3: the majority of the time. Within the spread as to 121 00:06:31,400 --> 00:06:34,360 Speaker 3: how you can trade it, there's this embedded risk premium 122 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 3: that I mean, sure people could argue that there's an 123 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:41,360 Speaker 3: equity risk premium as well, but the expression towards how 124 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 3: you apply this, whether it's short s and p puts, 125 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:50,240 Speaker 3: short mixed calls, short variant swaps, it has a tendency 126 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:53,960 Speaker 3: to win the majority of the time, and this expression 127 00:06:54,560 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 3: lulls market participants into very poor habits of expressing the training. 128 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:03,680 Speaker 3: Imagine you have taken a trade and you're going to 129 00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 3: win ninety percent of the time, and when the trade 130 00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 3: is working against you, you're adding more size and you're 131 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 3: adding more conviction. Over the course of years, when the 132 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 3: trade is beginning to work against you, you have a 133 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,280 Speaker 3: tendency to believe that this is just another one of 134 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:25,559 Speaker 3: those cases right, It's like being rewarded for buying the dip. 135 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,240 Speaker 3: If you do it over and over again, you're going 136 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 3: to feel this conviction towards it. But in short volatility terms, 137 00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 3: eventually it catches up and it all goes wrong at once. 138 00:07:37,120 --> 00:07:41,679 Speaker 1: Yeah. The journalistic euphemism that was usually deployed is picking 139 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 1: up pennies in front of a steamroller. Right, So why 140 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:47,880 Speaker 1: don't you talk to us about the numbers that you're 141 00:07:47,920 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: seeing in the market. We say, shortfall seems to be 142 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:54,200 Speaker 1: back and bigger than ever. What are the actual figures 143 00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:54,760 Speaker 1: around that? 144 00:07:55,400 --> 00:07:58,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, So I think it's important for listeners to have 145 00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 3: a little bit of an understanding of my background and 146 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 3: why it is we track these numbers. So I was 147 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:07,080 Speaker 3: a prop trader on two different desks camera securities in 148 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 3: Xanthis Capital, and then I went to a large Canadian 149 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 3: investment bank. I spent three and a half years there 150 00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 3: and most of my time was spent trading exotic derivatives. 151 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:17,600 Speaker 3: Then myself and a couple of my partners who are 152 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:21,720 Speaker 3: XCTC excitadel guys, we got together and we said, hey, 153 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 3: we could run this carriy neutral tail restrategy, which effectively 154 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 3: when volatility is exploding, it's going to have this massive return. 155 00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 3: But when markets are dormant, we use a lot of 156 00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:38,439 Speaker 3: short term proprietary trading to be flat. So you'll have foundations, 157 00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 3: high networked individuals, family offices that will use something like 158 00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 3: this as a hedge in their portfolio. 159 00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 1: Right. 160 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:49,080 Speaker 3: Because of that, we need to understand the derivative market 161 00:08:49,120 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 3: microstructure and also the ecosystem, understanding how certain agents in 162 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 3: that ecosystem are participating with one another. So over the 163 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:01,160 Speaker 3: last year, would start to come up in the data 164 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:05,920 Speaker 3: was that the short volatility trade was coming back in 165 00:09:06,280 --> 00:09:10,000 Speaker 3: huge size. So when you think about the SMP complex, 166 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:15,360 Speaker 3: in the VIX complex, the net short VEGA notional today 167 00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 3: is two times higher than when it was during January 168 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 3: of twenty eighteen, which was the month right before VALLMA, 169 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:23,240 Speaker 3: get it. 170 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 1: This is when we're going to have to define vega. 171 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:29,839 Speaker 1: We should just do all the Greek letters, just cut 172 00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:31,680 Speaker 1: them out of the way right now, but vega. 173 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:37,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, So in VALL terms, right, think one point of 174 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 3: a VALL move and how much you'll make or lose. Okay, right, 175 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 3: So if your net long a million bucks of vega 176 00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:50,000 Speaker 3: and volatility moves up one vall point you'll make a 177 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 3: million bucks vice versa. Right, So what that's saying today 178 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 3: that number the netting short exposure is two times higher 179 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 3: than where it was during January of twenty eighteen, which 180 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 3: is right before vallom again. Additionally, and I sent you 181 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:09,719 Speaker 3: guys this chart from Morning STARU, which is such a 182 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 3: crucial chart in my opinion. These derivative income generating funds, 183 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:18,240 Speaker 3: the AUM in these have increased by over ten x 184 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:24,600 Speaker 3: since January twenty eighteen. Right, that's another sort of fact 185 00:10:24,679 --> 00:10:26,800 Speaker 3: that's pretty insane to think about. 186 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 1: What's the definition of a derivative income fund? 187 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, so it's the same thing as to what we 188 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:34,320 Speaker 3: were talking about at the beginning of the pod, where 189 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 3: we said different expressions towards harvesting these volatility versus premium traits. 190 00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 2: It's intuitive to me why there was so much interest 191 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 2: in these income generating deriative strategies during the ZERP years 192 00:11:03,559 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 2: when you couldn't just generate income by going out and 193 00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 2: buying a government bond. But now you can get five 194 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:11,400 Speaker 2: percent or whatever. So why is the like, why do 195 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:14,719 Speaker 2: people go to the exotic route for income generation when 196 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,640 Speaker 2: they are very plain, vanilla things that actually pay yield 197 00:11:17,679 --> 00:11:18,240 Speaker 2: these days. 198 00:11:18,800 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 3: I think twenty twenty one is a year that will 199 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 3: go down in the derivative history books because what happened 200 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 3: during that year was you had a slew of new 201 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:38,120 Speaker 3: mandate additions between large foundations, pensions, rias, endowments, mainly because 202 00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:40,439 Speaker 3: of what transpired in twenty twenty. You had a really 203 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:42,920 Speaker 3: big ball move in twenty twenty, and then also in 204 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 3: Q one of twenty twenty one, you had the whole 205 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 3: Meme Stock sort of debacle. So if you were a 206 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:53,839 Speaker 3: large institution that did not have exposure to derivatives and 207 00:11:53,840 --> 00:11:56,600 Speaker 3: that type of mandate, you almost looked at as archaic 208 00:11:56,720 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 3: in a way, right, So at that time, a lot 209 00:12:00,400 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 3: of these institutions said we want we want to start 210 00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 3: trading options. Simultaneously, what was going on was the exchanges 211 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,880 Speaker 3: started listing more and more tenors, right, so you started 212 00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:14,920 Speaker 3: having seven days till expiration options, five days till expiration, 213 00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 3: zero days till expiration, and a lot of the consultants 214 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:25,760 Speaker 3: at these larger institutions started realizing, well, back in the day, 215 00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:28,360 Speaker 3: if we wanted to sell a twenty percent out the 216 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:31,920 Speaker 3: money SMP put, we have to wait one quarter to 217 00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:37,280 Speaker 3: collect five bucks in premium terms. Right today, we could 218 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 3: sell a zero DT option for fifty cents and do 219 00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 3: that twenty times over and over and over. And what 220 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:48,679 Speaker 3: this does on paper is that it changes the path dependency, right, 221 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:52,320 Speaker 3: so you really won't get hurt for one little thing 222 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 3: happening at the end of the month or the end 223 00:12:54,040 --> 00:12:58,079 Speaker 3: of the quarter. The problem with that is that on 224 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:01,480 Speaker 3: paper it looks like that, but when you run certain 225 00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 3: correlations you realize that you're still taking the same exact trait. 226 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,240 Speaker 3: Because if you wake up tomorrow and you say balls 227 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,640 Speaker 3: are up five ball points across the wall surface and 228 00:13:11,679 --> 00:13:14,880 Speaker 3: the term structure, you're going to realize that seven days 229 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:18,559 Speaker 3: till expiration option and the one month till expiration option 230 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:21,559 Speaker 3: are both going to be negatively impacted. 231 00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:25,120 Speaker 1: Maybe this is a good chance to talk about the 232 00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:30,119 Speaker 1: ecosystem of the options world. So, setting aside the derivative 233 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:33,680 Speaker 1: funds which are buying these things, someone is also selling 234 00:13:33,720 --> 00:13:37,400 Speaker 1: them the options. Usually the market makers are the dealers, 235 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:40,840 Speaker 1: So what is the role of market makers in this process? 236 00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: And then also I'm curious how cheap it is to 237 00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 1: go short volatility in general now, because this was also 238 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: a hallmark of the twenty tens, which was it was 239 00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:54,320 Speaker 1: pretty cheap to do these trades, right, and so that 240 00:13:54,480 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: was also another part of the appeal, like why not 241 00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,560 Speaker 1: just pick up a little extra yield for not that 242 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 1: much more? 243 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:04,679 Speaker 3: Right? So, in the ecosystem, the market makers play a 244 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:08,680 Speaker 3: very unique role because if you look at some of 245 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 3: the data that some cell side research doesthks put out, 246 00:14:12,120 --> 00:14:16,199 Speaker 3: it's not really entirely correct because a lot of these 247 00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:20,760 Speaker 3: deaths like to take a certain narrative, but that positioning 248 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:23,880 Speaker 3: changes day by day with these market makers. So it's 249 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:27,960 Speaker 3: not to say that at every single day their long 250 00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 3: gamma or short camera. It's at certain moments where that 251 00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:36,960 Speaker 3: positioning becomes unbalanced and can really create that more cascading 252 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 3: effect in cheapness and richness in volatility terms. We're seeing 253 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:46,080 Speaker 3: one of the lowest levels of tail exposure that we've 254 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 3: ever seen, huh. And this is something that is really 255 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:55,080 Speaker 3: surprising because everybody understands you shouldn't sell teals. That was 256 00:14:55,120 --> 00:14:59,640 Speaker 3: something that people learned in two thousand and eight, twenty eighteen, 257 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 3: twenty twenty. Yet that exposure keeps making its way back 258 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 3: into the market and right now forward skew that like 259 00:15:09,280 --> 00:15:12,400 Speaker 3: thirty days out skew and I'm not trying to get 260 00:15:12,440 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 3: super esoteric with the VALL terminology, but just that type 261 00:15:16,520 --> 00:15:22,520 Speaker 3: of WINGI exposure has been oversupplied over the last let's 262 00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 3: call it six to nine months. 263 00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 2: Wait, sorry, just to be clear, there is not currently 264 00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 2: a lot of people buying de facto tail insurance right now. 265 00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 3: Correct, not at all. 266 00:15:34,480 --> 00:15:37,120 Speaker 2: It's weird. I mean, I guess on some level, I'm 267 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:41,480 Speaker 2: surprised because right like things seem crazy, and there's wars 268 00:15:41,520 --> 00:15:43,880 Speaker 2: going on, and people are concerned about what the Fed 269 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:46,480 Speaker 2: is going to do, and the economic environment is uncertain, 270 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:49,320 Speaker 2: and the political environment is uncertain. On one level, it 271 00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:51,480 Speaker 2: feels like it would be an environment that would be oh, 272 00:15:51,520 --> 00:15:53,560 Speaker 2: I want to grab tails, I want to buy insurance. 273 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 2: On the other hand, the stock market is at all 274 00:15:55,960 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 2: time highs volatility is low. Clearly, just looking at financials, 275 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 2: this is not a market environment in which many people 276 00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:05,800 Speaker 2: seem particularly concerned about very much. 277 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 3: Well, why would you buy tails up? Think about this, 278 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 3: It's been four years since the last real fall move. 279 00:16:14,280 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 3: So in the face of rising inflation, in the face 280 00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:22,440 Speaker 3: of a declining SMP in twenty twenty two, in the 281 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:25,840 Speaker 3: face of a mini banking crisis, in the face of 282 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:28,680 Speaker 3: all those things, you've been able to sell vall make money. 283 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:31,560 Speaker 3: This is why. So some of the data that we 284 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:36,120 Speaker 3: track is like US equity short ball hedge funds that 285 00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:40,880 Speaker 3: AUM has grown six times since twenty eighteen. Why would 286 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 3: that AUM grow because those funds are doing insanely well 287 00:16:45,320 --> 00:16:48,320 Speaker 3: because you've been able to sell volatility left and right 288 00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:51,720 Speaker 3: and really just get away with it. A generic straddle 289 00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:56,640 Speaker 3: selling program, like without having any sort of true quantitative input, 290 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:58,960 Speaker 3: you just wake up every day and sell straddles has 291 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:02,480 Speaker 3: made money handle for FIST over the last four years. 292 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:07,040 Speaker 1: Could it be the case you mentioned the shorter tenors 293 00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:09,880 Speaker 1: that are now available, and this has been a much 294 00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:14,280 Speaker 1: discussed point among market commentators, the impact of zero and 295 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:19,119 Speaker 1: one day options ODT and one DTE. Could it be 296 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:23,119 Speaker 1: the case that people are buying less tail risk exposure 297 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:29,240 Speaker 1: or extreme downside protection in favor of maybe hedging themselves 298 00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:31,920 Speaker 1: on a day to day basis with the shorter dated options. 299 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:35,879 Speaker 3: So what we're seeing is that during certain events that's 300 00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:40,919 Speaker 3: the case. However, that doesn't take away for the reach 301 00:17:41,240 --> 00:17:44,919 Speaker 3: that you have in that thirty day exposure because when 302 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:49,040 Speaker 3: you look at the volume across the VIX complex, and 303 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:52,120 Speaker 3: you look at the volume traded in that thirty day exposure, 304 00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 3: it's still heavy. It's still there. So people that are saying, well, 305 00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:58,880 Speaker 3: nobody's going to hedge with thirty day options anymore because 306 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 3: they're hedging with zero DP so the vics won't go up, 307 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:06,879 Speaker 3: that's really a bad view. And there's one real point 308 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:09,280 Speaker 3: that I'll bring up that will push back on that 309 00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:12,480 Speaker 3: in a pretty large way. If you are an institution, 310 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 3: a multi billion dollar institution, and tomorrow, god forbid, there's 311 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,600 Speaker 3: a geopolitical event, are you going to hedge a multi 312 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:23,480 Speaker 3: billion dollar book with zero DT options. There's no way 313 00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:28,240 Speaker 3: any sophisticated fund is going to realize, well, I probably 314 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:30,800 Speaker 3: need to extend my duration on that hedge, so that 315 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:34,520 Speaker 3: reach for one to let's call it three month old 316 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:38,440 Speaker 3: will always be there. It's just that in the recent environment, 317 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:41,520 Speaker 3: again over the last four years, that has not been 318 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:44,199 Speaker 3: the case because we really have not been met with 319 00:18:44,320 --> 00:18:47,760 Speaker 3: a catalyst that has tested the broad market just real. 320 00:18:47,680 --> 00:18:50,000 Speaker 2: Quickly going back to a short straddle trade, which are 321 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 2: very popular or it has been a big money maker. 322 00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:55,440 Speaker 2: As you said, that's just betting that markets won't move much, 323 00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:57,720 Speaker 2: but selling a call and selling a put at the 324 00:18:57,720 --> 00:19:00,119 Speaker 2: same time. Implicitly, it's just like you're just betting that 325 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 2: things basically stay in a neuro range. 326 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:02,840 Speaker 3: Correct, you're selling. 327 00:19:02,920 --> 00:19:07,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, how did shortvall make money in twenty twenty two 328 00:19:07,359 --> 00:19:08,720 Speaker 2: when the stock market. 329 00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:11,480 Speaker 3: Was going down? That was the main point of twenty 330 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 3: twenty two. If you were a VALL trader, and you 331 00:19:14,440 --> 00:19:16,360 Speaker 3: don't need to take my word for it, you could 332 00:19:16,359 --> 00:19:19,480 Speaker 3: look at how well shortfall funds did in twenty twenty two, 333 00:19:19,600 --> 00:19:22,640 Speaker 3: really because there was not a pickup in equity fall 334 00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 3: and a lot of people misunderstand this because rates VALL moved, 335 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:31,720 Speaker 3: fx fall moved. It was almost like every fall in 336 00:19:31,800 --> 00:19:36,040 Speaker 3: every aspect move except for US equity VALL. So when 337 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:38,080 Speaker 3: you look at and you can look at just the 338 00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:42,080 Speaker 3: VIX to begin with, right, nix is a great representation 339 00:19:42,160 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 3: of something like that because it's variance right, So it's 340 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,000 Speaker 3: really VALL squared. SMP fall squared is going to give 341 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 3: you VIX. So SMP thirty implied. VALL always stayed in 342 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:54,560 Speaker 3: that range from like twenty to I believe the high 343 00:19:54,600 --> 00:19:58,560 Speaker 3: end was like thirty something. It's really difficult to get 344 00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:02,359 Speaker 3: VALL to move up when you have a lack of 345 00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:07,159 Speaker 3: realize move and panic that's coming in. So a slow 346 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:11,200 Speaker 3: grind down every day, going down one percent, half a percent, 347 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:15,040 Speaker 3: two percent, that's not really going to get people panicking 348 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:17,119 Speaker 3: to bid for that insurance protection. 349 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:22,439 Speaker 1: Let's go back to the sort of worst case scenario 350 00:20:22,840 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 1: that you were touching on earlier. But just before Christmas, 351 00:20:26,440 --> 00:20:29,240 Speaker 1: I think it was like a Wednesday or a Tuesday, 352 00:20:29,440 --> 00:20:31,320 Speaker 1: there was a sharp drop in the S and P 353 00:20:31,440 --> 00:20:35,320 Speaker 1: five hundred, and this kicked off a wave of speculation 354 00:20:35,880 --> 00:20:40,120 Speaker 1: about the degree to which shorter dated options had exacerbated 355 00:20:40,160 --> 00:20:44,040 Speaker 1: that fall into the close. And the thinking here is that, well, 356 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:46,679 Speaker 1: when stocks start to move down like that, all the 357 00:20:46,720 --> 00:20:50,160 Speaker 1: market makers have to go out and hedge their exposure, 358 00:20:50,280 --> 00:20:53,080 Speaker 1: and so you can get this sort of doom feedback 359 00:20:53,119 --> 00:20:56,439 Speaker 1: loop in the market where stocks keep going down because 360 00:20:56,440 --> 00:20:59,280 Speaker 1: dealers have to hedge the fact that stocks are going down. 361 00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:03,120 Speaker 1: Walk us through that dynamic, and then how much are 362 00:21:03,160 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: you actually seeing an impact in the wider market from 363 00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:09,360 Speaker 1: these shorter dated options on a day to day basis. 364 00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:13,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, So we wrote a paper early on in twenty 365 00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:16,240 Speaker 3: twenty three. They got a lot of attention. Surprisingly, it 366 00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:22,399 Speaker 3: got attention from regulators and central banks, and I think 367 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:25,840 Speaker 3: when some of the regulators reached out to us, it 368 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:30,479 Speaker 3: was because they understood as well just how severe a 369 00:21:30,520 --> 00:21:34,040 Speaker 3: certain situation can end up being, and they want to 370 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:37,080 Speaker 3: collect data on that as well. So when you talk 371 00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 3: about zero DT, it usually falls into two camps. You 372 00:21:41,119 --> 00:21:45,720 Speaker 3: have Camp A that says, oh, no, nothing's going to happen. 373 00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:49,400 Speaker 3: The positioning off sets one another, this is not a risk. 374 00:21:49,760 --> 00:21:53,000 Speaker 3: And then you have Camp BE that says this is 375 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,320 Speaker 3: going to create a massive catastrophe. This kind of stuff, right, 376 00:21:56,359 --> 00:22:00,200 Speaker 3: this is a black Swan event, And I don't think 377 00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:01,119 Speaker 3: either or are true. 378 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:01,640 Speaker 1: Right. 379 00:22:02,280 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 3: This becomes a problem when dealers are hedging their exposure 380 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 3: in a high ball environment. So what ends up happening 381 00:22:09,920 --> 00:22:13,560 Speaker 3: is during normal conditions, when you have most of the 382 00:22:13,560 --> 00:22:16,680 Speaker 3: flow that's leaned to sell these shorter data and options, 383 00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:21,199 Speaker 3: that is stabilizing to the broad market. However, when volatility 384 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:24,400 Speaker 3: is going up and these end users are not only 385 00:22:24,440 --> 00:22:27,960 Speaker 3: closing their position but opening new ones, that puts dealers 386 00:22:28,080 --> 00:22:31,320 Speaker 3: under pressure where they now need to hedge their exposure 387 00:22:31,359 --> 00:22:34,680 Speaker 3: and reflexively that could drive the asset price lower or 388 00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 3: instant cases higher as well. So in this situation, it's 389 00:22:39,640 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 3: not really a case of the SMP going from zero 390 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:47,080 Speaker 3: percent on the day to down five percent. It's what 391 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:49,760 Speaker 3: does this look like if the SMP is down five 392 00:22:49,800 --> 00:22:53,000 Speaker 3: percent and then could escalate to down ten percent. The 393 00:22:53,119 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 3: second point to that that I'll bring up, and this 394 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 3: is a very valid point. If you are a hedge 395 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:02,919 Speaker 3: fund or or an asset manager, you understand that the 396 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 3: larger primes are concerned with trading with their clients trading 397 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:11,160 Speaker 3: this stuff because of the lack of visibility around certain 398 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:14,399 Speaker 3: intra day margin requirements. So if you're a hedge fund, 399 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 3: you have a certain EMS that may be outsourced somewhere else. 400 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 3: It's just like an execution management system, right, So you 401 00:23:24,119 --> 00:23:27,760 Speaker 3: might be trading somewhere else and those positions are settling 402 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:30,480 Speaker 3: at the end of the day. The PB is not 403 00:23:30,640 --> 00:23:33,640 Speaker 3: really able to see that. So if those positions go 404 00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 3: against you, you may be on the hook for certain 405 00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:43,199 Speaker 3: exposure that is not accurately assessed for That's really the 406 00:23:43,240 --> 00:23:45,120 Speaker 3: second Yeah, that's the second problem there. 407 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:47,480 Speaker 1: I have so many questions already, but I do think 408 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:50,080 Speaker 1: this is actually an important point, which is that in 409 00:23:50,119 --> 00:23:53,280 Speaker 1: a lot of the commentary on shorter dated options and 410 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:58,040 Speaker 1: zero TTE, there's an implication that it's all these stupid 411 00:23:58,040 --> 00:24:01,199 Speaker 1: retail traders who are using these things. And you know, 412 00:24:01,240 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 1: people talk a lot about Wall Street bets, and it 413 00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:05,840 Speaker 1: is true that you can find some out there stories 414 00:24:05,880 --> 00:24:08,879 Speaker 1: about people on Wall Street bets losing and also making 415 00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 1: money on shorter dated options, But a big portion of 416 00:24:11,640 --> 00:24:17,080 Speaker 1: this is huge institutional ostensibly sophisticated investors. 417 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:19,000 Speaker 2: I'm glad you brought that up, because actually this brought 418 00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:22,159 Speaker 2: me back to something that I wanted to return to, 419 00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:26,439 Speaker 2: the sophisticatid investor. Talk more about what happened in twenty 420 00:24:26,480 --> 00:24:29,960 Speaker 2: twenty one with the introduction of these mandates, because I 421 00:24:29,960 --> 00:24:33,040 Speaker 2: do think that feels like a very important element that like, 422 00:24:33,320 --> 00:24:35,800 Speaker 2: we can always talk about market environments and we are 423 00:24:35,840 --> 00:24:39,040 Speaker 2: in a high wall environment or a high rates environment 424 00:24:39,160 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 2: or a low rates environment, but if the allocation is 425 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:45,640 Speaker 2: going to change and new products exist, we see how 426 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:49,080 Speaker 2: that affects the market. What specifically were these decisions that 427 00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:51,800 Speaker 2: were made where these big institutions felt that they had to, 428 00:24:51,880 --> 00:24:54,879 Speaker 2: like tell us a little bit more about some of 429 00:24:54,920 --> 00:24:55,480 Speaker 2: these decisions. 430 00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:59,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, so think of twenty twenty. Twenty twenty was a 431 00:24:59,200 --> 00:25:02,879 Speaker 3: year that option trading did very well on both sides. 432 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:06,159 Speaker 3: Hedging programs did very well. And then also when the 433 00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:11,120 Speaker 3: market rebounded, certain stock replacement programs did extremely well. When 434 00:25:11,160 --> 00:25:15,360 Speaker 3: twenty twenty one came Q one and the memestock craze hit, 435 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:19,399 Speaker 3: that was almost like the nail in the coffin, where 436 00:25:19,480 --> 00:25:24,960 Speaker 3: you had certain investors and boards that started pounding on 437 00:25:25,000 --> 00:25:28,440 Speaker 3: the door and saying, why are we not exposed to options? 438 00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:31,639 Speaker 3: Because look, everybody's making money, not in the sense that 439 00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:34,639 Speaker 3: they want exposure to MEME stocks, but they're saying, hey, 440 00:25:35,160 --> 00:25:38,359 Speaker 3: we should have long call tech exposure, you know, or 441 00:25:38,400 --> 00:25:43,800 Speaker 3: we should have vultility risk premium harvesting programs. And ultimately 442 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:47,800 Speaker 3: that put a lot of pressure on certain consultants. It 443 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,520 Speaker 3: put a lot of pressure on certain teams. But as 444 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 3: I said, simultaneously, when the exchanges began listing more and 445 00:25:55,680 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 3: more tenors, people started realizing that, well, idly, we probably 446 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:05,679 Speaker 3: want to engage in these volatility risk premium harvesting programs 447 00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:09,280 Speaker 3: because look, if this is what the S and P 448 00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 3: is doing, look how much more we can make by 449 00:26:11,880 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 3: selling Vault. And now the path dependency has completely changed, 450 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:18,920 Speaker 3: so ideally this becomes an easier trade for everybody. 451 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,400 Speaker 2: Tracy, now I am reminded it's so funny all these 452 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:24,159 Speaker 2: things I forgot from that time. But there was like 453 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:26,879 Speaker 2: that big thing with like soft Bank, because you know, 454 00:26:27,359 --> 00:26:30,920 Speaker 2: a massive buyer of just like long call options. Yeah, 455 00:26:30,960 --> 00:26:33,840 Speaker 2: on tech Is. If it weren't already exposed enough to 456 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:36,600 Speaker 2: tech Beta, they also bought a bunch of call options 457 00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:38,000 Speaker 2: on tech Stock got to double down. 458 00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:41,840 Speaker 1: Now, I do find it remarkable that they're like everyone 459 00:26:41,880 --> 00:26:45,360 Speaker 1: thinks Wall Street bets and that retail craziness was sort 460 00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: of people trying to imitate Wall Street, But now we 461 00:26:48,359 --> 00:26:51,959 Speaker 1: basically have Wall Street trying to imitate the retail crowd 462 00:26:52,040 --> 00:26:54,400 Speaker 1: and the sort of yolo mindset of let's just try 463 00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 1: to make as much money as possible on a sort 464 00:26:56,600 --> 00:26:59,840 Speaker 1: of in as short an amount of time as possible. 465 00:27:00,400 --> 00:27:03,040 Speaker 1: I want to go back to the impact on markets, 466 00:27:03,080 --> 00:27:06,879 Speaker 1: and I take the point about the doom loop scenario, 467 00:27:06,960 --> 00:27:09,600 Speaker 1: although as you say, you don't think it's as bad 468 00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:12,320 Speaker 1: as you know, getting a sort of Black Shoals esque 469 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:17,720 Speaker 1: kind of crash. But one thing I guess I don't 470 00:27:17,800 --> 00:27:21,199 Speaker 1: quite understand in this argument is people are not going 471 00:27:21,280 --> 00:27:24,840 Speaker 1: to keep doing the same stuff if the market is 472 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:28,080 Speaker 1: falling significantly. So if someone has a put that went 473 00:27:28,240 --> 00:27:31,639 Speaker 1: up five hundred percent, they're probably going to sell some 474 00:27:31,760 --> 00:27:35,040 Speaker 1: of it, right, So if you have people selling puts, 475 00:27:35,160 --> 00:27:38,879 Speaker 1: then wouldn't that bring in buying from the market makers, 476 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:43,080 Speaker 1: which could actually stabilize the market in that scenario. 477 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 3: No, No, So when an end user is short the put, 478 00:27:48,960 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 3: the market maker is effectively long the put, right, So 479 00:27:54,160 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 3: at that time, if they're long the put, they're going 480 00:27:56,840 --> 00:27:59,440 Speaker 3: to be long the underlying on the other side, so 481 00:27:59,560 --> 00:28:03,160 Speaker 3: long stop. It changes when the end user is now 482 00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:07,000 Speaker 3: long the put, that puts the dealer short the put. 483 00:28:07,280 --> 00:28:09,919 Speaker 3: If they're short the put, that's bullish, which means that 484 00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:13,760 Speaker 3: they now need to sell the underlying on the other side. So, 485 00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:17,080 Speaker 3: and this is where this comes into like a second 486 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:20,520 Speaker 3: order effect. Naturally, if the end user is selling this, 487 00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:25,480 Speaker 3: the market maker is stabilizing this. When that position starts 488 00:28:25,520 --> 00:28:27,879 Speaker 3: to move against them, what's the what is the end 489 00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:30,000 Speaker 3: user going to do? They're either going to close off 490 00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:32,800 Speaker 3: that position, right, or they're going to close it off 491 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:34,600 Speaker 3: and then take more of the other side. So they're 492 00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:36,440 Speaker 3: going to say, Okay, we're closing this off and maybe 493 00:28:36,440 --> 00:28:37,800 Speaker 3: we're going to bat on long volatility. 494 00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:38,760 Speaker 1: Oh I see, okay. 495 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:42,680 Speaker 3: That is when the market maker begins to get put 496 00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 3: under pressure. And just to be clear, this has existed 497 00:28:47,560 --> 00:28:51,000 Speaker 3: since derivatives started trading. I think people think that gamma 498 00:28:51,040 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 3: heaging is something that came about six years ago. That's 499 00:28:54,200 --> 00:28:55,960 Speaker 3: not the case. If you were a market maker in 500 00:28:56,000 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 3: the early two thousands in the nineties, you realized that, hey, 501 00:28:59,200 --> 00:29:02,520 Speaker 3: this is how we hedge of a derivatives book. So 502 00:29:03,440 --> 00:29:07,160 Speaker 3: that second order effect only becomes more relevant because the 503 00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:12,080 Speaker 3: sheer size of what you're trading is so much larger. 504 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,400 Speaker 3: So now you have back in the day, you had 505 00:29:15,400 --> 00:29:19,320 Speaker 3: twenty market makers. Today you have four, right, four main 506 00:29:19,440 --> 00:29:22,040 Speaker 3: market maker or let's go it, five that really control 507 00:29:22,120 --> 00:29:23,520 Speaker 3: the flow in the US equity mark. 508 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:26,040 Speaker 2: These are really big bank trading desks. 509 00:29:26,320 --> 00:29:27,840 Speaker 1: Are these not just banks? 510 00:29:27,880 --> 00:29:30,880 Speaker 3: Not just banks? I probably I'm not going to name them, 511 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 3: but like. 512 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:32,959 Speaker 2: Well, just like what are the nature of these, like 513 00:29:33,040 --> 00:29:33,800 Speaker 2: the four or five? 514 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:36,720 Speaker 1: I'll whisper to them to you after the show, but 515 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:39,240 Speaker 1: I don't wait, we could I mean, we have no 516 00:29:39,360 --> 00:29:44,960 Speaker 1: limitations on market Yeah, okay, so people like JP Morgan, Citadel, 517 00:29:46,680 --> 00:29:47,400 Speaker 1: that kind of thing. 518 00:29:47,720 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 2: So just big trading shops, yeah, okay, so some bank 519 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:53,320 Speaker 2: but not necessarily bank, yes, okay. 520 00:29:53,480 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, So going back to the numbers right index option 521 00:29:58,760 --> 00:30:03,920 Speaker 3: trading has grown two times since twenty eighteen, and equity 522 00:30:03,920 --> 00:30:06,760 Speaker 3: option trading has grown almost two and a half times 523 00:30:06,800 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 3: in totality. So when you think about the concentration risk here, 524 00:30:11,280 --> 00:30:14,360 Speaker 3: you have less market makers and more options being traded. 525 00:30:14,680 --> 00:30:18,400 Speaker 3: So of course it's natural to think that those market 526 00:30:18,400 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 3: makers will get caught all sizes on positioning, especially when 527 00:30:22,560 --> 00:30:26,160 Speaker 3: the end user is so dogmatic in their application of 528 00:30:26,200 --> 00:30:41,760 Speaker 3: this shortfall trade. 529 00:30:43,160 --> 00:30:47,280 Speaker 1: You know you mentioned was it ems earlier? What is 530 00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:52,800 Speaker 1: the underlying risk management architecture for managing these positions? Because 531 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:56,680 Speaker 1: it has to be there must be so many numbers 532 00:30:56,720 --> 00:30:59,920 Speaker 1: involved with this, and like the values are constantly changing, 533 00:31:00,120 --> 00:31:03,520 Speaker 1: so things like gamma and delta are changing along with 534 00:31:03,600 --> 00:31:06,680 Speaker 1: the market. And if you are one of the market makers, 535 00:31:07,240 --> 00:31:10,520 Speaker 1: I can only imagine all the different exposures you have 536 00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:12,440 Speaker 1: at any one point in time that you are trying 537 00:31:12,440 --> 00:31:15,320 Speaker 1: to calculate in real time as well, how do people 538 00:31:15,400 --> 00:31:16,120 Speaker 1: actually do it? 539 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 3: So if you are a sophisticated vall arbitraasure, you will 540 00:31:21,440 --> 00:31:25,680 Speaker 3: have certain in house systems that monitor certain second order 541 00:31:25,760 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 3: Greek exposure like vallavall right spot moves in gamma exposure 542 00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:34,400 Speaker 3: van A exposure. Very few people in the world who 543 00:31:34,440 --> 00:31:37,600 Speaker 3: need to care about that. You know, for the most part, 544 00:31:38,040 --> 00:31:41,360 Speaker 3: if you are an RIA or even like a macro 545 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:44,600 Speaker 3: hedge fund that's trading options, you're probably going to be 546 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:47,920 Speaker 3: on like a certain bank platform, and that's going to 547 00:31:47,960 --> 00:31:51,240 Speaker 3: be okay, right, because you really don't need to care 548 00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:54,440 Speaker 3: about second order Greek exposure. But if you are more 549 00:31:54,440 --> 00:31:58,040 Speaker 3: so a dynamic ball shop, those things become more important. 550 00:31:58,800 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 3: I think when you're thinking about the problems of an 551 00:32:02,120 --> 00:32:04,800 Speaker 3: ems and how that translates to something like this, and 552 00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:08,680 Speaker 3: then also the applications of shortfall, really you have to 553 00:32:08,760 --> 00:32:12,960 Speaker 3: understand that the majority of the world and how they 554 00:32:13,000 --> 00:32:16,880 Speaker 3: trade is not like a sophisticated ball shop. It's like 555 00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:20,960 Speaker 3: an RIA that's going to wake up and say, hey, 556 00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:24,160 Speaker 3: we need to make fifty basis points every month, so 557 00:32:24,360 --> 00:32:27,520 Speaker 3: sell these options, and if the position begins to move 558 00:32:27,560 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 3: against them, they're gonna say, oh well great, sell some more, 559 00:32:32,000 --> 00:32:34,800 Speaker 3: and then it moves against them. Sell some more, and 560 00:32:34,840 --> 00:32:38,080 Speaker 3: then it moves against them, and then maybe they'll capitulate 561 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:41,880 Speaker 3: the position. So it's not really the bulk of the 562 00:32:41,920 --> 00:32:45,720 Speaker 3: world is not really dynamically trading these things. They're more 563 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:50,360 Speaker 3: so dogmatically taking a one sided view on this, and 564 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:51,880 Speaker 3: that's why you get those ball blow ups. 565 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:56,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, who is longfall these days? Because you know, again 566 00:32:56,920 --> 00:32:59,680 Speaker 2: in my mind, I just think, you know, very my, very. 567 00:32:59,640 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 1: Root of my theoretically they should net right, the amount 568 00:33:02,400 --> 00:33:04,600 Speaker 1: of people shortening ball should be offset by the amount 569 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:06,400 Speaker 1: of people going to And. 570 00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:08,400 Speaker 2: Also I just think like, if I had a lot 571 00:33:08,400 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 2: of money, I would want to take out some insurance 572 00:33:11,760 --> 00:33:13,600 Speaker 2: against some sort of law. But if the people with 573 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:16,160 Speaker 2: the money, even them, are sort of like sort of 574 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:21,400 Speaker 2: changing their strategies, is there anyone who's structurally long vall 575 00:33:21,640 --> 00:33:24,400 Speaker 2: in there in parts of their portfolio or like the 576 00:33:24,440 --> 00:33:25,680 Speaker 2: sort of the hedging aspect. 577 00:33:26,040 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, So for what we do, it's called carry neutral 578 00:33:29,680 --> 00:33:33,800 Speaker 3: tail risk hedging, and this is more so a tactical approach. However, 579 00:33:34,240 --> 00:33:38,640 Speaker 3: the majority of what you call strategic or solutions based 580 00:33:39,520 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 3: long ball or tail risk hedging has done insanely poor 581 00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:46,120 Speaker 3: over the last three to four years. It's been right, 582 00:33:46,160 --> 00:33:51,600 Speaker 3: it's been obliteration. And we're you know, we're pretty outspoken 583 00:33:51,680 --> 00:33:55,120 Speaker 3: that those type of applications don't work. Because what you'll 584 00:33:55,120 --> 00:33:57,880 Speaker 3: see at an asset management firm, they'll say, okay, great, 585 00:33:57,960 --> 00:34:00,200 Speaker 3: you have if you're a family office, you have five 586 00:34:00,240 --> 00:34:03,240 Speaker 3: hundred million dollars in equities, Let's take one percent a 587 00:34:03,320 --> 00:34:07,200 Speaker 3: year and allocate it to some long fall and then 588 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:10,080 Speaker 3: over the course of years you realize that, well, that's 589 00:34:10,080 --> 00:34:12,880 Speaker 3: really destroying my portfolio. I can't just lose a percent 590 00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:18,399 Speaker 3: a year. That's why you're seeing more sophisticated institutions go 591 00:34:18,719 --> 00:34:22,920 Speaker 3: or lean towards tactical defensive hedging as opposed to the 592 00:34:22,960 --> 00:34:26,520 Speaker 3: solutions based defensive hedging, because those just really do not 593 00:34:26,600 --> 00:34:29,879 Speaker 3: work over the long run. So you just can't wake 594 00:34:29,960 --> 00:34:31,960 Speaker 3: up and say, yeah, I'm gonna buy a put and 595 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:33,400 Speaker 3: just keep rolling it and rolling. 596 00:34:33,160 --> 00:34:35,520 Speaker 2: It right, That eventually costs a lot of money. 597 00:34:35,560 --> 00:34:37,359 Speaker 3: Exactly Who are the. 598 00:34:37,280 --> 00:34:42,360 Speaker 1: Big winners from the explosion in shortfall and derivatives in general? 599 00:34:42,400 --> 00:34:45,359 Speaker 1: I have to imagine that the CBOE would be in there, 600 00:34:45,440 --> 00:34:48,440 Speaker 1: given that they're the ones selling the shorter dated options. 601 00:34:48,480 --> 00:34:51,640 Speaker 1: Maybe some of the market makers who's making tons of 602 00:34:51,680 --> 00:34:52,279 Speaker 1: money from this. 603 00:34:53,920 --> 00:34:58,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, so definitely the exchanges are doing quite well. Market 604 00:34:58,239 --> 00:35:02,120 Speaker 3: makers generally do quite well when you have big ball environments. 605 00:35:02,280 --> 00:35:05,319 Speaker 3: For the most part, it's important to note, and I 606 00:35:05,360 --> 00:35:08,160 Speaker 3: think that this goes over a lot of it goes 607 00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:10,120 Speaker 3: over a lot of people's heads when they're going through 608 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:16,879 Speaker 3: the research. Se Bow is incentivized to make sure that 609 00:35:16,960 --> 00:35:21,440 Speaker 3: the data that they're showing you is pretty right. So 610 00:35:21,480 --> 00:35:24,359 Speaker 3: Sebow's never really going to come out and say, hey, 611 00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:27,360 Speaker 3: all these options traded is a hazard because it just 612 00:35:27,400 --> 00:35:29,160 Speaker 3: goes against what they're trying to do as a business. 613 00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:31,520 Speaker 3: And for what it's where I like the guys at SEBO, 614 00:35:31,760 --> 00:35:35,160 Speaker 3: respect them clearly doing extremely well from a business standpoint, 615 00:35:35,239 --> 00:35:38,320 Speaker 3: But yeah, the exchanges are doing quite well. Market makers 616 00:35:38,360 --> 00:35:41,400 Speaker 3: are doing quite well. But when whenever you're reading research 617 00:35:41,520 --> 00:35:46,200 Speaker 3: or data about these options or zero DT, it's important 618 00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:47,920 Speaker 3: to take it with a grain of salt. When you're 619 00:35:47,920 --> 00:35:50,359 Speaker 3: getting the research from people who have been doing well. 620 00:35:51,440 --> 00:35:54,239 Speaker 2: I just have one more question, and it kind of 621 00:35:54,239 --> 00:35:56,440 Speaker 2: goes back to what I was saying, like, how you 622 00:35:56,480 --> 00:36:01,200 Speaker 2: know I understood the value of in come generating strategies 623 00:36:01,239 --> 00:36:03,520 Speaker 2: through derivatives, particularly in the zurb era when there was 624 00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,400 Speaker 2: not many sources of just sort of like income. You know, 625 00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:10,080 Speaker 2: the market complexion is obviously changed quite a bit because 626 00:36:10,239 --> 00:36:13,920 Speaker 2: although now you know there's yield, but also like traditional 627 00:36:14,040 --> 00:36:18,320 Speaker 2: like sort of natural hedges in the market don't work anymore. 628 00:36:18,320 --> 00:36:20,040 Speaker 2: So if you had you know this, the old sixty 629 00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:22,440 Speaker 2: forty portfolio, at least for a while, was like terrible 630 00:36:22,480 --> 00:36:24,560 Speaker 2: and so like this idea like, oh, a hedge by 631 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:26,600 Speaker 2: having a little bit along here and long here, and 632 00:36:26,719 --> 00:36:29,200 Speaker 2: they do differently like that doesn't work. How has that 633 00:36:29,800 --> 00:36:34,000 Speaker 2: changed the vault trading business, These sort of reversals of 634 00:36:34,040 --> 00:36:37,480 Speaker 2: some long standing just sort of correlations of bread and 635 00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:38,240 Speaker 2: butter assets. 636 00:36:38,480 --> 00:36:41,239 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's it's for the good of the 637 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:46,759 Speaker 3: ecosystem because I think it is cycled out. The bad managers, 638 00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:50,680 Speaker 3: the managers who have not been able to navigate this 639 00:36:50,840 --> 00:36:54,759 Speaker 3: environment have been really taken to the woodshed, And I 640 00:36:54,760 --> 00:36:58,120 Speaker 3: think that's important. You need a healthy cycle out of 641 00:36:58,160 --> 00:37:02,879 Speaker 3: those bad products and those bad managers, because look, everybody's 642 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:06,319 Speaker 3: a hedge fund these days. Everybody manages some sort of 643 00:37:06,400 --> 00:37:10,640 Speaker 3: assets these days, and the reality is that that alpha 644 00:37:10,719 --> 00:37:15,640 Speaker 3: doesn't exist everywhere. So when you have poor products, after 645 00:37:15,719 --> 00:37:19,200 Speaker 3: a while, people start realizing just how poor they are, 646 00:37:19,719 --> 00:37:22,480 Speaker 3: and then those participants get cycled out. So I think 647 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:26,040 Speaker 3: it's healthy that this sort of stuff has come to light, 648 00:37:26,480 --> 00:37:29,880 Speaker 3: because yeah, you shouldn't just be able to put somebody 649 00:37:29,960 --> 00:37:33,279 Speaker 3: in some generic put buying program you charge twenty five 650 00:37:33,320 --> 00:37:36,160 Speaker 3: basis points and you know five percent CENTI fee on that. 651 00:37:36,160 --> 00:37:37,279 Speaker 3: That doesn't just jibe. Well. 652 00:37:38,080 --> 00:37:40,719 Speaker 1: I have one more question, which is, how do you 653 00:37:41,280 --> 00:37:46,719 Speaker 1: prove that the explosion and options is having an impact 654 00:37:46,840 --> 00:37:50,560 Speaker 1: in the market, because so far, the observable pattern that 655 00:37:50,640 --> 00:37:52,920 Speaker 1: I have seen is that something like a December twenty 656 00:37:52,920 --> 00:37:57,160 Speaker 1: first happens where the market falls. JP Morgan publishes a 657 00:37:57,200 --> 00:38:00,600 Speaker 1: note saying part of this was because of short dated options, 658 00:38:00,640 --> 00:38:03,520 Speaker 1: and then the CBOE comes out and says, no, no, no, 659 00:38:03,520 --> 00:38:05,440 Speaker 1: we didn't see any evidence of that, and you have 660 00:38:05,520 --> 00:38:10,200 Speaker 1: all this polarized commentary. It feels like in something as 661 00:38:10,239 --> 00:38:14,200 Speaker 1: mathematical as options trading and finance, we should be able 662 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:17,320 Speaker 1: to point to concrete evidence, but we are still having 663 00:38:17,320 --> 00:38:19,640 Speaker 1: this debate about the overall impact. So what do you 664 00:38:19,719 --> 00:38:21,920 Speaker 1: look at to prove that this is happening. 665 00:38:23,040 --> 00:38:25,440 Speaker 3: So the way how we trade is literally a second 666 00:38:25,520 --> 00:38:28,680 Speaker 3: by second basis, and I think unless you're trading like that, 667 00:38:29,239 --> 00:38:32,560 Speaker 3: you won't be able to have a good picture as 668 00:38:32,600 --> 00:38:35,920 Speaker 3: to what's going on. So we have certain agency desks 669 00:38:36,120 --> 00:38:39,560 Speaker 3: and market makers that cover our flow, and you talk 670 00:38:39,640 --> 00:38:41,560 Speaker 3: to these guys, you go out to eat with them, 671 00:38:42,080 --> 00:38:45,479 Speaker 3: you build relationships with them, and there's an ongoing joke 672 00:38:46,120 --> 00:38:49,760 Speaker 3: that we have with one of them, and they say, listen, 673 00:38:50,239 --> 00:38:55,719 Speaker 3: every time volatility spikes, we have five clients that will 674 00:38:55,719 --> 00:38:58,080 Speaker 3: come in and fight with each other to sell it. 675 00:38:59,360 --> 00:39:03,480 Speaker 3: They are jumping over one another to sell volatility. Now, 676 00:39:03,920 --> 00:39:06,640 Speaker 3: it's hard when you don't have that color or you're 677 00:39:06,920 --> 00:39:11,920 Speaker 3: only seeing a price on screens, But when you understand 678 00:39:12,000 --> 00:39:17,040 Speaker 3: the ecosystem and what's transpiring under the hood, it paints 679 00:39:17,200 --> 00:39:21,520 Speaker 3: a cleaner mosaic to understand that we've only seen one 680 00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:26,680 Speaker 3: side of the equation, which is yeah, volatility being stabilizing 681 00:39:26,920 --> 00:39:31,120 Speaker 3: and just not really performing endorment markets. But there will 682 00:39:31,120 --> 00:39:35,080 Speaker 3: come a day when there's a catalyst that pushes this 683 00:39:35,120 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 3: thing through. And it's very similar to like Vallmageddon, where 684 00:39:39,719 --> 00:39:44,279 Speaker 3: everybody who was trading vault during that time understood the 685 00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:48,239 Speaker 3: exposures were baked into the etpis, and then after it 686 00:39:48,280 --> 00:39:51,480 Speaker 3: occurs they'll say, oh, yeah, it was so obvious. Didn't 687 00:39:51,520 --> 00:39:55,759 Speaker 3: you know that everybody was short volatility in the ETPs H. 688 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:58,000 Speaker 1: I swear to god, it was not obvious to everyone. 689 00:39:58,080 --> 00:40:00,160 Speaker 1: Chris sid You'll thank you so much again for me 690 00:40:00,200 --> 00:40:03,680 Speaker 1: back on all thoughts that was a fantastic explanation of 691 00:40:03,880 --> 00:40:06,080 Speaker 1: you know, a pretty technical change in the markets, but 692 00:40:06,160 --> 00:40:07,480 Speaker 1: an important one. So thank you. 693 00:40:08,520 --> 00:40:09,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, that was great, Thank you so much. 694 00:40:22,560 --> 00:40:25,440 Speaker 1: Joe. That was so good. That was really interesting. I 695 00:40:25,440 --> 00:40:29,520 Speaker 1: have a joke. It's not as good as Chris's joke, 696 00:40:29,560 --> 00:40:30,879 Speaker 1: though maybe I shouldn't tell it. 697 00:40:31,280 --> 00:40:33,279 Speaker 2: Tell it, tell it, tell it. 698 00:40:34,000 --> 00:40:37,560 Speaker 1: What is a risk manager with a science degree at 699 00:40:37,760 --> 00:40:41,840 Speaker 1: a large market maker say when he wants a salary increase? 700 00:40:45,800 --> 00:40:47,720 Speaker 1: Tell me he asks for a Gamma raise. 701 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:49,520 Speaker 2: That's good. Yeah, it's good. 702 00:40:50,520 --> 00:40:51,959 Speaker 1: That's good, Gama raise. 703 00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:52,359 Speaker 3: It's good. 704 00:40:52,360 --> 00:40:56,239 Speaker 1: It's good for Gamma raise. I'll work a workshop. 705 00:40:57,480 --> 00:40:57,560 Speaker 2: No. 706 00:40:57,680 --> 00:41:02,239 Speaker 1: I thought that was really interesting. He's sort of Chris crystallized. Oh, 707 00:41:02,400 --> 00:41:05,440 Speaker 1: Chris crystallized something in my head which was about the 708 00:41:05,480 --> 00:41:09,719 Speaker 1: exact mechanism of the feedback loop. Because I had assumed 709 00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:13,400 Speaker 1: that as the market moves around, like people are lessening 710 00:41:13,520 --> 00:41:16,000 Speaker 1: their exposure, but as he put it, like the thing 711 00:41:16,040 --> 00:41:19,319 Speaker 1: they're doing to lessen the exposure can also lead to 712 00:41:19,440 --> 00:41:22,640 Speaker 1: market maker behavior that is not ideal. In the stock's 713 00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:25,640 Speaker 1: going down, everyone scrambling all together a scenario. 714 00:41:26,000 --> 00:41:27,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought that was very interesting. I also just 715 00:41:27,719 --> 00:41:31,000 Speaker 2: thought like the sort of big picture if you have 716 00:41:31,040 --> 00:41:36,800 Speaker 2: a lot of money, you just cannot buy insurance trivially. 717 00:41:36,880 --> 00:41:38,600 Speaker 2: It's not like he's like, oh, I'm just gonna like, 718 00:41:38,760 --> 00:41:40,839 Speaker 2: as you pointed out, like you know, you take one 719 00:41:40,880 --> 00:41:43,720 Speaker 2: percent of your assets a year and roll it into 720 00:41:43,760 --> 00:41:46,840 Speaker 2: some fun that supposedly is going to deliver major returns 721 00:41:46,880 --> 00:41:49,840 Speaker 2: every time there's a pandemic or some major thing, like 722 00:41:49,880 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 2: you're just gonna lose too much money that way. And 723 00:41:53,120 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 2: so then the idea of like, okay, well, like these 724 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:58,320 Speaker 2: institutions take the other side and see opportunities in shorting 725 00:41:58,400 --> 00:42:01,680 Speaker 2: vall and so you sort of see how how this 726 00:42:01,800 --> 00:42:04,280 Speaker 2: trade can just get so large on one side. 727 00:42:04,400 --> 00:42:07,440 Speaker 1: I also like the point that, okay, this is not nothing. 728 00:42:07,680 --> 00:42:10,920 Speaker 1: It's not a trivial evolution of the market. But at 729 00:42:10,920 --> 00:42:14,280 Speaker 1: the same time, it's not a black Monday black shoals 730 00:42:14,520 --> 00:42:16,799 Speaker 1: reducts where this is going to lead to like a 731 00:42:16,880 --> 00:42:19,480 Speaker 1: massive crash because at the end of the day one 732 00:42:19,560 --> 00:42:22,440 Speaker 1: day options expire. At the end of the day, the 733 00:42:22,560 --> 00:42:26,560 Speaker 1: options are ended. The end day options end. Okay, I 734 00:42:26,560 --> 00:42:26,799 Speaker 1: need to. 735 00:42:26,800 --> 00:42:29,759 Speaker 2: Work that work, thank you, But there's something there. 736 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:32,000 Speaker 1: But no, I like that point. I thought it was 737 00:42:32,000 --> 00:42:34,840 Speaker 1: a very clear description of the ecosystem. Yeah, and it 738 00:42:34,960 --> 00:42:38,520 Speaker 1: is amazing to me, given everything that's sort of gone on, 739 00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:42,719 Speaker 1: how much the vault trading environment has changed, because you 740 00:42:42,719 --> 00:42:46,520 Speaker 1: would have thought after twenty eighteen, after the wildness of 741 00:42:46,600 --> 00:42:49,800 Speaker 1: the post pandemic period, that things would have gone in 742 00:42:49,840 --> 00:42:52,120 Speaker 1: the other direction, but nope, no. 743 00:42:52,280 --> 00:42:55,279 Speaker 2: And also we knew because of you know, we took 744 00:42:55,400 --> 00:42:59,839 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty one. We talked a lot about retail obviously, 745 00:43:00,600 --> 00:43:02,960 Speaker 2: but it really is telling and then that fell off, 746 00:43:03,320 --> 00:43:05,280 Speaker 2: and then you know, you could see, you know, Cibo 747 00:43:05,440 --> 00:43:07,600 Speaker 2: as a stock kind of peaked at the end of 748 00:43:07,640 --> 00:43:10,000 Speaker 2: twenty twenty one for a while and then fell and everything. 749 00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:14,600 Speaker 2: But obviously there's just so much more than retail. And 750 00:43:14,680 --> 00:43:16,360 Speaker 2: so when we're talking, you know, I think if people 751 00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:18,960 Speaker 2: hear zero day options or any of these options, you know, 752 00:43:19,000 --> 00:43:20,640 Speaker 2: they just sort of think about people like on their 753 00:43:20,680 --> 00:43:24,240 Speaker 2: apps gambling. But the idea that it's not necessarily gambling, 754 00:43:24,280 --> 00:43:27,960 Speaker 2: but there's sort of like very dynamic intentional hedging participation 755 00:43:28,080 --> 00:43:30,280 Speaker 2: in these markets from big money is pretty astounding. 756 00:43:30,360 --> 00:43:33,399 Speaker 1: Sometimes it is gambling though, and there's gambling all right, well, 757 00:43:33,880 --> 00:43:36,640 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, one day options expire, 758 00:43:36,760 --> 00:43:40,239 Speaker 1: that's what it is. But the conversation and the controversy 759 00:43:40,280 --> 00:43:43,160 Speaker 1: over them certainly does not. It goes on forever. 760 00:43:43,560 --> 00:43:44,120 Speaker 2: Sounds good. 761 00:43:44,160 --> 00:43:44,840 Speaker 1: Shall we leave it there? 762 00:43:44,960 --> 00:43:45,640 Speaker 2: Let's leave it there. 763 00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:48,800 Speaker 1: This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. 764 00:43:49,080 --> 00:43:52,280 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. 765 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:54,160 Speaker 2: And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You could have followed me at 766 00:43:54,160 --> 00:43:57,279 Speaker 2: the Stalwart. Follow our guest Chris Sidiel, He's at CA 767 00:43:57,600 --> 00:44:02,400 Speaker 2: sid I. I Hello our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman 768 00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:06,200 Speaker 2: armand dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. 769 00:44:06,600 --> 00:44:10,000 Speaker 2: Thank you to our producer Moses Ondem. For more Oddlots content, 770 00:44:10,040 --> 00:44:12,360 Speaker 2: go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we 771 00:44:12,400 --> 00:44:15,719 Speaker 2: have transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter and you can 772 00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:18,360 Speaker 2: chat about all these topics twenty four to seven in 773 00:44:18,440 --> 00:44:22,480 Speaker 2: the discord Discord dot gg slash Odlots. 774 00:44:22,600 --> 00:44:25,000 Speaker 1: And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you think that 775 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:27,560 Speaker 1: all of our guests should bring donuts when they appear 776 00:44:27,600 --> 00:44:29,880 Speaker 1: on the show, then please leave us a positive review 777 00:44:29,920 --> 00:44:33,000 Speaker 1: on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are 778 00:44:33,040 --> 00:44:36,360 Speaker 1: a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all our episodes 779 00:44:36,440 --> 00:44:41,239 Speaker 1: add free by connecting your Bloomberg subscription to Apple podcasts. 780 00:44:41,360 --> 00:45:05,000 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. Stood in the Eiler