WEBVTT - Chamath Palihapitiya Says A Reckoning Is Coming For Big Tech

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisntal and I'm Tracy Halloway. So, Tracy, I

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you're just waking up in Hong Kong. But

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we had a little bit of market volatility to day.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that, you know what? I woke up

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to an alert on my phone. Something It's never good.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever noticed whenever you get those alerts on

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your phone, it's never anything good. It's always something bad.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But yes, something about stocks falling. Yes, there's never been

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a good push, that's safe to say. But it is

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>June eleventh. We just had this market volatility. Nonetheless, even

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>with the volatility, there is this sense that people have

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it'll change by the time people are listening

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to this episode. Is that the sort of the most

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>intense periods of the crisis at least, you know, it's

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not as intense as it was back in early April

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or late March. Yeah. Absolutely, I think that's true. And

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly earlier this week we did get another alert, which

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was so I guess sometimes you do get good alerts,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but the alert was smid regains all its losses for

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the year and basically went back to the highs that

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it was seeing before the coronavirus. So we do have

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a sense, and I think a lot of people will

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>attribute it to either the federal Reserve or some of

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal stimulus measures by the government, that these have

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>combined to at least save the stock market, if not

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the real economy. Right, it's still very tb D on

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all that. One of the things, and you and I

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have talked about this tracy, is that in the middle

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of a crisis. One of the things that makes crises

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting is it new ideas can emerge. And so often

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when things are growing, people don't want to rock the boat.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But in the middle the acute phase of a crisis,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it always feels as though there's openings for sort of

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>new ideas, new approaches, and a sort of wide range

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>discussion about what the future should look like. Yeah, I

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's right. It's funny how there's nothing like losing

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>money to make everyone reevaluate their capitalist model. But yes,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be an opportunity in crisis for

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>people to start thinking about deep seated issues in their

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>respective markets, or the way the economy works, or even

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the political system which is something that we're sort of

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing now. Yeah, that's exactly right. So today we're going

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to be talking to a guest who actually got a

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention. He had this interview when totally viral.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was back in early April. That had

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>to do with Bailouds, and it was very opposed to Bailouds,

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>but it was a sort of good example of how

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the most intense period there is this sort of

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>yearning for people uh to offer different ideas than the

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of standard approach where we just sort of try

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to u put everything back together again. Yeah, and can

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I just say that this interview was so viral that

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>even I in Hong Kong without access to US cable

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>TV saw clips of it exactly. So today we're going

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to be talking to Chamath Poli Hapatia. He's the founder

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Social Capital. He's the chairman of Virgin Galactic.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he owns a steak in the NBA team,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Golden State Warriors. I think there's our there's our

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>second time now we've talked to someone who owns part

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of an NBA team, Having talked to Mark Cuban, as

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned back in April, he uh did this interview

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>on CNBC talking about the airline bailouds it's been very

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>critical of share buybacks bailouts that, in his view, prop

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>up the rich while failing to protect everyday people. Things

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit less severe right now than they

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were back then, but nonetheless, I think there's still a

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of space to be talking about these ideas. So,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>without further Ado Chama, thank you very much for joining us.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys, thanks for having me on. So let's go back.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember that interview. It absolutely blew up

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>all over social media. What was your main message, like,

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what was the thrust of what you saw we were

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>doing wrong, both in terms of an economy and in

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the political approach to addressing the crisis that,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in your view is misguided. Well, I mean, I think

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've probably known for a long time that the

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>tools that we give politicians to help society function probably

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have never been duller. They typically have a lot of

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences, and so my commentary was more of a

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>frustration in realizing that this thing was going to meaningfully

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>exacerbate what was already a very very skewed economy and

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>that the people that needed the help wouldn't get it,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and that you would see the emergence of a lot

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of perverse incentives that wouldn't really fix the system properly,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to know that now we're going to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>deal with the tail many years long of the activity

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of Treasury and the Fed over just you know, what

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was basically four to six weeks of a of a

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>drunken binge will play out in ways that will have

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of unintended consequence, I think. So I'm

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to declare an interest here, which is that my

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>dad is a former pilot, and he was a pilot

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for Southwest Airlines for a long time, and I remember

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>distinctly in the early two thousand's after the nine eleven attacks,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>when a bunch of his competitor airlines were getting bailed out,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he used to get really annoyed and say, why are

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>his taxes going to pay his competitors. Of course, fast

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>forward to now he's retired, but he still takes a

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>big interest in Southwest and of course Southwest Airlines is

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the airlines getting a bailout. But what do

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you say to people who will argue that this is

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a short term cash flow problem, and just because people

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>have been ordered to stay inside for you know, the

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future revenues are drying up. That shouldn't mean that

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>companies that are essentially viable should go out of business. Yeah,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I just think that the incentives

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that the government creates to make sure that those things

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't happen can be very different um them just giving

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a hand out. And the reason is because that the

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>handcuffs that we put on companies when we give them

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>these handouts are very brittle. And so what happens in

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the case of airlines specifically, is that, you know, we

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>made them sign a pledge that essentially said that they

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't lay anybody off until I think September, and I

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think what you're going to see is a wave of layoffs,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think American has already announced that it's going

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen essentially October one. And so, in no event

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>did any of this capital do anything other than just

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dilute the actual problem at hand and confuse us all

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>into thinking what the problem was. Because you create a

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>problem where you've inflated the money supply, you've you know,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>created more debt all of that debt. It gets spread

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>across every single American citizen, and none of us are

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>necessarily better off for it. So I think the better

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>question to ask is, actually, what could we have done

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually help Southwest Airlines or American Airlines, or United

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or Delta and the panoply of other companies that needed

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>help to bridge the time between the coronavirus and a

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>normal resumption in business. And I think you would have

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>come up with a whole bunch of different answers than

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the ones that we came up with, which which is

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially was here's a check, Please at least don't do

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>anything until near the election, so that we can at

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>least look, you know, semi competent. Well, what does that

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>look like to you? So we've kind of as a

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Federal Reserve and the Treasury combined,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of taken a dual track approach, which is,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>provide a lot of liquidity loans to small businesses, loans

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially turn into grants to keep the corporate

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure alive. And then for the layoffs that have happened,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of expanded unemployment insurance so that households can

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>maintain their income and buying power during the acute phase

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the health crisis, and the idea in theory is

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that as the health crisis phades, the businesses were kept

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>alive with access to sort of cheap financing, households were

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>able to keep their buying power, keep their homes, keep

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>paying their rent, keep putting food on the table during

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this period, and then ideally go back to their old jobs.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And we sort of do that bridge from the past

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to the future. Well, so what is what is the

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>ideal of what would the idea of approach been do? So,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, for you and your listeners, how I would

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine this is a two two dimensional grid and the

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>X axis is something that says short term and long term,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and the y axis is bottoms up, top down. Look,

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last forty to fifty years, we've always believed that,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a top down reallocation of wealth was the

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>only way trickle down economics that was really you know,

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>started by Reagan and frankly hasn't changed very much since

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in any presidency thereafter, to be completely honest, um, and

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>we've never believed that bottoms up actually works. What I

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would have advocated for was a lot more short term

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>bottoms up help, and I think what that looks like

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is guaranteeing wages for basically a lot of individual people

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>that would have been put out of work and making

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that they have complete financial security to at a

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>minimum pay their ongoing repeat bills and at a maximum

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually be able to pull forward some amount of

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>spending that they would otherwise not do. And the reason

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is because you know, we are not a country that

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>relies on government spending to drive the economy, although now

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>after these last four or five weeks, you know the

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>government is responsible for probably fifty of GDP, which is

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little crazy. So in the short term

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I would have done something that was a lot more

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bottoms up. Some people would call it u B I

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we need to label it, but I

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that hand money in the hands of consumers

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>would have been a much smarter strategy. And then over

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the long term, I do think that top down really

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>works and long term change. Top down is all about

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>incentives and tax policy, and I think the right thing

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to have done there would actually be to make it

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>uh much more profitable and credible for companies to spend

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on things like R and D to you know, not

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fritter away the cash profits they have today via buy backs.

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, all these idiotic basically activities, which is the

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>tool kid of the dumb CEO. And if you actually

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>force some intelligent long term planning and thinking at the

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>board level and at the CEO level and tie compensation

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to things that are truly long term versus EPs, you

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would change those incentives as well. So if I was

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the government, I would have spent trillions of dollars on

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>giving money to individual citizens, and then I would have

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>spent several trillion dollars of tax incentives that told companies, hey, listen,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a short term loan, but in return

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you must sign up for the following idea. You must

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>spend at least fifteen or twenty percent of your profits

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on R and D. You must actually say fifteen in

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a rainy day account for the future. You must guarantee

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the pensions. There are all these things that you could

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have done. None of those things were done. You know

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the SMP five hundred do have an

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>R and D budget. How is that possible? I definitely

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the idea of the idiot CEO

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing short term EPs growth, but just before we do.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to government policy, it did feel like

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a sense that in the worst of the crisis,

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>people were trying to act relatively fast. And when people

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like that are trying to act relatively fast within a

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>very defined political system, they tend to reach for things

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that already exist, or they reach for fiscal tools that

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they've used before. How would you encourage politicians specifically to think,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, slightly more creatively when they faced this sort

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of time sensitive crisis and start thinking about new ways

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of tackling the idea or tackling the problem. Well, the

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we did were actually completely novel and new.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>U b I wasn't a concept that existed until you know,

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we decided to give to every uh, every American. You know.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We we had no concept that the FED would be

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>impowered or to basically use a bunch of cash, lever

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it up and enter the capital markets and by debt

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of all kinds of maturities to be able to pick

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>off you know, debt that's actually you know, degraded in

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>quality and credit worthiness to buy e t s. These

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>were all new things that none of US had ever

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>seen before. So I think that they know clearly invented things.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I just wish they would have invented smarter things. When

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I ever I saw your your interview a Railian against

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the bailout, I tweeted something kind of cynical, but I

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>also kind of wonder what the deal is. So you're

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of Virgin Galactic. The ticker is SPC, which

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounds like space, except that you've said in

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the past that the sort of at least medium term

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>likely business model is something that can heat's not actually

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going into space, but terrestrial travel that could be like

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a much better version of business class, much faster, potentially

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>more economical than traditional business class. Do you feel that

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a incentive or that you the company of

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>which your chairman is a competitor of these companies that

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you were calling out against their bailout. You know, we

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of work to do before we

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>build a hypersonic airplane. And just to give you a

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sense of it, um, a hypersonic airplane is something that

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>flies at nine to a hundred and ten thousand, hundred

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and twenty thousand feet. The spaceship that we have today

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>flies up to three fifty feet. So we're in the

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>business of spaceships, and we will be for a very

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>long time. It's just that when you're in space, the

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>physics are such that flying from here to Beijing is

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as troublesome as when you're flying at thirty

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand feet. And so obviously long term, you know, we

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can enable a different form of travel that's not possible

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>by basically going so high into the into the atmosphere

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the practical difficulties of traditional planes

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are not the problems that we would face. But I

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>really do firmly believe we're in the business of spaceship.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just that those spaceships can be used for a

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>whole host of different applications, including point to point what

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you call that. I guess we can get sonantic and

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>call it an airplane if you want. So you are

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of in I mean in theory in terms of

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like a revenue model, they would be your competitive Maybe

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just on one more cynical note, but you're talking about

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>government policy. Sorry, sorry to throw this all out at

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you at the beginning, but um, you're talking about government

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>policy and central bank policy distorting economies and potentially distorting markets.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people would say that venture capital has

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>benefited enormously from the kind of central bank liquidity that

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in recent years, and that because of it,

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you've had a lot of money that can continuously fund

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of loss making tech enterprise. How do how

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>do you respond to that? Yeah, you're right. I mean

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no point putting lipstick on a pig. Like

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's be honest about what's happened. You know, starting

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight and two thousand and nine,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we printed an enormous amount of money. The United States

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>government stepped into financial markets and basically told investors, listen,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the things that you have and

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>give you U S dollars in return. Those investors, in

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>turn took those US dollars and said, well, I can

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do three things with it. One is nothing, two as

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I can buy bonds, or three as I can buy stocks.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And what has happened is we've had the most incredible

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>market that we've ever seen. Along with that, what that

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>gives investors is an enormous amount of confidence because they

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>will conflate luck and skill. They think that they were

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>geniuses in picking stocks, and we don't really you know,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>take into account is we we have this huge behemoth

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>behind us, you know, giving us a massive tail wind

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in that. What happened was a bunch of you know,

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>um investors decided that they needed more liquid exposure to

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>get even better returns, and so they pumped enormous amounts

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of money in private equity. Now what did those private

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>equity companies do. They went back and issued more debt,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>bought companies, fired people, you know, pillaged balance sheets. They

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>also then decided that venture looked interesting, and they tripled

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and quadrupled the amount of money that's gone into venture.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>What do venture capitalists do? They respond to those market

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and they raise larger and larger funds, doing dumber

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and dumber things so that they can get the money

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>while the getting is good. I mean, this, this problem

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of people very quickly reverting to lowest common denominator behavior

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in search for money is tried and tested and true

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and has been true for hundreds of years. And you know,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think venture capitalists are any more virtuous than

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. And so that's absolutely what they did. But

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you trace it all back. How did it start?

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It started with the United States government deciding to print

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars. Now, ask yourself, what happens in two

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty five when you look back at two

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty and realized that, you know, we printed eight, nine,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ten trillion dollars. When it's all said and done, almost

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty of a year's worth of GDP UM. So, whatever

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>has happened in the last ten years, I suspect in

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the absence of some cataclysmic market realization, um, we are

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we are going to go to heights that you didn't

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>think were possible from you Well, let's talk about right now.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So obviously you have a lot of different purchase via

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which you see the economy. Early June, most people would say, okay,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>things are not as dire looking as they were in uh,

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 1>early April. But how from your various businesses and your

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>various roles including sports and so forth, what's your assessment

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of the economy me and its trajectory? And you feel

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're on a path regardless of the incentives that

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>policies created towards something resembling the pre crisis economy, or

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>were still a long way from that in your view.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing to remember is that typically the

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>way that markets behave in the face of a recession

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is can be can be sort of seen over about

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>six quarters. I'm just gonna make the math simple. Six quarters.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And in the first two to three quarters the markets

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>trade down, and they trade down because people are trying

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to figure out when the bottom is, and you know,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy is contracting, and then it's contracting a little

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more, and then it contracts yet a little bit more.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's that last quarter where we have been taught

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>as normal traditional market participants in the middle of a

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>recession to buy and that's the term. And then you

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>get the next two or three quarters of massive ripping

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>equity prices, and then the economy returns to normal and

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>then you get back to judging companies based on normalized elearnings.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>If you had said a priority this event, how would

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>people react to our session, That's what they would have said.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>They would have said, Okay, we are in for two

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to three quarters of a draw down and then uh,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the markets will turn and rip back over

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>two to three quarters. Instead, what we did was shut

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>down the economy and we took it to zero. So

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>from a very basic level, it actually couldn't get any

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>worse than the first quarter. And you know when then

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you again supercharge it with all the money that the

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Fed gave us. This is why we've had such a

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>such an indiscriminate rally going into early June. Now all

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of that said, my large and more broader market framework

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>still applies, which is at their thrip, typically three phases

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of a market. And the way that I think about

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it is, at first, you reflect the worst and everybody

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>assumes the worst, and you have to basically manage to

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the absolute worst case scenario. But that's all psychological, and

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in all of that, what happens is people realize that

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they overreacted, as they always do. And then what happens

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>is you start phase two, which is you priced the news,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and what that means is you become a little bit

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>more sober, you become a little bit more thoughtful, You

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit more time, and you try to

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>really understand what's happening and try to really weigh the

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>balance of things that are happening and be a little

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>bit more judicious in your decision making. And then you

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>enter the third phase, which is then you harvest profits,

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can be harvesting profits for a year, for

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>ten years. You know, you could wait till the last

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>month of the tenth year. But the point is that

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're really in a position where markets are trending

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>higher and you can safely be a holder and a

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>net seller and make money. I think where we are

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is we're in the middle of phase one and two.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>We reflected the worst in March, and what we're still

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to find is our version of the truth, and

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so we're testing theories in the marketplace right now. We're

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>pricing the news, trying to see how people react. So

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we just spent the last six weeks pricing the news,

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that there's a v shape recovery and everything

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be great. Uh, then you know, George

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Floyd happened, and it's unlocked a level of discomfort in

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the in the again, the real world, we've had a

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>spike in coronavirus cases in the last two to three weeks,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think now the market is going to price

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of news, which is that this is

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be tumultuous and that it's not going to

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be a clean recovery and that there's a lot more

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty to come. And I think that over the next

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>probably two to three weeks, we're going to play around

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with that model of how the market should work to

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>see if that works. In general, my perspective is that

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for us, the amount of money that the Fed

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is printed mutes and masks any of these things, and

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>so the tendency will be for the markets to trend

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>higher going into the fall, into the election, just zooming

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>out from markets. Uh. In one of your investor newsletters,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about how you were viewing a sort

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of parallel with with what's happening now and a moment

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in time from US history, which was the Gilded Age.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you walk us through that parallel, because I think

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting, Um, you know, the Gilded Age? Uh.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And basically this is the late eighteen eighteen hundreds, turn

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of the turn of the nineteen hundreds. What we saw

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was a handful of industries really represent all the success

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world, specifically the railroads, and a handful of

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>industrialists that were personified with both greed and villainy in

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>many ways for being at the center of those industries

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's not dissimilar to how tech is viewed or

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>has been viewed going into this pandemic. But what really

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>happened was, you know, there was there was pushback against immigrants,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there was pushback against women's rights, there was pushback against

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>labor organization. But eventually what happened was there was a

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>pushback against trust busting. There was you know, a movement

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for labor rights, for women's rights, for immigrants, for high schools.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, organized high schools didn't exist until the late

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds, etcetera. All of this is to say that,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we sort of had a short term bottoming

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>in the pure form of capitalism that had preceded it,

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and we layered capitalism with a lot more social consciousness.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that we're in that progression right now,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and I think that you know, in the next four years,

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it really irrespective of which whoever holds the presidency between

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is the bottoming of the top down, trickle down economic process,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, largely defined by a gerontocracy who will eventually

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>recede into the you know, annals of history and will

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be replaced by young progressives on both the right and

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the left, and so by four and beyond through I

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see a rise in progressive ideals and

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>arise in social consciousness, a more responsible approach that looks

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>at every human inside of the United States as roughly

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>equal and asks ourselves what we have to do. A

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more trust busting of big companies, higher taxes for companies.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>All of those things I think are in there are

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, you know, what I expect to happen

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten years. Let's talk about

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that further, particularly from the perspective of the tech world.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You're at Facebook for a long time. Facebook is in

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>many ways at the center of a lot of these

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these tensions because so much information flows

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>through Facebook. There's tension with inside Facebook, different views on

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>how it should regulate itself and regulate speech, or how

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>much it should just be a completely open platform. There's

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>also you mentioned trust busting. I'm sure I know there's

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who want Facebook to be broken up.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>But give us your take on Facebook's role right now

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and how it should first of all, how internally, how

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>management should be in your view, addressing some of these

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>thorny issues about what it should allow on his platform,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and then also perhaps your view on what a policy standpoint,

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of society, politicians and I trust experts should

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how it should go about regulating placebook. Let me answer

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it in the context of all of big tech, so Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>To my answer is that these guys should, um try

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to build the most value for consumers and

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>try to give as much of that away as cheaply

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or as freely as possible, because it is the only

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>path to maintain consumer loyalty. Um. You know, the tech

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sector has largely been responsible for a decade of deflation.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have taught consumers not to spend money

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>because you get great things for free, and tomorrow you'll

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get even more great things for free. That's an inherently

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>deflationary set of behaviors and dynamics that that largely the

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tech the tech industry has created. The other reality, those

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that governments, I think have two very practical issues. The

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>first is that big tech threatens their ability to govern,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and the second is that big tech is collectively more

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>economically viable than most governments. And so what you see now,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you look in Australia, is a much

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive taxation and policy regime in Europe, a much

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive taxation and policy regime. Um, we've heard that

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the fifty A G s plus the federal dj who

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>seemingly couldn't agree on anything, has agreed to try to

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>trust Bus Google. You know, in France, they tried to

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>tax Amazon or they're going to tax you know, the

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars that they make their through Amazon Prime. So this

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning of this trend. You know, local, state

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and federal governments all around the world are the poorest

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they've ever been, and these five or six companies are

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the richest they've ever been, and so it sets them

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on a collision course. That's pretty obvious, and what I

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think the markets are doing right now is trying to

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>fight the obvious. If you look at, for example, the

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the weighted SNPI market cap versus the unweighted, what that

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>means is every company is worth the same versus every

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>company is worth what their market cap is worth. The

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>weighted market cap has completely dispersed from the unweighted, which

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is to say that, you know, the big five tech

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>companies have completely ripped and the rest of you know,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the four other companies in the SNP five have been

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of sitting on their hands. And the reason why

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that lollygagging is happening in the capital markets is that

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>market participants don't want to believe that it's true that

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the future profitability and long term profit capture of these

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses will stay intact. The practical reality is that when

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's happening, just by reading the news,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you can see that, you know, there's not much recourse

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>for these companies over time once the government decides that

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get their pound of flesh. So it's

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious from my perspective. I don't think that it's

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the consensus you um, but if you know, if you

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>had to basically trade that news, what I would tell

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you is that you're over time, especially as we rally,

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you'll see more dispersion of these five companies relative to

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest. And that's when you want to get short,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's when the the spread will collapse at some point,

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>when enough of these lawsuits basically you know, trigger a

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>realization that a bunch of these things will get broken

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>up and taxed and over taxed, and it's just going

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to be an ugly position I think for big tech overtime.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about obviously inequality in society, but also

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>inequality in companies, you know, between the big ones like

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Thing stocks and some of the others, And you

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think eventually a lot of that is sort of going

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to get worked on or worked out in a similar

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>way to what we saw I guess during the progressive

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>era after the Gilded Ages. That sort of the thesis

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>UM in some ways. Yeah, I mean I don't think.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to look exactly the same UM.

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I think that you know, at that time,

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>these were all domestic companies with domestic motives, and there

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>were fewer actors to really manage. This time around, you're

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about global companies with um you know, global balance

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>sheets and hundreds of regulators you know, up and down

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the value chain at the federal, state, and local level

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all around the world that will want their pound of flesh.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's just inevitable. From the internal side, How do

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you think Mark Zuckerberg or some of these CEOs who

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying to wrestle this very strange role in which

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of de facto governments unto themselves, who have

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to set norms and their own lines of what they

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think is appropriate speech. How should they go about adjudicating

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these questions, because of course there are a lot of

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>people inside Facebook that would love to see it. Depends

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on the lens in which you want to view it.

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you're running a big tech company, you have

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>two options. Option one is um to hold on for

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>dear life um and and basically, you know, wait until

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they come knocking. Or option two would be to do

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it yourself so that you can control the outcome better.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, if you take Amazon as an example, you

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>could make a case that Amazon could spin out a

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>WS into its own entity right now and have some

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of an agreement that they define between them and

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon Retail, versus having it done to them by

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the d J. You know, you could make a claim

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know you could spin out Skype from Microsoft,

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or that you know, Gmail and the Google Ads business

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube should all be three separate entities, each individually

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>traded um where you know the agreements and the bilateral

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>sharing or trilateral sharing agreements of data are defined by

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>them themselves. Or you can just wait and have it

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>done to you in the absence of anything else. UM.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes all the sense in the world

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to wait. It's not necessarily what is the moral answer,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's not necessarily what the companies or employees may

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>want you to do. But it's absolutely the thing that

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>maximizes market cap in the short term, because that also

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>maximizes your influence in the short term, which then probably

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gives you a sensation that maybe you can change the

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>outcome if all this were to happen, if you saw

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the big tech giants start to get broken

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>up or reined in a little bit, how how harmful

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is that for their business models? I guess I'm asking

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>how much of their business model is predicated on having

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>basically a monopoly over certain sets of data. Yeah, I

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that you probably see a whole host

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of other competitors. Look you, you know. The thing to

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind is that the UM technology ecosystem typically

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has swung, you know, as a pendulum between these two poles.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Poll number one is, you know, a few companies highly integrated,

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the other the other spectrum, the other end

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum is a highly highly fragmented ecosystem of

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>many small players. And we've done this twice already on

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. I think in general, a smaller set of

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>five or six large tech companies just means that there

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>will be you know, hundreds of smaller businesses that sort

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of more cooperate nicely together and you know, have very

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>clean interfaces and very clean data sharing rules, and you know,

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more transparency and how you're you know,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>how individual consumers are being tracked, and there's you know,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's there's better interoperability. That becomes very important when you

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have a fragmented ecosystem. But in general, I think it's

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>better for innovation, it's better for consumer choice. It's just

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not good for you know, market cap of a few

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>folks and then the holders of those businesses as well,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because then they have to go and you know, figure

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>out where to reallocate that capital. Jamal, you mentioned a

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit ago the killing of George Floyd and the

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>tensions that we've seen since then. You yourself, I've seen

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter have been very critical of the police state

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and how we do law enforcement in this country. I'm

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>curious if you could talk a little bit more about

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what tech of Silicon Valley can contribute to accelerating change,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think you hear a lot from tech leaders

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about the importance of diversity, and more companies have published

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>diversity numbers and things like that. But from your perspective,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of putting things into practice that would make

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a difference both internally and for society, where do you

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>see tech falling short still and what more of substance

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>could be done. Look, um, this is a very delicate topic,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and UM, I don't exactly know how to address it,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest. It's something that I've been thinking about.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really caused me a lot of anxiety

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>actually the last couple of weeks, because when you see

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, both the Amy Cooper video and then the

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd incident back to back. You know, for all

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of us that are minorities, it triggers, you know, all

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the many slights and inconsistencies and behavior that we've observed

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know, have been done to you and have accumulated,

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and you you normalize them because that's what it takes

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to live a normal life and be a participant in

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>society without sort of seeing you know, embittered. But I

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think the real the real change isn't necessarily for a company,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's for the majority, you know, ruling class, and

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>those are to be honest white folks. You know. The

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>analogy I made to a friend is if your child

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>came to you and said, you know, I'm being bullied,

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the child's responsibility or the parents responsibility to

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>do something. If you had a very close friend and

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>she said to you, you know, I've been sexually assault

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to is it her responsibility to fix it or is

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it our society's responsibility to actually, you know, educate people

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and train folks to be more respectful. And I think

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of what it comes down to to

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like point to an industry and say, folks

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>need to do better. I think MS is the mark.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a societal issue that's that's kind of been

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>left unaddressed for a long time. And um, I think

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>people feel very sensitive about it on both sides. If

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you're a person of color, you know, you feel at

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>points shame, anger, resentment. If you're not a person of color,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you feel grief, shame, resentment, fear, discomfort. And I

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a very good answer. I wish I

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>could give you an articulate sense of what needs to happen.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Except that it is up to the folks who recognize

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's wrong, but who are not the ones on

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whom these injustices are put on to do something about it.

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you one story, which is at after

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven. You know, I hated getting on a airplane

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and I still do because people look at you like

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to blow the plane up. I mean literally,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, knowing me and knowing who I am,

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine it's the furthest thing from the truth

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and on my mind, and it's it's just it's just

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a very very simple example because it doesn't really even

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>come close to the magnitude of what black people deal

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with in America. But it's just an example. And I

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>used to have S S S written on my boarding

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>pass and it was there for years. I could have

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>been flying business class, first class economy, domestically, internationally, one

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>way return, it didn't matter. And uh, I would always

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>get these guys that were kind of like very kind

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of like physically patting me down, and you know, it

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just would delay me for hours, it seemed, and you

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>just feel so helpless and targeted. And what happened was

0:36:57.840 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I told a coworker at the time of mine who

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>work today. Oh well, white guy, And what's so sad

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>about this incident was I was not ashamed. I was

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just I didn't know what to do. He was so

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>angry he wrote the same letter that I wrote to

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>United and then all of a sudden, the SSS was

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gone from my boarding past. It's a very simple example,

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's not to take away from the severity of

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of what the real issues are. But my point is

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in that example, like you know, people of color sometimes

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>feel helpless, and it's the non people of color that

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.919
<v Speaker 1>have to do something because you're just more credible at times,

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're taking more seriously in a way where it

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like we're complaining. And I don't feel like

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I've ever complained in my life. But it makes you

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty worthless, you know. You know, you get pulled

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>over by the cops ten times. I remember, like, I

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have a driver now, and I told somebody. They asked me, like,

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>why do you have an Asian guy as your driver?

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, if it was another person of

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>color driving me, we would get pulled over in my car.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>If it was a white person driving me, people would

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, maybe I had sort of car

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>jacked this car, and I've found through iteration of not

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>getting pulled over that this is the sequence that allows

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>me to do it. And I I did that. The

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>reason I did that was because I was so ashamed

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of getting pulled over. So off. These are all these

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>little things, These are the things that accumulate rust in

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a person's mind, and it's hard to overcome that stuff.

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to explain it to guys like you,

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sure you never understand what that means. You know,

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to when I talk to my black friends,

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a if, it's a when was the

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>first time that a policemen pulled a gun on you?

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine? I can't imagine that. So, you know,

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what I just told you was a one on the scale.

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>What they're dealing with is a thousand on the scale.

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's up to you guys to

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem. It's not a tech industry problem. This

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is not an industry defining thing. This is a racial problem.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, Uh, it is a great spot to leave

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it there, and I really appreciate you joining us. Appreciate

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, appreciate your outspokenness. I enjoy following you on

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Chama. Thank you very much for joining us.

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Thanks take care of yourselves. So

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I really like that conversation. I mean often, you know,

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what would first catalyze the discussion or wanting to have

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>him on was the whole question about bailout. And I'm

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>often pretty cyndical about the sort of some of the

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>old let's let it go no bailoud nobi allouds for

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the rich discussion, because I often get the impression that

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of this desire among people with money to

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>um buy assets on the cheap or implicitly. But I

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>really don't think that that is that's his angle anyway. No,

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you definitely don't get that sense. It is interesting to

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>see a venture capitalist piece so thoughtful on a number

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of these topics. So he's talking about inequality and society

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as between companies like the Big Bang stocks

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and others, and also trying to decide, trying to think about,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to parse ways to fix a lot of societal

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and economic issues. You don't see that very often. I

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like you see a lot of like you see

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of venture capitalists who like to talk about

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>making the world a better place, but not necessarily in

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>these terms and with as much sincerity. No, exactly right,

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>And often there is this view that it's sort of like,

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's a sort of quasi libertarians, sort

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of like leave us alone and let us build, right,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>let us build this thing. And I think it's interesting

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that he's specifically talking about the need for, or the

0:40:54.480 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of more aggressive taxation. There is reincredible constant right

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>rating tech in from a sort of like very substantive way,

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>taking the money, and it's gonna in his view, I mean,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>people have been predicting it for a while. Maybe it won't,

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it will happen. But the tension that he sets up,

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>especially state and local government that are already sort of

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>stretched on cash and are gonna it's gonna be much

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>worse due to this crisis. This idea that this um

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this tension is coming, or this class this inevitable clashes coming,

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I found to be pretty compelling. Yeah, and I can

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of see it going either way, because, of course,

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>in a crisis, like we were discussing, sometimes people want

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to preserve whatever the industries are that are actually making money,

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and tech, as we've seen, has still been doing reasonably

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>well because it's insulated from the coronavirus quarantine measures and

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the stocks have been doing really great. But on the

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>other hand, because of the social discord that's been sparked

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>by everything that we've seen in the past month the

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>or so, you could also see a lot of the

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 1>public anger eventually aligning on big tech. So again, it's

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really interesting to see which way it goes. Yeah,

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like that's like, you know, we've been

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>doing a number of episodes that are kind of about

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this question of like do we return to normal or

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>do the events of are they so profound that they

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully reshape policy? And we've talked about it with trade policy,

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about fiscal policy, but I think this sort

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of question of whether we really as a society go

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>after huge power centers is another really big aspect of

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that question. Yeah. Absolutely, you know, it will be fun

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in ten years or so if we listen to a

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of old All Thoughts episodes from and just see

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of these issues eventually got resolved. That'd

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>be fascinating. We have to get Laura, the producer, to

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>schedule those and out in so we could do the

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>ten years look back. Laura, please make us a time

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>capsule of All Thoughts episodes and bury it somewhere in

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg office so that we can find it in

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>dig it up and listen to everything. Of course, not

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a problem at all, Thank you. Ally. Should we leave

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it there? Yeah, let's do that. This has been another

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Why Isn't All? You could follow me on Twitter

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwart. You should follow our guest Chamath Polly

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Hapatia on Twitter at Chama. Follow our producer on Twitter,

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check out

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to