WEBVTT - US Considers More Chip Tariffs

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and Vla Lolow in San Francisco.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>President Trump says more chip tariffs are coming soon. This

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 3>is the administration explores equipping chips with location tracking tech.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Will have the latest from Washington.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Plus, Booming AI demand is sending Palenties second quarter revenue

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 4>soaring above a billion dollars, Chez hit a new record.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And AMD also out of earnings after market close today

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>with the company under pressure to show benefits from the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>AI race, and.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 4>We take a check on the markets amid what is

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>yet more earnings to come from AMD and a digestion

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of weaker services data that seems to be putting up

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>pressure in a macro picture is underwhelming. We're off by

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 4>five ten percent on nasback one hundred, but ed get

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 4>to the nitty gritty, what's moving in terms of points here?

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the earning story is palent here and we're up

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>eight percentage points forty eight percent growth on the top line,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>which the company attributes to astonishing AI contribution. We're going

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>to get deeper into that in the program. Another top

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 3>story that we're tracking is what's happening with AI chips

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>in particular. So we're going to talk about how tariffs

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 3>are coming, specifically for semiconductors. But then there's the reporting

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 3>overnight that the US is thinking about putting location trackers

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>on AI chips that are exported to certain countries. In fact,

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>overnight we caught out with a key White House official

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>who talks about it.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 5>There is discussion around very important research and development that

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 5>needs to be done on potentially the types of software

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 5>or even physical changes you could make to the chips

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 5>themselves to do better location tracking. And that's something that

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 5>we're exploring and we explicitly included in the plant.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>We can get to order this with Boomberg's Mike Shepherd,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 4>who's joining us.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Now from Washington.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Look, I want to go into the broader picture first

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 4>and foremost, we are anticipating semiconductors to be in the

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>eye in the storm when it comes to localized tariffs.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>How much is that impacting the future of companies wanting

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 4>to import.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's a great question, Carol, because the administration, while

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 7>it has spared chips imports from the country by country tariffs.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 7>We are now expecting Donald Trump to sign an order

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 7>in the next week or so putting tariffs on semiconductors

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 7>as a category, no matter the point of origin, and

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 7>the countries will have to negotiate individual levels perhaps after that.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 7>But they have made clear that just like with pharmaceuticals

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 7>and autos and copper and so many other categories of goods,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 7>they want to see more of them produced here in

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 7>the US, and they see tariffs as a great means

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 7>of doing so. Now, what this means is that industries

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 7>such as automakers, even the chip plants themselves, will face

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 7>higher costs. And then when you look at the hyperscalers,

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 7>Open AI and the companies that we've seen report their

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.279
<v Speaker 7>earnings this week and announced even further intentions of expanding

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 7>their investment in artificial intelligence, they run the risk CARAF

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 7>facing higher costs on those two from chips. Chips are

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 7>one of the biggest inputs that these hyperscalers face in

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 7>terms of cost, and adding to that, adding up to

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 7>a twenty five percent tariff would be tricky. Now we've

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 7>been anticipating this since April, when the Commerce Department opened

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 7>its investigation into whether tariffs were called for. It's under

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 7>a so called two thirty two process. It would be

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 7>on sounder legal ground than the reciprocal country by country tariffs.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 7>We will have to see what the timing looks like

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 7>and whether or not they carve out any exemptions as well,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 7>including for semiconductor manufacturing equipment, which is key to expanding

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 7>here in the US as well.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike location track, we have the United States willing to

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>export technology, the American tech stack around the world, but

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>it wants to track where the chips are going. Can

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>you explain that one to us?

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.839
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Ed, And it really is central to the administration's

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 7>plan to try to expand the American tech stack, especially

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 7>advanced AI chips. They want to be able to sell

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 7>those more broadly and more widely, including even into the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 7>Chinese market. We saw the promise to loosen restrictions on

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 7>those aged twenty chips.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.119
<v Speaker 2>But it's more than just China.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 7>It's being able to sell those semiconductors across the Middle East.

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We saw all the deals that.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 7>Were reached with the United Arab Emirates and in Saudi Arabia,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 7>But to be able to sell in those markets. The

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 7>US wants to also have the capability of tracking those

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 7>chips to ensure that they are not somehow diverted or

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 7>smuggled or resold or somehow end up in the wrong hands.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 7>And that would include not only China, but Russia, in Iran,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 7>every series that the US does not want to see

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 7>gain capability when it comes to artificial intelligence, which of course,

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 7>as we know, has a dual use capability.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Mike Sheffin always on the nose. We thank you from Washington. Meanwhile,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Taiwanese prosecutors, well, they've arrested six people suspected of stealing

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 4>trade secrets from TSMC. Now, the chipmaker reported former and

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 4>current staff to authorities on suspicion they illegally obtained core technology.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 6>The prosecutors searching the homes of some staff.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Now authorities are now trying to find out if data

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 4>had been leaked to other parties.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Z okay Onto Earnings Palenteer reported a forty eight percent

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>increase in revenue for the second quarter to more than

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollars. The company cited the quote astonishing impact

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 3>of AI on its business. Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst Mandy

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Singh joins US. Now, this is the story that everyone's

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about this morning, Palenteer's continued momentum. At BI, you

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 3>went a little bit deeper on how that's playing out,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>But did you just summarize where they were strong and

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 3>what's happening with Palenteer right now?

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 8>I mean when you look at the US commercial segment,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 8>that is what everyone is excited about. It grew ninety

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 8>three percent for the full year. Their guide is eighty

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 8>five percent, and look for a small segment with over

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 8>a one point two billion dollar run rate, it's very

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 8>impressive growth. But I think the metric that we still

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 8>don't understand is how much is the AI contribution to

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 8>their top line growth. I mean, when you look at

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 8>a Microsoft Azure number, you know the AI contribution to

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 8>growth this seventeen percent when they grew thirty nine percent.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 8>In the case of Palenteer, yes they grew forty eight percent,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 8>but we don't know how much of that is driven

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 8>by AI because their business model is dependent on contract wins.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 8>And yes, they gave us a number around the backlock

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 8>growth and the remaining deal value on the commercial side,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 8>but we just don't know enough to quantify that AI contribute.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 8>And for a company that's trading at such a rich

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 8>valuation multiple, you want to have a better sense of,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, what that flow through of AAR revenue is.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So perhaps more transparency on a breakdown of numbers, Mandy,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>what about who they're taking market share from, who's losing

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 4>out as we see Palenteer make these wins.

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, their core business is data ware housing, So you

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 8>have the legacy vendors like terror Data and Oracle, and

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 8>you also have cloud companies like Snowflake and Data Breaks.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 8>And we know Data Breaks is also doing very well

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 8>in terms of growth rates. So now that Palenteer is

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 8>expanding on the commercial side, it'll be interesting to see

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 8>if they can sustain this kind of growth rates, because

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 8>you're right, it will come at the expense of someone

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 8>on the commercial side. Clearly, the hyperscalers are looking to

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 8>get a piece of that pie as well. Because Microsoft,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 8>the way it's positioning Copilot, it's trying to solve some

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 8>of the use cases that Valenteer is looking to solve

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 8>by applying LLLM. So to my mind, the commercial side growth,

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 8>the sustainability of growth is going to determine whether it

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 8>can sustain this valuation, and so far I find the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 8>net new arr metric from the Hyperscalers far exceeds what

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 8>Talenteer has had a given. Talenteers is a much smaller company.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Great context, Blue meg Intelligence, Senior analyst, man Leeve Seeing,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much. Let's dive into all of this,

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 4>particularly into the valuation front. Stephanie Aliaga is with US,

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 4>joining us from Global Market Strategy JP morgas Asset Management

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 4>market Insights team.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 6>Stephanie, we look at.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Something like Palenteer five hundred percent in twelve months, the

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>most expensive stock on the s and P five hundred

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 4>When you're looking at where it prices versus future sales,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 4>does it seem vindicated to you these sorts of valuations.

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 9>There's absolutely some AI enthusiasm at play here, and I

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 9>think there's some and I think in this earning season

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 9>we have heard from a variety of companies, not just

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 9>these megacap tech companies, that they're seeing early signs of

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 9>success US with AI. AI is helping them run more efficiently.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 9>It's writing more and more of their code, something like

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 9>fifty percent of code, and it's also helping them hit

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 9>more shots on target, particularly in marketing. But beyond that,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 9>I think when it comes to valuations, you need to

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 9>on one end, look at the stability in the core

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 9>business operations of some of these companies, these megacap tech

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 9>companies which remain highly profitable, and then also some of

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 9>the upside moving forward in the AI race. And when

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 9>it comes to the leading megacap tech companies, at least,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 9>we actually think valuations aren't as overstretched because core earnings

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 9>are so robust and they are actively reinvesting a lot

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 9>of those profits that cash flow into the next paradigm shift,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 9>and we're already seeing some early signs of success these

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 9>Faces and Shovels companies.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 6>They're also digging for goals and seeing the fruits of that.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie, when you were lost with us in April, it

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 3>was just after the sort of deep seat chaos and

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 3>we discussed how the semiconductor industry in particular was in

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the crosshairs of the administration. A lot has changed since then.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Actually the administration has been very supported at exporting American technology.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 3>But just on the stories we touched on tariffs on

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 3>semiconductors and location tracking on chips, there's a risk premium.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 9>There is there absolutely geopolitics remains a risk. Policy has

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 9>been a headwind for the sector in recent months and

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 9>particularly today, but we are seeing a shift from this

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 9>administration towards a greater appreciation around what safeguarding US dominance in.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 6>AI really looks like.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 9>Right, And I will add, outside of these risks around tariffs,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 9>what is really promising and quite structural, is that you

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 9>have seen a decline in over ninety percent around the

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 9>cost of inference for AI, and that has to do

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 9>with four factors. Hard hardware, the chips themselves have been

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 9>getting significantly more efficient. Algorithms are getting more efficient, how

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 9>much data, how many numbers they need a crunch, we're

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 9>right sizing models. We now have mini models that we

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:13.599
<v Speaker 9>can access, and we've seen this democratization in models, particularly

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 9>open source. So all of that has led to this

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 9>pretty remarkable decline in the costs of AI, and I

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 9>think we need to put that to one side when

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 9>thinking about these risks for tariffs.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>We shall borrow the acronym going forward. What I've wanted

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to ask you for a real long time, is there

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>an America ink trade going on here where you just say,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I bet on these companies that are most likely to

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 3>succeed if this American strategy pays off.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a really interesting point, particularly in the

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 9>context of this debate around US exceptionalism, because when I

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 9>look at the markets right now, I don't see so

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 9>much US exceptionalism, but exceptionalism from a few US companies,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 9>and that is really what is driving the markets right now.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 9>We're actually less concerned about valuations for let's say, the

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 9>Magnificent seven and.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 6>A bit more concerned about the other four.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 9>Ninety three because without that structural tailwind when it comes

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 9>to AI, it's a bit harder to see the cyclical

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 9>tailwinds for the rest of the market. But when it

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 9>comes to these leading tech companies, I think you do

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 9>have unprecedented fundamentals and the continued dominance, particularly in tech services.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 9>Now there's plenty for investors to consider, and we still

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 9>think portfolios should be diversified, but at a time like this,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 9>you maybe don't want to be diversifying away from that

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 9>epicenter of innovation.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so interesting that you got the.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Acronym hard tech is where everyone's looking at from a

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 4>spot up culture but also into these big Magnificent seven.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 4>But then drip feed it down into where if you

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 4>are going to diversify the sector, is that are deploying

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 4>it right or indeed, is it more about the picks

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 4>and shovels a little bit more, it's about the energy,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 4>It's about the infrastructure and that slide of the equation

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 4>that keeps you in the AI spin.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, the AI value is continuing to expand we think

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 9>that infrastructure layer is huge, and that is a secular

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 9>story that is still in its early innings. The amount

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 9>of energy that we're going to need, the investment that

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 9>we're going to need in a variety of different sources,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 9>and also everything that goes into those data centers themselves,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 9>the cooling equipment, the server technology, and so forth. So

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 9>we still think there's a significant investment case there. But

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 9>what's also really interesting in particularly what we're seeing in

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 9>private markets this year, is this explosion of AI applications,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 9>the kind of applications that businesses are going to need

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 9>because it's not enough to give their worker SHATBT.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 6>They need domain.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 9>Specific AI applications that are actually productivity enhancing and show

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 9>up in the bottom line. We're seeing more and more

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 9>of those come to market this year, mostly in private markets,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 9>but I think that's a trend that is worth watching

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 9>and just getting going.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 4>And then they move from private markets into public markets

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 4>and we see what happened with Figma and the bephoria

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>around that particular listing.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Are you seeing more of.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Your clients wanting to know about what IPOs to get

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 4>into or indeed how to make that move from private

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 4>markets into public markets.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a lot of interest there, as there

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 9>should be. I mean, there's a lot of anticipation for

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 9>a pickup an Ibo activity, and I think the fundamentals

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 9>and the promise and a lot of those AI startups

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 9>could be the thing that really gets enthusiasm and comfort going.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 6>In the market again.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 9>But I also don't think that we're going to go

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 9>back to that kind of post pandemic period. A lot

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.119
<v Speaker 9>of these companies have different goals beyond just being profitable

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 9>AI companies. Right, many of the LM providers that are

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 9>in private markets, they're on the race to AGI, and

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 9>so there is also this appreciation that these AI companies

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 9>can get a lot of the capital that they need

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 9>in private markets, maybe they will more control over their companies.

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 9>So if you want to access that opportunity set, don't

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 9>just wait for them to go public. I think you

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 9>might want to look at your private market exposure and

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 9>then also maybe some of those tactical opportunities that do

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 9>arise this year.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie Aliago, JP Morgan. Great to have you back on

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the show. Thank you very much. Now coming up, Joe Faff,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>known for making early bets on comempanies like Alphabet and

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Amazon while at tro Price, joins us discuss his new

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 3>role head of Growth for Eclipse, a VC firm.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Investor Joepath's scale trow Price's US growth stock Fund from

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven billion dollars to over one hundred and fifty

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in assets, and had twenty years at the

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 3>investment firm, making early bets on companies like Amazon, Alphabet,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>and Meta.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>He's now joining a Clipse, a.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>VC firm focused on physical industries as the head of

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>growth and also as a partner.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Joe's here with us in San Francisco.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I've always known you to be somebody who is higher

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 3>up the cap table of big companies that then go public.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Rivian is the example that I know best, late growth

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 3>stage round and anchor investor in in what was huge

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 3>IPO in twenty twenty one. You've been lures to bench

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 3>capital in Silicon Valley.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 10>Why good to be with you, Ed, I appreciate it.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 10>I'd say, you know, you've known me for a long

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 10>time now, and I've been a builder of companies over

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 10>time and investing capital, and those companies that they've scaled,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 10>I think what really attracted me eclips and opportunities. I

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 10>really think we're at a seminal moment right now for

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 10>physical industries. So if you look at the companies that

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 10>have been created now, both private and public, and you

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 10>look at the market caps, there's been significant interest in

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 10>those and there's capital formation around them.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 6>The other parts of.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 10>This, I would say, you know, all this is coming

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 10>together at once. Is US policy, which you talked about

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 10>earlier in the segment, I think is very supportive of

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 10>bringing industries back.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 11>To the United States.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 10>And the other thing is clearly an inordinate amount of

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 10>innovation around artificial general intelligence and ultimately artificial superintelligence, which

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 10>I think provides this unique intersection of hardware and software

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 10>to transform physical industries.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>So the reindustrialization piece is something that comes up in

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 3>this program all the time. There's a sort of national priority,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>national interest, even sort of national pride elements to it.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>How are you going to play that in your strategy.

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 10>I think it's important you talk about policy and ultimately

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 10>national security and economic sovereignty, and it's very important, I think,

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, looking at the Eclipse team and why I

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 10>joined them specifically, they've been doing this for ten years

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 10>and had a vision a decade ago, and it's an

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 10>incredibly competent, amazing team. During my process, the time I

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 10>spent with Lere and the rest of the partners, they're passionate,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 10>they're hungry.

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 6>They're true builders.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 10>They roll up their sleeves, they get their hands dirty,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 10>and they've done a lot of you know, early stage

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 10>enterprises and companies. Where I come in. I've allocated capital

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 10>at scale. I've looked at companies both private and public

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 10>that have grown, and I've worked alongside invested in many

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 10>of the best companies in the world. So to do

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 10>that as we scale these businesses and connect the two

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 10>together with that team, their technical experience, in my financial experience,

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 10>I think is really like a one plus one equals

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 10>three situation. They remind me I'll date myself here, ed,

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 10>but it's a team of Jerry Maguire's not.

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Dating at all. It's an iconic movie, Joe.

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested though, in just how you go from managing.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 6>Tens of billions to going.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 4>To managing and writing relatively small checks. What sort of

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 4>size checking you're going to be giving do you think

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.239
<v Speaker 4>when you see these smaller scale companies that are going

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 4>to be huge?

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, I mean initially, right at the early stage

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 10>or venture side of this Caroline, you're going to see

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 10>smaller check sizes. But we're going to scal all those

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 10>over time, both for companies as they hit a scale

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 10>velocity and they need more capital to continue to build

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 10>out their strategies. And on top of that, there will

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 10>be companies, as we've seen, that need bigger check sizes

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 10>earlier and getting more traction. A good example that is investment.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 10>I made it both Trow and we've made it Eclipses

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 10>Androl to give you an example.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 4>So, and Andrew, I immediately think of just the focus from

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 4>the government and indeed for many an investor right now,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 4>just what was happening in point seventy two, for example,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 4>on getting in on defense tech in particular. But I'm

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 4>interested in other particular areas where you think the US

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 4>is leaning in more that you want to be contributing

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 4>to thinking. When you think of red word, I'm thinking

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 4>about the supply chain more. But when you're thinking then

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>about Tesla is more about robotics. Where are your sweet

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 4>spot's going to be?

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 6>Do you think?

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I've heard a lot of experience in electric vehicles,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 10>material science, battery technology, but that's also extended and I

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 10>think it ties in with what Eclipse has done well,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 10>supply chain solutions, semiconductors. You mentioned defense tech, autonomy, So

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of crossing a paths given my experience

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 10>that I've had as a private and public investor, now

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 10>as I join.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Eclipse, Joe, you visited Tesla in twenty eleven. You took

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Rivian public basically, and then you help them after going public,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>just very quickly, What were the lessons you took from

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 3>M two companies?

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think this is one of the

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 10>seminal moment for me on physical industries was in twenty

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 10>eleven when I visited Tesla. It was not just a

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 10>differentiated product ed but at the end of the day,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 10>a different way of building right. The first principle ways

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 10>of thinking, and we see that permeating a lot of businesses.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 10>And as we've had successful companies like Tesla, SpaceX, mentioned Anderill, Redwood,

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 10>there's people leaving those firms and they're starting new firms

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 10>as well. So the ecosystem is growing and they're taking

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 10>those lessons they learned with them, things that were really

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 10>important to me, and I think I can help businesses

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 10>with clearly, product market fit is very important. You know,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 10>right product, right time, solving the right customer problem set

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 10>or providing them something that they don't have, that's very important.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 10>I've always talked about, you know, additional acts beyond X one.

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 10>You look at Tesla, They've done that, SpaceX has done that,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 10>Amazon's done that. So a handful of those and then

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 10>and then really what I've we've focused on growth for

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 10>many years is driving durable growth and making sure companies

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 10>are sustainable longer term. So I'll be working with most

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 10>of them to scale and ultimately get them to be

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 10>durable public companies.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Joe Farf on his second act, the Klip's partner and

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 3>head of growth, thank you very much. Coming up, Aberdabi's

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>MGX gets ready to raise billions for its own AI ambitions.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>We have more in that story. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 6>It's the time now for talking tech.

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 4>First up Abadabi based MNGX is said to be considering

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 4>plans to raise billions of dollars as it ramps up

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 4>investments in AI. And that's according to sources the firm.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 4>It plans to raise money through a fund structure and

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 4>can raise as much as twenty five billion. Now this

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 4>is his executives raising money from investors in Aberdabi, but

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 4>also beyond Plus and videos assembly partner on High and

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 4>actually saw sales growth slow in July, a signal that

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 4>tariff induced uncertainty is affecting electronics demand. Still, the company

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 4>hopes to ride that wave of continued AI spending from

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 4>its partners, even expanding its AI server assembly capacity in

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 4>the United States and shares of German ship maker in Finion,

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 4>where they're rising today after the company said that tariff

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 4>impact it's fourth quarter fiscal results will be less than anticipated.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Convenience CFOs Ben Schneider joined Blomberg TV Justselier today.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 11>I would say from today's perspective, the indirect tariff guestimate

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 11>for this fiscal quarter is probably less pronounced than we

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 11>thought last quarter. On the other hand, we are faced

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 11>with more and more negative currency headwinds from the weakening dollar,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 11>which offsets to a certain extent.

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, eleven Labs bets on AI Music, launching a

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 3>new service called eleven Music. We speak with CEO Matthew Sanazuski.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 6>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 4>In on those markets that just starling back from some

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>of the record highs have been out recently, we're seeing

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 4>then that one hundred and down sixt ten percent. There's

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 4>more of a creeping anxiety about the macro picture in

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 4>the United States that services data looking week, remember the

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.239
<v Speaker 4>jobs data that President Trump took issue with the end

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 4>of last week also painted a less than rosy picture

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 4>about the economy. We take some money off the table

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 4>as we digest also earnings. We're expecting amd after the bell,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 4>but let's look forward as also how we're seeing some

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 4>companies still at record highs. Palenteered doing the work today,

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 4>we're up almost seven percent, new record high after it's

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 4>already climbed five hundred percent in the last twelve months.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 6>This is their earnings managed to impress a billion dollars

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 6>in terms of revenue.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 4>We'll also see in Global Foundries, though not such a

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 4>pleasing picture that they actually beat in terms of their

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 4>fiscal quarter reported, but it's in anxiety around profitability looking

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 4>forward that midpoint of the range not met. When it

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 4>looks for their forecast, we're off by nine percent of

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 4>the contract ship make red.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, take a look at this chart showing the sales

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>slump Tesla's posting in key European markets.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>These numbers come as.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Chinese rival Bed picks up sales team in the region.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 3>I want to get out to Bloomberg Stefan Nikola to

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about this because it's an ongoing story. It's a

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 3>trend that we've seen Tesla in some European markets dropping

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 3>off and China's BYD making ground.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 2>How would you sum the data we got most recently.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean Tesla has been suffering in Europe for

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 12>the past few months and suffering in the key electric

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 12>vehicle markets Germany, the UK, France. Those are all markets

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 12>that are rising in terms of electric vehicle demand. So

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 12>you know that that's really bad for for Tesla. Of course, BYD,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 12>by contrary, is sort of making a big push into

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 12>all of these markets selling electric cars but also hybrids

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 12>and yeah, and just in general, it's it's a really

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 12>bad picture for Tesla. Of course, the company has a

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 12>factory up and running in Germany and it needs demand.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just try and weave the narrative for us, because

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 4>Tesla wanted the narrative to be. Look, we're moving to

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 4>a new production format, particularly with a model. Why that's

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 4>what's slowing down perhaps some of our end results, but

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 4>actually it seems to be political connotations. It seems to

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 4>be competition.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Is the issue? Is that really what we're seeing here?

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there are a lot of factors at play here.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 12>The whole shifting to a new model and narratives is

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 12>way too simple to explain this drastic decline. Elon Musk's

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 12>political activities are certainly contributing to this sales slump, as

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 12>are better models from rivals, better prices from rivals, but also,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 12>you know, just very shifting market dynamics in Europe, but

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 12>also more broadly, so you know, the overhaul of the

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 12>model why as you we certainly plays a role, but

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 12>it's definitely not the only reason for this really big slump.

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Chefen Nicola, we thank you. For painting, but what is

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 4>an intricate picture? Meanwhile, we shift gears. We look at

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 4>AI voice startup eleven Laps its launching a new initiative

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 4>for businesses stepping into the world of AI music. Customers

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 4>can enter a prompt and generate a new tune within

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 4>a matter of minutes using eleven Music.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 6>That's the name of the service.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Joining us now is Matty Sanychewski eleven Labs CEO. So

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 4>what is demand like, you're doing voices, but what was

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 4>the inbound? What scale you're seeing of companies wanting to

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 4>create their own music?

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 13>Carlin, thanks for having me here. So at eleven laps

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 13>we are doing AA audio research and product deployment. We

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 13>are on the mission to be the voice of technology,

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 13>build the most comprehensive AI audio platform in the world.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 13>And now this includes eleven Music, which we are extremely

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 13>excited about because this is something that so many customers

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 13>came to our platform to create a voiceover, to create

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 13>a voices, to create narrations with our core models, but

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 13>frequently needed that additional background sounds, soundtrack in those productions,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 13>which we will now be able to provide as part

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 13>of the service from creators all the way through the enterprises.

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a fraught world where you're trying to navigate IP.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 4>In particular, this is IP protective music because you've already

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 4>got the training of the models is based upon agreements

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 4>you have.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm thinking with Merlin Network.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 4>That's for independent labels, it's a digital rights agencies.

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Also got a similar deal with Cobalt Music Group. But

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 6>what about the bigger ones, what about UMG?

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 4>What about some of the other key music license holders?

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 4>Can you make deals with them?

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 11>It's exactly.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 13>One of the very special things about the release of

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 13>the Model is that it's both extremely high quality, one

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 13>of the highest qualities in the market, while it's also

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 13>fully licensed and built in collaboration with the labels, with

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 13>the artists, with the publishers. Like you mentioned, we already

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 13>are very happy to be working with Merlin and Cobbalt

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 13>frequently referred to as the fourth both because they represent

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 13>respectively thirty thousand independent labels on the Maryland side and

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 13>over twenty five thousand songwriters on the Cobbalt side. So

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 13>really that gives us such a high ability to create

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 13>extremely high equality music. Of course, as we look into

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 13>the future, we would love to work with UMGWG Sony

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 13>and help we find a path in the future to

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 13>do so. As we think about our work across eleven Music,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 13>that's one of the key elements to make sure that

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 13>the work we do is both licensed but also gives

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 13>you that broad commercial license to use it, which our

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 13>enterprises demand from gaming all the way to media entertainment

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 13>companies that we work with.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Maddie, are you talking with and negotiating with those major

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>labels you just named?

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 13>Currently the focus was on bringing the current model and

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 13>product to the market, So really we're deep with our

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 13>partners with Merlin, Cobalt, Source, Audio Lander and a number

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 13>of other partners that are in the mentioned in the

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 13>release to bring the current iteration. As we bring the

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 13>product to the market iterate, we will see whether we

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 13>can expand out further.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 3>But it does a lot of interest in eleven Labs

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>in your business to what stage have you grown? Do

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you have any financial metrics ar R or anything you

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 3>can tell us about how it's going for you over there.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 13>We're doing really well as a company. A few months ago,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 13>over half a year ago now, we crossed the one

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 13>hundred million ARR mark as a company and we've been

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 13>growing steadily since. Across the company, we have really those

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 13>two key offerings. The first one is that creative platform

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 13>which music will form those in those early and initial days,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 13>and then the agendic platform where we help companies create

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 13>voice agent conversational agents. And over the last six months

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 13>we've just seen an explosion in companies building with both

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 13>parts of the use cases, both on the creative and

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 13>the agentic side. We're now partnering over a thousand different

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 13>companies in the market and over a five million creators

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 13>that come through the platform on a monthly basis.

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 4>I want to go back to those creators because can

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 4>you name any individual musicians, for example, that are willing

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 4>to go this way? I think of how Grimes is

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 4>really lent into this and she wants a fifty to

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 4>fifty split with her royalties going forward. But what are

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the musicians you're seeing actually wanted to adopt this, Because,

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 4>as I say, it is fraud.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 13>We are seeing a number of musicians in the space

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 13>that are keen to lean into the technology Iterate quicker

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 13>make it a little bit easier to create music. Currently,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 13>as part of the eleven Music we are still crafting

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 13>the partnerships and will hopefully announce some of those in

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 13>the coming weeks. So I cannot name any on that

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 13>side just yet, but we've seen a wider set of

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 13>creators working with the tools to make it easier to

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 13>produce variations of the genres, make it easier to see

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 13>how the tracks can be produced before heading that production stuff.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Maddy, there's a lot of intro seen you and eleven

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Labs kind of fits the profile of this like vertical

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>model where it's a potential aqua higher target right. I

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>just wonder what you make of what's happening right now,

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>the windsurf scenario and whether you might consider doing something

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that joining a bigger entity to continue your work.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 13>We are building generational company, are planning to go in

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 13>the pandemic and try to create and become the voice

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 13>of the technology, make computers speak, make information accessible across

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 13>voices like ross sounds across languages and now music. So

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 13>current default this to a create a company that can

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 13>that can create something special on its own, and we

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 13>think we can. So hopefully the opposite will be true

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 13>where we'll be able to acqui hire or acquire a

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 13>number of companies in the space on that path too.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 13>To potential IPO in the future.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Matty Sanderschewski of eleven Labs, thank you very much. Now

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 3>coming up on the program, and thirteen partner Brent Murray

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>joins us talk about the firm's new investment in the

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 3>generative AI advertising space.

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Winberg Tech.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Venture firm M thirteen is just led a ten million

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 3>dollar seed round in generative AI advertising platform Context. The

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 3>startups now the largest and most well funded gen AI

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 3>ADS platform to date, according to M thirteen. M thirteen

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>partner Brent Murray's here to tell us more. This space

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>is dynamic, right because it's highly analogous with Meta. You know,

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the story around Meta is how their

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 3>working AI improves AD pricing, ad impact that core business.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>You are looking at a very different scale and early stage.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I'd just love to get a presentation of the thesis

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and why this is an interesting domain within AI.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, thank you Ed and Caroline as well for having me.

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 14>So we are excited to announce the coming out of

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 14>stealth of Context this morning. They're ten million dollar seed

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 14>round to really become the largest and most well funded

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 14>generative AD platform out there. And so to answer your

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 14>question our thesis on the space, Well, we see the

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 14>advertising world at a major inflection point, and I'm glad

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 14>you hit on meta. There's also industry incumbent Google that

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 14>have pioneered a lot of the previous waves.

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>We believe the first wave came sort of.

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 14>At the early two thousands when when Google pioneered digital

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 14>advertising as a space. Then shortly thereafter, a second wave

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 14>came in the twenty tens where social media platforms led

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 14>by Meta attracted new eyeballs, new audiences online, and ad

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 14>inventory exploded online.

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And we see this as a third wave.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 14>The one trillion dollar AD market, three quarters of which

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 14>is done through digital channels, is about to migrate towards

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 14>generative AI apps. You already see Open ai as the

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 14>fastest growing app of all time, closely getting to a

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 14>billion users. And it's not just them, they're just the

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 14>most well known. You have a lot of other generative

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 14>AI entertainment apps that are attracting audiences where context is

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 14>going to target them.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>What is context's core competency? What is it that they're

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 3>actually doing good at.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are two things.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 14>One is real time ad creation and the second is

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 14>hyper personalized contextual ads.

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So I'll take those in pieces.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.439
<v Speaker 14>The first one, similar to what Mark Zuckerberg is hinted

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 14>at where Meta is going, is end to end advertising creative,

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 14>where AI and llms are powering much of not just

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 14>the targeting of audiences online, but the actual creation of

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 14>the advertisement itself, the asset knowing what copy to use,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 14>what style, what color the image, the video. So what

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 14>context has done is enable an AD to be created

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 14>in real time using an LM. If you are in

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 14>a chat bot, then your ad will be served up

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 14>to you in real time, which means you don't have

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 14>to have a lot of wasted time on the ad

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 14>creative a lot of manual processes creating thousands of iterations.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first thing.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 14>The second thing is contextual hyper personalized. So in the

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 14>old world, if you're on social media, I think a

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 14>great example is my family and I just had a baby.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 14>Any of your viewers know that the months leading up

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 14>to a baby, the months following a baby, you are

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 14>targeted ad nauseum by the social media platforms because that

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 14>is when you're most likely to purchase baby goods. But

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 14>what happens after you purchase the crib, After you purchase

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 14>the high chair. You're not going to purchase them again,

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 14>But hundreds of dollars are wasted on you as an

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 14>audience because they're targeting you as a demographic and a

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 14>social behavior. Take that as what context is doing is

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 14>very different. They are targeting advertisements based on your real

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 14>time queries into the LM. So if you are chatting

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 14>through a chatbot telling it what you're interested in, an

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 14>advertisement will be created in real time based on exactly

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 14>what you're asking.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 4>I kind of want to go to the regulatory or

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 4>unnerving part of this, because we're almost trusting these chatbots

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 4>more than say, the social media side of things. How

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 4>do I know the chatbot's not steering me during my questions?

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 4>How do I ensure that basically I'm not suddenly finding

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 4>the conversation being bent to certain direction because it wants

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 4>me a hooked in it.

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 6>So we're worried about addiction process again.

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 4>Or indeed forcing me to then bend my will to

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 4>end up buying something and perhaps I didn't need.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 6>How are we going to regulate that?

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's a great question, and I think the advertising industry,

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 14>because we're at this inflection point, we'll have to face

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 14>a lot of those questions right now, you see what

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 14>happened with social media platforms in the past. Consumers are

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 14>always hesitant to go on ad platforms like Meta or

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 14>Instagram and just be served at ad after ad after ad.

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 14>But then they become much better and influencers started talking

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 14>about things that you wanted to buy, and a lot

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 14>of advertisers and online merchants rely on some of these

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 14>ads to power their businesses to stay in business. I

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 14>think the advertisements in AI will have to follow the

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 14>same suit. You have to be able to trust that

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 14>the publisher or the chat bot isn't trying to steer

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 14>you in the in the right in the wrong direction.

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 14>That will lead to unnecessary churn. That's the last thing

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 14>that Context wants for their publishing customers. They want to

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 14>create seamless environments where you're having a regular chat.

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 2>The ad will be.

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 14>Promoted or shown in a way that you can distinguish

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 14>it from an advertisement versus non advertisement, that it's not

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 14>predatory or you know, going after you.

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 2>In a certain way.

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 14>But you'll you'll see a very very natural process where

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 14>the chatbots are feeding you up things that you already

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 14>want to see, already want to potentially purchase.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, Google already doing that. In the third part, chatbots,

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 4>It's fascinating. Brent Marrying, We thank you so much for

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 4>your time talking about context. His partner over at thirteen. Now,

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 4>let's talk about how women are holding well then eighteen

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 4>percent of all partner and above rolls in venture capital.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 6>It's all according to data just released by All Rays Now.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a nonprofit that aims to increase gender parity in

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 4>tech and VC, and it's saying that this is ahead

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 4>of its projected schedule. We spoke with All Raised CEO

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Page Buckner about where that change can be seen.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 15>Most twenty percent of decision making roles at VC firms

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 15>with a billion plus and aom have women decision makers,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 15>which is super exciting. And so when you think about

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 15>that stat what's important to us is that we're making

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 15>progress at scale. But we do know that at the

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 15>mega funds there are only three women holding managing partner roles,

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 15>and so there's a big opportunity for us to make

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 15>progress there.

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 4>And they're the funds with more than ten billion in

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 4>assets under management. Go back to the data therefore, page

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 4>of what this means?

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 6>Why is it?

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 4>What is helping those that are managing in excess one

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 4>bay and make those decisions have more decision makers who

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 4>are diverse in thought.

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 15>So I think the first thing to ground ourselves in

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 15>is that there's so much data and we talked about

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 15>this last year that makes the case for having diversity

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 15>and decision making roles at any kind of organization, and

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 15>this is especially important in venture capital when they are

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 15>making decisions about the kind of innovation that we're going

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 15>to fund in the private markets and then eventually in

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 15>the public markets as well. So it's important for us

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 15>to stay grounded in the results, and we talked about

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 15>this last year. But what we know is that diversity

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 15>is an advantage because diverse teams consistently outperform. They also

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 15>better reflect where the market is heading. And one important

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 15>data point that we've been thinking deeply about is the

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 15>one hundred trillion dollars in wealth that's projected to move

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 15>into the hands of women by twenty forty eight, and

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 15>that's just going to reshape everything in the economy. But

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 15>as we think about venture capital in particular, we've been

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 15>asking what does that look like for LPs, what does

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 15>that look.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Like for venture firms?

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 15>What does that look like for the kind of innovation

0:39:58.760 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 15>that these women are.

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Going to be able to fund?

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 4>So is the thought process here more money lands in

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 4>female coffers, They therefore want to work with more diverse

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 4>LPs or allocate the LPs want to allocate to more

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 4>diverse vcs, and they want to be putting money to work.

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 4>How does that reflect in the portfolio companies that then

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 4>these diverse bench capitalists and decision makers are putting money into.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely so we know according to our friends at Kaufman

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 15>that women vcs are two times more likely to invest

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 15>in women's CEOs at the earliest stages.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 6>And we know that there's opportunity there.

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 15>And often these markets have been overlooked because they've been

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 15>perceived as niche markets. But what's great is that when

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 15>you bring in more diversity on the VC side of

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 15>the equation or on the LP side of the equation,

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 15>by the way, that is felt across the capital stack,

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 15>and then the kinds of innovation that we can have

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 15>on the start up side of the equation shift, and

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 15>so what gets funded then also better reflects than part

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 15>of me the marketplace, which is of course commanded by women.

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 15>When we think about the person of decisions around consumer

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 15>and healthcare and education that are made by women every

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 15>day for household across this country. So it is really

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 15>reflecting not just where the market is today, but where

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 15>the market is going to be. And we're thinking about

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 15>the products that are therefore reflective of the consumer that

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 15>vcs really want to be building for because they're going

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 15>to be able to get outsize returns.

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 3>That was Paige Buckner, CEO of All Rays. Now coming

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 3>up investors, IAMD results after the closing bell, the latest

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 3>earnings expectations coming up next, and the analysis from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 3>AMD out with earnings after the bell, and investors are

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 3>putting increased pressure on the chip maker, expecting the company

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 3>to show benefits from the AI race. Here with more

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Kungensavani of Bloomberg Intelligence, you put a number on this market.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 3>In Vidia has ninety five percent of the market for

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 3>GPUs is AI accelerators. AMD has five percent. What do

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 3>they need to show us that they're making some ground?

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 16>This time around the non air things will be important,

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 16>PC gaining share, some maybe pair of pull in embedded,

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 16>coming recovery in three Q but as you said, the

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 16>second half AI ramp both in server CPU and GPU

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 16>will matter the most. They need to again show sustained

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 16>execution on the three fifty five ramp. There's a possibility

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 16>of the China series coming back and adding about five

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 16>hundred million to even more revenue in the second half,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.959
<v Speaker 16>and any visibility into the Helios which is the next

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 16>year server level REX solution, should be very positive.

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Where have they been executing really well?

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 4>Because I feel like time and time again we're hearing

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 4>about the PC side of the equation, but the consumer

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 4>isn't too hot right now.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 16>Definitely, the ND markets are struggling, but they have been

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 16>really gaining share on CPU, both on the PC and

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 16>the server, which has really been helping them outperform even

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 16>the unit weakness in the market. Secondly, we have heard,

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 16>you know news about them raising prices both on the PC,

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 16>the service if you, and the GPU side. That really

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 16>speaks to the strength of their adoption across the board.

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Planning to watch out for in terms of size and

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 4>market application countri In Savanni on Bloomberg Intelligence some great

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 4>notes coming out ahead of these earnings, and we'll analyze

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 4>them after the Bell as well. That does it though

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 4>for this edition of Bloomberg Tech, and so much to

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 4>be digesting in terms of the market. It's the macro pressure,

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 4>but we look at AMD after the Bell in terms

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 4>of the micro perspective.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another day where chips are in focused because of policy.

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 2>But like AMD, best.

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Performing chip stock so far this year, right, and they

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of pressure on them. But it's an

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 3>interesting company to follow. Good analysis from Kunjan recap it.

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 3>As Cary said on the podcast, you know where to

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 3>find it.

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 2>It's on the.

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg terminal as well as online on all of those

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 3>great platforms Apple, Spotify, and on iHeart. From New York

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 3>City in San Francisco, this is Bloomberg Tech