WEBVTT - Nassim Taleb, Scott Patterson Talk 'Chaos Kings' Book

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Joining us here is not seeing teleeb and Scott Patterson

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and celebration of a brutal book. I really can't say

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>enough about this for Global Wall Street. I'm sorry. This

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the adult book Chaos Kings. Bill Cohen, William Cohen,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a book about Duke Lacrosse. It was Bill Cohen,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just says Scott Patterson. He's done it again, which he

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>did in twenty twelve, and with.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Dark Pools and all that.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And the problem we got here, David is we can

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>spend the next three hours of TALEB.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>But you know we got to give some love here.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Patterson, who's only here because James Madison University'd be chapel.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 2>That happened your book in.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Full disclosure, I'm totally enough, seems camp And knows that

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>like Wicked in his camp. So when you set up

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your book, which is the TALEB team like JMU against

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the other teams, some French dude like you, how did

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you set up that polarity?

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Describe the tension of Chaos Kings.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, it seems belief is that you can't predict markets,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 3>so you just need to prepare for extreme.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Events all the time. The Black Swans.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>And I can trast that with another character, a French

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>econophysicist named Didier Sornette, who uses advanced physics and other

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>mathematical models to try to predict these big events.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>He calls them dragon kings, which technical term.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I call it Newtonian envig So he's a

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 2>math guy, right.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's a math guy. He uses some things that could.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Be used to predict the explosion of rockets and transpose

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>that onto financial markets.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You gotta be kid. Here's the reality, folks. Now, see

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>tallav changed the world with John and Nero in Fooled

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>by randomness. Everybody else would have retired to.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Turks and caicos or whatever. He went on to do

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Swan. And then you and I sat on the

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>stairs of Saint Bart's on Park Avenue, and you described

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>anti fragile to me. Now, seeing where is the humility

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>among the quants in this great ballmarket.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 5>The point is you don't need humility. Humility actually is

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 5>not necessary. I don't want people are arrogant. There's just

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 5>got to be paranoid about the right things, namely how

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 5>much our error costs you when it happens that ruined

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 5>problem and uh and and and basically Scott's book is

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 5>about ruined problems.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's see.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>So you could be arrogant about everything, all right, you

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>can be wrong all the time, it doesn't matter. You

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 5>got to avoid you gotta avoid ruin the big things.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 5>You got to be right about the big sources of

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 5>risk and and and the rest take care of itself.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 6>Could could I get your having come out of the pandemic,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 6>your perspective on what happened there largely uh, but within

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 6>markets as well, the reaction to what we saw.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 2>The you mean the pandemic, the reaction to it. Yeah, okay,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>we we were.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean Scott discusses what happened in the pandemic and

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 5>and and how we were obsessing over it. I mean

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 5>when we started the idea of universe, and when Mark

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 5>started Universal, I was the passenger, you know, I was

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 5>a retired passenger. But the name universe I means universal properties.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 5>And we're talking about some universality of these classes of

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 5>tail uh, the processes that generate large tale events, and

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 5>we call them, I call them grace wants. Hence that

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 5>that's where the name universe came from. So the the

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 5>we were I was obsessing even when I wrote the

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 5>blacks one about pandemics and kept obsessing and he said, okay,

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 5>I didn't remember the interview. Someone asked me, what what

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>you have to worry about this and that you can

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 5>worry for Think about some germ traveling on air France.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Air France, you got good food and if they're bad germs,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 5>they travel along British air or they got food. So

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 5>that was and sure enough, nothing had happened for one

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 5>hundred years, or for close to one hundred years, right So,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 5>and people say, well, you know, just like financial risks,

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, people perception for risk before the crisis, say oh,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 5>we don't have to worry about these, they don't happen anymore.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure enough, right, Scott Patterson, you've got you know, one

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of the sections is the Boston section that we could

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 1>problem And the answer is flying blind.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've been doing this for fifteen years at

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street Journal, trying to figure out the mathiness

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and the certitude. And I'm gonna wake up and win.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're number six, We're gonna be number two

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or number one?

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>What are we flying blind on? Right now?

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that you know, right now, there's obviously a

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of complace and see.

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>In financial markets.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, we're hitting records time after time, and

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>yet you look outside Wall Street and it looks pretty crazy.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So there's all sorts of things that could happen. And

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I know Nasim wants to talk about China. I've been

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>predicting China would collapse for two decades now, and they don't.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, be careful. Cash flow lives there. My oldest son

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 2>speak care Okay, China's not going to collect. Let's do this.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 2>We do China. David Gurr in the next section.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we've got an extended conversation when nassee Telebin Scott

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Patterson Chaos.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Kings is a book. Okay.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You know I asked that question of Scott, and I

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to set you up here. We're flying blind, na

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing teleb and private equity and private credit.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>It's all the rage. Okay.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 5>The first thing I have to say that we have

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 5>that problem in the West. Okay, wether individual government. You

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 5>know you can have that. China has that, but you

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 5>must grow. And the problem of the West is that

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 5>we have an s curve of growth or of GDP

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 5>or per capita, and it looks like we're at it

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 5>on the top right of that curve. So it's concave.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 5>And people have two cars, they have two homes, and

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 5>what do they want, I mean, have perieer watership to them.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 5>I mean, so the incentive to grow isn't there. So

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 5>here it's a serious problem when you have low growth

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of that. And the problem is that

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 5>Western you know, economies have never had more debt in

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 5>history as a time where grows became concave simply the

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>nature of growth. You grow fast when you're China because

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 5>you got to pull people out of the provinces and stuff,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 5>and sentative living can still rise and make a difference.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, see, they're not quantic Curt sweets years ago.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>There, our listeners, our viewers there there, they put their

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>pants on one leg at a time. How did they

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hedge against your concave tensions that we're in right now?

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>How do mere mortals hedge this?

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, the whole thing is, it's not you hedge. If

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 5>you're investing without a tail hedge, you're practically not investing

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 5>because of the ruined problem. And that's what he discusses

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 5>in the book. That's my first statement and the second

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 5>one that people are way too static. They imagine either

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 5>they have a memory that's that's that's either too short

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 5>or or or or has problems updating that they don't

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 5>realize that, for example, what's happening in China that the

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 5>Nature index of publications that's very hard to gain. What

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 5>China used to have one percent today it's in the

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 5>twenties and rising. So tells you that's a leading indicator

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 5>of what technologies may come out of China. So you

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 5>realize that got to look back before seventeen fifty around

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 5>when the Industrial Revolution started starting. So we're starting to

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 5>shift and in eighteen thirty China had eight times the

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 5>GDP of Britain. We're back there as soon it's gone.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 5>So we're going back now in times like reversing the

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 5>downess of the West, not because the West is doing poorly,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 5>but because it got one of the work.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>David, we're going to China right now. Nasie's running the show.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>We're doing China here right now. We'll do the stock

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>market opening your Formanus David Gern Shina with Scott Patterson.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, Na, see.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 6>Scott, let me ask you more about you said you've

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 6>been predicting the sort of dissolutionally have been seeing for

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty years. What stands out to you about this moment.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 6>We spent the whole week talking about these kind of

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 6>unprecedented actions, the way they were delivered by the PBOC

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 6>in China. What that says about the actual state of

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 6>the economy there. Talk a bit about that and sort

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 6>of your vantage and also just sort of how much

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 6>varacity we can ascribe to the statistics that we're getting

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 6>out of China.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Well as to the veracity of the statistics. Who knows,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, they keep doing this, they keep they hit

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 3>a slow down and then they you know.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 4>Hit the accelerator.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 3>They've they've pulled you know, after the GFC, a great

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>financial crisis, China pulled the entire world out of out

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 3>of that situation by stimulus. You know, who knows how

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>long they can keep it up. It's it's a big

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>mystery for me. You know, my focus these days is

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 3>on climate and the dominance of China and climate technology

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 3>is astonishing, and that's the future of energy, it's the

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 3>future of vehicles, it's the future of batteries, and they're

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, light years ahead of everybody.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 4>We're trying to catch up.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Europe's trying to catch up, and that for China is

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a big, big advantage.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I got to do a shout out here with the

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal this week with a stunning effort. It's

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>newest nuclear submarines sank setting back. It's military modernization. That

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was an incredible story. Out of your shop. Now on

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>China again, continue, Aaron Freiberg for Foreign Affairs says, it's

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a Marxist Lendinist regime.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Nobody in Beijing read fooled by randomness.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 5>No, But the point is the point is that China

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 5>is in reverse. It's the reverse of Europe. If you're

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 5>small in China, you can do whatever you want. If

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 5>you're big, the government calls you up for a meeting.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 5>So in Europe, if you're small, you're overregulated. You got

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 5>you got like five tax inspectors bringing down your neck,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 5>you got to get all these permits. If you're big,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 5>then you own the government, okay, particularly the case in

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 5>France and Germany, everywhere and practically everywhere in Europe. So

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 5>China is a reverse. So they say, okay, it's capitalism

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 5>okay for the small, and communism for the large and

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 5>its effectively, it's not that much. There's you know, a

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 5>centralized economy except for the top.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>So what about America into our fractured election?

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I don't know about whether the election makes a

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 5>difference in many respects, but we have a problem. And

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 5>that problem is that our debt servicing is increasing and

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 5>I guess that you cross is more than military spending

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 5>more already. Okay, So and it will continue to pay

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 5>interest on that. Now you may say interest rates may

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 5>be lower. I don't think we can go back to

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 5>zero interest rate because zero interest rates Goll's here, all right,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 5>So we're going to go back to normal interest rates.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 5>So the dead problem is not going to go away.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 5>That service is going to keep increasing. And and the

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 5>problem is if the East becomes and that's just China,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 5>just the East in general becomes powerful and becomes a

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 5>target of for you know, retirement money and stuff like that,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 5>then the dollar would be in trouble.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm just looking at it from risks to that point. Okay, Well,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 5>you got to solve that problem, Scott.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.239
<v Speaker 1>What's the other side of the story here, the mathewness

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and certitude of Zurich, Switzerland.

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're foring to Didda Sornette, the Dragon Kings guy.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, we were talking about China, predicting what happens

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 3>in China. I just you know, after covering financial markets

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and talking to you know, hedge fund managers who twenty

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>years ago were billionaires and now they're you know, buzzing

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>tables at diners. I you know, this is where I

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 3>come down on the Seams side, is I don't think

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 3>you can predict markets.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 4>I think it's impossible.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that they're you know, when you look at

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>quant trading strategies are very short term, like over the

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 3>course of a few minutes and seconds. Those are the

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 3>only strategies that really survive long term. And even they

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, my first book, The Quants, showed how they

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 3>almost blew up in the in the two thousands in

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a period of big d leveraging.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 5>So basically they're basically getting a higher dimensional bit than

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.599
<v Speaker 5>ask Okay.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're trading.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 3>Didn't asked very rapidly, and that's that's good strategy. But

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, trading making big bets on your prediction of

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>what China is going to do next quarter, next year,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>or you know what the FED is going to do

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>this is very, very hard to do.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>My humility or David Gray is it's a once in

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime event. And you know, years ago in the

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>old World, which is where taub is from, you know,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven nine and all that, and over to the continent

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of Europe. You know, they're laughing at us about once

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in a lifetime event. You and I have gotten great?

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't eve any great, But the answer is there's a

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of once in a lifetime events.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>David, I have a.

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Question about young people in this industry, and it's inspired

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 6>by a conversation I had with my friend Robert Smith,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 6>who is at NPR. He's now running the Night Badge

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 6>of program at Columbia. I said, I was going to

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 6>be talking to you today and he said, here's what

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 6>you should ask him. He pulled up a tweet that

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 6>you filed more than a year ago. Now, the story

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 6>we haven't covered this week is Caroline Ellison of FTX

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 6>getting sentence, going to spend two years in prison, and

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 6>you tweeted about Sam begmanfreed when everything blew up. He said,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the problem with people like SBF is knowing a tiny

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 6>bit of statistics to pairrot about it, but not understanding processes.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 6>That is dynamics cross time. Shakespeare has survived nearly half

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 6>a millennium by filtering by time. Then you close. Sam

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Begnfreed worked at Jane Street. You're right to Jane Street.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 4>He would have flunked my job interview.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 6>What does the naseum telef job interview look like?

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you ask somebody to supply for?

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I understand.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 5>Some basics thing like ruined problems and understand dynamics.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>So which is the same.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 5>You know that people, if you have tiny probability of

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 5>losing money, you eventually would go out of business, Okay,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 5>because over time. So if you're aware of it, that's fine.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 5>If you're not aware of it, you've got a problem.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 5>The other one is sizing comes from sizing. Also, if

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 5>you have the edge, you still have probably a one

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent of blown up if you don't size properly.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 5>So sizing is very delicate. Two basic things. And the

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 5>third one is about fat tails, the difference between tintails

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 5>and fat tails. And that's pretty much the theme of

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 5>the Black Swan, the remedy and anti fragile and discussion

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 5>of white people don't understanding and skinning the game. Okay,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 5>so the difference between fat tail and thin tail finance

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 5>is not Gaussian. Now everybody claims, yeah, we know that. Yeah,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 5>if you know that, then why are you using Gaussian tools?

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>What tools do you use?

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 5>What do you suggest people in the street understand the

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 5>parreto eighty twenty? It is very intuitive. You need to

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 5>learn to know some mass but not enough, okay, to

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 5>get to stuck to the You know, if you teach

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 5>people a little bit of math but not enough.

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>They go to the Coe. This not Sing's laughing at

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>me here right now because he knows that.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>To Thudau David, thank you, Kerr and I don't speak

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>before the show. In fact, we're not on speaking terms.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad I brought that up. Not seem but

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you know me on position sizing.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Position sizing is everything, and right now we're living in

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a MAG seven world where everybody, whether they admit it

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or not, is Scott Patterson's four oh one k at

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Journal is loaded up with Nvidia and all the

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of it not seeing tellt on MAG seven the

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>anti position sizing.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so I let me give you one one thing

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 5>since I don't have a lot of feats.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I read tweet. I wrote a.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Tweet saying that if someone gave you twenty four hours

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 5>in advance the newspaper tomorrow's newspaper, that you would go bust.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 5>And actually someone just tested it. Victor hugg Formultive LTCN,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 5>who visibly know has long experience in the market, has

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 5>tested it by giving people over fifteen years next day's

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 5>newspaper and tell and giving them you can trade that

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 5>today's price, knowing towards newspaper.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>And people didn't do well. Why.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 5>One of it is of course sizing. They don't know

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 5>how to size the position right, whether they're right, They

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 5>don't know how right they are because they can't figure

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 5>out how much of it is noise, all right, and

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 5>of course the sizing. So so the just you know,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 5>heard of the paper yesterday because it starts with my tweet.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting to have a tweet turning into a paper

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 5>by someone else, like for someone lazy like me, it's perfect,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 5>right because tweets I don't an airport's typically right, So.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's not say, that's not how markets work. The

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>markets work on anticipation of news events. Oftentimes when you

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 3>you know you see the Fed cut interest rates, the

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>market go down, Yeah, because it's already trade on that news.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 5>There's a fact Tony story and anti fragile all right?

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 5>How people who anticipated the invasion of Iraq or the

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 5>starting of the war against Saddam in nineteen ninety one,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 5>those what a dissipated? It went bust because guess what

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 5>happened to oil prices?

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 2>They collapsed?

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 5>All right, So it's not figuring out the news. There's

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 5>something more subtle about markets.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to get one more question in a kiss

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Kings and Nassy, and then we've got to talk to

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you about it fractured your old world, your Europe with

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one two three the column conflicts, but I think there

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>was Skim Patterson, you have such a history of writing

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tension of Wall Street.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And your experience.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Is anybody on Wall Street putting the tension and the

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>outcome of it of your books into practice or we

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>still want a to var, which I.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Know Nasim loves var. Is anything changed on Wall Street?

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's it's funny. No, I don't think that

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>we learn our lessons. I think people are still using

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>value at risk even though it just got just I

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>mean it was a laughing stock in two.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 4>Thousand and eight. People look at this and like, oh,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 4>this is insane.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>We're cutting out five percent of the worst days every year,

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and like that doesn't matter. So yeah, no, I don't

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>think we learned list. I wanted to come back to

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the question of an interview asking, you know at a

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 3>hedge fund. Yeah. I spoke to a while back somebody

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 3>who you know at Renaissance Technologies and the big quant

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>shop Long Island. One of the questions they asked perspective

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>employees is how does the toilet work? Which you know

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about dynamics. I thought that that's an inod question,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 3>interesting and the answer is to vacuum.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to devote the rest of the time with

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>great honor to all the people from Lebanon that have

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>assisted David ger and I and what we see over

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the last weeks, days and indeed courtis and years led

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>by Jumana Bricchecci over in Dubai, who has been really

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>helpful to us here. Her show is Horizon out of Dubai.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Look for that now. Seeing you have lived this, you

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>were in your family or deputy prime ministers, you were

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>involved with it. Out of the Greek Orthodox Christian sphere

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of a Lebanon I remember with great prosperity, it is shattered.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>What did you not know?

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I was Elebanon two weeks ago, and I

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 5>go to Lebanon, I reside there part of the time.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 5>So what you see in pictures isn't doesn't map to

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 5>and when you hear about the economy doesn't map to

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 5>what's going on there.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 2>There've been a.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 5>Little slowed down by the slowed down by the Gaza War,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 5>some kind of rise and across all economic sectors in

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Lebanon on a more anti fragile basis. In other words,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 5>the collapse of the government of lebanon On economically gave

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 5>rise to the centralized municipal power and to a lot

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 5>more entrepreneurship. Okay, because the central bank was conducting a

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 5>ponzi and the ponzi went away, and then suddenly people

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 5>recovered and four years later you know, it's on amend

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 5>and and you can see economic activity across all sectors.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean restaurants, all full new restaurants opening up like

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 5>every day, at least in my in my my neighbor

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 5>is like forty to fifty years past year. I mean

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 5>every day, every week, so so you have you have

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 5>So what the perception of Lebanon from from the outside

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 5>is quite distorted, given that I spent time there. The

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 5>this war I think is I mean, there there is

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 5>a problem. Okay, let's let's say there is a problem.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 5>The fighting is confined to Hizballah and the State of Israel.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 5>But but but of course their side effects outside. But

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 5>something tells me that that if you go to a

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 5>bigger war, if Israel wants to drive the US into

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 5>a that war, and then then then think would would

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 5>would blow up?

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? David, one final question, how.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 6>Do you engage the prospects of that happening?

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 5>I think that the yes is resisting and the Iranians

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 5>are trying to be nice, and there is a more

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 5>considerate tone here. So we'll see, we'll see. I mean,

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 5>from there, you can see how irrational would be for

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 5>everyone to get involved in broader war, particularly that long

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 5>term it's not going to help.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Think about it.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 5>Israel had with Balla in two thousand and six, they

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 5>got stronger, they they had they occupied the southern Lebanon

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 5>and and has been stronger and stronger. So every every

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 5>war is just like delayed training program for for his Mala.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So Israel doesn't have it's its own interest. Okay, you

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 5>can't destroy a you can't destroy you know, a ideology.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 5>You can you can destroy military installations.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Coughing on.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>We got to leave it there, right not seeing Tella,

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. One of the protagonists of Chaos Kings,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>How Wall Street traders make billions in the new age

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of crisis, Scott Patterson, thank you so much for coming

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to today. This is a really really important book for

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>global Wall straight not so much what to do, but

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what not to do. Scott Patterson's Chaos Kings setting up

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>attension between two giants of investment