WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend:  Tesla Earnings, ECB Decision, Japan Election

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>actors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at upcoming housing data, along with earnings from

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 2>eb Giant Tesla and the latest on its CEO Elon Musk.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karen Hecke here in London, where we're asking what

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the European Central Bank we'll do next.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm dek Krisner taking a look at the upcoming national

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 4>election in Japan.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, good day to you.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with some

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 2>key US housing data as we wrap up the critical

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>spring home buying season. Existing home sales for June out

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday. New home sales for that same month on Thursday,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>for more on what to expect the impact of sky

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>high home prices, elevated mortgage rates arise in existing home inventories,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and the Trump tariffs and all that. We're joined by

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building Analysts. Well, Drew,

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for being here. I want to start

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>with what you're expecting to see in these reports, and

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 2>then we'll break down what's behind those numbers.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Sure, so let's start on the existing home side. Obviously,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 6>the resale market has been stuck in the mud. You know,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 6>we're expecting sales will be down modestly on a sequential basis,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 6>but you know, should be up a little bit from

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 6>last year's three point nine million annualized rate. Keep in

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 6>mind that was the lowest pace in about fifteen years,

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 6>so some modest improvement, but the market's still down over

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty sent from more normalized levels. We've kind of been

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 6>hovering around this four million annualized rate of sales for

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 6>a while now. But it does appear to us that,

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 6>at least from a volume perspective, the market as troth.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 6>You have to realize there's some level of underlying demand

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 6>out there. In the market given people have to move

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 6>for one reason or another, and you do you think

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 6>you'll see a little bit of growth this year and

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 6>perhaps stronger growth next year off that low base. Now

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 6>it's a little bit of a different story in the

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 6>new home market. Sales are expected to be down from

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 6>last year. Some of the higher frequency data we've seen

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 6>on purchase application showed a little bit of improvement, so

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 6>there are some conflicting signals. We've also been hovering in

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 6>a range for a part of two years now. But

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 6>what we do know is that builders are having to

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 6>fight harder for every sale, and they continue to discount

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 6>heavily to maintain their sales space. There's some evidence that

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 6>these incentives that they've been using or having diminishing returns,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 6>they're just not as effective at a certain point. So

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, builders are turning the base price. We've heard

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 6>that from Lennar and KB Home, so I think that's

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 6>probably the path forward.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that's the biggest sticking point is the price.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>The price not only on new homes of course, but

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>on existing homes. They are still rising. The growth is

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>starting to slow though, correct.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a great point, and the resale market, prices

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 6>are definitely still climbing. The latest data we've seen from

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 6>Redfin showed about a two percent increase in mid July,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 6>but as you mentioned, prices are rising at a slower pace.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Part of that reflects, you know, the obvious shift to

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 6>more of a buyer's market where sellers are getting a

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 6>little bit more realistic in terms of listing prices. So

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 6>it has started to help the monthly payment on the margins,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, like we've seen with inventories, the stories really

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 6>at the local level where we have a lot of

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 6>markets across the country that are actually already seeing price decline.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 6>So you know, you talk about markets in Florida, like Tampa,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 6>also Atlanta, al So it really varies by market, and

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be dependent on supply. You know. In

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 6>the new home market, we've already seen prices come down

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 6>more significantly and one of the reasons obviously builders have

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 6>been aggressive in the use of incentives, but they're turning

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 6>more to base price cuts as well. And if you

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 6>think about, you know, how builders account for incentives, it's

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 6>reflected as a reduction in the average selling price, so

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that inventory continues to puddle up, they

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 6>keep their foot on the gas in terms of incentives.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 6>We think you see further net pricing pressure in the

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 6>new home market as well.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 2>And those inventories of new homes the highest in almost

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>two decades, right.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's certainly an interesting dynamic right now. Remember over

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 6>the last couple of years, the lack of for sale

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>inventory in the existing home market had been a key

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 6>part of the investment thesis for home building investors. You know,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 6>you had a lack of options, so it helped the

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 6>funnel buyers over to the new home market, who were

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 6>also able to help with the monthly payment. But you know,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 6>as you mentioned, that's that tailwind has turned into a

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 6>headwind as more listings come onto the market and homes

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 6>are sitting for longer. On the resale side of things,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 6>inventories are about thirty percent from last year, and you know,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 6>we're still ten percent below twenty nineteen. But looking at

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the national data, I think really blurs the picture. At

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 6>this point. We now have ten states where resale supply

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 6>is higher than it was in twenty nineteen, and a

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 6>lot of that's in some important markets for the builders,

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 6>think of Florida, Texas, markets out west like Colorado and

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Arizona certainly a big risk out there, And as you mentioned,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 6>it's not just resale market, but it's also in the

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 6>new home market where completed inventories have really risen. And

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 6>the reason for that is over the last couple of years,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 6>when there wasn't supply in the resale market, builders stepped

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 6>in to fill that void, so they got more aggressive

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 6>in their use of specs. Now that build an inventory

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 6>was met with a rise in rates and a drop

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 6>in demand. So now they're left sitting with all that

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 6>inventory on their books. I think we ultimately that leads

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 6>to is a pullback in production, so fewer housing starts.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 6>We're starting to see it on the building from its side,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 6>so it's something that they're going to have to work

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 6>through before they start to put more more units in

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 6>the got.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 5>To clear out that inventory.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about interest rates, So you just mentioned still

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>stubbornly near seven percent. You know, that's probably why mortgage

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>applications just last week took a tumble down ten percent.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Now the Fed meets again about ten days from now,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 2>no indication the Central Bank is ready to lower those

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>benchmark lending rates. So how big a concern are rates

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>to the housing market.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 6>Right now, We've talked about one piece, which is home prices,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 6>and the other important piece is obviously where the thirty

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 6>year rate is. Right now, we're about six point eight percent.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 6>We had seen a little bit of improvement, but now

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 6>maybe some concerns reigniting with inflation pushing things back up.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 6>I think one of the main issues with rates is

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 6>not only the absolute level, but just the volatility. You know.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 6>I think if we could get rates into the low

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 6>six high five percent range for more of an extended

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 6>period of time, it gives you know, home shoppers a

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 6>little bit more comfort of what their payment might be

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 6>as they're going through the application process. So rates are

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 6>certainly a very important piece of the puzzle. And you know,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 6>there's not a whole lot of indication that things are

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 6>going to get significantly lower anytime soon.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh boy, it's a lot to take.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>In June, existing home sales out on Wednesday, new home

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>sales for that same month on Thursday. Our thanks to

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst. We move

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>now to earnings at Tesla. It's out with second quarter

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>results this coming Wednesday. Has the ev maker bounced back

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>from a troubling first quarter. What has CEO Elon Musk's

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>renewed focus on the company meant after he left his

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump Administration cost cutting duties, and what will the pending

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>rollback of clean energy tax credits mean for the company.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>For more on what to expect, we're joined by Steve Mann,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials Research Manager. Well, Steve,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining us. After a disappointing

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>first quarter results. Will there be good news in Tesla's

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>upcoming second quarter report?

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the vestor will be more focused on

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 7>what Elon must is going to talk about in the

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 7>remainder of the year and beyond. In terms of earnings,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 7>we actually expected to report in line with consensus, but

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 7>a few things that are on investor's mind, like you know,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 7>the Robotaxi, like the new models that they're rolling out

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 7>they're planning to roll out, and even Elon himself, you

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>know he's tweeted a few things around politics. You know

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 7>what does he thinking around that and how it's going

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 7>to impact the company.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with those models. Well, the Model three is

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>still the bread and butter for revenue, right, But how

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>about the revamped model Why Juniper Suv. What does that mean?

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 7>The ramp up has been going fairly well. It probably

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 7>disappointed some investors that they didn't ramp up as fast

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 7>as they thought, but it seems like the second quarter

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 7>it came in nicely. Is some initial data on China sales,

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 7>which is right now is probably like close to forty

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 7>to fifty percent of their sales now. They're also planning

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 7>to launch an extended version, a longer version of the

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Model Y in China, and I think that's going to

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 7>resonate with the clients over there fairly well.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>How does it compete against the byds and the Cherries

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and the other very very low cost Chinese rivals.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's tough. Launching FSD full self driving in China

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 7>earlier this year will help, But BYD did cut prices

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 7>quite a bit early in the year by a magnitude

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 7>of thirty percent, and Tesla it doesn't want to play

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 7>in that low cost, low price market. I think they're

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 7>going to be medium price to high price market, and

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 7>I think launching the extended version will actually help drive

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 7>sales for the company over there into next year.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, last month you mentioned this elon Musk rolled out

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 2>as long delayed robotaxi unit in Austin, Texas. How far

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>away is that service really for making any kind of

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>on the company.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a pretty exciting development. He's been talking about it

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 7>for a while. It's it's finally here. It's it's still

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 7>a slow go. I think he's very focused on safety,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 7>not a surprise, and and that's where he should be

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 7>focused on to make sure the long term reputation of

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 7>that business stays positive. And we think, you know, no

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 7>meaningful revenue or profit in the next couple of years

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 7>is probably going to come through in twenty twenty seven,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 7>so we haven't baked in that that business as a

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 7>meaningful contributor to to the bottom line. But it's a

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 7>it's a big market, so there's a number of players,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 7>Waymo being probably the largest at the moment. But I

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 7>think the market's going to grow to a point where

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 7>he's gonna be able to absorb a new competition like

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Tesla and even even Uber like. Uber announced that they're

0:10:55.559 --> 0:11:00.599
<v Speaker 7>partnering with Lucid to develop automous vehicles for their robotaxi business.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned something earlier, and that is safety concerns, especially

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>with the full self driving. I mean they've had quite

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>a few problems, a lot of litigation.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 7>I would say that's kind of normal mode of operation.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 7>I think there will be some safety concerns, there will

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 7>be accidents. I think the investors should be aware. No

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 7>engineering feat like this goes smoothly, so it's going to

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 7>have some hiccups. So that's why it's very important for

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 7>not just Tesla, but weimol to really hone in on

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 7>safety and making sure the consumer, the users of ROBOTAXI,

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 7>feels confident with this service.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Now I want to talk about something I think that

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>the shareholders are going to be very interested in what

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk has to say, and that's the expiration of

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the seventy five hundred dollars EV tax credits. That deadline

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>is coming soon September thirtieth. Now we know how Elon

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>must react to that Trump bill that removes those clean energies,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 2>and it was not pretty. How will Tesla respond, How

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 2>will the company respond?

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 7>It's a double edgh sword. I think on the surface

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 7>it is negative. It is negative because obviously they have

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 7>generated quite a bit of revenue and profit from the

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 7>selling these credits. If you look on the bottom line,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 7>it's minimal. It's probably like five percent, maybe less than

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 7>five percent of profits. So it's going to have an

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 7>impact on earnings definitely in the fourth quarter and well

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 7>into the next year.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, a lot to look forward to.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Tesla Q two earnings out this Wednesday after Wall Street's

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>closing bell Our thanks to Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence Global

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Autos and Industrials Research Manager, and coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>day Break weekend, we'll look ahead to the next monetary

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>policy decision from the European Central Bank. I'm Tom Busby

0:12:55.280 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm Tom Buzzby in New York.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Up later in our program, we look ahead as Japanese

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>citizens head to the polls for an Upper House election.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>But first europe Central bankers will vote on their next

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>move when it comes to interest rates. The Governing Council

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>decision comes at a time of heightened trade tensions fueled

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>by the back and forth with the US. How will

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>policymakers respond For more Let's go to London and bring

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in Bloomberg daybreak. Euro banker Caroline hepger.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Tom the Bundesbank president and DCB policymaker Joakim Nagel has

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>urged caution over the European Central Bank's next move on

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>interest rates, telling a newspaper that it requires a steady hand.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>His comments come as policymakers have cut rates eight times

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>between June twenty twenty four and June twenty twenty five,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>down to two percent. Economies and markets are now betting

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 3>on a pause in July. The final release of EU

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Area inflation for June also confirmed that the headline measure

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>accelerated to two percent year on year from one point

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 3>nine percent in the previous month, but still fairly well

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 3>anchored in terms of inflation in Europe. So the focus

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>is also going to be on the ECB September meeting

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 3>when we get new ECB economic projections, and that may

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>give officials more clarity on the economic backdrop. But with

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>US President Donald Trump's on again, off again tariff policy

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>clouding the outlook, Nagel says that the impact on inflation

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>is extremely uncertain and in Europe, member states are urging

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the Council to do more to support the economy. French

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Premier frostwy Beiru said his country's facing the same challenges

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 3>as the US, but without the strong dollar that he

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>says gives the Federal Reserve the option to create money

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>to fuel quote optimism in the economy. It's an issue,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>France's finance Minister Eric Lombard outlined, speaking to Primpaks and

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Edward's critique Cup and Mark Cardmore.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 8>France as an issue of a large public debt and

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 8>two large public deficit, and we are tackling the issue,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 8>I believe very seriously. The plan is a plan of

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 8>forty four billion euro of savings and revenue increases. Forty

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 8>four billion euro that will bring our deficit below the

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 8>five percent threshold next year to four point six percent,

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 8>and we are aiming at a deficit below three percent

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty nine. The bulk of the plan is

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 8>to cut public spending. There are thirty billion of savings

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 8>of cuts in public spending, whether for the state of

0:15:54.040 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 8>a social security, which is absolutely important but manageable. There

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 8>will be ten percent of revenue increases and four billion

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 8>more because French people will have to work more, two

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 8>days more, because we will cut to making holiday next

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 8>year and the years after. So it's a very easerious plan.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 8>Forty four billion euro okay.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 9>And you think that this is enough to reassure investors,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 9>What about getting the support of all of the lawmakers

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 9>in France, because that seems to be very difficult. You'll

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 9>need the support of a number of parties. Which parties

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 9>are you going to talk to to try and get support?

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 9>Here are the socialists at the top of your list,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 9>because I think the far right and the far left

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 9>have already found serious problems with this budget plan.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 8>For first, let me remind you that with the same

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 8>parliament we had an approval for the twenty twenty five

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 8>budget which is currently being implemented, which is already a

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 8>budget which is a very serious budget bringing down the deficit.

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 8>We will talk to all parties because it is an

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 8>issue of national interest. We believe it is the best

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 8>interest of France to put its public finance right before

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 8>the next presidential election of twenty twenty seven, and we

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 8>will talk to all parties. Having said that, the first

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 8>reaction of opposition parties is quite normal because it's a

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 8>huge plan. So the first reaction is negative. We will explain,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 8>we will discuss we will improve the plan and obviously

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 8>there are probably more possibilities to reach an approval with

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 8>the Socialist Party. They are still a party in the opposition,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 8>but they allowed the budget to pass for twenty twenty

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 8>five and if we have a fair discussion with them,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 8>and we will have a fair discussion with the Socialist Party,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 8>hopefully they can support the government for the budget. But

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 8>again we will talk to all parties and we hope

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 8>to have wider support because again it's an issue of

0:17:58.840 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 8>national interest.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 10>Eric, good Morning. Part of the plan is to raise

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 10>revenues through selling selling down stakes in companies without losing influence. Apparently,

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 10>what kind of sectors do you expect to see those

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 10>kind of revenue gains? Are there any sectors off limits

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 10>for selling down stakes and how much do you expect

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 10>to raise through that?

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, obviously, you know the French state owns many companies,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 8>some of which are listed, so I won't be very

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 8>talkative on that point. So we are working on it. Obviously,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 8>the large public sector companies like La post or like

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 8>EEDF are not on the plane, but there are many

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 8>options and we will work on it ultimately.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 10>The investor community, I think the initial reaction is not

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 10>a lot of faith that the trajectory of this budget

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 10>plan and the governments is much better than it was,

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, six months or a year ago. And I

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 10>think there's a lot of worry about the government again

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 10>Will will kind of struggle to get the budget passed

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 10>and will kind of suffer on that. But we saw

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 10>last year the investors move on. Are you more worried

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 10>about how the investor reaction this time or do you

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 10>not think that we're yet at a critical period for

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 10>investor pressure to cand of really force something to get done.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm not worried, but thank you to give me not

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 8>part need to talk to them. I want first to

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 8>reassure them on the twenty twenty five budget execution, because

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, public finance is something which is very operasional.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 8>We put a budget for this year cutting the deficit

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 8>to five point four percent, and we follow the budget

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 8>execution on a monthly basis. I gather all minister's General

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 8>secretary every month, and I can tell you beginning of July,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 8>a middle of July, while we are today that we

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 8>are totally online in the review of spending. We are

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 8>on plan on spending after I must say ten billion

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 8>cuts that we did in the first quarter in the

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 8>second quarter, but after ooskuts we are totally on NINER

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 8>and on the revenue where the vty income tax, corporate

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 8>tax we are also online. So we are monitoring the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 8>execution of twenty twenty five very closely. We have a

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 8>very ambitious target for twenty twenty six. I'm confident it

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 8>will be approved, it will be executed, and that France

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 8>will put itself back on track, which is absolutely key

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 8>in order to play our role in Europe and.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 5>In the world.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>That was the French Finance Minister Eric Lombard there speaking

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 3>to Blombergs and Edward's critique cup To and Mark Cudmore.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 3>The plight of France and other European countries in similar

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 3>positions will be on the minds of policymakers as they

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 3>make a decision about the ECB's immediate rate path in

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the days ahead. It's something I've been discussing with Bloomberg's

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 3>ECB reporter Jana Randall. Yana, France's situation is one all

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 3>too familiar to EU member states. High debt and stalling growth.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 3>How can the EU mitigate.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 11>Well, Mostly it's France's responsibility right, passing a budget that

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 11>puts the government on a path towards sustainable public finances,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 11>and of course it has presented plans on how to

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 11>narrow the deficit next year, which mainly look at austerity

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 11>measures including freezing welfare pensions as well and acting to

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 11>public holidays. As a matter of fact, whether that will

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 11>do the trick, whether that'll fly we of course I'll

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 11>remember what happened in France at the start of the year.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 11>We won't know until September because that's when lawmakers come

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 11>back and will properly engage and vote on This debate

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 11>surely will also be colored by the outcome or the

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 11>state of trade negotiations, because that affects growth in France

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 11>but also across the region. And that's of course where

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 11>the EU then comes in, because it's up to the

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 11>EU to engage with the US on trade. Good deal

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 11>has the potential to live confidence, thus demand investment and spending,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 11>consumer spending across Frants but also across the region. And yeah,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 11>I don't need to tell you what a bad deal

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 11>will do.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 3>But it's the French Prime minister writer to ask for

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>interest rate cuts in the near future.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 11>Then I find it always difficult when politicians tell central

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 11>bankers what to do, especially because central bankers are independent

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 11>for a reason, because they need to be, you know,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 11>keeping their cool when when maybe tensions and a sentiment

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 11>heats up and passions heat up in political decision making.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 11>And of course we can see what is happening in

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 11>the US currently with the federal reserves. The Prime Minister's

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 11>motivation is easily explained, and if you're naughty, you can

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 11>you can say it's very much in the same spirit

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 11>as the arguments that the president in the US makes

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 11>low barring costs for the government at a time when

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 11>dead levels are high and a lot of money is

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 11>needed to service that debt. Right, so low boring costs

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 11>help the government deal with its fiscal mess. If you

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 11>look a little bit back in the past, we've seen

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 11>similar voices, similar initiatives in Italy increase when those countries

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 11>were in the spotlight of markets. Well as for France,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 11>you know, I wouldn't make too much out of it

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 11>in terms of whether the youc be swayed by those

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 11>calls or not. I really would would see it more

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 11>as a sense of a sign of desperation from from

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 11>the French you know, realizing that something is going really

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 11>really wrong with their budget.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, and perhaps can't be compared to the sort

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 3>of relentless pressure that President Trump has put onto your

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 3>own power that we've seen repeatedly. But look, we might

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 3>not get an interest rate cut from the ECB this

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 3>time round. Over all, though, how fast our interest rates

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>expected to continue coming down in the months ahead, given

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 3>EU inflation that does look at the moment reasonably tamed.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>What is your view now on the path of interest rates.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 11>We're not expecting anything for the upcoming meeting, and as

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 11>as far as September is concerned, that is still very

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 11>much in play. Economists expect another rate cut in September. Others,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 11>you know, the majority, I should say, expect another cut.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 11>Others say the ECB is done or you know, might

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 11>wait a little bit longer to deliver it. It essentially

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 11>all hinges on some signals on how how trade negotiations

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 11>are going, uh, the implications they will have, or the

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 11>implications any result will have. And September in that sense

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 11>is a good month because the ECB will get another

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 11>fresh round of economic forecasts, so another look at growth

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 11>and inflation prospects for the Eurozone in September, so it

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 11>would be a good month to make up their minds. Equally,

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 11>if they still can't be sure and things are kind

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 11>of cod sting along, they might write it a little longer.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 11>So overall, one more rate cut is more or less

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 11>expected September if you need to put your money on it.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 11>But uncertainty is just exceptionally high. And listening to policymakers,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 11>some say, you know, the bar is very high for

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 11>another cut. Others are concerned about inflation maybe following a

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 11>bit too low below target. It's you know, highly answertain.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Diana, thank you so much for being with me

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 3>this morning. That is Blomberg CCB with Porta, Yana vandall.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. I'm Caroline Hepke here in London. You can

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 3>catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak. You're at

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the beginning at six am in London. That's one am

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street.

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Tom, thank you, Caroline.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 2>And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we look

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>ahead to an Upper House election in Japan.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories. For investors in the coming week.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Japanese citizens head to

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the polls in the coming days for an Upper House election.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 2>This comes at a time when the country's Prime Minister

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>finds himself in a precarious political position. For more, let's

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 2>get to the host of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Tom, this election will serve as the latest referendum on

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the leadership of Prime Minister Shiguru Ishiba. He's already running

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 4>a minority government after last autumn's dismal election results in

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the lower House. For a closer look now at what's

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 4>at stake in the Upper House, I'm joined by Bloomberg's

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Isabelle Reynolds. She is our Tokyo bureau chief, joining us

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 4>from our radio studio in Tokyo. Isabelle, thank you. I

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 4>know the stakes are high, as I understand where the

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 4>ruling coalition could lose its majority. This would be a first,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 4>is that correct?

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 12>Not exactly a first, but we did see a similar

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 12>case back in nineteen ninety four where the ruling LDP

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 12>lost its majority in both houses. But the party has

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 12>been in government for almost all of the time since

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 12>nineteen fifty five. Just so to be out of power

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 12>in both houses is pretty unusual. They did also lose

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 12>power to an opposition party in two thousand and nine,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 12>of course, but yes, this would be a historic occasion.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 4>So give me a sense of where things are in

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 4>terms of political stability. How would you describe that at

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 4>a time when Japan is really struggling with so many issues,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 4>not the least of which is a trade deal with

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 4>the US.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, yes, I would say the situation is extremely unstable

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 12>at the moment. What we're seeing is the support for

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 12>the ruling coalition is falling again as we're going into

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 12>the election. What we see is several of the big

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 12>media outlets here, the newspapers which were still widely read

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 12>in Japan and like other places in the world perhaps,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 12>but they do massive polls and analysis of what's going

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 12>on in the run up to the election, and it's

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 12>looking pretty likely that the ruling courlition and will lose

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 12>its majority in the upper house.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 4>So with that then Prime Minister Ishuba would probably lose

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 4>his position as prime minister.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Is that right?

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 12>Well, we don't know that for sure. It sort of

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 12>depends how bad the result is. You know, obviously they

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 12>could lose their majority by a very small margin, in

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 12>which case they could hope to sort of cobble together

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 12>not a formal coalition, but a loose coalition with some

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 12>other party to get to legislation through. And that's what

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.959
<v Speaker 12>they're already doing in the lower house, so it's not

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 12>out of the question that they could do that in

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 12>the upper house. But if the results are extremely bad,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 12>I think Ishuba would eventually have to take responsibility for

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 12>that situation and step down, and then we could see

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 12>a whole different level of chaos in Japan.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 4>So he's considered a physical hawk. So if the outcome

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 4>is such where Ishiba has to withdraw from the prime ministership,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 4>and that wouldn't necessarily I think put Japan on a

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 4>path where maybe the country's finances are somewhat in question.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Is that fair?

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 12>Yes, you're absolutely right there. I mean, the big issue

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 12>in the election, as it was in the last election,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 12>is the issue of inflation in Japan. It's the cost

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 12>of living. The level of frustration is growing among the public.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 12>They've been putting up with this situation where prices are

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 12>growing much faster than their own wages, and the question

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 12>is how to deal with that situation. So the LDP,

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 12>she get a issue buzzed party, is sticking to these

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 12>kind of temporary, one off solutions. It wants to do

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 12>a cash handout things like that. But those opposite, smaller

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 12>opposition parties that are growing in popularity proposing these much

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 12>more drastic ideas, such as cutting consumption tax, which is

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 12>a key source of income for the government, And that's

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 12>why we're seeing these kind of ructions in the bond market.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 12>Fears that these kind of policies could gain traction after

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 12>the election are raising concerns about Japan's finance.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned the fact that households in Japan are

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 4>dealing with higher inflation, much higher inflation. Is that why

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 4>this election is being referred to as the rice election?

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I mean that the symbolic issue it comes to

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 12>inflation is the price of rice, which at one point

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 12>was double what it had been a year earlier. There

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 12>are a lot of structural reasons why that's the case,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 12>and the LDP has put in place this young politician, Koizumi,

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 12>who has dealt with this by immediately sort of releasing

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 12>rice stores at a much cheaper price to the public.

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 12>So that did gain them some time, but that is

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 12>not a long term solution to what's going on. So

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 12>people who want a more drastic solution, for example, ramping

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 12>up production of food in Japan might opt to vote

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 12>for a different party.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 4>So how does what is happening in the diet the

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Japanese parliament impact what the Bank of Japan is trying

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 4>to do in weaning the economy of massive stimulus that,

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 4>as you well know, has been going on for decades now, right.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I mean we're seeing obviously the government tries officially

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 12>at least to keep its handle off the Bank of

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 12>Japan is choosing to do. But if we are going

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 12>to see a massive ramp up in spending, obviously that

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 12>will have to play into the thinking at the Bank

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 12>of Japan. So this path that we've been seeing towards

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 12>normalization could potentially be affected if we're going to see

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 12>a massive cut in, for example, revenue from consumption tax

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 12>and so on over the coming years.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 4>So put this election in the context of Tokyo and

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Washington trying to work out a new trade deal. I

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 4>think the deadline is now August first, to avoid being

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 4>slapped with twenty five percent tariffs. And we know that

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 4>for Japan when you're talking about automobiles and steel manufacturing,

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 4>this is critical. Put the election in context of trying

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>to work out a trade deal with the US.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 12>Yes, well, I think that that's an interesting question because

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a growing doubt in Japan about whether anything,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 12>any action or words on their part can affect what

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 12>decision Donald Trump makes on these tariffs. So although it's

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 12>been somewhat of an issue in the campaign, I think

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 12>there's very little sort of faith that either Ishiba or

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 12>any of these smaller opposition parties could do any better

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 12>job than they have done so far in trying to

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 12>negotiate a deal. So I'm not really sure how it

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 12>affects that. Obviously, Ishiba could opt to reshuffle his cabinet

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 12>after the election if there is a poor performance. But

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 12>if you ask the public who's going to do a

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 12>better job in organizing this trade deal, I doubt they

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 12>would come up with a very swift answer for you.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Before I let you go, Isabelle, can you break down

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 4>from me how this might look if we segment different

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 4>generations of Japanese society, let's say younger voters versus the

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 4>older generation.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think we are seeing increased interest in voting

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 12>among the younger voters. They traditionally have not had a

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 12>very high turnout. It's been the older voters who have

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 12>always voted for the LDP or its coalition partner, the

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 12>Core metor one particular. Their support is falling away rapidly,

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 12>and for the LDP, it's always a bad sign. If

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 12>young people are coming out to vote, that means that

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 12>somebody is going to be voting for opposition parties. So

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 12>for the LDP, I mean they'll be hoping that the

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 12>young people stay at home.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Isabelle, thank you so very much for helping us look

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 4>ahead to Japan's upper House election in the week ahead.

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 4>She is Isabelle Reynolds, Tokyo bureau chief for Bloomberg News.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's stay in Japan because we heard earlier in the

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 4>week from Masahiro Kihara, CEO of Misohu Financial Group. He

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 4>sees an end to uncertainty and reason to be optimistic

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 4>on the future. Here's part of the conversation with mister

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Kihara with Bloomberg's friend Sine Laqua.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 13>How confident are you about reaching the one trillion yen

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 13>profit within a few years, given all the global uncertainty,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 13>and given what we heard on tariffs and trade.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 14>In fact, I think from a current earning profile, I

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 14>think we have almost reached one trillion again. Actually we

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 14>had eight hundred last year. We had eight hundred and

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 14>eighty billion. We took one time losses around somewhere around

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 14>one hundred and twenty billion actually, so I think in

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 14>reality we reached one trillion. Thanks for all the you know, circumstances.

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 13>But what does the uncertainty do. The uncertainty is surrounding

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 13>some of the Trump policies and trade and tear.

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 14>Yes, yes, so before April second, we were aiming somewhere

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 14>around one point one trillion for this year. Actually, however,

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 14>because of all the uncertainties, we sort of shrink it

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 14>down from as a conservative base to nine hundred and

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 14>fifty trillion. I'm sorry, nine hundred and fifty billion yen.

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 14>But I think you know, when things get certain, the

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 14>corporate action will come back, which means that we can

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 14>wratchet up a little bit. Yeah, our guideance.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 13>So where are you seeing that uncertainty play into us now?

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 13>Is it loans? Is it cheap executives spending not deploying cash.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 14>Yes, right now, the CEOs are very very on the

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 14>sidelines actually, But for example, if it is a domestic deal,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 14>even in each region, if it is a domestic deal,

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 14>things are happening, which means that we don't see a

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 14>lot of cross border happening right now. All of them

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 14>are we have a big chunk of pipeline, but they're

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 14>not executed. But from a domestically perspective, people are moving

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 14>a little bit. So I think, you know, there is

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 14>a good chance that people will get confident at some point.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 13>How do you see them You know, Japanese landscape for

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 13>businesses changing, how much will they look? I mean, Japan

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 13>has been a great experiment right in terms of financials

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 13>for a long time. Yes, is it companies that will

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 13>then grow also abroad as economy stabilizes.

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 14>I would say that if right now there's many uncertainties,

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 14>but things get clearer, the coporate action will come back.

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 14>These couple of years, we have seen many corporate actions happening,

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 14>investing outside Japan, changing their business portfolio, miss selling parts

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 14>of the business that they are not doing well, so

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 14>concentrating the areas that has strengths. So I would say

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 14>that when things get clear corporate action will come back,

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 14>and many you know Japanese corporates will try to invest

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 14>in outside of Japan too.

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 13>Are you confident in the Japanese economy overall?

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 14>Over, I think we still have strengths in the economy

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 14>sectors that we have, so I think over we are

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 14>very I am very confident in that. The thing is

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 14>that we have to concentrate our resources in the area

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 14>that we have strengths. We have high quality manufacturing, high

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 14>quality you know products, So I think we need to

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 14>figure out where the strengths are and try to sell

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 14>it to the world.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 13>Do you worry or are there dangers actually to Japan

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 13>given the spike in long term interest rates?

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 14>Yes, so twenty years so for the long end it's

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 14>been twenty years, thirty years. There has been spike and

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 14>there has been volatility. But I think the government said

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 14>that they will try to shift the issuance to a

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 14>ten years of below. I think that BOJ is a

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 14>little bit shrinking, is QT. I think that will help.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 13>Is there a point where it actually starts treating your

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 13>business and starts shooting the real economy?

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think BOJ is saying that the neutral rate

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 14>is somewhere around one point one percent to one point

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 14>five percent, and on top of that ten years will

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 14>be somewhere around two to two point two five percent.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 14>Then I think that that's the level that is okay.

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 14>But if it goes beyond to three percent or so,

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 14>they will then hurt the budget.

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 13>I think, are you expecting more turmoil in the end,

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 13>but also not in the one market?

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 14>Not at this moment. Actually, I think the current level

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 14>of one point four one point five for ten years

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 14>is very it's okay. I think I haven't seen any

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 14>turmoil in the ten years old, so as long as

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 14>the ten year is fine, I think it's fine.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 4>That is masahiro Kihara, CEO of Misahu Financial Group, speaking

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 4>with Bloomberg's friend Sine Laqua, and I'm Doug Prisner. You

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 4>can catch us weekdays here for the Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 4>It's available wherever you get your podcast.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you, Doug. And that does it for this

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 2>edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>morning at five am Wall Street Time for the latest

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 2>on markets overseas and the news you need to start

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 2>your day. I'm Tom Buzby. Stay with us top stories

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 2>and global business headlines are coming up right now.