WEBVTT - The Science of Uncanny Music

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Hey, everybody, wasn't the Stuff to Blow

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind? My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It is Halloween weak here at Stuff to Blow Your

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Mind and then the rest of the world really to

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>be honest, and so we wanted to roll out a

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of our favorite Halloween episodes. So today we are

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>resurrecting the science of Uncanny Music, which is one of

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our favorites and one that we've received a lot of

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of praise for from listeners. So we thought, hey, let's

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>bring it back. Yeah, if I remember correctly, this, this

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>is when we explore the violent streams in Psycho and

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the psychological effect, which is pretty interesting because can you

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>imagine a world without Psycho and that? Yeah, yeah, we

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>really get to the question, you know, is the is

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the music in Psycho scary in and of itself or

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is it dependent entirely upon the movie that you're watching,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or is it some shade of gray between the two?

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Find out. Since this is the Halloween season and we're

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about creepy, uncanny, scary, frightening sonic experiences, let's kick

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode off with just a little bit of the

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>uncanny from the Weirding Module. We should talk about this

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>weird module. Yes, yeah, just yeah, real quick, this is

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Weirding Module. This is a solo project from musician

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Gladwin uh as soon as you may name, is

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>one half of Team do Yobi and very accomplished musician

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>has his hands in a number of different projects, but

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this one is all about the uncanny, about at times

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the frightening, the unsettling. This particular track was titled Chapter

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>one Abysmal Cathedrals Arise from mel flurious ire from some

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>less regions. And right there that gives you a clue. Yeah,

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a clue. And uh and if you

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>recognize the tune, and that's because he's utilizing Symphony Fantastic

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>from Hector Berlioz. And you may also recognize it because

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Carlos used it in the theme to The Shining.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So what we are introducing to you today is this

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that a scary movie could perhaps be less scary

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or not even scary without the sort of soundtrack that

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>goes along with it, really amping up our experiences while

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we're watching something on the screen, and when you listen

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to something like the Weirding Module, you can already start

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to sense that this ease, that that sort of d

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>centering that that music makes you feel with some of

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the chords and some of the ways that it's arranged. Yeah,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>so it it raises the question, and this is the

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>question we're gonna explore in this episode to what extent

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is there something just innately creepy, uncanny, scary, frightening about

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>music like this or is it all cultural? Is it

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all contextual? So we're gonna unravel that. But but first,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just to to to rehash, we did an episode of

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a while back called music on the Brain where we

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about the various ways that didn't music Uh speaks

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to us on a conscious and subconscious level. Uh, And

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to think about music and stuff. What is music?

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You know? It's obviously it's a deep part of our

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>cognitive architecture. It changes our mood, it heightens our emotions. Uh.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And we'd have to find a culture that didn't or

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have it. And some evidence even suggests that the Neanderthals,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in absence of language, may have used music as a

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>means of communication. Um. Indeed, there are also parts of

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the brain that respond to music. They don't respond to languid,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>separate parts of the brain that respond to the male

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pality of language, different from the parts that respond to

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the melody of music. So music is really kind of

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this uncanny thing in and of itself. Yeah. I like

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring up cognitive psychologists and ling with Stephen Pinker

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's the guy who he's probably pretty brilliant guy,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but he did say music is just auditory cheesecake, an

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>accident of evolution. But when we look at music a

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit deeper than we really begin to see that

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the case that was made in the documentary The Music

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Instinct with Bobby McFerrin, that music actually maybe a precursor

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to languages. You had said, um is there because you

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think about music and there's no one music center in

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>our brains. And as you had said, their music used

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain parts of our brain that language doesn't. UM.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the parts that music recruits, and I think

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this is so interesting is the visual cortext And it's

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>thought that the visual cortex actually maps a visual of

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>how the pitch and tone are changing, and in turn,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>music moves us literally moves us. We dance to it

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>because we envision the movement in it. So keep that

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind as we continue to talk a little bit

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>more about music and how it manipulates this um, and

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly spooky music, how that might motivate us. The manipulation

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>is key here because when when music psychologists talk about

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>music and emotion, they often distinguished between emotion perception, which

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>refers to the perception of emotions expressed by the music.

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Like oh um, the sprint the boss is singing about

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of sad working class story and run in

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with the law. That's a sad story. The song is sad.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm interpreting the sadness of it. Can you say the

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>boss you're talking about? Of course, of course he's still

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the boss. I don't I don't think he's that that

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>position has has not been vacated yet. Uh. And then

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>there But then there's emotion induction, and this refers to

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the listeners effective response to the music. But I think

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting about this. It's not just the emotional arousal.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's that we actually will show a physical demonstration of emotion.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's a two thousand and nine study of twenty

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>six people who it turns out for a strong correlation

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>between subjective emotional response and objective physical response to music.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The paper is called the Rewarding Aspects of music listening

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are related to a degree of emissional arousal, and it

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>details the chills that someone can feel when they're listening

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to something flesh, whatever you want to call it, and

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>have you you yourself experience this when you listen to

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>any music. Um, I think the one that comes to

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mind is um Centerman by Nana Simone, and I'm talking

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about the live version. It's like a ten minute long song.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>It is Actually you don't want me to do that,

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because I would do that for ten minutes gonna be insane.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you listen to that piece of music, it's

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a rollicking right of emotions and the piano just gets

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy at some points, and it's a it's a very

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>emotional song and there's um a lot of syncopated rhythm

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>with the clapping which is a stand in for the

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>percussion in it. Very nice. Well, well, I was trying

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to think of songs that have the similar effect on me,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>and for my own part, radioheads everything in its right place.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Every time I listened to that, particularly just the first

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>few seconds of it, when with this kind of cascade

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of notes, sort of finding synchronicity like that always gives

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>me chill bumps. Again, I think if you stay cascading

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's that movement, yeah, it's definitely the movement of

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the music, and and my body moves with it. I

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 1>just get to get the chills every time. These twenty

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>six people who underwent this experiment, well machines measured their

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>heart rate, respiration rate, body temperature, and galvanic skin response.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>This is how much basically they were sweating in response

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to the music and their blood volume pulse and uh.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>They were asked to click a button every time that

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they felt really aroused. And so number four, they're four

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>clicking button was the button that correlated with chills. And

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so they found that the chills occurred at the highest

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>moment of pleasure reported I think that's interesting that it's

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a pleasurable response and yet chills is the expression of

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the body. Yeah, you're you're intensely satisfied by the music,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's giving giving you chills. Um. And there's another

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>study we looked at here from You're All just Jack

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Panckship of Bowling Green State University. This one's interesting because

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he found that people listening to music often experienced goose

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>bumps because of sad feelings more so than happy or

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>excited emotions. But a lot of this came down to

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>um melancholy associations with the past, which which is kind

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, getting into the context issue of

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>all of this. For instance, that song that you listen

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred times in a row during a breakup,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you listen to it ten years later. You don't care

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the least bit about that individual, but that music can

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>still stir something and there's a bit of nostalgi in

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that as well. You know, it sort of sucks you

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit into that emotional state. It wasn't.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The idea behind that is that the listener is filling

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>us logic or sad because they and having these bumps

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>as a response because they physically are missing the warmth

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of that person. Yes, the researcher argues that music and

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>news chills are tied into the chemicals released in our

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>brain to deal with social loss. So the idea is

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that our ancient ancestors might have experienced as if they

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are separated from a family member all right, you you

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>wander off, and then the cries you hear in the

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>air of of of of the lost family members that

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that will call it cause a chill inside you and

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>cause you to have this desire to reach out to

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the warmth of others. And I thought it was interesting

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that this was the response, that these chill bumps, even

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for someone who would be singing or listening to the

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Star Spangled Banner. And I thought, Okay, that's a little

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>bit odd. But when you a little cheesy, no, it's fine,

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, it's nice, it's nice. But if you peel

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that back a little bit, and then you can say, okay,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>well what is it to be to be moved by

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that song? You feel united with your countrymen and country women.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So in a sense, there there's that community based longing. Well,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like with with with so many issues we've discussed.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find the sort of core of like ancestral

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>animal organism sense to what happens, but then you pile

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>enough layers of human complexity and human cognition and it

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just turns it into a maze. Yeah, And just to

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>further compound that the maze too, of course, we're going

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to have to look back at the brain because I

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>want to look at the amygdala for a moment, in

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>particular when we talk about scary music, because the amygdala,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>as we know, processes emotion, memory, fear, and to test

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>out the theory that certain strains of music can ramp

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>up or dial down the fear response, researchers in Oxford,

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>England played different kinds of music for people's who who'se

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>amygdala's had been removed because of an illness or an accident,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and then people without this part of the brain the

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>actually had trouble recognizing scary music, whereas people with their

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>amygdala's intact had a definite response when scary music was played,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>as shown by the brain scanners. So again there's an

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's so many different parts from your brain

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that are weighing in on the notes that you hear. Now,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I know what in a reviewer probably wondering to what

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>extent is it contextual? Is it cultural? Um For instance,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the music we heard at the top of the the

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>program um A, it's by an act known as the

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>weirding modul So some of you would if you hear

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that you interpret this kind of strange sounding name you're

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing that into the game, or you're recognizing the piece

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of music sample in the work as a as being

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar to something in the shining. We're bringing all this context,

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing all this culture, and so of course we

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>interpret it as creepy. So if you were to play

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>creepy music for someone who had zero experience with any

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, would they still find it scary. You're talking

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>about the study of the MafA people in Cameroon who

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>had never ever heard any sort of strains of Western music,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and they were introduced to three Western musical clips. One

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that is typically thought to be sad, one that's happy,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and one that's spooky. All three examples. By the way,

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like something that would play during like a um,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>an old silent film that would be played on the piano,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying somebody to the railroad tracks kind of

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>a thing right in the music speeds up, um all right.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>These Cameroonians were also shown something called Ekman faces, and

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>these Ekman faces are photos of standardized expressions of emotions.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, they had a happy, sad, and

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>scared face to look at while they listened to the music.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And just like Westerners the Cameroonians correlated the music type

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with the same facial expressions. So that would tell you

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's some universality to it. Now that's not There

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are other studies that say, no, that's there. You know,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>some that negate this because there are other cultures that

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>might hear certain notes in interpret in different ways. Yeah,

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>when you get in deep into saity of difference between

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern and Western music trends in Middle Eastern music versus

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Western music, then things get a little more complicated. Well,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking about Chinese opera, which the tones

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in a Chinese opera might sound very um, harsh or

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>dissonant to the Western year, but very pleasant to Eastern year. Yeah,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a fabulous I think in ther piece in the

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>past year about Western and Western musician a Western opera

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>singer traveling to China and engaging in Chinese opera and

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of dealing with the the the contrast between Western

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>opera and Chinese opera, I mean, some of the overlap

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the performers, and it's it's interesting because they are

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>such different animals well and even in language. And Alison

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and I had kind of talked about this a little bit.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a musicality to language, and if you look at

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>something like Vietnamese, one word can be said in five

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>different tones, I mean five entirely different things. So similar

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thing in Mandarin. Yeah, yeah, so it's much more nuanced

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be taken into account. But Christopher Gladwin,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the man behind the Weirding module, had some very interesting

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this universality. Yeah. It was exchanged some emails

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>UH with Chris and he had a lot of great

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in photo to share and sadly between the two of us,

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have time to do an audio interview, but

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll hopefully be sharing some stuff on the blog from

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the weeks they had. He said, quote, there

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are sounds which almost universally caused revulsion or fight or

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>flight responses. The sound of vomiting came out is the

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>most obnoxious auditory experience in a worldwide Internet survey conducted

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>by Professor Trevor Cox. The reason for this, UH is

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're it's hardware to our biology avoid those that

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are disgorging the contents of their stomachs unless you want

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the same to happen to you. Other sounds that came

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>out on top where babies crying and nails down at blackboard.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Both of these sounds have relatively complex, high frequency tones

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that we are evolutionarily designed to respond to. Having a

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>year old daughter, I can appreciate this. Many industrial bands

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have used such a casual tactics robbing gristle and their

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>use of recordings of dogs attappicking a dummy, etcetera. And

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he goes on to UH to discuss this in further depth,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and I will hopefully share that with everyone later on.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, there's certain things that just as an organism,

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we feel this either discussed with or this aversion to,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>or it just sets up all our alarms. I mean,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the baby crying. I I too am experiencing that one

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with the toddler that time my wife and I have

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have adopted and he will he'll start, you know, crying

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or tuning up a little bit in the middle of

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the night, and it just has this intense effect on me,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>uh to where even after I've I've put him back

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to sleep, my heart is just still beating like crazy,

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's just it's reaching behind my brain and uh

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, grabbing hold of the reptilian portion there

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, is your camp biscuit mimicking the cries of

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a newborn? Yeah, well, you know there's that argument that

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what cats are doing anyway, and they're they're perverse

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>means of manipulating a humans, And so yeah, we'll have

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll be situations where the child is authentically crying and

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>then the cat is also crying and it's mock human voice,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's you know what this is like, it's frustrating.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It becomes a loud household at three am. Yes, yeah, um.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Gladwin also mentions there was a sound that he

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>found difficult to describe. Michael Geret of the Swans, he said,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>put it best that sex death sound that comes from

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere deep inside. There are some experiences of sound that

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you just get that right. You tried to spot off.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the best I can do. Feeling from and some

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of possession occurs. I believe that this connects with

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>some subterranean evolutionary memory, something in our ancestral reptilian fish brain.

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>We still have this the sigil fish ears, you know,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know what that sound? Let me

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you this and I'm gonna give you the context

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it was not a sexual context, so you don't have

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to put your hands up to your ears and say no,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>no, no no no. I did something called the seven minute workout.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Do know about this? It's awful. It is like this

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ramped up, high density crazy workout you do for seven minutes,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just the best and highest rate that you can. Okay,

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And I heard these noises coming out of myself that

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit ashamed of. I felt a

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit like freaked out that they were actually coming out.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 1>But I understand what he's saying. There's a guttural like,

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I'm dying inside noise that I had

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>never heard come out of myself before. And so there

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is something to that, this evolutionary like, oh there's something wrong. Yeah.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>An example of that, I was driving my child around

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the night, trying to get him

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to sleep immediately after returning home, and his super jet

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>lagged now his jet lag, And so I was listening

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to Radio Lab catching up in some Radio Lavish episodes,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's an excellent one they did recently on rabies.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And in that episode they play some audio of humans

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>who have rabies and are experiencing that rage and that

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the mindless rage that is associated with

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the later stages of Rabies. And it was extremely unsettling

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear those sounds like and it's and I wonder

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to what extent that's kind of cross somebody, that this

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea, that that that is on some level human,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but it must be bodily possessioned by some outside force

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that is making that kind of noise. And you're right,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that bodily possession, as if you are outside of yourself

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or something was outside of itself. All right, we should

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>probably take a quick break, and when we get back,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we you and I Robert Lamb are going to actually

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sing some of the strains of music classics, not because

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we necessarily want to do that to your ears, but

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because we have no budget, correct, right, So stand by

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're back, Robert. Did you know that in

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the original cut of Psycho that Hitchcock did not want

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>those high pitched violin screens to accompany the shower scene

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>fa iconomy. He sorry about that. Again, we have no budgets,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's which you guys are getting. Um. It was

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>actually his wife, Alma Revel, who was a script writer

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and actually a director of her own right, and an

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>editor who said, no, no, no, you need to check

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>out Bernard Herman's score that he's created for this. It's amazing.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It's going to do its thing. And they actually tested

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>two versions, one with the with the violins and one without,

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and apparently when they showed the audience when without, they

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>were a little like, okay, so this this one is

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>getting hacked enough in a shower. But when they accompanied

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the violence strains of Bernard Herman, people freaked out. It's

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think of having not scene the scene without

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the music, and it's hard to imagine because such an

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>iconic scene and you go together so well, and when

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the scene in my mind, and I think

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a really horrific scene. You know, even even though

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't show as much um in way in

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the way of nudity or bloodshed that you might. You

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm sure you can get away with today. Uh.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's so effective and so disturbing, and yet the music

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is what seems to make it so effective, like in

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in a sense we can't feel or even imagine what

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>those the stabs feel like physically, because most of us

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>have not been brutally stabbed with a butcher knife before,

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but the music kind of fills that place. It's interesting

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that you say that it's it's not that much nudity

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's not that much violence, because then what you thought,

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people when they when they ask people,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, about that scene, they tend to envision much

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>more violence and nudity than there actually is because of

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that heightened emotionality there. I think, Um, and of course

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's that high pitch sound, and we'll get a little

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>bit more into that in terms of the animal world. Um,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to mention that in terms of pitch.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Blumstein uh He scrutinized on two films and found

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that horror films had a higher than expected number of

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>abrupt shifts up and down and pitch, which he reported

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Royal Society Journal Biology Letters. So already you

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>can see that they are very different ways that UM

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>filmmakers and musical composers can manipulate the brain. In terms

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of psycho that was just something that they didn't necessarily know, like, hey,

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>we've got all these neuroscientists saying like the amygdala is

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>going crazy. It was just sort of a hunch that

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this music would heighten the effect. Yeah. So, like you said,

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the neuroscientists, but they did have musical tradition. Obviously,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>run Herman knew what worked because when you look at

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff like Peter and the Wolf, you know, that's a

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>classic one that we always learned in like elementary music class,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>where every character has kind of their own little jaunty

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>number and you you're you're told by your music teacher, oh,

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>well this this music is behaving like this, because this

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is what's happening in the story. Um. Some of the

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>basics though, cord tempo in amplitude. Okay, So with chords,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we have minor and major chords, and in a very

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>very broad sense, minor chords evoke sad feelings. Major chords

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are happy. Um, at least again in Western music. Um,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you tay. And the interesting thing is if you take

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>something in a major key and you translate it into

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a minor key, you go from happy too sad. As

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a as an engineer, a musician by the name of

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Oleg Berg has demonstrated he's a from the Ukraine and

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>he has a YouTube account. Takes a number of songs

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>such as the rhythmic sweet dreams are made of these

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>minor key transforms. It tweaks, it makes it a major

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>key song, and it's suddenly a different entire emotional experience.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly it's upbeat and not kind of dark and uh

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know foreboding. Uh. That's the same thing with

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>losing my religion. Instead of it being this kind of

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, down song about oh I've lost my religion,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of lost my way, it's more like I've

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 1>lost my religion, I'm free, I'm happy, and Michael Stipes

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is sansing around. It's more in keeping with you know,

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the end of the world as I know it,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to what we we have come to expect

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from losing my religion. Now. He also took the song

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>don't Worry Be Happy, recorded by Bobby mcfarren. Are you

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that? Yeah, don't worry as long I wrote,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean just relentlessly upbeat, right, And he put that

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in a minor key and I don't know, it's it

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the beginnings of a mental breakdown. Yeah, it's

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>like it brings to mind the happy bobbing Farren reduced

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to hopping on a box car somewhere like shivering. Yeah,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you're like, there's there's gonna be problems ahead. I know

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you're saying don't worry, be happy, but it doesn't sound

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>like you really mean it. So it's amazing that just

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that shift can create that sense of dread and doom.

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Now it's interesting with pop music, is pointed out by

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Shellenberg of the University of Toronto. If you look

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at through the nine eighties and the nineties, UH, there's

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely a dominance of the major key in the top forties,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but it begins to shift slowly at first and then

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really radically, and by two thousand nine only eighteen out

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of the top forty songs are in the major key.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So there various explanations for this. And partially, people get

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of used to the major key UH preference in

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>pop music and it becomes more and more cliche. So

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>avoiding cliches, the trend moves towards the minor key. But

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>also there's the the idea that people were coming around

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more to the idea that life is not so happy,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that life is maybe a little more nuanced and a

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>little more ambiguous, and then their sadness uh at least

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>around the corner from any happiness, if not meshed in

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it to begin with. So even something that is more

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or less universal, you start applying enough cultural influence to it,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it can begin to shift. It's interesting that that's, Um,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that that's something that's happening, because I was just thinking

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Halloween music that the are you familiar with

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that one? The John Carper John you are, yeah, John Carpenter,

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Alan Howorth both both I mean John Carpenter excellent director, fighter, etcetera,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but also an accomplished musician, and his work with Allan

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Howorth is is some of my favorite stuff. But that

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>music has been sampled in pop music. And yeah, and

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually is a really good example of tempo in

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>an odd meter. And we talk about tempo, we're talking

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about how how fast or slow the intent intent intent entent. Again,

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel the motion in that music, right, Yeah, Like

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>even as you were you were doing that, you were

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>bopping back and forth as if you were running right.

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And Um, the thing about that is that most music

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>uses beat counts divisible by two, but the Halloween score

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>uses an odd meter of five four. That sort of

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>creates that weird like catch up feeling to do like

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you just can't really quite get there. Yeah, Like you're

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just you're trying to stay one step ahead of the

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>mass killer. You're trying to get to the car before

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the mass kill that gets you, but you're not quite

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there exactly. And now think about your visual cortex trying

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to map that and all while you're watching Jamie Lee

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Curtis do that. It works perfectly. Yeah, yeah, girl, you

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in danger. Yeah, all of that is happening. And according

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to Neil Learner, he is a professor of music at

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Davidson College and Davidson, North Carolina and an expert in

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>horror film music, one that music technique is messing with

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that tempo to suggest that chase, and he says that

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>musical music typically speeds up and grows louder as the

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>danger closes in. And he says, my hunch is that

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>our brains here that music in terms of being hunted,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Our instincts tell us a creature is upon us and

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to run away or just turn and fight it. Well,

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously one great example of that that everyone's already

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking of. Boom boom boom, bum boom boom boom, pumomum pomummmmmm,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>pump pump, bump, bump, and then the shark attacks Jaws.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course, yes, classic John Williams score, iconic

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>John Williams score been sampled all over the place, but

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>not here because we can't afford it, so that you

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>know that I'll have to do. But yeah, you've got

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>those Christian doing minor chords that again slicing in. And

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously you can't run from a shark. Um. I mean

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't. But if you're running from the shark, you're

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really okay, you don't run land, Yeah, you're good. But

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but it does bring this ideas like I'm stepping, I'm stepping,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm walking a little faster, and then I'm running. Uh

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and and it just grabs us right uh, you know,

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>right right at the root of our reptilian brain. Yeah.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And then in the middle of that you have a

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>high pitched noises in in terms of the whistle, right,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got the lifeguard on the beach blowing the whistle.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And then when Jaws finally gets victim, you've got the

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>big note pulling the person under corresponding with it. I'm

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>telling you right now, if I had some sort of

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>galvanic skin response that was looking at my like how

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>much I was sweating? They would feel it right now.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Just in talking about it now. To return to Daniel Bloomstein,

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he also pointed out that when he looked at a

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and two different film scores, he found it, among

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>other things, the screams of animals were used in several

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>key scenes in horror films, including such iconic films as

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>The Exorcist and The Shining Um. And and this is

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a is very interesting because in a sense,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it's very straightforward. The cries of animals are going to

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>resonate with us in the same way the cries of

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of humans are going to resonate with us. Yeah, and

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't he get this idea of of really looking at

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>these film scores for animal cries because he was working

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with actually yellow bellied marmots and he notices that when

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the research went to go and grab the marmots that

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they would have these high pitched screams. And he thought, wow,

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder you know what that's doing to our brains.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And then he examined those film scores and then found

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>those the animal screess I thought was really interesting. So he,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>along with film composer Michael Kay, created a study here,

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of course pattern on these screaming marmots, and they had

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a neutral music clip as well as music segments with

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>nonlinear sounds, so that Mormot was creating a discordant nonlinear sound. Yeah,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that the Christopher Gladwin brought up as well.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That Discordia, of course is big. And the music you

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think of all the shrieking, clanging noises, the one that

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>comes instantly to mind Texas Chainsaw Masca has a highly

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>effective score and it's another film that isn't nearly as

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>violent or bloody as some people think it is. That

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just everything just fell together perfectly in that film.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have Discordia and then you have you have

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>these these animal sounds popping up and uh. And another

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>thing Gladwin mentioned is the taking of animal sounds or

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>other sounds that are natural, tweaking them into an unnatural

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>area and then they hit us in a way wherever

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.479
<v Speaker 1>like what is that? I don't know what that is?

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And the fear of the unknown is summoned. Yeah. I

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>noticed this when we visited nether World last year. In

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the hunting house in the background, there were these sort

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of clinging elements that were going on. Now this was

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:14.719
<v Speaker 1>just the house music before they have actual music though, no, right,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no like um, but you know, is this

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>way of kind of setting the scene and making people

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit uncertain about it because you're going

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to do what's it? What sound is coming next? You know,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>our pattern recognition craving brains don't know what to make

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. So we're on edge where we don't know

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening next. Yeah, someone please play that chasing music

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so I know to run alright. So in this experiment

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that that k and Plumstein created, uh, they found that

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>participants were far more stimulated by the nonlinear music segments.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>In addition, this is so interesting to me. If the

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>nonlinear melodies became higher, the emotional reaction was more pronounced,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>much like a mother tuning into the tensed vocal cord

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>screams of the baby mormot. And so what he's saying

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is that um that these vocal cords straining sounds are

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>unbluffable signs of fear in the animal world, and of

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>course they would be in in the human world as well.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And it made me think back to those high pitched,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>strangled um pitches of the violin during the Psycho shower scene.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, let's listen to a marmot screen because we

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have a little clip, all right, so you can kind

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of hear that there's there's that element. And how did

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they get the scream out of the marmot? Do we

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>want to know? I think that they continually advanced upon

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the mormot until they were like, you're you're in my

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>zone here feeling uncomfortable. Okay, as long as no marmots

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>were harmed. Okay. So we've talked a lot about the

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>way that that's scary music, on settling music, on canny music,

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>how it will enhance some the visuals of a horror

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>movie or what have you. But what happens when we

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>take take away the visual text from the music, Well,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that it can do a couple of

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>different things. If you if you take away from the context,

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you can actually water down the effect. Because Bloomstein had

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a second stage of his study and participants were asked

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch objectively boring videos we're talking about drinking coffee

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or reading a book, which was paired with nonlinear music. Okay,

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So they found that the same disort of music was

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>much less emotionally stimulating and much less scary when it

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>went along with something that was just kind of wrote.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So watching a guy press his pants while a music

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>box track plays is just pretty ho hum, right, yeah,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's no room for interpretation in these

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>examples either. It's not like, say, imagine like a film

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of a of a mother approaching a cradle, where it

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like that's asitution at which and where if you

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>played happy music, you know, sad music or or scary music,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you could really force us to to to make the

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>story in our own head. It's like, oh my, you know,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>oh my goodness, what's in that cradle? What's not in

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that cradle but a guy ironing his shorts. You know,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not going to be a pitch for a

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>horror movie anytime soon, unless those tinny strains of a

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>music box are playing and then they pan to like

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a Portla indulve batting her eyes and you hear door creek. Yeah,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a student film, Yes, how did

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that was my fil And then here's another

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this, of the visual context is that when

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you shut your eyes, you change the emotional landscape. And

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I want you guys to guess out there, would it

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be more horrific or less horrific. I would have guessed

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>less horrifically yes before this, simply because it's something that

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I do when I don't, you know, I think that

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm lessening the experience. And I'm watching watching some scary

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you close your eyes and it's like my

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>my friend Dave will blur his eyes out during scary

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>parts in the movie to accomplish the same thing, like

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to sort of stare at nothing. Um. I guess it

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't surprise me because I listened to enough creepy music

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that I do find that, like I'm listening to weirding

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>module where I'm listening to like Throbbing Gristle or or

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what have you, Chris Carter, and it's uh, if I'm

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>if I'm zoning out or I'm closing my eyes, it

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really takes on a richer, darker form in my mind.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still stuck on Throbbing Gristle. Oh, They're one of

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the mainstays. It's just the combination. One of the creepiest

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>tracks of all time. Hamburger lady, look it up if

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to feel terrified. Okay, throbbing gristle, hamburger lady.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, and research published in the Public Library of

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Science one by Tel Aviv University researchers found that the

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>premise of squinting your eyes shut during a freaky scene

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>may actually heightened your fear responses. We've just said. Volunteers

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>listened to Hitchcock style music twice, once with their eyes

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>open and once with their eyes shut, and with their

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes closed, their migdalas were far more active, and volunteer

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>said that they also felt the emotional effects being much

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>more pronounced when when they were completely in the dark

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to this. So it seemed to wire together a

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>direct connection to the regions of our brain that process emotions.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's not merely subjective. They're using a functional m

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>r I and I can see the distinct changes in

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the brains were more pronounced in the person's eyes were

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not being used. Yeah, so the idea is that you're

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>actually better able to focus on your fear response. Yeah,

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, climbing to this fMRI machine listened

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to some really unsettling music and want to see what happens. Yeah,

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that's cool, right, So I mean those are a couple

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways that that music can actually game our response.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And I was thinking about this in terms of political ads.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you know those sort of dot notes that

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 1>are played sometimes to cast one of the politicians really

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>does know what's best for America. Don't, don't, but she really. Yeah.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Another great example of this in terms of changing the

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>music changing the tone of something. If you've ever seen

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the trailer for Shining um so available on YouTube, where

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>someone took the trailer for the Shining Kubrick's adaptation to

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King's novel How that we've been talking about here,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>took that recut, it added some happy music and and

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think through in one little Jack Nicholson quote from

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>another movie about fatherhood, and made the film look like

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a romantic comedy that maybe involved ghosts a little bit,

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a horrific journey into horror. It is

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hilarious because it looks like this inspirational tale of fatherhood

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and being a writer as well. Yeah, and Shelley Davall

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>actually looks perky in those clips. So there you have it.

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>To quote Christopher Glad when one last time. He said,

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it is my belief that our reaction to music we

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>find unsettling is triggered by a combination of inherited biological

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>responses modified by culturally acquired behavior. See. I think that

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much sums it up right there. So as we

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>close out the podcast here, let's just listen to one

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>last clip from the Weirding module of this the fourth

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:23.439
<v Speaker 1>track from No Lifus I Corps from some Lost Regions. Yes,

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, So there you have it, the science of

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Uncanny music. And uh and hey, if you enjoyed the

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Weirding Module, go look him up. He has I'm sure

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he's putting out at a mix for Halloween this year,

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think he has a new release coming out

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in the new year, so uh so, definitely definitely check

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>him out. He's one of my favorites. And Sundays even

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>your memories of your most frightening movies as a child

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and how the music affected you, And you can do

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that by sending us an email to blow the mind

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at how staff works dot com. For more on this

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, visit how staff works dot com.