WEBVTT - Netflix Drops After Worse-Than-Expected Forecast; Hastings Exits 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and ever Low in sentrances, go.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Netflix gives a lackluster

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>forecast for the second quarter, while chairman and co founder

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Red Hastings steps down after twenty nine years at the company.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus, the US government plans to make a version of

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 3>anthropics Mythos model available to major federal agencies to tackle

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>cyber risks, despite the ongoing legal feud with.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 4>The Pentagon and Sequoia.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Capital raises seven billion for its latest expansion fund, targeting

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>AI giants like Open Ai and Anthropic. We have details

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>later in the hour.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Such a great scoop ed that you've got. Meanwhile, let's

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>forget what the markets are doing. Extraordinary moves and once

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>again it's because we get an extraordinary barrage of news

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the Middle Eastern conflict, the straight

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>of war moves promised to be open for commercial vessels

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>at least. Oil absolutely tumbles down some twelve percent as

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>hopes that suddenly we'll get supply chain eases coming. We're

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>off by twelve percent. Now at one point it was

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>a record move for Brent. I'm looking at therefore still

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 3>a record high for the NASDAK one hundred up one.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:20.279
<v Speaker 5>Point three percent.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>This is another almost thirty we're seeing just trillions added

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>over the course of the last few trading days. I

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>want to look at what's happening in terms of the

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 3>last thirteen days. This is the longest streak that we've

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>seen in years. We're currently up some sixteen percent at

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the moment ed. It is notable the amount of games

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>that we see in the Nasdaq, how long they have

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>been for and even today despite one key drag on

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the market, that you're looking.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>At thirteen days for the first time since twenty thirteen.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>The technology story is in the markets. Microsoft is up

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>two and a half percent this Friday, but on the week,

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>it's heading for its best week since two thousand and seven.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>There's no one single story or catalyst out there, but

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>there's just momentum generally. Intel Similarly, we've been talking about

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Intel being an outperformer even in spite of the war

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>in Iran and how that's impacted chip supply chains. It's

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 2>a stock trading at its highest level since two thousand.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Where there is a story is in Netflix and Netflix's

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 2>earnings essentially, the outlook for the current period. The second

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 2>quarter not that good, and the stock is currently down

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half percent, its worst day as it

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>stands since October. At one point in the session, we're

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>even deeper declines. And then there's the overhang of the

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers Discovery deal that didn't happen. And then Read Hastings,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the co founder and now chairman who's been with this

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 2>company for twenty nine years, is stepping down. Let's summarize

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw, who leads the screen Time team, is

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>with us.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with that overhang.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess one of the reasons that the first quarter

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>results look good is that they got to pay a

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 2>breakup fee from Paramount, so factor that in, but I

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>think that that is the story. There's just this hang

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of what life looked like after walking away from the

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers Discovery deal.

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, walking away from the deal has been the short

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 6>term up until earning has been really good for the stock.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 6>Right the stock was up quite a bit over the

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 6>last few weeks. Investors did not like the Warner Brothers deal.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 6>They were worried about how much Netflix was paying. They

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 6>were worried about what it would mean for the company.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 6>But it also fed sort of, I think, expectations that

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 6>the forecast this year would be revised in a positive way,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>and instead, even though Netflix had a better first quarter

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 6>than they expected in terms of subscriber growth and revenue,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 6>they maintain the estimates, and they warned that actually profit

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 6>and margin would be down a little bit in the

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 6>second quarter because of increased spending on programming.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>So maybe the market got ahead of itself. Where did

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>they get impacted by Read Hastings? How much is that

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a concern that this looming large figure co founder is

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be stepping and looking more at philanthropy.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Hard to quantify, of course, because it's not like

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 6>the investors will saying, well, I sold for this reason

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 6>and I sold for that reason. But look, it has

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 6>to be a factor. On the one hand, Read Hastings

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 6>has been telegraphing his departure for a long time. In

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty he names ten surround Us as co CEO.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 6>In twenty twenty three, he steps down as CEO and

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 6>becomes executive chairman. Then he becomes just chairman. He's been

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 6>signaling that he's going to thraw from this business because

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 6>he feels like he's done his job. At the same time,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 6>this is the guy who led the company for most

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 6>of its existence, did a tremendous job, and so his

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 6>departure is going to worry people.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Just to point out that Read Hastings is also a

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>board member of Bloomberg Inc. And Bloomberg LP, the parent

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 2>company of Bloomberg Media, the parent company of this network, Lucas.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of choice right now. I watch Netflix.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching The Night Agent. I think it's very good.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>You might watch HBO Max, you might be Disney Place

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 2>or Hulu. Did we learn anything about Netflix's content slate strategy?

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, they've been pushing into live, pushing into games.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not really clear to me, like what what happens

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>next on that front.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 6>They're staying the course for the time being. At least

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 6>they're sort of reiterating we're confident in what we're doing.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 6>We're yes, they are. They're moving into some new areas

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 6>video podcasting, live programming, and gaming. Where the three that

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 6>they signaled both in their letter to shareholders and in

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the call I don't think those have immediate or dramatic

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 6>impacts on the business. Podcasting is not registering in a

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 6>big way yet. Live is probably the most significant, but

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 6>they are being very selective about what live programming that

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 6>they do. And video gaming they would acknowledge has has

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 6>been amiss so far, but they feel like they're starting

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 6>to develop a more comprehensive strategy for the most part.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 6>You look at the twenty billion dollars nineteen billion dollars

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 6>they're going to spend this year, and it's on the

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 6>same kind of scripted programming they've done for for a

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 6>long time now.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Lucas sure as always brilliant to have you leaders screen time.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more on Netflix with Alicia Reese when we're

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Security Senior vice president of equity Research. You've actually got

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 3>an outperform rating on the stock one hundred and eighteen

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 3>dollars twelve month price target actually raised a little bit

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 3>from one hundred and fifteen, So the confidence. Alicia talked

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>to us about where the confidence comes from.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the ads strategy is what is being

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 7>underappreciated here domestically. I think they had to put a

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 7>lot into content in the second quarter to offset or

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, just give the user reason to for resilience

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 7>on the on the subscriber, subscriber the premium tiers, but

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 7>those who are not convinced could easily go to the

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 7>AD tier. And we've seen with our survey work over

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 7>the years a lot of resilience around that since they

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 7>introduced the AD tier. I think there's a lot of

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 7>reason for people to stay when they give, when they

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 7>post all of that content. And you know, to lucas

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 7>this point, you know, podcasting hasn't been a huge mark

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 7>so far, but you know, Netflix did point out that

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot of their users are coming on during the

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 7>day when they wouldn't normally come on, and so that

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 7>is incremental engagement. I think it's useful to have as

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 7>much incremental engagement as they possibly can as they raise price.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 7>I do think it will be incremental here in with

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 7>the price increases domestically, perhaps not in Europe. There is

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 7>some legal pushback right now on the price increases in

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 7>a few countries and could potentially be in the continent.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, the AD tier is really you

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 7>know that the piece that is underappreciated here. There's so

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 7>much opportunity for them to expand, and as they increase price,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 7>some people and quite a few people tend to get

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 7>pushed over to the ad tier, and with Netflix's low

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 7>ad load and higher CPMs and potentially growing CPMs, they

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 7>can benefit pretty handsomely in the back half of the year, Ansia.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you go through geographically for US a little bit,

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 3>because perhaps we're underwhelmed in terms of first or pushing

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>forward first go to US. Canada was actually a slightly

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 3>slower growth and anticipated, but Asia doing well, Europe doing well,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>that in America doing well.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Is there's still the growth there.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think it's really important to note that, you know,

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 7>because of the geographic diversity, their results are you know,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 7>pretty steady overall. The World Baseball Classic was a huge

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 7>hit in Japan, but it didn't seem like there is

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of churn. Soon after, there was a lot

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 7>of content that people in the region found really favorable

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 7>and so they kept on the service. And Netflix noted

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 7>their AD tier being, you know, having a little bit

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 7>more heft in the region because of that increased subscriber growth.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 7>So that's something that we had not factored in. The

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 7>average revenue per member is quite low in APAC, and

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 7>I think advertising in Japan and elsewhere in the region

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 7>could really boost results. You can wasn't as strong as

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 7>we had expected it to be in the first quarter,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 7>but you know, there was a range, and it was

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 7>really within the range. Our survey work, you know, just

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 7>suggested that it was pretty standard part for the course.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 7>Nothing you know, huge, a miss or a beat, but

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 7>you know, you do have some decent trends in Europe,

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, absent the price increases as well. So I think,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 7>you know, overall regionally they're quite healthy and they'll continue

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 7>to be. But there is you know, nothing domestically that

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 7>helped them hit it out of the park this quarter.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a line in the Bloomberg story Alicia wall Street

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>is looking for signs Netflix can keep subscribers engaged, and

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Netflix has not disclosed subscribers since the first quarter of

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. It focuses on engagement time spent. And

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>so you've gone over a number of interesting telltale signs

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>of how you assess the health of the company going forward.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>What is the metric that proves definitively that Netflix is

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>taking time and eyeballs in a world where you have

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of choice, and it's not just about streaming

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>platforms in that battle.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, it doesn't matter whether they're on the premium tier

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 7>or the ad tier, so long as you know, Netflix

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 7>is extracting increasing revenue off of these users, and engagement

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 7>is clearly an important sign. But so you're looking at

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 7>a combination of revenue whether they're getting, you know, the

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 7>highest subscription price, or whether they're on the ad tier

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 7>and engaging significantly with the content and providing a lot

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 7>more value to advertisers and therefore revenue to Netflix. And

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 7>if they're able to do that at a reasonable cost

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 7>of content, the profitability will continue to climb and free

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 7>cash fow will continue to climb, and that's what we've

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 7>been seeing, and so for us, that's a huge positive.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 7>In the second quarter, surely there's going to be a

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 7>lot of content memorization, a lot more content on the service,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 7>but in the back half that's going to even out

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 7>and they'll be able to hit those full year targets

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 7>and probably exceed them.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Netflix ask Wall Street judge us on traditional financial metrics.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>The stocks down nine percent, on track for its bigges

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>stroops since October, but at one point down twelve percent,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 2>biggest drop since twenty twenty two Wall Streets judging on

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the financial metrics. Alisha Reesa Webersh, thank you very much.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up in the program, and thropics Mythos model

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>was among the top concerns for global leaders at the

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 2>IMF Spring meeting. We're going to get the latest on

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the cyber concerns buzzing around DC at s NEPs. This

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>is bloombog Tech Andthropic CEO Dario m. O'Day is set

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>to meet with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wilds today.

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 4>That's according to reports.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>The meeting comes as the company's powerful AI model Mythos

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>continues to raise concerns with public and private leaders over

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>its cybersecurity capabilities. And let's not forget and Thropic is

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>still feuding with the Pentagon over how the military uses

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 2>its AI tools. Let's get the latest with Bloomberg's Mike Shephard,

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 2>who's in Washington. I think we start with the reported meeting,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>but right now there is constant headlines about anthrop relationship

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>with the federal government.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 8>This is a little bit of a twist in the

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 8>whole saga. You know, since the beginning of the year,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 8>we've seen this increasing few between Anthropic, the developer of Claude,

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 8>and now Mythos over what degree of safeguard should be

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 8>included in its product, and it culminated in that Pentagon

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 8>declaration of the company and its systems as a supply

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 8>chain risk and prompting a company lawsuit to get that

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 8>designation overturned. Really an extraordinary turn of events, and yet

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 8>now the technology has forced another and this is the

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 8>prospect that its newest product, Mythos, could be so powerful

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 8>and so good at identifying cyber vulnerabilities that it can't

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 8>be released widely beyond a handful of technology firms and

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 8>Wall Street banks that really have that kind of trust

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 8>and also would need to be able to vet their

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 8>own systems. In a way, this really kind of brings

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 8>us closer to the remote possibility that has been talked

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 8>about by policy makers and others for years that there

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 8>could be a devastating cyber attack that takes out critical

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure or disrupts the financial system.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Mike, what have those in Washington?

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 3>What are those close to the administration made of this

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of contradictory relationship going on at the moment. The

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 3>fact that they're trying to freeze them out from a

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>supply chain headache risk in one sense, I mean an

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary step taken. And on the flip side, outside of

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the Pentagon, they seem to be working with a Treasury department,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.479
<v Speaker 3>and we understand would eventually be working with other federal agencies.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, this really is the question of the moment, and

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 8>it seems to be that they are looking past the

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 8>conflict that they're having between the company and the Pentagon

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 8>for the moment, simply because they need to.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 4>The urgency of it.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 8>Requires that the Treasury Department not only engage and test

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 8>the system on its own networks to make sure that

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 8>there are no vulnerabilities. Ever, remember the Treasury handles all

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 8>manner of payments to US citizens, social Security, you name it,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 8>and then also performs critical market functions that could be

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 8>disrupted if hackers were able to penetrate those networks. So

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 8>they really have an agenda, and so do many other agencies.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 8>So for the White House to line up access which

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 8>it currently does not have to METHOS for all these

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 8>agencies is something seen as important and it is putting

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.119
<v Speaker 8>in the backseat. This whole question of whether the Pentagon

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 8>should be insisting their anthropic drop its demands for safeguards

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 8>on its products and military use.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mike Shepherd and DC with the reporting. Thank you.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Carra just point out that over the last seven days

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a number of Anthropic executives have gone on stage or

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>done interviews and they've basically explained that they want to

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>have it both ways. They're saying, yeah, we are standing

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>with these principles against the Pentagon because we believe in it,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>but we know that the government needs to have access

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to and understand the most powerful model. That's basically the

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>lineally pragmatic. They're trying to be pragmatic, and at the

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 2>end of the day they are now based on our reporting,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>taking action on that and saying to government, have had it.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 5>And isn't it interesting.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, we've got the UK and Europe

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>desperate to get their hands on this technology as well

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and calling for steps to be taking. We learned, of

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>course in that interview with Tom McKenzie and the Anthropic

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>UK lead or North of Europe lead, the UK will

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>be getting it soon.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Look, you've got to learn more. There's plenty to discuss.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about how.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 3>We've got a Bloomberg Live Q and a coming up

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later today on Anthropics Mythos coming up,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 3>We're now going to be speaking to the AVEX CEO,

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Roger Wells. So the company makes its public market debut.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>This is a Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Madison Air made a strong debut on the public market's

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 2>pulling off the largest US industrial ip since nineteen ninety nine.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I spoke with CEO Jill Wyant about the company's strategy

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and how is data center business took shape.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>So we've been at this for a while.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, the data center business was born out of

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 9>our customer handling business, which has done this for a

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 9>combined three hundred and fifty years. So we did not

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 9>start doing this last week or last quarter. We've had

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 9>a triple source supply chain. We've had ninety nine to

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 9>one hundred percent delivery rates for the hyperscalers and the

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 9>co locators we've been serving for years, and we are

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 9>there to care for and optimize and ensure those assets

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 9>perform at their best. We are differentiated, we are winning,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 9>and I think the best part of that story and

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 9>it's all within a very balanced set of end markets.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 9>We are not a data center peer play. We give

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 9>investors great exposure to the obvious opportunity there while at

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 9>the same time growing nicely in other advanced high performance

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 9>environments in the macroeconomy where air impacts customer outcomes.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Away from the stock market.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, a focus of the Bloomberg Tech audience is

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the role of debt in all of these projects. Let's

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>call it the reindustrialization of America. I think, correct me

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>if I'm wrong. You know, coming out of this IPO,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>the debtloads, I think it looks like about three billion

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars for you. What's the strategy do you see with

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 2>time paying that down? That coming down quickly? Or your

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>sanguine on the load and how you work it?

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, about a one hundred one hundred percent of the

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 9>IPO proceeds we were used to retire debt. So now

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 9>I don't know the exact calculation. I've been talking to

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 9>a lot of folks today about green shoe execution. But

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 9>really we should come out of that IPO about three

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 9>and a half times trailing on a leverage basis, and

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 9>then we continue to do what we do, which is

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 9>grow our business and generate cash flow and expand our EBITA,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 9>which should allow us to exit twenty twenty six below

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 9>three times levered on a trailing basis. Again, we run

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 9>that play into next year, and we should be south

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 9>of two point five times levered, as I say, before

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 9>New Year's eve, well before New Year's Eve in twenty

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven. And really then it just comes back to

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 9>the same play we've always been running. Grade sales, higher

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 9>margins are EBITDA margins enterprise wide at twenty six and

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 9>a half percent or eight hundred to one thousand basis

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 9>points better than the most of the competition we see

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 9>out there. Our team is very focused and robust around

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 9>converting that to free cash flow. We have an asset

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 9>light model where we whereby we can make our growth

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 9>investments while remaining at a low single digit capex, and

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 9>we have an owner's mindset across the company, so good

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 9>discipline use of cash. So we feel good about that,

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, getting that balance sheet to the point where

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 9>investors consistently told us they wanted to be, and then

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 9>that just opens up more optionality and flexibility.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 10>For us going forward.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Madisoneo to Yan sticking with IPOs Shares, a military drone

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 3>maker AVEX. I'll have to begin trading today. The companies

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>raised three hundred and twenty million dollars. The shares pricing

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty dollars each, near the top of its projected range,

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>has beat now with Roger Wells, he's AVEX CEO, and

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 3>a big day for the business. What's interesting is what

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>you use the money for. Therefore, what will three hundred

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 3>and twenty million dollars by.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so our primary use of proceeds is going to

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 11>be to buy down debt and create networking capital that

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 11>we can really use to scale the business and accelerate growth.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Just so you know, Roger Bloomberg's reporting that these shares

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 2>are indicated to open somewhere twenty three to twenty five

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 2>dollars apiece. You priced at twenty it was twelve times

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 2>over subscribed. So I don't know how that makes you

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>makes you feel. But the basics of it are, you're

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a drone company, and you're a company that, in line

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>with the rest of industry, is looking at the battlefield

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you might move deeper into warfare.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Explain the strategy.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So, first off, we couldn't be more excited with

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 11>where we landed. A lot of investor excitement and interest

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 11>in the products, technologies, and solutions that AVX is moving

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 11>into the market. We are a company that builds autonomous,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 11>multi mission, multi domain systems that are battlefield proven. By

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 11>the time we get to the end of fiscal year

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 11>twenty six, we will have delivered over nine thousand system

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 11>to Ukraine and really proven the capabilities that we bring.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 11>We will continue to focus in on bringing kinetic solutions

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 11>that are designed to meet the needs of our customers

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 11>long range precision strike voider ammunitions and launched effects.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 3>More broadly, when you say that these are being used,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 3>how do we see the scale rampop and how dependent

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 3>do you remain on government contracts from the United States.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, I think the.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 11>Activities we've seen in Ukraine and more recently in Oran

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 11>just validate the fact that autonomous unmanned systems are going

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 11>to be a part of modern warfare now and long

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 11>into the future. We feel like we're well positioned with

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 11>significant backlog over eight billion dollars as it stands today,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 11>and really also validated by the fact that the fiscal

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 11>year twenty seven budget request came in over fifty billion

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 11>dollars for exactly the same types of systems that we

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 11>bring to the market into our customers. So we see

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 11>a lot of growth in this area of the market

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 11>and a broad adoption of this type of technology.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Have you done the math on that, Roja?

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>So when the full year twenty seven defense budget gets done,

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>how much of that you could capture?

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think we're well positioned and well aligned with

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 11>evolving requirements. Obviously, we're working very closely with our customers

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 11>to ensure that we are able to bring scaled systems

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 11>that are affordable and on the timeline that's operationally relevant.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 11>So we're constantly working with them to make sure that

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 11>we're meeting their demand.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Roger, There's been a lot of exuberance, shall I say,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 3>hype around defense tech names, and a lot of them

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 3>make drones, and I'm interested as to how you continue

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 3>to build a USP narrative here. What makes you different

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 3>than the other drone companies?

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Look, I think we really focus in on a

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 11>differentiated technology stack that allows our systems to be highly

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 11>competitive on the modern battlefield. We're able to execute in

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 11>highly contested environments where GPS is denied, communications jammed, electronic

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 11>warfare is being pervasively devoid quite technical sophisticated adversaries, and

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 11>that technology differentiation is really how we distinguish ourselves and

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 11>how we continue to bring top talent.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 4>To the AVX team.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Avex indicated it's open twenty three to twenty five dollars,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>priced at twenty dollars in an IPO that Bloomberg reports

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 2>was more than twelve times oversubscribed. Roger Wells is Avex's CEO,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Coming up on the program. Shares

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>of Netflix dropped pretty sharply as well, after posting disappointing

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>second quarter earnings forecast. There's also a big departure. Someone

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>with a long history of that company will have it next.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 4>It's halftime. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>We are checking in on these markets because it's an

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary day. From geopolitics, it looks as though the straight

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>ofform moves is open according to Iran courses as we

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 3>move towards closer end to conflict of the world hopes.

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>But we're down by nine point six percent if you're

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 3>looking at oil, we've jumped a head a little bit.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 5>So let's go back to the Nasdaq one hundred record high. Yeah,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 5>down ten percent on Brent.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Tech is unstoppable in spite of the war in Iran,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 2>so many headlines, so Iran's foreign minister confirms the straightform

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Moves is open. By the way, the straightfor Moves is

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>a body of water in the Gulf and lots of

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>ships carrying oil pass through it.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 4>More than oil, more than oil.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Everything's need for check.

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But that's why you see that that big drop in Brent.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 2>You know that the oil, I guess will start flowing

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more. And then you know, broadly speaking,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you know tech is the focus for a lot of

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 2>investors right now. And within that, you know that bucket

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Nasdaq one hundred for the first time, a

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>thirteen day streak since twenty thirteen.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, twenty thirteen.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 5>To go back that long.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>The sentiment risk on sentiment to remain just by all

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the jupilitical headlines. But let's go to the AI headlines

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 3>that continue to drive this market and look for some.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 5>It's positive, for others it's negative.

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Figment down off by six point four percent as we

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 3>get well reality check, that's still AI might be disrupting

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the world of software this time. Claude Design is what's

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 3>coming out and topic just relentless with the amount of announcements.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 2>So look at that chart, the squiggly line. But the

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>drop just after eleven Eastern is because the headline hit Anthropic,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>confirming that Claude Design is being launched and released. It

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>had been reported in the press earlier in the week,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>which also had hit Figma. But that's a pretty sharp

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>reaction of AI displacing a platform that does design.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Create polish visual work like designs, prototype slides, one pages

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and more.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Lanodobe as well for example.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, storry is not going to go away. Let's get

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>back to Netflix. And Netflix is under pressure and the

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>stockdown almost ten percent, on track for its biggest drop

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 2>since October. I believe at one point on track for

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>its biggest drop since twenty twenty two. The reactions to

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 2>the numbers and a big departure. Keitha rang A, then

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg intelligent intelligence, says in her React research. Netflix

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>maintaining its full year outlook despite avoiding M and A

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>costs may concern investors, but reflects a cautious approach. Peter

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>joins us, Now you know a lot of your colleagues

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and peers in the markets on the street pointed out

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that they kind of wanted to see Netflix raise the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 2>full year guidance. You know, was there an expectation of that, Like,

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 2>why were we going into to the print thinking maybe

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>they'll tell us things are better than they are.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there was definitely a lot of you know, elevated

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 12>expectations going into the print ed. So you know that

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 12>they just hiked prices in the US, and I think

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 12>that definitely fed into that optimism.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 5>There was also the.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 12>Thing of you know, the M and A integration cost

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 12>basically going away after they dropped the Warner bid, and

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 12>so you know, I think investors just naturally assumed that

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.239
<v Speaker 12>they would take up their operating margin, which they did

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 12>not do. So, you know, this was just your classic

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 12>case of when results were definitely good, but that's just

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 12>not good enough, given that the street was expecting a

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 12>whole lot more case it.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, what holds back margin growth revenue still looking regive good,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>perhaps a little more tepid than the street had anticipated,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 3>is consumer sentiment.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 5>The one being hit is it, Well, they.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Still have to deploy cash within their content because look,

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 3>they're not getting Warner Brothers discovery content anymore.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, No, that's a great point, Caroline, and it's exactly that.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 12>So it is elevated content spending this year. So historically

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 12>what we've seen for Netflix is content amortization in about

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 12>the six to seven percent growth range. This year, it

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 12>is actually jumping pretty significantly, so it's going to be

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 12>up ten percent. They've guided to cash content costs of

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 12>roughly twenty billion dollars, so that's you know, a pretty

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 12>significant step up from prior years, and that's what is

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 12>really kind of working its way into that kind the

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 12>tepid operating margin guidance. We're going to see the biggest

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 12>step up happen in the second quarter. And this is

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 12>really just Netflix kind of as you just pointed out, Caroline,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 12>this is just them diversifying their content portfolio, kind of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 12>making all of these new investments into live content, into

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 12>you know, some of these sports games, if you will,

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 12>video podcasts, all of that, and that is really casting them.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 12>But it's you know, it's them just playing both offense

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 12>and defense.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Rangon Avan, it's so good to have you on. Thank

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>you from Boomberg Intelligence Ed.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 5>What have we got?

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, many more news stories in the world of tech,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's time for talking Tech first Up. Chinese regulators

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 2>have find leading delivery platforms in the country, including those

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>from Ali, Barba, Pinduo Duo, and May Twan. For failing

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to screen unqualified merchants, authorities imposed five hundred and twenty

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>eight million dollars in fines and seizures, the largest since

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>China's twenty fifteen food safety law update. Plus TV shopping

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 2>network QVC has filed for bankruptcy. It's part of a

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>plan of the Struggle multimedia retailer to cut more than

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollars of debt. In a statement, the company

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 2>said it had more than a billion dollars in cash

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>at the end of twenty twenty five to fund ongoing operations.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 2>And Open AI is rolling out an early version of

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a new AI model designed to accelerate drug discovery to

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 2>chat tob tea maker says it's gpt Rosalin model targets

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>life sciences research that will initially be offered as a

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 2>limited preview to select business customers.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 3>CORCT the promise of healthcare is big when it comes

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 3>to AI. Meanwhile, you're coming up with a big set

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 3>of investment towards AI, potentially SEQUOIA capital raising seven billion

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>dollars for its latest expansion fund under this new leadership.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Were on that next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg reporting that Sequoia Capital, one of the largest and

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 2>most prominent venture capital firms, has raised seven billion dollars

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>for its latest expansion fund. It will target AI giants

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>like AI an Anthropic and the Dasher Mascarain has break

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the story joins us now. So like Sequoia raises funds

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 2>relatively often, I would say, but what we're hearing is

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>like that, this is a big raise seven billion. It's

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>very clear focus later stage mature companies.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 4>What else do we need to know? Yeah?

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, I mean, listen, this is the first fund raise

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 13>we've seen since there's been a leadership change and at Sequoia,

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 13>So this is something that we've been tracking very closely.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 13>What is it going to look like under a new

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 13>leadership with Pat Grady and Alfred Lynn at the top

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 13>of the firm they came in at the end of

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 13>last year. Right now, it looks like a lot more investing.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 13>This is about double the size of the last expansion

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 13>fund that Sequoya raised in twenty twenty two and comes

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 13>in addition to two point five billion raised for its

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 13>seed through growth investing last year.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 5>So just a lot more capital.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 3>And we're sort of seeing that written Nage, aren't we,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Clenn Perkins Thrive. We know that others are in the

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 3>market potentially raising you highlight capital, potentially general catalysts as well,

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and all of them having to raise bigger and bigger

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 3>funds because they need to write bigger and bigger checks

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to the bigger and bigger startups.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, I think right now there's a dynamic in venture

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 13>capital where if you're a platform fund, you can't just

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 13>be able to play in one stage. And so with

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 13>this new capital with Sequoia, it's fur their latest stage

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 13>investments and it remarks back to some of their most

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 13>successful investments with which closed last month and a thirty

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 13>two billion sale to Alphabet was something that Sequoia backed

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 13>at the earlier stages but continue to double down on.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 13>We've said that about Thrive, we're seeing that now about Iconic,

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 13>a firm that I profiled today, backing Anthropic again and again.

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 13>And so it's the new normal for funds to be

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 13>having to add billions to their balance sheet.

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Natasha, let's let's show our audience who's leading

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>this firm right the co stewards they're called not co CEOs,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>not co managing partners, co stewards. There they are on

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the left of your screen that read yeah, and they

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 2>clearly have sartorial direction and synergy as well. But Alfred

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Lynn on the left Pat Grady on the right, just

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>give the backstory of when they came in, the changes

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Sequoia made and set the scene for this new era

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>at what is a very important and big bench affirm.

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely so last year roll Off both handed the reins

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 13>over to Alfred Lynn and Pat Grady. Now, Alfred Lynn

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 13>was known as someone that was helping lead Sequoia's early

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 13>stage practice. Pat Grady is someone that was known as

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 13>leading Sequoya's later stage practice. Now we're seeing them both

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 13>really be hand in hand and co lead the firm together.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 4>And there's a few more changes.

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 13>So we've reported on some shake ups on the early

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 13>stage side of the house. We've also seen some people

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 13>come back to Sequoias fold. So most prominently we saw Douglioni,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 13>the former senior stewart, so former top leader of the firm,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 13>come back into an active investing world. And we've also

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 13>seen them beep out their growth stage investing ranks, so

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 13>a lot of changes and that's why really the New

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 13>Capital Hall is something we were so desperate to get

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 13>to the bottom up because we have just been wondering

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 13>if we're going to see Sequoia refocus or we're using

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 13>them expand. And for now you definitely can tell that

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 13>what Alfred and pats top priority will be will be expansion.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 5>And to the bottom of it you got within.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Natasha Mascarona is always great reporting on the benure space.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with that benure space because well, we just

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 3>posted actually for VC record chattering two hundred and sixty

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>seven billion dollars in the quarter.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 5>But the data shows that.

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 3>The landscape is almost entirely consumed by the aiarms race.

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 3>We don't want to call it that in this scenario,

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a race. Well, the rest of the ecosystem is

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 3>effectively frozen because of geopolitical uncertainties. Joining us now is

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the architects of the support. Carl Stamford, director

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of Venture Capital Research, over at pitchbook KYL, It's extraordinary

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>how much money is being raised, but how much money

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 3>is being spent on just a few companies.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it really is right, and to your point of

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 14>the data looking really great, and it does, but it

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 14>really depends on where you're at. Nine percent out of

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 14>the capital went to deals of one hundred million ar larger,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 14>so about one hundred and eighty five you had seventy

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 14>three percent of that go to five companies, all AI.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 14>And if you include data bricks in there, you have

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 14>investors that want exposure and LPs that want exposure to AI.

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 14>And so what's getting left behind is the non AI companies,

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 14>whether it be your traditional enterprise SaaS it was hot

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 14>in twenty twenty one, or you know, different business models

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 14>that are just not harnessing or not AIAI native like everyone.

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Wants, everyone wants. So what happens is a tale of

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 5>totally two cities.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Are there an awful lot of people out there who

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>are receiving no funds, who are still languishing in down

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 3>rounds or not even to raise funds at all?

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 13>Is that?

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Are there these zombie companies out that car.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Definitely?

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 14>I mean there's twenty five percent of the unicorns, you

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 14>know about nine hundred unicorns now in the US. Twenty

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 14>five percent of those haven't raised since twenty twenty two

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 14>in a market that's really fast and really hot like

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 14>we're seeing right now. If you were a strong company

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 14>and were leveraged for raising another around, you would do that.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 14>And so those companies are still trying to find a

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 14>way to you know, maybe they are going to take

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 14>a lower exit or you know, find some way to

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 14>go through us back and reorganize themselves. But there's a

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 14>lot of those companies that were strong and hot in

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 14>the next big company in twenty twenty one and twenty

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 14>two and have not raised sense and those are the

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 14>companies that are really struggling in this market.

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 2>We are we're just reflecting Kyle that the data we're showing,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 2>the data you guys published is from the first quarter, right,

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and activity has been heavy more recently. You heard the

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 2>reporting from from Natasha and I last night.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Our understanding from sources is Sequoias doing seven billion dollars

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>in an expansion to fund but to go after that

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 2>late stage, you know, the AI companies, What do you

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 2>infer from that? You know, the necessity to have capital

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 2>at those levels, I guess, because otherwise you're not buying

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>in to the names that we're talking about.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, there's a few things that tells me. Right, One,

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 14>companies will continue are going to continue to stay private longer, right,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 14>And so those vcs that have I have access and

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 14>exposure to companies that are then fifteen years old and

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 14>raising another private round, are going to want to get

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 14>into those companies again and continue to keep their stakes high.

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 14>It also tells me that LPs want that exposure. They

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 14>know these companies are not going to go public in

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 14>the timely fashion that we might have seen five years

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 14>ago or a decade ago, Right, So they want to

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 14>make sure that they have exposure to the anthropics and

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 14>the SpaceX is and the data breaks of the world.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 14>Maybe not, but in the.

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Future, those companies they're going to probably go public this year, right, Yeah, Yes, that's.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 4>What I'm saying everything.

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 14>I think that impacts a lot, right. I think One,

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 14>we're looking at those companies as the kind of market

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 14>indicators if the IPO market window is going to be

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 14>fully open this year. We have seen obviously SpaceX confidentially FI.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 14>We have seen discord filed in January, but hasn't gone

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 14>any movement. There's not really a backlog or a pipeline

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 14>of VC backed IPOs because everyone's waiting for these big

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 14>companies to go public to see what the public investors

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 14>want to support. You see how Figure has traded today

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 14>after Anthropic announced their design studio. That's the world. A

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 14>lot of these VCPAG companies, they're going to go public

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 14>and they're going to not find the support from their

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 14>high valuations and then have to contend with the Anthropic

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 14>and Open AI launching something that's very competitive to their space.

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Carl Stanford, director of Venged Capital Research at pitchbook back

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Tech, Thank you very much.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 4>We've just talked about it.

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Private markets are bracing for IPO soon to be public

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 2>markets ahead of what's expected to be the biggest IPO ever,

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX has moved up a scheduled vesting date for shares

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 2>awarded to employees. According to sources, it may be accelerated

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to assume as next week. Let's get the details with

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Deals. Brian gord I think the point here is

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>that an accelerated vesting kind of makes those employees feel

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better about the mechanics of an IPO

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 2>for them, what they might be able to sell, and

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of course lock up periods, et cetera.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 10>I think it gives them the comfort I suppose that

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 10>they're part of the journey. And I think, you know,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 10>given what's going on with Elon generally, I think his

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 10>view is that the employees, the shareholders are all in unison.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is very much part of their success.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 10>So I think, you know, having giving this sort of

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 10>reassurance and confidence to SpaceX employees that they're going to

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 10>be you know, made whole if you will, in terms

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 10>of what they're able to buy or sell, I think

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 10>is you know, massively important just for unity morale around

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 10>what is clearly a massive mega milestone, not just for

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 10>Space Expert for the world or CAVAMOD.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, not to put it lightly, this is

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 3>going to be the most extraordinary IPO, the most in

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>terms of scale, in terms of what the company itself

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>has achieved. But will there be this moment where we're

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 3>starting to worry about how much the current employees can

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 3>can lock in the money. What doesn't mean about the

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 3>time frame how quickly are we going to there for

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 3>b IPO.

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 10>I mean it's crazy to think that, you know, you're

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 10>looking at a day now where the nastack is up

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 10>one point six, one point seven. Everything is falling into place.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 10>But if you also put you know, this employee, you

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 10>know vesting schedule in the same light that you put

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 10>the thirty percent retail allocation in, I mean, it's all

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 10>kind of I mean, I don't think people fully understand

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 10>the gravity of like this deal in particular, right, I mean,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 10>thirty percent you know, retail allocation and an IPO as

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 10>large as large as this, they're looking to seventy five

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars. I mean, that's a significant chunk walking.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 2>So there's there's a there's a timeline here. So what

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 2>we're reporting is that SpaceX told employees that the vesting

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 2>date would take place in April rather than May.

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 4>But what we're working.

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Toward is June to set out the timeline and the

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of how we think this IPO is going to work.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 10>Right, so this next week, as soon as next week,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 10>we could see this resting eight moved up of public filing,

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 10>because they've already confidentially filed. The public filing could come

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 10>we hear as soon as maybe the third week of May,

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 10>which would then put them on track for that fifteen

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 10>day minimum cooling off perio at the SEC mandates, which

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 10>are then then for put them in line for the

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 10>June listing that could come in sort of the second

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 10>week of June, so that's like a matter of weeks.

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 10>So you know, by this time, in a couple of weeks,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 10>we could be at this thinking like the whole global

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 10>capital market looks entirely different, like not to mention the

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 10>trimming in some of the stocks that's already gone on

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 10>to make way.

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 3>For this, And what the extraordinary is how much money

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 3>has been made in the private markets and how much

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 3>might therefore be made or not in the public markets.

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Ryan called across this IPO, we thank you.

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Apple's longtime marketing executive retires, marking.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 5>A change of the guard for a series of key

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 5>product lines.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:28.919
<v Speaker 3>As a Bloomberg Tech, Iran has agreed to suspend its

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 3>nuclear program indefinitely, according to President Trump. In a phone

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 3>conversation with our own Bloomberg reporter, he said that Iran

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 3>will not receive any frozen funds from the United States.

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 3>This is breaking news from our own Kate Sullivan over

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a Bloomberg. We'll keep you abreast of the latest, but

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 3>He says that the deal between to end the conflict Iran,

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 3>US and Israel, most of their main points are finalized.

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 5>It'll go pretty quickly.

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 3>According to the President of the United States, A S

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 3>and PID a record and Nazak one hundred at a record.

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Brank crude off by ten percent.

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the stocks route record and session highs anyway, but

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 2>pushed even a little bit higher on those headlines. Another

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 2>big story we're tracking, Apple's longtime marketing executive Stan Ung

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 2>is retiring after thirty one years with the company. He'd

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 2>been in charge of a series of key product lines

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 2>for the iPhone maker, like the Apple Watch, airpod's health

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and smart home initiatives. Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Dana Warman's

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 2>here with us on set another name leaving the world

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of Apple one maybe people weren't familiar with, but important.

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Nonetheless, Yes, and it.

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 15>Appears to be a friendly departure. But as you said,

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 15>it's of a piece. There have been there's been a

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 15>big changing of the guard across both the Steve Jobs

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 15>era and even to some extent, the Tim Cook era.

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 15>And this is not to say that Tim Cook is

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 15>retiring anytime soon. But Bloomberg has reported really extensively that

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 15>the company is really deeply into its succession planning and

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 15>is preparing a successor. And this feels like just another

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 15>drum beat in a path that is going to culminate

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 15>in Tim Cook himself leaving at some point, again not

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 15>necessarily soon, but at some point not soon.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Stan is soon. What did he achieve? I mean, he's

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 3>so closely known with the watch but also the iPod.

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 5>The og of at all.

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 15>Yes, absolutely goes back way that way back. And even

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 15>in his LinkedIn post announcing his departure, he said that

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 15>one of the last things he did at Apple on

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 15>the Apple campus was do a workout in the gym

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 15>using his original iPod Classic that he said was still

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 15>working on a pretty good battery. But one thing that

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 15>Mark German did note in his report is that at Apple,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 15>at least, marketing executives aren't just in charge of the

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 15>advertising of these products, but they have a hand in

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 15>steering the product development itself. So that was interesting to me,

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 15>And that is that's not to say that there won't

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 15>be future airpod's, future Apple watches, and I'm sure that

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 15>there are products in the pipeline for years ahead, but

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 15>that just speaks to the influence that marketing executives at

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 15>that level have at the company.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 5>Well said in a woman, it's great to have you

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 5>on all things Apple. We thank you.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 3>There's another story we've got to get to over an

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Intel they're actually hiring Samsung executive Sean hun is about

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to join Intel next month to become general manager of

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 3>the company's foundry services in a bid to help win

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 3>over customers for the foundry business. And it course comes

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 3>as a company is trying to break into the outsourced

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 3>chip manufacturing business currently dominated by TSMC, and with Samsung

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 3>coming in as a second it's important with the reporting

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 3>you've done on the TERRAFAB.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Intel announced that it's joining must terrafab right,

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and generally the stock story is amazing. Intel is back

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>at its highest level since two thousand, extraordinary, and it's

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>up for a third straight week, and it's just like

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 2>has momentum. But that is the unproven part customers using

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 2>its chip manufacturing technology. And of course next week we'll

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 2>find out because they have earnings. You know how much

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 2>progress they've made.

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 5>Towards that two thousand to twenty and twenty six.

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 3>What a it has been to be with Intel and

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the fact that basically you're back at where we were

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty, that January high before, of course the

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 3>world came to a standstill, is where Intel was out.

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 3>But what a pummeling the stock got in previous years,

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>and then just last year extraordinary up eighty percent, this

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 3>year already up ninety.

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:15.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's not just about capacity either, you know the

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 2>volume of chips available. It's about what they've always said

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>is technology leadership and having the latest processes that can

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 2>produce the best chips at the highest year. The economics

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 2>are brutal, but they just got to come out and say, oh,

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 2>by the way, this is our customer. I'm not going

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 2>to name one for them, but that's the story that

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>we're looking for.

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I need the proof points. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 3>this edition of BlueBag Tech.

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 7>ED.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 5>You're sticking here in New York.

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I do a little New York weekend and we'll be

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:44.959
<v Speaker 2>back next week here on set. Check out the pod.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>You know exactly where to find it. Iheartspotify and Apple

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 2>and on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Tech