WEBVTT - How Existential Risks Work

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Josh here Um. We wanted to include a

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>note before this episode, which is about existential risks um

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>threats that are big enough to actually wipe humanity out

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of existence. Well, we recorded this episode just before the pandemic,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>which explains the weird lack of mention of COVID when

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about viruses, and when this pandemic came along,

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>we thought perhaps a wait and sea approach might be

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>best before just willy nilly releasing an episode about the

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the world. So we decided to release this now,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>still in the thick of things, not just because the

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>world hasn't ended, but because one of the few good

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>things that's come out of this terrible time is the

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>way that we've all kind of come together and given

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of thought about how we can look out

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for each other. And that's exactly what thinking about existential

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>risks is all about. So we thought there would be

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>no better time than right now to talk about them.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We hope this explains things, uh and that you realize

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not releasing the glibly in anyway. Instead, we hope

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that it makes you reflective about what it means to

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be human and why humanity is worth fighting for. Welcome

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff. You should know a production of My Heart

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, you, welcome to the podcast.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. And there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant over there,

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's guest producer Dave c sitting in yet again,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>at least the second time. I believe he's already picked

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>up that he knows not to speak. He's nodding the

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>custom established by Jerry Um. But yeah, he did not,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't he? So yeah, I guess it is twice that

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Dave's been sitting in. What if he just heard two

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>times from the other side of the room, You're like,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the heart to tell him not to do that? Right?

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he would be Um, he would catch the

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>drift from like the record scratching that just like materialized

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere. Many people know that we have someone

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on permanent stand by by a record player just in

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>case we do something like that, and that person is

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Chong. Hi, Tommy, do I smell bong water man?

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Betty breaks of it? Yeah? Probably, so, I mean, hats

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>off to him for sticking to his bit. You know.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Cheech was like, hey, hey, I want a good long

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>spot on Nash Bridges, So alls, whatever you want me

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to about, Like, I'm just into gummies now, Tommy Chong

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like tripled down. Yeah, and least he sold the bongs,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't he that? Uh? Pe test Beaters test beat Okay,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>suddenly think of how to say something like that away

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to um defeat urine test. Oh well, listen to you, fancy,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I don't know. I know that a

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>street guys call it pe Test Beaters, but Pete Test

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Beaters is a a band name about as good as say,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>like die your Planet. Actually I think diarrhea Planet's got

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it beat. But still all right, so chuck, um, we're

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>talking today about a topic that is near and dear

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to my heart. Existential risks, that's right, which I don't

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know if you if you've gathered that or not, but

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I really really am into this, this topic all all around. Um.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I did a temporart series

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on it called The End of the World with Josh Clark,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>available everywhere you get podcasts right now. Um, I managed

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to smash that down. That's kind of what this is.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a condensed version and forever, like I wanted to

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just s y s k if I the topic of

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>existential risks like do do it with you? I wanted

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it with you. This is going to be

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a live show at one point it was, Um, I

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think even before that, I was like, Hey, you want

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to do an episode on this. You're like, this is

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty dark stuff. We're doing it now now. I The

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>only time I said that was when you actually sent

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>me the document for the live show and I went,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about a live version of this, So

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I guess that must have been before the

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the world. Then, huh, this was like eight

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Well, I'm glad you turned down the live

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>show because it may have lived and died there. So Um,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the have made all those into the world

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>big bucks right exactly, Man, I'm rolling in it. My

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>mattress is stuffed with him. Um. So uh. And you know,

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>bucks aren't always just the only way of qualifying or

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>quantifying the success of something. You know, there's also Academy awards, right, oscars,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's it, peabodies, big money or public awards ceremonies. Okay, granted, Um,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the other reason I wanted to do this episode is

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>because one of the people who was a participant in

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Interviewee in the End of the World with Josh Clark,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Dr Toby ord Um recently published a

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>book called The Precipice and it is like a really

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>in depth look at existential risks and the ones we

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>face and you know what's coming down the pike and

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what we can do about him and why right exactly,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cheers and jeers right exactly. Um. And it's a it's

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a really good book and it's written just for like

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the average person to pick up and be like, I

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hadn't heard about this and then reached the end of

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>it and say, I'm terrified, but I'm also hopeful. And

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that one reason I wanted to do this episode to

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>let everybody know about Dr Ord's book or Toby's book.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It's impossible to call him dr or he's just a

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>really likable guy. Um is because he actually turned the

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>tone of the End of the World around almost single handedly.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.559
<v Speaker 1>It was really grim, remember before I interviewed him, really

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>and and also you remember I started like listening to

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The Cure a lot. Um just got real dark there

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. Which is funny that The Cure

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is my conception of like really dark anyway, um, death

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>metal guys out there laughing, right, so he but talking

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to him, he just kind of just steered the ship

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and by the end of it, because

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of his influence, the End of the the World actually is

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty hopeful well series. So my hat's off to

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the guy for for doing that, but also for writing

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this book the precipice. Hat's off, sir. So, um, we

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>should probably kind of describe what existential risks are. Um.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I know that you know in this document is described

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>many many times. But the reasons described many many times

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>is because there's like a lot of nuance to it.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>And the reason there's a lot of nuance to it

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is because we kind of tend to walk around thinking

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that we understand existential risks based on our experience with

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>previous risks. But the problem with existential risks are they're

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>actually new to us and they're not like other risks

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're just so big and if something happens one

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of these existential catastrophes but follows us, that's it. There's

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>no second chance, there's no do over, and we're not

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>used to risks like that. That's right. Uh, nobody is

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>because we are all people, right, and the thought of

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>all of human beings being gone um or at least uh,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not being able to live as regular humans live and

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>enjoy life like and not live as matrix batteries because

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, technically the matrix those are people. Yeah, but

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's no way to live. The people in the pods, Yeah,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. I wouldn't want to live that way.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's another version of existential risk. Is not necessarily

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's dead, but you could become just a matrix

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>battery and not flourish or move forward as a people,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, so um. But but with existential risks in general,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like that, the general idea of them is that like

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>if you are walking along and you suddenly get hit

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>by a car, like you no longer exist, but the

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of humanity continues on existing, uh. Correct. With existential risks,

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like the car that comes along and hits not

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a human but all humans. So it's a risk to

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>humanity itself. And that's just kind of different because all

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the other risks that we've ever run across, um

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>either give us the luxury of time or proximity, meaning

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that we have enough time to adapt our our behavior

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to it, to survive it and continue on as a species.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Or there's not enough of us in one place to

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be affected by this this UM risk that took out

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>say one person or a billion people, Like if all

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of Europe went away, that is not an ex risk. No,

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and so people might say, um, it would be really sad,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and I mean up to you know, the people alive

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, if they all died somehow, it would still

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly not be an existential risk because that one percent

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>living could conceivably rebuild civilization. That's right. We're talking about

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>giving the world back to mother Nature and just seeing

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Do you remember that UM series. I think

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a book to start the Earth without us

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>m oh so, I think I know that there was

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a big deal when it came out, and then they

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>made like a maybe a Science channel or that GEO

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>series about it where this guy describes like how our

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure will start to crumble, like if humans just vanished tomorrow,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>how the Earth would reclaim, Nature would reclaim everything we've

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>done and undo you know, after after a month, after

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a year, after ten years. I've heard of that it's

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>really cool stuff. Yeah, there's a Bonnie Prince. Billy my

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>idol has a song called It's Far from Over, and

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a Bonnie principally look at the fact that, hey,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>even if all humans leave, it's not over. Yeah, like

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>new animals are gonna new creatures are going to be born,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the earth continues. Yeah. Uh. And he also has a

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>line though about like you, but you better teacher kids

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a swim. That's a great line. Yeah, it's good stuff.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>They ever tell you. I saw that guy do karaoke

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with his wife once. Oh really, you know our friend

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Toby his wedding. Yeah, I would have not been able

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to be at that wedding because you would have just

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>been such a fanboy. I don't know what I would do.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would. It would have ruined my time,

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>They really would, because I would second guess everything I

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>did about talk. I mean I even talked to the

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>guy once backstage, and that ruined my day. It really did,

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because you spent the rest of the time just thinking

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>about how stuff. It was actually fine. He was a

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>very very very nice guy, and we talked about athens

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. But that's who I just went to see

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in d C Philly in New York. Nice when a

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>little follow him around the tour for a few days,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>did he sing that song about the world going on

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>on or life going on? He did so. Um, so

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>let's just cover a couple of things that we like

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people might think our existential risk that actually aren't. Okay. Yeah,

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think a lot of people might think, um, sure,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>some global pandemic that could wipe out humanity. There could

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>very well be a global pandemic that could kill a

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, but it's probably not going to kill

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>every living human, right. It would be a catastrophe, sure,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but not an next risk. Yeah, I mean, because humans

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have anybodies that we develop, and so people who survive

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that flu have anybodies that they pass on the next generation,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that that disease kind of dies out before

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it kills everybody off, and the preppers at the very

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>least they'll be fine, would be safe. Um, what about

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>calamities like a mud slide or something like that. You

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>can't mud slide the earth. You can't. And that's a

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really good point. This is what I figured out in

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>researching this, after doing the End of the World, after

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>talking all these people. It took researching this article for

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>me to figure this out. That it's time and proximity

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that are the two things that we used to survive,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and that if you take away time and proximity, we're

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. And so mud slides are a really good

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>example of proximity, where a mudslide can come down a

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>mountain and take out an entire village of people. Yes,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's really sad and really scary to think of.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean we saw it with our own eyes. We

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>stood in a field that was now what like eight

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or nine feet higher than it used to be. Yeah,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and you could see the trek. This is in Guatemala.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>When we went down to visit our friends at co

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>ed Um, there was like the trees were much sparser,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you could see the track of the mundon. They were like,

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the people are still down there. This is It was

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a horrible tragedy and it happened in a matter of seconds.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It just wiped out a village. But we all don't

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>live under one mountain, and so if a bunch of

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>people are taken out, the rest of us still go on.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's the time and there's a proximity yeah, I

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people in the eighties might have thought,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>because of movies like war games and movies like The

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Day after that global thermon nuclear war would be an

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>ex risk and as bad as that would be, it

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't kill every single human being. Uh no, No, they

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think so they started out thinking this. Like, as

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, nuclear war was the first one

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of the first things that we identify as a possible

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>existential risk. And if you kind of talk about the

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>history of the field for the first like several decades,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that was like the focus, the entire focus of existential risks.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Like Bertrand Russell and Einstein wrote a manifesto about how

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we really need to be careful with these nukes because

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wipe ourselves out. Carl Sagan, you remember our

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing Nuclear Winner episode that was from you know, studying

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>existential risks. And then in the nineties a guy named

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>John Leslie came along and said, Hey, there's way more

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>than just nuclear war that we could wipe ourselves out with.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And some of it is taking the form of this

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>technology that's coming down the pike. And that was taken

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>up by one of my personal hero is a guy

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>named Nick Bostrom. Yeah, he's a philosopher out of Oxford,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and he is one of the founders of this field.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And he's the one that said, are one of the

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that said, you know, there's a lot of potential

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>existential existential risks and nuclear wars peanuts bring it on.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But and I know, I don't know of boss from

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically believes they probably does that that there we would

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to recover from a nuclear war. That's the idea,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>as you rebuild as a society after whatever zombie apocalypse,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ri clear war happened. Yeah, and again say it killed

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>off people. To us, that would seem like an unimaginable

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>tragedy because we lived through it. But if you zoom

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>back out and look at the lifespan of humanity, not

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>just the humans life today, but all of humanity, like

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be a very horrible period in human history,

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but one we could rebuild from oversay ten thousand years

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the point where we were before

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear war. And so ultimately it's probably not an

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>existential risk. Yeah, it's tough. This is a tough topic

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for people because I think people have a hard time

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with that long of a view of things. And then

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever you hear uh the big Matt comparisons of you know,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>how long people have been around and how old the

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>earth is and that stuff, it kind of hits home.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's stuff for people living that live you eighty

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>years to think about, Well, ten thousand years will be fine,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and even like, um, you mean, when I was researching this,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>she brought this up a lot, like where do we

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>stop caring about people that our descendants? You know, we

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>care about our children or our grandchildren. That's about I

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just care about my daughter, That's about it. That's where

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it is with the grandchildren. You have grandchildren yet? Yeah,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but wait till they come along. Everything I've ever heard

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is that being a grandparents even better than being a parent.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And I know some grandparents. Okay, let's say I'm not

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>dead before my daughter eventually has a kid, if she

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to, I would care about that grandchild. But after that,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>forget it. Yeah, my kids, kids, kids, who cares granded

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that's about That's about where it would like, I care

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about people in humanity as a whole. I think that's

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what you gotta do. You can't think about like your

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>your eventual ancestors think you just got to think about people, right, Yeah,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that's really help people you don't know. Now, it's kind

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of requisite to start caring about existential risks, to start

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about people, not just well let's talk about it.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So Toby Ord made a really good point in his

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>book The Precipice, right that you care about people on

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the world that you've never met. Yeah,

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying, Like that happens every day, right,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's the difference between people who live on the

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>other side of the world that you will never meet

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and people who live in a different time that you

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>will never meet. Why would you care any less about

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>these people human beings that you'll never meet, whether they

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>live on the other side of the world at some

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>time or in the same place you do, but at

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a different time. I think a few I mean I'm

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not speaking for me, but I think if I were

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to step inside the brain of someone who thinks that,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they would think like a it's a little bit of

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a self Um, it's a bit of an ego thing

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, like, oh, I'm helping someone else, so

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that does something for you in the moment, Like someone

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>right now on the other side of the world that

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe I've sponsored is doing good because of me. And

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a little kick out of it from Sally Struthers.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that does something. It helps he help with food

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on her plate. She still with us, I think so.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. But I feel really bad if

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I certainly haven't heard any news of her death, people

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>would talk about that and the record scratch would have

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just happened. Uh. So I think that is something too.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are also sort of a certain

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of people that are just um that just believe

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you're worm dirt. There is no benefit to the afterlife

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as good deeds and things, so like once

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gone, it's just who cares because it doesn't matter.

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no consciousness. Yeah, well that's I mean, if you

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>if you were at all like piqued by that stuff,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say, definitely read the precipice because like one

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>of the best things that Toby does, and he does

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff really well, is describe why it matters,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, that's a philosopher after all. Um, so

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>he says like this is why it matters, Like not

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>only does it matter because you're you're keeping things going

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for the future generation, you're also continuing on with the

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.239
<v Speaker 1>previous generation built like who who are you to just

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, were you just gonna drop the ball? No?

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree that's a very self centered way to look

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at things totally. But I think you're right. I think

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who look at it

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that way. So you want to take a break, Yeah,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we can take a break now, and maybe we can

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>dive into Mr Bostrom's or doctor I imagine Bostroms U

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Five different types? Are there? Five? No, there's just a few. Okay,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a few different types of existential we can make up

0:18:35.119 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the addam net. Let's not stop, all right, Chuck. So, uh,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you said earlier is that existential risk,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the way we think of them typically is um that

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>something happens and humanity has wiped out and we all

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>die and there's no more humans forever and ever. That's

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>an existential risk. That's one kind, really, and that's the

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>easiest one to grasp with, which is extinction. Yeah, and

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of speaks for itself. Just like dinosaurs are

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>no longer here, that would be us, Yes, and I

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of those other things too. It's kind

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of like how people walk around like, yeah, I know

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to die someday. But if you sat them

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>down and you were like, do you really understand that

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to die someday? That they might start to

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>panic a little bit, you know, and they realize I

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>haven't actually confronted that, I just know that I'm going

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to die. Or if you knew the date, that'd be weird.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be like a Justin Timberlake movie. Would that

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>make things better? Or we're for humanity? I would say better? Probably, right.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be a mixed bag. I think some

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>people would be able to do nothing but focus on

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that and think about all the time they're wasting, and

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>other people would be like, I'm gonna make the absolute

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>most out of this. Well, I guess there are a

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of ways you can go, and it probably depends

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on when your data is. If if you found out

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>your date was a ripe old age, you might be like, well,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to try and lead the best life

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I can. That's great. If you find out you live

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fast and die hard at seven die harder, uh, you

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>might die harder. You might be like screw it, or

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you might really ramp up your good works. It depends

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of person you are. Probably and more and

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 1>more I'm realizing is it depends on how you were

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>raised to. You know, like we we definitely are responsible

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for carrying on ourselves as adults. Like you can't just say, well,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't raised very well or I was raised this way,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so whatever, Like you have a responsibility for yourself and

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>who you are as an adult. Sure, but I really

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>feel like the way that you're raised to really sets

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the stage and put you on a path that's that

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>can be difficult to get off of because it's so

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to see for sure, you know, because that's just

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>normal to you because that's what your family was. Yeah,

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. So anyway, extinction is just one

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ways one of the types of existential risks

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that we face, a bad one. Permanent stagnation is another one,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's the one we kind of mentioned. Um dance

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>around a little bit, and that's like some people are around.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Not every human died and whatever happened, but um, whatever

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is left is not enough to either repopulate the world

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>or to progress humanity in any meaningful way to rebuild

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>civilization back to where it was, and it would be

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that way permanently, which is kind of in itself tough

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to imagine too, just like the genuine extinction of humanity

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is tough to imagine the idea of, well, there's still

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of humans running around, how are we never going

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to get back to that place? And there's that may

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be the most depressing one, I think. I think the

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>next one is the most depressing. But that's pretty depressing.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>But one one example it's been given for that is like,

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say we say, um, all right, this climate change,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to do something about that. So we undertake

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a geo engineering project that isn't fully thought out, and

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>we end up causing like a runaway greenhouse gas effect

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's just nothing we can do to reverse course,

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we ultimately wreck the earth. That would be

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a good example of permanent stagnation. That's right, This is

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>this next one. So yes, agreed, permanent stagnation is pretty bad.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to live under that, But at least

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you can run around and like, um, do what you want.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the total lack of personal liberty and the

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>flawed realization one is what gets me. Yeah, they all

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>get me. Uh. Flawed realization is the next one, and

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's Um, that's sort of like the matrix example, which

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is that there's technology that we invented that eventually makes

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>us their little batteries and pods right basically, or there's

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just um, some someone is in charge, whether it's a

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>group or some some individual or something like that. It's

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>basically a permanent dictatorship that we will never be able

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to get out from under because this technology we've developed, yeah,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is being used against us, and it's so good at

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>keeping tabs on everybody and squashing descent before it grows.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>There's just nothing anybody could ever do to overthrow it.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a permanent dictatorship where um, we're not

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>doing anything productive, we're not advancing, we're say, um, say,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it's like a religious dictatorship or something like that. Oh,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody does is go to church and support the church

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and that's that. And so what Dr Bostrom

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>figured out is that there are there are fatest as

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>bad as death. There are possible outcomes for the human

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>race that aren't are as bad as extinction that still

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>live people alive even like in kind of a futuristic

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, like the flawed realization Wine goes um,

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>but that you wouldn't want to live the lives that

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>those humans live, and so humanity has lost its chance

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of ever achieving it's true, its true potential. That's right,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And that that those qualifies existential risks as well, that's right.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>They want to live in the matrix no at all,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or in a post apocalyptic um altered Earth. Yeah, the

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>matrix basically like thunder of the Barbarian that's what I

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine with with the permanent stagnation. So, uh, there are

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of big categories for existential risks, and they

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>are either nature made or man made um. The nature

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ones we've uh you know there there's always been the

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>threat that big enough um object hitting planet Earth could

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do it, right, Like that's always been around. It's not

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like that's some sort of new realization, but it's just

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty rare It's so rare that it's not likely. Right,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>All of the natural ones are pretty pretty rare compared

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to the human made ones. Yeah, Like I don't think

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>science wakes up every day and worries about a comet

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>or an asteroid or a meteor. No, and it's definitely

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>worth saying that the better we get at scanning the heavens,

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the safer we are eventually when we can do something

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. If we see this coming, what do we do?

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Just hit the gas and move the Earth over a bit?

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Since the right, Um, and there was nothing we can

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do about any of these anyway, So maybe that's also

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>why science doesn't wake up worrying, right. Yeah, so you've

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>got near earth objects, you've got celestial stuff like collapsing

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>stars that produce gamma ray births. And then even back

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, like a supervolcanic eruption could conceivably put

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>out enough soot that it blocks photosynthesis and showing that, yeah,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sends us into essentially a nuclear winner too. That would

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be bad. But like you're saying, there's these are very

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rare and there's not a lot we can do about

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>them now. Instead, the focus of people who think about

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>existential risks, um, And there are like a pretty decent

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>handful of people who are dedicated to this now. Um,

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they say that the anthropogenic or the human made ones,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>these are the ones we really need to mitigate because

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they're human made, so they're under our control and um,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>they they they that means we can do something about

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>them more than say a comment. Yeah. Yeah, but that's

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's a bit of a um double edged sword

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because you think, oh, well, it's since we could stop

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, that's really comforting to know. But we're not. Right, Like,

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we're headed down a bad path in some of these

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>areas for sure. So because we are creating these risks

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and not thinking about these things, in a lot of cases,

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're actually worse even though we could possibly control them.

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It definitely makes it more ironic too, right. So, um,

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a few that have been identified, and there's

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>probably more that we haven't figured out yet or haven't

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>been invented yet. But one of the big ones, just um,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think almost across the board, the one that existential

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>risk analysts worry about the most is AI artificial intelligence. Yeah,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is the most frustrating one because it seems

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>like it would be the easiest one to uh not

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>stopping its tracks, but to divert along a safer path. Um.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>The problem with that is that people who have dedicated

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>themselves to figuring out how to make that safer path,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming back and saying this is way harder than

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was going to be to make the

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>safer path. Yeah really yeah. And so at the same time,

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>while people recognize that there needs to be a safe

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>path for AI to follow, this other our path that

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's on now, which is known as the unsafe path,

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that's making people money. So everybody's just

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>going down the unsafe these other people are trying to

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out the safer one because the UM the computer

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and war games would say, maybe the best option is

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to not play the game, and that's if there is

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>no safe option, then maybe a I should not happen

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or we need to And this is almost heresy to

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>say we need to put the brakes on AI development

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so that we can figure out the safer way and

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>then move forward. But we should probably explain what we're

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about was safe in the in the first place, right, Yeah,

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about creating super intelligent AI that

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>basically is is so smart that it starts to self

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>learn UM and is beyond our control and it's not thinking, Ah,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, one of the one of the things

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm programmed to do is make sure we take care

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of humans. And it doesn't necessarily mean that some AI

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to become super intelligent and say I want

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to destroy all humans. That's actually probably not going to

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be the case. It will be that this super intelligent

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>AI is carrying out whatever it was programmed to do,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>would disregard humans exactly. And so if our goal of

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>staying alive and thriving UM comes in conflict with the

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>goal of whatever this AI's goal is, whatever it was

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>designed to do, we would lose that because it's smarter

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>than us. By definition, it's smarter than us. It's out

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, it's out of our control. And probably one

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first things it would do when it became

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent is figure out how to prevent us from

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>turning it off. Well, yeah, that's the fail safe, is

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the all important failsafe that the AI could just disable

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. You can just like sneak up behind it

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>with a screwdriver or something like that, and then you

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>can get shot the robots like in a robot voice.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's called UM designing friendly or aligned a I

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and people I have are like some of the smartest

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>people in the field of AI research. Have have stopped

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to build AI and have started to

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to build friendly AI. Yeah. Aligned is

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in aligned with our goals and needs and desires. And

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Bostrom actually has a really great um thought experiment

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>about is called the paper clip problem. Yeah. Um, and

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you can hear it on the end of

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. Nice. I like that driving listeners. The next

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>one is nanotech. Um. And nanotech is I mean, it's

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>something that's very much within the realm of possibility, as

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is AI. Actually it's not. That's not super far fetched

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>either by super intelligent AI. Yeah, it's definitely possible. Yeah,

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's the same with nanotechnology we're talking about. And

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this everywhere, from um, little tiny robots that

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>will just be dispersed and clean your house, um, to

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like the atomic level where they can like reprogram our

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>body from the inside, the little tiny robots that can

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>clean your car. Yeah. Those are those are the three.

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are three things, so um, two of them are cool.

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the things about these nanobots

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is that because they're so small, they'll be able to

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>manipulate matter on like the atomic level, which is like

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the usefulness of that is mind bottling to send them

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in and they're gonna be networked, so we'll be able

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to program to do whatever and control them. Right. Um.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is if they're networked in there under

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our control, if they fall under the control of somebody

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>else or say a super intelligent AI, then we would

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have a problem because they can rearrange matter on the

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>atomic level, so who knows what they would start rearranging

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't want them to rearrange. It's like that

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Gene Simmons sci fi movie in the eighties. Uh, I

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>won't say it was Looker. No. I always confuse those two,

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the other one this is Runaway, Runaway. I think one

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>inevitably followed the other on HBO. They had to have

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>been a double feature because they could not be more linked.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>In my mind. Same here, you know. I remember Albert

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Finney was in one. I think he was in Looker

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he was, and Gene Simmons was in Runaway as the

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>bad guy, of course, but it did a great job,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Selleck was the good guy. Tom Selleck. Yeah,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but the idea in that movie was not nanobots. They were,

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were a little um insect like robots that

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they just weren't nano sized, right, And so the reason

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that these could be so dangerous is because not their size.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's just so many of them. And while they're

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not big and they can't like punch you in the

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>face or stick you in the neck with a needle

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or something like the runaway robots, they can do all

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff to you molecularly, and you would not

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>want that to happen. Yeah, this is pretty bad. There's

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>an engineer out of m my Tea named Eric Drexler.

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>He is a big, big name in molecular nanotech. He

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if he's listening right now. Right up to when you

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>said his name, he was just sitting there saying, please

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>don't mention me, no, because he's tried to back off

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from his gray goo hypothesis. So, yeah, this is the idea.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>What there are so many of these nano bots that

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they can harvest their own energy, that can self replicate

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like a little bunny rabbits, and that there would be

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a point where there was runaway growth such that the

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>entire world would look like gray goo because it's covered

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>with nanobots. Yeah, and since they can harvest energy from

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the environment, they would eat the world, they'd wreck the world. Basically,

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this is that's a that's scary, you're right. So he

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>took so much flak for saying this, even because apparently

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it's scared people enough back in the eighties that nanotechnology

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was like kind of frozen for a little bit. Yeah,

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and so everybody went drux lure. And so he's backed

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>off from it, saying like, this would be a design flaw,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this would just naturally happen with nanobots. You'd have to

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>design them to harvest energy themselves and to self replicate,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and so just don't do that. And so the thing

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is like, yes, he took a lot of flak for it,

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but he also like it was a contribution to the world.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>He pointed out two big flaws that could happen that

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>now we're just like a sci fi trope. But when

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he when he thought about them, they weren't self evident

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or obvious. Yeah. I mean, I feel bad we even

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>said his name, but it's worth saying. Clyde Drexler, right, Glad,

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Biotechnology is another pretty scary field. Um. There

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are great people doing great research with infectious disease. UM.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Part of that, though, involves developing new bacteria and new viruses,

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>new strains that are even worse than the pre existing

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>ones as part of the research. And that is, uh,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that can be a little scary too, because I mean

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just stuff of movies. There are acts, events

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that happen, protocols that aren't followed, and this stuff can

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or could get out of a lab. Yeah, and it's

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not one of those like could get out of a lab.

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Even things that has gotten out of it happens, I

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say routinely. Dis happened so many times

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that when you look at the track record of the

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>biotech industry, it's just like, how are we not all

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>dead right now? It's crazy lost broken arrows, lost nuclear

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>warhead exactly, but with little, tiny, horrible viruses. And then

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>when you factor in that terrible track record with them

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>actually altering viruses in bacteria to make them more deadly,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to do those two things to reduce the time that

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to get over them right, so they make

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>them more deadly, um, and then to reduce proximity to

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>make them more easily spread, more contagious, so they spread

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>more quickly. And kill more more quickly as well. Then

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you have potentially an existential risk on your hand. For sure.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We've talked in here a lot about the Large Haydrin Collider.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about physics experiments as the I guess this

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is the last example that we're going to talk about. Yeah,

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I should point out that this is not physics experiments.

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Does not show up anywhere in Toby Ord's precipist book. Okay,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>this one is kind of my pet. Yeah. I mean,

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of people who agree that this is a possibility,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of existential risks. Theorists are like, I

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Well, you'll explain it better than me. But

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that we're doing all these experiments, uh

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like the large Adreing Collider to try and figure stuff

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>out we don't understand and which is great, but we

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't exactly know where that all could lead. Yeah, because

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand it enough, you can't say this is

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>totally safe. And so if you read some physics papers

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't like Rupert Sheldrake Morphick Fields kind of

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like right, it's it's actual physicists have said, well, actually

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>using this version of string. Are it's possible that this

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>could be created in a large hadron collider or more

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>likely a more powerful collider that's going to be built

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in the next fifty years or something like that. Super large. Sure,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the Duper, I think it's the nickname for it. Oh man,

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I hope that doesn't end up being the nickname the Duper, right, Yeah,

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess so. But it also has a little kind

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, I don't know, I like it all right,

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>So um, they're saying that a few things could be

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>created accidentally within one of these colliders when they smashed

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the particles together. Microscopic black hole. Uh, my favorite, the

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>low energy vacuum bubble, which is it's a little tiny

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>version of our universe that's more stable, like a more

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>stable version, a lower energy version, and so if it

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to grow, it would grow at the speed

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of light. It would overwhelm our universe and be the

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>new version of the universe. Yeah. That's like when you

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>buy the baby alligator or the baby constrictor python. You

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think is so cute, right, and then it grows up

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and eats the universe screwed. The problem is, is this

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>new version of the universe is set up in a

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 1>way that's different than our version, and so all the matter,

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>including us, that's arranged just so for this this version

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the universe would be disintegrated in this new version.

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's like the snap. But can you imagine if

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, just a new universe grew out

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a large hadron clider accidentally and at the speed of

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>light just ruined this universe forever, If it was we

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 1>just accidentally did this with a physics experiment. I find

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that endlessly fascinating and also hilarious, just the idea I

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>think the world will end ironically somehow. It's it's entirely possible. So, uh,

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe before we take a break, let's talk a little

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bit about climate change, because a lot of people might

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>think climate change is an existential threat. Uh, you know,

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible and we need to do all we can,

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but even the worst case models probably don't mean an

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>end the humanity as a as a whole. Like it

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>means we're living much further inland than we thought we

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ever would, and we maybe are much tighter quarters than

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we ever thought we might be in a lot of

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>people might be gone, but it's probably not going to

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>wipe out every human being. Yeah, it'll probably end up

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>being akin to that same that same line of thinking,

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the same path of Um, A catastrophic nuclear war, which

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could just say nuclear war catastrophic is

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of built into the idea, but we would be

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>able to adapt and rebuild. Um, it's possible that our

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenarios are actually better than what will actually happen.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like with a total nuclear war, it's

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>possible that it could be bad enough that it could

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be an existential risk. It's possible climate change could end

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>up being bad enough that it's an existential voice. But

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>from current understanding, they're probably not existential risks, right, all right,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a hopeful place to leave for another break,

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna come back and finish up with why

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>all of this is important. It should be pretty obvious,

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but we'll summarize it. Stop you know, stop, stop, you know, stop,

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, chuck um. One thing about existential risks

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that people like to say is well, let's just not

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.919
<v Speaker 1>let's just not do anything. And it turns out from

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>people like Nick Bostrom and Toby Ord and other people

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>around the world who are thinking about this kind of stuff.

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>If we don't do anything, we probably are going to

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>accidentally wipe ourselves out. Like doing nothing is not a

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>safe option. Yeah, But um Bostrom is one who has

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>developed a concept that's hypothetical called technological maturity Um, which

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is it would be great and that is sometime in

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the future where we have invented all these things, but

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we have done so safely and we have complete mastery

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>over it all, there won't be those accidents, there won't

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>be the gray goo, there won't be the AI that's

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>not aligned. Yeah, because we'll know how to use all

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Says right, like you said, right, we're not

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>mature in that way right now. No, Actually, we're at

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>a place that Carl Sagan called their technological adolescence, where

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we're becoming powerful, but we're also not wise. At the

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>point where we're right now technological adolescence where we're starting

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to invent the stuff that actually can wipe humanity out

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>of existence. But before we reach technological maturity, where we

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>have safely master and have that kind of wisdom to

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>use all this stuff, that's probably the most dangerous period

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the history of humanity. And we're entering it right now.

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And if we don't figure out how to take on

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>these existential risks, we probably won't survive from technological adolescents

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>all the way to technological maturity. We will wipe ourselves

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>out one way or another. Because this is really important

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to remember. All it takes is one one existential catastrophe,

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and not all of these have to take place. It

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be some combination, just one. Just one

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>um bug with basically a percent mortality has to get

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>out of a lab. Just one accidental physics experiment has

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to slip up um just one AI has to become

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.919
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent and take over the world like just one

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of those things happening, and then that's it. And again

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the problem with existential risks that makes them different is

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't get a second chance. One of them befalls us,

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's that. That's right. Uh, there depends on who

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you talked to about if you want to get in,

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a projection on our chances as a whole

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as humans. Uh Toby ord right now is uh what

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a one and six chance over the next hundred years. Yeah,

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he always follows that with Russian roulette, other people say

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent. Um. There's some different cosmologists. There's one

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>name Lord Martin Rees who puts it att Yeah. He

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>actually is a member of the Center for the Study

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of Existential Risk. And we didn't mention before. Bostrom founded

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>something called the Future of Humanity Institute, which is pretty

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>great f h I. And then there's another one more

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>place that I gotta want to shout out. It's called

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the Future of Life Institute. It was founded by Max

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tag Mark and Yon Talling, co founder of I think Skype.

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, I think so all right, well you should

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>probably also shut out the Church of Scientology. No, no, no,

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>no genius. Yeah, that's the one that's one thinking about. Well,

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they get confused a lot. This is a pretty cool

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>little um thing you did here with how long because

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of talking before about the long view

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of things and how long humans have been around. So

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I think your rope analogy is pretty spot on here.

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's J. L. Schellenberg's rope analogy. Well, I didn't

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think he wrote it. I wish it were admitting that

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you included it. So the what we were talking about,

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like you were saying, is like it's it's hard to

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>take that long view. But if you if you step

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back and look at how long humans have been around.

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So Homo sapiens have been on Earth about two thousand years,

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a very long time. It does. And

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>even modern humans um like us have been around for

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>about fifty thousand years, it seems like a very long

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>time as well. But if you think about how much

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>longer the human race, humanity could continue on to exist

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as a species, UM, it's that's nothing. It's virtually insignificant um.

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.919
<v Speaker 1>And J. L. Schellenberg puts it like this, like, let's

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>say humanity has a billion year lifespan, and you translate

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that billion years into a twenty foot rope. That's easy

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to show up with just the eighth of an inch

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mark on that twenty ft rope. You would have to

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>our species would have to live another three hundred thousand

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>years from the point where we've already lived. Yes, we

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>would have to live five hundred thousand years just to

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.720
<v Speaker 1>show up as an eighth of an inch that first

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>eighth of an inch on that twenty ft long rope.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's how long humanity might have ahead of us. And

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that's actually kind of a conservative estimate. Some people say,

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>once we reach technological maturity, we're we're fine, We're not

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>going to go extinct because we'll be able to use

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>all that technology like having a I track all those

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>new Earth objects and say, well, this one is a

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>little close for comfort, I'm gonna send some nanobouts out

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to disassembl it. We will remove ourselves from the risk

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of ever going extinct when we hit technological maturity. So

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a billion years is definitely doable for us. Yeah, and

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, why we care about it is because it's

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>happening right now. I mean, there is already a I

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that is unaligned. Um, we are, We've already talked about

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the biotech in labs. Accidents have already happened, have been

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and there are experiments going on with

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>physics that we we think we know what we're doing,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 1>but accidents happen, and an accident that you can't recover from,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no whoops is let me try that again,

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>right exactly because we're all toasts. So this is why

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to care about it. And luckily, um, I

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>wish there were more people that care about it. Well,

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming more of a thing and if you talk

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to Toby Ord, he's like, so, just like say, the

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>environmental movement was, you know, the the moral push, and

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see some some stuff some results from

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that now, but stay starting making the sixties and seventies,

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody had ever heard of that. Yeah, I mean it

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>took decades. He's saying, like, we're about that's what we're

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>doing now with existential Chris. People are going to start

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to realize like, oh man, this is for real, and

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we do something about it because we could live a

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>billion years if we managed to survive the next hundred,

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>which makes you and me chucking, like all of us

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>alive right now in one of the most unique positions

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>any humans ever been at. We have the entire future

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of the human race basically resting in our hands because

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we're the ones who happened to be alive when humanity

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>entered its technological adolescence. Yeah, and it's a it's a

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tougher one then save the planet, because it's such a

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>tangible thing when you talk about pollution, and it's very

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to put on a TV screen or in a classroom. Um,

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not so easily dismissed because you can see

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it in front of your eyeballs and understand it. This

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is a lot tougher education wise, because, um people, here's

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 1>something about nanobots and gray goo or ai and just think,

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>come on, man, that's the stuff of movies. Yeah, And

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's it's sad that like we couldn't dig

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>into it further, because when you really do start to

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>break it all down and understand it, it's like, no,

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this totally is for real and it makes sense, like

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this is entirely possible and maybe even likely. Yeah, and

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not the hardest thing to understand. It's not like you

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have to understand nanotechnology to understand its threat, right exactly.

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>That's well put. The other thing about all this is

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that not everybody is on board with this, even people,

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>even people who hear about this kind of stuff are like, no,

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is pie in the sky. It's overblown

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or the opposite of the sky. It's a cake in

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Is that the opposite dark sky territory? It's

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a turkey drumstick in the earth. Okay, that's kind of

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of the of a pie. Okay. I think

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I may have just come up with a coloaquialism I

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think so. Um, So, some people aren't convinced. Some people say, no,

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>AI is nowhere near being even close to human level intelligent,

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>let alone super intelligent. It like, why spend money because

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it's expensive, right, Well, and other people are like, yeah,

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 1>if you start diverting, you know, research into figuring out

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>make AI friendly, I can tell you China and India

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to do that, and so they're going to

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>leap frog ahead of us and we're going to be

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:18.959
<v Speaker 1>toast competitively. So there's a cost to an opportunity cost,

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there's an actual cost um So there's a lot of people.

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the same arguments for people who argue against

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>mitigating climate change. Yeah, same same thing kind of. So

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the answer is, uh, terraforming, terraforming, Well, that's that's not

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the answer. The answer is one of those right, study

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>terraforming is right. The answer is to study this stuff

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>figure out what to do about it. But it wouldn't

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>hurt to learn how to live on Mars, right or

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just off of Earth because in the exact same way,

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.479
<v Speaker 1>like um that, like a whole village is at risk

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>when it's under a mud slide or a mountain and

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a mud slide comes down. If we all live on Earth.

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>If something happens to life on Earth, that's it for humanity.

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 1>But if they're like a thriving population of humans who

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:08.799
<v Speaker 1>don't live on Earth, who live off of Earth, if

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>something happens on Earth, humanity continues on. So learning to

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 1>live off of Earth is a good step in the

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 1>right direction. That's plan A DOT one. Sure it's tied

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for first, like it's something we should be doing at

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the same time as studying and learning to mitigate existent tourists. Yeah,

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's got to be multi pronged, because

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the threats are multi pronged. Absolutely. And there's one other

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:37.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that I really think you've got to get across.

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Like we said that, if if say the US starts

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest all of its resources into figuring out how

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to make friendly AI, but India and China continue on

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like the path, it's not gonna work. And the same

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>goes with if every country in the world said, no,

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to figure out friendly AI, but just one

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 1>dedicate it itself to continuing on this path, the ninety

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>not the rest of the countries in the world. Progress

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>would be totally negated by that one yeah, so we

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta get the It's got to be a global effort.

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It has to be a species wide effort, not just

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with AI, but with all these understanding all of them

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and mitigating them together. Yeah, that could be a problem. So, um,

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you for very much for doing this episode with me.

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll though you talking to Dave. No, well, Dave too.

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you to Dave, but but big ups to

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you Charles, because Jerry was like, I'm not sitting in

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that room. It's like, I'm not listening to Clark blather

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on about existential risk for an hour. Um, so one

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>more time. Toby Ord's The Precipice is available everywhere you

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.280
<v Speaker 1>buy books. You can get The End of the World

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with Josh Clark wherever you get podcasts. If this kind

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing floated your boat, check out the Future of

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Humanity Institute the Future of Life Institute UM and they

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have a podcast hosted by Aerial Kahn and UM. She

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 1>had me on back in December of two eighteen as

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>part of a group that was talking about existential hope.

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can go listen to that too. If you're

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>like this is a downer, I want to think about

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the bright side, there's that whole Future of Life Institute podcast.

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So what about you? Are you like convinced of this

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>whole thing like that this is an actual like thing

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to be worrying about and thinking of. Really, No,

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that, sure there are people that

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>should be thinking about this stuff, and that's great as

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>far as like me, what can I do well? And

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>then I ran into that like, there's not a great

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.360
<v Speaker 1>answer for that. It's more like, start telling other people

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is the best thing that the average person can do. Hey, man,

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we just did that in a big way. We did,

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't We Like? It's people. Now we can go to sleep. Okay,

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else? I got nothing else? All right? Well,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>then since Chuck said he's got nothing else, that's time

0:52:57.480 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for listener mail. Uh yeah, this is the opposite of

0:53:03.000 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>all the smart stuff we just talked about. I just realized, Hey, guys,

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I love you, love stuff you should know. On a

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 1>recent airplane flight, I listened to and really enjoyed the

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Coyote episode wherein Chuck mentioned aften wolf bait as a

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>euphemism for farts. Coincidentally, on that same flight, Uh, we're

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ny the Science Guy and Anthony Michael Hall, the actor.

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What is this star studded airplane flight? He said, so Naturally,

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>when I arrived at my home, I felt compelled to

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>watch rewatch the film Weird Science, in which Anthony Michael

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Hall stars in that movie, and I remember this now

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that he mentions it. In that movie, Anthony Michael Hall

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>uses the term wolf bait as a euphemism for pooping

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>dropping a wolf bait, which makes sense now that it

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 1>would be actual poop and not a fart. Did you

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 1>say his name before? Who wrote this? No? Your friend

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>who used the word wolf bait? Eddie at sure? Okay?

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So is Eddie like a big Weird Science fan or

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Michael Hall. I think he just Kelly Lebroc fan. Yeah,

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that must be it. Uh. It has been a full

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>circle day for me and one that I hope you

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>will appreciate hearing about. And that is Jake Man. Can

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you imagine being on a flight with Bill Night and

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Michael Hall. Who do you talk to? Who do

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:23.839
<v Speaker 1>you hang with? I don't. I'd just be worried that

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody was gonna like take over control of the plane

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and fly it somewhere to hold us all hostage and

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 1>make those two like perform or what if Bill Knight

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Michael Holler Inca hoots maybe and they take

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the plane hostage. Yeah, it would be very suspicious if

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>they didn't talk to one another, you know what I mean?

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Who is that? That was Jake? Thanks Jake,

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that was a great email and thank you for joining us.

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with us, like

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Jake did, you can go onto stuff you Should Know

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com and get lost in the amazing nous of it.

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And you can also just send us an email to

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast at i heeart radio dot com. Stuff you

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.240
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H