WEBVTT - Is Japan Back? 

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Booking a trillions.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Webber and I'm Eric Altunas.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Eric, there's a country that is actually like big in

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>ETFs and we actually don't really talk about it enough,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but you're heading to Asia on a trip, and then

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden we started talking about Japan and

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, you know what, we should actually

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>do a Japan episode. And to do that, we're going

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to have Jeremy Schwartz, who's the global Chief investment Officer

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at Wisdom Tree joining us. What are we going to

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to him about?

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Eric?

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, beyond those reasons, there's also a new prime

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>minister there who, by all accounts is very like Abbe

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and Abe Nomis was a whole thing from about ten

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>years ago where this guy just cut He did a

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of you know, currency manipulation in order to exports

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and that created what was called the fee wars for

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years there. And DXJ, which is the

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 2>Wisdom Tree Japan hedged DTF was like a total rock star.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>In fact, remember the trivia episode we did. One of

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the trivia questions was what was the LASTDTF that wasn't

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Vanguard or I shares to win the annual flow crown

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and the answer is DXJ. In twenty thirteen, it took

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a nine billion, but then it started to underperform the

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>non hedged, a lot of people left. It was like

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a rise and then a fall. Then it actually had

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a good run again, but people didn't really come back

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>like they did. It was like it didn't get a

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>second bite at the apple, which we've seen on occasion.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>But with this leader in here, maybe we'll get a

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>third bite at the apple. Maybe this time it will work.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I can already see some of the assets growing in it,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's still, you know, basically a shell of what

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>it was ten years ago. But the design of DXJ

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>should be perfectly fit for this prime minister. Of what

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading is true.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That prime minister is Sanai Takeishi, the first female prime

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>minister in Japan's history. Her nickname is a throwback to

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Margaret Thatcher, the Iron Lady. And joining us is Jeremy

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Schwartz of Whitstry this time on trillions is Japan back. Jeremy,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Trillians.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for having me.

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 3>One of my favorite topics to talk about with Eric

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>from first episode of ETFIQ to back.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Japan might be coming back.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh so, Jeremy, we did a check.

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>You were on in April of twenty twenty two.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's been a second so excited to have you back.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's hear you answer the question, is Japan back?

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess you're gonna say the affirmative.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing is that Japan never left. I mean,

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 3>the thing is people might have traded it wrong. But

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, if I look at the performance of DXJ

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>compared to the S and P five hundred since twenty twelve,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 3>how many international funds can you say have beaten the

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 3>S ANDB five hundred since twenty twelve. EFA by the way,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>MSCI EFA, the broader national benchmark that everybody buys for

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>international has returned like seven percent a year. The S

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>and P has done fifteen percent a year, okay, and

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 3>so seven versus fifteen for thirteen years, by the way,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 3>compounds to like one hundred and fifty percent versus five

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent. So this is how much international has beaten.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>What has beaten the S and P since that time.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>D x JET.

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So it's like that now there's a period where it

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>wasn't but as of today. That's you know, and we're

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 3>recording early October. That is true, and so there's been

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, this comes back to a fundamental

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>problem through international I mean, Eric, this is something I've

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 3>talked about for a long time.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 4>This is somewhat a.

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Branding problem, but you know, it also just a sequencing

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 3>problem that people think hedging is this exotic thing, when

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>like betting on currencies is actually a much more interesting,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>more exotic thing. Like why are you going to go

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>long the en? You know, if you had to say default,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>should it be long the en or should just be

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>neutral the en? Most people would have been neutral, but

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 3>they default to being long v en all the time.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a crazy thing. But I'd say DXJA

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 3>never left, but people left and they made a mistake.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting about that timeline that you lay out

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is just how much has actually changed in Japan. You know,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this huge monetary policy experiment. It was they had like

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:39.119
<v Speaker 1>negative interest rates forever year and change ago. They left

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that and like re entered sort of the normalcy. Now

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there's inflation and even Japanese are starting to have to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>invest differently because they can't just keep cash under the

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Mattress anymore. So is this is dxj's success. Is it

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really like the the international investment opportunity or is there

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a domestic story there or too.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people do ask that question about if it's also

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the oldest populations of declining populations. So like

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>when when we talk about it, is it really about

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the local Japan story or just their global you know,

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of footprint. I have said that it's not about

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>just the local economy, that it's Japan is generally like

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 3>a global growth play that it sort of exports all

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>around the world. They have some of the you know,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>they're they're the infrastructure from their their semiconductors can find

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>their way. Soft Bank is like an AI play. Tokyo

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Electron feeds into a lot of the other global AI stories,

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, so they are components. They don't have like

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a they'd say the mag seven like we have these

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 3>tech leaders, but they have things that support a lot

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>of that, you know, I'd say. The other person who's

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>brought the most interest to Japan has been Buffet. So

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>like you think about world's premier best value investers. Five

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 3>years ago, I was telling people follow Buffet in Japan

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I've probably done six or seven different pieces follow Buffet

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>into Japan, and in fact, they actually then created a fund.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 4>To buy half the stocks.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, half of its weight basically is in the

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Buffet stocks, so OP j OPBJ Japan Opportunities, which we

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>took a smaller fund to do that. We had a

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>small cap fund. That's the more local that was the

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 3>more local story. I just said, you know, people don't

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 3>care much enough about the small caps. As much as

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I cared, people didn't care.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 4>But the Japan.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Opportunity story with Buffet tagging along actually is is just

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 3>as interesting today.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Actually, when we look at the year today returns, it's

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty close. So the non hedged is up eighteen percent,

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 2>d XJ is up about the same, and the SMP's

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>up thirteen percent. Now, the dollar has been weakening, and

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>usually if the dollar's weakening, it's not good for currency

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 2>hedged international ATFS, right, you want the dollar strengthening and

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Japan's currency getting weaker.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 5>That's the perfect trade for d XJ.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Is this prime minister going to do what Abe did

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and like really purposely make the current see worthless in

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>order to jack up exports, and how much is left

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>in that trade because when I just went back and

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>looked at five year, d XJ is destroying the non hedged.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>So I guess that would be my two questions as

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>somebody thinking about going in now.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a very tricky question.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>These cursies can be very unpredictable, which goes back to

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>like do you really want to bet on the end

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>going up? You know, which it's a it's a high

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 3>bar to say, like do I really want to bet

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>on the end?

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 4>You know what d XJA you're basically getting today.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>You're getting called three and a half to four percent

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 3>on top of the local market or this is an

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 3>important distinction because when you hedge, you get the interest

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>rate differentials on top of the local market return.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Like you hear about the end carry trade. You hear

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>about these carry trades.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>When you're hedging, you're paid the interest rate differentials between

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the local you know, between the US and local market. So, yes,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the Feds bring rates down, Japan's been hiking a little

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>bit for a little while. We're getting five to six

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 3>percent carry on top of the local market return, which

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 3>is again is how much the end has to go

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 3>up to break even with the hedge, right, so they're

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>starting out four percent behind the eight ball is how

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>much the unheedged has to go up now the end

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 3>had the dollar had beginning week, A lot of people

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 3>are think the dollar had peeked out and things go.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>So it is not just in Japan's control. I mean,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>for sure, when AB came in, you had eighty en

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to the dollar. Today we're over one fifty end to

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the dollar. So it's definitely a very different starting point.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>It was a very overly strong end when ABI came in.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't say it's an overly strong end today. But

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 3>it sort of comes back to the policies, like if

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>she's trying to get them to delay raising rates, if

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>they do a lot more physical spending. They've got some

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the highest debts to GDP. You know, there's just the questions.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>It's like what you know, Now, she might be pro

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>growth and that might be good for the currency, but

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 3>it's it's sort of an it's it's unpredictable, so it's like,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 3>is that your thesis?

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 4>The thesis is is she's.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 3>Good for the equities, she might not be good for

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the currency, or at least it adds extra noise and

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 3>extra volatility when you know, you could buy the stocks

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and get paid over three percent today to hedge it.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 5>One thing you mentioned was the debt to GDP.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>As Joel knows, I've been deep in this bitcoin book,

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and one of the things that you have to cover

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 2>when you're covering this is deficit debt inflation. And I

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>think the US is like one thirty percent. I have

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>to double check out, but I believe Japan's double two

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty percent. They're basically like the highest in

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the world for a big country. That seems crazy to me,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>But as some people pointed out, that doesn't necessarily mean

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get a lot of inflation. And Japan

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>is also you know, there's a famous like kind of

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 2>meme on social media where somebody starts talking about US

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 2>stocks and somebody comes in, now do Japan, And it's

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>usually looking at like the Lost Decade of Japan, like,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>which was a couple decades ago, about how a stock

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>market can just do nothing.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 5>So I guess with I don't know as.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>An investor, and I'm thinking, like, hey, this is a

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>debt ridden country. I don't hear a lot of things

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>about mag seven type stocks there. What am I really

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>buying here is it just to trade on monetary policy?

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>And how much more monetary policy can be dubbish or

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>loose given they're already at that debt to GDP level.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 3>My friends at all Star Charts j C, PERETZTI, Strasa

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>do these like thirty year breakout charts on Japan, Like,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, like they has been building this base for

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty years and you just got like the Nieka breakout

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>of forty eight thousand, and it's you know, nineteen eighty

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 3>nine was the peak. It's just catching up to the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty nine peak.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 4>But it was like one of the.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Greatest bubbles of all time. Like international stocks were sixty

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 3>percent Japan in nineteen eighty nine. It was one of

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the most expensive markets. You thought the tech bubble in

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 3>two thousand was expensive, more of Japan was more expensive

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>than tech bubble of two thousand, Right, That's how big

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>it was. Now it's the inverse today. If I look

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>at that, you know, I've got two different Japan foots.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>But let's just stay with di XJA the flagship fourteen

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half pe when the S and P's twenty

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>three pe. Okay, so SMP selling at a four to

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>five percent earning sield. We've got a two and a

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 3>half percent equity premium. Let's call it, you know, like

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 3>we look at the earning zield versus a tipshield, so

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>you know'll take you over forty years to w your

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>money in bonds today in perching power terms, under two percent,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 3>tip shield stocks might take you fourteen to fifteen years.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>In the US at a five percent earnings field, Japan

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>at a fourteen pe is like an eight seven to

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>eight percent earning yield. It's more like a eight to

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 3>nine year doubling of your perching power.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a much.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Better value than is like the call it the inverse bubble,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Like people just have lack of apathy. You know, there's

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 3>not any interest. International has been out of favor for

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 3>this fifteen twenty years at the US Max seven have

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>been in favor, and so nobody cares, and so the

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 3>valuations support that. The Japan Opportunities Fund, which has all

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>those buffet stocks, is a twelve and a half pe

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 3>eight percent earn ex zield, very high quality stocks, doing

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>a ton of buybacks, growing the dividends. I mean, it's

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 3>such a good value story.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 4>In my opinion.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you get any positive catalyst that taik these

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 3>takaichi trades. If she is, you know, there's there's questions

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>on how effective she's going to be. She's got to

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>get her coalition together. But if she is productive in

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>lowering tax, if you're talking about doing a ten percent consumption,

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>like bringing a flatter tax to ten percent to try

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 3>to restimulate demand, that could be a very very big deal.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And it's a cheap market. So you know, I obviously

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I like the market.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>How big are these challenges that that she faces, just

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of lay out the landscape tough.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Man, I mean, it's a tough set of politics. She's

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 3>got to figure out who's going to to go with her,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 3>how she brings it. They do have these inflation problemts,

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 3>but people are somewhat Eric's when you talk about the

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 3>currency before versus abe. You know, the end was way

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 3>too strong before. Now people are worried that their yen

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 3>aren't going as far and there's inflation, and so the

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 3>week end makes it a hamster. One of our former

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>strategies said she needs to go for.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 4>A strong end policy.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's there's questions, but that is one of the

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 3>things she's got to confront. But she's definitely being trying

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to bring a pro growth mindset the battle. Like I

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 3>call it, Eric, we launched an Asia Defense fund, and

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Eric was giving me a hard time in the name

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>of like, well is it why you know? Is there

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 3>China in that Asia Defense fun? And I said, well, no, no,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>this is with the battle for China and.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Joel I told him they need to run with that

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and call it.

0:13:59.000 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 5>I forget the name.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>We came out with defending ourselves from China, Asia Defense

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>etf versus.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Just like Asia Defense.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, you should own the fact that it's a

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>specific situation there.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Jeremy wants to comment on that.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it is the battle with China fun in

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 3>some ways. I mean we called it Asia Defense. I

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 3>thought I was implied that it was for the battle

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>for China. Yes, I understand his point, like is it

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>with China or for the battle? But that is very

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>topical too. In ta Kaichi, one of the ta Kayuchi trades,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I wrote a piece that the ta Kaichi trades, and

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the trades is a defense positioning like she

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 3>is very strong against China and she thinks they if

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>there were to be a conflict with Taiwan. She wants

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to defend Taiwan and she wants to increase spending, and

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>so she you know, now, if you think back to

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the US politics and geopolitics, there is you know, Trump

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>is negotiating hard with China. Maybe by the time people

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 3>hearing this, they negotiate some grand bargain, but it's it's hot,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, the China US has been one of the

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>big hot topics this year. Abe was one of Trump's

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 3>close allies, and then you had sort of a fledgling

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 3>of prime miships that weren't you know, doing as well

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 3>with Trump. The idea was Takaichi might be a better

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>negotiator with Trump on some of these issues, more friendly

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>with Trump because she is kind of viewed as this

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>abbe two point zero in some ways. But the defense

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>story is one of the big stories, and so I think,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the European defense was one of the hot

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>ETFs this year. Like we somehow in our European team

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 3>launched a European Defense Fund like the week Zelenski was

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 3>in the White House, and that fun just took off

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 3>like like.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 4>You would expect.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>But we actually think this Asia defense today is the

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 3>hotspot actually for where things could go over the next

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>few years. And Takichi is very supportive for Asian defense.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>As long as we're talking about China and Trump and

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Japan sort of in the middle, but maybe leaning a

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more towards Trump, I just want to go

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>back to trade, which has obviously been the backdrop for

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>so much of what we've been talking about all year.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Japan very much an export economy. I'm curious specifically about

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the automotive industry and sort of your exposure to it

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and how it's going to try and navigate what's to

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>come and how that might impact your investments.

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that that is why I've been highlighting this second fund.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I have this Japan Opportunities Fund because it's much more

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>in the industrials, the five buffet stocks than just betting

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>on the car companies.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Now I'm not saying that DXJ is just.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>The car companies, but in terms of the sectors, you know,

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>DXJ fourteen a half pe it has, it's going to

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>have more exposure to like Toyota, which is its second

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>largest holding, or Honda, which is in the top ten.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, so it's going to have twenty five percent

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>may be closer to twenty percent in conservatives. Grechary's industrial

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>is still a big sector there twenty five percent, So

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 3>it's more tied to that. The autos has been a sector,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, that China's rise has been competing with. Like

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 3>my colleague Sam was just in Mexico coming off of

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a Mexico trip. Everywhere, everywhere, like everything is all China cars,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 3>and Elon had said, you know, nine of the ten

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>largest car kept are gonna be Chinese, you know, because

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 3>of the competition that they are so strong. It's global

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 3>competitive that the car industry has been under pressure everywhere,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 3>and so that is China a big China competitive dynamic.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 2>I got an ETF NERD question for you here a

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit d XJ again. When I wrote my first book,

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>The ETF Toolbox, it.

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 5>Was like DSJA had taken over the industry.

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>So I have a whole chapter called currency hatching, which

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>isn't that big of a deal anymore like, but at

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>the time, that's how big it was. I made a

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>whole chapter for it, and I just thought, you guys

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>really set the bar for how to market an ETF

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I called speedboat marketing. Instead of acting like an aircraft carrier.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 2>If you have one of these ETFs that gets hot,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you drop everything and you rally around this one product.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 2>They had ads Jrol on Bloomberg TV and elsewhere.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Take the yen out of Japan. I mean that is good, right.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy was everywhere, and Deutsche Bank had a competing product

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 2>that had actually launched earlier, but DXJ got all the money.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>DXJ then saw some outflows since and it's had great performance,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 2>but it hasn't able to kind of get back to

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that peak.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of that?

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>We on a team have this phrase called like it's

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>hard to get a second bite at the apple. If

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you look at high flyers and history past, especially active managers,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>these shooting star types like the Janus twenty, it's just

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>hard to come back. Even if you come back performance wise,

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to come back in a sort of zeitgeist way.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 2>How do you get DXJ back on people's radars, given

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that they might have been like, well, I did that

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>ride already and it was a little and I'm not

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 2>doing that again yet.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 4>It's very interesting.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll say I probably talked more Curtsey Hedging than anybody

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>of the industry for the last fifteen years.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 4>I did my first one in nine.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 3>I think I was the first ETF actually, and the

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>first one was broad EFA and now, interestingly in the

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 3>history folklore, HDJ, which became Europe, was the first one

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>we converted. It's fascinating. I remember talking about a market maker.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>We had a client who wanted to buy it, and

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 3>the market maker didn't want to make this is we're

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>talking two thousand and nine, enty ten, and they didn't

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 3>want to quote all the spreads because you had to

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 3>put on these hedges and it was too wide of

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>a thing. And the broad EFO just didn't take off.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 3>And then it was April twenty ten we had DXJ unhedged.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>From six April twenty ten, I added the hedge. We

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>added the hedge to the end, and then it took

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 3>off during the earthquake in twenty eleven, so the end

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>really went up and people were starting to say, oh,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>this was a going up too much, and so it

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 3>started to work for the end. So we probably talking

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 3>about five hundred million and twenty eleven timeframe after the earthquake,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and we saw that it was working for a single

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 3>currency with Japan, and then we made hedge the European one,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 3>which we should have just launched a broad EFA one

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 3>versus converting.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>But you know, who know you're going back in time.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>But then then both of those took off, you know,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>as you said, Eric, like the single currencies did take off,

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the broad EFAs took off. We've started doing a little

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 3>bit below the radar now some more active hedging, Like

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 3>we have a multi factor family that's actively hedging.

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 4>We have a dynamic family.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Probably our big our fund that's raising the most in

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 3>the international marks this year has been a dynamic fund

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 3>that does it just as part of the factors.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 4>So it does seem scary.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I get it comes back to branding, Like people think

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 3>dynamic currency hedge, Oh it's a scary thing, but dynamic

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>international the branding I think is a bit better in

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 3>multi factors just one of the factors. And so we're

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to win the longer game.

0:20:58.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 4>But you know, for sure, it.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Real juice is volatility taking the taking out this noisy thing.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Currency moves seven eight percent a year. Do you really

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 3>want that volatility? I think most people wouldn't accept that.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 3>It comes back to benchmarking questions and all right, AQUI

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 3>or EFA have the currency, so they feel like they're

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 3>going to make an active call to hedge, but really

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 3>the active call is to bet on the currency.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like, really, do you want to bet on the euro?

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Really you have the long term strong bealon the Euro.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the challenge with currency hedging. You have to

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 2>actually change the way your mind works. You have to

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>see almost the way I would describe a Jeremy, I

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>would say this lets you invest as if you're a

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>person in Japan investing in the stock market. It takes

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>out this other element. So when you buy EWJ, you're actually.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Buying two things.

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And I hear you because I remember I used to

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 2>say this was an A minus b ETF and you're like, no,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 2>it's just a the other one, asked me, yeah, and

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>you got me.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 5>It took a while.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Some of this stuff takes a couple of years. But

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I also think you guys, that are great job of

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>diversifying away. You've got you had like this huge hit song,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 2>but instead of just like relying on this one, like

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 2>your next couple products over the next decade, you've got

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>some huge hits that really diversified the product line. D

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>XJ is still up there for you. But like you've

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 2>got USFR and dg RW both seventeen sixteen billion. We've

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>written about that a couple times. But anyway, it's just interesting.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Wisdom Tree has always been like an interesting case study.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Puer ETF company, publicly traded ETF company, and you know

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>how to like survive after you know your big hit

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 2>and not make sure you're not just living off of that,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>which I think is a good lesson for all the

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>issuers out there.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, just as we as we come to the end here,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy like, what's next.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, in some ways it's interesting, Eric, you talked about

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the A plus B ETFs and A minus BUS test,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 3>the one that's gaining a lot of traction.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Now that should be so much bigger.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 3>You know that we if you said, go back to

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the TV the TV days.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 4>You know what we have TV right now is our

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 4>gold stack. You know, are sort of.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Capital fishing gold funds where you put gold on top

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of things. As gold up fifty percent year to date,

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>we have it basically US equities plus gold futures on

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 3>top of it GD and then we have gdm N,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>which is miners plus gold that competes with that, those

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 3>are now you know, the miners are taken one hundred

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and fifty million this year the gold overlay to the

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 3>S and P kind of stocks, to our own basket

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of five hundred stocks.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 2>But gd is, oh my god, run is up one

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty percent.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Top performing compared to your standard miners.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 2>That's efficient gold plus miners.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 5>So that's gold miners.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that like leverage at one hundred and fifty or something.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's it's ninety ninety. So ninety percent the stocks,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent the futures. So it's say, you know, it's

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>adding the gold futures on top. And we do the

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 3>same thing with core stocks. So if you go back

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to your deficit problems, the debt and deficits, you know,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 3>people worried about the dollar.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to go to.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>International to do that. Just add gold on top of

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 3>your US large stacks with GDE. So that's our that's

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 3>that is really a p This is you know, this

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 3>is a good a good family.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Joel, they got a China X state

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 2>owned enterprises and so that I told them that should

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>be take the communism out of China. But they didn't

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>run with that, I said, that's on the house.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty good.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Bring it back.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Then they have one EM that's X state owned EM companies,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and I said, probably can't. I'd say take the socialism

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>out of the emerging markets.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go back with that.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna bring that back to the marketing team after

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>we get off.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 4>This call here.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you clearly have a way of surfing

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>some interesting situations. Uh so, Jeremy, thanks for coming back

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on Trillions and looking forward to having you back again soon.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 4>I always do to show with you guys.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions. Until next time. You can

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever else you'd like to listen to. I'd love

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Hit us up on social I'm

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Weber Show, He's at Eric Balchino's. Trillions is

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Sage Bauman is the head of

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcast