WEBVTT - Stand-Up Pt II

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.020
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.450
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck,

0:00:14.490 --> 0:00:17.130
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry's here, too. And we are kicking off part

0:00:17.230 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>two of our two-part episode on stand-up comedy. And I

0:00:21.620 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>think if I remember correctly, Chuck, it was a couple

0:00:23.540 --> 0:00:26.500
<v Speaker 2>of days ago, but you said something about alt comedy.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:28.380
<v Speaker 2>We were going to talk about that.

0:00:28.780 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:00:29.380 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.090
<v Speaker 3>Alt comedy is something that came about in the early

0:00:33.750 --> 0:00:39.650
<v Speaker 3>90s with a group of comedians performing in. And I

0:00:39.670 --> 0:00:41.690
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that's where the term comes from, but

0:00:42.229 --> 0:00:44.130
<v Speaker 3>performing in alternative venues.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:46.420
<v Speaker 1>They weren't performing.

0:00:46.500 --> 0:00:47.780
<v Speaker 3>And, you know, of course, they would all go to

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.300
<v Speaker 3>perform in a comedy store and all that kind of stuff, too.

0:00:51.350 --> 0:00:53.830
<v Speaker 3>And comedy clubs, but they were well known for performing

0:00:53.890 --> 0:00:57.370
<v Speaker 3>in like piano bars or like bookstores.

0:00:56.810 --> 0:00:57.570
<v Speaker 1>And things like that.

0:00:57.850 --> 0:01:03.070
<v Speaker 3>And, you know, people like Jeanine Garofalo, the great Dana Gould,

0:01:03.110 --> 0:01:05.790
<v Speaker 3>who is a wonderful comic and human being still.

0:01:06.370 --> 0:01:06.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:07.110 --> 0:01:10.150
<v Speaker 3>They started out at performing at a place called Big

0:01:10.170 --> 0:01:13.950
<v Speaker 3>and Tall Books in L.A., the Luna Lounge in New

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 3>York and Largo, the original Largo in L.A.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.020
<v Speaker 1>Were all sort of home bases for these comics.

0:01:20.980 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>We did a show in Largo. Was that the original Largo?

0:01:23.780 --> 0:01:26.060
<v Speaker 1>No, the original was like this little piano bar.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:26.970
<v Speaker 2>I see.

0:01:27.670 --> 0:01:30.470
<v Speaker 1>Uh, but the, the new Largo is great too. It's awesome.

0:01:31.130 --> 0:01:34.690
<v Speaker 2>For sure. Uh, so I mentioned Mr. Show before, if

0:01:34.709 --> 0:01:38.050
<v Speaker 2>you're familiar with Mr. Show with Bob and David, um,

0:01:38.830 --> 0:01:43.390
<v Speaker 2>that is essentially alt comedy at its core. And most

0:01:43.410 --> 0:01:45.150
<v Speaker 2>of the people associated with the show, if not all

0:01:45.190 --> 0:01:47.710
<v Speaker 2>of them were alt comics of the time, early, early

0:01:47.750 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>mid nineties. Right. Um, Patton Oswalt, Maria Bamford, Mark Maron, PFT,

0:01:54.860 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the great Paul F. Tompkins. Yeah. One of the funniest

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:02.260
<v Speaker 2>people alive. Mary Lynn Raskub.

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:03.020
<v Speaker 1>She's great.

0:02:03.220 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I was like, who is that? And I went

0:02:04.740 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and looked her up. I'm like, oh, OK. I had

0:02:06.620 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>no idea that she started out as a stand up.

0:02:08.780 --> 0:02:08.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:09.220 --> 0:02:13.190
<v Speaker 2>But she was great on Larry Sanders as the booking

0:02:13.220 --> 0:02:15.730
<v Speaker 2>assistant to, I think, Janine Garofalo, right?

0:02:17.030 --> 0:02:17.230
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:17.350 --> 0:02:18.390
<v Speaker 1>Janine Garofalo was on that show.

0:02:19.389 --> 0:02:24.230
<v Speaker 2>And she's probably more well-known by mainstream America as a

0:02:24.310 --> 0:02:27.510
<v Speaker 2>character on 24. She was on 24 basically the entire

0:02:27.710 --> 0:02:29.550
<v Speaker 2>run of the show. I'm not sure what she did, though,

0:02:29.570 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>because I didn't watch it.

0:02:30.669 --> 0:02:32.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she was great. She was part of that crew.

0:02:32.430 --> 0:02:35.589
<v Speaker 3>I know you mentioned Maria Bamford, but if you've never

0:02:35.630 --> 0:02:38.950
<v Speaker 3>seen Maria Bamford's comedy, please go see it because she's

0:02:39.330 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>still one of the most original comedians working today, for sure.

0:02:43.660 --> 0:02:47.100
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you said still, because most of these comedians,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.660
<v Speaker 2>the ones who are still alive, are still working and

0:02:50.710 --> 0:02:52.370
<v Speaker 2>still doing stuff, and a lot of them are still

0:02:52.389 --> 0:02:57.370
<v Speaker 2>doing stand-up. Like David Cross, he's had some Mondo TV hits,

0:02:57.450 --> 0:03:00.490
<v Speaker 2>like he was on Arrested Development, he was on Mr. Show,

0:03:00.550 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>he's been on just tons of movies and just killed

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>on all of them. He still does stand-up pretty regularly,

0:03:06.340 --> 0:03:09.660
<v Speaker 2>as a matter of fact. Oh, yeah. Does Patton Oswalt still?

0:03:09.860 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:03:10.740 --> 0:03:13.100
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah. So these guys are still doing stand-up, which

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.750
<v Speaker 2>is Really, to their credit, because most of them, I mean,

0:03:16.790 --> 0:03:21.730
<v Speaker 2>Patton Oswalt was on what? Was it King of Queens?

0:03:23.050 --> 0:03:23.550
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:03:24.510 --> 0:03:26.870
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember either, but he had a huge role

0:03:26.910 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>in like a major network television show. Like, I just

0:03:31.900 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's amazing that they're still doing stand-up because as

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.980
<v Speaker 2>we've seen, people like Steve Martin and Robin Williams and

0:03:37.020 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>all that. It's like once they became huge, they left

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>stand-up behind. The early 90s alt comics did not. And

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.700
<v Speaker 2>they had some other there were some other characteristics besides

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.410
<v Speaker 2>just appearing in small like alternative clubs, too.

0:03:52.010 --> 0:03:55.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. You know, it was, I guess, sort

0:03:55.550 --> 0:03:56.810
<v Speaker 1>of an alternative point of view.

0:03:56.910 --> 0:03:58.610
<v Speaker 3>And this was in the 90s at a time where

0:03:58.670 --> 0:04:01.010
<v Speaker 3>alternative music that was just sort of the buzzword for

0:04:01.090 --> 0:04:04.690
<v Speaker 3>anything that kind of broke from the previous mainstreams of

0:04:04.750 --> 0:04:05.350
<v Speaker 3>the 80s.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:06.460
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.460
<v Speaker 3>So a little more like they were making like insider

0:04:09.500 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 3>references more. A little less like set up punchline and

0:04:14.460 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>more sort of observational, like wry humor about life and

0:04:18.220 --> 0:04:20.669
<v Speaker 3>telling stories about their lives and stuff like that.

0:04:22.070 --> 0:04:22.390
<v Speaker 1>What else?

0:04:23.850 --> 0:04:29.710
<v Speaker 2>They eschewed the racism, generally homophobia. Essentially, if you if

0:04:29.730 --> 0:04:33.430
<v Speaker 2>you're familiar with Don Rickles, imagine the antithesis of Don Rickles.

0:04:33.990 --> 0:04:34.150
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:35.950 --> 0:04:38.270
<v Speaker 2>One of the alt comics from this time, too, is

0:04:38.450 --> 0:04:40.739
<v Speaker 2>very sadly no longer with us because he was also

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.100
<v Speaker 2>one of the funniest people around. His mind was just

0:04:43.779 --> 0:04:48.340
<v Speaker 2>a national treasure, was Mitch Hedberg. Yeah. Were you into him?

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's the greatest. We've talked about him on the

0:04:50.820 --> 0:04:53.969
<v Speaker 3>show before. Mitch Hedberg is very, very sad that we

0:04:53.990 --> 0:04:56.490
<v Speaker 3>lost him because he was just kind of getting started,

0:04:56.510 --> 0:04:56.969
<v Speaker 3>I feel like.

0:04:57.930 --> 0:05:00.950
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he really was. I came across, I think, a

0:05:01.029 --> 0:05:07.860
<v Speaker 2>BuzzFeed list of 275 people. Of his jokes ranked from

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.940
<v Speaker 2>worst to best. And there really was no worst one

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>on there. They're all just wonderful.

0:05:13.940 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>God bless you, BuzzFeed.

0:05:16.380 --> 0:05:17.180
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to hear one?

0:05:17.700 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:05:19.740 --> 0:05:23.020
<v Speaker 2>Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only disease you

0:05:23.050 --> 0:05:24.429
<v Speaker 2>can get yelled at for having.

0:05:25.210 --> 0:05:26.450
<v Speaker 1>I think I remember that joke.

0:05:27.029 --> 0:05:31.790
<v Speaker 2>And his like delivery too was just... just amazing. Yeah.

0:05:31.850 --> 0:05:35.110
<v Speaker 2>His whole act was great. So, yeah, I'm sad he's

0:05:35.150 --> 0:05:35.529
<v Speaker 2>gone too.

0:05:37.050 --> 0:05:41.650
<v Speaker 3>There was a thing though with alt comedy where some

0:05:41.670 --> 0:05:45.469
<v Speaker 3>like club comics would sometimes sort of deride that scene.

0:05:45.550 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I know Bill Burr in 2012 called it that scene

0:05:49.540 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 3>like you were in a comedy womb.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:52.100 --> 0:05:54.339
<v Speaker 3>Like it was a real safe place to go and

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.060
<v Speaker 3>you weren't just going up in front of like a

0:05:56.540 --> 0:05:59.870
<v Speaker 3>potentially hostile. I think there's like This idea that you

0:05:59.910 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>earn your stripes by going in front of hostile crowds

0:06:02.250 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that might hate you and might heckle you.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And you got to earn your stripes that way in

0:06:06.420 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the comedy world.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.380
<v Speaker 3>And I think that all comedy scene, there were some

0:06:09.420 --> 0:06:12.460
<v Speaker 3>comics that thought that that was probably not going to

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:13.100
<v Speaker 3>happen there.

0:06:13.260 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So it was a little too easy.

0:06:14.740 --> 0:06:20.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he definitely thought that. And I think his point was,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.090
<v Speaker 2>if you took those comedians and put them in a

0:06:23.150 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 2>regular club, they would. not do very well because they

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.060
<v Speaker 2>hadn't gone through heckling or something like that. And I

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.780
<v Speaker 2>think more to the point, I read the transcript of this.

0:06:34.860 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 2>It was on some podcast, a comedy podcast. And he

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>was saying that one of the things that really rubbed

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.930
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong way was that if their jokes bombed

0:06:44.940 --> 0:06:47.450
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, they just told the audience that

0:06:47.470 --> 0:06:50.650
<v Speaker 2>the audience was too dumb to get what genius they were.

0:06:51.339 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, as I was reading that, I

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.500
<v Speaker 2>was like, totally. I could totally see most of these

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>alt comics that I've mentioned telling the audience they're not

0:07:00.860 --> 0:07:03.380
<v Speaker 2>getting it, that that's why they're not laughing, that it's them.

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And he called that out. And I was like, okay,

0:07:06.490 --> 0:07:07.950
<v Speaker 2>I kind of get that. It was a little more

0:07:08.010 --> 0:07:09.430
<v Speaker 2>nuanced than that. Yeah.

0:07:09.610 --> 0:07:10.170
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so.

0:07:10.590 --> 0:07:12.970
<v Speaker 2>And I never thought I'd be standing here defending Bill Burr,

0:07:12.990 --> 0:07:13.530
<v Speaker 2>but you know what I mean.

0:07:15.750 --> 0:07:18.250
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you know, with the rise of podcasting, you talked

0:07:18.290 --> 0:07:21.070
<v Speaker 3>earlier about, uh, comedy podcasts, and that's such a huge

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:22.810
<v Speaker 3>thing now. Like most of the shows I listened to

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.020
<v Speaker 3>are comedy shows. And, uh, Mark Maron's WTF, of course,

0:07:27.060 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>was an interview show. Uh, and the Joe Rogan experience,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.580
<v Speaker 3>you know, Joe Rogan started out.

0:07:31.540 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>As a standup. Um, both of those shows were created

0:07:35.500 --> 0:07:35.610
<v Speaker 1>in 2009.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:41.260
<v Speaker 3>And, um, You know, before Joe Rogan experience became like super,

0:07:41.300 --> 0:07:44.420
<v Speaker 3>super political, it was much more of a and I

0:07:44.460 --> 0:07:46.550
<v Speaker 3>think he still does some of that stuff now with

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.690
<v Speaker 3>this little comedy crew. But it was much more of

0:07:48.950 --> 0:07:51.530
<v Speaker 3>like a Marin, like let's just have comedians on kind

0:07:51.550 --> 0:07:51.770
<v Speaker 3>of thing.

0:07:52.350 --> 0:07:57.750
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he he very frequently referred to it as the craft.

0:07:58.030 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think I've ever seen a commenter online

0:08:01.940 --> 0:08:04.460
<v Speaker 2>talk about him saying the craft and not deriding.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.740
<v Speaker 1>It is a craft. I guess you just can't say

0:08:07.780 --> 0:08:08.420
<v Speaker 1>that out loud, huh?

0:08:08.970 --> 0:08:09.450
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:08:09.550 --> 0:08:10.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:10.830 --> 0:08:14.270
<v Speaker 2>There was a great takedown video of him by another

0:08:14.330 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>stand-up when he did that recent live stream comedy stand-up

0:08:19.660 --> 0:08:20.820
<v Speaker 2>show Joe Rogan did.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.020
<v Speaker 2>Apparently it didn't go all that well. All right. And

0:08:24.060 --> 0:08:28.020
<v Speaker 2>this stand-up basically just disassembled it and pointed out all

0:08:28.060 --> 0:08:31.580
<v Speaker 2>the reasons why, and it was very funny. But supposedly

0:08:31.770 --> 0:08:34.470
<v Speaker 2>Joe Rogan used his clout to get it taken down

0:08:34.550 --> 0:08:36.530
<v Speaker 2>at YouTube, which is not super cool.

0:08:36.870 --> 0:08:38.390
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Yeah, I didn't hear about that.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.420
<v Speaker 2>But no matter what you think of Joe Rogan, his politics,

0:08:42.460 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 2>the people he has on, his views, his opinions, it's

0:08:45.780 --> 0:08:51.230
<v Speaker 2>indisputable that he's had an enormous impact on comedy of

0:08:51.300 --> 0:08:55.370
<v Speaker 2>all kinds in the 21st century because of how huge

0:08:55.390 --> 0:08:59.790
<v Speaker 2>his podcast is and because of how often he'll use

0:08:59.830 --> 0:09:04.230
<v Speaker 2>his platform to bring on up-and-coming comedians. But because of

0:09:04.290 --> 0:09:11.099
<v Speaker 2>the politics, most of those comedians are like, at least center-right,

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:16.820
<v Speaker 2>if not full-on right-wing comedians. And it's a huge, yeah,

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>it's been a huge shift. I mean, you know, in

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 2>the United States, it's been an enormous shift. And Joe

0:09:22.700 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Rogan's a huge reason why that's happened.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:26.330
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that, actually.

0:09:27.210 --> 0:09:28.750
<v Speaker 3>I guess I don't keep up with the comedy scene

0:09:28.790 --> 0:09:30.050
<v Speaker 3>as much, so I didn't know that was sort of

0:09:30.090 --> 0:09:30.370
<v Speaker 3>a thing.

0:09:31.090 --> 0:09:36.270
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that. So, yes, those same alt-right

0:09:36.370 --> 0:09:40.950
<v Speaker 2>comedians are often criticized in the same way that the

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.330
<v Speaker 2>early 90s alt comedians were. That was like Bill Burr said,

0:09:44.350 --> 0:09:46.949
<v Speaker 2>it was a comedy womb that they weren't exposing themselves

0:09:47.150 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to what club comedians normally did. And the same thing

0:09:51.170 --> 0:09:55.100
<v Speaker 2>is with the alt-right comedians today because they start out

0:09:56.020 --> 0:10:00.300
<v Speaker 2>on podcasts usually. Right. Not even necessarily as stand-up. They're

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.699
<v Speaker 2>just funny guys on podcasts. And they go out and

0:10:03.820 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they get nothing but love on these podcasts. And then

0:10:06.140 --> 0:10:10.610
<v Speaker 2>they go out. They've generated enough followers on Instagram or

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.350
<v Speaker 2>whatever to automatically get booked in a club.

0:10:13.470 --> 0:10:13.650
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:14.530 --> 0:10:19.130
<v Speaker 2>Apparently, I read somewhere that 250,000 followers on Instagram is

0:10:19.170 --> 0:10:22.230
<v Speaker 2>like an automatic yes for a weekend at a club,

0:10:22.350 --> 0:10:27.030
<v Speaker 2>maybe even headlining there. But some of them have zero

0:10:27.100 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>experience doing stand-up. And so the criticism is like, that's

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.140
<v Speaker 2>not good for the person coming to see you because

0:10:35.179 --> 0:10:37.820
<v Speaker 2>they paid that money and they're expecting a good stand-up

0:10:37.860 --> 0:10:41.369
<v Speaker 2>performance when you're taking this funny guy on the podcast

0:10:41.710 --> 0:10:43.890
<v Speaker 2>out of the conversation and all that stuff. And it's

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 2>just that person on stage.

0:10:46.860 --> 0:10:47.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:47.140 --> 0:10:50.380
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't always go very well. They don't always necessarily

0:10:50.420 --> 0:10:53.820
<v Speaker 2>become a good standup because they're funny on a podcast.

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:55.860
<v Speaker 2>And just the same way we're like that, that funny

0:10:55.900 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 2>guy at work.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:57.100
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:10:57.500 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't necessarily do very well as a standup either because

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.420
<v Speaker 2>it's a totally different context.

0:11:02.660 --> 0:11:02.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:03.630 --> 0:11:04.290
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:11:04.309 --> 0:11:08.209
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you know, or they might like I always encourage

0:11:08.250 --> 0:11:11.450
<v Speaker 3>funny people to try it because you never know. And

0:11:11.670 --> 0:11:13.230
<v Speaker 3>we'll get to that at the end, like kind of

0:11:13.250 --> 0:11:15.910
<v Speaker 3>the best steps for dipping your toe in that pond.

0:11:16.830 --> 0:11:17.449
<v Speaker 1>But, yeah, you're right.

0:11:17.510 --> 0:11:21.109
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the gatekeeping is different these days, of course,

0:11:21.130 --> 0:11:24.250
<v Speaker 3>with social media and podcast. It's not like the old

0:11:24.270 --> 0:11:26.940
<v Speaker 3>days where you would, you know, get up at coffee

0:11:26.980 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>houses and open mic nights and then eventually maybe try

0:11:30.260 --> 0:11:33.309
<v Speaker 3>and crack in to doing five minutes on like a

0:11:33.350 --> 0:11:35.070
<v Speaker 3>local comedy night or something like that at.

0:11:35.050 --> 0:11:35.589
<v Speaker 1>A real club.

0:11:35.610 --> 0:11:36.750
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:36.929 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 3>If you have that social media following like you're talking about,

0:11:39.540 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>if you have your own podcast, like you can bypass

0:11:43.420 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of what used to be locked gates.

0:11:48.300 --> 0:11:49.020
<v Speaker 1>Mark Maron, shout out.

0:11:49.780 --> 0:11:55.370
<v Speaker 3>And it's just a different scene now. I don't know

0:11:55.390 --> 0:11:57.050
<v Speaker 3>if it's good or bad. I think a lot of

0:11:57.090 --> 0:12:00.069
<v Speaker 3>the old school comics probably complain about it. But I'm

0:12:00.170 --> 0:12:02.069
<v Speaker 3>not a stand-up, so I just sort of see it

0:12:02.110 --> 0:12:02.910
<v Speaker 3>for what it is, I think.

0:12:03.650 --> 0:12:05.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's tough at the end of the day

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to feel good about arguing about democratizing anything.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, true.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:16.579
<v Speaker 2>I think the point is that there's more non-funny stand-ups

0:12:16.940 --> 0:12:19.260
<v Speaker 2>potentially than there ever have been in the history of

0:12:19.300 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the world right now.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:21.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, agreed.

0:12:22.490 --> 0:12:24.670
<v Speaker 2>That's not to say that all people who get their

0:12:24.690 --> 0:12:28.370
<v Speaker 2>start on social media or podcasts aren't great at stand-up.

0:12:28.860 --> 0:12:31.940
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember the girl and her boyfriend who was

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>hanging out backstage with us in Toronto? I think you

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>met them briefly.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:38.220 --> 0:12:42.380
<v Speaker 2>That was Michelle Sui. And Yumi found her on Instagram.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.500
<v Speaker 2>And she is hilarious, not just like on Instagram, but

0:12:45.540 --> 0:12:49.090
<v Speaker 2>also in person. She's like a very, very early on

0:12:49.130 --> 0:12:54.050
<v Speaker 2>in her career stand up. But Party Hardiston, Patty, I

0:12:54.390 --> 0:12:58.860
<v Speaker 2>can't remember her last name. You know, Party Hardiston, she

0:12:58.900 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>appears on Tim Robinson's stuff sometimes.

0:13:02.020 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I know her as an actor, and she is totally

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:05.860
<v Speaker 1>weird and amazing.

0:13:06.300 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes. If you follow her on Instagram, she's just constantly

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>bringing the good stuff. So, yeah, it's not a total

0:13:12.940 --> 0:13:16.730
<v Speaker 2>critique of social media or podcasts in general. It definitely

0:13:16.750 --> 0:13:20.910
<v Speaker 2>has had a massive impact on stand-up comedy. Not all

0:13:20.929 --> 0:13:21.450
<v Speaker 2>of it good.

0:13:21.770 --> 0:13:24.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, agreed. Should we take a break?

0:13:25.850 --> 0:13:26.050
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:13:26.070 --> 0:13:28.350
<v Speaker 3>All right. We're going to take a break and talk

0:13:28.390 --> 0:13:31.130
<v Speaker 3>about the transition to the one-person show right after this.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:44.420
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:14:05.570 --> 0:14:05.910
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:14:05.990 --> 0:14:08.770
<v Speaker 3>I promised talk of the one person show. And that

0:14:09.070 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 3>is it's sort of a thing where it's stand up,

0:14:13.020 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>but it's skinned a little bit differently. And they're often

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.340
<v Speaker 3>it's usually billed as like a one person show or

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>like an evening with or something like that.

0:14:22.660 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's definitely comedy.

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.710
<v Speaker 3>But there can be very deep, sad moments of pathos

0:14:27.780 --> 0:14:32.619
<v Speaker 3>and just sadness. There's usually a very well-crafted. kind of

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:37.420
<v Speaker 3>arc to the show, like it feels much more sort

0:14:37.460 --> 0:14:41.580
<v Speaker 3>of plotted out. Mike Birbiglia, of course, is one of

0:14:41.660 --> 0:14:46.860
<v Speaker 3>the masters of this craft. Alex Edelman and his great

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>show Just for Us that ran on Broadway. Gary Gullman,

0:14:51.100 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 3>one of my favorite comedians of all time, he has

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.020
<v Speaker 3>kind of made that transition in the last few years

0:14:57.100 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 3>to a little bit more of a one person show.

0:14:59.510 --> 0:14:59.830
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:15:00.050 --> 0:15:01.540
<v Speaker 1>Rather than straight up joke telling.

0:15:02.940 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>And our buddy, John Hodgman, you know, John always calls

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>his stand up imitation stand up like he won't say

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.620
<v Speaker 3>he does stand up. And it's definitely sort of a

0:15:11.700 --> 0:15:13.970
<v Speaker 3>one person show. But it's all of this stuff is

0:15:14.090 --> 0:15:17.729
<v Speaker 3>always very, very funny. It's just sort of slightly different

0:15:17.750 --> 0:15:19.730
<v Speaker 3>than like a standard stand up set.

0:15:20.490 --> 0:15:22.990
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And those are all great examples, too, not just

0:15:23.290 --> 0:15:28.650
<v Speaker 2>of great like one person shows, but also great examples

0:15:28.690 --> 0:15:30.690
<v Speaker 2>of why a lot of people are like, that's not

0:15:30.750 --> 0:15:35.670
<v Speaker 2>stand-up comedy. That's different. That just seems to be like

0:15:35.710 --> 0:15:39.070
<v Speaker 2>an unnecessary controversy. I don't think it really matters. But

0:15:39.590 --> 0:15:42.490
<v Speaker 2>there are definitely purists out there, if it hasn't become

0:15:42.630 --> 0:15:46.220
<v Speaker 2>clear yet, who are like, this is stand-up comedy. Everything

0:15:46.250 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>else ain't. And that's one of the things that they

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.700
<v Speaker 2>point to frequently is like, that's not stand-up comedy. One

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:58.990
<v Speaker 2>huge target was Nanette. From Australian comedian Hannah Gadsby that

0:15:59.030 --> 0:16:02.190
<v Speaker 2>came out in 2017 and was a massive like cultural

0:16:02.410 --> 0:16:05.670
<v Speaker 2>tidal wave here in the United States for sure. And

0:16:05.770 --> 0:16:09.150
<v Speaker 2>I think in a bunch of other countries too. And

0:16:10.390 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>like there, it was mostly like gut punches with some

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.859
<v Speaker 2>funny stuff carrying it between, but it was, And it

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.980
<v Speaker 2>was not funny. And in fact, she almost kind of uses,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.420
<v Speaker 2>if not directly, I haven't seen it, but I had

0:16:26.460 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to read a bunch about it. It seems like she

0:16:29.780 --> 0:16:33.970
<v Speaker 2>uses or she points out that comedy can be harmful

0:16:34.390 --> 0:16:38.170
<v Speaker 2>because it can take, you know, stuff that really needs

0:16:38.210 --> 0:16:40.790
<v Speaker 2>to get out and just kind of keep it simmered.

0:16:40.830 --> 0:16:43.010
<v Speaker 2>Like it doesn't let it out all the way. And

0:16:43.030 --> 0:16:45.290
<v Speaker 2>so a lot of people are like, that's not, don't

0:16:45.350 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>call that comedy. And it gets called comedy because Hannah

0:16:48.140 --> 0:16:49.740
<v Speaker 2>Gadsby started out as a standup.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.940
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Seth Meyers coined a term called claptor

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.900
<v Speaker 3>comedy rather than laughter comedy. And this it's like a

0:16:57.940 --> 0:17:01.950
<v Speaker 3>show where like the audience will give applause in agreement

0:17:02.010 --> 0:17:04.450
<v Speaker 3>with the person on stage and the points that they're

0:17:04.470 --> 0:17:07.950
<v Speaker 3>making rather than like having people rolling in the aisles laughing.

0:17:08.790 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And in the case of Nanette. It's like they're

0:17:12.340 --> 0:17:14.939
<v Speaker 2>clapping like you're so brave for doing this. And she

0:17:15.020 --> 0:17:19.340
<v Speaker 2>is indisputably brave for having done that show. But but yes,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.939
<v Speaker 2>she's not really making people laugh or she's making people laugh.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.750
<v Speaker 2>They're laughing out of relief because it's carrying them out

0:17:25.790 --> 0:17:28.510
<v Speaker 2>of this horrific story that she's just finished, you know?

0:17:28.930 --> 0:17:29.650
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:17:30.830 --> 0:17:34.410
<v Speaker 3>You know, Tig Notaro is a very, very funny comedian.

0:17:34.450 --> 0:17:37.470
<v Speaker 3>And she actually had us perform live at her comedy

0:17:37.490 --> 0:17:40.220
<v Speaker 3>festival yesterday. And is a wonderful human being as well.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:46.250
<v Speaker 3>But she– Tig is probably one of the biggest risk

0:17:46.410 --> 0:17:51.450
<v Speaker 3>takers in comedy, I think. And also just from hearing

0:17:51.490 --> 0:17:56.250
<v Speaker 3>interviews with her and seeing her work, like, seems to

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 3>care as little as any comedian I've ever seen as

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>to what people think about her and her stand-up. That's–

0:18:06.100 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Like just totally comfortable in her own skin, does what

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:15.100
<v Speaker 3>she does. She very famously performed topless after her mastectomy

0:18:16.100 --> 0:18:17.820
<v Speaker 3>and her breast cancer.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.580
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, that's what Tig would do.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 3>Or when she went, I don't know if you ever

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 3>saw when she went on Conan and moved the chair

0:18:25.260 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>around for her whole act.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.220
<v Speaker 3>She went on stage and instead of doing comedy, she,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.090
<v Speaker 3>I guess in rehearsals, I think as the story goes,

0:18:36.130 --> 0:18:39.690
<v Speaker 3>she had a routine, but realized that this chair made

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 3>an awful, like, squeaky sound when it moved across the stage.

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.340
<v Speaker 3>And so she got up there and she moved this

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.060
<v Speaker 3>chair around for five minutes.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:51.540
<v Speaker 1>That was it.

0:18:52.940 --> 0:18:55.540
<v Speaker 2>Like, was she talking while she was doing it? No.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So she just wasn't talking. She was just moving the chair.

0:18:58.859 --> 0:19:00.060
<v Speaker 1>Moving the chair. It stopped.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>That's funny.

0:19:00.710 --> 0:19:02.050
<v Speaker 1>Get a reaction. Move the chair.

0:19:02.130 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Conan is doubled over laughing like on the side about

0:19:05.700 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 3>just the, you know, the chutzpah of taking the charge,

0:19:08.420 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>doing something like that.

0:19:09.540 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. One more thing on Claptor. It doesn't

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>have to just be like brave or you're a risk

0:19:15.020 --> 0:19:16.870
<v Speaker 2>taker or something like that. It can it can just

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.530
<v Speaker 2>be as simple as like preaching to the choir. So telling,

0:19:20.030 --> 0:19:25.410
<v Speaker 2>you know, Democrat jokes or Republican jokes to an audience

0:19:25.430 --> 0:19:28.270
<v Speaker 2>full of liberals. That's Claptor, you know.

0:19:28.910 --> 0:19:31.659
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure. Or like us on stage.

0:19:32.980 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, for sure. That's why I'm saying I don't think

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I would translate to a good standup because like talk

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.389
<v Speaker 2>about a womb, like everyone who's there knows who we are.

0:19:43.450 --> 0:19:45.810
<v Speaker 2>They listen to us. They came to see us expecting

0:19:45.890 --> 0:19:49.909
<v Speaker 2>exactly what we're doing. Remember that group of women at

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.180
<v Speaker 2>the casino in Ottawa? Yeah.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:56.900
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea if they thought we were funny

0:19:56.940 --> 0:19:58.940
<v Speaker 2>at all. They had no idea who we were. They

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>just came because they got comp tickets by the casino.

0:20:02.100 --> 0:20:04.540
<v Speaker 2>And it's still not clear to me whether they thought

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 2>we were funny or if they sat there because we

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>called them out at the very beginning of the show

0:20:08.460 --> 0:20:10.340
<v Speaker 2>and they felt obligated to sit there now.

0:20:10.980 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I bet they had a good time.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I don't know if they thought we were like

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.050
<v Speaker 3>the funniest comedians they'd ever seen, but they stayed.

0:20:18.030 --> 0:20:20.210
<v Speaker 2>They did stay. You can't argue with that.

0:20:21.050 --> 0:20:21.250
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:21.890 --> 0:20:22.610
<v Speaker 2>Uh, What else?

0:20:22.630 --> 0:20:26.210
<v Speaker 3>Cell phones is a big deal these days because, you know,

0:20:27.070 --> 0:20:30.710
<v Speaker 3>you can get famous and go viral for taking down

0:20:30.750 --> 0:20:34.790
<v Speaker 3>a heckler on stage, which has nothing to do with

0:20:34.830 --> 0:20:38.540
<v Speaker 3>your actual stand up set. It's always fun seeing a

0:20:38.580 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>comedian take down a heckler. But in the days of

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.340
<v Speaker 3>social media and people with their phones in the audience.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.050
<v Speaker 3>You might become like super, super famous as a stand

0:20:49.090 --> 0:20:52.649
<v Speaker 3>up for like somebody that like jumps up on stage

0:20:52.710 --> 0:20:55.409
<v Speaker 3>and physically attacks you or something. It's an interesting time.

0:20:56.810 --> 0:21:00.350
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Or the crowd work is all it's not even

0:21:01.510 --> 0:21:04.690
<v Speaker 2>putting a heckler down like it's with a lot of

0:21:05.109 --> 0:21:09.710
<v Speaker 2>younger stand up comedians today. It's like prompted like, hey,

0:21:09.770 --> 0:21:11.590
<v Speaker 2>how are you doing? Are you here tonight? And then.

0:21:12.100 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 2>instead of making a joke and moving on, that's like

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.220
<v Speaker 2>five minutes of material.

0:21:16.619 --> 0:21:18.460
<v Speaker 1>Like talking to the person on the front row.

0:21:18.830 --> 0:21:21.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then moving on to somebody else. And it's

0:21:21.369 --> 0:21:24.130
<v Speaker 2>not even necessarily funny. It might be funny throughout, but

0:21:24.310 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 2>not all of them are really particularly funny. And like

0:21:27.490 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 2>crowd work is the bulk of that, that, that act.

0:21:33.190 --> 0:21:36.390
<v Speaker 2>And again, the club comedians, the purists are like, what

0:21:36.430 --> 0:21:38.950
<v Speaker 2>are you doing? That's not stand-up comedy. You're not even

0:21:39.230 --> 0:21:42.109
<v Speaker 2>writing anything. You're just sitting there riffing with people in

0:21:42.130 --> 0:21:43.170
<v Speaker 2>the audience, you know?

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a sucker for crowd work.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay. Well, then you would like this guy. I

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>discovered him from researching. His name's Big Jay Oakerson. I'm

0:21:50.940 --> 0:21:55.139
<v Speaker 2>not sure his sense of humor is exactly dovetailing with yours,

0:21:55.220 --> 0:21:58.070
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's enough that you would find him funny.

0:21:58.930 --> 0:22:02.630
<v Speaker 2>But he interacts with the crowd by basically... It's almost

0:22:02.670 --> 0:22:05.510
<v Speaker 2>like improv where he's like, what kind of joke do

0:22:05.530 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 2>you guys want to hear? And somebody will say something

0:22:08.150 --> 0:22:10.899
<v Speaker 2>and he just makes up a joke on the spot.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's not like a one liner necessarily.

0:22:12.900 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Might even be like a little plot to it or something.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 2>But it's pretty impressive what he's doing off of the cuff.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, Rory Scoville does that. He's probably my

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:23.260
<v Speaker 3>favorite stand up right now.

0:22:23.460 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Great.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 3>He and Gary Goldman. But Rory, I mean, he has

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>shows where he writes a set and does that.

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.930
<v Speaker 1>And that's great. But he will also do these a

0:22:30.970 --> 0:22:31.350
<v Speaker 1>lot of times.

0:22:31.430 --> 0:22:32.990
<v Speaker 3>It's like five nights in a row in a city

0:22:33.550 --> 0:22:35.390
<v Speaker 3>where he will tell everyone ahead of time, like these

0:22:35.450 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>are improv stand up shows. And man, you talk about

0:22:38.859 --> 0:22:41.740
<v Speaker 3>the guts to stand up on stage with no material.

0:22:42.100 --> 0:22:42.379
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.780
<v Speaker 3>And just start making stuff up. And it's not a

0:22:44.780 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 3>10 minute set or whatever. Like he's up there for

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.770
<v Speaker 3>an hour just making stuff up. And it's so, so funny.

0:22:51.250 --> 0:22:51.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:22:51.530 --> 0:22:55.730
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the thing. He's funny. His mind is capable

0:22:55.770 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of doing that, you know? Yeah. So you mentioned Rory

0:23:01.180 --> 0:23:04.260
<v Speaker 2>Scoville working today. There's a bunch of other people working

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 2>today that are great in addition to him. Kyle Kinane

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>is another good one.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Love Kyle.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.420
<v Speaker 2>My favorite, though, can I just go ahead and say

0:23:12.460 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>who my favorite comedian of all time is, though? I

0:23:14.780 --> 0:23:15.500
<v Speaker 2>think you might know.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:16.660
<v Speaker 1>I think I know, but go ahead.

0:23:17.580 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Jezelnik, is that who you're going to say?

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:20.139
<v Speaker 1>That's who I was going to say.

0:23:20.660 --> 0:23:22.870
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that there's ever been a funnier person

0:23:23.070 --> 0:23:25.010
<v Speaker 2>on the planet than Anthony Jezelnik.

0:23:25.500 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He's great.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.420
<v Speaker 3>And we know some people who know him and he's

0:23:29.580 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 3>he's he's a really good guy, too. Right.

0:23:31.660 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.699
<v Speaker 3>And he right now, I don't know if you know this,

0:23:34.740 --> 0:23:36.459
<v Speaker 3>you probably do, but he's got a book club now

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.340
<v Speaker 3>that he started. No. And like promoting literacy is one

0:23:39.380 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>of his big jams now. And I guess sort of

0:23:43.140 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>a joke around that was he was when he's promoting

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.980
<v Speaker 3>this stuff and, you know, he has that delivery. And

0:23:50.020 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 3>he said that, you know, people tell me they don't

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.330
<v Speaker 3>like to read. And I always tell them, you're you're

0:23:54.350 --> 0:23:58.350
<v Speaker 3>just reading books. books that are too long. So all

0:23:58.369 --> 0:24:01.510
<v Speaker 3>of his books and his book clubs are like really short. Uh,

0:24:01.609 --> 0:24:05.310
<v Speaker 3>and that's his, his argument is that like, uh, people

0:24:05.369 --> 0:24:07.590
<v Speaker 3>think they don't like to read because they're, they're trying

0:24:07.630 --> 0:24:10.030
<v Speaker 3>to read stuff that's too long. And so he's, he's

0:24:10.290 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>genuinely promoting like reading, uh, literacy and stuff.

0:24:13.260 --> 0:24:14.100
<v Speaker 1>It's, it's pretty awesome.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:24:15.380 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 2>That is the, that is the opposite of what his

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.479
<v Speaker 2>persona is. Like his persona is, is insult comic, but

0:24:21.500 --> 0:24:22.540
<v Speaker 2>also really dark.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:28.270
<v Speaker 2>And really, um, Really egotistical and arrogant and yes, he's

0:24:28.310 --> 0:24:31.510
<v Speaker 2>not really like that in real life But he's managed

0:24:31.530 --> 0:24:33.890
<v Speaker 2>to keep that going that persona going for like 20

0:24:33.890 --> 0:24:37.310
<v Speaker 2>years Yeah, he has I think three Netflix specials all

0:24:37.350 --> 0:24:40.710
<v Speaker 2>three of them kill every time we've ever seen him

0:24:40.950 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>in person It's just like you just like you said

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>we were like Conan like doubled over laughing like yeah

0:24:46.900 --> 0:24:49.540
<v Speaker 2>laughing as hard as you ever have out loud the

0:24:49.580 --> 0:24:51.870
<v Speaker 2>bunch of other people laughing and A bunch of other

0:24:51.910 --> 0:24:54.350
<v Speaker 2>people who aren't laughing because they had no idea what

0:24:54.390 --> 0:24:57.270
<v Speaker 2>they were going to see. And if you're not prepared

0:24:57.290 --> 0:25:00.590
<v Speaker 2>to go see him, especially if you're sensitive at all

0:25:00.630 --> 0:25:03.110
<v Speaker 2>to some types of humor, you're not going to have

0:25:03.150 --> 0:25:08.100
<v Speaker 2>a good time. But I would suggest everybody go look

0:25:08.180 --> 0:25:09.340
<v Speaker 2>up Anthony Jezelnik.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:10.460
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's great.

0:25:11.180 --> 0:25:14.220
<v Speaker 3>And you can't do much better these days than Mulaney still.

0:25:14.260 --> 0:25:16.500
<v Speaker 3>He's one of those that I think has sort of

0:25:16.540 --> 0:25:20.740
<v Speaker 3>mastered the craft. such that he just can do no wrong.

0:25:21.900 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>And he, next year, I tried to get tickets to

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 3>some of these, but have you heard about his Mulaney

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.939
<v Speaker 3>takes Manhattan run that he's doing? He's doing seven nights

0:25:29.060 --> 0:25:31.660
<v Speaker 3>in New York in a row. And he's starting out

0:25:31.820 --> 0:25:36.250
<v Speaker 3>at like the comedy cellar. And then it's like comedy cellar,

0:25:36.430 --> 0:25:38.730
<v Speaker 3>then Bowery ballroom. And then he goes up and up

0:25:38.790 --> 0:25:40.290
<v Speaker 3>and up through Carnegie.

0:25:39.930 --> 0:25:42.590
<v Speaker 1>Hall radio city. And then eventually Madison square garden.

0:25:43.530 --> 0:25:45.500
<v Speaker 3>And all of those, you know, I signed up for the,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.260
<v Speaker 3>list to try and get into any of those shows

0:25:48.340 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 3>and could not get into any of them.

0:25:51.300 --> 0:25:54.510
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I believe that, though, except for Madison Square Garden. Man,

0:25:54.530 --> 0:25:56.810
<v Speaker 2>that's big time, dude, to sell out Madison Square Garden.

0:25:57.090 --> 0:25:59.489
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, dude, I think he last year went

0:25:59.530 --> 0:26:01.850
<v Speaker 3>on a run where he sold out like multiple nights

0:26:01.910 --> 0:26:03.230
<v Speaker 3>in a row at Madison Square Garden.

0:26:03.270 --> 0:26:05.850
<v Speaker 1>He's just crushing it. Yeah.

0:26:06.010 --> 0:26:08.430
<v Speaker 2>I have one more anecdote about Anthony Jezelnik.

0:26:09.190 --> 0:26:09.889
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's hear it.

0:26:10.270 --> 0:26:14.710
<v Speaker 2>We went and saw him at Funny Bone. Which was

0:26:14.770 --> 0:26:16.889
<v Speaker 2>the one that was on Roswell Road? I don't think

0:26:16.950 --> 0:26:17.530
<v Speaker 2>it's there anymore.

0:26:17.810 --> 0:26:18.470
<v Speaker 1>I think Funny Bone.

0:26:19.510 --> 0:26:21.690
<v Speaker 2>Funny Bone? No, that was out in Roswell. This was

0:26:21.750 --> 0:26:22.390
<v Speaker 2>the Punchline.

0:26:22.750 --> 0:26:23.070
<v Speaker 1>Punchline.

0:26:23.150 --> 0:26:23.330
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:26:23.970 --> 0:26:25.470
<v Speaker 2>So we saw him at the Punchline, which is a

0:26:25.510 --> 0:26:27.670
<v Speaker 2>really tiny club for any of you who've never been

0:26:27.690 --> 0:26:30.740
<v Speaker 2>to the Punchline in Atlanta. I mean, like maybe a 75,

0:26:30.740 --> 0:26:35.540
<v Speaker 2>maybe a hundred person seat club. So it was really small.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And this was the first time we saw him and

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.660
<v Speaker 2>we were just laughing. But Yumi was like really, really laughing.

0:26:42.700 --> 0:26:42.940
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.060
<v Speaker 2>I think the joke that got her, he was saying

0:26:45.100 --> 0:26:50.010
<v Speaker 2>that his family scattered his grandma's ashes outside of the

0:26:50.130 --> 0:26:53.430
<v Speaker 2>funeral home because that's where his arms got tired from

0:26:53.650 --> 0:26:58.130
<v Speaker 2>carrying the urn. And just, it just got Yumi. So

0:26:58.190 --> 0:26:59.370
<v Speaker 2>she's laughing, crying.

0:26:59.390 --> 0:26:59.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:00.170 --> 0:27:03.050
<v Speaker 2>So much so that he stopped the show and asked her,

0:27:03.109 --> 0:27:05.770
<v Speaker 2>he was like, what's your name? And she said, Yumi.

0:27:06.330 --> 0:27:08.950
<v Speaker 2>And he goes, I want all of you laughing like Yumi.

0:27:08.990 --> 0:27:11.369
<v Speaker 2>I want Yumi, Yumi, Yumi.

0:27:11.830 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's great.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:12.990
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:13.340 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So that's how hard we laugh at Anthony Jeselnik. And

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>if you go check out Anthony Jeselnik and you're like,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:20.780
<v Speaker 2>this is wrong, don't judge us.

0:27:21.140 --> 0:27:21.380
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:27:22.100 --> 0:27:22.780
<v Speaker 1>No, he's great.

0:27:24.220 --> 0:27:24.619
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:27:24.700 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could have seen that.

0:27:26.380 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was great.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:28.820
<v Speaker 1>Should we take a break?

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we should. Is this our first or second?

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's our second break.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Well, we'll find out in the edit.

0:27:36.820 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We'll come back and talk about some less fun

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:56.250
<v Speaker 3>stuff like the psychology of stand-up right after this. Thank you.

0:28:16.020 --> 0:28:18.180
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're back, Chuck. And as you promised, we're going

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.939
<v Speaker 2>to stop talking about funny stuff. We're going to talk

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.260
<v Speaker 2>about the psychology of being a stand-up because there, as

0:28:25.030 --> 0:28:29.070
<v Speaker 2>you can probably guess, there's a specific type of person

0:28:29.130 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>who makes a Good stand up. And it's actually been

0:28:31.780 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 2>studied a little bit here or there.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:35.060 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't think it's any secret that most

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 3>stand ups will say that like their comedy oftentimes comes

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:45.290
<v Speaker 3>from pain. If you polled 100 stand ups, you'd probably

0:28:45.330 --> 0:28:49.030
<v Speaker 3>be in like the 80 something percentile of people that

0:28:49.450 --> 0:28:51.450
<v Speaker 3>weren't like, yeah, I had a great childhood. I grew

0:28:51.530 --> 0:28:53.010
<v Speaker 3>up and I was just happy all the time and

0:28:53.030 --> 0:28:54.330
<v Speaker 3>everything was awesome in my life.

0:28:55.450 --> 0:28:56.310
<v Speaker 1>But they have studied it.

0:28:56.310 --> 0:28:58.330
<v Speaker 3>There's a guy named David Webb on the all about

0:28:58.410 --> 0:29:02.610
<v Speaker 3>psychology sub stack. who found some studies and found that,

0:29:03.410 --> 0:29:06.130
<v Speaker 3>you know, as it bears out compared to population averages,

0:29:06.910 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 3>stand-ups have higher rates of depression, anxiety, and emotional distress,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.820
<v Speaker 3>which is not surprising.

0:29:13.740 --> 0:29:16.260
<v Speaker 2>No. And actually, to kind of dig in a little further,

0:29:16.300 --> 0:29:20.980
<v Speaker 2>there's something called the Oxford Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences,

0:29:21.220 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>or OLIFE. And there are some dimensions that pop up

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.490
<v Speaker 2>that comedians score higher on that. If you put the

0:29:29.510 --> 0:29:31.910
<v Speaker 2>whole thing together, you're like, yeah, I can kind of

0:29:31.950 --> 0:29:34.810
<v Speaker 2>see that's a stand up comedian. They score high on

0:29:34.990 --> 0:29:39.870
<v Speaker 2>unusual experiences. So they perceive things differently, use magical style thinking.

0:29:40.900 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>They make unexpected connections that other people might not make.

0:29:45.180 --> 0:29:45.380
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>There's your jokes right there.

0:29:47.140 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.980
<v Speaker 3>One of the other ones is cognitive disorganization. So a

0:29:54.020 --> 0:29:56.310
<v Speaker 3>thought style that may be a little more scattered or

0:29:56.620 --> 0:30:00.020
<v Speaker 3>shifting kind of quickly between things. A lot of times

0:30:00.060 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>that can really be gasoline for getting great ideas, even

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 3>though it may not be the easiest thing like in life.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:14.590
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, living with a disorganized mind is very difficult. Also,

0:30:14.830 --> 0:30:21.070
<v Speaker 2>so can introvert of anhedonia be difficult because you might

0:30:21.110 --> 0:30:23.750
<v Speaker 2>have trouble making social connections. And yet at the same time,

0:30:23.770 --> 0:30:28.710
<v Speaker 2>you want to. validation from people. So you go get

0:30:28.750 --> 0:30:30.540
<v Speaker 2>it from strangers on stage.

0:30:30.650 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's kind of lonely and you don't enjoy

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>being around people. And that's a stand up comic if

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:39.660
<v Speaker 2>I've ever met one.

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. And then the last one was impulsive nonconformity.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, someone who will break a rule, push

0:30:47.460 --> 0:30:50.650
<v Speaker 3>a boundary, obviously someone who will say something that no

0:30:50.690 --> 0:30:52.190
<v Speaker 3>one else would say, like in public, they would say

0:30:52.210 --> 0:30:56.450
<v Speaker 3>it on stage. And it's not, you know, You know,

0:30:56.470 --> 0:30:58.250
<v Speaker 3>this is like a Venn diagram when it comes to

0:30:58.290 --> 0:31:00.969
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. It's like a combination of different things out

0:31:00.990 --> 0:31:04.570
<v Speaker 3>of these lists will maybe make someone a little more

0:31:04.610 --> 0:31:06.500
<v Speaker 3>inclined to do stand up or maybe be good at

0:31:06.540 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>stand up. Yeah. But, you know, you have to be

0:31:09.660 --> 0:31:13.180
<v Speaker 3>someone who's quick witted and make quick associations between things

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:18.310
<v Speaker 3>and be comfortable not, you know, necessarily being a part

0:31:18.350 --> 0:31:20.850
<v Speaker 3>of the middle of the road of life, you know.

0:31:21.530 --> 0:31:21.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:21.850 --> 0:31:24.010
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I read this and think about it,

0:31:24.710 --> 0:31:27.410
<v Speaker 2>when I see all those components broken out, I see

0:31:27.490 --> 0:31:31.310
<v Speaker 2>Dave Vettel standing there as like the example, the illustrated

0:31:31.390 --> 0:31:33.210
<v Speaker 2>example of the standup comedian.

0:31:33.450 --> 0:31:34.410
<v Speaker 1>One of the all-time greats.

0:31:34.910 --> 0:31:37.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And he's like, he's like Norm Macdonald in the

0:31:37.490 --> 0:31:41.070
<v Speaker 2>sense that he's like a comedian's comedian. Like a lot

0:31:41.130 --> 0:31:43.990
<v Speaker 2>of people might not find them that funny. Sorry, Dave.

0:31:45.100 --> 0:31:49.260
<v Speaker 2>But Pretty much every stand-up comedian, especially the club comics,

0:31:49.420 --> 0:31:52.460
<v Speaker 2>are going to just say, like, that guy's a legend. Oh, yeah.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.340
<v Speaker 3>And you can still, I mean, you can go see

0:31:54.380 --> 0:31:56.940
<v Speaker 3>Dave up in the Comedy Cellar in New York on

0:31:57.020 --> 0:32:00.260
<v Speaker 3>any given, like, random Tuesday. You know, he's still just like,

0:32:01.340 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like guys like that and performers like that

0:32:04.180 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 3>just love being on stage and doing it. And, like,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not about, like, you know, Patton Oswalt's still doing stand-up.

0:32:09.700 --> 0:32:11.140
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't need to do that kind of thing. He's

0:32:11.740 --> 0:32:14.530
<v Speaker 3>made a great living as an actor. But they just

0:32:14.630 --> 0:32:17.190
<v Speaker 3>love getting up there and telling jokes and making people laugh,

0:32:17.230 --> 0:32:18.740
<v Speaker 3>like in being in a room with that energy.

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.740
<v Speaker 2>Who doesn't? Seriously, I mean, I think anybody would love

0:32:23.780 --> 0:32:26.020
<v Speaker 2>to have all their jokes laughed at. But yeah, it's

0:32:26.060 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 2>just whether your jokes are actually funny or not is

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:28.700
<v Speaker 2>the key.

0:32:29.100 --> 0:32:29.540
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:32:30.340 --> 0:32:32.300
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're a stand up, like I mentioned,

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.330
<v Speaker 3>you might have had like a rough go as a kid.

0:32:35.330 --> 0:32:38.390
<v Speaker 3>You probably had to not like found humor as a

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.340
<v Speaker 3>Maybe as a defense in life, like maybe you were

0:32:42.420 --> 0:32:44.660
<v Speaker 3>bullied or maybe it was a bit of survival skill

0:32:45.140 --> 0:32:49.340
<v Speaker 3>in your own family. Obviously, the worst situations if there's

0:32:49.380 --> 0:32:52.220
<v Speaker 3>real abuse, but at the very least, just like maybe

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.670
<v Speaker 3>a happy, not so happy family with family tension.

0:32:54.730 --> 0:32:56.370
<v Speaker 1>And it was a survival skill for you.

0:32:57.810 --> 0:33:00.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. When you're being threatened to be beaten up by

0:33:00.810 --> 0:33:03.770
<v Speaker 2>a bully, you'd say something like, take my lunch, please.

0:33:03.790 --> 0:33:06.270
<v Speaker 2>And then the bully would just crack up and let

0:33:06.310 --> 0:33:06.770
<v Speaker 2>you go.

0:33:07.130 --> 0:33:07.710
<v Speaker 1>Classic move.

0:33:08.770 --> 0:33:10.530
<v Speaker 2>There's some other things that don't fare well for being

0:33:10.570 --> 0:33:15.650
<v Speaker 2>a stand-up, too. According to a 2016 study done by

0:33:15.790 --> 0:33:22.310
<v Speaker 2>Australian researchers, the average stand-up comedian dies 10 years earlier

0:33:22.390 --> 0:33:27.190
<v Speaker 2>than people in the general population. Yeah. That's a significant

0:33:27.590 --> 0:33:29.550
<v Speaker 2>amount of time. Yeah.

0:33:30.150 --> 0:33:30.930
<v Speaker 1>How do they explain that?

0:33:31.210 --> 0:33:33.650
<v Speaker 2>Think about how much life you could pack into 10 years, Chuck.

0:33:34.150 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. I'm thinking about my first 10 years. I

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:37.340
<v Speaker 1>accomplished a lot.

0:33:38.950 --> 0:33:42.890
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. But they looked at 200 stand-up comedians and they

0:33:42.930 --> 0:33:47.230
<v Speaker 2>compared them to comic actors and dramatic actors. And stand-ups

0:33:47.290 --> 0:33:50.450
<v Speaker 2>died younger than both, although not as much as compared

0:33:50.470 --> 0:33:51.730
<v Speaker 2>to the general population.

0:33:52.130 --> 0:33:52.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.700
<v Speaker 3>I think 80 percent of those stand-ups still died of

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.060
<v Speaker 3>natural causes, but they were likelier to die from non-natural

0:34:01.100 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 3>causes like accidents or obviously overdoses is included in that

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.020
<v Speaker 3>or by suicide.

0:34:09.590 --> 0:34:12.190
<v Speaker 2>On a banana peel, which is the classic way for

0:34:12.210 --> 0:34:13.950
<v Speaker 2>a stand-up comedian to die young.

0:34:14.780 --> 0:34:16.140
<v Speaker 1>So what if you want to be a stand-up? What

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.580
<v Speaker 1>should you do? What are the steps you should take?

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there's a lot of stuff you can do. It

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.460
<v Speaker 2>turns out there's a lot of people on the internet

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>who like to write blog posts about that. And we

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.580
<v Speaker 2>looked through a bunch of them and found that they

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 2>all kind of generally fall into the same handful of categories.

0:34:31.940 --> 0:34:34.509
<v Speaker 2>One of the basic ones, obviously, is come up with material.

0:34:34.610 --> 0:34:37.110
<v Speaker 2>You say, duh. But there's some things you have to

0:34:37.150 --> 0:34:40.070
<v Speaker 2>do to come up with material. I think most comedians

0:34:40.110 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>suggest you start with a solid five minutes of material.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Most of the reason why is because wherever you get

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.540
<v Speaker 2>like your shot at getting up on stage, especially as

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody brand new, you're probably going to get five minutes.

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 2>So you just want to have that prepared and you

0:34:55.340 --> 0:34:58.300
<v Speaker 2>want to prepare way more than five minutes of jokes

0:34:58.440 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>just to start. Right.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:00.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:35:01.180 --> 0:35:03.980
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen the latest Bradley Cooper movie that he

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 3>directed with Will Arnett?

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this thing on?

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:35:09.230 --> 0:35:10.469
<v Speaker 1>It was actually pretty good.

0:35:11.030 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 2>You're the only person I've met who said that.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.300
<v Speaker 1>That said it was pretty good. Oh, I liked it

0:35:16.340 --> 0:35:16.739
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.940
<v Speaker 3>It's about this guy who accidentally stumbles on stage for

0:35:21.980 --> 0:35:24.910
<v Speaker 3>an open mic night. Just this, you know, dad and

0:35:24.950 --> 0:35:27.790
<v Speaker 3>a family going through a divorce and it stand up

0:35:27.850 --> 0:35:30.090
<v Speaker 3>ends up being kind of the thing that he loves doing.

0:35:31.190 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I liked it.

0:35:32.650 --> 0:35:32.830
<v Speaker 3>Cool.

0:35:33.410 --> 0:35:33.830
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome.

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Who said they didn't like it? Everyone else that you

0:35:38.020 --> 0:35:38.670
<v Speaker 1>spoke to about it?

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:43.140
<v Speaker 2>Well, people online, typically. I didn't see that it was

0:35:43.340 --> 0:35:47.219
<v Speaker 2>very well. You're the only person I know who's seen it, actually.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.230
<v Speaker 2>From my impression, it just wasn't very well received.

0:35:50.870 --> 0:35:52.070
<v Speaker 1>Well, hey, buddy, I received it.

0:35:52.810 --> 0:35:54.870
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Well, now you give me a reason to go

0:35:54.910 --> 0:35:56.710
<v Speaker 2>check it out. If you thought it was good, you

0:35:56.730 --> 0:35:58.130
<v Speaker 2>got good taste in movies. I know that.

0:35:58.150 --> 0:36:00.089
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. I thought it was pretty good. But

0:36:00.110 --> 0:36:02.610
<v Speaker 1>that was a sidetrack. After you have your material, you

0:36:02.630 --> 0:36:03.610
<v Speaker 1>got to practice it, of course.

0:36:04.210 --> 0:36:07.169
<v Speaker 3>Mm-hmm. Especially like you can get away with having notes

0:36:07.230 --> 0:36:10.390
<v Speaker 3>on stage if you're like a super well-known comic and

0:36:10.410 --> 0:36:12.570
<v Speaker 3>you're like workshopping new material and you can make a

0:36:12.590 --> 0:36:14.620
<v Speaker 3>joke about like, oh, the notes are on my stool.

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.540
<v Speaker 3>But like you don't want to get up there looking

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.660
<v Speaker 3>at any notes if you're just starting out like that's

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 3>a bad look.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.140
<v Speaker 2>No. And actually, that brings up another Jeselnik anecdote. The

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.989
<v Speaker 2>first time we saw him was at South by Southwest

0:36:26.130 --> 0:36:29.250
<v Speaker 2>years and years and years ago. And he was part

0:36:29.270 --> 0:36:31.870
<v Speaker 2>of like four or five other comedians. And he was

0:36:31.910 --> 0:36:33.989
<v Speaker 2>like one of the last ones to get up. And

0:36:34.050 --> 0:36:36.100
<v Speaker 2>all the other comedians had their little notebooks that they

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:39.180
<v Speaker 2>were basically reading off of on stage. And Jeselnik gets

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.779
<v Speaker 2>up there, his stuff's totally polished and everything. And he's like,

0:36:42.300 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't have my notebook with me. I feel so unprepared.

0:36:44.940 --> 0:36:46.380
<v Speaker 1>That's good.

0:36:47.100 --> 0:36:48.500
<v Speaker 2>Then he proceeded to kill.

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course he did.

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.940
<v Speaker 3>So once you had that material, once it's practiced, you

0:36:52.980 --> 0:36:55.250
<v Speaker 3>want to You know, you want to make it really good.

0:36:55.410 --> 0:36:57.210
<v Speaker 3>And so that means you need to do it in

0:36:57.270 --> 0:37:01.170
<v Speaker 3>front of people. So pick something very low stakes. Obviously,

0:37:01.210 --> 0:37:03.270
<v Speaker 3>if you're someone who's never done it, you're not going

0:37:03.290 --> 0:37:06.009
<v Speaker 3>to have any other choice but low stakes. It'll just

0:37:06.030 --> 0:37:08.509
<v Speaker 3>be a local open mic or something like that. But

0:37:08.570 --> 0:37:10.390
<v Speaker 3>that's where the rubber meets the road. And that's where

0:37:10.430 --> 0:37:13.070
<v Speaker 3>you're going to figure out, like, not only what's funny,

0:37:13.630 --> 0:37:16.610
<v Speaker 3>but like how you tell it. Can you tell it

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 3>in a different way? Can your timing be a little different?

0:37:18.820 --> 0:37:21.779
<v Speaker 3>Can you stress a certain word? Or paste something in

0:37:21.820 --> 0:37:24.140
<v Speaker 3>a little bit different way to make something that wasn't

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 3>funny one night funny the next night.

0:37:26.610 --> 0:37:28.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it'll also give you some real insight into

0:37:28.750 --> 0:37:31.569
<v Speaker 2>how you should structure your five minutes, right? So what

0:37:31.610 --> 0:37:34.710
<v Speaker 2>joke goes where? You want to start with something strong,

0:37:34.790 --> 0:37:37.910
<v Speaker 2>often like a one-liner. Then you put your riskier stuff

0:37:37.950 --> 0:37:40.969
<v Speaker 2>in the middle, which doesn't necessarily mean just like, you know,

0:37:41.510 --> 0:37:45.670
<v Speaker 2>potentially tasteless jokes. But like weird jokes, maybe something that

0:37:45.690 --> 0:37:48.940
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a punchline. And then you follow with like

0:37:48.980 --> 0:37:50.890
<v Speaker 2>your biggest joke, the one you know you're going to

0:37:50.910 --> 0:37:53.350
<v Speaker 2>get the most laughs from because then you get to

0:37:53.390 --> 0:37:57.330
<v Speaker 2>walk off stage to that applause while people are still laughing. Yeah.

0:37:57.590 --> 0:38:01.180
<v Speaker 3>And not always, but oftentimes that last joke is a

0:38:01.260 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 3>rejoinder where you might circle back to something from the beginning. Again,

0:38:06.380 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>there are no rules, but that seems to be a

0:38:08.980 --> 0:38:10.660
<v Speaker 3>formula that works pretty well. Yes.

0:38:11.700 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Chuck. Here's a really important question that I'm interested

0:38:15.219 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>in exploring because no one's answered it and it's certainly

0:38:18.900 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 2>not settled. But the question is as follows. Should there

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.980
<v Speaker 2>be any topic that's off limits for stand up comedians?

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>What's your answer?

0:38:30.620 --> 0:38:34.660
<v Speaker 3>Well, my honest answer is no, because it just feels

0:38:34.700 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 3>to me like a medium that should just be completely

0:38:37.900 --> 0:38:42.060
<v Speaker 3>wide open, but it's like that free speech thing, not

0:38:42.100 --> 0:38:45.550
<v Speaker 3>free from consequences. If you wanna get up there and

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.290
<v Speaker 3>say awful things about a group of people or something,

0:38:49.410 --> 0:38:54.609
<v Speaker 3>I think it should be allowed, but people may hate

0:38:54.670 --> 0:38:57.330
<v Speaker 3>it and people may put up a big fuss and

0:38:57.370 --> 0:38:58.650
<v Speaker 3>hate you because of it.

0:38:58.710 --> 0:39:01.950
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Okay, well, you're in good company because basically every

0:39:01.989 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 2>standup comedian on record who's gone on record about it

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.660
<v Speaker 2>is like, yes, or no, there should not be any

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.530
<v Speaker 2>topic that's off limits for stand-up comedy. But if you

0:39:12.570 --> 0:39:14.970
<v Speaker 2>dig in a little further and go one layer deeper

0:39:15.090 --> 0:39:16.830
<v Speaker 2>and you say, well, wait a minute, do you mean

0:39:17.590 --> 0:39:21.230
<v Speaker 2>that no topic should be off limits for any comedian,

0:39:21.830 --> 0:39:26.010
<v Speaker 2>any individual comedian? Or you're saying that for stand-up comedy

0:39:26.050 --> 0:39:29.250
<v Speaker 2>in general, no topic should be off limits. And then

0:39:29.430 --> 0:39:33.020
<v Speaker 2>like a division. starts to come about because you reach

0:39:33.060 --> 0:39:36.459
<v Speaker 2>the question like who can say what about who. Right.

0:39:36.860 --> 0:39:37.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:37.100 --> 0:39:39.540
<v Speaker 2>And that's where the debate really starts to begin.

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, for sure. What do you think?

0:39:47.820 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 2>I think it cuts both ways. I think that if

0:39:50.900 --> 0:39:54.509
<v Speaker 2>you think that you have something very funny and insightful

0:39:55.450 --> 0:40:00.270
<v Speaker 2>that you could make basically anyone laugh with that's offensive

0:40:00.989 --> 0:40:04.410
<v Speaker 2>and you're willing to take the risk, more power to you.

0:40:04.530 --> 0:40:06.830
<v Speaker 2>And I hope it is funny because something like that

0:40:06.850 --> 0:40:12.620
<v Speaker 2>can just be groundbreaking. On the opposite side, if you're

0:40:12.660 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>offended by a joke, I think that it's incumbent upon

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:21.020
<v Speaker 2>you to stop and say, why am I offended by this? Like,

0:40:21.300 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 2>what is actually offending me personally about this? Or am

0:40:25.020 --> 0:40:28.569
<v Speaker 2>I being offended on behalf of some other people who

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.989
<v Speaker 2>may not even be offended by it? And if you

0:40:31.010 --> 0:40:34.230
<v Speaker 2>start traipsing into that territory, I think you should examine

0:40:34.250 --> 0:40:37.730
<v Speaker 2>yourself a little further and your sensitivities, because I think

0:40:37.750 --> 0:40:40.299
<v Speaker 2>that that's a, That's something that can help people in

0:40:40.340 --> 0:40:44.580
<v Speaker 2>life in general, not just in taking stand-up comedy in

0:40:44.620 --> 0:40:46.420
<v Speaker 2>ways that it can just make you laugh.

0:40:46.940 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:40:48.460 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, there have been cases where there have been

0:40:50.700 --> 0:40:53.460
<v Speaker 3>comedians with like certain disabilities that get up on stage

0:40:54.219 --> 0:40:57.029
<v Speaker 3>and part of their act, sometimes a big part of

0:40:57.050 --> 0:40:59.509
<v Speaker 3>their act is making fun of that disability in a

0:40:59.530 --> 0:41:02.690
<v Speaker 3>certain way. So, you know, that's a case where obviously

0:41:02.750 --> 0:41:09.259
<v Speaker 3>someone that, or, you know, like any sort of ethnic joke, joke,

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.580
<v Speaker 3>if someone is of that ethnicity, it's obviously going to

0:41:12.620 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 3>go over a little bit less with less controversy.

0:41:15.620 --> 0:41:16.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:16.580 --> 0:41:19.259
<v Speaker 3>If you're not of a certain ethnic group and you're

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:23.379
<v Speaker 3>making fun of a different group other than yourself, like

0:41:23.900 --> 0:41:25.780
<v Speaker 3>I still say more power to you if that's your thing.

0:41:25.860 --> 0:41:29.660
<v Speaker 3>But just be be ready if it's like not good

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:31.009
<v Speaker 3>or it doesn't work, you know?

0:41:31.550 --> 0:41:31.710
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the key, the through line here is if

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.700
<v Speaker 2>it's funny. If it's so funny that that group that

0:41:37.739 --> 0:41:42.500
<v Speaker 2>you're making fun of or that is involved in the joke,

0:41:42.580 --> 0:41:44.420
<v Speaker 2>even if you're not making fun of them, if they

0:41:44.460 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 2>will laugh, then it's just legitimately, objectively funny, I think,

0:41:49.500 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>at that point.

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And it also depends on how much people love you.

0:41:54.500 --> 0:41:58.370
<v Speaker 3>People generally kind of love Sarah Silverman. I know, obviously,

0:41:58.430 --> 0:42:00.609
<v Speaker 3>she has people who don't like her, but she's sort

0:42:00.650 --> 0:42:04.810
<v Speaker 3>of a beloved comic. And She has got a, you know,

0:42:05.210 --> 0:42:10.529
<v Speaker 3>in her past, like some derogatory ethnic slurs in her routines.

0:42:11.530 --> 0:42:15.589
<v Speaker 3>She's made very famously, had some rape jokes in her

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 3>past routines. She wore blackface. And Sarah Silverman always seems

0:42:21.340 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 3>to bounce back. And I think it's because people like

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Silverman. And I love Sarah Silverman.

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.940
<v Speaker 2>She's very lovable. And the thing is, is she's not

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:35.660
<v Speaker 2>beloved by, you know— like racists, she's beloved by like

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the people who kind of lean social justice warrior. And

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 2>yet she's extremely well known for telling racist jokes. The, the,

0:42:43.380 --> 0:42:46.980
<v Speaker 2>I think the reason why she's able to, um, to

0:42:47.060 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 2>traverse those very dangerous waters is because at the end

0:42:50.460 --> 0:42:55.060
<v Speaker 2>of the day, her racist jokes are not putting down

0:42:55.080 --> 0:43:01.700
<v Speaker 2>any group. She's actually pointing out this, like the, the,

0:43:02.530 --> 0:43:06.300
<v Speaker 2>secret thoughts that people like her or in her group

0:43:06.380 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 2>feel guilty about having.

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Right. Yeah.

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.620
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like she's putting down black people. She's

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 2>pointing out how, you know, like white people like inadvertently

0:43:15.900 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 2>think of black people and don't even aren't even aware

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of it. She points that out.

0:43:20.739 --> 0:43:21.740
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:26.780
<v Speaker 3>And it obviously also matters like the power structure and

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:31.589
<v Speaker 3>the power dynamic as a comedian. So Ronnie Chang is

0:43:31.610 --> 0:43:34.070
<v Speaker 3>a comedian. His last special was incredible.

0:43:34.210 --> 0:43:34.629
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was.

0:43:35.010 --> 0:43:37.170
<v Speaker 3>And he makes fun of white people a lot in

0:43:37.210 --> 0:43:40.009
<v Speaker 3>that show because and he can get away with that

0:43:40.030 --> 0:43:43.220
<v Speaker 3>because he's an immigrant to the United States who is

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:45.819
<v Speaker 3>in a position of less power than the white people

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:50.219
<v Speaker 3>that he's making fun of. So he's he's punching up.

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 3>And you've heard of like punching up or punching down,

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.460
<v Speaker 3>like punching up is is almost always funny. Punching down

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 3>is is usually not funny.

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:01.270
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just really not. I mean, it's just not

0:44:01.370 --> 0:44:05.049
<v Speaker 2>like textbook. It's not funny almost ever.

0:44:05.510 --> 0:44:08.610
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And I love Dave Chappelle, but he seems to

0:44:08.650 --> 0:44:10.509
<v Speaker 3>have just gotten kind of mean with some of his

0:44:10.530 --> 0:44:12.989
<v Speaker 3>stand up. And that's to me where it kind of

0:44:13.030 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 3>crosses the line is like and it's just a personal opinion.

0:44:16.860 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. I haven't found him as funny.

0:44:21.420 --> 0:44:23.500
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it, but I agree with you.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.260
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's because he's being mean. I think

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:28.030
<v Speaker 2>it's because he's turned kind of preachy.

0:44:28.370 --> 0:44:28.890
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe.

0:44:29.230 --> 0:44:31.569
<v Speaker 2>And he's gotten away from jokes more.

0:44:32.010 --> 0:44:32.210
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:44:32.510 --> 0:44:35.069
<v Speaker 2>I think he's just I think he's become so uncoupled from,

0:44:35.850 --> 0:44:38.450
<v Speaker 2>you know, the average person because he's just become so

0:44:38.489 --> 0:44:39.230
<v Speaker 2>vastly wealthy.

0:44:39.590 --> 0:44:39.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:44:39.989 --> 0:44:42.910
<v Speaker 2>That it's hard for him to relate. And then also,

0:44:43.030 --> 0:44:45.930
<v Speaker 2>I think he doesn't like being come after. I think

0:44:45.969 --> 0:44:48.250
<v Speaker 2>that that's really like affected him. And so he's coming

0:44:48.330 --> 0:44:50.390
<v Speaker 2>out offensively even harder.

0:44:50.430 --> 0:44:51.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true.

0:44:52.010 --> 0:44:54.450
<v Speaker 3>But, you know, like like we said, it's like you

0:44:54.489 --> 0:44:56.810
<v Speaker 3>can say what you want, but the audiences are the

0:44:56.890 --> 0:44:58.730
<v Speaker 3>ones who are going to have the final say. So

0:44:58.770 --> 0:45:02.270
<v Speaker 3>it's society who's going to. ultimately decide like what's funny

0:45:02.330 --> 0:45:05.210
<v Speaker 3>and what isn't and who should be allowed to say

0:45:05.270 --> 0:45:08.430
<v Speaker 3>what or not, you know, because that's what you're doing.

0:45:08.450 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>You're getting up on stage in front of people and saying,

0:45:11.489 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 3>judge me, basically. And people will judge you one way

0:45:15.780 --> 0:45:16.779
<v Speaker 3>or the other. Right.

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 2>For sure. There's one other thing that really stuck out

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 2>to me, too, was you had said I don't know

0:45:22.940 --> 0:45:24.910
<v Speaker 2>if it was in this episode or the last where

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:29.489
<v Speaker 2>you weren't familiar with the alt-right comedy becoming a big thing.

0:45:29.870 --> 0:45:33.810
<v Speaker 2>like around Joe Rogan. I saw a really good explanation

0:45:33.870 --> 0:45:37.660
<v Speaker 2>for why that's emerged. And that was that back in

0:45:37.739 --> 0:45:41.460
<v Speaker 2>like the 70s and 80s, America was very, very conservative.

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 2>And so it made sense for left-leaning, liberal thinking comedians

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.300
<v Speaker 2>to be huge because the comedian's job is to basically

0:45:49.340 --> 0:45:52.900
<v Speaker 2>take on the establishment, to criticize the establishment. Well, if

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you follow the arc of American society through the 90s,

0:45:56.830 --> 0:46:00.290
<v Speaker 2>it got way more liberal and Way more politically correct.

0:46:00.730 --> 0:46:04.299
<v Speaker 2>And so the people more on the outside of that

0:46:04.500 --> 0:46:08.259
<v Speaker 2>type of society are right-leaning and they became the ones

0:46:08.620 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 2>whose role it was to attack the establishment. That's the

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.459
<v Speaker 2>best example I've seen or best explanation I've seen for

0:46:16.219 --> 0:46:18.230
<v Speaker 2>the rise of alt-right comedy.

0:46:18.630 --> 0:46:19.010
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:46:19.430 --> 0:46:20.589
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was interesting too.

0:46:20.890 --> 0:46:21.069
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:46:21.890 --> 0:46:24.830
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully these two episodes were interesting and people weren't just like,

0:46:25.630 --> 0:46:25.969
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:46:26.750 --> 0:46:27.250
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so.

0:46:27.730 --> 0:46:30.370
<v Speaker 2>Okay, great. Well, Chuck doesn't think you guys fell asleep,

0:46:30.410 --> 0:46:32.450
<v Speaker 2>which I think means it's time for listener mail.

0:46:35.830 --> 0:46:38.660
<v Speaker 3>This is we got shouted out in a book yet

0:46:38.700 --> 0:46:40.779
<v Speaker 3>to be released. And so we're going to plug that book.

0:46:42.020 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Author Sarah Addison. Hey, guys, I'm reading an advanced copy

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 3>of Sarah Addison Clark's new book, Paper Ghosts.

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It comes out Tuesday next week.

0:46:51.140 --> 0:46:52.630
<v Speaker 3>So I guess it'll already be out by the time

0:46:52.650 --> 0:46:53.109
<v Speaker 3>this comes out.

0:46:53.390 --> 0:46:55.430
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Y'all got a shout out in the book, guys.

0:46:56.450 --> 0:46:59.300
<v Speaker 3>Uh, it's somewhere around chapter 18, although they may change

0:46:59.340 --> 0:47:01.340
<v Speaker 3>since this is an advanced copy, but one of the

0:47:01.380 --> 0:47:03.779
<v Speaker 3>main characters had been talking with her friend on the

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 3>phone about the main plot line. And the next sentence

0:47:06.780 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 3>is after they hung up Bailey queued an episode of

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.670
<v Speaker 3>the stuff you should know podcast, this one explaining chaos theory,

0:47:13.790 --> 0:47:14.930
<v Speaker 3>which seemed appropriate.

0:47:15.790 --> 0:47:16.250
<v Speaker 2>I saw that.

0:47:16.750 --> 0:47:19.330
<v Speaker 1>Pretty great. Uh, Sarah Addison Allen. Well, wait a minute.

0:47:19.350 --> 0:47:20.170
<v Speaker 1>It said Clark earlier.

0:47:20.190 --> 0:47:22.649
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure if that was a typer or what,

0:47:22.690 --> 0:47:25.310
<v Speaker 3>but the author is Sarah Addison Allen. Okay. It's from

0:47:25.370 --> 0:47:27.609
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina. So a lot of her books, if not all,

0:47:27.660 --> 0:47:29.750
<v Speaker 3>are set in the southeast. I haven't read them all,

0:47:30.190 --> 0:47:32.150
<v Speaker 3>but I've enjoyed the ones I've read so far. So

0:47:32.170 --> 0:47:36.230
<v Speaker 3>I thought I'd share. That is from Abby Sellers.

0:47:36.590 --> 0:47:39.330
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome. Thanks for pointing that out, Abby. And thank

0:47:39.370 --> 0:47:42.730
<v Speaker 2>you to Sarah Addison Allen, too, for including us. And

0:47:42.750 --> 0:47:44.770
<v Speaker 2>by the way, you have great taste because that is

0:47:44.850 --> 0:47:47.150
<v Speaker 2>one of our best episodes, the one on chaos theory.

0:47:47.410 --> 0:47:49.510
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Everyone go out and get Paper Ghosts.

0:47:50.290 --> 0:47:54.130
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Great, Chuck. That was well done. And if you

0:47:54.210 --> 0:47:56.090
<v Speaker 2>have seen us out in the wild and want to

0:47:56.190 --> 0:47:58.569
<v Speaker 2>share a story about it, we'd love to hear that

0:47:58.610 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. It's thrilling. You can send it off

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:08.940
<v Speaker 2>to stuffpodcasts at iheartradio.com. Stuff You Should Know is a

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 2>production of iHeartRadio.

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.390
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app. Apple

0:48:14.410 --> 0:48:16.970
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.