WEBVTT - Amazon's Latest Gadgets, Circle and Robinhood

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation, money and power callive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I made Ludlow in New York in family

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>chang This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>A Bloomberg report about Apple's plans to scale back iPhone

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>production sends the stock down by as much as four

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>point six pc. The company planned to build an extra

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>six million phones, but the extra demand never materialized. We'll

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have the details in a moment. Plus, Amazon devices get

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a facelift and a good night's rest. The company unveiled

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a bedside sleep tracker, as well as a new Kindle,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>updated ring cameras, and echo products. I'll discuss with Amazon

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Senior VP of Devices and so cause, Jeremy Alaire talks

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>about the latest announcements from their Converge twenty two conference,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>including its new partnership with Robin Hood. Bloomberger has learned

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple is backing off plans to increase production of its

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>new iPhones this year. The company had expected a surge

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in demand, but that hadn't happened, according to sources. Bloomber's

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Mount German joins me from l A with the details. Mark,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what is our latest reporting on what's going on? So

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for two, Apple set out to build and sell through

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety million new iPhone fourteen units. That's across the four models,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourteen, the fourteen plus, the Pro, and the Pro Max.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But recently they sort of had this extra credit idea

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll call it for an extra six million phones on

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>top of that ninety million. But like you said, that

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>extra six million no longer necessary because the concerns about

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that extra demand not happening in two. I would say

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that probably has to do with some recession pressures inflationary

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>pressures as well. That people are experiencing the iPhone fourteen

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen plus not significant upgrades over the thirteens, but

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the pros that's where the big upgrades are. That's what

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>people want to buy. So I think people are holding

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>off on buying the phone until they're able to buy

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that fourteen Pro or Pro Max for when it makes

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sense for them to upgrade to those price here and

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly far better versions of the device market. Seems

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to be some evidence some data that consumers around the

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>world of going to the higher price point pro. What

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have we learned about early demand. Yeah, early demand tells

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>us that the iPhone fourteen Pro and particularly iPhone fourteen

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Pro Max, that's where it's at this year. People want

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>those devices. If you just look at on your over

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>year level, the move from the iPhone thirteen to the

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and the non Pro models extremely minimal. I would

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>say the thirteen to the fourteen smallest upgrade in the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone's history, but Pro to Pro very big upgrade. Fort

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>makeapixel camera on the back, the dynamic island system that

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you're showing on the on the on the screen right now.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>The satellite connectivity is available on both models, but some

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of those video upgrades, those are all on the Pro models,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's what people really want to

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hold out for. If you look at the Apple online store,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see in particular there the shipment delay times

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>for the Pro models far longer than the regular models.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good indicator of demand. Also, this is

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not an exaggeration. You go to an Apple store, there

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>have been lines around the block for days still for

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Models. You ask people which phone are you

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>here to line up for? You ask fifty people, I

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, maybe forty eight or forty nine of them

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are there for the pro phones, not the regular fourteen

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks to bloombugs Matt Gum and I want

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to stick with this story and bring in forest to research.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Vice president Julie asked, Julie, this is interesting because no

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>matter what the environment, people buy iPhones around the world.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>What's your read on what bloombug reported over overnight? Yes,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you. So I think there's a number of factors.

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first one is always you know,

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that Apple's iPhone owners and buyers are more

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>affluent than the of and Android. Even if you just

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>look in the U S alone, the average household income

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of an iPhone owner is eighty eight thousand dollars versus

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine for Android. UH. Thirty two percent of households

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that own an iPhone have a household income of more

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred thousand dollars a year. For Android, that's

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three percent. UH. And final point there is, if

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at households with an income of over three

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars annually, three percent for the iPhone and only

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent for Android. So I think that's you know,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the top of the list. We know, and there's a

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of data that shows that simply iPhone owners are

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>more affluent than those that are purchasing an Android. I

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think the second thing that comes into the mix is

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the upgrade cycle. Last year and this year has been

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting time because a lot of carriers shut down

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three G and they forced an upgrade. So when we

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>look at our data across the United States and Europe,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from twenty five of consumers have purchased an iPhone

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>in the past year, and I think it's a really

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>substantial number, especially when you take into account that iPhone

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>represents under fifty percent of share in each of those

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>market once you get outside of the United States. And then, finally,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to echo what Mark was saying, you know, when we

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>look at it, we talked to our consumers. Six one

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of consumers expect that a recession is coming, and so

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they are slowing spending. We've got thirty of US online

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>adults saying we are going to spend less on electronics

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming year. So there's a little bit of

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>hesitation in the market um and consumers are pulling back

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>on spending. Julie, we love having you on because you

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>crunch the numbers. Let's take a step back, let's zoom

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out here. A lot of cell siders seem to be saying, well,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I was always modeling nine units anyway, So what's changed. Yeah,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's hard to say, you know what,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the analysts were modeling. I think it's um.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, certainly, there's always good reasons to think about

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>why they could have grown the market. Um, certainly. You know,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the things that we know that

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if of consumers who buy Apple products only buy Apple products.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>So if they're buying a watch, if they're buying a tablet,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>if they're signing up for Apple one, they're more likely

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>to be a smartphone owner, you know, an io as

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>smartphone owner. So you know, it's fair to expect that

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple could have you know, predicted that they would have

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>converted more Android users this year. And they've also got

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a very deep lineup that's capable of doing that and

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>competing at lower price points. So again, I don't know

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what was going on when they did the end when

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they did the forecast, but there's you know, you know,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>six millions not a big number on top of ninety.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's more than it's more than five,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's not Demper said, it's not a big number.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about global technology the prospects of a recession,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to look for clues, right of what's happening

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with the global consumer. What do you see broadly in

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone market globally? Are their markets where the consumers weak?

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Are they're spending habits that are changing? Yes, so I think,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly when we look at the numbers and

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to consumers, where are you you know what

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>concerns you write? Food is more expensive, you know, rents

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>are up all right, Right, there's a few categories you

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>know that I would say are certainly more essential than

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>having the latest and greatest smartphone. Um but again, like

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep in mind, you know, the upgrades, like

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>these phones are amazing, amazing feats of engineering. There are

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>amazing devices, whether it's an iPhone device or it's you know,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the latest Android devices. Consumers are hanging onto

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>these vices for you know, two, three, four years, and

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so that we saw consumers in United States buy an

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>iPhone in the last twelve months is astounding on its own,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and so that also could be contributing to a little

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of softer demands at you know, all of the

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>price points as we go into the end of all right,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>forest to Research Vice President Julie Arsk, Thank you very much.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Coming up Amazon's ambient intelligence, how the company is looking

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to a more personalized and proactive future in its devices.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Our conversation with Amazon's Dave Limp. Next, This is Bloomberg.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday, Amazon held its full Hardware event, where announced

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of new gadgets. I caught up with Dave Limp,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>amazon senior vice president for Devices and Services, right after

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the event and also about the company's strategy. With so

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>much competition in the space, what we're trying to do

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is build devices and services that mostly focused on the home,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>although increasingly in the car. That follow the pattern of

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what we call ambient intelligence, which is the ability for

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>devices to be very very useful to customers when they're

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in the foreground and when they need it, but when

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not using it, they kind of disappear in the background.

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And when we're doing when we're at our best, we're

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing customers to pick their heads up, enjoy the real world,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy their families, and let technology help that rather than

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>being you know, absorbed in their phones or out in

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some metaverse somewhere. With inflation such as it is around

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, higher input costs. How conscious a decision was

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that with pricing to not raise prices with certain product lines.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I think we're always trying to you know, since the

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>very beginning, our first Kindle, we've we have fifteen years ago,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we've tried to make our products as affordable as possible,

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. We our strategy has been the same since

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, which is we want to make money

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>when customers use their products, not necessarily when they buy them.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And so uh, we we are obviously looking always looking

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at commodity costs. But but part of the ability to

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>pass on that value to customers is that the businesses

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 1>at a scale where we can buy in volume and

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and we want to give that value back to customers

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever possible. You mentioned the Kindle. It's a bit of

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a throwback, right, the first Amazon device, and you've added

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a stylus interesting products. What's the strategy with that. Do

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that this is going to be a volume seller? Well,

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Kindle Scribe is in some ways, it's the Kindle we've

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to build, you know, and we have some

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>great kindles we just announced some last last two weeks

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ago that are at but this one, as you mentioned,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>it's the first kindle you can write on, and it

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>has a ten point three inch display that's incredibly high resolution.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I but also as a stylist, and one that doesn't

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have a battery. You don't have to sink. It just works.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And when write on Kindle Scribe, it really does feel

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like you're writing on paper. It's something that's amazing. You

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to try it to see it. And uh,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I never try to predict volumes. Uh. What

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>we try to do is build great products and let

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>customers speak for themselves. I know for sure that I

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>will be buying one of these, You'll be buying one.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But around the world that the consumer is feeling pain

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time there's evidence that consumer is

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all still spending at the higher end of the market.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>What are you saying in the markets that you operate

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in and the spending habits of consumers where they are

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>putting cash awar to holding back. Yeah, obviously, we our

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>first signal was a couple of months ago with Prime Day.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We had we had a good Prime day. For my

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Amazon's business, we uh. I think customers tend

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to look for value in times when the economy is tougher.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to predict what's going to happen as we

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>go into queue four. There's no question that there is

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tightening in the economy. Um, But I think what the

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>best thing we can do is get our inputs right

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and build products that we think customers are gonna love.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Price them, as you mentioned earlier, crisply so that they're affordable,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you know the rest is going to be

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 1>up to up to the consumer. But I have I'm

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>internal optimists, but I have a high level conviction there's

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of echoes and kindles and

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>other products under people's trees this year. The deal with

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I Robot, I think we've got used last week that

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the FTC has made a second request for additional information.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>How optimistic are you that deal gets done and how

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>important is I Robot. Well, obviously we have to go

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>through approve the approval cycles around the world, and until

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we do get through, those will continue to operate at

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>arm's length as separate companies. But you know, I wouldn't

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>have ever kind of sat down with Colin, if we

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have optimism that we could get the get the

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>transaction done. Colin, who's the CEO of I Robot, is

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the most missionary entrepreneur, one of the

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>most missionary entrepreneurs I've ever met, and I look forward

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to once we consummate the transaction to working with them

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even closer. You have really expanded the devices offering in

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>recent years. There's so many product lines, product type. We

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get onto the new TVs um and some

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the other devices aimed at kids. But all that

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>makes me think about your manufacturing footprint print globally. Now

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk semiconductors. You know, how is supply chain for you?

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>How is manufacturing and how are access to key chips

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that you need to go into these devices. I think

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're coming out at the other end of at least

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for the products that are under my purview, of the

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>worst of the supply train crisis. I don't think it's

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>by any means over We still see disruptions in the

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>worldwide transportation network, especially if you're throwing things on ocean.

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>UH and certain chip sets are still in shorter supply,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but some of the more critical components, UH, you know,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>systems on a chip, the actual processors and our products.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The supply looks brighter for them. When you look at

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>UH display panels for things like tablets and TVs, that

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>supply looks better than it did a year ago. So again,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're through it, but I can start

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing a light at the end of the tunnel. That

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was Amazon's Dave Limp. Let's stick with Amazon's product unvailing

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and bring in Tom Forte if d a Davidson Tom

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of products, some of them are faceless, right

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>upgrades to existing lines. Some of them are You did

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>any of that move the needle for you? Sure? So

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>when I think about their strategy, I think of them

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as the low cost or one of the low cost

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>providers of hardware and the consumer electronics space. I think

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about time, and I think it should be a

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>very popular product that they're adding a stylus to the Kindle.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>When I think of their different lines of consumer electronics products,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Kindle's probably probably we're we would say Amazon is most dominant. Otherwise,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>when you think about a lot of their echo devices.

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>The good news is that Amazon makes a lot of

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>devices that leverage Alexa, but a lot of other consumer

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>electronic companies do too, So I think when you think

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about the products that are leveraging Alexa, it isn't just

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>what Amazon is doing on the Echo device line, but

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that so many manufacturers think so Nos as

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>an example, are making products integrated with Alexa. That's the

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>important thing there. So that was kind of my initial

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>take on their new hardware offering. And I'm fascinated at

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Astro and I'm glad you talked to him about

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the i robot acquisition. So what is it about the

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>roomba that attracted Amazon and why does it feel like

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it needed to make an acquisition there rather than extend

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what it's already doing with the Astro line up. The

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>timing of this is interesting because we've just had news

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of a second Prime Day essentially next month. Do you

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>expect consume is right now around the world to rush

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>out and alot these Amazon devices? Yes and no. So

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's start with the second prime Day in one

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>calendar year. So it's a long time student of Amazon.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember when they had the first Prime Day and

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it was in July, and the reason was they wanted

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to test their logistics to see if they were ready

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for their big sales days Black Friday Cyber Monday. So,

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, having two Prime days encounter is actually

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a sign of weakness. It means that they need a

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>sale because their sales are not doing as well as

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they hope for. I also think they want to leverage

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>their logistics to get as much of a return on

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that investment. So do I think investors or consumers rather

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>will gobble up their consumer electronics devices at a second

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day? Generally speaking, they do well with Amazon devices

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on Prime Day, but as it pertains to the sales

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>trends in general on the stock, I'm concerned that they're

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>having two sales in one year. I think that's a

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>negative sign. Tom. I wouldn't you give me an explanation

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of why we care about Amazon devices business. They price

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>them competitively, right, But it seems to me the idea

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>here is just to bring more people into Prime, more

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>people using Alecta products. They're not actually so focused on

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>making money through the hardware, are they. You know, they're

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely the opposite of Apple, where Apple makes the majority

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of its revenue from its hardware sales. For Amazon hardware

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is essentially an enabler. What can I give a consumer

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that will make it easier for them to buy products

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon? What can I give a consumer that will

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>make it easier for them to watch videos on Amazon? So,

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, not the profit neutle mover. Certainly it

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is for Apple, but it can have a positive impact

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on their e commerce sales to the extent that everything

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they do makes it easier for the consumers to buy

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>products through Amazon. Hey, Tom, really quickly, you were concerned

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about the mixed reception for Rings of Power. I've been

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>watching Rings of Power. Have the episode so far changed

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>your mind? Okay, So I'm publishing a note tomorrow where

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna talk about how I essentially felt sleep in

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>episodes one, three, and four, and have a much episode five. Yet,

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So with approval rating and written Tomatoes, I'm very concerned

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about the billion dollars investment been made. Tom Forte, harsh

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>critic of d A. Davidson. Of course, thank you very much.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk asked a federal appeals court to throw out

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the deal he made with the SEC in eighteen over

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a so called Twitter sitter. Since a Tesla lawyer has

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>screened all of Musque company related tweets. We believe after

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a tweet about taking Tesla private forced the SEC to act.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Musk calls the Twitter Sitter agreement and a legal effort

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to muzzle him, adding that it's hindering his freedom of speech.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>A judge refused Musque's last plea to end the Twitter

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sist a deal back in April, and Tesla's did Joe

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Gibier as a board member. Gabier is the co founder

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of Airbnb and last fourteen years has helped launch Airbnb's

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>design studio and airbnb dot org, the company's nonprofit foundation.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He recently stepped back from his full time role in

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>operations to pursue other ventures. Gibier replaces Larry Ellison on

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the board, and General Mills, the maker of Cinnamon Toast

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Crunch and Annie's Box Pastors, is backing food tech startup

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>grub Market. San Francisco based grub Market has raised a

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty million dollars in new equity from General

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Mills and other investors, including Tiger Global, and a two

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar valuation. The startup offers software and an e

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>commerce platform connecting farmers and key food suppliers with customers.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Grub Market operates all across the US, South America, Asia, Europe,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and Africa, and i p O could also be on

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the horizon with grub Market holding talks with underwriters. Bloomberg

0:18:54.840 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>has reported this is Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed Ludlow in

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>New York. The popular messaging platform WhatsApp is more than

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>just an encryptive messaging app connecting people worldwide. It's become

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a major part of Wall Street communication. That's why regulators

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>reach settlements with a dozen banks for failing to monitor

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>employees communications on on unauthorized messaging apps like WhatsApp. Wall

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Street has been hit with more than two billion dollars

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of fines and what's become called the WhatsApp investigation. Goldman Sachs,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America and City Group were among those penalized.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Street are Naturation is covering this story. Let's go

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the beginning. What is the activity and which

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>apps are we talking about here? Again? And that's important

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>because why we call it the WhatsApp problem. It's important

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that listeners understand that what we're really talking about is

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>something that's dubbed or WhatsApp broke effectively, regulators want banks

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they're monitoring all these messaging apps. They

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are worried about the unauthorized use of these apps. So

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp is one prominent example, but it could be Signal,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>could be telegramed, it could be any one of these

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>apps that have gotten pop so popular in recent years.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the communication between bankers and traders, their

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>clients just inside the film has gravitated to these platforms.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But archiving these chats, monitoring these chats, and compliance has

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not kept pace with the growth and technology. There is

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this a pandemic story where we're all sort of at home,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out of your office and communicating with each other in

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>new ways. Or does it pre date that the pandemic

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is an accelerator for sure, But I think it's more

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of a technology story. You have just gotten used to

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that people are just more comfortable using these

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>apps to communicate. Even someone sitting two seats down from you,

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to send them a message rather than

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pick up the phone and call them or email them.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why there's so much focus on these apps. And

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of course the pandemic played a role because you had

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a disparate situation where everyone left the officers, the officers

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>emptied out, and everyone is at home. And when you're

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>at home, you're more likely to be more comfortable with

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the kind of apps you use anywhere when you're outside

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>your usual eight to six schedule. These fines, seeing big,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>big numbers, why so hefty? It's extraordinary? Two billion dollars

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>cost your mind. Eight years back, when Mark Zuckerberg wanted

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to buy WhatsApp, we were all scratching our heads as

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to why they would buy something like that for twenty

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in two Now we're talking about a fine

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that cruise as much as two billion dollars that in

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>some ways it's truly crazy, because the previous highest fine

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for something like this, which is effectively a record keeping laps,

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was fifteen million dollars one five for Morgan Stanley back

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and six. Now each and every bank,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>at least the big banks are coming out there and

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>paying two million dollars. This is the kind of fine

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you play pay when you find some sort of wrongdoing,

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>when you bring down an insider trading cartel or something

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. But this, honestly is the reflection of the

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>reality today, which is the Biden administration's approach to regulation.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you're saying, playing out some of those

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fines somewhat eye wars ring so bigger than others. I

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>guess they like you see it on your screen. There

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a big institutions right that we're talking about the

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of paying the price for this. I guess the

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>question is what happens next? What's the reaction? Tell me

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about the WhatsApp cop? Is a WhatsApp cop on wool Street.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a mouthful that that certainly seems to be the

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>funny byproduct of the saga. But we've created a new

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>compliance roll. All the banks that have that are part

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the settlement have agreed with their SEC and CFTC

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to install a new confluence official whose role, effectively is

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that there are archiving and monitoring these

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>communications properly. And we're more than happy to dub that

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>role as the WhatsApp cop. What was the frustrations within

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks themselves? I think you know, they would argue,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps this is kind of a commonplace practice, but there's

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a caution retail as well. It is it is a

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>cautionary deal and of course, you can see the frustration,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>right Look look at everything that the regulators have put

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. When they talk about the messages they found,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they talk about the great volume of messages. But it's

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not like the unearthed some sort of fraud. It could

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>very well have been everyday communication, could have been about work,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but just that a regular everyday communication, whether it's about

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a new bond deal or something else that's going on.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>They shifted the platform from an email or an ib

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that they would normally use to these messaging apps. The

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>regulators frustrations came through because they've got't necessarily monitor it

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and they just want to make sure that banks are safe.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And sorry, right well, Bloomberg, trida natarada, naturaja, and thank

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you very much. The European Union's foreign policy chief is

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>warning of retaliation for any attack on Europe's energy networks.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The EU suspects damage to two nord Stream underwater natural

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>gas pipelines running from Russia to Germany was sabotage and

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that they will support any investigation. Meanwhile, the CEO of

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>dark Trace, one of the largest cyber security firms in Europe,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>says there is significant demand for business since the Russian

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>War in Ukraine. Here's some of what Poppy Good Stuffson

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>told Bloomberg's Tom mckenn in London. Critical infrastructure is an

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>area that absolutely has to be right at the cutting

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>edge of adopting sort of cyberth principles because they are

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>so so many businesses rely on their their products, whether

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's energy or other sort of supplies, and this isn't

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>something that new that's necessarily come out today, even with

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>things like sort of Russia and crane earlier in the year,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we have had seen significant demand for our products from

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the critical national infrastructure sector purely for that reason because

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they are at heightened risk and there is such a

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>dependence from that on their supply to so many other businesses,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>which particular areas isn't utility companies as energy companies and

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the specific demands that they need, the specific

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>challenges they need addressed. It's all of the about just

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think about how many businesses depends on the services that

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they supply, so utilities and energy. We have seen heightened

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>demand in CROs in terms of Europe and in US,

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's because they're an easy target. If you are

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>operating a business that typically can be reliant on very

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>old legacy systems that have been around for decades. They're

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily at the cutting edge of capability. But also,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking to enact your cyber gains and

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>use that to the nefarious reasons, there are a very

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>high profile target where the consequences can be felt very

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>very quietly, and therefore it makes a sort of ideal

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>victim feeling you seeing you monitor this obviously on a daily,

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hourly basis, are you seeing a tick up of attacks

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>emanating from Russia. We're not in the business of attribution necessarily,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>so we're not necessarily saying this is coming from one

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nation or the other. But since the invasion of Ukraine

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we have seen an optic and attacks across the critical

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure sectors, particularly in Europe and the US in this

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>environment of higher interest rates and slower growth recession concerns.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing reluctance from clients and customs? Are you

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>start need to see that? Ever way, I've answered, because

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in past, I think to be honest, we are

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as a business, we're still quite a poor indicator of demands.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, because we are still very much as supply

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>constraint rather to man's constraints. So the our business growth

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>so quick that I bring people in, so we're not

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a good proxy about what is happening in the market.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, mark perspective, we're still seeing very strong demand

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for our acquisition costs. Are they inevitably going to be

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>moving higher in this environment? I think you're seeing inflating

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>costs that are all over predominantly in terms of you

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>see that in terms of employee costs and things like that. Okay,

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago Toma Bravo was in conversations with them,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of course about the potential takeover. It didn't come to pass.

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us some some detail as to why

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately they walked away? I mean I had to be

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some fair as you can understand them phonily limited about

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what I can and can't say. But what I will

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>say is we've loved being a public company and there's

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole ton of ideas. Was a question of pricing

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>or do they find something that they didn't like? I

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would say it's no. These conversations leaked at the very

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>very earlier stage of engagement with Tom Bravo that unfortunately

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>became public, and you know, in September we said that

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>those conversations had ended. We have a legal obligation to

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>explore any such office. But you know, if I was

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>st where Termer Bravo is, I'll be looking across at

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the UK thinking, you know, it's a very cheap area

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to be able to come protect you decent takeover. Does

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the collapse of the pound make you a more attractive target?

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And arguing conversations with anyone else, I would speculate that

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if I was in the U S side looking over

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>here at the UK, I would say, yeah, the the

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>UK does look cheap. But from my perspective and from

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>my business, we're just really prioritizing or exploring all of

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that we see ahead of us, and we've

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>got a whole bunch of ideas, a whole bunch of innovation.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We had new product launch over the summer and we're

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just really excited to get back to businesses year. That

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was Dark Tray CEO Poppy gas Staffson that the Bloomberg

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Text Summit in London coming up. Circle and robin Hood

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>team up to offer its stable coin to retail traders.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Will discuss with the CEO of Circle next this is

0:27:52.119 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg time now for our crypto report. Today we have

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO behind one of the most populous stable coins

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in circulation. For that, we turned to Bloomberg's crypto contributor Sali.

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Ed. And today we have Circle

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO Jeremy Alaire. Thank you so much for

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us because you have this new deal. You've struck

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>this partnership with robin Hood. And I'm wondering, you're somebody

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that already works with so many institutions, what does this

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do to really add to your base of retail customers. Yeah, thanks,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me on. Um, we we

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>announced a broad partnership with robin Hood. Here today it

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>converge our first platform ecosystem conference. We've got thousands of

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>people here in San Francisco, which we're pretty excited about.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And UM, this morning, UM, you know, on stage, uh,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood CTO you know, talked about this and what

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I can say is, you know, robin Hood is an

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing retail in best or platform. They have twenty three

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>million users. UM. It really is sort of represents the

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of mainstream user participating in this more democratized financial system.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And what we've done with robin Hood is a few things.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the first is just making USDC one of

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the digital currencies that people can trade on on robin Hood.

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>They started with some of the you know, kind of

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional popular cryptocurrencies, but USDC has just become such a

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>critical part of anyone that's operating in the digital assets space,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>whether you're using exchanges while it's defy and so just

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>having that built into robin hood and their twenty three

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>million users is really powerful. The second thing really was,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've launched a new wallet, a Web three wallet,

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know they're really trying to bring that huge

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>user base they have into Web three and you know,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>making fiction lists fast and easy payments is a is

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a core part of what people want to be able

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to do in Web three and USDC is a core

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>part of that value proposition and and built in part

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. Well, for me, as you think about how

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>core USDC is and the stable coin ecosystem is when

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the linkage between the traditional financial system

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and the crypto world, let's quick listen to her of

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what that church your own parallel had to say. Given

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's so much regulatory attention to take a listen

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to this sound bite. There's a real need for more

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>appropriate regulation so that as as a DeFi expands and

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>starts to touch more and more retail customers and that

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Uh, so that appropriate regulation is in place.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really curious here, who do you think is

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take the biggest lead here and really stepping

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in and setting the groundwork for the US And how

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>soon do you expect it? Well, I mean, I think

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a critical issue, and I think there's bipartisan

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>support for this idea that payment stable coins such as

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>U s DC are a critical piece of how the

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going to compete on the Internet. And the

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>focus of policymakers, regulators like the FED and Treasury and

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>others is we need to have a clear set of

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>statutes for dollar stable coins in the United States, both

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to manage the risks but also to make it clear

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is a new model for using dollars on

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. And I think that with that is going

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to come tremendous legitimacy for not just stable coins, but

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 1>for the advancement of of digital assets as a as

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a core part of the financial system, core part of

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial system, and think about what's happening in China

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of millions of accounts when it comes to

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the digital one already very early to really get behind

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a central bank digital currency. Do you think the US

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is falling behind? You know, we like to say that

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the US is already winning the digital currency space race.

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Dollar digital currencies are the most widely used digital currencies

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet today, which says something which is the

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>preference for the dollar, the power of the open innovation

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of blockchains, the power of private sector innovation in the space.

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all. He created a leadership position for the dollar

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and for the United States. Now, what the United States

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to do is codify that and and solidify that

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so that these digital currency dollars like USDC and others

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that many other firms will likely issue, can become the

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>foundation for how financial products and services and payments and

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>commerce are going to work on the Internet. And so

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>really this is an opportunity for the U S who

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sees that existing leadership position and strengthen it. Well, we're

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>also coming at this conversation at a time of just

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>tremendous strength in the dollar. And if you look at

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>something that Sam bankmen, Freed tweeted just earlier this week, Boy,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>would the world be thinking differently about crypto price moves

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if they measured it for verse is world currency baskets

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of just US dollars. I'm wondering how you interpret

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that and what that means for currencies around the world

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in relationship cryptocurrency. I mean, look, it's a it's a

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fascinating time from a macro perspective. UM, I'm gonna be

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>talking in a few minutes here. It converged with Larry

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Summers about that macro outlook and out the role of

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar and what role the dollar is playing not

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>just in currency markets today, but the role that the

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going to play on the internet. UM. I

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>think right now it's a pretty it's a pretty pivotal moment.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And um, I think the structure of the international monetary

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>system is at stake, and there's a new kind of

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>competition that's happening in currencies. And I think, you know,

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>payment stable coins and this form of digital currency aligns

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with these kind of changing macro dynamics, and so I

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think play together give us some more specificity here, what

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>does the future look like in a world where currencies

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have been kind of all over the place more recently,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people really worry about the value of

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're holding. So what role very specifically does a

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>stable coin play. Especially outside of the US, We've we've

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>seen an incredible amount of adoption of dollar digital currencies

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like USDC all around the world. The demand for being

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>able to transact in the dollar and using it as

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a medium of exchange on the internet is very high.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that says a lot about the strength of

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar as an international currency. And I think the

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>growth of these networks, the growth of these blockchain networks,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the proliferation of more and more of these digital wallets

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like robin Hood or coin base or so many other

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>products that are out there. Um are are you know,

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to make these kinds of fiat digital currency

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>is even more popular in the world, And I think

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, I think that's a you know, it's

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous opportunity for the United States. Now, A question

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for you just about circle itself. Do you have any

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fundraising plans? What's next for you guys as you grow,

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and what's the status of going public? Yeah, so, um

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>circles in a really strong financial position. We've been growing

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty rapidly over the past couple of years. You can

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>see that in in sort of the growth in USDC.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>The company's more than doubling in size this year, and

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in in the best financial position that we've

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>really ever been in. We are in a registration process

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC to become a public company, and we

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>continue to go through that process of becoming qualified to

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and and

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll get there in the near future. What's the

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive landscape here? Do you think that USDC we'll look

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 1>see us d T very soon tether in market cap?

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that hasn't happened yet? And when

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>will it happen? Do you think? Yeah, I don't like

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to make you know, timeframe predictions or things like that.

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we've always just been very heads down focused

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on building something with a lot of trust and transparency,

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it in a regulated environment, partnering with great institutions,

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with great companies to continue to build this out, working

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with the developer community to grow this and I think

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>if we continue to do that, the rest the rest

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the work kind of gets done and so we're

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the very early stages of the adoption of of

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar stable coins and technology like this. You know, we

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think the total addressable market for this kind of technology

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is M two money, which is in the tens of

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars globally, and so it's super early stage. UM,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We're just focused on just trying to build infrastructure that

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>works for developers, businesses, people, users all around the world,

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and we'll just keep trying to improve that. Jeremy Lair,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that Circle's founder and CEO, on the heels of a

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>new big deal with Robin Hood. Thank you so much

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for your time. Add back to you. Thanks so Nali.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Now to the latest with Congress is battle to regulate

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>big tech. Supporters of a landmark bill to restrict Internet

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>giants from favoring their own products has a tough road

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 1>ahead now lawmakers are trying to jam the legislation through

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the brief lane duck period after the elections. Here to

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>discuss is Bloomberg's Emily burn Baum. Emily, why haven't we

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>voted on this yet? Hi? Thanks so much for having me. UM.

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Majority Leader Chuck Schumer pledged earlier this year that he

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>would put this legislation on the floor for obviously been months,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and that Um, we're hearing that he simply doesn't think

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it has the votes. The supporters of the legislation, such

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>as Minnesota Democrat Amy Klobshar, say they absolutely do have

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the votes. You just have to put it on the

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>floor to test that. Um. Schumer is uncomfortable with that.

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want people vote ahead of the mid term.

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's why it has gone this long without going

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to a vote. Emily, I'm reading your story on the

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal on bloomberg dot com title big text fos

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Pin fading antitrust hope on Lane Duck vote. Now, I

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>think I'm right in saying that this final push for

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>legislation was plotted over pretzels and beer. Give me the background. Yeah,

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So there was an October Fest, theamed Happy Hour gathering

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>UM last week. Basically, Uh, it was activist UM Congressional

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Aid supporting the legislation, FTC chair Lena Cohn, d O

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>j ANTI Trust head Jonathan Cantor so some of the

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>most important people in the Biden administration and in Congress,

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as Elizabeth Warren UM plotting out how are

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we going to get this bill across the finish line

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year. UM. It looks likely

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that the GOP is going to retake the House. UM,

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the GOP is not going to take up this bill

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in its current form, especially under a potential speaker Kevin McCarthy.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So they they were just trying to strategize and get together.

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Well quickly, Emily, how do they regroup? So are really

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing for the lame duck vote? They think, fine, have

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms pass and then there's no reason for

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable Democrats not to want to take this vote. They're

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>going to spend the next couple of months firming up

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the whip count UM and getting people on the record

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>saying I support this legislation. UM, in a lastic effort.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bloomberg's Emily burn Boum, thank you for that.

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That does it For this edition of Bloomberg Technology Thursday,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we have Desmond Limb from Workstream to talk employment, particularly

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with frontline workers. Don't forget you can check out our podcasts.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 1>online on Apple, Spotify and also on I Heart Radio.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg