WEBVTT - Balancing Free Agency and the Draft in 2026 | Buffalo Bills | Bills By The Numbers

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Glad you're here for Bills by the Numbers, where we

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>let the stats tell you where the Bills are at.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We're presented by fand will make every moment more coming up.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The balance between free agency and the draft. Is the

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>equation different for GM Brandon Bean this time around? And

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>why how much of the cap dollars have to go

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to the.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Defensive side of the ball.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And we'll have our one burning question, can somebody get

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>cap compliance online? One? Please to have you listening to

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>us here on Bills by the Numbers. He has Bill's

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall of Fame re Steve Tasker on Bills play by

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Playman Chris Brown. And as we approach the NFL Combine

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the month, this is where the

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>rubber meets the road for all NFL club decision making

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the roster, the free agent plan comes

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into focus in terms of a budget and player targets

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to sign. It's also where the final stage of information

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>gathering happens on draft prospects, whether they have a clean

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>bill of health and most importantly, are they a fit

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Bills. But despite a change made a head

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>coach this offseason and a scheme change on the defensive

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. A step back in twenty twenty

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>six from where they've been the last seven years running

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is not an option. How might that mandate change jam

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Bean's approach in improving the roster this offseason.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 3>You and I've talked about it a little bit on

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the Daily Show. I think the trade market is going

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 3>to be a little bit juiced up this year because

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>of ten head coaching vacancies, a large number of teams

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 3>going from four to three to three four and three

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>four to four to three, vice versa. There'll be players

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>on those ten rosters on the defensive side who fit

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>or don't fit. If they fit in a three to

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>four and they're not running a three to four anymore,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 3>you can trade that guy, and vice versa. I think

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>there's gonna be more lateral movement for players and gms

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>in this season than there has been, just because of

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>how many regime changes there are and the scheme fits.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 3>The cap continues to go up, so they'll you should

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>be able to kind of squeeze a more expensive player

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>under your cap if you've got the room. Teams have

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>known this is coming. The Bills are in better shape

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 3>than they have been in years past. At this point,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't mean they'll get to better shape than they

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>need to get, but so I'm I really think this year,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>as far as philosophically changing your roster, I think the

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>trade route is gonna be I think a little bit

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>more juicy than it has been in years past.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Sense to think that the trade market would be more robust,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you couple that with the teams that are

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>typically in need of making moves just to become cap compliant,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then on top of that salary structures on players

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that have just gotten too fat to justify the expense,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>and those players getting pushed potentially into the market. I

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a very intriguing off season

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Bills, knowing what has to change and the

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>degree of change on the defensive side of the ball,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and how the Bills are going to find the financial

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>space to address all of that while also entertaining a

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>draft shortly thereafter. I think it's going to be a

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>fascinating offseason for this team because of how much has

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to change so as to adjust to the new scheme defensively,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>while also not losing any ground in their contender status.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>If you will, taking a step back really does not

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sound like an option here, even though when you make

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a change like this, there is a chance you slide

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit from what you've been the last

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>several years.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.559
<v Speaker 2>As we know, job.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>One will be for the Bills to become cap compliant.

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Even with a cap set to go up between twenty

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five million dollars, Buffalo still has work to

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>do to not only get under the cap, but create

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>enough space to fortify the roster in some capacity in

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 1>free agency. In years past, we've largely seen Brandon Bean's

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>swing for value in the free agent market rather than

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>go big game hunting, and with cap constraints, they're likely

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>to do the same this offseason. The question is what

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage of their free agent budget do you believe goes

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to the defensive side of the ball, knowing that's where

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they have far more holes, at least on a surface look.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna kind of do the obviously, certainly they're

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>going to spend more money on the defensive side. I

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know that those guys are out there. I think

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 3>it probably be fifty to fifty. I think if they're

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna spend money, it's gonna be on a high end

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 3>wide out, which will you know, balance out the ledger

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of the guys they don't need they're gonna try and

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>get on defense that aren't available. I mean, you're not

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna get Miles Garrett on the free agent market or TJ.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Watt or Kyle Hamilton or some of these guys. Right,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Defenders are more valuable and are more costly. So I

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>think Brandon Bereen's probably gonna continue to go value on

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the defensive side, particularly in this first year of a

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 3>new defense, rather than go all in try and get

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a you know, swing for the fence on a home run. Now,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>there may be one that's presented to him by another

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 3>team that we don't know about. Maybe, but I would

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 3>think there's gonna spend more on fewer guys on the

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 3>offensive side of the ball to make sure they can

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>still keep scoring touchdowns even if it takes them a

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>minute to find their their legs.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>On defense, Yeah, if you're talking dollars in cents, I

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>would tend to agree it's probably going to wind up

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.799
<v Speaker 1>being balanced when it all comes out in the wash.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking bodies though, right, it's probably eighty twenty defense.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, by sheer number.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Think there are going to be some players on that

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball that just flat out don't fit.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 2>Anymore with the new scheme change.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>And even if they're under contract, you know, they might

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>be a cap casualty or just deemed not a fit

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and moved via trade, you know, to get back to

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>your earlier point. And so I think, if you're talking

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of bodies, the defense is going to endure

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>far more change over than the offensive side of the ball.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>This offseason we have often seen being fill as many

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>perceived roster holes as possible with free agents, so his

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>hand is enforced in theft and more often than not,

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>he's been successful in doing that. But knowing the pressure

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is there to get over the playoff hump right now,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>does Bean have to acquire more proven commodities in free

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>agency to improve the roster rather than drafting players and

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>hoping a few of them are starting caliber anthers answers

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for their offensive or defensive lineup.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question. H No, I think they're gonna

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>do both. I think they're gonna draft guys and they're

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna try and get as good a guys as they

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>possibly can, and I think they'll probably lean on their

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>coaching staffs expertise about saying, what about this, particularly in

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>the free agent market, but what do you think about

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>this guy versus this guy, that guy versus this guy.

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the coaching staff will have a large, a

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 3>loud voice in the guys they pluck out of the

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 3>free agent market, and I that's the way it's always

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna draft. Now, the draft may be a different story.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>It may be the college scouts who have the bigger voice.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 3>The coach will say I like this, you know, they'll

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 3>say I like this type of guy. The scouts will say,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>this is that guy. So that's what I think. That's

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>how I think it will go. But I they'll get

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>as proven of players as they can and fit them

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 3>under the cap. But I just don't think there are

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:31.679
<v Speaker 3>gonna be any elite players available on the defensive side.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm attacking this question from a different angle

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>than you are. I don't think they're looking for elite

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>players per se on the free agent market. They first

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, they can't afford them. But I think more

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>than in recent years, they are looking for known fits

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in this system. Because as much as their coaches watch

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the guys that are under contract on this roster and

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>deem them a fit for this defense.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>It's still a projection.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, you might have a more accurate projection on a

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>guy like Terrell Bernard who's played in a three to

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>four in college and was very successful, or a Landon

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson who played in a three man front at Arkansas

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've seen him in this role, and so the

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>projection you feel better about. The vast majority of these

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are projections. So knowing you have players under contract

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>from previous years that you're projecting into this scheme, and

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>then everyone you draft might be a projection into that

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>scheme on the defensive side of the ball man, you

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>need some sure things and so I think this offseason

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>even more so than previous ones, you need more sure

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>fire fits that you know can line up and play

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and be productive for you in this system in the

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>free agent market than maybe in the last five years,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because you already had guys in your pipeline on your

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>roster that you knew or fit. You had Matt Mullane,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you had Jordan Poyer, you know, you had Taron Johnson,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you had Tredevious. What you had Christian Beffer. You had

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive lineman. Whatever it was that you knew fit this system,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's all gone. Now you're starting fresh, and as convinced

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as you might be that Dion Walker can be a

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle in a two gap system, I'm still finding

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>myself a nose tackle on the free agent market that

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I know for sure can play nose tackle.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not like, I gotta have that.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think because of and desperation is not

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the word I'm looking for here, but because you have

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to have positional certainty at some positions in this three

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>four defense, I think you unequivocally have to find free

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>agent answers.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>They can be budgetary, but.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>As long as you know day one I put the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ball on the ground that guy can play nose tackle

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for me's have to have answers.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the gray area we're talking about. If you've got

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>a guy like an Ed Oliver who's a first round

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 3>draft pick, he's got first round capabilities, and when he's

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>out there and healthy, he's a difference maker and a real,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of a problem in a four to

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>three and you pulled them over to three four and

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 3>you think, okay, it's gonna take some getting used to

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 3>it. But his athleticism and his traits are better than Joey

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 3>bagg of Donuts, who his traits whatever they are, and

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 3>his gifts are which are not as good as eds.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 3>But he's built for the four three three four. I mean,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 3>he's built for the system. That's the gray area. You

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>have his ed with his gifts and maybe not exactly

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 3>what you want, but his athleticism and his skills allow

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>him to figure it out and be productive. Or is

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>he better as a guy who doesn't fit but is

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>a better athlete than a guy who does fit who's

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>not as good an athlete. You know what I'm saying.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 3>That's the gray are the call you got to make.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the call you got to make as a as

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>a coaching staff. It's it's not easy until you actually

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, because you don't get a chance to line

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>He's get in a game and find That's.

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Why I think Being's gonna lean toward guys that he

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sees on film being productive in a three four scheme.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh and we can get him for six million a year.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Done get him in here, like you know what I mean,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Like it's that kind of you. I think that's the scenario.

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna put himself in more often.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>The problem And as crazy as it sounds, you're gonna

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>pay the guys six million a year, You're gonna get

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>six million in value when everybody around him is making

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty and they're getting twenty million dollars in value. That's

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>a problem.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I just think they gotta find that kind

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of value.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they're looking for different types of athletes, now, no

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 3>question about it.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Affordable but proven productive in this kind of a scheme

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is the highest of highest priorities. All Right, we just

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we discussed this and broach this subject a little bit.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna tweak it a little.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But knowing that cap constraints could make the ability to

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sign a higher number of free agents difficult, do you

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>expect the Bills personnel department to be more apt to

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>execute a few player for player or player for draft

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>capital trades to move money out and create more cap space.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>It does open up a logical window for players rather

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 3>than draft picks to go out to go out. It

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>opens that up on all ten of the new regimes,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and with that many teams moving around like that, it

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 3>will also kind of reach out and make its way

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 3>into other teams who aren't making regime changes but have

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>guys available or who they're deep at this position or

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>shallow at the position and they need the guys. So, yes,

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 3>I do. I think it really widens the market for

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>players to be available in trades rather than draft picks. Now,

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 3>certainly we're going to see the same number. Listen, we're

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>going to give you our one this year for your

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 3>one next year, and you can pick your guy, will

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>take your one for next year. We're seeing that all.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>We see that all the time. Right, we'll move back

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 3>fifteen spots, but you're gonna give us your one next

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>year and a two next year or a three next year.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>That's always happening, And that's gonna that's gonna be exactly

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 3>the same this year as it always is, because it's

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 3>draft picks for draft picks, and they're all unknowns. This

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>year more so than any other. I believe it opens

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>up the possibility that players that you love and respect

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 3>on your respective teams are around the knee league, they're

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>up on they're on the block.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the Bills, because of their cap constraints, are in

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a much different position than a regime change in Tennessee

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>or in Las Vegas. They're tight against the cap and

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they're making a scheme change. They want to move players out.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>The Titans and the Raiders lead the league in cap

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>space this offseason one hundred and four million, ninety one

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half million. Those are teams that, just by

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>virtue of example, Brandon Bean could call and say, Hey,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got player X is their interest. I know you

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can stomach the salary. Either give me draft capital back

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so I have dollars out, or give me a player

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on his rookie deal so I can have dollars in

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that I can absorb. And I'm giving you a frontline

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>player for your new scheme because you can stomach the money.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are valuable potential trade partners. Titans with almost one

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five million in cap space, you can give

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>them a fifteen million dollar a year player.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>They don't even blink, right, and the thing that you'll

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 3>get back is something. But you have to get something

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 3>back that they don't value as much as the player.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is it to Andre Sweat, I'm gonna keep talking

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>about that guy until we land them in a trade.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>The more you talk about the less likely this might be.

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>That's like, that's a guy in his rookie deal. That's

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>why I was.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's yeah, but yet easier said than Doe is.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I get it, but you're right. I do think players

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 3>will be more available to move teams this year in

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the trade market rather than draft capital and cap space

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>than all of that. I just think that's more likely

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>We move along to the numbers game where Steve is

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be quizzed on NFL Combine history. It is

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on the doorsteps, So why knock?

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Question number one?

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Max Harston had the fastest forty time at the

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>combine last year. He clocked a four to eight. Where

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>does his forty time rank in the history of the

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>combine since two thousand and six, when the modern timing

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>system was implemented.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Top ten?

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You are correct, he is exactly tenth tenth fastest time

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and six, fourth fastest corners.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 3>That listen, that's four to two.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 2>That's moving.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah, he's fast.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So he trails only Kaylon Barnes, DJ Turner who's with

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, and Riek Woolen of the Seahawks in fastest

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>forty times among quarterbacks since cornerbacks since two thousand and six.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Question number two, what Buffalo Bill's draft choice holds the

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>team record for bench press reps at the NFL COMBA

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bench press rep? Oh, yeah, not really done that much

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>anymore by a lot of prospects at the combat.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>What year was it done? Can I ask her?

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have it my era or was it somebody else?

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>It's after your era.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Bench press reps Kyle Wood, It is not Kyle Williams.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'll say Quiat Teller.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not Wyatt Teller. It's a little bit earlier than that.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, give you one more US reps.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It is a big guy as you would expect.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll say Dion, No, it's before deal. Hold on,

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>that's not guess uh. I put the card down, but

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 3>I didn't take my hand down. I will say, let

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>me think, boy, I couldn't tell it.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It is life Larsen, Remember I do

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>remember him powerlifter.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Forty five reps on.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>The bench, the five That is a fat number. Question

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>number three, how long did Dion Dawkins arms measure at

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the NFL COMBA.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>You had to guess? What would you say is arm.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Length was between thirty four and thirty five inches.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>It is exactly thirty five inches for Dionda Hawkins thirty

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>five inch arms. That's why he's getting it done at

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just six foot three. He's got vines for arms. Kidding

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and question number four, what Buffalo Bill's draft choice holds

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the team record for highest vertical leap at the NFL combine?

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Do you wonder what the number is?

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Forty one and a half inches? Aaron who got forty

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one and a half inches between the bottom of their

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>shoes and the floor.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not Aaron, it is not. I will say I'm

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>leaning towards as an offensive player.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>It is not.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you it's a defensive player.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll say Tredavious White.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>It is not Tredavious White. But your position is correct?

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Right now? Is it like post two thousand, Yes, it is.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it's within the last ten years.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll say, uh, if you wouldn't say Max Harriston all passes,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>it's not Max.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, No, he is third all time thirty nine and

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a half inches.

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say, I sure know I knew this.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Trel Bernard. It is not Terrell Bernard.

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It is Ronald Darby forty one and a half inches,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the first pick in the twenty fifteen draft. In round two,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Saran Neil second all time at forty and a half inches,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and Max Harrison third all time at thirty nine and

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. The DB's holding it down on the vertical.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Eat those guys or they're different cats, man. I go

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>on and on telling story about it. The dbs in

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the NFL are faster than anybody you've ever you've ever

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 3>competed against, and they're better athletes anybody you've ever competed against.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Play the whole game in reverse there. They're unbelievable. Yeah,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 3>unbelievable athletes.

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Bill's fans.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Get in on the action with FanDuel, America's number one sportsbook.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Just download the app today to play anyway you want. Plus,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>with live betting, you'll get updated odds on games that

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have already started.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Best of all, you get paid your winnings fast.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Make every moment more with FanDuel Official Sportsbook, partner of

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. Time now for our one burning question

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty twenty six NFL draft. Do you expect

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Bean to be more aggressive and part with draft

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>capital to move up the board, or do you think

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>after possibly being somewhat limited in free agency, that Bean

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>will be more app to trade back out of positions

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to acquire more draft capital and take a volume approach.

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I think think it's more likely that it takes a

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 3>volume approach because they're picking twenty sixth overall. Now, I

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many guys they have a first round

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 3>grade on, so nobody does. They probably haven't even decided

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that themselves. But if there's like thirty, maybe they do

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>move up. If it's you know, twenty or fifteen, then

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>they'll probably move back and get more picks. Last year,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>it was one of those drafts where most of the

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 3>value is between the second and fourth round. There was

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a ton of players in that spot there, which meant,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's where you want to pick. I think

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it's more I think it's more likely this year that

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 3>he drops back, grabs a bunch more picks, and makes selections.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I think volume is the way they're going to go.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Only because they're picking twenty six to begin with.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's gonna be hard to move up to get somebody,

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>so I think he's more appt to go with the

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>volume approach, especially with cap constraints. Odds are not as

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>many free agents coming in, so your numbers might be

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>down there. So you've got to increase your numbers in

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the draft, move back, add picks. I mean, they only

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>have seven going in and it's it's all their own

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>through the first five rounds. They're gonna be drafting low

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>every single round. If you move back, you can at

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>least get higher in a round or two with extra

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>picks that you acquire.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>And also this is the pick, the pick that you get,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the twenty fifth pick or whatever, twenty six, twenty sixth pick.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>There's just there's just it's a quarterback week draft, so

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 3>there's not going to be teams wanting to get into

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 3>the end of the third first round so they can

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>grab a fifth year on a quarterback. There's just you're

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>just not going to be able to You might be

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 3>able to move back, but only I don't even know,

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 3>because there's no like, there's no Lamar Jackson in this

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>draft where a team might say, you know what, we're

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 3>going to take a flyer on this quarterback thinking he's

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 3>and we're gonna get an extra year on his contract

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 3>by picking him in the first round. Kind of thing.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Bills will probably market that pick

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 3>big time and see what they can get for it.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>You can just see teams going, yeah, we'll give you

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 3>a pick, like a really good pick next year. Yeah,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, we need our picks this year. I don't

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 3>know that I'm gonna go. Look, we'll start getting into

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 3>this more and more as we get through this. But

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to know how many teams have like twelve

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 3>picks in this draft, right, I mean, how many teams

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>have eleven picks? How many teams have ten picks rather

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>than just the seven or the six that some teams have. Yeah,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 3>that'll tell you how which teams will be in the market.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>If the Bills only have seven, they've got their own

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one through five, and then they have two sevens which

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>came from trades the last couple of years from the

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Dallas Cowboys. So you gonna be picking

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>late through the first five rounds. Might behoove them to

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>move back add a few picks, picking the high or

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>middle stages of some of those rounds, and scoop up

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>some quality talent for their offense or defense, respectively. So

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've seen them go both ways. I mean,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Bean has gone both ways in the draft in

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>his you know, eight drafts that he's presided over for

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bills, so nothing would surprise me coming from him

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Our closing figure takes a look at

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's top pick, which hasn't always been in round one.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Since the twenty eighteen draft when Brandon Bean took over,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bills have taken a defensive player five times and

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 1>an offensive player three times with their first pick, and

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we are counting second round picks aj Epanessa and Keon

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Coleman since they were the first picks taken in those

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>respective drafts. So pretty balanced all things considered. That's all

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for this edition. Make sure you subscribe on your podcast

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>platform of choice so you're notified when our next episode

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is out, or watch us on the Bills YouTube channel,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>because when you need to know about the Bills, you

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>need to check Bills by the Numbers for Steve Tasker

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>on Chris Brown.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. We'll catch you next time.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Everybody,