WEBVTT - Oaktree Howard Marks: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholets on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>This week on Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio, I

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have a very special guest. Yes, I know you're all

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna make fun of me once again, I am saying

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a very special guest. But when you hear

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with my guest, you will agree this is

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a very special guest. Howard Mark's chairman, co founder oak

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Tree Capital. His firm has put up an absolutely astonishing

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>track record of long term performance in the debt market.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>He's been running the firm for twenty two years. They've

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>put up phenomenal numbers. Nobody is really even close to them. Uh.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And and when you consider that it's in debt and

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not equity, the numbers are even more astonishing. I I

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>found Howard to be extremely thoughtful, intelligent, forthcoming individual. Not

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are in his circumstances UH

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to be as just transparent and open. And you know,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>he just lays his cards down on the table. Uh.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll find his discussion on second level thinking

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to be very worthwhile, as well as his explanation for

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>how and why investors become successful. You know, there are

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are smart guys, who are

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hard working, who who apply their their field in the

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>um industry of of investing in finance, and they end

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>up putting out numbers that are you know, fair at best.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And Howard explains what you need to do if you

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>want to outperform. I especially am fond of his discussion

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on predictions and the folly of forecasts let's a little

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of confirmation bias on my time, my my part,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as his discussion on on risk and risk management.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>I found that absolutely fascinating and I think you will

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. So, without any further ado, here is my

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Howard Marks of oak Tree Capital. This is

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>special guest today is truly a special guest. His name

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>is Howard Marks and he runs oak Tree Capital. Let

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>me give a short version of Howard's curriculum vita, which

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is quite lengthy. Um graduated from Wharton at the University

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania cum laude in nine seven, a major in

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>finance and a minor in Japanese studies. Got his MBA

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, worked

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as an equity research analyst at City Corps for the

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>next decade before he became director of research. Ultimately became

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>vice president and senior portfolio manager for convertible and high

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>yield securities. Left to lead the distressed asset group at

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Trust Company of the West. Did you lead that group

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>or set it up? We'll we'll get into that. We'll

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>get into a little more details about that. And then

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he left Trust Company of the West to set up

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>oak Tree Capital, which runs a high yeld bond fund,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>distressed debt, private equity, and other strategies, and has put

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>up some astonishing performance numbers. The seventeen distressed debt funds

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that oak Tree has ranked up annual gains of after

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fees for the past twenty two years, far outpacing its peers.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marks, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you, Barry. So let's

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get into a little bit about your background. Obviously Wharton

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then a MBA suggests you had been thinking about finance.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Were there ever any plans to do anything besides uh,

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>go into asset management. Well, I wasn't one of these

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>kids who was reading prospectuses at nine you know. Uh,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>first I wanted to be a high school history professor,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to be an architect. I had lots

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of interest. And then then when I got serious, I

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>thought I'd be an accountant because that's what my dad was,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and I I really enjoyed accounting. But when when I

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>got to Warden, I switched from accounting to finance in

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>terms of my interest. When I got out of Chicago,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I still didn't know what I wanted to do. I

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>knew it would be in finance, but I applied for

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>six different jobs in six different fields of finance. Oh

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's quite interesting. What other fields were you looking at? Accounting,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate finance, investment, banking, consulting, um, great variety. Well, well,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you seem to have found your call. And I got

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>lucky to say, And by the way, that's something that

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.239
<v Speaker 1>just about every guest I've had has said, never hurts

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to get lucky, and U being smart doesn't hurt either.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>A good combination between the two of them. So you

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>began your career. I found this fascinating. You began your

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>career as an equity analyst, and yet when you moved

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Trust Company of the West, you started covering

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. How did that transition take place? Well, it's

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>not that interesting a story, but but but you know

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at a bank, you progress, uh hierarchically. So I moved

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>from being a junior anals so senior analyst, to a

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>unit head to director of research. As you described. The

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>bank didn't do well in that period because we were

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>nifty fifty investors, the fifty biggest, fastest growing, best companies

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in America. UM. And if you bought them in sixty

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>eight and you sold him in seventy three, uh, in

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the best companies in America lost any money. Uh. And

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so that that didn't work out well. I was part

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of that UM regime and a new guy came in

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to be chief investment officer and and he wanted his

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>own director of research. And he said, I'd like you

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to start a convertible body fund just like just like that,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I did. It was August the first seventy eight.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I got a call later that month from

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from my boss and he said, you know, the there's

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>some guy in California named Milken or something, and he

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>deals in high yield bonds. Can you figure out what

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that means? Because a client has just asked for a

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hiel bond portfolio. You know, that was part of my luck.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>That was the beginning of the hyl bond industry. I

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>was thirty seven years ago. And uh, you know, almost

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 1>everything that's been interesting in finance in the last thirty

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seven years has gone through, uh, the hyal bond market.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's front row seat on history. And you know,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the luck is to get there early, and

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I did. And I also get the sense that you

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>very much enjoy having that front seat on history, in

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>history and being able to to be more than a spectator,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but an active partisan, right, an active participant, and and

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and somebody who tries to figure out what's going on,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not just cope with what's going on, but actually understand

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and fundamentally and and as you know, communicate about it.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe you have described that as second degree thinking,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>second level, second level, second level thinking. Yes, that's right. Uh.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the real success in investing goes to people

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>who who achieve a superior understanding of the things that

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are going on, why they're going on, and what they mean.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, not just understand what the crowd knows,

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but a whole level beyond that. Well, if you if

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you think the same as everybody else, you'll behave the

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>same And if you behave the same as everybody else,

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't expect to outperform. You'll get you'll get average results.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But in investing um success consists of having above average results.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So you have to get away from the crowd and

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to achieve a higher level of thinking. You know,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, very simple uh people say it's a great company,

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you should buy the stock. Second level thinker says, it's

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a great company, but it's not as great as everybody thinks,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you should sell the stock. So it's kind of uh,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of reflexive or counterintuitive. Doug Doug cast We

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.239
<v Speaker 1>were discussing a mutual friend calls that variant perception, looking

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>at things a little differently than everybody else does to

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>find the opportunity. That's right. So, so speaking of opportunity,

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you end up at Trust Company of the West and

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you created the high EELD bond fund. There a convertible

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>securities funds and is this was this the world's first

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>distress bond fund. I think it was the first distressed

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>debt fund from a mainstream financial institution prior to that

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>at just as our high yeld bond fund that city

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and seventy eight was the first one from a financial institution.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>No bank had ever done it before, or trust company

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and UH and the same was true in the distress

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>dead field. You know, you had your your, your couple

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of guys at a desk in Grantwitch or on place

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>trading for their own accounts, or a few for a few,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a small high net worth hedge funds,

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but UH, nobody had ever done it on the institutional scale.

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>special guest today is Howard Marks. He is the founder

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and chairman of oak Tree Capital. And we were discussing previously.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You had set up what turned out to be the

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>largest distressed debt funds right in the midst of the

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>financial collapse in oh seven o eight. What was that like?

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>What sort of pushback did you get from investors? Well,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we started to raise UH capital on the first day

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of oh seven and things have been going very well

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world. UM. And what happens, of course, is

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that when things go well, UH standards decline. People require

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>less credit worthiness, they do riskier deals, they take more risk,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because what the hell they figure, the more risk you take,

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the more money you make. Uh. We were alarmed at

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that friend, and so we went out to raise a fund.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>On the first day of O seven, we said we'd

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>like to raise three billion. Now we had started off

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>eight UM with a ninety six million dollar fund. We

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>had grown past a billion dollar mark around and here

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we are in O seven. We said we liked that

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>three billion UM and uh. Within a month people had

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>offered us eight and we said, we can't take eight.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing to do with eight. But we'll take three

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half and we'll close that fund and we'll

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>start investing the three and a half billion. And uh.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But we asked people to give us the remainder of

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their commitments for a standby fund, that the money that

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we could have in reserve, because we thought there was

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity coming and if it came, we'd like that

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more money. I think I think that was a little

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of an understatement that opportunity came along. It certainly

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>did later on it did. So anyway, we had the

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>first closing in March of O seven and the last

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>closing in March of OH eight, and by the time

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we finished raising money was ten point nine billion, as

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and now is our fund seven B we

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>called it, and we we told people that we wouldn't

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>raise them invest the money until there was something good

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with it, and we wouldn't charge any fees

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>until we invested the money. Um So we waited from

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the March oh seven until June of eight to start investing,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and in June of eight we started to invest gradually

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and the fund was called the Dailyman went under September

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of eight, and then we really got busy and

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it was se called on December. How long did it

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>take to get fully invested at that point, well, the

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>last we never invested the last money. It's an interesting story, yes,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>because well we thought that in a real meltdown that

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>cash would be king. We would be involved in bankruptcy restructurings,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and in order to really capitalize on them. You know,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in a world where nobody has any money, there's a

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>great premium on having some cash, and we thought that

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>having some cash in reserve could give us real power

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at the bargaining table. So we we said we're going

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to leave the last ten percent of the fund, which

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was a billion one uninvested, so we never did invest that,

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and those restructurings, for the most part, never materialized. The

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>world turned around much faster than we would have thought.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's quite fascinating. And I mentioned in in the introduction

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that you have about seventeen distress funds, all told different series.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. And the performance numbers on those funds,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and we rarely tout performance. We don't like to get

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>into the details too much, but I have to mention

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>these numbers because they're just astonishing. After fees over the

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>past twenty two years, your funds of average annually, that's

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>just extraordinary. Well, my colleagues are exceptional. Um, you're just

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a buy stand. They're just an innocent boy. Well, the

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>day to day the person who really uh you know,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I I help set the scene and make them big

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>tactical decisions. But the person who actually runs that fund

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from day to day is Bruce carsh He's been my

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>partner since right as well, right, and uh, and he's

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just he's just an exceptional strategist, you know, competitor, uh,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, chess player, what what have you? And he

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just figures out how to gain these things. We we've

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>always had a great UH stable of financial analysts that

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>work with us. And so you know, the key is

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to do a better job than others of figuring out

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>what the what the company that rises from the ashes

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of bankruptcy is going to be worth, and how to

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>get how to get a piece of that cheaply and

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>UH and they've been able to do that successfully over

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the years. Now, I agree with you Barry the short

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>term that performance numbers, we shouldn't dwell on them too much.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And I love your reciting hours. But but I would

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I didn't mention the fact that that is

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>an unlevered return. Now that's we don't borrow any money

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to amp up the results. That's just the result of

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>our investments making it even even more extraordinary. So so

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the secret to your success is a combination of an

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>outstanding team UH, excellent assessment of what's going on, figuring

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>out the valuation of what things are worth, and and

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you avoid what's been Dick Thaler called the

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>failor called the winner's course, the bidding too much to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually win, and finding yourself with something that you ultimately

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>paid too much for. I think that the secret to

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>solving all problems. Starts with awareness of that problem. So

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if you understand that that that winning an auction is

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a a boon, uh, then you you can

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>develop discipline. Uh and UH you know UH. When we

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>started oak Tree, we wrote out the uh the investment philosophy.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>There are six tenants to it. It's on the website

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if anybody wants to look. We've never changed a word

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in over twenty years. And the first tenant says that

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the that they are the most important part of our

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>job is risk control. So I'm proud of the performance

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers that you reported, but I'm prouder that I believe

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>they have been achieved with the risks under control. I

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>believe that the first job of the money manager is

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not to make a lot of money, and it's not

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to beat the market, and it's not to be in

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the top quartile. The first job is to control risk.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And everybody at oak Tree believes that follows that and

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe that we always have had an effective emphasis

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on controlling the risk. So now, when you describe controlling risk,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to put a little mean on those bones.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you referring to potential returns relative to the risk

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're taking. Are you talking about loss of capital? What

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly is risk to someone running other people's money? Well,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, you know, the the academics to find investment

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>risk as volatility. I do not agree. To me. The

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>risk that matters is the risk of of permanent loss. Now,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of kinds of risks, and I put

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>out a memo in which I think I described twenty

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>three or twenty four different kinds of risk. But the

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one that really matters is the risk of permanent laws.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And we believe that we can mitigate that risk by

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>picking in the right industries where the values are lasting

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than ephemeral, by buying debt which is at the

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>top in terms of priority rather than at the bottom,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>by doing rigorous financial analysis. You know, really, uh, safety

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from paying less than things are worth and building

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in a margin of safety. Uh So, only if you

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>fully understand what things are worth can you buy for less.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Howard Marks. He is the founder and

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>chairman of oak Tree Capital. And before the break we

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>had been talking about your chairman's memos, which I find

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to be not only required reading, but absolutely fascinating. Um,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>why did you start the chairman memos? Chairman's memos? What

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was the thinking beyond that? I wish I knew. You know,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I started twenty five years ago. I certainly can't remember

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>back that long. No legislative history, you don't have any

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>notes or anything. It just started. Well, what I would

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guess is that you know, I mean years ago, I

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>had twenty years in this industry or twenty two, and

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I was starting to think to develop the philosophy. What

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>did I believe in? What did I stand for? And

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what did I reject? Uh? And UH. Two events occurred

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>UH where I thought there was something to be learned

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>from the juxtaposition. So I wrote the first memo. H

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I had. I had dinner with the chief investment officer

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>of a large pension fund, and he explained to me

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that in his fourteen years on the job, his fund

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>had never been above the twenty seven percentile or below

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the forty seventh percentile. It was solidly in the second

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>quartile of pension funds, and as a result, for the

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years overall, he was in the fourth percentage. So,

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words, by not having any huge blowout years

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>which often follows those huge top ten years. He managed

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to just gradually rise to the top. He never had

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a top ten year he was he was solidly just

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>just a bit above average. Uh, and in the peculiar

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>math of investing, that made him one of the best

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And then I came back to New

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>York and I and I read about the president of

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an investment management firm which was having a particularly bad

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>year that year, and he said, well, you know, he says, yes,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's unfortunate, but the truth is, if you want to

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be in the top five percent of money managers, you

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>have to be willing to be in the bottom five percent.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And I said to myself, I am absolutely unwilling to

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>be in the bottom five percent. I don't care if

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the top five percent in any given years. Obviously,

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>my previous discussion had shown that it's not essential, uh,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but I sure didn't want to be in the bottom five.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So that was that was a good look at two

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>different ways to think, and it was clear to me

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>which one had the appeal. So consistency second quartile over

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>long periods of time put you in that top five

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or better, and no blow ups and no blow ups.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So you start these in this is pre internet. Are

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you faxing these? Are you? How are these going out?

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm writing them up and uh, you know, stuffing

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>envelopes and and and putting them out on paper and

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh putting stamps on him and and and throwing

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>them down the drain. Now why do I say down that? Wait? Wait,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so every quarter the whole staff gets together periodically, so

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't wasn't that regular in the beginning, but at

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>least once a year, I think, just once a year

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in ninety and once a year in ninety one. And

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>out they go. And what's the response? Non zero crickets

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>zero response. That's why I say throwing him down the drain?

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>If for all I knew they were being held up

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>by the post office and this was going to investors

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in your funds and clients of the firm and other

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>assorted well, yes, clients and friends, and nobody picked up

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the response that because just so you know, in my office,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you put out a note and my head of research

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>comes up to me and said, hey, did you see

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the marks letter? Yeah, of course I saw it this morning.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on I'm on the list like anybody else. Who's

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>half smart has done none of that, you know, you know,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just crickets. As I recall it, there wasn't a response

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first ten years, Akade. So you're just sending

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>these out into the void and literally nothing. And I

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what kept me going, uh you know,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with that lack of a reward, no feedback, none, none.

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>But it had to be a the process itself had

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhat of a reward of itself, yet enjoy it.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You clearly are a gifted writer or you like putting

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>words on paper. There had to be something, although I

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>would tell you it has to be a little funny

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>not here. So when did you first start to see

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like if you were on the radio and

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you just spoke and nobody spoke back. By the way,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>nobody is you should know that we're not broadcasting this.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>This is just my own private collection. Uh So, so

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what finally generates a response? When do you finally hear that, hey,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody is reading these thoughts. Well, I was working on

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a memo and I put it out on the first

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>day of two thousand and it was called bubble dot com.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And basically what it said is that there's so much

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>buzz and hype around technology that I think it's overdone,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to cause a problem for

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the people who are following it blindly. And that memo

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>had too virtues. It was right, and it was right soon.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Being right is not enough, because if it takes you

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to three four years to be right, everybody's forgotten you

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>by the time the events, Uh comply with your forecast.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But trading right plus early equals wrong. Right. But you know,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the the tech stocks collapsed sometime around the second quarter

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and and, as I think I wrote

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in the introduction to my book, after ten years, I

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>became an overnight success. There you go. You're listening to

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>is Howard Marks. He is the founder and chairman of

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Oaktree Capital. We were talking about Wall Streets obsession with forecast.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me give you a quote of yours,

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm paraphrasing slightly. Uh. When it comes to investing,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we are concerned with actually one thing, dealing with the future.

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Yet it's clearly impossible to know anything about the future.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't predict, you can only prepare So the first

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>question is why is the financial industry so in love

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>with forecasts? And the second question is what can investor

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>do about it? Well, if I was competing for a

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>piece of business, and I walked into your living room

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know, look, very I really have

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>no idea what's going to happen in the markets, in

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the economies, or in rates and in the coming year.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And the next guy comes in he says, I'll tell

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what's gonna happen. You know that guy,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the business ninety odd percent of the time. Now,

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the truth is he'll give you the business because because

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't know any better than I do. But

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, nobody likes totally ambiguity. Um. And yet you

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>know Mark Twain said, it's not what you don't know

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that gets you into trouble, it's what you know for

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>certain that just ain't true. I think it's much more

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>valid and much more prudent to admit when you don't

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>know something than to act as if you do. To

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>say the least, I'm I'm fond of looking at current

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>situations and going back a year to say, hey, how

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>many people last saw the we're saying, by the way,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>oil is going to get cut in half. Nobody said

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Nobody said in advance Russia's invading the Ukraine.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>People had idea there were issues with with Greece. I

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think a lot of people were saying, hey, get

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ready for a full on bear market in China after

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the market doubles the first six months of this year, right, So,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so no doubt that that's a that's a process. Here's

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>another quote of yours that I really enjoy. We can

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>make excellent investment decisions on the basis of present observations

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with no need to make guesses about the future. Well,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I believe what are my mottos for myself

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we never know where we're going, but we

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sure as hell order know where we are. We don't

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen in the economy, we don't

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen in the market next year,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but we can have a sense for the whether the

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>market environment is hostile or friendly from what's going on

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>around us. What are other people doing, what are they thinking,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>how are they acting? Um are are are the people

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on radio and TV shows wildly bullish? Or are they

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>very cautious. When they're wildly bullish, we should be worried.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>When they're cautious, we can turn aggressive, you know. Uh.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett says, the less prudence with which others conduct

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>their affairs, the greater the prudence with which we must

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>conduct our own affairs. So if we know that people

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are throwing money at wild leverage straw sured speculative deals,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>then we know that we're in an overheated environment, and

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we should turn cautious. And I think that using indicators

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>like like those can work. Nobody gets timing exactly right.

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>But the question is, uh, can you improve upon a

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold approach? Can you improve upon the faulty

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>uh timing that the herd engages in. It makes a

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Um, here's another quote of yours that

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like. I called called once called this extrapolation

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to infinity. And you had said, rule number one, most

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>things proved to be cyclical. Rule number two. Some of

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the greatest opportunities for gain and loss comes when other

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people forget rule number one. Explain that, well, I mean,

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid in the early seventies, one

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of my mentors described to me the three stage is

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of a bull market. The first stage, when only a

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 1>few people believed that things could ever get better, the

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>middle stage, when most people understand that improvement is taking place,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and the last stage, when everybody believes things will get

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>better forever. So the point is, uh, you should know

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which stage you're in, and you should act accordingly. And

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if you if it's hard to get in in the

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>first stage but desirable but dangerous to get in or

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>stay in in the latter stage, And the question is

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>can you figure that out? And I believe you can,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>which leads us to a question. Here we are in

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>mid two thousand fifteen, what stage of the bull market

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are we in? Um? Well, first of all, it depends

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on which market you're talking about. You most people talk

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about the stock market, I think in terms of the

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>credit market or the debt market. So let's let's talk

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>about both. Okay, Okay, Well, first of all, let me

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>say that the U. S economy is going okay. It

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a gradual, unsteady, halting, unimpressive, but intact recovery

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and no reason to think that's gonna stop anytime. So,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>so what we call in the business the fundamentals are

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a relatively intact in this country. I don't even want

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to go abroad yet. Uh. Then we have to look

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>at investor psychology. Uh, and then we have to look

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at valuations. Psychology is a little bit on the positive side.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think too many people are very excited about

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the future. They're too I don't think too many people

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are excited about buying today. Um, and yet they are buying.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Why I call them handcuffed volunteers. People can't keep money

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in cash, they can't be money in the bank, they

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>can't keep it in money market funds because they get

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a return of zero. They can't buy treasuries that yield

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>one or two. So they go out on the risk

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>curve and they buy things that historically maybe they haven't

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>bought because they're so satisfy with returns of zero, one

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or two. So there is no alternative form of invitment.

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And and and so in that context, people look for

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what they call good relative buys. Well, this is I

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like this because it's not as bad as that. You know,

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>do you really want to buy something for your investment

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>portfolio because it's not as bad as something else? No? Uh,

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'd like to buy great buys, and then

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to look at price, and the answer is

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on price, there's very little out there today which is

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a great buy. You know, the goal of the value investor,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>our goal at oak Tree, the goal of Bruce Carsh's

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>distress debt funds, which you described, is to buy things

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for less than their worth. There's very little that you

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>can buy today for less than its worth? Is that

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>true on the debt side as well as the equality?

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Think it very much is. So we're we're fully valued

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on on equity, were fairly valued on debt. So where

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>do you look to find value? Well, that's the answer

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is there's nothing easy today. I would I describe you

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>asked where are we in the cycle? I say that

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>most assets are on what I call the high side

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>affair high side of fair Yeah, and and in other words,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing which is which which you can buy at

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or below fair value. Most things are above fair value,

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>some are at the high part of the fair range,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and some are at the beginning part of the expensive range.

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are no pronounced bargains. Um, what do you

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>do in that environment? Well, it's tough. You can go defensive,

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but if the economy is gonna hold together for another

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>few years. Uh, you know, a high degree of defense

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>today and putting money in cash at a return of

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>zero is not going to be very satisfactory. So the

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is you put money to work, but you do

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it carefully, selectively, careful for for the last four years.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's four years now. Almost of the day, Barry,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the mantra at oak Tree has been moved forward. But

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with Ocean, I believe that that the outlook is not

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so bad and prices are not so high that you

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can't be invested if But on the other hand, the

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>outlook is not so good and prices are not so

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>low that you should be doing it with any aggressiveness.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you must. The real key question before you

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get to the granular question of exactly which stocks to buy,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>which bonds to buy in which companies. The key question

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at any given point in time is should your portfolio

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive or defensive? What balance do you strike? If

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 1>you get that wrong, you're not going to succeed, no

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>matter if you're a good stock picker, And if you

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>get it right, you will succeed even if you're a

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>bad stock picker. So the point is, should be aggressive

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or defensive today, And I would I think personally that

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you should favor defense. Not exclusively defense, but I think

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you should favor defense. So you're a little more balanced

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 1>in in your perspective in terms of both aggressiveness and defense.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm but still I'm favoring defense. I'm not balanced.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. So you're leaning a little more defensive than you. Yes,

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>typically will you mentioned in passing psychology. Here's another quote

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of yours I want to throw out related to that,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest investing eras come not from factors that are

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>informational or analytical, but from those that are psychological. Just

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>about every investor has access to the exact same information

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>these days. That's describe this if you would. Well, another

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.239
<v Speaker 1>way I put it is that the key disciplines for

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>investment success well, certainly they include accounting in finance, but

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but they also include psychiatry. So you have to understand

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>your psyche, and you have to understand the psyche of

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>those around you, and what what is going on in

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. And uh and uh, I believe today that

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>people are coerced into buying risky securities because they don't

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like the return prospects on safe securities and that this

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>has pushed up prices in the risky asset classes and

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>permitted um less sound deals to get done. And if

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>those things are true, that that mas. That's the source

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of my caution today. So psychology not frothy, but valuation

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fairly fully valued. So you're someone invested somewhat balanced, a

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the defensive stuff. We're fully invested, but

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but in cautious holdings. So if you'd like to hear

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more of my conversation with Howard Marks, please check out

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>our podcast extras. You can find them on Apple, iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg. I mentioned Howard's chairman's memos. Those are all

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>available at oak Tree Capital dot com. Be sure and

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Ridolts, and check out my

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>daily column on Bloomberg View dot com. I'm Barry Ridults.

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast portion of the show. Um, I'm sitting

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>here with Howard Marks. He is the founder and chairman

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of oak Tree Capital. Howard, thank you so much for

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. I really appreciate it. Well, I just

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>want to show my kids that I'm an early adapter.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Here you are, You're you're not only on radio, but

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and on periscope. Um, your kids will be

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>your kids will be impressed with that. So previously you

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and I had a similar conversation at the Seattle cf A.

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Was that the beginning of this year. That was um,

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of fascinating because I'd only passed through Seattle,

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I had previously, I had never stayed as long as

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I did that week in Seattle. And that is a boomtown,

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Boomtown. It's a very nice place to live. Really,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>really is delightful. The weather is delightful. We ended up

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going to Bainbridge Island, which is about as nice a

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>place as uh, this half of the planet has to

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as to offer. Let's some let's plow through some questions.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh that we had some stuff that I didn't get

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to during the radio portion, and then we'll get into

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>some of my my favorite questions. So we did not

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>get to discuss the fact. I bet a lot of

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>people don't know that when you were at Trust Company

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the West, you supervise some kid named Jeffrey Gunlock.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>There was a guy named Jeffrey Gunlack and and uh uh,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the supervisor is the right term,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>but I assisted him in my last year there, all right,

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And then ultimately he uh he left Trust Company of

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the West and called you and said, hey, it's not

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's something I want to do is go out on

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my own. What do you suggest and and how did

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you respond to Jeff? Well, uh, he actually went out

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on his own. But the key is that he called

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>us uh and or had a representative call us and said,

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>would you help us get started? Would you you know

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the big when I started oak Tree eight twenty years ago,

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>people would say, well, what's the biggest surprise? And the

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>big surprise is how much non investment stuff there is

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to do personnel, premises, tax, insurance accounting. Uh. Yes, and

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>it's and so you know, Jeff said, can you help

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>us get started? Because you know tc W fired him

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and he had no preparations made, and he wanted to

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>get up and running, and he didn't want to stumble

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because then then people would say he wasn't able up

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to the task. So so uh, we earned a piece

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of his company double line by putting him in business Organizationally,

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to assume that was a pretty good investment.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a good investment. And and then, and then,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and then we bought a further piece because we wanted

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to get up to on the accounting rules. If you

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have we can include our share of their profits. Uh,

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's called equity accounting. And so we wanted to be

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty and uh and we're our happy owners of

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Double Line. It turns out Jeff was the first show

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we had done here. And at the time, I think

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>he was coming up on sixty or seventy billion in

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a u M in an incredibly fast time. I think

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they just celebrated their fifth anniversary. Is that right? I

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's not too long. Yeah, So that's really a

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating You know, you've mentioned very often cash is king

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities come along. That has to be one of

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those great examples of being there at the right place,

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at the right time with cash, ready to to do

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do. Well, it didn't. It didn't

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>take us much cash. It took us some expertise and

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh, Jeff's trust in us to to that

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 1>he would get a good solid foundation, which I think

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he did get. Um and it constitutes getting lucky. Barry,

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that's right. As you and I were saying before,

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it helps to be smart, but being smart is not enough.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You also have to catch a break. Lot lots of

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>smart guys. But smart plus preparation plus luck that that

0:37:55.800 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly a secret. Speaking about preparation and not getting lucky.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>We never mentioned earlier, but it was on my list

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of things to talk about. You took a small piece,

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if I'm reading this correctly, of oak Tree and did

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>an I p O with that. Yes, in two thousand

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and twelve, how much of the company UM was listed

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>as a relatively small percentage of memories. Yes, I think

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it was. I think it was about and we've heard

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>for the past ten years how arduous going public is

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and all the headaches involving what motivated you to say,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's fight through that and become a public company.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>We had always given ownership of the firm to the

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>employees from the very beginning. You know, we started off

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>there were five of us who owned a d At

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of that first year, we brought in thirteen

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>more people into the ownership. And we've always had about

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the employees owning, owning equity, the ones who could who

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could really determine the future of the company, and we

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thought they would want to have a way to number one,

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>know the value of their steak and number two monetize it. UH.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we use it as a compensation tool.

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you're giving people equity, but they say, I,

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>how do I know what it's worth? And how do

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you be able to get out? Then it

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have much power as a conversation tool. So

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought that that that would be desirable. And then

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for further generational transition UM, as my generation UM moves

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>on one of these days, I'd like to have a

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>way to monetize that value and part of it and

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>turn the rest of it over to the other employees.

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think that public ownership played a key role

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 1>in that. But by the way, you mentioned making sure

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that UH employees had a way to participate. That's a

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>theme I've heard from so many people who have passed

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>through here. Listen, these are the people who helped build

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the firm. We want to make sure they're fully compensated

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and and have a steak in the future success of

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the company. It's a azing how consistently that concept comes

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>up time and time and time again. Well, I might

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have something to do with the way you choose your guests. Okay,

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>so you're saying this is not a this is a

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sample set error, this is not a a full on

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>random I think you may be onto something with that.

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So so let's go to UM. There's a question I

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ask all of my guests. But you've talked about this

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>question in the past, so I want to jump right

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>into this before I get into your book. And you

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have suggested people read broadly. What's the significance of reading

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to the investor, I think that you have to see

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole world to understand the importance of things. You

0:40:53.760 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have to understand other countries, other political systems, other monetary systems,

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be they in place today or in history. UH. I

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>think you have to understand different disciplines, the sciences, UM,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and UH and so forth. UM. You have to understand

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>how people have thought over the years. UM. You have

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to UM. You have to be able to see cycles,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of the important cycles of the world have

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 1>taken place in in decades and centuries. UM. And you're

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to get that in the Wall Street General.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>This more exactly, you need something with the full weight

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of history written by somebody who's an expert in that

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>space exactly. So, UM, you know, if you, if you,

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you follow people like uh Warren Buffett and Charlie Monger,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>they say, read broadly and and and the other thing

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it does is it it's it just makes you think bigger.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, this business of figuring out whether a company's

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna earn sixty six cents next quarter of sixty seven,

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the bigger pictures. It doesn't help you cope

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>with the big pictures of life, big questions of life.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So so, aside from Dot and Graham, which I know

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you have mentioned many times, UM, what other books did

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you find influential? What else do you recommend investors should

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>be familiar with? UM? I have gotten a lot out

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of a book called The Short History of Financial Euphoria

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>by John Kenneth Galbraith, UM Loved Fooled by Randomness by Nessa.

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas teleb Um, um Against the Gods by Peter Bernstein,

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really a story of of risk of risk

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and how people evolved their understanding of risk and probability.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can only you you can only cope

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with the world if you can see things probabilistically. I

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's you know you you you've talked about my

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dislike of forecast. I don't like people who say this

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to happen next year. You put a

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>probability on it, as long as that's a will considered

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>probability just because it rained. If you say chance of

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a sunny day doesn't mean you're wrong. It means the

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>ten percent outcome. But so you you you shouldn't say

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to happen. I'm sure, but you also

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say three different things can happen. I have no

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.919
<v Speaker 1>idea which you'll be. You know you have to make

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a judgment about likelihoods and probabilities. That's how you have

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to live your life. You know you. You decided whether

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or not to take an umbrella this morning be based

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on the probability of rain. Chance of rain at two o'clock.

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I have an umbrella only because now I'm in a

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>suit and tie. So the downside of was this gets

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>ruined if I'm in jeans and a shirt. Maybe you

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Maybe you take the umbrella if it's if

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's eighty right, that's right, Okay? So I think you

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>know during the radio interview, you mentioned UH something, which

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was the title of one of my memos, You can't predict,

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you can prepare. That was the tagline for I think

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it was. I think it was Mass Mutual's advertising program

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a dozen years ago, and I stole it for a

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>memo because it's true, we don't know what's going to

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future, but we have to prepare for

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that may happen. We can't prepare for everything

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that may happen, so we have to do it probabilistically.

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Against the Gods was really about. So

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you're preparing for the likely outcomes. What do you have

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to do about preparing for the you mentioned full by randomness?

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you do to prepare for the black swans?

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>The highly improbable but enormously disruptive possible outcomes what I

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>call the improbable disaster? And one of the most interesting

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>questions in investing is what do you do about the

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>improbable disaster? Uh? You can't prepare for every eventuality. If

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you ensure, if you spend money for insurance premiums against

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>every possible outcome, then you will have protected against every

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 1>negative outcome and you'll have no money left, right, So

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's really interesting. You have to you have to, uh,

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are some possible courses of action which offer

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>an attractive expected value on average, but which entail some

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>outcomes that you absolutely can't stand. Maybe you just avoid that. Uh.

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I always say that I'm not interested in

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>being a skydiver who was successful at the time. Uh,

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>So I don't skydive. Um. But then you you say

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ca says that's a risk I can live with.

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>That's I either don't think it's going to happen, or

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>if it does happen, I don't think the consequences will

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>be uh unbearable. And then you take those concuences. We

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>face that back in oh eight, we had the big

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>eleven billion dollar fund you were talking about and the

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>distressed asset fund. That's right, and we're investing in the

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of the Lehman meltdown when everybody thought the world

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was gonna end. That was that was an improbable disaster.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We concluded that we would invest nevertheless. So so you

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned um a short history of financial euphoria, You mentioned

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Fooled by Randomness? What other books really come to mind?

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have on my night table Charlie Monger's

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>um port Charlie's Almanac, which is which is this this thing?

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm saving it for the winter because the weather

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has been Peter Kaufman did a great job on the

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Almanac and and he conveys a lot of wisdom. Um.

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think that's a really good idea. UM.

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you had mentioned other things of Buffett you

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>put out your letters Buffets Annual Letters or something else

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that you have mentioned. You really enjoyed everything. They're great. Um,

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They're really great. There's a book out called The Warren

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Buffett Way for people who are interested in Carol Loomis No,

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:26.240
<v Speaker 1>no Carol No. I think was Bob Haxtrom who wrote

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and and uh. I think we're on the fourth edition

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of The Warren Buffett Way now and uh and Bob

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>asked me to write the the introduction really the book,

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I did an interest what I thought it

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting thing? I said, what is it? My

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>theme was what makes Buffett Buffett? Uh? And that's what

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the introduction is about. Have you ever gone to any

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Buffett Annual events. I did go to one.

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>What was that like? Well, it's it's a it's a

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>cultural phenomenon, you know, it's the scale is great, the

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere is great. Everybody it's a. It's a. It's a

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a. It's a whole full of happy people,

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of good feeling. You know. The the adulation of of

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Warren and Charlie is something to behold. I can imagine

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of people. They've made lots of people very very

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>let's call it comfortable over the decades, and and that

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>would that sort of response wouldn't surprise me. You know.

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I found fascinating in your background

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>is you minored in Japanese studies. Did that ever come

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in handy with anything? And I'm gonna put a stop

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on this because We've been going so long with this,

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give away too much of Well,

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it hates. I think it helped shape who

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I am, for one thing, and it helped shape the

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 1>way I think. Uh, in what way? How did how

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>did you study? The main thing was there's an element

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>in Happanese philosophy called mujo and uh it's kind of uh.

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The literal translation is the turning of the will of

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the law. The turning of the wheel of the law.

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And in other words, uh, nothing ever stays the same.

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Change and impermanence are are are forever. And I think

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's very good to understand, uh, that that things

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.919
<v Speaker 1>don't go on forever as they are, that there will

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>be change, and to prepare for and adapt to it.

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So I never heard the term mujo, but it certainly

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of Heroiclydus. The only constant is changed. It's

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a similar philosophy. Um. So earlier you also mentioned

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>one of your mentors had advised you about the three

0:49:56.360 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>phases of a bull market. Who who were your early mentors? Oh,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just the people I worked with at that city, the

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>people I met in the investment business back in back

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the early seventies, as I recall, you know, it's

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time to remember, Barry, but we have to.

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we used to have a group called the

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>third Third Day Group, the Third Thursday, which met for

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lunch on the third Thursday of every month, you know,

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>And I was let's say it was seventy three, I

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>means I was twenty seven years old. I was a kid,

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 1>but I got to hang out with Lee Cooperman, who

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I know was one of your guests. And uh, I

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying earlier, he's a boy from the Bronx, You're

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a boy from Queen's right. We're keeping it local. So

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Lee Cooperman was part of that Third Thursday. As I

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>recall again it's a long time ago, but you know,

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the people from from Cumberland Group, which was one of

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the uh one of the early hedge funds, and uh

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe Steinhardt Finer Berkwitz and mating people like like you know,

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh maybe Carnie Awson who was at Jennison. Jennison

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first institutional investment boutique formed around the sixty nine,

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:11.479
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, or eight, and uh, you know, yeah,

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a I didn't have a anybody whose

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.320
<v Speaker 1>knee I sad on. I didn't have any one person

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>uh that that, But I just I was lucky to

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>hang around with a bunch of smart people and pick

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up snippets here and there. You strike me as a

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>very astute observer of both human nature and other investors.

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And I suspect you were. You were picking little bits

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and pieces off of all those guys. Maybe a magpie. Okay,

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that was not what I was thinking of. But if

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to go with Magpie, I'm happy with that.

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So those are the investors who who helped Were they formative,

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they helped shallp shape your view or these people who

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of added minor course corrections over time I think

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>helped change shape my view, you know. I mean it's

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really intangibles. Uh. You know. I I have

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all these adages that I use, and you know, I

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can't remember who gave him to me, but I got

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to ended up with quite a collection of those, and

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they come in very handy. Uh. And then just you

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you you watch people think, you know, I mean you

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>watch people think, or maybe you should say listen to

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people think. But I mean, you know, maybe maybe thirty

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>five or forty years ago, uh, listening to how Lee

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Cooperman uh analyzed Henry Singleton and tele Dine. You know,

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he used that as an example one of his face

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when he was at Goldman SAX. I've heard that example

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 1>from other people, and the great thing about it is

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that nobody liked tele Dine. Henry was was not one

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of these managements who gave out forecasts breakdowns of prophets.

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 1>He said you're on your own. And I went to

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>see him on my first business trip in my life

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>nine and and you know, we said, well, yes, could

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you tell us what you're gonna earn per year for

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the next five years? This was, you know, common question

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>or management. We could you break down your earnings by

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>by by division? And and Henry said, that's your job,

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I run the company. Uh. And most people didn't like that.

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Most people thought he was crusty. He was crusty, Uh,

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but with the reason to be to not say, let

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>me chew your food for you, your analyst with the number. Well,

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is that, you know, uh, most managements

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 1>want their stocks to go up because they have options

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or what have you. I think Henry wanted the stock

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to go down so that he could buy out the public.

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he started off as a paid employee

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of the company and he ended up as a very

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>major shareholder at the end because he used the month

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>company's money to buy back a lot of stock uh

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>from the public at low prices. He did he realized

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that his he had that are interest in having the

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>stock be low than high. There's a great book out

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>now called Outsiders. I don't know if you're aware of that.

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's about it's about eight Maverick CEOs and how they

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>ran their companies. Uh. And he's one. Uh and he's

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>one of he's the he's the leader, he's the man.

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>He's chapter one and how to tell the Telegugne story

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>ultimately end well, the tell Dine story ended up that

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that he owned it, ended up owning a major piece

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and the stock ended up being very valuable.

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 1>We weren't they ultimately am I misremembering this? Weren't they

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>taken out by somebody? Or well? I think they were

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:40.080
<v Speaker 1>taking out taken out in pieces? Yes, But of course

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:45.320
<v Speaker 1>tele digne is is is it? Name doesn't exist anymore

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know. No, I think you're right. Yeah,

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>well we'll have to we'll have to look at But

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean he viewed as he viewed a capital as

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a tool that you can that you can use to

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the betterment the company. And you you you you can

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you can use it to buy the stock back when

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's cheap, not when it's expensive. And you don't do

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>buy backs when the stock is high, and you don't

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:14.239
<v Speaker 1>do acquisitions with stock when the stock is low. So

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and then and these people in the in the people

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>who follow outsiders and follow this movement, they're called capital

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>allocators and and this is a very good way to

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>manage a company. I think we've we've seen so much

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of stock buy backs the past few years

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>after you've run up in the markets. Um, what's your

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on on share buy backs lately? Because history tells

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>us that management has a tendency to overpay for their

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 1>own stock, and when stocks are cheap, they have a

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>tendency to be a little timid and not want to

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 1>look stupid when every hey conserve your cash as opposed

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to saying my stock is cheap on buying it here? Well,

0:55:57.880 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>probably just like mother ridholds. My mother said by low

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sell high, and why would you do the opposite? It's

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>easier to do them. It's easier, it's comfortable, it's emotionally,

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes a lot of off to tell you,

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>guys who are out buying stock when when you were

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>raising the distressed funds, did you get feedback from clients

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you'r or from potential investors? Hey, listen, I know you've

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>got a great track record, but you're crazy. The world

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming to an end, like, did you get pushed back? Well, no,

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the main the main pushback we got, Remember we started

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise the funding, oh seven and um, and the

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>main pushback we got in the beginning of seven it

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:44.959
<v Speaker 1>was there's not going to be any distress. The world

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>is too good. You know, everything's going smoothly, and it's

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go smoothly forever. And that was a year

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 1>after housing had already begun to roll over. Yes, but

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody took notice, right, And I think some subprime subridy

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 1>more well subprime more goages began to soften in uh

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the first or second quarter of or six, and but

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.359
<v Speaker 1>they people didn't generalize it to the rest of the world,

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and nobody said, well just a minute there, people applied

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>terribly weak standards in extending subprime mortgages. Maybe they extended

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we maybe they applied weak standards every place. So what

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? If if this weak mortgagees everywhere, that's

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a negative, of course, but also it implies to me,

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it implied that the system had been faulty because people

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had been making uh bad decisions and they and they

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't making him in just one place, I mean, Oaktree

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>turned very cautious in oh uh four five six, Why, Well,

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on everything we do. Uh, but most of what we

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:58.160
<v Speaker 1>do is debt. But we turned very cautious. Why because

0:57:58.240 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw what we thought were ridiculously unsafe deals being issued.

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I would walk into Bruce's office, my

0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 1>partner Sheldon, my partner Larry, and Richard, and we would say,

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 1>look at this piece of John, can you believe this

0:58:12.400 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>got issued. There's something wrong if a deal like this

0:58:16.000 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>can get issued. And so again understanding what's going on

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>around us. If we're in an environment in which faulty

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>deals can readily be issued, there's something wrong with the environment.

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>What's amazing is how long it takes from the recognition

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of hey, this is a lot of junks till the

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world figures it out. It literally takes years. Well,

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody that famous, somebody I can't remember who

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it was. One said, Uh, it takes a lot longer

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>for things to happen then you think it could. But

0:58:51.360 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>then they happen much faster than you think they will.

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, makes perfect sense. Yes, you're right, things things

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>don't it through to investors, uh, other than very slowly.

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But then when everybody has that ah moment and says,

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know we're in trouble. Then the collapse comes quite fast.

0:59:14.240 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Think back to the famous irrational xuberans speech in you

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 1>still had four more years of market upside before a

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast and furious collapse there there too. I wonder

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if that that three to four year number is is

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because you said in O four you started to become cautious.

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a sample set of two, but that

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that run of four years after looking back after the fact,

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to be kind of an interesting coincidence. It's a

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>small sample. But but but you're right. I mean, look

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>when Alan Greensband said I I I believe I detect

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>signs of irrational exuberance. That was at six thousand, and

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it exceeded ten. Right. Uh, if I have my numbers

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:01.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's about yeah. So you know, and the people.

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The point is that anybody who listened to green Span

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and in six thousand got out of the market by

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>oh nine, people ruled him an idiot. Uh. And by

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, everybody had Buffett written off at the beginning

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand because they said he's passed his cell

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>by date. You know, he's missed his tech bubble. What's

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong with him? This this value investing is you know,

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that's old school. That's not gonna art anymore. Well, the

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>greatest quote you know comes from Galbrai's uh, Short History

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of Financial Euphoria, and he says the he talks about

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the the short comings of the markets. He says, one

1:00:37.000 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is the is the limited span of memory. Uh. And

1:00:44.400 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he says that anybody who remembers the old bad events

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and cautions against the recurrence is dismissed as past their prime.

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh and old basically an old foggy here.

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's my turn, not his. Uh. And then you get

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that history is elevant. Right. There's another quote,

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember with Galbraith or someone else who said,

1:01:04.720 --> 1:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the distinguishing characteristics about people in finance is

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their steadfast refusal to learn from history. And it's really true.

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's in oh seven o eight, it was as if

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand had never happens. Well, all of six years

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>had passed. But you know that the point is that

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this this dismissal of the past has helpers, has handmaidens,

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>if you would, and and and and one of them

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is that in oh six it looks like if you're

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>merely willing to disregard the lessons of the past and

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and plunge in, you can get rich. M And what

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do people want more than anything else? You know? I

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>always imagine, uh, you know, those more movies about Las Vegas,

1:01:57.280 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and and that you got the angel on one shoulder

1:02:00.240 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>saying don't do it, it's not the right thing, and

1:02:02.000 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the devils sitting on the other shoulders saying, you know,

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>do it, it will be fun. Well, the devil always wins, right,

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>also wouldn't have a movie. Well in the investing business,

1:02:09.400 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the angel sitting on one shoulder says, don't do it.

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not prudent. You know, trees don't go to the sky.

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's too good to be true. The market risk is elevated.

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But on the other side, the devil sitting there and

1:02:20.480 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he says, do it, you'll get rich. And who is

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that devil? Because the handmaiden to forgetting history very often

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is that what have you done for me this quarter?

1:02:32.040 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The investor class, So you and I are in the

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>business you a little longer and a lot more money

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:42.439
<v Speaker 1>managing of managing other people's money. There is a very

1:02:42.680 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>very consistent thing that takes place every cycle where the

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>investor class says, this prudence thing has gone on long enough.

1:02:53.000 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else is getting rich, why aren't you making me rich? Well,

1:02:56.800 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>people respect, people respect managers who exhibit proof. At the bottom,

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they say, boy, I wish I wish I'd been with

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that guy. He didn't lose his clients any money. But

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>at the top, when the market has doubled, nobody wants prudence.

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>They want the guy who full throw the most out

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of that double This is what this is. This is

1:03:15.720 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>herd behavior, and uh, this is the This is the

1:03:20.120 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>ticket to losing money and the ticket to preserving capital

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is something called contrarian behavior. Very very hard to do,

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>very hard to stick with, which is why you mentioned

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>by low so high, the crowd seems to find itself

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly doing the opposite. When when that energy, when that

1:03:42.320 --> 1:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>excitement and enthusiasm is there, they're looking to um, They're

1:03:46.680 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy a top and and move forward. It's

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>very very easy. The crowd finds it very easy to

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>buy things that have been rising for a while and

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>very hard to buy things that have fallen. So in

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the last few minutes we have I have a handful

1:04:03.160 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of questions I'd like to ask everybody, and one or

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>two more quotes of yours. So so let me run

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>through these pretty quickly, and and we'll see if we

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>can get you out. I know we have a call

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>waiting for you shortly. Um. One of the things you

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned previously that I always found interesting was clients

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>need a creed. Whether it's beta versus alpha, risk control,

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>return maximization. What's the significance of a creed? Why do

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>investors require one? Well, it's not really clients. I think

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's investors or money managers need a creed because you

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have to have something to stand by, you know, uh,

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>A philosophy, philosophy, a religion. If you will, what do

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you do, what do you don't do? What do you

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>believe in? What do you do not believe in? Uh?

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you if you don't have these things,

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and then what are your signposts of your of your activity,

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of your behavior. What would you say, I buy things

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that go up. That's not enough. You have to you

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have a system for the kinds of things

1:05:09.320 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you buy and how you figure out that they're a

1:05:12.280 --> 1:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy and and how do you when you and when

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you get off the trend and do you believe in

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>growth or value? I believe in forecasts or not forecast?

1:05:21.720 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You believe in maximization or or risk control? Uh, there

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are many many things that you should have to make

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a decision about, um and and Uh, I believe you

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>can only you know. The people that I know who

1:05:36.520 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are great investors all have They can state what it

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is they do. MH. They have a philosophy, they have

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>freed and it could be summed up very very very simply. So,

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's go through one other quote of yours

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that I really like. Um and this this hearkens back

1:05:54.560 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to your your discussion on probabilities. The future does not exist.

1:05:59.040 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It is only a range of possibilities. We have to

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>understand that most outcomes will be determined by luck. Explain that, well,

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the world and the economies and the markets do not

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>run according to you know, Newton's laws of physics. Uh.

1:06:24.000 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. And if you hire an an electrician to

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>come in your house and he does it right, then

1:06:31.040 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that if he puts in a light switch

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over here and he throws that switch, the light will

1:06:35.240 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>go on over there every time. That's not the investment business.

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no, there are no there are no relationships that

1:06:43.640 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are that dependable. There's a lot of randomness. You know.

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the company announces good earnings and the stock goes up.

1:06:50.880 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they announced good earnings stock goes down. Uh, And

1:06:55.120 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it just isn't that reliable, um and so um. You know.

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>We have to keep that in mind, and we have

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to allow for other outcomes than the one we think

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>should happen. One of the things I try to point

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>out is that should does not mean will, and it

1:07:15.160 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly does not mean will right away. Overpriced, if a

1:07:19.680 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>stock is over priced, that doesn't mean it's going down tomorrow.

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>You can stay over priced for a long time or

1:07:24.480 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>go higher, you know, Uh, cheap stocks get cheaper than

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Lord Kane said the market could remain uh

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in so irrational longer than you can remain solving. So

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't bet your all your money that

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that should happen will happen promptly. And that's

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>why I feel we have to think of the future

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>as a range of possible outcomes, and we had we

1:07:56.000 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>might bet on the one we think will happen, but

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we should give allowance for some of the others, Now,

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>how much allowance which of the others? These are the

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>hard questions, Like I said before, how much do you

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>how much do you allow for the improbable disaster? You know,

1:08:09.200 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in Fooled by randomness to lab talks about alternative histories,

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the other things that probably reasonably could have happened but didn't.

1:08:17.760 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>We're thinking about and and and The point is that

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the world is an uncertain place, just to say the least.

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of uncertainty, you've been in the industry for

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a few decades. Now, what have you noticed that has changed? Um,

1:08:35.000 --> 1:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the most important changes to the financial industry? And

1:08:39.280 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is this a good thing or a beat? Well, the

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>biggest single change is that it has become much more

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>preoccupied with the short run. And that is very negative

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>for the people who participate because but it's very positive

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for the people who for the people who like to

1:08:57.080 --> 1:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of other people's mistakes. The point is, many

1:09:01.080 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>people believe, you know, we used to buy stocks five

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>six years at the bank. Uh. Now people think that

1:09:07.479 --> 1:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>if your owners for five or six months, it's a

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>long time hold. And and uh and so uh you know,

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I I believe that you should figure out how to

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>make money in the long run and stick to that.

1:09:20.720 --> 1:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Now a lot of people say, no, there is no

1:09:22.320 --> 1:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>long run. Is the long run is just a series

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of short runs. But but but I don't I don't

1:09:28.760 --> 1:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>go with that. And and you know, forty seven years ago,

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>when I started working at City Bank, at the end

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:40.519
<v Speaker 1>of the year, it took a couple of days to

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out how we did that year, to compute our

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rate of return. Then you got to the point where

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you got it the same day. Then you got to

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the point where you could get it at the end

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of every every month, then to the point where you

1:09:54.000 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>could get it at the end of every day. And

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>now every money manager worth is sold has the thing

1:09:59.040 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 1>on his Bloomberg screen which shows his return at that moment,

1:10:04.040 --> 1:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>by take by take. And that's a negative. I think

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it's a negative because that's not uh, that's not what

1:10:11.640 --> 1:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you should be thinking about. What did I make so

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>far today, what did I make this month? And that

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. You know. UH. My son Andrew uh

1:10:23.240 --> 1:10:28.519
<v Speaker 1>is UH is one of my most valued advisors, and

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>he gave me some great inspirations for my UH memo

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on liquidity UH, and one of them was if you don't.

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>If you don't think you can hold a stock for

1:10:42.880 --> 1:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>five years, don't even think about holding it for five minutes.

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. Uh. The real way to build wealth in

1:10:52.200 --> 1:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the long run is to find a limited number of

1:10:56.920 --> 1:10:59.639
<v Speaker 1>things with a lot of potential and not too much risk,

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and day with them for the long term. And and

1:11:03.160 --> 1:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I the thing he gave me that I thought was

1:11:05.640 --> 1:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the greatest, that made the greatest impression on me. He said,

1:11:09.840 --> 1:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a chart of a stock which

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has gone up for twenty years, and you look at

1:11:15.800 --> 1:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that chart longingly, and you say, boy, I wish I'd

1:11:19.360 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been on that stock. Think of all the days if

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you bought it on the first day. Think of all

1:11:25.960 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>the days on which you would have had to talk

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself out of selling. Everybody looks at those charts and say,

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. You know, uh, Apple, it's up from

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>five bucks to five hundred bucks, and all you had

1:11:41.720 --> 1:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to do was buy it at five. And I once

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had a friend who's talked to me about a piece

1:11:46.000 --> 1:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>of property that could have brought X decades ago at

1:11:48.640 --> 1:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a very low price, you know, And I said, yes,

1:11:51.000 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>And as soon as it got to two X, you

1:11:52.479 --> 1:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>would have sold it. You have to stay on for

1:11:55.040 --> 1:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the long run. And so I think, I think that

1:11:57.360 --> 1:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this short sightedness is the worst single to development and

1:12:00.760 --> 1:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>per and and and ubiquitous. So before I get to

1:12:04.080 --> 1:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>my last two questions, I would be remiss if I

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:11.759
<v Speaker 1>did not mention the most important thing, which is your book,

1:12:11.960 --> 1:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>which Warren Buffett, I want to give you this this.

1:12:15.479 --> 1:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to listeners to hear this quote because it

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is just so um poignant and really um sums it

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>up perfectly. Buffett said, When I see memos from Howard

1:12:29.280 --> 1:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Marks in my mail, they're the first things I open

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and read. I always learned something and that goes double

1:12:36.840 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for his book. What was the motivation of of putting

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the book together? And how gratifying is it to get

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that sort of feedback from a Warren Buffett? Well? Uh,

1:12:46.520 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>number one, As I mentioned, I've been writing the memos

1:12:51.400 --> 1:12:56.639
<v Speaker 1>since I've been thinking one way the other since nineteen

1:12:57.000 --> 1:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy and uh, you know, I always thought that when

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I retired, I would write a book and pull the

1:13:02.400 --> 1:13:05.519
<v Speaker 1>themes of the memos together. And and the truth is

1:13:05.600 --> 1:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I got a note from Well. I was approached by Columbia,

1:13:09.560 --> 1:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>who was the publisher of the book Columbia University Press,

1:13:12.120 --> 1:13:13.519
<v Speaker 1>and they asked me to write a book. And then

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>I got an email from Warren and and he said, uh,

1:13:17.640 --> 1:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you write a book, I'll give you a paragraph

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for the jacket. So that was enough. Uh and so

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Warren has been a great inspiration to me.

1:13:27.439 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh and uh you know you just learned

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so much through associating with him, and and uh, the

1:13:35.200 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to to do something that he suggested was something

1:13:40.160 --> 1:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>too good to pass up, to say the least. And

1:13:42.880 --> 1:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and now I know we we're tied on time. Let

1:13:45.240 --> 1:13:47.479
<v Speaker 1>me give you my last two questions. I asked all

1:13:47.520 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of my guests. First, what sort of advice would you

1:13:50.479 --> 1:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>give to somebody just graduating college and and starting out

1:13:54.400 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the financial business. Christopher Morley, the English writer, said,

1:14:02.320 --> 1:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>there's only one success, to live your life your way.

1:14:05.840 --> 1:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think that investing is very interesting,

1:14:09.400 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>uh discipline and obviously can be lucrative. Um, but it's

1:14:14.840 --> 1:14:17.639
<v Speaker 1>not for everybody, and you should figure out if it's

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. The last thing you should do is go

1:14:20.000 --> 1:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>into a career because everybody else is doing it, or

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's hot, or because people say you can make

1:14:26.120 --> 1:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. You know, you have to spend

1:14:28.479 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>your life in your career and you're not going to

1:14:31.120 --> 1:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get another one. Uh, So why wasted on something that's

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not for you? Uh? You know it's been great for

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>me and it is simpatico with my with who I am,

1:14:42.840 --> 1:14:45.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's not for everybody, to say the very least.

1:14:45.520 --> 1:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And and then our final question, what is it you

1:14:48.920 --> 1:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>know about investing today you wish you knew when you

1:14:52.160 --> 1:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>began forty seven years ago? Um? And I love that

1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you stop and really contemplate these questions before jumping into them. Well,

1:15:04.360 --> 1:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the whole aspect of number one contrarian

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:17.799
<v Speaker 1>behavior and number two, uh, understanding what's going on around

1:15:17.920 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you and basing your activities uh in response to that behavior.

1:15:25.320 --> 1:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think these are the keys. You know, when you're

1:15:27.680 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a kid, you come out, you start thinking that if

1:15:29.960 --> 1:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you can just find a stock whose earnings are going

1:15:31.680 --> 1:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to rise fast, that's the key to success. Uh. And

1:15:34.680 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>then as you do it longer, you learn that there's

1:15:37.080 --> 1:15:41.719
<v Speaker 1>so much more to it. So it's it's situational awareness

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>first and then knowing where in lens of your contrarian

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>um is that Howard, Thank you so much for being

1:15:48.280 --> 1:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so generous with your time and staying with us. Um

1:15:52.600 --> 1:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the full geez, almost ninety minutes. Uh. People want to

1:15:56.040 --> 1:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>find your memos. It's at oak Tree Capital dot com.

1:15:59.200 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You have the full history of news. I think they're

1:16:02.120 --> 1:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>almost all there. Some were. The ones that were originally

1:16:05.200 --> 1:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>written on papyrus are not available, but they're almost in

1:16:10.280 --> 1:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the book. And the book, you know, give us the

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>full time. It's called it's called the Well. The first

1:16:17.200 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>book was called The Most Important Thing Uncommon Sense for

1:16:20.040 --> 1:16:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the Thoughtful Investor. That came out in Columbia University Press.

1:16:23.600 --> 1:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And then a year or two later they brought out

1:16:25.360 --> 1:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>something called The Most Important Thing Illuminated, which has an

1:16:29.240 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>additional chapter and commentary from myself and a number of

1:16:35.040 --> 1:16:39.639
<v Speaker 1>prominent investors, and it's annotated along throughout the throughout the book.

1:16:39.920 --> 1:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So you say something and other people explain what you mean. Howard,

1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:46.439
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for this. You've been listening to

1:16:46.600 --> 1:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloombug Radio. I want to thank

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike bat Nick, my head of research, Matt my engineer,

1:16:52.720 --> 1:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and Charlie Vollmer Uh, my producer. If you've enjoyed this conversation.

1:16:57.680 --> 1:16:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Looked up an inch or down an inch and iTunes,

1:16:59.760 --> 1:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you could see any of our prior forty nine

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>UM Masters in Business. You are our fiftieth and and

1:17:06.439 --> 1:17:10.479
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your time pleasure. You're listening

1:17:10.520 --> 1:17:14.519
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business with Barry Dholts on Bloomberg Radio