WEBVTT - Amtrak President Roger Harris Talks Travel Infrastructure

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Just about three thirty pm here in New York. This

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is the countdown to the close arm remain bostic.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Alex Steele. Guess what's that's performing today? What's

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>now Transportation index? And I wonder if that's a China

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 2>effect or if it's growth here in the US effect,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But it is outperforming.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was kind there to I saw earlier this

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>week it is all airlines rallying, a lot of transportation

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>socks rallying as well here, and of course I think

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of US, at least certainly here in the US,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>obsess over some of these transportation stocks. Yeah, that's right,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because we try to get fromer point A to point B,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you're in New York, that's impossible even when

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not un week here. And of course it raises

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions here about the infrastructure that we

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have to move people around.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 3>So whether it is by land, air, or sea. You know,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 3>you have a.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Huge amount of passengers utilizing US transportation systems every year,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>more than three hundred million, and just last year twenty

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>eight million of those passengers chose But what you're looking

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>at they are Amtrak, formerly known as the National Railroad

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Road Passenger Corporation amtractors remained one of the go to

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>services for inner city rail travel, particularly here in the Northeast,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but it also has challenges, be it outdated infrastructure causing

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>delays or increase competition from other private rail companies. Here

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about all that is well, the president of Amtrak,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Roger Harris, joining us right now from Union Station down

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, DC. And Roger, great to have you back

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>here on the program. I do want to start off

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>you guys have been spending a lot of money last

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>time I checked, at least in the fiscal year. Last year,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at twenty twenty three, you had one of your biggest

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>capital investments. The Biden administration gave you a big shot

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in the arm about a year ago, fundeling several billion

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars to railroads here. How exactly is that money being spent?

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Hi remain Thanks for having me back. It's good to

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 4>be here. Well, it's going on a lot of different things.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>It's partly going on new fleet, so we have new

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>trains coming this winter. We're going to be hopefully putting

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 4>into service our new Aessela trains coming after that in

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty seven, we will be launching our new Aerrow

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 4>trainsets on the Northeast Regional service in the Northeast, so

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 4>really a complete makeover of the trains that we have

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 4>in the northeast of the US. We're also spending a

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of money on new infrastructure, not only in things

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 4>like tracks, signaling, and electrical infrastructure that really makes the

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 4>railroad run every day, but also those really big one

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 4>hundred year investments in things like major bridges and tunnels.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 4>And that's really a lot of the work that we're

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>going to have us getting underway and earnest in twenty

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty five. So you mentioned that we have a lot

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>of growth in our capital spending in twenty twenty three.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 4>Well this year twenty twenty four, we grew fifty percent

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 4>for twenty twenty three.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And is that going to continue into twenty twenty five

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. And if so, Roger, are some of the

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>those costs are they going to be passed on to

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the commuter? Are they going to pay more in ticket prices?

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 4>So the large infrastructure items that we're talking about are

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 4>primarily funded through the I I J at this point,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 4>so they won't inherently be passed on to the commuter

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 4>in that form. We have a lot of other costs

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 4>that are going up though at the same time, so

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 4>there are price increases probably underway, but it's for all

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>kinds of other inputs.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Roger, it's Alex, what's the biggest hurdle to you building

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>these projects on time and on budget? Like, what's the

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>risk that you take on in the medium.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Term, Alex, great question. One of the things we've done

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 4>since the money was awarded is we have built up

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 4>an incredible infrastructure of project management, project controls, things to

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>make sure that we get the projects done right and

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 4>that we don't have a lot of unpleasant prizes later on.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>There are a lot of steps that we have to

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 4>go through, including environmental clearances, historical clearances. We work with

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>our partners who are investors in these projects, and those

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 4>steps typically take a number of years. And that's why

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 4>you don't see these projects delivering benefits yet because the

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>setup of the projects really takes a long time. But

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 4>it's a necessary part of making sure that they're successful

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 4>in the long run.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So then how do you compete back to Romains's original question,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 2>how do you compete then with more of the private

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>players who can get in there in a different way

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 2>and move money faster and build projects faster.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Very good question. We have a lot of efforts underway

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 4>to be more efficient. So when you look at, for instance,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 4>our newest sellers that, as I said, we hope to

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 4>launch this winter, they carry about twenty five percent more

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 4>customers than the previous sellers, and they're about twenty five

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 4>percent lighter. So they're actually going to be twenty percent

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 4>more energy efficiently, and that translates directly into lower operating costs,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>especially on a per passenger basis.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Roger, I am curious when we talk long

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>term about the future and the health of Amtrak, when

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the number of miles of tracks you have,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the number of passengers you have a lot of that

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>is still and correct if I'm wrong, still weighted towards

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast Corridor. And I am curious as to whether

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there are ambitions to do more outside of the Northeast,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>whether there is profitability to be had outside of the Northeast.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Is there? I think so?

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's some very unique features of the Northeast

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 4>Corridor that do help to make it profitable, including density, congestion,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 4>et cetera. But those things are happening all over the

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>country as the country grows. We've been investigating the Texas

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>High speed Rail project to see what we can do

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 4>there to assist in the development of that project, because

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 4>we think that's very promising. Between Dallas and Houston. It's

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 4>a metro market of fifteen million people and perfectly situated

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 4>for high speed rail. We also have really exciting developments

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 4>in North Carolina with the S Line project, which also

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 4>got some funding in the last round of grants from

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 4>the FRA, and we continue to work with our partners

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Commonwealth of Virginia on extending and expanding rails

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>between Washington, d C. And Richmond, Virginia, which will eventually

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>connect to the S Line projects.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>In addition to those issues, there's also the issue of

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>delays and other things. Some of that has to do with,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, the tracks that you control, or rather that

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't control. I know you guys have made some

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>deals recently that gives you more control of tracks.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Even in Union Station, where.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You're at right now, you've gained a greater degree of

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>control of what comes in and out of there.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you have more leverage to do that?

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>In other cities and other regions as well well.

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 4>I think we do. One of the things that we're

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 4>really focused on is working with our partners to have

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the kind of relationships that really enable those improvements that

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>you're talking about. Whether it be our host railroads or

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 4>freight railroads that we run on, We're really trying to

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 4>work hard to make sure that we understand their concerns.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 4>And also, you know, all over the country we were

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>commuter agencies who are also an important part of the

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 4>rail environment, and they're necessary parts of the environment in

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 4>terms of the investments that need to be made.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>One just final quick question here, and you mentioned the

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>host tracks that you're on. Obviously a lot of those

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>either owned or operated by the freight companies. There's a

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>big potential strike in East Coast ports. It could have

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>reverberations on rail lines. Is that going to affect Amtrak

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at all?

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>We don't expect it to.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there may, in isolated situations, create congestion on

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 4>the freight lines, but we don't expect it to impact

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>our operations.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Roger, we'll let you get back to work.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you taking time to be with us today. Roger Harris.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>He's the president of Amtrak down there in Union Station

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, DC.