WEBVTT - The New World War: Cyber Pandemics

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to another episode of the Markmas Show,

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where we talk about the decentralized revolution, talking about the

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>way the world is changing or right before our very eyes,

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as we go from a world of centralization to decentralization,

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and technology, and of course that technology is bitcoin, the

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralized technology that is changing the world. And of course

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, each and every week I try to bring

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to you a different perspective. I try to bring to you,

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, some stories, some narratives, some ways to look

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>at stories differently, so you can start to expand your mind,

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>expand your thinking, and start to look at things differently.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring to you some of the latest

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>breaking news so you can see this happening in real time.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I have for you today. I have

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some really big news this week. My job gets easier

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and easier because there is so much going on in

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the world that you need to be aware of. And

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the reason why you need to be aware of it

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is because we're always looking for confirmation of where we're going.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I gave you directions how to get to

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>my house, I might say you know, uh, drive down

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the highway until you see this sign, and then go

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>down until you see this blue fence and then make

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a left, and then at the mailbox to make a right.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And so and I would say, eventually you're gonna get

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to this location, get to my house, or get to wherever.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And so as you're driving, you're constantly looking at the

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>signs to make sure you're continuing to go the right way,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're also um looking to see if, um, you know,

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting closer. And so we have these ideas

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of where the world is going, and we're looking for

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>either confirmation confirmation that we are going that way or

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going somewhere different. It's very similar on how the

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligence agencies like the FBI would look at threats. And

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>so they might say, you know, here's three or four

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>potential threats for this event. Um, you know, there could

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>be a bombing, there could be a shooting, there could

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be uh, you know whatever. Right, so there's there's different

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>threats for these for these for this event, if this

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen, then this, this, this, and this would

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have to happen. But if this thing was to happen,

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then it would be this, this, and this, and then

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>because they don't know exactly, not a Cristal ball. And

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so what they're gonna do then is they're gonna sit

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>back and they're gonna watch. And as they start to

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>see these certain events happening, they start to show them

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which direction that we're going, which potential outcome would be reached.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>And so, if we are going into a decentralized world,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like I believe we are, I believe that's what history

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.839
<v Speaker 1>shows us, or we're not, we want to know are

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we going that direction? So we look for these signposts,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and we can see them everywhere. They're all over the place.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the signposts that I see all over is

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the world seemingly breaking down before our very eyes. If

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you've read the book Atlas Shrug, then you know what

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. You haven't. On highly recommended. I Rand

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>wrote it um. It's a big book. It's highly worth

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to read, and talks about how as government gets big,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets oppressive. It starts to restrict the free markets

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>which create all the all the development technologies, and as

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it continues to restrict them, you get less and less

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs participate in society. They start going and creating their

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>own society, and that society breaks down. And of course,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so we can see this all over the place. Uh,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are signs to show this. Now, there's a

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that I saw, one of which is

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>um cyber pandemics. Now, is this a sign that society

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is breaking down because entrepreneurs aren't participating, or is this

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a sign that we're at the end of an empire

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>where basically the best way to get ahead is to

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>steal and manipulate, or is it maybe intentionally being done

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in a way to get us to act on something. Well,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to that, but what I

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do know is that these things are happening, and it's

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>very coincidental that at the very same time the World

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Economic Form is meeting talking about the risks that we

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>face because more cyber we're going to face a cyber pandemic.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So cyber attacks are going to happen so big and

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so frequently it becomes so bad it's gonna be a pandemic,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a cyber pandemic. And so since this is going to happen,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and because it's gonna be so bad, then we need

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it now. And what would that

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thing be, Oh, yeah, you and I, we should give

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it more of our freedoms. What freedom should we give up? Well,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to give up any of our freedoms that

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>would allow us to use the Internet anonymously. So they

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be like China. In China, you have to

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>be verified before you can use the internet. Being able

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to use the Internet anonymously puts everybody in danger, and

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the right to put others in danger.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't be so selfish. Who cares about your own personal privacy?

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Think about the greater good. You stay in private puts

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>me in danger, and you don't have that right. Being sarcastic,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really being sarcastic. That's what they say. I

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>don't agree, or maybe I do agree, It doesn't really matter.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The point is is that a greater good is doing

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>less harm. So for the couple of percent of people

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that want to potentially hurt things, that's bad. I don't

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>want terrorism, but at risk of putting of the population

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>through hassle, trouble, and even more danger, I don't think

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's worth that. And so what am I talking about?

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So they what they propose is that everybody has to

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>put an idea in. They have to be verified before

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they can use the web. That way, if you say

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>mean things, they don't like or approve. They know who

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you are, but they believe if you give up your

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>privacy then they can control that. Now there's the carrot approach,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which is how do we incentivize people to do that?

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the stick approach, how can we force

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>them to do that. We've been seeing them talk about

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this ramp up of cyber attacks, and yet all of

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, here they are. I saw this week, we

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>saw Young Brands says that nearly three restaurants in the

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>UK were impacted due to a cyber attack. Young Brand

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>said late on Wednesday, at ransomware attacked or impacted certain

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>information technology systems of the company, which led to the

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>closure of nearly three hundred restaurants in the UK for

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a day. It's a big deal. Now A side note,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>funny coincidental. Young Brand owns Pizza Hut and Taco Bell.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>They didn't specify which restaurants were impacted. I just think

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. It's Pizza Hut. Um. If you don't understand

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the relevance of that in the very first purchase of

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was done and it was at Pizza Hut,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think two thousand nine or two two nine,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the first purchase with bitcoin was done and

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it was for pizza. And now we have the cyber

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>taxs being done at pizza joints. Something about pizza and

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>hackers and computer nerds. I guess I'm not sure you

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>know about that. Let me leave me a comment, let

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>me know. But it says that KFC said there was

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of customer databases were stolen, even though data

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was taken from the company's network, and so this seems

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to be ramp being up. Now. Some of these ransomware

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>attackers has to be paid in Bitcoin, so they might

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have you believe that it's bitcoin's fault. Never mind the

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that they've been doing these long before bitcoin. We're around,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>uh more of these have been paid off in dollars

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've never been paid in bitcoin. But they may

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you it's been bitcoin's fault, but I don't want

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to point into that. What I want to talk about

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this is coincidentally gaming gaining steam at the

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>same time as the WEF is warning us that we

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>need to give up our privacy so they can have

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>more control to prevent us from this exact type of thing.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You might also know, last week we saw the f

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a A in the United States. The f A shut

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>down all flights at the same time. It was the

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>largest shut down, the largest disturbance of flights in history,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly they had a glitch in the system and

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the glitz forced them to shut it down. Now, Pete Buddendog,

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who's in charge of the Transportation Secretary, he says that

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it could have been a cyber attack. That could have

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>been we don't know. They haven't come out with that yet.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>But what's coincidental and I wasn't aware of this until

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just the other day, is that just before or I'm sorry,

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a week two weeks later after the fight attack happened.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>The same thing happened in Canada. Their flight system was

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>attacked as a matter of fact, and it has also

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>been done in the Philippines as well. And it's almost

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like these cyber attackers are attacking our core critical infrastructure

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like transportation, like flights. Now, when that happens, it causes

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars of loss, hundreds of millions of people,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as lives are impacted. They don't get to the meetings

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on time, to see their loved ones on time, etcetera.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is the pain. It's that turning the pain

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>dial up. It's the stick that gets us to give

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>them our freedom. If you're just tune in and listening

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Markmas Show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the way the world is ransforming into

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized world. We're talking about that some of the

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest news headlines of the week. I have more to cover.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into what the economy, the markets are doing,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>with the stock markets are doing, what bitcoin is doing.

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about what's happening with the war, potential

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war. We're gonna talk about some more disinformation and

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot more stuff you don't want to miss.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We're back with all that moren a minute. You don't

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>go away, We're back, all right, Welcome back. If you

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just tune in, you're listening to the Mark mo Show,

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized Revolution, and we're running through

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest news headlines of this week to help you

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>understand where things are going, where we're headed and what

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:40.599
<v Speaker 1>is going on We're talking about before some of the

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>risks that we've seen in the system, and let's talk

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about some some more practical stuff that's in front of us.

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, all eyes are on the FED, They're on inflation,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they're on potential recession. Now, typically we refer to a

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>recession as two quarters of negative economic growth, but of

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>course the Biden administration changed that definition for us, and

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so technically I guess, well, I don't about technically, but

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>per Biden, we're not in a recession. But what is

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the real risks of the economy. Are we going into

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a recession? Are we going into a depression? And what

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for your job? What does that mean

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for your cost of living? What does that mean for

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>your retirement accounts and your assets and things like that. Now,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>nobody has a crystal ball, and so we have opinions,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we have guesses, um and things like that. There was

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a really big survey that was done and that was

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>asking about will the global stock markets crashing? Now at

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one point, I'm gonna talk about some of the economic

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>data and some of the market data. I do want

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you to keep in mind, though, that the economy does

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not equal the market. So in when we saw them,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy shutdown. Businesses were shutdown, people were put out

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of work. We saw the stock markets hit, all asset

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>prices a new all timized. So just rememheer. The two

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>are not connected to key peace to keep in mind,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but when we're looking at global stock markets, we can

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>see that um the of a. Results are all over

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the board. Now, one thing about surveys is that if

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's done through a big enough sample size, they can

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be extremely accurate. As a matter of fact, there's been

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>numerous tests where they crowdsourced information. They've done them where

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like at a at a county fair, they have like

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a steer like a big bowl, and they ask people

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to go vote on how much that steerways how many

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pounds it was, and they put all their votes in

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a into a into a bucket and then they tally

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>them up and they average them out. Or they'll ask

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>people how many jelly beans are in a jar, and

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll get all these people to vote how many jelly

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>beans in the jar, talllily them up on the average amount.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And what they found is that in these crowdsourced type

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of environments where they're trying to guess the weight of

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the bowl or how many gelly beans in the dark,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they get really really really close, like really close. I

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the exact studies in front of me, but

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about extremely close. Now, a couple of things

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about the test. Two things have to be present. One,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask people who could potential we know. So,

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, if we're going to ask people to vote

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on how big the bull, how many pounds of the bullways,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to ask like farmers and ranchers, right,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't want to ask people from New York City,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>for example. The second thing is that we'd want to

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they didn't see each other's answers, because

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>what happens is if if they say, oh, this guy

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>said a thousand pounds, will all go pounds? Right, and

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so they you want to make sure they don't see

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>each other's answers. But when those two conditions are met,

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they get extremely close. Now with this survey, I don't

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>know if those two factors were met. They're asking experts,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>so I'm assuming they're experts. Uh, And because it was

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>done online, I'm guessing they did't see those answers. So

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing those two things were met, so it's just

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna be accurate. I don't know, we have to wait

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and see. But basically, they are asked, UM, what percentage

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>do they think stock markets will crash in the upcoming year?

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And they did this through thirty six countries UM. They

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>surveyed more than twenty four thousand adults. Each country shown

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had at least five individuals, sampled with countries in the

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>G seven and other major economies including China, Brazil, South Korea,

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and and sampling at least a thousand people. So

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so pretty decent, Pretty decent. Respondents were asked a question

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>on whether quote, major stock markets around the world would

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>crash in the following year, and we're asked to respond

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>either likely or unlikely. So what they say. You may

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not like these answers. You may not like these answers.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start at the Let's just go to the

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>United States. We can see the global average. Let's just

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>start with the global average. Fifty thought a market crash,

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>UM was likely, said it was likely, thirty one percent

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>said it was unlikely. In the United States, forty seven

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>percent said likely, thirty one said unlikely. UM where is

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it lower. Take a look. Israel, thirty five percent said likely,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>forty two more people said unlikely. More majority in Israel

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>said it's not likely to happen. In Hungary, the majority

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>said not likely to happen. In China, the majority said

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to happen. Um. Everywhere else, they pretty much said

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it was more likely, more probabilistic to have a crash

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>market crash than it was unlikely to The piece that

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about here, though, is for the

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>most part, in the United States, was forty seven percent

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>said likely. We're kind of in this like sixty forty split.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And the key piece that I want to hit on

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>here is that there is no such thing as certainties

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in life. There's only probabilities. Nothing is h certain. Well, death,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>death certain and taxes, right, that's the old same death

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and taxes um. But other than that, we don't know

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. Are the market's gonna crash? Well,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think they will, think they won't know? What do you

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think you might go? That's insane. There's a seventy chance

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it crashes in my mind, and perchance it doesn't. Okay,

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you might think it has a chance of crashing and

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent chance it doesn't the average. The reason

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>why it's important is what are you doing this year

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with your money? If you think that the markets are

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>going to crash, more than it would be prudent not

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to have money in the markets. It would be prudent

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to store more cash and keep that cash in something

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>safe like cash, c d S, treasuries, things like that.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you think there's a thirty percent chance or

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent chance it doesn't crash, then you might

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>want to start to deploy some of that money right now.

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Now there's there's still a forty seven percent chance it

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>does crash, so then you would keep some of that

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>money on the sidelines to average in in case that happens.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And this way you're protected either way. So if the

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>markets don't crash and things keep going up, at least

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you've taken some positions now and you have to average

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and as it goes higher. But if you're right and

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it goes down, you could average in lower and have

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a better entry. The key piece here is that nobody

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>knows there is no probabilities. And I know you don't

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. You want me to give you, You want

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>me to give you a certainty, but there's not. But

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought this is interesting in the United States thinks

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>there will be another crash, but think they don't, and

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so figure out what it is for you and act accordingly.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But we can see that there is bad economic data,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>um and so it leads us to think that there is.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But the Biden administration wants to continue to gas light.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, they want to taunt you

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>basically saying six six it's a good thing. And you know,

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I get it that you can't afford to put gas

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in your car, and I get it that you can't

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>afford to buy organic eggs anymore, and now you've got

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to buy sugar cereal instead. But a good thing. Alright,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we've done a good job. It's a form of gas lighting,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>highlighting how climbing prices are a good thing because we

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>need inflation. Right, how's what the economy grow? They say,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>how's what the economy grow? Never mind that you're still inflated,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're still struggling. The key piece here to understand

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is that while inflation has come down, meaning the rate

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of increase has slowed, they're still paying more money. If

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you're just tune in you're listening to the Markmall Show.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized revolution, how the world is

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>changing before our very eyes, and we're looking at through

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the lens of politics, finance, and technology. And I'm reading

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>through some of the biggest breaking news of the week

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can stay on top of what is going on.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back. I want to talk about

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some more decentralization of the world, how supply chains are

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>are being rerouted. I want to talk about what's happening

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>with potential nuclear war that we're facing, some threats that

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>were made, and some other things about freedom of speech,

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a whole lots of ever want to come back, You

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss this away. Hello, welcome back here,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Market Mo Show. We're talking about the

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Revolution, and we are going through some of the

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest news headlines of the week, and there are some

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>big ones and one thing I've been talking about quite

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit that I think is just insane. I mean,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>there's so many things that are insane, but one of

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the things that I'm talking about that are insane is

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that having grown up at the tail end of the

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Cold War, the Cold War, which was when the US

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was engaged in this standoff war with Russia and communism,

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and the USS are basically um Having grown up at

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the tail end of that, I never would have imagined

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that we are back here and really, for the first

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>time in my life, actually facing a real nuclear war.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Cold War and the standoff kind of

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>started and ended when everybody got nuclear weapons because of

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>something called mutually assured destruction. If we can both kill

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>each other, than we're not going to do that, right, Yeah,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just like a free market, a free market only works

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>when one party, well, each party has to believe they're

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>getting the better deal. And a war would only happen

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if one side thought they could win. But if both

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>sides know that no matter what happens, we both die,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>then what's the point. And so then it created peace, peace, violence,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the threat of violence created peace. But yet here we

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are now and again for the first time in my life,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with a real threat of nuclear war. And this is

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>not a joke. As a matter of fact. This week

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw a Putin ally Warren's NATO of nuclear war

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if Russia is defeated in Ukraine. An ally of President

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin put out this message, he said. The quote

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote the defeat of a nuclear power and

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a conventional war may trigger a nuclear war. End quote.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And this was by former Russian President Dmitri Metev med Medvedev,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>who serves as deputy chairman of Putin's powerful Security Council.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>He said, quote, nuclear powers have never lost major conflicts

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on which their fate depends. End quote. He's for it

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was the president from two thousand twelve. Let me let

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>me let me say that again, nuclear powers have never lost.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So he's saying, anybody who has nuclear powers, nuclear weapons,

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear power has never lost a major conflict in

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>which their fate depends. Why would it if you're going

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to die? It's like, uh, what's the saying about when

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, be afraid of the person who has nothing

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to lose, or backing a wounded animal into a corner, right,

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Like when you back the wounded animal into a corner,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when you have somebody that has nothing left to lose,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>they're very, very dangerous. And if you have a nuclear power,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>who has wh who's losing, who's gonna die, then what

0:20:55.760 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do they care? Mutually assured destruction works because me either

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>side want to die, right, but if one side is

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>already dying and what do they care, Well, let's just

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>kill the other side too. Who doesn't work like that?

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what he's saying here. Dmitri is saying

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that nuclear powers have never lost major conflicts on which

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>their fate depends, and so he's basically saying, if the

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>West attempt to defeat Russia and Ukraine were to work out,

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and if Russia was losing, and if Russia was dying,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>then nuclear doctrine would say that that could actually trigger

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear war, which makes sense. If Putin is half

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as psychotic as Western media would have you believe, then

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't he do that? Right, Why wouldn't he do that? Now?

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Would NATO put him into that corner where he would

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be forced to do that, to force to die? Well,

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it sure seems like they're trying to.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And we can just look at the facts. So and

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>let me let me just let me just be clear

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>before we dig in these facts a little bit. I'm

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not for war. I don't want anyone to die. I

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>wish everyone could just stay in their corner of the world.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, that which most of these

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>governments could just shut down and shut shut down all

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear programs, not have this anymore. But this is

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>where we're at, UM, and I would like to prevent

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>more war from happening. I would like to prevent nuclear

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>war from happening. Not sure exactould like that, because I

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be caught up in that. And so

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>if what he's saying is true, then we have to

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>look at what's the possibility that we get to that point. Well,

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we know that um many people from the United States

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have gone over to Ukraine, including Nancy Pelosi, including the

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Adam Shift, and they've gone over there and said, we

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>are committed to be with you and nothing short of

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>victory will account right. They've they've made these outlandish statements,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we guarantee victory like uh so they've they've made all

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>these statements, they made all these claims that give them

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>no way out. And we can see that through the

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of money, through the amount of weapons, through the

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>amount of support that we contend to give Ukraine. We

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly the amount of money going to Ukraine

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is very murky. We know that there's been over one

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars have been sent to Ukraine just from

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the last month, but we're not very clear on exactly

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>how much, nor are we anywhere clear on where that

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>money actually went. We know it's over hunter billion dollars.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that's just from the US. Now we have Germany

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of Europe and NATO cinem weapons, so

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>we could say maybe it's a hundred and fifty billion dollars.

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>How much has Russia spent so far? It's rumored about

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty about less than half, so they spent less than

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>half the money. So they're facing basically the world is

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>coming at them, committing to spending and doing whatever it

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>takes to annihilate them, to kill them. And so if

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>they're facing sudden death, like Dmitri says, why would they lose?

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't they just fire off nular weapons. I don't

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's good. I don't think it's right, and I

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't want to happen. I would hope, and I

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>would hope that you would feel the same way that

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>these leaders would come and they would use calm, cool,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>collected heads. We'll come to some sense. Can we find

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>some middle ground, can we find some peace. There's not

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>any winners here. There's never going to be a winner here.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It's like an argument. Nobody wins. Nobody wins an argument.

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're married, you know what I'm talking about. Nobody

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>wins an argument you don't have them. And here we are,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we're in a war. There's no winners here. People have died,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>money has been lost. So now at this point we

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>have to stop thinking about winning and losing because there

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are no winners, but have to think about how is

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the best way we get out of this today without

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 1>causing more death and destruction. Now part of me, as

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>an American, wants to say, why do we even care?

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>As the president of the United States, he should be

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the safety of his own people first and foremost.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Why is he putting my life and my family's life

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and your family's life and jeopardy over whatever he's trying

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to achieve. We're trying to stop putting from taking over

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a country that used to be part of Russia, that

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has Russian citizens, in a world far away, in a

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>country that we don't even know or care about that

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>most people couldn't even put on a map. We're doing

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>it to save democracy a country Ukraine that's arguably one

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most corrupt countries in the world, a country

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>where the president used to be a TV actor and

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>jailed the democratically elected president that was there before him.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to save that country. And again, look, I'm

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not trying to say there's good or bad here. There's

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>no good out of this. But the good that we

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>can do from here on out is to make sure

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that you and I don't die in nuclear war. I'm

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for that now, But it doesn't look like that's the

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>path that we're going down. We can see that the

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon just they have They're just given over another eight

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars for the Pentagon in this one point

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>seven troy dollar omnibus bill, with a good chunk of

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that going to Yes Ukraine. But of course we don't

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>know where that money goes, not even the Pentagon knows.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, in November two, a few

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>months ago, the Pentagon admitted that it can't account for

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollars again. Again. It's lost two trillion dollars before,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and it lost two trillion dollars again. As a matter

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of fact, the Pentagon says that it's failed it's fifth

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>audit in a road. It's fifth audit. They have no

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>idea where the money goes. The Pentagon can't account for

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>roughly two hundred and twenty billion dollars in equipment that

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it gave the contractors. So your six hundred dollars in

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your VENMO accounts that they're gonna audit you over could

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially terrorism. But they lost two billion dollars in equipment,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, weapons they gave to contracts and they don't

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know where they are. This is what we're facing and uh,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's atrocious and at this point we're facing nuclear war.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You should be alarmed, UM, alarmed, read the information, call

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>right your your senators or lawmakers and do something about it.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning and listen to the Mark Mo Show,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the decentralized Revolution and this is showing

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how the world is breaking apart. This is really big news. UM.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot more to cover when I come back.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Some big things that are happening, UM, coming out of

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the WF that you need to know about. Be back

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with that morning a minute. Don't go away, I'll be back.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome back to another episode of the Markma Show.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We're still talking about some of the latest breaking news

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>headlines of the week talking about how the world is

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>changing from a world of centralization to decentralization. Of course,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and technology. That technology is a bitcoin. It's decentralized technology

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that's changing the world. And a lot has been happening

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in the bitcoin ecosystem, the bitcoin space this week. Specifically,

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's back from the dead. Every time the bitcoin price tumbles,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>another obituary is written and bitcoin has died again. I

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There's h there's sites that track how many

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>times it's died. I think it's died like four hundred

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>times at this point. But every time it dies and

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>then resurrects, every time it comes back from the dead,

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it only signals not much stronger, that it's resilient, that

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to die, that's come back. As a

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, many many of the some of the

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest and most wealthy investors in the world have actually

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 1>said that's why they decided to buy bitcoin. And when

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw it crashed all the way down to this

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>price and come back, I knew it was legit. A

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>lot times people want to compare a bitcoin to the

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>tulip bulemania, right, the tulip mania at Holland, where everybody

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>bought these tulips so feverishly that the price went up

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>so high, which was ridiculous. It was a flower, and

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>then it, you know, spectactually crashed. It never came back.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Tulip bubble prices never came back. It went up and

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it went down. That's like a pump and dump. You

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can look at tho cryptocurrencies and they've all gone up

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've gone down, and they've never come back. Bitcoin

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>comes back over and over and over again, and so

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that it really builds into it. Now, let let me

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>go back. I said something about crypto that you might

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>not believe. I said that crypto has its pump like

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the like the Toolia bubble, and then it crashes that

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it never comes back. And you're probably saying, Mark, that's wrong.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And now I question everything that you say, Mark, and

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good. You should question everything I think. But let

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>me clarify what I mean by that. Um, if you

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>look at any other if you look at all the

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies and you priced them in bitcoin, not in dollars,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at any crypto priced in bitcoin, so

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just go to your favorite trading app like Trading View

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and put in the pair you know, H E T

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>H slash BTC, So instead of measuring in dollars, you're

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>measured in bitcoin, or cardano, measured in bitcoin or um whatever, ah, Cardano, Ethereum, Cosmos,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the polka dot, you name it. None of them have

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ever made a second all time high a second. So

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're priced it bitcoin, they've all made one pump,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and they've all come back down like a table. But

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin keeps coming back, and so Bitcoin has been very stable.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, it's become the most stable

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been at any point in his career for

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the last dozen or so years, where it's been sitting

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in this like kind of sixteen thousand dollar price rings

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, which down from its sixty nine

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>thou dollar high in November is quite a tumble. And

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so while it's been sitting there, a lot of people

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's dead, and this week it roared back to

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>over twenty one thousand and sitting in this kind of

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty one dollar price point today, and that's good for

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons. It's up about thirty bitcoin Um

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>derivatives like coin based stock, for example, or up over

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>eight Bitcoin miners like Mara are up over a hundred

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty percent, and so we're seeing life come back

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>into the ecosystem. Now a lot of people are wondering

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>why this is happening. Is this sustained rally? Is this

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be another uh bull trap they call it,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning suck all the bulls in and trapped them and

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>then and crushed them out? Or is this legit? And

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think we want to look at that from

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of ways. I think what's happening, in my

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion is that bitcoin Bitcoin is what we would call

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like the canary in the coal mine. And so I'm

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a coal miner, if from from like North Carolina, I

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think where they get the coal out of the ground,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you probably no better than me. But going in there,

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of gases and things that would kill people.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And I believe the story goes that they would carry

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like they would carry a canary in there with them

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because the bird was much more susceptible to those gases

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and it would die. And if you saw the bird die, like,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>oh shoot, I better get out of here. Nowadays, I'm

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sure they have like electronic quid measures it. That's that was,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and so Bitcoin is sort of like that, where Bitcoin

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is this very volatible asset that moves very quickly. And

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so we saw in November when Bitcoin hit its all

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>time high, as did the NASDAC, all the tech stocks,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the fang stocks, as did everything. Um we saw, the

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>FED came out and said they were going to start

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>raising rates next year. But Bitcoin started selling off immediately,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>started moving first, Then naz DAC and the tech starts.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Tech stocks started coming down a couple weeks later, and

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>then the SMP five started coming down a couple of

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>months later. Now Bitcoin is going up first, the tech

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks and the NAZDAC are starting to move a little

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>bit after And to me, it looks like Bitcoin is

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sniffing out another move. Now what another move could that be? Well,

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like what it's sniffing out is that the

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>FED is getting towards the end of their tightening cycle.

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>We know this for a number of reasons, but that's

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like is happening. I think that potentially

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the worst for Bitcoin could be over now. In one

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of the previous segments, I talked about the sentiment and

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the surveys that we're done, forty seven percent of people

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States think the markets will still fall further,

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so about half, but that means about half think it won't. Now,

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't like that fifty fifty, but that's

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about where the sentiments at. Nobody has a crystal ball.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks like bitcoin is sniffing this move out.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The Feds paused, now, is this good for the economy?

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean that, um, the economy is gonna be strong. No,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy is horrible and economy is gonna get worse.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>But the markets, the asset prices could be doing better. However,

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>there are some big bombs that could go off inside

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the market, especially inside the cryptocurrency market. We can see

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the big bombs that everybody's been focusing on

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is what's going on over at Genesis. Genesis is the

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>giant in the room. Genesis is one of the biggest

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>companies in the crypto ecosystem that's kind of behind the scenes.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not really a forward facing customer company, and they

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>were really supplying a lot of equity for a lot

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of these companies that we're doing these yield products. So

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.479
<v Speaker 1>like with Gemini. For example, you could park your bitcoin

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of your cryptocurrency with Gemini and they would offer you yield,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they would give you a return, they would borrow that

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and pay you back whatever six percent they were paying you.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>They weren't actually doing it, was actually going to Genesis.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Genesis was the company behind that. In Genesis, well, if

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you're with Gemini, you know very well who Genesis is,

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>because your money has been locked up. You've been unable

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to get your money out of Gemini because of what's

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>happened there. And it looks like now Genesis is potentially

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>filing for bankruptcy. There's accusations of fraud coming out um

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a pretty big deal. Part of the

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>reason why it's the big deal is that Genesis is

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a sister company to Gray Scale Bitcoin Trust, both owned

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>underneath the parent company, which is DCG Digital Currency Group.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are speculating that if Genesis goes down,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it could potentially put Gray Scale Bitcoin Trust in danger.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And if that goes down, then potentially hundreds of thousands

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoins could be released and dumped in the market,

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>which would be very barish for bitcoin's price. I don't

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to happen. I think the fears of

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>contagion happening from Genesis going bankrupt are overblown. I think

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that for a couple of reasons, we saw the price

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin really get crushed when we saw Tara Luna

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>go down and then Celsius go down, Three's Capital go down,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and boom boo the domino effect. By the time it

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>got to f t X, it didn't matter anymore. F

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>t X was the largest bomb to go off. It

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was the second largest cryptocurrency exchange, but yet it didn't

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>affect Bitcoin's price. Part of the reason why I didn't

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>affect bitcoins prices they didn't have a lot of bitcoin. Now.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>On their books they said they had one point four

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a bitcoin. In reality, they had less than

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand dollars a bitcoins. There was no bitcoin to

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>dump into the market. And I think this is probably

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>another one of those events um where we could potentially

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>see Genesis it was gonna file bankruptcy. They're doing that.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You could potentially have some contagion and potentially put DCG

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>group into instability, could potentially um cause lawsuits to be

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>filed against gracecal bit Cointrust and even potentially cause a

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>breakup of that trust. I think those are long shots.

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's probably at all, but it could happen.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But even if all that happened, I still don't think

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's bearish for bitcoin's price. And so even though I

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>see those bombs in the ecosystem, I don't think that

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it could cause the price a bitcoin to come down

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>even more. Now on some good news for you if

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you're if you were involved in this whole f t

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>X situation, it looks like regulators have found over five

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in liquid assets. Just found them. I think

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're looking at the in the couch cushions or

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Somehow they just happened to find five

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars they didn't know about. Good news. If you're

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>owed money from f t X, still it wouldn't be

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>holding your breath. Still, probably not a lot of money

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to go around. If you're just tune in and listening

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to the Mark mo Show, we're talking about some of

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news in the end of the system

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this week, talking about the way the world is changing

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into a decentralized world. Hopefully that makes sense. I appreciate

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you tune in. We'll be back each and every week

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time in the same channel, so put

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a calendar reminder. Make sure to follow me on social

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>media at one Mark Moss. That's at one Mark Moss.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 1>And if you miss any of that, you can catch

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it on YouTube at Market Disruptors. And that's what I got.

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening.