WEBVTT - An Extremely Q&A Episode

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>On the beck Doll Cast, the questions asked if movies

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have women in them, are all their discussions just boyfriends

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and husbands, or do they have individualism? The patriarchy? Zef

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>invest start changing it with the beck Del Cast. Hello,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Becdel Cast listeners. Oh my god, I almost just like,

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, I was going to start singing that

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>being the song. I was like, Okay, we've did our countdown.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We're like one, two, three, four or five past. Oh wow,

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if we did that, that would be actually really fucked up.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>If we did that. Well, look, my voice, as you

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>might be able to tell listeners, is it doesn't sound

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>quite like myself. I'm a little sick at the moment. Sick.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh sexy, what stop it? Sorry, you're gonna refort me

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to hrfort me to Jack O'Brien, I dare you? Um,

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is I don't know how that will

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>affect my amazing, beautiful, perfect singing voice being sick. So

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's true, So we better not. But what we are

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>going to do today is answer some questions in a

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Q and I episode, which we've done in the past.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of become a yearly tradition that we kick

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>off the new year with a Q and I episode

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>answering questions that our matrons have submitted. So thank you

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to all the matrons who submitted a question. Yeah, we're

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to have time to answer all of them

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're so popular and we've got so many questions.

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Sorry everybody, but but um we're gonna answer a few

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. And that's how we kick off. I love

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>our Q and A episode. It's it's a time of traditions,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. We we released our Grace Freud episode on

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Santa Clauses. Is that Grace at the show last

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>night and we were really reflecting on how we are

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing a fifth one of those episodes.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It kind of like I can't believe the bone chilling

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in a way. Um, but a lot of traditions, you know,

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like really hit you in the marrow of

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>your existence. Sure. Well, as we discussed on that episode,

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not quite certain if this is a tradition or

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a curse. So it's true. I mean, but I do

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>love um being cursed by things. It makes me happy.

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It's reassuring at times, that's true. Yeah, it reminds you

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're alive. It when you think about it. Doesn't

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it though? Doesn't it though? I? Yeah, yeah, all right, um, okay,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>shall we get into it? I was like, I guess

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't really need to tell people what the Bachtel

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>test is today, Like it's this week, honey, look it up. Yeah.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Plus we are going to be passing it so much

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in this by answering these questions, can we start with

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just like, I just want to know. I'm like, I

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>just want to tell you something. I was like, how

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can I make this a part of the show. I

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to tell you something. I saw a ska

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>band last night, A ska band. I skanked. It was awesome.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It was so cool, and it was feminism. And you

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know why why the vast majority of the horn section

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>were women? Oh no kidding. We had a woman on

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the trump bone. We had a woman on the trumpet.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It was very thrilling. I am now really like, you know,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>much like many things, I feel like Scott Scott is

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>going to make a comeback. You can really quote me

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>on that. I saw a cool ska band last night

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and people were like, are you gonna skank

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or what? And I was like, is that the verb

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to wait, what does to skank mean? Oh, we're having

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a moment um, it's uh skank. It's like the dance

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>well now I sound it's like the dance that Scott do. Um.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of just like really performative, low kicking um,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but you can do. You do it in the kind

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of like a pit situation and it's just like a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of friendly kicking and you know, the time registers

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>doing what it's doing. Okay, So like the Charlie Brown dance,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't that how the Peanuts characters. I don't know the

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>SKA community would feel about you saying that, Caitlin, but

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm sure that's very reductive. But it's not

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.799
<v Speaker 1>unlike that. But it's more like intense. It's pretty fast,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>but it is just kind of like bad dancing. But

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like when people are into it, you're like, maybe this

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>is good. And I and I did that bit that

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I have with the egg where I eat the egg familiar,

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Listeners remain in the dark. Um.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But the guy brought up bassist in the SKA band,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>so they're also allies to me doing the egg bit.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Ska is feminist and I just wanted to let you

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know that. Okay, I'm glad to hear it, and then

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>can I tell you something? Yeah, of course, I don't

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>know if I'll follow through on this, but I think

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>in the new year I want to take a burlesque

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>class and then get into burlesque. That's so, that's amazing.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>What if you did burlesque and I played the trombone,

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we could do Oh, I could play for you. That

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>would be perfect. You could do rose do itpy cater burlesque,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and then I would play my Heart Will go On

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on the trombone. Yes, that wouldn't be cursed. Wait, that's

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>so amazing. Are there classes like locally? I guess I

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>would imagine their I I think so, yeah, because I

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I'm doing. I don't know how to

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>do burlesque, but it's an art for us, so I

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have to learn. And so if anyone has any tips

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on how to do burlesque or play the trombone, if

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone's trying to get rid of a trombone, um, I'm

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the market for one. I feel like if I

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have of trombone like around, at some point, I'm gonna

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pick it up. You know like it's acquiring

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the traumbone is half the battle, and then finding a

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>good traumba to you if you're a local l a trombonus.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'll stick with this, but it

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>was just so inspiring to um see so many women

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in the SKA band. Anyways, Okay, queues and as here

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>we go, starting with a question from Alex. Hi. Alex asks,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>y'all sometimes talk about how watching movies for the show

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>changes your perspective on them. Along similar lines, has doing

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the show changed your perspective on films in general? If so,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>in what ways? Oh? I would say for me, the

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>show has made me realize that so few movies are

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that I could ever vouch for in terms of

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>does this hold up when looking at it through an

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:01.679
<v Speaker 1>intersectional feminist lens? Because I think the average nipple skill

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>writing we give out is like one pull out of five.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe too, I would say, maybe too, because we've we've

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>been covering like better movies as the show went on. Yeah,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we used to be strictly, strictly a hater. This used

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to be strictly a hater zone, but grew up. But

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I still love movies. I still I always have, I

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>always will. I don't think anything's ever gonna change that.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>So even though nearly every movie ever made is a

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>disaster at least when it comes to intersexual feminism, it's

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>still a medium that I adore so and I don't

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know what that says about me, but I'm always going

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to love movies. Beautiful Yeah for me, I like it

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely has changed my perspective, but even like a life,

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like even throughout the course of the show, it has

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 1>changed my perspective in like more nuanced ways as things

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>went on, because as as fun as it always will

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be to be like, yeah, this is just like not good.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>This is like a hateful use of media. But as

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time goes on, you know, and and we cover movies

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that have like more kind of shape, Like I guess,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been interesting too. Now I feel like I approached

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like you, there's like different ways to approach the movie,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways you can appreciate it more and

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in other ways, like it is not as fun of

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a watch, like I guess, I used to watch movies

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on one setting, but now I have like an appreciation

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for being able to like watch movies on more than

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one setting, and and had that be okay, you know,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>because it used to I feel like I used to

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be like movie good or movie bad, and it's like, well,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different ways, and you know, everyone

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is their own person. Some movies are just like straight

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>up sucking bad. But I've enjoyed kind of like training

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>myself to like seek out context and like try to

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>understand a little better if a movie is like challenging

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>me and not just like clearly shitty or clearly amazing,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to kind of like seek out more context and figure

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>out like what time was this coming out in, Like

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>where was the writer and the filmmaker coming from, and

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like how does that kind of And I feel like

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on our show that's kind of like skewed us in

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>both directions towards a movie where there's like some movies

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>were giving the benefit of the doubt, and then we

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>learn more about it, we're like, oh no, we were

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>being too nice, never again, and then other times, um

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, we're like, Okay, clearly this like missed, but

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the attempt was at least somewhat sincere or whatever. And

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also changed the way that I write,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully for the better. I think for the better. UM,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and just like the way that I approach characters, and

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to kind of have the Bechdel track in

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>your head to make sure that you're giving everyone the

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>space they need in the story. That's my answer, Alex, Yes, M,

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks for asking it. Our next question comes from Catherine High. Catherine, UM,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of movies lately are experimenting with subverting tired

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>old movie tropes. Are y'all noticing any of these recent

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>tropes of versions that are becoming tropes of their own? Um?

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>One comes to mind right away, which is like forced

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>villain Redemption arc. Don't like it. Don't like I mean,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how that how much that has

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with feminism or intersectionality. I just don't like it.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I miss pushing the villain off of a cliff,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>which I know before, but actually it does connect to

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the episode that came out last week on the Santa Clauses,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like it's become I think especially in

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Disney properties, but kind of across media in general, like

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's become so normalized to be like I get started

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>by coming from a sincere place. I'm trying to think of,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like what big movie would have kicked this off, but

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like coming at a villain character with empathy, it might

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>have been even like Wicked or something like that. Like

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>coming at a classic villainous character with empathy and trying

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to understand things from their point of view. I think

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that that is like a sincere thing at the beginning,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but now it's just like I mean, in the Santa Clauses,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>for example, you just have like a guy who's straight

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>up a bad guy. The cow Penn character is like

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a Jeff Bezos villain, but the movie, but the movie

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that whatever Avatar length miniseries is like doing fucking Olympic

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>gymnastics to try to like redeem him, because that's just

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like what you do now. And I feel like it

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can really like go the other way in a very

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable way. I don't know, Like there's movies where it's

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>super works, and then there's other movies where it just

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>feels like, oh, this is what we do now. So

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to write a truly despicable horror character and

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>then just have everyone forgive them at the end, even

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if they are like Jeff Bezos human rights abuse. Like

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You're like, but we don't need to forgive that guy.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>We just don't. There are some people we need to

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>forgive in movies, and I like that, but others not

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as much. Right, I have complicated feelings about it because

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's important that depending on the person

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and their crimes, redemption like their crimes is a huge thing,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, you know, right, like the society would

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be a better place. You just reminded me of what

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Searchharonan saying women and little the My my cold is

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>affecting my cognitive functioning. But what I'm trying to say

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>is redemption is possible for some people, and I, like,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I want to like create space for

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>people who, you know, if they if they do what

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they need to do to redeem themselves and their and

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>their crimes aren't so heinous that they could possibly deserve redemption.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a message that I think should be put

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>out into aforementioned society, especially in kids media, because there's

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so many like tropes that villainized marginalized people in a

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>way that is like absolutely fucked up and needs to

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be re examined. I think it's just like that as

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a trope that also applies to like people who are

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>fucking capitalism ng the hell out, Like you're just like, yeah,

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I struggle with it. Yeah, for sure, it's also kind

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of boring. Another trope I've noticed is movies and TV

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and media in general. Um, I mean, we have noticed

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>more diverse casts in terms of race, gender, sexuality, and

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but because so much media is still

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>made by rich, powerful white men, it's clear that this

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>inclusion only is happening because these guys are tired of

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>people challenging them. So there's there is like more diversity,

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it isn't good or meaningful, or

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that they didn't consult anyone about these characters. Oftentimes,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>these characters are very flat, underdeveloped people who behave in

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that make no sense, and they are just there

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to like fill a quota more or less. Yeah, which

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is like like I like, arguably worse. Like I mean, yeah,

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like the yardstick they're really but like

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that's diabolical to do like higher talented people and

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>then be like, but I'm just doing this so people

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>leave me alone. It's like a fucking character do your job, man,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So yeah, I also find that frustrating. I

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think we may be uh the gender swapped reboot maybe

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on its on its dying legs. I think we may

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>really well and truly be done with it. Yes, what

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope happens. In addition to like what we always

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about with more movies, and I think in the

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>time this show, like you're just saying the time the

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>show's existed, there's been an increase in diverse storytelling and

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been getting better. But I also hope that it's

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like that makes way for more original storytelling to it

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's kind of on the upswing. We got

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>her everything everywhere all at once, like we're chilling. It's good,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but like, I hope that that kind of keeps moving. Also, unrelated,

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>hope that, um that short movies come back. If short

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that would say that is a trope that every movie

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is three hours long now and I will allow it

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when it's r R R, which I'll talk about later,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but why is every other movie so long? It's complicated

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>stopping even when movies I like are long, I'm like,

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>come on, um, Yeah, I hope that the eight seven

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>minute movie makes come back. Wouldn't that be cool? And

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then then you could go to double features without like

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>your fucking organs rupturing. It would be cool. Um without

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>your intestines exploding. Call back to while you were sleeping, Oh,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Matreon head over, Yanna, listen to Sandra Boogs Boss talking

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about his mother's organs exploding when she met his wife

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was an amazing time for writing. Um. Yeah, I think

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to think of other I think those

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>are maybe we'll think of more later. I know that

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch that are kind of prevalent right now.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a lot of them boiled down

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to people attempting more inclusion and diversity in storytelling and

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>not getting it quite right because they are like coming

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from places of extreme privilege and aren't bothering to consult

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or like hand the reins to someone else who can

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>tell those stories more meaningfully. So agree anyway, Um, let's

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break and then come back for some

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>more questions and we're back. Next question comes from Jacqueline

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>asks do you feel like the era of Prestige TV

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>slash limited anthology series does a better job of representing

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>women and diverse voices on camera and do you have

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>theories as to why or why not? For example, I

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the way streamers produce TV shows allow diverse

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>creators to make their art, and having longer character arts

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in general seems to let women have more depth. These

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>points both have their negative counterpoint um and Yeah, I

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think you're already touching on a lot of why this is.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>And I I don't watch a ton of TV. I'm

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely more of a movie person. But the nature of

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>TV just generally does allow for more in depth character development. However,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>TV is still full of regressive tropes, maybe not as

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>many today. I do think that a lot of media

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>again is like trying to avoid that stuff, um, for

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>better or worse. And I also think that because TV

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is ongoing, usually with multiple seasons, it gives creators and

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>writers a chance to course correct as the series goes

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on m based on responses from fans usually, but it

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>always comes down to who is behind the camera, who's

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the writer's room, who's making these creative choices about characters. Yeah,

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I have like a lot. I don't. I have a

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of opinions on TV. I love TV. I've worked

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>in TV for five years now, brag Binkie, but mostly

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in animation, but I feel like there's I agree with Jacqueline,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there is more, I think more diversity in general. Then

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>TV is also so fraud Like I think that there's

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of amazing shows that are uh from women

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and people call her and queer people. There's there's simply

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just more of them than there are in movies. But

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because of how streaming works, it's so fraught, and I

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like sometimes things just go away and it feels

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes it's like, Okay, we'll give you one season,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and like the same problems kind of exist where you know,

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like a show by you know, a notable white man,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>even if it kind of sucks for one season, they'll

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>get a second season to find their voice and do

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff and blah blah blah. Where like in movies,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about this a lot with with marginalised

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>directors of like if you have one movie that doesn't

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do great financially or critically, you could be kind of done,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and like that also bears out in TV quite a bit.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do feel like there's a lot to be

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>excited about, like you know, absolutely Broken Record being like

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Abbot elementary, but like for real abbot elementary, like it's

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the fucking cool Like, it's the funniest show on TV. Um,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so many good shows at right now, but Okay,

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a show that sticks out to me is like The

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Gordita Chronicles, which was a really cute shell It was

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>really good. It was on HBO Max. It is a

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Latin focused show and it's from Latin creators, but they

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>were only given one season and not only was the

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>show canceled, it's being pulled from HBO Max because of

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>all this evil corporate ship that's going on right now.

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>That makes it really really hard for because of how

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>streaming works, like, it makes it so hard for like,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>even though there's more opportunities I think technically on paper

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in TV for um for marginalized creators than in movies,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it's way easier to like short change and disappear that

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>same media. Like why isn't Rutherford Falls getting a third

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fucking season? Are you joking? Like it's ridiculous and it

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>makes me um piste off obviously, but there is so

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>much to love about what's on TV right now, and

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I really I don't know and that, but but there's

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like sorry, I'm like, she's still going. There's also tropes

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>within like Prestige TV right now, that's kind of exhausting

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to where it's like, you know, I know that a lot.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I watched some of them. I'm Succession fan

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>number one. I've got my Waistar Roy co hat in

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the other room, don't you forget it. I had hot

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>coffee this morning out of my we here for you

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>mug um. Yeah. Like I but there are so many

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>shows right now about rich people being bad and then

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>but then the the underlying message is like capitalism bad.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it kind of sick to watch? And like

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I don't know if that started with Succession,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but like Succession is so fucking good that I feel

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like that is a huge trend right now. That kind

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of I feel like it's like, well, it's technically anti

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>capitalist because we're making fun of rich people, so we

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>should be able to just do this and then we

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>could still have all white, rich traditionally hot casts and

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well you can do that, and sometimes I

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>will watch it, but like you know, clocked, I see it. Um,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think that that is. I think people

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>should watch what we do in the Shadows and p

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Valley and succession, and that's what I have to say

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Also stopped making really boring true crime adaptations.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Enough enough, I should have played Elizabeth Holmes. Okay, yeah,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and that's my problem. All right, UM, Sorry

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>that was I hope that answered the question. UM. Also animation,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>look at look at how animation is unionized. And when

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I say that, I mean it's not unionized. A fun

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>fact about animation writers, they are not allowed in the

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>w g A. Why we durable not that they're not allowed,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but like very few animated shows are. I've been working

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in TV for five years and I'm not in the

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>w g A because I work at animation ridiculous. So

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of like evil shit afoot, and it's

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's good to know about. Um if you're a media consumer,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's depressing to know about. But it's interesting in a way,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>especially if it doesn't affect your health insurance. So let's

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>take another question. This one is from Deirdre, but we

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>got similar questions from several different matrons. Are there any

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>movies that you absolutely will not cover even if they

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are requested by listeners, whether it's because they are so bad,

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>treat marginalized people, so poorly or wouldn't lead to much discussion.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to know which titles are in the Bechtel

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>cast trash bin Oh. I was thinking about this, and

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's any movie that is completely

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>off limits to me. There are some that I think, wait, well, okay,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so I will maybe protest and be like, I don't

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>want to cover Hereditary But I said the same thing.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But I said the same thing about Midsummer and we

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>covered that on the Matreon. Yeah, I've definitely covered movies

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't stoked about, but like, I feel like that

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>usually makes for a pretty interesting episode. It's true. Um, yeah,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are definitely movies that I am not

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>thrilled about or that I don't want to rewatch because

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they made me feel horrible the first time. But I

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>think that that just means that, yeah, it'll inspire an

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting conversation and yeah, and it's our duty to cover it. Then.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually I'm looking at the next question, which feels

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>should we just roll in this next question because I

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's relevant. The next question is from Oliver.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Is there still an embargo on covering Master of Disguise?

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say I don't really want to cover that

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>movie at this point because it's like I feel like

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that's an I don't know, like how to category. I mean,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's a lot of comedy movies honestly that

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are aging poorly. But like, I think that people developed

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>an ironic appreciation for that movie, myself included back in

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the day. But when you watch it on becteal cast terms,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like so unforgivably bad that like I don't even

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>want to really give it air time. Like it's like

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Dana Carvey appears in Brown Face, Like it's a funked

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up movie. And I think that there are certain things

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that like can provoke interesting discussions, And then I feel

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like there's other movies that it's like, oh, we're just

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of digging this movie up from the

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>grave to point out how bad it is, which I

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's like not a productive something. Yeah, something

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>like Master of Disguise, which has no legacy to speak of.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not as though people are still like I ride

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or die for Master of Disguise. I think it's they're

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. I think it's important to have conversations about

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>movies that include really awful stuff like just you know,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>horrible racism and homophobia and transphobia and things like that.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>But that I think is more important to do for

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>movies that still are like in the cultural zeitgeist, the

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>daily zeitgeist. Maybe it's yeah, where it doesn't make sense

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that for a movie that no one remembers,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>such as Master of Disguise, right, I mean, I guess

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I could be talked out of it because I know

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that like a lot of kids around our age saw

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>that movie like and so it could be interesting to

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and be like, look at the like horrific

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>slop we were forced to consume and say thank you.

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>M Also, the name Pistachio disguise E is funny, so

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that's comedy. But I mean, I don't know that's an

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>example of something that I would be I feel like

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we would. There are movies that we've had discussions before

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we've decided to come for it to be like is

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this like useful, is it funny? Like or what you know,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>figuring out where those lines are? Okay, pitch, what if

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we do a Matreon month it's Master of Disguise and

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Master or Master and Commander. Wow, so many Masters?

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of any others but food for thought.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think outside of that, the only movies that like.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>If there's like movies that you're like, why haven't they

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>covered that? And it seems like we would, it's probably

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>just because we know someone involved and like it. I

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't want I just don't want to feel weird.

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you're for wondering, that's likely. If it's a

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more recent movie, it's likely. Why. Yeah, again, we're very

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>popular and we know so many people. Yes, the Madam's

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood over here. Wow. Okay, so our next question

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from Katie asks. I loved your discussion in the

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Good Fellows episode of movies that you didn't care to

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>watch because of the way people i e. Men talked

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to you about them, And I immediately thought of Fight Club,

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which I recently finally watched and hated. But would love

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to know what other movies fall into this category for

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you all, and what of those movies have you seen

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and think are definitely worth watching? I have some thoughts. Okay,

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this well, this is a little This is tricky for

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>me because of my already extremely dude bro taste in movies,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which is like, you don't need to. I feel like

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you've apologized for it in the past, where it's like

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you are who you argue that that's thank you. So

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>point being, I've already seen many of the movies that

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>men will try to insist that I need to see,

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, bitch, I've already seen that, and I

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hate it. Um Because there are many that I have

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen and that I hate so deeply. We've

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>covered some of them, but um Leon the Professional is

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one that jumps to mind. I hate it so much.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Blade Runner, Yeah, I don't see the appeal the movie.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Heat Men are like heat Rocks, and I'm like, it's

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so boring though a lot of like I mean, I

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>think that there's like, I don't know, like good Fellas.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed that discussion because we were like good Fellas

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>heads and we also liked The Godfather. If you're not

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on the fucking Matreon and you've been yelled at us

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for years, we liked both those damn movies. We like

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>good Fellas better. Yeah, and we're right about that, but

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that is the correct answer. Yes, But yeah, I feel

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like there's like I'm trying to think of like a

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>dude bro movie that I avoided for a long time

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that I'm on this list called men's gear dot Net. Uh,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that is it is kind of an interesting

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's like fight club. I think we talked

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about this back in the day. I also like, I

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to that episode someday because I

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's things that like. Because we did it

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as a live show for some reason, we couldn't get

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to everything, and I feel like I had more nuanced thoughts,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but was um kind of self editing because we have

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to do an entertaining live show on top of having

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a very complicated discussion, which is why our live shows

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pluging our tour are now basically fun popcorny movie they're

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>goofy movies, such as a goofy movie. Um, I can't

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.239
<v Speaker 1>really think of any I think that, like honestly, all

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinions are right. So actually, actually, Big Lebowski was

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie that I avoided for a long time, and

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I uh, it's a classic. It's awesome. Um, and I

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>resent that I was kept away from it. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I wrote down that one. I think. I mean film

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>bros love the Cohen Brothers, and I think and I'm

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a big fan as well. I like they're the best many,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if not most, of their films. Um, big Lebowski probably

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>being my favorite of them. Um. I would say a

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of Tarantino movies are also ones that I think

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are worth watching if you avoid Tarantino because of film

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>bros Telling you you gotta see their movies. Although honestly,

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's mostly just Kill Bill. I really love

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Kill Bill. Yeah, I love kill but others I hate.

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I hated The Hateful Eight. I think that's a kind

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of common opinion, though I think that that's like people

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are like, that's his worst one. Yeah, So I'm not

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like saying anything profound here. Although I watched and I

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>was on a plane, so I was I was the

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>snake on the plane. But I I rewatched and Glorious

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Bastards I hadn't seen since high school. I like, that's

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good movie. I really liked that one. I

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>think holds up. On the other hand, once upon a

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>time in Hollywood, we didn't lose one of my least

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite movies. I saw that year, so I have to

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>rewatch it. But I did not like it when it

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>came out. Um, a couple of others I would say

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are worth watching Our Speed and Point Break, And while

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they are both copaganda, they are fun romps and Keanu

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Reeves is in them and he's a national treasure, so

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he and national treasure although no one kept us from

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>no one kept us from National Treasure. Um. And then

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>my final one that we talked about in Good Fellas,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because I just am like, I guess I've always been

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Martin Scorsese movies, but now I'm like,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe this could be my personality for a while. But

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Wolf of Wall Street one of my favorite movies ever.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like such a good capitalism critique. It's fun

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch and everyone's good in it. Um. But but um,

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a certain contingency that take away the

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong message and spoil it for people. But I think

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's um it's one of my favs, thing with American Psycho,

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which we discussed on that episode from a while back.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's it's always a matter of like, because

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these movies are satire or have biting commentary,

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but often the wrong message is taken away or the

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>satire isn't very clear to begin with, so or it's

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like poorly adapted which I think is like I don't

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>remember if we really talked about that in the fight

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Club episode, but I think that, yeah, like it kind

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of like pings my brain for like how Lolita has

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>been adapted over the years, where like in the source material,

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the morality that the writer is trying to

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>get across is very clear, but the adaptations lack that,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like the fight Club kind of falls

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>into that category in some ways. Yeah, I don't have

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>nuance thoughts on it at the moment, but um, yeah,

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd be interested to kind of explore that idea more.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Katie, You've opened my mind, You've opened my heart.

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Two movies by men. Um, let's take another break and

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>then come back and answer a few more questions. We

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are back, and I think it's time to answer some

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>super fun questions. Yeah, fun ones. First ones from Melanie.

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>What episode is gregg in from? I've listened to every episode.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the origin. Well, Melanie from YouTube dot

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>com from we did not make it up? We did

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not make it up. It is from a YouTube video

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>entitled It's Not Even. If you search the word gregnt,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this video will come up. But the video is called

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>how is Prangent Formed? Like? Can we listen to it

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>together right now? It's so funny. So what it is?

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like a bunch of like frantically typed typo

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>written um like answer websites like Cora and Yahoo Answers

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. It's just clearly like people who

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think that they are pregnant, frantically asking a question on

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and not checking their spelling, and it's just

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the urgency of these typos. It's very funny. It's very yes.

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's where gregnant is from. We first mention it

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on the episode on the Rock with Miles Gray. So

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's because you and Miles knew about this video already

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and you were you were giggling about Gregnant, and I

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, what do you guys? Because I hadn't seen

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the video at that point, and so you were in

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on the joke. I was not. But now hopefully everyone's

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in on the joke. We encourage you to watch this

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video How is Prangent Formed? A k a. The

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Gregnant video? Kind of an Internet classic. It's fun and

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and now full fucking circle Miles and his partner there,

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Wow, I know and should send

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry and congregulations to them. We should really send

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a onesie that says Greg. Yes, absolutely, whatever comes out

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that baby is Greg exactly. Um. Our next question comes

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>from Forest. I'm so excited I get to read this one. Okay,

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Forest says, bellow bellow for bellow to you two? Forest,

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 1>who is the most shreky in character in Titanic? And whomp?

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Would the Minions hitch their banana wagon two on the Titanic?

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And then Forest says, sorry, if these questions have already

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>been answered, which is I really hope that there's sincere

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in saying that, because it's not out of the question

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that this would have come up on this true, Well,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have to be um Bruce, Okay, So I

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think the Minions would would work for Bruce is may

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or the iceberg. Okay, now we're talking because, as we've

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>discussed in past Minions episodes, it's minions cannon to avoid

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>historical monsters in historically recent memory that the that the

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>minions were frozen. They were were not frozen, but they

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>lived in the Arctic in a cave from like most

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteenth century until the nineteen sixties. To avoid

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of horrible things. Um, they're like, well, the

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>minions weren't involved with that because they were in the

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Arctic Circle at that time. They were busy with ice,

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so they get ice, they know ice. They ice each other.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably remember when we used to ice each other and

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>drink spear enough ices aristotles a simpler time. Wow, And

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that was also the Mike's Hard Lemonade era. It really was.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We've gone through We've gone through so many phases of

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>this show. We've grown up to. I know, we've really

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>grown up together. I think it's nice. I'm drinking a

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>saltzer right now. Are you joking? I'm drinking would never

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>drink water. Oh my god, that's just because I'm sick.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But I was like, I'm glad we are hydrating more healthfully.

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so I think I think the iceberg is

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an excellent answer, and let's go with that. Is May

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is a coward, and like the minions don't really vibe

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with that. They work for dinosaurs and grew. So I

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>would say probably the iceberg is the right answer. As

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for Shreky in that here here's my thinking. Okay, I

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think cal Hockley gives off some intense lord far Quad

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>vibes he is, Yes, yes, he is very far quad. Yes.

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But also I think Molly Brown it feels very shreky

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in to me. I feel like Fabrizio has some shreky

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in qualities due to his fake exaggerated accent. Um, and

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>how shreki in is that Mike Meyer is certainly not Scottish,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly not, so there's that um. And then

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>also I mean Rose Dowippycator, Fiona both kind of feisty redheads,

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that is a bit shreky in, very shreky.

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think Shrek and Fiona of different classes rich girl,

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>poor guy shreky exactly makes you think holy crap. Basically,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Shrek is an adaptation of Titanic. Are they ever on

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a boat? Is there a dragon and Titanic? Is there

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a donkey and Titanic? Yes? Yes and yes. Trying to

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bear this out, it's Pinocchio and Titanic. Um, I think

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there are enough. Yeah. I think Molly Brown definitely shreky

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and energy. I think the more exaggerated Titanic characters could

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>very easily be in track, which is many of them.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a very yeah. What's the what TV network. Their

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tagline is something like we know characters, or like you're

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mixing up TVs and t N t Kalin. It's characters welcome,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that's TBS. We know drama, that's TNT. Oh my god,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh good grief. Okay, so I guess I mean both

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>apply to Titanic. Titanic nose drama and characters are welcome

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Titanic. We're holding two truths here. We've got

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>TVs and TNT energy. Goodness, it's Titanic. I've a Titanic

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is on t ANT all the damn time, for sure.

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that. Yeah, I would say Jack not

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>very shreky in, but the dynamic between Jack and Rose

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>has Shrek vibes to it. I feel like Rose do

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Itplicator is in a tower of the mind, I mean

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>cerebral tower. She talks about how she's trapped in a

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>metaphorical prison. The whole love triangle honestly is shreky in.

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Titanic is a very shreky in movie, is what we're

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>concluding it is. It is, And the minions would work

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Iceberg, which is so funny. Oh can I

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>read a text? I had a text exchange with my

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>mom yesterday. That made me laugh so much because it's

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. Uh and my my mom's

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>second grade teacher reminder listeners. And I also, Minion piled

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>her so hard this year that she's like, there's there's

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>something going on in her head. It's not quite right.

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>She had never seen a Minion movie. Took her to

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>see Rise of gru in Orlando over the summer, and

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>she's a new woman. She's got a new lease on life.

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So all her kids now are and she knows that

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's my faith. So she had her kids draw me

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>some Christmas Kevin's here's one. Oh my gosh, that's so good.

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I know second graders know how to draw Kevin. He's

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>their friend. But then she texted me, I told my

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>kids this morning that you want to marry Kevin. Ha ha,

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And for the record, had not said, but I replied,

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I do. He's a compassionate leader. And she said exactly,

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>We're Minion felt so hard. I love it, and her

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one of her students got her Kevin chia pet. But

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, do they have hippi have little strands of hair?

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But they're not hippie. Kevin planted Okay, We're gonna have

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to post some of these photos to them. It's so

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the minions, you know, Happy holidays to to them. Well,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the minions, our next question, Oh yeah, that

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't um take it away, Jamie. Oh, this is a

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>question from Kelly favorite things you watched in two movies,

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:11.720
<v Speaker 1>TV docs, whatever? Also at least favorite. Um, Everything Everywhere

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is probably my favorite movie of the years. Same but

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but you got Rise of Group coming in hot right

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>behind it. That's what I'm saying. That's why I saw

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Everything Everywhere three times in theaters. I saw a Group

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>two times in theaters, but in two states, which I

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like isn't nothing. That's effort. It took. You got

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to put an effort for that, and I sawed it. Wait,

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I sawed at both city walks that's fucked up in

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles and in Orlando. No kidding, I go to

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the Manon's house to watch that damn movie. Yeah. Those

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>are my top two. Nice I will add to that,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>are are Are? Which kind of going back to the

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>very first question, we answered as far as like perspective

0:44:56.760 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on film in general, if that has changed? Um, because

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the movie are are Are? While a flawless masterpiece. Um.

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>If we were to cover it on the Backtel cast

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>up well on the conversation about you know, the characterization

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of women in the movie, UM would be it's it's laughable,

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not very um And yet I love the movie

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so so much. It's complicated at the point being sometimes

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I just have to like take off my back dol

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>goggles and I can still enjoy a movie. Sometimes I

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 1>put them back on. You know, it's all about and honestly,

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about this before, but if we're just

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like going to the movies to watch a movie, we

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:46.760
<v Speaker 1>don't necessary at least I don't want to speak for you, Jamie,

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>but I don't necessarily have my back dol goggles on

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or not in the same way that I would when

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like unless it's like egregious, Like if it's egregious,

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>then exactly can't not. But yeah, no, I I agree

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just I think, honestly, the most this is

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not one of my favorite movies of the year by

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a long shot, but one of my favorite pieces of

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>media this year is the Harry Stytles quote. I feel

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's so useful. It's the movie feels like like

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a movie movie and sometimes and now to transition into

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Nicole kidman and we need that, all of all of us,

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that indescribable feeling we get when the lights begin to

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dim and we go somewhere. Oh damn again, it's okay.

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna know the whole thing. Other movies

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I really liked this year, Turning Red and Pray, both bangers.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Both have seen in multiple times. The Woman King I loved.

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I still haven't seen it. Oh you gotta see The

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Woman King. Another one of my favorites was Marcel the

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Shell with Shoes On. I still haven't seen it. I

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, you little movie. At the time of this recording,

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we have yet to see Puss in Boots, but I

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to one of my favorite movies of

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the year. And talk about a shreky In movie, Oh,

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I I mean harder to get shreky in the net

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>unless it's Shrek five, which I can't fucking wait for.

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh there's I'm looking at my AMC history so a

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>documentary I really loved this year, and I think it

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>will probably. I think it's like it's like made the

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Oscars short lists and stuff. But it made me cry.

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it on the Matreon because there was

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy behind me who was really rude about it.

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I was crying, cry, crying fire of love about

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>two vulcanologists who are married and spoiler alert, they tell

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you in the trailer they die in a volcano. Um

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's a really beautiful story and I would recommend

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>watching it. I saw Nope twice. I had a good

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>time at Nope. And then also, this is not a

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>movie from this year, but I saw ET in IMEX

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this year and it was I was crying so much.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's such a I feel like I didn't really have

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is like a micro generational thing too,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but like I didn't have a ton of excite ment

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and love for ET as a kid, but watching it

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as an adult, oh boy, I really love it and

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it it delivered. I also enjoyed Crimes of the Future

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.919
<v Speaker 1>because I love body horror. Um. Oh, I didn't see

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that one, but every time I hear the title of

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that movie, I'm reminded of another movie called Needle in

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a Time Stack. Do you remember this? Oh? Yes, we

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>had a hell of it time with Needle and a

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Time Stack. Did that movie come out do we know.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think so, but it was a blip because I

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and and speaking of amazing incredible movies that are awesome

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and perfect, Moonfall was one of my favorite movies of

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. Not because it's good, because it wasn't. But

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to watch a I Frankenstein level

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>terrible movie, Moonfall is one to watch. You know what

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I liked. I liked Scream five. I liked five Cream.

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a fun one. I'm trying to

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:06.239
<v Speaker 1>spread the love around genres. Sure, Barbarian I thought was

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun. We had some notes for it, but I

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>thought Morbarian was like a really yeah, like a really

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>well done movie. I saw it twice. Enjoyed Bodies Bodies, Bodies.

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed UM. I wasn't wild about X, but I

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy Pearl a lot. Sure, I didn't see either

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of them. I had had a fun time. I will

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>see the third one. As far as TV, we mentioned

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a few shows the Rock and Roll Abbott, Elementary, Rutherford Falls,

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>also Reservation Dogs. I'll add to that list. Um. One

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite shows that came out I think this

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>year is We Are Lady Parts. Watched it people that

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's so good. I highly recommend everyone check out We

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Are Lady Parts. It's about a group of women in

0:49:57.120 --> 0:50:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the UK, all Muslim women who are in a punk

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>band and it's awesome. I gotta watch it. I've been

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoying the sex lives of college girls. Oh, I gotta

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 1>watch that's a fun one. Um, I haven't been. I'm

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of behind on TV right now, honestly, but there

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was one. I mean, I I always stay up on

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 1>what we do in the Shadows. Always a classic, always delivers,

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just for no reason, Like, there's some

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>really good TV shows coming out next year, and I'm

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just going to throw out a couple of titles. Um,

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth season of Star Trek Lower Decks is supposed

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to be like really amazing, and it's actually a really

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 1>good show. And if you are not into Star Trek

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or like don't have a working knowledge and you're nervous

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about getting into the Star Trek Expanded universe, it's kind

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of a great show to start with. It's an adult

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>animated comedy. But I guess that that's all I can

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>really say about it. But I just like the first

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>few seasons are good, but I just like think that

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the fourth season, something's gonna change, it's gonna be really special.

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I want if it's because like a writer joins the

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>writer's room and really like elevates the show the particular writer.

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I would not say that I did that, but I

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>had a really good time. You should watch it and

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Teenage Us in Asia. I just like love that room

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so much, and it's created and written by majority women,

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's so fun and you'll have you'll have a

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 1>great time. It's on I think it's on HBO Max

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's an adult swimshow. Wow. As far as my

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>least favorite things of this year, No Offense Till thor

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Love and Thunder, but I thought that was a turd.

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it. I didn't have fun at any

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Marvel movies this year. I was like, I'm excited for

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the New ant Man movie. I am genuinely excited for

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that because Michelle Fibers in it. Yeah, like the cast

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Rocks and Jeff Loveness wrote the movie and he's so funny,

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I believe in the New ant Man movie.

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a great year with Marvel movies this year.

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I love like Sam Ramy directed the best movie of

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>all time Spider Man too, but doctor Strange just like

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I was confused, I was tired. I was like, oh god,

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of space rocks like you know, also

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Jurassic World dominions. If they had just had the courage

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Yeah. Yeah, I was talking to Sarah

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Marshall was like, it's just like never ceases to amaze

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>me that the last Jurassic Park movie is mainly about

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>locusts and not dinosaurs. Wild. I didn't see it was

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:38.959
<v Speaker 1>such a turd um. Yeah, so those are the ones

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of my list. I saw MORBs as

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a joke. It wasn't worth it. Jared Letto was like

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Jared Letto was genuinely a criminalis bad person And then

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie I was let down by from a director

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I like, and I'm excited for his nose for out too,

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't. I didn't like The Northman. It didn't

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do anything for me me either. I thought it was

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>too violent. Whoa mom. That wasn't my I just thought

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it was like boring, and like Roberts is like not

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a boring filmmaker. So I was just kind of like

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they made the Vivich. He made the Vivich. He made

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the lighthouse. He makes like wild movies. So I don't know.

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And I enjoyed Bandtrees of Inn Sharon. I think I'm

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna think I'll say it a second time. Band Trees

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of Ed Sheeran. Yeah, that was one of the ones

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I liked. It made me want to go back to

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Ireland to visit my family. Oh my god, wait, I

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have a wild As we're winding down this episode, I

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have the weirdest story. I don't know if I told you,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I tell you about the guy I met at the

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 1>airport in Alaska who was like, we're related. No. So

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in the airport and I called up to

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the desk for some seating things. So they said my

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>full name and I was walking back and then there

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>was like an Irish guy and he was like, I

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>can't do an Irish accent. I was about to go Australian.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 1>He was like, is your last name Loftis? I was

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, and he's like, my last name is Loftis

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's Irish and you know, I'm mostly Irish and

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, that's so wild. And he's like,

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifteen years older than me. And I was like, Oh,

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we're just having a conversation here. He's telling me about himself.

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling him about myself. The people at the desk,

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Delta desk, they're loving it. They're like this is

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting and like, yeah it is. This is actually awesome.

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, oh we should. Like he said like

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Loftus is a rare last name, which I have since checked.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's actually true. Um, but I was

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like he's from Ireland. I believe him, which is a

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>weird instinct also, but I was just like he's like

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we might be distantly related, like give me your number

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and like I will blah blah blah blah blah. And

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>then anyways, get on the plane. He immediately starts to

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>texting me so much and then makes a joke about

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like what if we had sex, And I was like,

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>never give a man your phone number, Jamie, wait, what

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what was the text? I received? And now like I

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't blocked his number because I love to choose violence.

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But he was going to Ireland and like I talked

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to my dad for a couple like literally two minutes

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, yeah, we're definitely not related to that guy.

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But glad you enjoyed the airport. So he was like, hey,

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we're probably related. Should we have sex? That really that

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what he was like, because okay, wait no,

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna read the text. Um, this is a

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>few texts down. It starts very friendly. He's like, so

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>cool to meet you, blah blah blah. I was like, yeah,

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that was really awesome, enjoy enjoy the flight. And he's like,

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a seat next to me. And I didn't reply um,

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but then he said, you have the culture in you.

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You are female version of me, less facial hair, and

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, m texts are getting weird, but I

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>reply just a little ha ha. The Loftiest brand is

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:59.400
<v Speaker 1>strong trying to keep things friendly. He replies, would make

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>an awkward morning after waking up in same bed than

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>asking names dot dot dot incest l O L. He

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>immediately applies l O L again. He replies again, how

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 1>cool to meet you. I'm so happy. It's like, okay,

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I bet his name isn't even loftist. He just like

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>goes up to people and like uses that as a

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:23.280
<v Speaker 1>pickup line and then I don't. It's like an excuse

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to get numbers from women. I don't know. I mean

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he has been WhatsApp messaging me pictures of horses in

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Ireland for weeks. It's like it's the kind of thing

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, it's not that joke was I should

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have blocked him, but I am choosing violence. I'm like,

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how many pictures of horses I'm going to

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get um and then if there's a dick pick, then

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll block him. Okay. I wouldn't recommend this approach for

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 1>literally anyone else or really myself, but when I saw

0:56:56.640 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like fancies in shared, which is like it

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:04.359
<v Speaker 1>isn't but I was like Irish accent. Anyways, it made

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>me want to visit Ireland. And then meeting that guy

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe not want to visit Ireland. So I kind of

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.840
<v Speaker 1>been on this whole challenging journey with my homelands. What

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a roller coaster, you know. The final question, um a

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people wanted to know was what movies are

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we most excited for coming out? In Barbie Barbie and

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people mentioned Barbie. Um, my most

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>anticipated is Spider Man Across the Spider Verse. Yes, yes,

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very excited for that. Cocaine Bear is right there at

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the top of my list. Elizabeth Banks is about to

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:46.959
<v Speaker 1>sweep the Oscars. I'm excited for the new Magic Mike,

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Magic Mike's Last Ants. I am excited for Aunt Man.

0:57:50.720 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That'll be fun. Uh huh um mad Max the Wasteland.

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's slated to come out in Oh Wow.

0:57:58.080 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I an't excited for that Cocaine Bear. Oh speaking of

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>scary bears, not Paddington. I don't know when Paddington three

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is coming out, and it better not be before I

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>get cast in it. But Winnie the Pooh, Blood and Honey,

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty excited for. I'm not excited for that. I

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:20.440
<v Speaker 1>can't even really describe why my body rejects that concept.

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing it and you're like, fuck, you have seen Megan.

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>We have to Oh my god, we will be seeing Megan.

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Wh'ere to start the year strong with Megan? I feel

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's actually a strong um madrean contender, Like, yeah,

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to see Wonka only because I think it's

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be horrible. What if Wonka is good? But

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like there's no way, but what if it's are we

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have to cover Willy Wonka and the Chocolate

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 1>factory when that comes out, perhaps perhaps we will. And

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited for the new scream because I'm just like,

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm back, I'm back, I'm in six six cream, six cream. Yeah,

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:00.479
<v Speaker 1>they should just stylize there's five cream and others six

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>crew and now let's add another cream on the pile

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:06.360
<v Speaker 1>while we're at it. I think those are the ones

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that I'm generally excited for it. But I am, I've

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really I'm I'm Barbie puilt, I'm really excited for Did

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you see the teaser trailer? I don't actually think I've

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it yet. I've seen a lot of the like

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>onset photos the teaser trailer. I like, need to watch

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it again. But I'm like, oh, she's she's doing something here.

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not just Barbie and Ken. She's doing what is

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 1>she up to? And then you're just like, you know,

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Searcher running women, women women. So I am, I'm really

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>interested to see that. I'm sure there's ore's there's like

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>independent releases that I am a d for Brady obviously,

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. But yes, the Horny Jane Fonda movie, Yes,

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I will see that. Obviously, I always see the Horny

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I got, I got kicked out of book Club. I

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:56.240
<v Speaker 1>got funked up at book Club and I was cheering

0:59:56.400 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>too much. The only time I've ever been kicked out

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of a movie. Yeah, you were there. You're not comfortable.

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, it's a simpler time. Yeah. Well, so that

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>concludes our Q and a episode for this year. Thank

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you listeners for all your support, and I would hey, hey, hey,

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>now hey, you asked us questions. I'd like to ask

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you a question, which is, what would you like to

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>hear from us? What movies that we haven't already covered

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>would you like us to cover? What suggestions might you

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have for guests that you'd like us to have on

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the show? Things like that. Yes, so, well, we can

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>link to the request form in the description. We're always

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>looking to to hear from you. We love you, and

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>um I'm really looking forward to we have some we

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>have some fun plans in store for you this year.

1:00:56.320 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We're starting the year with our tour um So, if

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you made it to the to the episode neilive on

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast, We've still got tickets available in dwindling numbers.

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I might add in Los Angeles on January we're doing

1:01:10.000 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a Goofy movie then We're going up to San Francisco

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on February first to do George of the Jungle, and

1:01:16.920 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then we're going up to Portland's Oregon on the second,

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>doing two shows. One is The Goonies with Sarah Marshall,

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the second is a mystery show with a mystery guest.

1:01:25.240 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And then February five, we're gonna be up in Seattle,

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>also doing the Goonies. So you're gonna want to go, Bibe,

1:01:32.480 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna want to go. And you can find tickets

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to those shows on our link tree, which is linked

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on our Twitter and Instagram. You can follow us those

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>places as well. You can also subscribe to our Patreon

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a k a Matreon. It gets you two bonus episodes

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>every single month, plus access to the back catalog. And

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's January, and that means only one thing. The Pinocchio Wars,

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh God covering look the two Pinocchios from Bockle the

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>fuck in. It's gonna be bloody, it's gonna be brutal.

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin and my friendship might faull apart, might not survive

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>because what you don't know is that Caitlin and I

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:22.439
<v Speaker 1>have both been drafted and not to the same side

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of the war. Wow, yeah, my goodness. Yeah, so stay

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>tuned a bit of R R R energy, yeah in

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this war, but our friendship may say, hey, win the day.

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh. And if you haven't seen R R R,

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotta watch it. But anyway, thank you for listening

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back next week with a regularly scheduled programming. Wait,

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>let's on the back dock. Okay, um, as as as

1:02:55.760 --> 1:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>my husband Kevin would say, poopie, poopie below and poopie

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's famous Beatles song. Okay, bye bye,