WEBVTT - NFL Draft Odds (Ep. 84)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 2>We've got a great show for you today.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>We are getting so close to the NFL Draft just

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>days away. So we brought in two of our fantastic

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>experts from fantasy pros, from the fantasy side, because we've

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>been doing a whole lot of mock drafting and we're

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that knowledge of all these mocks that we've

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>done and try to help you out on the wagering

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>at betting Pros. So I want to welcome to the

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>show today, Kyleie Yates and Mike Tagliere. Like I said,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we are getting so close to the NFL Draft you

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>could basically feel it. You can sense it. And I

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you Tags, We'll start with you here. It

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like, once again, you know, the crossover between fantasy,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>between wagering, between everything and our love of NFL is

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at a peek. It's at a fever pitch right now,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta tell you it's kind of a fun

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>way to watch the draft when you have a little

0:00:59.280 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of money in it.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, we're we're gonna be watching the Draft.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be talking about the draft. We're gonna be

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>going through like so I'm not even have time to

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 2>think about anything. It's just literally is gonna keep going.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And I can't wait because I'm tired of the talk.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Like basically, everybody's talking in circles. It's the same thing

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>over and over and it's been that way for a

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>little while, and now storylines are being made up just

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to pump up interest. I don't need anything pumped up.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm pumped for the draft. I'm ready for it, and

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to do the show today.

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yates, are you as pumped as tags is? Because, my goodness,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I am pumped right now because of his pumpedness, everyone's

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just so ump. But he's right to a certain extent,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is and he gates that at this point it is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not only just talk, but it feels like everybody's just

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>repeating the same narratives about certain things. And we all

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know that when push comes to shove, something is going

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to be completely different that nobody recognize all coming, and

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to affect the rest of the draft because

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>why it happens every single.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Year, oh absolutely, And this has been like the longest

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>three months of my life right where like the Super

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Bowl ended, and it feels like this is a very

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 3>in the grand scheme of things, in the grand scheme

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>of the NFL season and the off season, like this

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>is a very small window. But yeah, it feels like

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>this is just a six month long process of leading

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>up to the NFL Draft.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's still it's.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Like getting closer and closer, but yet at the same

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>time feels like it's never going to get here. So

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>very excited to be here on the betting pros side

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of things and talking some NFL draft here.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the first round right now as

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it stands with it seems like Wilson going second overall,

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so you're not getting any good odds on Tremor Lawrence.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the lock, and then of course Wilson looks like

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the second lock. And next we've got Mac Jones, who

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like a minus one forty five over on betting pros.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got Justin Fields at plus one sixty five

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to go third for the forty nine ers, Trey Lance

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at plus four hundred, and then Wilson, if for some

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>reason something does change, you're getting a twenty five to

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one on him. So let's start with you here, Yates,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in this one, because I know you and I have

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a very distinct feeling about this, which is the quarterback

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>situation in terms of where we like them, where we

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>rank them. We think the forty nine would be nuts

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to pass on Trey Lance, And I guess here's the question.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>If you truly believe that, as you and I do,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't it clear that the bet on the board four

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to one is how you make money with Trey Lance?

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely is.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 3>When you're looking at Mac Jones at minus one forty five,

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going anywhere near that. I don't buy the

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>smoke screen whatsoever the chatter that it's going to be

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones and number three. Overall, you just do not

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>trade multiple first round picks to go up and get

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>someone of that caliber. And then with Justin Fields, I

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>think that it's a worthy bet. But if you're looking

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to hit on this one, I think that it could

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>be Trey Lancer. And so at those odds of you know,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the four to one of that plus four hundred, that's

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>really really solid, and I'm looking to lay it on

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>some money on that one, all right.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's nuts tags to lay one forty five

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to win one hundred for mac Jones. I just think

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this is like one of the sucker bets on the board.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to talk about that, So let's

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about justin Fields instead, because Fields right now is

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a plus one sixty five. Now in your opinion, looking

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>at this, do you think this is kind of that

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>safe wager where actually you know what the odds are good.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>All of the buzz seems to be that Fields is

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in contention for that third pick. A lot of experts

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do believe he is the next best guy on the

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>board consensus, even though that some of us are not

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 1>in that same consensus. Do you look at Fields as

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>probably being the chalky be here? But in a way

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>good chalk because moving up to take mac Jones seems

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like the wrong thing to do if you're the forty

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>nine ers, So it would make a lot more sense

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>if it was Lance or Fields. Even though the odds

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are much better on Fields, Is it a good way

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a little bit of a better wager here

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of rather him than mac Jones.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I would not, I obviously would not bet on mac Jones.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying it's not gonna happen. You know, where

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 2>there's smoke, there's usually fire. But at the same time,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>when you think about this, when San Francisco made this trade,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 2>there were rumors that they reached out to both the

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Falcons and the Dolphins, so they were talking to both

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>those teams, which means that they were interested in one

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 2>of those two spots, and they had to assume if

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 2>Miami was going to stay there, someone else was going

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>to trade up. So therefore, it's almost like the Falcons

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be holding out for a ransom that they're

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 2>not getting from any other team. So me, it's like

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted three or four, that tells me that

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you're okay with one of the top four quarterbacks on

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>your board. And Kyle Shanahan with the ties now with

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Roberts Salat out there in New York, it's like, I

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>feel like he knows exactly who the Jets are taking.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they know that in San Francisco and

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>then they trade it up into this spot to know

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly who they're going to pick. I don't think that

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>you're going to trade up this far to take Mac Jones.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones was a guy that a lot of mock

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>drafts leading up to this was good was going in

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the teens. I think the Patriots were a team that

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>was there, Washington was there, the Bears, those are That's

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the territory that a lot of people were talking about it,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and everybody wants to drum this up, and Yates has

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>said it all along that he thinks this is a

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Draft Nights story that they're going to be looking up

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to drum up, be like how far is mac Jones

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna fall? When in reality he should have been falling

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 2>all along. So I do think that the best bet

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>for me, it would have been justin Fields. I'm a

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>little worried about this epilepsy thing that came out just yesterday.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Actually it said that there were multiple NFL teams that

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 2>this came through in his medical checks, So that's a

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>little worrisome, especially when you're spending as much. So tree

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Lance at plus four hundred feels like he's probably the

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>best bet, to be honest, I don't think I'm betting

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>at all though, because I think there's a lot of

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of ifans or butts with this pick.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 2>But if I had to pick one right now, I'd

0:05:58.640 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>say Tree Lance plus four hundred.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to first player drafted by position,

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a consensus over here at betting Pros

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with Penny seoel and minus five sixty, they'd be the

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.559
<v Speaker 1>first O lineman off the board. Rashaun Slater plus two fifty. Now,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is this as stark as it appears from these odds

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>here in your opinion tags? Because most of the mockx

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we've done over on the fantasy side here have been

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Penny Sewell being the first guy. But we've heard a

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of buzz about Rashawn Slater. A lot of teams

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>love him. Is there any way that you can justify

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Slater going over Seool.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 2>I am not laying five hundred and sixty on Penny Seowol.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>I good question.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I I do believe that he's the first offensive line

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 2>off the board, But I don't think it's a stone

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>called lock. I don't think it's like Trevor Lawrence going

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>to the Jackson. It's not that this is a bet

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 2>that I would actually stay away from because Rayshawon Slater

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 2>has not got nothing but like Steam going into this

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 2>draft or Penny School, he held out and We've heard

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>from multiple people that players that held out could fall

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>further than you think because teams just have no idea

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>what shape their in. If that year away from football,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you know it did some damage. But there's a lot

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 2>of question marks here. So if I was forced to

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 2>pick one of them, I'd say Slater plus two to fifty.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not betting either of those.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, clearly sool is not even available. I'm sorry, mis

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>five sixty is just nuts. There's no reason to ever

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>do that. But is there enough helium right now with

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Slater Yates in your opinion to justify maybe taking a

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>little look at this plus two fifty because this is

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a nice little odds here in terms of offensive lineman

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>considering well, Slater's getting a ton of buzz here late

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.559
<v Speaker 1>or once again it's just just another classic smoke screen

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>going on with the NFL guys.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>If you have to ask me just straight up, which

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>offensive lineman goes off the board first. I do think

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that it's penny school at the end of the day.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>But rayson Slater is getting a ton of buzz, like

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>you said, to the point where a lot of NFL teams,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 3>from what we've been told, have Raceeon Slater ranked above

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Penny Sool. Now it just matters the guys in the five, six,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>seven eight range. What do they have, right? Do they

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>have Penny School over race On Slater. That's what it matters.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>So when you sent this list over, like, I circled

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 3>O line right, because this is drastic that five sixty

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to plus.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Two to fifty from Rayeon Slater.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>If you had to just pick straight up, I would

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>would still lean Penny Soul. But if I'm looking to

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>look at that action there at plus two fifty, I

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 3>think that it's actually worthy of at least laying down.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>A little bit. Yeah, And it's kind of how I

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>feel about that last one we talked about earlier on

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with the you know, the third over round pick. It's like,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to bet big with fields,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but I would throw a little bit in

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>hedge with tray lance just in case, because you might

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to hit pretty good right there with that one.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't think that's an impossibility at all, And

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually going to possibly change as we

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get into next week with the NFL Draft, So keep

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that one too. I think that's a

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>line that might move, especially after some of the news

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that came out about fields too. Just keep a close

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>eye on that one. Let's go to cornerback here and

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Cirtan is minus three h five on betting pros consensus.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>JC Horn is plus two hundred. Is there any way here, Yates,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>you see these two flip flopping or is Certan gonna

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be basically the first cornerback off the board.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Regardless, there's absolutely a path for jac Horn to be

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 3>taken over Patrick Surtan. Do I think that that's the

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>right move. No, But Dallas Cowboys sitting there at number

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 3>ten overall, if Sirtan and Horn are on the board,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 3>there is some significant smoke that jac Horn might be

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the corner that they prefer, just with his ability to

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>be a press man across the board, be able to

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>guard slot corners to big tight ends. He locked down

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Moore in college all the way out to Kyle Pitt's,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 3>so that ability would be really, really attractive for Dallas

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>at number ten overall. So I think there's a possibility.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>But if you have to ask me just straight up,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I do think that Patrick Sutan at minus three h

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 3>five is still the way that I would.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Go, yes, I'm glad you brought that up because that's

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>something I was looking at yesterday, which is how good

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Horn was against some of the elite talent in college football.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that matters enough or could matter enough

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion tags to put him over Certan first

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>as the first corner going off the board.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Do I think it's possible? Sure, But I'm actually with

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yates in this one that at minus three h five,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a fair bet. That's actually actually one

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I would do because I think if Caleb Farley didn't

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 2>have the back issues that he did, I would be

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable selecting him there because I think Farley was the

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>better cornerback in my opinion. I feel like there's deficiencies

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 2>in Cirtan's game, but coming from Alabama, if you're looking

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>for something to tilt it, Alabama players almost always get

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>picked before anybody else. So, Sir Tan to me, I

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>think that there's another prop bet available right now we're Cirtan.

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>The over under on where he's picked is ten and

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a half, and I would say under that. So if

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to, if you're uncomfortable with Sirtan or Horn,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 2>here if you're like, I can see it going either way.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I think both of them can potentially be picked by ten.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And that one that Tags is talking about is minus

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one fifty nine if you like that, So keep that

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in mind. That's a spot open there. If you like

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sir Tan going over under ten and a half, it

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>would be the under there at minus one fifty nine.

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Is those odds. Let's go to the defensive lineman and

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll move on to some more of Tags as favorites.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We've got Quitty Pay at minus two hundred, Azizoljari at

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty, and Jalen Phillips at plus two hundred.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Tags will start with you with this one. Quidty Pay

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is the favorite right now in your opinion? Is there

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>any way you want to justify? Because these are pretty

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>tight right now. This was a little bit tighter than

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the other ones we've seen here, but you

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>got three guys who are pretty close. So I guess

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do in of approaching this. Do you

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stay away for the defensive alignement because it is kind

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of tough to taill because every team does have certain

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>schemes that they want to run, or do you think

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>there really is a definitive guy that you're gonna put

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>above everybody else.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I honestly, I don't think that there's a right answer here.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody knows who's gonna come to stay

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>away for you. It really is because Quitty Pay is

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 2>someone that people are doing some projecting in order to

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>get him there and saying he wasn't used correctly at Michigan. Well,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>when you're taking a guy as high as you know,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>twelve fifteen or wherever the first edge rusher is picked,

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you need to know that the guy's going to produce,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. Jalen Phillips, he would be

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the number one for me. I think that he one

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent would be the first one off the board

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't have these question marks, you know, retiring

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen from concussions and then coming back and

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 2>playing the way he did. Obviously that's fantastic, but there

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 2>are health concerns there. We can't eliminate those. Oh, Jalari,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think belongs in the conversation. To be honest,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't even have him in my top four ed

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>rushers in this class.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So well, if you're taking him out of their tags.

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Then that means Quitty Pay at minus two hundred, Jalen

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Phillips at plus two hundred, Yates take Phillips is I

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna say, Yates, are you kind of wear tags?

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Which seems like, take oh Jari out of it, and

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>then that's a pretty big divide right now, you're between

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the minus two and the plus two. In my opinion too,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it would seem like you're crazy not to if you

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>want to lay down some money on this one to

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>go with the Phillips side.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, I'm in complete agreement with Tags on this one

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 3>across the board where you say this is one that

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I would probably stay away from in general, because Jalen Phillips,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>if he was fully healthy, would be that favorite that

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I would say. I think that you would see the

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 3>odds flipped if we knew that Phillips was completely healthy. Unfortunately,

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 3>unless we get something leaked in the media about his

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>medical history, we're not going to have that clarity. So

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Phillips, if I'm putting any money down on this one,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it would be Jalen Phillips, just because from the talent perspective,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 3>he belongs above Quity Pay. But does the NFL, does

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Vegas know or like the odd makers know something here

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 3>with quity pay over Jalen Phillips that we don't. So

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 3>this is just one that I would probably stay away from.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 3>If I'm forced to do anything, it would be Jalen

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Phillips at plus two hundred.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, before we move on to some of

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the individual teams, uh tag you high. I lighted a

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>few things here, and I want to talk about this

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>first one because one of the unders for the total

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks the numbers five and a half, and you've circled

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>this as the under, but it's a minus five sixty here.

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And typically, again, if you're gonna lay that much just

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to win, it must be an absolute one percent lock,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like it is. Yeah, and it probably is.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But still, how do you, I guess, how do you

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sleep at night making sure that you're gonna go for

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this minus five sixty just to win one hundred dollars there?

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Because to lay five sixty, even though you know it's

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a lock, that is a whole lot to lay down there.

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So why do you like this wager so much?

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a whole lot, but it's really not

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's the same as that Penny Sule has

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>got to be the first offensive lineman off the board.

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Like when you think about it, and that that one,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to me has more whibble room. Every year they talk

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>about quarterbacks that could potentially sneak in the in the

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 2>first round. Remember Mason Rudolph, that whole conversation. You know

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what I'm saying, those quarterbacks, That's what I'm saying.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You go to those.

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Quarterbacks and it's like Lamar Jackson fell He was a

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>guy that should have went higher and he fell away

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to the thirty second pick, where you're gonna have guys.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I swear some of these names they're bringing up are

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>going to follow the third and fourth round. And I

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>don't see any chance it gets, no chance it gets

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>over five. I'm just willing to do it.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I tend to agree with you. It's

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>just a lot. It's a big you know, mayas five

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sixties a lot yates. Are you as confidences tags in

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as this number?

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, if I'm forced to take those odds at

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 3>five sixty, that's just something that's a little steep for

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>me to get me in on. But when you look

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>at the names outside of the top five. Obviously you

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>have your Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Justin Fields, Trey Lance

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>mac Jones, and that conversation seem to be guaranteed first

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>round locks. Well, then it's got to be one of

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Trask, Kellen Mond, Davis Mills sneaking up into that

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>back into the first round.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That's just not happening.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Like, I'm fairly, fairly certain, ninety nine percent certain that

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>that is not going to happen. But it's just that

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>if it were minus three hundred, that would be another conversation.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 3>But minus five sixty, man, it's just steepy.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>See. That's where I struggle too. I struggle with the

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>five sixty. And here's the other part that I struggle,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, we're taking this at face value with the

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that are on the board at the end of

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the first round. But that's not necessarily the trade you're

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be picking there, And I think the variable of

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the trade scares me. With that much juice I get

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it to me, it's just too much that I would

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>personally stay away from this one. Mike's confident, and he

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>should be. I think he is one hundred percent right,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's small variable of any team could jump in

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in those last couple of rounds, and and you know,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City could trade out or or a Tampa or

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody like that at the very end, because somebody might say, oh,

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we love this quarterback, which might make

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>sure we get him before it flips over to the

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>second round. It's not impossible. I mean, some people didn't

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think Jordan Love would go in the first round last year.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Who would necessarily thought that not only would.

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>He, but he was expected he was expected to go

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to the first round, but.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Him in the first round. He was a guy you'd

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>see in the first and sometimes at the second last year,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the mocks it was. It was

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>somewhere debatable, But I don't think any of us thought

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that Green Bay Packers were gonna be the team to

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. That's or to trade up to do it.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, over my point, five running backs drafted in

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the first round. So basically we're looking at basically a

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>running back being draft or not. The juice is minus

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>three zero five. So tags, what about this wager kind

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of peaked your interest?

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, it comes down to, like looking at the teams,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the end of the first round. You have the Dolphins

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>who are at eighteen, they're picking. You have the Steelers

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>who are twenty four. You have those chances, But then

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>you have the guys who are at the top of

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the next round. You know, you talk about teams like Atlanta,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>You talk about teams like the Jets, these Miami has

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>another pick early in the round. These are all teams

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>that I could see moving up just a couple spots

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to get back in the first round to draft that

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>running back and get that fifth year option on their contract. Because,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>as we know, running backs walk into the league, they're

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>in their prime, they're used right away. They're not going

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to be signed to a second contract the majority of

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the time. And like we can go back a couple

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>of years and like talk about Rashad Penny, that guy

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>went in the first round. You know, Naje Harris is

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>a running back I love. You know, Travis etn is

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>perfect for today's NFL. Javonte Williams is a guy that's

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>been getting picking up a lot of steam lately. So

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>one of those three running backs I do believe will

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>go in the first round.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe Yates that Trevin Morigg would be the

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>first safety drafted. It's minus four hunh Vegas certainly seems

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to think so.

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that this is kind of a lock

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>when you look at guys like Javon Holland out of

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Oregon as that kind of consensus second safety off the board.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but after that Hamsun is Cyril la Dean

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>out of Florida State, Andre Cisco, Like it's a it's

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a week safety class just in general. So when you're

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 3>looking at Trevon Merrigan what he brings to the table,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>I think that he is kind of just locked in

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>to be that first safety taken this again, Steve odds

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>minus four hundred, but I doubt I just can't see

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>any of those other guys going above him.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, the over under for Alabama players going in the

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>first round it's five and a half. Tags. You've circled

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the under here on this one. The line is plus

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one fifty five. So your thoughts on this Alabama player total.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've been running through it. I'm trying to figure

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 2>out where they got that from. I think it would

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 2>be safer to set it at four and a half,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, Like, but the five and a half

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is you know, Christian Barmore is not a guy that's

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>being mocked in every single first round of every single one.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 2>And then you work through it and you try and

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 2>like Naja Harris. That's assuming that Naja Harris goes in,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 2>and that's where I set at four and a half

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>because you start working it in, you start it's almost

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 2>like you just look at it and you start adding

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 2>up the players and you're like, not just one guy,

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>but two guys have to get into that first round.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 2>That almost like I don't expect to be there. Barmore

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>has a chance, I will say that, but you're gonna

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>need one more. So it's just I don't see it.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it happening.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like actually one of the better bets on

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the board the way we're talking about it, because in

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>all the mocks we've done, we've been under that number

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. The fact that I can recall,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So Yates, do you feel confident in this plus one

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty five as well?

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't because you're looking at Christian Barmore is getting

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>top twenty buzz. Now this is at the point of

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 3>the season where you say, because it's just heading in,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 3>like we talked about at the top, it's just draft

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>season and it's getting closer to the draft where there's

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 3>just so much smoke and forty players are going to

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>go in the top twenty picks, right. But with Barmore,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 3>he's getting that buzz because it is a very very

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>weak interior defensive lineman class. When you have a player

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>who has the upside of Barmore, that's the potential. So

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 3>you go Barmore, Mac Jones, Jalen Wattle, Davante Smith. There's

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>four right there. Then Dickerson would be the other one

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 3>right where potentially it's all dependent upon the health for him,

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 3>and then Naji Harris. So at that point you have

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 3>the six players. So it's just it comes down to

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 3>really Land and Dickerson, because I do think that Naji

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Harris is gonna go in the first round. So now

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 3>it really just comes down to Land and Dickerson and

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 3>what his health is. This is probably one that I

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 3>would probably stay away from it.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder also if you could, you know, if you

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think about it, if you like we just talked about

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>before the whether or not you think Naja Harris goes

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, right, that number of running backs right.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like you want to tie in the maybe

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the under on the running backs if you could get it,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and the under on Alabama if you like that side.

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that's the tie in because it might

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be Naj Harris as the guy who breaks this five

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half as that seemed like a good pairing

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if indeed you were inclined to do so.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I think Harris is one of those guys that's gonna

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>come through that he's gonna actually be in the first round.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 2>But it's bar More and uh Dickerson. Those are the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 2>two that I don't maybe one of them does. But

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>then if you're gonna put both of them in there,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you're kicking out some big names out of the first round.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's the only I just don't see it because

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>they're almost that line is almost saying, hey, if you

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 2>think both are gonna come out, like if that's a

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of players, I mean.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to Dickerson. Sorry to cut you off text,

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 3>it comes down to Dickerson. And again, that's a health

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>just like Jalen Phillips, it's a health thing where we

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know unless it leaks, we're not going to have

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 3>that information so that's just a risky bet to put

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 3>down when you don't have all the information at your fingertips.

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not confident in it.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's see how confident you guys are in

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a few of these individual team wagers that are out there.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So these are teams whether or not they're going to

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pick this specific player, which is a little tougher to gauge,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but you do have some pretty good odds. Most of

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>them are all on the plus obviously as well the

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>ones we're going to talk about. So Trey Lance for

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos is a plus two hundred. For the Broncos,

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Micah Parsons is a plus four. Mac Jones is a

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>plus six yates, Can I tempt you on any of these?

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 3>If I'm willing to take a shot on any of these.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Trey Lance is off the board. I don't

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 3>think that Michah Parson goes Micah Parsons goes in the

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 3>top ten because of some off the field concerns, so

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 3>I think he falls a little bit. Mac Jones is

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the one that I look at any of the if

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>he is supposed to go in the top ten, which

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 3>is what we're being told, which is what we're being fed.

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Denver probably makes the most sense where you look at

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the situation that he has with the playmakers around him.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a team that's committed to running the football, playing

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>with good defense, taking care of the football. Mac Jones

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 3>fits that, and he brings that experience that Drew Locke doesn't.

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 3>So I guess it really all just comes down to

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 3>where do you think mac Jones is gonna go. If

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take a shot on any of these, it

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>would be mac Jones at plus six hundred.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, the six to one is certainly good enough odds

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to take a shot. Tags Are you in agreement there

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or is this just a complete stay away anyway?

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I stay away from teams that are that. You tie

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to teams just because you have no idea, Like literally,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 2>one trade that happens above that team, it changes the

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 2>entire draft board and it changes everything. Teams know that,

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's why they have to go in. They have

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to meet with all these different prospects because they have

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to be prepared for every situation. Unfortunately, when you're betting

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>before the draft, you're not prepared for every situation. Betting

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>on a single player, I should say, so Mike A.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Parsons at four hundred, I don't know if I might

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 2>that one. You know, you go back to Vic Fangio

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>when he was with Chicago drafting Rokwon Smith with the

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 2>number eight overall pick. I think it was, you know,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and they linebacker is a position of need for them.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>They did add cornerbacks, they don't need that. So if

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a if a quarterback does not fall to them that

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>they would want. I think mac Jones is redundant in

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 2>terms of having Drew Locke on the roster. See what

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you have. If they were able to get Trey Lance,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 2>they'd love it. But I don't think Lance falls there.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>But Micah Parsons is interesting because he's a guy that

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I would have mocked earlier in the draft,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>like definitely inside the top ten earlier, and it seems

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>like he's fallen through the media. But I don't know

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>really why. But at nine for the Broncos, for Vic

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Fanjo to add another piece to that defense, it kind

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 2>of makes some sense, all right.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So you have a good argument there for the mac Jones.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So I had a good argument for the Parsons side.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look at the Giants. DeVante Smith is

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the highest odds here plus two to fifty. Then they

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have Michael Parsons as well at plus five, and then

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Rashaun Slater plus five yeates. The plus five hundred on

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Slater is the one I'm circling because the Giants could

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly use some more offensive line help. I mean they've

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>done everything else. I mean the health of Saquon Barky

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the last few years has not been good. Let's be honest.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You've added Kenny Galladay, so you want to get time

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for him to get open downfield if you're going to

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really make this offense work. It seems like Slater five

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to one is actually a pretty good wager if you're

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be looking there. But then again, you never know

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what teams are gonna do. Do you feel like this

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is a stay away for you when it comes to

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giants or do you think Slater's actually a good investment.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 3>This really is a stay away from me. If there

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 3>were any of these guys that were edge players and

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 3>there were favorable odds, that would probably be something I

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>would look at, because I think edge is where they

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 3>go in the first round. But there's not I don't

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 3>think that they double down on wide receiver after adding

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Galladay and adding some key pieces throughout free agency

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Micah Parsons. Again, it makes sense with Dave Gettleman. But

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 3>yet at the same time, I don't know if Parsons

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 3>is gonna go this early. So if there was an edge, maybe,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>but outside of that, man, I just don't think Raychaun

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Slater is still there, So I will I'll stay away

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>from this one.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>You seem like you're in agreement, So let's move on

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Eagles instead. DeVonta Smith plus three hundred, pastricks

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of Tan plus three hundred and Jalen Wattle plus five hundred.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we got the two wide receivers in this cluster.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the Eagles do go back to that

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver? Well, and if so, which one of these two.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Guys and DeVante Smith would be my choice here, just

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, this is a team that desperately needs

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers after letting go of Alshon, Jeffrey DeShawn Jackson.

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Obviously they weren't on the field for them. But Jalen Rager,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think if you put him in Jalen Wattle together,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 2>I just think you have a couple burners that I

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>like Raager, and I don't think I'm not giving up

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 2>on him. I don't think the Eagles should either. But

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Davanta Smith is DeVante Smith is someone that accents his

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 2>play very well, like he's a different type of player

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 2>than Jalen Rager. So I believe DeVante Smith would be

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the one I would choose. But again I'm staying away

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>from this. I heard the Eagles could look to trade

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>back even more in this and if the Eagles do

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 2>trade back, they're not gonna get DeVante Smith. So that's again,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 2>this is why I avoid at all costs like doing

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>a prop bet with players going to specific teams.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, let's try about these two players in general, then,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Smith and Jalen Waddle. Let's look at them and Yates.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>We have minus one O that Smith goes first, minus

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>one eight team that Wattle goes first. Number one. Do

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you think this is the correct odds on these guys?

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And number two? Are one of these more interesting you

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>than the other in terms of wagering.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I think Waddle goes first with DeVante Smith at one

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty six pounds. I think that he's going

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 3>to be a great pro. Like, don't get me wrong,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that he's going to be great, But it's

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 3>the outlier perspective here with DeVante Smith and just how

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>high do you take this guy in the NFL draft?

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think that teams are still going to be

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 3>looking to get Davante Smith on their team. Like, don't

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>get me wrong, again, I think he's gonna be great,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 3>but it's just when you look at the price tag,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the investment, and then the fact that he's an outlier

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 3>at that size, I just don't know if that's someone

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that you take within the top fifteen picks. And if

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that's the case, then I know that Wattle's going to

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 3>go in that range, and I know that Jamar Chase

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 3>is going to go in that range. So I'll go

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 3>waddle here over Davonte Smith.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go back and talk more about the

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>first round. How many players from each position is going

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to go. We already talked about the quarterbacks, so we

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of dug into that one. We touched on the

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but I want to kind of bring it

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to everybody's attention too, because right now on betting pros

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the consensus the over under the number is point five,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's basically is running back and it get taken

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. Just to simplify for folks out there who

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>are still new to wagering, you got the minus three

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>oh five for the under. That's a consensus number. Then

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the under is plus two thirty. Now that number is

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>different in lots of different places. On FanDuel, for instance,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the over is minus two seventy, the unders plus two hundred.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>If you go to another site like fox bet, you

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>got plus two hundred for the under, excuse me for

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the over, and then for the under minus two to

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty six. And this is the nice thing about betting

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pros is that you can go to betting pros dot

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>com and you can see the different houses, how they

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>wager everything, how they set everything up, and basically where

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you like to get the best odds, and then you

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>can go place your bet very smartly, so it's kind

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of like a condensed version where you don't have to

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>keep looking at all these different sites. You can go

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to just one spot and you could see everything there,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like the wagers you like, and then find the best

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>odds and boom, you can go take care of that all.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to this one. Just use the consent, boys,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>because again that point five, the consensus numbers minus three

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>oh five the on the over the under is plus

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>two thirty. So tags, once again, we'll just kind of

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>touch on this one more times whether or not you

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think a running back is gonna go. We've done Max

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>where they have, We've done Mox where they haven't, and

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that makes this one a tough one. This is a

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>stay away from me, how about you?

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking the over here. There will be one. The

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 2>question is which one is it? You know for me

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>it would be Naja Harris. You know it couldn't be

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>too Travesey CNN one hundred percent.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Go there.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>He put on some weight for his pro day, he

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>still ran a fast time.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Again.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Javonte william has been getting some hype recently. It reminds

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 2>me a little bit Uppershod Penny in a way where

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 2>like the Rise, I'm not not the player, not the player,

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>but the rise during the draft process. So but I

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>definitely see one of those three running backs coming off

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the board, if not two of them.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yates, do you see one running back coming

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>off the board?

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 2>I do, I do Okay.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.239
<v Speaker 1>So basically then if you do like that over when

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you're looking around, you got plus two hundred of fox

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>bet that's the place to go make that wager. Yeah,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you're right now that's the spot. And

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that's because of looking at agat bettingpros dot com. Now,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when you go to the wide receivers right now, right

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the consensus so far, we've got the under at four

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And looking at this again, you can

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>go over under in some different places. Let's just take

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the number right now, because the consensus is plus one

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy five on the under. You go to FanDuel and

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>get the over at minus two oh five. Just to

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>give you a gauge of where the numbers are at Yates,

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>how many receivers do you think are going to go

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in this first round?

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, this is a really tough one. Where you

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 3>look at Jamar Chase, Davante Smith, Jalen Waddle, they all

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 3>seem to be locks. But then there is a huge

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 3>range for the number four wide receiver off the board.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it Rashad Bateman, is it Terrace Marshall out of

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 3>LSU Is it somehow Elijah Moore out of all miss

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 3>like Kadarius Tony is supposed to go a lot higher,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 3>could even potentially go over Davante Smith, according to Peter

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Trigger of know NFL Media. So there's just a ton

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 3>here where it's a ton of uncertainty. If you had

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>to make me choose, I would say the over here.

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I do think that we get five in the first round.

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>As to which it's gonna be, I just have absolutely

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>no idea yeap.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, across the board, the overs are all in the

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>minus two ish range, so we're talking two ten to

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>two twenty five. As I'm looking here on bettingpros dot

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>com tags, what do you think about this number here?

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Because look, they really are I mean, you just never

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>know in the leads going in this direction. But we've

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>done these mocks these last month or so where we've

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>had big wide receiver mocks and then somewhere they faded

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>into the second round a little bit, and I'd say

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>recently we're kind of close to this number, which is

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>again why you're getting the four and a half. We

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>know the three that are a lock. It's whether or

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not Bateman is a lock for you too. If so

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that's four automatically, you just need one more, So do

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you think one more can squeeze out of this first round?

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, if Bateman was a lock, i'd say yeah, But

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>after Bateman came in at six foot, one hundred and

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>ninety pounds, I don't know if he's a lock because

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 2>he was always a guy that was talked about in

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the twenties. So I mean, do I think Bateman should

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 2>go there? Yeah? I absolutely do. Do I think Tony

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 2>should be considered? No? Do I think Elijah Mark should

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>be considered?

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Do I think Terris Marshall should be considered? No? So

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>all these players I go through it. But that's the

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>thing is you look at last year and teams are

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 2>craving wide receive right now. So if this was even money,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>i'd probably say the over. But given it's minus three

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 2>ten for over four and a half, I can't do it.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't do that, So I would actually rather take

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the under four and a half plus two twenty five.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 2>But in reality, I do happen there's probably gonna be

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>five ride receivers in that first round, but as he said,

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>we don't know who, and I don't feel comfortable with it.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But if I was the first pick, if I was

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 2>forced to pick one side, I'd take the under four

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the offensive lineman. Over under is six

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half minus one twelve on both sides, So

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tags will start you with this one. Obviously, offensive line

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>has really been valued much more in the last few years.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Teams are identifying and understanding how important it is to

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>really build with these guys. If you don't have them,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have anything because you can't protect your

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>investments in these quarterbacks that you have. So your thoughts

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on this number of six and a half, Obviously we

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>know a couple guys are locks, but do we have

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>six or do we have seven?

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm going over and I'm gonna say over because it's

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman. If you said offensive tackles, I think that

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>would be a really good number because the edge class

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>is so weak, because the safety class is weak, because

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the linebackers are there's a lot of borderline guys there. Like,

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 2>this is not a defensive draft. So it's like you

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>start looking at it offensive line. You rarely see these

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>players hit the open market, rarely true, and so it's

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 2>like they need to attack these positions. And if you

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 2>said six and a half offensive tackles. I would have

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>been like, I'll probably take the under because there's usually

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy or two waiting there in the second round

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>that nobody expected to fall. But being you're saying offensive lineman,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>there is a chance that we seed Creed, Humphrey, or

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Land and Dickerson go in the first round. You know

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, these guys do. There's usually center that

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 2>typically will go towards the end of the first round.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna take the over on six and a

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 2>half because it's total offensive lineman.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>It makes a great point there, Yates, because what tax

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is saying is basically it's it's as good as this

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>class is an offensive lineman, it's also not a great

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive draft necessarily compared to some other years, and that

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>impact might indeed show up in this number. Do you

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>agree that the over is probably a lock here at

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>mis one twelve.

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I never want to call anything a lock in the

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 3>NFL draft, but this seems like it. Where you say

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the offensive lineman, again, that classification is very important. Where

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>if it was offensive tackle or interior offensive lineman, you

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 3>know that would be one thing. But when we're looking

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 3>at the overall offensive lineman, yeah, I'm pretty comfortable leaning

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the over there all right.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, we had to get a little bit of a

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>clarity on one of these because we weren't sure what

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this was or whether or not so who's a linebacker,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>who's a defensive lineman. We looked at all of this

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and what we found is we went over to the

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel sportsbook and in case you're looking to make any

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of wagers on things in terms of what's an

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>edge player versus not and how it's all about what

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they are at NFL dot Com. So whatever NFL dot

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Com designates them for, that's what the wagering house is

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>going to do. So this is very important we clarify

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this because going into it, we were looking at this

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>number and asking ourselves the same question. But it is

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>out there on most of these houses, so you could

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. The linebacker number here is four and

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a half over under Yates. You're getting plus one thirty

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on the over, minus one sixty seven on the under.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on linebackers in the first round.

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking the under here. There's definitely a chance that

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Jamine Davis can slide in there, or a Baron Browning

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>from Ohio State can slide in there at the back

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 3>end of the first round, but outside of that, it's

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Micah Parsons, it's Jeremiah Usukorromoa out of Notre Dame and

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 3>then maybe Saving Collins, you know, And even if if

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Savin Collins is a lock, then I mean that's still

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and and Jaman Davis slides in there, that's still four.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna go under here, And that's pretty pretty

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 3>comfortable for me.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Tags you are not in agreement, you seem to agree

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>here with this wholeheartedly, right.

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel very comfortable saying the under on that one.

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Linebackers for whatever reason, and it seems like it keeps

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>getting pushed more and more. Like Patrick Queen, you know,

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 2>last year was a guy that we talked about being

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the top linebacker prospects, and he fell all

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the way to the Ravens. So, you know, I think

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>they devalue. It's almost like the opposite of teams what

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>they're doing wide receivers right now, they're devaluing the linebackers.

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 2>They're valuing the cornerbacks more. So I definitely say under

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>on this one.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Last one here, and then we'll close up shop. We

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have defensive linemen over under four and a half. The

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>overs plus one ten. The under is minus one thirty

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>seven tags your thoughts on this.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I am torn, but I will say that's a great song.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, is that in the nineties. I feel like

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that was the nineties? I am torn. Well, no, it's

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's like, you.

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Know, I did not sing I did not sing that song.

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes you did.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It was close to it. It was close. That's okay,

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you're a little late.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to think I have a better ear and

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 2>voice than that. But Jesus, all right, So I'm gonna

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go over on this one. I will say

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>over four and a half because even though it's not

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>a strong edge rusher class, I think we're gonna see

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>some teams in the later part of the round, like

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a you know, Gates is gonna bet me on this one.

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna bet on Gregory Russell on whether or not

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be a top forty or forty five pick.

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember what the terms were, but you're getting

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 2>an upside player that's got some question marks.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Jaylen Phillips is gonna go there, Quitdy Pay is gonna

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.959
<v Speaker 2>go there. Jason Ahway is definitely a guy that's gonna

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>go there, so you're just looking for basically one more

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 2>guy or another defensive tackle like a Christian Barmore. I

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 2>think Davion Nixon is a guy that should be considered

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 2>first round, but he's not for whatever reason. But there's

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna be someone else. O Jalai's gonna probably sneak in there.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm gonna take the over on defensive lineman

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>over four.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you in the same mind here, Yeah, so you

0:34:58.320 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like the over as well? At the plus one ten

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the consensus, this.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Is a great line.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 3>If it was five and a half, I would say

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the under if it's you know, but with

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 3>it being the four and a half, I will take

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the over because I do think five go in the

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 3>first round and you get the plus odds on that,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, I'll take the over four and a half.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>There all, I want to remind everybody too, we're gonna

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>be live during the NFL Draft. Make sure you subscribe

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pro so you could watch the three of

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>us break it all down every pick. And I'm sure

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>from a wagering standpoint, all this stuff is gonna come

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>up to It's gonna be a fun night of the

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft, that's for sure. And make sure you go

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bettingpros dot com to get all these consensus. Like

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, we kind of walked you through it. That's

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what the general numbers are. But if you like some

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of these wagers, you can go find the absolute best

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>odds you can find and go right to them. And

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of betting pros. So I want to

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>thank Tags and Yates for spending some quality time here

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>talking more NFL Draft because I know they just can't

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>get enough. No matter what Tag said how he's sick

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of all the talk of it, he's not. He loves it.

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>He's torn because he loves it so much, and yet

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he knows it's going to go away soon, and then

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that means the beginning of the NFL season for real.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And then that's and we don't see Tags go outside

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>for much the rest of the year. So I want

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to thank you guys for your time and your knowledge.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Is always great to talk football with you. We'll be

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back again next week for some more betting pros. In

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, that'll do it for us. We'll see you

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>next time, kids,