Speaker 1: It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.
Speaker 1: Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros.
Speaker 2: We've got a great show for you today.
Speaker 1: We are getting so close to the NFL Draft just
Speaker 1: days away. So we brought in two of our fantastic
Speaker 1: experts from fantasy pros, from the fantasy side, because we've
Speaker 1: been doing a whole lot of mock drafting and we're
Speaker 1: gonna take that knowledge of all these mocks that we've
Speaker 1: done and try to help you out on the wagering
Speaker 1: at betting Pros. So I want to welcome to the
Speaker 1: show today, Kyleie Yates and Mike Tagliere. Like I said,
Speaker 1: we are getting so close to the NFL Draft you
Speaker 1: could basically feel it. You can sense it. And I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you Tags, We'll start with you here. It
Speaker 1: feels like, once again, you know, the crossover between fantasy,
Speaker 1: between wagering, between everything and our love of NFL is
Speaker 1: at a peek. It's at a fever pitch right now,
Speaker 1: and I gotta tell you it's kind of a fun
Speaker 1: way to watch the draft when you have a little
Speaker 1: bit of money in it.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, we're we're gonna be watching the Draft.
Speaker 2: We're gonna be talking about the draft. We're gonna be
Speaker 2: going through like so I'm not even have time to
Speaker 2: think about anything. It's just literally is gonna keep going.
Speaker 2: And I can't wait because I'm tired of the talk.
Speaker 2: Like basically, everybody's talking in circles. It's the same thing
Speaker 2: over and over and it's been that way for a
Speaker 2: little while, and now storylines are being made up just
Speaker 2: to pump up interest. I don't need anything pumped up.
Speaker 2: I'm pumped for the draft. I'm ready for it, and
Speaker 2: I'm ready to do the show today.
Speaker 1: Yates, are you as pumped as tags is? Because, my goodness,
Speaker 1: I am pumped right now because of his pumpedness, everyone's
Speaker 1: just so ump. But he's right to a certain extent,
Speaker 1: is and he gates that at this point it is
Speaker 1: not only just talk, but it feels like everybody's just
Speaker 1: repeating the same narratives about certain things. And we all
Speaker 1: know that when push comes to shove, something is going
Speaker 1: to be completely different that nobody recognize all coming, and
Speaker 1: it's going to affect the rest of the draft because
Speaker 1: why it happens every single.
Speaker 3: Year, oh absolutely, And this has been like the longest
Speaker 3: three months of my life right where like the Super
Speaker 3: Bowl ended, and it feels like this is a very
Speaker 3: in the grand scheme of things, in the grand scheme
Speaker 3: of the NFL season and the off season, like this
Speaker 3: is a very small window. But yeah, it feels like
Speaker 3: this is just a six month long process of leading
Speaker 3: up to the NFL Draft.
Speaker 2: So it's still it's.
Speaker 3: Like getting closer and closer, but yet at the same
Speaker 3: time feels like it's never going to get here. So
Speaker 3: very excited to be here on the betting pros side
Speaker 3: of things and talking some NFL draft here.
Speaker 1: So let's talk about the first round right now as
Speaker 1: it stands with it seems like Wilson going second overall,
Speaker 1: so you're not getting any good odds on Tremor Lawrence.
Speaker 1: That's the lock, and then of course Wilson looks like
Speaker 1: the second lock. And next we've got Mac Jones, who
Speaker 1: looks like a minus one forty five over on betting pros.
Speaker 1: Then you've got Justin Fields at plus one sixty five
Speaker 1: to go third for the forty nine ers, Trey Lance
Speaker 1: at plus four hundred, and then Wilson, if for some
Speaker 1: reason something does change, you're getting a twenty five to
Speaker 1: one on him. So let's start with you here, Yates,
Speaker 1: in this one, because I know you and I have
Speaker 1: a very distinct feeling about this, which is the quarterback
Speaker 1: situation in terms of where we like them, where we
Speaker 1: rank them. We think the forty nine would be nuts
Speaker 1: to pass on Trey Lance, And I guess here's the question.
Speaker 1: If you truly believe that, as you and I do,
Speaker 1: isn't it clear that the bet on the board four
Speaker 1: to one is how you make money with Trey Lance?
Speaker 1: It absolutely is.
Speaker 3: When you're looking at Mac Jones at minus one forty five,
Speaker 3: I'm not going anywhere near that. I don't buy the
Speaker 3: smoke screen whatsoever the chatter that it's going to be
Speaker 3: Mac Jones and number three. Overall, you just do not
Speaker 3: trade multiple first round picks to go up and get
Speaker 3: someone of that caliber. And then with Justin Fields, I
Speaker 3: think that it's a worthy bet. But if you're looking
Speaker 3: to hit on this one, I think that it could
Speaker 3: be Trey Lancer. And so at those odds of you know,
Speaker 3: the four to one of that plus four hundred, that's
Speaker 3: really really solid, and I'm looking to lay it on
Speaker 3: some money on that one, all right.
Speaker 1: I think it's nuts tags to lay one forty five
Speaker 1: to win one hundred for mac Jones. I just think
Speaker 1: this is like one of the sucker bets on the board.
Speaker 1: So I don't want to talk about that, So let's
Speaker 1: talk about justin Fields instead, because Fields right now is
Speaker 1: a plus one sixty five. Now in your opinion, looking
Speaker 1: at this, do you think this is kind of that
Speaker 1: safe wager where actually you know what the odds are good.
Speaker 1: All of the buzz seems to be that Fields is
Speaker 1: in contention for that third pick. A lot of experts
Speaker 1: do believe he is the next best guy on the
Speaker 1: board consensus, even though that some of us are not
Speaker 1: in that same consensus. Do you look at Fields as
Speaker 1: probably being the chalky be here? But in a way
Speaker 1: good chalk because moving up to take mac Jones seems
Speaker 1: like the wrong thing to do if you're the forty
Speaker 1: nine ers, So it would make a lot more sense
Speaker 1: if it was Lance or Fields. Even though the odds
Speaker 1: are much better on Fields, Is it a good way
Speaker 1: to make a little bit of a better wager here
Speaker 1: in terms of rather him than mac Jones.
Speaker 2: I would not, I obviously would not bet on mac Jones.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's not gonna happen. You know, where
Speaker 2: there's smoke, there's usually fire. But at the same time,
Speaker 2: when you think about this, when San Francisco made this trade,
Speaker 2: there were rumors that they reached out to both the
Speaker 2: Falcons and the Dolphins, so they were talking to both
Speaker 2: those teams, which means that they were interested in one
Speaker 2: of those two spots, and they had to assume if
Speaker 2: Miami was going to stay there, someone else was going
Speaker 2: to trade up. So therefore, it's almost like the Falcons
Speaker 2: seemed to be holding out for a ransom that they're
Speaker 2: not getting from any other team. So me, it's like
Speaker 2: if you wanted three or four, that tells me that
Speaker 2: you're okay with one of the top four quarterbacks on
Speaker 2: your board. And Kyle Shanahan with the ties now with
Speaker 2: Roberts Salat out there in New York, it's like, I
Speaker 2: feel like he knows exactly who the Jets are taking.
Speaker 2: I feel like they know that in San Francisco and
Speaker 2: then they trade it up into this spot to know
Speaker 2: exactly who they're going to pick. I don't think that
Speaker 2: you're going to trade up this far to take Mac Jones.
Speaker 2: Mac Jones was a guy that a lot of mock
Speaker 2: drafts leading up to this was good was going in
Speaker 2: the teens. I think the Patriots were a team that
Speaker 2: was there, Washington was there, the Bears, those are That's
Speaker 2: the territory that a lot of people were talking about it,
Speaker 2: and everybody wants to drum this up, and Yates has
Speaker 2: said it all along that he thinks this is a
Speaker 2: Draft Nights story that they're going to be looking up
Speaker 2: to drum up, be like how far is mac Jones
Speaker 2: gonna fall? When in reality he should have been falling
Speaker 2: all along. So I do think that the best bet
Speaker 2: for me, it would have been justin Fields. I'm a
Speaker 2: little worried about this epilepsy thing that came out just yesterday.
Speaker 2: Actually it said that there were multiple NFL teams that
Speaker 2: this came through in his medical checks, So that's a
Speaker 2: little worrisome, especially when you're spending as much. So tree
Speaker 2: Lance at plus four hundred feels like he's probably the
Speaker 2: best bet, to be honest, I don't think I'm betting
Speaker 2: at all though, because I think there's a lot of
Speaker 2: there's a lot of ifans or butts with this pick.
Speaker 2: But if I had to pick one right now, I'd
Speaker 2: say Tree Lance plus four hundred.
Speaker 1: All right, let's move on to first player drafted by position,
Speaker 1: and we've got a consensus over here at betting Pros
Speaker 1: with Penny seoel and minus five sixty, they'd be the
Speaker 1: first O lineman off the board. Rashaun Slater plus two fifty. Now,
Speaker 1: is this as stark as it appears from these odds
Speaker 1: here in your opinion tags? Because most of the mockx
Speaker 1: we've done over on the fantasy side here have been
Speaker 1: Penny Sewell being the first guy. But we've heard a
Speaker 1: lot of buzz about Rashawn Slater. A lot of teams
Speaker 1: love him. Is there any way that you can justify
Speaker 1: Slater going over Seool.
Speaker 2: I am not laying five hundred and sixty on Penny Seowol.
Speaker 1: I good question.
Speaker 2: I I do believe that he's the first offensive line
Speaker 2: off the board, But I don't think it's a stone
Speaker 2: called lock. I don't think it's like Trevor Lawrence going
Speaker 2: to the Jackson. It's not that this is a bet
Speaker 2: that I would actually stay away from because Rayshawon Slater
Speaker 2: has not got nothing but like Steam going into this
Speaker 2: draft or Penny School, he held out and We've heard
Speaker 2: from multiple people that players that held out could fall
Speaker 2: further than you think because teams just have no idea
Speaker 2: what shape their in. If that year away from football,
Speaker 2: you know it did some damage. But there's a lot
Speaker 2: of question marks here. So if I was forced to
Speaker 2: pick one of them, I'd say Slater plus two to fifty.
Speaker 2: But I'm not betting either of those.
Speaker 1: Well, clearly sool is not even available. I'm sorry, mis
Speaker 1: five sixty is just nuts. There's no reason to ever
Speaker 1: do that. But is there enough helium right now with
Speaker 1: Slater Yates in your opinion to justify maybe taking a
Speaker 1: little look at this plus two fifty because this is
Speaker 1: a nice little odds here in terms of offensive lineman
Speaker 1: considering well, Slater's getting a ton of buzz here late
Speaker 1: or once again it's just just another classic smoke screen
Speaker 1: going on with the NFL guys.
Speaker 3: If you have to ask me just straight up, which
Speaker 3: offensive lineman goes off the board first. I do think
Speaker 3: that it's penny school at the end of the day.
Speaker 3: But rayson Slater is getting a ton of buzz, like
Speaker 3: you said, to the point where a lot of NFL teams,
Speaker 3: from what we've been told, have Raceeon Slater ranked above
Speaker 3: Penny Sool. Now it just matters the guys in the five, six,
Speaker 3: seven eight range. What do they have, right? Do they
Speaker 3: have Penny School over race On Slater. That's what it matters.
Speaker 3: So when you sent this list over, like, I circled
Speaker 3: O line right, because this is drastic that five sixty
Speaker 3: to plus.
Speaker 2: Two to fifty from Rayeon Slater.
Speaker 3: If you had to just pick straight up, I would
Speaker 3: would still lean Penny Soul. But if I'm looking to
Speaker 3: look at that action there at plus two fifty, I
Speaker 3: think that it's actually worthy of at least laying down.
Speaker 1: A little bit. Yeah, And it's kind of how I
Speaker 1: feel about that last one we talked about earlier on
Speaker 1: with the you know, the third over round pick. It's like,
Speaker 1: you know, if you want to bet big with fields,
Speaker 1: that's fine, but I would throw a little bit in
Speaker 1: hedge with tray lance just in case, because you might
Speaker 1: be able to hit pretty good right there with that one.
Speaker 1: Because I don't think that's an impossibility at all, And
Speaker 1: I think that's actually going to possibly change as we
Speaker 1: get into next week with the NFL Draft, So keep
Speaker 1: an eye on that one too. I think that's a
Speaker 1: line that might move, especially after some of the news
Speaker 1: that came out about fields too. Just keep a close
Speaker 1: eye on that one. Let's go to cornerback here and
Speaker 1: Patrick Cirtan is minus three h five on betting pros consensus.
Speaker 1: JC Horn is plus two hundred. Is there any way here, Yates,
Speaker 1: you see these two flip flopping or is Certan gonna
Speaker 1: be basically the first cornerback off the board.
Speaker 3: Regardless, there's absolutely a path for jac Horn to be
Speaker 3: taken over Patrick Surtan. Do I think that that's the
Speaker 3: right move. No, But Dallas Cowboys sitting there at number
Speaker 3: ten overall, if Sirtan and Horn are on the board,
Speaker 3: there is some significant smoke that jac Horn might be
Speaker 3: the corner that they prefer, just with his ability to
Speaker 3: be a press man across the board, be able to
Speaker 3: guard slot corners to big tight ends. He locked down
Speaker 3: Elijah Moore in college all the way out to Kyle Pitt's,
Speaker 3: so that ability would be really, really attractive for Dallas
Speaker 3: at number ten overall. So I think there's a possibility.
Speaker 3: But if you have to ask me just straight up,
Speaker 3: I do think that Patrick Sutan at minus three h
Speaker 3: five is still the way that I would.
Speaker 1: Go, yes, I'm glad you brought that up because that's
Speaker 1: something I was looking at yesterday, which is how good
Speaker 1: Horn was against some of the elite talent in college football.
Speaker 1: Do you think that matters enough or could matter enough
Speaker 1: in your opinion tags to put him over Certan first
Speaker 1: as the first corner going off the board.
Speaker 2: Do I think it's possible? Sure, But I'm actually with
Speaker 2: Yates in this one that at minus three h five,
Speaker 2: I think it's a fair bet. That's actually actually one
Speaker 2: I would do because I think if Caleb Farley didn't
Speaker 2: have the back issues that he did, I would be
Speaker 2: uncomfortable selecting him there because I think Farley was the
Speaker 2: better cornerback in my opinion. I feel like there's deficiencies
Speaker 2: in Cirtan's game, but coming from Alabama, if you're looking
Speaker 2: for something to tilt it, Alabama players almost always get
Speaker 2: picked before anybody else. So, Sir Tan to me, I
Speaker 2: think that there's another prop bet available right now we're Cirtan.
Speaker 2: The over under on where he's picked is ten and
Speaker 2: a half, and I would say under that. So if
Speaker 2: you don't want to, if you're uncomfortable with Sirtan or Horn,
Speaker 2: here if you're like, I can see it going either way.
Speaker 2: I think both of them can potentially be picked by ten.
Speaker 1: And that one that Tags is talking about is minus
Speaker 1: one fifty nine if you like that, So keep that
Speaker 1: in mind. That's a spot open there. If you like
Speaker 1: sir Tan going over under ten and a half, it
Speaker 1: would be the under there at minus one fifty nine.
Speaker 1: Is those odds. Let's go to the defensive lineman and
Speaker 1: we'll move on to some more of Tags as favorites.
Speaker 1: We've got Quitty Pay at minus two hundred, Azizoljari at
Speaker 1: plus one fifty, and Jalen Phillips at plus two hundred.
Speaker 1: Tags will start with you with this one. Quidty Pay
Speaker 1: is the favorite right now in your opinion? Is there
Speaker 1: any way you want to justify? Because these are pretty
Speaker 1: tight right now. This was a little bit tighter than
Speaker 1: some of the other ones we've seen here, but you
Speaker 1: got three guys who are pretty close. So I guess
Speaker 1: what do you do in of approaching this. Do you
Speaker 1: stay away for the defensive alignement because it is kind
Speaker 1: of tough to taill because every team does have certain
Speaker 1: schemes that they want to run, or do you think
Speaker 1: there really is a definitive guy that you're gonna put
Speaker 1: above everybody else.
Speaker 2: I honestly, I don't think that there's a right answer here.
Speaker 2: I don't think anybody knows who's gonna come to stay
Speaker 2: away for you. It really is because Quitty Pay is
Speaker 2: someone that people are doing some projecting in order to
Speaker 2: get him there and saying he wasn't used correctly at Michigan. Well,
Speaker 2: when you're taking a guy as high as you know,
Speaker 2: twelve fifteen or wherever the first edge rusher is picked,
Speaker 2: you need to know that the guy's going to produce,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean. Jalen Phillips, he would be
Speaker 2: the number one for me. I think that he one
Speaker 2: hundred percent would be the first one off the board
Speaker 2: if he didn't have these question marks, you know, retiring
Speaker 2: in twenty eighteen from concussions and then coming back and
Speaker 2: playing the way he did. Obviously that's fantastic, but there
Speaker 2: are health concerns there. We can't eliminate those. Oh, Jalari,
Speaker 2: I don't think belongs in the conversation. To be honest,
Speaker 2: I don't even have him in my top four ed
Speaker 2: rushers in this class.
Speaker 1: So well, if you're taking him out of their tags.
Speaker 1: Then that means Quitty Pay at minus two hundred, Jalen
Speaker 1: Phillips at plus two hundred, Yates take Phillips is I
Speaker 1: was just gonna say, Yates, are you kind of wear tags?
Speaker 1: Which seems like, take oh Jari out of it, and
Speaker 1: then that's a pretty big divide right now, you're between
Speaker 1: the minus two and the plus two. In my opinion too,
Speaker 1: it would seem like you're crazy not to if you
Speaker 1: want to lay down some money on this one to
Speaker 1: go with the Phillips side.
Speaker 3: Obviously, I'm in complete agreement with Tags on this one
Speaker 3: across the board where you say this is one that
Speaker 3: I would probably stay away from in general, because Jalen Phillips,
Speaker 3: if he was fully healthy, would be that favorite that
Speaker 3: I would say. I think that you would see the
Speaker 3: odds flipped if we knew that Phillips was completely healthy. Unfortunately,
Speaker 3: unless we get something leaked in the media about his
Speaker 3: medical history, we're not going to have that clarity. So
Speaker 3: Jalen Phillips, if I'm putting any money down on this one,
Speaker 3: it would be Jalen Phillips, just because from the talent perspective,
Speaker 3: he belongs above Quity Pay. But does the NFL, does
Speaker 3: Vegas know or like the odd makers know something here
Speaker 3: with quity pay over Jalen Phillips that we don't. So
Speaker 3: this is just one that I would probably stay away from.
Speaker 3: If I'm forced to do anything, it would be Jalen
Speaker 3: Phillips at plus two hundred.
Speaker 1: All right, now, before we move on to some of
Speaker 1: the individual teams, uh tag you high. I lighted a
Speaker 1: few things here, and I want to talk about this
Speaker 1: first one because one of the unders for the total
Speaker 1: quarterbacks the numbers five and a half, and you've circled
Speaker 1: this as the under, but it's a minus five sixty here.
Speaker 1: And typically, again, if you're gonna lay that much just
Speaker 1: to win, it must be an absolute one percent lock,
Speaker 1: and it feels like it is. Yeah, and it probably is.
Speaker 1: But still, how do you, I guess, how do you
Speaker 1: sleep at night making sure that you're gonna go for
Speaker 1: this minus five sixty just to win one hundred dollars there?
Speaker 1: Because to lay five sixty, even though you know it's
Speaker 1: a lock, that is a whole lot to lay down there.
Speaker 1: So why do you like this wager so much?
Speaker 2: I mean, it's a whole lot, but it's really not
Speaker 2: I mean, it's the same as that Penny Sule has
Speaker 2: got to be the first offensive lineman off the board.
Speaker 2: Like when you think about it, and that that one,
Speaker 2: to me has more whibble room. Every year they talk
Speaker 2: about quarterbacks that could potentially sneak in the in the
Speaker 2: first round. Remember Mason Rudolph, that whole conversation. You know
Speaker 2: what I'm saying, those quarterbacks, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: You go to those.
Speaker 2: Quarterbacks and it's like Lamar Jackson fell He was a
Speaker 2: guy that should have went higher and he fell away
Speaker 2: to the thirty second pick, where you're gonna have guys.
Speaker 2: I swear some of these names they're bringing up are
Speaker 2: going to follow the third and fourth round. And I
Speaker 2: don't see any chance it gets, no chance it gets
Speaker 2: over five. I'm just willing to do it.
Speaker 1: You know what, I tend to agree with you. It's
Speaker 1: just a lot. It's a big you know, mayas five
Speaker 1: sixties a lot yates. Are you as confidences tags in
Speaker 1: as this number?
Speaker 3: Oh man, if I'm forced to take those odds at
Speaker 3: five sixty, that's just something that's a little steep for
Speaker 3: me to get me in on. But when you look
Speaker 3: at the names outside of the top five. Obviously you
Speaker 3: have your Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Justin Fields, Trey Lance
Speaker 3: mac Jones, and that conversation seem to be guaranteed first
Speaker 3: round locks. Well, then it's got to be one of
Speaker 3: Kyle Trask, Kellen Mond, Davis Mills sneaking up into that
Speaker 3: back into the first round.
Speaker 1: That's just not happening.
Speaker 3: Like, I'm fairly, fairly certain, ninety nine percent certain that
Speaker 3: that is not going to happen. But it's just that
Speaker 3: if it were minus three hundred, that would be another conversation.
Speaker 3: But minus five sixty, man, it's just steepy.
Speaker 1: See. That's where I struggle too. I struggle with the
Speaker 1: five sixty. And here's the other part that I struggle,
Speaker 1: which is, we're taking this at face value with the
Speaker 1: teams that are on the board at the end of
Speaker 1: the first round. But that's not necessarily the trade you're
Speaker 1: gonna be picking there, And I think the variable of
Speaker 1: the trade scares me. With that much juice I get
Speaker 1: it to me, it's just too much that I would
Speaker 1: personally stay away from this one. Mike's confident, and he
Speaker 1: should be. I think he is one hundred percent right,
Speaker 1: But that's small variable of any team could jump in
Speaker 1: in those last couple of rounds, and and you know,
Speaker 1: Kansas City could trade out or or a Tampa or
Speaker 1: somebody like that at the very end, because somebody might say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know what, we love this quarterback, which might make
Speaker 1: sure we get him before it flips over to the
Speaker 1: second round. It's not impossible. I mean, some people didn't
Speaker 1: think Jordan Love would go in the first round last year.
Speaker 1: Who would necessarily thought that not only would.
Speaker 2: He, but he was expected he was expected to go
Speaker 2: to the first round, but.
Speaker 1: Him in the first round. He was a guy you'd
Speaker 1: see in the first and sometimes at the second last year,
Speaker 1: and a lot of the mocks it was. It was
Speaker 1: somewhere debatable, But I don't think any of us thought
Speaker 1: that Green Bay Packers were gonna be the team to
Speaker 1: do it. That's or to trade up to do it.
Speaker 1: Right now, over my point, five running backs drafted in
Speaker 1: the first round. So basically we're looking at basically a
Speaker 1: running back being draft or not. The juice is minus
Speaker 1: three zero five. So tags, what about this wager kind
Speaker 1: of peaked your interest?
Speaker 2: Well, it comes down to, like looking at the teams,
Speaker 2: the end of the first round. You have the Dolphins
Speaker 2: who are at eighteen, they're picking. You have the Steelers
Speaker 2: who are twenty four. You have those chances, But then
Speaker 2: you have the guys who are at the top of
Speaker 2: the next round. You know, you talk about teams like Atlanta,
Speaker 2: You talk about teams like the Jets, these Miami has
Speaker 2: another pick early in the round. These are all teams
Speaker 2: that I could see moving up just a couple spots
Speaker 2: to get back in the first round to draft that
Speaker 2: running back and get that fifth year option on their contract. Because,
Speaker 2: as we know, running backs walk into the league, they're
Speaker 2: in their prime, they're used right away. They're not going
Speaker 2: to be signed to a second contract the majority of
Speaker 2: the time. And like we can go back a couple
Speaker 2: of years and like talk about Rashad Penny, that guy
Speaker 2: went in the first round. You know, Naje Harris is
Speaker 2: a running back I love. You know, Travis etn is
Speaker 2: perfect for today's NFL. Javonte Williams is a guy that's
Speaker 2: been getting picking up a lot of steam lately. So
Speaker 2: one of those three running backs I do believe will
Speaker 2: go in the first round.
Speaker 1: Do you believe Yates that Trevin Morigg would be the
Speaker 1: first safety drafted. It's minus four hunh Vegas certainly seems
Speaker 1: to think so.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that this is kind of a lock
Speaker 3: when you look at guys like Javon Holland out of
Speaker 3: Oregon as that kind of consensus second safety off the board.
Speaker 3: I mean, but after that Hamsun is Cyril la Dean
Speaker 3: out of Florida State, Andre Cisco, Like it's a it's
Speaker 3: a week safety class just in general. So when you're
Speaker 3: looking at Trevon Merrigan what he brings to the table,
Speaker 3: I think that he is kind of just locked in
Speaker 3: to be that first safety taken this again, Steve odds
Speaker 3: minus four hundred, but I doubt I just can't see
Speaker 3: any of those other guys going above him.
Speaker 1: Now, the over under for Alabama players going in the
Speaker 1: first round it's five and a half. Tags. You've circled
Speaker 1: the under here on this one. The line is plus
Speaker 1: one fifty five. So your thoughts on this Alabama player total.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I've been running through it. I'm trying to figure
Speaker 2: out where they got that from. I think it would
Speaker 2: be safer to set it at four and a half,
Speaker 2: to be honest, Like, but the five and a half
Speaker 2: is you know, Christian Barmore is not a guy that's
Speaker 2: being mocked in every single first round of every single one.
Speaker 2: And then you work through it and you try and
Speaker 2: like Naja Harris. That's assuming that Naja Harris goes in,
Speaker 2: and that's where I set at four and a half
Speaker 2: because you start working it in, you start it's almost
Speaker 2: like you just look at it and you start adding
Speaker 2: up the players and you're like, not just one guy,
Speaker 2: but two guys have to get into that first round.
Speaker 2: That almost like I don't expect to be there. Barmore
Speaker 2: has a chance, I will say that, but you're gonna
Speaker 2: need one more. So it's just I don't see it.
Speaker 2: I don't see it happening.
Speaker 1: It seems like actually one of the better bets on
Speaker 1: the board the way we're talking about it, because in
Speaker 1: all the mocks we've done, we've been under that number
Speaker 1: for the most part. The fact that I can recall,
Speaker 1: So Yates, do you feel confident in this plus one
Speaker 1: fifty five as well?
Speaker 3: I don't because you're looking at Christian Barmore is getting
Speaker 3: top twenty buzz. Now this is at the point of
Speaker 3: the season where you say, because it's just heading in,
Speaker 3: like we talked about at the top, it's just draft
Speaker 3: season and it's getting closer to the draft where there's
Speaker 3: just so much smoke and forty players are going to
Speaker 3: go in the top twenty picks, right. But with Barmore,
Speaker 3: he's getting that buzz because it is a very very
Speaker 3: weak interior defensive lineman class. When you have a player
Speaker 3: who has the upside of Barmore, that's the potential. So
Speaker 3: you go Barmore, Mac Jones, Jalen Wattle, Davante Smith. There's
Speaker 3: four right there. Then Dickerson would be the other one
Speaker 3: right where potentially it's all dependent upon the health for him,
Speaker 3: and then Naji Harris. So at that point you have
Speaker 3: the six players. So it's just it comes down to
Speaker 3: really Land and Dickerson, because I do think that Naji
Speaker 3: Harris is gonna go in the first round. So now
Speaker 3: it really just comes down to Land and Dickerson and
Speaker 3: what his health is. This is probably one that I
Speaker 3: would probably stay away from it.
Speaker 1: I wonder also if you could, you know, if you
Speaker 1: think about it, if you like we just talked about
Speaker 1: before the whether or not you think Naja Harris goes
Speaker 1: in the first round, right, that number of running backs right.
Speaker 1: It's almost like you want to tie in the maybe
Speaker 1: the under on the running backs if you could get it,
Speaker 1: and the under on Alabama if you like that side.
Speaker 1: It seems like that's the tie in because it might
Speaker 1: be Naj Harris as the guy who breaks this five
Speaker 1: and a half as that seemed like a good pairing
Speaker 1: if indeed you were inclined to do so.
Speaker 2: I think Harris is one of those guys that's gonna
Speaker 2: come through that he's gonna actually be in the first round.
Speaker 2: But it's bar More and uh Dickerson. Those are the
Speaker 2: two that I don't maybe one of them does. But
Speaker 2: then if you're gonna put both of them in there,
Speaker 2: you're kicking out some big names out of the first round.
Speaker 2: And that's the only I just don't see it because
Speaker 2: they're almost that line is almost saying, hey, if you
Speaker 2: think both are gonna come out, like if that's a
Speaker 2: lot of players, I mean.
Speaker 3: It comes down to Dickerson. Sorry to cut you off text,
Speaker 3: it comes down to Dickerson. And again, that's a health
Speaker 3: just like Jalen Phillips, it's a health thing where we
Speaker 3: don't know unless it leaks, we're not going to have
Speaker 3: that information so that's just a risky bet to put
Speaker 3: down when you don't have all the information at your fingertips.
Speaker 2: I just don't know.
Speaker 3: I'm not confident in it.
Speaker 1: All right, Let's see how confident you guys are in
Speaker 1: a few of these individual team wagers that are out there.
Speaker 1: So these are teams whether or not they're going to
Speaker 1: pick this specific player, which is a little tougher to gauge,
Speaker 1: but you do have some pretty good odds. Most of
Speaker 1: them are all on the plus obviously as well the
Speaker 1: ones we're going to talk about. So Trey Lance for
Speaker 1: the Denver Broncos is a plus two hundred. For the Broncos,
Speaker 1: Micah Parsons is a plus four. Mac Jones is a
Speaker 1: plus six yates, Can I tempt you on any of these?
Speaker 3: If I'm willing to take a shot on any of these.
Speaker 3: I think Trey Lance is off the board. I don't
Speaker 3: think that Michah Parson goes Micah Parsons goes in the
Speaker 3: top ten because of some off the field concerns, so
Speaker 3: I think he falls a little bit. Mac Jones is
Speaker 3: the one that I look at any of the if
Speaker 3: he is supposed to go in the top ten, which
Speaker 3: is what we're being told, which is what we're being fed.
Speaker 3: Denver probably makes the most sense where you look at
Speaker 3: the situation that he has with the playmakers around him.
Speaker 3: It's a team that's committed to running the football, playing
Speaker 3: with good defense, taking care of the football. Mac Jones
Speaker 3: fits that, and he brings that experience that Drew Locke doesn't.
Speaker 3: So I guess it really all just comes down to
Speaker 3: where do you think mac Jones is gonna go. If
Speaker 3: I'm gonna take a shot on any of these, it
Speaker 3: would be mac Jones at plus six hundred.
Speaker 1: Well, the six to one is certainly good enough odds
Speaker 1: to take a shot. Tags Are you in agreement there
Speaker 1: or is this just a complete stay away anyway?
Speaker 2: I stay away from teams that are that. You tie
Speaker 2: to teams just because you have no idea, Like literally,
Speaker 2: one trade that happens above that team, it changes the
Speaker 2: entire draft board and it changes everything. Teams know that,
Speaker 2: and that's why they have to go in. They have
Speaker 2: to meet with all these different prospects because they have
Speaker 2: to be prepared for every situation. Unfortunately, when you're betting
Speaker 2: before the draft, you're not prepared for every situation. Betting
Speaker 2: on a single player, I should say, so Mike A.
Speaker 2: Parsons at four hundred, I don't know if I might
Speaker 2: that one. You know, you go back to Vic Fangio
Speaker 2: when he was with Chicago drafting Rokwon Smith with the
Speaker 2: number eight overall pick. I think it was, you know,
Speaker 2: and they linebacker is a position of need for them.
Speaker 2: They did add cornerbacks, they don't need that. So if
Speaker 2: a if a quarterback does not fall to them that
Speaker 2: they would want. I think mac Jones is redundant in
Speaker 2: terms of having Drew Locke on the roster. See what
Speaker 2: you have. If they were able to get Trey Lance,
Speaker 2: they'd love it. But I don't think Lance falls there.
Speaker 2: But Micah Parsons is interesting because he's a guy that
Speaker 2: I think I would have mocked earlier in the draft,
Speaker 2: like definitely inside the top ten earlier, and it seems
Speaker 2: like he's fallen through the media. But I don't know
Speaker 2: really why. But at nine for the Broncos, for Vic
Speaker 2: Fanjo to add another piece to that defense, it kind
Speaker 2: of makes some sense, all right.
Speaker 1: So you have a good argument there for the mac Jones.
Speaker 1: So I had a good argument for the Parsons side.
Speaker 1: Let's take a look at the Giants. DeVante Smith is
Speaker 1: the highest odds here plus two to fifty. Then they
Speaker 1: have Michael Parsons as well at plus five, and then
Speaker 1: Rashaun Slater plus five yeates. The plus five hundred on
Speaker 1: Slater is the one I'm circling because the Giants could
Speaker 1: certainly use some more offensive line help. I mean they've
Speaker 1: done everything else. I mean the health of Saquon Barky
Speaker 1: the last few years has not been good. Let's be honest.
Speaker 1: You've added Kenny Galladay, so you want to get time
Speaker 1: for him to get open downfield if you're going to
Speaker 1: really make this offense work. It seems like Slater five
Speaker 1: to one is actually a pretty good wager if you're
Speaker 1: gonna be looking there. But then again, you never know
Speaker 1: what teams are gonna do. Do you feel like this
Speaker 1: is a stay away for you when it comes to
Speaker 1: the Giants or do you think Slater's actually a good investment.
Speaker 3: This really is a stay away from me. If there
Speaker 3: were any of these guys that were edge players and
Speaker 3: there were favorable odds, that would probably be something I
Speaker 3: would look at, because I think edge is where they
Speaker 3: go in the first round. But there's not I don't
Speaker 3: think that they double down on wide receiver after adding
Speaker 3: Kenny Galladay and adding some key pieces throughout free agency
Speaker 3: Micah Parsons. Again, it makes sense with Dave Gettleman. But
Speaker 3: yet at the same time, I don't know if Parsons
Speaker 3: is gonna go this early. So if there was an edge, maybe,
Speaker 3: but outside of that, man, I just don't think Raychaun
Speaker 3: Slater is still there, So I will I'll stay away
Speaker 3: from this one.
Speaker 1: You seem like you're in agreement, So let's move on
Speaker 1: to the Eagles instead. DeVonta Smith plus three hundred, pastricks
Speaker 1: of Tan plus three hundred and Jalen Wattle plus five hundred.
Speaker 1: So obviously we got the two wide receivers in this cluster.
Speaker 1: Do you think the Eagles do go back to that
Speaker 1: wide receiver? Well, and if so, which one of these two.
Speaker 2: Guys and DeVante Smith would be my choice here, just
Speaker 2: because I mean, this is a team that desperately needs
Speaker 2: wide receivers after letting go of Alshon, Jeffrey DeShawn Jackson.
Speaker 2: Obviously they weren't on the field for them. But Jalen Rager,
Speaker 2: I think if you put him in Jalen Wattle together,
Speaker 2: I just think you have a couple burners that I
Speaker 2: like Raager, and I don't think I'm not giving up
Speaker 2: on him. I don't think the Eagles should either. But
Speaker 2: Davanta Smith is DeVante Smith is someone that accents his
Speaker 2: play very well, like he's a different type of player
Speaker 2: than Jalen Rager. So I believe DeVante Smith would be
Speaker 2: the one I would choose. But again I'm staying away
Speaker 2: from this. I heard the Eagles could look to trade
Speaker 2: back even more in this and if the Eagles do
Speaker 2: trade back, they're not gonna get DeVante Smith. So that's again,
Speaker 2: this is why I avoid at all costs like doing
Speaker 2: a prop bet with players going to specific teams.
Speaker 1: All right, well, let's try about these two players in general, then,
Speaker 1: DeVonta Smith and Jalen Waddle. Let's look at them and Yates.
Speaker 1: We have minus one O that Smith goes first, minus
Speaker 1: one eight team that Wattle goes first. Number one. Do
Speaker 1: you think this is the correct odds on these guys?
Speaker 1: And number two? Are one of these more interesting you
Speaker 1: than the other in terms of wagering.
Speaker 3: I think Waddle goes first with DeVante Smith at one
Speaker 3: hundred and sixty six pounds. I think that he's going
Speaker 3: to be a great pro. Like, don't get me wrong,
Speaker 3: I think that he's going to be great, But it's
Speaker 3: the outlier perspective here with DeVante Smith and just how
Speaker 3: high do you take this guy in the NFL draft?
Speaker 3: So I think that teams are still going to be
Speaker 3: looking to get Davante Smith on their team. Like, don't
Speaker 3: get me wrong, again, I think he's gonna be great,
Speaker 3: but it's just when you look at the price tag,
Speaker 3: the investment, and then the fact that he's an outlier
Speaker 3: at that size, I just don't know if that's someone
Speaker 3: that you take within the top fifteen picks. And if
Speaker 3: that's the case, then I know that Wattle's going to
Speaker 3: go in that range, and I know that Jamar Chase
Speaker 3: is going to go in that range. So I'll go
Speaker 3: waddle here over Davonte Smith.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go back and talk more about the
Speaker 1: first round. How many players from each position is going
Speaker 1: to go. We already talked about the quarterbacks, so we
Speaker 1: kind of dug into that one. We touched on the
Speaker 1: running backs, but I want to kind of bring it
Speaker 1: to everybody's attention too, because right now on betting pros
Speaker 1: and the consensus the over under the number is point five,
Speaker 1: so that's basically is running back and it get taken
Speaker 1: or not. Just to simplify for folks out there who
Speaker 1: are still new to wagering, you got the minus three
Speaker 1: oh five for the under. That's a consensus number. Then
Speaker 1: the under is plus two thirty. Now that number is
Speaker 1: different in lots of different places. On FanDuel, for instance,
Speaker 1: the over is minus two seventy, the unders plus two hundred.
Speaker 1: If you go to another site like fox bet, you
Speaker 1: got plus two hundred for the under, excuse me for
Speaker 1: the over, and then for the under minus two to
Speaker 1: eighty six. And this is the nice thing about betting
Speaker 1: pros is that you can go to betting pros dot
Speaker 1: com and you can see the different houses, how they
Speaker 1: wager everything, how they set everything up, and basically where
Speaker 1: you like to get the best odds, and then you
Speaker 1: can go place your bet very smartly, so it's kind
Speaker 1: of like a condensed version where you don't have to
Speaker 1: keep looking at all these different sites. You can go
Speaker 1: to just one spot and you could see everything there,
Speaker 1: like the wagers you like, and then find the best
Speaker 1: odds and boom, you can go take care of that all.
Speaker 1: So let's go back to this one. Just use the consent, boys,
Speaker 1: because again that point five, the consensus numbers minus three
Speaker 1: oh five the on the over the under is plus
Speaker 1: two thirty. So tags, once again, we'll just kind of
Speaker 1: touch on this one more times whether or not you
Speaker 1: think a running back is gonna go. We've done Max
Speaker 1: where they have, We've done Mox where they haven't, and
Speaker 1: that makes this one a tough one. This is a
Speaker 1: stay away from me, how about you?
Speaker 2: I'm taking the over here. There will be one. The
Speaker 2: question is which one is it? You know for me
Speaker 2: it would be Naja Harris. You know it couldn't be
Speaker 2: too Travesey CNN one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: Go there.
Speaker 2: He put on some weight for his pro day, he
Speaker 2: still ran a fast time.
Speaker 1: Again.
Speaker 2: Javonte william has been getting some hype recently. It reminds
Speaker 2: me a little bit Uppershod Penny in a way where
Speaker 2: like the Rise, I'm not not the player, not the player,
Speaker 2: but the rise during the draft process. So but I
Speaker 2: definitely see one of those three running backs coming off
Speaker 2: the board, if not two of them.
Speaker 1: All right, Yates, do you see one running back coming
Speaker 1: off the board?
Speaker 2: I do, I do Okay.
Speaker 1: So basically then if you do like that over when
Speaker 1: you're looking around, you got plus two hundred of fox
Speaker 1: bet that's the place to go make that wager. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can tell you're right now that's the spot. And
Speaker 1: that's because of looking at agat bettingpros dot com. Now,
Speaker 1: when you go to the wide receivers right now, right
Speaker 1: the consensus so far, we've got the under at four
Speaker 1: and a half. And looking at this again, you can
Speaker 1: go over under in some different places. Let's just take
Speaker 1: the number right now, because the consensus is plus one
Speaker 1: seventy five on the under. You go to FanDuel and
Speaker 1: get the over at minus two oh five. Just to
Speaker 1: give you a gauge of where the numbers are at Yates,
Speaker 1: how many receivers do you think are going to go
Speaker 1: in this first round?
Speaker 3: Oh man, this is a really tough one. Where you
Speaker 3: look at Jamar Chase, Davante Smith, Jalen Waddle, they all
Speaker 3: seem to be locks. But then there is a huge
Speaker 3: range for the number four wide receiver off the board.
Speaker 3: Is it Rashad Bateman, is it Terrace Marshall out of
Speaker 3: LSU Is it somehow Elijah Moore out of all miss
Speaker 3: like Kadarius Tony is supposed to go a lot higher,
Speaker 3: could even potentially go over Davante Smith, according to Peter
Speaker 3: Trigger of know NFL Media. So there's just a ton
Speaker 3: here where it's a ton of uncertainty. If you had
Speaker 3: to make me choose, I would say the over here.
Speaker 3: I do think that we get five in the first round.
Speaker 3: As to which it's gonna be, I just have absolutely
Speaker 3: no idea yeap.
Speaker 1: Well, across the board, the overs are all in the
Speaker 1: minus two ish range, so we're talking two ten to
Speaker 1: two twenty five. As I'm looking here on bettingpros dot
Speaker 1: com tags, what do you think about this number here?
Speaker 1: Because look, they really are I mean, you just never
Speaker 1: know in the leads going in this direction. But we've
Speaker 1: done these mocks these last month or so where we've
Speaker 1: had big wide receiver mocks and then somewhere they faded
Speaker 1: into the second round a little bit, and I'd say
Speaker 1: recently we're kind of close to this number, which is
Speaker 1: again why you're getting the four and a half. We
Speaker 1: know the three that are a lock. It's whether or
Speaker 1: not Bateman is a lock for you too. If so
Speaker 1: that's four automatically, you just need one more, So do
Speaker 1: you think one more can squeeze out of this first round?
Speaker 2: Well, if Bateman was a lock, i'd say yeah, But
Speaker 2: after Bateman came in at six foot, one hundred and
Speaker 2: ninety pounds, I don't know if he's a lock because
Speaker 2: he was always a guy that was talked about in
Speaker 2: the twenties. So I mean, do I think Bateman should
Speaker 2: go there? Yeah? I absolutely do. Do I think Tony
Speaker 2: should be considered? No? Do I think Elijah Mark should
Speaker 2: be considered?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 2: Do I think Terris Marshall should be considered? No? So
Speaker 2: all these players I go through it. But that's the
Speaker 2: thing is you look at last year and teams are
Speaker 2: craving wide receive right now. So if this was even money,
Speaker 2: i'd probably say the over. But given it's minus three
Speaker 2: ten for over four and a half, I can't do it.
Speaker 2: I can't do that, So I would actually rather take
Speaker 2: the under four and a half plus two twenty five.
Speaker 2: But in reality, I do happen there's probably gonna be
Speaker 2: five ride receivers in that first round, but as he said,
Speaker 2: we don't know who, and I don't feel comfortable with it.
Speaker 2: But if I was the first pick, if I was
Speaker 2: forced to pick one side, I'd take the under four
Speaker 2: and a half.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the offensive lineman. Over under is six
Speaker 1: and a half minus one twelve on both sides, So
Speaker 1: tags will start you with this one. Obviously, offensive line
Speaker 1: has really been valued much more in the last few years.
Speaker 1: Teams are identifying and understanding how important it is to
Speaker 1: really build with these guys. If you don't have them,
Speaker 1: then you don't have anything because you can't protect your
Speaker 1: investments in these quarterbacks that you have. So your thoughts
Speaker 1: on this number of six and a half, Obviously we
Speaker 1: know a couple guys are locks, but do we have
Speaker 1: six or do we have seven?
Speaker 2: I'm going over and I'm gonna say over because it's
Speaker 2: offensive lineman. If you said offensive tackles, I think that
Speaker 2: would be a really good number because the edge class
Speaker 2: is so weak, because the safety class is weak, because
Speaker 2: the linebackers are there's a lot of borderline guys there. Like,
Speaker 2: this is not a defensive draft. So it's like you
Speaker 2: start looking at it offensive line. You rarely see these
Speaker 2: players hit the open market, rarely true, and so it's
Speaker 2: like they need to attack these positions. And if you
Speaker 2: said six and a half offensive tackles. I would have
Speaker 2: been like, I'll probably take the under because there's usually
Speaker 2: a guy or two waiting there in the second round
Speaker 2: that nobody expected to fall. But being you're saying offensive lineman,
Speaker 2: there is a chance that we seed Creed, Humphrey, or
Speaker 2: Land and Dickerson go in the first round. You know
Speaker 2: what I mean, these guys do. There's usually center that
Speaker 2: typically will go towards the end of the first round.
Speaker 2: So I'm gonna take the over on six and a
Speaker 2: half because it's total offensive lineman.
Speaker 1: It makes a great point there, Yates, because what tax
Speaker 1: is saying is basically it's it's as good as this
Speaker 1: class is an offensive lineman, it's also not a great
Speaker 1: defensive draft necessarily compared to some other years, and that
Speaker 1: impact might indeed show up in this number. Do you
Speaker 1: agree that the over is probably a lock here at
Speaker 1: mis one twelve.
Speaker 3: I never want to call anything a lock in the
Speaker 3: NFL draft, but this seems like it. Where you say
Speaker 3: the offensive lineman, again, that classification is very important. Where
Speaker 3: if it was offensive tackle or interior offensive lineman, you
Speaker 3: know that would be one thing. But when we're looking
Speaker 3: at the overall offensive lineman, yeah, I'm pretty comfortable leaning
Speaker 3: the over there all right.
Speaker 1: Now, we had to get a little bit of a
Speaker 1: clarity on one of these because we weren't sure what
Speaker 1: this was or whether or not so who's a linebacker,
Speaker 1: who's a defensive lineman. We looked at all of this
Speaker 1: and what we found is we went over to the
Speaker 1: FanDuel sportsbook and in case you're looking to make any
Speaker 1: kind of wagers on things in terms of what's an
Speaker 1: edge player versus not and how it's all about what
Speaker 1: they are at NFL dot Com. So whatever NFL dot
Speaker 1: Com designates them for, that's what the wagering house is
Speaker 1: going to do. So this is very important we clarify
Speaker 1: this because going into it, we were looking at this
Speaker 1: number and asking ourselves the same question. But it is
Speaker 1: out there on most of these houses, so you could
Speaker 1: figure it out. The linebacker number here is four and
Speaker 1: a half over under Yates. You're getting plus one thirty
Speaker 1: on the over, minus one sixty seven on the under.
Speaker 1: Your thoughts on linebackers in the first round.
Speaker 3: I'm taking the under here. There's definitely a chance that
Speaker 3: Jamine Davis can slide in there, or a Baron Browning
Speaker 3: from Ohio State can slide in there at the back
Speaker 3: end of the first round, but outside of that, it's
Speaker 3: Micah Parsons, it's Jeremiah Usukorromoa out of Notre Dame and
Speaker 3: then maybe Saving Collins, you know, And even if if
Speaker 3: Savin Collins is a lock, then I mean that's still
Speaker 3: and and Jaman Davis slides in there, that's still four.
Speaker 3: So I'm gonna go under here, And that's pretty pretty
Speaker 3: comfortable for me.
Speaker 1: Tags you are not in agreement, you seem to agree
Speaker 1: here with this wholeheartedly, right.
Speaker 2: I feel very comfortable saying the under on that one.
Speaker 2: Linebackers for whatever reason, and it seems like it keeps
Speaker 2: getting pushed more and more. Like Patrick Queen, you know,
Speaker 2: last year was a guy that we talked about being
Speaker 2: one of the top linebacker prospects, and he fell all
Speaker 2: the way to the Ravens. So, you know, I think
Speaker 2: they devalue. It's almost like the opposite of teams what
Speaker 2: they're doing wide receivers right now, they're devaluing the linebackers.
Speaker 2: They're valuing the cornerbacks more. So I definitely say under
Speaker 2: on this one.
Speaker 1: Last one here, and then we'll close up shop. We
Speaker 1: have defensive linemen over under four and a half. The
Speaker 1: overs plus one ten. The under is minus one thirty
Speaker 1: seven tags your thoughts on this.
Speaker 2: I am torn, but I will say that's a great song.
Speaker 1: You know, is that in the nineties. I feel like
Speaker 1: that was the nineties? I am torn. Well, no, it's
Speaker 1: like it's like, you.
Speaker 2: Know, I did not sing I did not sing that song.
Speaker 3: Yes you did.
Speaker 1: It was close to it. It was close. That's okay,
Speaker 1: you're a little late.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 2: I'd like to think I have a better ear and
Speaker 2: voice than that. But Jesus, all right, So I'm gonna
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go over on this one. I will say
Speaker 2: over four and a half because even though it's not
Speaker 2: a strong edge rusher class, I think we're gonna see
Speaker 2: some teams in the later part of the round, like
Speaker 2: a you know, Gates is gonna bet me on this one.
Speaker 2: We're gonna bet on Gregory Russell on whether or not
Speaker 2: he's gonna be a top forty or forty five pick.
Speaker 2: I can't remember what the terms were, but you're getting
Speaker 2: an upside player that's got some question marks.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: Jaylen Phillips is gonna go there, Quitdy Pay is gonna
Speaker 2: go there. Jason Ahway is definitely a guy that's gonna
Speaker 2: go there, so you're just looking for basically one more
Speaker 2: guy or another defensive tackle like a Christian Barmore. I
Speaker 2: think Davion Nixon is a guy that should be considered
Speaker 2: first round, but he's not for whatever reason. But there's
Speaker 2: gonna be someone else. O Jalai's gonna probably sneak in there.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm gonna take the over on defensive lineman
Speaker 2: over four.
Speaker 1: Are you in the same mind here, Yeah, so you
Speaker 1: like the over as well? At the plus one ten
Speaker 1: the consensus, this.
Speaker 2: Is a great line.
Speaker 3: If it was five and a half, I would say
Speaker 3: I'll take the under if it's you know, but with
Speaker 3: it being the four and a half, I will take
Speaker 3: the over because I do think five go in the
Speaker 3: first round and you get the plus odds on that,
Speaker 3: so yeah, I'll take the over four and a half.
Speaker 1: There all, I want to remind everybody too, we're gonna
Speaker 1: be live during the NFL Draft. Make sure you subscribe
Speaker 1: to Fantasy Pro so you could watch the three of
Speaker 1: us break it all down every pick. And I'm sure
Speaker 1: from a wagering standpoint, all this stuff is gonna come
Speaker 1: up to It's gonna be a fun night of the
Speaker 1: NFL Draft, that's for sure. And make sure you go
Speaker 1: to Bettingpros dot com to get all these consensus. Like
Speaker 1: I said, we kind of walked you through it. That's
Speaker 1: what the general numbers are. But if you like some
Speaker 1: of these wagers, you can go find the absolute best
Speaker 1: odds you can find and go right to them. And
Speaker 1: that's the beauty of betting pros. So I want to
Speaker 1: thank Tags and Yates for spending some quality time here
Speaker 1: talking more NFL Draft because I know they just can't
Speaker 1: get enough. No matter what Tag said how he's sick
Speaker 1: of all the talk of it, he's not. He loves it.
Speaker 1: He's torn because he loves it so much, and yet
Speaker 1: he knows it's going to go away soon, and then
Speaker 1: that means the beginning of the NFL season for real.
Speaker 1: And then that's and we don't see Tags go outside
Speaker 1: for much the rest of the year. So I want
Speaker 1: to thank you guys for your time and your knowledge.
Speaker 1: Is always great to talk football with you. We'll be
Speaker 1: back again next week for some more betting pros. In
Speaker 1: the meantime, that'll do it for us. We'll see you
Speaker 1: next time, kids,