WEBVTT - The White House's Impact on the Corporate Community

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. We

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>have spent a lot of time on this program talking

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>about the woeful state that retail is in right now.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a defender, someone who can explain what's going on,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>put it into perspective, and argue that perhaps markets have

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little over their skis with their hatred of

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the retail sector. Rick Helfin Fine, thank you so much

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Rick Helfnbine is President, chief executive officer

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of American Apparel and Footwear Association, which is based in Washington,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>d C. And is a cheerleader for these beating up

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>retailers that are seeing so much pain. So let's just

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>start broadly, Rick, why do you think that traders have

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps gotten a little ahead of themselves with selling some

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of these shares and bonds of retailers. Well, that's pretty

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>easy to answer. You know, when you hear there's a

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>hurricane warning in Florida and nobody wants to fly down there.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't want to fly into an apocalypse.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And people have been talking down on retail for months

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>now and form a whole host of reasons. You know,

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you go back to two thousand and eight. The first

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sign of coming out of a recession is a boost

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in retail sales. And when you see that, which we

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.279
<v Speaker 1>did in two thousand, retail stocks start flying up because

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people have a little money in their pocket, they go

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>buy some new clothes and that's that's just the way

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it works. So now we're in the mature part of

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. And the mature part of the cycle is

0:01:55.520 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>look a look at the numbers. Consumer confidence sixteen year high, gasolene.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>These are things we look at. Two dollars and forty

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cents a gallon, Unemployment four point six pc, the GDP

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>at two point six percent. These are all indicators that

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>people are buying. Remember, two thirds of our economy is

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>based on consumer spending. On consumer spending, but that includes

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending on services as well as good So there

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>has been a pretty big shift towards services and experiences

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>rather than buying a new outfit, right. I mean, this

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has been one big driver of some of the pessimism

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>around retail. That's true, But then you also look at

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of goods coming into the country and you say,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, because we can read these import numbers, we

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can look at domestic manufacturing, we look at the amount

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>of apparel and foot where that's coming in the country.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>There really hasn't been slowdown. People are buying product. The

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>question is the new shopper, how's the new shopper buying?

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's affecting brick and mortar retail sales. So

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about brick and mortar because embedded in a

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of the results that we have been seeing and

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the pessimism is this very uncomfortable period where

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar has to spend a lot of money

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to adapt to the online world, to distribution services to

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>online networks um while also dealing with lower margins on

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>those sales and higher competition from people who can see

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>marketplaces that are more comprehensive. This is what people are

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about. What do you say to them, Well, the

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>worry is real, but the reality is nobody's walking around naked.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean really, realistically speaking, today you have to look

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at who's your customer, you know, that's the big thing.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's buying the goods. And the millennial customers age eighteen

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to thirty four of them will compare a shop or

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>plan with their phones now will still go on a

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>store to buy. So that's part of what's driving the

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>price pressure down because there is price comparison. So the

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>market is changing and retailers are adapting. And you know,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I know there was a lot of noise this morning

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about foot Locker. You know, maybe they just didn't like

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what's in the foot Lockers store. But foot Locker is

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>going to do just fine well. But in fairness, we

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have seen a pretty broad based disappointment when it comes

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to athletic where both what you wear when you go

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>work out as well as what you wear when you

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>want to look like you're working out even if you're not. Um. So,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is something that is raising concerns that

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing the death of ath leisure as one

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst put it, or you know, what's going on here?

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this a sea change in the way people shop

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at an entire industry? Uh? You know, are you saying

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that you don't expect as many brick and mortar retailers

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>to go to business as UH are currently kind of

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. You get into the numbers. We've had

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen bankruptcy so far this year, and that would be

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>in half the year, whereas two thousand and eight we

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>had eighteen for the whole year. So clearly there's a

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people going out of business. We have too

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>many stores, that's quite obvious. We have too many malls.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>We have fifteen hundred walls at the peak. We have

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about eleven hundred walls today. We may have eighties six

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred doors closing this year. But we have too many

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>square foot per person in the United States. And with

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this size and shift to the internet adjustment. So you

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>said we have eleven hundred malls in the US. Where

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that number will be five new years

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from now? I think a thousand. I think we have

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>been another thousand walls to go to pare down to

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>probably where we should be. We're overmalled, we're overstored, and

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you have this rise of the Internet. However, keep in

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mind one thing about the rise of the Internet. It's

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>only eight point five of all the sales. So people

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>are still shopping brick and mortar. That's why I believe

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>the market is clearly oversold in the last week. You know,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>look at look at people going into the stores. Look

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>at Nordstrom up, look at Target up, look at Walmart up,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>look at Gap up. So let's not focus on the

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>bid news. Let's assume that all these retailers are going

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>into a period of adjustment and they will come out

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of it just fine. Nobody's walking around naked. Rick Healfonbyne,

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Truly a pleasure

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear what you have to say. Rick Healfnbine is president,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer at American Apparel and Footwear Association, which

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is based in Washington, d C. Another share that we

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are watching today is that of Infocis. That's the I

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I T company and outsourcing provider who shares fell as

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>much as thirteen percent today, wiping three and a half

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars from the company's market value. This came, of course,

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>after it's chief executive officer v Shall seek a resigned

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>even though many had really herald hit him as the

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>driver A lot of a lot of the companies gains

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years. Here to discuss what the

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>road is ahead is anorag Grana. He's our senior analyst

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of software and I T Services for Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he joins us in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. Now, Anora,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can you just give us a sense of why the

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO resigned and why it's being perceived so negatively by

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the market. This company has a very interesting history. Prior

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to Vichal taking over as the CEO, all the you know,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>older CEOs were founding members of the company, and you know,

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of pressure that the last couple

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of CEOs didn't do the job as well as uh,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, other publicly traded companies. So they brought in

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a new guy that didn't was not a founder uh

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>from SAP. He did a good job. He's done a

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting things in the company since he came over.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Employe atriction has dropped, sales has improved, the overall perception

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of emphasis is also improved in the industry. And then

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, one of the founding members has always

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>been nudging and bothering the board about you know, constantly

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>interfering with the way he's been running it, so he

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just got sick of it and said, I'm quitting. So

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>why did one of the founders do that If he's

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>doing such a good job, if he's created so much

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>market value. It seems a lot like some cultural differences

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two. Now, remember this is a forty billion

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar company or around forty billion dollar company without the drop,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know a lot of the complaints were, well,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>why are you paying so much so much? Why are

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you taking charter jets? How much? Not not him? I

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>mean they had paid you know, the CFO a little

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>bit higher than what the founder thought was appropriate. And

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it was basically constant interference from these founders as to

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>how the business should be run that made it, you know,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, made him said that, you know, enough is enough. Well,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the business of a process, right,

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because right now it is a promising time for a

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of the services that they provide. But they're trying

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to transfer over to more web services and provide software solutions.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it is a little bit away from their original wheelhouse, right,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense of what the big

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>challenges are? So if you look at this industry, has

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>been dominated by you know these three or four major

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>companies taught a consulting services in Force, Cognizance, web pro Um,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and all of them do similar kind of products and services,

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but the bulk of their revenue comes from a lot

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of legacy I T work, application maintenance and software development,

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and the industry is moving more towards artificial intelligence software

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>oriented tools. And you know this guy at Emphasis his

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>background as he came from SAP, so he has done

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new changes ever since he came as

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, which is where the space has to go. Um.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So if the place is kind of commoditized and you

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have a good leadership, just in this case, and

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know in an influsis it might give chance for

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>others to take shared away from the company, which is

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the reasons why you see the

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>stocks dropping quite a bit. I see. So in other words,

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the co founders looking at this company the way he

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>created it, which was providing providing outsourcing services, helping with

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>your company with your company's computer system from AFAR, which

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is also sort of challenged right now given the HB

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one visas and the emphasis are not outsourcing as much

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at least in the US. Right well, publicly they have

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>said that they don't you know, find any fault with

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>his strategy and execution. They are more quite concerned about

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the corporate governance issues. And now, I mean

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the company has had an investigation to see you know,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>there were any as there's some visible ragley allegations about

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular acquisition, and they went through as this whole

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>round of um, you know, going through an investigation and

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't find anything. It is those kinds of issues

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the founders are more um you know, problematic or issue

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have issues with rather than the running of the company.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>What about this idea of this emphasis on a more

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>nationalistic approach to business and how this could affect in

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>persus it. You know, they have said that they will

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be hiring a lot more people in the US, and

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just part and parcel of what they do. Um.

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you do have to do emerging technologies

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for your clients, you do need more people on site,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, which is what all of these

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>companies are doing at this point. Um. But the bigger

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>issue in this particular cases, who can come Now? I mean,

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you really cannot have a non founder is

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of a company at this point, because whoever

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>comes will face the same exact scrutiny from the founders.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going to start looking at every move this person makes,

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who they hire, what kind of pay goes in. So

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be very difficult for them to find

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a SEEO. At this point. Have the founders said anything, Yeah,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they're still complaining. I mean I just saw that there

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is a there is another letter that they have sent

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>out blasting the board, and I mean they might have to,

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, either either you know, in my my view,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>either the founders will have to sit down and decide.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Either they come and run the way they wanted and

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they completely rechange the board and the management team and everything,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or they get rid of their you know, the stake

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that they have and then let the let the other

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>shareholders on this company. This is really interesting to me

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of money at stake, because, as

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, a forty billion dollar company, and clearly the

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>market has retraced some of the losses from earlier. Now

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the shares are only down only down a little more

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>than eight percent. But you know, you raise a lot

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of very important issues just about the path forward at

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a time when this is a very competitive space, when

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>they do have to make a lot of investments and

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of decisions sooner than later. Uh, and they

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>now are facing a leadership void and a very aggressive

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>co founder. Fascinating story. Ana Grana senior Analystic Software and

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I T Services here at Bloomberg Intelligence and he joins

0:12:52.640 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>us in our eleven three oh studios right now. I

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>am so pleased to be speaking with Mike Buchanan, Deputy

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Chief investment Officer at Western Asset Management. It oversees four

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty three billion dollars and is based in Pasadena, California. Mike,

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining me. I want to

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>focus a little bit on what we've been hearing from

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a growing number of big asset management firms, which is,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we are getting concerned about the overvaluation of US high

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>yield bonds and we are reducing allocations to this debt.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do you stand on this? Well, first of all, Lisa,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. And yeah, you're right. I

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that's something that um, we we hear a lot

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>from our clients, from consultants, concern that when you look

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>at the corporate credit markets, and it's not just hi

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>yield but investment grade as well. You just look at spreads,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at yields. Valuations overall seem you know, somewhat compressed.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And our view is that, Um, it's not necessarily indicative

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of a market that's that's over bought or it's certainly

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>not in bubble territory. I think you have to put

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it in context. You have to think about what is

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental backdrop that's supporting these valuations. And it's very

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>important to to marry those two. And when we look

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>at that, what we see our fundamentals that we think

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>are still very strong, Uh, the most part moving in

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. Um, And I think you know, valuations uh,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not table pounding. We're finding opportunities, and in high

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>yield we're finding opportunities and investment grade. But to be

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>fair back to your question, we have been reducing our

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>our allocations just on opportunity. We're finding some other areas

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>where we think, uh, you have better risk adjusted returns,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>so skewing our multisector portfolios in that direction. Like where

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>where are you seeing better opportunities? Well, I think, uh,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>local emerging market, currency, debt is probably our our highest

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>conviction idea right now. UM. And you know it's you

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>think about a world that is where yields scarce. UM.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You certainly can get a lot of yield in emerging

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>market local currency debt. UM. And I think there's a

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of macro forces that are that are behind you

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and should result in some tightening of these spreads or

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>these yields relative to developed market. Um. You're starting to

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>see growth now for the first time and in really

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>three years in Russia and Brazil as an example, positive

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>growth there after two consecutive years of contraction. Uh. Some

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the inflationary pressures in those economies UH and and

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and even broader emerging markets seem to be uh subsidying.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's going to give their central banks a little more

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>flexibility on policy. And UH. You know, I think you're

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>also seeing a little more of a bias towards policy

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>discipline and reform. UH. So we really like take advantage

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of of a lot of those opportunities. And that's where

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we reduce some of these credit positions

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned earlier, that's where a lot of that

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>money is going. In correspondences before this segment. You also

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>noted that a sector specific wager, you're looking at investment

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>grade credit in the financial metals and mining and energy

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>sectors as well as rising star opportunities in high yield.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Are there specific names that you're targeting within that rising

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>star category UH that you really believe in strongly? Yeah,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a real interesting trade in high yield

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. You know, people don't look at the the

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>shift and composition UH in terms of ratings in the

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>market UM as much as we think they should right now,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're definitely seeing less triple c issuance, You're seeing

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more double b issuance. The double B market within high

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>yield is now the largest portion UH in terms of

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>rating UH category within the high old market, and we

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's an inordinate number of those double bees that

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we think have a reasonable chance to make it to

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>investment grade within the next year to year and a half.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Specific names, yeah, I mean they're they're you know, kind

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of broad based, but I can throughout, you know, like

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Haynes Brands is a good example, Park aerospace, even in

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, sectors that seem like they're

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>UH somewhat stressed. You mentioned Metals and Mining, Freeport mcmaran.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>There on the energy side, Williams Pipeline Company. Uh, there

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>is really I think the bigger message is there's just

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a very large number of these that our research teams identified,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and we think you'll get not only a decent amount

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of income just from coupon clip there, but you'll also

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get some total return from spread compression as they make

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that jump from double B to triple B. Let's talk Tesla.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You didn't buy those bonds, did you. Well, we did

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>not participate in that deal. And you know, so it

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't because it's not a great company, but um, it's

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>really as a fixed income manager. Uh, you know, we

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>saw some things there that just didn't really uh compel

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>us to to to to participate in that deal. Didn't

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>think it offered a lot of relative value, and we

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thought there were some risks there. But you did go

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon. Amazon just sold the sixteen billion dollar offering.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you even buy the forty year bonds? We did.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We We bought Amazon um across most maturities. Uh. And

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting at least you look at those

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>two deals on the surface, they look somewhat similar. Um,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are obviously two great companies with tremendous

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>management teams, very proactive vision and in great leadership. The

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 1>difference being free cash flow generation. Tesla, you know, kind

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of a different part of its its life cycle, still

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>burning cash, no free cash flow generation. It's going to

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>take at least three years um to get there, and

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you certainly have execution risk and you know, a little

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>over five percent yield. We thought there were better UH

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in the high old market, but you go over

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon. Amazon, you know, really a pristine balance sheet.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They are generating a lot of free cash flow over

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ten billion UH per annum by our estimates, great liquidity profile,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>over twenty billion of cash and liquid securities on the

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. Triple A balance sheet. Even though the ratings

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>are are somewhat odd at B double A one double

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>A minus, we probably think it's closer to a high

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>single A you know, double A type company. So um, yeah,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we we really like the Amazon deal. Thought it was

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>priced right and took advantage of that. And Mike, just

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to give you some kudos, the bonds are trading up

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in the days after trading, so it seems like others

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I want to ask you about cash holdings,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>because there have been a series of articles talking about

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a reduced amount of dry powder or cash in investment

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>grade and high yield bond funds, and I'm wondering where

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you stand on that and whether you've been also eating

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>into your cash piles in order to take advantage of

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these opportunities. Yeah, I mean, are we we

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>manage our cash in accordance with what we see as

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity in the market. And yeah, right now, Like I said,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that's it's not a table pounder in either investment grade

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or high yield. So we're operating with, you know, a

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit more cash than maybe we traditionally have, UM

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of you know, maybe pullbacks or some

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>new issue opportunities. Um. But I think the also, I mean,

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just kind of speaking beyond Western asset management and maybe

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps looking at some of our competitors, you've had a

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of investment grade new issuance recently. And it's

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not just the Amazon deal. You've had uh, some very

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>high profile you know, the A T and T issue

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and B A T. You know, these are big, big issues.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So UM, a lot of that cash has probably been deployed,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the leaner cash positions. Mike Buchanan, Always a pleasure.

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I love speaking with you. Mike bi canon as deputy

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Chief Investment Officer for Western Asset Management, which has four

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>d and thirty three billion dollars out of management and

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is based in Pasadena, California. Always fascinating to hear what

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>looks good and what doesn't for that behemoth money manager.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I am trying to wrap my head around

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be a responsible investor and to

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>get a better sense of it from somebody who knows

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>best because he helped found the whole movement. Is John Stroyer,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Calvert Research and Management, which was

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>acquired by Eaton Vance earlier this year and is based

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in Bethesda, Maryland. John, I was reading some notes earlier,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and uh, evidently Calvert helped found this concept, this United

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Nations Principles for Responsible Investment that now counts seventeen hundred

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>large investors in more than seventy trillion dollars in assets.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean? Great? Well, first of all, thanks

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for having me on the show and your question, what

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be a responsible investor is a

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>very important one day answer. First and foremost, what it

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>means to be responsible investor is to get the right

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of return for the risk you're taking. Some performance

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of what we think about day

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in and day out. The second big part of our

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>process is understanding how companies are impacting the environment and

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>how companies are impacting society. But again, it's critical that

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we find the companies that are able to do a

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>great job for people in planet and do it in

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>a way that works for financially motivated investors. So is

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>your job to essentially come up with a framework of

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what's responsible to give to some of these investors and say, here,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want to sleep well at night, if you

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>want to feel like you're doing the right thing with

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>respect to human rights, with respect to global warming, with

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>respect to whatever it is that you think is super important,

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>here's a basket of stuff to buy you bet. And

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the question really is what matters to which companies. In

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, a company that's in the utility sector, we

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>need to really focus on their greenhouse gas emissions, their

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage of power generated from renewable sources, what they're doing

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>visa v fossil fossil fuels, those are very very important

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>considerations a company in the tech sector, it's a different

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>set of issues. We want to understand their ability to

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>create well being for a diverse workforce, their issues around

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Internet privacy and security. So you said it right. We

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>want to give clients the answers in terms of here

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are the companies that are really making a positive difference.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But it means different things to different companies, and that's

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>where our big research platform and industry leading team of

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>analysts really come into play figuring that all out. Can

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you give some perspective on how much this sector has

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>grown over the past few years, just in terms of

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>now well, As you said, Calvert was one of the

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>founding signatories of the United Nations Principles Responsible Investing in

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. At that time there were thirteen of us

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>representing just a few billions, a few hundred billion dollars

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in assets. Today, seventeen hundred large investors have signed on

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy trillion dollars um in in assets under management worldwide.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But what does that mean? Seventy trillion dollars in assets?

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean as far as companies that are adhering

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to these principles. This is their total a U gasset owners,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so large pension funds and other investment management firms who

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>have said this matters. We think it matters to understand

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>how a company is impacting people in the planet in

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>our investment process. But let's talk about it from a

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor and a client's perspective. What do we know

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>there today? There's still a pretty big gap between the

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>investors who have put their hands up and said, hey,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in responsible investing, versus the financial advisors who

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>are comfortable with their level of expertise in talking about it.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>About seventy three percent of investors and Eaton Van his

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>most recent ATOMICS survey have said that they're really interested

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and responsible investing, but only about twenty three percent of

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors have said this is a meaningful part of

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>my business. So we know that advisors are catching up.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>They're developing expertise or learning about products and ways to

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>serve these clients. But still, one of the most interesting

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>parts about this movement is its investor lad it's interesting.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and just real quick, you noted before the

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>segment that President Trump has actually given some steam to

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>this movement. Can you just encapsulate that in thirty seconds? Sure.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all looking to companies to solve some

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of our most pressing social and environmental challenges today, more

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so than we're looking to the federal government. UM. I

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>could leave it at that, but I'd also observe over

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days, a lot of CEOs have

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>stepped up and said, we're going to disassociate ourselves with

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>these business counsels that the president put put together, and

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this is part of it. These are these are companies

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>saying we're going to continue to press forward. We're going

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to work hard to solve the challenges that the population

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of the United States needs to have solved, environmental challenges,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>equality challenges, social challenges, and we're going to do what

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of on our own. So I think that the

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has made it clear the companies, more so

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>today relative to government, are responsible for our environmental and

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>social outcomes. Thank you very much, John Stroyer, chief executive

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>officer of Calvert Research and Management, owned by Eaton Vans

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and based in Bethesda, Maryland. Thanks for listening to the

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramowits one before the podcast.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio