WEBVTT - The Saudis Need To Pick A Fall Guy: CIA Veteran Devine

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Let's

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>turn our focus now to Jamal Kashogi, the Saudi Arabian

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>writer journalist who was killed sensibly at the Saudi consulate

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>high level Turkish officials so that they have evidence about this.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>This has thrown a lot of diplomatic relations into questions,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly between the US and Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia had

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to care is is having to see corporate leaders move

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>away from the nation joining us now to try to

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>give us some insight into the potential impact of this

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>move is Jack Divine, former acting director of the CIA

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and founding partner and president of security firm The Arkan Group. Jack,

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this? What's going on here? Well,

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the news is unfolding by the minute. I mean, it

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the more bizarre cases that I can

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>remember in terms of diplomacy or in the intelligence world.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on is our one of our most

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>important allies now has a political crisis on his hands,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>which by extension, draws us into it and everybody and

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I was just going to say in the

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, but also in Europe. So it's it's a

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>big story that has to be resolved. How could it

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be resolved? Well, the blue book would tell you that

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>when you get a crisis like this, um, the the

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>focus of it steps aside and a new person is appointed. Okay,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately blue blue books are collecting dust on OCE shelves nowaday,

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think the I don't think. Yeah, the way

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the way the game is played, so to speak, whether

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's diplomacy, military, there are all there are a set

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of principles on pond which each of the people in

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>those fields of endeavor operate. Right, So you would say,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>when you get this crisis. For example, when Jack Kennedy

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>ran into debate at Pigs and it turned into fiasco,

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he told Alan Donalds, the director of CIA, fiasco, one

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of us has to go, I'm president, You're you're resigning,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You're fired. So uh, no matter where who's called here,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to take a fall on a new person

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>comes into it. That's the only way you can move forward.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Dying every day A slice salami slice at the time

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is a really difficult policy. This. The sooner this thing

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can be said right, the better it is for everybody. Wait,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second, said right, because this has been

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of the focus of a lot of articles that

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have been written, which is, how can Saudi Arabia and

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the US joined forces this of spin this in the

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>right way to be able to continue things as things

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>were before, and my characterizing that correctly because that seems

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the way that I think I would agree with,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at least other than the words spin. I don't think

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Spain is viable. In other words, I think the war

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you try and spend it, this is one where you

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have to get as close to the truth as possible.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And I would hope that you know, we just saw

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that our secretary state was out there in the desert,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think the point is to make

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>clear what we think is is known, and that the

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>story needs not to wander too far from that. So

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how should the US react if indeed the Saudi Arabian

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership led by Mohammed bin Salman, who has been close

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>with our leadership here in the US. How should the

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>US respond if they did just outright kill a critic

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of their of their administration. I think the burden really

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>begins with the Saudis. The Saudis need to decide how

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they are going to respond because we are their most

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>important now I and so are all. There are other

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>important allies. Um UH need to be in the zone

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>where it's comfortable dealing with them. So at this point,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>if the record shows that MBS the Crown Prince is involved,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>than the only way this goes forward if somehow he

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>steps aside, which is a really high ask. But I

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>think the Saudis have to decide where they're going, and

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to stay as close to the

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>reality as possible. I don't think there's this is not

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a spin opportunity. Floating floating floating ideas is probably one

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to see what's viable. But I think it's a

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake for anybody to try and work between the lines.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You do not know what everyone else knows, so you

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>put out a story. The next day of the story

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is overtaken because there's more information credible information put into it.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The charts are sitting a lot of information. I suspect

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that we are others people within the Saudi government. You

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this is one that's not going to go away easily, Jack.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that U. S Intelligence assets know what happened?

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you know what happened. It covers a lot

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of territory. I would say that because of our relationship

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of foreign governments, our own collection capabilities,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd have a pretty good sense of what happened.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>What literally happened inside the consulate may not be uh

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>noable for some time. Do you believe the Turkish government knows?

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They say, Well, they say in the press says that

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they do. Um. My own instinct as opposed to fact,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is that they probably know a heck of a lot

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 1>more than anybody wish they know. So I'm wondering about

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the arms deal. I believe it's a hundred and ten

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar arms deal at the US has with Saudi Arabia.

0:05:59.920 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>There have been numerous reports that one reason why President

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump was initially reluctant to sort of castigate Mohammed bin

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Salman and the Saudi Arabian government was because he didn't

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>want to jeopardize this deal. Do you buy that now?

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too small of the piece. I mean,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's the bigger relationship. I mean, we're in

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a you know, and when you look at the Middle East,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of countering around which is a

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>large part of the last several administrations, you have to

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>look at Saudi Arabia as a key the key player,

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and this when you look at oil and the oil industry.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the deal is is an important deal.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to see it go up and smoke,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's an awful lot riding on the overall relationship.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>It's in everyone interested to get this thing reset. And

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I and you know that this place

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>out the way it appears to play out, it's going

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to be very hard to reset it without a change

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in in in leadership, which means Mohammed bin Salman stepping

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>down or being pushed out of office, out of the leadership.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>That that I mean again, I would come back to

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I were looking at old formulas on

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>how problems are resolved quickly, it's to change personnel and

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the basic relationship stays in fact intact This one is

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a seems to me a great deal more difficult than

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>others I've seen in the past, because it's not clear

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to me, uh, how much wait the king has or

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is willing to exert, and how much the person it

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>has to step aside is going to be prepared to

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. And you know, people's first instinct, as we

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>saw in this case, is to try and weather this storm.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It is not weatherable and particularly if the pace of

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>attention stays where it is now. Is there any chance

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that this reflects a power struggle inside of Saudi Arabia, Well,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly this has been a in my I shouldn't say clearly.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>In my view, it's been a path coo. The the

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>MBS coming into power is really I think took people

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>by surprise. But it's not a singleton. It's uh, it's

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a the predominant faction. But there are a lot of

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>losers and um, you know, there are the prospects of

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>external forces, in other words, those that have been thrown

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>back orchestrating something that would remove MBS is unlikely. Any

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>change would have to come from the internal forces. Thank

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being with us. Jack Divine, former

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>acting director of the Central Intelligence Agency, founding partner and

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>president of the security firm the Arkin Group. Return on

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>equity is up for the revenue trend is good. So

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>why is the stock down thirteen and a half percent

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so far this year? I'm talking about Morgan Stanley. And

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>here to help us understand the situation is Chris Whalen.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>He is the chairman of Whalen Global Advisors. Chris, why

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is the stock of Morgan Stanley down when the results

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seem so good? Well, the results are not bad. Um,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>there's done a lot of animal spirits in these stocks

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>like Morgan Stanley. Now their asset managers, Uh, predominantly they

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have a banking business, of course, um, but they are

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>really feed driven. They don't make money on interest rates.

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So Goldman, Morgan Stanley, all the near banks, if you will, um,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are a function in the market. So if they have

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>some big deals that make you know, good money on

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the trading investment banking side, and then the rest is

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much fixed. Um. You have treasury and then you

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have the asset managers who work for a set feet right,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why they like it. It's stable, but it's not exciting.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>So no biggish about City was the best of a

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch so far, but really why Yeah, just in terms

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know, year over year comparisons of falling credit

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>costs in all of the two key factors for the

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>last eight nine years have been cost cutting and cheap funding.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So the question is how do we transition from that

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when the banks, you know, a year from now, their

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>funding costs are almost going to be normalized back to

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>where they were in two thousand eight, more balanced by

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the way between investors and equity because during the crisis.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>After the crisis, the bank equity holders got the interest

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar well through banks and their depositor has got nothing.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well well, I mean, that's actually exactly where I wanted

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to go with this, right. I mean, we talk about

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the KNT interest margins, which have been increasing, but the

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>gap between what big banks are paying people to put

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>their money in their deposit accounts and what the banks

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>are earning from the Fed funds overnight rate has widened dramatically.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's more than a percentage point

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>now on average for the four biggest banks that they're

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>basically capturing an extra and extra revenue without doing any thing.

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And at what point will they be forced to pay up.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Will big banks be forced to offer depositors some additional

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>yield to entice deposits? And how much could that hurt

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>their earnings? Well, it's already happening. Um, as the FED

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>balance she runs off, you eliminated dollar of deposits for

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>every dollar in access to reserves. So that's just mechanistic. Um.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The other thing, remember is that the FED crush funding

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>costs in two thousand eleven, I think it was or fourteen.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It was literally done like ten billion dollars for the

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>whole industry for a quarter. So normal is closer to

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred. Right now it's about thirty, and it's increasing

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>year over year, so buying you know, a second quarter

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>next year, the increase in funding costs will be higher

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>than the increase in interest earnings. And that's when you'll

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>see him flatten out and go down. Now, Chris, you

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about the City Group and they're they're sort of

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a report and saying that that they're better. But I'm

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just trying to understand wouldn't this wouldn't this whole group

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>benefit from what you described maybe a low valuation base,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>also cost pressures. You said they're abating they're expanding the

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>net interest margin, you've got shared buy back programs and

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>better than anticipated EPs growth. Why wouldn't. Yeah, the business

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is okay, but for banks that really run off of

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, of the advantages eving um. You know, as

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I said before, the last five years, cost cutting, reserve reverses,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>things of that nature really drove Burnning to Then we

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>had the tax bill. The text bill structurally increased those

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>equity returns you were talking about earlier, So at one

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>time adjustment both asset and equity returns after tax obviously, right,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you really want to understand the business, you

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the pre tax line, you look at credit

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>costs and other factors, and they've all been very low.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean right now, real estate has gone up so

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>much PIM that banks are making money on defaults. In

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>other words, they get all their money back, they sell

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the defaulted property, and they make money on that. So

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like negative um. So there's no credit issue on

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the street today. But to your question, you know, it's

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a function of deal flow. For Marian Stanley and for

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Goldman and the transactional houses. JP has a big component

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of this. But JP also makes money on interest, not

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>as much as their peers, by the way, because they're big,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Marianne with Lake would love to be uh

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, no, no, maybe smaller should get much better

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>equity returns, you know, more manageable business. So you know,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, the Street is losing their advantage on interest

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed gave them very quickly. And I think

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people have to pay attention to this because name is

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to be expanding next year, it's gonna be

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>contracting because the cost of phones has gone up so quickly.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Whalen, thank you so much for being with us

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and for that perspective. Chris Whalen as chairman of Whalen

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at Global Advisors and some an interesting trend to watch him,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and one that we've been talking about for a long time,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>which is banks are going to have to start paying

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>their depositors more and when they do, will that lead

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to much more disappointing earnings? Although he did his strength

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with deals to Yeah, but also if you're going to

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>see higher interest rates, that means that if they are

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really asset gatherers, they're gonna be making more on the

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>assets that they gather. It depends which interest rates go up.

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Faster and how I mean if we get the flattening

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>yield curve, if they have to pay depositors more. I

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mean Ally Bank actually came out with this front page

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>advertisement in the New York Times talking about how the

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest bank heist in the world is going on right now.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But we can talk about that later. Well, I know

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that Paul Sweeney, the US director of Research and senior

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>media and Internet analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, he's got a

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>list of things he's going to watch on Netflix. He's

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>probably already going to tape Fight World that has already debut.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Then he's got The Haunting of Hill House as well

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>as Marvel's Dare Devil. These are all Netflix only on Netflix.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a whole new feeling towards Paul Sweeney. Now, yeah,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got it all. The reason I bring up these

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>only on Netflix productions, Paul is this is where the

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>money's going, isn't it. It really is. And uh, you know,

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for the record, I am a big fan of Ozark.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of hooked on that, so I'm binging the

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>second season of that. But yeah, they're going to spend

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, over eight billion dollars this year in programming. Um,

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, most of that, A lot of that is

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>original programming, So they're not just licensing movies and TV

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>shows from the networks in the studios, they're they're producing

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>more and more of their own content and there, and

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they they recognize that from their perspective, that is what

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>drives their subscriber growth, that is what their users want,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and so they're stepping up to spending there. And maybe

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>even tonight we'll get an an outlook from the company

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on what they expect to spend next year, and most investors, um,

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, expect that number will be even higher than

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>what it is this year. So they're by far the

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest UH creator of content in Hollywood, the biggest spender

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on content in Hollywood, and that looks to to get

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>even bigger going forward. Will this be the year that

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>investors start to care about profitability here? You know, I

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. Um you know, the the it's interesting

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as you segment the company, the more mature US business

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for them already is profitable and and they and they

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>showed a pretty good path to profitability there, so we

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know the business or investors know the business can be

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>profitable at these expense levels. Uh, internationally, they have not

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>turned a profit corner. That's a less mature business. But

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some markets internationally that have turned profitable. So

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but the big question I think for investors is free

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. This is a company that has no free

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and they'll probably lose a couple of three

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in free cash flow this year. Um. And

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so the question is how do you fund eight billion

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars or even more of programming? And the answer as

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to the debt markets and your borrow money

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, and that's kind of how they're funding it.

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is how long can they continue

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that? And at increasingly investors are charting starting

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to get uh, you know, a little sensitive to the

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of the free cash flow generation of the business.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They have more than eight billion dollars in debt right right,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know that the debt markets have been

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very open and very receptive to this credit, even though

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no profits or cash flow to pay back the debt.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think they look and they see

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that big equity valuation cushion underneath their debt supporting their

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>their debt. And you know when you take a look

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>at street consensus numbers, UM, this company will not be

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow till one maybe. Uh so there's still

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>ways off from free cash flow, UM, but there is

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a path. So one question that I have is that

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Disney is going to take a lot of its content

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>off of Netflix starting at the beginning of next year,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and they're starting their own streaming service. And I have

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to wonder how big of a competitive concern this is

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for Netflix and how can we really even determine that. Yeah,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>competition is ramping up, no question about it. That you

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Disney, the big reason that they epped up and

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>spend eighty billion dollars to buy Century Fox was to

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get more content UM for their streaming service which they're

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>going to launch next year, a T and T, which

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just spent eighty billion dollars buying Time Warner. They announced

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this week that they in fact are getting into the

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>director consumer streaming business with some of the Warner Brothers content.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So competition is absolutely ramping up, UM. And I think

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Netflix clearly recognized this several years ago. UM, and that's

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>when they really started to ramp up their original program

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 1>because they knew at some point Hollywood would wisen up

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and they would, you know, start taking back some of

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>their content and that Netflix would need to rely on

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>more on original programming. And the good news is, um,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as you have a big check book,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and Netflix has a big checkbook, you can get any writer,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>any talent, any director, uh, any producer to come and

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>make content for you, just like they would make it

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for one of the big studios. Paul Sweeney just quickly.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand that Netflix with its understanding of the consumer,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning they know what you watch, they know what are

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in. They have able they have been able to

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>broaden they're offering. And that's just talking about series. They've

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>got the stand up comedy specials, They've got films. They

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>know what you want to watch, don't they They do.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of information because they have a

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>direct relationship with the consumer. They know what the consumer wants.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to a cable network which has a you know, intermediary,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>which is the cable system, the comcast or the satellite provider. Uh,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't own the content, they don't know what their

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers really run. Netflix does so originally on the original

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>programming the Netflix created in house. They knew that their

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>users liked Kevin Spacey. They knew that their users liked

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>political dramas, so let's create a political drama with Kevin Spacey,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that. And they're they're using that in

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>international markets because they're starting to bring up a lot

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of original programming in international markets. Paul Sweeney, thank you

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Paul Sweeney, us director

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of Research and senior Senior Media and Internet Analyst for

0:19:54.800 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Fidelity Investment is jumping into the world of

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto currency. It is offering to manage digital assets for

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a hedge funds, family offices and trading firms. And here

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to tell us more about this particular aspect of the

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>financial industry and fidelities Responses Aaron Brown. He is a

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>former managing director and head of Financial market Research at

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a q R Capital Management, and he is the author

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the book The Poker Face of Wall Street. Aaron Brown,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's always a pleasure to hear your views. Tell us

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of Fidelity offering this digital asset

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>management business? Well, thanks for having me, Um. I think

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this is mostly important symbolically, UH, Fidelity has always been

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>among similar financial institutions they've been a relative cheerleader for crypto.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that they're promising in two thousand nineteen

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that they'll offer custody and trading for some of the

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>larger cryptos for some larger investors is uh, sort of

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a you know, it's an affirmation of the legitimacy and

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the faith they have in crypto. It doesn't really add

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot. If institutional investors have been dying to pour

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>billions and billions of dollars into crypto, They've had many

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunities since two thousands seventeen. We had led your ac

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>c m E, cbo E offering futures claim based, Gemini

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>have offered services. We know Northern Trust is looking at

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>probably all the other big custodians are looking at this.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's a lot of pure news

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>here fundamentally, but it's certainly going to uh, you know,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>charge the market and and give a lot of name

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>recognition to people who perhaps don't really know what a

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>custodian is. But but no the fidelity name well, Aaron,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm struck by sort of the risk that is implied

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>by holding something uh that could potentially evaporate and value

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and what is the potential risk that Fidelity would be

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>taking on if it really does become a major player

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and if this market continues to expand, well, of course

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're brokeer, so they're holding these for other people,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and crypto could go to zero. Um UM. I hope

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone who knows that before they invest, and then Fidelity

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>would be uh, you know, I probably have a lot

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of customer relation issues. Um. But they're offering this to

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors who presumably know the rules. UM. I would

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>say the bigger risks to Fidelity as a company are

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that they get hacked. Now they're planning to put all

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of these assets in cold storage, which is supposed to

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>be hacked proof, but you know, you're never quite sure,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and cold storage can be very vulnerable to an internal

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>rogue employee and the internal embezzlement or fraud. UM. If

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>there are problems with the pricing, if they sell institutions

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of assets that you know, six thousand dollars

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin and it turns out that wasn't really the price,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that it was being manipulated, and some of the shadowy exchanges,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the crypto trades on UM. I think this kind of

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thing could be a big black eye, or if there's

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory problem, if if people give the regulators come

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in and say the stuff is all illegal. Um, I

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>don't take that. I don't think those are huge risks today.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, two years ago, people would have

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>worried a lot more about those things. But I think

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto's mainstream enough that Fidelities maybe pushing the envelope a

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But I would expect to see all the

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>big financial institutions follow suit. Here. The arm of Fidelity

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to handle this is going to be called

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity Digital Assets. And according to Tom Jessup, who runs

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that business, they've been mining bitcoin since twenty fifteen. Can

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you give us your views on mining bitcoin and bitcoin

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as a proxy for this world of cryptocurrencies? Yeah, I mean,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean mining was I started mining in two thousand thirteen,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, I quickly got, you know, pushed

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out of that business. You need to be really big now.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Fidelities obviously big enough to do it if they want.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not a hugely profitable business anymore, but but you know,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it pays the bill, but it's a very good way.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I always tell people who want to invest in crypto. Listen,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>mine a little bit. You know you're not going to

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>get rich doing it. If you're doing on your PC.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>You know you may make making ten cents for for

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a month of letting your PC churn away at this,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But you'll excuse me, eron, Can I just interrupt and

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ask you what kind of set up of technical setup

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>were you able to put together in order to mine bitcoin? Well, okay,

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand and thirteen, you just did it

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>on your PC. You know, with spare you let it

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>run at night while you weren't using it today to

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be competitive in mind and you need highly specialized equipment

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and need to be next door to a hydroelectric plant. Um.

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not urging people to go and do this

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to make money. I'm just saying you do it. You

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>really learn what cryptocurrency is when you mind it and

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you spend it. And before you invest in something, it's

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>always nice to you know, make it and sell it.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you say, okay, now, I maybe it was

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>only ten cents worth and maybe he used it to

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, by something you didn't really want. But but

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but but you know what you're doing in a way

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that somebody who's just read about bitcoin doesn't and you

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>learned an awful lot about exactly what it is, what

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a key is, how these work, and how convenient it is.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Um so so for Fidelity, I think, I think, you know,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense. I don't think they're going to

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>go in the business of mining to compete with some

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of these Chinese giant consortiums, but it does give them

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of legitimacy in the space, and it's given

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of legitimacy among crypto enthusiasts the fact

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>they're actually willing to get their hands dirty with this stuff.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of financial people who talk about crypto have never,

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, spent a bitcoin and wouldn't know what it

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is if you know, somebody gave a hundred Well. One

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm struck by is it seems, on its

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>face as if this is a risk that Fidelity is

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>taking getting into sort of a more niscent market, one

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that is that is spurned by a lot of people.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I'm wondering how much is a

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>move like this is a risk like this required for

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>big asset managers that focus on index funds that increasingly

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>pay zero fees or next to nothing in terms of fees.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in other words, how much do these types

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>of services have to be the drivers of profitability to

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>place like Fidelity going forward? Okay, I'm not an expert

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in fidelities business. I know more on the hedge fund side,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but I do know, yes, everybody and asset management is

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>desperate for new kinds of revenue because the fee impression.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten so efficient with ets with indext funds free

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>now many places, Uh you just can't make money, you know,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just for existing the way you used to, and so yeah,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you need some sort of value added. Uh. Crypto is one,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know way where they're still margins. You can still

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>differentiate yourself. You know, there are other things you could do.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I think we're going to be seeing more experimentation,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>more risk taking among asset managers and the ones that refuse,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the ones that try to keep just the traditional business alive,

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't see them. I got to see the profits

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>slowly eroding until nobody wants to work there anymore. Aaron,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, how profitable do you think a

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency department the way that Fidelity is sort of outlineyone

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>could be well if they're the only one, or if

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, they're the giant one, then I think

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be tremendously profitable. I think there's a lot

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of money that wants to go into crypto and UH,

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of for you know, you buy the

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto and currency exchange yourself to your customers, you keep

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>it in cold storage, costs you nothing, and you can

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>probably charge pretty good fees on it. If everybody in

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the world gets into this business, and you know, the

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>fees are going to go down to zero, just like

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Aaron Brown, thank you so much for being

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with us. We love having your views highlighted here. Aaron

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Brown is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, also former managing

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>director and head of financial market risk Research at a

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>q R Capital Management. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox, I'm on Twitter at a Fox, I'm

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.