WEBVTT - 5/14 Part 2: Draft Simulator, Monday night MLB recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess it, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did we

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just become best friends? Fantasy best Friends Forever? Shaw's gonna

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>here too long, you guys, A one minute here before

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you come in. He's getting comfortable. It's been wait too long.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg Sausman. That's Frank's atleast this is the Fantasy

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever up. Should I hate you with the Budweiser?

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's probably something you hate. Greg. That

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>was so nineties. Don't do that. I was, I wasn't.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't like that. It's also like a Bubbara Dudley

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>thing too, so they took it from the commercial. Yeah,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, So if I started making that part of

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>my thing every day, would you a hate it? We

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>love it. We're just I don't think I think neither

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>probably past it. But you know, you know how like

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>everything comes full circle, Greg, like they're starting to make

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all these like not starting. They've been making remakes of

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>movies for like ever now, and remakes of shows and stuff.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're close to getting like the remake

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of that commercial. None, like another iteration of it or

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Do that recently? Maybe, I don't know

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>if they did. It wasn't nearly as successful as when

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it first came out. I mean it was hard. It

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>would be hard to live up to that, but it

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>was a big fan of that. It was fun. I'll

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>never forget the super Bowl commercial, not when that was

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the most popular in the world. Did a super Bowl commercial?

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You'mber what it was? No, Oh my god, it was amazing.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I was really young when that, like ad campaign was

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a fan. I was young too, but I just just

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>remember the one up being the be A going into

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl almost like um the Deally Dally guys

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. So they did a super Bowl commercial

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? What are you doing? What are

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Instead of what it was, what are you doing?

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing? What are you doing. Oh my god,

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it's hysterical. Yeah, it was really you gotta check that

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>out on YouTube during the break. Check it out. It was.

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really funny. All right, yea, I trust you, Greg. Greg.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to do a little NBA dress a

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>lottery simulator before we jump into baseball, and we should

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>do it every hour on the hour, So on every hour,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean every like ten minutes ago, okay, every every

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes. Are you ready for this one? Okay? Do do

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>do do? Do Do? Do do? Sit in the lottery with

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the number one overall pick this Chicago Bulls are on

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the clock on by the Atlanta Hawks. The only team

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>projected to be in the top three that actually makes it,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Suns. Congratulations. Chris Welsh for the Los Angeles

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Lakers with the pick your New York Knickerbockers. God, this

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would be terrible. Cleveland drops the six two. Oh yeah yeah. Alright.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So so that's our that's our one oh five pm

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>NBA Draft Lottery simulator. We'll be back in about ten minutes. Reagan,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>back to you, all right, back to me. So let's

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>begin with some of the work from last night, and

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with Chicago White Socks. Because you want Monicada,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you went nuts. Yeah, Makada was awesome in this one.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the start, obviously with a close eye

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on Shane Bieber here, and Mancata just tagged him and

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>he he hit a fastball up and in basically down

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the line, and then later on he just kind of

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like flicked his wrist. Looks like anyone else would have

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hit it probably would have been like a bloop to

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite field goes over the fence for you

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on Moncada. That's just the way that this guy is

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>locked in so far of this year in the type

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of contact that he's making when he does make contact. Um,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he's significantly lowered his strikeout rate this year. Greg, we

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked a lot about Mankada recently, but I said

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>coming into the season, if he can lower his strikeout

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>rate about five six pc, his batting average will shoot

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>up because he makes hard contact. And that's exactly what's happened.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Last year thirty three point four percent strikeout rate. This

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>year twenty six point nine percent strikeout rate. So he's

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lowered it quite significantly. The batting average up to two

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine that's probably overly optimistic. Like if I had

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to put a aligne on it the rest of the way,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably put him at like two sixty two sixty

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>five is something like that, just because he does still

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>strike out a lot, but the powers legit. He has

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>nine home runs in a hundred and seventy five plate

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>appearances so far this year. He had seventeen in six

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>d fifty plate appearances last year. Um, he's just looks

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's on that verge of that breakout, Greg,

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is why you don't write off prospects early

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>on in their career. Last year was his first full

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>season and only hit seventeen runs with twelve stolen basis.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But this year nine homers, twenty nine runs scored, already,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight r b i s, four stolen basis, twoity

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>nine batting average. Again, I think the batting average coming down.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But even if he's a four category contributor, Greg, you

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>love that. You love that when it comes to you

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on no doubt about it all. Mccon has been really,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>really good this season. Happy that he's off today, but

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he's been really man. You'll take a day off after

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>last night. The guy gave you a three hits and

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>two home runs. I think you're doing all right if

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a Moncata owner. I hope so. Like it's Daniel

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Murphy where he's off every other day, we're gonna started.

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>You probably want him off today against Chris Sale. I

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to start him, No, I just I want

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the guy to play greg That's what I want. Ronaldo

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Lopez was also awesome in this start. Yeah, So Ronaldo Lopez,

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we had the question yesterday are you going to use

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>him as a two start pitcher on the week? And

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>last night if you did, you got what you needed.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>In that first start as has been seven and two thirds,

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed just two hits, one or in run two or

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>two runs total six ks. He walked to. The only

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>run that he allowed those earth was the Francisco Lindoor

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>solo shot. Lindore later hit a sack fly in the

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>third and that was it. He was absolutely fantastic last night,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was her not the Lopez shamby or not so much?

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Six and the third, seven hits, five runs, he struck

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>out six. You know, it's crazy. Even after this start,

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>his ear a stands at five point five eight, which

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>just shows you the wide range of outcomes that you

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>could get from Ronaldo Lopez. As I mentioned, I was

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>watching the start and he was lights out. I don't

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>know if it's him being really good or this Indians

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lineup is just god offer right now, like you could

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just stream any starting pitcher against the Cleveland Indians, They're

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>an absolute mess. But something that I have noticed regarding

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronaldo Lopez is with each success in two season greg

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he has started to scrap the curveball even more. And

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>now over his past four starts he basically hasn't thrown it.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't thrown it a single time. He's just focusing

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in on his ask ball, his changeup and his slider,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and the past couple starts, what I've seen the out

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the changeup is this is a pretty good offering.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's a if it's an organizational

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>philosophy thing that they're going through right now, but Gelto

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>has been using his change up more. Ronaldo Lopez has

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>been using his change up more, and the results have

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>been night and day for these guys. So Ronaldo Lopez

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on the year, the cape or nine is up to

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>nine point four. Last year it was seven point two,

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so again, both with him and ge Leo, you see

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rade up massively. It's up over two

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>percent this year. Um the strikeouts are up over the

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>past two starts. He's walked just three total over his

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>past two starts. Not that that's phenomenally low. It's not like,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, he's gotten three straight games without walking anyone.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But he's getting better. I mean, these are like the slow,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>incremental steps that you need to see out of a

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>guy like Ronaldo Lopez. He's not just gonna continue stop

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>walking guys like immediately, but just three walks over his

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>last two starts, and we're starting to see some results here. Greg.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's starting to learn how to pitch, kind

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of similarly to what we're seeing out of Lucas Gielito.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's taken some time. He didn't just come up and

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>take the world by storm, but he throws me in nineties.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>He's got a pretty good slider, and it seems like

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the changeup is coming along. I like what I've seen

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out of Ronaldo Lopez. He's a guy that should be owned.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that, and you'll stream him in the right

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>matchups to start week Cleveland in means Toronto. This was

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the right week to start him. The matches were good.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>He took a shot last night. It obviously paid off

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in a major, major way. Outside of Yawn Lacatas two

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hole runs. It was his eighth and ninth homers of

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the season. Jose Bray, you hit his tent whole run

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I now you were a Jose Rae

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you guy coming into this season, Frank, you liked where

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you were getting. You were drafting him and compared to the

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cheei Vada who's really really struggled obviously on this season,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a Ray was fantastic value. We compared those two and

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you were getting a brave I believe. Two rounds later

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or so, and he's got in Tuesdays nine with a

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>three thirty o b P. With those ten hole runs

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>now on the year. Yeah, I mean the thirty six

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>RB I s that's the biggest number that I'm looking at.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>He's top five in baseball right now, so especially it

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like he got off to a really slow start.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Still has thirty six RBIs the show right now. Also

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>has two stone bases, which is like this guy never

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>steals based I'm not expecting that from him, but ten

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>home runs to seventy batting average, Right, Greg, I mean

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>I was all over jose Brey. You at his price

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>coming into the season, and he's given you everything that

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you can hope for. Um, He's not just like a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a one format kind of guy. He's good in rodo,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>he's good in points leagues, he makes a lot of contact. Um,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>he's been rock solid the past couple of seasons. So

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously no complaints. I've I've loved everything that I've gotten

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>out of jose Brew. You mentioned he hit his tenth

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>home run, which came off of Shane Bieber in this start,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber. I'm gonna jump in here, Greg on Bieber.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The first three innings he got two quick outs in

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>each ending and then allowed a solo home run three

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>innings in a row with two outs. It was just really,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>really frustrating. And you know, I got a few questions

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>last night regarding Shane Bieber, and I'm kind of en

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>this up to you as well. We could have a

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of back and forth. He had twelve swinging

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>strikes in a hundred and one pitches. He still had

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts in six and a third in pitch, but

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he allowed four solo homers in the start, five runs total.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>And what we said about Biever coming into this season, Greg,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>is that he needed to learn to not pitch in

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the zone as much because he has really good command,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that this year. His zone percentages down.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Last year, he pitched in his zonecent of the time.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>This year it's forty two point six percent. He's walking

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>more guys, so I mean, these are indications that he's

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>pitching outside the zone. He's trying to get guys to

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>chase pitches outside the strike zone more this year, and

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>his chase rate is up a little bit, it's up

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Nothing phenomenal here on The swinging strike rate

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is up a little bit. But I'll open this up

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to you, Greg, do we have a case here with

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber that his stuff is just not as good

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as we thought it was. I think is that what

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to, because I don't really have any

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>other explanation. He's still averaging almost ten case per nine,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but his hard hit rate, once again, even with not

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pitching outside, pitching in the zone as much as he

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>did last year, he's doing what we asked him to do.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Nit pick a little bit more, pitch around the outside

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the zone a little bit, don't live inside the

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>zone as much. He's doing that. His heart hit rate

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>GREG this year has gone up. They're making optimal contact

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>against him forty percent hard hit rate. And I was

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>actually talking with our buddy in the chat Big Timer

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last night on Twitter. He's pitched in cold weather to

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this point. If he's giving up one point eight home

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>runs per nine and forty five percent hard hit rate

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>right now in cold weather, what's gonna happen when the

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>weather starts to heat up. So I do have some

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>concerns over Shane Bieber. He's got a three eight one

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ear ray, he's got a three nine seven x fit,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got a four point four six FIPS. So there's

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>not really anything that you can hold your hat on

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>him right now. His BABIT is actually low. That's because

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's given up as many home runs as he is.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's frustrating. It's frustrating to watch because

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the stuff is it's pretty good. I

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>was really banking on him taking that next step because

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>he's in Cleveland and they've done a really good job

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>developing starting pitchers. You know he sits ninety three with

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>his fastball not overwhelming. His fastball gets crushed a lot um.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's changed up. His breaking pitches are I

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>mean slider, his breaking pitches are plus pitches. But for

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, he's getting masked Greg. It hasn't worked out

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>right now four shape Bieber. And there's also the signs

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>right there, as Fright mentioned that it may not just

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden turned around a which flipped as

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we may hope. I think it's a logical logical question.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So you want to sell shape Bieber? What are you

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>telling him for or are you not there yet? Yeah?

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not there yet because look, there's still a lot

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that I liked about him coming into the year, and

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Cleveland Indians as a team

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>will get better overall, and I do think that Shane

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Bieber will be part of that. But I just don't

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>know what else he could do differently, Like he's lowered

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>his fastball usage this year ten percent, so it's kind

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of additioned by subtraction. He's using the slider more, he's

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>using the change up more this year. I'm not selling

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>him yet because it seems like this will be an

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>odd time to try and sell him. He's coming off

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to lackluster starts. I mean his past. His last start

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was a quality start, it wasn't bad, but six and

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the third three and runs against the White Sox. There's

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a team now that has seen him two starts in

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a row and then yesterday five or and run. So

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it would be a weird time to

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>try and sell him. So I'm gonna hold There's still

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot that I like coming into the season, Greg,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But but I do have my my concerns. Maybe I

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>don't rank him, like if I'm rebranking today, I don't

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>rank him as aggressively as I did. I had him

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>rank the tip of my top twenty. I think I

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>had him rank nineteen right around twenty. Maybe I have

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that number closer to thirty. Shame byber the question mark

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>do e saist? Who's the second start with against this week?

0:13:54.400 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>That would be against the Baltimore Orioles, so that's the

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>toughest matchup. He should be able to take advantage there.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll see, We hope, we hope indeed at correct on

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the year. As I said yesterday about now, there will

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be a three thirty three Lindora. One of the big

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>counting around Greg. Josie Ramirez that had fifth in this

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>game is the first time he batted lower than third

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>all season long. He went over four o BP at

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>two ninety one batting average at one three. No bueno

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Josie Ramirez slugging percentage? What do you what do you

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>do if you're Josie Ramiro's owner, Greg, and you can't

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>bench him? Why you can't? It's the first round pick.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean we drafted him in fifteen team league. Obviously

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not benching him there? What are you doing with

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy? Though? Like his batting averages, he's expected batting

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>averages tote, so he's clearly been unlucky for a long

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>time now. But is wOBA way down from last year.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>His slugging percentage has expected slugging percentage, everything is down.

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you just try and sell hosing your mirrors based

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on his name value? Right now? Greg? Yes? But what

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna get so everyone's gonna recognize the numbers? Obviously?

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Constantine sent me a text today and said he got

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>offered Stoley, Marte and Hunter Dozert. You know why I

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Constant sent you a text because he subscribes to your

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Patreon's rank. He's the highest of the high. Like, I'm

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just letting you know this is a true story. Frank

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>walks in this morning. I'm like, Frank, I really need

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you to do this video, like we got work to do.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I need you, I need you to do this, and

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he goes, well, I constance. He texted me he pays

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for my time. I have to respond first, and I

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was very frustrated because I was like, I also pay you,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and He's just like, well, deal with it. That happened.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want that kind of attention from Frank, you

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>should also subscribe to his Patreon. That's exactly right, Greggy.

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll answer your d ms on Patreon as well. They

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have a nice little feature there, so I get hit

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>up from a few of the Patreon subscribers asking questions

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with the private messages, so I'm always around to answer

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>questions obviously, and they obviously put out the Waiver Wire

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff over the weekend. I like to put out some

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Swinging Strikes stuff fabrary cap So yeah, it's been fun, Greg.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking into Ramirez right now. Stack cast numbers against

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>certain pitches. So we were worried about the breaking pitches.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Coming into the year. He hit one eight one against

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches last year, three against fastballs. This year, he's

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting two six against breaking pitches, one sixty against fast

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in his own head, dude. I think

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking so much about these breaking pitches that he's

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>psyching himself out. He's sitting won sixty against fastballs with

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a two seven expected batting average against fastballs this year,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so he's always been a good fastball hitter. He's hitting

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>two year against breaking pitches, is expected batting average against

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches one four. It's bad. It's very May four.

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm getting close to the point where we almost

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have a full calendar year of data. Greg of Josira

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Mirs struggling against breaking pitches. Everyone who was fading Josi

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Ramires worried about that second half, worried about him struggling

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>against breaking pitches. You might be onto something. Let's take

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a break here when we come back. Got a whole

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lot more to talk about, including Lorenzo Kin's five hit

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>night stick around four. Next, lose weight now, got a

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>fat dot com louse that unwanted belly fat today and

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>get free information at fat one dot com. Fit in

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the dress or pets or bathing suits you've always wanted

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to a fat dot com lose ten, twenty or more

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>pounds immediately go to fat one dot com For free

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>information on how you can lose weight. Go to fat

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com, fat dot com. That's fat dot com. What's

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>your I R S problem? Do you owe back taxes?

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there a lean placed on your property? Have your

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>bank accounts been frozen or seized? Have your wages been garnished?

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you being audited by the I R S? Are

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they sending you letters that demand actions and have urgent

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>due dates? Well. Solving your tax problems is as easy

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>as calling Taxes three to one. The I R S

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is the largest collection agency in the world. You need

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the best representation to give you peace of mind. You

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>need experienced professionals that can cut through the red tape

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and stop the collection process. If you have a serious

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>problem with the I R S, called the Taxes three

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to one network today, We'll get them off your back.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight hundred

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>nine six one thirty six thirty one eight hundred nine

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>six one three six three one Fantasy sports today. There's

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>no commitment that needs to be made. You just need

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to show up. That doesn't have to the story. You

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>don't have to tell me how you're committed to the

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>mandatory mini caamp. You don't show up for the mandatory minicamp,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that's problems, fines, and it means that you want to

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>do your own thing and you don't care about the team.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll criticize you, but not for the voluntary stuff.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I just have to be there if the NFL, p

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>A and the league negotiate it. What Tom Coughlin did

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>was wrong, and anything other than what Adam Gaze said

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>would be wrong in my opinion. Saturday's eight a m.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Easter on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>providers Fantasy Best Friends Grabber Fantasy Sports where you could

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dive there or right the Lopez and Justin Bieber. He

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>did a whole segment on the Indians and White Sox recap.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We did all right, Greg, It is now two. It's

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the lottery on this time to simulate the lotter read

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and with the number one overall pick tonight, the Memphis

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Grizzlies will be selecting Zion Williamson, ated by the Cleveland Cavaliers,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>followed by the Washington Wizards, followed by the Dallas Mavericks,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and you're New York Knicks at number five. Greg, I

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have done this now three times, and all three times

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I have got the fifth pick for the New York Knicks.

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>This is very bad. This is not going to dwell

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Cameraddish territory. This is not this is not gonna well.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Knicks must know this. They must know

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to fail at the lottery tonight. And

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that's why they were talking about ham Reddish over the weekend,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that that the Knicks are doing their homework, do when

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>their due diligence because they know they know they're getting

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the fifth pick, right, you know they've accepted it. To

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>where are you simulating years Tankathon. It's funny because I

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just simulated for fun. I'm not saying anything anybody. No,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that, Greg, Only it's on the twos lottery.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>On the twos and the next the first pick one. Well,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should be going to represent the next tonight

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and not Patrick Ewing. Oh my god, this is so bad. Oh,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>this is so bad. If you've got the offer of

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stalling Marte and Hunter Dozer for Jose Ramirez, what would

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you do? Because to me, that seems like a pretty

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>good offer. Sorry, Martin Hunter for Jose Ramirez, Are you

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it? It's a pretty damn good deal, man, Like,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the territory that we're in right now. You get

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a dude, hundred Dozier could be this year's breakout third basement.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Everything that he's doing right now seems legit. Hope that

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the back spasms don't flare up again, but everything that

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, from cutting down the strikeout rate to hitting

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball hard or putting them ball in the air,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting in the middle of a really good Royals lineup

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. I never thought that I would say that

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this season, this Royals lineup is fun and it's a

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>good one. Under Dozer is in the midst of a breakout,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you get staling. Marte's off of that. Who

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>doing what he's doing. The batting averages climbing up right now,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he's getting his hits. You know, he's gonna steal bases.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>The weather starts to eat up. It's a great Ballpark

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, but probably gonna give you his fifteen plus

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs. He's a third round pick. I think that's

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a very fair return right now. If you're shopping Jose A.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Ramirez and you need depth, you're just kind of shopping

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and based off his name value. If you're one of

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the owners right now, that's worried that this can linger

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>all season from Jose Ramirez because honestly, we don't have

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers here that's say that it's going to get

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that much better with Jose Ramirez. I'm worried. I own

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>him in two leagues. I'm worried about him. So you

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are also worried that's something that can linger all year,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you shop him with the hope of getting

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>too pretty damn Cherson returns Sally Marte and Hunter Dozer.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good return, Greig, Yeah, it's a very

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fair restart, I think at this point for Jose Ramirez.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's do the Cain and I eventued Lorenzo Caine before

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the break. Lorenzo Caine killed me yesterday Kill the Phillies

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Phillies were able to pull this one out

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>seven of four. Lorenzo Caine was five for six on

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the day, including two dollars and his fourth stolen base

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Mikey mustock is his tenth home run

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Moustock Is was wonderful, four fifty, Travis

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Show and over three sixty three. That's why casting here

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is coming up now. When it comes to here, I'll

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>bring this game down in a moment. How far do

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we go with casting here? If you want to pick

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>him up right, like you gotta drop someone to pick

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>up here, I'm assuming you would drop Travis Show. F M.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that's a fair it's a fair statement. Um,

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>would you drop the question that we got? Would you

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>drop Michael Javis for him? I would not? Would you

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>drop the other? I got a question about Jesse Winker?

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Winker. Winker has been dealing with a quad But

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so my response to someone asking if they Sauld drop

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Winker is like, what do you expecting kest and

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>here to do? Because Winker is also that's pretty good

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>prospect pedigree, and he's in a good ballpark and he

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>hits the middle of a solid lineup. Y'all hop we

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>coming around for the Reds. Like how much better is Kesse?

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And here are gonna be than Jesse Winker? I like

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>jes See Winker a lot, and he's doing some good things.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It's here hard hit rate is like over betting average

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't there yet, but he's already set a career high

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in home runs. He's dealing with this quad issue and no,

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe if we get more news on that, like whether

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna hit the I L or something like. I

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that severe because I think they would

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have placed him on the I L if that were

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the case. But that that's my response, Greig, is how

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>much better is Kessing? Here are gonna be than Winker?

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Batting ADVERTISEMM in there for Winker, but based on the

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bat of ball data, I would expect it to be there.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I still really like Jesse Winker. I wouldn't make that move,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and I like here a lot too. I want to

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:47.719
<v Speaker 1>make the move either. I think when it comes to prospects,

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we all get super excited. You want to join the fun,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to be able to ride the wave. But

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you're a good player, you you he's a good player.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop Ryan McMann for him? So I had

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that decision. This morning, actually because I picked him up

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the pit League and I was debating dropping Ryan McMahon,

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't because they still had Roddy to Les

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on my team. So like, that's a move on make.

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But if I didn't have Ruddy to Les, I probably

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would have made that move. Yeah, I would have dropped

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryan McMahon, even even with the fact that he has

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like the multi position eligibility he plays in Colorado. But

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been frustrating. He I believe ryani Man has three

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs in the year, Greg. Two of those came

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>in one game, So it's been frustrating. And I know

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been like really cold in Colorado and they haven't

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of games there yet, but you still

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about him struggling. It's lefties sitting against

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>lefties at times, and just flat out like, is he

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the player that we expected to be? He hasn't been

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>great so far, So I would make that move, Greg,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay making that move? Okay, Dared Hampson has been sent down,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a move on. And make how about Dan Vogelock? Greg?

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>He dropping that was literally the next name out of

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>my mouth. Three run bomb last night game tying three

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>runs he did. I would rather have here that here, really,

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>am Okay, it's because Milwaukee better place to hit. I

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like vogel Box, But over the past month or so

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he's really slowed down. Really good still in points leads

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because he walks a lot o b P is good.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But the Mariners seem like they're about to get really crowded.

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Greg like when everyone's healthy, Like de Gordon came back

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>last night as a pinch runner, stole a base, But

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>once he's there, you're gonna have shed Long. You're gonna

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have JP Crawford. There's a team that's geared towards, you know,

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>playing younger players, and and Dan vogel Bok meets that,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, and totally trade away Edwin and Karnassiana

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>J Bruce Like, all right, we might have a little

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of a log jam here for playing time when

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to to the Mariners, I like vogel Bok.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have here. Okay, So there you go.

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the deal. Kessing here. What the other guys,

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Nicky Lopez and and Oscar Modado. Yeah, so they don't

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have the same pedigree obviously as as a Kessing hera

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>um I would probably still be willing to drop like

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan McMahon um Volo Bok. I would keep over those

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>other two guys. But it comes down to what you need,

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>right like if you need a middle infielder, who when

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we had the Welshaw in the first hour, you go

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to him. He gave us a great

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of each of these prospects and what he's expecting.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He's more excited about Nikki Lopez. But there's a little

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of something for everybody right now. Greg, if you

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>need a middle infielder, then Nikki Lopez. There's a guy's

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>someone that you could pick up and plug in, and

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems like he's gonna play quite regularly for the Royals.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>He has good o BP, he has a little bit

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of pop, a little bit of speed to hit for

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>good batting average so far this year. And then Mercado

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of the I think he has higher upside.

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Nicky Lopez is safer. I think Mercado has

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>higher upside because he has like forty stolen base seasons

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in the minors. He has a little bit of pop too.

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>He was crushing it during spring training and I think

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Indians are gonna keep him up because they've

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>been starting like Jordan Luplo. I know either he got

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>placed in the oh no it was Tyler Nikelan got

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>placed in the I l so like it's been a

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>revolving door in the outfield, like they signed Carlos Gonzalez

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>like veteran contract whatever. I think the Oscar Mercado is

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, and I think he does have high upside

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>because of his stolen basis. So there's a little bit

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of something out there for everyone. He has an outfielder

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, endfielder. You've got Pablo Lopez, you have

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Mercado on the outfield. Obviously Kessin here. I'd rather have

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>over over both of them. But yeah, I would pick

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>these guys up, and especially if you have like a

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dead roster spot right now, I'm gonna drop anyone who's

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely helping me right now, my dropping Javis and my

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>dropping Winker for for these guys. No, I'm not, And

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that's the question that we've been getting a lot.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's how I feel about the prospects. Okay, back

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Phillies and the brew Crew, because two interesting starters.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention Frank. Let's start with the Phillies.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaronola three innings, five hits, three runs, three walks, three

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>k's not good, not good at all, Greg and frustrating

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a year so far for Aaronolah is the guy that

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was going in the second third round. Uh. Seemed like

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he was coming around a little bit his past couple

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of starts, you know, against the St. Louis Cardinals at St.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Louis six names, one run ball, seven strikeouts. The time

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>before that against the Tigers five and two thirds, one

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>earned run, six strikeouts, seemed like he was coming around

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Even before that Miami. You're supposed to

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dominate Miami. That's fine. Six and two thirds, one and run.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So we had three straight starts of one earned run

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>ball from Aaron Nolah. That's good. But he gets faced

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Brewers last night. And what I've always said, Look,

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a two star weeks, so I would

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have used Aaronola anyway, but I don't like using pictures

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>against Milwaukee. It's for this reason. They're a tough lineup.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be patient, take their pitches. They walked three

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>times last night they hit a home run off of him.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest problem that I'm seeing out of Aaron

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>nola right now, Greg is the walks and the home runs.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who coming into this year two

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>point five six walk per nine for his career. Last

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>year he was two point four four six walks per nine.

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>This year he's up at three point eight eight. Something

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is not going right for Aaron Nolah, and it might

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to, you know, Mike Florio's conspiracy theory last

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>week that hit hitters around the league are laying off

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pitchers more pitches more, They're being more patient, they're walking more.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing with guys like Aaron Nolah. He hasn't normally

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>walked as many guys, but for whatever reason, I don't

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>know if it's something that's gone gone league wide this year,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's the walks are up massively. How about the

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs? One point seven five home runs per nine

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>right now for Aaronolah. Last year he was zero point

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>seven two. So he's walking more guys and he's giving

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>up home runs. He's giving hup home runs with guys

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on base because he's walking him. The strikeouts still look

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>really good nine point three case per nine, even though

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rate is downtre tremendously this year, Greg,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>something's not right with with with Aaronolah so far this

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>year just walking more guys doesn't have that pinpoint command

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're selling Aaronola. You can't sell him because I

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>mean you could try if you could still get like

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a top if ting is starting pitcher based off his

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>name value, it might be something that you look into.

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>If I own Aaronola, I'm frustrated right now and I

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>would understand why you would want to move him, But

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>coming of last night's performance is just not the right time.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe after his last three starts where he pitched No.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Six innings one run ball, maybe you tried to trade

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>him after that. But it's a long season, Like he

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>could still write the ship, and we've seen Aaronola how

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>talented he could be. Is he was he gonna be

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a two point three seven e r A pitcher again

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this year? I think we all agreed coming in No,

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna be in the low three's e r

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>A Like I think that would be a good year

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from Aaronola. But something that's just not right with him.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now. The swinging strike rate down four percent this year.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>The walks are up, Babban is extremely high, the hard

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>hit rate is up, the home runs per nine are up.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's been frustrating for Aaronola. If you can

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>get top fifteen starting pitcher right now for him, Greg,

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably look into it. But am I just giving

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>him up for the sake of giving him up? No, Frank,

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want. Yes, I understand, we passed our time,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is now four on the on the show

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gives you one more time, we will go with gives

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me one more time, alrighty. In the twenty nineteen NBA

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Draft Lottery simulator, the first overall pick goes to the

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix Sons. Congratulations, Chris Welsh. You land Zion Williamson a

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>year after getting DeAndre eight and with the first overall pick.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>With the second world pick, Greg, the Atlanta Hawks will

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>likely be selecting R. J. Barrett because they have their

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>point guard of the future. And with the third overall pick,

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>your New York Knickerbockers end up with John Murray. We'll

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>take that. Take that. What's better than fit? Hustling a

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of similarities once again, see what happens? What do

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you get? Greg let the wrong pick? Two thousand nineteen

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>NBA Draft The Chicago Balls, Scarboard Balls. Don't need the

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>first pick, man, come on, followed by your Cleveland Cavaliers, third,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans in Pelicans, followed by Memphis Grizzly and

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>your New your Nicks. Oh man, you've done this, maybe

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you combined six times? And how did you go? Pavona

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>number one pick the Phoenix Suns and number two. Yeo

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>y x he is good. You do a good one.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You need do me one more time. You do a

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>good one. Oh man, I kind of want to get

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the can I get like a can I get to

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the next break to do this? Sure, thank you, don't worry.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll have another lottery coming up soon, a lottery could

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>forty two? Do you own Aaron? Know what? Anywhere? I

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>told you I was talked off of him. You were

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talking off of him because of Nick Follock. All right.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, last night, Freddy Perralta four inings,

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>seven hits, two runs, and they warned struck out five.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I was encouraged by this. Freddy Parralta. I know you

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>don't love him to pitch guy, but he was brought

0:33:56.120 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>back into the rotation here, not exactly stretched out, but

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he pitched. Okay, it's a tough lineup. I'm actually surprised

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers didn't go with the openers. She's here too,

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because they brought in Jeremy Jeffers right after him too.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And you knew that if you're only gonna allowed him

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to go four endings, why didn't you go with the

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>opening strategy anyway, let someone else start off the game

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for an ending or two, and then bringing Freddy Peralta.

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And he looked pretty good his last time out where

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he went you know, five I believe it was five

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>shoutout endings, and then yesterday it was all right. I mean,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the seven hits is not great. I mean, granted it

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is against the Phillies, and he only allowed one earned run.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>He's did allow two runs the average over a strikeout

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for ending with five no walks. That's really good to see. Overall,

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not a Freddie Parulta guy. Greg. I'm not

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it for the Philadelphia Phillies. I can give you

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what the Brewers doing. Let me tell you what the Phillies.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I was looking at picking up somebody yesterday, I

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the move I'm thinking about doing today. Caesar

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>her nand is his fourth whole run of the year.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Hernandez was two for three in the day with a walk.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>He's now nearly Yes, he's now batting a were three

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred with four homers, seventeen rives. He's got just three steals.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens when you're playing in eight team league, folks,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league, as you know, where they start one catcher,

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one outfielder, one utility. We start to utility. We do

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you start one catcher, we start more than one affielder.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, anyway, stay, I shouldn't be a free agent. Greig.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>He's been hot. He's own so he's he's up there.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>But he's crushing it right now. I mean, he gets

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred and he's still giving you value even

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>though he's not leading off anymore like he was last year.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, he's hitting a little bit lower down.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting six in the order. Last year, he was awesome.

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year. He didn't do anything to get into motion.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just is the nature of the beast. When it

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Philadelphia Phillies, they just brought in so

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>much talent. They sign h Cutching, they bring him Bryce Harper,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>trade for Jean Sigura. So someone's got to drop down

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, and unfortunately it's been SE's our Hernandez. But

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>wore home runs three fatting average, and remember last year

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he is crushing it. Believe he suffered some kind of

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.959
<v Speaker 1>injury which started to slow him down in the second

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>half of the season, but still fifteen homers, nineteen stolen bases,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety one runs scored. The guy's always had good plate discipline.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>The strikeouts are way down this yere last year was

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one nine percent, this year thirteen and a half percent,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you see the big jump and batting average.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Rio six hitting the ball harder than ever before. He's

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he's your typical middle infield, so he's not a guy

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that's ever gonna hit the ball really hard. But to

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>see in his career great he's twenty percent hard hit

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rate and this year he's all the way up to

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent. That's a nice little jump fer season. Hernandez.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying in. He's hot and I like him a lot.

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you a question for a friend who

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would you rather go? Right now? Says Hernandez or somebody

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Isittary in the program Alnmus Diaz see her

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Nandez Seesar Hernandez or is he hot? No? All of

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, I do like Lenmus Marley Gonzalez home yesterday.

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna leave him as soon as we get rid

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of him. Grad Look at that are nowadays? Are Julie Guariel,

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Caesar Nandez, Ronay. Death is not an option. I still

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>take Caesar, But man, I love Ronnie, your dream, love

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>my rownon Riguez Pulver, Flora's sees are I'm these are

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>jar and we go. Maid Sailors is the leading cleaning

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>service in New York City and Boston. We service homes, offices,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate departments and Airbnb turnarounds. Give us a call or

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a text at two and two zero to book now.

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>That's two one two one seven zero. Use the promo

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>code f n T s Y for off your first cleaning.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>For more information, go to maid sailors dot com. That's

0:37:54.600 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>made Sailors dot com brains make it rain now tell

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>me how this works. Over there, you can download the

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel laugh right you want to place the fat inside

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, right, So if it's hanging off

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>on one of those towers of the I, you still

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to log on. I can see the bets,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I can withdraw, I can deposit funds. At the very

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning when you log on, it goes with this thing

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>where it's like searching for your location. It's like location error.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You can do everything but that week days six and

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast Providers Maurice Salad two thousand and fifteen, two

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>World number one. Me personally, I can keep my game

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>face on me all the time, especially coming out with

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the pots.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game face Grooming dot com

0:38:55.880 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs.

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Good morning after. Have you ever bet on the Little

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>League World Series? One year? I did, Yes, when Boyt

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Beach here in South Florida was trying to make it

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Yeah, exactly, Hello you sam it duty. I'll say,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't get back. I bet it. For a few years,

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they stopped taking bets on it because I don't have

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 1>people pitched and stuff. But once again, but shut up, man,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's on ABC alright, so I can't make money off

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of but ESPN CAM with your houts a lot of

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>people from twelve You're all Sweet Days, not amm Easter

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>on F and T, s Y Radio and on your

0:39:26.760 --> 0:40:03.760
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast providers welcome, Yeah Fantasy, your host, that's man

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and your go that far the heck coach tell the

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:22.399
<v Speaker 1>fancy by cut out. Oh my gosh. I mean, that's

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>gotta be the new open of the show. I got good.

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's gotta be the new open of the show.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything else besides that, Bivona, I mean,

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you gotta make it open. God, that was direct. I mean,

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're setting really high here. But that's got

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the new opening, God, dress, no doubt about it.

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That has to be the new open of the show.

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I will run through anything, right now, run through those

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>glass windows. Greg, No, that was awesome. That was awesome.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm really serious about making that like an alternate open,

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 1>not alternate, be open, come down. I'm sure most people

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>would agree to let's leave the New York Knicks like

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you gotta change the music, probably a little bit. He's

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks music, but like von Nuts. But it's perfect. Greg,

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand. I feel like we're adjusted a bit. I'll

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>do with that cat. You got some work to do. Wow,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you just created some more work for yourself by doing

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a great job. So there you go. Thanks and Greg,

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not timeing oh my god. It is four, oh

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>my god, which means it's time for a simulation. Do

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>do do do do do do do do Do Do.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 1>With the number one overall pick tonight, Zion Wimpson will

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>land with the Cleveland Cavalier. It's my turn. Frank with

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the second overall pick, the Chicago Bulls. Convinced that Chris

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Dunn is not the point guard of the future, we'll

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>take Jah mirand with the third pick, your New York

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Knicks select R. J. Barrett Turner, which I'm cool with.

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>My turn. Let's get that top three man with the

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>first overal pick, and that's one nineteen NBA drafts. I

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't Williams goes to Memphis Grizzly that like that's a

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>design Like the NBA won't let they're not let you guys.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You know it's number two, not even go to Memphis.

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Number two. Martino's Boston Celtics trade chip and then the

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Hawks. This is the worst one, Martino. I just

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>got nump. By the way, the Knicks are quote showing

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>interest in Terry Rozier and Marcus Morris, so you have

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>competition for your boys. No, they're both walking. I don't

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>see them stay in either of them. So Greg and

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I were talking about this during the break. What kind

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of contract do you think Terry Rosier gets half of

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what he was expecting going into last summer. Um, I

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think he'll be somewhere into the eight

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to ten range. Max, I don't think he's getting anything.

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>But now, I mean it what a disastervice season. I mean,

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this stock couldn't have been high or after last year's playoffs,

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and he cost himself a ton of money. He was

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just on first take today pretty much ripping everybody on

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics. He's gone. Oh he's gone for sure. But

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that also costs him some money, you know. I mean,

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you could come across as a locker room problem too.

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you're if you're the next you're trying to

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>change your culture. Why would you want somebody like that?

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He restricted though, Right, so they can technically match if

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to. Yeah, they could match if they wanted to.

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, the Celtics do have the King's Pick as well,

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so even if that doesn't fall there, you could potentially

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>get Kobe White, get him to back up whoever the

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>hell it would be, whether it's Kyrie or Marcus Smart.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So all right, we'll see what happens. I was saying, Greg,

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets like four for sixty. Just the

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>way that the NBA free agency has gone the past

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. It's like the pay structure is so strange.

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Id get overpaid and he's still a young point guard

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and he showed flashes too. So yeah, I think he

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gets closer to four for sixty. But that's just me.

0:43:56.239 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree. It's gonna do baseball rapid fire blur, we

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>hate you once again at nice check with the save

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>last night, right, Hector Naris has pitched once since May three?

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>What all right? You're you're a Gabe Kapler's guy. What

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do you got, Greg? Maybe he's hurt, Maybe he's hurt.

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Last night seemed like Abe Kapler is probably

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>just a clown makeup on this guy. By the way,

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I texted you guys last night because we got it

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>live and live in color. Did he do it? Oh?

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He did it. Oh he did it. But he didn't

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>give up a home run. Didn't give up the home

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>run wasn't it wasn't a home run. It was not

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>probably give a hit. He did it last night. I

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was so excited. It was probably like a flyball to

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the warning track. Probably that's all on Twitter. It was

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>all over it. I love it. It's a robust another

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 1>save last night. He seems like the guy. He seems

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like the guy right now. He's performing well. Why would

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it be anything different, Ty Butch multi and eton set

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>up role. He's performing very well right now. Needs to

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.959
<v Speaker 1>be owned in saves plus holds leagues. He's been absolutely awesome.

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He's got zero point eight six e r A on

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the season. Sho Tani gets on the board. He hits

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>his first home run last night and it was a

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>bomb in opposite field. Bomb. I mean, that's how good

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy is. To go to left center field as

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a left handed batter off of one of the best

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>pictures in baseball right now, and I don't think I'm

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm overstating that when I say this off of

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Jose Burrios, that just shows you how good so Aotani

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really is. Baseball is just better with Otani in it.

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Ulbert Pools, Greg another three hits last night, gets batting

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>average up to thirty. He also gets an RBI. Once again,

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I was kicking myself for picking up warmer Flora's over

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Albert Pools because warmer Flora is not in the lineup

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>last night for the d Backs. Fool holes in the lineup,

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>gets three hits, gets an RBI. If you need a

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>corner infielder right now in a deeper league, Wolves is

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what thy well man, I like what I've seen. You

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted You wanted him over River Flores. That's right. So

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm kicking myself a little bit. Greg, Jose Berrios five

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds twelve. It's five earned runs, three strikeouts.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Here is your regression game if I've ever seen one.

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>There climbs up to three point zero five after this,

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but great fifteen it's post walks combined and five and

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>two thirds and he's sitch that's gonna hurt the whip Frank,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna hurt the whip quite a bit, quite a

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:31.919
<v Speaker 1>bit here, So I thought there were some regression coming

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for Jose Burrios. But see something like this, it is

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit alarming. That's why yesterday when I was

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>talking to Ventra and he was talking about Jose Burrios

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best pitchers in the league right now,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and he ends a bit of an over statement. He's

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>got a three point zero five ear A, he's got

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a four point one seven x fit right now. The

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>guy's pitching the fly balls fly balls this year, um,

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and he's not giving up as many home runs as

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>has been expected. I mean, he gave up how many

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>did you give up last night? Gave up to home

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>runs last night. So you see, you see some of

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that regression last night, the fact that he's giving up

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as many homesh fly balls as he is. The weather

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:12.919
<v Speaker 1>starts to heat up a little bit in Minnesota, Jose

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Barrios is gonna give up some home runs. I love, love,

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>love that he's not walking as many batters this year.

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>He had three walks last night, but overall in the

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 1>season one point six eight walks per nine. That's great

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to see, but also not getting as many swings, swings

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and mrs. So we know he's talented. On the fastball

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is a huge, sweeping, breaking pitch, whatever you wanna call it,

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a slurve. He's talented, but I do think some regression

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is in order. Greggy. He's probably more of a mid

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>three's e r A picture, and that's fine if he

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 1>If he's a mid three's e r A picture, Greg,

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>with a let's say one point one five whip mid

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>three d R A one point one five whip with

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout per anny in that division, he's gonna severely

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>out per form where he was drafted. He's probably a

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen starting pitcher he if he puts that kind

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of season together, which I think he's capable of. But

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the picture that we saw early on this year, Greg,

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I just think that we should temper expectations a little bit.

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Jose Burrios is a guy that he

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>showed us early on in the season. I still like

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>him a lot, and he could put together a top

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen starting pitcher season, but he's not the guy that

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw early on. He's not like a sub two

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>ear a kind of guy. Sub three ear A, Well,

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he could have been here to defend his boy, but

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he's not your boy. That's correct. You want to jump

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>around j J. Roddy Rodriguez keeps it going. Last night,

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>two more hits, a stolen base, No, who didn't have it?

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boyd four and he's pitched five hits, three runs,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two walks to strikeouts. I'm gonna give Matthew boy to

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pass on this one. And here's why, Greg Houston Astros

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 1>are red hot. DA have scored fifty two runs over

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the last week of baseball. I mean, they're putting up

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>football numbers when it comes to their their offensive output.

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So kind of hard to to to to start a

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>picture against them right now. But again, like I said

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about Nolah, I'll say the same thing for Boyd. He

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>would have been in my line up because he's a

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>two star pitcher. Just really hate using pictures against the Brewers,

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Astros, um against any of these you know,

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 1>awesome offenses right now. And we saw last night with

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boyd, even as good as he's been, the swinging

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>strikes are down. Um doesn't get the strikeouts and gives

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>up some home runs. That's just because he runs into

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a team that's red hot in the Houston Astros, and

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:36.320
<v Speaker 1>why are they hot? Gregg. Part of it has to

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>do with Ledginus DZ who I said yesterday, I like

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the short term if you're a jose

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Al Twoba owner, or if you need a middle infielder,

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you need a second baseman here shortstop eligibility as well.

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Lemus DS is going to play every single day for

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros for the short term. Maybe it's the

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>next two or three weeks. As long as Josel two

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Bay is out and he's performing well, Greg two hits

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>home run Diaz. We get all the playing time without

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:04.760
<v Speaker 1>um Josel to Bay in the lineup. We also mentioned

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Seattle in the big home run from Dan Vogel Box.

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to Seattle, all right, it is we

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.399
<v Speaker 1>have a simulation do do doo doo doo doo doo

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 1>doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>doo doo doo doo doo. With the first overall picks,

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson will be playing for the Memphis Grizzlies. The

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>second overall pick goes to the Phoenix Suns. Third orall

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pick goes to the Atlanta Hawks. This goes wrong too

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>many times. The fourth overall pick goes to the Dallas Mavericks.

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The next trade with the fifth orall pick, YO, New

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>York Knicks. How about that, Greg? How about if they

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.359
<v Speaker 1>miss out on Cam Reddish and the top three? That'd

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>be nice? Huh? Should I run it? Frank? Let's go?

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, give me some good news here, Greg, all right,

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 1>give me something good? Yeah, something good. With the number

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one pick in the twenty nine NBA draft, Zion Williamson

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>goes to Is like, I go, We've probably done this

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like ten or twelve times. The Knicks got the number

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one once, Nicks. That's basically the odds right, one out

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of twelve. I have to say, I'm doing mine down here, um,

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and mine came up the Knicks. I got the Knicks

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 1>two times in the row. I hate this. Hate this.

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We're sending you instead of Patrick Ewing gosh man, what

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a disaster? All right, Greig? Anything else from this game?

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Brad Peacock was fine. I watched some of the start.

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh seven hits plus walks combined in five inning. He

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>was okay. The pitch count got up a little bit here,

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eight eight pitches in five innings. Pitch. I mean, we've

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.720
<v Speaker 1>said this about Peacock before. It's it's quality over quantity.

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You want to see more strikeouts here only three strikeouts

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Detroit Tigers. Not a great line up,

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>only seven swinging strikes, so it should have been better.

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 1>But you'll take it one and run five innings pass.

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He gets you the win too. I don't think he's

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:58.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you quality starts much because it seems like

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that fifth aning of lot of times is the cut

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>off for Brad Peacock. But I do agree that I

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>do think that he should be owned, obviously more so

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:12.959
<v Speaker 1>than m Yeah, if he actually be own, I agree.

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Nothing has changed for me there leading the Athletics and

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners. Here, umchi, he goes six and five hits,

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>three runs, he shrugged out five, He louded three runs,

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:26.720
<v Speaker 1>three runs all on Homer's all solo shots from Mark Canna,

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olson, La Man, and Crush Davis, who who word

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>twice on the evening. Mike Fires allowed just one run,

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>two hits in the first game since his no hitter.

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh he walked through he struck out four, including a

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 1>leadoff shot to Mitch Hanneger last night, Gregg, you don't

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>look now, but you say Cacuchi coming around a little bit.

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Over his past three starts. We all remember the Pine

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Tower against the Yankees. That's perfectly fine, but a two

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>point one eight e r a where his last three

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>starts still the seven point eight case per nine. But

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I really like the command that I've seen the past

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>three starts, only four walks one point seven four walks

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>per nine during that span. He's gonna get thinged up

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for some home runs at some at times. We saw

0:53:08.560 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that last night against the Oakland A's. But Cocuchi. Don't

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>give up on the guy yet. Looks like he is

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>coming around a little bit here. And we we've said

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this about UM Japanese pictures when they come over normally

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>their first season, they put together a really nice season

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>because the first time that teams get to see them UM,

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a transition. It's a transition for hitters to pick

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:33.479
<v Speaker 1>up on the ball. He obviously has um a little

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different delivery than other pitches Pictures, but

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>overall the past three starts, that's closer to the picture

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that you were hoping to get coming into the season.

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to you, say Cacuchi, Mitch Haniger leads

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this game off with a home run, Greggy, Uh Gordon

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.439
<v Speaker 1>pitch runs here, not swinging a bat yet still dealing

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with the risk thing. But is he rich runs, steals,

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the base run scored, So I think we're getting closer

0:53:57.640 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to seeing d Gordon in the line up. I don't

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know that he's there yet, and I do wonder what

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>happens is it is that just the end of it

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for shed Long? Um we start to see JP Crawford

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>losom playing time. JP Crawford goes over five last night

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>after and I think he had four hits the three

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>games combined coming into this one over the weekend. But

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>he goes over five with with two strikeouts and a

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>run scored. So not really great performance from JP Crawford

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or shed Long. Shed Long goes over two as well.

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It was nice to see Chris Davis get back on

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the board here. Greggy two home runs, two solo shots,

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but he was battling a hip injury. You might have

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:35.439
<v Speaker 1>even had questions about how much he was gonna play

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 1>this week, but he's in the line up last night

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and it hits two home runs. Would you like to

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>gets his batting average right now? Greg Close, close, standard,

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Davis, absolutely anything else, Frank, the whole the Matdilson

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>home run did come off couch. He really like to

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>see that. I was watching this game last night while

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was doing more Game of Thrones research. Did you

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>find any interesting? Um? I mean, I watched so much

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff last night, dude, like watch probably an hour's worth it.

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Like George R. Martin interviews is I'm I'm on another

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 1>level right now. But all the all the mean the meantime,

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I had baseball on in the background, I was watching

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Shane Beaver, I was watching Kuchi was washing all what's happened?

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.399
<v Speaker 1>It was nice to see Madelson gets on the board. Here.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 1>It's is second home run of the season and it

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 1>comes off the left handed pitcher. So I really like

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to see that. Great. Sure, we have a minute left

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the program, Frank, you know what that means? What

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.399
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Lucarino, by the way, you got blown

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>up yesterday with three run homer too, Dan Vogel Boch,

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a minute left. That means only one thing, Avona.

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You're doing one more time? Do do do do do

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>do do do do do it stuff is not it's

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>really for bones. Whenever we're ready here do do do

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do do do do trying to do it tank, you

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. Here we going six hours in

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty one minutes in counting until the draft lottery, which

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>means we are simming. And with these number one Diane

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Williamson will be Hey Cleveland Cavalier. The second pick gos

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to Phoenix Sons, the third pick gos to the Sicago Bulls,

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the four pick goes into Dallas Mavericks. The fifth pick

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 1>goes to your New York And here it is my

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:30.240
<v Speaker 1>final sim of the day. With the first pick overall

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in it's NBA draft Zion Williamson goes to and then

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Phis Grislies. You've been getting the Grizzlies a lot, followed

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:44.640
<v Speaker 1>by the little the two pick Los Angeles Lakers, Oh God,

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>followed by the third pick. Next, let's getting that top three, Greggy.

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get in that top three, Greggy. It's gonna be

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a good shot of one. Let's do it. I want

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to Chris Welsh for joining us. I wanted Chris doing

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic job. Or Tina as well, and all of

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us into his backery. Frank Stample, oh

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman, Let's go next tonight, have a great night,

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe Zion Williamson will be on the next. We

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>hope