WEBVTT - Lynn Martin, President of the New York Stock Exchange

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Lynn Martin is with us.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>She's president of the New York Stock Exchange. She joins

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>us here at a Bloomberg invest in downtown Manhattan. It's

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it seems like there's been this sudden change

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in sentiment. We saw an IPO polled this week already.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this conflict enough to materially change how companies are

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about IPO ing.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I mean, there's always going to

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>be geopolitical events happening, and the political framework is always

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to evolve, and if you're a good company,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>you can always go public. I mean, you look at

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the volatility we saw in twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. We had some amazing companies go public

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and do really well, raise a ton of capital to

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>fund their operations, to build R and D capabilities, and

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>they're trading levels that are multiples of where they iPod.

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 2>You look at a company like Reddit, for example, that

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>iPod around this time in twenty twenty four, it's done

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarily well. So I think companies need to be mindful

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of how anything that's occurring on the geopolitical landscape is

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>going to affect their businesses in the short term, medium term.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>What's more difficult land or what's the thing that kind

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of makes you kind of want to pull your hair out?

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it the geopolitical is it stuff out of Washington?

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Or is it the constant and increasing growth of private

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>markets that allow companies to stay private longer?

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Like it's pretty staggering, you know. I think the thing

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that makes me want to pull my hair out is,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the narrative of around what we could do

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to fix the fact that companies don't necessarily see a

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>quick exit in the public markets. If you take a

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>couple of steps back, our public markets are the NB

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>of the world. You look at the amount of capital

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that gets raised their secondaries, IPOs, whatever the case may be,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 2>it's extraordinary. It is why more and more companies are

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>looking towards the US as the most desirable geography from

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a capital formation standpoint. When you think about why a

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 2>company isn't going public, a lot of times it is

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 2>the areas that Chair Atkins covered in his make IPOs

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Great Again speech, Simpler disclosure frameworks, looking and mitigating some

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of the litigation risks that face public companies. Those types

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of things significant shareholder reform, proxy reform, things of that nature.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>That's really what keeps companies off to the sideline.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Is there something that lind to be said that by

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>having though a pretty deep private market and allowing companies

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>to stay private a little bit longer, that when they

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>finally go public, they're a much healthier company.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Absolutely, I've been saying this for years. Companies being

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 2>private for longer, that's a great thing because to your point,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 2>when they come out to market, they have refined their strategy,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>they have a very clear path towards profitability, or they're

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>already profitable and they're ready to take that next step

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>in diversification of shareholders.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>What about ending quarterly reporting? Does that prevent blasphemy? Well,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the President pushed for that, you know, the

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>SEC chairs looking to fast track it is what would

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that do? In your view?

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh, it's a bit of a two edged sort because

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>what does eliminate in quarterly reporting necessarily mean you want

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to give people less transparency around financials?

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we can, we hear you there, that's our job.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a newly public company, should you have

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to report your first earnings call forty five days. Within

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>forty five days after you've ip o'ed, you've just given

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>investors a very clear forward guidance and a clear look

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>at your financial what really changed over those forty five days.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So there, I think there's probably a path forward that

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>makes it less punitive but doesn't sacrifice the transparency. And

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>potentially something we've advocated for is if you're a newly

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>public company, maybe you don't fall into the quarterly reporting

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>cycle immediately.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like you are a fan of quarterly reports.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I am, and I think I don't want to speak

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for you.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Carol, I do. I mean, you know, I often think

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>about how it sometimes is frustrating for companies because you know,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>look at the AI build out or different things that

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>might be transformative or are transformative that in order to

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>spend money, it's going to impact you, you know, in

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>terms of your balance sheet. So where do we kind

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of give some leeway for people to do this right?

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>But I also do think we have seen things go wrong,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and so I love, like you said, the US market.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>It's deep, it's liquid, it's incredibly transparent.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's the envy of the world.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the envy of the world because I think of

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that right, But a silver bullet is not necessarily okay,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 2>decrease the amount of transparency you're given to investors, although

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 2>I do think there is a role for less, less

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 2>frequent reporting for the newly public companies. But then also,

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>what are you reporting, how are you reporting it? And

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>does it look like a quarterly earn a scholar, doesn't

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 2>look like just a simple financial update.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk prediction markets?

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Please do it?

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So Nazak is working on yes, no contracts. We saw

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this news break yesterday, our colleague Cat Doherty reporting this.

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>You have a poly Market investment, yep. Give us an

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>update on how that partnership is going. And I'm curious

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if you would consider just doing prediction markets yourself.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if there's a regulatory framework that allows

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>for us to do, we absolutely would would look at

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>that as an opportunity. But to your question, your initial

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>question is our investment in poly market. The partnership's going

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 2>incredibly well. We announced an investment in poly market about

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars last fall. It was really focused more

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>on the data side and giving transparency, particularly when you

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>look at how the data is impacting your more traditional markets.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Great example is which I love to tell people, is

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I was on the floor on election night and I

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>remember looking up, and you've been to the New York

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Stock Exchange. You see all the technology and market data

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that that is broadcast every day from there, and I

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>saw the market starting a spike up. I said, well,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>what just happened? The S and P futures in particular

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>started to spike up. So what just happened? And someone said,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Polly just called the election for President Trump, And that

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>was more like a double click moment, like, oh, interesting

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that the prediction markets are influencing what is occurring in

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>your more traditional markets. You look at everything that's gone

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>on this past weekend, the strait of horror mooos, which

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we've all been focused on, how is that impacting energy markets?

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Our parent company is the leader in energy futures contracts.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So what you see on poly market around news and

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>sentiment around the strait of horror moves is impacting what

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>happens in our energy market.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Just get about thirty seconds has become though more than

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>just there's a lot of sports and sports gambling that

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>still happens on these marketplaces. Does it change, How does

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 3>it change, How quicly does it change?

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 2>So Polly, Our interest in Polly was because it wasn't

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>as focused on the sports band market. It's more focused

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>on the geopolitical. They were a little bit different when

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you look at the markets that they had operated.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so that's not something yeah, okay, that you're too

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>worried about or concerned about. Thank you, thanks for having

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 3>me Lyn Martin, president of the New York Stocking Change,

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>joining us here at Bloomberg in Vest