WEBVTT - May CPI and Major IPOs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>The reason Credit Suite was so good, Mark Flaherty and Oil,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera, was their research was gorgeous, Which

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>is why I hate laur Kelvisina because she sends over

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and three page power point read it because

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I got time to read every single screen.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you marry?

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Meeker's in disguise, that's the mini pulse, that's the meeting.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 4>We cut it down recently. It was getting up to

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 4>around like one hundred and thirty hundred and forty.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just sick. Laurie.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>You're too young to remember this, but I remember LIFO

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>FIFO and all the accounting that went into more traditional companies.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Does big tech hyperscalers do they have accountable LIFEO fi

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>fo balance sheets.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 4>That I'm not qualified to comment on. Tom, I'm not

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 4>really sure. But the reality is that we are seeing

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.639
<v Speaker 4>the nervousness around that top ten cohort for one reason

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 4>or another. Right, is it cash flow? Are we at

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 4>a peak in the CAPEC cycle? How much are these

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 4>technologies being used? Are we overspending? That nervousness you know,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 4>tends to rise and people start to pull things, you know,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 4>from all over the place when we get to peak valuations.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>And that's exactly what we saw last fall, and that's

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 4>what we're starting to see again, though I would say

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 4>it's not to the same degree. Give you a couple

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 4>of examples. I mean, talking to clients earlier this week

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 4>about you know, sort of the semi sell off that

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>we saw on Friday. The general vibe I was getting was, Yeah,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>this stuff feels like it's been a little bit ahead

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>of itself, but we still like these stories longer term.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>And if I go back to a month ago when

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I was in Europe, I was talking to a lot

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 4>of clients in London and Zurich, I would say, in particular,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 4>where they're like, we've been in the semis, we've been

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 4>on the AI theme.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Is there anything else we.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Should be looking at? We want to explore other opportunities.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 4>You could sense that impulse to diversify, But at the

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 4>same time, when we would go through and look at

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 4>all the other sectors, the picking seemed pretty slim, and

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I've picked up on that same vibe this week as well.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Small mid caps. The Russell outperforming here today. What do

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 6>you make of that?

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 3>So if you look at.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Russell, it's been outperforming since last fall, but it's been very,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>very choppy. It's been sort of jagged, you know, with

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 4>big swings up and down, and one thing that seems

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>to trip small caps up. You know, the fundamentals are

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>fantastic right now in terms of jobs growth, three accelerating

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 4>ism is above fifty for several months in a row.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 4>The animal spirits feel like they're coming back to the economy.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, interest rates and when you

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 4>bake in hikes from the Fed or dial down your

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>dubbishness since twenty twenty two, that's been a surefire way

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 4>to trip up the small cap trade. So we've been

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit less enthusiastic here of.

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Lake a little more time with Lori Kelvicina Ira Jersey

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 2>coming up. Jeff given as well. The tape does better.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Negative seventy was a negative fifty now negative thirty seven.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>And the SMB futures.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The Vics twenty handle twenty point ninety seven is better

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 2>from twenty two to twenty one into a better twenty

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>point ninety seven. Even oil comes in off the back

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and forth tweets, if you will, and newsfall from Iran

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. In the yield space, thirty

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 2>year bond five oh two becomes a five oh one.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm running it out to four decimal points because that's

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 2>the way we roll as well. Ten yere yield four

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>point five two percent. Discuss companies make profit versus the

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>nonprofit companies.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>This is a complicated issue. I mean, it's one that

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>comes up quite a bit in smallcalf. We're seeing, you know,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of low earnings quality stocks out performed similar to

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>what we saw last year off the April eighth low.

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 4>That's something that tends to happen off recession typelows. But

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>we're also starting to see that show up in the

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 4>S and P five hundred as well. You Know, what

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I would say is, especially when you get into small cap,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a question of our loss makers really low quality.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 4>A lot of biotech stocks, for example, early stage technology companies.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, I have seen frankly, in the small cap space,

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>people are getting a little bit more comfortable with biotech,

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 4>which is not something I would have heard five and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 4>ten years ago. And those are technically, you know, like

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote low quality because of the earnings component, but

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 4>not really so I do think small caps, you know,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm starting to increasingly think they're getting us a bad

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>rap on the quality issue.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Laurie, thanks so much for coming in the new slow

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>is crazy. I don't know how you do it. I

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know anybody in that.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't sleep.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we don't sleep.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Literally, that's about five hours a night and it's one

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>hour here, three hours there kind of thing. And then

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend and we take eight naps.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 4>I had an hour and forty nine minute nap on

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Sunday afternoon.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, heaven. Yeah, you gag the children.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Their grandparents.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I thank you, Lloyd Kelvicina, thank you so much. Of course,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 2>always and forever with RBC. We're gonna get Tira Jersey

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>here in a moment. We got to have an extended

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>time with him not only on what he sees off

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>this CPI report, but also is work on the World

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Cup again. As I noticed on stub ub tickets issued.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Tickets released today for so many games at this World

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Cup is like a huge deal. When was the last

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>time we talked about the Nis Alexis?

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh a few minutes. It's been way too Our ticket

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>price has gone up since then. Yeah.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Gibbon joins how to develop market fixed income at

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Manual Life Investor. Thank you for coming today and just

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>a crazy day. How do you synthesize a higher CPI?

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>And this angst about what about core a Manual Life?

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>How do you fold that into the bond story? Yeah?

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean one thing to look at is, you know,

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 7>how temporary is this going to be?

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one of the.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 7>Dangers that we're in right now I was we're having

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 7>all these one off shocks and we try to push

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 7>it away and say it's one off, it's one off.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 7>At what point in time does it become not one off?

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're not trying to play too too much

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 7>into the recent run up in CPI as it is

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 7>more energy related and if we start to get oil

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 7>flowing through the straight again, maybe that comes off a

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 7>little bit. However, if we stay up here another three, four,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 7>five months, then we're gonna have to you know, really

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 7>consider what the FED has to do to slow this

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 7>economy down.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 6>We've got it seems like the bomb market's doing the

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Fed's work. Here, We've got rates moving higher. Here, I'm

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 6>looking at the ten year four fifty two year. What

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 6>do you think we end the year on a tenure exactly?

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, I do think we ended a ten year

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 7>around the four to fifty ish level. It's really hard

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 7>for me to see the tenure coming down a whole lot.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 7>It's hard to see getting back into pricing in FED

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 7>cuts like we were at the end of February. You know,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 7>there is a risk it goes a bit higher. However,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 7>if we get to the point that we have to

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 7>price in the bed saying we're going to need to

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 7>crush inflation, I think that ends up being curved, flattener,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 7>and maybe an inverted curve, because you know, I don't

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 7>think they're going to have to go gradually just to

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, make themselves feel better.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 6>So again, we got this inflation print today in line

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 6>with expectations, but it's higher, I mean, and how much

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 6>of that is just energy? I mean, I'm looking at

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the core that's higher too, But I mean, I don't know.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I think it's not just energy story. Right,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 7>We're starting to see a bit stronger inflation back even

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 7>in January and February when you look at some of

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 7>the subcomponents, and so there's other things going on now

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 7>that what we don't know is, you know, energy prices

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 7>usually have a six to twelve month lag on the economy,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 7>and does that put the consumer at risk when he

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 7>hit October this year?

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>What is a five thirty year bond signal? I mean,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and again after this inflation report, looking at really yields,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>some of the hourly real yield statistics were negative. I mean,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>what is the how does your day to day grine

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 2>ensure with a five percent thirty year?

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I you know, I worry a little

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 7>bit more about the tenure. If the tenure got up

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 7>to five percent, I'd be very concerned. As far as

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 7>where we're going a big move. I would take a

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 7>look at which mortgage rates. He's seeing housing prices across

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 7>the across the US slowing and you know in some

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 7>areas podcat is turning negative, and if you added another

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 7>fifty basis points to mortgage rates, I mean, I think

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 7>that's a problem. For the overall economy and in addition

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 7>to having higher energy prices at the same time.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 6>How much credit risk are you taking these days?

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're moving our credit risk a bit higher quality.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you don't have to reach for yield anymore.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's one of the things that you

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 7>can't be missed. Like, when's the last time we've been

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 7>able to learn four and a half percent on tenure

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 7>treasury and if you're throw in another hundred basis points,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 7>so so for credit five and a half percent, that's

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 7>pretty good. And you're seeing fixed annuity buyers come in

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 7>the market because they like that print insurance companies, you know,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 7>we you know, as a total return investor maybe five

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 7>percent thirty years, you know, a bit scary at times,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 7>but an insurance company, they loving that environment.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 6>Interesting, So that's kind of the place to be. I

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 6>think people want to talk to these bodcasts now, well.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they have no right for years. Is it a

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>total return man your life or you just clipped the cooper.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 7>We're more we're totally more total return approach. You know,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're benchmark against the AG but it's a

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 7>bit of AG aware and looking for a fair amount

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 7>of access.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Did you have v body at Boston University?

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 7>I was not fortunate enough to take one of his classes,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 7>but I had obviously had to read his book.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Paul, you know this has got to be

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a Duke equivalent.

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you go academics from BU to I mean

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you have to switch from Cornwalls, which is the bar

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>for BU, and you.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Got to go up to Marianne's. Okay, all right, I

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 3>mean that's a whole of a shift in Boston. It's

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>one of my little part.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Boston College in Boston University, they're just two

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>separate worlds, aren't.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 3>They They are.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean it's teach pub versus Marianne's after a hockey

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 7>game all the day, all day long.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I don't think people understand like Duke

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and in the UNC, how far are a part of

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>They like.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Literally about a mile.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a little a mile, and they integrate like

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>when you the student sections the lines of blurred.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, we'll have to see.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for coming in. We got massive breaking news

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>today that we've got to run to. Can you I

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>hope you can come back again when it's not nuts.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey given had a developed.

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Market fixing income and fixed income portfolio manager, a manual

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>life of Boston. So here's what we're going to do.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Hugely anticipate. I've got a lot of emails on this

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 2>is Ira coming on today.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're gonna do the World Cup, but.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>We've got to do the inflation report first, and all

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.599
<v Speaker 2>of his wonderful fixed income work as well. Ira, go

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>phobosy on me here and tell me what matters within

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the four characteristics of the curve right now, discuss the premium,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the fancy stuff you guys work in every day.

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so if you're talking about term premium, you know

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 9>basically the risk premium that you need to hold in

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 9>order to or get the extra yield you need in

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 9>order to hold a bond for the long term. You know,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 9>that's actually been very stable for five years out.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 8>The thirty years.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 9>Over the last couple of months, it's the two year

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 9>really that's been moving around quite a lot. And initially

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 9>that was because inflation expectations jumped much higher, and now

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 9>it's really because the policy rate is now expected maybe

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 9>to be increased, So basically the Fed hiking interest rates.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 9>So that's where you get two year yields up above

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 9>four percent and the yield curve flattening a little bit.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 8>I think that's probably about done.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 9>We put out a note just this morning noting that

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 9>we thought the two year yield was fully priced for

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 9>the realistic outcomes for the policy and for the FED,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 9>and a big reason for that was this number today.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 9>Because this number, this four point two percent year on

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 9>year CPI print, is price by the market to be

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 9>the high print of this cycle. So so I think

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 9>that's very important because if inflation starts to come down,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 9>then two year yield's good stable.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I you agree with that.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to be rude here, but this is

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 2>like saying Senegal is going to be France. Do you

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that you believe four point two percent the peak? It probably?

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>It probably is now obviously there's a lot of risk

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>in that. But but but based on where the where

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the oil futures curve is pricing based on the fact

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that you you get a level adjustment, right, So we

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 2>have to be careful because I think a lot of

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>times people say, oh, there's still a lot of inflation,

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>because you know, bread prices are you know, five dollars

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a you know a bag or whatever, but but the

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>issue is is that that a jump in UH in

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>prices to a new level doesn't mean that you're going

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 2>to get high a bigger change in the future, right.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>It just means that the level is high of individual prices,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't mean that that you're going to have

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>persistent inflation and persistently increasing prices even if prices never

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>go down, right. I think that's it's a kind of

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the observational fallacies that a lot of people,

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, wind up having because they'll say, oh, you know,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>gas prices are still four dollars a gallon.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, but they're still at four. They're not going to five. Right,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 9>That's the I think one of the issues that people

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 9>don't don't see. It's changed versus level. So yeah, I

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 9>think that four point two percent probably is the high now.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 9>Of course, if we continue to run at three percent,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 9>which is something that the market's also priced for over

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>the next year or so, you know, obviously it's going

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 9>to be difficult for the Federal Reserve to decrease interest

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 9>rates if you're still well above their targeted inflation level.

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 6>We haven't been, as some quoted, we haven't been in

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 6>two percent inflation and like forever, where did this two

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 6>percent number go?

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Can we kick this to the curb?

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, I actually think that it was kind a little

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 9>bit of a mistake to have any kind of hard

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 9>two percent number, right, So Paul, you know, you know,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 9>we think back in the nineteen nineties, we were running

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 9>a bit above that, right, PC deflator was running around

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 9>two point three two point five percent. Things seemed fine, right,

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 9>because wages were growing faster than that and we had

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 9>a decent, decent economic activity. You know, I think the

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 9>Fed lost a little bit of flexibility and how they

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 9>approach their inflation target by by you know, having a

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 9>hard two percent target. And you know, quite frankly, that

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 9>is something Kevin Moorsh would like to would like to revisit.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 9>So as he comes in next week and to his

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 9>first meeting as the FOMC chair, you know, he'll need

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 9>to He'll need to try to figure out with his colleagues, like, Hey,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 9>should we actually have this hard two percent number or

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 9>should we think about it more as in is it

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 9>two point three percent two point five percent and stable?

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 9>That that's really probably more important in my view to

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 9>the health of the economy is give certainty to how

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 9>quickly prices are going to grow, and the economy will

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 9>figure it out around that, which it always has done.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Across America, Ira Jersey, with us driving all of Bloomberg

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>intelligence fixed income that covers definitive at credit squeeze years ago, Ira,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>help us here off your remit with the complexity of

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the fixed income transactions of the technology. Bro Paul and

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I learned that if we see the word mezzaning, circle

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 2>it in the perspectives. This is back folks when there

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 2>was pencil and paper. We've gone way beyond mezzaning. Do

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you see a complexity and a frenzy like two thousand

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and six.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 9>It's not quite as bad, but there are people who

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 9>were you know, I think, I think when you go

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 9>back to that period of time, remember we spent five

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 9>years with the Fed fundrate at one percent.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 8>Interest rates were relatively low and stable.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 9>And you had a lot of financial engineering and a

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 9>lot of new products that were trying to be used

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 9>for yield enhancement purposes. I actually think, and I wrote

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 9>about this actually when I was at.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 8>Credits a long time ago.

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 9>Was one of the reasons why the markets created all

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 9>of these you know, CDOs and all of the triple

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 9>A tranches of different fixed income products was really because

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 9>the Federal Reserve didn't increase the money supply quickly enough.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 9>And I know a lot of you know, academic economists

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 9>don't agree with me with this, but the fact this

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 9>is that money demand was going very quickly during that

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 9>period of time. And when money demand is outstripping money supply,

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 9>then obviously the market will create new kinds of money,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 9>and then of course, once that doesn't become money, you

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 9>wind up putting on the financial crisis. I think in

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 9>today's environment, we have plenty of money out there. There's

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 9>some funding market needs that need to be addressed and

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 9>have been addressed by the Fed. But otherwise, no, we

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 9>don't see the same kind of you know, gearing that

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 9>we had back then.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Nobody cares, Okay, iira.

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>What they care about is two thirds of America doesn't

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>care about the World Cup. I guess a lot of

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 2>them do care about the World Cup. The world's coming

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to America for the World Cup. And I saw on

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>stub ub today all sorts of games with new ticket issueance.

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>How bad has FEFA screwed up the tickets nationwide?

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah? I think they've made some you know, pretty big mistakes.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean they were trying to maximize I think their

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 9>their profits by you know, leaking out leaking out tickets.

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 9>But then you know, that became a problem for the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 9>resellers and the like. There's a lot of people that

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 9>I've talked to in Europe, a lot of my friends

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 9>from when I was in graduate school and the like,

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 9>who are like, you know, tickets are crazy expensive.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 8>How are we going to go?

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 9>Like when you know, when we went to Russia where

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 9>we went to cutter, like, yeah, there were some tickets

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 9>that were expensive, but we were able to get into

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 9>a match for you.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 8>Know, one hundred euros or whatever.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 9>And so these were eye popping kind of prices for

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of people, especially when you have to consider

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 9>you have to travel over you know, over an ocean,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 9>and then you have all of the relatively high priced

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 9>accommodations in the United States compared to other places where

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 9>the World's Cup has been held over the last twenty

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 9>years or so, So there is a big sticker shock.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 9>So I'm a little bit concerned that you won't get

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 9>the kind of environment that where you have a sellout crowd,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 9>or you'll have a lot of a lot of maybe

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 9>domestic people going to games instead of people from these

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 9>countries to create a great stadium environment.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 8>So I'm really interested to see how that's going to work.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to see our jersey. Thank you so much.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Driving all the fixed incoment, Bloomberg Intelligence is Surveillance World

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Cup corresponded.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Joining Center Studio usually in San Francisco.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Edward Lovelow driving all of our technology coverage. Open question,

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>How do you study SpaceX this morning?

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 10>I study it as a pitch on the economic of

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 10>a satellite of great scale, that is a data center.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 10>So in a satellite, you have the body, and right now,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 10>the body in any given satellite is a probe of

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 10>some kind. It creates data intents about down to Earth.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 10>What SpaceX is pitching is a story where there are

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 10>thousands and thousands of satellites and in the body of

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 10>that satellite with massive soda arraisin reads is a server.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 2>You're in Charlotte, sil Virginia and your lecture in CFA

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Institute on this, what's your ex access to the hopes

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>and dreams of mister Musk? Is it three years?

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Is it thirty years?

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 10>This is why it's worth us discussing this on air

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 10>right now Wednesday morning for an IPO that will price

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 10>tomorrow and trade Friday, because actually something has been happening

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 10>since Sunday night. Bankers around the country have been pitching

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 10>this idea in real time, and based on our reporting,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 10>the institutional investors' long only asset managers are placing orders

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 10>for ten billion dollars of shares big blocks because they

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 10>believe in the economics of what Elon Musk is pitching

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 10>on the data center side. In other words, I'm saying

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 10>the road shows worked. Based on our reporting Sunday night,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 10>they had a certain number of orders. By Wednesday morning

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 10>they had many more, and thus we arrived to a

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 10>place where they're oversubscribed. By the way that the math

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 10>on a space based data centers is the same as

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 10>a day central on Earth. It's a dollar per token.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 10>How many dollars it takes to generate a token or

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 10>a dollar per killer? What the dollar to generate a killer?

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 10>What worth of compute which is measured in the electrical

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 10>draw It's exactly the same. I know, Paul, I.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 3>See it in your face. It hasn't been done.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 6>When did they expect to deploy some of this technology?

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 10>So this is why I say this is a live situation.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 10>The roadshow has meaning. In the prospectus, they very clearly

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 10>outlined that they expected to put an orbital data center

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 10>in place twenty twenty eight into twenty twenty nine. The

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 10>bankers and SpaceX's representatives have been telling very important investors

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 10>ahead of the IPO that they actually might pull that

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 10>forward a little bit and do a demo, a test,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 10>a pilot in twenty twenty seven. But given that three

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 10>days ago we saw the design of the thing for

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 10>the first time, and how many times have you rolled

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 10>your eyes at me or caution me on Elon Musk

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 10>stating a date and then see where we actually land.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 10>So all of that gets taken into account. But he

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 10>is also in the boilerplate risk factors of the document,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 10>you know, So that's how I view it.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Ages has Elon been on the road pitching this person.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Do we know?

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, I don't have any reporting or evidence that

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 10>he has done much beyond the conversation he had with

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 10>Jamie Diamond. Brett Johnson is SpaceX's CFO. He's much less known.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 10>He's basically space x is only ever CFO, and he

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 10>is going to preside over the finance org that does

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 10>the biggest IPO in history, much more engaged directly with

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 10>the bankers, the important shareholders. You will note that Ela Musk,

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 10>I don't know. I see the Elizabeth Warre and headlines

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 10>on the SEC. I don't really have any reporting on that,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 10>but that's fine. I would say Ela Musk has continued

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 10>to post on X quite often.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 3>So there's in this period two questions.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with this same blood low with this folks

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 2>the high ground on technology. Do you just assume SpaceX

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and Tesla made at some point?

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 10>Yes, I mean, well, I don't assume the market assumes

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 10>that in the end SpaceX and Tesla.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Still this drives and I think.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Of George Noble definitive Fidelity Overseas and many many other

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>critics of all does he think the ed loud Low

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>world is just you know, yeah, it's going to hell

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>on the desk, Kerra Carlson, Bloomberg News. Yes, Tesla has

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine robotaxis in three Texas cities, and yet people

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>talking to you say this is the second coming of whatever. Yeah,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's the discontinuous nature of the ed blood

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>low world.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just discussed that.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 10>So the thesis is that if Tesla gets there on

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 10>the end where they have fleets of thousands and thousands

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 10>of robotaxis, in other words, a Tesla vehicle that has

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 10>no human driver, it drives itself. There is an element

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 10>in that of onboard compute. The cars have computers on

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 10>them which helps them perceive the world around them. But

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 10>this is still AI where you are asking an underlying

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 10>algorithm AO model to do something that still requires some

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 10>kind of mathematics going on in data center. So the

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 10>link is if SpaceX is going to do thousands of

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 10>satellites and orbits that are data centers and they are

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 10>focused on what we call inference running the AI model,

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Tesla becomes the first big customer of that. Gotcha, it

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 10>is Elon having a negotiation with Elon, how.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Is a robotaxi going to pick somebody up a terminal

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 2>one at JFK.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Good question.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 10>How they've done it at other airports is to have

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 10>asignated pickup areas.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Very simples jf K. Yeah, you know Kansas City gorgeous

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 3>new airport. Frankly, Manila has a gorgeous new airport. Can

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I give you a case study? SFO?

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 10>Right, so WEIMO off services SFO. Dear listener, if you

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 10>know what's you on YouTube, I'm waving my fingers in

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 10>the air in Asterisk operates at SFO. You have to

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 10>go out the terminal, up the escalator, onto the air

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 10>train change stop, go on another stop, walk five hundred

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 10>feet and then you can get picked up by a

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 10>WEIMO SFO. So like that's the reality of it.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 3>What's going to happen Thursday? What's your I mean?

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to pinion down if you're wrong. We

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>understand that I'm wrong all the time.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, do you what's your best guess that's going

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to happen?

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 10>Thursday Friday, Kyle Porter and I reported that SpaceX had

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 10>had valued this and priced this IPO early at one

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 10>point seven seven trillion. A Musk replied on X saying false.

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 10>In the end, when all the documents came out. It

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 10>was one point seven to seven tri billion and one

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 10>hundred and thirty five dollars per share price, so we

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 10>got that right. However, because this is a typical and unusual,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 10>they priced ahead of the road show. People don't know

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 10>what will happen. There is every legal, mechanical, and psychological

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 10>chance that the price goes way up. You know that

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 10>they price it higher. That we're talking about a company

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 10>in excess of two trillion. How it trades at the

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 10>Friday whenever that gets going, I'm not idea. It's academic,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 10>isn't it. It doesn't matter, But right now the state of

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 10>player is so clear. This is a massively oversubscribed IPO

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 10>and people want to participate in it.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 6>How about retail? I think they allocata initially maybe thirty thirty.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 6>So how's that playing out?

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 10>There's an outstanding question, which is indirectly. Musk has promised

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 10>Tesla's very loyal, quite broad retail shareholder base that they

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 10>would get some kind of access to this IPO, and

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 10>that's not been codified, no mechanism for that, so I'd

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 10>be interested in that, you know. He Musk has talked

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 10>about rewarding loyalty in that sense. It'd be interesting to

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 10>see how those TESTA shareholders react if they weren't able

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 10>to participate. Remember, the institutional book closes four pm today.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 10>But all these different platforms offering the retail trade that

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 10>I think that carries on till Thursday night.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 8>I didn't know that.

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah today, yeah, yeah, all right, I'll get to get

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 6>my order in.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 10>You're looking at me with great skepticism. But that's healthy,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 10>Like how healthy is that?

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>That's good?

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 8>Yep, all right, I'm on it.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 6>I'll take my index allocation.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 3>That's how we roll. My love love great, Thank you,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>thank you, thank you for so much. Stay with us.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. Easter Listen on Apple,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business Up, or

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Odetta Kushi joins US now Deputy Chief Economists, First American

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>out of Northeastern out of Saint John Fisher College, Paul,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, they open the other the PGA RA

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>at the Oak Kill up in Rochester.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 3>The other year Saint John Fisher. I mean the kids

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>just roll out of bed, is that right? And they

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 3>they do eighteen holes at hops, very good, that's the

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>way they roll. It's Saint John Fisher a college.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Odetta, what do you expect to see in the CPA report?

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 3>What is the distinction for you?

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 11>What I'm really looking for is whether we're seeing inflation

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 11>broadening across categories. The consensus is that we'll have a

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 11>print above four percent. Consider that just a year ago

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 11>the inflation was with a two handle, and so the

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 11>question really is are we seeing it broaden outside of

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 11>just the energy sector into goods and services?

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 5>And that would really be the concern from the fence perspective.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, off George Bory Paul Core CPI two point

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent up from two point eight percent.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine a three handle on core?

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Boy, that's not what the market's looking for, Odetta. If

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 6>we do, in fact see higher core inflation, where do

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 6>you think it's coming from? Because a lot of folks

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 6>definitely feel it when they go to the gas station

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 6>to fill up the tank of gas. They fill it

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 6>at the shopping center when they go to buy groceries.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 6>Where is inflation most problematic for you.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, as a real estate economist, we see

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 11>that the higher gas prices is in facting construction costs.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing it flow through to diesel prices obviously, which

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 11>is which is very important for construction and higher and

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 11>certainly burdens them to breaking ground on more homes.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 5>So that's certainly one area that we're monitoring.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 6>Where are you seeing in your business here in real estate?

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean we have mortgage rates, boy, you know, back

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 6>up to six and a half percent here, and we

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 6>just got a housing number yesterday, you know, still that

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 6>four handle four million used homes.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 8>It seems tough for.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 6>The real estate business.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 11>It's been a challenging year, though I will see a

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 11>better year than last year. Mortgage rates while they've hit

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 11>about six and a half percent, mortgage rates are still

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 11>lower than a year ago. Inventory is still a bit

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 11>higher than it was a year ago, so that's helping

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 11>move transactions in the right direction, albeit very slowly. But

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 11>we did start the year with a rate of six

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 11>percent and now we've moved up to six and a

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 11>half so certainly that slowed the momentum.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>So what's the inflation series you lean on? I mean,

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>is it trim this, trim that, Cleveland, the eighteen other

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 2>flavors we've got. What does a denkush you believe in?

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'm classic look at the core inflation, and

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 11>then what I tend to do is break it out

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 11>into its main components, and I track core goods inflation,

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 11>core services inflation, and then I tend to break out

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 11>shelter on its own.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Shelter inflation makes up.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 11>Forty percent of core, and so we like to see

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 11>what's happening with shelter and the good news there is

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 11>that you know, that tends to trail what's happening with

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 11>rents on new leases, and we know that we continue

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 11>to see acceleration in new leases, So that should drag

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 11>overall shelter inflation lower later this year. I think that's

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 11>a tailwind to getting inflation back down.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That's really important. Is that zeitgeist in the market right now?

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 2>This idea of oeer and you know, eight other ways

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>of calculating real estate disinflation.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that in the zeitgeist right now? Or is that

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>a surprise to come?

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 11>I think I think it's pretty well understood that shelter

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 11>inflation should continue to drag overall inflation lower. I think

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 11>all eyes right now are certainly on the energy sector

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 11>and whether we start to see those higher oil prices

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 11>flow into other portions of our of our inflation back.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Get affordability in housing here? Is there a solution out there?

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 6>Is it just build more houses?

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 11>I do think that the supply side should be getting

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 11>the attention here, because what happens if you juice up

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 11>the demand side of the equation in a supply and

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 11>strain market is you just start to see house prices

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 11>go up. And so I think building more homes, making

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 11>it less burdensome, less costly to build new homes is

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 11>the solution.

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. The new slow folks this morning

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is just killing me. O Data Cushion, Thank you so

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal