WEBVTT - S5 Ep9 | The Judge

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>We left off last time with each side accusing the

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>other of bribing Ecuadorian judge Alberto Ghera, and we're going

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the end of that story today,

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I promise. But first we need to talk about another judge,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the American Lewis A Caplan, Senior District court judge in

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District of New York. Caplan approved Chevron's various

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas prior to the RICO being filed. He oversaw the

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>rico trial itself, and he's the judge behind Stephen Donziger's

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>current troubles too. He's the guy who charged Donziger with

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>first civil and then criminal contempt. Prior to his appointment

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to the bench, Caplan was a lawyer. He worked at

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Weiss ex On Mobiles, law firm of choice, defending

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>tobacco companies in the seventies and eighties. As a judge,

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he has a reputation for ruling in favor of corporations.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan ruled on behalf of R. J. Reynolds in a

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cigarette smuggling case in two thousand and two, and he

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>ruled in defense of the accounting firm KPMG when the

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>government went after them for creating tax shelters for the wealthy.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>According to Stephen Donziger's attorney, Lauren Reagan, Caplan has been

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a friend to Chevron throughout the company's decade long pursuit

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of her client.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Ecuador's Supreme Court validated the judgment and said, yep, they

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>always used nine billion dollars. And Chevron basically gave him

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the finger and said, you know, pulled all their assets

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>out of Ecuador. I was like, oh, no one here

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>for you to take. And so then, you know, the

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>way the legal system works is you can go to

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 2>other countries where assets exist and ask that country to

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>assist in collecting the debt. And so don Zigger and

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the legal team, you know, started going to European countries

0:01:55.520 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and Canada and other places to begin collecting on the judge.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>And at that time, Chevron started going around to various

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 2>states in the US asking the US court to put

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a stop basically.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 3>To those proceedings.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>And most states in the US shoot him away and

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 2>said that's that's not real. But when they got to

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 2>Judge Kaplan's court in the Southern District of New York,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's a former tobacco lobbyist, and so Chevron

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>realized they had a friend in that courtroom on this

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>like minor proceeding. And then while they were in that

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>minor proceeding, it was Kaplin that said, you know, this

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a RICO case.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan has denied this. He says Chevron already made its

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>intention to file a RICO claim known before he made

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>these comments. Donziger and the Logo Ugriel plaintiffs have accused

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan of bias against them on other fronts too. Here's

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Moncayo. You might remember him from earlier episodes. He's

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy who used to lead people on tours of

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the toxic pits in the Amazon. Moncayo came to New

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>York to testify in the Rico case.

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Paramil, who is corpor mas l.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He says for me, Caplin was a corporate judge, the

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>most racist judge I've ever seen. We've heard stuff like

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this from quite a few Ecuadorians and their lawyers. They've

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>told us that Caplin didn't really understand Spanish, that he

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't grasp Ecuadorian law or the differences between Ecuadorian law

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and US law, and that he was just generally dismissive

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Ecuadorians. We're going to dig into whether and

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how that played out in the Rigo trial right after

0:03:52.600 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this quick break. Zoe Littlepage, who represented Donziger in the

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Rico trial, said the court's preferential treatment of Chevron was

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>obvious from the jump.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 5>Judge Caplin likes to run a very tight ship, as

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 5>many federal judges do, and he was not amused by activism,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:38.119
<v Speaker 5>and he certainly was not amused by Stephen's attempt to

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 5>be both an activist and a lawyer. In fact, he

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 5>appeared to be sort of insulted by lawyers who went

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>beyond just being an advocate and actually being an activist. So, remember,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 5>all of the underlying facts of the case was Stephen

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 5>and many activists groups attempts to get the word out

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 5>about what was happening in the Amazon, and.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>So for a lawyer to sort of cross those lines

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and attend protests.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 5>And be a part of an activism movement appeared to

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>upset and anger Judge Caplan.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Little Page says even the logistics of the courtroom favored Chevron.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Judge Caplan gave Chevron half of the room, so they

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 5>had five or six rows of benches. Then he gave

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 5>the media every other seat except for one row, which

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 5>seats about six or seven people, so that was all

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 5>we were allowed to bring in on our triality was

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 5>six or seven people because they couldn't sit. He also

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>gave Chevron a jury room for all their extra lawyers

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 5>who couldn't fit in their five or six rows, and

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 5>all their legal assistants and all their boxes. And in

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 5>that courtroom we had several human rights nonprofit law firms

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 5>had provided us with lawyers to help with briefing and

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 5>with getting the case ready at night, so we had

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 5>four or five volunteer lawyers.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Who were working for us.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 5>So in the mornings we would be lined up in

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 5>this very long line. We had to get there very early,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 5>and it was in October November, so it was cold,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 5>so we would be all bundled up. We would be

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 5>in this long line to get through security to get

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 5>into the courthouse, and we'd have our blow ups and

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 5>our boxes with us and our briefcases, and then you

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 5>would see a row of five black Lincoln suburbans arrive

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 5>with tinted windows, and out of it would come the

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 5>senior management of Chevron, their head of litigation, their entire

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 5>legal team, and they were ushered in through a separate

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 5>entrance as VIPs, so they didn't have to stand in

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 5>the line with all the rest of us.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>They would get out.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 5>And go straight into the courtroom, So we would have

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 5>been in line for forty five minutes when they would

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 5>arrive and go straight through.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Julio Gomez is the attorney for the Ecuadorians named as

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>defendants in the Rico case. He says he also saw

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>examples of this, particularly with respect to how stacked the

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>case was in favor of Chevron, simply by virtue of

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Chevron having the budget to put what Gomez, Little Page,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and Donziger all described as a quote unquote army of

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lawyers on this case.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 4>For example, one of the things we wanted to do

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 4>in our case is to have live testimony. In any

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>usual case, you have a witness get on the stand

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 4>and they give what's they direct examination. Their attorney questions them,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 4>what happened to you, what did you see, what did

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 4>you observe, et cetera, and then the other side cross

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 4>examines you live. That's the way most trials are conducted

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>in the United States. In New York, in this particular, trial.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 4>New York has this practice where, well, you know, that

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 4>can take too long. So what we'll do is we'll

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 4>have the witness submit a written testimony, and then the

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 4>other side just gets up and cross examines them based

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 4>on that written testimony that they submitted. Think about what

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 4>happens in a case where you are a small team

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 4>up against Chevron. Chevron has thirty witnesses, and a day

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>before trial or two days before trial, you are handed

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 4>thirty written testimonies with you know, ten to fifty exhibits each.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Now you, as the cross examining attorney, has to read

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 4>all twenty or thirty of these written testimonies in a

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 4>short period of time, process all all of those exhibits,

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>prepare all of your cross examination questions, and come into

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 4>court and start doing one after the other after the other.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's just impossible. I would have much preferred having

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 4>them testify live, because not only do they have to

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 4>tell their story properly, and some witnesses, no matter how

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>well you prepare them, are going to screw up when

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 4>they give their testimony in court.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>That would have benefited us.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 4>But more importantly, we would have heard the testimony in

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 4>real time and had time to react to it slowly,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to being bombarded with all of the testimony

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 4>at once and then being required to prepare to go

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>in and cross examine and everybody in the next week.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Guma says he actually asked Caplan to space out the testimony,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>have live testimony and live cross examinations, but to no avail.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 4>We made repeated appeals to Kaplan that take into account

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 4>our life act of resources to develop procedures for the

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 4>trial that could counteract the prejudice that these procedures would

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 4>cause on the plaintiffs, on Steven Donziger, and on the

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Ecuadorian plaintiffs. And I don't remember any instance when the

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>court made those kinds of accommodations to us. Judge says, no,

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 4>we do this all the time in New York. There's

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 4>nothing unusual about doing this the way, and we're going

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 4>to do it this way in this case.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The mismatch of resources is something that came up a

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lot when we started digging into the Rico case. A

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>couple episodes back, filmmaker Joe Berlinger said something about how

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a justice system where deep pockets prevail. Gomez

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>said something very similar about the Rico trial.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 4>What would it take to mount the challenge to that

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 4>another oil company. The people don't understand the incredible, incredible

0:10:53.880 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 4>inequity in our legal system to finances. Know, if you

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>have the money, you can right the most incredibly prepared,

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 4>beautifully articulated briefs. You can hire the best investigators. You

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 4>can look under every stone, you can hire the best

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 4>experts with the best credentials. I mean, you can, whether

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 4>whether you're on the right or on the side of wrong,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>you can create an incredible presentation with resources. If you don't,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 4>everything is less than satisfactory. That's why you know. That's

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 4>why you know. When what are the proper matchups? It's

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 4>it's Microsoft only only. Can only go up against Google,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Apple can only go up against Samsung, Chevron can only

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 4>go up against Exon Mobile, and vice versa. Because that's

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 4>the only way to do it right. To meet every expert,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.359
<v Speaker 4>to meet every motion, you need exactly the same resources.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 4>And unfortunately our judicial system does not take that into account.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That mismatch started to come into play more and more

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>as the case wore on. It showed up in a

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways, like the number and length of

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>motions that Chevron filed.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, you could work on this case twenty four

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>hours a day, not sleep, not eat, not spend time

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 4>with your family, not spend time working on other cases

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 4>to earn a living, and you wouldn't have enough time

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 4>to do everything that a thousand attorneys on the other

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 4>side were doing or piling on you to do, because

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Chevron would file every type of motion they could at

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 4>every single instance they did it. That was just it

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 4>was insane.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>On top of what was happening in court, Chevron had

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>attorneys working the case out of the courts too.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Chevron plays dirty by putting pressure on pieces of the

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 4>strategy that would benefit them. So, for example, they went

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 4>after the Ecuadorians had hired an environmental engineering firm to

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 4>do the analysis in Ecuador, and Chevron was making arguments

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 4>that those analyzes were not only unreliable, they were being

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 4>ghosts written by this firm for the other experts in Ecuador.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that Chevron did was to put

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, that's an environmental engineering firm. It's a business

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>like any other business. The Ecuador and plaintiffs are not

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 4>their only client. They have other clients that they do

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 4>work for and that's how they earn their living, and

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 4>that's how they pay their rent, and that's how they

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 4>pay their employees. Well, Chevron would contact those other clients

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 4>and try to persuade them to stop using the environmental

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 4>engineering firm. They would defame the firm to those other clients,

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 4>so that if you continued to work on the case,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 4>or if you did not do Chevron's bidding, and by

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 4>doing Chevron's bidding, I mean switch sides.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Gumez is talking about Stratus, the environmental engineering firm that

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>worked on the Cabrera Report. Now, remember the Cabrera Report

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is something we've about quite a bit. It's this report

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Damage's assessment was initially based on in Ecuador.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Mastro says Donziger and the Ecuadorians were far too involved

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in what was supposed to be an independent report and

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that Stratus should not have been writing any part of it.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Donziger says it was all perfectly legal within Ecuadorian law.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>In either case, Chevron went after Stratus hard. They told

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the company's clients and anyone else who would listen that

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Stratus was part of an international conspiracy to defraud Chevron.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>In one case, Chevron even sent a letter to the

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Portland Harbor in Oregon, which had hired Stratus for a project.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>They wrote, quote, because of the extensive evidence of corrupt

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>activity on the part of Stratus in furtherance of the

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>claims in Ecuador, Chevron believes that it would be in

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the best interest of all the parties involved at the

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Portland Harbor site for the trustees to sever ties with Stratus.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Multiple letters were sent to the Portland Council too. Vron

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>posted an article and video on its website accusing Stratus

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of fraud too. At one point, Stratus even countersuits Chevron

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for libel and slander. That complaint reads quote. Filing suit

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>against Stratus was not enough for Chevron. Now it has

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>embarked on an extra judicial campaign of malicious defamation and

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>deliberate interference with Stratus's business to tortiously destroy Stratus and

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the livelihood of its employees, and to prevent Stratus from

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>being able to successfully defend itself a trial against Chevron's allegations.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>We asked Randy Mastro, the attorney heading up the Rico

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>case for Chevron, about this.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 6>When you are the victim of a fraud.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 7>And as an extortion scheme, as Chevron believed it was.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>It took.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 7>Tenacity and conviction and perseverance and principle to stand up

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 7>to the fraud, so that Chevron asserted every form that

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 7>would listen that this is what we believe happened here

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 7>and it was wrong.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 6>And then for Chevron to prove it.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I I.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 6>Think that Chevron not only had every right to do that,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 7>It's it speaks volumes about you know, Chevron on behalf

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 7>of its shareholders and stakeholders.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm doing the right thing and not being m hm.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 7>Pressured or or holding back in the face of what

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 7>I believed to be a fraud and mix extortion scheme

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 7>than not paying tribute to anyone involved in that fraud

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 7>or extortion scheme.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Two years after his original deposition, Stratus VP Douglas Beltman

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>recanted his testimony. In that recantation, Beltman notes that he

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and colleague and Macet wrote the Cabrera Report with no

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>interaction with Cabrera. He also notes repeatedly that they were

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>never directed to try to separate Petro Ecuador's responsibilities from Texico's,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>which became Chevron's, and that they were instructed by Donziger

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to use a contamination standard that would increase the cost

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of remediation. The focus is specifically on Damage's claims and

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>whether there was evidence to back them up, and Beltman

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>never does say anything like there was no contamination. It's

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>more about who's responsible financially for the contamination, not whether

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>or not it exists, or even whether or not Texico

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had a hand in it.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 4>They convinced that firm or forced that firm, in my opinion,

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 4>to switch sides and turn against the Ecuadorian plaintifs who

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 4>were their clients.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Gomez and little Page made this argument in court as well,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but Kaplan wasn't having it. We asked Donziger about Beltman's

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>recantation too, because he looms large in it as the

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>person directing Beltman's work.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 8>Douglas Beltman. That just makes me weep and hurt. Doug

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 8>was one of our scientific experts, a wonderful man of

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 8>high integrity and intelligence and skill. And Chevron just I

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 8>think they just destroyed his life. I mean, they named

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 8>his company as a defendant in the Rico case. They

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 8>got a law firm, and they countersued chevn N for

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 8>defamation and tortious interference with their business and in the

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 8>end of the day to settle the case as between

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 8>the consultancy, which was called Stratus, Beltman and another scientist

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 8>there named Anne Mace, and Chevron, Stratus came to an

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 8>agreement that required Beltman and Mace to put in affidavits

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 8>that contained a ton of false information. Telling LYE Beltman

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 8>never came to testify. And the sad part is, I

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 8>think when Doug wrote that affidavit, you know, with all

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 8>this distorted or false information, I think he thought that

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 8>would be the end of his problem. But what ended

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 8>up happening is right after he submitted it, his partners

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 8>fired him anyway, and he hasn't been heard from since.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 8>So I don't know what happened to him, and I'm scared. Honestly,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 8>He's another one of Chevron's victims, and you know, I

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 8>worry about him. I think about him a lot. Actually,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 8>I have no idea where he is.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>My co reporter on this season, Karen Savage found Doug Beltman.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He's retired now and can't talk publicly about the case

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>because he signed various agreements with Chevron that prohibit it.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>He said he wished he could talk to us, but

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't, and he sounded pretty scared to attract any

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>attention from Chevron. Julio Gomez, the lawyer for the Ecuadorian plaintiffs,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>said he also heard from lawyers at some of the

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>firms working on the case that Chevron was calling their

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>other clients applying pressure to Joe Cohne, a prominent lawyer

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who had helped to fund the Lago Augdio litigation, was

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>another partner who testified against Donziger.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so one of the things that I saw is

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 9>a guy named Joseph Cohne, Yeah, testified against you, said

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 9>you obtained millions of dollars in litigation funding and didn't

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 9>keep him in the loop basically and misrepresented what was

0:20:59.560 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 9>going on.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Tell us more about that.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 8>Joe Cone is a prominent lawyer in Philly. His law

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 8>firm funded most of the case. They funded my work

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 8>on the case. For the most part, we worked well together.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 8>He's a good, solid lawyer. When Chevron started to make

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 8>these allegations that the Cabrera report was done wrongly or fraudulently,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 8>and then they filed the Rico case, Joe got extremely nervous.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 8>I think he was petrified that the Rico litigation would

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 8>name him as a defendant and he would be you know,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 8>that time, they were suing us for sixty billion dollars,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 8>largest potential liability in US history, And I think he

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 8>thought his life was going to be destroyed and he

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 8>was going to be bankrupted, and his firm was going

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 8>to be closed down by a liability that might come

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 8>out of this fake Rico case. So I think out

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 8>of that fear, Joe started to cooperate with Chevron. I mean,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 8>it's really no different in my mind than what a

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of people did to get out from under the

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 8>pressure that Chevron and Judge Kapel were putting on them.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 8>Other law firms who are working with US did this

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 8>as well, but many others stayed in there. I mean,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't want people to think that people just abandoned

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 8>the case, but there were certain individuals, Joe Cone among them,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 8>who basically abandoned their duties to the case and to

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 8>the people of Ecuador into their own integrity in my view,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 8>to get Chevron off their back.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The people who could have easily abandoned Donziger and didn't

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>were the Ecuadorians. The US courts really had no jurisdiction

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>over them. That's true in general, but in this case

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular. Keep in mind that Chevron had argued itself

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about a decade ago that the New York courts had

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>no jurisdiction over what had happened in Ecuador. Here's their attorney,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>who you'll Gomez again.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Looking back to take the position that this case cannot

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 4>return to New York at all, and that the defend

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 4>that the Ecuadorian plaintiffs should simply default entirely and not

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 4>do absolutely anything and completely protest the return of this

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 4>case to New York. If I had it to do

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 4>over again, that's probably the card that I would play.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 4>It would have been better for the Ecuadorian plaintiffs to

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 4>be able to say in other countries, as a matter

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 4>of principle, we should not have been required to present

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 4>any evidence in New York after New York had already

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 4>told us to go home, and to bring us back

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to do anything is completely illegitimate and completely wrong, and

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 4>we will not.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Participate in it.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 4>I think if I had it to do over, I

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 4>would advise my client to do that, to completely protest

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 4>the trial. And and that's it. And unfortunately Stephen didn't

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 4>have that option because Stephen lives in New York and

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 4>he's subject to the jurisdiction of the court and he

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>has to defend the case. But my clients did have

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 4>that option, and that was not a card we chose

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 4>to play.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>According to Donziger's lawyer in the Rico case, the Little Page,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Judge Kaplan focused on two key issues in the case,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cabrera report and the allegation that the judgment itself

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>had been ghostwritten.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 5>It was very clear Judge Kaplin was really focused on

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 5>the bribery, and so a lot of a lot of

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 5>the stuff that had happened in the underlying case, and

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the disquiet that the tribesmen had about

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 5>the way Chevron had handled the case and some of

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 5>the sort of dirty tricks Chevron had played in Ecuador

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 5>with the underlying case was not allowed into evidence. We

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 5>were not allowed to explore any of those prior issues.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 5>And Judge Caplin's ruling was it was just wasn't relevant.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 5>He was really focused on some very specific incidents and

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 5>that's all he wanted to talk about, and he would

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 5>not allow any evidence of anything else. The other thing

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 5>that Judge Kaplan was really sort of focused on, was

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 5>had the plaintiff's team cross the line with that court

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 5>expert and been sort of too interfering, helped him actually

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 5>create his report, helped him put together the exhibits to

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 5>his report, none of which is prohibited under Ecuador law.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We've covered the Cabrera report at length, but the bribery

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 1>little pages referring to there brings us back to the

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Gerra story. We heard last time from Chevron's attorney Randy

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Mastro that Ghera had been part of the conspiracy with

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Donziger and the Ecuadorians and then flipped on the Lago

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Agrio plaintiffs testifying against them. Here's Mastro again.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 7>There were actually multiple witnesses in Ecuador and in the

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 7>United States who'd been working with the plaintiffs team who

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 7>flipped during the case. I'm a former federal prosecutor and

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 7>I don't use that term lightly. They were part of

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 7>the conspiracy, or they refused to be a part of

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 7>the conspiracy, and they later gave testimony against Donziger and

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 7>his allies about the conspiracy that they were perpetrating.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 6>Alpert Toquera wasn't.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 7>The only one, and he gave very powerful testimony at

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 7>the trial, and he ended its testimony by saying, I

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 7>know I did bad things. In words or substance, he said,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 7>I know I did bad things. I regret that I

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 7>did bad things, but I'm telling the truth today.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But Gara's testimony changed in a couple of instances, and

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the story took some wild turns. We asked Little Page

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to walk us through it.

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, it was shocking, you know, we knew coming in

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 5>that Chevron had gone and recruited and paid cash in

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 5>a Duffel bag to a judge who had been essentially

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 5>disbarred in Ecuador for corruption and fraud. And you know,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 5>as an American lawyer, I just assumed that that sort

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 5>of what sounded like a story like a movie plot

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 5>would completely laughed out of an American courtroom. That we

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 5>would have a key witness in a trial be someone

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 5>that Chevron had paid close to a million dollars too

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 5>in either money or compensation or you know, they bought

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 5>him a house, they gave him a job, they bought

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 5>him cars, they paid his flights for him and his

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 5>family to move out of Ecuador, they paid for the

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 5>immigration lawyer to bring him here. They you know, and

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 5>it all started with Chevron showing up to a sketchy

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 5>meeting with this former disbarred judge with a duffel bag

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 5>full of cash, and the idea that what this judge

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 5>would say would hold any weight in an American courtroom

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 5>was laughable. When I got first got involved, I mean,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 5>I thought, okay, this is a joke, right, I mean,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 5>we are not allowed to play to pay fact witnesses.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 5>That's the rules. You cannot pay a fact witness just

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 5>for this reason, because we're not supposed to influence the

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>facts of a case. And yet Chevron had paid a

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 5>fact witness and not just paid him fifteen thousand dollars

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 5>in a duffel bag the first time they met, but

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 5>then paid him another ten thousand, and then would.

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Give him bonuses of cash. If he came forward with

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 3>more and more.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Supposed facts that he had just remembered, he would get

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 5>a bull everything he had just remembered.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 3>So that was an incredible concept.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Gumez was also blown away by this.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Given what Gara was allowed to testify about, and given

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the court chose to believe some aspects

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 4>of his testimony and disregard other aspects of his testimony.

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that another witness would have made the

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 4>difference if the court's willing to cherry pick testimony like that,

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the court had reasons to do it,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 4>and the court has every prerogative to do it. Judges

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 4>do that all the time. What Judge Kaplin did about

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 4>deciding to believe some of Gara, some of what Garat

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 4>said and what some of what Gara did not happens

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 4>all the time in court. I particularly don't think it

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 4>should have happened here, given you know that he was

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 4>getting paid twelve thousand dollars a month. But you know

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>that's my opinion.

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Little Page says it was clear from investigations of Gara

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and his leader testimony that he was regularly adding more

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed evidence to his story to get more money out

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of Chevron. Transcripts of his testimony back this up.

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 5>The first time he met with Chevron, Judge Ghara had,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 5>first of all, with every conversation with Chevron, it was

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 5>always about how much money Gara could get, always, so

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 5>every conversation, and they were recording these conversations, we were

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 5>actually able to see them. You could see in his

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 5>conversations that he was every single time. It was how

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 5>much am I going to get? But just listen to

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 5>the evolution of the story. I mean the first time

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 5>he met, the first time he sort of concocted this

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 5>story of bribery.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 3>He said very specific facts.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 5>He said he met Judge Sembrano at the Keito airport,

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 5>because Judge Ghara lived in Quito, not in the Frontira,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 5>not where the actual case was happening. So he said

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Sombrano had been at the Keto airport. He went to

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 5>the Quito airport. Judge Sombrano handed him the draft verdict

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 5>on a flash drive, and his understanding was this flash

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 5>drive was coming from the plaintiffs lawyers, from Stephen Donzinger

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 5>and the other Ecuadorian lawyers. He took that flash drive

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 5>home to his house in Quito, where he put it

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 5>into his home computer. He never spoke to Judge Sombrano

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 5>at all that whole weekend, and he retyped the verdict

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 5>so it would sound like an Ecuadorian judge had written it.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 5>He put it back on the jump drive. He went

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 5>back to the airport and he handed it to Judge Sombranno. Okay,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 5>so a very specific recollection well, Chevron then said, great,

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 5>we'll pay you to come and buy your ten year

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 5>old computer from your house, and we will find the

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 5>draft verdict on there because you worked on it and

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 5>you saved it back to this jump drive and it's

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 5>going to be there and that's going to be our proof.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>And of course he sold off his.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 5>Multi year old computer to them and they put a

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 5>forensic team on it, and there was absolutely no evidence

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 5>of the verdict being on Judge Gara's home computer none.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 5>So then they bought from him every jump drive he

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 5>could find, every jump drive in his house, and they

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 5>found no evidence of the verdict.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>So when they came back to him and said, you know, look,

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of disappointing.

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 5>We don't have any support for what you've been telling us,

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 5>he said, oh no, now I remember, ah, I went

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 5>by bus all the way to Lago Agrim. I actually,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 5>now remember I got on a bus and I drove

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 5>hour after hour after hour all the way to Lago Agriam.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 5>When I got there, I went to Judge Sombrano's apartment

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 5>and I stayed with.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Him over the weekend.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Now, the first story said he never sold so Brono

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 5>over the weekend here now he's staying at Judge Sombrano's house.

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 5>He worked on it on a laptop that Judge Sombrano

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 5>gave him that he believed belonged to one of the

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Ecuadorian plain his lawyers, and that's why he couldn't produce it.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Because it wasn't his, it belonged to someone else. He

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't put it on a jump drive. He worked on

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>it on the computer. He left it on the computer.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 5>He had dinner together with Judge Sombrano in the evenings,

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 5>and that's how.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 3>The verdict came about.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, those stories are so completely different that

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 5>that witness under any rule of law would have zero credibility,

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean just zero credibility. And even more amazing, there

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 5>had been an article in the Quito newspaper about a

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 5>judge being busted for having a plaintive's lawyer give him

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 5>a proposed verdict on a jump drive that he then

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 5>put into his computer, changed a couple of the words

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 5>and printed it anditied it.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 3>As his own. And the jump drive had been found.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 5>So here we have a man that we know right

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 5>in the news about verdicts on jump drives came to

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Chevron with a story about working on this verdict on

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 5>a jump drive that Judge Sombrano gave him at the

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 5>airport in Quito, and when he could support none of that,

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 5>he made up a whole new story about traveling by

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 5>bus across the country into the Frontierra to Lago Agria

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 5>to live at Judge Sombrano's house while he typed up

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 5>this verdict on a different computer.

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Completely. So it was so comical.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when I first got into the case, Rick

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Friedman had asked me if I would handle Judge Ghira,

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 5>the cross examination of Judge Gehra and that sort of

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 5>whole timeline. And when I started reading it and I saw,

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, Chevron was recording their conversations with Judge Gira,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 5>and he would say things like how much gold do

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 5>you have for me?

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 3>The best story brings the best gold.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Just incredible things on these tapes, and I thought, okay,

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 5>this is a right. I mean, no American court would

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 5>allow this person to even come testify. I mean, they

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 5>are the epitome of perjuring witness. And then the amount

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 5>of money that had been paid to this fact witness

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 5>was so absurd, and yet none of that counted.

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It's true. Ultimately none of it counted. Judge Kaplan ruled

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>against Donzenger and the Ecuadorians throughout the case and eventually

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>did find them guilty of fraud. His ruling barred them

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>from collecting the Ecuadorian judgment in the US. That verdict

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>came down in twenty fourteen. But that wasn't the end

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of this story either. Next time on Drilled.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 10>And Gerta and Carmen gave kind of like a warning

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 10>about what they had gone through. You know that it's

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 10>like to come to pass once again now that this

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 10>RICO precedent has been set, And indeed that's what happened.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 10>Energy Chancer Partners put that case against Greenpeace, against stand

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 10>dot Earth, against several water protectors, and we can see

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 10>so many many cases in which RICO law has morphed

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 10>from its original intention of targeting the mafia and white

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 10>collar criminals to silencing protests to chin to quel particular

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 10>forms of political organizing.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Drilled is an original production of the Critical Frequency podcast Network.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>The show was created, reported, and written by me Amy Westervelt.

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>My co reporter this season is Karen Savage. Our editor

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is Julia Ritchie. The show's editorial consultant is Rika Murphy.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Mixing and mastering by Mark Bush, original score by b Beeman,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>fact checking by Dan Yan. Our artwork for this season

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was done by the super talented Matt Fleming. Special thanks

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to Trevor Gowan and Emily Gertz. If you are a

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Patreon subscriber, thank you. Your money is helping to make

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this season, and as a special thank you to Patreon members,

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we're providing a variety of benefits, including bonus content and

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>early access to episodes in this season. If that sounds

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>appealing to you, or you just want to support our work,

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>go over to patreon dot com, slash drilled and sign up.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>We also have some merch associated with that. You can

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>find stories, documents, and photos related to this season on

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>our website at drillednews dot com. That's it for this time,

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and we'll see you next week.