WEBVTT - The Thing Before the Beginning, part 3

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>My name is Robert Lamb and I am Joe McCormick.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 3>And today we're coming back to revisit a series that

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>we started a few weeks ago. We ended up going

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>off and doing some other stuff in the meantime, but

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 3>today we're coming back. This series was called The Thing

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Before the Beginning.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>That's right, what existed before the creation or emergence of

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 2>the universe of reality itself. It's a big one. So

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the reasons we figured, Hey, even

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>after a couple of weeks, folks are still going to

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>be interested in this. Lord knows we are.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Sorry. If I was just looking around all over the place,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I realized we started recording without me popping rob out

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>into the little window that I put you in. Folks

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>at home, I don't know if you know that we

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>have to arrange things on our screens just right and

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>just so. I was just messing around with that. Okay, Now,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>everything's where it should be there.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>You have two screens, though, right.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I do, but I only look at one while I'm recording.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, I mean if I look at the other one,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be really weird. I'm like down here.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess I technically have two screens because there's

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>also the little camera screen.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>But that's just me.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to look at that. Yeah.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I'm looking at you up here. I got

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>my notes here, so I think we're all good now.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, anyway, so we are talking about what existed

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>before the creation event in creation stories. Now, this might

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>seem like a paradoxical question, because like, how can there

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>be something before the creation of the world, But it's

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>really not paradoxical, because, as we talked about in the

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 3>last couple of episodes, most creation narratives actually do not

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 3>describe a universe being brought into existence from a state

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 3>of total nothingness. Instead, most creation stories describe the beginning

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>as some kind of ordering or transformation of a previously

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>existing state of affairs into a stage of some sort

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>where the history of the gods or of human beings

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>can take place. So in the first episode, we talked

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>about the Chinese story of Pengu, the ancient coiled one,

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 3>who emerges inside a cosmic egg from a formless, misty

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>primordial state known as the Wuji pengu is often described

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 3>as a hairy giant who manages to separate the essences

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of yin from yang and pushes or holds the sky

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>up from the earth. We also talked about the biblical

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 3>creation story in Genesis chapter one, which is interesting for

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of reasons. For one thing, it is commonly

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>misunderstood as a creation ex nihilo, a creation of the

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>world from nothing, when actually scholars now pretty much agree

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 3>that it is a story of a God bringing order

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 3>and furnishings into a pre existing world. That pre existing

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>world is described as one of dark, deep cosmic waters.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>We also talked about the Babylonian epic of creation, the

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Inuma a leash, which you could think of as having

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>two different creation events and thus two different states before creation.

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>So the first is a time when the sky above

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 3>and the earth below were without names, implying a very

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting kind of spiritual non existence by virtue of the

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>fact that they are not acknowledged in language. And so

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>you have that you have the essences of fresh water

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>and salt water, which are named beings known as apsu

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and tiamot, respectively. These essences are mixed and swirling and

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>This mixing gives rise to a sort of first creation

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and the issue of the first generations of gods and

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>goddesses from the mingled waters. Then you've got a second

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 3>creation event, that is the creation by combat story, where

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 3>the younger god Marduke wages war against the saltwater goddess

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Tiamot and against her monsters, and then fashions the heavens

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>and the earth out of the dead body of his enemy.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>In the second episode, we talked about an interesting creation

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 3>account from Maori traditions, in which the pre creation state

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>is this tight loving embrace between the skyfather Rungi and

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the earth mother Papa, and we talked about how the

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>act of ordering emerges when their children, who are crushed

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>between them, pushed them apart so that they can have

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>space and so that light can be let in. This one,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I thought was really notable because it describes the pre

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 3>creation state in human relational terms, so not like dark

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>waters or a great void of welter and waste, but

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>an eternal gesture of love which has to be broken

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>before history can happen. We also talked about the Aztec

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>creation account known as the Legend of the Five Sons.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>This one is interesting in that it posits before the

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 3>creation of this world, there was another world, similar in

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>some ways but very different in others. And then before

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 3>that there was another world, and going back, five ages

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 3>characterized by five different suns. And so there's a cycle

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of creation and destruction and creation anew in this account.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And we're back today to talk about more.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, what do we have up for us

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>first here? Ja?

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, one that I wanted to talk about because I

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 3>thought it was interesting and because it's so different from

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the stories we've talked about so far, is an account

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of the ordering of the world and commentary on the

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>mysteries of the previous state in the creation hymn of

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the rig Veda. So, the rig Veda is a large

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 3>collection of early Sanskrit hymns, considered the most ancient surviving

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Vedic text, making it foundational to the later development of Hinduism.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I've seen different dates proposed for the origin of the Rigveda.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 3>My Oxford Companion to World Mythology suggests that at least

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 3>some of the hymns go back to between seventeen hundred

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 3>and two thousand BCE. Other sources say more like fifteen

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred to twelve hundred BCE, and these are texts that

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 3>would have been propagated through systems of memorization and oral

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 3>transmission long before they were actually written down. They're thought

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 3>to have emerged from the northwestern Indian subcontinent, sort of

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 3>around the region of Punjab, and the hymns of the

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Rigveda are organized into ten circles or mandolas, which you

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>can think of like individual volumes or long chapters. So

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 3>interesting thing about creation within the Rigveda. Broadly, multiple hymns

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>of the Rigveda make reference to the creation of the world,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and thus this corpus actually gives multiple very different accounts

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>of creation. Some indicate a creation through combat, kind of

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 3>like we see in the Inuma a Leash, but with

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>very different details. Other stories tell about a separation of

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the sky from the earth, like we see in the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Chinese story of Pengu or in the Maori creation story.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Others make suggestions about acts of sacrifice as the origin

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>of the world and of human beings. And I think

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>this multiplicity of different creation stories within the same corpus

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 3>in itself has interesting implications for how believers in the

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>rig Veda as a sacred text would thus start to

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>think about creation in a religious context. If you have

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>multiple totally different stories all coming from this authoritative religious text, Like,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>how does that affect the way you think about you know,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the text itself and about the creation. Maybe we can

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>come back to that in a minute. But the one

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>hymn that I wanted to look at in particular from

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the Rigveda is known as the Creation hymn or the

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Nasadia Sukta, which is ordered as hymn number one twenty

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>nine in the tenth Mandola. Now a note about translations here.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 3>The Rigveda is famously difficult to translate, rob, I bet

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you've read about this before, Like, its original language is

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>full of spiritually intellectually freighted words and phrases that have

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>all these secondary meanings and ambiguities. Also, it is an

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>archaic text, so some meanings are difficult to reach across history.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Translations tend to be crowded with footnotes trying to explain

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>complexities that can't really be captured in a straight translation

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 3>of the text itself. So I cannot do justice to

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 3>all of that or compare a bunch of different translations

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 3>in the time we have here, So please just take

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 3>this section with the caveat that basically all translations of

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the rig Veda are going to be compromises in some

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>way that fail to get at some aspects of the original.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 3>And you could say this is true of all ancient texts,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>but it seems to be especially true of the of

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 3>the Vedas in general and of the rig Veda.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in general, we are never the intended readers of

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a text like this.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So with that caveat, the main translation I'm going

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>to refer to here is the one in the Penguin

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Classics edition by the scholar Wendy Donager of the University

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 3>of Chicago. So the creation Him begins like this, There

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 3>was neither non existence nor existence. Then there was neither

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the realm of space nor the sky, which is beyond

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 3>what stirred? Where in whose protection? Was there water bottomlessly deep?

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 3>And just a note on the line in there what's

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 3>stirred and the part what's stirred? Where in whose protection?

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Donager as a footnote saying that this verb stirred here

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>is often used to describe the motion of breath, which

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>itself brings in a new ambiguity that I like, because

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I wonder does that mean stirring as in breath falling

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 3>upon something and moving it, or stirring as in breathing

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 3>in itself.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That's a great point because as a modern reader

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>reading this translation, I think stirred within this context, I

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 2>think something stirring within the depths.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe depending on how you interpret interpret the breath, you

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>can maybe get halfway there. But yeah, fascinating.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So this is the first verse of this creation hymn,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 3>and I'd love that it begins with not with a

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>statement of what happened at the beginning. It begins with

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 3>a statement of negation and paradox Like it says there

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 3>was neither non existence nor existence, which is I think

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 3>intentionally provocative and paradoxical because that's like violating the law

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of excluded middle. It's saying there was neither a nor

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>not ah. And then it also begins so it's got

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 3>the the negation in paradox, and then it's got questions.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Instead of saying telling you what stirred, it says what stirred?

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Where in whose protection? Was their water? Not there was water,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 3>but was their water? Was it bottomlessly deep?

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Almost makes me think of the poetry of Blake

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know what immortal hand or eye you know,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And by asking these questions, you know, it makes the

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 2>answer more ambiguous and more majestic.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think, like Blake. From what I've read, a

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>major purpose of this hymn is it is often interpreted

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>as meaning to provoke wonder. But anyway it goes on.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>There's a second verse that says there was neither death

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 3>nor immortality. Then again a kind of paradox, neither death

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 3>nor immortality. Then there was no distinguishing sign of night

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 3>nor of day that one breathed. And this phrase that one.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>In other translations, I've seen it rendered as something like

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 3>that one thing, so you could think of it maybe

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>like that. But Donnagier here has it as that one

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>that one breathed, windless by its own impulse. Other than

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 3>that there was nothing beyond darkness, was hidden by darkness

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 3>in the beginning, with no distinguishing sign. All this was water,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 3>the life force that was covered with emptiness. That one

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>arose through the power of heat. Desire came upon that

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 3>one in the beginning. That was the first seed of mind.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Poets seeking in their heart with wisdom found the bond

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 3>of existence in non existence. Their cord was ended across

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>was there below? Was there above? There were seed placers,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 3>there were powers, there was impulse beneath, there was giving

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 3>forth above? Who really knows? Who will hear proclaim it?

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? The gods

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 3>came afterwards with the creation of this universe? Who then

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 3>knows whence it has arisen? So I like that point there, though.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, gods often play a role in the creation

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>of the world in stories, you know, within the Vedas

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and in other traditions. But here it's saying the gods

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 3>came later with the creation of the universe, So what

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>brought this earlier state into being? And then finally, the

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 3>last verse is whence this creation has arisen? Perhaps it

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>formed itself, or perhaps it did not. The one who

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>looks down on it in the highest heaven only he knows,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:00.359
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps he does not know. Hm nice I thought this.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>This is such an interesting contrast to many of the

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>other stories we've seen so far, and again, like the

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Rigveda does not lack references to more traditional creation stories

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 3>like we talked about, But here, rather than telling a

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 3>story like this happened to bring the world into existence?

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:26.359
<v Speaker 3>This creation narrative is at its heart questions and expressions

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>of skepticism, encouraging the reader or the listener, the person

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>engaging with this hymn, to have questions and doubts of

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>their own and to kind of think about what it

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>means for things to exist. I do like that. One

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 3>of the few things that it seems to posit sort

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of confidently or definitively is something about there being a

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>mind principle at the beginning of things, though not attributing

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>it to any particular person. Like it's talking about desire

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 3>coming upon this unnamed one, that one at the beginning

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>had some kind of desire, and this was the first

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>seed of mind, and this seems to be a power

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 3>that gives rise to other things. But then it's never

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 3>described in explicit like creative terms. It doesn't go from

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>there to saying, therefore God created X, Y, and Z.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting how when you think of a creation myth

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>in which everything is described in statements, it is inevitably

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>going to produce questions in the mind of the reader

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>or the listener. Here we're establishing it via questions, which

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in a way kind of creates an ambiguous certainty if

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense in the mind of the reader or

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the listener, you know, like it's not like, do the

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>questions have formed the mental image, rather than us being

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>given a mental image, than then we have questions.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 3>About Yeah, that's true. That there's almost there's a way

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 3>in which you can have more confidence in a mystery,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 3>because if you're given a story and told to believe it,

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>then naturally one must have doubts. But if instead you

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>are you are posed a question and told it is

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>a mystery, I mean, how can you argue with that?

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, yeah. If you definitively say well, this individual was, say,

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the son of the gods, the son of this god

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 2>or that goddess, then well then you got to describe

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>how that happened and what were the ramifications of that,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and what was the why of that. But if it's

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>just no one knows who this individual was, what was

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>their origin? Were they the child of a god? Were

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>they a mortal who became to halfway divine? You know,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 2>if you ask it in that sense, it's like, oh, yeah,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>nobody knows. Maybe it's all those things at once superposition.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I love the last statement too, where it's saying, uh,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, nobody really knows the answer to this mystery.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>What what create? What caused creation to arise? What brought

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the world into existence from this state of Again, I

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 3>love how it's saying before that it's not nothingness. The

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>pre creation state here is not nothingness. It is neither

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 3>existence nor non existence, which is somehow less than nothingness.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 3>It is a contradiction in terms. Yeah, but oh but anyway, Yeah,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 3>I only did the second half. I only did the

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>first half of that statement because I got interested in that. So, yeah,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 3>it begins with this logical contradiction or this neither existence

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 3>nor non existence. When existence comes, what brings it into existence?

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>We get this claim that well maybe it is only

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the one in the highest heaven who knows, but maybe

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 3>he does not know.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 2>And then they go on to write, if you know,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>write it down and send it to the following address.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, I really like this him and I think

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a really interesting contrast to the things we've

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about before in multiple ways, Like I love the questions,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the role of questions in establishing the pre creation state

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 3>and the act of creation, the the implicit and explicit

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 3>encouraging of of questions in the mind of the listener,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the raising of doubts, and the closest thing that it

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>really gets to describing the pre creation state is the

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 3>use of logical contradictions and paradoxes.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, which which kind of situates is a

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 2>thing outside of reason, outside of our our even our

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>ability to understand it. I love this. All right. Well, let's, uh, Lena,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 2>let's return briefly, at least to Egyptian mythology. You know,

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>we we've discussed Egyptian mythology multiple times on the show before,

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 2>and we may have I think we alluded to it

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>in passing in the previous and stuff elements of the

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>thing before the beginning, just pointing out that, well, you know, this,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>this line of thought, or this particular mythology, it has

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 2>some parallels in Egyptian pod and all. So I want

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to bring up a specific Egyptian creation myth here. And

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in bringing this up, we're going to end up touching

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>on a couple of pre creation ideas that we've already

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>discussed in other examples. One, of course, is common to

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 2>so many different religions, and that is the idea of

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>primordial waters.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Water is big, big, in the pre creation space. A

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of people are thinking about water there exactly.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And then the second idea is that that the

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 2>pre creation state is a thing that also continues to

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>exist either within its own pocket dimension or beyond the

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>boundaries of creation, and maybe at least by certain individuals

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and certainly divine individuals can still be reached and interacted with.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 3>That is really interesting. Yeah. That so that the pre

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 3>creation world is not just something that exists in the past.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 3>It was what the world was once like and has

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 3>now been totally transformed. You could imagine the world we

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>live in as maybe a subset of reality that has

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 3>been transformed into the world we know, but that somewhere

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 3>else there is the world that was before and it's

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>still like that.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And you know, part of this is certainly

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>as we'll get into with the we've discussed this before.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>How with the ancient Egyptians, a lot of their belief system,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>it is, is informed by the importance of the nile.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 2>It is it is shaped by the movement of water,

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and so in one on one level, there is the

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>idea that water is flowing from a source to a destination,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and then there are these you know, we have this

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>periodic surges in floods, and that's going to have both

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 2>destructive and creative ramifications. But you can easily imagine like, okay,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 2>we have all this water, This water is important, it

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>must come from somewhere. And what is water like when

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not doing anything? It is stagnant, it's still, it's dark.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>And so we get into similar ideas here. So, as

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 2>we've of course discussed in the show, you can't just

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about Egyptian ancient Egyptian mythology as if it's a

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>single codified thing. Rather, we're dealing with an array of

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 2>beliefs and traditions that exist across time and across different

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>parts of Egypt over the course of many thousands of years.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>So there are actually multiple creation myths. But worth discussing

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>for our purposes here especially is that of none or

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>noun or none. It's sometimes spelled in English as noun

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 2>like a noun or nune like a holy sister of

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the cloth. And this is the personification of the prime

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 2>evil ocean. So the prime evolution in Egyptian mythology consisted

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of the waters of chaos, a kind of vast stagnant potentiality,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the prime evil matter here was dark, moist, boundaryless. And

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>these attributes are embodied in a group of primordial deities,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>all the Ogdode of Hermopolis. The exact makeup of this

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>group varies from one telling or tradition to the next,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>but it generally consists of eight deities consisting of four

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 2>male and female counterparts representing about four qualities of the

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 2>primeval waters. So the lineup is kind of like the Avengers.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>It's going to vary, but you know, but in this case,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>all the different lineups of the Ogdode are going to

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>include none. None is often included in this kind of

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>frog headed form, and he's included alongside his female counterpart nonet.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And according to Geraldine Pinch in Egyptian Mythology, in one

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of my main books that I look to for this

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing, quote obeying some primitive instinct unquote, the

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Ogdode comes together to form the Primeval Mound. This is

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the first emergence of land from the prime evil ocean,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and this would serve as the center of the un

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>universe and the place where subsequent creation happens. Think of

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>it as like base camp for all creation, and it

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>remains a place of continuous creation and renewal.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so in one literal sense, you can think about

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 3>this because it's easier to do things on land if

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you just think about human organizational activities, you know, ordering,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>it's easier to take place on land. You can build stuff,

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you can sort things. But also I think it's important

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 3>to think about the raising of the land from the

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 3>primordial waters as an act of separation. You are making

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>a distinction between two places or two types of things.

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>And like so many of these creation myths, somehow they

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 3>focus on an act of separation or distinction drawing, like

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 3>you take a previously undifferentiated place or substance and you

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>separate it into two different things, and then you have

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the beginnings of order.

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you see that with the octode here as well,

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 2>because it's like they are all they all kind of

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>seem to emerge out of descriptions. They're almost like linguistic

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 2>attributes of the primeval waters. So they are like they're

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the the the hashtags, they're the they're

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the word cloud for the the primeval matter. And then

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they become personifications of that and separated into male and

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 2>female energies. So the prime evil Waters of none, embodied

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>again by the god and goddess None and None that

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 2>they continue to exist. This continues to exist, these waters

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>both above the stars and beyond the boundaries of creation,

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>feeding the life giving waters of the rivers and the ocean.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>So here we get back to what I mentioned earlier,

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea of like the river being all important. Where

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>does the water come from? Well, the water has its

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>source in this stagnant potentiality. Now I'm going to keep

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>referring to the entity as none, but again it also

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 2>exists in the feminine as none, and Pinch refers to

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 2>the entity as an it the oldest of beings, the

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>father of the gods, but also something with an eternal

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>potential to create life, a demi urge and quote a

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of instinctive movement towards consciousness. But again within this,

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>within this context here it is also a place that

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 2>may be returned to and has a like a has

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of renewing energy. And here's an example of it.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>We've discussed the god Ra or Ray, the Egyptian god

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 2>of the sun, and how during the day he's piloting

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the sun barge across the sky. It's a movement of

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the Sun and then in the evening what happens goes

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>down into the underworld and traverses the underworld. But there's

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>something else that happens down there as well. He also

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>undergoes regeneration in the nun so And this is interesting

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 2>because again None is both the water and also the

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 2>personification of the waters. And in some ancient Egyptian iconography

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 2>you will see None pictured as a giant, like a

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 2>like a male giant raising the sun barge, the solar

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 2>barge out of the waters above his head like bench

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>pressing it back up and and and therefore playing a

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 2>vital role in just continual you know, nightly renewal of

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the energy of the Sun and of the Sun God.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Very interesting that this implies, at least in a metaphorical

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 3>sense of belief in the constant returning to the pre

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 3>creation state, like every night there is some kind of

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 3>recommunion with what the world was like before it was created. Yeah.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because as we've talked about before, like the voyage

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of the sun barge is one in which there are

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>enemies there they have to be fought off like it's

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 2>it's it is a it is a cycle that is perpetual,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>but not all the way guaranteed. And you know, certain

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>things have to be observed in this world and in

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>other worlds for this to continue.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right. I mean a big part of Egyptian religious

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 3>ritual was humans engaging in rituals that were designed to

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>help the sun, the god raw and the sun barge

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 3>on its journey through the underworld. So like we have

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to do rituals to help the god make the journey

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 3>and make sure that he succeeds.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, And so in all this all creation is

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>realized in the nun as well. And also there's this

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 2>other little tidbit that pinch mentions that, and that is

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that in some tellings, the world will end one day

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 2>when the creator and slash creators, you know, the creative

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 2>almost you can think of it less in terms of

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a creator entity, but sort of like the creative movement

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 2>returns to the nun. So in a sense, again, if

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>we come back to the idea of a great expansion,

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>we kind of get into the idea of a great

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>collapse that one day everything will just return to primordial,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>stagnant potentiality, and then maybe it will come out again.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll get the same pattern throughout history.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 3>If only we could get this exact same pattern again,

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't that be great?

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe the next one will be better, right, hopefully.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 2>It is kind of like the Aztec model, where each

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 2>new draft is an improvement. Uh. You know, you don't

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 2>want you you don't want your sixth draft to be

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>worse than your fifth. Maybe there shouldn't have been a

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>fifth draft. Maybe fifth should have been final, that sort

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of thing. All right, So obviously this is this is

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a case. And like most like all these examples we've

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>been discussing, these are cases where you're you're dealing with

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 2>generally the ancient world. You're dealing with ancient peoples asking,

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, deep complex questions about the nature of reality

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and their place in reality, you know, informed by their

0:28:54.840 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 2>observations of the world, deep human contemplation. Uh. And and

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>also other religious influences of the time, either something that

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>was practiced in their own culture or has been brought

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>in from another culture. But I think it would be

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>an interesting exercise here to look at a few recent

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 2>religious movements, new religious movements to consider what happens when

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you throw in some modern influences, especially the idea that

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 2>these would be religious movements that emerge during the scientific age.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>That's not to say that these are necessarily science informed religions,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>but they are at least culturally informed by a world

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that is shaped by science as well as science fiction.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I would say that a lot of recently formed religions,

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 3>in my view, they partake of the esthetics of science.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>They don't make necessarily functional use of science, but there

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>is a sort of poetry or the language of science

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>that they try to incorporate rate into their beliefs.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and at the same time they may do the

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>same with ancient religion as well. I mean, we see

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>this in esoteric thought and in mysticism all the time,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 2>where you're also drawing on these ancient practices and you know,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>depending on how you're doing it, who's doing it, and

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 2>so forth, and as well as intention, you know, they

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 2>might be rather accurate. You might be you know, bringing

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>in some of these concepts and actually slightly reworking them

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 2>in a way where they function better for certain populations

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>of the modern world while still retaining their value. Or

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it could be entirely superficial, you know, where you're just

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 2>taking the dressings of something ancient and using it to

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sell something new. I mean, it's going to run the

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>gamut of possibility here.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of reasons to bring in things

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 3>that are ancient, but one of them is that antiquity

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>brings implied authority. When you say something is very old,

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>people are like, oh, well that's something I should pay attention.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>To, which, of course is an interesting scenario to consider

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>it with a new religious movement something, you know, where

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>somebody's come along and they're like, this is this is

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the new path, this is the way, and they're going

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to lean on maybe some ancient and some sort of

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>ancient knowledge one way or another in order to prop

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>it up. And that is not to not to not

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to you know, disparage this idea, because of course we

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>look at any of these ancient religions, all of these

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>were new religions at one point. You know, none of

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>these actually like predates the first humans who advanced them.

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, again, they may be influenced by earlier models

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and and always were, but yeah, any ancient religion was

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 2>once a new religious movement. We just continue to do this.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>This is a continual human practice. Either you're going to

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 2>reach the point and it makes sense too the world changes,

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>culture changes, you either have to continually create new drafts

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of a particular religion, or you have to change ourselves

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to match an old model of religion, or you come

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 2>up with something to some extent entirely new.

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I've ever put it in these

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 3>terms before, but I just had the thought, I wonder

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 3>if a lot of the venerable and respectable seeming aspects

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>of older religions are actually things that traditions mature into

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 3>the results of things existing for a long time and

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 3>evolving and maturing. That would kind of run counter to

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>an intuition that a lot of people have that things

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>begin pure and then devolve from there. I wonder if

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 3>some religions actually gain a lot of respectability over time

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 3>as they sort of evolve and grow.

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean certainly they're you know, we could

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 2>we could easily get into the nuances and the history

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 2>of various new religions, where you know, early on, there

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of places where you can misstep, certainly

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're in an area where everything isn't completely codified

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and is highly controlled by you know, one or two individuals.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 3>That sort of thing.

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But then again, there are counterexamples of that as well.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>So for our purposes here, I don't want to get

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>two into the weeds. This is all fascinating, but I

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 2>want to try and focus mostly on the idea of

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>pre creation in some of these religions, without really getting

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>into much in the way of, you know, discussing like

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the values or the criticism of any of these religious models,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and again kind of basing it broadly in the idea

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>that all religions were new at one point, and there's

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 2>nothing there's nothing strange about there being new religions today.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to begin with with all three of these

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 2>are ones that I think everyone has heard of, but

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're not as up on exactly what they seem

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to be saying about this strange idea of the thing

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that existed before reality. So I want to start with

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the Raelian Movement. This is an international atheistic UFO religion

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 2>founded by the French religious leader Rayel born nineteen forty six.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 2>This religion is based on his alleged UFO experiences in

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy three. As of this recording, he is still alive.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is kind of a this is an interesting

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 2>example and that this is a new religious movement in

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 2>which the founder is still living and presumably active in

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the faith. So I'm not going to get it. As

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 2>with all these I'm not going to get into all

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the teachings, but the Raelian movement teaches that life on

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Earth originated via directed panspermia, so like directed seating of

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>the planet's life twenty five thousand years ago by aliens

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 2>known as the elhem However, mirroring modern conceptions of eternity

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and some cosmological models, Raelian teachings contend that there simply

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is no beginning and there's also no end. Both space

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and time are boundless, and their chief religious symbol of

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 2>infinity is a combination of the Star of David and

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>the swastika, meant to convey some sense of all of this.

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read from their website that this is

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 2>certainly one of those one of the modern religious movements

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>where they have a lot of information on their websites

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and you can just go and just read exactly what

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>they are saying about themselves, and this is what they say,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 2>quote the extraterrestrials who created humankind, and laboratories have proven

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 2>that the infinitely small and the infinitely large have the

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>same structure. The atoms in our hands contain tiny galaxies,

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 2>which themselves contain planets and minuscule humanities, and our own

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 2>galaxy is a tiny particle and a huge atom that

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>forms part of an immense world, etc. At infintium. So

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 2>powers of ten basically, except with like little universes inside

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 2>us and our entire universes inside of something inside of

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a macro world, and it just goes on forever. There's

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 2>no beginning, there's no end. And it does match up

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 2>with you to some extent with numerous cosmological hypotheses that

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>have featured on one level or another, the idea of

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 2>a cosmos without true beginning around.

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the universe is beginning from other universes and seeding

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 3>other universes beyond. I don't know of anybody. I don't

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 3>know of any theories that say, like atoms actually have

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 3>universes inside them. Maybe somebody thinks that with scientific basis,

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>so I kind of doubt it.

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're getting more into the realm of

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>mysticism here when you start considering that. But you know,

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 2>in another way, it kind of rubs up against the

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 2>idea of many worlds, right, I mean, they're being a

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 2>multiverse out there, that sort of thing. So again, I

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 2>think there's an important distinction to be made here, Like

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>we're not making the case and I don't think we're

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 2>not discussing it anyway as if these are examples of

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 2>scientifically informed religions, but they are religions that have emerged

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 2>within a scientifically literate culture, and therefore they are going

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to at least rub up against these scientific concepts.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is interesting. Yeah, and in a way, you know,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 3>you think about it, that might not actually be different

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 3>than ancient creation stories. It's just that we have more

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 3>and different knowledge that we think of as scientific about

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 3>the world. I mean, you know, ancient cultures didn't really

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 3>have a concept of scientific but they would have had

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 3>understandings of the natural world that included maybe complex knowledge

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 3>about how to do certain things. You know, you can

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine creation accounts that involve things about technology, things about

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>agriculture and metal working and building of structures, things like that,

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 3>all these things that are sort of physical discoveries about

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>how things work in the universe and things we can

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 3>do with the substances around us, and that knowledge, like

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 3>secular functional knowledge is included into the creation accounts of

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 3>old Yeah.

0:37:52.560 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I think that's an important point all right. Now,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 2>in talking about scientifically informed or inspired religions, we of

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 2>course have to talk about one of the big ones,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 2>at least in name Scientology, founded by science fiction author l.

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Ron Hubbard who lived nineteen eleven through nineteen eighty six.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 2>He claimed to have developed the teachings through this is

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 2>rather interesting through experimentation rather than divine revelation, at least

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 2>in the hard sense. And I think this is rather interesting.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that the idea that it's not that I

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 2>have gone back and discovered something in ancient writings or

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I have you know, uncovered some forgotten tone of knowledge.

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 2>This is like a product of my own research, in

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 2>my own like sort of lab work.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's funny. I one day, when I was long

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 3>long ago, there was a day when I was basically

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>stuck in a library all day with no ability to

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 3>go anywhere or do anything. So I was just wandering

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 3>around and I found a copy of Dianetics in the

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.959
<v Speaker 3>library and I started reading it. I remember actually being

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 3>disappointed and thinking that it would be more interesting than

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 3>it was. It's got a slog for me.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 2>I had, I had, I had a similar experience with it.

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was, I was interested, I was, you know,

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 2>has a volcano on the front for crying out loud? Yeah,

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it's going to be dynamic. It had

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>some pretty cool television commercials back in the day, and

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I assume they're still probably doing some TV commercials. And

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and then when I started reading it, it like starts off

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 2>very confrontational and and and in general, I can sometimes

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I can find Hubbard's writing a bit hard to crack.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean not to and that's not even necessarily a knock.

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like we're talking about like ancient religious texts that

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 2>are difficult to understand and maybe intentionally a bit cryptic

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and suggestive. And you can certainly find that in scientology

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>writings as well, again perhaps intended, but anyway, the broader

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>teachings of scientology involve a number of philosophical and psychiatric

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 2>concepts ideas from Western esoteric practices, along with some definite

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Sci Fi related concepts. And I'm not going to pretend

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to be an expert on scientology or its teachings, and

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a scientologist, but I'm to understand that the

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 2>basic idea is that the universe we experience is the

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 2>mess the nest the matter, energy and space time universe,

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and this was born seventy six sorry, seventy six trillion

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 2>years ago out of a pre existing static universe of

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 2>pure Thetan energy, So a universe composed all of Thetans,

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 2>spiritual beings and our true selves. But then the Thetans

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 2>become lost in their own creation something to this effect. So,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 2>as far as I understand it as a non scientologist,

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that prior to the beginning, you just

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>have like a pure sort of communal spiritual existence, but

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 2>also one that you could think of is kind of

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, having a lot in common with these ideas

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>of pure potentiality as well. But but then that you

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 2>could also I think you can directly compare this too

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to sort of a you know, it has a certain

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 2>what prelaps arian energy as well. The idea that that

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 2>through scientology, the practitioner is trying to sort of return

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to that condition before this reality and sort of reconnect

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 2>with the Thetan that they are slash were, And this

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 2>also brings in various concepts of human potential as well.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Like I have to I have to find my true

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 2>potential by connecting with the pure energy being that I

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 2>was in the sort of the realm of potentiality that

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 2>existed before our universe.

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 3>So the return to Eden is in this case that

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 3>it's the return to the pure Thetan energy.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, And and again you can you can kind

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of compare that to even the ancient Egyptian model. We

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 2>were just discussing the idea that there's some sort of

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 2>renewal to be found in the pre creation existence, and

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 2>there is some connection between where we are now and

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 2>what we are now, and that like vital pre existing energy.

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I guess I created accidentally. They're created some

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 3>of the wrong implications by saying Eden, because Eden is

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 3>not a pre created state. It's just the good state.

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the good state.

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's very much the created state.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah. And then I do not know, there

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 2>may be something else in scientology that explores what existed

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 2>before the Thetans, or perhaps Thetans I may be mispronouncing it,

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 2>what existed before them.

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're they're a constant state that always existed. I

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 2>suspect that might be the case, all right, And then

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 2>one more to discuss. This one is by far the

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 2>largest and much larger than the aforementioned groups, and generally

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 2>considered the most successful new religious movement of the past

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 2>couple of centuries, and that is the Church of Jesus

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Christ of Latter day Saints, founded by Joseph Smith in

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 2>eighteen thirty. And it is easy to forget that this

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 2>too is a religion that, despite its connection to older

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Christian traditions and its use of scriptures that invoke this

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 2>feeling of ancient time, it's easy to forget that this too,

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 2>is a religion that really takes shape and takes off

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in the scientific age. And we see that reflected. We've

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 2>discussed this a little bit on the show before in

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 2>some of the ways that it is space friendly. Again

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 2>not making the case that any of these new religious

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 2>movements are necessarily science informed, but it has been observed

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 2>that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 2>is largely space friendly, explicitly stating that there are other

0:43:55.840 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 2>inhabited planets, so at least, you know, acknowledging a modern

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 2>understanding of the cosmos and in incorporating that into its worldview,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, into some of its ideas of what

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 2>came before.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you don't have to say that the

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 3>scientific ideas taken on board are necessarily all that complex.

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Just to acknowledge that this is like a post Galileo religion.

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 3>This is a religion from the age in which it

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 3>is a It is common knowledge that the other planets

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>are not just like movable points of light in the

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 3>sky that move on different patterns than the rest of

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the stars, that they are spheres of like rock and gas,

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 3>and there are other things like you could walk on

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 3>the other planets.

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, And therefore it's acknowledged that there there is life

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 2>on other planets, and and then that has to be

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 2>theologically worked out to some degree, which is not something

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that comes up in like you know, ancient Christian or

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Jewish thought. You know, like nobody's saying, but wait, what

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 2>about people potentially living on other planets? Like what are

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 2>you talking about? That's not going with it's not going

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 2>in the book. Yeah. So we again, as we've mentioned before,

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, several notable prominent NASA figures were LDS members,

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 2>including fourth and seventh NASA Administrator James C. Fletcher. So

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 2>I think a strong case can be made for being

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 2>like a space friendly religion and some extent to some extent,

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 2>but coming back to the bigger question. According to the

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter day Saints, what

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 2>comes before the beginning then? And how does this rub

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>up against modern scientific concepts. Well, it's spelled out on

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 2>their website, so again this is coming more or less

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 2>directly from the Church. The idea is that Jesus Christ,

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.720
<v Speaker 2>under the direction of the heavenly Father, is not creating

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 2>things out of magic, is not snapping his fingers and

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 2>making things pop into existence. He is organizing pre existing matter.

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, there's going to be a difference here in that

0:45:54.640 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 3>it names and asserts Jesus as the creator, but at

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 3>least in the aspect that it is an organization of

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 3>some pre existing material world rather than a creation ex nihilo.

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting in that that is actually what the Christian

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and Jewish creation narrative in its original text does say,

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Like the text of Genesis is an ordering narrative, not

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 3>a creation x nihilo narrative, but it is commonly misunderstood

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 3>as a creation x nihilo narrative. So it's funny that

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 3>that this is like a making more explicit something that

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 3>is true about the original text but is often misunderstood

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 3>by believers in that text.

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, So, so of reacting to the misunderstanding and

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the interpretation that is kind of like you know, common

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to the world and then pushing against that and instead

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 2>like adhering to say that the law of the conservation

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of mass and energy and saying like, you know, no, no,

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not saying that the divine architect just made all

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the materials. No, the divine architect move things around. And

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I'm going to read here from the this

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 2>is the from the LDS Book of Abraham. This is

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>three twenty four from their website.

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Quote.

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And there stood one among them that was like unto God,

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and he said, unto those who were with him, we

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 2>will go down, for there is space there, and we

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>will take of these materials and we will make an

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 2>earth where on these may dwell. Okay, So yeah, so

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>God is an organizer. God is God is architect, God

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 2>is builder, as opposed to you know, a snap of

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the fingers and things you know, pop into existence.

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what, actually, I do want to come

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 3>back on that, because there is a I think there

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 3>are things in the Genesis narrative where God does bring

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 3>things into existence that didn't exist before, Like he speaks

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 3>things into existence, such as light. It seems like that

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 3>he says, let their light, and then there is light.

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 3>But it's just that he doesn't do that with the

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 3>world itself. There is already a material world, and he

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 3>organizes that and then additional things he brings into existence

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 3>by speaking their names.

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, so so again, Yeah, I think it's

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 2>fascinating how you know, these these newer religions like the

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 2>older religions. You know, they're ultimately answering the same questions.

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 2>They're using a lot of the same answers, but the

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 2>way they're rolled out, you know, again, sometimes they have

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to there's an effort to make them adhere a little

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 2>more to the modern world as we understand it, and

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to fit into like yeah, like you said, like in

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the ancient world, it was fitting in with social knowledge

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and say agricultural technological understanding, you know, crafting knowledge, that

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing. Whatever the the readily accessible metaphors were,

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 2>and today the metaphors are different. In the future, the

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 2>metaphors will be different, Like what are the new religious

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 2>movements of the future going to be rolling out. I mean,

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 2>my main hope is that humans are still involved in

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the process of creating these uh these stories, but you know, inherently,

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 2>inevitably they're going to draw on some different contemporary knowledge

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>sets to do so.

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Interesting, I wonder if there are any religions yet

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that have a creation account, essentially a creation by biological evolution.

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great question. I think we should come

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>back to that in a future episode, you know, evolution

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and at least the if not the creation of new

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 2>religious movements, but the up we can even discuss, like

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the the tweaking of understanding regarding these older faiths as

0:49:55.600 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>well incorporating evolutionary knowledge instead of you know, completely rejecting it.

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. But I don't know. I'm trying to imagine the

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 3>particulars of how evolution would really work as a creation narrative.

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I'm not sure it really works.

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't well that would entail I mean, one of

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the it also depends on, As with all of these things,

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 2>it also depends on like how deep into the concept

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 2>you're getting. So with evolution, for example, I think it

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 2>is is very logical to say to take a view

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 2>that if there is a divine creator, then that divine

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>creator sets certain acts in motion. But you get into

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 2>this with evolution. You also have the situation where well,

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it at least from our human perspective, that is,

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, perhaps incomplete compared doing it, you know, in

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like divine entity. Evolution can appear very cruel.

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 3>It can.

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 2>It can take directions that you know, end up being

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 2>dead ends and so forth. So it raises additional theological

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 2>questions like why, you know, why would the divine force

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 2>set this act in motion if it was going to

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 2>end and say the creation of a parasite that blinds

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 2>children or something. You know. So, yeah, there's a there's

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot to unravel there.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess another question, if our world was created via

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 3>evolution would be what what part of the evolutionary model

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 3>is the world? Is the world the I don't know,

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a cell or an organism as a whole, or is

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 3>it like a gene or a mutation? You know, like

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess is our world a mutation?

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean we get into the model presented in

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 2>really Scott's Prometheus, right where exactly the engineers set things

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in motion and they have maybe a certain agenda in mind,

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 2>but also accidents happen, and then those accidents have to

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 2>be corrected later on.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:45.280
<v Speaker 3>That is my religion.

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does kind of come back to the Church

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.879
<v Speaker 2>of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints in a sense.

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I was reading a little bit about how this idea

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 2>of a creator who is, you know, adjusting some sort

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 2>of pre existing it kind of sort of reframed. It's

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 2>almost like when a new I'm not making the case

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 2>that this is directly what's involved here, but it's kind

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of like, imagine you have a new boss arrive on

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the scene. They get to sort of establish themselves as

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the guy who's fixing stuff. You know, I'm instituting changes

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that are improving the company, and if there are problems beforehand,

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>well that's that's kind of out of my hands. But

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm just here to fix things. I'm the good guy boss.

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 2>And so in a way it kind of you can

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 2>get into this area where you're establishing a creator deity

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 2>as as a complete good guide boss. To some extent,

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it gets messy, it gets complicated, because

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you know that is that's the These are the problems

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 2>of theology, and then we have to justify the ways

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>of God demand and that ultimately is the role of poets.

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, does that do it? For part three of I

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 3>think so?

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, I feel myself beginning to ramble here, because again,

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 2>they can go in so many different directions with this.

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 2>I will say that certainly, if anyone out there, if

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 2>you were you know, a current or past adherent to

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 2>any of the religious faces that we've discussed here, and

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>you want to write in with your additional thoughts on it,

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 2>or if we got something wrong, yeah, do write in.

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 2>We would love to hear from you and potentially hash

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that out in a future episode of Stuff to Blow

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 2>your Mind listener mail, which we run those about once

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a month. Yeah, so write in. We'd love to hear

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 2>from you. And we will also just go ahead and say, hey,

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 2>if you wherever you happen to listen to the show

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 2>or watch the show, if you're watching on Netflix, if

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 2>there is a way to throw us some stars, throw

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 2>us some thumbs up, one thumbs up, two thumbs up,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 2>star ratings, written reviews, whatever the case may be. If

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 2>it's positive, leave it, throw it into the system. This

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:47.360
<v Speaker 2>helps us out in the long run.

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Even more than that. Subscribe, Please subscribe or if you

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 3>get your podcasts and on Netflix, you can click the

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 3>remind Me button. Okay, huge, thanks as always to our

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 3>excellent audio producer Jay J. Pauseway. If you would like

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 3>episode or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:08.399
<v Speaker 3>or just to say hello, you can email us at

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 3>contact stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:24.839
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.