WEBVTT - 60: These Were the Most Interesting Stories of 2016

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm h and I'm Tracy Halloway. So, Tracy, it's a

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>been quite a year. Huh, that's one way of putting it. Yes,

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of things happened this year

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that probably people wouldn't have necessarily predicted coming into this year.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we can be a bit stronger than that.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we can say a lot of crazy things

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>happened this year. All right, Yeah, I think you're right.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe I was understating a little bit, but

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to be I just wanted to be

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>on the right side of things. I wanted to be

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of conservative. But yeah, it was pretty wild year.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And I feel confident in saying that for several years

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>down the road, people are going to be talking about

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>various events that transpired in the year. Yeah, the history

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>books will be looking back just like us, and there

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>probably all the historians are probably gonna be listening to

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the Odd Lots Podcast really really get a sense of

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened, don't you think, Yeah, we should bury this

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in a time capsule, right, Yeah, I agree. So there's

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously the obvious stories, you know, Brexit, Trump all that,

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're probably also a lot of facets to these

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stories and stories that people missed that we don't want

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>those historians to pass over and miss That's right, So

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we are going to um do the historians work for them,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and try to dig up some of the

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>lesser known stories that happened this year, some things that really,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>um maybe taught us a lesson or entertained us or

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>amused us in some way, or that we thought were

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>very important. So who do we have? So We've brought

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>together a bunch of folks from Bloomberg News who cover

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>various aspects of our world day in and day out.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It cover stories better than just about anyone in the world.

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm gonna I'll go around and introduce them,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to talk to them about their

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite stories of the year, so we can catch all

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the stories that we might have missed. All right, So

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>let me, uh, let me go around the room. I'll start.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Ed Hammond is with us, Hey, Ed, how are you doing?

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>He covers deals at Bloomberg. We have Mike Reagan, who

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is a veteran coverer. I don't think that's a word

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>journalists covering the market, particularly the stock market for a

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>long time. Who's leading a new blog venture here at Bloomberg.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for coming, Mike, Thanks for having me. Max Abelson

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, Wall Street, Uh, Wall Street whisper Wall Street reporter,

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets a Wall Street to speak his mind, st

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>legend Wall Street. He stumbled on the word yeah, I

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>was going there was Wall Streets. Max A. Wolson Dan

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Moss are top editor for economics coverge great to be

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>made a great prediction going into this year, which we'll

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about, um what probably one of the best predictions

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And Megan Murphy who led all of

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's politics coverage this year and is now on a

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>new venture leading Business Week magazine. So thanks for joining us, Megan,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. All right, So now that we

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have all that out the way, let's talk about our

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite stories this year. And uh, Ed, Let's start with you.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>What was your favorite story of I'm not going to

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>go with the deal story. I was sort of tempted

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to self grandize and go with the deal that we

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>had broken by I decided instead to go with the

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>story from July, which I partly like because it was

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the summer when everything was quiet, and

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it was the story of Brett Barner, who was the

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund manager um at Louis Bacon's fund, and he

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>trashed his mansion out in the Hampton's and it was

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>just it was one of these classic you know, we

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>all sort of no hedge fund guys like that, and

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they all pretend desperately that they're not a tool like that,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually very responsible and they do all this

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>charity stuff. But he did exactly what we all know

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they really do, which was go to a mansion, spray

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>people with champagne, throw midgets in a swimming pool, um,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, leave the mansion in a pretty despicable state.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously he went on to NBC and defended

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>himself and said that it was all good fun, it

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was harmless, that the midgets weren't actually there was sort

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of paid entertainment. They were friends of his family. Uh.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And Louis macn um eventually fired him and I think

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>put out a statement which was sort of ridiculous, that's

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>something like his behavior was not consistent with the personal

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>views of the fun and it was just one of

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>these great, you know moments where it all kind of

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it was all, um, what we think about these guys,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and as I say, they worked very hard to beat

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>anything but that, and it became incredibly public and it

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was very foolish of him, I think, to go on

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to the NBC and m making very limp case in

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>his defense. It was actual Wolf of Wall Street, right,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was billed at the time. You know

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what what's ironic about each using that story, ed, is

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that one of the best stories of two thousand and

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>fifteen was his boss, Louie Bacon's unbelievable brawl with his

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>neighbor out in I think it was like the Bahamas,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Peter Peter and I guard and it was, oh man,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their fight was awful. You guys remember this. They accused

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>each other of murder, being in the Ku Klux Klan,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>try dealing drugs. Louie Bacon and his neighbor really want

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>after each other. And uh that story And wasn't it

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>all because one was having potties like off the midnight?

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It was? Indeed. Yeah. The other interesting thing about this

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>story is it's also kind of a story of about

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like modern media and social media because it was all

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>over Instagram, right, so there probably is a time when

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they could have had this party and then just paid

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the house the clean up fee and

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe some extra fee, and that would have been it.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that all these people came to the

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>party and posted about it on social media. Uh, and

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so that that those images live forever really makes um

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>really makes it hard for these stories to remember. The

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>hashtag spray than which apparently is a thing, right who knew?

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But apparently all these guys doing a sprayer thon, and

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it was this kind of this great disconnect between the

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>behavior of the people there are apparently with the people there,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and what they were doing it for, which was apparently

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to raise money for I think was it an animal

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>shelter like I Lost dog shelter or something, And yet

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they were obviously doing things that were seen as some

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>overly debauched even by their employers standards. It was a

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rental house too, I believe didn't you didn't you rent

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the house? It was? And I think the sort of

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the alternate version of the story, the one that Mr

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Barnard came out with, was that the owner of the

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>house was just trying to shake him down for more money,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and the person who rented in the house and asked

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>for like twenty dollars in cash up front, and was

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this kind of dodgy guy and had all these other

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>things going on. I think it was. It did come

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>out that the guy who rented in the house had

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>some problems of his own, But anyway, it was just

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>one of these great stories in the middle of the

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>summer and everything is normally quite quiet and flat, and

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of it brightened up my July. And none

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of us were invited. Is the worst part? That is?

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>That is the real worst part. Speak for yourself. Do

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you think part of the reason why that story took

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>off was look in the middle of a campaign season,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wall Street vilified by more than one candidate,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just the midget throwing. It's almost like

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a cliche. It's almost like, could this really be true? Wow,

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it is actually true. I believe the official name of

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the sport is dwarf tossing, not midget throwing. I just

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>want just for the record for the historians. Traditionally, this

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of debauchery takes place at market tops, right, and

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone just is so so flush with cash that they

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>decided to spend it on rented midgets or dwarves or um,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever term we choose. Well, what was the date, because

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the bond market did peak on July eight, so maybe

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we could go back to uh, maybe maybe that was

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact the bottom of ten year yields. That would

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be a great one. This was July seven. He got fired.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>He got fired on the seventh. I think the party

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was the weekend before. But why, in the political climate

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know prevailed for much of this year, and

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really the post financial crisis landscape, why would you give

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>your foes something like this to grab hold off. I

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>don't get it. That is that's the huge blunder. All right, Max,

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>let's stay on the Wall Street theme and uh, let's

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. What was your favorite story of Business Week?

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Does a good thing called the envy List where everyone

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>has to pick an article by someone outside of Bloomberg,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>which is good because you know, if you flat of

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues too much, you see it as a sucker.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So I picked some stories outside of Bloomberg that I

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>admired very much. One of them was about something that

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think I even really knew existed

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>before private prisons. Mother Jones did this four month investigation

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>into private prisons that was so good that basically the

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice within a few weeks after it was like, yeah,

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to use private prisons any longer. And

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the stock plummeted. And the amazing thing for me, besides

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the story was just an incredible story,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because that it had all this effect and that, but

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, Trump won the election, of course

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock went right back up to where it was

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>before for the Mother Jones investigation and private prisons came out. Yeah, Joe,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember we wrote that story right like the day

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>after Trump's win. We wrote the prison private prison stocks

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>were surging and the idea was maybe, um, the Justice

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Department was going to back down on all of this.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>It's it's incredible. I wonder what the writer, whose name

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is Shane Bauer, I wonder what he thinks that he spent.

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>What he did is he got a job in a

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>private prison run by c c A. It's that the

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Corrections Corporate America, although actually they just they just changed

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>their name to too Much. It has like it's called

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like civics now something it's gotten very probably it has

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>very benign sounding name. So you know, afterwards, the Department

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, the Inspector General Report came out with a

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>report that basically agreed with this guy's investigation. He got

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a job in one of these prisons, and it is

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a dark I really recommend everyone reads it very

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>very very depressing. It sounds like something from the wire.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>It's really really bleak portrait of how untrained these guards are.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I assume the stock market pop because

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to reverse that decision and they're going

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to go back to it. Yeah, those stocks really went

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>nuts the day after the election. On the other hand,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I just have to say two downs sixteen was such

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a good year for business. Jersalm. I want to give

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a quick shout out to a couple of other things

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that I've loved. So because I'm a classy guy surrounded

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>by English people, I want to mention the London Review

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of Books had a beautiful, beautiful piece about Satoshi and

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it was by a guy named Andrew O'Hagan, the bitcoin founder.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The bitcoin founder. Though the question is what was this

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>guy the bitcoin founder. It's like the size of a novel.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like forty thou words. I think it must have

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>taken up all of the l RB that week. Also

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful, beautiful story that's similar to that first one.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>A little bit dissatisfying because you get to the end

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of this monster monster piece and you're not quite sure

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>which way is up. But that's I think that's sort

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of an accurate that's only you know, no one knows

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>which way is up in in bitcoin anyway. I mean,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I quickly have to say, my former New York Observer

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>colleague Gabe Sherman just went bonkers this year writing about

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Fox Fox News, I mean basically single handedly costs the

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>top man his job. That's like a good example of

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who just like owned a story for a long

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>time and then just like went to town and just

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>totally dominated it. And unless you had been following Fox

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>News as a beat for years, you could never have

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>done what he did. What's cool for me as a

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>journalist is that Gabe wrote a book about Fox News

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago that said that Roger Ales

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was basically creepy with women. But then the thing is,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing happened. The book sort of disappeared, and he stayed

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>on the beat for years after the book came out,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I whant to write a story, even

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if I've only spent a couple of weeks on it

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't do well. I want to like, I

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>want to die. I want to crawl up under my

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>bed and not work ever again. But he's got sued

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>over that didn't something I don't. I don't think gig

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>got suit. No, Okay, well we've had to kind of

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>wall streety politics see things. Why don't we go over

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do Mike and let's have him maybe maybe

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bring us a market story. I don't know, Mike, what

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do you have for us? Well, this one's a little

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>bit out of left field, and and Max is going

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to make me feel like a suck up here for

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>actually choosing a Timberg Business Week story. But it really

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was my favorite story of the year, by Matthew Campbell

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and Kit chill l It was about a Goldman Sachs

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>trader in Libya. He went to Tripoli and it was

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>right when sort of Libya's markets were ringing up. And

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the story, if I were to pick one story of

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the year that would sort of you could make a

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>feature film out of, this would be it. And it

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>starts off describing like you know what a lousy place

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Libya is for a banker to do business. You know,

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not many five star hotels, not many courbet restaurants,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>but there is a sixty billion dollar sovereign Wealth fund UM.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And this trader, Yusef Cabbaje cozied up to the sovereign

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Wealth fund and it was a good salesman. They the

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>story describes him as Goldman's basically their biggest rainmaker. He

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>got the Sovereign Wealth Fund to invest in a lot

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of very risky equity, uh, derivative synthetic equity derivatives in

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>positions in banks, and the timing was really unfortunate. It

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was right before the financial crisis, and very quickly these

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>positions just went south and uh he handed up losing

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the sovereign wealth and ended up losing about one point

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars uh. And this guy basically had to

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>flee for his life out of Tripoli. And the reason

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this year it's kind of interesting is because

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the story came out at the same time as a

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>big discussion in the US about the fiduciary standard. Uh,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, should you hold brokers accountable obviously for mom

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and pop retirees, and this case went to court this year.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually Goldman won the case. And you know, the argument

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was should a sixty billion dollars sovereign wealth fund, you know,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't they be sophisticated enough to know what they're dealing with.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They they claimed that Goldman had sort of led them

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>astray with these uh, with these investments. UM. So fascinating story.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I encourage everyone to google it and hopefully it will

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be a motion picture someday, if there's anyone from Hollywood listening.

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So Goldman in the end, Um, they didn't get in

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble for it, right they Yeah, they were cleared. Yeah,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they won the case. I mean it. You know, it's

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>dragged on for years. Obviously Kadafi was ousted and then

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that that complicated things. But the verdict came uh police

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it was in the fall around October, uh, and Goldman

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>actually prevailed. So fascinating. You know what I love about

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>stories like this is when we think of trading in

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the year sixteen or seen. You just think of someone

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>behind a terminal looking at lots of screens with numbers

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>blinking green or red, uh, looking at charts and lines

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on charts and going through spreadsheets, but any story that

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>involves legwork and having to say, hey, here's a huge

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>pile of money somewhere. It's in Libya, and I'm going

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to get on a plane and try to get some

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. And anything you know that's it's sort of

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>real is a good reminder that there is in finance,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still this sort of uh, you know, well literal

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>frontier market but sort of wild west frontier aspect to

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it that if you have the sort of get on

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a plan and try and get some of it, that

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you can make money that way. Yeah. Matt Levine wrote

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a column about it that was pretty interesting, basically saying

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the salesmanship has been sucked out of

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street because of computerized automated trading. Uh. And here's

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>an example of a good salesman, right for better or worse?

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You know this what's and also what's fascinating to me

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is this guy went from being considered, you know, Goldman's

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>top rainmaker too when everything went south, he was sort of,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest goat in the Goldman you know.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And and it's it's interesting how quickly your fortunes can

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>change on Wall Street. You know, one day, you're at

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the top and then something goes wrong and you're you're

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly find your way on the bottom. I wonder what

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the hero or anti hero of that story would make

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the hotel scene in Tripoli right now. I mean

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that was back when Libya had a government, right right,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So probably as rough as it is, that than significantly

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>rougher ye exactly accuately, the would be a few more opportunities.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. I don't know what the golden

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>will to send an army over to investigate. We'll see,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all right. Megan Murphy, you had probably the most important

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>beat often as a leader of Bloomberg's politics coverage, obviously

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the election of being the defining story of the year.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So as you look back at what was your favorite story,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to say this, just because I'm on with

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with with Joe and Tracy, that I have picked out

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a market's theme. Thank you. Um, it's probably like our

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>first one. So for me that it was really the

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexican pay so because here's why, you know, when as

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the politics editor of the cycle, I have to admit

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that people will come to me with all sorts of crab.

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Oh, we're seeing a reaction and you know,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>various different esoteric corners of the market as the sort

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of Trump and Clinton uh punch off sort of lumbered along,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and we and we have to be you know, we

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>would always say to people that you know, even as

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>late as the summer, we weren't really seeing that much

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>impact in the market. We we felt that markets were

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very late and sort of thinking about a Trump presidency

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and pricing in the reality of this, and that market

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>seemed relatively calm, and so I have to admit that

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we would we constantly sort of back back. I think

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and I were probably some of the people that

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>came to random stories. But the one, sorry, Megan, the

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that was actually real was the Mexican pay

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>so and and just that sort of with you know

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of Mexican uh, you know, exports going into the US

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and watching that currency and watching how much I went

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>back this morning and actually was looking back at some

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the moments. So I'm talking moments when sort of

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's groping tape gets released. It's like Mexican PAYSA strengthens,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's all these bloomer headlines. It's like Mexican pasa

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>strengthens as groping video. It's released, and and and it

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating to me because you know, I did the

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>election that coverage and on the night, you know, I

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>think the pay so fo what was it? And just watching,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching that and again it was it was

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>almost you know, it became such a barometer and such

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a fun, I hate to say that, a very fun

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>indicator of where we were going after the debates and

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>every little moment in the Trump campaign when I think

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about it, and became a running joke on my desk

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is where's the Mexican pay So There's two things I

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>really like about the fact that the pace so became

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate barometer for how the election was going. One, obviously,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I just amused at all these politics reporters having to

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>follows in my hands, but more importantly, not only politics

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>reporters having to follow a currency, but learning that when

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican paceo goes down, the line on the chart

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is going up, which must have known a bunch of

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people's minds, because of course, the convention and currencies is

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that in most cases are three exceptions. The dollar comes first,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's US d m x N, which means that

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the traditional way you characterize that is to the dollar

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>rallying against the pace. So so I'm so happy that

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>all these politics reporters that have never thought about this

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>learned an important aspect of quote currency quoting conventions because

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of this election. And some were very skeptical. Some were

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>very skeptical. Some were very skeptical. There's also a bit

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of irony in that that weaker currency was, you know,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>probably a really a good thing for Mexico's economy. Ultimately,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know how many Americans are checking out Cabo now

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for for spring break because it's so true. Mexico's manufacturing

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>competitiveness having increased because the currency plunged on Trump's wind

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate irony. And these were very, very sophisticated views.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I visited our colleagues in Mexico City Bureau in August,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, almost without question, the economists, the officials,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the investors that we met, they all knew far more

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about what had transpired in the campaign that day than

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I did. Be going to breakfast at an investment bank

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at seven o'clock, they had all read five thirty eight,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they had all read the daily two oh two. They

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>were all set for the day that well, I guess that.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that gets to one of the interesting things,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>um that I was thinking when we were watching them

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>pay so, is like I get how it became a

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>barometer for the election outcome. But on the other hand,

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there's it was kind of weird that people just settled

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on this one asset as the thing that they were

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>going to trade, um, the election with, right, because you

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>could have chosen all sorts of things you could have chosen,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the betting market, for instance, is a more

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>direct thing, or bank stocks or drugs docks or anything. Well,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican paso is the most liquid, most actively traded

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging market currency, so it kind of becomes a proxy

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for emerging markets generally. And look the other country that

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>was in the crosshairs of Donald Trump, China. Not a

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>lot you can do with that market. Good point. Another

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>one other point that I want to make about this,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and this speaks exactly to what Tracy was saying, is

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in markets, you can get to a point where the

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>underlying reality is not that important. And what happens is,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>you know Cain's talked about this in uh, you know,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>his concept of the beauty contest, which I think we've

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about before on this on this podcast, which is

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that markets are not really about figuring out who is

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the most beautiful person in the beauty contest, but in

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out who the people you're competing against,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>trading against who they think will be the most beautiful

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>person in the contest. And then there's endless layers of that.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>So everybody else knows that that's how everyone is playing

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the game. So at some point you settle on this

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>idea that the Mexican pasto is the proxy for the election,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And even if there's not necessarily any particular object to

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it as being the best, the fact that we've all

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>settled on it as the proxy makes it a reality nonetheless.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And in my view, that's when markets get more interesting,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get at their peak interestingness, when they sort of become

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>almost purely expressions of group psychology very end, get further

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and further divorced from underlying reality. So I love I

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>love this, call Megan, great choice. All right, Dan Moss,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what was your favorite story of We're going to go

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to Japan and a more economic landscape? So on July one,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>two of our colleagues in Tokyo published a story citing

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>people familiar with the discussions as saying that an increasing

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>number of b o J insiders concerned about the sustainability

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of what was then the monitary policy framework in Japan,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>which was the road to throw everything at the kitchen sink.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Quei as far as the I can see, just keep

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>hitting it and hitting it and hitting it in the

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>hopes that that inflation target can get up to two.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>What our reporters we're hearing was WHOA inside the building,

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there's increasing concern about, look, where are we going here?

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And sure enough, a week later, when the bj was

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>expected to do a large easing, they announced a policy review.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Things are going to be on hold for a couple

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of months, that we're going to think about it over

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the summer, and they're going to come back. And when

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they came back, what they had was a whole new framework.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>They were instead going to target various points on the

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>yield curve rather than a quantitative amount of money. Big shift.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That is it unusual to get that sort of you know,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>inside the palace holes type of gossip from the b

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>o J. And also is it an unusual situation in

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States where every member of the Fed goes

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>off on their own little speaking tour between events, you know,

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and which sort of approach do you think makes more sense. Well,

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>let's take the second one first. There are quite a

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>large number of members of the Bank of Japan's Monetary

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Policy Committee who makes speeches in various parts of the country.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>They just tend not to make the headlines. They tend

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to be more cautious than what they say, and in

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>some of Kuroda's biggest decisions, the votes were split and

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it was really only his vote that carried the day.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's not a monolithic thing. They are

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in various parts of the country making speeches, but for

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>some reason they tend not to resonate outside Japan. But

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the dissension is real, and it's there now. The flip

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>side of your question was is it a problem that

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there's too many fair officials speaking in too many places,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>saying too many different things. The trick there, and we

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>wrestle with this daily, is trying to figure out which

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>officials matter the most at anyone given point in the cycle.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>No names, but for example, if there's someone who's a

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>chronic dissenter known as a hard money person with a

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>track record of being predisposed against further easing. It's important

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to take that into account when understanding what that person says,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and the markets do struggle with that, I think sometimes,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and I can understand it so down. I love that

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you chose this story because I think a lot of

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people maybe not forget, but this doesn't get as much

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>attention as it should. The Bank of Japan was, of

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>course at the forefront of easy monetary policy and experimental

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, and the fact that they kind of um

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>started rethinking that strategy this year speaks to the rest

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the world and really the efficacy of things like

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing and of things like negative interest rates. Right,

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, and privately officials will tell you. Yet, look,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we know we're a laboratory. We're not that proud of it,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>but we were out there first. And the things that

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Japan has been wrestling with, demographic change, a burst, property bubble,

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>these are things that are no longer just a Japanese issue.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The big difference is while Japan has a shrinking labor

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>market a shrinking population, there is not a robust embrace

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of immigration. I also I agree with Tracy that there's

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a great story because yea, as as Tracy put it,

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of these same rethinks throughout the

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>world this year. The strategy of buy a bunch of

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff and said an inflation target is arguably worked, or

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>has been mediocre at best, or is maybe just worked

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit not as as strong as people thought.

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Great story that we'll keep watching. All right, Well, I

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>want to thank all you guys for giving your favorite

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>stories of fantastic list. Ed Hammond, our Deal's reporter, thank you,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mike Reagan, Markets Maven, thank you, Max Abelson

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>great uh great stories from showing some great range on

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that and giving some shout outs to some non Bloomberg folks.

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Megan Murphy loved your call, Thank you,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and Dan Moss thanks a lot. Okay, Joe, Well, that

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was our special hindsight episode. I guess I mean in

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>all seriousness, I really love talking about the stories that

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are fellow journalists um loved this year or found interesting

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or important. It's good to get a range from different perspectives, right,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not just markets people. Totally I think I loved I

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>had totally forgotten about the spray Athon party because in

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the year which so much huge earth moving events happened.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to have forgotten about a party that got

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a plastered all over Instagram with a silly hashtag. But

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe in retrospect that will have been the most

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>important story of the year, right because of the market link.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you brought up the point about social media,

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think probably for almost all of the stories

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that we just spoke about, there is a social media angle,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've been talking about this on the podcast a lot.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But like the degree to which social media has changed

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the landscape of everything from politics to economics, to markets,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to the way finance works, um to the possibility of

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some hedge fund guy getting his party outed much fast

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>or than he would otherwise, it's just phenomenal. Yeah, I'm

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>actually of the view that for as much as we

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about social media, and we've talked about a lot

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast and people talk about it all the time,

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we arguably don't talk about social media enough overall in

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this because I think the ramifications on every aspect of

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>our life of everyone being able to communicate with each

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>other and have their opinion on everything maybe even a

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger deal than we realize. So all right, Well, we'll

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do more social media podcasts in all Right. This has

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been another edition of the odd Loads podcast. Thank you

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so much to our listeners who joined us in sen

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with another fresh slate of episodes in

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't Thought. You can follow me on Twitter

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwarts and I'm Tracy Alloway. I'm on Twitter

0:30:53.920 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>at Tracy Alloway. Thanks for listening a