WEBVTT - Apple Outlook Mixed Post-Earnings on China Concerns

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Apple earnings just crossing the let's go through them.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fourth quarter EPs, Carol coming in above estimates at

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a dollar forty six, estimates for forty dollar thirty nine.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>So investors certainly happy to see that fourth quarter revenue

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine point five billion. That also beat estimates of

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine point three to five billion.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm looking at the stock already up about

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>two percent here in the aftermarket. What's great about Apple

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>is you've got to go through the different categories. Fourth

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 2>quarter service revenue, that's about twenty two point thirty one billion.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>The estimate was for twenty one point thirty seven Wearables,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>home and Accessories, a little bit light, nine point thirty

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>two billion, nine point forty one Greater China revenue. We

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>were focused on this. It is coming in light fifteen

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>point zero zero eight billion, and the forecast was for

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>seventeen point zero one billion. That pop in the stock

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>in the aftermarket not as enthusiastic. In fact, we've seen

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the stock go a little bit negative. It's just up

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 2>about zero point six percent. iPhone revenue forty three point

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>eight billion, that is slightly better than the street forecast

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>of forty three point seventy three billion, But again, China

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming in light. iPhone revenue, it's a slight beat,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>called it almost inline, and fourth quarter revenue overall, it

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>is a slight beat. Stock is now though, down about

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>zero point five percent in the aftermarket.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>Services revenue reaches a new all time high. Also, Carol,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>we should note Apple has declared a quarterly dividend of

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty four cents per share.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's interesting, though, is we were all wondering about

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 2>China revenue, such an important market to this company. But

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>keep in mind, you know, I was looking kind of

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>going into this the comps were considered to be somewhat

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>easy for the iPhone generally because of the production lines

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that were off in China. So we did see iPhone

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>revenue generally come in strong. But we've been talking increasingly

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>about the competition that is happening in China when it

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 2>comes to smartphones generally, and that China revenue. The domestic

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>consumer has been coming back. We certainly saw it in

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the Golden week, right people were traveling. But nonetheless, the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>China revenue fifteen point zero eight billion versus an estimate

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of seventeen point zero one to almost two billion dollars.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Leight.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey, somebody who's watching this just as closely as we

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>are is Angelo Zino. He's senior equity analyst at CFRA Research.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 3>He joins us on Zoom from New York City. Angela,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>good to have you join us, as you always do

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 3>on Apple earnings such as these. Give us an idea

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of the numbers that you're focused on and why you

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>think that we're seeing the stock move like this in

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the after hours.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, listen, I think initially kind of and

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 5>we still have to look deeper into the numbers, but initially,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, it looked good in terms of the earnings

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 5>as far as well as the top line is concerned,

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 5>fairly coming in line, slightly above our expectations out there.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 5>And you know, also on the services side of things,

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, reacceleration towards double digit growth, all kind of positives,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 5>and I think kind of, you know, some keys out there.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Of course, you guys have highlighted the disappointment on the

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 5>China side of things, so we definitely want to hear

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more priority and more importantly what they

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 5>see for the December quarter as far as China is concerned.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it could just be you know, more of

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 5>a comps thing as far as you know the September

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 5>quarter is concerned versus a year ago, relative to when

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 5>the iPhone fourteen was launched versus fifteen. But you know,

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 5>we want to see what they have to say about

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 5>the full quarter in terms of the December quarter as

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 5>far as the holiday selling season is concerned, and of course,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 5>you know some of the headwinds that are that are

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 5>notably out there, specifically some of the competitive pressures that are

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 5>definitely arising, So we definitely want to hear all of

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 5>that in China. Looks like it's going to be the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 5>key here on the call.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just interesting. Stock down two percent, and you

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>make a really good point on the iPhone number, even

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>though it came in I think to slightly higher our

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>own mark German and we were talking about this earlier

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that it's a slight beat, but it's not impressive given

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>that the iPhone fourteen Pro couldn't be so last well

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>for several weeks because of the Fox cons shutdown due

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to COVID. So you expected that it was an easy

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 2>comp that maybe it should have been an even big

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>bigger beat. So our Mark German doing that on our

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 2>live blog. We do have the stock down about one

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>point eight percent. The outlook, as you say, is going

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to be very very important here specifically, what do you

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 2>want to know about China? Is it just a case

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of the increasing competition that Apple is seeing in that

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>massive market?

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, listen, I think we want to know specifically, we

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 5>want to kind of know what was going on both

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 5>on the hardware side as well as the services side

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 5>of things out in China. Specifically on the hardware side

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 5>of things, it is, you know, on the competitive side

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 5>of things, what does that look like to them, what

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>does the demand picture look like as far as the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 5>iPhone fifteen is concerned. And then also you know, on

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 5>the other side of things, you know, they are launching

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 5>kind of the new max out there that should help

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 5>them here in the December quarter as well. We do

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 5>think that they're going to they are going to return

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 5>to growth on the max side of things in the

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 5>December quarter, that should help a little bit. And then

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 5>as far as services, I think it'll be important for

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 5>them to continue to say that, you know, the landscape

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 5>looks fairly healthy in China as far as services is concerned.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 5>But you know, at the end of the day, it

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 5>really it's you know, you don't want to extrapolate too

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 5>much from this one number as far as China is concerned. Right, So,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 5>and also when you think about the December quarter as

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 5>well versus the December quarter a year ago, the numbers

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 5>again are the comps are super easy. Our view is

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 5>they are going to point towards an acceleration in terms

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 5>of iPhone revenue in the December quarter versus September quarter

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 5>because of those easy comps. So again, let's see what

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 5>the trajectory looks like over the next kind of couple

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 5>of months.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say, go to the press release,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>pretty basic, pretty forward. I'm not saying anything about outlook yet.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>We should remind everyone that Apple's fiscal year ends at

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of September. In the December quarter that we're

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 3>currently in right now, as Angela keeps referencing, is Apple's

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 3>first quarter of its fiscal year. Our own Mark German

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>pointing out on our live blog which I highly recommend,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>reminding us that it's a huge miss on the Mac

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>coming in at least a billion dollars below expectations. It's

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>no wonder. Mark writes that Apple pulled every lever it

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>could to get the M three, MacBook Pro and iMac

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 3>out the door during the holiday quarter. Angelo, what do

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>you make of the billion dollar below expectations when it

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>comes to the Mac and how important is that category

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 3>to Apple?

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, we'll see if they're kind of looking

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 5>at this on wine inventory, and you know, maybe they

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 5>just weren't kind of pushing, pushing kind of sales through

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 5>any more ahead of these new product launches. But you know, again,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 5>it was an extremely difficult comp as far as the

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 5>Mac has been concerned, not only here in the September quarter,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 5>but over the last year. So you know, now that

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 5>they've kind of gone through that was last four tough quarters. Again,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 5>you're now going to enter the December quarter where you're laughing,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 5>essentially at twenty nine percent or so declined from a

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 5>year ago, right with those new product launches. So you know,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 5>it's weak because of those tough comps we think, as

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 5>well as the fact that, hey, listen, it's not the

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 5>most favorable landscape out there for piecs, even though the

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 5>broader PC landscape appears to have found some sort of

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 5>footing for the time being. But at the end of

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the day, the consumer landscape is still very challenging. In nature,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 5>but again, we want to know more clarity. They're not

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 5>going to give exact numbers as far as the guidance

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 5>is current concerned. It's only going to be more directional

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>in nature. But our view it is going to be

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 5>decent at least for the mask.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It's funny Tim and I were just going back and

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>forth because I'm like, wait, they're going to give an

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>out look, and they don't do that, right, They don't,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>you know. But you're looking for some commentary. Stocks now

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>down about zero point nine percent here in the aftermarket

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 2>if you're just joining us, we're talking with Angelo Zeno,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>who covers Apple. Apple sales decline for a fourth straight quarter,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>marking the longest slowdown since two thousand and one, as

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the company struggles with sluggish demand and a shaky smartphone

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>market in China, specifically, revenue falling to eighty nine point

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>five billion in the fiscal fourth quarter that ended, of course,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>September thirtieth, compared with the average Wall Street estimate of

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine point four billion. Apple did not provide formal

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>guidance for the quarter, sticking with a policy it adopted

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic. It's still a law of I feel

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>like whenever there you look at Apple, they still angelo

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 2>sell so much stuff. But remind us, I mean everybody

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>has always for decades been going after the Chinese market.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, our Mark German says China also needs Apple.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Apple employs a lot of workers still in China. So

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that relationship is this just maybe a slight dip, a

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>one quarter dip or who knows? And I guess that's

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>what we want commentary on. But how do you think

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>about that relationship with Apple? Is it at some point

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's going to wind down to some extent

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>or no?

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean we don't think it's going to wind down.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when we kind of forecast Apple and China

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 5>at least looking ahead, we're kind of looking for the

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 5>company they essentially kind of grow in line with the

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 5>smartphone market in that region. So we're no longer looking

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 5>for share gain, which is something that they saw, you know,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 5>as a significant tail wind over the.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 6>Last two years.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Right, Huawei exits essentially kind of exits the high end

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 5>of the market because they can't get their hands on

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 5>these you know, these great chips. As far as five

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 5>G is concerned, Apple takes a significant amount of share.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 5>Now that you know, those tailwinds are now gone in

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 5>our view, So now it's more along the lines of

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 5>kind of them growing in line with the market probably

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 5>at best, to be honest with you, in China. The

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 5>fact of the matter, though, is the growth story isn't

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 5>necessarily dead for Apple because they've got such low share

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 5>in a ton of emerging regions out there.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 5>India is of course a key market out there and

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 5>growth op.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 3>How many people are Apple? How many people in India

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>can afford an iPhone?

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Well not many, but I mean you start, well, well,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 5>there is going to be a wealth effect over the

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 5>next decade in terms of India, right, I mean, similar

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 5>to what we've seen in China over the last you know,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 5>two decades or so. So there is going to be

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>a kind of Apple will grow with that that region

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 5>over time. And now our view is they can probably

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 5>take you know, they can probably see unit growth of

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 5>about one to three percentage points on an annual basis

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 5>from India alone over the next decade. So we're not

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 5>necessarily looking for significant kind of growth in any given

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 5>year out of India, but I think it will be

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 5>an increasing contributor to Apple's business over time, and I

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 5>think that is important, right, I mean, what what happens

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 5>with Apple here is they're just so darn big is

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 5>there's not any single kind of item that's really going

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 5>to move them noteworthy.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 6>At this point in time.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 5>You can't expect to kind of you're an investor out there,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 5>don't expect to get you know, fifty to sixty percent

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 5>gains on a name like this, you know, every single year.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 6>That's just not going to happen anymore.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 5>You kind of say, in this name because it's a

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 5>great free cash flow generator, they can continue to see

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 5>solid earnings growth of let's say, high single digit, low

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 5>double digit, you know annually here over the next kind

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 5>of five to seven years. And that's why you're invested

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 5>in this name, not you know, necessarily because of the

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 5>significant growth opportunities that are attached to them.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Maybe any specific region.

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>It's funny that you said about India. It made me

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 2>look back because I'd just come across a story this

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>past week, the Hamptons of India rises as nation's wealth

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 2>boom eclipses China's. But it just talks about a new

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 2>class of wealthy entrepreneurs, deal makers, you know, and the

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>luxury market just taking off in a big way in India.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's not the market. We've always focused on

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the emerging market, but it is increasingly that case. And

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>they talk about the suspending, whether it's watches or what

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>have you, it's taking off. Having said that, what's the

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that worries you about Apple?

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, listen, I think at this point in time,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 5>I think China would be the biggest concern out there.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 5>What does a competitive landscape look out there? It still

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 5>is twenty percent of their revenue, So I think that

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 5>is kind of the key, at least here in the

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 5>near term over the next kind of nine to twelve months,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 5>as far as this iPhone and fifteen cycle is concerned.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 5>So if it was us, it's on the China side

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 5>of things. And then of course you've always got to

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 5>worry about the regulatory landscape out there, right, you've got

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 5>the digital market deck that's going to go full into

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 5>effect here in Europe here in calendar twenty twenty four.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 5>No one's kind of really warned about that at this

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 5>point in time. As far as kind of the big

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 5>tech companies are concerned, whether or not it disrupts their

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 5>business or kind of slows down the revenue trajectory on

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 5>any of these individual companies remains to be seen. But

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 5>regulatory pressures out there are always something you've got to

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 5>keep your mind on, whether you're Apple or another company

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 5>out there. But this is specifically for Apple as far

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 5>as that service is business, and we know if that

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 5>service business gets dented in terms of the growth that

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 5>look at any point in time, that's going to result

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 5>in some sort of multiple compression. And Apple shit is

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 5>because it is a significantly higher margin business. It is

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 5>driving a lot of the earnings trajectory here looking ahead.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Angela, what's the question you'd ask Tim Cook and executives

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>on the earnings call later?

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think at this point in time, you've

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 5>got to ask him about the competitive outlook in terms

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 5>of China, whether it's legit, whether you know he thinks

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 5>that they can continue to grow in China despite kind

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 5>of increasing pressures from Huawei, because if you recall before

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 5>the pandemic, Huawei was probably Apple's biggest threat out there

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 5>from a competitive landscape. So now they are re emerging

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 5>here and we need to know whether or not Huawei

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 5>is going to be a legitimate, legitimate threat here over

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 5>the next couple of years.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, you mentioned, Okay, the stocks now down about one

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>point three percent, it's not falling off a cliffs.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Especially fair we saw today with Apple.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly it rallied in today's session. I'm looking at your note.

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>You've got a twelve month price target of two twenty.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that multiple compression that needs to happen. Would

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you adjust your price target on the stock as a

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>result of some of the news today. It's right now

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>when it closed about one hundred and seventy seven, just

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>below one seventy eight to share, Yeah.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean we we'd kind of want to get a

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 5>better idea of what the outlook here, what they have

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to say in terms of the December quarter is concerned,

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 5>what their views are as far as the iPhone fifteen

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 5>cycle is concerned, and you know, specifically what they see

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 5>ahead for the services side of things. But you know

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 5>that being said, you know, this is continues to be

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 5>a stable ship.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 6>And as far as that as long as.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 5>That pre cash flow trajectory over the next kind of

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 5>five to seven years remain intact and there's nothing from

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 5>at least these initial numbers that would tell us otherwise,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 5>then I think, you know, this is a company that

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 5>still is worth buying here and should speak you know,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 5>capital appreciation here over the next twelve to eighteen months.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, and you know, I'm looking at your note. You

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>like their pipeline, you like their spatial computing, their Apple car,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>their healthcare, their shift towards hardware as a service.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a long pipeline.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 7>They have been.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Expanding out right, so that the other side of the story,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is this potentially a little bit of an

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>entry point if it's down one percent or so, maybe

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in tomorrow's trade or in the aftermarket here.

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Yep, And we do see you know, some significant secular opportunities,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 5>and you kind of alluded to some of them, but

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 5>the pricing, you know that they're brand and the pricing

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 5>power they have, not to mention, you know, all across

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 5>the globe specifically in the US, but you know, eventually,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 5>we do think they come out with foldable phones right,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 5>foldable devices across their ecosystem. That's going to help support

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 5>higher asps, higher revenue trajectory for this company. So in

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 5>any given cycle there, you're going to have those soft patches,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 5>especially with an iPhone fourteen and fifteen cycles as you're

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 5>lapping the twelve and thirteen, which were absolutely stellar cycles

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 5>and have had the five G momentum right and some

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 5>of the market share gains on that side of things,

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 5>So they're going to be soft cycles here and there.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 5>The iPhone fifteen will probably be one of those cycles.

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 6>If you're an investor out.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 5>There that you know can't be patient with the name,

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 5>then you're probably you know, you potentially get out of

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 5>the name and looking for, you know, certain opportunities to

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 5>get back in. But it's extremely difficult to time Apple overtime,

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 5>and it's probably the most forward looking name that we cover.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>You're probably looking at an iPhone sixteen and seventeen cycle

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 5>for many investors out there at this point in time,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 5>and what the potential for the company as far as

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 5>those cycles are concerned. Where we do see higher average

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 5>selling prices over time because of you know, opportunities like

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 5>buldable devices.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>This two point seven trillion dollars stock is up almost

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven percent year to date, and we are looking

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 2>at a little bit of selling in the after hours.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But now it's just down about eight tens of percent, so.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 3>More than two percent today, Carol Session exactly.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's like hard yours. You know, the perspective on

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 2>this name is just kind of fascinating. Really appreciate. Angela Zino,

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Senior equity Analysts at CFI Research. On zoom in New York.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>City, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>us Live weekday afternoons from three to sixty d Listen

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or wants us live on YouTube.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>What a man he is? Michael McKee man nobody covers

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the economy, international economy.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm so glad you went there. I thought you cold

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>said what a man?

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 7>J Powell is?

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I agree?

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Sorry Michael McKee, Sorry, Jay, Let's just get right to it.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Michael McKee is out there in our Atlanta bureau. He's

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>International Economics and Policy correspondent. Joining us there getting ready

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 2>for a big interview, which we'll get to you in

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>just a moment. What's with that?

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 8>Go Dogs, University of Georgia. We are here in Atlanta,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 8>and of course the big game this weekend in Tennessee.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 8>Everybody's going to be focused on that here. You think

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 8>jobs is important, but I mean this is as my

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 8>daughter who went to UGA says, this is football, football,

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 8>This is football.

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 7>I love it.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you had assessed the game that is monetary policy,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>how would you do it? In terms of what we

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>got from Jay Powell and Company yesterday? Mike Well, I.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 8>Think the bottom line for people on Wall Street is

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 8>basically that you can't at this point think the FED

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 8>is done, and you can't think they're not done. You

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 8>sort of have to throw as my question to Jay

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.479
<v Speaker 8>Boble was, you have to throw the dot plot out

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 8>the window and the forecasts out the window and just

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 8>basically go meeting by many and think that each meeting

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 8>is live. They don't have an objective measure of data

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 8>that they're using now to decide on whether they should

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 8>raise rates or not. It's subjective. What does everything look

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 8>like when you put it all together what does it

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 8>appear to them to be telling them, And so it's

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 8>going to be hard for people to really invest ahead

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 8>of the FED.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 7>At this point.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 8>We'll see the markets gyrate a lot based on economic data,

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 8>but really, what you think the FED is going to do,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 8>you're not going to know till you're pretty close.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 7>To the meetings.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 3>It seems like traders today are pretty convinced they know

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the FED is going to do, and they certainly think

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that the FED is not going to raise rates another time.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty surprised to see this market reaction, Mike. I

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 3>know you're a macro guy, but you certainly pay attention

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to what's happening in all of the markets. Does this

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 3>surprise you, the moves that we're seeing today in the

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 3>bond market and the equity market.

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it doesn't surprise me, because I think the markets

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 8>were leaning in this direction and they go where they

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 8>want to go where they think they want to go. Now,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 8>I've been telling people all day on Bloomberg, talk to

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 8>me at eight thirty one tomorrow. If we get another

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 8>blowout number like we did last week last month, rout

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 8>there three hundred and thirty six thousand, then you're going

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 8>to see yields go right back up again, So it

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 8>really doesn't matter at this point. We focus a lot

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 8>on the movement and J. Powell said this, and look

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 8>what happened, But it's really going to depend on what

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 8>happens between now and then and what they set us

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 8>up for when they get close to the meeting.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 2>What's J. Powell more worried about at this point, you think,

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 2>or is it even in terms of doing too much

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>or too little.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 7>He's still worried about doing too little.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 8>The FED gets in trouble when they do too little,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 8>and the memory of Arthur Burns is seared into every

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 8>FED official's brain. So they're still going to be worried

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 8>about doing too little. But at this point they think

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 8>they've done enough. They just need to get confirmation of that,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 8>and it doesn't come in a neat, tidy package. So

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 8>they're going to sit and wait and watch and eventually decide, well,

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 8>it looks good enough and we don't have to raise anymore,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 8>or if inflation comes back, we'll see them raise.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 7>They won't be cutting anytime soon.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, Mike, it sounds like that's what you were trying

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to get to at your question to J. Palate, Abigail

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Doolittle and I were like just kind of parsing over

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>words that you said and when you were asking, kind

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of just remind everybody what you asked, what you wanted

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 2>to get, and did you feel like you got a

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>good answer.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 8>Well, I wanted to get a sense that the FED

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 8>is that the market can't guess really at what the

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 8>FED is going to do successfully because they don't have

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 8>an objective way of measuring it at this point. And

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 8>while Powell was saying we're on hold, we could raise

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 8>rates again. That's what they've been saying for a long time.

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 8>They had another rate increase penciled in in the dot

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 8>plot before the end of the year, but now the

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 8>end of the year doesn't mean anything. Every meeting is

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 8>going to have that potential for a higher rate if

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 8>the inflation numbers start to go back up again.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Mike, I was talking with Carol earlier about this because

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the takeaways that people had yesterday

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 3>after hearing from Jay Powell was something they've been saying

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 3>for weeks, which is, Okay, the bond market could be

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 3>doing some of the work of the FED. And we've

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>heard that from FED speakers over the last few weeks

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>or so. What happens if yields fall because of that

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>relief that people think the Fed is done raising rates

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and those higher yields stop doing the work that the

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Fed wanted them to do.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, a little bit of that has been what's happened

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 8>over the last twenty four hours. It's going to have

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 8>to be sustained. The way monetary policy works is they

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 8>raised the cost of money. You go in for a loan,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 8>you more, maybe you don't borrow as much, or maybe

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 8>you don't borrow at all. But that takes place over

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 8>a long period of time, the long and variable lags.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 8>Not everybody lines up to get a loan at the

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 8>same time. So they're anticipating that the longer this goes on,

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 8>the lower the economic activity will be because people aren't

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 8>going to be taking out these loans to expand their

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 8>business or buy houses or whatever, and that'll slow down

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 8>the economy enough to bring inflation down.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 7>The question is does that happen.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 8>They've been surprised all along by how strong the labor

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 8>market is and how strong growth has been, so they

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 8>want to keep that possibility of raising rates again in

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 8>reserve in case they continue to get surprised, and if

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 8>the market doesn't back off, then it is.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 7>Always possible that growth stays strong.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 8>But if growth stays strong and we get strong numbers,

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 8>the market's going to come back up again. Yields are

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 8>going to come back up again as bond investors try

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 8>to force the.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Issue mike as economic cycles go, once they start to

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>come undone, whether it's you know, we fall into a

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>recession or not, but once they start to come undone,

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 2>do they start to come undone rather quickly?

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 7>Historically that's been the case.

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 8>There is a saying in economics that recessions are non

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 8>linear events. They just sort of spring upon you. Now,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 8>we haven't had this kind of downturn recovery really ever,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 8>or at least in the age of data. Nineteen eighteen

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 8>flu we didn't have the data that we have today,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 8>so we don't know exactly how things are going to

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 8>work out. The last couple of recessions before the pandemic,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 8>the pandemic brought on this recession, and the last two

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 8>we're brought on by financial market excesses. In this case,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 8>it's hard to say what the excess is and why

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 8>we would necessarily have a recession.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 7>So it's hard to see where the recession comes.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 8>From except putting it in the lens of previous, previous downturns.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 8>And that's kind of what the Fed's been doing and

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 8>a lot of economists on Wall Street have been doing,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 8>and it hasn't worked, and nobody quite knows why. So

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 8>we could have a nonlinear event, we could go into recession,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 8>but it's hard to say, here's the thing that could

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 8>make it happen.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Can we go into recession if the US is still

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>adding roughly two hundred thousand jobs a month.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 8>Nobody thinks that's really possible because all those people are

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 8>going to be spending all that money that they are

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 8>now making, and that just adds to the overall spending

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 8>in the US and the overall wealth in the US.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 8>So as long as that's why the FED thinks they

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 8>need to have a higher unemployment rate and lower job growth,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 8>is at this point we are adding to the economy's

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 8>capabilities for growing rather than being neutral or cutting back.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>But if we're spending perhaps more on student loan paybacks

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 2>or more on our mortgage rates, could it possibly just

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of feel like a recession mic or will we

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe start to see some areas of the economy kind

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of get hurt just because we're spending more money elsewhere.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, there are a number of theories about that. If

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 8>we're spending more money elsewhere, then yes, there would be

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 8>cut back somewhere. The general feeling of academics who've studied

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 8>the student loan thing is it's not going to have

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 8>a major impact on spending overall. Most of the people

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 8>with large student loans are the people who have the

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 8>more lucrative professions, and so they can continue to pay

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 8>their bills. Housing is an issue because if we don't

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 8>buy houses, then we're not going to be buying the

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 8>furniture and carpeting and etc.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 7>That goes with it.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 8>So you could see a bit of a downturn there.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 8>But as long as people get jobs, they're still going

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 8>to be spending money, and they've shown they want to

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 8>spend money, they're going to be spending money on stuff,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 8>and that's going to keep it going even if some

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 8>of these particular areas do fall off.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 7>Now, the question kind of is who would fall off

0:25:58.440 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 7>at this point.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 8>If it's lower income people, yes, they're going to be

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 8>buying less stuff like groceries and gas, and things because

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 8>they live paycheck to paycheck. But we see the upper

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 8>income stratus still spending like crazy, and they can power

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 8>the economy for quite a while.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Mike, I took the day off on Tuesday to go

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 3>trick or treating, and I will say that it was

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 3>pretty subdued in my neighborhood. And I heard it was

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 3>subdued in my old neighborhood as well, and I saw

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 3>people tweeting about people, you know, one candy limits. Is

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 3>there any sort of anecdotal data that we can look

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>at here for a Halloween candy indicator.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 8>I don't know that there's solid data. There are trade

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 8>associations that anticipated a good Halloween, but I can tell

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 8>you anecdotally talking to a lot of people in the

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 8>Washington DC office after Tuesday night, there were a lot

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 8>of complaints about the cost of candy bugs to give out,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 8>and so maybe people were a little less generous.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 8>You remember Robert Griffin third, the former quarterback for the

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 8>Washington Redskins who is now an ESPN broadcaster. He tweeted

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 8>that he took his kids out and they got to

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 8>a house and the people wanted to charge the kids.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 7>For ken no, I don't know that's true. But wait

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 7>what but there's an economic indicator for you.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, you're the best. And Mike, by the way,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>sits down with Atlanta Fed President Rafael Bostak for an

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>exclusive interview tomorrow at three thirty pm AL Street time

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio. Do not miss it. Mike McKee. Of course,

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>at Atlanta Bureau covers all things international economics and policy.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So we're looking forward to that tomorrow. Tomorrow. Yeah, So

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>don't go anywhere, everybody. We're just getting started on this Friday.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>All of the news. Speaking of the news, the flow

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of it has made the environment very heavy and very

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 2>stressful again safe to say.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 3>When I was preparing for this segment, Carol, I did

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 3>some research about you know, mental health at the workplace,

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know the meditation ap Colm, they did a

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 3>survey of two thousand employees earlier this year. They get

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>some insight into mental health in the workplace. It turns

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>out that employees who work in education, retail, hospitality, and yes,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 3>healthcare yep, they report above average feelings of stress and anxiety. Yeah.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, it makes a lot of sense. So there's a

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>lot to be anxious about the economy. Kids are sick,

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>stuff going on at home. We know a lot of

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>people understandably are upset and concerned about the Israel Gaza war,

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and even conversations that are spilling into the workplace. All

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of this is spilling over. So we have a great

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>voice for us. Ron Getzel is a senior scientist at

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg School of Public Health. He's also the director

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Health and Productivity Studies,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>where he studies the relationships specifically between health and well being,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>medical costs, and work related productivity. Speaking of productivity, which

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 2>we are more productive as we heard this morning in

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 2>government data. He joins us though on zoom from Baltimore. Hi,

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 2>ay Ron, nice to have you here with Tim and myself,

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of course, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg Help and

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Philanthropies. Yeah, we're all feeling pretty heavy and pretty

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 2>stressed out. Again, make the connection for us, because I

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 2>think people are like, well, let's just stress. We have

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to deal with it. But there is a cost, a

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>significant cost.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 9>There is, and thank you very much for inviting me.

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 9>We've done quite a bit of research looking at the

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 9>relationship between mental health and well being and the costs

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 9>and employers bear not my dep with communities and society

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 9>as a whole. So we find that there is certainly

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 9>an impact on ind digital workers.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Mental health and well being.

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 9>So they may feel stressed out, they may be depressed,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 9>they may not have opportunities to have a work life balance,

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 9>they're not getting enough sleep and eating wealth and all

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 9>of those costs money, not just in terms of direct

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 9>medical costs, but also in productivity losses.

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.719
<v Speaker 3>How is it, Yeah, how is that manifested in productivity

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>loss This is something that you study very closely, So

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 3>give us some numbers here.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 9>Right, So we looked at direct medical costs, certainly a

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 9>prescription drug and medical care. On the productivity side, it's

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 9>things like absenteeism, and disability, and also this issue called presenteeism,

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 9>and what that means is that you're actually at work,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 9>but your mind may not be there because you're worried

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 9>about your own health and well being or some family

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 9>members health and well being. And there are ways to

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 9>actually monetize it.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, talk to us to you a little bit about

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the monetization aspect of it, because I do think about

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes resonates unfortunately but maybe rightfully so I don't

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>know with individuals and people who are listening.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 9>All right, So imagine that you know you're stressed and depressed.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Now there may be things in the workplace that are

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 9>causing that to happen, and there are many things that

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 9>employers can do to improve the workplace. But let's say

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 9>in general, so your mind is drifting, you're not focused,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 9>you're not engaged, You kind of you have trouble getting

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 9>out of better in the morning. That is a cost

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 9>to you. It's a cost to the business because instead

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 9>of you being focused, engaged, directed at the goals of

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 9>the business, you're actually distracted and worried about other things. Now,

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 9>the business can have tremendous impact on improving that for

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 9>many people. You know, going to work is actually a

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 9>good thing.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 9>It gives us an opportunity to be with our coworkers,

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 9>to do things that are important and meaningful to us

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 9>in life, and almost a respite from all the bad

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 9>news that's around us. So employers can do quite a

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 9>bit to improve mental health, well being, and productivity of

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 9>the workforce.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you said that. I mean I certainly feel

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>that way. I don't know if you feel that way, Carol,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Like work is like especially. I mean, anyone with young

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>kids can can relate to this, but it's like you

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of get to work and you know your kids

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 3>are at school or in daycare, and like everyone's in

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the right place and you kind of like breathe the

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>sigh of relief. But I completely agree with that. I

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 3>think that's why it's important to work in a place

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that you enjoy working.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I completely agree. I mean I've gone through parents who

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>were ill and coming to work was like this incredible

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 2>constant with a very warm environment, and I kind of

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 2>knew what was going on. There were things that could control, yeah,

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>but it was just something that was so important to me.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, so what's your advice to folks in

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>this environment, or leaders at institutions or organizations about thinking

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 2>about this, because I think there are times like we

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 2>keep talking about meditation so important, so important, but it's

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 2>not always so easy to do at an office environment

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>or a workplace environment.

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, let me just say that you can't yoga math

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 9>yourself out of a stressful and toxic work environment. Meditation

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 9>apps and yoga are very, very helpful, absolutely, But the

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 9>approach that we've adopted at Johns Hopkins and our Total

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 9>Worker Health Center of Excellence says there are three basic

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 9>buckets of stressors and solutions. The first is and we

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 9>call it the Post Center Poe someone named after ad

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 9>gow Ed ground Poe, who have a house in the

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 9>museum in Baltimore. But peace stance for psychosocial factors, O,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 9>organizational and E environmental factors. So, imagine being in a

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 9>work situation where the work demands are high, deadlines are imposed,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 9>you don't have the resources to do your job, your

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 9>boss is yelling at you, You're exposed to toxic fumes,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 9>your pay is ridiculously low, benefits are limited, you're not

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 9>sleeping well, no opportunity to exercise, diet is past, food

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 9>blood pressure to control so no yoga class is not

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 9>going to fix all those problems. But there are things

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 9>that employers can do within those broad categories of POE.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, just give us just got about fifteen seconds. What

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 2>would be one or two things, just quickly, well.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Flex time breaks, predictable schedules, access to healthcare that's not

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 9>too expensive, an EAP program, greater autonomy, shared decision making,

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 9>living wages, paid medical leave, career path opportunity. So I

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 9>can go on and on.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, you're hired some now, Ron for president.

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a very very productive list. I really appreciate you

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 2>going there. Ron Getzel, Senior scientist at the Bloomberg School

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of Public Health, Director at the Johns Hopkins Institute for

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Health and Productivity Studies. As we said, of course, the

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg School of Public Health, supported by Michael our Bloomberg.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app band YouTube. You can also listen

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty Big Way.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well a long way home may mean you get

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 2>there and then you've got a really expensive mortgage to

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 2>pay for because of higher rates. We're going to talk

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 2>about the so called lock in effect homeowners who are

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>unwilling to let go of cheap mortgages they got when

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 2>rates were scraping bottom. They're the lucky ones, which has

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>resulted in the least affordable housing market since the nineteen eighties,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 2>with sales approaching record lows.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 3>This story is the domestic cover story this week of

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.479
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week. It's also today Carol among the most

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 3>read on the Bloomberg terminal with more on the US

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 3>housing market that has become an impossible mess for so

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 3>many people. With us is the team of the Bloomberg

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 3>News real estate reporter. We got Prashan Gopaal, who wrote

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 3>the story along with Pat Clark shot on Zoom from Massachusetts.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 3>We also got the editor of Business Week here, Joel Weber,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 3>with us in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Jiel, this

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 3>is a story or a movie I should say that

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen before.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I've seen it before, but not maybe recently. And look, ultimately,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 10>if you want to feel like there's an existential crisis

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 10>in the US, I think the housing industry. Housing market

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 10>is maybe a pretty good one good place to look

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 10>right now if you have one of those low rate mortgages.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of people do that.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 10>A lot of people got fortunate enough to get in

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 10>when when the market uh allowed that, you know, you're

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 10>you don't want to give it up, so there's very

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 10>little incentive to sell and then have to take out

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 10>a high mortgage. Now that also means that for those

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 10>people who never had a chance to get in, you're

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 10>not able to get in because nobody's selling, there's very

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 10>low inventory, and if you could get in, you have

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 10>to pay that eight percent mortgage that is potentially, you know,

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 10>dramatically higher than what the housing market even looked like

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 10>two years ago. And boy, that is just a rotten

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 10>place to be. And especially for people who are starting out,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 10>it really feels like you're just iced out and that

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 10>has I think some long term economic implications for the US.

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 10>And there I think we're done talking about the story

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 10>because that's basically how rotten this is.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 7>But there's a whole lot more there.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 10>And Prashant and Pat Clark did a great job of

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 10>not only setting that table and and this is to

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 10>me one of these stories that when I first started

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 10>engaging with them about it, it feels like one of

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 10>the most important stories of the year. We've talked about

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 10>what happened. What's happened in the commercial real estate world,

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 10>this is equally scary because it affects meeple so directly,

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 10>I think. So, Prashan, you've got to speak to some people,

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 10>tell us about what you and Pat learned along the way.

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Well, really, this is like two different worlds, right, So

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 11>people who own houses are really the haves here, and

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 11>in some ways they're sitting pretty because they locked in

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 11>some of the lowest rates in history, and they're unaffected

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 11>for the most part by the rising mortgage rates because

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, most people have fixed rate mortgages for you know,

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 11>thirty years, so they might be in those homes for

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 11>a long time because they have very little incentives to

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 11>sell and take on sort of a much higher rate.

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 11>On the other hand, people who haven't gotten a chance

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 11>to buy yet, maybe they were you know, they couldn't

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 11>buy during the peak of the COVID buying frenzy because

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 11>they lost out in bidding wars. But now they can't

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 11>buy because they can't afford to. You combine these very

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 11>high prices and these extraordinarily high rates, and you know

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 11>they're they're just locked out.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 2>What I think is interesting for me, and I kind

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of had to remember, you remind us of an economist

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 2>back in the nineteen eighties who actually identified this so

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.959
<v Speaker 2>called lock in effect, take us back there, because we've

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of been in these disposition before.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 11>Pat actually read that study, so that go for it.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, So it was very much like what we're

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 4>seeing now, which is that interest rates shot up quickly,

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 4>and people who you know, I think between nineteen seventy

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 4>eight nineteen eighty one, interest rates doubled. They were much

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 4>higher in those days. I think they shut up all

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the way I think to eighteen percent or so. But

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 4>interest rates went up very quickly, and it became clear

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 4>that the old mortgage had a value attached to it, right.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't just the bill you had to pay every month,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 4>but it was worth you know, thousands of dollars, and

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 4>because if you were to trade it into a new mortgage,

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 4>that's how much more you would pay over the life

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 4>of alone. And you know, at the time, there was

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 4>a an economist at the University of California who who

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 4>you know who sort of showed that this was correlated

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 4>or or he associated this with a strong dist incentive

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 4>to move, which is logical. You know. You fast forward

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 4>now to today and there there are two researchers, one

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 4>at University of Illinois and one at the University of Pennsylvania.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 4>But actually, you know, have a you know, a way

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 4>to do a sort of back of the envelope calculation

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 4>to show that there's a real causal effect between this,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, luck and effect and deuce residential mobility. People

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 4>are going to move last and and in fact, people

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 4>have been moving less than America, you know, for we

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 4>were finally moving.

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 2>We were finally moving again right with the pandemic because

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you could work Jill anywhere, Like finally people were starting

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 2>to move around again a little bit.

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 10>And boy did that end with the pandemic, right and

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 10>and now suddenly maybe you did move somewhere, and now

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, even being able to offload that thing that

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 10>you got yourself into, maybe you won't be so lucky now.

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 10>Most important question amount I asked today Pat Pashant, which

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 10>have you got to speak to Eugene Quackenbush.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 12>I always.

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so tell us about.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 3>Also, can we say the name of Eugene Quackenbush.

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 10>Quackenbush, exactly what he's doing Phoenix broke Like I know

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Pat has a deep understanding of Phoenix. But tell us

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 10>about what what mister Quackenbush.

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 3>Revealed his name.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but but but he's a you know, he's a

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 4>pretty savvy real estate guy in uh in Phoenix who

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 4>has a real estate company called Get Your Nest. That

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 4>will that that that that acts as a brokerage and

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 4>the types of you know, effectively, he has to get

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.919
<v Speaker 4>creative for his clients. And and and the simplest thing

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 4>is you go and look for a new home, right

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 4>because the homebuilders are often buying down interest rates and

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 4>and and we can tell you more about that. I

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 4>can tell you more about that. But he's doing things

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 4>as well, like well, can we go out and find

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 4>people who have assumable mortgages which is usually an f

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 4>h A or a v A loan that someone else

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 4>can take on, so you know, it was a there's

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 4>a three percent mortgage and you sell the mortgage along

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 4>with the house. You know, the package today, the package not.

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Just it's not just not the garden.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 10>You know, throw it, throw in the three percent mortgage.

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:02.879
<v Speaker 10>I mean it sounds like a great deal.

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally, and it's you know, and it's probably better

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 4>than the alternatives because the alternatives are you either look

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 4>for something smaller. I mean, one thing we've heard about

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot is you look for something or what you

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 4>find is a house that's not in great condition and

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 4>so not only is it expensive, it's going to need

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 4>more work. Or another thing that that Eugene told me

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 4>he was doing with clients or you know, clients were

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 4>considering as you know, you just drive farther. It's it's

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 4>no longer you know, the close in suburb that you

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 4>pictured yourself in in twenty twenty one when all your

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 4>friends were rushing to buy homes. You are now you know,

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 4>you're now in the next or the one after, and

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 4>you're having to drive farther every day.

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 10>Supershan, Let's talk about the home builder dynamic, because the

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 10>other thing here is that there just hasn't been that

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 10>much inventory.

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 10>But like so we're the homebuilders in all of this.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 11>Right, So the home builders in some ways are in

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 11>much better shape because they produce inventory. So you've had

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 11>the existing market just completely lock up, and that's left

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 11>a little bit of an opening, especially for the larger

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 11>builders that have their own mortgage arms, so they're able

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 11>to kind of offer subsidized mortgage rates which are really

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 11>enticing buyers to buy new so there can more aggressively

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:29.439
<v Speaker 11>cut prices and you know, offer you know, a five

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 11>percent mortgage or something like that, at least for a

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 11>period of time. It can you know, it might increase later,

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 11>but for the first few years five percent, and that's

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 11>that's actually working for them, so they're able to sort

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 11>of increase production and get more buyers in.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so young people can't get in, people with low

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 10>rate mortgages don't.

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Want to sell.

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 10>What's the way out of this impossible mess? Mortgage impossible

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 10>as we called it on the cover, Well.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 11>We had we had like we spoke with UH, you know,

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 11>Ralph McLaughlin. He's a he's an economist. So there's been

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 11>some efforts to sort of attack this from uh, from

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:17.280
<v Speaker 11>the perspective of demand, trying to get make it easier

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 11>for people to purchase, right, so lowering fees for mortgages,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 11>things like that down payment assistance. But all that does

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 11>is sort of adds to the competition, right, which is

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 11>the problem we have. So his idea is, let's try

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 11>to get convinced sellers to sell. So he's suggesting that

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:38.720
<v Speaker 11>you could do things like, you know, uh, a window

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 11>of time where you know, capital gains where you where

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 11>maybe investors wouldn't have to pay that, or or or

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 11>you you increase taxes on rental landlords. Either way, the

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 11>idea would be to get some of these airbnb landlords

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 11>and other landlords to sell to first time buyers.

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 10>Hey, there was a different answer that I was like,

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 10>which was like, you know, inspired by mortgage impossible. It's

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 10>tim descending from the ceiling down to you know, jove,

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 10>there's a knife that lends on the.

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Desks, just me at the bond market. Yeah, cutting rates.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 10>That was there was an alternative answer that was a

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 10>very academic and effective one.

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, isn't that go ahead?

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 6>Go ahead?

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 4>No please, no, no, no, My joke was not that good.

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 4>We do have to do that. It's just like it

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 4>was just like in the Federal Reserve interest rates if

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 4>and this is really what the problem is, is like

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 4>we don't see a way, you know, this is higher

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 4>for longer for housing like we don't see a way

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 4>for mortgage rates to come down quickly. They will come down,

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.399
<v Speaker 4>it's just you know, they're not going back to where

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 4>they were. And if they were to go back to

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 4>where they were quickly, it would be because we had

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 4>really big problems in the world.

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and if they came down, you know, you prices

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 11>might go up because.

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 10>Well that's the other thing though, right, because like the

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 10>thing that has not budged is the prices, and so

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 10>prices could come down here because that's the dynamic that

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 10>we have yet to really start to see.

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 11>Right, Yeah, rate rate. I mean, no one thought that

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 11>we'd be, you know, flirting with eight percent mortgage rates,

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 11>so that that really has been a downer for the market.

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 11>Which you know, prices had been rising a bit because

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 11>of this lack of supply, but the higher rates could

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 11>actually hurt start to hurt demand more, and that would

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 11>there's a potential here that you know, prices could come

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 11>down a bit going forward, but you know if rates fell,

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 11>that actually could drive prices up again, so because you know,

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 11>more people would be able to buy. So there's there

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 11>are very few solutions other than time, right, because if

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 11>you've given enough time builders might be able to create

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 11>some more inventory, but you know that's it's not gonna

0:47:58.360 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 11>happen very.

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Fast, Joel. One thing I want to make sure to

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 3>touch on was the demographic implications of something like this,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 3>which I didn't even consider until I read this cover story.

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 3>If people cannot move to a bigger place, then maybe

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 3>they don't have kids, or maybe they only have one

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 3>kid when they want to have two. And we all

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 3>know what happens to a society that stops having children.

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you just hate the boomers even more for everything

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 10>that they have than the rest of us didn't get

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 10>right now and I just a little bit.

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 3>But or you're never able to retire because nobody can

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 3>fund social Security.

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exactly.

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 10>These are these long term economic implications that I think

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 10>are are going to be a significant challenge. And like,

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 10>if it's like this now and we think about how

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 10>quick this happened, I'm not so sure that this isn't

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 10>a very slow unwind out of this then and again,

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 10>maybe there's no end in sight.

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Remember that earlier segment we did about being depressed.

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 10>A little bit in the meantime tim coming down from

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 10>the ceiling in the Federal Reserve. But it's a movie

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 10>I might want to watch.

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, December FED meeting, I'll be there.

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. All right. Bloomberg News real estate reporters

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 2>pack Law Ark and Personcobal. They wrote the story. It's

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 2>the domestic cover story of Bloomberg BusinessWeek. It's a most

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 2>read two on the Bloomberg Or thanks to them as

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 2>well as the editor of BusinessWeek, Jill Webber.

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 8>Umbrella Marc.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 4>A journal. How about you let me drive? O?

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 7>No, no, no, no, who's going to drive?

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Honey?

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 7>Please the gravel?

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's wat I want to try it.

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 12>It's a good question.

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the Globes dot com.

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 6>I think well.

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Byn on Bloomberg Radio.

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, TikTok. It's just under eighteen minutes left

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 2>in today's trading session. Carol Master along with Tim Stanovic

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 2>life here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. We've got

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the talks pretty much staying at their best levels of

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 2>the day. Charlie just breaking down the numbers. Uh, as

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 2>we said, everything seems awesome. Awesome again.

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Bill Maloney, who you just heard? Yeah, he used a

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 3>very technical term that I think was one he developed

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 3>as a trader. He said, this is a rip your

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 3>face off rally.

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Bill, Are you listening?

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 3>He's walking away right now. I see him for your

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 3>face rally.

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty interesting. I think he said the S and

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 2>P right back above. It's two hundred days, so it's

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.359
<v Speaker 2>bullish significant. Yeah, certainly technicians would say so. All right,

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to it with Len's Canon, portfolio manager

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 2>at hood River Capital Management, joining us on zoom from

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Palm Beach Cord in Florida. He manages the hood River

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>International Opportunity Fund. It's up nine percent year to date,

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Timmitt's and an eighty ninth percentile for funds in this category.

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 2>That's according to our own data here at Bloomberg.

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Len's good to have you with us this afternoon.

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the day and then zoom out a

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I mean, the S and P five hundred

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 3>is up four point three percent over the last five days.

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Our investors getting ahead of himself right now.

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 12>Tim Girl's great to be here. You know, that's a

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 12>good question. I'm it would be great to have more

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 12>of these days coming ahead. But I think it's hard

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 12>to ignore that was is happening from a macro standpoint

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 12>out there. As well, and the fact that there are

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 12>some signals that would suggest that maybe this isn't self

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 12>sustaining as long as we'd like. But you know, we've

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 12>been wrong before and we'd all love to see more

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 12>of these days going forward. So here's a hope that

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 12>this is sustainable at this juncture.

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, so you've got to manage a fun or you

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 2>are managing a fund, and I don't know how much

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you kind of kind of move around the portfolio. But

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 2>in this environment, I mean, what is it that makes

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 2>you sell buy? Is it just case by case company?

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there macro factors that impact the portfolio strategy?

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 12>That's a good question. So here at hood River, we're

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 12>a bottoms up fundamental long only shop, so we tend

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 12>to look for quality management teams we can invest with

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 12>over time, have good quality products, and so for us,

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 12>it's all about the fundamentals. Funamals drive both the buy

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 12>and sell process. So we're looking for companies and opportunities

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 12>that present a company in a situation where it's undervalued

0:51:58.040 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 12>relative to maybe some of us peers, or even what

0:51:59.880 --> 0:52:01.919
<v Speaker 12>we think it should be valued. I think a great

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 12>example of one of those type of names would be

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.720
<v Speaker 12>on Holdings, which is the company that owns on cloud shoes.

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 12>It's a company that we own their international fund. It's

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 12>based out of Switzerland that it's listened here in the US.

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 6>They've done a really good job with in terms of

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 6>growing in Europe.

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 12>They've got a really great management team that's continued to

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 12>work here and growing the company in the North America

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 12>region as well as an Asia Pacific, which we think

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 12>has a lot of leg Well.

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 2>North America right is their big, big market right now

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 2>if you look at a pie chart right in terms

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 2>of revenues, and I know the ADRs that trade here

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 2>in the United States are up about sixty percent. I'm

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 2>not being a show off, but our team just did

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a show one of our chief Future officers on Holding

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 2>and they talked with there's two co CEOs, but one

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 2>of the co CEOs is actually the CFO as well,

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 2>So we just did a whole half hour on it.

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 2>So it's certainly been a company that's on our radar.

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 2>But you're right, China, there's a lot of room for

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 2>growth there if they can make it work.

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I agree on hundred percent with that, and I

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 12>think that will have been if they can be successful

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 12>over there. I think it's one of the things that

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 12>can help them continue to drive the margin expansion. And

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 12>one of the reasons why we're excited about the name

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 12>is that we think there's opportunity for them to continue

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 12>to expand margins, drive higher earnings growth, and develop more

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 12>cash flow so then could be distributed back to us

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 12>as investors down the road.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what about Baltic Classified. It's part of Baltic Classified,

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the group of trades over in London.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, you hear online classifieds and you think to yourself,

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Wait a second, I thought Facebook and Google completely disrupted, Yeah,

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 3>this space, what's going on?

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so these guys are not necessarily in those jurisdictions

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 12>that where you would think about Facebook and some of

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 12>the other guys, whether this is like a Lithuania or

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 12>some of the Eastern European countries where maybe it's not

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 12>quite as developed. From that standpoint, they've been able to

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.360
<v Speaker 12>go out and find the right platforms and built the

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 12>right platforms in those jurisdictions or in those geographies, and

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 12>it allows them to be a number one or number

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 12>two market shared holder from that standpoint, and their average

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 12>revenue per customer or per ad is significantly lower relative

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 12>like your Facebook or eBay or some of these other

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 12>online platforms that are doing and selling products online from

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 12>the individuals, and so we really like the opportunity they've created.

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 12>They can drive top line growth through both price and

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 12>the pricing part that they have, as well as through

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 12>expanding into other geographies that are adjacent to the ones

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 12>that are already in where they're already starting to see

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 12>some traction from you know, cross border opportunities, and from

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 12>there successful in doing this, we believe that EBITDA will

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 12>continue to grow, They'll continue to see margins expand as

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 12>they've got a really hot, really low level of fixed

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 12>costs that have already been covered and then some and

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:37.439
<v Speaker 12>well it currently trades at eighteen times and this thing's

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 12>growing it you know, call it mid teens. We think

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:41.399
<v Speaker 12>this is a longer term play that can really kind

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 12>of choose your portfolio going forward.

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Small cap when you look at the small cap universe,

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 2>lots of names out there, you think right now for

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you to be looking at, a lot of them have

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 2>been been beaten up. I know, certainly here in the

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:52.680
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 12>Oh yeah, yeah, no, it's we're definitely constructive on international

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:00.120
<v Speaker 12>small cap or a small cap in general as a whole.

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 12>You know, if you look at like the msci XUS

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 12>small Cap Index relative to the fsci XUS Large Cap Index,

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 12>historically the small cap index is traded at a premium

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:13.919
<v Speaker 12>relative to large cap. Right now, large cap is trading

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.280
<v Speaker 12>at a premium relative to small cap, which to your point,

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 12>I think illustrates that these small cap neans have just

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 12>really been beaten up. But that's also why we're so

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.280
<v Speaker 12>positive and excited about the opportunities that we're seeing out there.

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 12>We're seeing a lot of companies where there's opportunities to

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 12>own names that will have positive earnings revisions over the

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 12>next twelve to eighteen months, and that's really where we're

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 12>focused right now, is identifying those names that are going

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 12>to have those positive earnings revisions and then allow us

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 12>to generate alpha for our clients going forward.

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Is there a geography a region in the world that

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you're most bullish on.

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 12>There's a hamp I mean, India is very interesting to

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 12>us right now. We're excited about various parts. Obviously we've

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 12>talked about a name there in the UK slash Europe area,

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 12>there's opportunities almost everywhere we look. To say that there's

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 12>one particular that I'm excited about more than others is

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 12>not true because I find that as opportunities to pretymache.

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:07.839
<v Speaker 2>Everywhere, squeeze in one more basic fit.

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:13.280
<v Speaker 2>They're based over in the Netherlands, I believe. Yes, another

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:16.320
<v Speaker 2>one point six billion market cap. I'm looking at actually

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 2>one point six billion in terms of euros. So tell

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 2>us about this. This is what health clubs fitness just what.

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:25.399
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like, basically be fit.

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:27.399
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's exactly basic fit.

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 6>I would tell you.

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit of roughly be kind.

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Just talking to me. Don't worry, We've got.

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 6>It's all good.

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Thirty seconds go ahead.

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:39.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so I guess real quickly. And this is like

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 12>the Planet Fitness of Europe.

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:45.240
<v Speaker 12>So it's a low cost provider. They're opening in more countries.

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 12>They're in Spain and the Netherlands and Belgium and France.

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 12>Another expanded in Germany and the UK and Italy. It's

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 12>a lot of opportunity to expand there's not really a

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:56.279
<v Speaker 12>whole lot of competition for them. You're going to grow

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 12>top line both by driving more memberships into the current

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 12>clubs that are open those various countries, as well as

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:04.759
<v Speaker 12>expanding to other countries adjacent to them. Even demarts to

0:57:04.760 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 12>continue to expand as they were able to lovers six costs.

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.320
<v Speaker 12>All right, all the fun stuff, thank you.

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 3>The question is, you know, if it's the Planet Fitness

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 3>of Europe, do they still have pizza mondays like Planet Fitness's.

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's Only Hope? Lance Cannon, portfolio manager at hood River

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Capital Management, joining us there from Florida.

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You can also want us live every weekday on YouTube

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Jurmalone