WEBVTT - Baltimore Bridge and Biden Polls

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. Paul went

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 2>to our team and he said, can you get us

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 2>somebody here that's completely holistic on global shipping that can

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>understand a Where's mayors Copenhagen, I think Denil I care

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>you remember from the Baltic Sea over to Sri Lanka

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>through Singapore. All these geographies are around and there has

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to be somebody who's encyclopedic and global shipping and the

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>many geographies. John Krtsonis fits the bill. Not only was

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>his work at City Group years ago, but with Breakwave Advisors.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>He's a board member with Synergy as well. He's encyclopedic

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>on shipping. What are the people doing? John? Thank you

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>so much first of all for being with us on

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>short notice. What is Maersk doing this morning? What are

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the people in the shipping business do when they have

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a horrific event like this?

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Good morning and thank you for having me.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, indeed, that's a horrific event, and I think like

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 4>from a shipping perspective, the first thing you have to

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 4>do is obviously find what went wrong? Right, I mean,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 4>these are state of the r ships, especially this one

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>involved in this accident is a brand new ship. He's

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 4>less than ten years old building Korea. These are high

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>quality shapes, so very it's a very unlikely phenomenon that

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>you get something like that. The other thing is, obviously

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 4>you have to look at the human error. But again,

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>when the ships approach ports or tight waterways or areas

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>that they don't know very well, you have experienced personnel

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 4>that gets on board from the port, called basically pilots,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 4>and the other ones we're going to steer the ship

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 4>through the waterway. So there are a lot of elements here.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 4>One is obviously the human element. The other is the

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>mechanical failure, which seems to be the case here. But

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 4>there's also obviously the timing here, because if you happened

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 4>like ten or fifteen minutes later, nothing would have gone wrong.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Is a process here in the coming quarters in months

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 2>and years, a litigious years in the making process or

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 2>is it covered by insurance and reinsurance and offices in Hamilton,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Bermuda that I don't know about where there's almost the

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>routine how the shipping industry deals with a tragedy like this.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think it's routine at all.

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean usually human laws and hopefully there is none here,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 4>but human loss, especially outside the ship, is kind that

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>is very rare in the maritime industry. You have very

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>few incidents globally that you have basically this type of

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 4>an event that will cause basically ordinary citizens to you know.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>To die.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's definitely not an ordinary process. It

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 4>will take a very very long time, and it will have.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>A multiple.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, multiple agents organizations involved, especially given that this

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 4>happened in the US.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 5>John, can you give us a sensis for folks that

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 5>you're not in this business, like at one thirty in

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 5>the morning navigating through a harbor. Is this navigation visual

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Is it by instruments? How is that done? Because it

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 5>seemed like it was significantly you know, off course here.

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course it's not visual.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, This are as I said at the beginning, state

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 4>of the art equipment on board and very experienced pilots

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>and captains that are going to steer the ship outside,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, to go towards the ocean. So as we

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 4>all saw on the videos, it seems that there's a

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>blackout happening just moments before the collision. So again we

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 4>don't know what was happening at that point on the bridge,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 4>what people were discussing, what was the incident, But it

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>seems that a blackout where basically everything stops, the engine stops,

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 4>there is no power, and there is no way you

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 4>can steer the boat the ship away from either.

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Currents or maybe the router get stuck.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 4>Who knows, but it seems that the mechanical failure is

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 4>most likely scenario here.

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 5>John, Just give us a sense how big Baltimore is

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 5>in the in the global scale of shipping. It seems

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 5>like a busy board. Just give us a sense of

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 5>its relative scale.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>It is very significant in terms of especially of consumer goods, cars,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 4>stuff that the US imports from abroad is not as

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 4>significant in the commodities business. I mean that to export

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 4>a call from the Baltimore area. But I think like

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>probably what's going to be affected most is like deliveries

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 4>of new cars, for example, or consumer goods. But again,

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean there is a lot of other areas obviously

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 4>north the New York Harbord all the way down to Georgia,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Savannah and so on, so that you have alternative destinations.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 4>But obviously that's going to take a while for the

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>situation to resolve and this thing to begin operating normally again.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 4>So definitely the delays will cause delays in deliveries of

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>goods if.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>You're joining US now worldwide and across this nation. As

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>we look at a horrific bridge accident in Baltimore. John

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Katsunas joins US now managing partner Breakaway Advisors, has worked

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>with Energy, has worked with City Group over the years,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>just truly cyclopedic on the linkage of global shipping in

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the equity and helysis. John, I think a question that

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Americans have today that needs to be reviewed.

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It seems like everybody in America is involved in shipping.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Mariska is over in the Baltic Sea. You and your

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>board membership with Centergy. They're out of Athens, Greece. Okay,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I get that, breakwaves his own beast. Why aren't Americans involved?

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't there American ships, US ships, US shipping, US

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 2>ship building. Why is America left out of the discussion?

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Huh, that's that's a very interesting question. And it goes

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>back to I think that what everybody knows that it

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 4>is cheaper and more efficient to build it abroad or

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 4>to stop it abroad. I mean, this is something that

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.119
<v Speaker 4>has gone through you know, decades now, the US maritime business,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 4>if you go back one hundred and hundred years, was thriving.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 4>But this has changed over the years and right now

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 4>basically Asia and you know, some European countries are dominating

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 4>the global shipping space. You know, it has to do

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>with cost. It has to do with the cost of

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 4>building a ship. I mean, you can build a ship

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 4>in the US, but it's gonna cost you three times

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>more because of like the protectionism that the shipping industry

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 4>is enjoying the US.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>So you know, that's that's the main reason for.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>US just thirty seconds left, John, totally unfair question. But

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you're I mean, you're an act former exa analyst at

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>City Group. It was used to it. John, When does

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the Baltimore Harbor open up again? And you're just guests

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>here in the moments of this tragedy, when would you

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>see free sailing down the river towards the Chesapeake Bay again?

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say not this year. If I was taken,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I would take a while.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes here, John, thank you so much on short notice.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to our team, Eric Mulane, everybody forgetting just such

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>an authority. John carsonis with with Breakwave Advisors here with

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>some real pro perspective there. I'm this tragedy joining us

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in the Peterson Institute. Adam Posen here on the state, Adam,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I love the beginning of the interview with Robert Armstrong

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and you say something that's on the edge of Robert

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Taylor out of Chicago, Richard Taylor, excuse me, and that

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>you say you underestimated the resiliency of the people of

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the American and global economy. Discuss how you fold a character,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a culture, a fabric of people into economics.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 6>Thank you Tom for reading and having me back. It's

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 6>great to be with you on this, and I'm grateful

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 6>of Robert and the Ft for taking me through all that.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 6>I think what we have to think about is going

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 6>into the pandemic. There was reason for fear. We didn't

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 6>know what was going to happen, and we have in

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 6>the US, in particular this enormous spike in unemployment, and rightly,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 6>the FED and first the Trump and then the Biden

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 6>administration started providing some social benefits, some healthcare, all things

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 6>I supported. But what was amazing and became evident within

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 6>the first few months was that people adapted. They set

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 6>up new businesses, they moved to new jobs, they arranged care.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 6>That doesn't mean we should leave them to that. It's

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 6>better that we didn't. But we as economists, and particularly

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 6>people who are on the progressive side, where I sort

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 6>of am. You know, we understandably worry a lot about

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 6>people buffeted by large shocks that they have no fault

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 6>in and they can't control. But what I think COVID

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 6>showed us is people's ability to adapt to these shocks

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 6>is much much bigger than we worried about, and that

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 6>leads into all kinds of positive though non intended labor

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 6>market changes in the US that I think came out

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 6>of this process.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 5>One of the things, Adam, I think folks are concerned

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 5>about is the economic divide in this country may have

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 5>been even exacerbated from even prior levels by this pandemic.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Just simply, you know, it could be as simple as

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 5>some people can afford to work from home, some jobs

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 5>you can't do that. How big of a concern is

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 5>that for you?

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Paul, you're absolutely right, and I mean it

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 6>doesn't get much more basic and important than what you

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 6>said that people who have different levels of income, different

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 6>levels well, particularly in the US, have different vulnerabilities. Nonetheless,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 6>it's more about, let's call it, the health gradient than

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 6>the economic gradient. Over the last few years, so what

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 6>we've seen is people who didn't have good healthcare, people

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 6>who had pre existing conditions, which is associated with socioeconomic status,

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 6>people who had less access to medicine, and people unfortunately,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 6>who were less educated and more willing to believe lies

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 6>and fears about vaccinations. They had much worse health outcomes,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 6>much higher mortality and morbidity, as they say. But on

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 6>the economics, what we've seen for the last few years

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 6>is we've actually seen a closing of the income inequality.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 6>We've seen much more growth in real income for the

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 6>lower end of the income distribution than for the higher end.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 6>And again I don't think I certainly didn't. I don't

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 6>think anybody else was expecting that going in.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 2>When you look at adamire running out of time here

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>where the news flow out of Baltimore this morning. I

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 2>want to get you back really soon here on more

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Adam posting economics. But just as a general statement, do

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you buy the new productivity and is it just simply

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>total factor productivity the oddities of technology over on the

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>right side of the equation.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 6>Tom, I am reluctantly a productivity bulk. I think it's

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 6>a productivity two step. The first is what we've seen

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 6>for the last year and are seeing still, is this

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 6>labor market transition where millions of lower income workers we're

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 6>more willing to take risks and have more of a

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 6>sense of backstop, and are moving on large numbers to

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 6>bigger employers and becoming more productive. And I think that's

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 6>what we're benefiting from. I think we're at the start

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 6>of a boom created by generative AI. We've had many

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 6>guests I know you've been talking about this way early. Tom.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 6>We don't know when that's going to hit. We don't

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 6>know how big it's going to hit, but it's pretty

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 6>certain it's coming.

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Adam, thank you so much. Way too short of visit.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll have doctor Poson on again here more than soon.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>It's tough to get him, he's busy, but we'll try

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to get him out here with a news flow today

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in our studios. Now, as someone who knows we rip.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 7>Up the script regularly, we can do this with Peter Sheer,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 7>Academy Securities, Bloomberg Newspeter moments ago reporting I'm going to

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 7>read it verbatim because I really have not dived into

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 7>a link.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>They article. Apple iPhone shipments in China fell about thirty

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 2>three percent in February from a year earlier. This according

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to official data. I guess it's part of the China

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 2>mix here, which you are expert on the export import

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of America to China, from China to America. Is it

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>anything like we knew or is it a whole new world?

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>After all?

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a very new world, and I think

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 8>people are a little bit dismissive and saying, well, sales right, now,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 8>for some companies in China are slower because the Chinese

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 8>economy is slowing. Yes, that is true, but I think

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 8>that's far more than that. What we see China doing

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 8>is repressing sales of Western brands in China, whether they're

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 8>telling certain agencies that they can't use the sorts of phones,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 8>whether they're putting outright bands. So the one thing they're

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 8>trying to do is suppress sales of Western brands in

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 8>China to elevate Chinese sales. And I think they're also

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 8>trying to do that globally. They're pushing and emerging markets.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 8>They have companies like Shine and Timu who are really

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 8>aggressively competing on price with US brands, And I think

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 8>people are being a little bit too dismissive and saying, oh,

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 8>this is just weakness in China. I think this is

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 8>an attempt by China to replace our brands with their

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 8>brands domestically and pushing globally, which will not be good

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 8>for valuations of US docs.

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 5>From your perspective, I'm looking at your research here. What

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 5>is the difference between made in China versus made by China.

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 8>So traditionally, right, we took western companies took our products,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 8>made them in China, and then we took and tried

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 8>to sell those products globally, so they were really our products,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 8>but they happen to be made in China. So to me,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 8>the difference is China's having difficulty attracting people to manufacture

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 8>in there, so if they're going to do manufacturing, they

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 8>have to manufacture their own brands and sell there. So

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 8>that's why I think it's more of a made by

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 8>China because you're going to start seeing byd much more

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 8>frequently Huawei, these companies you never heard of, whether it's

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>through Shine or Timo Timu sorry, And I think that's

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 8>why I'm calling it made by China because they've been

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 8>making all the goods so long time, but it was

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 8>largely them making our goods. I think they're now more

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 8>aggressively trying to develop their own brands sell those, and

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 8>that will lead into market share. It will cut profit

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 8>because they are going to compete on price.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 5>So you know, I think about these companies, I mean

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 5>tim Cook, I think as we speak is in China,

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:29.119
<v Speaker 5>we see Western CEOs making that seemingly weekly monthly pilgrimage

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 5>to China, Yet we do in fact, appear to have

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 5>some type of technological cold war between China and the West.

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 9>What does Apple do?

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 5>What does Tesla do? I mean some of these companies

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 5>are really intertwined with China.

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and so at Academy Securities, as Tom knows, we've

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 8>got eighteen retired generals and admirals who service our Geopolitical

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 8>Intelligence Group. I would say I'm seeing a disconnect where

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 8>a lot of corporations are still trying to figure out, Okay,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 8>how do we work with China? How do we sell

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 8>into China?

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 8>That's still the brand and everything that we're hearing At

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 8>a national security level, it is all about China. It

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 8>is completely bipartisan, It doesn't matter which party the people

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 8>are in charge of national security. And SISO, which puts

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 8>out a lot of bulletins on cyber warfare and cyber attacks,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 8>they came out with, you know, really a big warning

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 8>on this typhoon volt which they part clearly label as

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>the People Republic of China's Communist Party. Their hackers working

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 8>on their behalf trying to infiltrate US infrastructure. So this

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 8>is not going to get better. This is going to

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 8>get worse. As these you know you see an entity

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 8>like that very willing to public a common and I

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 8>just say state actors.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I've never asked this question before. There's

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>always a firse what does it mean for Nvidia? And

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I just all of our audiences glued into growth stocks

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>quality Lizzie Saunders off on yesterday with Schwab talking about quality.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying exit the glorified stocks of the moment?

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, I do think some of we may be

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 8>peak AI in this particular cycle where you know, I

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 8>was mentioning earlier that all of a sudden brushes now

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 8>have AI components or something like that. So I think

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 8>everyone's kind of latching onto this. We've got one of

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 8>their generals who's been very good helps advise DC on

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 8>AI in particular, and we see AI developing into four worlds.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 8>We've got what's going on in the US, which we

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 8>think is very healthy. It's growing, it's going to be

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 8>a big part of our economy. It might be overdone.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 8>You've got Europe, where I think AI is going to

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 8>stagnate because they have so much data restriction, so Europe's

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 8>not going to be competitive in AI. You've got India,

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 8>which is actually a rising place, and you're seeing places

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 8>like Nvidia investors, so I think that'll be exciting. And

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 8>China is marching to the beat of their own drum.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 8>They have a very strong AI plan. They're one directional.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 8>If they get it right, it could be dangerous if

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 8>they get it wrong. We have hope, but that to me,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 8>there is no work for Nvidia or US companies in

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 8>China that is getting separated.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter, we have major, major breaking news. You can stay

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 2>with us and take this in. I'm sure it'll fold

0:17:53.880 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>into your report this morning. Peter, Chair Academy securitizers. With

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a difficult news flow, We're going to try to make

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>light of it, and only Lisa Matteo can do that.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>You look at the front pages around the world. Lisa,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>were you bruised from my beard yesterday? We took a.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I got a little mark right here, but I'm okay.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 9>I recovered yet.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 2>This is this is you like this. I went to

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the I went to the grower barber shop. This is

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 2>is what I went to. They gave it. It was

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>so difficult. They took a razor out with it. So

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it was so difficult. I had to shave twice. But

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 2>thank you to the good people at the Grower of Barbershop.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 9>Really it was fantastic. Well, by the way the poll,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 9>a lot of people wanted you to.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Lose it, so that it was a mixed effort. But

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the tilt is that both that Bill and missus Keane

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>wanted me to keep the beard.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 9>O oay, No, I can't do it.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>You get a call from the grower of Barbershop, shave

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>that you're no Matt Miller shave that off. What do

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 2>you got, Lisa?

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>All Right, kids in Florida under the age of fourteen,

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>they're a little upset. They will no longer be able

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a social media this went through. Yeah, Florida

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the first state to do this. It's apps like TikTok

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and Snapchat. Fourteen and fifteen year olds though, they are

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do it, but they will have to get

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>their parents' permission in order to do that. But under fourteen, so.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Are the Florida police going to go in?

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 3>How?

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly that is the question.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>How do you just the world tiktoking from? I mean

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>that's like Nirvana.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so they're gonna have to go back TikTok, Snapchat

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and see how old.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 9>Some of these kids are who's got it's going.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>To be it's gonna be along the companies TikTok, Snapchat,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all these companies are gonna have to go back and

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly delete some. But the question is if it's going

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I mean, this is going to face you know,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>backlash and constitutional challenges.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 9>And and all that.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 5>That's the realities of the marketplace. You know whatever, the

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 5>parent sounds like a parent.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, some kids down there on group with somebody

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg to see mcgloone, who's you know, they're on

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the porch of the Betsy on South Beach and the

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>kids TikTok and from the Betsy and what the police

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 2>show up.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's gonna be a long road. Let's just put

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it that way. It's the first step. Let's just put

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it that way. The first step. Okay, So we're going

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Wall Street Journal. You know how Mark Zuckerberg's known.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>He was known for wearing the hoodies and the shower

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>slides and that whole casual kind of look. Well, maybe

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he's doing a little middle aged makeover. It's a new

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg he's wearing.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 9>He's been seen wearing suits.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And a shirllink jacket, you know, different cardigans.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 9>So he's stepping up.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The hoodies are out, he's stepping up his look. I

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a middle aged thing. But there's

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>also you know, scrutiny for the industry, the tech industry.

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Well he's sharpening up the image.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 5>As according to rich go on the Bloomberg terminal, the

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 5>fourth wealthiest person on the planet one hundred and seventy

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 5>eight and a half billion dollars. So he can afford

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 5>to upgrade.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 9>He can afford a suit, or you can.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Get a hoodie from you or Selene or you know.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can you imagine. I don't even know what

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>they caused, but can you imagine?

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Oh ridiculous and I oh, by the way, in terms

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 5>of the increase year to date in the net worth

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 5>on Richiko, he is number one, up fifty billion dollars

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 5>this year. It's been a good year.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not going to mention the mutual fund, it

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter. But the number one holding is met a Facebook,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's gone up so much. It's gone from eleven

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 2>percent of the portfolio to fourteen percent of the portfolio.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>It's Lau Paul Navis, this has never happened, Lisa posts

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>of my life. I mean it's original. What else do

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 2>you have?

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, we always talk about how lises in

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the city are really expensive for a lot of retailers.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 9>Not if you are Kim Kardashian.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, she's getting a big least discount. She has a

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Skim store coming to New York City. She is leasing

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty thousand square foot space right along Fifth Avenue

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the heart of New York City for at least

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent less than what was paid by the

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>last tenant for Sachi. This is from the New York Post,

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're saying. So if you break it down,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Skin has paid less than two hundred dollars per square

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>foot for the lot, whereas Versace I had about seven

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy dollars per square foot.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 9>Is for that?

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, seriously, this is the I've noticed this just

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>in the last couple of days. Let me make it clear.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Paris does not have the empty stores in their primary area.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>They have some selected ones, but Paris doesn't look like

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a ghost town, Paul, parts of Midtown look like a

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>ghost team.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Tom this is six forty seven to Fifth Avenue, right

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 5>near East fifty second Street. This is an iconic retail,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 5>luxury retail address on Fifth Avenue.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>So, but isn't this solution. It's just the lower rents. Yeah,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean I get the taxes go down and all that.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 2>But basically she got a good deal.

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 9>She got a very good deal.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Are you done? Is there one more?

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 9>One more? This is breaking.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, McDonald's bringing Krispy Cream Donuts.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 9>They are coming to McDonald's.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know what they want to get more breakfast people.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 9>They want to get more of those you know, all

0:22:58.840 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 9>day snackers.

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Krispy Kreme shares actually up about fourteen percent right now,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wow on this news. If that gain holds, Krispy Kreme

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>will be set for its biggest rise since December of

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 9>So this is big news for Krispy Kreme.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's still a little bit lower with their shares, but

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>big news for Krispy Kreme. It could happen by the

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, nationwide rolled out roll out by

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty sex.

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I girl like you, I'm sure has her faith. It's

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>not Dunkin Donuts. It's not Krispy Kreme. Is there is

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>there like a local donut that you think is?

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Duck Donuts. That's another one donuts. Yes, that's a

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>big in Jersey.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 9>Yes, they make them right there. You could watch it.

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm forever Dunkin Donuts. They took away my favorite. But

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you know it's it's not Krispy Kreme.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, Chrispy, there will be three of them.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>You have the original glaze chocolate ice with the sprinkles

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and the chocolate ice cream filled all there.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be there, Ken, what do you think.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to our global technical director, Ken. I'll tell

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you Ken, what do you think? Chispy Kreamer, Dunkin Donuts?

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 5>No, oh Krispy, that was definitive.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Evan, he's the baker. Thank you so much. Lisa

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Mantello had a tough day. A little lightness there with

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 2>our news report. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 2>weekday mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>global headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and always

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.