WEBVTT - The AI Con

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Ah, welcome back to it could happen here a podcast.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:15.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a podcast. I'm Robert evans Uh and with me

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>today is Garrison Davis and James Stout.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Hello, a Canadian, a Britishman and a text and walk

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>into a podcast.

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, welcome to a podcast. Only two of them can

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>drink in a bar.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>That's not true in Canada.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>We can all drink in a bar now, Garrison, A

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>moment ago, you were holding your hand above a lit

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>candle in a way that reminded me of G. Gordon Liddy,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Nazi who masterminded the Watergate breaking, and in order

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to convince people that he was a hard man, would

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>regularly burn the palm with his hand on a candle

0:00:52.760 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>while staring at them and gender great g Gordon Letty,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't know enough about We'll talk about g. Gordon Letty,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but today we're talking about something else, problematic artificial intelligence,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>which is not a thing that exists anywhere. It is

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>instead a terrible, terrible error going back to like the

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sixties in case of terminology, when we talk about all

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that people are like, you know, flipping

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>out as ais chat GPT and stable diffusion and fucking

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>all these other sort of like different programs. They're not intelligences.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>They're you know, the chat GPT is like a large

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>language model. They're all essentially like bots that you train

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to understand kind of like what the likeliest thing that,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what the likeliest appropriate response is to like a given prompt.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like the broadest way to explain it.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It's comp located and they're you know, very useful. But

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously if you've been paying attention to the world right now,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there's just a whole bunch of bullshit about them, and

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think to kind of make sense of why we're

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the shit around AI that we're seeing.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And for a little bit of specificity, there have been

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>like this kind of endless series of articles around this

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>open letter signed by a bunch of luminaries in the

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>AI field talking about how, you know, there need to

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be laws put in place to stop it from ending

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, you've seen articles about like oh

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>x percentage of AI researchers think that it could it

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>could destroy the planet, destroy the human race kind of.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Most recently, the biggest article, the biggest like viral hype article,

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was that the Pentagon had supposedly been testing an AI

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>like missile system that blew up its operator in a

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>simulation because the operator was trying to stop it from

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from firing or whatever. It was bullshit, like what was that?

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>What actually had? Like Vice ran with the article. It

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was very breakfas Advice would do this flipping out about

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>how horrifying you know, our AI weapons future is and like, yeah,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't give AI the ability to like kill people,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's not at all what happened. Basically, a bunch

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of army nerds or air force nerds were sitting around

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a table doing the D and D version of like

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>military planning, where you say, what if we did this,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of things could happen if we did this system?

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And another guy around the table said, oh, well, if

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we build the system this way, it might conceivably attack

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>its operator, you know, in order to optimize for this

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of result, which is like not scary, Like it's

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just people talking through pot like a flow chart

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of possibilities around a fucking table. You don't need to

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. There's so many other things to worry about.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>New York City is blanketed in a layer of smogs

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so thick you could cut it with a butter knife. Like,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>don't don't flip out about AI weapons just yet, folks.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to kind of talk about why this

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>shit is happening, And a lot of it comes down

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that when we're talking about the aspects

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the tech industry that have an impact on

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of the tech industry. Right, there's basically three jobs

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in big tech. One job is creating iterative improvements on

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>existing products. These would be the teams of folks who

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are responsible for designing a new iPhone every year, right,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>every couple of years. Lenovo puts out a new series

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>of think pads and idea pads every couple of years.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get a new MacBook every couple of years.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Razor puts out a new blade. This is you know,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>these are the folks who kind of move along technology

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at a relatively like steady pace for consumer devices. And

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>then you have the people who are responsible for kind

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of what you might call the moonshot products. This is

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a mix of the next big thing and doomed failures,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's often pretty hard to tell you know what's

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be what ahead of time. A very good

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>example would be back in the nineties, Apple a bunch

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of resources into launching an early tablet computer called the

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Newton that was a fabulous disaster. And then in the

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>mid oughts they put a bunch of resources into launching

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the iPad, which was a huge success. And when you

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of think about like the folks doing this, like

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>working on the moonshot products. The most recent example would

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>be whatever team at Apple, the team at Apple that

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>was behind putting together these new Apple goggles, which I

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think are going to be a wildly successful product

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the way that they need it to be, like

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone scale success. But this is an example of

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like a thing that didn't exist and a bunch of

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>people had to invent new technologies or new ways to

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>combine technologies in order to make it exist. The third

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of job that the tech industry has, broadly speaking,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>are conmen, right, And the state that we are in

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in the industry right now is that every major tech

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>company is run by some form of con man. Right.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook is, you know, kind of the least cones

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the conment among them. But like Mark Zuckerberg obviously

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is a fucking flim flam artist, you know, and you

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>can see this with the huge amount of money, like

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's something like eleven billion dollars at least that Facebook

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>pumped into this bullshit metaverse scheme that like Apple barely

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even talked about during their event unveiling like a headset

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that has VR potential in it. I'm getting away from

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>myself here. Kind of the point that I'm making is

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can often have very real products. There's actual

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>technology going into the Apple glasses marketed by conman flim

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>flam artist. This is not always like a bad thing, Right.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs was a con man, and it worked out

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty well for him because it just so happened that

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the tech not He had a decent enough idea of

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>what the tech was capable of that it was able

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to kind of meet the promises he was making in

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more or less real time. An example of what happens,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty spectacularly when that's not the case is

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>what we saw with Theronose and Elizabeth Holmes who started

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>prison last week. Right, You've got these promises being made

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>by the con man and the people who are responsible

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for the moonshots can't make it work. I'm bringing this

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>up right now because there's a lot of folks, I

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think who believe that the the nate like the actual

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>potential of AI has been proven in a spectacular way

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because the tools that have been released are able to

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>do cool things, and I think those people are missing

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>some key aspect, like some key things that like might

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cause one to think more critically about the actual potential

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry has and also might cause one to think

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more critically about how earth shattering it's all going to be.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's being taken kind of as red right now by

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of particularly journalists and media analysts outside of

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech and or like outside of you know, the

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>dogged tech press, that like, well, this is going to

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>upend huge numbers of industries and put massive numbers of

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people out of work. And you know, that may seem

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if you sat down in front of this chatbot and

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>had like a mind blowing experience, that may seem credible.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>There's not the evidence behind that yet. If you actually

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers behind some of these different companies

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and like how their usership has grown and how it's

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fallen off, one of the things you've seen is that

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these tools had this kind of massive

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>surge peak in terms of the number of people adopting

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>them and in terms of their profitability. You saw this

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with like Stable Diffusion, right, and then this kind of

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>fairly rapid fall afterwards, not because people are like giving

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>it up forever or whatever, but because, like, once you

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fucked around with it and generated some images or generated

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>some stories, there's not a huge amount to do unless

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you're someone who's specifically going to be using this for

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>your job. And most of the people that wanted to

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>fuck around with a lot of these apps didn't have

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>long term use cases for them. This is why while

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got like, for example, Stability, which is the company

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or at least the main company behind Stable Diffusion, has

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>been valued at like four billion dollars I think last

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it was checked, but their annualized revenue is only about

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars. So that's a pretty significant gap. And

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty significant gap because the actual money in

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>AI so far isn't with the service providers really like

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got some that have made in like the one

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar range, although it's not entirely clear what

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>their margins are or what the kind of the long

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>term reliability of that profit is But the vast majority

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of money in AI, like almost all of it has

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>been made by companies like Nvidia, and Vidia jumped up

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to become like a trillion dollar company as a result

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of this, because the hardware needs of these products are

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>so intense, and obviously that shows there's money here for somebody.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that like a shitload of people got

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>curious about these apps and use them in in quick

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>succession and then kind of dropped off is an evidence that,

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're seeing entire industries replaced as much of it

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as it is evidence that like a lot of people

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thought this was interesting briefly, and so I think kind

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of when you look at the data, one of the

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>things that suggests is that we're heading towards a point

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in AI, and I think we're probably going to hit

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it within the next six months to a year that

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is broadly referred to as like the trial of disappointment,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is what happens when kind of the promises

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of a new technology that are being made by the

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>hypemen or con men as I tend to call them,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>meet with like the actual reality of its execution, which

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in some areas is going to be significant. There are places,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I think medical research maybe one of them. We'll talk

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about that in a bit, where a lot of the

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>promises people are making about AI will be fairly quickly realized,

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and then there are areas where it won't be. I

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think content generation is one of those things. But yeah,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's kind of like what I'm seeing when I'm

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at the broad strokes of where this technology is

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>here and kind of the gap between how people are

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and what we're actually seeing in terms

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of monetization. I want to talk a little bit now

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>about kind of one of the guys I would call

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>him kind of a con man who's been a big

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>driver of the current AI push. He's a dude named

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Amad Mustock, and he's the founder of Stable Diffusion right,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a text to image generator that was kind

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of like before chat GPT hit. This was like the

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>first really really big mainstream AI thing. Chat GPT was

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot larger, but Stable Deviusion came first, and you know,

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>was critical behind, among other things, a lot of the

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>silliest NFT bullshit. And he's a really interesting dude, Like

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at kind of his own claims his background.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>He says that he's got an Oxford master's degree, that

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he was like the behind an award winning hedge fund,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that he like worked for the United Nations and a

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>really important capacity, and also that he obviously founded this

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this a I bought. None of that's true. He has

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a bachelor's degree from Oxford, not a master's degree.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>He did well, that's what he's playing off. A thing

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>that happens where like you can you can get if

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 3>you have a BA ox and you can you can

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>get it to be an MA. Doesn't mean you did

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a master's. It's just a wealthy people flex. Yeah, it's

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>not a master's degree. You shouldn't qute it that. If

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>you're quoting it now, you're taking the pace.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, he's taken the piss knowing no one's gonna

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.239
<v Speaker 1>call him on it, or at least knowing that people wouldn't,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like at large, like loudly enough for it to matter

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>for him. He hasn't worked with the UN in quite

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>some time, and never did in a major capacity. He

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>did run a hedge fund that was successful in its

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>first year, but then got shut down in its sex

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>year because he lost everybody's money. So like this is

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this is. But you see with this guy, if you

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>go through his like history, he's like he's like chasing

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds in the early aughts. He first gets in

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with stable diffusion after COVID, and he's kind of like

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>billing it as this is gonna help with like research

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>into trying to like you know, fight the COVID nineteen pandemic,

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and then he kind of pivots to like, oh, this

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to like make NFTs and shit,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know when that hit, Like he's he's just sort

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of like chasing where the money is. Yeah, any way

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he kind of can. And he's not, by the way,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not the guy who wrote any of the source

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>code for this. That was done by like a group

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of researchers, and he you know, he essentially like acquired it,

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>which is usually what happens here. Now, none of this

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>has stopped him from getting one hundred million dollars or

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so in investments from various venture partners, and hasn't stopped

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>his company from getting this massive violation. It hasn't stopped

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the White House from inviting him to talk as part

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of like a federal AI safety initiative, But it is

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those like when I kind of look into

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy and kind of the gap between his claims

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and what's actually happened and the claims that are being

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>made about the value of his company and what it's

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>actually like proved to be worth so far. I think

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Sam Bankman Freed because a lot of

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like the early writing around this guy was similar, and

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the kind of shit that he's claiming

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is similar. And yeah, I'm not sure if this is

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a case where because Bankman Freed is one of these

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>people who, like Elizabeth Holmes, I think, backed the wrong

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>technology because it's fine in Silicon Valley. It's fine, generally

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking in capitalism to lie about what a product can

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>do if you can, you know, fake it till you

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>make it. And maybe AI is there. He may have

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy may have made a good bet as to

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the future, but that's kind of far from certain yet.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's just really clear how much of this

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>industry is being built on, or is being built by.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>How much of the people running sort of these AI

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are dudes who managed one way or another, either

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>through access to VC funding or kind of like you know,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just being in the right place at the right time

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to jump in on the bandwagon in the hopes that

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to cash out very, very quickly. I

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>found a good quote from a Forbes article talking about

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like a big part of why guys like Mustock are

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so interested in AI right now from a financial perspective,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is true, not just this was true about

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like crypto before, but AI because there's more to the technology.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of even more so valid quote. Venture

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalists historically spend months performing due diligence, a process that

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>involves analyzing the market, vetting the founder, and speaking to

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>customers to check for red flags before investing in a startup,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but start to finish. Mstock told Forbes he needed just

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>six days to secure one hundred million dollars from leading

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>investment firms Coach You and light Speed once Stable Diffusion

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>went viral. The extent of due diligence at the firms

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>performed is unclear given the speed of the investment. The

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>investment thesis we had is that we don't know exactly

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what all the use cases will be, but we know

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that this technology is truly transformative and has reached a

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tipping point in terms of what it can do. Garav Gupta,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the light Speed partner who led the investment, told Forbes

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in a January interview. So again they're being like, yeah,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we're pumping tens of million dollars of dollars into this.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how it'll make money. It just seems

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>so impressive that it has to be profitable. Now that

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>line is particularly funny, maybe the wrong word when compared

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>alongside this paragraph from later in the article. In an

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>open letter last September, Democratic Representative Anna Essue urged action

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in Washington against the open source nature of stable Diffusion.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The model, she wrote, had been used to generate images

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of violently beaten Asian women and pornography, some of which

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>portrays real people. Bashara said new versions of stable Diffusion

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>filtered data for potentially unsafe content, helping to prove users

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>from generating harmful images in the first place. So it's like,

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>part of what's happening here is you've got this thing

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems really impressive, and that is to some extent

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>because it's able to like remix stuff that exists in

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a way that you haven't done automatically before. But all

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of these kind of valuations are based number one, and

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ignoring the problems with monetizing this stuff, including like the

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>still very much unsorted nature of how copyright's going to

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>affect this, and also like the question of is this

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>really worth that much money? Like is this actually is

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>being able to generate kind of weird slightly off putting

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>AI images a huge business, like how much of because

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>like from where I'm seeing it, one of two things

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>is possible. Number one, this replaces all art everywhere and

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's a shitload of money in it. Or number two,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this remains a way that like low quality websites and

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon drop ship scammers who are like putting up

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fake books on Kindle and whatnot to trick people using

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>keywords like that this is just like a way to

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>fill that shit out. Like I don't see a whole

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of room in the middle there. You know, maybe

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm being like overly pessimistic there, but that's that's that's

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>where I'm sitting.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, some of the models we've seen used is

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 2>selling like subscription packs for like access to these tools

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>and access to use them for like commercial reasons. The

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>other thing we can see is just like corporations selling

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to other corporations like basically having Disney and Warner Brothers

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>be able to use this to generate concept art and

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>now they don't need to pay concept artists and instead

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>they just have like pretty pretty uh pretty like nicely

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>curated tools for them to generate this type of Yeah A,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I imagining those are kind of two of the biggest

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 2>use cases that at least I'm seeing right now from

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>more on like the creative filmmaking art side of things.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Because I mean, I don't think it's going to replace

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 2>all all art. I think nobody nobody is actually uh

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 2>is actually thinking it's just going to replace all all art,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>just like photography did not replace all art. It just

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it changes the paradigm. And because this this tool does

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 2>seem like specifically useful for the for the way that

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing like corporations make the same a movie every

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 2>five years, like it's all it's it's it's it's all

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 2>built on all of the same stuff. And I think

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that that's how a lot of a lot of it's

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna get used. It's gonna be a lot of weird

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>scam artists, people just messing around for fun, and then

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 2>people not paying like illustrators as much.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, and I think that's kind of like I

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>see this being adopted widely, but that's not the same

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as it like being a huge success. Like right now

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at an article that's estimating the current value

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of AI in the US is at one hundred billion

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars and that buy twenty thirty, it'll be worth two

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion US dollars. And it's like, I don't know, man,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like is.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean the AI is more than just like mid

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Journey image creation right there, is just like open AI

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and chat GPT, and like AI is in everything we

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>use now, like yeah, like AI is in your smartphone.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to be in your refrigerator soon. It's

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>like it's not just image generation by any means.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>That kind of gets to what I'm saying, because that's

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that's when you look at AI as a tool. Is

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more of like a paint brush than a painter. Is

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a tool that will like augment or be used in

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 1>because I think a lot of a number of times

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it may be used in a way that makes the

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>product worse and a lot of existing technologies, Well that's

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really different from kind of number one, the doom and gloom,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like this is an intelligence on its own that could

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like overtake humanity. I think the worry is more like

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>this could make get adopted on such a large scale

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that it like makes a lot of shit worse. Like

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>my biggest fear with AI is that it kind of

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>hyper charges the SEO industry and the way that that

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>has worked to destroy search and destroy so much of

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Internet content.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that is very possible. Like if I

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>look at chat GPT, like, I don't think that's going

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 3>to be writing features for Rolling Stone anytime soon, but

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 3>what it can probably do because SEO max copy is derivative, right,

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 3>like like it's predictable, it's derivative, it's based on other stuff.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so it can do that SEO max copy

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and some of that ad copy like very well, and yeah,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 3>either really fuck up searches, which is quite possible, and

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 3>also make the lowest kind of acceptable tier of that

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 3>kind of copy what it can generate. And because you

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 3>can just shove that copy in front of people with

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>SEO max and then have shitty AD copy written by

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 3>chat GPT, like that will change how it certainly how

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>we buy stuff on the Internet, right, But also how

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>we read news, et cetera. Yeah, absolutely, and I already

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>see that, Like I've written for some big pub locations.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>You have like essentially a side. Do people know what

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 3>content driven commerce is? Oh yeah, yeah yeah yeah, it's

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 3>why every article about stuff is now the best five

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>x right.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like they have affiliate links and the publication will

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>profit if you buy stuff after clicking the link.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah. So like in the probably twenty sixteen era,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 3>all of the stuff. So I did a lot of

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 3>previously outdoor journalism right right about climbing, gear, bikes, that

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing, and like that whole industry went to

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>just aft com like just affiliate links, and they kind

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 3>of trashed any quality review stuff. And I can see

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 3>like a similar change to that happening with this right

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>where where people will just chase that SEO max copy

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 3>and that will become the new cool thing to do

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>and like a lot of outlets as a result. But

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that's not the like earth shattering change that people are

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about on Twitter dot com or whatever.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, one thing I saw recently is that more and

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>more students are just using chat GPT to look up

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 2>information like as opposed to like as a Wikipedia as

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>opposed to Wikipedia, are as supposed to Google if they

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 2>have a question. The last chat GPT which has a

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 2>few problems as soon as you start getting into how

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 2>much of the chat gbt output is just AI hallucinations

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>where it's not actual information, which is honest, that's not

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>think I should just write my own thing on in

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>the future. But yeah, it's just it's a really weird problem.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting that the problem of like because I

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's very clear to me at this point

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that AI is a more user friendly search experience than

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a search engine, right because you can talk to it

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like a person and explain what you need explained. That

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it's a better option in terms of it

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>provides people within information more effectively that it that it

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>actually tells them what they want to know as well.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's like easier and maybe like less kind of

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>an imposing task to like asking AI a question that

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it is to ask like a search and to especially

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as as much worse as Google has gotten lately. Like

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I found interesting is I

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was kind of doing digging for this. I was looking

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at some AI articles that were published in like twenty

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty twenty twenty twenty one. This is before the

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>big you know AI push that like we're currently all

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of before chat GPT you know, got

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>its its widespread release, and it was talking with like

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>some people from Google who were like, yeah, we really

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>see AI like supercharging our search results. You know, there's

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of potential and like its ability to help

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>people with search. And I'm thinking about in twenty twenty

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, Google was a really useful tool and it's

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a shit show now, like it's filled with ads, like

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>arch results have gotten markedly worse. Everyone who uses Google

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as part of their job will tell you that it's

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten like significantly worse in the recent past. And like,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I that's kind of like the thing that I see

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>being more of a worry And it's one of those things.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like on one hand, in the heype machine you have,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like AI could become like our new god king and

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>destroy us all, and the other like AI is going

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to like, you know, create all. There's all this vague

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about what it could be giving people the tools

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to create more art than ever before, to you know,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>make more good things faster, And I kind of feel like, well,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what if neither of those things happens, which I and

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of allows us to continue making the

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Internet worse for everybody at a more rapid pace. What

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if that's the primary thing that we notice about AI

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as consumers.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 3>It's probably a reasonab assumption. I think Garrison's point was

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 3>good though, when they said that, like bigger companies will buy,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>like companies will just exist to get brought right, which

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>is the thing that's hapened to tech for decades, because

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 3>like it can't fundamentally change things, Like if AI is

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 3>another means of production, right, if we want to be

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 3>like a grossly materialist, if AI is another means of credits,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 3>a tool for making things, if the same people own

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 3>it and benefit from it, then like it's incapable of

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally changing our material conditions. Right, just becomes another way

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and for them to churn out shit and say that

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>like this is fine, this is what you'll get, you know,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>like churn out shit content on the Internet or whatever

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 3>it might be.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And likewise, if AI is primarily like if it gets

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>caught in this kind of SEO loop where it exists

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>primarily to help advertise and sell products, whether it's as

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a search engine or generating mass content, you know, for

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Internet that's sort of optimized to appear higher

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and search results, and it's also being trained on that.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there a point at which it kind of starts

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to lobotomize itself where it's just recycling shit other AI

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is written, which also seems kind of inevitable with that.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those things. So one of the

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>more famous moments, and like recent AI research is this

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Google researcher timnit Gibru, who no longer works at Google,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and some other very smart people put together a paper

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that like it was I think generally regarded by AI

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>folks as kind of middle of the road, but it

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of it developed the term stochastic parrot, which is

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what people know it for as sort of trying to

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>describe what these quote unquote AIS do in a way

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's better than an AI, because like, part of what

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it was saying is that, like we have to look

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>at this as kind of like a parrot that if

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you say enough like words around it, including enough like

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>racial slurs, it'll start repeating a bunch of toxic shit.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't know what it's doing. It doesn't have intention,

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of like repeating this stuff because that's

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what's been fed into it. But one of the things

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that point out in that paper is that like when

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you have an AI, when you have one of these

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lms trained on too large of a model, it becomes

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>number one kind of impossible to avoid that toxic stuff.

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>But it also reduces the utility of of the AI

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways because like when you have

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>so much data going in, it's very difficult for the

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>humans to kind of tell how competent it is. This

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is why stuff like chat GPT involves so much human training,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>why they had hundreds of people spending tens of thousands

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of man hours like going through responses to tell if

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they made sense. Because when you've got like it's one

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 1>thing if you're like using an if you're for example,

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>training an AI on a bunch of different like medical

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>data to try to determine patterns and like antibiotic research, right,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a thing that that lllms have been like

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>shown to be have some early utility in is like

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of helping to id identify new paths for like

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>antibiot research, because like we've got a lot of data

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a really focused kind of data.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not like training these things on like all of

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wikipedia and you know thousands and thousands and

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>thousands of fan fiction stories about Kirk and Molder fucking

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>each other during some sort of like Exile File Star

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Trek crossover. We're using a fairly focused data set to

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>try and analyze it in a manner more efficiently than

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>people are simply capable of. That's a lot more useful

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting good data than you know, just

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>training it on half of trillion different things out there,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of which you're going to be lies. But anyway,

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I found that interesting. It's kind of worth noting that,

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like Gabrew and a number of other people who were

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>responsible for that got forced out by Google and kind

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of attacked by the industry. Because I think there's a desperation,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about this in that episode I did

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>last year kind of about the fundamental emptiness at the

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>core of the modern tech industry. But I think there's

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this desperation and we have to find the new thing,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's going to be as big as social

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>media was, the thing that's going to deliver the kind

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of stock market returns that social media did and that

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist yet. And AI is the after especially several

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>years of disasters with crypto and diminishing returns in social

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>media and honestly diminishing returns and like traditional tech because

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>shit like smartphones have reached kind of a point of saturation. Right.

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You can make money sell obviously, like you can make

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>money selling smartphones, but you can't show exponential growth, right,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>There's just not that many people who need new ones. Yeah, anyway, yeah,

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I feel some desperation here. I wanted

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of close by reading you all. I found

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a very funny article in the Financial Times that was

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>about the potential that the head of Europe's biggest media group, Birtlesman,

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>sees for generative AI, and yeah, it interviewed a couple

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of people, including a guy Thomas Rabe, who works is

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of the German business that owns Penguin

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Random House. And one of the things that he says

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in this is basically like I think this is, you know, uh,

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be super great for authors. You know, there's

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a potential for copyright infringement problems, but really like it

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>would allow you to feed your own work into an

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>AI and then produce much more content than you were

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a raverable put able to put out before like exact

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what is it's if it's your content for what you

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>own the copyright, and then you use it to train

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the software. You can in theory generate content like never before,

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which I think is yeah, a fundamental, Like you know,

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually even think it's going to be possible

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to like train them on airport novels. You've got like

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>James Patterson and other guys who they're not They don't

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>write their own books anymore. They have like a team

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of ghostwriters. But like having gone through a lot of

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>AI's stories, they're not books, Like they're not capable of

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>writing books. They're capable of like producing text and producing

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pieces of books that human beings can edit laboriously into

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>something that might look like a book. But the use

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in that is not like filling up airports with kind

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of mid grade fiction, because I think that's even beyond

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>these models. It's like tricking people on Amazon. There was

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a really funny quote in this article though, where at

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, Rabe is like I asked chat

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>GPT what the impact of chat GPT or generative AI

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is unpublishing. It prepared a phenomenal text. Frankly, it was

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very detailed into the point, which he then presented at

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a staff event. So there is kind of evidence that

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO jobs could be pretty easily replaced by this.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Like you don't actually have to do anything, comrade chat GVT.

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>We agree, it's just spinning Jenny for bosses. I love it.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anyway, that's that's what I've got right now. We

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have a We've been doing some research and we'll have

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>an article out on one of the more unsettling little

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>site industries that I think AI is going to create,

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>which is like scam children's books that exist to make

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>conment on the Internet money and poison the minds of

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little kids. But we'll get that to you next week. Yeah,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it felt like it was worth coming back to this

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>subject because it, I don't know, it's the most apocalyptic

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>thing people in the media are talking about in a

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>day in which like the entire Northeast is blanketed in

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>poison smoke, which seems bad.

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, people are talking about that now because they all

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>live in New York. I'm a fuck out, But yeah,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>previous to this, Yeah.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, if it's good of hell, it could happen here

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as a production of cool Zone Media.

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>coolzonemedia dot com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 2>find sources for It could Happen here, updated monthly at

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 2>coolzonemedia dot com slash sources.

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.