WEBVTT - Why We're (Cautiously) Optimistic About the PGA Tour's Designated Events

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 2>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a bride egg

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, Frida Egg, frid Egg,

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>brigg Frida Egg, bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 2>run off the the.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Frida Egg Podcast. I'm Garrett Morrison, and

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>today we are talking about designated events on the PGA Tour,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>formerly known as elevated events. Frankly, elevated makes more sense

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>in terms of nomenclature, but we're talking about the new

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>series events of events on the PGA Tour that you know,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of concentrating the schedule around certain big tournaments

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that all the top players are going to be at.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a major chain on tour that's really going to

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>come into focus next season, but we're kind of rolling

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>into it this season. And the occasion for this, of course,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the Waste Management Phoenix opened. The first full

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 1>field designated event of twenty twenty three is happening right

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>now this week. Here to talk about all of the

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting issues around this with me is Andy Johnson. Andy,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>How's it going.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>It's going great, Garrett. I'm super excited about this. You know,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>as this came to fruition, I think there are some

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 2>qualms about how it was rolled out this year, and

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, it goes back to kind of the response

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to live that the tour had last year, right, But

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 2>I think the exciting thing about it is the is

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>what's happening where we know when the best players are

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>all going to be together, and then the future of it,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like next year. Obviously it sounds like

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty clean slate and next year is going

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to look a lot different than this year's elevated events look.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So this year's elevated events, just to list them off

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for you, are the Century Tournament of Champions, which happened

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously early January at Kapalua. It didn't really feel like

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a full elevated event because it was kind of its

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>normal self, right. It was the winners and some more

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, players from the past season. Rory McElroy wasn't there.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The Tournament of Mostly Champions. It's the identity of that

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>event is a little bit up in the air right now.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't full field, right, It was just Kapalalua.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>The Phoenix Open this year is going to be a

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>little different. That's the first kind of real designated event.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Then we have another one next week at the Genesis

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Invitational Riviera, then another one two weeks after that, the

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Palmer Invitational bay Hill. Players and the Majors are

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of course designated events. But the other ones that are

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>not the players or the Majors would be the Dell

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Technology's Match Play Rip after this year, by the way way,

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the RBC Heritage at Harbortown, the Wells Fargo Championship, the

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Memorial Tournament, Jack's Tournament, the Travelers Championship, TPC River Highlands.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite kind of little PGA Tour events

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that the little tournament that could. That's going to be

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>a designated.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Event this year, just a little tournament that could. Given

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Bubba's comments about potential appearance fees, the table appearance fees,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't know if we can we can label

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the Travelers as that. It seems like the crooked PGA

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Tour events.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Is big insurance open. Uh yeah, well, I I like

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Travelers Championship. I lived in Connecticut for a few

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>years and went to a couple way back in the day.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an outstanding venue. But yeah, it's no

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>mystery why it would occasionally just get Roy McElroy, you know,

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>showing up at the at the Travelers. There was maybe

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of money involved. Then the other designated

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>events that I haven't mentioned yet are the FedEx Cup

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>playoff events at the end of the season in August,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's the Desert schedule. Majors too, Yeah, I mentioned

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that earlier. The Majors and the players those are yeah,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are pre designated, like the PGA Tour

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to give it give it stamp of approval

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to those events in order for them to feel really elevated.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But the rest of these events that I mentioned, these

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of normal PGA Tour events, some of which were

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger before and some of which didn't have that big

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>status now have bigger purses, And that's basically what it

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is this year. Bigger purses and a guarantee that the

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>top players are going to show up to them.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think, as you alluded to, the

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Kapalua event was not really like it's not what indicative

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of what a designated event is going to be and

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this week with the Waste Management, we're going

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to get our first look. It's it's pretty incredible place

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to have it roll out, obviously with the super Bowl

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 2>in town this week, but I think there's a lot

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 2>of questions about about what, you know, the future of

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>these are going to look like and how different it

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 2>will be from this week's elevated event at Waste Management

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that had a full field, had Monday qualifiers, had sponsor exemptions,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and had you know, effectively a you know, top one

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>twenty five plus extras. Feel so like, is that going

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to be the criteria going forward? And then you know,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the most important, you know, one of the I don't

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.119
<v Speaker 2>think the most important question, but one big, really big

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>question I have, what is Kapalua next year? Are they

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>effectively like being held hostage to be a designated event

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 2>because and you know, does it.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Because of the concept of the tournament? Right, because because

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>they have to have the winners there for it to

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be the tournament that it.

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Is exactly in the expansion of it's the top thirty

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 2>now in the FedEx Cup is a is a going

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>forward rule, right, So anybody that makes it to East

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Lake is there so this If it's not, it's another

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>event that is kind of required, you know, by by

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the PGA Tour, but not maybe not required. If it's

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>not required, how many guys are showing up if they

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 2>have to play all these other events? Like I think,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 2>if it's not required, you run the risk of any

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>European that it has Ryder Cup fantasies is not going

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to show up. You know, they will go to Dubai instead,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, So, like do you want to lose John

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Ram who's obviously fallen in love with the event, who's

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>shown up played extremely well the last two years at

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>this event, like you know, and obviously so that that

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is a big conversation. Is that event going to expand out?

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be bigger? Are these elevated events

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 2>going to have different fuel sizes or are they going

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to be standardized?

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean those are all really legitimate questions about

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the designated events, as you've been indicating. You know, it

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>gets so complicated once you start thinking about actually executing

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea and all that. All the stakeholders who are involved,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the players, the sponsors, you know, they're all going to

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>have their own opinions about what this should look like,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>their own feelings about whether the old way was better

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>than this new way, and so we'll get into all

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. But I think that you and I might

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>agree that the Waste Management Phoenix Open is a really

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>good event to designate, Like this feels like a one

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that should be designated maybe every year. Maybe it doesn't

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>even need it every year, but this is a fantastic event.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Has turned into an event that really kind of penetrates

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the general public consciousness in a way that most PGA

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Tour events don't. And a lot of that has to

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>do with the crowds there and all the content that

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you get out of that the sixteenth hole scene. But

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>also I think that this is a legit PGA Tour

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>golf course. TPC Scottsdale is a well designed course. It's

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not you know, it's not Riviera. It's it's not maybe

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not Kapalua, you know. The architecture is esthetically just fine,

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But strategically, I feel like this is a pretty good

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>golf course, especially on the back nine. Would you agree

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with that?

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the front nine is quite forgetable, and

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I think but the back nine really culminates and the

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>close of it is what you kind of want. And obviously,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I think something that has to be talked about is

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 2>the eighteenth hole. What it was ten years ago, even

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>compared to what it is today. You know, it was

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult closing hole. And what technico you know,

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 2>just the advancement of having one hundred guys on tour

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that hit the ball over three hundred yards versus you know,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago there was maybe fifteen like that has

0:08:54.160 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>really changed the dynamic of the clothes. But fifteen, sixteen, seventeen,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 2>we see this at a variety of courses. I you know, honestly,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that the clothes at at PGA West is

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>really good. I like, I have always been fascinated with

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the clothes at PGA West and it's simple. Yeah, So

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that that is the same recipe in a way PGA West,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>TPC Sawgrass has a similar recipe with a late, scorable

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>par five, a shortish, shortish par three, and then a

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, a tough part four. Now TPC Scottsdale throws

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 2>in a drivable par four into that mix, so you

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>have you know, you know, what was once eighteen, you know,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>is not what it was because of just distance. Sheer

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>like how far these guys are hitting it. But it

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 2>once was a tough part four, But the recipe of

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>two three really three really scorable holes coming down the

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>stretch makes just theater. And I think sixteen obviously doesn't

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 2>have the the trouble that PGA West or Scott or

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Sagress has around it, but it has the atmosphere.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it has a stadium. It doesn't need to be

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>architecturally interesting. I kind of wish it were. But at

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time, because it's such a simple hole, it

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of allows the stadium atmosphere to be the star there.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But fortunately the holes around it, fifteen seventeen I think

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are really well designed tournament golf holes. On fifteen, you

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have players laying up on that hole a little, you know,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a little less than half of the time. Right it's

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>an island green par five. Not everybody's going for that,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>especially if they don't drive it well. And so you know,

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a fun hole to kind of watch and see

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how the players approach it strategically. And then of course seventeen,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the driveable par four. You know, it's not just unique

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's drivable. It's not just exciting for that reason.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason that it's that it's fun to

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>watch is that it combines a really wide way and

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge green with a lot of trouble right water

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>all around, and so there's this huge range of outcomes.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can be in a lot of different

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>places on that hole because it's wide, because there's a

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of short grass, because the green is huge, you

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>can be in a lot of different places. You can

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have a tricky chip from short grass, you can have

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge long putt, or you can be in the

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>water off the tee, And just that range of potential

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>outcomes is really what I'm looking for in a short part.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>For Yeah, I agree, especially when they get the pin.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Everybody thinks, oh, the pins over on the left side

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 2>by the water are super cool. When the pins are

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>over right on the right side of the green and

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they and because that right side of the green, what

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>it does is it really penalizes the bailout, and that

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I think is a is a general little bit of

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 2>misconception is the cool pins, like if somebody's setting up

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the course that oh, we got to push it up

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 2>against the water, that'll be really neat, But really, what

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>when the pin's over on the right, it eliminates. It

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't eliminate, but it it dissuades the bailout, which it

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, when the pins on the left, that bailout's

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>very friendly because you have a lot of green to

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 2>work with. But when the pin's either back or on

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the right side, that becomes a much more difficult shot.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know, your percentages of the chance of making

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>birdie from the bailout position gets much much smaller. And

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we've seen some really cool like one of

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the things that happens on that hole in particular is

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>we see the ball on the ground a lot. You know,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 2>if you think about last year, Sahithagala is in, I

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>think it was tied for the lead and he hit

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>what looked like a great shot and it just got

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>a bad bounce, it rolled down into the water. Ricky

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Fowler a few years ago hit it right through the

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>green over the back what looked like a great shot

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>and it got a hard bounce, you know, and everybody's, oh,

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 2>did he take too much club. It's like, well, if

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't get that chasing bounce, if he give us

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a soft bounce that you know, we're talking about an

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 2>iconic shot in his career. So I think that is

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the magical things about seventeen. And you know,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it goes a little bit under the radar.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's become it's risen in popularity. But one

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>of the great things is is the penalty for bailout

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>with those right pins in the backpin, but also the

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>magic of the ball on the ground and that little

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>bunker is placed perfectly where you know, you need to

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>just barely carry that bunker in order run it up

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>on the green, and you know, if you carry it

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>too far you run the risk of running through. And

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>thank god the PGA Tour hasn't put a grand stand

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 2>behind the green yet, you.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Know, because.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>That would really ruin the brilliant One other thing I

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk about with the course, and what I

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>like about the golf course as a whole, is that

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>it rewards distance a great in great degree. It is

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 2>very advantageous to be long, but it's also almost equally,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>if not more, advantageous, to be accurate. You know, you

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>look at the variety of winners of this at this place.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>You have Kevin Staler, not a long guy. You know,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you have Phil pretty you know, long hitter, but you

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>know can be crooked but the desert. But then you

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 2>have Hideki twice. You have Web Simpson who won and

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 2>lost in a playoff to Hideki, who's a very short,

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>straight hitter. Hideki, I would say when he's playing well

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is a is a longer player, but very precise. Brooks

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Kepka's won it twice. Brooks Keopka. One of the things

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>that's gone wrong with brooks Kepka in this kind of

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>demise is he isn't as accurate as he was off

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the tee. He was kind of reached this unicorn status

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>of a player because of the distance combined with the

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>relative accuracy of that distance. You know, it's always important

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to when you're talking about like people will look at oh,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy hits it really far and he's not straight

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>based off his accuracy percentage, But that accuracy percentage needs

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to be considered with the distance that they're hitting it right,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's not in apples. A two to eighty hitter

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>who's sixty percent in the fairway is not in apples

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to apples as a three hundred hitter who's sixty percent

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>in the fairway, that three hundred hitter who's who's sixty

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>percent is far far more accurate, because the further you

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>hit it, the less accurate you become.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And this was the real secret of Beef Bryson. Right

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Bryson for what the height of his BFY era, Yeah,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about not now, but at the you know,

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at his US Open winning height, he was combining distance

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with accuracy in basically an unprecedented combination, except if you're

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about maybe brooks Kepka in twenty eighteen, twenty seventeen

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at brooks Kepka's height, and so that that is an

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>underrated thing.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's the thing that makes DJ and Rory such

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>impressive drivers over the totality of their career. You know,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>they hit it extraordinarily long distances, but they're very, very

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>accurate for their length. That's what makes these unicorns of

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>driving the golf ball. But the cool thing about this

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>venue is you get such a wide range of winners

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>because that accuracy is really important. So a shorter hitter

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>like we saw chees Reeve in a long playoff with

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Gary Woodland, you get that contrast of playing style. Obviously

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Woodland very long rev short Web Simpson in a playoff

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>with Tony Fenw you get that long short right, it's

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>uh and that and that, I think is what makes

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>this venue extra, you know cool like on the periphery.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't have like that glitzy stuff the like the Bunkers,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the aesthetic. The Front nine is about as forgettable as

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>you can get on the PGA Tour, but it does

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it provides a wide variety of play, which which I

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 2>think is you know, the biggest recipe for success on

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the PGA Tour is venues that don't just emphasize a

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>singular skill and you know, almost pre require a singular

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>skill like a Tory Pines.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of the reason for that at

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Waste Management is that you have room to play off

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the tee, but you have a lot of tricky tea

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>shots where you have to decide, Okay, am I going

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to hit it three twenty five here? If I'm a

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>PGA too or player, right, that's the reality that they're

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. Now, am I going to hit it three

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty or should I throttle back a little bit hit

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at two eighty. There are options like that on a

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the holes, and there's usually quite a bit

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of risk in going with the long option. There's water

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or there's desert, right, and so there's there's a real

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>calculation to be done off the tee, and as a result,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes big long hitters who don't quite have it under

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>control get punished at the Phoenix Open, whereas accurate hitters

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of are able to position themselves well and they

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do well.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things is that the in

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Joseph Lamanna, who obviously is on this podcast fairly regularly,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>he wrote in his newsletter about Tory, is that the

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the really wide miss at Scottsdale is penalized heavily with

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the desert.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely yes, and water in a lot of cases.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The smaller miss, you know, missing the fairway five yards

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>is not heavily penalized, right, So the big miss is

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 2>what is what really gets you at at Scottsdale, and

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously those that's what big hitters do, right, But there

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>is a huge advantage. There are bunkers that big hitters

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>can carry. So it's if that big hitter has the

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>driver going, they have a huge advantage, which is the

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>way it should be.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. Absolutely. So, you know, in a lot of ways,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Open represents what a designated event should be. Right.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a good golf course here with real strategic options,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and that allows many different types of players to thrive,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you get interesting competition year after year. You

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have a rate local culture, you have a committed sponsor,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and you just have a unique product. Right, this is

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what a designated event should look like. This is a

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>true elevated PGA Tour event. And you know, I think

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that that's part of what is exciting about the Designated

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Event series. If we want to get into some of

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the positives here, what does this new program bring to

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour. I think it, you know, identifies what

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>those special events are and it confirms that in the

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the fans, in the eyes of the tour,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes of the players, so that we really

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>know this is a week to get excited. This is

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a week to see the best players face off against

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>each other at a good venue, in a good atmosphere.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I'm so pumped up about this event.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not just because the Super Bowls in

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>town that that adds a little something to it. You know,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm genuinely excited about the Phoenix Open in a way

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that I haven't been before for this event. Now, I'm

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>usually pretty excited about it, but not to this degree.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's one big, big positive for

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>designated events. Would you agree with that?

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think that the biggest positive for designated event

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>centers around expectations with the fans. All Right, we know,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 2>unless you follow the tour with a very very fine

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 2>tooth comb, you aren't going to know weekend week out,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>like who exactly is at the event. With these designated tags,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 2>it emphasizes two fans that these are the events that

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you have to watch these, These are the ones that

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>you can plan for that on hey, on on Thursday,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>you're making plans for the weekend. You know, hey, I

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of want to watch this event. Right. It's like

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 2>when you when your favorite team the schedule comes out, right,

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're a sports fan, if you're a

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>golf fan, when the schedule comes out, you can circle, hey,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>these are the events that I want to plan my

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>weekends around if I'm interested in watching live golf on TV.

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really important versus the old kind

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>of like you knew certain events were big, but like

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the regular the run of the mill PGA

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Tour event not really knowing who's going to be there

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 2>when you turn the TV on. So I think the

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing is that it gives the tour a it.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>It gives fans a real expectation. They understand when they

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>turn on the TV that all the big players are

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be there. And for the most part, the

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 2>only times that that was the case in the last

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years or whatever it may be, when really,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 2>since you know, the tour expanded added events and players

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 2>started to contract their schedule, which started with Tiger, it

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 2>created this wide golf of there are way more events

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>than players are playing way less. So since that occurrence,

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, when guys used to play thirty when big

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 2>players used to play thirty events a year and there

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 2>were thirty five forty events, you knew big guys were

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in every field. But now it's like, big guys play

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty events, twenty five events and there's forty five events.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, that gap got bigger. So that's the biggest

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>thing is that as fans, you know what to expect

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>with designated events, the best players all at the same spot.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>And that's really big because it creates you know, and

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>effectively it creates, like you know, for the tour twelve

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>other players Championships, which is their most competitive event. And

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I would argue, like the thing we talked about this

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of the waste management, like it's up

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.719
<v Speaker 2>in the air whether like who's going to be designated

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>next year and it's on the sponsor to pay up?

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, right, because the PGA Tour just sort of

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>chose chose the events this year said you're designated. But

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>next year it's going to be different in the sense

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that sponsors will be asked to essentially it'll go to

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the highest bidder.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So you know these these sponsors are going to

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 2>have to pay up for designated events, and you know,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>waste Management didn't have to this year. The big question

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>is who's going to pay up for those events? You

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 2>know what what events are going to I think it's

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>really important that waste Management is one of those events

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 2>because it falls on Super Bowl Sunday. You have a

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 2>captive audience of people that are watching TV that day,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>that have Sunday set aside as a day that I'm

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be watching sports. And I think the way

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that this event has infiltrated the greater sports world. It's

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>really important that this one is a elevated event. And

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the question is is the sponsor going to want to

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>pay for that? And that's you know, that's a tricky thing.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the compelling things about these

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>designated events going forward is what are they going to

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 2>be going forward? How people are going to qualify and

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. But you know, it's important these designated events,

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen with like the diminishment of other events,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that the schedule cadence works. You know, like what if

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 2>four sponsors all want to pay up in their four

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 2>events in a row, you know, leading into a big tournament,

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what happens there? You know, So this is

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a super fascinating aspect and I think you know,

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>there's they obviously are trying to figure out how to

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>flip the twenty million dollar per spill. And that's that's

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>why they need these sponsors to pay up, because in

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>an ideal world, you would almost hand pick these events

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and structure your schedule around it so that you don't

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>you can ensure good fields across the board.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Well you need to for the sake of the players partly, right,

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>because if you have four designated events in a row,

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and the players need to go the top players need

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to go to all of them, Then what are you

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? You know that that creates a really tricky situation,

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's an example of all the different constituencies that

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour needs to serve here, the sponsors, the

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tournament organizers, the players. You know, they are really caught

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>between here. I mean the fans are also part of this,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>but will usually last not a good fan situation.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 2>If you have four four of these really big events,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 2>it starts to wear thin. Yeah, they become less important

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the more you have of them. The scarcity of these

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 2>is actually super valuable to the tour.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And I would say also, and this might be

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a niche golf media take and call

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>me out if that is the case, but personally designated events.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Having designated events helps me enjoy the lesser events the

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>non designated more. It helps me receive those in the

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>way that I think they should be received, which is,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't expect this to be a big time event.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I should feel that there's something lacking. If there is

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a quote unquote weak field here, I should understand it

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>as an event that's an opportunity for players to get

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to the next level, And I'm watching this event in

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>order to kind of scalp those players in order to

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>see who's next, who's going to be next on the

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>designated stage, who are going to be the players who

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are really up and coming, who are some of the

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>veterans who are having a revival. Those are the story

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>lines that I'm going to start to attend to with

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the non designated events in a different way, because I

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know what they are. I know that they're not supposed

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to be big events, and I'm not disappointed if they

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't turn out to feel like big events. I can

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>just sort of understand them in that way. Do you

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's a take that the normal fan would have

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>or is that just me as somebody who watches golf

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>every week covers golf is saying.

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that the tour had

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>suffered from really the last thirty years is an identity

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>crisis with the events. So, you know, what's what every

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the idea was that every event is the same.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what the goal of the tour was was the

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 2>homogenize the events. Every sponsor pays the same amount of money.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>You're getting the great greatest players in the world because

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>we're the greatest tour in the world. But the reality

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>was they weren't, and it created I think where it

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 2>clarifies it and makes it a little bit easier is

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the way fans experienced the golf is through the broadcast.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you feel that way, I guarantee the broadcasters

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 2>feel that way. Tommy Roy feels that way, Seller Shy

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>feels that way, and they are able to craft their

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 2>broadcasts around these very concrete identities. It creates identities with

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 2>events on tour, and I think that's super important, and

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that creates a more coherent storytelling throughout the year.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the fascinating things, honestly with smaller

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>events is when you have fields that are weak, like

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the American Express this year, right, the ability for John

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Rahm to go out and win that is a bonafide

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>great player, Like great players go to small events when

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 2>they're expected to win and win. You know, that is

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>a quality that we see with great players. And I

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>think that along with giving younger players the opportunity to

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>take down great players, because there are almost always going

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 2>to be because of the way the sponsorships work. And

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that the tour is pushed with sponsorships.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>If you sponsor an event, you need to spend a

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>considerable amount sponsoring a players also. So that's one of

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the things that the tour is doing in response to live,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to attempt to leverage, you know, to make up that

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>wage gap. Really, like when you talk about the money

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 2>gap that lives offering, one of them is, hey, we're

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna lean on these sponsors of tour events who also

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 2>sponsor players. So when a tour event sponsor, when of

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a sponsor sponsors a tour event, usually what that also

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>yields is those players they're sponsoring show up. You saw

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>it last week with Pebble Jordan Spiece playing. Another sponsor

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>of that event in Cisco. Victor Hovlin is a Cisco player,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, Keith Mitchell is a Cisco player, Brendan Todd

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is a Cisco player. They were all on the leader board, right.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Maverick McNeely is a Cisco and AT and T player.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>He was at the event. So you start to see,

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 2>like with that caveat and the way the tour is

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>pushing these sponsors to do to spend with players. That

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is going to ensure that some of these smaller events

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>have top flight players because of the players that they sponsor.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be a top flight player, then

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing you should do is go to Club Champion.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey give that time. That was a pretty good segue. Okay,

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Porath, I am coming for you with the second

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ways into Adreads. So okay, this episode is brought to

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you by Club Champion. Club Champion helps golfers of any

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>skill level play better golf through custom fitted and custom

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>built equipment. They're extensively trained master fitters, provide an in depth,

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>data driven, tour level fitting process, and have access to

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand hit able head and shaft combos as well

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as sixty plus brands. I'm just saying those numbers. I

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're true, but those are those are large numbers.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's kind of cool when you go there

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and you see like all the show.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You see all of them on them in all the different.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Heads, and it's like, you know, I I have to

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>go do my iron fitting. I go to schedule that.

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got it. This has been lingering for a while.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I did a woods fitting a while ago, and it

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was really helpful. But in any case, another thing that

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Club Champion uses is industry leading technology like track Man

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and sam Putt Lab and they build to the tightest

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>tolerances in the industry. Club Champions fittings produce real results

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for every level of player, including an average of twenty

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>two yard increases off the tee and an average of

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ten yard improvements in dispersion.

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 2>That'll help you out at TPC Scottsdale more yards in

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 2>tighter dispersion.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we were talking, that's what you need. You need

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay out of the desert with custom fitted equipment.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So Andy, although you have not done your iron fitting

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and you've been talking about doing it for about a

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>year now, I would say you have had previous experiences

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with Club Champion. You've got gotten fitted by Club Champion fitters,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know what are those experiences like great?

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I've been I've been a loyalist with this brand since

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>really they started, since they were like fitting out of

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>their garage. So this is one of the things I love.

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm one of those people that I go get

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>fit and then like I just I don't change the

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>equipment until I'm forced to The reason I need in

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>iron fitting is that the POxy wore out on my

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>clubs and the heads started to fall off. Those were

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Club Champion irons like twelve years ago. I just like

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the thing that also recently broke. So the thing I

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 2>find comfort in is that I get fit and I

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>know that I've tried everything and I don't need to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>try anything else, and I'm good to go, and these

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 2>are the irons I'm gonna play and I don't even

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>think about it. That's the beauty. The comfort I find

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 2>is I don't have to think about equipment until they break.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I really appreciate is that I

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>went to Club Champion more than once and the fitter

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, you'd be absolutely crazy to switch from that

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>driver to something new. You'd be crazy, and and.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Side the driver illegal it was might have been hot.

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So so anyways, like that's the thing that they're like.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 2>They're like, your dispersion is infinitely tighter, and you might

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 2>get like one mile an hour ball speed, but it's

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>not worth switching because you're hitting it so much straight.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the type of stuff you get, like, it's not.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>What I've always appreciated is it's not the feeling of

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna sell you that if your clubs like they

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>have you hate your clubs, if your clubs are better,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 2>they'll tell you they're better and you don't need something,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's super valuable. So the promo code

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>is Frida Egg. You get fifty percent off a club

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 2>fitting with a club purchase. So there you go, Like,

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>if you go want to go iron, you'll get fifty

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 2>percent off your iron fitting with the purchase you're talking

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>about like seventy five dollars or so, right.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a good deal. So the code is

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg. That's fifty percent off the cost of your

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>fitting with the purchase of a club. Club Champion, thank

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you for sponsoring this episode. Why don't we get back

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>into designated events? Not sure where you want to take

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it from here. You know, one thought I had when

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you were talking, you know, about the relationships between different

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>kinds of events, right between the non designated and designated events,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is that having some of this clarity is going to

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>help things like a documentary about a PGA tour season, right,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Because I've been thinking about this recently with with Full

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Swing coming out and we have it. We have a

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>whole separate podcast feed Full Swing Thoughts with you Brendan

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Joseph Lamania talking about each episode of the series

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be coming out next week. When the

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Netflix documentary.

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Is Describe Double ad Here Go Subscribe, I think, you know,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, like, I think the episodes, having recorded

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 2>them would be compelling whether or not you watch the

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 2>show they are. You know, each of these episodes really

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>focuses on players, and these podcasts are going to be

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 2>really deep dive discussions on those on those subjects perfect.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's going to be really fun to talk

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Netflix series as it is. But I think

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that the documentary makers would have had a lot easier

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of a time. First of all, if liv hadn't hadn't

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>happened this past season, because that that was probably a

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing for them to deal with. But also if

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour season itself just had a little bit

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>more structure, because one of the things that Drive to

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Survive really benefited from is the extreme structure of the

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>F one season, where every driver shows up every week,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>every team is always there, everybody cares about the season

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>long championship, In fact, cares so much about the season

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>long championship that they care about whether they get fourth

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>or fifth, not just first, right, and that structure gives

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the documentary series something to hang on to. Right, Those

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are the dramatic stakes of the season, and right now,

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour season doesn't really have coherent dramatic stakes

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can follow from beginning to end, partly because

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares about the FedEx Cup, but also partly because

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the schedule doesn't differentiate between events, doesn't clarify which events

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are the big ones, and as a result, events very

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>rarely have all the best players at them, So you

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have players going head to head. You don't have

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Rory and Ram going ahead to head. I mean, Rory

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ram have not appeared in the same event yet

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>this year, but they're going to in Scottsdale. And that's

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>really helpful for understanding the PGA Tour season as a story. Now,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say that Full Swing won't be really good,

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but it focuses on players, right, Each episode focuses on

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a player. It's not a documentary really about the PGA

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Tour season as a season in the way that the

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Drive to Survive episodes are those episodes are about that

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>season of F one And maybe this new structure for

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour season will allow people like us, people

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like Netflix, you know, or just normal fans to understand

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour season in terms of storytelling. And I

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think that that's going to be really helpful.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that's why it's so fascinating to

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>see how this shakes out in twenty twenty four. I

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>think that when you think about if you do the

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>backwards math here, there's seventeen of these designated events there

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 2>are you know, from what the players have really harped on,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>they want the season to be done in August when

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the fed Ex Cup is done. That's what they want,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and that's I think believe the plan is. So you've

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 2>got eight months of golf and you've got seventeen designated events,

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 2>three of which are the FedEx Cup playoffs, which will

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 2>be August. So you're down to fourteen events in seven months.

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>So really it shakes out you need to have two

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 2>of these a month, you really want. What they need

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>to avoid is this run that they have coming up

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>right here where there's four events in five weeks, four

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>elevated events in five weeks. That doesn't. What it does

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 2>is it kills the other events around it, and it

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 2>creates a situation where players have to play a great

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 2>deal of golf that might not be on their terms.

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>So with that in mind, when you start to lay

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>out the schedule, that's how you need to think, right

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And obviously this is the clash. Here is the sponsorship

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 2>and who's paying up, and this is not They are

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 2>not going about this in a process that would be ideal,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, ideally they would just create the event and

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 2>then let the schedule fall from there, you know, and

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>that's not going to be the case. So thinking about

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that through, like, what's vitally important for the PGA Tour

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>is to you know, is to structure this properly so

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that the players are really happy. Because some players, like

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 2>I think this is one of the big drawbacks and

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>something they can hit on with live. Some players like

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to play before majors. Other players don't. There should never

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 2>be an elevated event the week before, you know, and

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 2>there shouldn't be a run of elevated events leading into

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the week before because every you know, every major, the

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.919
<v Speaker 2>players should get who really like the we're talking about

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the top players they should get to want to prepare

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the way they want to for these big tournaments. That's

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 2>what matters the most to them. Like, you know, this

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 2>is obviously the long term battle with Live. Like it's

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 2>not over. It is going to be a long term

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 2>battle unless something monumental happens with Live that they just

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>fall apart completely. I wouldn't bet on that. They've already

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>invested a lot of money. I don't see them quitting

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 2>anytime soon. So if you're talking about your long term

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 2>battle with Live, this is such a very important aspect

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>of it is how these elevated events work, How the schedule,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, really caters to the way a player wants

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for these major championships, because you know, you

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 2>hear like you've heard. I think one of the things

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I've listened to a couple of the recent nollying up

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 2>podcasts they've had John Rahm Will's l Tourus. The thing

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been fascinating about hearing these players talk about, you

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 2>know things, Wills l Tourus obviously a PGA tour loyalist.

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 2>He talked about, I'm not going to to do anything

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 2>that takes away my opportunity to play in major championships. Right,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that is a big carrot that the PGA Tour has

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 2>managed to hold on to who knows how long. But

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you also should with that in mind, not only playing,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 2>but preparing exactly the way I want to prepare for

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a major championship. And that's where Live has some really

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>wacky things like one one major they're playing the week

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 2>before another major they aren't playing the week before. Where

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 2>if I'm you know, Phil is obviously one of their

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 2>big players who's had you know, he is historically in

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>his career like to play the week before. So all

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, he's in his fifties, he's got only

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 2>a few major championship. I'm not counting him out after

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>that PGA when you know it's as crazy as that was.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>He's not like a real threat, but you know he

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 2>went out one one in the last two years, and

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 2>so you have to But if I'm Phil and I

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 2>only have a few bullets left in majors, like what

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 2>if I can't prepare exactly the way I want to prepare?

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Like and this goes for other players, right, you know

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it is it is vitally important to create a schedule

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.959
<v Speaker 2>that's player friendly, that makes sense, and that's the hard

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 2>thing for the tour is going to be doing that

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 2>where you know it's up to the sponsor to pay

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>up for this.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that they really shouldn't rotate designated

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>events because that would just create a new kind of

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>chaos every season, right? I mean, how can that be

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>avoided if they're really planning to rotate designated events because

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to change every year.

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 2>You can rotate a dates, right, so you can move

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>event dates around if you want to rotate. So maybe

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the set date is this is an elevated week

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and an event slides in and out. I think that

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that they it's ironic, right, Like

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 2>with the LPGA, they have done a horrible job with

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 2>setting up convenient travel for their players. That matters because

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 2>if you're a bottom tier LPGA player, you're not making

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 2>enough money in order to have this crazy travel schedule.

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 2>It will with the PGA Tour that shouldn't be a

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 2>concern and that might end up Like a good example

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 2>is this Pebble Beach event. Pebble Beach is in its

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 2>current construct where it is in the schedule is because

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 2>of the history of the West Coast Swing, you can drive.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Like we had a podcasts with Zach Blair a couple

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago. He talked about how he's driving the

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 2>entire West Coast Swing. That's super convenient, super cool, But

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.959
<v Speaker 2>like that's not something that you have to keep in mind.

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Like it's important probably for caddies of lower tier players,

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 2>but maybe you could make a tweak that makes life

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit easier for caddies, you know, maybe there's

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 2>a travel stipend or something. But the idea like the

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>AT and T Pebble Beach pro Am, to me, feels

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 2>like an event that's a that's a sponsor that sponsors

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 2>two events. You've got the super to this. You know,

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 2>we talk about what makes waste management. It's it's kind

0:42:59.960 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of like transcended just the golf crowd and gotten into

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 2>the greater sports crowd thanks to its atmosphere. At State

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Pebble Beach Pro Am is one of those events that

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 2>has the ability to transcend the golf crowd. So to me,

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense for an elevated event. Now, like what

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>goes against it is the pro am aspect of it.

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's Pebble freaking Beach, Like you want to see

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the best courses in the world.

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 2>You want to see the best players in the world

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:31.439
<v Speaker 2>playing at Pebble Beach year in, year out, and it's

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to draw in a bigger bucket of fans.

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 2>So does that event make sense on the West Coast

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 2>swing in this current date? The weather's not great. It's

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 2>right around Riviera, it's right around Waste Management, it's close

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to Century, it's close to Torry Pines. These are all

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 2>events that I feel like could have a pretty good

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 2>claim at a designated tag. So maybe we look at

0:43:55.800 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 2>it and say, hey, let's move Pebble back. What does

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Pebble look like in June or July or maybe even

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 2>later in the year. You know what is has a

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 2>playoff as a playoff event, how about Pebble Beach is

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a playoff event? Now that would run counter with the

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 2>pro am, which is not something they're gonna budge on.

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 2>So maybe we look at a March date or an

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.479
<v Speaker 2>April date. All you're only getting better and better weather

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 2>on the Monterey Peninsula as you move away from February,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and travel shouldn't be a concern as you're going to

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 2>see with the Netflix show, all the top guys fly private,

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 2>like we should not be like traveling.

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Designated events specifically, the travel is not a huge part

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of the equation.

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, so thinking about it that way, right, like

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 2>what are your strongest events. The other thing that the

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 2>West Coast events really create a great appeal about is

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 2>there time that they are telecasted. You know, it is

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 2>super advantageous to get later in that coverage window because

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, your demo which is like middle

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 2>aged people golf, Like, I know they want to be younger,

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 2>but the demo is middle aged people. You know, what

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>gets easier and easier the later and later things are

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>on is for people to watch golf on the weekend

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 2>because they have less and less child activities. You know,

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 2>like the majority of golf fans either have children or

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 2>are like past the age of children, make it easier

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>for them to watch have it on later, you know,

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 2>West Coast events Like I don't know, I think that

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Florida portion should maybe go a little bit earlier into

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>this end of the year because in the winter people

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 2>are more at home, and that West Coast swing should

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.760
<v Speaker 2>push later so you can take advantage of later telecast times.

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, I mean, you know, there's gonna be some

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>musical chairs with these events, moving them around, finding new places,

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll probably see some of that in the twenty

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four season. You know, there was a quote in

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Joel Beal article about the Pebble Beach pro Am,

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>which everybody should read and Golf Digest it was excellent

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>that the thing about the twenty twenty three season is

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that it gets us to twenty twenty four. So the players,

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour executives, sponsors are all expecting things to change

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 1>next season, and maybe some of this shifting around of

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>events in the schedule can be a feature of next season,

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>or as you're mentioning, it could potentially be just a

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>reality of the PGA Tour schedule going forward, because you know,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to find specific weeks for designated events,

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>but you also want to rotate sponsors in and out

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of designation, then you're really going to have to move

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>things around on a year to year basis, which would

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be enormously complicated, I'm sure, but it would also solve

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the potential problems with the cadence of the

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour schedule that you've outlined here. So I think

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about that well enough people have an idea

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of what the large a scheduling ramifications of designated events

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>could be. Basically, it's going to introduce some chaos, some uncertainty,

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and some difficulty into the schedule for PGA Tour executives

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>especially and potentially for players. You have one more point.

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 2>One more thing on that is if you listen to

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>no laying up interview with John Rahm, obviously a very

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:26.959
<v Speaker 2>influential player, he really talked about the his his him

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>pushing for more international elevated events, so that would also

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 2>throw just another wrinkle and you know difficult. I mean,

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 2>this is the top thing about these events. He was

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about how he really wants an elevated event in Spain, right,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to do that just for John ram?

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe he might be important enough.

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 2>And so you're talking about like can you you know,

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it, like the balance of Hey,

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 2>these a lot of our top flight international players probably

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 2>would like to see three or four events played internationally,

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and how do you do that within the construct of

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 2>like when you take out the majors and the players,

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you're down to twelve and then how do you fit

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:16.399
<v Speaker 2>it into the fields? Right? So that's just another it's

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 2>going this is I'm not envious of the tour here

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 2>with the situation, it's it's going to be extraordinarily challenging.

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 2>And it does, like to my earlier point, like if

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>this is not the ideal construct with the with the sponsors,

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it adds like a whole new layer of of having

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 2>of hoops and hurdles to jump through. The ideal situation

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 2>would honestly be if you just started from scratch brand

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 2>new events.

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, you know, a lot of sponsors are

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be unhappy, uncomfortable, not only sponsors of non

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>designated events who don't want to pay up, but even

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>sponsors of designated events who maybe feel like they're paying

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>too much or feel like they don't want their event

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to be designated in style. And that sort of opens

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 1>up the other question, the other big question I have

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>about designated events, which is format, field size, qualification, criteria,

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Monday qualification. What do these events look like? What can

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.720
<v Speaker 1>these events look like? What should they look like? Should

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:22.959
<v Speaker 1>there be cuts? So you know, maybe we just start

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 1>with the field size question. What do you think would

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be the ideal field size for a designated event, because

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not going to be one hundred and.

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:35.959
<v Speaker 2>Forty, right, yeah, I think in that like one hundred

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and twenty as we've seen with the world ranking formula,

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think there needs to be a critical

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 2>amount of players. But what I don't like I do

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 2>not like the idea of the top one twenty five

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:54.240
<v Speaker 2>in the FedEx Cup allowing you a I don't think

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 2>finishing one twenty in the FedEx Cup should grant you

0:49:57.719 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a spot in every elevated event.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not a designated style of compress.

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 2>If you look at what a resume of a player

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 2>that's from one hundred to one hundred and twenty five,

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they are people that should like. I

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think that should qualify being a admittance into the

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 2>great events of golf. I think, you know, when you

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.760
<v Speaker 2>look at when you start to get to about seventy

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 2>in the FedEx Cup, you start to look at players

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 2>like season and you say, you know what, they had

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a good season. When you get to the top forty,

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 2>you start to look at it and you think about

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 2>some guys that had narrow misses, Like you have a

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 2>guy like Denny McCarthy who narrowly missed making it to

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Eastlake last year. You look at his year and you're like,

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, he was a good, good PGA Tour player

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 2>for years before this, and this was a great year

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 2>for him. So you start to think, like, I think

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the right numbers is fifty, but you need to get

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 2>You probably want to get to about one hundred and

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty one hundred person fee at the minimum, right.

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so. But you know, you've just gone

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>through a logic of why when you start to admit

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>players who are more in that one hundred to one

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty range, you begin to dilute the strength or the

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not the strength of the field in an owgr sense,

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but the eliteness of the field. When you begin to

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>let in that many players, you have to start going

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to players who I don't know. You kind of look

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>at their resumes and you're like, well, should they be

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>playing in this designated event? Should they have a shot

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to win this? Because anything can happen on any given

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>week in golf. That's one of the problems with the

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:41.320
<v Speaker 1>entertainment product is that it's such a high variance sport

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that there's no guarantee that it's going to come down

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to John Rahm and Roy McElroy in the end. So

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the more players you have an event in an event,

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the more chances you have that you get a finish

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't feel like a designated event finish because

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you have numbers one hundred and seven and one twenty

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>one in the FedEx Cup going head to head down

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. I mean, So that's the issue, I think.

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And also the issue is that the top top players,

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are trying to be who are trying

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to pacify here that the PGA Tour is trying to

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>keep in the fold, the top players want these fields

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to be probably as small as possible, right, and so

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're pushing for probably like sixty seventy like WGC style.

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And so how do you you know, is one twenty

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the compromise or does it need to be lower than that.

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like one hundred when I think about it,

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 2>is the number I like. I like one hundred with

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a cut to the top sixty. Yeah, you know, I

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 2>don't think it makes any sense to have people hanging

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 2>around that are you know, the spread is so amusing

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 2>when you have the note cut events and you see

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 2>the highest the highest score to the lowest score. It's

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 2>always it's an amusing thing. But I don't think that

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that should go. Now, Like, what if we say,

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to do one hundred, what if we

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 2>have sixty exempt spots for the top six players on

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the PGA Tour. I think another exemption should go to

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the Corn Faery Tour Player of the year, so you

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 2>have sixty one exemptions. From there, you start to build

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 2>out qualifications that are based on the current year. So

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe there are ten spots that go to

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the top ten in the FedEx Cup. And obviously with

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 2>all of this, I mean a whole nother pod is

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 2>FedEx Cup reform. What should a designated event get versus

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a non designated event and FedEx Cup points and it

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 2>should not be very close. Right now, it's fifty points different,

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 2>which is laughable.

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's going to change. I mean, I

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>love that right, like it really does have to change.

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That's like a big thing. But man, you know, it

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>just seems like that's going to be so hard to

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:52.319
<v Speaker 1>change because the motivation to make all these events to

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fool people, not only sponsors but fans into thinking that

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 1>all the events are more or less the same kind

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of significance. The impulse toward that is so strong. But

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, we'll see, But I agree that that needs

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen.

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 2>So we're at seventy one spots with the top ten

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the existing year's FedEx Cup all right from there,

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 2>like so we have twenty nine more spots. One idea

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I think is getting informed players into the event. Really

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously you're accomplishing that with the FedEx Cup exemption. But

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 2>also I think one of the really I think great

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 2>aspects of golf. One of the things I really enjoy

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is that Open qualifying series leading into the Open Championship,

0:54:40.719 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 2>where an event has you know, this guy's gonna win,

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 2>But there's also that caret of you know, the top

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 2>three guys that aren't exempt into the Open in this

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 2>event are getting in something similar. Maybe it's the top

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 2>five guys not otherwise exempt are getting a spot in

0:54:57.640 --> 0:55:00.800
<v Speaker 2>this designated event. Let this could be a life changing

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for somebody. You know, if you go last week

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that wouldn't be exempt to get in. You know that

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Brent Grant for example, a rookie who's playing the week

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 2>of He's playing the week of his life at Pebble

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and he and he's going into the final round with

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:19.839
<v Speaker 2>a real chance to play his way into a designated

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.399
<v Speaker 2>event in the near future while he's in form. That's

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the important thing is golf is fickle. Players come in

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and out of form. How do we get the most

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.959
<v Speaker 2>informed guys into this event. So there's let's just say

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 2>that there's ten spots that are given out in that

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:39.920
<v Speaker 2>space of time between designated events to inform players. Now

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 2>we're at eighty one spots of one hundred, all right.

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I think a Monday qualifier would be extraordinary when you

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:51.240
<v Speaker 2>limit the field to the top the only exempt players

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 2>are the top sixty and last year's FedEx Cup, you know,

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and then like players that are really informed. Like an

0:55:57.160 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 2>example of a player really informed that probably would get

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in that played a Monday qualifier for the Waste Management,

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Ben Griffin, a rookie who is I think he was

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 2>top thirty in FedEx Cup points going into the Waste Management,

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 2>has had a great, great start to his professional career.

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Like Taylor Montgomery, would be another example of a guy

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 2>that would be automatically in this in this thing. But

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 2>then you have this, like you have guys that are

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 2>legitimate tour pros that are playing a Monday Qualifier, and

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe you make it thirty six holes. You make the

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Monday Qualifier only available to corn Faery Tour players or

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour players, and if there's an excess, you have

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a pre qualifier. Right. Don't schedule corn

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Faery events opposite these events. Make this the you know,

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.880
<v Speaker 2>like the players the only event that matters this week.

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't have opposite events. Have this this Monday Qualifier be

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 2>really something. And guess what, It's another television product that

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you could sell. It could be part of your rights package.

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Is a Monday qualifier. Who doesn't want to come off

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 2>a weekend of golf with like, hey, there's another event

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 2>on Monday. It's enjoyable to have it on in the background.

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Golf is one of the few sports that you can

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of keep a passing interest of it, you know,

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 2>depending on what your occupation is in the background. People

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 2>do it every year with the Masters, Right, So Monday

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 2>qualify are four spots that it has more of like

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a US Open, like one of the most fascinating aspects

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 2>of the US Open is final qualifying. This would have

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 2>this would give this thing a final qualifying feel. So

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 2>have ten spots through that. So now we're up to

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety one, right, if my mask's right?

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing sponsor exemptions?

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I this is a tricky question. I think it should

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 2>be spot There should be a few sponsors exemptions, but

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 2>it should be limited to the one whatever your one

0:57:47.000 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty five PGA Tour player.

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that way, So there needs to be restrictions. Are

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>sponsor is going to be happy about that? Because we're

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>already worried about sponsors being unhappy with the PGA Tour.

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Listen, the the job of the PGA Tour here. An

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 2>unhappy sponsor is one thing. This is their response to

0:58:07.720 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 2>an existential threat. That has to be priority number one

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 2>with every decision that they make. It cannot be Is

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the sponsor going to be happy? Obviously if the sponsor's

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 2>mass exodus. But there's a balancing act. We're delivering you

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the best players in the world. Your sponsor exemption, it

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't matter in comparison to us delivering you Rory

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 2>ram Speith, you know, justin Thomas to your event. That

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 2>that is the thing, right.

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are giving you a semi major has to

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be the message, right, Yes, you're paying more. Yes, there

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 1>might be some differences in how the event feels on site,

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what concessions are doing, and sponsor exemption exemptions will be different.

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But you're getting like a really really premium product here

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people are going to care about

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and be excited about. I guess that that really does

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have to be the message. But but I love that

0:59:06.080 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what you just laid out there sounds really exciting. And

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a mix.

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Of I've got a few more spots.

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got a few more spots. You didn't fill up

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the sponsor exemptions.

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Now you've got some sponsor exemption.

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>One sponsor exemption.

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 2>One sponsor exemption ninety.

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't think that's realistic, but whatever, We'll got.

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Word to ninety two. And now I'm pulling from two

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 2>other places. Okay, European Tour, Yeah, DP World Tour six spots,

0:59:34.480 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 2>and then the top two players on the Corn Faery

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Tour are in. Oh, you don't have an opposite corn

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 2>faery event. You're giving people legitimate like you're investing in

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 2>your corn fairy tour. By having these spots, you're building exposure.

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 2>What if, you know, what if Pearson Couty is in

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the mix. And I don't think anyone would disagree that

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Pearson Couty could play in this event and can.

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I was literally just gonna call it Andy's Pearson Cuty

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>exemption when you when you brought this idea up. But

1:00:07.200 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's great. And you know, we've been looking

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for ways to get Corn Fairy Tour players involved more

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly on the PGA Tour. You know, first of all,

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a value to players proving themselves over the

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>course of a season on the Corn Fairy Tour. I

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think we need to get rid of that. But

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I also think that winning three events in you know,

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in one season is a is a particularly I don't know,

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that's a useful way. The only

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, immediate elevation opportunity that there should

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be these designated events, you know, given opportunity for the

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour to get some players who maybe belong on

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the tour. Just give them a chance, and they might

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they might not take advantage of it, and that's okay.

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think that's that's really nice. But

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know who's going to be really, you know, not

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>stoked about everything that you just laid.

1:01:04.120 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Out sixty one on the fat X Cup.

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you know, what are you going to do

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about those guys or are we not worried about them anymore?

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Because we've been worried about these sort of mid tier

1:01:16.600 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour players who just sort of stick around, keep

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>their cards year after year, but don't really bring much

1:01:23.480 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of value in terms of entertainment to the fans. And

1:01:28.800 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've been kind of determining policy for a

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>long time. That's the reason why we have the schedule

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have. Partly, you know, the sponsors are also

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a factor, but the players pushing for the rank and

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>file players, pushing for events not to be demoted that

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they rely on is a big reason why the PGA

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Tour schedule is what it is now. In the Live era,

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the power of the rank and file

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour player is snding and the decisions are being

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>made that don't really serve them directly because of the

1:02:07.840 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>threat that Live has presented. And so I wonder if

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that in creating the designated events that the

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour is going to continue to be able to

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of push past these players sixty to one to

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty in the FedEx Cup who have been determining so

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>much policy in the past.

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Again, what what does the core thesis of these elevated

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:35.919
<v Speaker 2>events have to focus on? Preventing your existential threat? So

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>from that standpoint, you cannot be worried about you know,

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing it with live the high profile player defections

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>have slowed down since really since the Delaware meeting, and

1:02:50.360 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>as those have slowed down, the defections have become Meto Perreira,

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>great young player that I'd be excited about, but about playing,

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>like see going and seeing play, but not somebody who's

1:03:03.520 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>going to make a huge difference if he stays or leaves.

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget about Bassie Munios.

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, same same bucket, right, So creating this for the

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>big players, and the other message to players sixty through

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>one twenty is we're providing you a number of opportunities

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to elevate yourself. Like these other smaller events are going

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to have less stars in them, they give you more

1:03:28.600 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to play your way into these big events every week,

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>every week, you play, you have the opportunity to play

1:03:36.400 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>your way into an elevated event.

1:03:38.840 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's exactly what they don't want to do, right,

1:03:41.960 --> 1:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to have to play their way in.

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They want they want the exemptocracy. Yeah, I know, but

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, it's it's not what they want though

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that the meritocracy is not what FedEx sixty through one

1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to twenty really want. I mean, I don't want to

1:03:57.000 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>paint with too broad of a brush here. I'm sure

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are some guys in that range who, you know,

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>want to see these changes that seem to be underway.

1:04:05.880 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, those have been pretty comfortable spots in

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the past, with a lot of exemptions into very high

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar events, and they're going to lose quite a bit

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of that in this new PGA tour schedule. Now, are

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they going to lose all of it? No? I think

1:04:23.000 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>their lives are still going to be pretty comfy if

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they're in that range, and maybe they deserve that, because

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>being sixty through one twenty in the FedEx Cup is

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing to turn your nose up at. That is a

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>major accomplishment for a golfer. These guys are amazingly good,

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but should they be getting, you know, these kind of

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>automatic exemptions into any event that they want on the

1:04:45.760 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour. I don't know about that, and so it

1:04:50.040 --> 1:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>might be a tough sell though, I think. I mean,

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do you agree that it'll be a tough sell or

1:04:54.120 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think that this is going to, you know,

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>resolve itself a little more easily than I think it is.

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that the power has shifted on the PGA

1:05:04.680 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Tour to the point of where it is a you know,

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>it matters less. To be completely honest, I think.

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The Delaware delegation is ascendant for sure. Yeah, the thirty

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>players who were in Delaware meeting the top players, it

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like that was a big moment where that group

1:05:24.440 --> 1:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of players was sort of announcing we are the new

1:05:28.400 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>power source on the PGA Tour.

1:05:30.800 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm reidoff players sixty to seventy in the FedEx Cup

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>last year, and just to give you an idea of

1:05:39.960 --> 1:05:43.360
<v Speaker 2>what they were, I just got to find where I

1:05:43.400 --> 1:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>had it pulled up here, So all right, sixty to

1:05:46.240 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>seventy sixty or sixty one to seventy, say top sixty,

1:05:49.880 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>so sixty one Alex Smalley, Mark Leishman, a Nierbonn Lahiri,

1:05:56.000 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Troy Barrett, Taylor Moore, Cam Davis, John had And Todd

1:06:00.800 --> 1:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Lanto Griffin, Trey moll Nax.

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yep, right, we were talking about yeah.

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>About about these guys not do you you know based

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>off of their relevance last year, are any of these

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>guys Like are you crying because they're not in there?

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Like that's that's the reality is that these are the

1:06:20.320 --> 1:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>players that you know. They're nice players. I'm not trying

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to demean them. They they had good years, but they

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like you're missing out And and really like

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>if you start to scroll through the the first guy

1:06:32.880 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 2>from last year that I feel like, okay, if we

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>if we missed here, it would be a big miss

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>is when we get into the forties and in the forties.

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>At that back into the forties, you got Fleetwood at

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 2>forty seven, see wook Him at forty eight, Turtle Hatton

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>at forty nine, and Adam Hadwin at fifty. Like to me,

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>that's where you get at like forty seven through forty nine,

1:06:55.240 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Y're where you have Hatton in Fleetwood. That's feels like, okay,

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>like those are guys that be at elevate events.

1:07:01.720 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is a big, you know, a long

1:07:05.800 --> 1:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>running disjunction between fans and the PGA Tour, where fans

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>those names that you read off in the sixties, with

1:07:14.960 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the exception of maybe Mark Leishman who went to Live

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, right, fans really don't follow those players in general.

1:07:24.200 --> 1:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Casual fans don't know who they are. We know who

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they are, but they're not bringing value to most fans

1:07:31.520 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>watching at home. But the PGA Tour and the way

1:07:36.680 --> 1:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it was run valued those opinions of those players just

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as much as anybody else's on the PGA Tour. And

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so I guess the hope is recently that that dynamic

1:07:49.160 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>has shifted a little bit and that the weight of

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the word of John rom Roy, McElroy, Justin Thomas, et

1:07:56.600 --> 1:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>cetera is starting to take on something more like it's

1:08:00.400 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>true weight that it has with fans, right, that the

1:08:04.720 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>importance of what they want to do with the PGA

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Tour is more in line with what the fans want

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to see from the PGA Tour. At least, that is

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the hope here, and that's what a lot of these

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:19.519
<v Speaker 1>speculations that we're going through about what the designated events

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>could be are based on that these top players can

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>start to make some decisions that would be more aligned

1:08:28.160 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>with what the fans want.

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the important thing to remember, too, is that

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>players who finished like sixty sixty fifth, they likely have

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>played well enough at periods of time that they would

1:08:43.080 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>have played their way into designated events a handful in

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:49.559
<v Speaker 2>a given year. And that's the important thing is that

1:08:49.640 --> 1:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>they aren't being excluded like the example here, Like you've

1:08:53.880 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 2>got Alex Smalley and Taylor Moore, who I think I

1:08:57.320 --> 1:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>think Smalley was a rookie too, Taylor Moore was a rookie.

1:09:00.400 --> 1:09:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Those guys had sensational years as rookies, right, and those

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:09.320
<v Speaker 2>guys are getting the opportunity to effectively play many major championships, right.

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. The majors are even more closed off

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 2>than these elevated events would be, Like the majors are

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:18.719
<v Speaker 2>harder to get into, like you need to be top

1:09:18.760 --> 1:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty in the world rankings or you know one of

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:25.599
<v Speaker 2>these qualifications, like they aren't available to rookies. And this

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>might be what the PGA tour veterans hate to hear.

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 2>But these these elevated event, these designated events. These many

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>major championships effectively would be so wide open to anyone

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>with a PGA Tour card because all you have to

1:09:40.880 --> 1:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>do is play well in a week in a week

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:46.639
<v Speaker 2>leading up to the PGA Tour event, and you are in.

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, if there are three spots in effectively each

1:09:50.160 --> 1:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>event leading in for the top three non exempt, all

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 2>you have to do really is finish in the top

1:09:55.880 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>top seven, top eight in a given week. You have

1:09:58.280 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 2>to play exceptionally one time, you know, in a year

1:10:01.240 --> 1:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to play in one of these events. And what I

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>really like is it rewards a Hothand maybe I'm just

1:10:08.000 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this now, there's a also you could cut

1:10:11.880 --> 1:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>back a certain exempt number. Maybe you cut back to

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:19.639
<v Speaker 2>what did we start with, fifty or sixty sixty sixty,

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>So maybe we cut back to fifty. And there's a

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>ten top ten non exempt from the last elevated event

1:10:26.880 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to next elevated event. So if you get hot in

1:10:29.439 --> 1:10:33.839
<v Speaker 2>these elevated events, those designated events, sorry, these designated events,

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:36.600
<v Speaker 2>if you top ten, that would be pretty cool that

1:10:36.680 --> 1:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>you earn your way into the next one.

1:10:39.000 --> 1:10:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think that's a good place to wrap up.

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We got the phoenix open come out this week for

1:10:44.240 --> 1:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>hours first full field designated event. Yeah, it's a really

1:10:48.439 --> 1:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting subject. It sort of intersects with a lot of

1:10:51.000 --> 1:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>different topics that we've been talking about for years now,

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see how they turn out. But my feeling

1:10:57.439 --> 1:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is that this week's waste management is going to be

1:10:59.760 --> 1:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a fun watch. We'll see. I don't think I remember

1:11:03.760 --> 1:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing Rory McElroy at this event before. I'm not sure

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm right about that or wrong about that, but

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that he's there along with John Rahm

1:11:12.240 --> 1:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and all of the other top players on the PGA

1:11:14.280 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Tour is very very exciting to me. And so in general,

1:11:18.479 --> 1:11:20.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not always the most positive about the

1:11:20.560 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour. We are the furthest thing from PGA Tour,

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>yes men, But this has us, I think, legitimately excited

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about the future of the tour schedule. I think that

1:11:33.280 --> 1:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see some real improvements and that kind

1:11:36.000 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of starts this week. This episode of the Frida Egg

1:11:48.120 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Podcast was edited by Matt Ruschius. Thank you, Matt. So

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>A big new way to support the Frida Egg is

1:11:55.760 --> 1:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a Club TFE member. Club TFE is our

1:12:00.000 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>membership program. It's a wide ranging offering from content every day.

1:12:07.120 --> 1:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Basically at this point, we have the CLUBTFE blog, we've

1:12:09.840 --> 1:12:13.519
<v Speaker 1>got member videos, we've got course profiles, and we've also

1:12:13.640 --> 1:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>got deals for a club at TFE members in the

1:12:16.280 --> 1:12:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg Pro shop, as well as early access to events,

1:12:20.240 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>access to a monthly hangout with Frida Egg staff. I'm

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:26.639
<v Speaker 1>probably missing a couple of things here, but it's going

1:12:26.720 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>really well so far. We've been enjoying getting to know

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the members in CLUBTFE. There's been a lot of interaction

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>between us and the members on the member site, and

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you'd like to join us, or if you're

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in what this offering is, go to the Frida

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Egg dot com slash Membership and see what it's all about.

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred and twenty dollars a year and it

1:12:47.720 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>has all the things that I just went through, plus

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a couple of things that I'm forgetting about. So

1:12:52.240 --> 1:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the Frida Egg dot Com Slash Membership CLUBTF all right,

1:12:56.680 --> 1:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you for listening, and we'll see you against it