WEBVTT - The Story: What China Tariffs Really Signal

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, five mans Voloscian Caroen. I'm curious

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>if you agree, but I kind of feel like in

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the abstract, this idea of a kind of tech grace

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or even a tech war between the US and China

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>has been brewing for almost a decade, but this year

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it started to feel very real in terms of really

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the practical power that China wields over the US and

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>its key industries. And he's a perfect moment for this

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation and this guest, given the news about China's export

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>controls on rare earth metals.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it isn't until we started reporting on

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>this show that I actually thought about how much China

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>dominates what the future will look like. And I'm just

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 2>not sure that the US is on a level playing field.

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean has been this kind of rattat tat

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of one upmanship this year. There's been borderline frightening. Obviously,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the US took the world by storm with its AI models,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and then China released one that was purportedly far more

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>efficient in deepsek R one. The US band export of

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>advanced AI chips, so China started making its own, although

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they haven't caught up quite yet and now there's this

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>reciprocal relationship between US tariffs and Chinese export controls on

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>rare earth metals, Which is why my ears perked up

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>when our guests today said this.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I really feel like Chinese and Americans are the most

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>alike people in the world. Both countries have a sense

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of hustle, They are pragmatic people. They have a sense

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>of the technological sublime.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Dan Wong, who's a research fellow at Stanford University's

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Hoover History Lab and the author of a new book, Breakneck,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>China's Quest to Engineer the Future.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>People in both countries believe they are great powers and

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>smaller countries Canada or the UK have to listen to them.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>And they are also two of the greatest engines for

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>technological change and economic change as well.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I never really think about China and the

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>US as like uniquely similar in terms of culture, and

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I love this term the technological sublime, and I am

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>curious to hear more of what he's talking about. Why

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 2>is Dan the man here?

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan's the man because he wrote this excellent book, but

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>also because he lived in China during kind of a

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>crucial period between twenty seventeen and twenty twenty three, and

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he actually went there in part because it was during

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the time that the Communist Party had set this ambitious

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>agenda to transition from being quote the world's factory I

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing consumer products to becoming the world's leader in advanced

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing so robots, batteries, aerospace, and Dan was there to

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of study this transition up close. Then came COVID,

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and Dan was actually in Shanghai during this zero COVID lockdown,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so he got to see these kind of two faces

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of how China manages its economy is production and its population.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And he also had a lot of time to think

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>about the relationship between the US and China, what's similar

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and what's different. The framework he came up with is

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty intriguing. It's basically that one of the societies is

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>an engineering society and the other is a loyally society.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm going to guess that China is the

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>engineering force.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Good guess, And per Dan's framework, this engineering versus loyally

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>disposition massively impacts how the two countries relate to one another.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Take the trade war, for example, China is showing strength

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>by leveraging its resources, production, manufacturing chops, while the US

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is trying to maintain control through tariffs and laws.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>But Dan is essentially saying, the US and China are

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>very similar in temperament and are tackling the same goal,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>which is to be the world's technology superpower, but the

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>two are approaching it in very different ways.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And we talked about actually how in this

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very heightened moment, the US is learning all the worst

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>lessons from China's political system, but also about what the

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>US should do, at least in an ideal world, in

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>response to China's engineering dominance. But I wanted to start

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the conversation by having Dan define this paradigm China the

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>engineering state and US the loyally society.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>In his own words, China's the country I call the

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>engineering state because at various points in the recent past,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the entirety of the senior leadership had degrees in engineering.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 3>And what do engineers like to do build? They build

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>skyscrapers and highways and bridges, solar, colwyn, nuclear, you name it.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 3>They're building a lot of these things. They also treat

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the economy sometimes as an engineering exercise. And China's also

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>made up of engineers of the soul in which they

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.119
<v Speaker 3>are also fundamentally social engineers. So I spent a lot

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 3>of time in the book talking about the one child

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 3>policy as well as zero COVID, which the number is

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>right there in the name. There's no ambiguity about what

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>these policies could possibly mean. They're very liberal minded about

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 3>engineering the population. I contrast the engineering state with the

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>United States, which I call the loyally society, because at

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>various points the entirety of America's leadership were all lawyers.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Most of the founding fathers were lawyers. For sixteen US presidents,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 3>from George Washington to Abraham Lincoln, thirteen of them were lawyers.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Every single nominee to be president from the Democratic Party

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>between nineteen eighty to twenty twenty four went to law school.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>The Republicans are pretty loyally as well, And the issue

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 3>with lawyers is that they block everything good and bad,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>so you don't have stupid ideas like the one child policy.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>They also don't have functioning infrastructure almost anywhere in the US.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>To play Devil's advocate here, would it be fair to

0:05:55.040 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>say that most empires on the rise are engineering cultures?

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And most empires, when they get to maturity, become loyally societies.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 3>There are certainly something to that. I acknowledge that though

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the US has always been loyally at various points, it

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>was a proto engineering state. So I think between the

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 3>middle of the nineteenth century to the middle of the

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>twentieth century, the US certainly built a lot. It built

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 3>highway systems, Manhattan Project, the Apollo Missions, and these are

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 3>all extraordinary achievements by American engineers. And then I think

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the characters changed in the nineteen sixties as people got

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>very tired of Robert Moses ramming highways through dense neighborhoods

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 3>in New York City, of the Department of Agriculture spraying

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>DDT absolutely everywhere throughout the country, and of all sorts

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>of projects that the engineering state in America was messing

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>up on. And so people like Ralph Nader really took

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 3>charge to tell law students that they needed to quote

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 3>sue the bastards, and the bastards referred to the government.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So this is where the lawyers turned into litigators as

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 3>well as regulators.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to this idea of the tariffs and

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the export controls that successive US administrations have used as

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>tools of leverage against China are very loyally. There's a

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quote of yours which is the United States has made

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical mistake of bringing lawyers to a showdown with

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>China on trade and technology. Why is a mistake?

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to a fundamentally different view of what

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>are American strengths and what are Chinese strengths. So, on

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, China overproduces and the Americans over consume. Now,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>the Americans believe they are strong because they have the

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 3>world's greatest market. They have the world's biggest market, and

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>everybody needs to sell to Americans. I think that is

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>true to some extent. If you control demand, that is

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty important. And I think that the Chinese are saying, well,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>you are a consumer, We are a production superpower. We

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>make all your goods. When the Americans are unable to

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 3>get essential goods, when during the early days of the pandemic,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't make masks and cotton swabs, when the grocery

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>stores ran out of particular barriers depending on which part

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of California or Mexico had COVID at the time, that

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>made a lot of people quite upset. So I think

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese are accounting on the Americans not to have

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>very strong pain tolerance to endure empty shelves.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>When you look back at the last twenty thirty years,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the automotive industry, calm manufacturing, or whether it's

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>AI more recently with deep seek, what do you think

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about the argument that wasn't that the United States was

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>too loyally, It's just that it was too bad at

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>enforcing its rules well.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>To be clear, the Chinese don't lack for loss. I

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>think China drowns and loss and regulations. The difference is

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>that the Chinese have a very serious state that is

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.119
<v Speaker 3>very intent on making its will clear to the population.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're just living normally in China. I think that

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 3>there is a much greater degree of seriousness in China.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's something that unites the Chinese as

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 3>well as folks in Silicon Valley. Official China and Silicon

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Valley are both very very serious. They're not only serious,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>they're also self serious. You know, it's almost as dangerous

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>writing a mean tweet about a prominent VC as it

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>is done write a mean tweet about a member of

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 3>the Central Committee.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny you mentioned this because I was,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you can tell, I'm English and our

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>highest virtue educational system was rhetoric. And I was at

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a wedding with a number of my English friends this

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>summer and they were saying, oh, you spent some more

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>time in San Francisco and Solon Valley. You know, should

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>we go and try and make our lives there. Guys,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you're your charm. What's considered your charm in Britain will

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>not take you very far because isn't not value as

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of humor and conversational dexterity that a Cherish I mean,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't you think.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>That, because there's so much self seriousness here that are

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 3>really charming plishmen, so do so many bright young things.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I hoping by side, I think you guys

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>are mist guy that I think you're going to be

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>able to do it.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I've always liked saying that what Britain specializes in is

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 3>the sounding clever industries, namely television, journalism, finance, and consulting.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, part of the mythology of Silicon Valley

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it's the innocense, the absence of government that

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed this extraordinary technological flourishing to happen, you know, from

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineties to today. And I'm sure if you spoke

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to Samiltman or Jenson Wong or others and said this

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is a fundamentally a nation of lawyers not engineers, and

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in China is the other way around, they would disagree

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with you.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think they will probably push back, but I'll

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 3>hold on to my case, mostly because I don't feel

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 3>like Silicon Maalia is quite running the world just yet. Now,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 3>it got quite close to when Eli Musk promoted to

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>be co president, but then Elion flamed out, so he

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>goofed and he was pretty promptly fired with this public

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 3>dispute between Trump and himself. Now, I feel like there

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 3>could have been a moment in which Elon Musk was

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>running the American government and DOGE could have represented some

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of a return to the engineering state. But that

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>also flamed out really really quickly. And so I think

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>that it is a tragedy that Eli Musk was so misguided,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 3>turned a lot of people against this idea of government reform,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and rather than building up government capabilities, he was sharing

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>down its capabilities. I think it is pretty clear that

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Trump is still running the show out of Washington, DC,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>that when he summons the tech CEOs to hail him

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 3>at a dinner, then they will promise to invest hundreds

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>of billions of dollars in the American economy in Trump's name.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 3>And so that doesn't seem like the people who are

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 3>running Masters of the Universe to me. Rather, they seem

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 3>like obsequious courtiers. Now. I acknowledge that Donald Trump is

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>learning from China, but I think it's unfortunate that he's

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 3>learning some of the worst things from China. And I

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>think the great shame here is that in America it

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 3>feels like we're getting authoritarianism without the good stuff functioning

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 3>logistics and public order, the buildout of mass transit, and

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 3>the buildout of clean energy. Rather, what we're getting is

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of the construction of guilded ballrooms as well as

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>detention centers, rather than the creation of more public works

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>as well as a healthy manufacturing base. I think that's

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>a tragedy.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Would it be fair to say that the thrust of

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>your argument is that, on the balance of things, an

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.359
<v Speaker 1>engineering society is preferable to a loyally society.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think so. I would say that the

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 3>US and China both have virtues to teach each other.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>My great hope is for the Americans to become twenty

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>percent more engineering. Because the US needs to build many

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>more homes for people, to build much better mass transit,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 3>and needs to achieve the clean technology revolution, and it

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 3>needs to revitalize its manufacturing base. It doesn't have to

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 3>be like China in all respects. I think that China

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 3>is a good operating model for abundance. It's not a

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 3>great operating model for abundance. So I think that the

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 3>US should be twenty percent more engineering at the same

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 3>time I think that China should be fifty percent more Loyally,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>what I really wish is for the Communist Party to

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>actually respect individual freedoms, to not strangle so hard the

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>creative impulses of Chinese and fundamentally, what I really wish

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 3>is for the Communist Party to just leave people alone

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 3>for a little while and let them get on with

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 3>their lives and just not feel like they're under the

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>thumbs of the engineering state all the time, such that

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>these engineers want to be engineers of the soul.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>After the break, what China thinks of Donald Trump, stay

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with us. Coming to the book, why did you write it?

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And well, the key inputs and I know one of

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the key inputs was living in China between I think

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen and twenty twenty three, when you do it

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and what came out of it.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I felt I was living through a pretty momentous time

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 3>over that period, Donald Trump's first trade war, something that

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 3>morphed into a tech war I was living through sees

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 3>greater repression than the centerpiece was being in China throughout

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 3>all three years of zero COVID. There's something about living

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>in China which feels a little bit apocalyptic. You really

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>get the sense during zero COVID when you have all

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>of these videos from zero COVID times of people fleeing

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 3>office buildings or something because there was rumors of a

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>potential case inside the building, and once that happens, the

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>police will seal off the entire building, trapping everyone inside.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Imagine sleeping on the office floor with all of your

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 3>colleagues without being able to shower because they need to

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>test everyone in that office. And even for me, there

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>was a slight apocalyptic sense of the Great Firewall block

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 3>my website in twenty twenty two, which is when I

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 3>had to go see the Canadian Console General to ask

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 3>whether they needed me to leave in a hurry. And

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that is something quite surprising to happen. Generally they block

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 3>big platforms like Wikipedia or Twitter or The New York Times,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>not little RinkyDink websites like mine. And so to be

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>quite clear, I moved to back to the US in

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three because I craved some of the pluralism

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of the United States.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Talk about shin Zen. This is a city, as far

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as I understand, went from basically producing cheapies for Japanese

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer electronics in the nineties to being was the leading

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>auto producing cities and technology cities in the world in

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this space of just thirty years. I mean, how did

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that happen? And what would be necessary to happen here

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to emulate a story like that.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Hinjin really started to develop throughout the nineteen eighties

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>when Doncaping designated it a special Economic zone, and Hinjin

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>really grew by leaps and bounds. This was the sharp

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>tip of the spear into China's foray in becoming a

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 3>much more capitalist in Chhinjin has been an interesting success

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in all sorts of ways. Shinjin is most famously the

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 3>city that started making the first iPhones. So Tim Cook

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 3>and Steve Jobs before two thousand and eight decided to

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>situate most iPhone production in the city of Shinjin. And

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it is no wonder that Hinjin is now

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the global hardware capital of the world because once you

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>start training a lot of workers, hundreds of thousands of

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>workers producing the most sophisticated electronics in the world, what

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>that has produced is a giant workforce able to deploy

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 3>their talents into many other fields as well. So imagine

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>that you are someone working on assembly line making iPhones

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>this year, you're making iPhones next year, maybe you're making

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>a Huawei phone. You're after that a Dji drone the

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 3>year after that electric vehicle battery. There's just this gianted

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 3>supple workforce that investors as well as academics and factory

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 3>managers are rubbing shoulders with. And I think it is

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>no surprise that it has been an innovative leader in

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 3>producing all sorts of great electronics goods.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the US and Silicon Valley over values

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>innovative platform technology like AI coming back to this idea

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of engineered versus lawyers and whether people in Silicon Valley

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>would agree with you. I mean it seems like people

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>here might say, well, it's great to be able to

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>put the technology to use, but that the real value

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is in laying down the tracks to the future.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. First of all, I wonder what the term innovation

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 3>really is. So I think the Silicon Valley model of

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>innovation is that you take Steve Jobs, put him in

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 3>a garage, put some LSD into the garage, and what

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 3>comes out is an Apple computer. And I think that

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 3>is a strange model of innovation. I mean, it is

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>a valid Silicon Valley model of innovation. But I think

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 3>with the Americans, really value is kind of this moment

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 3>of invention, and what I challenge Americans to acknowledge is

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 3>that maybe there's greater glory in the production and actually

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.719
<v Speaker 3>owning various industries. So I think a lot about the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 3>solar photote Excel. This is something solar PV was invented

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 3>by Bell Labs in the year in nineteen fifty four,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 3>and so that could go straight into the history books

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 3>as an American invention for all time. But does that

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 3>really matter when China now owns ninety percent of the

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 3>solar industry, everything from the police and processing to the

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 3>final module assembly. I think that there's much greater glory

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>in owning a product rather than inventing it.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>How do you view attempts under President Trump of technology

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>companies to onshore manufacturing and the skating up of technologies

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>not simply the creation of the idea.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's not going great if we just take

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a look at manufacturing employment. Since Liberation Day in April,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 3>US has lost something like forty thousand manufacturing jobs, and

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 3>actually the data has stopped, so we don't know how

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the manufacturing employment sector has been doing. I think that

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 3>it is counter productive to become a great scientific and

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 3>technological superpower by cutting a lot of funding to the

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 3>National Science Foundation. I don't see a scenario in which

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 3>we get better science by spending less on science. I

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 3>think it is a big mistake to frighten away a

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of European researchers as well as supporting a lot

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 3>of the American workforce. Imagine if you are an engineer

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 3>today in South Korea and Taiwan, in France, wherever else,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and your boss is telling you you've gotten an assignment

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to go build factories in the US. Maybe they say no,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 3>thank you, because they've seen these images of South Korean

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>engineers who are trying to build a battery facility in

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 3>the state of Georgia being deported away in chains, and

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>that does not feel like a very good prospect. And

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>then this way, the Chinese were much more sophisticated. They

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>really welcomed Walmart and Apple and Tesla to build in China.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 3>They welcomed the managerial expertise from the West because they

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 3>recognized that they were so behind. And I would really

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>love it if the Americans were able to have the

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>same attitude.

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I've read about the reaction in Korea after the deportation

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Hundai factory workers being seen as a kind

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of watershed moment in terms of the relationship between South

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Korea and the United States, in terms of how much

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>trust they could put in an ally that treated their

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>citizens like that. What is the perception of the current

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>US policies that you just outline in China.

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, really hard to figure out how they think about

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. But for the most part, rampant hostility I

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 3>think is kind of a default mode that the Chinese

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 3>would greet Trump. Now, there is some sense in which

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of Chinese still kind of like

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. He doesn't seem like the Great Satan to them,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 3>mostly because during the First Trade War there was a

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a sense that Donald Trump likes Chinese. Essentially,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 3>he is very Chinese in terms of his business practices.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, it is very strange that Donald Trump keeps

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>praising Sees King. I dug up an interview he gave

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>to The Wall Street Journal last year in which Trump

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 3>said he was and I quote nearly verbatim, brilliant, so smart,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 3>everything nearly perfect. And so you know, there is a

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>sense in which he wants to be friends with See.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 3>But I think that friendship would not be reciprocated by See,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>who finds this guy too obnoxious to deal with. But

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that maybe these two countries can co exist very well,

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 3>because right now Donald Trump is the most pro China

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>member of the White House. So let's see how this

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 3>shakes up.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>There were two kind of narratives that people in the

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>West reassured themselves with when it came to China's rise

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and potential supremacy. The first was that the state control

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>over the economy in China would inevitably strangle innovation, and

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that would ultimately lead to economic collapse. On the one hand,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, the attempts of the state to be,

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>as you put it, engineers of the soul or control

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the private individual, whether through the one child policy or

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>zero COVID policies, would inevitably, because of the evidence of history,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>result in seismic revolutionary change. What is the status of

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>those myths today.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the first thing to do is to recognize

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that it is a myth that there is this American

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>narrative that China's poised on a knife edge, that the

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Communist Party's entire basis for legitimacy depends on delivering economic growth,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and I think that is not the case. I think

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that the Communist Party certainly values economic growth, but its

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 3>sources of legitimacy are more robust than that part. Because

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 3>there's been excellent momentum from the engineering state. Because if

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 3>you're a resident of Shanghai, what you've gotten over the

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 3>last decade are more and more subway stations throughout the city,

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 3>better in better parks, better air quality, as well as

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 3>well as around networks that allow you to go throughout

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the country. The engineering state has managed to build quite

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of political resilience by delivering people a sense

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of physical dynamism, and so I think that has given

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 3>people some degree of optimism. Whereas if you're living in

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco or a bunch of other mostly blue cities

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 3>and your physical environment does not change almost at all,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the only way can imagine that your life could be

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better, as if there's another coffee shop

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 3>around the corner, I think you really don't have a

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 3>sense that the future will be different from the past.

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>And so that is also something I'm really trying to

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 3>encourage that people have a sense of physical dynamism and

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>develop greater optimism too.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>These is only a very interesting earlier in our conversation

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about the United States learning the worst lessons from China.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, how do you when you look at these

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>two countries next to each other, how do you look

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at what those wrong lessons the United States is learning

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are and what the consequences will be if it continues

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to focus on those learnings and perhaps lose its ownership

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the American dream mythology.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it is still pretty clear that most of

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 3>the world's most successful people are still really eager to

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 3>work and establish their lives in the United States. There

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 3>is just so much more economic opportunity, much better compensation,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>much higher levels of energy and dynamism in the US

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 3>relative to let's say Europe or Canada, and I think

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 3>that is still clear and obvious. At the same time,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the United States is doing its very best

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>to erode a lot of its attractiveness to a lot

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 3>of global migrants. And my view is that the United

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>States is a superpower in many dimensions and that China

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 3>will not overcome the US and all of its dimensions.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 3>The US is also a financial superpower, it is also

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a cultural superpower. It is also a diplomatic superpower. And

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>China will not overcome these sort of things because, for example,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>it can't be a financial superpower because it imposes really

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 3>stiff capital controls on the financial system. But there is

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 3>one area in which China can be a very big

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 3>threat to the US, which is in advanced manufacturing. So

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 3>China produces so many things, and I think it is

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 3>on track to continue to the industrial the US as

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 3>well as Europe. Right now, America's APEX manufacturers companies like

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Intel and Boeing and Detroit automakers in Tesla. They haven't

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>been doing very well for a long time. And that's

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 3>not mostly because of China. That's mostly because of their

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>own missteps. So I think that China will not do

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 3>very well rid large but if it wins even narrowly

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 3>on this narrow victory of advanced manufacturing could be pretty

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>devastating to the West.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan final question in a sentence, whatsh the United States do.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Build more and have a little bit more seriousness about

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 3>recognizing its own problems, not demonizing the Chinese, and recognize

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 3>what are the Chinese successes that it's able to learn from,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 3>because the Chinese have done very well and much better

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 3>in learning from the Americans rather than the other way around.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 3>And I believe that was one sentence with just one

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>semi colon.

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, appreciate you taking the time.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 4>As for tech stuff, I'm Kara Price and I'm Oz Valoshian.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis, Melissa Slaughter, and

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Hill. Was executive produced by me Oz Valoshian, Julia Nutter,

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 2>and Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katrina Norvell for iHeart Podcasts.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Jack Insley mixed this episode and Kyle Murdoch wrote our

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 2>theme song.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Join us on Friday for the Weekend tech when Karen

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and I will run through the tech headlines you may

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have missed.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Great review and reach out to us at tech Stuff

0:27:51.359 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 2>podcast at gmail dot com.