WEBVTT - Nvidia, OpenAI Make $100 Billion Data Center Deal

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's have a quick check

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>in on these markets, because we are continuing to see

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>pressure on the tech stocks only by about two tens

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>per percent, and as that one hundred coming off of

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>what was a five tens percent increase the previous day.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>A lot of macro, a lot of digestion this week

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>as we anticipate, of course, the inflation readings, and a

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of FED speak. We're just questioning though, perhaps some

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>of the valuations in the AI space. Let's move on

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to see what's happening on this day with Micro and

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>get earnings After the bell, We're up more than two percent.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a stock that has increased forty percent in

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the month of September alone, But can it live up

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to the hopes for revenue increases to also be up

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>some forty percent in their fiscal quarter on which they're reporting.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course, key is the demand for high bandwidth memory

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and the use within AI accelerators. Talking about AI accelerators,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>check out in video. We're off by one point eight

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>percent after yesterday's rally. Remember that one hundred billion dollar

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>investment commitment into open AI. If open Ai in return

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>commits to buying GPUs the future from Invidea, the merry

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>go round of money continues. Let's break that all down

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg Semiconductors report Ian King just going back to

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that extraordinary one hundred billion dollar commitment getting equity from

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>open Ai, but only as they bring on AI accelerators,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>GPUs from Invidea, and ten gigawatts eventually in the next

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>few years. Ian, are we questioning the way in which

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>money is floating Right now.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a large number, and it seems excessive, even for

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>in Video. But then you sort of take a step

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 3>back and you realize that this is going to happen

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in an incremental basis, and it's going to be put

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to work only when the actual hardware is put in

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>place and the actual capacity is put in place. So yes,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a massive headline. Yes, even for Invidea, that seems huge,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>But if you take it over a number of years,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>then maybe it isn't that excessive. Maybe it's just what

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>is needed for this market.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And in Video continues to be a deeply strategic investor,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 2>often putting money to work in the like sort of

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>core Weaver n scale or long term demand for their GPUs.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>In talking of demand, we're going to get a bit

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of a fundamental check on it, right with Micron's earnings

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>after the bell.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Micron story is everybody is focused. As you

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>mentioned on HBM high bind with memory one of Ed

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>lard Low's favorite topics. Everybody wants to see this company

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 3>converting what they know is strong demand into very rapid growth.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Everybody wants to see Micron really having a say in

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the AI world, and that's what people be focused on.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Because the market overall for other types of memory, maybe

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>isn't that strong. Maybe isn't recovering as quickly as as

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>some had hoped.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Eleven point one five billion dollars is a consensus up

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 2>forty four percent in terms of revenue for fiscal fourth quarter.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's inking as always a very busy man. Thank him.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Look as we await earnings. Interestingly, anxiety around AI funding

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>just continues to be intensifying. The industry. We understand will

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>need two trillion dollars in combined annual revenue to fund

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the computing power that's needed by twenty thirty, but their

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>revenue is likely to fall short by a tune of

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred billion dollars. It's all according to Bain's annual

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Global Technology Report. It was released today Tuesday, as bringing

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>in j Jacobs for more US head of Equity ETS

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>over at black Rock who you really get an analysis

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>of the insatiable demand of investors into the AI data

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 2>center story. But are they starting to question ultimately whether

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>we can meet that insatiable demand where the funding is

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>there in the longer term.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 4>No, I think it's quite the opposite. Investor enthusiasm is

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>only growing. If you look at one of our ETFs, BAI,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>it's an actively managed AIETF. It's brought in over five

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars this year and is now the largest AIETF

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>in the United States. And a lot of the exposure

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 4>that is providing to investors is around that digital infrastructure layer,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the hardware producers in the semiconductor space, the digital infrastructure owners,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>some of the data owners that are becoming really valuable

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>in this explosion of AI models. And so there's a

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>ton of investor enthusiasm, and I think there's a lot

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 4>of expectations that revenues will match the expenditures, if not

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 4>exceed them, in the next several years.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>But how much should we get comfortable with companies like

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in Nvidia basically plowing their own revenues of today into

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>hopes of revenue of tomorrow, basically funding their end clients.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it's beyond comfort. This is a necessity for

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>some of the leading technology companies. They have a tremendous

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 4>mode because they have low cost of capital, they have

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>tremendous access to dollars, and they're able to really kind

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 4>of leverage their own strengths, which is if you look

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>at a semiconductor company owning GPUs, owning this manufacturing process

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>is really valuable in the semiconductor space. That's the short

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 4>that's the shortfall that's needed by large language model developers.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 4>So this investment across the industry makes a ton of sense.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>So going back to your I shares AI Innovation in

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Tech actively managed ETF, how much are clients begging you

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 2>for more diversification when it comes to the AI trade.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Because we have put so much stock into a few names.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of ask to go beyond the MAG seven.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I think people understand the MAG seven story. They understand

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>why these companies are so successful in AI space, and

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 4>why they're leading it, but they do want to know

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 4>what's beyond that. What are the other semiconductor companies, why

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 4>are some of the data owners, what are some of

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 4>the companies that aren't necessarily a consensus view as an

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 4>AI company but are involved in the space. And so

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 4>that's where and actively managed fund I think can provide

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of value to investors is by yes, it's

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 4>going to have Max seven exposure, but beyond two thirds

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 4>of it is going to look beyond it and provide

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of the next names that are going to rise

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 4>in this ecosystem.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>And all those names rising in the United States. We've

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>also just seen President Trump, alongside Jensen Wang and many others,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 2>go to the United Kingdom to talk up an investment.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>There are we seeing more names being added to the ets.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>They're coming from Europe, coming from Asia.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a global theme, but predominantly it is being led

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 4>out of the United States today, and that's where we've

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 4>seen some of these kind of new up and come

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>AI risers largely coming from We sell have a really

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 4>robust startup environment and venture capital environment around AI. So

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 4>the US is very much at the center of this ecosystem,

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 4>but it is a global theme.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>So the members of the ETF a larger US. Are

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the investors in that INTF getting ever any more global

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>or is it predominantly US investors that want to stick

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>with this theme.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 5>It's both.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 4>We certainly have seen a ton of global appetite, but

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 4>some of the biggest investors today are coming from the

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 4>United States. I think AI is not surprising anyone. Everyone

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 4>knows globally this is the biggest area right now. They

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>want to have access to the best investment tools to

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>get exposure to it. Our ETF is really risen as

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 4>the number one tool in the US for AI exposure.

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 2>What about other parts, like the energy side of the equation?

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>Are the areas that eventually will do well. We're always

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about healthcare predominantly being a user of generals of

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>AI and therefore more productive.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I would say the energy space is coming up more

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 4>and more with clients as they look to the AI

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 4>trade beyond technology kind of what's the next shoot to drop,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 4>what's the area of opportunity. We've seen a ton of

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 4>interest around different energy sources to be able to power

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>the AI trade, whether that's nuclear, whether it's fossil fuels,

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 4>whether it's renewables. Really looking across the entire energy ecosystem,

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a way of looking at utilities from a more

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>forward looking lens. If you take the utility sector, but

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 4>say who's really going to grow here, who really has

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 4>this great ten urre trajectory because of AI. It's a

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 4>more thematic cut of that space.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>We've just been coming out of the United Nations General Assembly.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It does feel as though fossil fuels very much have

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to be put back on the map by President Trump

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>at least. Is that something you're seeing echoed by investors

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>they want to be recommitting once again after years of

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>perhaps rebalancing, moving towards renewables, looking at cleanoforms of energy.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>It's across the entire energy value chain. I think you

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 4>have to look at There are going to be energy

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 4>fuels that are going to be really necessary, there's going

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>to be energy producers that are really necessary, and there's

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>energy distribution that's going to be really necessary in this

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 4>AI theme, and so I think people are looking very

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 4>broadly at where it's going to come from.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Every now and then the market goes through moments of anxiety,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>whether it's about fact that maybe we've got this revenue

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>mismatch when it comes to compute funding, whether it's about

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>actual productivity gains with the MIT report that came out

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>last month, are you seeing any anxiety pull back in

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>actual fun flows wanting to go into AI?

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 5>More broadly, like.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I said, our aifun flows have been accelerating recently, so

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>we're not seeing a lot of anxiety. Look, this is

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 4>a long term theme. This is a bet for the

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 4>next five to ten and beyond years. I'm sure within

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 4>that timeframe there will be bouts of anxiety. There will

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 4>be questions around what the valuation should be. But if

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 4>you take a long term view of artificial intelligence, we

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>believe this is going to be one of the most

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 4>powerful drivers of the markets for the next decade and beyond.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and more broadly, when we're thinking about fundamentals, how

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 2>much to earnings matter for your portfolio managers, but more

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>broadly for the investor sentiment too.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 4>So they matter, but when you're looking over the long term,

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 4>it's more about what does the earning say about the

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 4>direction of travel rather than what's happening today. There's not

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 4>a ton of concern about what is your revenue today.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>If you're a large language model developer. What we prefer

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 4>is have you gotten more paying subscribers? Have you developed

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>the best model? Are you starting to see more penetration

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 4>in the corporate world where you're going to have more

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 4>ability to spend on these technologies? The direction of travel

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 4>is what we're really looking at. The earnings.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 2>J Jacobs is always great to have you here. Thankscoming

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>in the studio. Black rocks. J Jacobs there. Meanwhile, I

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 2>want to talk other areas of AI now, the application

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 2>of it. Snowflake, alongside industry leaders and key partners, just

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>unvailed a new initiative aiming to set a new industry

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>standard for AI interoperability. But they call it the Open

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Semantic Interchange and it will be open sourced in an

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 2>effort to remove what they call data islands and accelerate

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>AI for all. Treat our Ramaswami and piece to say

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>is with us. Snowflake CEO set the context of the

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>problem here, shout out how difficult is it to get

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>access to all data out there at the moment to

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>make the generative AI become this reality.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, great to be here at Caroline.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>AI has a lot of promise for making data very

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>broad available to everyone in the enterprise, including business users using.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 5>Natural language, which they which all of us like doing.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But the problem often is that the meaning behind the

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>data is in multiple places. It can be in databases,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it can be in business intelligent tools. This just makes

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>developing AI solutions on top of this data very hard.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And what we announced today with a consortium of industry

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>folks is an open standard for exchanging this semantic information.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is this is going to enhance

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>interoperability between different folks between Salesforce, DBT Labs, Blackrock that

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we would like to see happen. It can help accelerate

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>value that is going to be gotten from AI. It

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>also just simplifies things for everybody that's involved, and that's

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>why we're super excited about working with these giant industry

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>players to announce this new interchange format.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, universal translator is a nice way about talking about it.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 2>With Snowflake, the sell Source, DBT Labs, black Rot, Thought Spot,

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Wig Giki on this program, can you tell us about

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>how difficult the technology exchange is going to be? Here?

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>What actually you need to do beneath the surface.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a standard.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>What this means is that people that want to be

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the standard or want to confirm to the standard,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just for going to make it easy to send and

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>receive this semantic information. This is you know, this is

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>business stuff, stuff like OS revenue defined, how is profit defined,

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how is EBITA defined?

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 5>And so on.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So we intentionally wanted it to be a lightlift for

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>each of these players. But what happens collectively is that

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the semantic information is free to

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>move about. It just makes value creation, especially with AI,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just a whole lot faster. And it's a big step

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>forward for the industry, and we expect more and more

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>folks in the data industry to be a part of

0:11:59.080 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this standard.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, so that's for the data industry, going to the

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>large language model industry in and of itself. Anthropics seem

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 2>to have seen this issue with data and inter proability

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>as well. They've been seeing silos. They introduce something called

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>model context protocol that's again open standard up. How is

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>that different?

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 5>This is one layer below that.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What a model context protocol does is it creates a

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>standard way, for example, to talk to an AI agent.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 5>But on the other hand, even to.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Create the AI agent, you need to make sense of

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the underlying data. It can be the case that you

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have data sitting in one place while the definition for

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what the data means is in a different place.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 5>This makes it.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Easier to create agents, which can then take advantage of

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>protocols like Model Control Protocol MCP that you mentioned to

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>make agent interoperability work a whole lot better. So you

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>need all of these layers for AI value to get created.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And we need the agents to get better for the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>productivity to really result. Should I ask you, after months

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of worry perhaps about MIT reports saying that ultimately the

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>productivity gains aren't being seen yet, what are you seeing

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>with your clients using your own offerings and products.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are seeing a lot of productivity gain in

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>specific areas, and I can speak even personally to examples

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like my sales data is just a whole lot easier

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for me to get to with the snowflake intelligence. Blackrock,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the customers in the OSI standard, also is

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>using our AI products to create what's called the customer

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>three sixty. So when you call Blackrock, the person on

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side has access to all of the relevant

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>information about you. It's things like that that are creating value,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and what's unique about Snowflake is we let our customers

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>create AI products without a ton of investment on their part.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>We make it much easier to iterate and create these

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>products and use them and see for themselves what's creating

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>value before turning on this figot and having these products

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>exposed more and more and in areas like coding agents,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the productivity gains that we are seeing is truly remarkable,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's an area where you will continue

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to see a ton of adoption across the board in enterprises.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, finally or strangely.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that coding is one of the most

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting and important applications of language models we've seen.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>The adoption of your products is shown up in your earnings.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>People have seen really the growth that you're talking about.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>For that, you need sales and marketing people to go

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>out and sell your products. But that's where your Talent

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>edition has been. But I go to the news of

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the day for example around at h one b visas

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 2>how much is that becoming an issue for you with talent?

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that something that you're worried about access to the

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>right people here in the United States?

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is. It is an issue roughly less than

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of our workforce is on H one B

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Visas you know, I'm an immigrant, and I think there

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are a ton of folks like me that come in,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>create massive amounts of value and then become and then

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>become proud citizens. If we don't see it as an

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>immediate problem, but we do think that tech workers from

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world have a lot to add to the

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>tech industry. We're watching and work, you know, working as

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>closely with the administration as we can to make sure

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is more of a win win for everybody involved.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Trida Ramaswami, so thank you for that answer and talking

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>us through your announcement today on AI interrooperability. We appreciated

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of Snowflake coming up, Michelle Geider of Produce

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Crowd Institute. A tech diplomacy we're going to break down

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>instead of US China relations, this is blombag Tech. Welcome

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>back to Bloomberg Tech. I quick check on these markets,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>which pretty sanguine at the moment, is we have a

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>big week ahead in terms of inflation data and FED speaking.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>That's that one hundred just down about two tech of

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 2>percent having been on a record high streak across most

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of the benchmarks. We pause for breath on equities more

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>broadly in video in the red, which cause tugs down

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in large part the rest of the index. But we

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>want to set a global context here because the movement's

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 2>being made geopolitically and what's in the eye of the

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>investor right now. We've just had the United Nations General

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Assembly speech by the United States President, really big claims

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and blasting the United Nations more broadly, but all of

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>this in a context of geopolitical relationships perhaps the US

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and China, for example, we have been understanding they're nearing

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>an agreement to hive off the US operations and social

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>media platform TikTok to a consortium that inclosed software giant Oracle.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>We want to just give you the global context right now.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>With Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Sheppard standing by, you've

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>just been sat tuned in to President Trump where he

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 2>talked about whole wealth of issues that he sees right now.

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Any of them catch your attention, and.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 6>Certainly for our context, Cara on this program, what really

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 6>caught my year was what he was talking about in

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 6>terms of investment and what he's been trying to attract

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 6>to the US when you think about all the announcements

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 6>that we've seen related to artificial intelligence and more recently,

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 6>as you just alluded to, this push to try to

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 6>reach a deal with China on TikTok, the President was

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 6>talking about seventeen trillion dollars in announcement investment pledges so

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 6>far this year. That number bears some skepticism, but there

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 6>is some kernel of truth in it.

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 7>Of course, when you towed up the.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 6>Pledges that we have seen from Nvidia, from open Ai,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 6>from soft Bank and others to build plants here in

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 6>the US and TSMC, we can't leave them out either,

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 6>and all that fits into the picture that the President

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 6>is trying to portray of the US on the move.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 6>During this address to the UN General Assembly, he talked

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 6>about this golden age of America, and he defended his

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 6>tariff program as well, and some of the trade agreements

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 6>that he's reached with the UK, the EU and other nations.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 6>And he even talked about trying to meet with Brazil's

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 6>leader next work to try to sort out some of

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 6>the trade and other differences with that trading partner as well.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 6>So there's a lot happening here on the international trade

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 6>and deal making front.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And it had a market reaction sending on the Brazilian

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 2>reality gaining in the session, Mike, What's interesting is he

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>did go on to chastise China when it comes to

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the Russian relationship, that they hold anything that could put

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>at risk any sort of ultimate deal around TikTok.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a great question, because for the President, the

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 6>TikTok deal is of paramount importance. He's talked about it

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 6>for more than a year. It was something that came

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 6>up on the campaign trail. It's something that he credits

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 6>with helping him in his comeback victory to the White House,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 6>and yet it has been a very difficult victory for

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 6>him to bring home, in part because China is reluctant

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 6>to sell this precious asset from Beijing based Byte Dance Limited.

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 6>China is reluctant also to see Byte Dance let go

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 6>of an any way, shape or form the algorithm that

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 6>powers TikTok, and that has really been the secret sauce

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 6>to the app and its appeal to young users. Now,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 6>the question in this deal that is taking shape is

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 6>perhaps there could be a way for a copy to

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 6>be handed to the new US venture that would be

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 6>led by American investors and have six of seven board

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 6>seats occupy by Americans. Now, would China go along with that?

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 6>Oracle would have a role with the new venture in

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 6>retraining this new model, But will China go along? We

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 6>have not heard enough from China yet about whether they

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>will approve this deal in full. On Friday, we heard

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump talk about how Shijinping has counterpart hours earlier

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 6>in a conversation they had had on Friday, really blessing

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 6>the deal. But China's Foreign Ministry was far more circumspect

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 6>in its statement. So we'll have to see where this

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 6>goes and whether some of that leverage on Russian oil

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 6>purchases may factor into the conversation.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Here, ybugs, Mike sheffind Up, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>now let's discuss this more broadly with Michelle Geider. She

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>is the CEO of the Crack Institute for Tech Diplomacy

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 2>at Purdue used to serve as Assistant Secretary of State

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 2>for Global Public Affairs under the first Trump administration. Wonderful

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 2>to have you here in New York. Michelle. Taking a

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>step back, the fact that TikTok is becoming so central

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to the future discussions between the two leaders of the

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>United States and China. Does that surprise him at all?

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's a really interesting reflection of the importance

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 8>of technology today when it comes to national security, when

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 8>it comes to economic prosperity. But when you talk about

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 8>taking a step back, whether it's TikTok, whether it's export

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 8>controls on semiconductor chips, whether it's tariffs, bans on TikTok

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 8>bands on Huawei, all of these things are really important

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 8>defensive tactical tools the US government can use to ensure

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 8>that we're trying to keep our competitive edge. But when

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 8>you think about what's really happening with the US China relationship,

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 8>the fundamentals are still the same right now as they

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 8>have been for years. And we're in this sort of grinding,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 8>incremental struggle on TikTok, on terrafts, on this and on that.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 8>And the only way that America actually breaks away is

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 8>if we build an event like crazy. We have to

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 8>go on offense. In addition to the defensive measures that

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 8>are happening. We have to build chips, we have to

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 8>build ships, we have to build data centers, we have

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 8>to build rare earth magnets. We have to design new

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 8>frontier models. We have to do all of these things

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 8>and by the way, export them around the globe to

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 8>all of our allies and partners. And so going on

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 8>offense is what's going to change the fundamental nature of

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 8>this relationship, and that ultimately comes down to the private sector.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 8>The government can do all of these really important defensive tactics,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 8>but when it comes to breaking away and unleashing the

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 8>full force of United States, that's a private sector.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>It feels like the private sector. Call the memo and

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Vidia one hundred billion dollars going to open AI. We've

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>got just five billion going to Intel. It seems tiny

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 2>in comparison. Was an important move and signal for Intel.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>But should there be more dumb by the government because

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>there's actually been a pulling away from the chipsacked from

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>support from a financial perspective instead that taking equity stakes

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 2>in Intel for example.

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think the Trump administration has really motivated the

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 8>private sector in this direction. If you think about the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 8>AI Action Plan, which is about unleashing our AI, exporting

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 8>American AI around the globe. If you think about unleashing

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 8>American energy and the national Energy Dominance Council. Right, All

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 8>of these things are to enable the private sector to

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 8>go run and to do their thing, and so I

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 8>think we're headed in the right direction. But to your point,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 8>that's why these deals like the US UK Prosperity Partnership

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 8>on technology are really interesting. All of the deals on

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 8>semiconductor and AI and energy coming out of the Middle

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 8>East trip that President Trump took a few months ago,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 8>that's really interesting. You mentioned Nvidia and all of these investments.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 8>There's also this five hundred and fifty billion dollar fund

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 8>that the Japanese government has built part of our trade

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 8>agreement with them, that now the administration is taking a

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 8>look at to say can we use that to spur manufacturing.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 8>Those are really interesting because that's what's going to give

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 8>us not only allow us to go on offense, but

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 8>really be a full force multiplier and working with our allies.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Seems to be a more difficult square to circle is

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>whether or not Nvidio or other powerhouses in the United

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>States should be able to export their technology into China

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>to be able to ensure that they win the tech

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>stack race to a cain extent. David Sachs has been

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 2>outspoken about this. How are you seeing that very sensitive

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>discussion percolate through the government and the administration.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's a really important point because there's an underlying

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 8>assumption on both sides of the aisle about or two

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 8>camps really about whether or not China actually wants American

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 8>tech in the long run. Yes, and you see some

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 8>project if you just look at chips, for example, they

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 8>are on a mission to be self sufficient when it

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 8>comes to semiconductor technology. There's some estimates now there'll be

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 8>eighty percent self sufficient in domestic chips within two to

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 8>three years, and that's up from one third last year.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 8>And so they want Chinese chips, they want the Chinese

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 8>tech stack. And so really it's a question of how

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 8>are we going to go on offense and get global

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 8>market share with all of our friendly allies who share

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 8>the same values and make China less of an issue

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to market share.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So you were on the camp, yes, restrained from sending

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>into China, but just win everywhere else. En sure that

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 2>we're supplying to Africa are one hundred percent? That makes sense.

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting more broadly about the China US context is

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>we do keep feeling as though there is this ultimate

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>race is there. What can you remind the audience what's

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>at stake if America quote unquote doesn't win it. Yeah.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, it's interesting. We're talking right now on

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 8>the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and it's been

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 8>eighty years. And if you look at the past eighty

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 8>years and the backbone of the free world, it's been

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 8>institutions that the United States has built and led. Right,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 8>whether it's United States itself or the UN or the

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 8>G seven or the OECD, all of these important institutions

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 8>have helped in the twentieth century, they're not as relevant

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 8>heading into the twenty first century. The new backbone of

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 8>the free world is going to be technology, and it's

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 8>going to be all the businesses we build off the

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 8>back of the technology, all the values that the technology propagates.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 8>And so we we have to re earn our leadership

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 8>in the twenty first century by inventing a new framework

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 8>for freedom and prosperity. And the backbone of that is

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 8>going to be technology. And so the really good news

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:11.719
<v Speaker 8>is America is good at this stuff. This is our

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 8>superpower innovation and enterprise. And so if we lean into that,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 8>we can lead the twenty First.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Are we good at governance of it? Yes? I think we.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 8>I mean, look at what we did in the twentieth century.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 8>But it's not going to be the status quo. We're

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 8>going to have to think and operate in really different ways.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 8>That's what tech diplomacy is all about, right, It's about

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 8>bringing tech companies in the private sector together with government

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 8>officials to have a conversation around how do you unleash

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 8>innovation and also make sure that it accelerates our values

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 8>of freedom and prosperity and human rights and data privacy

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 8>and things like that. That conversation needs to happen where

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 8>it traditionally doesn't.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>One you're probably having here right here in New York,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Michelle Geide making time for us. We so appreciate it.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Perduce cruct Institute for Tech Diplomacy. Now we're going to

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 2>have an update now. In the world of entertainment, Jimmy

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Kimmel Live, it's set to return to the airwaves tonight,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 2>a suspension imposed by Disney following remarks made by the

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>host about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Meanwhile, Next Star,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 2>alongside Sinclair Broadcast Group, announced it will continue to pre

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>empt the airing of the late night program across its stations.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>According to sources, Kimmel is set to address the controversy

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 2>during his show. Defense tech startup or Tarryon has raised

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty million dollars in new funding led

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 2>by Bessemer Benure Partners. The drone software maker says it's

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 2>platform tas individual drones into coordinated combat forces and it's

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 2>already deploying AI strike kits to Ukraine. Speak with Autarion

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 2>CEO Lorenzmeyer, Lorenzi is great to have you on. You're

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 2>not building the hardware, You're all in on the software.

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Why is that the right strategy?

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 7>Thank you for having me.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 9>Yes, it is a very unique strategy, surprisingly given their

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 9>software is such a force in every other industry.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.479
<v Speaker 7>But what we're building is the common operating system.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 9>You can think of it as the Windows or Android

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 9>of drones, along with the app store for it. And

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 9>right now, the most urgent need for our technology is

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 9>on the battlefield in Ukraine. We're delivering tens of thousands

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 9>of strike kits, which is software pre installed on a

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 9>small computer to improve the combat effectiveness of Ukrainian forces,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 9>and we are already supplying US forces native forces. So

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 9>the learnings that we're making on the battlefield on Ukraine

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 9>are coming back quickly to all of our allies and partners.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And talk about your partners, because many would say, okay,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I can see here in the US perhaps the hardware

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>competition of ANDRAIL along with its full vertical integration, but

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>actually working with those sorts of companies too.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 9>So we are happy to work with everybody, so we're

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 9>not discriminative on that. But our focus is the warfighter.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 9>Our mission is to give warfighters the unified swarm of

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 9>different drones, different sizes, different purposes, and to allow them

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 9>to choose the right tool for the mission. And that's

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 9>only possible if you run them all with one operating

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 9>system which enables them to speak a single language. And

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 9>a single language is necessary for them to move and

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 9>swarm together and fight together. And in the future, what

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 9>we're expecting more and more are robot wars where drones

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 9>are fighting not just today tanks, but actually other drones.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 9>And so it is important, it is imperative that we

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 9>achieve supremacy in that autonomy field to defend our freedoms.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And so when you say we are selling to the

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Western world and allies. At the moment, I understand you

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 2>just want a contract with Taiwan. You've also been winning

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>contracts in Europe and the United States. Where is the

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>largest amount of demand coming from Lorentz for you?

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 9>I would say medium term definitely from the Department of War,

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 9>and we're super excited about the fact that we've been

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 9>supplying back the n.

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 7>DUD for the past eight years.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 9>But short term definitely on the battlefield in Ukraine because

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 9>with the additional aion board, these drones are a lot

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 9>easier to operate and more precise, and so we're helping

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 9>Ukrainian units to be a lot more effective in combat

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 9>with the same amount of drones.

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.239
<v Speaker 2>This money one hundred and thirty million dollars. What does

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that help you do, then, Lorenz? Is it about being

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>able to negotiate navigate big government entities. Is it more

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>about scaling and bringing in demand, making acquisitions.

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 7>So we're already cashful positive.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 9>So this is all about non organic growth in terms

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 9>of growing our international footprint the Nordics. We have entered

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 9>the British market, we are in Asia. You've mentioned the

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 9>partnership with Taiwan, and we're expanding our product line. So

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 9>a year ago we did the operating system for individual

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 9>drones with terminal guidance. Recently we announced as the first

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 9>software company in our space swarming at a very large

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 9>number of drones. And so we are expanding our product

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 9>portfolio continuously. And because we are software centric, that is

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 9>as simple as a software update, as an app install.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And then the money. You've course got better men leading

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 2>these serious b But where has the interest been coming

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>from a venture capital perspective? You're based out in Europe,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you were born in Switzerland, But has it been US

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>investors knocking on your door? Where do you think the

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 2>pools of capital are for you?

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, we actually planned to fundraise later in the years,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 9>so best we're preempted the around, which shows how how

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 9>excited they are about what we're building. The technology has

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 9>a lot of i would say European heritage. We have

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 9>fantastic developers. But where we're pushing forward is the American market,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 9>which is the largest market.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Arensmeyer, founder and CEO of Autarion. Keep coming back as

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you build out here in the United States too. Look

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>now that's pivot and take a look at fireflies first

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>earning results as a public company. Of course, this is

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 2>a space company in many ways. Some would see this

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>defense falling short of expectations. The rocket makers revenue miss

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Tall Street expectations, currently off by twelve percent in the

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>market after we digest those numbers. Interestingly similar thing happened

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to Figma, of course, after its first earnings as a

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>public company. Now coming up, we're going to be taking

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a look at kind Body, once one of the fastest

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 2>growing fertility chains in the United States, and it's spiraling

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 2>into crisis. It's the latest Bloomberg Big Tape podcast. That's next.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech US fertility chain kind Body. It

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>was one's booming. The venture backed company cultivated a modern

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 2>millennial friendly esthetic that did help but attract one of

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 2>three hundred million dollars in investments, including backing some celebrity

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>investors like Gwyneth Paltrow Chelsea Clinton. But kind Body has

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>been riddled with clinical problems with embryos being mislabeled, lost,

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>accidentally destroyed, and has spiraled into crisis as more people's

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>seek fertility treatment than ever. The startup story illustrates really

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the dangers are moving fast in a largely unregulated industry.

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Jackie Devolos took a deep dive into this for

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's latest podcast, IVF Disrupted. It's such an important deep

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>investigation you've done, one that just highlights turmoil and real

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>pain points for individuals. Can you just tell us a

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit about how you first understood that this was

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a spiral occurring?

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely well, of course, I'm a venture capital and stre

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 10>ups reporter, and like with any story I look into,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 10>I was trying to identify whether these one off occurrences

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 10>I was hearing about from employees and patients was a

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 10>pattern of mistakes or if it really was just that

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 10>a one off. And two years of investigating, I was

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 10>able to uncover multiple incidents across several kind body clinics

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 10>that really came down to the high turnover that led

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 10>to understaffing, as well as inconsistently applied protocols in the

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 10>embryology lab. This is the place where embryos are made

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 10>and have to be carefully handled, and because of how

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 10>quickly the company was growing, a lot of those protocols

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 10>were going by the wayside in some cases. Now the

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 10>company does dispute at least some of these incidents, but

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 10>it did acknowledge that accidents did occur, but it also

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 10>said that these issues are not unique to kind Body,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 10>but illustrative of the broader industry as well.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's a worry for people who are out

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 2>there seeking fertility help, that the fact that this is

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 2>an industry wide issue. Are there instances where femtech in

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 2>particular has done good things, managed to keep the balance

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of growth versus security and safety, and where has it

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>dropped by the wayside.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, this is one of the areas in which I

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 10>found Kind Body was unique. It was one of the

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 10>only venture backed and private equity backed startups that was

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 10>building brick in mortar clinics. This is a really difficult

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 10>thing to do because, like I said, the embryology lab

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 10>has to be very carefully put together. It's very expensive

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 10>to put together. And they were going out and putting

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 10>these clinics in areas where there's a lot of foot traffic,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 10>and that can potentially open it up to other issues

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 10>like flooding or other things that come along with being

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 10>next to a Berrie's boot camp, for example. You do

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 10>have other femtech providers in the fertility space, like a maven,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 10>but they don't open up brick and mortar. Clinics and

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 10>experts have told me that that's for a reason. So

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 10>of course investors got very excited about the prospect of

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 10>a new company disrupting the way fertility had been done.

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 10>But of course, as I found, there were real human

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 10>costs and consequences to that.

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 2>This is an enormous industry and what's the takeaway here

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimately is that it shouldn't be venture backed or what

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>things that can be learned from this that means a

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 2>company is able to scale, but at the pace that

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 2>it needs you to have security for those that it's serving.

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 10>I think this reporting can really be helpful for it

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 10>not just patients, but also investors looking at these companies,

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 10>for families of people going through some of these procedures.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 10>You get to hear in this five part podcast from

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 10>patients themselves who went through these treatments, which are incredibly

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 10>taxing on the human body. There's a lot of what

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 10>they would describe kind of dismissing of symptoms and doubts,

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 10>and you get to hear more about where some of

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 10>those pressures inside the company were coming from. A worry

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 10>about the bottom line, and so while there is no

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 10>prospect for regulation for the industry, at least people who

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 10>listen can come out better equipped with more information about

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 10>what they should know when they're walking through in IVF

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 10>clinic stories.

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Listen to the podcast, read your print stories on it.

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It has been a two year thorough investigation and phenomenal

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 2>work from Jackie Devodos. We so thank her. Meanwhile, you

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 2>can see, as I say, the IVF Disrupted series from

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the Big Takes podcast. Get it on the Terminal, online

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart you can get ours there too,

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 2>But that does it for this edition. A Boomberg Tech