WEBVTT - Robot People and Autopilots

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Get technology with tech Stuff from stuff dot Com. Hey there,

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>together once again reunited with Scott Benjamin who was joining

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>me today in the studio. Thanks Scott reunited. Isn't there

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a song? Reunited? It feels so good? Yeah, that's it. Yeah,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the one. Thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to tackle a couple of different stories

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that have been in the news over the past several

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks now as at the time we're recording this, obviously

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the episode will publish a little bit later, but we

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about some stuff that has to do

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with artificial intelligence, with autonomy, with vehicles, and also just

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a robots in general. So we're gonna start with probably

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the more sobering of the two stories, the story about

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Tesla Auto Pilot um and specifically the fatal accident that

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>have and on May seventh, two thousand sixteen, involving Joshua Brown,

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And and what does that mean? What do we know

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>about the accident as of the recording of this show,

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for for autonomous vehicles? Why, why

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>does Tesla maintain that Tesla autopilot isn't autonomous. We're gonna

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>get into all those details, but first I just want

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to give a quick kind of layout of the order

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of events. So the accident happened on May seven, six

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. UM Joshua Brown was in a vehicle Tesla

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Model S that what had autopilot engaged, and I was

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>traveling eastward down the highway when a semi truck was

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>turning left. The semi truck was traveling westward down that

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>same highway, turning left to cross onto another street, which

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>meant that the semi truck's trailer was crossing the traffic

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that Joshua's car or the direction that Joshua's car was

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>going in. UH. Neither the car nor Joshua appeared to

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>detect the trailer. They didn't see it, didn't react to it,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and so there was a collision. We'll get more into

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>more details about the collision a little bit, and UM

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Mr Brown passed away due to that. He died from

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>his injuries. The Tesla actually released information to the National

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Highway Traffic Safety Administration about a week and a half

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>after it happened, giving them the details of the accident.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>UH just a couple of days later, they held a

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>big shareholder meeting that's gonna come into play a little bit.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And then it wasn't until June that Tesla posted a

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>blog that acknowledged and disclosed this accident. And so this

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of it's kind of a multi tiered thing

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna chat about, not just the technology, uh,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>not just what kind of of effect is this going

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to have on the on on driver assist systems and

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and autonomous vehicles moving forward, but also the implications some

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>people have raised saying that perhaps Tesla was trying to

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>hide the fact that there was this accident in light

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that we're going to have a shareholder

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting and and offer more stocks. They raised like one

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollars in stocks. So we're gonna attack

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>all of that. So the start, Scott, how would you

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>describe Tesla autopilot? Tesla autopilot? Okay, so I guess you

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>can't call it autonomous, right, That's the first thing we

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>need to get out of the way. It's it's a

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>legality issue. And we've talked about this, I think on

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other podcasts that I've been here for sure tech stuff

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly on car stuff and the it's it's again it's

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a legal issue because you can't say autonomous because that

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>indicates that there doesn't necessarily have to be a driver

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in place behind the wheel. And again it's just a

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a word thing. It's a word play thing right now,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because most major manufacturers have autonomous like systems in the works,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>autopilot like systems in the works um or they already

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have them implemented, but they have a strict rule that

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a driver has to be you know, in the driver

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>position at all times, ready to take control at any time.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And some of them even say that you have to

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>have hands on the wheel, as did the test La situation.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Here the Tesla, when you agree to enter autopilot mode,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you you have to I don't know, if you click

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 1>on something on that giant screen that they have essentially

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like in terms of service saying like you are acknowledging

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that in order to have autopilot on, you are supposed

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep your hands on the wheel as well as

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>maintain alertness to your surroundings, not just you know, not

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just shut down and allow the card to take over. Okay,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we have more to say about that as we go

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>here too, because you'll find that there's a lot of

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>shenanigans that go along with with people in autopilot mode

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.559
<v Speaker 1>that shouldn't be happening because of this terms. You know, this,

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this term of agreement that you sign, and so Mr

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Brown had agreed to that, and then we will later

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>find out that he was in a negligence of that.

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And listen, I want to also get this out of

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the way too, is that we were not here to

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>point fingers at the dead guy or any by any means.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But um, as we go through this and see if

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you agree with this as we talk here, but um,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I really feel that Tesla is not necessarily in the

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong here, right, and I don't I feel it's more

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the fault of the driver himself than it is Tesla

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>by by all means. Right, Let's let me see if

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you if you think this is fair. I would I

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>would say that over the last decade, really a couple

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of decades, we've seen more automated systems or driver assist

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>systems come into play. Some are are pretty you know,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>still rely entirely upon human input. Like I would argue

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>power steering falls into that kind of category. It's the

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>car itself is not taking over any steering in power steering.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's a driver assist feature. It's helping someone operate

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle without having to do ridiculous amounts of turning

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a wheel in order to actually do what you need

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. Sure, we've seen so many of these in

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the past, I mean in the recent past, I guess

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>with with lane keep systems. You know that that's part

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the autonomous system that we're talking or almost said,

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the driver assist system talking about from Tesla, the autopilot um.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You know it. It maintains the lane, It maintains a

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>distance between the vehicle in front of it and uh

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and and tries to keep that at a reasonable I

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would believe that you would be able to set the

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>distance that you want, or maybe it doesn't based on

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a calculation of your speed versus the distance it needs

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to break right, like like that basic rule of thumb

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that you should be able to count to three when

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you see the vehicle ahead of you passes something like

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a lamp. Yeah, and then you street lamp, you count

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, one, one thousand, two and thousand or three,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, and there's a there's a just kind of

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a general rule of thumb. As you said, you know

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that that uh, you know, at this speed, you have

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>this amount of time time in order to react, and

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just something that humans need. I suppose it's a

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>little faster. Of course for an autopilot system that can

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it can do things a lot quicker, although it has

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to do so in a way that's safe and isn't

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>going to injure a person. So in other words, like

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 1>technically you could have a a a computer system follow

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a little closer to a car and be able to

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>react faster, but momentum is still a thing. And what

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about the driver behind you? Exactly? Yeah, behind got the

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>human driver behind you, so they may not be able

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to react that quickly. And you also have the issue

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of when you come to a stop, you've got so

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>much mass, you've got so much momentum built up that

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>even if your car is capable coming to a stop

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at that at that reduced distance between you and the

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>person in front of you, they're still going to be

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a very measurable uh effect on the person sitting in

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that car. It's gonna you're gonna be jerked around a lot. Yeah,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and this wasn't necessarily the case with this crash. You

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>know it wasn't this is a truck. You have to

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 1>imagine what it would be like if a semi truck

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was crossing your path in front of you, I mean

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>perpendicular to the road right, almost like you're coming up

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to a crossroads and there's a semi truck going going

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>perpendicular ninety degrees from where you're going. Yeah, the cab

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>has passed in front of you. You're now at that

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the trailer where there's nothing below it but

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the cab or the trailers above you, and the rear

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>wheels have yet to cross the road. So that's the

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>position where this was. This was when Mr Brown went

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>underneath the trailer, and so you you know the you

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, how come he neither he nor the

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>car detected this. Well, there are a couple of different

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>things that people have said so far. One was that

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the sky was brightly lit that day, that the trailer

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>itself was white, and therefore it was more difficult to

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>differentiate between the trailer and the sky. Uh So, from

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>just an optical standpoint like then the dual spectrum, it

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>was hard to see well for the computer to understand

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, you would see a truck in front

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of you if you had your eyes on the road.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That's That's the other part of this is that the

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>human element, I believe, and as we get as we

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>go through here, I think you're going to see more

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and more that my my, my thoughts on this whole

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>thing are that he wasn't watching at all. I mean,

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>there was no there were no eyes up on the

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>road at all. This was completely an autopilot mode and

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he was hands off for the whole thing. Because if

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>he were hands on, it is hard to imagine how

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he could not have seen the truck simply because you're

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about him traveling eastward. It was in the afternoon,

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so the sun should be behind him, not in front

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of him, so he shouldn't shouldn't have sun in his eyes.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna be bright on the trailer, if it's

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a white trailer, it's gonna be bright against that bright sky.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And I can see how that would be difficult to

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>differentiate between you know that in the sky for the computer,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know, if there's no chrome trim or

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>anything that you know that makes a um some type

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of delineation that says this is the beginning of another

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>chick and they can and then can detect it. It's

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>also moving all Another thing that this is all hinges

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on is that there's an eyewitness report that came out

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in early July on a site called Teslaaratti and it's

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a it's kind of just a compliment compilation of Tesla news,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, of all all news, you know, SpaceX, Tesla Motors,

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Investor News, etcetera. And one of the witnesses to this accident,

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the truck driver, which we'll hear from

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in just a minute, said that prior to this accident,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy, the Model S was on the same

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>road as this person, this this woman driver. She was

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>on us A in Florida, and the Model S on

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on autopilot at that time, passed her while she was

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>driving at eighty five miles per hour. So he's going

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in excessive eighty five miles per hour, where let's just

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>say it's it's a ballpark one hundred miles an hour.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen what happens to car when it

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>crashes a hundred miles per hour? It's it's devastating. I mean,

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got to keep in mind that most crash tests

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that are done are done at a much much lower speed,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet they're dramatic in the outcome. Yeah, you would

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be shocked to see what kind of damage that happens.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And let's says, you know, a side impact collision, you know,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those those really dramatic ones where the whole the car

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to bend in half in the car enters the

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>other vehicle. Practically that that's happening somewhere around thirty five

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty five miles per hour. This is this is

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a car traveling at one hundred miles per hour, let's

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>say more than five to be fair, more than any

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure. And uh and of course at that point

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the trailer which we're talking about it, what happened

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was it sheared the roof off of the vehicle. And

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we can all understand what that probably means

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to the driver of that vehicle. It's horrific. So beyond that,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the car continued on, and it didn't continue on a long,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>long distance. And I'm looking at a diagram that was

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>drawn up here of the crash investigation scene, and it's

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not the scale or anything, but the car doesn't go

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot farther in its in its own lane.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It did veer off the road, went through one fence

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>or went through a ditch, went through a fence, went

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>across the field, through another fence and into a pole,

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so to ditch. Two fences and a pole, and that's

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>where it came to rest. Is After that it kind

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>of rotated to arrest. Um the truck. The driver of

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the truck said that it all happened so fast that

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>by the time he didn't even I don't even know

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if he felt the impact, of course, but by the

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>time he even checked his mirrors, the vehicle was already

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond you know, the impact site. He couldn't he could

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>even pick it up. He couldn't spot it, um other

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>than looking, you know, I guess at this point he

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>had to look to his left to see it out

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in the field somewhere. Um, it's moving, it's traveling that fast.

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's this disconnect between what what happened in that

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>vehicle just seconds before the the the crash, the impact,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and what happened. And you know, I don't know if

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I should say it that way. Maybe there's a I

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>guess just not enough information out there, like what was

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in the car beforehand. It's not disconnected. It's just

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>we just need to know more information and we don't

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>quite yet. Yeah, the fact that you know, you had

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you had different eyewitnesses saying that, like one saying that

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a portable DVD player with a screen showing

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a Harry Potter movie. That someone else said there was

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a portable DVD player inside the car, but it wasn't

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>actually running at the time. Can I tell you something,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>What's that The driver of the truck who went to

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>check on this driver out in the field as he approached,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he said that he did hear a Harry Potter movie playing,

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but did not see it. But that's the way he

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way that he was able to discern

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was a Harry Potter movie. He could hear

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the audio from that, because I guess it's and if

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you saw the wreck, it's a mangled mess. It's it's

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>a it's a horrific car crash scene. Um. But he

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was one of the first people on the scene, of course,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and he did, in fact here a Harry Potter movie playing.

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So it appears, at least from the limited information that

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>we have it appears that that this was a case

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>where the person behind the wheel was not following the

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>directions stated specifically under engaging the autopilot that you you know,

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>need to have your full attention on the road and

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have been ready to take over. Um, that's what it

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Also, we should say that, yes, the optical

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>camera system failed in that it did not recognize the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that there was a truck crossing its path, which

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is that's pretty dramatic. But some people have said, well

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't there backups, like beyond optical, wasn't their radar? Well, yeah,

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and as radar. Here's the thing, though, the trailer is

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>off the ground right, it's it's above the ground because

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got that space between you know, where the chassis

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is and the trailer a part. And the problem is

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that the radar system can misinterpret that to be an

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>overhead sign because it's it's detecting a surface, a flat

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>surface that's above the ground. And Tesla autopilot essentially ignores

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>those because if it did, and every time we went

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>down the highway, your car would start to break every

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>time you start to approach an overhead sign. If it

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>has identified that as a potential collision could be a

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>real problem. Yeah, it could mean that you're actually causing

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>accidents because you're you're hitting the brake on a highway

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>when everything is perfectly fine. Uh So, I mean you

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could argue that maybe this this was at least partly

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a failure of technology in the sense that the optical

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>cameras did not pick up the truck. Or it could

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be that the car was just traveling so fast that

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>even even at that advanced speed that computers can react to,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it would not have been able to react fast enough

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at detecting the truck and being able to do anything

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now you're hitting out. Something that I wanted

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to to make clear here too, is that when we

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>first talked about this, when we first heard about this ourselves,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I have thought that I had imagined that this vehicle

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>continued on down the road and you know, the autopilot

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>remain engaged, and um, you know, it was it was

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like it was almost like a ghost car, ghost ship

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>traveling down the road with no one, no one at

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the wheel of course, And um, I thought I thought

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a much greater distance that had traveled after

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the accident. But now that I'm hearing that. You know,

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he's traveling at such a high rate of speed. And

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at this diagram now, I know it's not

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to scale, but it's really if if it's anywhere close

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to the way it's drawn here. Um, you know, it's

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not like it's five miles down the road. It's right

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>there where this car came to rest. If he's traveling

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that quickly and something like the top is being sheered

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>off the car in the grand scheme of things that

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a full on impact into a wall

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or anything that's that's it's relatively easy to take the

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>top off of the vehicle. It's mostly glass and a

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>few beams. That's it quickly handled by you know that

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>type of speed. So for it to just travel that

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>far on its own momentum, it's own you know, the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>chared over velocity. I guess, um, I could see a

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>car taking a quarter mile to come to arrest from

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>something that that uh, that fast and not quite as

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>abrupt as a as a as a dead on him

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>packed sure, and you know it's I think we do

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have to stress again. Tesla has always maintained that autopilot

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is really a collection of integrated driver assist systems that

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>together make it safer to operate a vehicle, and they

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have data to back that up. The big, the big

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>point that they like to mention is the number of

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>miles driven by vehicles in autopilot mode without a fatality.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>This was the first fatality of anyone driving a Tesla

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>vehicle in autopilot mode, and they say that the cars

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>had accumulated something like a hundred thirty million miles of

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>travel without having a fatality, which is above average. Right, Yeah,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because in the United States, again, according to Tesla, they

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>cited a number saying that it's nine million miles for

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>every particular model of car. That's the that's the average,

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>is that every nine million miles driven by a vehicle,

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a fatality. Yeah. That's in the US, the US.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Globally it's different, Yes, sixty it's it's it's sixty million

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>miles globally, which is the global numbers. I've got global

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers if you want to hear. Yeah, they're huge. Alright.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So globally auto related deaths per year, one point three

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 1>million people died per year in auto related deaths. And

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that's an It says an average of about it's just

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>just under thirty three hundred deaths every single day from

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>auto related deaths. Now in the United States, it's significantly less,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a high number. Um. It is it's

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>estimated in we still have estimate numbers. I think the

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>latest year for concrete numbers is probably twenty fourteen or

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen even um it's estimated that thirty eight thousand, three

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred people are killed every year in the United States

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>alone on the roads, and that's about an average of

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and five per day. So this is one

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>accident that's happened with autopilot, and it gets so much attention,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's so much, So much focus has put on this

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>one accident because of the autopilot element. That's that's been

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>um you know, put out there into the media, and

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are of course focused on that

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing. And I would guess that Elon Musk is uh,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of scratched his head saying like, well,

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this statistically it's about to happen. I mean, of course,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we don't want a car that is going to have

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this occur. We don't want it to happen again ever,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>but statistically it's going to happen, and and accidents are inevitable, inevitable,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and so our fatalities. There's just there's no way to

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>create a one death proof vehicle. You can't do it.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>There's always gonna be some wild card that you just

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can't account for. You can't there's no way to anticipate

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>every potential scenario. And in fact, that is an important

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to point out, is that this this situation, that uh,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>this tragic situation was kind of the perfect storm of

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>elements for this accident to have happened. It should in

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>most case, it should not have happened. And in fact,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, people have criticized tesla Um. Some of the

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>journalists have criticized tesla for uh not just for the

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that autopilot appears to have played a part

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in a fatal accident, never mind the fact that there

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>so many other fatal accidents happening with so many other

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that uh, you know that well, they don't garner

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the attention because this one, because it's not as novel

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>an idea as autopilots as the first. But not only

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>did they they criticize them for that, but also and

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I can understand this as well, the fact that Tesla

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>did not disclose the accident until after it had had

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this shareholder meeting where it had offered more stock and

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>made more money. Uh. The company's response was that the

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>accidents not material to Tesla's business and in fact, you

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>would never expect other automakers to have to do the

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's bad optics, you know, it doesn't look good.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's also you know, again there's no precedent for

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this by any this is the first time this has happened,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>which automatically means that there's definitely going to be more

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>interest anyway. So I given the fact that it is autopilot,

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I lean a little more toward it might have been

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>better for Tesla to get ahead of this rather than

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it a month more than a month afterward,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but with a very logical explanation of why it happened

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and that likely will happen again. It's just this is

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>simply the first time it's happened. And then also he

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>could he could have stressed you know that, yeah, we've

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>we've achieved a hundred and thirty million miles to travel

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>without a fatality at this point. That's that's again way

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>above average. Yeah. In fact, you know, he says like, well,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if you extrapolate, which, by the way, I'm just gonna

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>say what Musk said essentially. But this extrapolation, I completely understand,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is not uh not an apples to apples kind of thing.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Must as well, Let's assume that in two thousand fifteen,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla autopilot feature were universally available on all vehicles globally. Globally,

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that would mean that there would be five hundred thousand

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer deaths in two thousand fifteen due to car accidents.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite understand that at all. I mean, okay,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the global figure that I just gave you is one

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>point three million, so I can understand the half of

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that point. But you can't say for sure that an

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>autopilot system would have corrected or made adjustments so that,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, half of those people would still be alive.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's interesting because here I understand how he's

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doing his math. He's saying, globally speaking, there's one fatality

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for every sixty miles driven million sixty million miles driver.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm I'm sorry, that is a very important distinction.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, huge, huge factor there sixty million miles driven,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>so one fatality every sixty million miles driven. With Tesla

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>autopilot records, there's one fatality for one thirty million miles driven.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Therefore that the Usla autopilot is twice as safe. Fuzzy math,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>very fuzzy math. But but we get this point saying

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the driver assist systems, when used properly, are they

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really do improve the safety of a vehicle. So it's true.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That leads to the the discussion about why are people

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>not using this properly, Why are people and whether this

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was the case with Joshua Brown's particular instant or not,

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we suspect things, but we don't know for sure.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But we do know for sure that people have been

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>jackasses in Tesla vehicles running on autopilot because their YouTube

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>videos of it. Absolutely and unfortunately for for this this case,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for this guy, uh, there are videos of him engaging

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in some of these activities. I mean, I've seen videos

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of people, not necessarily uh, Mr Brown, but I've also

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>seen people you know, that are in traffic and autopilot

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mode taking a nap, or playing cards, or playing guitar,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>not air guitar, but playing guitar, uh, doing all kinds

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of things. I mean just you know, facing sideways instead

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of forward. Um, it's just it's I guess it's fun

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to get online and kind of show what you can

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>do other than driving in rush hour traffic. That's that.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the point is is a lot of these videos

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these videos are making is that

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>look what I'm doing, I'm making use of my time

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>aside from just driving home my laptop out, I'm still

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>working or whatever the case might be, shopping. Unfortunately, Joshua

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Brown also has some of these videos out there that

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>shows him him engaged in some of these activities. And

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the thing is these cars, especially the Tesla,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they have of course engine control modules, lots of modules

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in this one in the Tesla models. That's going to

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>tell the tale. That's going to say, it's kind of

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like an event recorder at a black box, if you will,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>for for autmobile, and it's going to, uh, let us

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>know what Speedy was traveling, exactly what happened before and

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and after this accident immediately after. It's going to also

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>let us know when the last time there was any

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of driver input into the system and all this

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>can be read via code, and if somebody was careful

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to remove those modules properly, which I hope they were,

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>will be able to kind of piece this all together,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in reverse order, and figure out what happened.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And it may be a while and or possibly even

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>never before we hear the details of that investigation, and

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they may may keep that tight. Yeah. So, but it's

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's again, it's one of those things where we see people, uh,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>disregarding Tesla's very clear message about what autopilot is intended

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to be. I have said a few times this past

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>week when talking about the story that part of the

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>issue to me is calling the feature autopilot in the

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>first place. Not again not assigning blame to Tesla, but

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying that I think some people are taking this

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>word autopilot and they're thinking it means more than what

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to do. We got to think that autopilot

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is really a collection of systems. They're integrated, so it's

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool, but they're they're systems that have been

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>found on on high end vehicles for the past few years, uh,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that are integrated in such a way that almost feels

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like the cars really taking over. But it's not not

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>quite there yet, and Tesla has maintained like, no, it's

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not an autonomous type of thing. It could do a

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff. And and if your hands are on

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the wheel and you're paying attention, it may feel like

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't even need to be here for this to work.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But but but the reality is that if you see

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a semi trailer trailer in tractor crossing the road in

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>front of you, you're going to react by touching the

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 1>brake or swerving to avoid that that vehicle. You're going

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to see it ahead of time. I I just have

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a gut feeling that there were no eyes up in

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 1>this situation. There were no hands on the wheel at all.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>There was probably no driver input for quite some time

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in this case. And I just again just a gut feeling.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, just that the way the accident happened,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I can't see it the other way. And that's of

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>course this is all borrowing any kind of medical situation.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think, but I think we would have heard

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that by now if that had been the case, if

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>there was like a heart attack or a stroke, or

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a medical situation was so dire that he was unable

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to interact with the vehicle in any way. I think

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>that we would have heard about that by now, but

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you never know. I mean, we'll have to let all

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that kind of come out in the wash, and it will.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you gotta understand that this is going

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen in other makes and models of cars as

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>well that have systems that are autonomous like or you know,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>autopilot like, and that you know, um, the Mercedes that

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>will do the same thing, or the bmw s that

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>will do the same thing, or the Chryslers or any

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of these cars that can drive themselves in traffic. People

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to kind of take that to the extreme

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and and not pay attention. It's like, um, you're just

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of the situation, right and the you know,

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a very real fear in the technology sphere that

0:27:56.200 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this will end up creating hurdles for auton amous vehicles

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>down down down the road. I didn't want to do

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a pun there, but I wouldn't have did one anyway.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So but that, yeah, in the future, you're going to

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>see some hurdles in the way of autonomous vehicles because

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's to me, it's it's apples and oranges,

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>because an autonomous vehicle, especially if you're taking the route

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that Google is taking, there's no way to interact with

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that vehicle apart from telling it where you want to

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>go it there's there are no controls, there's no break,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>there's no accelerator, there's no steering wheel, there's nothing, and

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that in that case, you have to really convincingly demonstrate

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that the technology is robust and capable of responding to

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a myriad of situations, well beyond just the typical traffic

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>situations you would run into on a day to day basis,

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but some of the more extraordinary experiences that you could encounter,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, one day may not be exactly the

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>same as the next. You may have one day where

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you're driving to work and everything is pretty much normal,

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe the next day you try to work

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and who knows, a poultry truck has just spilled a

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>big load of chickens all across the road. That happens

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>here in Georgia. Let me tell you that happens two

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or three times a year here in Georgia. Yeah, it's

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not that uncommon. Yeah, it's uh. I grew up in Gainesville, Georgia,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>poultry capital of the world. We've got a chicken statue

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of town. That's not a lie. Um

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it happens. It's one of those things where

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but but it's one of those things where you if

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you're programming an autonomous vehicle out in Mountain View, California,

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not necessarily thinking, Hey, what happens if chickens are everywhere?

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a chicken plan? Yeah, that says, but

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the source of stuff you have to take into account.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>My my worry is that we're going to see a

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>disproportionate response from various UH agencies in in the wake

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of this accident, which again tragic accident. We hate to

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>see this happen at all UH and and place a

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>level of responsibility that is not merited. Yeah, you know,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think in the short term, my gut feeling is

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that you're right. But I think that it won't be

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>too long before we get back on this full board

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people I mean sad to say

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that they'll do this will become part of Tesla's history,

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they'll say, well, yeah, that happened, but

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we then ran two million tests in order you know,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>electronic tests in order to prevent that from ever happening again.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And now that situation won't occur ever again in a Tesla. Now,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the next unusual set of circumstances that will lead

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to a driver death? That's gonna that's gonna be the

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>next question. Because you can only do so much. You

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>can't foresee every single circumstances. Well, and I and that

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>also reminds me, in fact, I should have said this earlier.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's a good point in that the Tesla Autopilot

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is a beta service. It's it's in beta, which means

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's in testing mode, it's not the final product.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, Tesla takes the data gathered from people

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>driving an autopilot mode in order to tweak autopilot and

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>make it more effective. So, in other words, this is

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a trial of a program that they're still not legally

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ready to call even autonomous. Yet people are treating it

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>as it's autonomous. So it's like it's like two levels

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>below that. At least, yes, it's it's it's a level

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>where if you are treating it like it's an autonomous car,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you are you are behaving in a way that I

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>would argue as irresponsible. Um. And you know, I'm hopeful

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that this will stories like this will become fewer and

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fewer in number, simply because the improvements in technology have

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>us avoid some of these accidents where we never have

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a story, right, Like, you're not gonna tell, hey, seventeen

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>more accidents didn't happen today. That's not a story, right

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>unless you had some sort of we're definitive proof of it,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know who. I want to have autonomous systems or

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>autopilot systems every driver around me because recently, I don't

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>know if this is a thing everywhere. I would guess

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that it is because it distracted driving with smartphones, et cetera.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Everything else. Uh, there have been several times in his

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>last five seven days, maybe I've had several occasions where

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I've had to make an invasive mover at maneuver as

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle in front of somebody who is coming up

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and behind me with a device in their hand. And

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just it's hard to try to maintain focus

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on what I'm doing when I'm having to watch what

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>people in the lane next to me you are doing,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:41.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're they're constantly you know, two wheels over the

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>line or um, you know, someone behind me is just

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>every time late, breaking and nearly touching my bumper. It

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>drives me crazy. If they had an auto or an

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>autopilot system, or even an adaptive cruise control that was

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>capable of stopping the vehicle like Mercedes or you know

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 1>BMW have, I would love it myself. I would run,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>remain in control. But for everybody else, I have a

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling that what you've just described as something that is

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>universally wished for that everybody but me. I think that's

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the way. I know how selfish. That's I'm of the

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody period, But you know I don't try. Yeah, well,

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's something to be said for for that as well.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You know that. You know, if everybody had the system,

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it would work out that way, right, And there's so

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>many that are like that. If if it was one implemented,

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things would be a lot safer. Yeah,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more boring boring, you say, but you could

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>get to where you're going with less traffic. Is it

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>more for yeah, well, you would be able to fill

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>your time with entertaining things. Is it more involve being

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in a car more boring or boring. Er, it's more boring,

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>more boring. I can tell you what's more boring is

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>us debating the word. So yeah, we're gonna wrap that

0:33:55.320 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>part up the discussion. So ultimately, uh, I'm hopeful that

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla autopilot can continue to evolve over time become better.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful that more people really take it to heart

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that their level of responsibility has not changed when they

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>engage autopilot, that that system is there to improve their safety,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but not replace them as an actual operator of the vehicle,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>not entirely at any rate. Remain vigilant behind the wheel. Yeah,

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>don't don't create more terrible stories like I feel for

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr Brown's family and I am. I really wish that

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this story had turned out a different way. And of

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.479
<v Speaker 1>course there's a second story that we could talk about

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that um, but we don't have all the details. There

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was one another accident that happens to life first with

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla Model X. Yeah, that's right, that's their newest

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>first that's the SUV looking vehicle, and that was on

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Have you ever been on the turnpike? Yeah,

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you know what it's like. Yeah, my wife's from Pennsylvania.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So I we've also been on it, and the story

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in that case was that supposedly they had turned on autopilot,

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle struck a guardrail on the right hand side.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The vehicle then veered across to the left hand side,

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>hit the concrete median in the middle of the road,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and then flipped over. Yeah, this is crazy because this

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>is not like, um, you just simply didn't detect something

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 1>above the road surface. This left the lane. Yeah, so

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's something totally different. We're going to find out a

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more about this one, so we and we don't

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have the details yet. We do know that Tesla initially

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>said it doesn't look like autopilot was necessarily involved in

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>this particular accident, and then they kind of revised that

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to say that the data so far has not supported it,

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but that they are investigating it. Um And to be honest,

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the full information. Right, We've got the uh,

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the first hand account of the driver. Both the driver

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and his passenger escaped from They didn't I'm sure they

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>were injured, but they were They did not die. Maybe

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cut some bruises or something like that. But yeah, it

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as quite as a um traumatic I guess as

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the other one was. Of course, so we we don't

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>have enough information on that at the time of this

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>recording to really dive into was this actually a failure

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of autopilot? Because if this were a failure under totally

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>different circumstances, then you have to start asking some pretty

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>tough questions about Tesla's technology. Can I just make a guess,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll make a guess. An irresponsible guess is that somehow

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the driver disengaged the system. Because the lane departure system

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is something that's been around for so long and they've

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 1>got it so nailed down, really that something like that

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that part of the of the autopilot system with everything

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>else that it has to to think about. If it

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just simply left the lane because it couldn't detect the lane,

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's uh, I don't it seems like something is

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>up there? It would you would think it would give

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>an alert to the driver to say, like bing or

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>something like, hey, you know, make sure you're taking control,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I've heard of I've heard of these

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>systems having a little bit of trouble at it at

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sunrise and sunset detecting detecting white lines on the road

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>because of the glare, and maybe that's a you know

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>factor in this. I would imagine such a thing like

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta, if it's if it's been raining, uh,

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you get sunshine. It is really hard to

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.439
<v Speaker 1>see some of the lines on some of the roads

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta. I do if I feel. Yeah, so

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>when you start feeling that bump of the reflector, Okay,

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's fair, I got you, all right, But again that's

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>all irresponsible speculation. Yeah, exactly. We we don't know. So

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so while we're making some wild guesses here, by the

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>time this episode comes out, maybe there'll be more information

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that will be available, and perhaps if if it actually

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately an autopilot issue, we'll revisit this and talk

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more about it. But for now we're going to transition

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>over to a different story. And this was one that

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you brought to my attention, Scott. This um. This this

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>p posal that was part of the European parliament um

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>where they want to talk about robots and and part

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of the proposal that's got the most attention is the

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>concept of electronic personhood for robots. Yeah, and that's what

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I came to you with because I wasn't sure if

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be in a podcast episode or not.

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was kind of an interesting little

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>news blurer. But I suppose and and I'll be I'll

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be right up front with you when I say that

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I have more questions about this than answers. Really well, Scott, thankfully,

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I have printed out the entire report and I have

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>read it, so I am happy to answer some question.

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you? Will you read it to us? Now? Slowly?

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two pages? Let's begin. Actually, I do want to read.

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I do want to read the first paragraph very briefly,

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because I love it so much. So this is the

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this is introduction section A. Whereas from Mary Shelley's Frankenstein's

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Monster to the classical myth of Pygmalion, through the story

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of Prague's Gulam to the robot of Carol Keepec, who

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>coined the word, people have fantasized about the possibility of

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>building intelligent machines, more often than not androids with human features.

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I would never have expected that to make it into

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this draft. Not only that's not the only fiction reference

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>made in this So a famous, famous fictional piece about

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>robotics is mentioned, which is, of course Asimov's Laws of robots.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard of Asimov's Laws of robotics? So basically,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in case you're not familiar, first law is, a robot

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>may not harm a human or through inaction, allow a

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>human to come to harm. Second law is a robot

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>must follow the commands of a human unless it were

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to violate the first law. Third law is a robot

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>must protect itself from harm unless it would bring it

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>into conflict with one of the first two laws. And

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>these are critical in this argument because they're going to

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>treat them as if they're human with uh, not only

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>not only rights, but also responsibilities. They're going to hold

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>them accountable for their actions, which is their program by

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>humans at this point. So what what is this? Where

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is this all sort out to here? Because the idea

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that a robot that's in a factory creating a part

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or you know, an automotive part, the idea that that

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.839
<v Speaker 1>is soon to be considered an electronic person. Uh, it's

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy too. It seems insane to me. But the

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>goal here, as we'll talk about in I guess a

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in depth, is that they'll be taxed,

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they will pay into a social security system that will

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>then be drawn from by humans, but not robots. Robots

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get social security. Well, yeah, you get compensation, all right,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So these are these are it's true. I'll tell you

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>about they get compensation proposal. I'll tell you we're talking maintenance. No,

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is that a compensation? Really? Know what it is? Their

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Their compensation is money money they get paid. Well, okay,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so that goes to the owner of the robot. But

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the robot is the one that's paying

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>into the social security right, the owner of the robot pays.

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>The owner of the robot pays the robot. Well, this

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a real screw drive. You want to know why? Alright,

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>here's here's here's the reason why this gets so it

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>gets clear once you start to understand the logic, because

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at first, on the face of it, you're like, this

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous. Why would an owner have to pay in

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>for social security for a robot which is never going

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to draw on social Security? Yes, why would you ever

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.479
<v Speaker 1>pay a salary to a robot? Well, the compensation fund.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I was being a little unfair. That

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was one possible solution to a very real problem. That

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>very real problem being when you get to a situation

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in which a robot causes damage or harm, who is

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>liable for that damage or harm? And how do you

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>compensate the harmed party? And so one of the arguments

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>was the more autonomous a robot is, the more it

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is able to interact with its environment in new ways,

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like use machine learning to adapt to its environment and

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>work within that environment, the less liable you can hold

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturer of that robot if it's not something that

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is directly tied to a very basic function of the robot.

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You could argue, while the robot learned something, it learned

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a poor way of doing that thing, someone or something

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was harmed as a result of that. The robots actually

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at fault, not the producer. This is a self aware issue,

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not even self aware, but so much as like like so,

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say there there's a famous thing in Stanford where

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>uh computer scientists set up a computer with artificial intelligence,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and they had to observe a pendulum as it swung

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Through observing the pendulum, the computer was

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>able to figure out the basic laws of motion just

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>by observing the behavior of the pendulum swinging without being

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>given any information about the laws emotion. Now extend that

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to an idea for a an artificially intelligent device. It

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be self aware. It just has to

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to observe things within its environment and adapt

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. Another great example would be let's say you've

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>made a robot, and you put a robot on a

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 1>on an assembly line, and the robot needs to put

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>together a certain thing. And then as the robot attempts

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to put the thing together, at first, the robots pretty crappy.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not doing it very well. But each time it attempts,

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it tries something a little bit different and starts to

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>learn what works better than what worked before. You're not

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>actually programming the robot to do this. The robot is

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>learning how to do this through trial and error, essentially,

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>just as a would on the same line exactly. And

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the time the robots we talk about an industry,

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't fall into that category. They've been designed to

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>do a very specific series of actions repeated repetitively, like

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that's it, that's and that's all they do. They don't.

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't start putting together a car and then turn

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>around and flip burgers that's not the purpose, the idea

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>being with these new robots, they'd be more adaptive and

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could therefore change the way they do things in order

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to try and experiment do something a little more effectively

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if in fact, we get to a further stage where

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>robots are able to adapt even beyond that level. Because

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really this proposal is more about we're heading down a

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 1>road eventually we're going to need to have legislation to

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to handle these issues. It would be better for us

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to think about it now than when it becomes necessary,

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like like when a problem happens, we have to figure

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>out what to do about it. It's more about anticipating

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those problems, all right, I see now. But then the

0:44:57.239 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk reaction to this from a lot of people

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh, you know, the robots are taking my

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>job and also they're they're not paying Social Security and

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so so what's gonna happen in the in the end here,

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a uh, we're gonna have an economy

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>collapse because it's gonna be all robotic workers in the

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>in the factory or going to have massive amounts of

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.359
<v Speaker 1>unemployment across the board. Um, and no one's paying into

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the system that already can't sustain the number of people

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that have retired or are drawing from that right now,

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen when I'm in that position, because it's

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an entirely robotic work For this is like

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the the the the just the idea that they have,

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not it's not the reality. Really. The

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>reality is that as the as the robots are slowly

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>being implemented in the workforce, humans are also increasing in

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, but in different jobs. So the robots maybe

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>taking this position away slowly. And I've got a few

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers here I can mention in a moment um slowly.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's happening very slowly for for this um, you know,

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like the end of the world scenario that they're thinking of.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that um not into the world, but you

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, Well, yeah, the idea, the idea

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism folding in on itself. Yeah, And and they're

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking of it happening almost immediately overnight. And if

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's something like that did happen overnight, that would be

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>horrific for the the economy would collapse almost immediately. It

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>would be really really difficult for for the system to

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 1>keep up. So it's a much more it's a it's

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a much slower implementation than what people are thinking it is,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and and that humans are in fact finding jobs in

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>other positions and places that you know then keep them

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>gainfully employed. And it's just it's a balance. It's all

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a balance right now. But if things were to happen

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly as I said it would, it would throw things

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>into turmoil. But it's not happening that way. Yeah, it's

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>not happening that way right now. The question is will

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>it always be more of a gradual thing or will

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>will there be a tipping point? Right like will there

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>be a development in robotics and artificial intelligence where we

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get to a tipping point where it's a rapid implement

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>intation and deployment of automated systems across multiple jobs. Like

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing certain jobs get more automation involved in them,

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not all of them stay that way. Sometimes a company

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>will go in with an automation strategy and then ultimately decide, hey,

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>this is not actually working out the way we thought

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it would, and they back off of it. In other cases,

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we see more and more automation go into that space.

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 1>And so what what this proposal is trying to do

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>is say, in the case where perhaps we see more

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>jobs going away from automation than our generative through automation,

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>we would need to have a method to respond to that.

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Here are some potential ways we could do that. But

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they also actually acknowledge this is not necessarily the case.

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of the proposals in the draft is,

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the draft report, I should read out

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the title Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Civil Law Rules on Robotics in case you were wondering

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if there were such a thing, uh they in the

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>draft if they actually state that one of the things

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that should happen is the European Union should create an

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>agency or or a department that actually monitors the number

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of jobs in the EU that are quote unquote taken

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>by robots and the number of jobs that are created.

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Because they said, we we lack this right now, we

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>don't actually have a dedicated group of people that are

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>monitoring these job trends. And and in fact, if we

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to see more jobs created than are being taken,

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a non issue, right like, but we don't

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>know is the problem I found those numbers. If you

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>want to hear what I want to hear, So well,

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just I guess a precursor to this is that, Um,

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in that same draft you're talking about, the European Parliament draft,

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the Committee on Legal Affairs said that organizations should have

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to declare savings they've made in also savings they made

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in social security contributions by using robotics instead of people

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for tax purposes. So that amount then is going to

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>be applied to tax. They're will be taxed on that amount.

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>So um, well, okay, anyway, let's move on to this.

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no proven correlation between increasing robot density and unemployment.

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was getting at before, is that By

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that there's a number of employees in the

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>German automotive industry. Um that, in fact, well, the whole

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>German automoive industry by rose by thirteen percent between two

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten, and rather well, industrial robots stock in

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the industry rose seventeen percent and in the same time period, So, um,

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>humans up thirteen percent, robots up seventeen percent. Sure, but

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they're they're right now coexisting. Yeah, and it's not like

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 1>ones declining, the other ones increasing, you know, exponentially. It's

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>just they're they're kind of growing at the same rate.

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just getting bigger, that's all. And I think I

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think part of the issue here is that some people

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>who are commenting on the on the report have probably

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 1>not read it, at least not all the way through,

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because I when I read it, the feeling I got

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was not so much that they were saying, Uh, here's

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem that we need to solve right now. It

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was more like people have talked about the possibility of

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this thing happening. If this thing in fact happens, we're

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be in trouble unless we plan for that eventuality.

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And they say, here are some ways that we could

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at least have have systems in place to to make

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>that transition less painful. And the framework of time that

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about here is a decade or even decades

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in in reality, because they said it's not going to

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>happen overnight like we've been saying. And the other they're

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>The quick thing that I want to mention is that,

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as you said, most people haven't really read the draft

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or what it read it really entails, but a lot

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of people right away. Will say, oh, well, my toaster

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>can make make toast on its own, and my refrigerator

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>knows when I need to stock it because it's a

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>smart refrigerator. You're gonna charge my smartphone like that's a

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>person as well? Are you gonna you know, tax me

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for uh you know all the devices, my my thermostat

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that knows when I'm coming home and makes it warmer. Uh,

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, where does this end? What's the what's the ends?

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Like who's going to be tax and why? Yeah, it's

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:05.399
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. They actually in the report mentioned that there

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a new classification either either the whole

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>electronic personhood thing. They said that, uh, once we see

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>robots received reach a certain level of sophistication, they have

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gone beyond what we would typically refer to as an

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>object like a toaster. They say, yeah, a toaster is

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an object. You're not gonna treat a toaster like it's

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a sentient creature or even even a robot with advanced

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, artificial intelligence doesn't necessarily mean it's sentient.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And they aren't even saying we should treat them as sentient.

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>They just say we might need to come up with

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a new classification, something that's not human or animal, but

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 1>something with a legal classification to deal with robotics in

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a manner that is consistent with just legal proceedings, because

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>there's not anything yet well, and one of those parameters

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>would have to be something that directly takes the place

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of a human on an assembly line or in a

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>fast food restaurant or you know, wherever it would be.

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's not something that it's not like a

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>device that you use would not be considered like you're

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a job away from somebody. You don't have somebody

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>your house that makes toast for you, and and now

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the toaster is automatic and it's taking away the toaster's job.

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not that way. It's it's it's a device that

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you normally would have to operate manually, but now it's

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>just a smart device and it does that for you.

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just a it's a handy thing. But it's not

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not taking away employment from somebody. Yeah, it's uh,

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that particular idea is one that uh,

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some technologists have really been bandying about as a possibility

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like a decade or two decades out. You know, something

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>where we actually see more and more automation and artificial

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence taking the place of jobs and fewer and fewer

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for humans. It's not like it's something that is

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>um imperative right now. But again, I think that the

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people who drafted the report are doing it in a

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>way that is fairly responsible in the idea that there

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they are looking ahead, like they actually talk about how

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there they need to look ahead ten to fifteen years

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and and anticipate what skills are going to be needed

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in the job, which is really hard to do. Oh

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, I was just gonna say this is impossible.

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>But because look back fifteen years ago and see where

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>we were, it was entirely I mean not not maybe

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago. It looked back thirty years ago, it's

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>entirely humans doing all that stuff. And it wasn't and

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there were there may be a few simple, simple robots

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>doing things. But look at an automation or you know,

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>an automated assembly line now in an auto plant. It's

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable what they're capable of and the number of robots

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>versus the number of humans doing that. But I one

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>thing I gotta get out of here is this is

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:52.319
<v Speaker 1>this This opens up so many boxes of worms in

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're not talking about many other things here. This

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is strictly this issue. But uh, there's gonna be the

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>whole you know, what are we paying these people to

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do the jobs versus what we pay the robots to

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do the job, which is not really paying them. It's

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's more like paying for the robot to do the

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>job and programming and then maintaining it. And then what

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>does it due to the price of the product? And

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>why is that in there in the first place, Because

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to lower the price of the product by

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.399
<v Speaker 1>not having that human that they're gonna have to pay

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Social Security to for thirty years after retirement. The robots

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. So there's there's so many layers of

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this that we can argue back and forth, and it

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>gets very political, it really does. Yeah, I I imagine

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at least that some of the arguments they've made for

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>things like the compensation fund for the robot, that's really

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>more of a break glass in case robot goes berserk fund.

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's really what it's meant for. The compensation

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:45.800
<v Speaker 1>fund is really meant for a Hey, if your robot

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>happens to go biserk one day and rampage down the

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>street and slap kids around. You're gonna be paying some money. Well,

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the safety fund for that. What if?

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So here's here's maybe imagine this scenario. Let's say robot

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to in stall the front window, you know,

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the glass in the vehicle. What if it just starts

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 1>flinging glass all over the over the factory and and

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>does injure human or it does, you know, slice through

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 1>several lines of hydraulic lines for the other robots. How

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:15.439
<v Speaker 1>do you come for that damage? That's well, let's see

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and and it's one bad apple. One of the things

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned was that so the conversation fun, like they said,

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was a possible approach. The other thing they talked about

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was obligatory insurance, similar to what you would have with

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 1>car insurance, only in this case it would be the

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:33.240
<v Speaker 1>company's producing the robots that would be responsible for paying

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that insurance, not the people who purchase or own the robot.

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, I know that was a ridiculous example, but

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's perfectly it's it's perfectly a reasonable example. It goes berserk. Yeah,

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you know what happens. They're saying, like, you know, as

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:50.279
<v Speaker 1>we get to a point where robots are in are

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 1>able to act more autonomously within an environment, they're going

0:55:54.280 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to encounter variables that you could not This goes back

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla Autopilot. They're going to encounter variables that you

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would not have expected when you were first programming office politics. Yeah,

0:56:06.080 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe something uh simple, maybe it's something

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that is that hardly ever happens, but happens at this

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>one point, And how does the robot behave in that situation?

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>And and there's their argument is that they're going to

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be cases where it is truly unpredictable that you cannot,

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just from its basic programming, necessarily anticipate what the robot's

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do. Like say, like it's after work and

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 1>one robot hits on the other robot's girlfriend at the bar,

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Monday, there's a lot of tension between the

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>two of them. Yet at work it's going to be

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a difficult situation where they are standing around the w

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>D forty cooler. That's something you just can't account for

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:48.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, I mean, like like specifically, the the

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 1>passage that I keep kind of referring to here, it

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>says considers that in principle, once the ultimately responsible parties

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have been identified, their liability would be proportionate to the

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>actual level of structions given to the robot and of

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:05.840
<v Speaker 1>its autonomy, so that the greater robots learning capability or

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>autonomy is, the lower other parties responsibility should be, and

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the longer robots education has lasted, the greater the responsibility

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of its teacher should be. All right, so this should

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of robot programmers shaking in their boots

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, because that really ups their responsibility for this

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this machine, which is already great, but that will extend

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>into if it learns how to adapt to the job.

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And then but then then it's the robot's fault as

0:57:35.280 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>long as there as long as you can make the

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>robot autonomous enough, then you're like, I'm free. This is

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like having a kid. I'm responsible for my kid up

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to a certain age, and then after that it's the

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>kid's fault. I guess. So I mean it's like, well,

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>when when the robot turns eighteen, maybe that's that's when.

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's the idea, that's the basic idea of the

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>idea is that if if you program a robot so

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that it has very little autonomy, then you would argue,

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>logically speaking, the person liable for any damage to the

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 1>robot makes is the person who programmed it or built

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it or whatever, because the robot can only follow the

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.480
<v Speaker 1>instructions that were given to it. If you have a

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:13.959
<v Speaker 1>robot that has more autonomy and more ability to extrapolate

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from its environment, then it goes beyond the basics that

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you gave the that you equipped the robot with, and

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so it becomes harder to say, oh, it's your fault

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because your robot did this thing. So it's kind of

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like having a kid and a kid growing up and

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, you know, why can't you control your kid, Like, well,

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my kid is becoming a person, and I mean I can.

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing the best I can and educating and and

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 1>giving discipline and giving guidance to my kid. But my

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 1>kid is a person. So occasionally my kid chooses to

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do something that you know, we have to have a

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>discussion and say, listen, this was a bad choice you made.

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's why it was. That kind of all part of

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>free will, it is. Yeah, So it's an interesting argument

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>though that it's like it's like a child that you

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have to maintain control over for a certain amount of time.

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a point where you say this is

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>operating on its own at this point, responsible for its

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.240
<v Speaker 1>own actions. And and again the report is very clear

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that this is stuff that we're talking about

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that decades out. It's not like it's not like this

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is It's not like we're gonna wake up tomorrow and

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>our our little remote controlled robot is suddenly gonna be

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>no back talking us, no no on the lions right now.

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like you pick up part A and put it

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in slot B and then do it again and again

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and again for eighteen hours a day. And and the

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>report is essentially saying like we just want to make

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that we're not unprepared when when technologology advances beyond

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the stage where at now I mean, Scott, we've seen

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past, like with other types of technology, how

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>technological development far outpaces the law, and then we have

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, okay, wait, what does this actually mean

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 1>legally speaking? What what this draft is trying to do

0:59:56.960 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is get ahead of that and just to say like,

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>let's set up the legal frame now, so that we

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't caught in that situation when it ultimately happens. Well,

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but it does. It does lead to some jokes. Yeah,

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and what gets everybody's dander up is that you know,

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they're they're calling them electronic persons, and that

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right away is is kind of a I don't know,

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a is it not. It's not like bully move,

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's more like, um, this is definitely something that's

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>replacing you as as a person in the or at

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>least joining you. Yeah, at the minimum, let's say, is

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>joining you. And then the other thing is that I

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people feel this way too, is

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that wait a minute, you're gonna tax them as if

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a human. Isn't that The reason why they may

1:00:40.800 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be replaced that human with a machine is that they

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to be responsible for it after that point,

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like once it retires, because these robots don't retire, they

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>don't die, they have you know, they have mechanical issues

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in there, and they are I guess retired in a way,

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and that they're replaced by another one. But you don't

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>go on, you don't continue paying for it with a

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>pension for the rest of the robots, you know, air

1:01:03.200 --> 1:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>quote life, you know, um, it's it's it's strange that

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>people people want to extrapolate this too, like like it's

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a human and that you'll have to care for it

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of its its mechanical life as if

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a human. But that's not the way it is.

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Really No, I think it's different. I think really what

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they're what they were trying to get at, is that

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there are certain systems we have in place as human

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>beings that depend entirely or at least in large part

1:01:30.800 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on employment taxes, and that if we, in fact do

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>reach a future which is still not not necessarily the

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's going to happen, but if we reach

1:01:41.600 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a future where automation really has taken over to a

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>great extent, Uh, what do we do to protect those

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>systems for the people who are still dependent upon them

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>until we reach a point where those systems are moot

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>because we've moved on to something else. In fact, one

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other things they actually mentioned is that the

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Member States could all start to consider the possibility of

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a general basic income, which you know, we've got a

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of countries out there in Europe that are are

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with this to some degree. Uh. I did an

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of Forward Thinking's audio podcast where I talked about this,

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I would use that as a way

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of just seeing what happens. And then, you know, do

1:02:24.440 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, all right, it works, let's try it, or

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>do you say, oh boy, that didn't work at all,

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>let's not do that. I think we didn't implement it everywhere,

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think automo manufacturers are gonna hate this.

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be bad for their business. I

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>really do. They're they're not gonna like this at all,

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because that was the benefit to them of having something

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that robot. It doesn't it doesn't have the complaints, it

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the you know, the same concerns. Right, you

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have the you have the upfront cost, and you have

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the maintenance cost of the robots, but you don't have

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>these ongoing you don't have a salary, you don't have benefits,

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have these other taxes and other elements that

1:02:59.840 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you would have to have if it were a human workforce.

1:03:01.960 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you start adding all these things that they

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have to pay on the on the end of the

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>owner of the robot, you know, the founder of the

1:03:08.600 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>company or the the owner of the company, whoever that

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>may be. It maybe a group of people. If they

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have to pay more for that, you better believe that

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that price is going to be passed on to the

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer and the price of the price of your automobile

1:03:19.440 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to go skyrocketing. And it just leads to

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trouble. I mean, there's gonna be um,

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some issues. I think if they if

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they really do go forward with this, and it's just

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a draft now it's an I said, it's kind of

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>getting it in people's heads that it may happen. But

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:36.479
<v Speaker 1>if they really do go forward with this, it's gonna

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>cause a lot of trouble. I think. The I think

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the important thing to remember is it's not just that

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a draft report, but also that this is a

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>report that's giving recommendations, and most of those recommendations really

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>boiled down to let's form an actual official European agency

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that is going to oversee this stuff and staff it

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with people who are experts in their field, not just

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>technical experts, but regulatory experts, ethical experts, to do to

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of the legwork, to make sure

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that if any legislative aims are are created, that they

1:04:11.520 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>are done so with the most information from the most

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the most diverse perspective possible, rather than you know, this

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like we should try this, let's do this, let's

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>go this way. You be ready, but take your time

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>getting there. And I think that that ultimately is the

1:04:28.120 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>message of the report. It is a little whimsical in places,

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it references fiction. UH you think I

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>love it. I think it's great. It was one of

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that you can word to me and said,

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>can you believe this? You will see to me this

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is you're excited. But I do a show called forward

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Thinking you know where, and so I know how hard

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it is to try and predict the future. I have

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it every week fw Cohen thinking it's a

1:04:52.960 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by Toyota, this show is not, but forward Thinking

1:04:55.440 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is anyway the UH doing. Doing the show air, we

1:05:00.400 --> 1:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about how it's funny because in those episodes when

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we talk about these big, big ideas, things like what

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>happens if a UH an artificial intelligence becomes sophisticated enough

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that it is difficult too to differentiate it from an

1:05:18.280 --> 1:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligent creature to the point maybe it has some form

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of self awareness. Maybe it doesn't, but maybe it seems

1:05:25.720 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like it does. Like, that's a difficult question. What happens

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if automation were to take over more jobs than it

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>could create? What if we were you know, the all

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>these different what if questions We always conclude with, you know,

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know, but it really is important that

1:05:43.160 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we talk about it and discuss it and start thinking,

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, how would this actually impact us now,

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so that we're not caught by surprise what happens later on.

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like this draft report is exactly what

1:05:55.840 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying and so wild. Part of it is

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>funny and and you can joke about like your toaster

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming a person, uh, and I would make the same joke.

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm also I also admire that someone has taken the

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>time to do what I keep asking people to do

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it every episode. I'm like, well, I can't make too

1:06:15.080 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>much fun of them. I've been this is exactly what

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been calling for for four years. It's become a reality. Yeah.

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm just like amused that it happened. Also, I'll

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and tell you guys, like this report is

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>very easy to read. Uh is twenty two pages long,

1:06:30.360 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's after you get past the first couple of

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>pages of it's less than twenty pages because the first

1:06:34.960 --> 1:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of pages are like a cover and a table

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>contents and stuff. It's a piec cake. It's it's it's

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, I mean, it's written in a little

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of legal language, but not terrible. Like it's nowhere

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>near as dense as some of the stuff I used

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to have to read when I worked in a law firm.

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Those were dark times, my friend. Um, but it's it's

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty easy read. It's a little scattered because you

1:06:58.200 --> 1:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like some of the sections are repeated, but it's

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>worth checking out. And it's all available online and PDF form,

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can go and pull down this read it

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>see if you you know, think like, is this is

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this prudent? Is it? Is it really proactive? Is it reactionary?

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it unnecessary? Should we not worry about this for

1:07:18.360 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another ten years? I mean it certainly could spark at

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>least a conversation. We should also keep in mind, nothing

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the report is like would become legally binding. It's

1:07:29.560 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>really just a bunch of suggestions. It's just just kind

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of a prep work work framework, I guess for them

1:07:36.400 --> 1:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to adhere to later. It's right, it's not even not

1:07:38.680 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>even so much as like a legal proposal as it is. Hey, guys,

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be a really good idea if we've

1:07:42.720 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>got some smart people to think about this stuff for

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a while. That's when it comes down to start with

1:07:47.400 --> 1:07:49.439
<v Speaker 1>this and see what you come up with. Yeah, yeah,

1:07:49.560 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much. And they you know the fact that they say,

1:07:51.600 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like this is one possible solution. Uh, there they are

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>implying at least that they don't know all the answers

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and therefore they're just kind of throwing something out there,

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe there's a much better way of approaching it

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>than the way that they have suggested. You know. So

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>European Parliament is a lot like us. They have more

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>questions than answers on this one. Yeah, but at least

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they're asking to get you know, the top thinkers together

1:08:14.840 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to try and answer some of these questions. That's true,

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>just like how stuff works did with us here to

1:08:19.000 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's that's why we make the big bucks

1:08:22.040 --> 1:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Scott get the top thinkers together in the podcast studio. Okay,

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a little that's too much. We were really only

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the only two people here, so it was just there's

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>no other option. Really, that's right, there's an empty room,

1:08:37.479 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and I just happened to raise my hand. Yeah. Yeah,

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's either going to be you know you are Matt

1:08:42.200 --> 1:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Frederick and man, I can't stand that guy. So I

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>said that just as he was literally passing the window

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at that. I love Matt. He'll never

1:08:49.680 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>he'll never listen to this. I don't have to worry

1:08:51.560 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about I'm listening to this, but just in case, I

1:08:53.280 --> 1:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>love you, Matt. All right. So guys, first of all,

1:08:56.880 --> 1:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta thank Scott again for joining me on this

1:08:58.960 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>show and bringing bringing the European Parliament proposal to my

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>attention because it has given me a wealth of material.

1:09:07.040 --> 1:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for asking me into the studio again. With you,

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I always have a good time and it's always a

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>fun conversation. It's a good back and forth between us. Yeah, yeah,

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we we have a blast. There's certain people that I

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just feel a fun rapport with and I'm happy to say,

1:09:21.760 --> 1:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at no time during this particular conversation did I set

1:09:24.840 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>out to break your heart. Yeah you didn't. You didn't

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:30.639
<v Speaker 1>even he didn't physically strike me either way. Sometimes do it? Sometimes?

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's it's a Friday and I'm tired. Honestly,

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have the energy. Yeah, you know what,

1:09:35.880 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>usually you do? You too, tried to you try to try,

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>try to sing me with you. Usually I usually withhold

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>one important piece of information and then see see how

1:09:45.680 --> 1:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you react. It normally has something to do with people

1:09:48.240 --> 1:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>not driving anymore, but I'm not doing that today. So

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of course you can go check out car Stuff. Scott

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is a co host on car Stuff along with Ben

1:09:56.960 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 1>Bolan and Uh. He does amazing work here at how

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works, so check that out. And guys, if you

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have any questions or suggestions for future episodes, write me

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>my email addresses tech stuff at how stuff works dot

1:10:11.160 --> 1:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>com or drop me a line on Twitter or Facebook.

1:10:14.760 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The handle at both of those is text stuff H

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>s W and I will talk to you again. Really

1:10:20.720 --> 1:10:27.879
<v Speaker 1>see for more on this and thousands of other topics,

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is a how stuff Works dot com