WEBVTT - The AI that lives Inside your PC: Revolutionizing Computing

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>For as long as humans have used computers, we have

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>sought to make them faster, smarter, and more capable. But

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what happens when we harness the power of artificial intelligence

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>with new PC hardware and software? And what if every

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>computer could use AI technology to unleash new capabilities that

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will benefit anyone and everyone who uses a computer.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>What can I help you with?

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>This is not a distant dream. Each day it becomes

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>more and more of a reality. AI is no longer

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>exclusively running in the cloud. It's increasingly finding its way

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>into all computers, enabling business users to do more and

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be more with PC technology from Intel. In this episode,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll be focusing on defining the AIPC and what represents

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for the future of this transformative technology. We'll also explore

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what the growth of AI running directly on the PC

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>versus the cloud means and how this AIPC revolution changes

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>how we work, live and create. Join us as we

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>take a journey into the future of AI computing, where

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>machines are not just tools but partners in our endeavors.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Technically Speaking, an Intel podcast produced by iHeartMedia's

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Ruby Studio in partnership with Intel. Hey the I'm gram class.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Joining us today is Robert Hallock, the VP and General

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>manager of Client AI and Technical Marketing at Intel. Here

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has a long history with product development and PCs. Welcome

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to the show, Robert.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Good to be here. Yeah, I just want to the

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>start off by saying, there seems to be a lot

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of talk around AI, and it seems to always revolve

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>around cloud based or software as a service type business models.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>How Intel is taking a different route. Well, but can

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you give us an overview of what an AIPC means

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at Intel and can you help us understand some of

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of running AI directly on a PC versus

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in the cloud.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people have been exposed to AI

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>through the cloud, and these are services like chat, GPT

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>or Dolly three where you can create a piece of

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>content from a text description. And that's one kind of

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>AI that's called generative AI is a category pros and

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>cons to that doing it in the cloud. The pro

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is the models are huge, right. They essentially have the

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Internet's collective knowledge of data to produce an answer or

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 2>a picture, and that's highly detailed. But one of the

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>cons is that they're not very specific to you what

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you are doing on your PC, the information on your computer,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>or the images that you care about. So that's sort

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>of motivating to bring AI capabilities locally to the PC

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>where you don't need an Internet connection to use these capabilities.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's sort of the tip of the iceberg, because

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>when you move AI to the PC without a cloud connection,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>you can also do new types of AI workloads that

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 2>would be too big or simply can't run in the cloud.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>So a good example of that is in teleconferencing, lots

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of people use background blurring or background pictures, and we

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>can actually make that a lot more energy efficient. We

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>can actually give you hours of battery life back by

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>using AI on that use case. So the whole point

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>of AI is that there's a wave of software coming

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that uses AI to improve performance or to reduce power consumption.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So you'll get better performance from your system and longer

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>battery life as well. And this will continue to grow

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>over the next five years.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And Robert I was wondering if you could please describe

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to the audience what the current state of the art

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is with PC architecture. You know, we've got CPUs, which

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>are central processing units that make computing possible, and you've

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>got GPUs, which are graphical processing units that are instrumental

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for machine learning, gaming applications, video editing. So how does

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that actually differ from the concept of an AIPC.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. So, yeah, users may have heard

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.239
<v Speaker 2>about an AIPC at this point, and at the basic level,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>this is just a new generation computer with hardware inside

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 2>that is capable of accelerating an AI based workload and

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>previous hardware, let's say early twenty twenty three computers, you

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>can run AI workloads, but they will fall back to

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 2>the CPU cores, which are not as fast and not

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>as energy efficient as running that same workload on the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>new accelerators in an AIPC. And the way we're doing

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 2>it at Intel is actually the CPU cores themselves. We've

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>added AI accelerating capabilities to those cores. The GPU that's

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 2>built into our processor also has accelerators, and then we've

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>also added an entirely new component called the NPU or

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>neural processing unit, which sits next to the CPU and

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the GPU and is now its own third category of

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 2>acceleration on the device. And different workloads in AI, or

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>different features in AI run best on one of those

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 2>three engines, so you kind of need all three to

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>do this well. And our new product, Intel Core Ultra

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>is our first AIPC processor, and so if you see

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>that name Core Ultra, you know that it has the

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>AI accelerators to run these features well. But at its route,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it is a PC that has AI specific hardware.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm quite interested in I guess the thinking behind

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>at Intel of this shift towards this new architecture. Was

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it something that was internally driven or did you see

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some conversations and discussions with your key customers and clients

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>driving that sort of shift.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 2>This is very much a software industry driven transition, and

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>CPU vendors like Intel were innovating to keep pace with

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in the software environment. And that's kind

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>of a key thing I'd want to stress. You know,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're on the fence about AIPC or you wonder,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, how long is this thing going to stick around.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those cases where it's both the

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 2>hardware industry and the software industry agreeing that this is

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the right thing to do for performance and features and power.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I truly believe that over the next three to

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>five years we will reach this point of general acceptance

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in AI, where it's whether you know it or not,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>widely diffused. In most of the applications you're working on

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>or working with, many of the features that you value

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 2>will use AI again transparently in the background. But this

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is very much a collaborative, industry wide effort from all

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the hardware makers, all the big software vendors. This is

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>here to stay for sure. Let's pause for second here

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to reiterate Robert's point. Right of adoption is always a

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>crucial aspect of any new technology, and that's certainly true

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of what we're discussing today with AIPCS. It's important to

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>understand that the leaders in the field of computing, both

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>in the hardware and software domain, have already begun down

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>this revolutionary path and it doesn't seem like there's any

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>roadblocks in site. With that in mind, I asked Robert

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>about the benefits of moving AI workloads from the cloud

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>to the PC, especially when it comes to issues of

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>data privacy, latency, and connectivity. You just touched couple that

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>are really important to local AI. It's that data privacy

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>or data security. We've all read about information going up

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to a cloud resource of some kind, and you don't

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>really know what's going to happen with your data or

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>your request after that. And that's not to say there's

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>anything malicious implied. You just don't know. So I'm sure

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>people in corporation, certainly at Intel, when you go to

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 2>a generative AI website, it says, hey, be careful what

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you enter into this textbox. And so moving this stuff

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>offline gives you a couple of things. Yes, you get

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>chain of custody over the data. It's private, right, it's

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>working on your information offline, right, so it doesn't have

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to go to the cloud. That's a big one. Cost

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>is another component. A lot of the most powerful AI

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>services online, you know, ten to twenty bucks a month,

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's not cheap to have several of those. The

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>last that is interesting is cloud servers are intrinsically pricey.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying they're expensive, but for AI as a

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>genre of software to truly take off and thrive in

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 2>all the way the software vendors want it to, it

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 2>has to reach the local PC. It has to reach

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, tens of millions of users, hundreds of millions

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of users on a local device and that's sort of

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that critical mass install base that takes this effort to

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the next level. Cloud was sort of one point zero

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>of AI, and now we're trying to, you know, for

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>one of a better term, create the two point zero

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>where lots of people have access to this and it's

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>widely available and in a couple of years Intel alone

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 2>we want to get one hundred million accelerators for AI

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>into the hands of people.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And do you have any examples of at this early

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>stage of actually pushing the boundaries of using this sort

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of power in a local PC to do some really

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting work.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>One for an enterprise that we've been tinkering with is

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a technology called rag rag, and it's the idea where

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>you have a language model running offline on the user's PC.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 2>But this RAG component can scan your documents, your corporate information,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>and then specialize the LM to be for you, your work,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 2>your knowledge. So just as an example, we scanned one

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>state's DMV manual, which hundreds of pages long for the

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Department of Motor Vehicle manual and now you can ask

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>very specific procedural and legal questions about the subject of

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 2>that manual and it'll spit back highly accurate answers for you.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>And if you extend out out words, protecting and promoting

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>institutional knowledge is hard. You might have that employ that's

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 2>been there for twenty years and has all that institutional

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>knowledge in their head and if they leave, it goes

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>with them. But a RAG model could synthesize that knowledge

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 2>for people, so a new employee could just ask a

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>question in a text box and get an accurate answer

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>about what that company's working on or what this feature does.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's just huge for business.

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I'm from a small business sort of background.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>My dad has a small business. And the fact that

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you can bring this power to the small and micro

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses as well without having to pay these cloud based

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>prices and also in conjunction with using some of the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>open source type software that I know Intel is very

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>supportive of. I'm just really excited to see the little guys,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, be able to compete with some of the

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>technology that the big boys have.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, AI is, at the end of the day, a

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>force multiplier for a person. Right like at the root,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>AI is designed to save time writing meeting minutes or

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>email summaries or drafting in outline. These are all just

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>like time consuming tasks for people, and they don't require

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>skill per se, but it's it's time consuming, and so

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>being able to offload that to a digital assistant that

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 2>can just sort of ninety percent or ninety five percent

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>do that for you allows you to refocus your efforts

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 2>back to something else that is more productive and more

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>worthy of your time. And especially for a small business,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>administrative overhead, bureaucratic overhead is hard, it's time consuming. I

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>myself own a single member LLC and administrative stuff takes

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>up a ton of my time. Like I'd love to

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 2>outsource that to AI.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right. In terms of Intel's history with past, you know,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>technological revolutions, I'm reminded of Intel's initiative to get Wi

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Fi into every your laptop and that was code named Centrino,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting to hear that again. Intel are trying

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to push new technology so that it's ubiquitous, and that's

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they're doing with these aipcs. And in ten

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years time, I think that aipowered PCs will be

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so ubiquitous that we won't think anything of it. I'd

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like Robert your thoughts on that and more insights into

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the way Intel is evolving their strategy and Intel's role

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in this. Yeah.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Actually, Centrino is a really nice analogy because that's sort

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of what we're trying to do with these AI accelerators.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not a huge tweak to the configuration of a

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 2>system design because most of the work happens inside the CPU,

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and there are very few external requirements that would change

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a system designed to make this possible. Right, So it's

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a system vendor could theoretically update last year's chassis to

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>have a new CPU and that would confer the benefits

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 2>from Core Ultra and an AI workloads and Centrino not

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 2>much different, right. You're adding a Wi Fi chip and

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 2>an antenna to the system.

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But for those.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Of you who weren't around during the Centrino days, it

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>used to be very common that a laptop would not

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>have Wi Fi, which seems sort of unimaginable now, but

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>that's because Intel made this massive effort to make it

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>common and we all sort of take it for granted now.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Another analogous moment for me is the addition of graphics

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in the processor. I was a hardware reviewer when that

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>started happening, and I remember the conversations back then like

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>why are we doing this? You can't even play a

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>game on it, what's the point? This is just going

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to make CPUs more expensive, YadA, YadA, YadA. Today web

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>pages are rendered by your graphics card orphics accelerator in

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the processor, your browser uses it. It's everywhere. So both of

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 2>those are very foundational examples for me, because I see

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>AI as being quite analogous in both respects. But I

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>think history will bear out that this was a pivotal

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>moment and AI will be very, very widespread, just like

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>graphics and just like Wi Fi.

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next on Technically Speaking and Intel podcast.

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Being familiar with how prompts work, it's going to be

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>a key business skill, and I think there'll be a

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>real advantage for employees who know how to engineer a

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 2>good prompt to get a great result quickly.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back after a brief message from our

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>partners that Intel welcome back to Technically Speaking. I'm here

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>now with Robert Hallett getting back to I guess more

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on the business side of things. Maybe if you can

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about our friends in the IT

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>department having to manage the security and all these sort

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. Yeah, what's some of the benefits they could

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>look forward to in terms of managing these types of

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>aipcs in their enterprise.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll make every ITDM happy that at the

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, these AI applications are nothing more

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>than endpoint applications. You download them, you install them, and

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>they're from software vendors, and I'm sure they'll be breakout

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 2>ISVs that come under the scene as a result of

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 2>this AI transformation, but largely speaking, trusted vendors doing new work.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>And because it's entirely offline, your user has custody of

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>the data and the information, which is no different from

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>any other application today. So it's not like this transformation

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>comes part and parcel with like a radical transformation and

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>endpoint management, which would make it way harder. From a

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>security point of view, AI has some very interesting benefits

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 2>for security models. So now this is the ITDM point

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of view. We recently with Dell and CrowdStrike, and if

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>people don't know what CrowdStrike is, it's, amongst many things,

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>an endpoint security solution which is specifically designed to help

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 2>prevent threats that don't attack files. Many of the tax

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>that go into a system now aren't like a virus

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>that infects a file, it's actually resident in memory. They're

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 2>fileless attacks, and these are way harder to detect and prevent.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So CrowdStrike uses convolutional neural networks, which is a simpler

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>form of neural network or AI, to monitor the real

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>time conditions of the system and see if something unusual

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 2>is happening. And this experiment moves these convolutional neural network

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>models or CNNs to that neural processing unit or the

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>NPU in coraltrum. It did a couple things when we

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 2>did that. First, it gave the processor cores twenty percent

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>performance back. The second thing it did it made the

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 2>security model slightly smaller, so it had a smaller memory

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>footprint now so user gets some RAM back. And it

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 2>also improved the accuracy of the model because they can

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>make the model computationally bigger, right because it has its

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>own dedicated accelerator now to run on. And so security

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>got better and crowdstreg is a very popular solution, and

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 2>there are other solutions in the pipe for phishing detection,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 2>which is notoriously hard pattern matching problem. And that's just

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 2>two examples of the way security can be enhanced by

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 2>offloading to an AI specific accelerator.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we talked a little bit about you know,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses and enterprises adopting these new aipcs. Is anything special

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that IT departments and organizations need to do to prepare

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for this.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll say there's probably three things that an ITDM would

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>want to think about if they intend to use large

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>language models or just generative AI. Those workloads are pretty

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>sensitive to memory bandwidth, so you wouldn't normally think about

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>memory bandwidth in a system purchase, but making sure that

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>it has two memory sticks over one. For example, right,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 2>if you want to get sixteen gigs a RAM, make

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>sure that's two by eight instead of one by sixteen,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Just as an example, that will dramatically improve the performance

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 2>of the LLM, because these language models are fundamentally limited

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 2>or enhanced by the performance of the memory subsystem. Outside

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of that, for other forms of AI in the year ahead,

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>there is a calculation called TOPS or terra operations per second,

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>which is sort of a ballpark for how much AI

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>performance a device can give you. Software makes or breaks

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the acquisition of that TOPS figure. So I can give

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>you a billion TOPS, and if I had a very

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>poor software stack under that you would never see the

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>billion tops. So there's a new level of knowledge the

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>ITDM needs to develop on sort of software stack robustness

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>underneath that rating. Okay, so you have to be familiar

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>with what Intel's doing in the software space, what its

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>competitors are doing in the software space to really understand

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you're going to get a good experience

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>out of the device you're purchasing. So that's number two,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and number three I think would be to say that

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>itdms will probably be faced with a lot of advocacy

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 2>for the NPU as an AIX, but it's important to

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 2>understand that the software industry broadly also wants to use

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>GPU and CPU as well. So if you make an

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 2>upgrade decision that is all in on NPU performance and

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 2>you didn't check on the GPU or the CPU, you

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 2>may be out in the cold on performance or power

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>efficiency for these Frankly a large number of workloads that

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 2>use graphics and CPU for AI acceleration. Those are the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 2>three things that I would say are new or different

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>in this era, But overall it is something that you

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>can integrate into your upgrade cycle piecemeal. YEP, Newer devices

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>will be faster. I mean, they always are, but it's

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 2>not like you're missing out on a new feature, right,

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 2>We're going to make them faster, But the features are

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>delivered by the software, are not the hardware. You can

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of get in at any point and get the

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 2>goodness of AI, which is pretty cool as well.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And are you helping the software vendors, I

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>guess compile their code so that it will help them

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>really utilize that hardware underneath.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the secret of AI. And I'll start with

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>an analogy of PC gaming, which I think is a

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 2>lot more familiar to people. So at the bottom, you

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>have a piece of hardware, a graphics card, and they

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 2>tell you, you know, it's certain terra flops or gigaflops of performance,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>but everybody knows that really depends on how well optimized

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the game engine is, how well optimized the game you're

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>running is, how good the graphics drivers are. AI is

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>no different. AI accelerators are actually exposed in direct X

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 2>in Windows as a GPU without display outputs, so the

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 2>system sees them as essentially graphics cards, and instead of

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 2>game engines you have AI models will have features and

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>apps just like games you even have run times or

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 2>an environment where the code is running in there's a

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>DirectX run time for graphics, there is equivalent run times

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>for AI. So in many respects, the AI software stack

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 2>looks and works a lot like the gaming software stack.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And so if people think about all the times that

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 2>a GPU that's supposed to be faster on paper didn't

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 2>live up to that number because of one software reason

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>or another, that is a possible reality for AI as well.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's why it's so important to make your decision

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>not just on tops or what the accelerator is, but

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>on the robustness of the software underneath, because that's where

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 2>it really happens.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Regular listeners to the show Mike remember back in season one,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we divided a whole episode on the skills that workers

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>will need in order to take advantage of the kinds

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>of AI tools we discussed today. AI technology can only

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>expand our expectations of what's possible if we understand the

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>most effective ways to use it. So I asked Robert

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>for his thoughts and what workers should focus on to

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of this new wave of technology, and he

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>began his answer with something just about everyone does on

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, every day.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, that's a good one. I actually want to start

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 2>briefly at web searching. You know, web searching, a good,

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>well composed query is a learned skill. We have all

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 2>encountered people that haven't quite learned that skill, and they

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 2>get bad search results and they're frustrated with a search engine.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 2>And not a lot of people teach that skill because

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 2>it's its own language of sorts. You know, you want

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>to freeze things to a search box differently than how

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 2>I would ask it out loud. So that takes me

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to AI, where you are still engineering a search of sorts.

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>It's called a prompt now, but it's a search and

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the skill is in like, how do you craft that

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 2>prompt to get the result that you're looking for? You

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>have to be somewhat specific, and you have to understand

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the limitations of the AI model you're working with. So

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>let's take an image creation model. Some of them only

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>support what's called positive prompts. You have to describe the

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>things that you want and it will kind of omit

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 2>anything else that you're not asking for explicitly. Others support

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 2>negative prompts, and if you're working with a positive only

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>image service, you could easily have users saying I want this,

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 2>this and this, but not that, that and that. Yeah,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the not operator the AI engine's not going to understand it,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 2>so it's going to give you the things in the

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>not category. In the picture.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like saying I want a picture of a zoo,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but no elephants.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, and it doesn't nderstand the word no, So in.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>A positive one, it'll just have elephants.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you get all elephants exactly right. So understanding this

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>is a real skill. Understanding like what the AI model

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>or by distant extension, what the game engine will let

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you do is really important, and how to be specific

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and understanding how to provide follow up commentary to tweak

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the result to get what you're looking for.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Whole category of skill that is not taught, not widely

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>known in business or even amongst users because this is

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 2>so new. But being familiar with how prompts work is

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be a key business skill, and I think

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>there'll be a real advantage for employees who know how

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>to engineer a good prompt to get a great result quickly.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So going to take a bit of a step back

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and look far in the horizon in the sort of

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the three to five seven year time range. What's Intel's

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>plan for this journey into AI.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I think at top level, i'd want to acknowledge that

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I understand the skepticism or the I don't understand of AI.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 2>But where we're going is like a complete industry transformation.

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Intel believes by twenty twenty seven or twenty twenty eight

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that eighty percent of all the computer sold will have

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>AI accelerators inside. And by the end of this year,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 2>we want at least one hundred different software developers partnered

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>with Intel. We want to deliver three hundred or so

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 2>different AI features into the marketplace through all of those companies,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>help them optimize it, deliver it, market it. We want

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>to bring one hundred million accelerators into the space by

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the end of twenty twenty five, and so just between

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 2>now and twenty twenty seven twenty eight, we're talking about

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 2>zero to eighty percent of the market in under four years,

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>which is an extraordinary velocity. And as of right now,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Intel has the largest number of accelerators, the most number

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of applications in the market, and sort of below the scenes,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 2>all the enabling tools and softwares and frameworks, we also

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>have the most of those as well, So we want

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 2>to be the scale provider for AI, you know, the

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>biggest install based and we want to help to succeed

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>because that's what software vendors are asking us to do.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's the longest short of it.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's great. I think I'll leave it there. Thanks Robert.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks my deepest thanks to Robert Hallock for his invaluable

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>contributions to today's episode of Technically Speaking. Robert's passion and

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm has convinced me that we are on the brink

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of a revolutionary technology that could transform humanity. We've all

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>used PCs both in our personal and professional lives, but

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the leap to aipowered processes represents a once in a

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>generation advancement. Imagine having your own personal AIS system that

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>continually adapts to your needs and priorities. Admittedly, this is

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a prospect I'm still trying to fully grasp, but I

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>especially appreciate that this technology will operate locally on my PC,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping my data private and secure. I'm also particularly interested

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in how technology can empower the underdog to do amazing things.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The garage based tech entrepreneur building the next world beating

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>app the corner cafe owner getting that extra hour per

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>day to spend with their family, and the first year

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>design student creating beautiful and innovative art. With AI enhanced

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>pieces readily accessible, I believe we can greatly advance human prosperity.

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The future looks bright. Ground. Next episode will continue to

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>unpact the involvement of AI to create a more accessible

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and livable city for everyone. Join us again on Tuesday,

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>April twenty third for another enlightening discussion here on Technically

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Speaking and Intel podcast. Technically Speaking was produced by Ruby

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Studio from iHeartRadio in partnership with Intel and hosted by

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>me Graham Class. Our executive producer is Molly Sosher, our

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>EP of Post Production is James Foster, and our supervising

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>producer is Nikia Swinton. This episode was edited by Sierra

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Spreen and was written by Molly Sosher and Nick Ferschall.