WEBVTT - Stocks Look Forward Past Nvidia

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive a little bit deeper into the Nvidia earnings.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Who do you want to dive deeper in than d.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 3>No better person right now?

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>That's our guy. I mean, he's getting geared up for

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Penn State, Nevada this weekend, but he's probably focusing a

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 2>little bit here on Nvidia. Hey, Dan, I thought these

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>numbers were darn good, but I know there's the law

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>of large numbers. I know there's a whole thing about expectations.

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Give us your take on these Nvidia numbers, Dan, I.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Thought they were robot and I think the some extent

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>when you factored China and they actually beat expectations, especially

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 4>when you look at the outlook. I think there's a

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 4>stock that's up today and I think it further validates Well.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 4>We've obviously been talking a lot, you know, with you

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and the team about about the AI story now playing

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 4>out into the next stiege of growth. This is bullish

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 4>in my opinion.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 5>Dan, what was your takeaway here as it relates to

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the spending here Capax.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I think it just sures there's one ship in the world,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 4>fewling the AI revolutions led by godfather of AI, Jensen,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 4>the Vidning and you what's happened on Capex. It's just

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>continuing to accelerate, and then you factor in China that

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 4>could be fifty billion. I mean in just talking about

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 4>the fifty percent growth. I look, I think this is

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 4>just now it's showing the next feeds of the AI

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>revolutions now starting to play out, especially when you combine

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>it with hyper scalers and everything we've seen from Pallenteer

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 4>now Snowflake, Mango de Be, the use cases are expanded.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Dan, flush out for us the whole China situation. Where

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>is in Vidio today visa via China? And how do

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 2>you think this is going to play out over the

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>coming quarters with our age twenty.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Chip Yeah, Paul, Look, they're they're cognmental between US and China.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 4>But the reality is Jensen's ten percent politician, ninety percent

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>CEO and Trump administration to do is big as Chip

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>on the broker table is in the video. So as

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 4>this all plays out there, it's to pay for play model.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>They're going to have access to China, even if it's restricted,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 4>and that's going to add and incremental what two five

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 4>six billion per quarter. And you know, even though Beijing's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 4>saying telling you know, maybe these companies you don't want

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>to buy in video chips, that's like telling a kid

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 4>not eat candied. Big tech in China wants in video chips.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean, as we dig in here into the data,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 5>what we saw from the earnings report, what is takeaway

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 5>in terms of what they were able to see specifically

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 5>in terms of data center AI demand. That's definitely something

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 5>that's been in focus here with this report.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, I think it's noise in terms of any

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote like miss because when you factored China, it's

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 4>basically over a billion and a half feet. They're seeing

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 4>demand accelerate. I mean, no region is not showing acceleration.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 4>And now you're starting to factor what's going to happen

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 4>in Middle East, what's going to happen in China. It's

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>got to rest the world and you're really talking about

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 4>one chip that's fueling it. So when I walk in

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>a video, I think there's a five trillion dollars mark

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>cap attention by a year under early twenty six, and

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>it's just further validation for the AI revolution. Biasis.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>So talk to us DAN about their customer base and

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the concentration of the customers, and I know they want

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to broaden out their customer base maybe to sovereigns into

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>other net buyers out there. How do you think that's

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>going to evolve?

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Big tech is going to continue domino as a quote

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 4>unquote customer base in terms of the concentration. But now

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>as sovereigns play out, as enterprises play out, and you're

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>going to see more and more people you know, obviously

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>start to understand that this revolution is not just big Tech.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 4>It's about other sort of regions starting to play. And

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 4>there's only one ship in the world fuel in it,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 4>and that's in video.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 5>So taking a step back here in video wrapped up

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 5>all of the mag seven earnings here. What were your

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 5>thoughts more broadly overall this earning season.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think this is the bullish Tech earning season.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>We talked about it, the validation of the AI revolution,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>his next stage of growth it's spreading, second, third, fourth derivatives.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Now grant look in video is a Scottie chauffeur of

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 4>tech okay, But what you're just starting to see now

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 4>play out is those derivatives, the spending, the multiplier, it's

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 4>all happening. And I think that's just bullish going into

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 4>year end in terms of tax stocks, and I think

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 4>this bull market has two to three year run still left. Dan.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So as you talk to institutional investors, how are they

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>viewing this fifteen percent? I don't know government fee that

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the US government may impose on some of these chip

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>sales that China. How's that being viewed by investors?

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, it's obviously it's unusual. It's a pay for play model,

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 4>but guess what, investors, it's new rules of the road, right,

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 4>big text, start and understand how that works. But when

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 4>it comes in video, okay, pay fifteen percent, that's breadcrumbs.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>You can raise prices fifteen percent. You need access to China.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 4>You can't give Huawei on a silver platter that market.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 4>So as it continues to play out, I think investors

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 4>have accepted they want to video open access to China

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>because that continues to be the golden goose that Jensen's

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 4>going after.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Dan.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 5>I want to quickly go right back to what we

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 5>were talking about here when it relates to data centers.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 5>How concentrated is in Video's revenue right now or like

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, the top five hyper scalers still the overwhelming

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:10.239
<v Speaker 5>majority of data center sales.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's concentrated. But that's just the nature right

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 4>now big text three hundred, what fifty during sixty billion?

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>But it's going to spread sovereigns enterprises the rest of

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 4>the world, and Vidia is going to continue to own

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>that so contrade today when you look out three four,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 4>five years ago, that concentration will continue, I think to

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 4>diminish as more players get into AI. But there's one

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 4>chip fuel in it. It's in video.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Dam How do you think about the competitive environment for

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>in Nvidia?

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Here?

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Is it AMD? Is it Huawei? Is it others? We

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know about at the moment.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Here, well, glease issue in AMD clearly competition. I think

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.559
<v Speaker 4>that we continue to be bullsh in that in terms

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of getting more and more pieces of pie. Huawei is

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>a competitor, but that's the whole reason that you don't

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 4>want to just give them full access to China because

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 4>that will help them narrow the gap for bulls obviously

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 4>on Broad common others. And I think, look as this

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>plays out, in Vidia is years ahead of any of

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 4>their competition. And even when you hear talked about you know,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 4>US government and obviously you know SoftBank investing in Intel.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Intel is you know, so many years behind.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, they continue to really have just a massive

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 4>uptil battle. And that's why video is top of the mountain.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dan, your Penn State Nitley Ions open the

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>season Saturday, three thirty pm on the CBS Television network,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Compariment plus against Nevada forty three and a half point favorites.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you feel about you Nitley Lions this year?

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, I was at practice last week State College.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>I told you, I think this is the year. I

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 4>think we win the nanty. We have some tough games

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 4>of Oregon Ohio State, but I think Big ten continues

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 4>to hold the mantle. I like al our Singleton and

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Penn State. I think I think we'll be holding the

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>trophy in January.

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I like the call LEAs and clear and confident. Dan

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>ives Global ahead of technology Webush Securities appreciate getting a

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>few minutes of Dan's time here today on Nvidia and

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>big tech. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Anastasia Amoroso joints as chief investment strategist at Private Wealth

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>at Firms Partners Group. Anastasia, the market's been so fixated

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 2>on AI and then I guess Nvidia is probably the

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>poster child for AI. How do you think about that

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>as a theme for the market. How important is that

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to you? The NVIDIAs of the world in this AI?

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Sure well, obviously very important, and Paul, I'm with you.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 6>I thought the Nvidia numbers were just fine. It's really

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 6>interesting that on the surface, investors were disappointed because in Vidia,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 6>despite the fact that they beat and raised, they didn't

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 6>meet the loftiest of expectations. Of course, that probably makes

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 6>sense because the stock has rallied as.

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Much as it has, I think over one hundred percent.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 6>Since since the bottom in April, so I thought the

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 6>numbers were fine, and the AI theme is obviously hugely important,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 6>and I think in Vidia highlights that it's still top

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.239
<v Speaker 6>of mind in front and center for investors.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>And I say that because, you know.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Analysts focus on the growth rates that are tapering off,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 6>but consider the base.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, consider the.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Fact that AI hyperscalers are going to spend four hundred

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars in AI cap x in twenty twenty six.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 6>This would be a number that was unthinkable about just

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years ago. So we're at a significantly

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 6>higher scale. But what happens at that point? It's natural

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 6>that some of those growth rates taper off, But for us, Paul,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 6>it's still AI is such an important theme, and I

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 6>think in Vidia results also highlight that there's so many

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 6>other ways to access that, including in private markets, including

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 6>in infrastructure.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's what we're really focused on.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when we look at any sort of earnings

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 5>report from Nvidia, there's a lot of anticipation heading up

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 5>to it, and we do see a lot of these

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 5>lofty expectations. As you noted, is there any concern that maybe,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, expectations are too high for some of these companies.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they've certainly been ratcheted up. But I will

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>say that if.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 6>You look at the history of Nvidia, for example, it

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 6>has a history of delivering on those expectations, and maybe

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 6>on the exact earnings day, they don't always deliver on

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 6>the loftiest of expectations. But what you see over time

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 6>is the price continued to march higher because the expectations

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 6>have continued to march higher. So I think that's something

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 6>that supported the stock and probably will continue. And look,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, broadly speaking, if I think about is AI

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 6>meeting expectations, I think it is for what it is today.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 6>We are starting to see some early signs of monetization,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 6>and you can think about it in terms of a

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:57.359
<v Speaker 6>couple of pockets.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>You can think about it.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 6>In terms of cost reduction, in terms of productivity improvements,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 6>and also in terms of actual new revenue streams. And

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 6>I think the actual new revenue streams maybe are a

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 6>little bit further off for some companies. Although I think

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 6>we are starting to see more cloud, we're starting to

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 6>see utilization, We're starting to see more social media success, for.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Example with our targeted ads.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 6>So I think you start to you do have some

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 6>positives in that revenue generation pocket, but you have more

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 6>and more positives that companies are citing in terms of

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 6>efficiency gains and in terms of cost reductions.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>And so that's.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 6>Why the momentum for US for AI is likely to continue,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 6>because there are tangible benefits that more and more companies

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 6>can point to.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>So what are the ways are you suggesting that investors

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 2>get exposure to AI? A lot of folks saying maybe

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 2>like power generation or something like that. How do you

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>think about that? Because not everybody is comfortable paying some

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of these technology multiples, and maybe a lot of folks

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>think that some of these tech names, like the software

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>names or maybe the hyperscalars, have kind of outrun comfort level,

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>so they're looking for other ways.

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Right, Well, I think the first thing investors have to

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 6>do is take a giant step back and just size

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 6>the opportunity set. Right, a couple of years ago, the

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 6>GENAI total addressable market was somewhere around two hundred billion dollars.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 6>You fast forward to twenty twenty seven, twenty thirty, you're

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.359
<v Speaker 6>now looking close to a trillion dollar TAM for artificial intelligence.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 6>So that means that it's not just nvidiaan semiconductors. But

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 6>it's a whole host of beneficiaries, and I would put

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 6>them in two sorts of opportunities bucket. The first one,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 6>I would say, is an infrastructure. We have to build

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 6>up the infrastructure to ensure that AI is possible.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So what does that mean.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 6>That certainly means data centers, and not just any data center,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 6>but an AI specific data center, which.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Requires more power density.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Which requires greater connectivity, which requires more cooling.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's a big topic for us.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 6>The second one, as you mentioned, it's actually power generation.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 6>You can't really run that data center without the power.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 3>And if you think about the power.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 6>Consumption, and it's for some of these things, it's approaching

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 6>one gigawot, you know. That's what we're talking about here.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 6>The third component, which is not as well talked about,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 6>I would say, is actually fiber and all sorts of

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 6>wireless connectivity. You know, it's one thing to train AI

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.599
<v Speaker 6>in a data center, let's say, in the middle of

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the country without a proximity to the end user. But

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 6>it's a whole different thing if you start to do

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 6>inference and you need that instant feedback loop and reaction,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 6>so you need fiber. You need you know, dense network,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 6>you need towers, you need small cells. So there's so

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 6>many opportunities within infrastructure. And then Paul the other thing,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 6>I would say in software, there's going to be winners

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 6>and losers in software. But companies that we're emphasizing are

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 6>those that maybe have a proprietary data set.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really important.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 6>They are developing AI tools, like large language models that

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 6>are able to use some of that proprietary data. They

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 6>automate certain workflows and in some cases completely sort of

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 6>substitute what a human may do in that situation. So

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's definitely a careful selection approach. But I

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 6>would say so many of those companies AI software companies

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 6>are actually available in private markets, much more so than

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 6>what's publicly traded today.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 5>So you know, we heard that Nvidia expects to spend

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 5>three to four trillion dollars on AI infrastructure through between

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 5>now and the end of the decade. Here, do you

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 5>have any sort of thoughts about what CAPEX looks like

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 5>right now, what is spending right now in the space

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 5>technology more broadly when it pertains to AI spend.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, let's look at the hyperscalers for example, you know,

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 6>I mentioned that in twenty twenty six they're likely to

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 6>spend four hundred billion dollars. That's up from three hundred

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 6>and fifty billion that we're forecasting for twenty twenty five.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's up a lot.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 6>From you know, one hundred billion dollars so run rate

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 6>just a couple of years ago. Now, the interesting thing

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 6>about that is those estimates have been consistently moved higher,

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 6>and that I think goes back to the point is

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 6>a demand for AI at this point is really insatiable,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 6>and it's because we're starting to see those early signs

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 6>of payoff. And so you know, if the question is

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 6>do we have a concern about the sort of massive

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 6>spend on AI, I wouldn't say so because the demand

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 6>is just so robust.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's back away from the air. I talked

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit last week to talk was about the

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve and what are they going to do with

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 2>interest rates? What did you take away from Jackson Hole

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and moving forward here through major.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Right, Well, it was probably a strong Evan nod to September,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 6>as we could have expected from Fetchair Powell. And you

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 6>know what's interesting is he clearly pivoted to focus on

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 6>the labor market weakness, and we saw that once again

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 6>in the conference board. For example, we saw that the

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 6>labor market differential meaning the jobs that are plentiful versus

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 6>hard to get, that continues to narrow. So that suggests

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 6>that labor market weakness. The other thought that I thought

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 6>was interesting from Jackson Hole is that while inflation is

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 6>surely likely to spike in the coming months, they're willing

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 6>to look through that. And part of the reason for

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 6>that is because they don't expect it to be sticky.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 6>They don't think this is going to be systemic, they

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 6>don't think is going to be structural. The reason for

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 6>that is actually that weakening labor market. And you know,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 6>if you're trying to raise prices into a weakening consumer

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 6>or into a weaker jobs market, you're likely not going

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 6>to be successful. And so that's becoming part of the

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 6>FED narrative as well. So I think it is a

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 6>layout for September. I mean, barring just a huge upside

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 6>surprise on payrolls, which I don't expect, or you know,

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 6>barring I would say not only a spike in inflation,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 6>but a spike in inflation.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Expectations, and I don't think we're seeing that. Do you

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 5>agree with that view from the Fed right now? I mean,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 5>of course we know about this dual mandate. It's about

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 5>stabilizing prices, bringing down inflation, and of course maximum unemployment

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 5>or maximum employment excuse.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Me, Yeah, I do actually very much agree.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, I do think the FLA story, the teriff

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 6>for re lated induced inflation is a one time step

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 6>up higher in the price levels, and I very much

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 6>agree with the argument that you don't have the labor

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 6>market strength in order to be able to fully pass

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 6>through those increases.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 6>The other thing I would say, if you look at companies,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 6>including our portfolio companies, they're using a mix of tactics

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 6>in order to deal with tariffs. Some of them are

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 6>passing through all of the cost increases, for example in

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 6>the data center space, because they can. Some of them

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 6>are passing through partial cost increases. They're working with suppliers

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 6>to absorb some of those TERRAF related increases as well,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 6>and some of them are shifting supply chains.

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 3>So for that reason, I.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 6>Don't think we're seeing a huge we're going to see

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 6>a huge spike in inflation as it could have been

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 6>in the coming months.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's the first part that I agree with.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 6>The second part I agree with is the labor market

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 6>is clearly.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Weakening, and I would say it's sort of I don't

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 3>want to say the precipice, but I'll call it. It's

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of on edge.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 6>It's sort of on this edge, and if you tip

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 6>it over, you're going to tip it over into weakness.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, if you look at the unemployment rate of

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 6>four point two likely go into four point three percent.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 6>If you look at the layoffs, you know, we're just

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 6>this close to actually slipping into outright potential negative job growth.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 6>And by the way, you know, I mentioned that if

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 6>companies are not passing through the cost increases, what are

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 6>they doing. They're absorbing that in their margins. So that's

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 6>why the labor market in turn is again on this edge.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 6>So I do very much agree, and I hope we

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 6>see a rate cut in September. I do associate scope

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 6>for a couple more this year.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Other than technology. What screens well for you guys these days?

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you'd do it by industry, sector,

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>by factor, how do you guys try to find some opportunities?

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 6>We do it by theme and also of course by

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 6>industry sector as well. But when I think about some

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 6>of the themes that we're excited about, it's clearly the

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 6>digital transformation and the many sectors that it touches. We're

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 6>also investing along the sustained nobility theme as well. And finally,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 6>this notion of new living. The way we consume, the

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 6>way we take care of ourselves, the way we exercise,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 6>the way we live is all very different today, and

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 6>in many ways it's tech enabled.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Further, I would think of it in terms of different

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 6>sectors within sort of the private market space, and it's

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 6>it's goods and its services, it's goods and products, it's technology,

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 6>and it's also healthcare, health and healthcare sciences. And so

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 6>we're we're finding a multid of opportunities along all those,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 6>all four of.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Those, digging into healthcare because I mean, it's the worst

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 5>performing sector so far this year in the S and

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 5>P five hundred. Where are you seeing opportunities there?

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 6>So clearly healthcare in the public markets has been the

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 6>mercy of what's happening in Washington, d C. And the

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 6>policy there. You know, one secular growth in healthcare, I

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 6>would say, is within pharmaceuticals and the fact that so

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 6>many R and D dollars have gone into new clinical

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 6>trials and new discoveries and eventually for some companies those payoff.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 6>That's not actually where we're taking our risks, but rather

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at pharmaceutical services that cater to the large

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 6>or small farmer companies in helping them develop some of

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 6>those new biologics. So we think the services side of

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 6>pharmaceuticals is a better risk adjusted return in order to

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 6>capitalize for what is a trend in healthcare, which is

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 6>the growth in the number of molecules that are being created.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Where do you see the just private capital going. It

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 2>seems like the deal market's kind of picking up, seeing

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>some more from MNA IPOs becase it's some really successful

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 2>tech enabled IPOs this year. Is that suggests to you

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that maybe the capital markets are picking up and that

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>could be a.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Driver they are actually picking up. And I feel like

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>this maybe.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 6>Is catching people by surprise, because when you look at

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 6>the numbers year today, the first half of the year,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 6>the M and A activity is up about thirty percent.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 6>If you look at the IPO market up about twenty

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 6>one percent, and Paul, You're right that it's not just

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 6>the volume and the number of companies that are, you know,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 6>seeking that public listing, but it's also the performance. If

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 6>you look at the average IPO of a company year

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 6>to date, it's it's up fifty or sixty percent, so

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 6>it's been successful.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's an accident that this level of

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 6>activity is happening. I think public market valuations are interesting

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 6>to some of those private market companies becoming listed. I

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 6>think it's increasing consumer confidence and also business confidence, which

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 6>we've seen quite a turnaround actually since April. And finally

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 6>it's you know, the market is sniffing out a RAID

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 6>cut and so all of those things are supportive for

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 6>capital markets activity. So we've seen a very robust first

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 6>half of the year already. We've actually seen an acceleration

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 6>in the third quarter as well. So I suspect, especially

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 6>with a RAID cut in September, this should continue.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>And have to labor to everybody else get back to work.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Anastasia Almarroso, she's at work, chief investment strategist Private Wealth

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>at Partners Group, joining us live here on our Bloomberg

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and Act report shooting. We appreciate that stay with us.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>watch US Live on YouTube.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 2>John Murray, he's the CIO of NFJ. They're based down

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 2>in Dallas, Texas. John, how do you think about inflation,

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the labor market and maybe how the FED should be

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>proceding here?

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 8>So a couple of things I would say, Paul, the

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 8>first on inflation, I think inflation is going to cool,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 8>and I'll say that for two reasons. The first is

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 8>that housing, which is the biggest component R one third

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 8>of CPI, that should continue too slow. And the reason

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 8>for that is real time rents tracked by Zillo are

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 8>flat to negative. On top of that, as a fundamental

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 8>bottom up stock picker, I can see that in the

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 8>FFO reports coming out of Mid America apartments funds flow

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 8>from operation funds.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, cover reads.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 7>So we always dook about.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 8>Okay, okay, I like that, so you can see it.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 8>You can see it in the numbers. So for those reasons.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 8>I think that people are underestimating and that's a twelve

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 8>month lag, and so that data should be coming out

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 8>and you have inventory building and vacancy rates rising. And

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 8>that's because when rates were low, people built a lot

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 8>that all came on the market, and now you have

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 8>restricted that because rates are high. So there's an imbalanced brewing,

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 8>I think. So I expect that to roll over. And

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 8>then the second piece is around services, which is a

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 8>quarter of the CPI. Healthcare is a big chunk of that.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 8>And again bottom up basis. So you guys have seen

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 8>U and H, you've seen Humana. Well, a lot of

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 8>folks don't realize that the insurer portion of that basket, okay,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 8>is calculated based on margins, not what you pay at

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 8>the doctor. Everyone says, well, why healthcare inflation keeps going

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 8>up up, up, up up, But it's not based on that.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 8>The insurers is based on the margins. Margins have been crushed.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's going to come down and that's

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 8>going to give the room a lot more ammo to cut.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 5>So speaking of cuts, I mean market is essentially pricing

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 5>in a cut in the coming weeks here in September.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Is that also in line with what your expectations are.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 5>And if so, what's the cadence afterward for cuts?

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, the two year bond yield has been screaming at

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 8>the FETI cut for a long time now. So you've

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 8>got that down there at three point six versus four

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 8>and a half. You know, let's give a little bit

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 8>of a sneak preed for what could happen when they

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 8>start to move rates lower.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 7>The Russell two thousand.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Value okay, on Friday was up just over four percent.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 8>You got one third of the entire the entire year's

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 8>gain of the S and P five hundred a day.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 8>So like you, I think, think about that for a second.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 8>It's like all year the SMP, Grind, Grind Grind and

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 8>vida Ai, all these amazing companies. You get one third

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 8>of that return in a single day, just because Jpowell

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 8>opens his mouth and says we may need to lower rates.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 7>So this is a coiled spring.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 8>And to get on another topic just briefly, with regard

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 8>to unemployment, I actually think it's a moral issue that

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 8>we're waiting to lower rates to see unemployment go up,

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 8>because why are we doing this? We have a system

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 8>that encourages debt. That is the incentive structure that is

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 8>embedded with how interest is deducted.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 7>And yet we're waiting to see unemployment tick up.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 8>We're waiting to see people lose jobs before we make

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 8>we make barring costs lower. And I know that the

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 8>inflation goes of the seventies are haunting the FED. But

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 8>I'll be honest, I think it's totally different with the

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 8>economies more globalized, unionization's way down, It's a totally different landscape.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 8>So I think we should rethink this entire discussion around

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 8>waiting for unemployment to go up before we cut.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 5>So what do you think the FED should be squarely

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 5>focused on right now? Is the priority here stabilizing prices,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 5>bringing down inflation, or maximizing unemployment? Where do you think

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 5>their eyes are fixed?

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 8>I think well, I think they're pivoting to the unemployment picture,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 8>and they should be, and they should be and that

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 8>should be the primary focus. To be honest, the inflation

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 8>pictures already tackled. We're down at the long term range.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 8>The long term range for inflation is two and a

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 8>half to three percent, going back all the way to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 8>the nineteen seventies.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 7>That's where it's been.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 8>The reality is I have a bit of an issue

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 8>with this whole discussion because we're talking about the rate

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 8>of change. Things aren't cheaper. Hamburgers are more expensive and

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 8>they're going to stay more expensive.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 7>We all know this. Cars are more expensive, houses and

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 7>more expensive.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 8>The rate of change calculation is what they target, and

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 8>to be honest, the cumulative graph or inflation does this

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 8>over time. So the idea that we've tamed inflation is

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 8>a bit of a misnomer. It's just how the calculation's done.

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 8>But unemployment is the real issue because if you have

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 8>people that lose their jobs, that is a real toll

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 8>in the psyche of Americans, and that's an acute problem

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 8>that is harder to solve. So I think, based on

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 8>where the two year bond yield sits, they should lower rates,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 8>and they should be quick about it, and they should

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 8>be more dynamic about it. And I think waiting too

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 8>long presents serious risks to the US economy.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>If the FED is going to be in a rate

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>cutting mode for the next twelve eighteen months, what do

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you own? What do you want to own?

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 7>So I mentioned small caps.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 8>I think an area that is just primed to outperform

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 8>are the regional banks. Let me give a couple comments

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 8>on this. The price to books for regional banks. Some

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 8>of these are trading back to where they were in

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 8>March of twenty three during the banking crisis. No one's

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 8>looking at this. Price to books are very attractive. But

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 8>on top of that, you've got earnings growth in the

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 8>mid teens fifteen sixteen percent. Some of these are growing

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 8>faster than growth stock. So I'm getting price to books

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 8>at a discount earnings growth. And if that yield curve steepens,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 8>and it should and it should, they're going to print money.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 8>So those look very attractive. They're twenty percent of the

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 8>Russell two thousand value. You can't get a small rally

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 8>without the banks. You can't get a value rally without

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 8>the banks. We've been in a decade growth market. I

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 8>like regional banks here. I think they're prime. No one's looking.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 8>They're growing big dividends, and the regulation going on with

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 8>the Basle three requirements for big banks is going to

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 8>level the playing field more for the smaller and mid banks.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's stick with another sector that is very rate

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 5>sensitive as well, real estate.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing there?

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 7>I like real estate, but not all of it.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 8>Industrial routs look really attractive names like Proligious, Rexford, First Industrial,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 8>a couple of things on these They have massive structural tailwinds.

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 8>I don't know about you guys, but Amazon keeps coming

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 8>to my house pretty regularly.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 7>So those boxes are around the clock.

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 8>So those, uh, those need to go through those logistical

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 8>warehouses and ports. Those are strategic assets. These are some

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 8>of these are trading at the biggest valuation discounts in

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 8>a decade, namely Proligious as kind of a Hallmark company.

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 8>Very juicy diviting yields. They're not at risk of being caught.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 8>Evaluations are attractive. Again, no one wants to really own

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 8>real estate. They're non existent in the growth indexes.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 7>So I like that space a lot. I think there's

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 7>major upside of these names.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 8>And you saw them move big on Friday, and they

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 8>are a coiled spring. So when do you want to

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 8>own real state? Ironically when capital gets turned off? So

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 8>where are you avoiding?

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 5>I mean you mentioned that there are opportunities you're looking

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 5>at industrial, What about what areas?

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you a little.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 8>Bit so there are I would say that you know,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 8>if you look up and down the cap scale, and

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 8>you look to where the opportunities. I would say that

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 8>some of the growth areas are priced to perfection. You've

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 8>got really high multiples, particularly in some of the semi names.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 8>I know those names are firing and all cylinders, and

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 8>they look great. Broadcom is an example of that. It's

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 8>a great company, but you're paying a lot. And so

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 8>I think that if you look at the market as

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 8>a whole, some of the technology names are more expensive

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 8>than I would argue people should pay for those multiples,

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 8>and it makes sense the markets at all time high multiples.

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 8>But that being said, there are plenty of technology names

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 8>that still look good. Some of the software names look

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 8>very interesting to us. Google is a name that we

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 8>really like here. You know, that's now one of the

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 8>largest weights in the Russell one thousand values, So that's

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 8>a value stock. I love how Frank Russell gets to

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 8>decide what's in and out. But that's fine. But I

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 8>think there's a lot of opportunity in that name as well.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 8>And they've got one of the best teams around Quantum

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 8>ai Talent, and they're trading one of the lower multiples.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 8>Tons of cash, buybacks, dividends.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 7>Et cetera.

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>For being like, yo, what you call in the bond

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>market here? Where do you see opportunities if at all

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>in the bond market.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'm an equity guy. Guy, I'm an equity guy,

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 8>so I won't motificate there. But what I'll say is

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 8>I think that the equity income area of the market,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 8>namely those reachs we talked about those banks.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 7>If you think that rates are going to.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 8>Come down and you like bonds, and you should really

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 8>like some of the equity income areas of the market.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Great stuff is always John, Thanks so much for joining us,

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 2>John Murray, cio at n FJ, giving you some good

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>names there, some good thoughts on some themes there in

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the marketplace for a feed a reserve that looks like

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>it's getting ready to cut us with us. More from

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>It's time for the famous Lisa Matteo newspaper segment, Lisa, what.

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Do you got first?

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Today?

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 7>Famous I'm excited.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.959
<v Speaker 9>Okay, yes, Nora, welcome to newspapers. Okay, So the job market, right,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 9>we know for entry level workers, it's a little bit

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 9>of a slump, right, But the Wall Street Journal actually

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 9>has a story it says, not if you're in AI

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 9>and you've experienced in machine learning. They're saying some of

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 9>these kids in their twenty I call them kids, sorry,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 9>in their twenties, that many of them are making a

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 9>million dollars a year. Okay, this is a new report.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 9>It says base salaries for even non managerial AI workers

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 9>zero to three years experience increase by abound twelve percent

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 9>from twenty twenty four to twenty twenty. And they're also

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 9>moving to management roles twice as fast as some of

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 9>the other folks who are just doing regular you know,

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 9>software engineers. So there's a company called Data Bricks and

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 9>they said, if you have a generative AI research scientists

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 9>as little as two years experience, they can make a

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 9>base salary between one hundred and ninety and two hundred

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 9>and sixty thousand dollars there, and if you include the

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 9>stock grants, it's even more.

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 9>It just goes to show you, you know, exactly how

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 9>much these students can make when they come out of

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 9>college having these AI.

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Skills and what companies are looking for.

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy. So I mean, is there an AI degree

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 2>or is it just I mean it's so new, I

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 2>mean it's very nice. I guess it's machine learning versus

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>software engineer. Correct? Correct, because a software engineer that's been this.

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 5>It's like the next generation y software engineers and the

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 5>next iteration here.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so that's the way to go, I know. Okay,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 9>So this one, I just want to say, I'm sorry

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 9>kids before we get to the story. A school cafeteria staple.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 9>New York City public schools could be disappearing. We're talking

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 9>about the chicken nugget.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Guys.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 3>This is serious, Okay.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 9>No, but the reason why Okay, So there's these new

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 9>food standards, right, they were announced this week. They go

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 9>into effect July twenty twenty six. It's for like a

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 9>dozen city agencies and that includes the Department of Education.

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 9>So they want to do things like ban process meats

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 9>like chicken nuggets, create new restrictions on artificial colors, preservatives,

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 9>further limit those low calorie sweeteners, increase offerings of plant protein.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So mayor Eric.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 9>Addams is saying, you know what, we're going to make

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 9>New Yorkers healthier. You remember he tried that vegan Friday

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:37.479
<v Speaker 9>thing back in twenty twenty two.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 7>Didn't didn't kind of work out.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 3>He tried it.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 9>But a lot of educators are saying, you know what,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 9>the kids might not like this, and what if you

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 9>have those picky.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 7>Eaters, what are they going to eat instead?

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 9>Because now they're going to be hungry. So it's a

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 9>it's a battle in the New York City public schools

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 9>for the nugget.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 3>So they'll just you know, skip out on lunch. You're like,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 3>this is this is too healthy for me.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm not gonna eat it, you.

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Know, because you do have the picky eaters. I know,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I had one.

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 9>I had one. He grew out of it, thank goodness. Okay,

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 9>I gotta go to cracker Barrel Paul for you. Okay,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 9>all right, you know they went back to the original logo, right,

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 9>but the New York Post is saying, now you have

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 9>the workers. They're going on social media complaining about the company. Right,

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 9>They're complaining about how much money they're making, their hours

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 9>are cut back, and they're also complaining about fake homestyle cooking.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not sure.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 9>Did you ever have the meat.

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Loaf when you were there? No, you never did the

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 3>meat I did. I always get the pancakes.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 9>Well, you're traveling on the road, right, you're a crackerbll yay,

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 9>let me try the meat loaf.

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So I did.

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 3>It was okay.

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 9>But what they're saying now is because they've been cutting

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 9>back on kitchen staff. What the meat loaf actually is,

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 9>it's off a truck, it's frozen, it's prepackaged and these

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 9>sealed things. So all the basically workers do is they

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 9>take it out of the steel package, pop it in

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 9>the microwave, and there's your homestyle. So people are just

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 9>like going off about it. They're saying they're cutting back

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 9>on their hours because they don't have to give him

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 9>the health insurance benefits if they cut back their hours.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 9>But it's this whole back and forth now on social media.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 9>The company hasn't said anything about it, but it's this

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 9>like continuing thing with with the restaurant.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 2>It's been in the headline, Yeah, it's been in the headlines. Crazy.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>The stock is up eighteen percent year to date, a

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of molatility. It's up fifty percent. You spoke to

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike Mike Helen yesterday and BlueBag Intelligence. He covers the

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 2>restaurants for BI. He says, this management team is doing

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a great job. Wall Street loves.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 7>Them, yes, and even this whole absolutely.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 2>You can see it in the stock prices. He said,

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>they weren't getting younger people. The older people that were complaining,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:36.919
<v Speaker 2>and maybe or the people that are complaining on social

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 2>media weren't the ones coming into the store. Interesting, So anyway,

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>it's just a different take on what's going on there.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, LEAs man tell you with the newspapers. Thank

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>you so much.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 7>Listen live each.

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Weekday, seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.