WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: August 13, 2024

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Here's the lead ist, Donald Trump, taking aim at Vice

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 3>President Kamala Harris in a wide ranging conversation on X

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>with Elon Musk. The conversation coming after Musk endorsed Trump

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>last month, with Trump's campaign looking to curb a wave

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 3>of momentum for Harris, Henrietta Trees and Beta Partners joins us. Now,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta a lot of talk through about this particular discussion.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to start with what was your main takeaway?

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>The main takeaway was that this was a great opportunity

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>for X to promote spaces. I mean, over a million

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 4>listeners at some point, but it was sort of two

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 4>two and a half hours of two guys.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 5>In a room agreeing with one another.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't call it an interview, but more of a

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 4>conversation that touched on all the hits that you hear.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 5>From a Trump rally or other.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Press press briefings that the president and former president puts on.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 5>There wasn't a whole lot of new information there.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 4>The main takeaway for me was that Elon Musk is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 4>interested in getting further involved in the federal government, being.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Part of a federal sort of.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 4>Task force to take on government spending and efficiency, as

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>he calls it.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 5>But that was really the newsiest part of the interview to.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Me, Henrietta, what I took away is that Musk was

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 6>advocating for two key things. One to stop this demonization

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 6>which I think someone of you is coming from the

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 6>far right when it comes to sustainability and evs, but

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 6>also deregulation, and he brought it up a number of times.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 6>Do you think he was successful Musk in convincing Trump

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 6>potentially some Trump acolytes on that call.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that there has been a history of Musk

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 4>being able to move present former President Trump, specifically electric vehicles,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 4>government subsidies of that industry, in particular when it comes

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 4>to deregulation. I think that's already a big part of

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 4>the platform. When I speak with Republican staff, that's always

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 4>a refrain. So I think there's a primed audience for

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>that conversation that could certainly be receptive to that. What's

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 4>obviously interesting about that is that you simultaneously don't have

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the votes to repeal the federal subsidies for all.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Of those industries in the clean energy tech space.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 4>The manufacturing tax credits eighteen House Republicans to send a

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>letter to Speaker Johnson saying, hey, we need those subsidies

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>to continue going.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 5>They promote job growth in our districts.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 4>They're promoting you know, research and development, they're countering China.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>So I think they're going to have a lot of

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>trouble actually governing on that agenda next year if former

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 4>President Trump is reelected.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 6>So last night was pretty light on substance, but potentially

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 6>from the Harris camp, we'll actually get some policies on Thursday.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 6>We have not seen a policy proposal yet from the

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 6>Harris Walls campaign, and they're going to be coming out

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 6>with this economic plan.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What are you expecting, Yeah.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 4>We're expecting the plans to be rolled out around Thursday. Obviously,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 4>there are not a lot of heavy hitting interviews happening

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 4>right now, last night being an example, So I don't

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 4>know that the Harris Waltz team needs to get two

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>in the weeds.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>My advice to clients is to focus on the bill that.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>The Houseways and Means Committee put out in twenty twenty one,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>which receives widespread support from the Democratic Conference.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 5>It includes a top corporate tax rate.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Of twenty six and a half percent, it's graduated in

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>and I think, overarchingly, whatever Harris does put out on Thursday,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 4>take that as the high watermark when you go into

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Congress next year in the off chance it's not a

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Republican controlled set, and you're going to have to thread

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the needle very very closely to get two hundred eighteen

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>votes on anything in the House and fifty one or

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 4>sixty in the Senate. It's going to be much more

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>lenient than whatever a Democratic proposal comes out looking like

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 7>In the meantime, Henrietta, we're about a month away from

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 7>early voting starting, and by all accounts, this is going

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 7>to be a lot of early voting compared with historical references.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Is Donald Trump more or less out of time in

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 7>trying to define Kamala Harris?

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 4>I have two things to say on that. Number One,

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 4>the most important thing that happened last night is that

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Arizona put the abortion issue on the ballot. That is

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 4>something that got doubled the number of signatures that they need.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 5>They didn't bring abortion up once. That's the whole state

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 5>of Arizona.

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 4>If Democrats hold on to Arizona and pick up Nevada

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>and keep it in the blue camp, that seriously undermines

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Trump's electoral college strategy.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 5>So they should be focusing on that.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 4>And I think time has run out on Trump being

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>able to define himself in a way that's favorable to

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 4>the majority of Americans on abortion, certainly with gdbans position. Secondarily,

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned early voting, seventy two percent of early mail

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 4>in ballot requests in Pennsylvania came from the Democratic Party.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>What the Republican Conference led by Trump and sort of

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 4>the concerns over election fraud have really driven is a

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>material tactical disadvantage in denigrating mail in balloting, which allows

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>the campaign to bank voters, Get those people off your

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 4>roles once they've already voted, and focus.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 5>On the people you need to turn out on election day.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 4>It's a tactical disadvantage that I think the Republicans have

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>been screaming about for several years, but to no avail

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 4>at this point, Henry.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 7>But it also brings this possibility that Republicans can continue

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 7>the line that they did at the last election, that

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 7>it was rigged, that there were issues if it was

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 7>all mail in ballots, that they weren't genuine. How concerned

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 7>are you about a peaceful handover, not a handover, a

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 7>peaceful continuation of power, I suppose if Kamala Harris is

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 7>the president.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>You know what's really interesting, and I heard this from

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Republican staff as long as a year ago. Keep in

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 4>mind why there was a delay twenty twenty and why

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 4>there was a delay in calling Nevada and upending the

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 4>Arizona turnout or decision making process.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 5>It was because who was in office at the time.

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 4>When Biden is in office, which he will become this November,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a much more orderly process that

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>adheres to what's actually.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Happening on the ground.

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 4>No one's going to be calling the governor of Georgia

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 4>saying find me the votes. So I think who is

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 4>actually in office right now materially impacts whether this will

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 4>be a smooth transition.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 5>I expect that it will be.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 4>You can claim that there was broad but it's going

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 4>to be certified, hopefully within the next day or two

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 4>after November fifth, and.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>HATI, given the fact that we haven't gotten a lot

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of policy proposals that people actually are taking seriously and

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.559
<v Speaker 3>wondering how much you actually do, think that the Federal

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Reserve is going to avoid cutting rates too much or

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 3>too soon in order not.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>To seem like a political agent.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>And I say this because in the absence of real policies,

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 3>we have heard a lot from the Republican camp, from

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 3>jad Vans as well as Donald Trump about having a

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>more political hand in the Fed, whereas the Harris camp

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>is talking.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>About not so much. How does that color your view

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we have to focus on what's going

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 4>to be happening next year. Extending the twenty seventeen tax

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 4>cuts is going to cost four.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Point six trillion dollars.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting a lot of inbound questions from clients about

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 4>whether there will be deficit reduction next year.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 5>There's no scenario where the deficit is renewed. Next year.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 4>There will be substantial federal spending. It'll happen as soon

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 4>as September thirtieth of this year.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 5>I expect we.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Will continue to get aid to Ukraine, albeit a smaller

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>and lower amounts, along with Israel. There will continue to

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 4>be spending on par with what we've had in the past,

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 4>which is about one point seven trillion dollars just to

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 4>keep functionality. And then next year we have to keep

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the tax bill extended, and I suspect that almost none

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 4>of those tax cuts will expire, So the FED is

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>going to have to contend with some of the political stuff,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 4>but more importantly with just the fisful outlays that are

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be coming through, whether Democrats or Republicans win

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 4>next year.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think engaging with the FED and trying.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 4>To meddle from a perspective as somebody who's there when

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 4>we did Tarp and the Auto Baila and that's not.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 5>What I want to see.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>You need the autonomy of the FED, and I think

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 4>that they'll fight you the Neil for that.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Henrita Trees and Veta Partners. Thank you so much.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Four season CEO Alejandra right now saying his company is

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>seen in strongest year ever, writing this short term uncertainty

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>given the current geopolitical macroeconomic pressures are impacting traveler sentiment,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:37.359
<v Speaker 3>but the luxury sent segment is more resilient, Alejandro joins us. Now, Alejandro,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for being with us. Pleasure to

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 3>have you here in studio. I want to start there.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it true that you're not seeing any slowdown whatsoever

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in the luxury element?

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 8>Good morning, Thanks for having me. It's a pleasure to

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 8>be here. And I love the fact that we're talking

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 8>about in luxury hospitality. Yes, I mean, we had a

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 8>really strong first half of the year compared to last year,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 8>much better. When I look into the booking trends for

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 8>the second half of the year, even going on into

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five, they look very strong as well. You know,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 8>I think there's two things that are happening there. First,

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 8>and for most, is that the luxury guest or the

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 8>luxury consumer continues to be very resilient. They continue to spend.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 8>You know, that desire for experiences to explore continues to

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 8>be there. But also I would say that from a

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 8>four seasons angle and from a four season's point of view,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 8>we do offer a very clear value proposition to our guest.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we do have very proud to say that

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 8>we have the very best hotels in the best locations

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 8>and we provide the best service to our guest. And

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 8>when you have that as the brand proposition, and that's

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 8>what we do at four seasons, there's a demand for that.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 8>And by the way, this is not new of this year.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 8>We've been operating down for sixty years and has been

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 8>the constant all throughout the period.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So what has changed?

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 3>And I'm wondering not just from the consumer who's able

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>to spend, but also from the employer, Yes, and who

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>you're able to recruit. For a long time, there is

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>this earth of people willing to work in hospitality in

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 3>the direct aftermath of the pandemic. Do you see it

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>as being much easier now to hire people and sort

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>of easier to also retain them without massive price increases

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>wage increases.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 8>Yes. I mean, obviously for us, a key component of

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 8>what we do is through our people, and we are

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 8>a service company and the most important asset is the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 8>people that we have with us. So we place a

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 8>lot of emphasis in making sure that we are the

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 8>employer of choice in every single market that we operate.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 8>We do spend a lot of time training people, developing

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 8>them for us. We do measure employee engagement twice per year.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 8>We are at the two percent across all industries in

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 8>terms of employee engagement. So it's a topic that we

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 8>spend a lot of time because we do believe that

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 8>we need to have the best and most engage employees

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 8>with us. We haven't had. I mean, obviously after the

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 8>pandemic there was a little bit of pressure from the

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 8>labor point of view. We don't see that anymore, but

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 8>again it's because of the air force that we place

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 8>in making sure that we are the employer of choice

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 8>in the marketing where we operate.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 7>I want to know about more about your customer, but

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 7>specifically like the ultra luxury and there. I know you

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 7>have a private jet service something like one hundred and

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 7>fifteen thousand dollars for charter a day.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 9>How much demand is there for that?

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Yes, you know, it's interesting And just to give you

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 8>the context of this is obviously Four Seasons started as

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 8>a hotel and a resource company, and we are now

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 8>the leading luxury hospitality company and that's where our guests

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 8>experience the brand. What we found over time is that

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 8>because our second business is the residential brand, the residential

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 8>so guests they stay with us, they experience the brand,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 8>and then they are willing to buy a residence with us.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 8>So that's sort of the journey that they start experiencing

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 8>with four seasons. And the third piece is what you

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 8>just said is the journey's experience based travel that we

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 8>promote as a third line of business. So if you

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 8>think about the whole analogy, guests they stay with us,

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 8>they live with us, and they travel with us. They

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 8>developed such a comfort with the brand and with the

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 8>brand promise and the brand proposition that they're willing to

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 8>spend that amount of money in traveling for twenty days

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 8>through ten four seasons in Africa, in Europe and so forth.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 8>So for us, it's been more around creating this lucture

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 8>ecosystem for four seasons that our guests are eager to travel.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 8>By the way, we have all the intineraries for this

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 8>year sold out for the rest of the year, so

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 8>it's a very successful product and it taps into that

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 8>desire to experience, to explore that we find in our guests.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 7>You're saying we're too late for it, then.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, twenty twenty five, we're opening the.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 7>Good To keep in mind, I mean just talking about

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the different mix of your businesses.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Only one doing in this.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Space, and it obviously is an exclusive space of those

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 7>who can offer this, but you think of the online

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 7>resources also trying to give also experiences to What does

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 7>competition look like right now?

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, competition because of the attractiveness of the luxury space,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of competitors coming in. I think we

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 8>have as a Four Seasons the advantage of the brand.

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we are the most We continuously measure brand preference,

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 8>brand awareness in terms of our brand, and we continue

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 8>to be the number one luxury hospitality brand, and I

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 8>think that carries a lot of weight. But it's because

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the day, we're able to deliver

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 8>that value proposition to our guest. I mean when it's

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 8>interesting because I do interact with a lot of our

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 8>guests and when I ask them what do they like

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 8>about the Four Seasons, the first thing they tell me

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 8>is that I know what to expect and I've been

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 8>able as a guest to explore remote destinations. So for example,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 8>I've been able to go to Garabora. But because there's

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 8>the Four Seasons, I feel comfortable because I know what

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 8>to expect and to have that level of conceit extensy

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 8>and that brand power is very, very unique. So I

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 8>think we're uniquely a very well positioned.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 6>Where do you see the demand right now in terms

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 6>of the hot spots top five people are traveling too.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, it's interesting because and I'm going to

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 8>say something which is a little bit of contrariant. When

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 8>I look into the history of Four Seasons over the

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 8>last years, travel patterns haven't changed much. For example, fifty

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 8>five percent of our revenues come from the Americas, the

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 8>majority of in the US. More than fifty percent of

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 8>our guests, they are from the US. And whether they

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 8>travel to the US right now during the summertime, they

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 8>travel to our South Florida collection, they go to Hawaii.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.119
<v Speaker 8>Beyond the US, they go to Mexico and then Europe.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 8>The fact is that this has happened for many, many years.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 8>Americans are going to go to Europe probably once a

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 8>year every summer. I mean, that's so, and we're seeing

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 8>that again this summer, but it happened last year, prior year,

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 8>prior year. But again America representing fifty five percent of

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 8>revenues for US in the Europe and the Middle East

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 8>represents twenty five percent of the revenues, and there the

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 8>dynamics are similar. Europeans they mostly stay within Europe. They

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 8>ventured into the Middle East or Africa. And then we

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 8>have APAC, which is twenty percent of our business. Three

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 8>percent is only China and that's mainly regional travel.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 6>Do you still see the Chinese consumers spending as much

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 6>in luxury hotels the same way the US consumers.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 8>No, they have not come back. I mean when I

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 8>look into what was spending prior to the pandemic is less.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting because they are spending less in China, so

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 8>we still don't have the same race that we used

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 8>to have prior to the pandemic in China. But they're

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 8>starting to spend more internationally, but internationally within the region

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 8>meaning Japan for the most part, because of visa issues

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 8>and many other things. They still have not come back

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 8>to Europe or the US, which is where we saw

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 8>them prior to the pandemic.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>There's real question here about how much and towards is

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>slow of Apollo called us out for us this morning.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>He said, all you people in media, and I'm paraphrasing,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>just keep using everyone as an anecdote to try to

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 3>paint a macro picture. Your company has been around for

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 3>sixty years. How independent of the macrocycle is it?

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about something that.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Is a complete microcosmon to itself of people who have

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>disposable wealth and are going to travel no matter what,

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 3>versus a company that does have some sort of sensitivity

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>to what's going on in the underlying consumer centimacy.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I would be lying if I would say

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 8>that we are immune to any microeconomic geopolitical impacts, because

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 8>we are. I mean, at the end of the day,

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 8>that uncertainty impacts travel or sentiment, and people don't travel

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 8>because of that. But obviously we've been operating for sixty years.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Have We've gone through these cycles and they go away,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 8>and at the end of the day, what we see

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 8>in is year or year that the market continues to grow.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, trouble and torurism has been growing for many

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 8>years now, that desire to experience, to explore, continues to

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 8>be there. I think it's really interesting when you look

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 8>into the luxury consumer that our composition of guests about

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 8>twenty percent are boomers, forty five percent are Gen X,

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 8>thirty five percent already are millennials, so that transfer of

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 8>wealth is starting to happen, but we're not losing the boomers,

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 8>so it means that the market is expanding. So always

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 8>year and year, there's going to be more demand, more growth,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 8>and at the end of the day as well, we

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 8>as as a hotel and restore company, need to be

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 8>at the forefront in terms of creating amazing experiences so

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 8>we can satisfy the demand. So I don't think at

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 8>the end of the day that the demand just comes

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 8>by itself. We need to have, like we do, a

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 8>very special product, a very special service proposition to our guests,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 8>so at the end of the day, they are eager

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 8>to come to a four seasons.

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're doing great with the baby class.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.959
<v Speaker 3>I hear that you really crushing it, you know, particularly

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 3>south of the US.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Paid actor.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 8>No, it was, you know, but that's one. It's a

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 8>tremendous learning experience because sometimes we so much more you're

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 8>marketing that doesn't provide any outcomes, But then these special

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 8>authentic moments are the ones that the consumers value the most.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 8>This was a complete viral moment, but it was completely authentic.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 8>We had nothing to do with it. In the end,

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 8>we have more than three hundred million views through various

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.479
<v Speaker 8>digital platforms on the four Seasons Baby. Obably, we got

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 8>a spike on on searches on four Seasons Orlando, so

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 8>it was very good. But again it was very authentic,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 8>which ultimately is what.

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 9>People like I love it.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I wonder how many board meetings for about the four

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 3>seasons Baby. All right, now four Seasons, CEO, thank you

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>so much for being.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Joining us. Now I'm so pleased to say it's now

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Leazei of.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Deutsche Bank, and I want to start thank you so

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 3>much for being here. Matt, I want to start with

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 3>your impression of how predictive to Danny's this PPI print

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 3>is for tomorrow's CPI.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I would agree with Mike that not very Usually

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 10>what we look at are the few components that go

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 10>into PC the form the inflation gage that the FED

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 10>focus is on, so their portfolio management, healthcare, a few

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 10>of the other airfares or used car prices are most important.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 10>I would downplay, you know, what we're seeing in the

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 10>headline or the core just for that reason. I think,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, we have to go through some of the details.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 10>There are some reasons to think that some of those

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 10>components could have been stronger, so portfolio management. Inflation one

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 10>tends to lag the market. So the strength we had

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 10>in markets and prior months should actually lift that inflation component.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 10>But I think ultimately as little feed through into how

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 10>we think about the CPI beyond those components that matter

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 10>for the pc I wouldn't change too much of how

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 10>we're thinking about the CPI tomorrow. But the market is lean,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 10>I think in a very doughest direction from a CPI perspective.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 10>You know, the market pricing is around a zero point

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 10>one percent core CPI print, below what consensus is expecting.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 10>So the market is kind of anticipating soft inflation numbers

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 10>which allow the Fed begin to cut rates.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>And this really is basically feeding into that kind of

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>coiled spring that we've got coming into tomorrow. In terms

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of that dubvish positioning, Is there anything that you're seeing

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>in the data that should push back against that because

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>at one point you are more dubbish than the market

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 3>in terms of rate cut calls.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you're actually more hawkish.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Than the market with three rate cuts for the remainder

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>of this year. So is there anything in this data

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that would give you pause before throwing your hat in

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 3>the ring and saying you know.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>What, market? You're right?

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, thinks changed quickly, you know, as you mentioned about

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 10>a month ago, we shifted to three twenty five basis

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 10>point back to back to back cuts and was viewed

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 10>as aggressive at that point in time. You know, I

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 10>think from the Fed, what we've heard from them is

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 10>wanting to kind of take a step back, be able

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 10>to see the data.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 10>I think my read on the data is you have

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 10>a clear slowing, including in the labor market, but it's

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 10>not recessionary at this point in time. You still do

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 10>have inflation that's above target, but I think inflation risks

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 10>have really dissipated, and so I think the Fed should

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 10>be very comfortable cutting rates should they go by fifty

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 10>basis points. You know, the market has been priced kind

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 10>of fifty to fifty for that at this point in time,

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 10>I think the data will determine it. So if we

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 10>get confirmation in the next job support that the latest

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 10>weakness was real, then I think it could be quite

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 10>likely that the FED cuts by fifty basis points. If

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 10>you see a reversal of some of that weakness, which

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 10>is my baseline expectation, if you have the continer to

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 10>consumer continue to come in resilient, then I think that

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 10>the Fed can have a path here of going by

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 10>twenty five basis points at each meeting.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 7>Can you just break down with the difference of going

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty five and fifty is on impact? Is it signaling

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 7>or is there actual economic legs up that they give

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 7>the economy by going by fifty instead of twenty five.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so at the moment, a lot of this is

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 10>already priced into the market, right, So two year yields

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 10>are reflecting an aggressive rate cutting cycle, a little bit

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 10>more aggressive than we're anticipating. I think markets are reflecting

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 10>that at this point in time. So if the Fed

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 10>were to go by twenty five basis point increments rather

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 10>than that, yields would rise, maybe you see equities come.

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 9>Down a little bit. But I'm skeptical that the Fed

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 9>being a.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 10>Little bit more hawkish is going to tighten financial conditions aggressively,

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 10>And the reason is the only way that they would

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 10>do that is if the economy is looking resilient, and

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 10>I think the market is highly leveraged to negative news

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 10>on the economy, as I saw with the jobs report.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 9>Anything that looks like it's a downside risk.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 10>So I think if we get resilient news on the

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 10>labor market and consumer financial conditions can remain easy even

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 10>if the FED only goes by twenty five basis point.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Clip, are you surprised or even maybe concerned the Fed

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 7>hasn't given themselves that optionality, announced that optionality of doing

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 7>fifty basis points that at the moment they're still discussing

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 7>whether or not to do even just twenty five.

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think you know what we will often hear

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 10>they make decisions at a meeting, and it's only for

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 10>that meeting. I think what we've heard from FED officials

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.479
<v Speaker 10>since the jobs report and since market volatility has been

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 10>entirely appropriate, which has been Yes, there was some weakness

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 10>in the labor market data, but they are not overly

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 10>worried about it. They're not worried that it was signaling recession.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 10>I think what they were seeing in markets, they thought

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 10>was being driven by technicals and positioning in a nonwind

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 10>of positioning, and so I far I think that's played out,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 10>and the market went from pricing over one hundred and

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 10>twenty five basis points this year down to less than

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 10>one hundred. And if you get good data, I think

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 10>it'll give them the optionality. So I think they're in

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 10>a fine place at this point time, and chair pal

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 10>at Jackson Hole can help guide guide us on how

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 10>they're thinking.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt, you say the consumer's resilient.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of what Home Depot said this morning,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 6>which is that they're in this deferral mindset that they're

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 6>waiting to make big purchases.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think resilience is definitely different than kind of

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 10>robustness or strength, and so I think we're coming from

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 10>a consumer environment where you just had a very robust

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 10>consumer over the course of twenty twenty three, and it

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 10>was across the income distribution. It was kind of hard

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 10>to find pockets of weakness. You now do have some

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 10>pockets of weakness. You do have some pockets of softness.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 10>I think it's more reflecting of a normal type of

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 10>an environment, you know that said the labor market data

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 10>does have some risks to it. Job gains did slow,

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 10>we think some of it was due to hurricane effects,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 10>but they have the uneployment rate has risen up to

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 10>four point three percent, and job gains remain resilient only

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 10>because layoffs remain low. So if there are risks that

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 10>I am looking at, it is that that layoff picture

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 10>changes and that would clearly undermine the consumer in a

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 10>way that turns it into it kind of a more

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 10>negative dynamic.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 6>If we are now at full three percent of the

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 6>uneployment rate is basically what the Fed wants to be

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the year. Does that in itself

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 6>signal that they are behind the curve.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 9>I don't think it's signals that they're behind the curve.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 10>I think it's signals that their dot plot in June

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 10>is not appropriate at this point in time. So when

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 10>they set that forecast with that unemployment rate, they had

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 10>one rate cut this year. I think that no longer

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 10>is a reasonable view at this point. I think it's

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 10>more likely that the debate is between going twenty five

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 10>or fifty basis points, and I think that will be

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 10>a real debate. I think it'll be dictated by the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 10>data I honestly think that there's compelling arguments on both sides.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 9>They are restrictive.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 10>The inflation data is telling them that there's not as

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 10>much upside inflation risks, and then it depends on whether

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 10>not the economy is actually as resilient as we think.

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 10>If it is, then I think that they should go

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 10>by twenty five basis points, and I think they probably will.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 10>But if we get kind of confirming evidence on the

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 10>labor market front, that gives them scope to go more.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Aggressively, giving some credence to that fifty basis point a

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 3>rate cut thesis.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>If you are just joining us, we did just.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Get that PPI number and did come in softer than

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>expected inflation, then not necessarily the concern and opening the

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 3>door really to the Fed to cut rates perhaps even

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 3>more aggressively. Zero point one percent was PPI final demand

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>versus the expectation of zero point two percent.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>That leaves the year over year final.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Demand at two point two percent versus the expected two

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 3>point three percent.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much across the board, it seems softer.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 3>What you see in markets is pretty much a collective cheer.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>You see across the board, stocks rally much more aggressively

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 3>led by the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You also have bonds.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Rallying, as you see two year yields fall below four

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 3>percent solidly. So although we're tracing some of the earlier

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>rally that we saw three ninety six sixty eight, it's

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty much across the board. The biggest bid though into

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the two year, and if you bleed that through foreign exchange,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 3>you see the dollar softer as you expect some sort

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 3>of rate cutting cycle to commend, certainly in September. A

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>question now the depth of it, the yeurogaining versus the

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>dollar one oh nine forty five. Michael mckeis still with

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>us here. Our economics corresponded, what are you seeing in

0:25:59.080 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the details of this?

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 11>Well, the big change, as I mentioned earlier, was that

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 11>services prices went down, while goods prices went up, largely

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 11>because of gasoline, but we also saw passenger car prices

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 11>fall two tents. Health Care prices were basically flat, insurance

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 11>prices basically flat. The big increase in the numbers came

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 11>from portfolio management. Matt Lizzetti's colleagues are causing inflation at

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 11>this point. Portfolio management prices rose two point three percent,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 11>one of the biggest moves in the whole PPI. So

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 11>the fact that you get paid either.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 9>Way works out well.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Melazetia is still with us and can responding. What do

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you make of the details.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so portfolio maagement rose as I kind of signaled.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 10>I think actually, I think maybe the most important thing

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 10>was healthcare being flat. So healthcare in the PC is

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 10>twenty percent of.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 9>The core PC index.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 10>It's basically as important as rent and know we are.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 10>We've been signaling some upside risks to that because it

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 10>tends to be leveraged on healthcare wage growth, and that's

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.239
<v Speaker 10>been very strong. You got a soft print there, so

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 10>that is as a read through to core PC. It's

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 10>a very good indicator for the Fed.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 7>Matt. Just while you've been talking, I've been looking at

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 7>the interest rate probability tick lower and lower. I mean

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 7>not a dramatic move, but you were saying it's about

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 7>fifty to fifty. It's now more than fifty percent chance

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 7>that they go fifty basis points.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 9>The next meeting.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 7>Are we putting too much weight on each individual data

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 7>point as this market rolls on?

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, the market is highly sensitive to each

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 10>data point.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 9>I think just seeing some big moves.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 10>It doesn't take much to move, you know, by ten

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 10>percent for a cut. It's only two BIPs on in

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 10>terms of the pricing.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 9>But you know, it makes sense. We're in an uncertain.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 10>Environment at this point in time, and the FED is

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 10>providing little for guidance. I think appropriately, if the FED

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 10>is providing little for guidance, then it means the FED

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 10>is data dependent and we should be sensitive to those moves.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 10>I do think the healthcare component here is important. That

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 10>being flat rather than strong is a Dubbs signal for

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 10>the core PC.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 9>We'll have to wait what we get from the CPI tomorrow.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 3>Mat Is that a really really smart Thank you so much,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 3>As always, Mount Assadi of George.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Bag This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>best in markets, economics, angio politics. You can watch the

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.