WEBVTT - White Sox Wild Series Split vs. Yankees

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Howard, my husband fell at a construction site. I knew

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't safe.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 2>It ain't and law. We're one of the largest filers

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 2>of workers' compensation claims in the state. If you've been

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>hurt on the job, in a car accident, or suffered

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a medical mistake, call three one, two six million.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 3>From your favorite source for Chicago White Sox Talk, delivering news, interviews,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>analysis and more. This is the Socks Machine Podcast with

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>your hosts Jim Margolis, James Began, and Josh Nelson.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 4>You see any great airs in the mirror after at

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 4>least last two days.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 5>They're already there. But yeah, tough couple of games. We're

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 5>really had to grind it. Contributions from everybody, obviously extra endings.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 5>There's a ton of situational stuff that you have execute

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and guys really executed.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Welcome, Welcome to the Sox Machine Podcast, part of the

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 6>Foul Territory Network. I'm your host, Josh Nelson. And that

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 6>was White Sox manager Will Vennable speaking Bose game after

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Thursdays two to one win, another extra innings win for

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 6>the Chicago White Sox as they some way, somehow, in

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 6>a very wild way, get a series split against the

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 6>New York Yankees as that concludes their seven game homestand

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 6>they end up finishing three to four, But it looked

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 6>really dour for the White Sox against the New York

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 6>Yankees this week. And joining me, of course on this

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 6>episode is Sox Machines Beat reporter James Sveigan and managing

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 6>editor Jim Margulus and Hello Jensen. We'll start with the

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 6>show about this series split for the White Sox, and

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 6>from my perspective, I'm impressed in the way that they

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 6>were able to win these last two games and really

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 6>demonstrated the resiliency that this.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 7>Young squad has.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 6>They had no right really to win on Wednesday thanks

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 6>to back to back home runs in the eighth inning.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 6>They were just simply being dominated by Yankees starting pitching

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 6>through this series, and that was also true on Thursday

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 6>as the game was scoreless, but in extra innings the

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 6>White Sox were able to grind out those wins, and

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 6>I just found that to be a very impressive performance

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 6>and even more reasons to get excited about this White

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 6>Sox team and be hopeful of what's to come, as

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 6>we're just three games away, four days away from the

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 6>trade deadline for the White Sox and wondering what Chris

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 6>gets will do to help add to this squad. But Jim,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 6>I'll start with you. What does splitting this four game

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 6>series with the New York Yankees mean for the White Sox.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 8>It means not losing ground in the central basically holding serve,

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 8>playing a good team, and not getting the doors blown off,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 8>which is like when first game happened, second game shut

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 8>shutdown at a kind of Cleveland like open to that

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 8>series where they could give up the entire lead and

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 8>one four game swoop and then back to games. Not

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 8>necessarily the prettiest way to do it, but a reminder

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 8>that one, the White Sox are resilient and two, either

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 8>the American League is questionable in high end quality overall,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 8>or the White Sox are either patient enough or talented enough,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 8>pesky enough, whatever you want to say to drag teams

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 8>to their level and make them just as frustrated, just

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 8>as you hear a lot of the same complaints about

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 8>fundamentals too aggressive a base running, trying to force issues

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 8>on defense, not hitting with the runners in scoring position.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, Yankees fans are saying those things about their

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 8>team and X ratings losses. And you know, my one

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 8>of my long running mantras here is no team's problems

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 8>are unique. But I think when you have two teams

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 8>that are right now slated four postseason spots, a possible

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 8>October preview of some kind, it's good to be able

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 8>to either climb up to a team's level or drag

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 8>them down to yours.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 6>And I can understand from like the White Sox fans

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 6>perspective that maybe are not as impressed because the Yankees

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 6>don't have Aaron Judge or Cody Bellinger the White Sox

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 6>and John Carl stan for that matter. It's not like

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 6>the Yankees offense is at full power. They still can

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 6>be dangerous. Ben Rice has been excellent for them offensively,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Jazz Chisholm Trent Grisham can provide some off to output. Yes,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 6>the Yankees at times did struggle to score runs and

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 6>that will be an issue for them while Bellinger's on

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 6>the il and who.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.239
<v Speaker 7>Knows the situation with Aaron Judge.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 6>But James still though the Yankees on the pitching side

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 6>of here to be at full strength and the White

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Sox being able to weather that storm long and off,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 6>especially on Wednesday, and Thursday to scratch out those wins again.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 6>I even though the Yankees are not a full strength

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 6>I still am impressed by the way the White Sox

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 6>came back and split this series. What is splitting the series?

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 6>What do you think this means for the White Sox

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 6>And what did you hear in the post game conferences

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 6>and the interviews with the players?

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it certainly feels better on the like it depends

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 4>on like sequencing, if they like have split these games up,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.119
<v Speaker 4>or if they had won the first two and certainly

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 4>lost the second two, it certainly has a much different

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 4>feel from it. Whereas like this makes it feel like,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 4>you know, they show their metal. They came back, and

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the element of it, and certainly like

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 4>the players aren't shocked or like feel like they've newly

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>proven this ability to do this. But I think it

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 4>certainly sends them to Tampa on a better note and

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>makes it feel like, all right, we are playing here,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, in our home stadium where they've had so

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 4>much success in a way that's familiar to them. Same time,

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 4>like if the biggest question with the White Sox is

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 4>like starting rotation, they won the two games where you know,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 4>basically their most successful starters over the season, you know, performed.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, then Noah Schultz only getting through three and

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 4>a third really put them in a situation that, you know,

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 4>it was difficult to n wind up. They didn't do

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 4>well offensively, you know, I think Anthony k look well

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 4>good overall, you know, even like it's kind of a

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 4>weird chopper, as much as he gave up like three

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of well hit balls in a row in the

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 4>second inning, like the one that like cashes into runs

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 4>seem pretty fluky.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>And then you have like Martin doing really well to

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 4>recover after a rough first inning, and you know, continuing

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 4>to say afterwards that he feels like he's trending in

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the right direction mechanically. And then to Burke being what

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 4>Burke has been for those last eight starts, and when

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 4>starting pitching is in line, they look a lot more

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>competitive and like they can hang with anybody. When it's not,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 4>it looks a little bit like, oh, well, this team

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 4>was a year early, wasn't it. Throughout that there was

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>a huge burden on the bullpen, and they certainly looked

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 4>better in the last two days, you know, with just

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 4>a herculean effer in terms of eleven innings total to

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 4>turn to versus like it's hard for them to get

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 4>the last five and two thirds of a game without

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, seeing an emplosion somewhere with Shultz. So I

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>feel like you saw the good and bad of the

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>pitching at times. I try to and I put it

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 4>in the recap, but like the offense has like certainly

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 4>had some games in the last like six weeks where

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>it just like seems like they can't get to a starter,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 4>or it takes a while, or you know, the drags

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a really late. But I do have to look up

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 4>the numbers and be like, oh, it's the top scoring

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 4>team in the AL. Maybe they have flaws, but like

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 4>literally every team in their compediing against his worse, So

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 4>how much should we freak out about, you know, Tristan

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Peters having a slow start to post All Star Break

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 4>and mcgil vargas like they've earned some trust to get

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 4>right with what they've done. But it's certainly I think

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the first two games had a feel of all right,

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>a better team is coming in and kind of assurding

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 4>itself the way they did in the series in New

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 4>York in a way. So for them to push back

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 4>on that, you know, kudos to them, and at this

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 4>point maybe we shouldn't be surprised. Certainly, Sam Mansinacci asking

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 4>him about it this morning or Thursday morning, at this point,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I was like, do you feel like like you guys

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of you know, turned around from at least a

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 4>small bad stretch. And he's like, there's nothing to turn

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 4>around from.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 7>We're good.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think they feel like they asserted themselves, like

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 4>obviously you have to prove it every single week in

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>the majors. But it didn't seem like something was beyond

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 4>or like oh wow, they've shown us this new thing.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 4>It's more like, oh, yeah, this is even when they

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>look bad for two games, Like this is the one

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>team in the league that hasn't lost four games in

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 4>a row. I believe still, like they that's crazy. They've

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 4>proven that they will swing around within you know, due time,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 4>even even after a couple of performances where they look

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty shaky.

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the White Sox haven't lost for straight this season. Jim,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 6>there is a time in two twenty four, I don't

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 6>know if they've won four games in thirty days.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 7>How long was that losing streak?

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 6>Again, like twenty something in or close to twenty twenty one. Wow,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 6>how much stains can change in a couple of years.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 6>I love the confidence, though, Jim from Sam Antonacci like again,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 6>we can be impressed everyone from the outside and still shocked,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 6>but it's not arrogance for these White Sox young players.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 6>And Colson Montgomery has mentioned it a few times now

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 6>that maybe they're too young, that they don't know any better.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 6>But I do enjoy as far as this type of

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 6>confidence of the White Sox beam, especially for them able

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 6>to climb back against the Yankees, and they're gonna need

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 6>it because they got a pretty tough road trip coming

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 6>up that we'll talk about later, starting in Tampa.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. I mean you could say they're faking it till

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 8>they make it when it comes to this kind of confidence,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 8>or you know, not willing to seed anything, and that's fine.

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, as long as they can back it up.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 8>It's I think the opposite. Not to invoke him unnecessarily,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 8>but Paige griff would be somebody who tried to fake

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 8>it till he made it, and he did not and

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 8>just sounded delusional to points you couldn't line up what

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 8>he was saying with what you were seeing there's no

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 8>reason to trust him. So I think there's a fine line,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 8>or at least a line to walk when saying that.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, when you never lose four games in a row,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, knock on wood for them. But it's a

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 8>testament to the fact that like, well, why should they

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 8>talk down about themselves or why should they admit it

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 8>if there hasn't been that stretch on paper showing that

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 8>they can really get into a tailspin.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 6>We'll be talking more about the White Sox starting pitching,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 6>especially Sean Burke, who was outstanding again on Thursday ten strikeouts.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 6>After a quick word from our sponsors.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There is one place to be entrede Deadline Day watching

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Foul Territory of course. A. J. Perdinski, Aeric Kratz, and

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott Braun will be live all afternoon speaking with insiders,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>reading tea leaves and reacting to unfolding deadline drama. Join

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>us on the FT YouTube channel at one ET and

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>stay locked in through the six pm deadline next Monday.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Foul Territory Network. It's baseball the way it should be covered.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Howard, I'm so.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Glad I saved your number.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>My husband fell at a construction.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Site of his in critical condition and new cookless.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm very sorry to hear that. I just want to

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>let you know I'm here to help.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, tell me more about it.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Work injuries not only affect the victim, but also everyone

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>around them. In can Launch, Chicago based here to advocate

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>on your behalf, with over one hundred attorneys in staff.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>If you or somebody you know has questions about a

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 2>work injury called three one two six million injury law

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>made personal, that's taking law.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 4>What'd you think of Bert Coberl.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Barke was outstanding? I think you know fastball is again

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 5>working for him, just a ton of confidence with it,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 5>just in the zone. He's getting swing and miss with

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 5>it and really opening up everything else. I thought, a

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 5>really good cutter again, today's just really get stuck here.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 5>I also thought, after like the third Fame a fastball

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 5>command was pretty bad.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 4>I think I love some stuff on the table.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 5>There's like some longer innings and counts. I was able

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 5>to finish as quick as I'd like to, But the

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 5>cutter is.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 8>Really good today.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 6>And then as always breaking down design it's good too.

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 6>That was White Sox manager Will Venable and of course

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 6>Sean Burke speaking postgame on Thursday, again, Sean Burke absolutely outstanding,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 6>six scoreless innings for the White Sox, ten strikeouts on

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 6>ninety one pitches, And James, it is a bit funny

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 6>to me to hear Will Vennable say that, yeah, Burke's

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 6>fastball again great, and then Sean Burke mentioning to you

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 6>and the other Beat reporters after the game, Yeah, my

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 6>fastball command wasn't all that great in the third and

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 6>fourth inning. But for this, again, this is consecutive starts

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 6>that Sean Burke has struck out ten plus hitters. Just

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 6>absolutely dominating from Burke today. What was the catalyst in

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 6>your point of view watching Burke on the field today, James,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 6>that led to the success?

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 4>First of all, Venable like understands almost every game for

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 4>the framework of did someone command like was the opposing

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 4>offense able to turn around your fastball? Were we able

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to be competitive or do damage on the fastball? Like

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>he that's his like baseline for like every game. So

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 4>if you ask him about like what the offense did well,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 4>what the pitcher did well on any level, like he's

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 4>he's probably going to like speak to like did did

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 4>they damage the fastball, Did they follow it off?

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Did they whi it?

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Burke might feel like he left some

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 4>in locations he didn't want to, but he didn't get

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 4>like if you can buy his four singer and sinker,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 4>you got eight whiffs off of it. And he continued

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 4>to sit ninety five, which was like a slightly above

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 4>like his ear average. It just reflects like his norms

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of dragged a bit up from you know, I

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 4>want to say he sat like ninety three point something

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 4>last year even though we knew he's capable of upper

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 4>nineties and really only topped out around like ninety seven

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 4>points something. You know, you know, hum drum on Thursday,

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 4>but has been more consistently having like this just the

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 4>more competitive version of his fastball on the zone, where

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>like even if he feels like he leaves the locations,

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 4>like it's not getting hit the way like it would

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 4>when he made mistakes or when it was a little

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 4>bit underpowered. So I think there's something what Venable's saying. Well. Also,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 4>while like Burke's self standards have just like rocketed up

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 4>in such a way where he's you know, this is

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 4>at least results wise, Like I agree with him some

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>like things are a little like spotty in points, but

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 4>like if you look at results in his career, like

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a short list contender for one of the best

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 4>starts of his life. It's six coolest Indians against the Yankees,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 4>but ten strikeouts. He has three double digit strikeout games

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 4>this month, but only five in his career. Like, I

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>know he's gotten used to, like, you know, being awesome

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 4>really quickly, but.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean he's a strong.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 6>Contender James to be American League Picture of the Month.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think, like I haven't looked at it yet,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>but right now, like it looks like someone deserving of

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>a vote. He feels like, and it's certainly true in

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 4>terms of like looking like how effective his cutter was,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Like I think he struck out Grisham and Chisholm with it,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 4>and I want to say another one. He feels like

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 4>this was a great day of like I was able

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to throw my cutter when I wasn't locating my fastball,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 4>or just like able to get whiffs off both the

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 4>slider and curve. Like it's like this kind of represents

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 4>if I don't have to lean on one thing. It's

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 4>not like, oh, if I don't have my huge four steamer,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 4>it's not getting tons of whiff or I'm not doing

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 4>my best curve ball like that dictates my start. The

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 4>fact that you can kind of like go to other

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>avenues and still be successful, I think for him is

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 4>what's standing out, Like I have confidence on all my

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 4>pitches right now in a way that he's really touting.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 4>So the fact that his arsenal has expanded so comfortably

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 4>and he can kind of see it all effective, not

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>necessarily so evenly distributed like this start, but so consistently

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 4>can turn to other options and not just be like

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I have to have perfect or great four seamers and

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>curves or otherwise it's going to be one and I'm

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 4>gonna you're gonna see me walk, guys. I think that's

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 4>what's standing out to him right now. Same time like

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's all kind of contributed, Like his

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 4>delivery is clearly clicked in a way that's allowed him

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 4>to make choices about what he feels like really fits

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.359
<v Speaker 4>in his arsenal. And you know, he's gotten so comfortable

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 4>with his curve and executing against lefties and the cutter

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 4>that if he hasn't outright just abandoned the change up.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like, well, it's really not that important for me

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>to get this right. I don't have to force myself

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 4>to throw it in situations where it seems pretty iffy.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's what every like super supernater guy

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 4>wants to feel about a change up, like truly a

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>choice to ever use it at all. And I think

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 4>he's at that point just because of how strong the

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 4>rest of those arsenal is. So I asked him like

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>straight up to like, I know you're quibbling some things here,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 4>but don't you kind of think this is the best

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 4>baseball you were throwning in your life? And he's like,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 4>oh yeah. So it's funny because like most guys high

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 4>school or college, you know, maybe they're just dominating in

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 4>ways like they never can replicate in the pros because

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 4>this pros are too hard. But like Burke is very

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 4>much like, yeah, like I was good, I could tell

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I could go to the next level, but like I

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 4>was never as consistent as I want to be. It

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 4>feels like he's these eight outings. They're not technically starts

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 4>because one of them at an opener, but like these

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 4>these eight starts are the most consistent he's really been,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 4>even though if it's the highest, you know, competition level

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 4>he's face in his career.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 6>It's funny that you mentioned like he's got other pitches

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 6>in his arsenal because looking at stat cast, podcast listeners

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 6>and watchers, opposing hitters against Burke's fourteen fastball are just

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 6>batting one to eighty against that pitch, and his knuckle

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 6>curve is two two. So I can understand, like, if

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 6>he's feeling a bit iffy James in his start that

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 6>it's not as sharp, or maybe the fastball is too

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 6>middle of his zone, it's too hit a ble that

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 6>I can go to the cutter, you know, after reading

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 6>some of your recent reports about Noah Schultz to like

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 6>try to keep it simple and maybe reducing from a

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 6>six pitch arsenal maybe down to like three for Noah's Schultz.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty clear that this fastball, curveball cutter accommodation is good.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean back to back ten plus strikeout outings. So

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 6>I don't know James, if Bert does need to change up,

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 6>for when he will need to change up again.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he doesn't really like there are multiple starts

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 4>in the stretch where he hasn't thrown it, and I

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 4>asked him about it and he's like, yeah, I've kind

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 4>of banged it, and like he mentioned throwing it a

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 4>little bit on Thursday, like just as like, but he've

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 4>views it as like not necessarily like a shape that

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 4>he thinks is super necessary in terms of like getting

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 4>something to move away from left eas He views this

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>purely as like a speed differential thing to kind of

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 4>mess up timing this whole dynamic that he used to

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 4>have of like you know a lot of these big

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 4>right handers who have big sliders or big curve balls

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 4>have like, oh, I can make everything move it's the left,

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 4>but I can't move and make anything go right away

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 4>from lefties. It's just not really holding him back right now.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not stopping him from getting left handed hitters out,

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's really it's not like the shape that's

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>missing from his profile, especially since he uses a sinker

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 4>so much and even the lefties. And he threw on

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 4>the Spencer Jones that was kind of in a spicy location,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 4>but he got him to fly out on. He's been

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 4>willing to do that pretty often. I don't think it's like,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 4>oh man, what am I going to do to get

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 4>anybody to not just kind of look, you know, glove

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 4>side on me over and over. It doesn't seem like

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 4>that's you know, occupying his attention the way it was,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, last year when he's really still figuring things out.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 6>And Jim, I think with Burke, like the the fastball

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 6>velocity difference. I was listening to the Game of the

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 6>radio and Len Casper and Darren Jackson were talking about

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 6>this point with Burke that when he is in the stretch,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 6>that's when you start seeing the fastball dip a little bit.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Where when he's in his wind up he can get

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 6>up to ninety eight and ninety nine. You usually don't

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 6>see those fastball velosies Burke out of the stretch. So

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 6>maybe that's it means pretty key, he's not walking a

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 6>whole lot. He only walked two batters in this outing

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 6>against the Yankees, So maybe that's something that we have

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 6>to take a deeper dive into and if that is

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 6>the difference, and maybe also leading success for Burke is

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 6>just simply not giving away free passes and staying out

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 6>of the stretch as long as possible. But if Game

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 6>one of the postseason were tomorrow. Jim Sean Burke's that starter, right.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 8>I hesitate to answer this question just because the last

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 8>two guys who had earned this mantle, Jane Smith, I

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 8>just watched him in Charlotte tonight, and.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 7>How did he look?

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 8>Just doesn't seem to have that same ability to bully

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 8>hitters with the fastball. I think last year when he

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 8>was on his game, like four seemers, Sinkers did the job. Basically.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 8>The changeup was there, curveball was there. He had some

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 8>breaking pitches to show, but it's mainly just relentless fastballsack, attack, attack,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 8>and the velocity isn't bad, but it's more like ninety

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 8>four versus ninety six. And he tops out at like

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 8>ninety six ninety seven and gets into bad counts to

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 8>where when they're expecting it, they can you hit line drives.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 8>So he's not so much a factor right now. Then

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 8>Davis Martin was that guy and you looked like he

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 8>was on an automatic All Star berth and possible Cy

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 8>Young votes, and then he hits this rough patch. So

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 8>now it's Burke, and so I'm tempted to try to

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 8>sidestep this in terms of like a sports illustrated jinks

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 8>or anything like that, to where you're catching somebody their

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 8>high point and then regression kicks in. But yeah, I

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 8>mean it's pretty obvious just in terms of how he's

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 8>mitigating everything. Just he's not giving up walks, he's striking

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 8>out guys. The contact that he's giving up is staying

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 8>in the park mostly, So he's controlling all three peripherals

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 8>the kind of breech Roy outcomes, and so when you

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 8>have that going for you, you can kind of get

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 8>by with the a single whether he has a little

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 8>bit of a lossy dip in the stretch, you can

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 8>get by with lesser stuff when you're still forcing hitters

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 8>to string together quality plate appearances against a pitcher who's

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 8>locating both fastball and breaking balls and kind of at

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 8>will in either count. That really isn't a fastball count necessarily.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, at this point, he's pitching like a postseason starter.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 8>And when you look at what Martin's done of late,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 8>although he bounced back very nicely after the rough first inning,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 8>and then you f k, who's kind of somebody who

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 8>battles through five I would say was probably the way

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 8>they characterize him. Then I think, yeah, it's Burke and

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 8>then distant second.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 6>Right. Now, well, where to take a quick break for

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 6>more words from our sponsors. But coming up after the break,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 6>we're going to take a look around the American League Central,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 6>update the standing, see how the other teams are doing

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 6>in the division, and preview this key road series of

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 6>the White Sox. They head to Saint Petersburg, Florida to

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 6>face the Tampa Bay Rays next on the Sox Machine podcast.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 6>Now taking a look around the American League Central, and

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 6>the Cleveland Guardians and Minnesota Twins both won their series.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 6>The Guardians won two out of three against the Reds.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 6>The Minnesota Twins were down three to nothing in their

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 6>third game against the Royals, two outs, bomb the ninth inning,

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 6>two strikes and Cody Clemens hits a walk off grand

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 6>Slam to win that series for the Minnesota Twins. And

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 6>the Detroit Tigers ended up losing their series to the

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 6>Baltimore Orioles. They were up seven to nothing in Trek

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 6>School's last start, maybe the last start with the Detroit

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 6>Tigers based on recent rumors. They were up seven to

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 6>nothing and they ended up losing that game. So a

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 6>really painful series loss for the Detroit Tigers when you

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 6>take a look around the American League Central standings as

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 6>an update before heading into this weekend, the Chicago White

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Sox still lead with the fifty seven to fifty one record,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 6>their two games ahead of the Guardians. We're fifty six

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 6>at fifty four to Minnesota Twins have battled back to

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 6>being five hundred. They're fifty five and fifty five, just

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 6>three games back at the White Sox. The Tigers are

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 6>seven games below five hundred at fifty one to fifty eight,

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 6>and the Kansas City Royals are forty six and sixty four.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 6>They are a distant last place right now, they're twelve

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 6>games back of the Chicago White Sox. A lot could

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 6>change here, guys, between now and the trade deadline, and

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 6>this gives me an opportunity to promote our next episode.

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Jim Margulus and I will be recording a new episode

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 6>on Friday, in which I'll be pitching some of my

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 6>ideas that the White Sox can make as far as

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 6>trades before the deadline. Will also be sharing your trade

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 6>ideas as well, so hit us up on social media

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 6>or most your trade ideas that you like to see

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 6>the White Sox make before the deadline. I guess we

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 6>can call this the mid season plan Project, Jim, where

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 6>our listeners and our followers on Sox Machine can make

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 6>their which is as well to see what they want

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 6>to when Chris gets to accomplish before the August third deadline.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 6>And of course again watch our friends over at fil

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Territory for their live show on Monday, as we'll have

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Ken Rosenthal, Aj Prazinski Aeric Kratz breaking it all down

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 6>when trades do happen. But I have to ask you, Jim,

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 6>I look at the standings the Minnesota Twins.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 7>They are still there.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 6>The fact that they're three games back of the White

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Sox has me a little itchy, especially now the White

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 6>Sox have six straight games against continuing this Ale East

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 6>part of the Gauntlet where they visit Tampa get a

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 6>day off before heading to Boston.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 7>Are you a believer in the Minnesota Twins.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 8>I guess I should be because I haven't been a

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 8>believer in them and they keep making me look dumb.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 8>So perhaps now is the time to get on the

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 8>bandwagon and try to sink it. They're another team. I

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 8>think that when you look at the components of it,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 8>the starting Rote is kind of okay but top heavy,

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 8>and Joe Ryan's been struggling as of late. The bullpen

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 8>has been kind of a mess all a year. But

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 8>they're getting by on hitting and having a modular lineup,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 8>and you know, Byron Buxton has been in out of

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 8>the lineup, but they've been able to compensate for it,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 8>and they have a pretty deep attack, and they have

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 8>some guys off the bench like Royce Lewis has come

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 8>back from Triple A and he's helped. So they've been

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 8>able to rotate guys in and out. Uh and it's

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 8>been pretty effective in scoring runs. It's just a matter

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 8>if they give up a lot of runs as well.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 8>So if they can you know, bash their way enough,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 8>then perhaps it is a way to hang around five

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 8>hundred in this kind of uneven imbalanced or I guess

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 8>balance in terms of just like nobody there are no

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 8>good teams right now or no great teams in the

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 8>American League, so they're in the white Sox of Ain

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 8>of Hell Raisers. I think that can just make a

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 8>team miserable pitching wise, and you hope that you just

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 8>bruise them enough. If you're the Twins to I guess

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 8>lose their senses a little bit, or lose their confidence

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 8>and get by on sheer brute force. It does make

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 8>me think, like, you know, the conversations that we've had

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.239
<v Speaker 8>about the Twins over the last couple of years, and

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 8>I was always, i guess not enamored with Rocco Baldelli,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 8>not thinking was a terrible manager, but just it felt

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 8>like the Twins had gotten stale, just with the front

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 8>office and with Baldeli there, and seemed like problems just

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 8>kept being the same problems the way we saw it

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 8>the White Sox, how sometimes their problems would repeat upon

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 8>themselves and it just seemed like nobody was really solving

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 8>problems where they were just kind of throwing different shape

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 8>or same shaped solutions at it. You know, maybe they

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 8>change the names, but nothing had really changed fundamentally about

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 8>the mix and they just had this low ceiling about them.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's probably the previous pole Ads as well,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 8>kind of setting that tone. But I think you have

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 8>a new poll Ad in charge, you have a new manager,

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 8>you have a new GM, and yeah you might get

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 8>some of that, you know, like we saw at the Phillies,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 8>just a little bit of a shakeup just with having

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 8>different people in charge, having new people, I guess decision

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 8>makers assessing the situation, trying to put their hands on

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 8>it and seeing what they can do with it. And

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 8>it might not be like a long term solution, like

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 8>this isn't resulting in a great Twins team, but it's

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 8>resulting in a better one, and I think it's a

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 8>feistier one or one with more power that when you

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 8>have teams that aren't pitching well like the Royals bullpen.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 8>It was funny. I was watching that game, or I

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 8>was watching the White Sox, but I was following on

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 8>Blue Sky and Craig Brown, who's ran about the Royals

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 8>for a long time, watches Noah Cameron throw eight scoreless innings.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 8>He's like, let's watch the Royals bullpen blow this, and

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 8>sure enough, like even he couldn't believe how they blew it.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 8>Like they had the first two outs like Lucas ersag

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 8>got the first two outs, and then they had three

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 8>of the next four hitters on two strikes, so at

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 8>three times they were one strike away from ending it

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 8>and give up a walk off Grand Slam. So against

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 8>teams that have these flawed pitching staffs, I think they

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 8>can just you know, kind of the death Star porch

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 8>is like, just fire missiles into it and blow it up.

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 8>Just with the deep lineup that they have, So yeah,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 8>I am taking them more seriously now, just because you know,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 8>with Buxton being hurt, like I thought, okay, he's been

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, his hips really been bothering him. You have

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Joe Ryan who's looking shaky like this is kind of

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 8>the lynchpin of their rotation and of their lineup. And

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 8>even when they're not on their game, they're still winning,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 8>they're still scoring runs. So yeah, you have to take

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 8>them seriously now.

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 6>And the Minnesota Twins head to Seattle, so they have

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 6>a series against Seattle Mariners, which the Mariners are still

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 6>in the thicket things, and the America League Quests before

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 6>they head back to Kansas City. So that's the next

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 6>six games for the Twins and again the White Sox.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 6>We talk about the race series in a moment. Three

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 6>at Tampa, three at Boston. Again, my neck is feeling

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 6>a little itchy. I was expecting the Minnesota Twins, I

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 6>have one of the worst records in Major League Baseball,

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 6>but CAP tip to them to be able to weather

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 6>their storms.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 8>As well.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Derek Shelton has done a very good job. It is

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 6>a surprise, just as surprising as the White Sox have been,

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 6>so have been the Minnesota Twins.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 7>And four days away.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 6>Let's see if Trek School does get dealt in how

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 6>that impacts the Detroit Tiger said, this does become a

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 6>three team race still in the America League Central, but

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 6>that makes this different gym. Instead of White Sox, Guardians, Tigers,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 6>it's White Sox, Guardians and Twins. We'll see what happens,

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 6>of course after Monday, but the Chicago White Sox boarded

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 6>they're playing and they are headed to Saint.

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Petersburg, Florida. Will also be sitting James.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Down there to cover that series for US because, in

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 6>a very weird way, if the season were to end

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 6>the day, the Rays would be the number one seed

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 6>and the White Sox would be the number two seed.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Could this be a potential American League Championship series?

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Preview?

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 6>Well, the White Sox are sorry. The Rays a sixty

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 6>four and forty four this year.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 7>They won their.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 6>Last two games. They're eight and ten in their last ten.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 6>They have been dominating at home this year. The Rays

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 6>are forty and sixteen. They win one game against the

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 6>White Sox this weekend, and they already clinch a winning

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 6>record for this season at home in early August. That's

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 6>how dominating the Rays have been at home. So this

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 6>is going to be a tough test for the White Sox.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 6>You're pitching problems for this series. Friday night, this is

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 6>a six to ten pm Central Time first pitch. Nick

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Martinez will take the ball for the Rays against Eric

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Favetti for the Chicago White Sox. On Saturday, this is

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 6>a three ten pm Central Time start. It's Drew Rasmussen

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 6>for the Rays against Noah Schultz. Tentatively right now, we'll

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 6>see if there's any adjustments by the White Sox, but

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 6>the plan is for Noah Schultz to make that start

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 6>on Saturday, and then on Sunday one ten I'm sorry,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 6>twelve forty pm Central time start, it's Griffin Jacks, the

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 6>former Minnesota twin out pitching for the Rays, and it'll

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 6>be Anthony k to go on Sunday. So big series

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 6>for the White Sox to see if they can do

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 6>what other teams have really struggled to do, which is

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 6>try to win a series in Saint Petersburg James, you

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 6>will be there as you are covering this series between

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 6>the White Sox and Rays.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 7>What's the biggest.

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 6>Storyline that you'll be following over these next three games.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 4>It's funny when I was at the All Star Game,

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Jason Starr came up to me and said, like, I

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>can't wait for the Rays White Sox ALCS and we

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 4>can proceeded to banter about it for a bit, which

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 4>my proposal is that it's somehow one sets a record

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 4>for most openers used in ALCS, and like Brian Hudson,

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 4>somehow like becomes like the record holder for like most

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 4>starts in a single ALCS because he opens like three

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 4>games or something ridiculous. He sounds like he's looking forward

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to it. Based off that description, I feel like they're

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 4>easy answers to this or chief answers. I should say

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 4>one is trades. Obviously it would be what we're I

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 4>feel like we really committed to the series for is

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 4>in case something like that happens. We're were welcoming new

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 4>people into the clubhouse. Obviously the deadline is until the

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 4>day after, but you know, certainly it socks have multiple

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 4>needs in a seller's market like this. Who knows how

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 4>many if they'll be able to check all those boxes,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 4>but if they are, likely one of them will come

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 4>a little early before the last day. We'll see. Second

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 4>one is I have been led to believe we're probably

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 4>gonna be finding out assignments for draftees on Saturday, most

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 4>notably Rock Chalowski number one overall pick As you mentioned,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 4>you're around these parts, so these are not storylines pertaining

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 4>to the series per se, but they're out there. I

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 4>think Noah Schultz certainly stands out to some degree just

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 4>because this rotation spot is the most in question, or like,

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 4>how do maybe there The Rais offense doesn't necessarily outside

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 4>of Junior Camonaro, Jonathan Aronda, like Yandi Diaz doesn't have

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 4>like these huge names on it to like invoke fear.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 4>But they're obviously able to match up a lot and

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 4>move on the bases and do a lot of things

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 4>like if you're create, if you're walking guys, or just

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of creating problems for yourself, and in ways that

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 4>struggling starters can that they can really be a pack

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 4>of branas on you rather than just kind of overwhelm

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 4>great pictures all the time. So that stands out. I though,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 4>am curious, like, can they this is like an elite

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 4>pitching team. Can the White Sox hit them? Like Drews

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Asmissen has been awesome, Griffin Jackson really good since movings

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 4>of the rotation like these are not I don't think

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 4>any of these matchups you really look like the pitching matchups.

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Nick Martinez is obviously be an effective and getting we contact,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 4>and you've certainly seen like uh pictures face the White

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 4>Sox and like challenge them the zone a lot and

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 4>get weak contact and kind of kider Montero their way

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 4>through like scoreless innings in the blink of an eye,

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 4>and you know, do they have ways of combat? Brian

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Weathers certainly seemed like he kind of did that just

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 4>getting weak contact below the zone. Uh, for seven innings

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday? Can they hit this team? They kind of

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 4>need to get here for It's weird to like the

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one White Sox are very much like you

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 4>guys should win a division and thus all the season

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>is about, like, all right, how are they going to

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 4>stack up in the playoffs? So what's their record against

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 4>winning teams? They were so clearly going to win the

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>whole time that like I feel like beyond just that

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>team not having nearly like the good vibes of this one.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 4>We just spent all that year kind of picking them apart,

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Like after the good first half, it's like, oh, are

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 4>they really that good? Are they really going to stack up?

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Are they really going to do more than just win

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 4>this bad division? Whereas like the White Sox win this

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 4>bad division, like it's you know, one hundred and thirty percent,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 4>like grade on your class, Like it's such an a

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 4>like we put up a picture of you afterwards, like

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 4>assessing them, like are they got to prove their playoff worthy?

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 4>The like doesn't feel like fair yet for like how

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 4>we should judge them. But at the same time, they're playing,

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, the best record in the AL. Want to

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 4>see if they prove their playoff worthy. They seem like

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 4>they're a much different team than the team that faced

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 4>the Rays earlier in the season Ulyast in terms of

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 4>like what we think they're capable of. So let's see

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 4>if they can handle elite pitching Teamsin's you know, Colson

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 4>Montgomery Miguel Vargus have both been probably a little bit

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 4>cold since the All Star break. The best version of

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 4>seeing them kind of fixed things probably involves, you know,

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 4>getting right against you know, a difficult stretch here that

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 4>they have coming up. So you ask, biggest storyline? I

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 4>listed five?

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Jim, the X factor for the White Sox, other

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 6>than score more runs than the Rays, what do you

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 6>think would be the big that will determine if the

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 6>White Sox are able to find any type of success

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 6>against Tampa or maybe even pull off the surprise and

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 6>win the series against the Rays in Saint Petersburg.

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, James took my answer a little bit, but I

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 8>can elaborate on it. With the pitching they're facing, the

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 8>specific into pitching they're facing with Nick Martinez and Drew Rasmus,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 8>and in particular, like they have really high arm angles

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 8>like overhead slots, throw a lot of fastballs up in

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 8>the zone. Even though Martinez throws more sinkers, he's okay

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 8>with using sinkers up in the zone also as a

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.919
<v Speaker 8>change up. So we've seen the White Sox against these

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 8>pittures with the I guess they'd call him Verdi with

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 8>the Astros, with the Mariners, we've seen them struggle against

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 8>that particular kind of pitture because at least last time

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 8>I check on SACas, they have the highest approach angle

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 8>in the game as a team, just with their batpath

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 8>to where they can get above them. So we've seen

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 8>them swing and miss, We've seen them hit a ton

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 8>of pop ups at times, and I think Martinez and

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 8>Rasmussen are probably the way they're built can exploit that

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 8>pretty well. So if the White Sox are going to

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 8>adjust to these teams, that can maybe either see them

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 8>in the postseason or plan to face them and you know,

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.959
<v Speaker 8>arrange their pitching staffs wdardingly. This would be a good

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 8>opportunity to show, even if they don't like thump them,

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 8>just showing that they can put up more fights, get

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 8>their bats up, get their barrels flatter to do some damage.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 8>And I think I'm also looking at this in this

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 8>regard facing a couple of writings and Tristan Peters. He's

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 8>scored for forty two in the second half so far,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 8>so you can kind of see what he contributed to

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 8>the offense by what he's not contributing right now in

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 8>terms of having that contact based approach. The line drives

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 8>the the I guess when it comes of bad balls,

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 8>the non easy outs, like the line you know when

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 8>Colson Montgomery makes now and it tends to be a

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 8>fly ball, a pop up, so he has to hit

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 8>the ball pretty square to get what he wants out

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 8>of the contact, whereas with Peters, you know, and Antonachi

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 8>is another guy who does this, so he can move

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 8>the ball around the field, mishit the ball and still

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 8>fine grass because of just how much ground they have

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 8>to cover. So I think he's valuable, and I think

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 8>the way he's struggling right now shows just what the

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 8>White Sox are missing. So if the White Sox have

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 8>a good weekend in Saint Petersburg, I'd imagine it's because

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 8>he's doing something to help.

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Peters right now looks like he's swaying with a

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 6>sixty ounce bat like it just looks either maybe he's

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 6>a bit fatigue for how much that he's been playing.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 6>The bat does look a little slow. But hey, you

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 6>had you had the walk off walk that helped the

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 6>White Sox win on Thursday. So we'll see what kind

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 6>of series happens between the White Sox and the Rays.

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 6>But that will do it for this episode of the

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 6>Sox Machine Podcast. Again, we'll have a new episode for

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 6>you guys over the weekend, as Jim and I will

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 6>go through my crazy trade ideas before the August third

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 6>trade deadline, and again pitch your ideas to us as well,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 6>which we'll be sharing those in the show either the

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 6>comments section at soxmachine dot com, in the YouTube section

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 6>at YouTube dot com slash sox Machine, or hit us

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 6>up on social media as we're on all the social

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 6>media platforms at sox Machine. You can follow us also

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 6>in Instagram and in Blue Sky. James again we'll be

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 6>in Florida covering this series. You can follow him at

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 6>j Rfigan and of course you can follow me at

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 6>socks Machine Underscore Josh. But again that'll do it for

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 6>this episode of the sox Machine podcast. Thank you guys

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.280
<v Speaker 6>so much for listening and watching. If you just discover

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 6>the sox Machine podcast, you subscribed to the show where

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 6>have you listened to podcasts? At a Spotify and Apple Music.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 6>If you do watch our videos which this is now

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 6>a video podcast, you can describe to a YouTube channel

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 6>at YouTube dot com slash sox Machine. If you enjoy

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 6>our work and win full access to all of our

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 6>coverage of the Chicago.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 7>White Sox at Major League Baseball.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 6>You can help support sox Machine at soxmachine dot com

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 6>slash Products in which right now, because the White Socks

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 6>are still winning, your first month is just fifty three

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 6>cents for the five dollars award of five dollars a

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 6>month here, we call it that the five War Tier.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 6>We also have additional tiers of support our Vegeance Committee,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 6>our BC members. Will we join us Friday for annual

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Sweet Night for the White Sox and Guardians game.

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 7>That's an extra perk as well.

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 6>So again, if you enjoy what we've been doing this

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 6>season covering the Chicago White Sox and you would like

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 6>more from us, and you would like to help support us,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 6>the best way to do that is go to soxmachine

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 6>dot com slash products and sign up today. The Sox

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 6>Machine Podcast is a production of Soxmachine dot Com. You're

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 6>on for all of things Chicago White Sox Baseball and

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 6>part of the File Territory Network alongside James Speaking and

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 6>Jim Margolis.

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 7>I'm Josh Nelson. Thanks for listening and watching.