WEBVTT - Surveillance: Eli Lilly CEO Sees Brighter Future

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jaily.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Let's

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do this. Let's dispense with the formalities right now and

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>get to David Ricks Eli Lily chairman and CEO, and

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I do this. John and Lisa have a lot of

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>questions about the news yesterday, But David, I think there's

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>massive confusion over all of these fancy words, and particularly

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>around vaccine, around anybody treatment. We conflate bacterial and virus

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>therapies on top of each other. How does a vaccine

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>differ from the antibody treatment you announced yesterday? Well, thanks

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for me on Tom, and it's any news last night

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with the emergency Use authorization in the US for our

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>monoclonal antibody neutralizing antibody, which is a therapy that you're

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to be given in this approval if you have new,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>newer onset disease, so a positive test and symptoms, and

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly if you fall into a high risk group, you

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have underlying conditions or you're older, then you can take

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this therapy and in our studies that reduced the probability

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that you go to the hospital pretty dramatically by sevent um.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's an important step, another tool now UM to

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>help manage this disease just when we need it most there.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>In terms of how it works, you're asking what we

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>did actually was UM. When your body is infected with

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a virus, it amounts a variety of immune responses. One

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of them is we create antibodies, which have been much

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about in these antibody testing UM. These antibodies, UH

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lock up the virus and dispose of it. What we

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>did was took antibodies from surviving patients early in the pandemic.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We isolated the very most potent ones in one in

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this case, and now we make it in a factory

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>synthetically and give it medicine. This is really important. David Ricks.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you suggest, just suggest that this bacterial like anibody therapy,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like a bacterial antibiotic, could be a substitute for

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a true vaccine. Well, we're studying UM what we call

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>passive immunization in a in a setting where you're trying

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to prevent spread. In our case, we're looking at spread

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>within nursing home facilities. It's similar to vaccination in a way.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So when you get a vaccine, we introduce a killed

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or modified version of a part of a virus, and

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>your body recognizes that as foreign and mounts its own

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>antibody response. Here, what we're doing is we're giving you

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the antibody response of someone else prior to getting sick.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in a study, it's not approved by the FDA,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have the data yet, but that's a

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>very interesting approach, and if we look at other viruses

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like ebol, even this was the setting where these antibodies

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>made the biggest difference. Of course in the US, and

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think around the world, nursing home patients, elderly nursing

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>comes are at the highest risk. So this would be

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>an important positive event if it occurred, and we should

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have that data in the coming weeks. They have to

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>build on what Tom's discussing. I think we're trying to

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>ask the question as to whether we need a multi

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pronged approach here, not just the advance when we heard

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>from Fiser yesterday, but maybe also complemented by what you're

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>doing as well. One thing that stuck out for us

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>all yesterday, it's just the storage of the m RNA

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that fights are moving forward with, and how difficult

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it is to store it really really freezing cold temperatures day.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak to that, the developments there on that side,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and how difficult it will be actually to distribute something

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like that widely and everywhere. Well, for for the messenger

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>our inn A vaccines, they are fragile molecules, so they

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be held at a very very low temperature.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>That will likely not I don't think that's going to

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be a major barrier UM. Once this is broadly available

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in developed markets with advanced medical systems UM, where it

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 1>becomes a problem is where refrigeration and available capacities UM

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in developing countries. UM. You know, it's gonna be much

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>tougher and we'll take longer. That's why we have uh.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, two of the leading ten UM vaccines are

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>using this technology. Eight aren't and likely won't have those

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>refrigeration constriction restrictions. I suspect some of those will work

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. I bet on that, and we'll likely end

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>up with multiple shots on goal with vaccines. In the meantime,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>none of them will work a percent of the time,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and back to the original question, will still need medicines

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>like our anibody therapy to help those that will still

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>get sick, hopefully at a much lower rate as we

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>approach something like um herd immunity, but you'll still have

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>endemic disease and we'll need therapies we have. There's many

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 1>examples where this is true, including common respiratory viruses like RSV,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>where we have both vaccination and antibodies. They can go together,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but together. I mean this is in the last forty

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>eight hours we have two important developments in the fight

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>against COVID nineteen. I think the future is looking more

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>certain and brighter for sure. To build though on what

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>John is talking about, there are some practical concerns as

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the pharmaceutical companies try to ramp up production,

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering supply chain issues, especially as a pandemic worsens.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea that all of these different pharmaceutical companies are

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to go for the same thing and probably sourcing

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the same uh some of the same substances,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as using some of the same staffers, how

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>well can you ramp up production of the antibody therapies

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to meet demand in the next couple of months. Well,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't worry so much about that competition phase where

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we're competing our ideas. I think once it's clear they're winners,

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll see the industry come together to make product at scale.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's already occurred in the antibody space where Rosian, Regenera

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and who have a different approach from Lily's, have teamed up.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We've teamed up with am Gin and then all of

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the largest contract manufacturing organizations in the world, like Samsung

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and Fuji to build out that supply base. So I

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're we're wasting material by by competing in

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that way. Of course, antibodies are complicated to make, one

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of the most complicated medicines we make, and we usually

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>reserve them for severe disease like cancer and autommunity. Here

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about treating thousands millions of people potentially with

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>these antibodies. It will strain that system and we will

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have scarcity, that's for sure. That's why the FDA last night,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>when they approved this, really asked doctors to use it

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the highest risk patients. That's appropriate, so we use

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it where it matters most these a serious issues. We

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>have about thirty seconds left and i'd i'd love for

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you to do me a favor on just the light

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and note, can you explain the offside rule to Tom

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Kane and about twenty seconds? Can you do that for us?

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about in football? Yes, of course offside just

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>when when the offensive players in front of the defensive

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>player prior to the ball being struck. Of course, once

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball struck he can run in front. It doesn't matter.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>That's different from hockey, where the blue line is what matters. Oh,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you, that's very good, David Rickster. And of course

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the sport of Eli lily to our Olympic Committee which

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they've been committed to for for many years. Last week

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it was Guernsey in the U S election. This week

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the great rotation East Anglia and Latin bat Chappa

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is joining us. Now she's sitting there wondering what is

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it about to happen on this show? Join us from

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sock Jan she's the head of US right strategy and

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a place to say. She's still here. So Batra, let's

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just start with the bond market move of yesterday. You

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>first take please, a spectacular move higher in in yield,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, basically the market has been all over

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the place supposed to be unwe the reflation trade after

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the election, and then we had to reflate in a

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>rush yesterday. Um, so we've we've broken through some key

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, technical levels yesterday, and I think that

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they set off, like you said with with equities set

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>off in the bond market could have legs as well.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of cash in the sidelines that

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be put to work, and if there's an opportunity,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see a departure away from

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.559
<v Speaker 1>bonds into into risky assets. It's about a really important question.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I did the math yesterday. I used JP Morgan just

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as a giant financial success. And yes it's come off

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, but it's nowhere back to the pre Valentine's

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Day trend. It needs to go up another fourteen percent

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of to get back to trend. Don't call me

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on that, folks, Those are rough numbers. Did you see

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>a Catharsis yesterday going upper? Job so Bradra that did

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you see a Catharsis that speaks to a new bull

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>market or a new leg of a bowl market. Well,

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an equity strategist, so I kind of a

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>comment on the on the on the on the equity market,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but from the bond side of the equation, I think

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that happened after the election was

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>positioning was a lot cleaner. There were a lot of

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>shorts going into the into the elections that got cleaned up.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And when we got this sort of surprise news from Fiser,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you saw this this sort of you know, massive sell

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>off in bonds. And I think that the going forward,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what the market is going to be focused on is is,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned earlier about what happens on the vaccine

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation. Um, you know, there's lots of

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>logistical issues that need to be dealt with. It's a

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a very large deployment from perhaps several

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>different vaccine makers, and and how that gets ruled out

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very key on how the bond

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>market reacts and how equities react as well. And I

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>think for for a change, you're gonna see more correlation

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or sort of more negative correlation between equities and bonds

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>where you see you know, riskond days and equities and

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the sell off in bonds. But I'm losing the neat

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>narrative here. I gotta be honest. Yesterday I was really

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>confused because we've got tenure yields shooting higher, seismic move

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you have break even rates, the expectation for longer term

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation not doing that much, so this isn't necessarily a

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>surge in long term growth prospects. And all of a

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sudden you've got junk bonds yields at record lows, even

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>though we've got an unemployment rate that still is a

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>nero historic highs in the recent era. What's the narrative? So,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say, broadly speaking, real yields as

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>well as break evens heading in the right direction. We

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hit a load of negative one percent in tennie real

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>yields that's gone up to a closer negative ad basis points.

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And then in break evens as well, you saw about

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a six or seven basis point rise and break evens.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's heading in the right direction. That's what

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to see in a reflation trade, higher real

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>yields and wider break evens the question is one of caution.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard for the bond market to price in

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of exuberance in a very short period of time,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that the FED is very much at

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>play and there's really no certainty on a lot of fronts.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's not there's not good it's not clear

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to get any sort of fiscal stimulus

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year. Even if we do,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be of the magie to that's

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>required by the by the economy to prevent new term

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>damage in the jobs market. Sespparentially mentioned the Federal Reserve,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and for me, it's the recovery through twenty one that

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we all hope for, whether feds new reaction function will

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>start to come into its own, where good news will

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just be good news because the FED is set we

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>will not step in. How are you thinking about that

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>after the news of the twenty four hours Well, I

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think the FED is doing exactly what they should be doing,

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>which is the staining path. Right. There's not much they

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>can do on the monetary policy side to stimulate the economy.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>What really need, what the economy really needs now is

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on the fiscal side if there is sort of an

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>unruly sell off in bonds, and I can see the

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>FED step in, But there's really no need for for

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>any sort of monetary stimulus at the current time. Financial conditions,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>broadly speaking, are extraordinarily easy. You're looking at interestrates and

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>historic blows, you know, equity markets and historic highs the

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars week. So there's really not much the Fed can

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>do to move the needle. Really, the stimulus has to

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>come on the fiscals time side to stop job losses.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's about a right to catch up. As Owise selk Jan,

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do John Fern, Liza bramoitts into

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>all of you on radio and TV, is bring you

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more than the markets. We're looking at economics, finance, investment

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as horrific virus. As we speak to scientists, sometimes we

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>speak to politicians. Kethy Hokel is a Lieutenant governor of

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Empire State. She knows the trajectory of the Erie

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Canal as it opened up western New York and from

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Onondaga to Munroe to Erie County, it is a yellow zone.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The Lieutenant governor joins us this morning, Cathy, what does

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the yellow zone, and what does it mean as you

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>confront a new virus. Well, thank you for having me

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>back on the show, and yes, I'm embedded in that

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>yellow zone right now. Yellow means caution, and it says

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that if our numbers don't start trending downward, reversing where

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been for the last two weeks, we'll be in

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where we're heading to orange and red,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and those means we will have shutdowns, and we'll be

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>trying very hard not to get to a situation where

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>we have to reverse the progress we've made on reopening.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But our schools also have to do more testing. We've

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>limited the number of people at gatherings. So it's not

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario, but it's a warning to our

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>residence here that I've been saying for days. Now change

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>your behavior or you'll be locked out of your favorite

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>restaurant and you have no chance of going through a

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>football game in person this year, and a lot of

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>other consequences. So it's basically trying to stay beware and

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>change your behavior starting today, Lieutenant Governor of the Conceit

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is the big cities have ample medicine, ample hospitalization. I

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think of strong and that complex and Rochester over in Buffalo,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a positivity rate that is just exploded. Are

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you concerned with Governor Cuomo about the hospitalization facilities available?

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>The good news is is that we are prepared for

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>even more capacity, far more capacity in the early months

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic, and the Governor made sure that we

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>had ample supplies of PPE and all the hospitals, each

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>one was required to have at least a three months

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>additional supply. I've been in regular charge with their leadership

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of the hospitals. Yes, our numbers have gone up, but

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's about maybe people in hospitals in Western York. We

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can handle that now. But you're absolutely right, it's something

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that if the numbers, you know, the number of people

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>testing positive, if they turn into serious cases and hospitalizations required,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to get back to the eliminating

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the elective surgeries and a lot of the unessential procedures

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that are now going on, so we can create the

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>capacity very quickly. Though. We are actually have unfortunately a

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience dealing with this and we'll be able

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to handle it in the meantime, Cathy, yesterday we got

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible news on the vaccine front from Fiser, A lot

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of people expecting a turn, perhaps an end to the

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>pandemic next year, but there's a lot of daylight between

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>now and then, and some people saying that will reduce

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis on a fiscal support plan from Washington, d C.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>From your vantage point, how much does this take pressure

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>off of Washington to help with the twelve billion dollar

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>bailout for the m t A, to help with the

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>unemployment as more people get laid off as the virus

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>counts go up, and just help financially going forward. I

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're related. I don't think that having a

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccine takes the pressure off at all, because we've already

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lost that money. We've already lost the revenues and the

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>feeds generated from people using our transportation systems or from

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the sales tax revenues that were not collected, and the

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary cost that we had to incur just fighting this

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and are still paying for now. That's not gone

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>away with the vaccine, And the truth is this vaccine

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to take a while to be wildly disseminated

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and have a real impact now. Governor Cuomo this summer

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>started working on this, you know, very early on to

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have a widespread distribution plan in the state of New York,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one that's quite different from what the White House is proposing,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where they're saying they're going to get into the hands

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of doctors and to the pharmacies. Would is great if

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you live in an area that has a lot of

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>doctors and pharmacies, but large parts of New York City,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or what we call healthcare deserts, they don't have a

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>right A or CVS or Walgreens. Where are they supposed

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it? So we're focused in New York. I'm

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>making sure that communities that have been hardest hit that

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they're not left out of the distribution

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine early on as well, because many of

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>those individuals in the black and brown communities, they're the

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>frontline workers, they're the health care workers, they're the mt

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>mt A workers. So we want to make sure that

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there's the plan includes everyone and is fairly distributed as

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly as possible. Lieutenant Government. Just to finish on a

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>final question about restrictions, We've seen restrictions from Massachusetts, we've

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>seen it from Utah, and yesterday evening we saw it

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from the government New Jersey, Mr Murphy, Now Phil Murphy

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>outlined a plan that we're all familiar with here in

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK, which is to close down indoor dining from

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ten pm. We're familiar with that. Because it didn't end there.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Something else came next, Cathy, do you see merit in

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that approach? Lieutenant Governor? Do you think that is a

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>good approach to allow indoor dining to shut at tempm?

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense to you to stop at temp M.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We actually have a restaurants have to shut down at

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>midnight in New York City and that is part of

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>our Yellow Zone in fact, and you know upstate New

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>York those counties that you referenced earlier will now be

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>having restaurants shut down at midnight because people tend to

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the more you drink, the more you're out, you know,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely to gather at parties afterwards. You just analyze

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>human behavior. Your defenses go down the more alcohol you've consumed,

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the left you are to be compliant about wearing the mask.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So we think it makes sense. The issue that we

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have here, though, Lieutenant Governor, is it didn't stop there,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and it clearly wasn't sufficient. You're not at all concerned

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that twelve doesn't make sense, tend doesn't make sense that

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually you need to get ahead of what's about to

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>happen through winter. Well you'res you're asking if it's going

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to be more a restrictive Well, the numbers will dictate

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that in the state of New York and New York

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>City's infection rate was one eight percent on Friday, it

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>has creeped up to about two point five percent. So clearly, yes,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we are watching those numbers. And as we head into

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>various zones, the one zone that does require a shutdown

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of restaurants is that is the red zone. What we're

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>now doing is limiting the number of people at tables.

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't have ten people at the table, you can

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>only at for so everything you're talking about, we are

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>watching what going on in other states. But New York

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>still maintains that we are the lowest large state infection ry.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of rural states are maybe a

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit lower than us, but we want to maintain that.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're absolutely right that everything has to be on

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the table to consider if we get to that situation.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>At sending Governor, we appreciate your time and howefully will

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>catch up against and Cathy. How cool that Mr Pharaoh

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>identifies that spread between Russell two thousands small cap is

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>indicated by the big tech is negative. Big tech negative

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of Russell two thousand is positive. Stampsovo has seen this before.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>He's a cfi A. Well, actually none of us have

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>seen what we saw yesterday, and it will go and

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you acclaim stock almanac, Sam Stovo, just your single summary

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of how unusual was yesterday? Well, Tom, very unusual. I

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mean we were up uh more than five percent at

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one point on the day, and then we closed up

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one on the S and P five. So when you

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>look to you know, closing percent changes, Um, it's just

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>simply a blip. We had five times this year that

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we're even substantially stronger. On March we were up nine

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>point in a single day. Um. And so I would

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>say it would certainly add excitement to one's portfolio, but

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly not adding a lot in terms of asset value.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Sam, yesterday was a catch up tride. We

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>can all agree on that the names, the parts of

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the market that were left behind all caught up. What

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>people thought it was safe suddenly became a massive risk

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you reprice Boom twenty four as done or is it?

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And Sam, that's the question right now. Was yesterday the

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>catch up trade or the beginning of a durable trend?

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Now that's really difficult to identify with one day's price action.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But Sam, do you have a cool on that? Well?

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know when you look to the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>individual day then you know you're absolutely correct. Um, you

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>had basically seventy of the near one hundred and fifties

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>sub industries in the SMP in positive territory, so it

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty broadly diversified. The SMP six was up close

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to five in the single day. Mid caps are up

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent versus the large caps a little more than

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Game. I think that because investors are saying,

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>we've got ten companies around the world that are in

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>phase three trials of a COVID nineteen virus vaccine, that

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>even if Fiser's stumbles a little bit, we still have

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nine more that we can work with. And so Wall

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Street is looking beyond the valley, it's looking beyond the

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>spike right now and saying six to twelve months from now,

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>things will be growing. And the real question is by

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>how much will analysts be elevating their two thousand and

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty one estimates, and we all have to look beyond

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this valley just to stay upright, frankly, because the pandemic

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been that fun. That said, you still have to

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>start wondering about valuations. Yes, we are going to reach

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of new normal, but record highs basically in

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the equity indices, and this is predicated

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that interest rates will stay low. At

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what point will treasury yields rise high enough to offset

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that narrative to basically say we have to reset valuations. Yes,

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a better world, but valuations got too high for

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>where rates maybe well, good point. If you look at

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it on an absolute basis, basically everything looks expensive. SMPI

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>trading at twenty two point four times next twelve month

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and TM earnings, which is a thirty premium to its

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>average over the last twenty years. Every sector except financials

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare are trading at double digit premiums on a

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>relative basis. However, only consumer discretionary and energy are trading

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>at double digit premiums to the market. So I guess

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on whether we're going to be seeing

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>rotation or an actual retreat right now. From a technical perspective,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to see interest rates go above

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>one in order for us to see a technical rotation

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>from a bearish trend to a neutral trend. And then

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to see interest rates rise more

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>dramatically for investors to really get scared and think that

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation is right around the corner. And just to give

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some perspective, we now have a tenure yield near session

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>highs at nine basis points, so about five basis points

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>away from that one percent mark. There is also a

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>question of whether this rotation means losses for big tech

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or just under performance. What's your take on that, sand Well,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>right now we're going for um losses or under performance,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>actually near term losses, but more longer term under performance.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the SMP five growth minus value

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on a rolling twelve month basis, we hit an all

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>time high in August and then again in September, meaning

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that going back to the twelve months present change for

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks minus uh that that for value was at

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about thirty five percentage points higher than where we were

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>during the tech bubble of the late nineties. So, uh,

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it just seeing that it was a matter of time

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>before we saw some sort of rotation away from growth

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and toward value, which were in the very early phases

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of right now. So, Sam, this rise is a really

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>important question. Let me build on one. LEAKSA just asked

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 1>how much risk is through the index level for passive

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>investors just sitting and holding the SMP five hundred, given

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the waitings of these huge tech names Apple six of

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, Microsoft five and a half percent, Amazon about

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent. Is there a lot of

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>risk at the index level because of the white things? Um?

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So. I mean, when you think about it,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned technology with Microsoft and Apple, but then you've

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>got Facebook and the two share classes of Google in

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the communications services, you have Amazon and Visa in the

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>consumer discretionary. So it's not just one sector. It is

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>spread around. Uh. And so it is a large cap

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>index and therefore the behemans do tend to drive the action.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But interesting, back in two thousand and eight you would

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have said pretty much the same thing. Um, ditto back

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand Yet the equal weight five tends to

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>fall more precipitously in the early phases of bear Mark

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's or or corrections, so it is interesting, but the

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>they do offer ballast because of their size, because of

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>their market share, etcetera. Well, the equal way at a

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>massive day yesterday, Sam, It's great to catch up to

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on this market. What a move we've had,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>What a week already. Sam Stuggle, the CFI right Chief

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Investment strategistic Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio