Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom. Huge riots in Portland, rage
Speaker 1: on major cities, embrace enhanced lockdowns. Oprah lectures us on
Speaker 1: white privilege, and Biden says more dumb things. Buck Sextons
Speaker 1: decoding the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence?
Speaker 1: Make no mistake American Great, You're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show. Pumas CIA analysts again
Speaker 1: can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try
Speaker 1: doing that sometimes. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show as always an honor, thank you for being here.
Speaker 1: I just want to jump right into it. You know,
Speaker 1: we were told in the last few weeks, I feel
Speaker 1: like I should just start doing a segment. We were
Speaker 1: told lies by libs dot dot dot. But this is
Speaker 1: another good example of it. We were told by people
Speaker 1: like Nancy Pelosi, who was out there saying this time
Speaker 1: tupas the federal government agents law enforcement officers who were
Speaker 1: trying to assist in the protection of a federal courthouse
Speaker 1: in Poland, that they're bad people doing bad things. They
Speaker 1: are the reason for the riots. That was the part
Speaker 1: of this that you really have to remember. They were
Speaker 1: the cause of the rioting and there was this effort
Speaker 1: also to pretend there weren't riots, and then that failed
Speaker 1: because of some intrepid actual journalists and people who show footage.
Speaker 1: Now not the mainstream journals. Really it was other citizen journalists,
Speaker 1: people like our friend Andy no who just show what
Speaker 1: really happens here. And then it's really difficult to make
Speaker 1: the case that these are mostly peaceful protests when everybody
Speaker 1: sees that they're throwing rocks and using weapons against federal
Speaker 1: law enforcement. They're dressed up for battle. They're not dressed
Speaker 1: up for a peaceful protest. We've seen all that. But
Speaker 1: remember that the Democrat position on all of this was
Speaker 1: that it was the presence of the federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: officers that was causing the problem. It was their deployment
Speaker 1: that was the reason for all the bad stuff that
Speaker 1: we then had to at least we had to at
Speaker 1: least all agree was happening because there was so much
Speaker 1: video of it. Well, you've got two nights now in
Speaker 1: a row where the police department in Portland, remember that
Speaker 1: it was handed over to them, and the mayor of
Speaker 1: poor Land, Ted Wheeler, antifozz Aran Boy and the governor
Speaker 1: in Oregon. I mean these leaders were saying the problem
Speaker 1: was the federal law enforcement officers just get to them
Speaker 1: and the rioting stops. They're the red. Now, no one
Speaker 1: really believed this, but it just shows you how dishonest
Speaker 1: the Libs are about all this stuff. We were quite
Speaker 1: aware that it was going to I'm pretty sure I
Speaker 1: actually said here on the show, Hey, they're going to
Speaker 1: be more riots. This is not going to stop. And
Speaker 1: now we can all look back to a Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: and the Democrats. We're making that absurd claim about federal
Speaker 1: law enforcement, and now we see with our own eyes
Speaker 1: exactly what is going on here. Continued riots, more nonsense,
Speaker 1: more madness, and the police chief in Portland is now
Speaker 1: saying that the cause of the cause of racial justice
Speaker 1: is not being helped by these rights. Remember that these
Speaker 1: ANTIFA members, they're they're really using Antifa tactics, but they
Speaker 1: think they're part of Black Lives Matter. And this anti
Speaker 1: cop sentiment that Democrats embrace because they need to for
Speaker 1: their political party, they need to for their aspirations for power,
Speaker 1: that has had an effect on cities all across the country.
Speaker 1: This has made urban areas worse, and Democrats own that
Speaker 1: that's on them. They're going to try to avoid it
Speaker 1: as much as possible, but they have been reckless and
Speaker 1: we are now suffering the consequences of this as a country.
Speaker 1: What's going on in Portland is a continued disgrace. These
Speaker 1: Antifa lunatic should be locked up. They should spend some
Speaker 1: serious time in prison. Rioting is a crime, destruction of
Speaker 1: property as a crime, and the laws either count or
Speaker 1: they don't. They don't get to have it both ways.
Speaker 1: I know the Libs love to pretend that they can
Speaker 1: have it both ways, or they try to have it
Speaker 1: both ways, but they are unable to as long as
Speaker 1: we are in a position to hold them to account
Speaker 1: on this. And that's why I keep saying, you want accountability,
Speaker 1: you want justice, you gotta win. That's what it really
Speaker 1: means now politics, That's the truth. You want accountability, You've
Speaker 1: got to have people who are not completely insane in power.
Speaker 1: That's where we are. So we also, while I'm talking
Speaker 1: about safety in cities, on the one hand, you have
Speaker 1: riots in Portland. They can't get that under control. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, you have Los Angeles, Chicago, New York
Speaker 1: that are going into what I've been saying all along.
Speaker 1: They would which is the lockdown two point zero phase,
Speaker 1: just in time for the election, just in time to
Speaker 1: make sure the economy remains suppressed, and to create a
Speaker 1: widespread perception of an America that is failing, that's going
Speaker 1: in the wrong direction, that is needs change, that needs
Speaker 1: to be in different hands. When it comes to leadership,
Speaker 1: Los Angeles and New York are almost at a competition
Speaker 1: right now for who can engage in the most breath
Speaker 1: to making government overreach. You see the problem, my friends,
Speaker 1: and this is true across most of America, is that
Speaker 1: we've let politicians seize unthinkably broad powers of unbounded duration
Speaker 1: and are going to continue suffering the consequences until we
Speaker 1: decide our rights outweigh their mandates. It's not going to stop.
Speaker 1: They love this power, they take to this, They have
Speaker 1: no problem with this. In fact, they want more of it.
Speaker 1: They want more of it if you allow Democrat leftists,
Speaker 1: they will dictate every aspect of your life, no matter
Speaker 1: how counterproductive, painful, absurd, and they think that that's their role.
Speaker 1: They have no problem with it. They'll continue to do this.
Speaker 1: Now we have Los Angeles, we have Los Angeles Mayor
Speaker 1: Garcetti telling everybody that they're willing, well, I'll let him
Speaker 1: say it. Play clip four. While we have already closed
Speaker 1: all nightclubs and bars, these large house parties have essentially
Speaker 1: become nightclubs in the hills. Many times the homes are
Speaker 1: vacant or used for short term rentals. And beyond the noise,
Speaker 1: the traffic and nuisance, these large parties are unsafe and
Speaker 1: can cost Angelino's their lives. That is why tonight I
Speaker 1: am authorizing the city to shut off Los Angeles Department
Speaker 1: of Water and Power service in the egregious cases in
Speaker 1: which houses, businesses, and other venues are hosting unpermitted large
Speaker 1: gatherings starting on Friday night. If the LAPD responds and
Speaker 1: verifies that a large gathering is occurring at a property,
Speaker 1: and we see these properties reoffending time and time again,
Speaker 1: they will provide notice and initiate the process to request
Speaker 1: that DWP shut off service within the next forty eight hours,
Speaker 1: weaponizing city services and regulations for what they say is
Speaker 1: as public health. But let's remember they could have prevented
Speaker 1: mass gatherings in the streets with the LAPD. Oh, but
Speaker 1: that was about BLM. That was too important, you see.
Speaker 1: But now people want to throw house parties. Look, I
Speaker 1: don't think it's a good idea to throw a house
Speaker 1: party right now if the numbers are pretty high in
Speaker 1: your community. I'm not saying that. But I also don't
Speaker 1: think the government has the authority to just tell you
Speaker 1: you can't see your fellow human beings. The government is
Speaker 1: telling people who are overwhelmingly healthy and don't have any
Speaker 1: disease whatsoever. By the numbers, ninety nine out of one
Speaker 1: hundred people that are at this party probably don't have
Speaker 1: any COVID, and maybe one hundred out of one hundred
Speaker 1: you don't know. The government is saying you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to do that. You're not allowed to gather together. Freedom
Speaker 1: of assembly, My friends, we have rights. We actually have
Speaker 1: things that are ours that the government is by charter,
Speaker 1: by constitution, by contract, not supposed to be able to
Speaker 1: just take away. And what do we see in particularly
Speaker 1: these democrat controlled major cities. They take it away on
Speaker 1: a whim, They take it away and there's not even
Speaker 1: a complaint from most of the population. How far are
Speaker 1: we from some of these other countries, never mind just
Speaker 1: democratic socialism in Europe? How far are we for what
Speaker 1: they're doing in China? These days. We have control over
Speaker 1: what we can say on the internet from the monopolistic
Speaker 1: major tech companies. We're not allowed to gather. We have
Speaker 1: to wear a face diaper all the time because that's
Speaker 1: going to save us all. We got all these rules
Speaker 1: and regulations. There's no there's no laws that are being
Speaker 1: passed for any of this. People in power who have
Speaker 1: police authority instead of just enforcing the laws as they
Speaker 1: are making up laws as they go along. That's what
Speaker 1: these governors are doing. They're expanding quarantine powers to the
Speaker 1: breaking point. They've been catastrophically ineffective. You know. On the
Speaker 1: one hand, you'll notice there's this this call for oh COVID.
Speaker 1: Our response has been so terrible in America. It's it's
Speaker 1: on all of us to listen to these governors. And
Speaker 1: they never stop and think, Hold on a second. These
Speaker 1: governors have been in charge all along. They're morons. We
Speaker 1: had this terrible response. They've had a terrible response. Why
Speaker 1: aren't they accountable? No, But the Democrat narrative, because Trump
Speaker 1: is the president, and because they're all so delusional with
Speaker 1: their anti trumpism, is that things are terrible in this
Speaker 1: country because Republicans haven't worn enough masks. That's that's what
Speaker 1: they tell themselves. If only that were different, then we
Speaker 1: would all be fine. We wouldn't be going through this.
Speaker 1: You know, there are surges in different countries right now too.
Speaker 1: You don't hear much about that. Our media just wants
Speaker 1: to focus on panic. Panic here in America. Panic. You
Speaker 1: got a surge going on in Germany, even a surgeon
Speaker 1: in Australia. I mean this, this virus is everywhere. It's everywhere.
Speaker 1: And what governors and mayors have shown is they can't
Speaker 1: protect us. They can't protect us. But what do they do.
Speaker 1: They keep doubling down. They decide that now that we
Speaker 1: live through this nightmare to this point and have seen
Speaker 1: more of the numbers and have a better sense of
Speaker 1: who's at risk and what's going on, they are taking
Speaker 1: the anti science position that the risk is too high
Speaker 1: for kids to be in school this fall. We all
Speaker 1: know that's crap. And they're also getting even more strict
Speaker 1: and severe with the lockdowns. In New York. We have
Speaker 1: quarantine checkpoints that are set up now. They're threatening to
Speaker 1: find people ten thousand dollars. Here's the mayor, the worst
Speaker 1: mayor in the country, even worse than Garcetti. Believe it
Speaker 1: or not, they are build the Blasio. Here he is
Speaker 1: explaining that he has special powers, and no one even
Speaker 1: knew about play clip fourteen. So starting today, we're going
Speaker 1: to do something new in New York City. We will
Speaker 1: have checkpoints at key entry points to the city. Travelers
Speaker 1: coming in from those states will be given information about
Speaker 1: the quarantine that will be reminded that it is required,
Speaker 1: not optional. They'll be reminded that failure to quarantine is
Speaker 1: a violation of state law and it comes with serious penalties.
Speaker 1: In fact, under certain circumstances, of fines can be at
Speaker 1: as highest ten thousand dollars. Where is the federal government?
Speaker 1: This is interfering in interstate commerce. Okay, enough is enough.
Speaker 1: This is insane. They can't enforce this quarantine. This quarantine
Speaker 1: is not based in any data. It's just, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we're terrified. Everybody has to lock themselves in their homes
Speaker 1: for two weeks. From the very beginning of this fight
Speaker 1: against COVID nineteen, lockdown was supposed to be the last
Speaker 1: ditch when you have nothing else you can do, you
Speaker 1: don't know what you're facing, you don't think you have enough.
Speaker 1: Hospital beds in Ppe. It was a last resort, the
Speaker 1: last resort in the fight against this has over time
Speaker 1: become the first resort, the first option that's being deployed.
Speaker 1: Oh there's a surgeon, numbers locked down, everybody. What benefit
Speaker 1: have we seen from this? Where has this worked in America?
Speaker 1: I'll sit here and wait. Anyone who says New York
Speaker 1: and New Jersey is a moron, because New York and
Speaker 1: New Jersey have gotten a hate by this worse, more
Speaker 1: dead people, more misery and sadness as a result of
Speaker 1: this virus than anywhere else in the world per capita.
Speaker 1: But the narrative is too important for the libs. They
Speaker 1: want to pretend, Oh no, we figured it out. Now
Speaker 1: just do what we're telling you to do this time around,
Speaker 1: because look at what a good job Cuomo has done.
Speaker 1: Look at how well Newsom has handled this. You look
Speaker 1: at these different states. You say it's done a horrible job,
Speaker 1: and now they're using that as justification to do the
Speaker 1: same thing over again. Cuomo is like a kid who
Speaker 1: shows up who got an F on the exam and
Speaker 1: then wants to stand up and lecture the rest of
Speaker 1: the class about the subject matter. The worst grade the
Speaker 1: worst results of anybody. And he's talking about this like
Speaker 1: he knows what the heck he's talking about quarantine checkpoints. Folks, know,
Speaker 1: where are the protests about that? We have massive protests
Speaker 1: across the country over one individual being killed by a
Speaker 1: cop and what certainly still seems to be excessive force,
Speaker 1: But there was a lead up to it. There was
Speaker 1: an individual who was noncompliant and who was high and
Speaker 1: who died of a heart attack, not asphyxiation. So that
Speaker 1: leads to nationwide protests. But we have cities telling us
Speaker 1: they're going to shut off power and water to a
Speaker 1: house if too many people gather there under what authorities.
Speaker 1: As the authority just we're scared, and we watch a
Speaker 1: lot of CNN, and we're the governor, so we're going
Speaker 1: to tell you that this is what you have to do.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna keep saying it. Where is the federal
Speaker 1: government on this? Where is the DOJ? Why aren't they
Speaker 1: stepping in? This needs to stop. They're interfering in the
Speaker 1: interstate commerce. They're stopping cars and saying that we're going
Speaker 1: to find you unless you lock yourself in a room
Speaker 1: for two weeks. That's insane. They can't think this through,
Speaker 1: my friends, how are they going to enforce this? Now?
Speaker 1: They're going to tell you in Dublasi already has Oh well,
Speaker 1: we're really just trying to make a point. That's what
Speaker 1: they said about masking originally. Right now, there are mandates
Speaker 1: now they find people. Now they lock you up if
Speaker 1: you open your business after a couple of warnings. Now
Speaker 1: they'll actually arrest you. What is suggested becomes mandatory. What
Speaker 1: becomes mandatory is punishable with fines and arrest. We have
Speaker 1: seen this progression keep happening. They don't have an answer
Speaker 1: about how to contain this thing. They don't unless you
Speaker 1: really want to lock down forever, where we keep coming
Speaker 1: back to the same discod just keep locking it down,
Speaker 1: Lock it down, hope a vaccine comes, and hope that
Speaker 1: vaccine is distributed quickly enough and is effective enough that
Speaker 1: it eradicates this disease, which I don't think anybody really
Speaker 1: believes that's going to happen. Lockdown, or else we'll shut
Speaker 1: off power, will shut off water, We'll find you ten
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. And they're doing this to people who are
Speaker 1: almost all zero risk to anyone. They may have antibodies
Speaker 1: they may have t cell immunity, they might just not
Speaker 1: be sick at all. I mean, they have no idea.
Speaker 1: This is the biggest power grab I have seen in
Speaker 1: my adult life, and everyone's just going along hoping that
Speaker 1: it'll go away. It's not going to go away. We
Speaker 1: confront this, we confront our lockdown overlords, or else it's
Speaker 1: just going to get worse. You're in the Freedom This
Speaker 1: is the Sex and Show podcast. There is a degree
Speaker 1: of anti science feeling in this country, and I think
Speaker 1: it is not just related to science. It's almost related
Speaker 1: to authority and a mistrust in authority that spills over
Speaker 1: because in some respects scientists, because they're trying to present data,
Speaker 1: may be looked at looked upon as being authoritative figure.
Speaker 1: And the pushing back on authority is pushing back on
Speaker 1: government is the same as pushing back on science. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: that's not what scientists are. And I think we need
Speaker 1: to be more transparent and reaching out to people and
Speaker 1: engaging society and understanding why science and evidence based policy
Speaker 1: is so important. It's that last point that you really
Speaker 1: got to focus in on evidence based policy. Where's the
Speaker 1: evidence that any of the most draconian policies in this
Speaker 1: country that different states have have an act, where's the
Speaker 1: evidence that it works? Fauci has said things like New
Speaker 1: York has really shown you how to get it done. Yeah,
Speaker 1: in New York, if you're willing to have you know,
Speaker 1: close to thirty thousand people die from this virus in
Speaker 1: one city, then sure, sure, that's a way to go.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of people that were hospitalized and
Speaker 1: are very close to death in New York who just
Speaker 1: barely made it out of the hospital and are okay now.
Speaker 1: But evidence based policy, where where is the evidence for
Speaker 1: these policies? What he doesn't understand? I mean, there's an
Speaker 1: arrogance here that we have to unpack. We have to
Speaker 1: deal with what they're saying that is clearly untrue. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Anti science feeling, that's what doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: calls it. You know, it's an ant there's a feeling
Speaker 1: of a mistrust of authority and the mistrust of the
Speaker 1: authority lead. Yes, that's right. Anybody with even a passing
Speaker 1: knowledge of US history understands that we have a whole
Speaker 1: heck of a lot of mistrust of authority, and with
Speaker 1: good reason. Our country. The limitations on government enshrined to
Speaker 1: the Constitution. The reason we have a Bill of rights,
Speaker 1: the reason we have delineated powers, is because we do
Speaker 1: not want authority to be concentrated. We want a separation
Speaker 1: of powers, we want checks and balances. There are reasons
Speaker 1: for that rooted deeply in our experience, not just as Americans,
Speaker 1: but as human beings. And we're seeing a forgetting of
Speaker 1: that right now. Oh yeah, let's just let these people
Speaker 1: make all these decisions. Let's let's leave them to be
Speaker 1: in charge of this. Fauci talks about science and data
Speaker 1: driven policy. See what is the data driven policy? There
Speaker 1: are plenty of research, of published, pure viewed research papers
Speaker 1: from epidemiologists that in the past looked at lockdowns as
Speaker 1: a way to deal with a pandemic, and they really
Speaker 1: all came to the same conclusion. It's disastrously costly in
Speaker 1: every sense, economically, in human toll, and it's not even
Speaker 1: that clear how well it would work. There are other
Speaker 1: countries that have never locked down. There are countries that
Speaker 1: have that had terrible results. I mean, where's the data
Speaker 1: being all the only data that we know? But there
Speaker 1: there's a lot. This disease spreads very quickly and is
Speaker 1: very lethal to older people with certain comorbid conditions. That
Speaker 1: data is all true, that's there. What's the other data
Speaker 1: we're using to determine this? Where was all this data
Speaker 1: driven policy? When you add hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: marching together in the streets, screaming, shouting and close quarters.
Speaker 1: Oh and a lot of young people got this disease.
Speaker 1: We're told it was just the bars. You see, it
Speaker 1: was just the bars. Okay, that's very convenient, isn't it.
Speaker 1: You got de Blasio setting up checkpoints in New York
Speaker 1: City for out of state drivers. I don't even I
Speaker 1: don't even really understand how they think this is supposed
Speaker 1: to work. Oh, you better quarantine for two weeks. What
Speaker 1: does that mean? You're gonna stay in your hotel room
Speaker 1: or stay if you're with you in a private home.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna go outside for two weeks. No one's
Speaker 1: gonna do that, de Blasio unless they have symptoms, maybe
Speaker 1: unless they actually get sick. But they're telling healthy people
Speaker 1: stay for two weeks. That's a long time, two weeks
Speaker 1: on your own. It's just crazy folks. And what do
Speaker 1: they say about the John Lewis funeral attendees? What do
Speaker 1: they say, Oh, well that was really important, so you
Speaker 1: don't have to quarantine. Oh okay, So if you're at
Speaker 1: the John Lewis funeral in Georgia, apparently the virus doesn't
Speaker 1: come after the same way. Wokeness is its own vaccine
Speaker 1: against the virus. Right. Sure, you've noticed in a Fauci
Speaker 1: he lost so much credibility for whatever credibility he had
Speaker 1: with so many people. When he was asked specifically in
Speaker 1: testimony recently about the crowds, he said, mask, you know,
Speaker 1: gatherings could spread the virus. Okay, So that means the
Speaker 1: protest could spread the virus, right, gatherings of all kinds.
Speaker 1: You know. This is like will you condemn Antifa? When
Speaker 1: you ask Democrat this, Well, we'll condemn all political violence, okay,
Speaker 1: but will you condemn Antifa? We condemn all political violence.
Speaker 1: And if this happens with Black lives matter and all
Speaker 1: lives matter, they completely accept, They completely reject that. They
Speaker 1: think that's a horrible thing to say, But they do
Speaker 1: this game all the time. This is how they This
Speaker 1: is how they operate. I'm wondering what it's going to take,
Speaker 1: my friends. They're doing everything they can to just steal
Speaker 1: this election, seize power from Trump, and run this country
Speaker 1: into the ground. And you know what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: It'll be just like when Obama took over after the
Speaker 1: Great Recession, and everyone's acting like Obama saved. Obama's economic
Speaker 1: policies were horrible, disastrous, just hurt productivity. Every decision that
Speaker 1: was pushed by him, by his administration was bad for
Speaker 1: the economy, was bad for wealth for all people, bad
Speaker 1: for wages, the things that he was really behind. But
Speaker 1: all they had to say was, well, look what happened
Speaker 1: when we took over. Look at how bad things were.
Speaker 1: They kept pointing to the worst month of a cyclical
Speaker 1: recession and saying, look at how much better we are
Speaker 1: than that. See, even though it was the slowest recovery
Speaker 1: out of a recession since World War Two, but that
Speaker 1: was all they needed. Just compare it to the worst
Speaker 1: at the very beginning, and they'll say it's better. They'll
Speaker 1: do the same thing with Biden for the first two years,
Speaker 1: when when we're grinding through and all this economic fallout
Speaker 1: and all the stupidity and the Green New Deal and
Speaker 1: all the things that they'll do that make the country poorer,
Speaker 1: less free, and more miserable. And then they'll turn us
Speaker 1: against each other and more of this wokeness and this
Speaker 1: rhetoric about race that's just really all virtue signaling for
Speaker 1: white libs these days. That's what's going on here. White
Speaker 1: liberals love to just preen about this BLM stuff. They're pathetic,
Speaker 1: they're cowardly. It's so easy. Oh, I care so much,
Speaker 1: you know BLM. They're marching through the streets and they've
Speaker 1: got like a T shirt with BLM and yeah, and
Speaker 1: celebrities like this. How many of them volunteer and minority
Speaker 1: communities to do after school, after school tutoring for underprivileged kids?
Speaker 1: How many of them have even I don't I really
Speaker 1: want to know this. I'd be so fastened to see
Speaker 1: people at the protests. When was the last time they
Speaker 1: actually had a person from a community of color over
Speaker 1: to their house for dinner. I'm telling you this right now,
Speaker 1: And I think you all know a lot of these
Speaker 1: white libs who are out there screaming about Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: and they it's about them. They don't care about the
Speaker 1: minority community at all. They don't spend time in the
Speaker 1: minority community. They don't socialize with a lot of minorities,
Speaker 1: if any. But oh, they're having this opportunity. Oh it's
Speaker 1: so so important. It makes me feel so good. And I'm,
Speaker 1: you know, all of a sudden, I'm part of a
Speaker 1: movement frauds, frauds, immature, cowardly frauds. And unfortunately they're they're
Speaker 1: the the the middle tier now and the you know,
Speaker 1: the the new hires at all the major media companies
Speaker 1: across the country, you know, the the assistant and associate producers.
Speaker 1: And if you look in the newsrooms, twenty five year
Speaker 1: olds right now are are terrifying the fifty five year
Speaker 1: olds that are in the c suite because the twenty
Speaker 1: five year olds are woke robots. They don't they don't
Speaker 1: look at reason, they don't look at new data. That
Speaker 1: they are like terminators for social justice. They are on
Speaker 1: a mission. Nothing else is acceptable, and they will even
Speaker 1: destroy their own that's one of the new that's one
Speaker 1: of the new layers to all this. They're willing to
Speaker 1: sacrifice their own people. It's like Longshanks in Braveheart when
Speaker 1: he starts firing off arrows while his own soldiers are
Speaker 1: in the melee in the middle of the field, He's like, whatever,
Speaker 1: we got more soldiers, just kill kill all of them, right,
Speaker 1: that's the attitude of the woke left. Now, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: have reserves. The dead costs nothing. That's their attitude. You know,
Speaker 1: there's plenty more lives out there. If we got to
Speaker 1: sacrifice some, we're willing to do it. Bring me back
Speaker 1: to Fauci for a moment here and the anti anti
Speaker 1: science feeling in this country. Fauci's policy have been a disaster.
Speaker 1: It has not. We are not better off because of this,
Speaker 1: all right there, You cannot show me one place where
Speaker 1: you know we listened that. They're all pretending now all
Speaker 1: the reopening happened too fast. Oh there was too fast
Speaker 1: of a reopening. Okay, what was the alternative? Lockdown? Straight up,
Speaker 1: no business is open nothing, only grocery stores, drug stores,
Speaker 1: and you know, hospitals. Unable to see anybody. We're going
Speaker 1: to keep doing that from March. Everyone just being being
Speaker 1: a total phony about this. What was the alternative? We
Speaker 1: opened up in May? We had been on lockdown for months.
Speaker 1: They said fifteen days to slow the spread. We basically
Speaker 1: waited ninety and then they say it was too soon.
Speaker 1: And now they're saying, well, maybe we got to do
Speaker 1: that again. This is the best they've got. The answer
Speaker 1: is they don't have answers. The answer is that the
Speaker 1: policy science nexus has been disastrous. Oh if we had
Speaker 1: only wore masks, right, you mean, like what they told
Speaker 1: us not to do for the first sixty days of
Speaker 1: the pandemic, make sure it spread all over the country,
Speaker 1: and then be like, oh, we're masks, guys, that'll stop
Speaker 1: this thing cold in its tracks. Does anyone really believe that?
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe it would be true if you wore
Speaker 1: a mask all the time and it was air tied
Speaker 1: and it was fitted, and you know, I mean, then
Speaker 1: here we are, here, we are it's our fault. You see.
Speaker 1: What else are they going to say? What else? What's
Speaker 1: the admission going to be from the people that have
Speaker 1: created so much misery? What I'm telling you this? You know,
Speaker 1: there's some things I predicted. I say, I think, but
Speaker 1: I don't know. I have a very high confidence. I
Speaker 1: would almost say I am not uncertain that when they
Speaker 1: were able to look back at the additional mortality this
Speaker 1: year for what would be expected in the US population.
Speaker 1: You've heard of last year, and they see the number
Speaker 1: of drug overdoses, suicides, and also the late stage cancer
Speaker 1: spurt or you're gonna see so much more late stage cancer.
Speaker 1: And that's just the one that everyone can think of.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of other diseases and a lot of
Speaker 1: other medical conditions. You know, they've made a lot of
Speaker 1: America a lot slower, fatter, and less healthy. Let's just
Speaker 1: be honest, and a massive scale. I know some of
Speaker 1: you have your solo flex, your bow flex, you're you know,
Speaker 1: whatever it is, your ab roller in the closet or
Speaker 1: maybe you've been able to keep up that. But for
Speaker 1: a lot of the rest of us, we're just not able.
Speaker 1: And plus there's all just the stress and your body's
Speaker 1: quarterisol levels, all these things. There are enormous costs that
Speaker 1: have been imposed on all of us. Do you think
Speaker 1: that people are ever going to listen to public health
Speaker 1: experts again if we really are able to look at
Speaker 1: the data and find out that these costs really didn't
Speaker 1: do anything for us, that this was an elephant with
Speaker 1: a mouse annoying it to get away from it falls
Speaker 1: off a cliff. Do you think they're ever gone. Do
Speaker 1: you think they'll ever admit that no matter what the
Speaker 1: data says, Oh, of course not. They'll fight this one
Speaker 1: till the very end, never going to relent on this,
Speaker 1: going to pretend that they had the answers all along
Speaker 1: and hope that people just go along. And you know,
Speaker 1: I guess also, I just have a different view of this.
Speaker 1: I've had some I've had so many different times where
Speaker 1: I've asked a doctor or no of a condition and
Speaker 1: I've asked the doctor, you know, how do we make
Speaker 1: this better? Or you know, I'm in pain or I've
Speaker 1: got this or that or whatever it may be. And
Speaker 1: do they try? And most doctors are really good people,
Speaker 1: and they're very very educated, but they don't have I know,
Speaker 1: they don't have all the answers. And I wish there
Speaker 1: was a little bit of a greater humility from the
Speaker 1: health policy community, right the lab coat wearing dictators that
Speaker 1: are out there right now, a little more humility that
Speaker 1: they have been wrong. They should square up with the
Speaker 1: American people. They should say, yeah, we were wrong on
Speaker 1: some stuff, no question about it. We didn't see how
Speaker 1: bad this was going to be. We thought our containment
Speaker 1: measures would work better. We didn't understand the real implications
Speaker 1: of masking or not masking. We thought handwashing would be
Speaker 1: much more effective than it was. But this is what
Speaker 1: we got, folks, this is the best we've gotten. Now,
Speaker 1: here's what we can tell you about where we are
Speaker 1: now that would go a long way. No, instead, what
Speaker 1: they do they have found here's a degree of anti
Speaker 1: science feeling. You know, they don't listen to don't do
Speaker 1: everything I tell them to do. And yeah, because you've
Speaker 1: been wrong, dude a lot, and people have suffered because
Speaker 1: of it. Can't even come in and out of major
Speaker 1: cities now without going through checkpoints on the orders of
Speaker 1: the most moronic mayor in the United States because he
Speaker 1: thinks he's backed up by the health policy community. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Oh. I think that we're all learning this
Speaker 1: at the same time now that he won't be there.
Speaker 1: But I think it's an indication of the serious and
Speaker 1: split that she judges that the situation this the pandemic
Speaker 1: is dangerous and the increase in numbers just demands that
Speaker 1: we keep our distances. Commend him for doing that. It's
Speaker 1: going to be a great convention. People will see it virtually,
Speaker 1: and we're very proud of him. I think it's it's
Speaker 1: a great thing that he's doing this early enough, so
Speaker 1: the rest of us now we're told that we're not
Speaker 1: coming either, I guess, and we can all make our
Speaker 1: plans from around the country for a great American victory
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden as he is nominated for president. Well,
Speaker 1: at least that was coherent chardonay socialist Nancy, and you know,
Speaker 1: she sounds like she, you know, got her ten hours
Speaker 1: of sleep last night. Biden's not going to Milwaukee because
Speaker 1: things are so serious. They act like we didn't see
Speaker 1: all the Democrat luminaries in Atlanta last week, right in
Speaker 1: Georgia or in Georgia last week. I think it was
Speaker 1: in Atlanta in Georgia last week for the John Lewis funeral,
Speaker 1: so that they'll go to But Biden, it's too serious. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's too serious for him to go to Milwaukee right now.
Speaker 1: Can't do it, can't do it now. There's a reason
Speaker 1: for all this. Biden is just trying to ride this
Speaker 1: whole situation out. I do think that he's going to
Speaker 1: show up for one debate and one debate only. But
Speaker 1: that's only because they're gonna try to get him out
Speaker 1: of it and it's gonna look too bad, and it'll
Speaker 1: be close enough in the polls. The Democrats realize he's
Speaker 1: got to just he's got to muddle through. He's got
Speaker 1: to just find a way to pretend like he knows
Speaker 1: what time of day it is and what year it
Speaker 1: is and all the rest of it. And if he
Speaker 1: can do that, they think that he'll win. But we're
Speaker 1: going in it. We're in a political season, deep into
Speaker 1: it right now. I mean, it's going to be September
Speaker 1: in the blink of an eye here, and you know,
Speaker 1: once you hit that, it's just for those of us
Speaker 1: who are in the political commentary media world, it is
Speaker 1: a flash and then it's election to I mean, it
Speaker 1: just moves very quickly. And there's been really no campaign.
Speaker 1: There's been very little. So I think it's important that
Speaker 1: we at least here, you know, what is President Trump
Speaker 1: a Biden is offering, not Trump hiding an abasement and
Speaker 1: America being terrified? What does Trump offer in a second term?
Speaker 1: Play fifteen A few of the things, just an ending.
Speaker 1: We will at least the full power of the American economy.
Speaker 1: We created an unprecedented economic miracle once and now we're
Speaker 1: doing it again, and already you see the numbers coming
Speaker 1: back very quickly. We'll shut down a legal immigration and
Speaker 1: we'll finish the wall. But if you're a farmer, you'll
Speaker 1: be able to get the same people that you've had
Speaker 1: for many years. Were shut it down, But the farmers
Speaker 1: will be allowed to have those same people come in.
Speaker 1: We're not going to make otherwise, you'd make it very
Speaker 1: tough in the farmers that we've made it very easy on.
Speaker 1: The farmers will be tough on China, demanding accountability and
Speaker 1: fair trade. We'll bring medical manufacturing and critical supply chains
Speaker 1: back to America, which I've been fighting for and succeeding in.
Speaker 1: But we've never ever done the things that I'm done.
Speaker 1: We're going to bring them back to our country. We'll
Speaker 1: root out anti American bias in our public schools and colleges.
Speaker 1: That's just a start. I like these things that President Trump.
Speaker 1: I think they're good for the country that thinks the
Speaker 1: President Trump is offering up What from what we know,
Speaker 1: does Joe Biden offer the country other than the hilariousness
Speaker 1: of yet more absurd incoherent statements. Well, I think we
Speaker 1: should also look at that, because this is in the
Speaker 1: background of all the debates right now about COVID and
Speaker 1: everything else. Who should lead the country. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Essen Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: What does Biden stand for? Everybody? Well, we all know
Speaker 1: that he stands for whatever the Democrat establishment, the coalition
Speaker 1: of activist groups, the media, Hollywood, academia, journals, whatever they
Speaker 1: tell him to stand for. That's effectively what he'll be
Speaker 1: all about. We know that. And we also know that
Speaker 1: he says incredibly dumb things and we're supposed to pretend
Speaker 1: that we don't notice for whatever reason. We know the reason.
Speaker 1: Here is Joe Biden speaking about Remember, he did very well.
Speaker 1: It was really the difference maker for him in the primary.
Speaker 1: He did very well with the African American community in
Speaker 1: the primary. And here's what he said today. We'll just
Speaker 1: let him say it himself. When he's talking about the
Speaker 1: African American community play twelve. Yes, by the way, what
Speaker 1: you all know but most people don't know unlike the
Speaker 1: African American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is
Speaker 1: an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's let's unpack this because you heard what you heard,
Speaker 1: and I know the media's get on. Unlike the African
Speaker 1: American community, Biden says the note with notable exceptions, the
Speaker 1: Latino community is incredibly diverse with different opinions. Now he's
Speaker 1: straight up telling you. Biden is saying that he views
Speaker 1: the black community as a as a monoliths, as all
Speaker 1: similar and all having similar ideas. You know, you would
Speaker 1: think this is kind of racist, right, but no, no,
Speaker 1: it's okay because you know he's Biden, and he's the
Speaker 1: guy the Democrats will prop up no matter what he says.
Speaker 1: I mean, they've made their bed, they're going to sleep
Speaker 1: in it. There is no all this stuff about they're
Speaker 1: gonna they're not gonna bail on Biden because even if
Speaker 1: they put a VP in place, and I think it's
Speaker 1: gonna be Kamala, which again, when we turn back, if
Speaker 1: they don't end up winning this election, to say that
Speaker 1: was the Biden and Kamala Harris were the best the
Speaker 1: Democrats would do. We got a country at three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty million people, and those are the two best
Speaker 1: people they could they could pull together on a ticket.
Speaker 1: Not Democrats don't really like either one of them. That's
Speaker 1: what's so fascinating. Biden is just the default candidate. He's
Speaker 1: the I guess we don't have We don't have an
Speaker 1: Obama this time around, so we gotta go with somebody
Speaker 1: that our base isn't excited about. But at least we
Speaker 1: all know his name, Joe Biden. That's it. And Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris ran for president and never did very well. And
Speaker 1: then most of the polls you would see she was
Speaker 1: not even really in the top and top five I think,
Speaker 1: I mean, she was a distant finisher in the Democrat primary.
Speaker 1: But Biden will get away with this, right. He'll say
Speaker 1: things like that. He said something there that wasn't his
Speaker 1: usual maham, we gonna be real loud. I don't really
Speaker 1: know what's going on. I'm getting kind of dizzy from
Speaker 1: all the talk. You know, he doesn't just say things
Speaker 1: like that. I think here that's he views the black
Speaker 1: community as as one, as having one political identity, as
Speaker 1: having you know, he said as not being diverse. You know,
Speaker 1: they're they're they're black is what Biden thinks. That's what
Speaker 1: he's saying. And so black people have certain attitudes and
Speaker 1: certain Can you imagine if a republic had said this?
Speaker 1: Can you imagine the I mean, it's but you know, I,
Speaker 1: I know, the double standards that we see all the
Speaker 1: time are just there. It's on. I run out of
Speaker 1: superlatives here. It isn't unfathomable because we fathom at constantly
Speaker 1: we have to deal with this. What else does Biden
Speaker 1: stand for? As we're getting closer into this And this
Speaker 1: is important too, because it can get easy to fall
Speaker 1: into this feeling of relative despair, like I just want
Speaker 1: it to end. I just want the craziness in this
Speaker 1: country to stop. How do we get it to stop?
Speaker 1: That's a feeling that I believe the Democrats are hoping
Speaker 1: to capitalize on when it comes to swing voters in independence,
Speaker 1: people who are going to be the difference maker. You know,
Speaker 1: unfortunately you and I most likely. Oh though, you gotta
Speaker 1: show up and vote, folks. I'm gonna do it here
Speaker 1: in New York even though my vote is meaningless. I
Speaker 1: gotta move. Producer Mark is looking at me. Right now
Speaker 1: without being able to see me. I know he's like, yeah, buddy, Florida, Florida.
Speaker 1: And he's right because at least there the vote would
Speaker 1: feel like it has some meaning because I think a
Speaker 1: New York you're outvoted in the presidential election. I think
Speaker 1: it's usually it's definitely two to one. I think it's
Speaker 1: closer to three to one in New York So in
Speaker 1: New York State, so we're definitely, Man, it's all because
Speaker 1: of New York City's eight to one Democrat to Republican.
Speaker 1: But we've got to make sure that we don't allow
Speaker 1: the rest of the country to feel like anything is
Speaker 1: better than what we have, because that's really the pitch,
Speaker 1: the elevator pitch of the Biden campaign is look at
Speaker 1: how and they're making you more miserable? Right, They want
Speaker 1: you to be more miserable than they're saying, Look at
Speaker 1: all miserable you are. Don't you want something else? This
Speaker 1: misery could all stop, you know, this misery could all stop.
Speaker 1: They're really holding the psychology of the American people hostage
Speaker 1: in all of this. That's the plan, that's the way
Speaker 1: that they're preparing this. And Biden does have policies though
Speaker 1: that he's speaking about that, I think you should hear
Speaker 1: about now. I mean, here's one because the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is now there's no leeway on certain issues, right, There's
Speaker 1: no leeway on being pro abortion, there's no leeway on
Speaker 1: being in favor of amnesty. There's nothing else all right,
Speaker 1: And here he is on the issue of immigration, specifically
Speaker 1: talking about what what illegal aliens should get in this
Speaker 1: country play thirteen. Should undocumented immigrants also be able to
Speaker 1: get subsidized healthcare? If they are working in the United
Speaker 1: States America and they are paying taxes, they should have
Speaker 1: access to healthcare. They should have access to what everybody
Speaker 1: else's has access to. The most important document. No, it depends.
Speaker 1: Not all undocumented workers are working. You say, you're saying
Speaker 1: on every undocumented worker here, you share your share undocumenter.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, I'm really deep on the polish here, Sure
Speaker 1: he is. Let's um, let's take a step back for
Speaker 1: a second, shall we. Why is there the distinction in
Speaker 1: Biden's formulation here between undocument always used the term undocumented
Speaker 1: illegal aliens who are working in this country illegal aliens
Speaker 1: who are not, because the argument for illegal aliens who
Speaker 1: work to get healthcare is a humanitarian one, right, it's not.
Speaker 1: It's not an economic one. Not really. Oh I'm sorry, well,
Speaker 1: people who this is also like when we talk about
Speaker 1: paying taxes, if they're actually the first of all, about
Speaker 1: half of illegal aliens and this is where you gotta
Speaker 1: get about half illegal aliens don't they're paid in cash,
Speaker 1: they don't have they don't have pay income taxes. That's
Speaker 1: not true. And if they were to pay income taxes,
Speaker 1: a lot of them get a refund from the federal governments.
Speaker 1: They don't make enough money to actually pay into the
Speaker 1: federal system. But beyond that, yeah, they pay sales tax.
Speaker 1: I mean everyone who's here is paying. When I go
Speaker 1: to Europe on vacation, which I haven't done in a
Speaker 1: very long time, you know, you're paying their vat taxes.
Speaker 1: You're whenever you buy or pay for something. So does
Speaker 1: that mean that wherever, any whenever anyone shows up because
Speaker 1: they've paid taxes, they're supposed to be able to access
Speaker 1: the same benefits as people who are here legally and
Speaker 1: who are paying all kinds of taxes and who are
Speaker 1: under an obligation into that state that others are not,
Speaker 1: and the state is under an obligation to them as well. No,
Speaker 1: Biden wants subsidized healthcare. He wants the government to be
Speaker 1: paying a portion of the premiums of illegal aliens under
Speaker 1: the Obamacare plan, which the Democrats under the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: which Biden was a part of, were just ferociously shouting
Speaker 1: down as a lie, constantly claiming that that's a lie.
Speaker 1: Illegal aliens would not get this that. No, they just
Speaker 1: were just gonna once they slide it through once the
Speaker 1: plan is enacted. Too late. Now they've got the power
Speaker 1: too late. Now the laws already moved on this one. Sorry, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we lied. What are you going to do about it?
Speaker 1: That is the Democrat attitude with policies like this all
Speaker 1: the time. Yeah, sure, we lied to you. What are
Speaker 1: you going to do about it? The answer, of course,
Speaker 1: is I don't know. Send some money to a think
Speaker 1: tank in DC and Republicans, I'm telling you, we are
Speaker 1: We do not have the platforms, We do not have
Speaker 1: the institutions that we need in this in this fight
Speaker 1: and fight for the future of the country. All we
Speaker 1: have are the American people, that's it. We do not
Speaker 1: we do not have these extra layers, these these auxiliaries
Speaker 1: of a conservative point of view that democrats can call upon.
Speaker 1: We just don't have it. Okay, So he wants illegal
Speaker 1: aliens to be able to access subsidized healthcare. What else?
Speaker 1: What else is Biden uh particularly excited about? Playlip play
Speaker 1: clip nine here. The way Trump, the way China will
Speaker 1: respond is when we gather the rest of the world
Speaker 1: that in fact invasion and in open trade and making
Speaker 1: sure that we're in a position that the world that
Speaker 1: we deal with who the right way. That that, in fact,
Speaker 1: that's when things began to change. That's when China, That's
Speaker 1: when Chinese behavior is going to change. Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: been a failure on China for as long as he's
Speaker 1: been in public office. This guy has no idea what
Speaker 1: he's talking about. I mean, really, his understanding of the
Speaker 1: private sector is giving speeches as a former vice president
Speaker 1: and helping his son get on the boards of foreign
Speaker 1: countries and hope that he doesn't blow it too soon
Speaker 1: with drugs and strippers, you know what I mean. That's
Speaker 1: that's Biden's understanding of economics, really, and yet he thinks
Speaker 1: he's going to be an architect of policy with China.
Speaker 1: It's going to make things better I don't think anybody
Speaker 1: who knows anything really believes any of this. But and
Speaker 1: Trump has been right on China. He doesn't get nearly
Speaker 1: enough credit for it. Trump has been right on China.
Speaker 1: But as with so many other things, now we pretend
Speaker 1: that all the initial all the initial outcries about how
Speaker 1: awful he was, it's it's just absurd. It's absurd. It's
Speaker 1: it's the constant, the constant drumbeat of lies and propaganda.
Speaker 1: You're almost overwhelmed by it. There's almost too much of it.
Speaker 1: You're just trying to you know, a lot of people
Speaker 1: want to go on their day, like I've had enough fun.
Speaker 1: I don't want to do this anymore. And then just
Speaker 1: one more thing on the point about the filibuster, which
Speaker 1: has come up in news stories recently. Democrats, remember what
Speaker 1: I told you about how they'll say we won't do that,
Speaker 1: and then when they're in position to do it, and
Speaker 1: they do it, they'll say, yeah, we lie to you,
Speaker 1: So what what are you going to do about it? Now?
Speaker 1: That's exactly their mentality with the filibuster, because Biden will
Speaker 1: tell the base, yes, we'll get rid of it, but
Speaker 1: then the national media will gaslight and say no, no,
Speaker 1: I mean they're not really gonna get rid of it.
Speaker 1: The base will no, no, no, Biden, Democrats, no, Biden's
Speaker 1: telling us it's gonna happen. Then the national media will
Speaker 1: tell the swing voters, and we'll tell the independence No. No,
Speaker 1: he's not really going to do that. Here's what he says,
Speaker 1: play clip eight. You do not agree with President Obama
Speaker 1: that getting rid of the filibuster is necessary, He just
Speaker 1: as a relic of Jim Crow. What I said was
Speaker 1: that if in fact they are as obstreperous as is expected,
Speaker 1: we'd have to get rid of the filibuster. But the
Speaker 1: filibuster has also saved a lot of bad things from
Speaker 1: happening too, So you'll oh, yeah, no, no, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I thought. I'm on record as saying that if the Republicans,
Speaker 1: if there's no way to move other than getting rid
Speaker 1: of the filibuster, that's what we'll do. This is the
Speaker 1: same as saying Republicans will do what we want, or
Speaker 1: we'll get rid of the filibuster. That's their version of
Speaker 1: if they're not willing to move, do what we say,
Speaker 1: or you're being unreasonable, we'll get rid of the filibuster.
Speaker 1: This is what I mean by they have no principles.
Speaker 1: There's no common ground, there's no sense of fair play.
Speaker 1: They'll always just change, They'll always just change the context
Speaker 1: to suit their needs in the moment and not allow
Speaker 1: any actual rule, regulation, policy principle to get in the way.
Speaker 1: That's certainly going to be the case with Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: the trojan horse for the far left to get into
Speaker 1: power once again. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. You know, we need
Speaker 1: some political analysis from because it's been a while, but
Speaker 1: we need to hear from from Lebron James, almost a billionaire,
Speaker 1: one of the most famous, wealthy, celebrated human beings on
Speaker 1: planet Earth. We need to hear from him. You know,
Speaker 1: he talks about the oppression, and he's very favorable to
Speaker 1: the Black Lives Matter movement and says that young black
Speaker 1: men are hunted every time they leave their homes. You know,
Speaker 1: Lebron James said some pretty reckless stuff, but and doesn't
Speaker 1: seem to have any gratitude for the country that's elevated
Speaker 1: him to superstardom status. You know, it really likes to
Speaker 1: tear the country down and take this attitude that it's
Speaker 1: all been so hard. This is a guy who I
Speaker 1: think was on the cover of Sports Illustrated when he
Speaker 1: was in in high school given like fifteen or sixteen.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean it's it's just been uh, I
Speaker 1: don't know, and we're supposed to believe it's been some
Speaker 1: impossible struggle. Okay, fine, right, but here's lebron on on
Speaker 1: Trump saying that he's not you know, he's not happy
Speaker 1: with all the kneeling going on. Play seven. Our game
Speaker 1: is in a beautiful position, and we have fans all
Speaker 1: over the world, and our fans not only love the
Speaker 1: way we play the game, we try to give it
Speaker 1: back to them with our commitment to the game, but
Speaker 1: also respect, you know what else we try to bring
Speaker 1: to the game and acknowledge and you know what's right
Speaker 1: and what's wrong. And I hope everyone UM, you know,
Speaker 1: no matter the race, no matter the color, no matter
Speaker 1: of the size, and see what what what leadership that
Speaker 1: we have in our at the top of our country
Speaker 1: and understand that in November, UM is right around the
Speaker 1: corner and it's and it's a big moment for us
Speaker 1: as Americans. UM. If we continue to talk about we want,
Speaker 1: you know, better. Won't change. We have an opportunity to do.
Speaker 1: But the game is the game. Will We'll go on
Speaker 1: without without his eyes on him. I can sit here
Speaker 1: and speak for all of us that love the Yama basketball.
Speaker 1: We can care less. Well, the ratings are way down,
Speaker 1: and I think the ratings are going to continue to
Speaker 1: go down. But here's one here's one dynamic that I
Speaker 1: see playing out reminds me a bit of of when
Speaker 1: um and I'm not even I could get into really
Speaker 1: Lebron about leadership and about changings. What do you think
Speaker 1: about China these days? We want to talk about that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're a huge He's a huge celebrity in China, Lebron James.
Speaker 1: NBA stars huge celebrities in China. He points out, there's
Speaker 1: a global dynamic now with the NBA that did not exist, certainly,
Speaker 1: you know, twenty or thirty years ago, anywhere near what
Speaker 1: it does right now. I mean, the NBA is now.
Speaker 1: And this is why I think there is a bit
Speaker 1: of arrogance from these leagues where they can, they think
Speaker 1: they can, they think they can, you know, upset a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans. It doesn't really matter all that much
Speaker 1: to the bottom line or at least they'll be able
Speaker 1: to continue on making a lot of money because they'll
Speaker 1: watch them in We'll watch these games in China, in
Speaker 1: Europe and South America and so on and so forth. Right,
Speaker 1: But I see a dynamic playing out here where where
Speaker 1: the lack of patriotism and professional sports. It reminds me
Speaker 1: a bit. And it's not across the board. I know
Speaker 1: they're athletes who have stood. I know there are a
Speaker 1: lot of great patriots who play in professional leagues. And
Speaker 1: you know, we're speaking obviously about those who think they're
Speaker 1: making some profound point by being disrespectful during the anthem.
Speaker 1: That's all it is, right by by calling attention to
Speaker 1: themselves during the national anthem, which is supposed to be
Speaker 1: a moment of unity, brings us together before sporting event.
Speaker 1: I honestly think that we should just probably I think
Speaker 1: we should probably just get rid of the anthem before
Speaker 1: these games. I think that it's we are selling the
Speaker 1: anthem by tying it to these some of these sporting events.
Speaker 1: I know we've you know, there's been this huge campaign.
Speaker 1: The NFL has been a really big part of it
Speaker 1: with you know, the military and the flag and this
Speaker 1: this sports game Okay, when they're being respectful about those things, fine,
Speaker 1: but they're going to be disrespectful. There's really no particular
Speaker 1: connection between these things. I'm getting to the point where
Speaker 1: I just think that this is a fight that we
Speaker 1: don't need to continue to have. But you know, other
Speaker 1: people would say, don't concede this ground. But as long
Speaker 1: as you're doing these anthems, any player who wants to
Speaker 1: draw attention to himself will just do this, and the
Speaker 1: woke side of things will come to his defense and
Speaker 1: they'll they'll make the whole Colin Kaepernick case. But I
Speaker 1: think you have the the international the internationalization of professional
Speaker 1: sports in the US, the same way you've had that
Speaker 1: with the media. It reminds me when I was in
Speaker 1: China watching CNN International because it was the only thing
Speaker 1: I could watch in English in my hotel room. And
Speaker 1: I mean, c AN International is taking a very anti
Speaker 1: American point of view, but that appeals to the rest
Speaker 1: of the world. Right, you can now have sports teams
Speaker 1: and sports leagues that lose a portion of American audience
Speaker 1: but gain you know, among the more woke, you know, youthful,
Speaker 1: lunatic lib side of things, but also know they can
Speaker 1: make it up within a global TV revenue. So it
Speaker 1: feels to me like some of these sports leagues are
Speaker 1: just becoming less patriotic. That's happening. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Sally Yates, Oh,
Speaker 1: Sally Yates, You miserable deep state democrat fraud you testify
Speaker 1: yesterday Lindsey Graham way too deferential to her. You notice
Speaker 1: how Democrats do this versus Republicans, or Republicans still think
Speaker 1: that they get points for being good little boys who
Speaker 1: will be respectful of our government servants, even when they've
Speaker 1: been part of an effort to ruin the ruin the
Speaker 1: life and career of decorated thirty year military veteran like
Speaker 1: General Flynn, to bring about a soft coup against the
Speaker 1: president of the United States. You know, now we've you
Speaker 1: see with time what ends up happening, what the new
Speaker 1: perception becomes. We went from a media apparatus that was
Speaker 1: in love with James Comey to now everyone's like, oh yeah, Comy, No,
Speaker 1: I mean every I mean everybody knows Comy's kind of
Speaker 1: a jerk, right. I mean, you know, Comy is not
Speaker 1: somebody you can't trust James Comy. Come on, No, I
Speaker 1: remember when they were telling us that James Comey was
Speaker 1: the greatest public servant in the history of the country.
Speaker 1: I remember when James Coomy was being hailed as like
Speaker 1: the greatest law enforcement guy since Elliott Ness or I
Speaker 1: don't know, pick somebody. And now they're all like, oh, no,
Speaker 1: he was a weirdo and what he was doing was wrong,
Speaker 1: and it was clearly a personal vendetta. And so but
Speaker 1: there's no h there's no accounting of this. There's no
Speaker 1: accountability for who was right and who was wrong? Right,
Speaker 1: what I've been telling you about James Comey now for
Speaker 1: four years? Correct, He's an untrustworthy, self absorbed, narcissistic, dishonest, lunatic. Okay, true,
Speaker 1: But you remember, for about two two and a half years,
Speaker 1: media was, oh, James Comy is a great How dare Trump?
Speaker 1: The FBI? Everyone's crying in the whole because Director comyus gone.
Speaker 1: They're all these little comius that were hired over at CNN,
Speaker 1: you know, Pajama Boy and a bunch of others that
Speaker 1: had worked with Comy at the FBI. Oh, Comey was
Speaker 1: the greatest. Comy's horrible, absolutely horrible, and even Sally Yates
Speaker 1: willing to throw him under the bus. Here's what she said,
Speaker 1: play clip five. Here's what I want to understand. It
Speaker 1: is a counterintelligence of vege that led to the interview.
Speaker 1: You didn't authorize the interview. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: you wanted to go to the White House and tell
Speaker 1: them about the problem, didn't you. That's right. I didn't
Speaker 1: thought that that was the more immediate issue. And when
Speaker 1: you hear when you heard about the interview, you got upset,
Speaker 1: didn't you. I was upset that director Comy didn't coordinate
Speaker 1: that with usn't acted unil like. Yes, I was, okay,
Speaker 1: did Comey go rogue? And you could chuse that term?
Speaker 1: Is finally, did Comey go rogue? You could use that term? Yes? Oh, Now,
Speaker 1: after what four years of when you Comey got fired
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff, now they'll actually just say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: I mean Comey was a jerk. Four years of just
Speaker 1: whining and all this stuff about how James Comy was
Speaker 1: this great public servant and how could Trump be so
Speaker 1: awful to them and all this other It's just garbage folks.
Speaker 1: They're lying to you, CNN. I mean, you go, you
Speaker 1: can go back and look at what people CNN's particularly
Speaker 1: agreedious in this regre. I mean they've lost their minds.
Speaker 1: I know people over at CNN, I can tell you,
Speaker 1: you know, they'll they'll behind closed doors, they'll be like,
Speaker 1: I mean, CNN has lost its mind. It's very pert
Speaker 1: That Zucker Trump thing is real. It's very personal and
Speaker 1: and that and he controls that organization with an iron fist,
Speaker 1: and it's it is an anti Trump pack. It's not
Speaker 1: a news organization anymore. It might as well CNN is
Speaker 1: the Lincoln Project with you know, more hairspray. That's what
Speaker 1: it is. And and obviously there there libs openly and
Speaker 1: like the Lincoln Project where they're just secret libs. But
Speaker 1: you watch the way that Yates is talking about all
Speaker 1: this stuff, and I can't help but say that I
Speaker 1: saw all this coming, that they just needed to use.
Speaker 1: That it was used the narrative as long as it's
Speaker 1: effective and by the time everyone finds out because the
Speaker 1: information will come forward despite all their efforts to suppress it.
Speaker 1: That the dossier was a joke, that Carter Page never
Speaker 1: should have been surveiled that all this stuff that was
Speaker 1: done by the FBI was done in bad faith. They
Speaker 1: were they're just claiming now that they were too stupid
Speaker 1: to see all the giant holes in their theories. That
Speaker 1: this guy Christopher Steele, who's not the second coming of
Speaker 1: James Bond, like we were led to believe, this guy's
Speaker 1: a fraud, a clown, a public drunk. All of that
Speaker 1: we find out and they're like, well, you know, but
Speaker 1: it was useful. While it was useful, and it's too late. Now,
Speaker 1: what are you gonna do about it? That's really you
Speaker 1: see it again, that's what the Democrats do. Okay, so
Speaker 1: we lied, we were wrong. Look at this, Look at
Speaker 1: what happened. That's why that that moment you will remember
Speaker 1: years ago and Mitt Romney ran against Barack Obama and
Speaker 1: a Mitt Romney don't even get me started. Don't even
Speaker 1: get me started. Folks be here all day. Mit you quit,
Speaker 1: you quit being a Republican. It's a very very sad thing,
Speaker 1: if you ever really were one, very sad thing to watch.
Speaker 1: It's all personal for these guys. These guys are all
Speaker 1: ego maniacs. They'll abandon their principles and their politics on
Speaker 1: personal on personal whim. That's what you've seen clearly with
Speaker 1: Romney among many many others. But you remember when Harry
Speaker 1: Reid said that Romney hadn't paid taxes in ten years,
Speaker 1: and he said, on the floor of the sentence, you
Speaker 1: can say anything there and you can't be sued. And
Speaker 1: it was a lie. And when someone pointed that out
Speaker 1: that it was just a lie what Harry said, He's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: did he win? That is the Democrat mentality on all
Speaker 1: of this stuff. That has been the mentality on Russia
Speaker 1: collusion all along. Okay, yeah, we lied, but didn't you
Speaker 1: have to have Trump on defense off balance? I mean,
Speaker 1: Trump presider over three of the best years in America
Speaker 1: in my lifetime. The first three years the Trump presidency
Speaker 1: were three of the best years in this country as
Speaker 1: long as I've been alive. No major wars, no major
Speaker 1: terrorist attacks, booming economy. I mean, the media finally getting
Speaker 1: when it deserves with a president who's telling them to
Speaker 1: just you know, stop being a bunch of jerks and
Speaker 1: shut up. But they were able to use this Russia
Speaker 1: collusion nonsense as a weapon against the president, and they
Speaker 1: were able to do it for a long time, and
Speaker 1: that's what mattered to them, that that was the whole
Speaker 1: point of it, to get away with the end. They
Speaker 1: did get away. There's not This is why I've said it.
Speaker 1: I talked to my friend doctor A Sebastian gork on
Speaker 1: his show yesterday. I said that if I'm by Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly still owes me a steak, I'm coming to collect
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly. We had a bet over Nancy Pelosi. You guys,
Speaker 1: remember that was earlier this year. Jesse Kelly is a
Speaker 1: great man, but he owes me a steak. Damn it
Speaker 1: when the quarantine's over. But I bet Gorka a steak.
Speaker 1: And it was what I've already said to you. There's
Speaker 1: not gonna be any major major prosecution, major arrests um made,
Speaker 1: you know, and any major indictment brought based on what
Speaker 1: has gone on here, based on the Durham probe. I
Speaker 1: just don't see it. If I'm wrong, you know, all
Speaker 1: coming to say, guys, I was wrong, I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: there's not going to be in my opinion, of major
Speaker 1: indictment because we just have all we've all gotten so
Speaker 1: used to the Democrat abuse that we're we're unwilling to
Speaker 1: use the same sort of winning at all costs mentality
Speaker 1: and even enforcing the law at at at it at
Speaker 1: its actual written level, right the way that it's supposed
Speaker 1: to be enforced. We won't do it. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and podcast. I
Speaker 1: relied upon the FBI as the fact finders here and
Speaker 1: the lawyers in the National Security Division to vet the
Speaker 1: accuracy of the application. Trump right, No, Senator, they did
Speaker 1: not hate well if I mean, we have to say,
Speaker 1: I have to speak up here for the career men
Speaker 1: and women of the Department of Justice. You know, do
Speaker 1: w oh, I'm not talking about all the career men
Speaker 1: and women. I think you and your collegue should have
Speaker 1: had tarnished the reputation of the FBI. She relied on
Speaker 1: the FBI, and see everybody was lying up, relying on
Speaker 1: somebody else to do the fact checking through the real
Speaker 1: investigation to the But they were happy to run fi's
Speaker 1: a warrants on people and play all of these games.
Speaker 1: It is the most appalling political scandal of my lifetime, right,
Speaker 1: and there is unlikely to be any real accountability for it,
Speaker 1: as I've told you, because they'll just say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: we were that was somebody else's job. This is the problem.
Speaker 1: Whenever you're dealing with a bureaucracy, it's always someone else's job.
Speaker 1: Someone else was always responsible. No one's really in the
Speaker 1: chain of command in a way where they're going to
Speaker 1: have to fall on their swords, so to speak. It's
Speaker 1: just not going to happen. And that's what I think
Speaker 1: you're going to see here. We'll find out that there
Speaker 1: were all of these very convenient It's the same way
Speaker 1: that libs can think that journalism is not just an
Speaker 1: enclave of Democrat activism. We can say to them, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, you've got a hundred stories, and ninety
Speaker 1: nine of the hundred stories for your news organization, or
Speaker 1: one hundred of one hundred news stories for your new
Speaker 1: quote news organization are anti Trump, and you're gonna tell
Speaker 1: us you're not biased, And it's a yeah, that's just
Speaker 1: how it went. No bias there. You know, I know
Speaker 1: it's only negative stories about Trump from our news organization.
Speaker 1: But you know that those that's what the facts, that's
Speaker 1: what the facts led us to. All the only negative stories,
Speaker 1: no good stories. And they'll say that to you. We'll say,
Speaker 1: how do I, how do I have an exchange of
Speaker 1: ideas with a person who is this incapable of dealing
Speaker 1: with things in a rational, factual way, Like, it's not possible,
Speaker 1: as a matter of probability, that you're only writing negative
Speaker 1: stories about Trump, because those are just the only stories
Speaker 1: that your news organization, a news organization, could come up with.
Speaker 1: It's certainly possible if the purpose of your news organization
Speaker 1: is to trash Trump and tear him down, Yeah, then
Speaker 1: it's going to be you know, one hundred out of
Speaker 1: a hundred. And you have the same thing here with
Speaker 1: the FBI. It's not possible that at all of these
Speaker 1: different stages, whether we're talking about Papadopoulos or Carter Page
Speaker 1: and the fires are worn and crossfire hurricane and sending
Speaker 1: somebody after National Security Advisor Flynn and Comy going rogue
Speaker 1: and Comy leaking documents to try to get even with
Speaker 1: Trump and get a special counsel started. It's not possible
Speaker 1: that all of these things are happening in the bureaucracy
Speaker 1: of the FBI and the DOJ that are all negative
Speaker 1: for Trump, and there wasn't actually a mentality and ideology
Speaker 1: of anti Trump bias pushing this. It's not possible. No,
Speaker 1: no one ever stopped or think you're talking about the
Speaker 1: most This isn't just some FBI investigation, right, This isn't
Speaker 1: a couple of guys you know named Tony and Billy
Speaker 1: running numbers in the back room of a grocery store
Speaker 1: somewhere and the FBI is looking at them for a
Speaker 1: RICO case. Like this is the biggest, most important, politically
Speaker 1: sensitive investigation in decades. And it's just a comedy of errors.
Speaker 1: Not funny comedy, but it's just endless clownishness. A dossier
Speaker 1: that was paid for by the DNC that they didn't
Speaker 1: tell the court, was paid for by the DNC, that
Speaker 1: was full of lies, faking information about carter Page, saying
Speaker 1: that he was working against the US government when he
Speaker 1: was working for the US government, pretending that he could
Speaker 1: be some kind of a Russian go between spy, that
Speaker 1: he was a trader. They pretended carter Page FBI agents pretended,
Speaker 1: knowing that it wasn't true that carter Page was a trader.
Speaker 1: They act like Papadopoulos was some bad Papadopolus didn't do
Speaker 1: anything wrong, nothing, he did nothing wrong. He got scared
Speaker 1: when he was having the Muller team trying to ruin
Speaker 1: his life, and he lied about an email that didn't
Speaker 1: make any difference, so they sent him a prison for
Speaker 1: fourteen days or whatever, ten days. But in terms of
Speaker 1: Russia collusia, he didn't do anything wrong. Nothing. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: heard a rumor. A lot of people were hearing rumors,
Speaker 1: but a lot of things. That's it. And yet they
Speaker 1: want you did the Sally ates is of the world
Speaker 1: want you to believe that all the unmasking, all the
Speaker 1: balloon that the dossier was real, the laundering the dossier
Speaker 1: through the intelligence community, and with the with the compliant media,
Speaker 1: and the back and forth between the two and Bruce
Speaker 1: Orr and Nelly or working you know, she's working for
Speaker 1: Fusion on behalf of the DNC, Bruce or Is at
Speaker 1: DJ all these things. We're to believe that it was
Speaker 1: just coincidence that these things all lined up, I'm to
Speaker 1: orchestrated in such a way that it was damaging for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, trying to ruin him and people around him.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to believe that as if we are all
Speaker 1: that blanking stupid, right, But that's that is the Sally
Speaker 1: Yate's argument. Oh, it was gonna we did this everything
Speaker 1: we had to do, and I just you know, I
Speaker 1: believe the FBI was gonna do no. No, that is unacceptable.
Speaker 1: That is completely and utterly breath of believability. Sally. It's
Speaker 1: a Democrat partisan. We all know this. She at her
Speaker 1: whole Oh, I'm gonna stand up and I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: do my job. I'm not gonna listen to Trump. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna Oh, I'm gonna show him, Okay, and she got that.
Speaker 1: What was it the letter from Weissman. I'm so proud
Speaker 1: of you, Weisman, Muller, Yates, you know they're Oh, there's
Speaker 1: so much co mingling of the deep state here, There's
Speaker 1: so much collusion behind the scenes with all of them.
Speaker 1: Weisman is head headlining or was going to do They
Speaker 1: realize how bad the optics were. The guy running the
Speaker 1: totally neutral, unbiased probe wasn't Mueller. We all know that
Speaker 1: Mueller was like Biden Murma doing and bring me a
Speaker 1: shippy cup. Weissman is a clear Democrat partisan, a vicious
Speaker 1: Democrat partisan who is thinking about how he's gonna raise
Speaker 1: money for Biden. He was the unbiased do J A
Speaker 1: veteran that was going to come in here and get
Speaker 1: us to the truth. Set out ten possible counts of
Speaker 1: wouldn't call it act, wouldn't say which one was actually criminal,
Speaker 1: but set out ten possible counts of criminality as a smear,
Speaker 1: a smear from the Mala report. It's just all politics, folks,
Speaker 1: It's all what we've seen it now. And this is
Speaker 1: my problem, this is my problem. I think that we
Speaker 1: already know what happened. Let's not let them gaslight us.
Speaker 1: You know, I understand that Durham is getting too more
Speaker 1: factions and maybe, and God willing, will find this out.
Speaker 1: Durham's got him. Maybe he's really got them on something.
Speaker 1: Maybe he finds that smoking gun, email or text or
Speaker 1: whatever where they can't even hide anymore. I certainly hope
Speaker 1: that's the case. But if I'm a betting man, and
Speaker 1: I've already told you, I owe doctor g Is stake
Speaker 1: if I'm wrong on this one, I think that we're
Speaker 1: going to find that everything that I have been telling
Speaker 1: you for four years, everything that the people defending Trump
Speaker 1: against this Russia collusion insanity for four years have said,
Speaker 1: was true and correct, and his opponents. Trump's opponents were
Speaker 1: lying about all of this and whether it was Adam's
Speaker 1: Schiff or Swalwell or Pelosi or Schumer or all these
Speaker 1: pundits at the different lib anti Trump networks, they just
Speaker 1: lied their faces off. And you know what's really frustrating.
Speaker 1: Once all the truth comes out, you know earth they're
Speaker 1: going to say, Yeah, but did he win this November?
Speaker 1: That's the only question that really matters, folks. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. White people, there are white people who are
Speaker 1: not as powerful as the system of white people, the
Speaker 1: cast system that's been put in place, but they still
Speaker 1: no matter where they are on the or the ladder
Speaker 1: of success, they still have their whiteness. Oh, they still
Speaker 1: have their whiteness. That's billionaire black celebrity Oprah letting people
Speaker 1: know in eastern Kentucky, the poorest per capita county counties
Speaker 1: in the United States. Letting people know who are living
Speaker 1: in a impoverished trailer park somewhere without a mom or
Speaker 1: without a dad and just trying to get by. At
Speaker 1: least they've got their whiteness. Yeah, that's right. Deal with it. Wow,
Speaker 1: this is pervasive. Though. Now let's let's talk about this,
Speaker 1: shall we. Let let's have a discussion about what this
Speaker 1: really does, this this mentality, what it does to our society.
Speaker 1: First of all, if we have she called it a
Speaker 1: cast system, if we have a racial cast system in
Speaker 1: this country, I'm going to need to know why is
Speaker 1: it that that cast system has also elevated? The system
Speaker 1: must have done it right, because it's the system. It's
Speaker 1: not individual decisions played out collectively among millions and millions
Speaker 1: of people. It's the system. Why has the system of
Speaker 1: white privilege elevated Asian Americans who have a higher per
Speaker 1: capita income than white Americans do? Why is it the
Speaker 1: Asian community? Why is it? In fact, numerous non white
Speaker 1: immigrant communities have more substantial wealth, higher levels of education achievement,
Speaker 1: and higher quality of life than white people in this country.
Speaker 1: I just I would like the Libs to try and
Speaker 1: answer this for me. I would I would like them
Speaker 1: to explain this. I would also like to know where
Speaker 1: is where is the overt discrimination in the law against
Speaker 1: say that the Latino community, where they're always they will
Speaker 1: often talk of the black and brown community. This is
Speaker 1: in liberal parlance, and they act like somebody who is
Speaker 1: from let's say, rural Honduras is in a very similar
Speaker 1: situation to say somebody who comes from, Oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: Puerto Rico or Brazil, and I'd say, um, these are
Speaker 1: people with very different cultural and economic backgrounds. You know,
Speaker 1: Puerto Ricans are Americans, their US passport holders, but somehow
Speaker 1: they're grouped together with impoverished Hondurans and the liberal conception
Speaker 1: their categorizations are wrong and sloppy. Whiteness, for example, Okay,
Speaker 1: let's talk about this concept of whiteness for a minute.
Speaker 1: Someone who is let's say, you know, sixth generation American
Speaker 1: board here who is white, it has the same has
Speaker 1: the same set up in the same Situation's the same privilege.
Speaker 1: You can call it as an a recent Albanian immigrant
Speaker 1: who came here not speaking any English, without a penny
Speaker 1: in his pocket, from a very different culture. White Albanians
Speaker 1: are white same? Is that the same? I just want
Speaker 1: to since we're talking about that that's the same, what
Speaker 1: exactly are the outer limits of white privilege or where
Speaker 1: does it and what does white privilege get you? I
Speaker 1: think a lot of people sit around in the country
Speaker 1: right now and say, what is my white privilege got me?
Speaker 1: Am I gonna I'm gonna hear more stories about how
Speaker 1: some people are anecdotal stories about some people feel like
Speaker 1: they're followed when they're in a store. I've been followed
Speaker 1: when I'm in a store. I was told very rudely
Speaker 1: once to pump somebody's gas because I had a hat
Speaker 1: pulled down over my head and he assumed that I
Speaker 1: was an employee. I guess I could have gone on
Speaker 1: for months and months afterwards, upset. Why would somebody think
Speaker 1: that I was an employee there? But stuff like that
Speaker 1: just sort of happens. But people can either hold onto
Speaker 1: it or they can say that stuff happens. Human beings
Speaker 1: are imperfect and there's not some system that is out
Speaker 1: to get me. In fact, we have a system that
Speaker 1: makes distinctions by race in favor of black, Latino and
Speaker 1: Native American people in America. That is a fact. That
Speaker 1: is legal reality. It's true in affirmative affirmative action, it's
Speaker 1: true in hiring, it's true in corporate America. And yet
Speaker 1: we're still always told that the system holds people down.
Speaker 1: We will have Lebron James, will have Oprah Winfrey will
Speaker 1: have people who are fabulously wealthy, influential, leading lives that
Speaker 1: ninety nine nine percent of people could never even dream of,
Speaker 1: and there will be complaints about how hard the system is. Wow, okay,
Speaker 1: my friends, this is very divisive. It's very destructive. The
Speaker 1: sloppy categorizations, the claims that are made that some people
Speaker 1: just some people have it easy. I mean, what is
Speaker 1: that supposed to say? What does white privilege mean that
Speaker 1: a white person is not really capable of earning what
Speaker 1: he or she has, that it has been given to him.
Speaker 1: There are more poor white people in America than there
Speaker 1: are anybody else, So what did their white privilege get them?
Speaker 1: And I know this is where they would say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's white fragility. See you're you're rejecting this concept. Nope.
Speaker 1: Judging people by skin color, treating them differently, thinking that
Speaker 1: they are different because of skin color, is racist. It
Speaker 1: is immoral. It is wrong. That is true, irrespective of
Speaker 1: whether the distinction is supposed to help some that you
Speaker 1: think are historically oppressed and hurt others that you think
Speaker 1: are historically advantage. It's wrong, it's immoral. It rests on
Speaker 1: moral fallacies and a lack of a real willingness to
Speaker 1: have a conversation about what's true and what's not. In
Speaker 1: America today, we have a system that we're told that
Speaker 1: elevates elevates white people, and yet we ask in what
Speaker 1: way are white people elevated through the system? And you
Speaker 1: get a lot of talk about statistics and everything else. Well,
Speaker 1: I can tell you this looking at numbers in the
Speaker 1: aggregate and making determinations that there is a system that
Speaker 1: created that is not what we do with a lot
Speaker 1: of other things. Murder is overwhelmingly a male institution. Guys
Speaker 1: kill people, women very very rarely. You look at violent crime,
Speaker 1: women very very rarely kill people. Do we have a
Speaker 1: system that unfairly targets men? Do we have a I
Speaker 1: always forget that when the misogyny is hatred of women,
Speaker 1: miss Andre right, miss Andre, hatred of men? Do we
Speaker 1: have a I don't even know how you say this,
Speaker 1: a missendryotic system or something. Do we have a system
Speaker 1: that hates men that's unfairly targeting men for the violent
Speaker 1: crimes they commit? Or do we have men who just
Speaker 1: commit more violent crimes women do? And maybe there's a
Speaker 1: lot of complicated sociological and you know, historical reasons. You
Speaker 1: could talk about this, but is it the system? Are
Speaker 1: we manufacturing that men create, that men cause more violent
Speaker 1: crime than women do. I don't think. I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody yet makes that argument. Although I don't know, give
Speaker 1: it time, Give it time. There has been a transition, friends,
Speaker 1: And there is a fascinating piece by Zach Goldberg in
Speaker 1: Tablet Magazine how the media led the Great racial Awakening.
Speaker 1: And what he does is he just goes and looks
Speaker 1: at the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los
Speaker 1: Angeles Times, and then the Wall Street Journal, almost as
Speaker 1: a control group in all of this. To see that
Speaker 1: starting right around right around twenty eleven, right around the
Speaker 1: second Obama term, you had a an enormous surge in
Speaker 1: the usage of terms like racism in the media. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, you're hearing a lot more about it,
Speaker 1: and it's clear you go from you go for him,
Speaker 1: an increase of seven hundred percent, so seven times as
Speaker 1: often in the media. The New York Times, the Washington
Speaker 1: Post used the words racism a thousand percent more in
Speaker 1: some cases, depending on the terms you're looking at, I mean,
Speaker 1: you're looking at seven to ten x increase in the
Speaker 1: usage of terms meant to describe racism in America. And
Speaker 1: then you start seeing and I've talked to you about
Speaker 1: this before this article came out, and a huge spike
Speaker 1: in usage of the term white supremacy. White supremacy was
Speaker 1: known in America until ten years ago. And that's about
Speaker 1: how long it takes for the for the wokeness, for
Speaker 1: the left to manufacture and spread a narrative that really
Speaker 1: seeps into the consciousness and becomes powerful. White supremacy was
Speaker 1: known ten years ago as something that would be, you know,
Speaker 1: a person with Nazi you know, a swastika tattoo on
Speaker 1: their forehead and says that white people are better than
Speaker 1: other people and and horrible racist garbage. That was what
Speaker 1: white supremacy was. You know, they wore boots and shaved heads,
Speaker 1: and they would march sometimes with Nazi swastika stuff and
Speaker 1: I mean Nazi flags, swastikas, all the rest. That's what
Speaker 1: white supremacy was. We all knew that there was that
Speaker 1: movie American History X about white supremacists that we'd see them. Now,
Speaker 1: white supremacy is not enough diversity on a corporate board
Speaker 1: that's considered that is used they used the term white
Speaker 1: supremacy for that, so they've expanded, and that's intentional. You
Speaker 1: see an enormous spike starting ten years ago immedia usage
Speaker 1: of the term white supremacy, and big surprise, folks, guess what.
Speaker 1: Around the same time, you start to have a large
Speaker 1: increase among white liberals, particularly in their perception of how
Speaker 1: racist America is. The journals of you know, the biggest
Speaker 1: opinion makers in liberal media convinced, and there was a
Speaker 1: clear campaign to do it. That the data speaks for itself.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, you're seeing all these terms appear
Speaker 1: that hadn't appeared before, came from it, came from academia,
Speaker 1: came from the college campuses, and had started there. It's
Speaker 1: really a reboot of critical race theory, which has been
Speaker 1: around since the sixties seventies. Herbert Marcus, some say, the
Speaker 1: father of critical race theory. And this happened, and you
Speaker 1: can see the perception, the trend changing as a result
Speaker 1: of it, and the way that the media covers race
Speaker 1: and racial issues all of a sudden shifts dramatically. This
Speaker 1: was intentional. This was intentional, and I really recommend this
Speaker 1: piece about the Great Racial Awakening because you see that
Speaker 1: this was manufactured and it was based on nothing other
Speaker 1: than the propagandistic desire of the media. They wanted to
Speaker 1: convince people that there was more racism, so that's what
Speaker 1: they did, because racism gets clicks, and racism is a
Speaker 1: narrative that makes the white liberals who are pushing it
Speaker 1: constantly feel better about themselves. And anybody who sees what's
Speaker 1: really going on in these protests across the country understands
Speaker 1: that you have crazy white liberals who are they're the
Speaker 1: dominant force in the protests and the BLM protests. It's
Speaker 1: crazy white liberals. They're the ones who are is claiming
Speaker 1: and cops. This piece also has New York Times latent
Speaker 1: association between race and white just takes off like a
Speaker 1: rocket ship in twenty eleven. It all started right around
Speaker 1: twenty eleven twenty twelve Obama's second term. You have an
Speaker 1: enormous increase in uses of terms like racial hierarchy, white privilege, whiteness,
Speaker 1: white supremacy. In it all just it couldn't be any
Speaker 1: more clear when you plot it and look at it
Speaker 1: on a graph. This was intentional. The country didn't change
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, didn't get much more racist, if anything,
Speaker 1: while we had our first black president who was universally
Speaker 1: celebrated in the media pretty much. I mean, there are
Speaker 1: a few people who were critics in the right, but
Speaker 1: I mean in a ninety five percent of journal its
Speaker 1: loved Obama. And he's ultra influential, wealthy guy, the most
Speaker 1: powerful political brand in the Democrat Party to this day.
Speaker 1: And yet there was supposed to be some huge surge
Speaker 1: of racism in his second term that the media is reflecting.
Speaker 1: I you know, you look for what was the what
Speaker 1: was the trigger, what was the incident that led to this,
Speaker 1: And yeah, all of a sudden, you're hearing a lot
Speaker 1: about white supremacy. You're hearing a lot about these things,
Speaker 1: reading a lot about these things in the media, and
Speaker 1: there's just there's a direct correlation between the perception and
Speaker 1: the usage of these terms. Also another interesting note that
Speaker 1: I think should get a lot more attention, and it's
Speaker 1: that then when they look into the data this is
Speaker 1: on the Conversation dot com, when they look into the
Speaker 1: data on diverse with diversity training, Diversity training often backfires
Speaker 1: and it is worse to have diversity training in terms
Speaker 1: if you really believe in diversity then to have no
Speaker 1: diversity training at all, because some people just rejected entirely
Speaker 1: and become even more annoyed by this. They reject these
Speaker 1: theories of white fragility and all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: But even people who don't reject it, here here's what
Speaker 1: it's as disappointing results in unintended consequences is from the
Speaker 1: conversation dot com, and this is about diversity training. In
Speaker 1: terms of reducing bias and promoting equal opportunity. Diversity training
Speaker 1: has failed spectacularly, according to the expert assessment of sociologist
Speaker 1: Frank Dobbin and Alexandra Calev. When Dobbin and Caleb evaluated
Speaker 1: the impact of diversity training at more than eight hundred
Speaker 1: companies over three decades, they found that the positive effects
Speaker 1: are short lived, and that compulsory training generates resistance and resentment.
Speaker 1: A company is better off doing nothing than mandatory diversity training.
Speaker 1: Caleb said. Some of the most popular training approaches are
Speaker 1: of dubious value. There is evidence, for example, that introducing
Speaker 1: people to the most commonly used readings about white privilege
Speaker 1: can reduce sympathy for poor whites. Oh you mean like
Speaker 1: Oprah saying even poor white people have their white privilege,
Speaker 1: especially among social liberals. Piece goes on, there's also evidence
Speaker 1: that emphasizing cultural differences across racial groups can lead to
Speaker 1: an increased belief in fundamental biological differences among races. This
Speaker 1: means that well intentioned efforts to celebrate diversity may in
Speaker 1: fact reinforce racial stereotyping. End quote. Ah, so you see
Speaker 1: this is where even the well intentioned libs with all
Speaker 1: the diversity training, are like, Oh, this group of people,
Speaker 1: we're gonna be We're gonna be so good. We're gonna
Speaker 1: give them more, we're gonna expect less from them, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna hire them. We're gonna bring them in because
Speaker 1: the Libs think this is what the sociological research shows
Speaker 1: they need the help. Without it, they couldn't get the job.
Speaker 1: That sounds pretty racist to me. Folks, you're enough. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And since we're
Speaker 1: talking about attitudes and race and there's such a conversation
Speaker 1: going on right now about about policing in this country,
Speaker 1: I thought it would be worth you hearing this because
Speaker 1: you won't see it in the mainstream media. According Gallup Polling,
Speaker 1: the narrative you here in the mainstream media is that
Speaker 1: defund cops is what the black community wants, meaning the
Speaker 1: average Black American is on board with this. That's what
Speaker 1: you get from the frauds at CNN, the lunatics on
Speaker 1: the left wing, the left wing media, but most Black Americans,
Speaker 1: according to Gallup, probably the most respected polling agency that
Speaker 1: there is sixty one percent. Sixty one percent of Black
Speaker 1: Americans want the police presence in America to remain this
Speaker 1: same sixty seven percent of all US adults want the
Speaker 1: police presence to remain the same, means not defund cops.
Speaker 1: Seventy one percent of white Americans want the police presence
Speaker 1: to remain the same Black Americans. Twenty percent of Black
Speaker 1: Americans would would like the police to spend more time
Speaker 1: in their area, nineteen percent would like them to spend
Speaker 1: less time in their area. So one in five Black
Speaker 1: Americans want less police presence, eighty percent want either more
Speaker 1: or the same. Do you ever get that sense from
Speaker 1: the media, No, because they're really still overwhelmingly controlled by
Speaker 1: and comprised of white lives who don't care about the
Speaker 1: Black community. They care about feeling like they care about
Speaker 1: the black community. Thanks for listening to the bus sess
Speaker 1: in Showbot. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts like Soft
Speaker 1: Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom, coast
Speaker 1: to coast. It's time for roll call, Roll call time,
Speaker 1: everybody you know? Pretty s mark. I started watching this
Speaker 1: new Netflix like Mafia New York versus The Mafia Show.
Speaker 1: Have you seen it yet? I have none? That sounds
Speaker 1: interesting though? Pretty good? Pretty good. Actually, I kind of
Speaker 1: turned it on as a you know when you throw
Speaker 1: something on and you're cleaning up, and you're like, I
Speaker 1: don't really want to watch this, but I want to
Speaker 1: kind of half watch it. I was a half watcher,
Speaker 1: and then I was like, well, this is actually pretty interesting,
Speaker 1: is it? Or is it like a documentary? No, it's
Speaker 1: like a it's like a documentary of this early eighties
Speaker 1: New York bringing down the mob. Giuliani makes appearances in it.
Speaker 1: That's really how he built his career. Giuliani was known
Speaker 1: as the US attorney who destroyed the Mob. Yeah, he
Speaker 1: cleaned up New York City as the merit if one
Speaker 1: knows that well, of course. But I'm saying, but to
Speaker 1: become the mayor first as US Attorney. He took it,
Speaker 1: he took down the Mob, and Nan he became you know,
Speaker 1: then he became the mayor of New York. But it's
Speaker 1: it's incredible. The Mob had so much influence and power,
Speaker 1: the control of the ports, control of meat packing, control
Speaker 1: of the fish market. I mean, it's and they could
Speaker 1: threaten these businesses to give them the payoffs. They would
Speaker 1: shut the whole thing down. All the workers wouldn't show up.
Speaker 1: You think they still don't in some businesses. I think
Speaker 1: there's still some control. I gotta say, I don't really
Speaker 1: know what the status of the mob is right now.
Speaker 1: I know more about some of the Russian Mob stuff
Speaker 1: because I worked with some anti Russian Mob NYPD guys,
Speaker 1: and they say the Russian Mob is ruthless in Russia.
Speaker 1: In the US, they say it's more they're just they're
Speaker 1: they're just whatever they can do to make money. If
Speaker 1: they can do, uh, like medicare fraud, they love that.
Speaker 1: Like if they can just steal from the government, that's
Speaker 1: their favorite thing to do. But they're also willing to
Speaker 1: just engage in shocking violence, particularly in the home country,
Speaker 1: which and the Russian Mob also involves all the former
Speaker 1: stand countries. So you know, there are Russian mobsters and
Speaker 1: who's Beckett. We'll call them Russian mafia, even though they're
Speaker 1: not Russian. In Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Armenia, the Armenians will often
Speaker 1: get grouped in as being Russian mob So, yeah, interesting stuff.
Speaker 1: And I think they call it the Brotherhood and they
Speaker 1: have all these like different names for this stuff. But
Speaker 1: Bruce Mark, I think you would like this Netflix show.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you, yeah if when I watch it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they go into the Banano crime family, the Gambino Genovese um,
Speaker 1: you know, a bunch of bunch of other ones. So
Speaker 1: I'm trying to think like a name Banano, Genovese, Gambino, Colombo.
Speaker 1: Did I get to five? Trying to see if I
Speaker 1: could do all five? On top of my head, I'm
Speaker 1: missing one, I think, yeah, you are. I can't even
Speaker 1: think of it. I know, I feel like Gambino became
Speaker 1: the most famous because of John Gotti. So anyway, oh,
Speaker 1: producer Nick's winging Luke CAZy, Luke CAZy, Yes, yes, yes,
Speaker 1: that that's the one. I feel like they didn't have
Speaker 1: the best pr I feel like of the crime families,
Speaker 1: they're the least known. You know somehow, I don't families people,
Speaker 1: what's up? I don't think crime families have pr people. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but you know what I mean, like they had the
Speaker 1: like they're the least there's the least lore about the
Speaker 1: Luke Casey out there. You get obviously Gambino, super big, Bonanos,
Speaker 1: super well known, General Vies. I know stuff about that
Speaker 1: about some of their captains. Um anyway, the mobs and
Speaker 1: there's a good mob show. I'm just telling I'm looking
Speaker 1: for good shows these days because you know, New York
Speaker 1: is still frozen in place. You can't really do anything here.
Speaker 1: So I reckon a Bosch and this Netflix show are
Speaker 1: my late night They're my late night joy. I'm all
Speaker 1: into Big Brothers back. I don't know. Have you ever
Speaker 1: watched Big brother Now? What's that? It's the show on CBS.
Speaker 1: It's been around for twenty years now, with a luck
Speaker 1: fifteen people into a house for three months. I can
Speaker 1: tell you A long time ago, I went on a
Speaker 1: date with a woman who I think won one of
Speaker 1: the Big Brothers. Really. Yes, Oh, I'm a fanboy of that. True.
Speaker 1: I gotta talk. I watched every season and I can't
Speaker 1: even remember her name, but I do remember it came
Speaker 1: up on a date and I was like, what is
Speaker 1: this show? And she explained to me and I was like,
Speaker 1: that sounds crazy. How have you never heard of it?
Speaker 1: Port It's like the biggest reality show almost ever. I've
Speaker 1: heard of it. I've never watched. Okay, I very idea
Speaker 1: what it's mindless and interesting? Yeah, speaking of much, I
Speaker 1: gotta get. I gotta get the PS four going a lot.
Speaker 1: Can you play Fortnite on a computer or only on PlayStation?
Speaker 1: You can play on a computer, I would say probably
Speaker 1: with the regular laptop, it's not going to be as good.
Speaker 1: Like there are people who have like serious gaming laptops,
Speaker 1: and it would probably be much better on the console. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've you know, I don't have a desktop computer anymore,
Speaker 1: having it a long time, but maybe it's time to
Speaker 1: get one. All right, let's get to some roll call here, John,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck? What do we get to? Wait? Hey Buck?
Speaker 1: On mail in ballots, there's a saying when a person
Speaker 1: doesn't give their best, they mailed it in. Well it
Speaker 1: came from somewhere right in person is the only way
Speaker 1: to keep it fair. Less technology is better and harder
Speaker 1: to cheat, John, I think you're right, and I think
Speaker 1: that the people that are pushing for this on the
Speaker 1: left don't care that you're right because they view this
Speaker 1: as a way to get their way. So that's what
Speaker 1: I see happening here. That's that's my belief. Alrighty, there's
Speaker 1: gonna be mail in balloting for a bunch of states.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's it's not gonna be universal, but
Speaker 1: there will be some of it. Sarah hey Buck readings
Speaker 1: from the Socialist State of Washington. You ever watched The
Speaker 1: American President with Michael Douglas and Michael J. Fox. One
Speaker 1: of my favorite lines seems eerily fitting for today. Michael J.
Speaker 1: Fox says, people want leadership, mister President, and in the
Speaker 1: absence of genuine leadership, to listen to anyone who steps
Speaker 1: up to the microphone, they want leadership. They're so thirsty
Speaker 1: for it. They'll crawl through the desert toward Mirage. When
Speaker 1: they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand and
Speaker 1: the president. Michael Douglas responds Lewis, We've had presidents who
Speaker 1: are beloved who couldn't find a coherent sentence with two
Speaker 1: hands in a flashlight. People don't drink the sand because
Speaker 1: they're thirsty. They drink the sand because they don't know
Speaker 1: the difference. Wow, are we there today? Or what? Keep
Speaker 1: up the good work? YouTube shields High. It's a kind
Speaker 1: of a somewhat cynical view of politics. But yeah, I
Speaker 1: remember the American President. I think that's the one with
Speaker 1: Anette Benning, where like the big line it's like, you've
Speaker 1: lost more than my respect, mister president, you've lost my vote.
Speaker 1: You know. She's like an environmentalist activist. I will tell
Speaker 1: you this. I have gone back and watched some of
Speaker 1: the West Wing, a show i'd never really I've maybe
Speaker 1: had seen two episodes of it in total before, and
Speaker 1: I was kind of curious. It's a fascinating time warp
Speaker 1: into the mentality of nineties libs. You go back and
Speaker 1: you watch it. It's all about like gun control and
Speaker 1: hate crime legislation and you know, a woman's right to choose,
Speaker 1: and it's all these really oh my gosh, all this
Speaker 1: sort of sanctimonious crapper on that, But so much of
Speaker 1: it is if we can just get gun control, we'll
Speaker 1: save so many lives. You're like, what doesn't work? Never
Speaker 1: has work? Didn't work then doesn't work now but oh,
Speaker 1: that's that. There's so much smug liberalism in it. But
Speaker 1: it's a little bit more. It's it's less insane than
Speaker 1: it is now. I will say that because it was
Speaker 1: it was so transparently about feel goodism, and now the
Speaker 1: Libs are less obsessed with their own feel goodism as
Speaker 1: they are the feelgodism of destroying you. So it's changed
Speaker 1: a little bit. There's also a pre nine eleven, so
Speaker 1: the world completely changed when we love to talk about
Speaker 1: that stuff again. Oh yeah, yeah, that's true too, it
Speaker 1: is it was wait was it pre nine eleven? The
Speaker 1: West Wing? Yeah, it wasn't it in the nineties. I
Speaker 1: think you're right. I think it was Clinton administration. When
Speaker 1: did the west Wings start? Do a quick google on
Speaker 1: that while I'm going through this. Bruce and Nicks. The
Speaker 1: west Wick is cheezy nineties Democrat fan fiction. It's absolutely true.
Speaker 1: It started pre nine eleven. So it started in ninety
Speaker 1: nine and it ended six that's right. That's right, So
Speaker 1: it started pre nine eleven, but it definitely continued inc
Speaker 1: because it was really the alternative to the Bush presidency
Speaker 1: for a lot of people for a number of years.
Speaker 1: But it is so corny and Aaron Sorkin is just
Speaker 1: it's just so transparent that they're creating this world where
Speaker 1: like the liberal ideas always win. M what a shock.
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, not all the good people are the liberal
Speaker 1: and the liberals are all like Econ Nobel Prize winners
Speaker 1: who also know how to throw a baseball and just
Speaker 1: want to make some delicious chili, you know. Oh god,
Speaker 1: it's fun to go back and watch it. She's like,
Speaker 1: is this how lives really see themselves or a bunch
Speaker 1: of a bunch of lunatics? Anyway, what was I saying? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: but the American President. I also remember that one because
Speaker 1: that was where they had the whole Bill Clinton like
Speaker 1: thing about how Michael Douglas has to call for an
Speaker 1: airstrike and he's like practically crying when he's thinking about
Speaker 1: how there's going to be some guy who works as
Speaker 1: a night janitor is going to get blown up in
Speaker 1: the night strike or something, and it's all all Clinton
Speaker 1: Clinton esque clean up stuff. Kyle Bluck when I was
Speaker 1: listening to Biden Harangue, that interviewer talking about taking Oh sorry,
Speaker 1: I gotta restart this one. When I was listening to
Speaker 1: Biden Harangue, that interviewer about taking a test beforehand to
Speaker 1: see if they were junkie on coke. I couldn't help
Speaker 1: but appreciate the irony of his own son being kicked
Speaker 1: out of the Navy for failing a drug test for cocaine,
Speaker 1: the same son who made money off his dad's name
Speaker 1: in Ukraine, in China. Good lord, I really hope Trump
Speaker 1: is able to capitalize on this in the debates. Kyle,
Speaker 1: you know Where's hunter sometimes trends on Twitter? But they're
Speaker 1: not going to care about that. You know you're seeing also,
Speaker 1: and I'll talk more about this tomorrow. The weaponization of
Speaker 1: prosecutor's offices once again against Trump. As I told you this,
Speaker 1: I did you know? I've been telling this what happened.
Speaker 1: You've got the Cyrus Vans, the District attorney from New York,
Speaker 1: bringing an investigation against the Trump organization, criminal investigation for fraud.
Speaker 1: You've got the New York State Attorney General calling for
Speaker 1: the disbanding of the NRA because of mismanagement of funds.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's not politically convenient timing, right, Sure, Sure,
Speaker 1: lives are ruthless, friends, Just accept it. Now, know that
Speaker 1: this is what you're up against. Michael right, shield's eye. Yeah,
Speaker 1: watching that wedding in Beirut, the wedding photos is a
Speaker 1: hard stopper. And judging from what I saw, they didn't
Speaker 1: get that there has mats right, and I can imagine
Speaker 1: it now put that dangerous stuff with the other dangerous stuff,
Speaker 1: not realize the properties of either. It sure shows very
Speaker 1: well just how fast one's life can change. Yeah, how
Speaker 1: fast one can lose one's life, Michael, biggest craziest explosion
Speaker 1: I've ever seen on video that wasn't nuclear, you know,
Speaker 1: historical footage, but I've never seen anything like that before.
Speaker 1: Almost three almost three thousand tons, not pounds, three thousand tons.
Speaker 1: It would be like loading up three thousand cars with
Speaker 1: ammonium nitrate and blowing them all at the same time. Right,
Speaker 1: you fill three three cars up with their you know,
Speaker 1: their own weight in ammonium nitrate, but that uh, you
Speaker 1: know that that amount of money in my trate and
Speaker 1: blowing it all at once. Unbelievable, unbelievable, horrible for the
Speaker 1: people a bear Root. Hopefully they'll be able to get
Speaker 1: them the aid and assistance that's needed to prevent this
Speaker 1: from becoming more of a full on humanitarian catastrophe than
Speaker 1: it already is. All right, next up here, Jay, Hey, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: Oh look at this, Jay's just writing a producer, Mark. Now,
Speaker 1: I first found the show on eleven hundred kN ZZ
Speaker 1: in Grand Junction, Colorado, when your show replaced Michael Savage.
Speaker 1: Well that's nice. Now I listen to the podcast, love
Speaker 1: the show. I think you're just the best. And that
Speaker 1: assistant of yours, buck Is, is pretty entertaining too. Just kidding, Buck,
Speaker 1: you're the best. I heard you start talking about Kindergarten
Speaker 1: Cop and how it got canceled. I was expecting the
Speaker 1: reason to be because the scene when the little boy
Speaker 1: says boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. I
Speaker 1: thought that would have triggered the libs long ago. Keep
Speaker 1: it up, shields high. Well, that is very very gender
Speaker 1: are a gender gender normative, I guess you'd say, And
Speaker 1: that's that's erasing translives when that little kid says that
Speaker 1: in the movie. Right, So there's a lot of reason
Speaker 1: for people to criticize this. I'm sure now that you
Speaker 1: bring it up, probably will get canceled. Probably will get
Speaker 1: canceled for that too. Whatever you think is the too
Speaker 1: extreme for the libs, to take a position. Now, give
Speaker 1: it time, they'll take it right. Whatever the slippery slope
Speaker 1: shows either going toward, we're going there. You gotta know
Speaker 1: that about the Libs, Robert hey Buck, Portland not only
Speaker 1: has lost control, they've lost their constituents confidence to lead.
Speaker 1: Portland and Seattle are losing billions of dollars as the
Speaker 1: lawlessness continues. Defunding the police will only further the decline
Speaker 1: as businesses and residents leave for a safer state. Insurance
Speaker 1: companies will be forced to decline the writing of policies
Speaker 1: of residential homes and businesses due to lack of security
Speaker 1: in the area. A total economic collapse will be imminent
Speaker 1: if this madness continues. That being said, people vote with
Speaker 1: their common sense as well as their wallets, So voting
Speaker 1: Democrat is a recipe for bankruptcy for most Americans. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. There's a spiral, a downward spiral that Democrats
Speaker 1: put us all on when they do things like defunct
Speaker 1: cops or just even make cops the bad guys. What
Speaker 1: then happens is we turn around and we see the
Speaker 1: businesses leaving a community because they don't want to get
Speaker 1: robbed or ransacked by by looters, and businesses don't want
Speaker 1: to go in people residences also people residential real estate changes.
Speaker 1: People don't want to live in high crime areas. And
Speaker 1: so what you have are the people with capital and
Speaker 1: jobs leave and who's left behind, People who are more
Speaker 1: dependent on the state, people who have less capital, people
Speaker 1: who are more likely to be stuck. And that's what
Speaker 1: ends up happening, and it's terrible for everybody, and it's
Speaker 1: how cities die. And Democrats are now flirting with policies
Speaker 1: that can actually destroy cities. You're in the freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, I'll
Speaker 1: remember you can send me messages for roll call at
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton or Team Buck at
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com for the email. Bucksexon dot com is
Speaker 1: getting a facelift as well. We're doing more and more
Speaker 1: stuff on the site, so please check in there and
Speaker 1: proc your mark. You got to check some voicemails out
Speaker 1: for tomorrow eight four four nine hundred two eight two
Speaker 1: five eight four four nine hundred Buck, Are you excited?
Speaker 1: Is this? What do you and missus Mark sit and
Speaker 1: you know, have a have a burrito or something and
Speaker 1: listen to the voicemails. Oh yes, of course, it's the
Speaker 1: highlight of the mid day. I actually forgot it was Thursday,
Speaker 1: So thank you for ruining my day. Appreciate Yep, yep, yep, yep.
Speaker 1: There you go, buddy, he loves it. Folks, don't listen
Speaker 1: to him. He loves it. He's it's his favorite part
Speaker 1: of the whole week is when he sits and listens
Speaker 1: to one hundred voicemails. All all right. Next up here,
Speaker 1: we'll go to that Instagram. You can also send me
Speaker 1: messages there. Next up we have Teal who writes great
Speaker 1: segment on Tucker Carlson last night till Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Appreciate that. Jeff writes in I've got a new book.
Speaker 1: Oh Jeff, I gotta check that one out offline and
Speaker 1: see what we're talking about here. Let's see. Next up, oh,
Speaker 1: Ivan writes in, there's a point where it stops being
Speaker 1: on them and it's on us. We are accepting the lawlessness,
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, the bankruptcies, the school closings, and the double standards,
Speaker 1: even when we know what these lunatic progressives are doing
Speaker 1: is insane. They are using whatever power they have. We
Speaker 1: are just unhappier by the day, miserable and complaining. Ivan,
Speaker 1: I'm with you, man. You know when are we gonna
Speaker 1: fight back? When are we gonna say enough is enough
Speaker 1: and we gotta win? You want justice win. That's the
Speaker 1: truth of American politics right now. If you were on
Speaker 1: the system and the good faith on the other side,
Speaker 1: get ready to eat a lot of stuff you don't
Speaker 1: want to eat, so to speak. After show for today,
Speaker 1: team back tomorrow for a freestyle Friday. She'll tie