WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Crypto Recap, Macau Recovery, Congress Wraps Up 2023

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>all around the world, and straight ahead on the program.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It's shaving up to be a very merry cryptomis with

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and ethereum soaring in value. Will the surge continue

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four with the SEC poise to approve

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the first ever spot bitcoin ETF. I'm Tom Busby in

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>New York.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm calin Hedge in London, where we're thinking about the

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>lessons learned from the past year in stocks.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Doug Prisoner looking at the odds for a better

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>gaming business in Macau for twenty twenty four.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm Kaylie Lynes in Washington, where we're reflecting on a

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 4>wild year in Congress and the legislative winners and losers.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Eleve on Free Own New York, bloombergon ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 5>DAB Digital Radio London, Sirius XM one to nineteen and

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 5>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 5>the Bloomberg Business Appen.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>today's program with a look at cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin, starting the

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>year just under seventeen thousand dollars. Fast forward nearly twelve

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>months later, Bitcoin is more than double trading above forty thousand.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Why the big rally and will it continue? We're pleased

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to welcome Mike McLoone. He's senior commodity strategist at Bloomberg

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and Bloomberg Markets editor Michael Reagan. Thank you both

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. What is behind the big rally in

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin this past year and what has changed if anything?

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Tom, Well, the potential the US is going to

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 6>be launching Bitcoin ETF starting nine. The dates really January tense,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 6>but that's kind of more than micro The market sorty price,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 6>and it's the macro. I think that matters is virtually

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 6>all risk assets were pretty well beat up at the

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 6>end of last year, and virtually all risk assets are

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 6>up this year. Bitcoin is just the riskiest. It's the

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 6>highest beta up the most. So that's what I look

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 6>at next year. That tilt is a pendulum, Mike swing

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 6>the other way and kind of just revert a little.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 6>To me, that's the key risk. And it's the example

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 6>of you know, bitcoin's up one hundred and sixty percent

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 6>this year and the NASSEX up about fifty three percent,

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 6>and on a voweltily weighting basis, that's just about what

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 6>Bitcoin should be up.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Reagan, so it's kind of mirrored the rise

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in equities this past year.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, mirrored it and really out on it.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, Mike's talking about the beta in the market,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 7>which is kind of a technical term for if you know,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 7>one asset is moving one percent, a higher bait asset

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 7>might move two percent or three percent. So, you know,

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 7>Bitcoin just more a beneficiary of this return in risk

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 7>appetites than the equity market, even both are really just

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 7>putting in tremendous rebounds this year.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And as Michael alluded to, with the SEC expected to

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>approve January tenth, the spot bitcoin ETF, this could change everything.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean that's the thinking.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 7>The idea is that there are a lot of investors

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 7>and financial advisors out there who were reluctant to invest

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 7>in crypto because they didn't quite trust all the crypto

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 7>native platforms FTX obviously giving the best example of that

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 7>when it collapsed last year. So, you know, the thinking is,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 7>now that it's available in an ETF, you can buy

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 7>it from your traditional brokerage whoever that is that you

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 7>deal with, and there's a little bit more safety there

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 7>involved now, you know, to Mike's point, I think the

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 7>question is is all that priced into the market already

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 7>for the price of bitcoin and then some you know,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 7>is it a sell the news event, And it's really

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 7>hard to predict that when the CTF one and if

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 7>it is actually approved. But you know, I think the

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 7>general thinking is that even if even if investors allocate

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 7>a tiny percent of their entire portfolio, say one or

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 7>two percent to crypto, now that's going to add up

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 7>to tens hundreds of billions of dollars potentially. So the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 7>optimism is that these ETFs will be a big hit,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 7>and that perhaps while they might not rally, bitcoin might

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 7>not rally the way it did this year, once they're introduced,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 7>that it will be a support going forward in the market.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 7>But to Mike's point, you know, this market rallied so

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 7>hard this year that it would be sort of natural

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 7>to expect a little bit of a pullback a correction

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 7>from that.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think, Mike mcloon, I'll address this

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to you. Why the change of heart from Gary Gensler

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>federal regulators about now going forward with this?

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 6>Oh, the good check and balances of courts. One example

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 6>was coinbase and GBTC Gray Scale Bitcoin Trust. They won

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 6>their actions in courts. There's been some other ones, but

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 6>it's that pendulum and it's just a wonderful check and

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 6>balance of our system. You might have people push back

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 6>on this rapidly advancing technology, then people push forward, and

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 6>that's what's happening. So I think what Michael pointed out

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 6>is the key thing is there is just so much

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 6>optimism and expectation. Okay, the ETFs are going to be launched.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 6>The key thing we like to say about it is

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 6>that when we launched the Bloomberg Galaxy crypto inext in

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen, this was the goal to get ETFs tracking

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 6>cryptos and most lightly a broad index, and we're just

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 6>so far behind. Now they happen, They already exist in

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 6>other countries. The US is just catching up. But it's

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Michael mentioned, it's the key thing that matters. The point

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm worried about is what it's doing for the space

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 6>is since futures were launched in bitcoin in twenty seventeen,

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 6>valtile is getting squashed. So what's happening is this teenager

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 6>or this child acid is becoming an adult rapidly, and

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 6>ETFs are going to push into the adult space really

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 6>fast meeting. Can I expect those very big returns we've

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 6>had in the past when it was trading at a

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 6>volatility of one hundred to two hundred percent, and now

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 6>that valtil is around thirty percent, that's the lowest ever.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 6>That's a two hundred and sixty day measure or an

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 6>annual measure. And the thing is it's still much higher

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 6>volatility than stock market goal. And that's where I think

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 6>people I'm worried about if we do get that normal

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 6>reversion in the stock market next year bitcoin keep thinking

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 6>about Bitcoin. It's trades twenty four seven. It's one of

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 6>the most significant leading indicators in the planet. It might

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 6>lead that way down. That's why I look at is yes,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 6>there's always going to be small pullbacks. I'm looking at

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 6>the pendulum for next year swinging more towards reversion as

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 6>the best Maybe we've already seen the best buy the

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 6>rumor in the markets.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Michael, Yeah, and that falseeity issue is a fascinating once unpacked,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 7>because you know, that's something these traders like, you know,

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 7>your typical buy and hold investor might not level lot

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 7>of volatility in their portfolio, but crypto investors, that's that's

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 7>their bread and butter, right, So you know, regardless of

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 7>what Bitcoin does, it's fascinating to look at some of

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 7>the other areas of crypto market and what's going on.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 7>I'll give you an example. Solana is the big star

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 7>of the industry this year. Their native token soul is

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 7>up like eight hundred percent. And the thinking there is

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 7>this is a blockchain that's much faster and cheaper to

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 7>run transactions on than Bitcoin or ethereum. So a lot

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 7>of these really crazy sort of meme coins and NFTs

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 7>and all that very very speculative and extra risky. I mean,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 7>all of crypto's risky, but this stuff is super ultra risky.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 7>Has really found a home on that blockchain and Avalanche,

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 7>so you know, the market is kind of I think

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 7>to Mike's point, there's a potential for sort of a

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 7>a fork in the road where bitcoin becomes more of

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 7>the mainstream, lower volatile the side of the market. But

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 7>then you still have this sort of more wild west,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 7>wildly volatile and speculative angle of the market where all

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 7>the true crypto you know, guys who like to trade

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 7>and really actively go long, go short, we'll be happy

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 7>to sort of move over to that side of the market.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seems also there are always new ones, ones

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>happening now you've never even heard of. Yeah.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, I mean it's so easy to create a new coin.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 7>You can basically copy the code from the last one,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 7>change a few variables in it, give it a new name,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 7>and you're off to the racist. And then it's you know,

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 7>a matter of you know, how strongly can you market

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 7>it and pump it up and get other people excited

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 7>about it. It's kind of a crazy scheme, but that

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 7>is sort of the nature of the market these days.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's a crazy scheme. Now, Mike mcgoon, I want

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about something I know you have spoken about,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>referring to bitcoin as a form of digital gold. What

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>do you mean, why is that and what do you mean?

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 6>It really struck me when I was in Hong Kong,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 6>the twenty eighteen visying colleagues, and almost everybody met there

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 6>when they're talking about mainland this and mainland that is

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 6>a no. And that was a significant bear market cryptos.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 6>Yet there was one bull market, and that was the

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 6>market capitalization of the number one stable going called Teather.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 6>And the key thing that really struck me is now

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 6>on a global basis, sort of first time in history,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 6>everybody in the planet with an iPhone, which you can

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 6>get now a phone in India for twelve bucks, has

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 6>access to a stable currency or something more like digital

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 6>like bitcoin, through their digital assistant or their phones. And

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 6>the key thing I like to stay about bitcoin is

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 6>in terms of gold is average Ask your average thirty

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 6>something person or someone like the age of my kids.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 6>They don't really care about goal. And that to me

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 6>is like to say, is if you are in the

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 6>gold space, you're bullish gold. I'm bullish gold, You're you're

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 6>involved in gold. That's kind of you have to have

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 6>some consideration of the world's going digital and bitcoin being

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 6>in that space. So it's me it has to have

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 6>some bitcoin in that space. Now, how much you put

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 6>in there is subject, but the world is going digital,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 6>and it's just a better way to transact. But one

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 6>thing I really want to touch on it's happening in

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 6>this space is Michael alluded to a little bit with

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 6>Solona is proliferation of stable coins. This technology allows everybody

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 6>in the planet to get access to the dollar. Call

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 6>them stable coins, I call them crypto dollars because they

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 6>all track the dollar and the AUM. And these crypto

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 6>dollars now are almost about one hundred and twenty five billion,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 6>and that's something that's just happening more and more, and

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 6>it's because the technology allows everybody in the will to

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 6>get access to this, particularly when you live in a

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 6>country with a melting currency, which most hour in the

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 6>long term is just the dollars, the most, the strongest,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 6>and just in terms of bitcoin, to me, it's digital

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 6>gold versus regular golden analog gold. You probably should put

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 6>them together. And then in the space, what's significant is

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 6>just the technologies allowing people to get to the dollar.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 6>And what's really it's called basically tokenization. What's next in

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 6>tokenization through the technology, And a lot of people I

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 6>hear say, are US treasuries?

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well they've got a lot to look forward to.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Mike McLoone, senior commodity strategist at Bloomberg

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and Bloomberg Market editor Michael Reagan. Coming up on

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend runaway, inflation, raid hikes, job cuts and more.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>What lessons have we learned from this past year? I'm

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top stories

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>New York. Up later in our program the big winners

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in this year's do Nothing Congress. But first, twenty twenty

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>three has been a year of inflation, rate debates, job cuts,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical tensions. We'll look back at twenty twenty three through

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of different lenses and ask what lessons can

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be learned from the past year and how they can

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>help us navigate the next twelve months. For more, let's

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak anchor Caroline Hepger.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Some might be asking what twenty twenty four could possibly

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>throw at markets after a year packed with every challenge

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>in the book. Again, as the year draws to a close,

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>investors have been hit with a curveball at tax on

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>merchant ships in the Red Sea, threatening to d stable

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>as the global economy. There's also been a final surprise

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in the UK this week's CPI data showing that inflation

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>slowed to three point nine percent. Now, that was a

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>bigger drop than had been originally forecast. No one saw

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>it coming, including Bloomberg's Markets Today reporter Dave Goodman. Here's

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>his reaction.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 8>Pretty stll in reading, wasn't it. I sit next to Connor,

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 8>who deserves squalwk on on Bloomberg, and I think everyone

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 8>heard me shout wow loudly in the background as he

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 8>was reading out to people a three point nine percent

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 8>No one we Bloomberg had surveyed thirty five economists, Not

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 8>one of them saw of reading below four point two percent.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 8>So that kind of shows you how much of a

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 8>shock in terms of a downward surprise. It's it's the

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 8>biggest since February twenty twenty one.

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>That was Bloomberg's David Goodman there. So what are the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>takeaways then from an unforgettable year for global equities? We

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>asked Bloomberg Stocks Guru, our director of Research, Tim Craighead,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>to help us make sense of it all, starting by

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>asking him his biggest lesson from the past year in stocks.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Here's what he had to say.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 9>I guess one thing that really comes to mind is

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 9>that composition matters. If you look at the nature of

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 9>the markets that have worked in Europe, or think about

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 9>Europe versus the US, it really does boiled down the composition.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 9>The SMI has been awful basically because of four stocks Rosa,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 9>nov Artists, Nesle, and Richmond. If you take those out,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 9>that market's up twenty one percent. It's equal to the US.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 9>If you look at Europe, it looks awful at up

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 9>twelve percent versus the US up twenty one percent. But

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 9>if you look at the Eurostocks fifty, which is concentrated

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 9>into some of the biggest important names in the Eurozone,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 9>it's up nineteen percent. That's call it roughly in line.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 9>It's the UK and Switzerland that have been awful for

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 9>Europe and taking the whole index if you look at

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 9>the stock six hundred down, So composition really matter.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>So then how do you think about Europe and how

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it will fare against the United States?

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 9>Looking to next Yeah, yeah, well two things here come

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 9>immediately to mind. One is clearly the US has gotten

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 9>an awful lot more TMT and that's been a huge

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 9>driver of the rally that we've seen since the October lows.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 9>They tend to be higher duration in terms of longer

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 9>term cash flow growth if you get into the math,

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 9>which makes them more sensitive to interest rate changes as

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 9>well as longer term secular growth drivers. So that is

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 9>a big difference in the last six weeks. That's really mattered.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 9>It brings up what happens from here, and we can

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 9>talk a little bit more about that from the standpoint

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 9>of how much the market is now baked in central

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 9>bank pivots, which I think is definitely the case across

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 9>both continents, but probably even more so in the US.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 9>The second thing is China. China is a big deal

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 9>for Europe. Call it four hundred and sixty billion dollars

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 9>in a billion euros in revenue across eighty big companies

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 9>in Europe. That's a lot of exposure. It's roughly thirty

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 9>percent of the market index that that's got China exposure.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 9>That's a tough first half comparison. I think there's a

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 9>tale of two halts for European markets looking into twenty

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 9>twenty four. Tough earnings to begin with, but maybe an

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 9>interesting second half looking towards twenty twenty five.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 10>So there's loads to unpack there. But I just want

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 10>to hone in on what you said about the UK.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>When do you think people will start deciding that Britain's

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.239
<v Speaker 2>cheap and it's a bargain and it's time to buy.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Never buy.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 9>So it is cheap, but it's cheap for a reason,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 9>and that goes back to the composition issue. It's got

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 9>a bunch of banks. Banks tend to trade cheap relative

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 9>to do a lot of other sectors. It's got a

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 9>heavy heavy dose of oil and metals and mining. Those

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 9>are contra to earnings, and right now we're still at

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 9>relatively higher earnings, so you're at relatively low valuations. The

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 9>only time you're going to see real revaluation in those

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 9>is when you have a down cycle in the commodity

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 9>prices that really depresses earnings and inflates multiples. But as

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 9>you look at it's interesting if you look over a

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 9>two year period, the Footsie's actually outperformed both the EERO

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 9>stocks and the S and P five hundred. Take a

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 9>look at that. Going back to January one, twenty twenty two,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 9>and it's because it was relatively flat and when we

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 9>had down drafts in the market, the FOOTE totally outperformed.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 9>So if you're concerned for whatever reason tactically at certain

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 9>points in time, the Footsie is a safe haven. If

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 9>you're looking for juice, you know, the foot sis global

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 9>defensives don't give you that a space. The pounds a

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 9>little bit stronger. Depends on what you think about commodity markets.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 9>It's got a lot of exposure there, but right now

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 9>those are relatively depressed, and it's got a heavy dose

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 9>in financials where margins are very inflated. And if you

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 9>think we're going to have a central bank pivot, that

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 9>puts those margins at risk a little bit of deflating.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So how do we think about then the central bank pivots.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've been slower in pricing in the potential

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of interest rate cuts on the Bank of England than

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>we have for the ECB and the FED, but it

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>is there. And if you think about the GDP data

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that some are concerned about the stagnation slash recession story

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>for the UK, you know, how do you think about

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 2>the pivot?

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 9>So between now and say year in twenty twenty four.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a positive backdrop and it's good for

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 9>the foot seat, and it's going to be good for

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 9>the European markets because both central banks are humble opinion,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 9>likely to either be pivoting. You know, there's a lot

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 9>more visibility on that progress continuing into twenty twenty five.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 9>The concern I suppose right now is that we've had

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 9>in all markets such a big discounting of a pivot

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 9>in the past six weeks that you know, just technically

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 9>we're getting a little bit extended, and you know, does

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 9>that balk a little bit, especially for the UK market

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 9>and Europe as we get into January February and have

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 9>to face fourth quarter earnings that are probably going to

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 9>be similar to third quarter, where yeah, they were somewhat resilient,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 9>but we saw negative revisions and we think you could

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 9>see a bit more on the negative revision front. So

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 9>first quarter I think is a little dicey, especially at

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 9>these elevated market levels, but an interesting second half of

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 9>the year.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>My thanks there to Bloomberg's director of research, Tim Craighead.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline hepget here in London. You can catch us

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning at six

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 2>am in London. That's one am on Wall Street.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Carolina. Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend and

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>look at how Mcow's casino industry has weathered the challenges

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of a global pandemic and a slow economic recovery in China.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Broadcasting from the Bloomberg It a active brokers studio in.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 11>New York, Bloomberg Eleving free own to Washington, DC, Bloomberg

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 11>ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one O six one

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 11>to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the Country, Serious

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 11>XM one one and around the globe, the Bloomberg Business

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 11>app in Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our global look ahead at

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York. After a devastating pandemic and

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a prolonged economic slowdown in China, how has Macow's casino

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and gaming business recovered? For more, we go to Bloomberg

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Asia co host Doug Krisner.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Tom The major casinos in Macau are still in the

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>process of recovering after being hard hit by the pandemic

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 3>obviously when China closed its borders. Despite the sluggishness of

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the overall Chinese economy, though, many analysts have a positive

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>outlook for Macau as we approach the new year. The city,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>if you didn't know, is the world's largest gambling center

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>by revenue. For a closer look at gaming and McCaw

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>let's bring in Bloomberg's Angela han Lee, gaming and Hospitality

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>analyst for the apack at Bloomberg Intelligence. It's a pleasure

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 3>to have the chance to chat with you, and I

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>know that in peak times, Macau gets a lot of

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 3>activity during the Lunar New Year festivity and the Golden

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Week holiday in October. But since the Christmas holiday is

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 3>upon us and New Year's is just around the corner, Angela,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious will these holidays produce any traffic in a

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 3>meaningful way for the casinos.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think that in the past, the Luna New

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 12>Year and October Golden Week were the major events for

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 12>McCall casinos because that's basically where mainland China has the

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 12>longest holidays. But now I think it's a bit different

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 12>because we are having more young people who likes to

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 12>celebrate Christmas. And also given that this consumption downgraade trend,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 12>people cannot travel too far. That's why they prefer to

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 12>go make shock hold trips. And Macau is one of

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 12>the popular places because it's outside Mala in China but

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 12>still very attractive. So and also because the Macau's integrity

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 12>results now have much more amenities. They are hosting a

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 12>lot of concerts and also events. So you see that

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 12>some TV stations of China is hosting some year end

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 12>concerts and events in Macau as well, so that it's

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 12>going to also bring more traffic from mailing Chinese people.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So did the.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Gaming companies use the opportunity of a decline in business

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 3>during the pandemic to really reinvest and put some of

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 3>these new venues in place so that hopefully when things

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 3>emerged from the pandemic that a lot of new venues

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>would be in place for people to take advantage of.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 12>Yes, there are some new casinos that open during the pandemic,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 12>say s GM's grandl Isba Palace and recently Galaxy Macau

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 12>also expanded fifty three, so it's new capacity and its

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 12>new capacity can bring much more traffic because in the

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 12>past those hotel rooms were only for big rollers, but

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 12>now there are much more hotel rooms in Macau. So

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 12>that's why, like some young people can also pay for

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 12>the hotel biers by themselves and stay in Macau.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 10>So I think the.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 12>Whole maccaunt is changing towards this type of mass lasor

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 12>travel thing rather than pure gambling.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 3>So younger people, I understand. What about for the family,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>if you have even younger children, is it a good destination?

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 10>True?

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 12>If you go to Macau, you will find some fancy facilities,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 12>say in Galaxy Macau.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 10>There are places like.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 12>You know, artificial Beach that you can go and enjoy

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 12>video kids. And also there is a water park in

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 12>Still City face two. And you also see many other

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 12>events and shows that you can go with kids. So

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 12>Macau is transforming. I would say mask gaming revenue is

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 12>something coming with the higher profit margin, so I guess

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 12>that also benefits Macaus casinos to achieve itBit the improvement

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 12>faster than gaming revenue.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So I suggested that many analysts have upgraded their opinion

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty four in terms of outlook for revenue.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 3>What is driving a lot of this optimism if.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 12>They say so the pre pandemic numbers by ten percent.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 12>It's about the mask gaming revenue, meaning the people who

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 12>go and gamble with their own cash, excluding the gaming

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 12>revenue coming from credit gamblers.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 10>But this is a major driver for ma CAA casinos.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 12>That makes sense, and the major reason is orgain because

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 12>of the hotel inventory has increased in Macau, making like

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 12>people to be like the hotel rooms are much more

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 12>affordable for some people as well, So I think that's

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 12>one thing. The other is because the people who used

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 12>to travel long hauld don't go there far because too

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 12>expensive for them, so they prefer coming to Macau. So

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 12>Macau is kind of benefiting from this consumption downreature in

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 12>China too.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering if the government has been involved in helping

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 3>to promote the industry from countries like South Korea, Malaysia,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Philippines and Singapore. Has there been an active campaign to

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>try to get tourists from those jurisdictions to come to Macau.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 10>I think that's the trend as well.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 12>So to start with, I would say Macau's hirola business,

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 12>which means credit gamblers, junket business has been under crackdown,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 12>so some people has been who used to play in

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 12>Macau with credit facilitated by underground banks in China are

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 12>also to like cash gamblers. That is also a type

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 12>of thing that Macau and Melan government is urging those

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 12>players and the whole industry to become much more transparent.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 10>That's one thing.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 12>The other is that you know, like there are a

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 12>lot of crackdowns going on regarding some human trafficking and

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 12>some organized crimes in Southea Asia. You may also have

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 12>seen some news saying that, like China has sent their

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 12>own military forces to crack down those organized crimes in Miyama.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 12>So all the things together, I think even government and

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 12>even some like a media in China are kind of

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 12>promoting that, you know, like a be more careful when

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 12>you travel out and try to try to be like

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 12>a stay in safe places.

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Angela, We've touched on two things, and I'm wondering whether

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 3>there's a connection. The interesting attracting young people to a

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 3>lot of these casinos, and you're talking about the extent

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to which these gaming companies are more reliant on cash

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>rather than credit. And I'm wondering whether young people now

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>are using the latest technology when they walk into these

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 3>gaming facilities, so they're able to take their phone and

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 3>essentially gamble using the phone.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that happening?

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 12>You are not allowed to use phone when you're gambling.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 12>If you take out your phone to take pictures. They

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 12>were coming say like, don't take pictures of the casinos.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 12>That's about privacy thing. And also because they want to

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 12>prevent this phone gambling, they don't want people to do

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 12>the video streaming with the gaming tables because that is

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 12>allowing another kind of proxy gambling online that used to

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 12>happen more like in other parts of the world, like

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 12>in Philippines, which was which used to be legal. In

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 12>Macau it has been illegal for a long time, like

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 12>for the past I think Alice in my memory should

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 12>be more than seven years. So Macaw's gaming business is

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 12>really about in person gambling thing rather than online streaming.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 10>If you do online stream you get caught.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 3>But what about using new forms of money technology. I'm

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily saying a cryptocurrency, but are there technological platforms

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that you might have on your phone where you could

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 3>use the phone just in a moment to transfer money

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 3>at the casino so that you could get cash in

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 3>hand and then go to a table and play.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 12>So one to start with that, you know, China has

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 12>some limits if you want to vitual money off show.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 12>If you are we're doing the money which is under

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 12>the like a lot amount, then you obviously can do

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 12>through the union pay. But if you want to do

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 12>more than a lot of amount, then you have to

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 12>do something else, which is like a weed chad or

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 12>something else that you know, like some underground banks will facilitate.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 12>So at the end, what Macau will do is that

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 12>Macau casinos will try to make money from more people

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 12>who spend less than before.

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering how the office of the Chief Executive in Macau,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 3>how that office is expressing a view on the business,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>whether or not the office of the Chief Executive is

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 3>as optimistic as many of the animals that we've been

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 12>He's also optimistic, and government is always trying to express

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 12>that the most important is promoting non gaming business and

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 12>then they don't like gaming business. But from casino product perspective,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 12>casino business is the best business with better ROI.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 10>So there's some suggle over there.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 12>But we come to a point that you know, casino

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 12>products now understand that if they want to draw more

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 12>traffic and keep players longer, they should have more non

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 12>gaming amenities to people to let peper use. So on,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 12>this says, I believe casino operators will keep investing in

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 12>non gaming amenities including hotel rooms or other like you know, say,

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 12>other retail shops or even like a concert. There are

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 12>so many concerts going on and this is driving so

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 12>much traffic.

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 10>They did like a.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 12>Black Pink in the middle of this year, and Brunomas

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 12>is also coming like the next year. They also have

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 12>like some big Canton pop stars like a Jackie Chen

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 12>as well like this year. Everyone is just trying to

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 12>bring more people to the property so that they can

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 12>generate more gaming and on gaming revenue.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Angela, You've given us a lot of good information. Thanks

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 3>for taking the time to chat with us. That is

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Angela Han League Gaming and Hospitality analyst for the apack

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm Doug Prisner in New York and

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>you can catch Brian Curtison myself weekdays here for Bloomberg

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Daybreak Asia beginning at seven am in Hong Kong six

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>pm on Wall Street, Tom.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Doug. Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The US Congress this past year passing the fewest laws

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in decades. How did that benefit some of the biggest

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>players on Wall Street. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Turmoil this year in the one hundred and eighteenth Congress,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>which went through several House speakers even voted out one

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of its own members while lawmakers did little to actually govern.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>That meant good news for banks, tech giants, and big pharma.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 9>More.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's head to our Bloomberg ninety nine one Newsomen Washington

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Sound on co host Kaylee Lines.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Tom.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Congress is officially done for twenty twenty three, and what

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 4>a year.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 6>It was.

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Started off with fifteen rounds of votes to elect Kevin

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 4>McCarthy Speaker of the House, continued on to a dead

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 4>ceiling fight, multiple almost shutdowns, the ouster of Kevin McCarthy,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the election of a new Speaker, My Johnson, the expulsion

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 4>of New York Congressman George Santos, and for all of

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the drama in the headlines outside of major must pass

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 4>legislation that barely squeaked through, what was actually accomplished and

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 4>who were the winners and losers within that. Megan Scully,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>who leads Bloomberg's congressional coverage, took a closer look at

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 4>that exact question and is joining me now with the answers. So, Megan,

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 4>there were winners this year.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 13>There were largely thanks to inaction on Congress's part, which is,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, how lobbyists make their money in Washington is

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 13>trying to prevent legislation from happening more times than not.

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 13>So you had big winners such as banks and the

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 13>tech industry certainly walked away from this year without any

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 13>new stringent regulations placed against them. Railroad industry as well,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 13>you know, following the East Palestine disaster, the real push

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 13>to enact new reforms for that industry fell by the

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 13>wayside amid you know, partisan fighting on Capitol Hill.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 4>So when we think about legislation that didn't pass, often,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, legislation can be viewed as a threat to

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 4>industries in some senses. You mentioned banks and the railroads,

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 4>but there also were a few industries that were actually

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 4>pushing for legislation to get through that actually hasn't fully

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>come through yet, like crypto. Yeah, you had a couple

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 4>bills passed out of house financial Services of course, helmed

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 4>by chair Patrick McHenry, and yet didn't get anywhere in

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three beyond that. So in that sense, I

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 4>guess it's a loss that the bills didn't happen.

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 13>Yes, there are occasions, you know, certainly in the semiconductor

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 13>industry as well, and new regulations on China. You know

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 13>that China hawks tried to push through at the end

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 13>of the year and that fell by the wayside. Those

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 13>were certainly all losers this year. Perhaps the biggest loser

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 13>we sort of reversed it on our list, but was Ukraine,

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 13>which is walking away without aid. Yet Congress is going

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 13>to come back to that early January when they return,

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 13>you know, on our list we made that Putin certainly

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 13>is walking away with some bragging rights this year, or

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 13>at least attempting to use congressional inaction to say that

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 13>this demonstrates a weakening resolve in the US to fund

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 13>Ukraine in this war.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned this is something they're going to have

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 4>to come back to. Of course, that's not the only

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 4>big item they're going to have to deal with very

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.479
<v Speaker 4>early on in the year, and when you're dealing with

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 4>so much big picture must deal with stuff, does all

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of these other legislative efforts, you know, targeted at specific industries,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 4>other bills just kind of fall to the wayside? Again,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 4>is that what we're in. We're in twenty twenty four.

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 13>So if you look at the last several congresses, the

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 13>first year of a Congress, which was twenty twenty three,

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 13>doesn't tend to have much legislative action. This one was

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 13>unusually low. There are only twenty two bills as of

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 13>December nineteenth that were passed. Maybe some more will be

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 13>enacted before the end of the year, and usually that

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 13>numbers in the seventies or eighties.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 10>We will see.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 13>Some a flurry of activity next year, even though it's

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 13>an election year. Probably some of these pieces of legislation

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 13>getting attached to other bills, be it spending bills or

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 13>the Annual Defense Authorization Bill that somehow managed to squeak

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 13>through at the end of each year. So there is

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 13>another hope legislation doesn't expire at the end of a year.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 13>It expires at the end of a congress, so they

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 13>do have a second chance to get this done.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Congressional team leader Megan Schully, thank you so much

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 4>as always, and Tom, I guess we'll see what they

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 4>can do in twenty twenty four.

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kaylee. That was Bloomberg's sound on co host

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine to one

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>news from in Washington. And you can hear sound on

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays one to three pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg day

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five am

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time for the latest on the markets, overseas

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby. Stay with us. Top stories and global business

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>headlines are coming up right now.