WEBVTT - Apple Fall Season and Meta's Election Mistakes

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay erimily changing San Francisco in this hy is

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. It is

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a date. Apple's next big product unveiling is set for

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>September seven, according to Bloomberg sources. Details on the new

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>max iPads and of course iPhones we will see, plus

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>some meta rolls out It's old playbook for a new

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>round of midterm election. We'll talk about whether it's enough

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to fight the latest trends in miss and disinformation. And

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.319
<v Speaker 1>arm just posted record revenue and ship mints, but it's

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>chip industry peers are seeing a slowdown ahead. I'll ask

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO Days if he airs that sentiment. Meantime, a number

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of high profile venture capitalists and entrepreneurs are meeting in

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles for l A Tech Week. It includes names

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>like Mark andreson Ari Emmanuel. For a better sense of

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment there, I want to bring in Zillo co

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>founder and seventy five and Sunny general partner Spencer Raskoff,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>who's also a speaker at l A Tech Week this week. Spencer.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>If we were to take the temperature of the markets,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>it is anything but seventy and Sonny, what's the temperature

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in l A? The market temper hot? Yeah, it's hot.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna We're not gonna let a week, a couple

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of days, or a couple of months in the stock

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>market damper the enthusiasm for tech here in Los Angeles.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a really exciting time. This conference this week. You know,

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of an unconference because we just sort

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of announced it to the community just a couple of

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and now we have over three events and

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thousand people, many of whom have come from other

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>areas including the Bay Area, exploring l A Tech filled

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with enthusiasm and excitement, and it's it's a boom time here.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, tech hubs have been changing. Obviously we've been

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the movement away from Silicon Valley, but now

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with more distributed work, more remote work. What is the

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>power of the l A tech hub? In particular? L

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>A is the intersection of media, entertainment, pop culture, commerce.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>It's where tastemakers live. So you know, the ten thousand,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty people that decide what's cool for the rest of

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the country, the rest of the world, they live in

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>l A. This is where culture happens. And now you

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have this convergence of media through streaming and studios which

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>really are tech companies increasingly so the the you know, media,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>entertainment and pop culture is very strong in tech community here.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But it should be remembered that l A also has

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a fifty year manufacturing history and aerospace in heavy equipment

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and technology. Incredible universities and it is it has

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>now cemented itself as the number two at tech hub

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the Bay Area. Our goal, my goal, the l

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>A Tech communities goal, Emily, is to get you someday

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to move your show from the Bay Area to here

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in l A and have the intro of your show

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about how l A is the tech center of

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the country and hopefully the world. It's a wonderful idea Spencer,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I can't say we haven't thought about it. So

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you will be my first phone call when that happens.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, look, it's it's it's dreary. There's a

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of red on the screen. Um when you look

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>at the markets almost every day, how is this impacting

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>your strategy? Yeah? So um, Look, we're in the midst

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of a venture winter, there's no doubt. So venture firms

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have pulled back. Late stage growth investors, the hedge funds,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the crossover investors that we're leading, all of these high

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>price series D, series E, series F rounds. They've moved

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>out of privates. They're either hiding under their desk or

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they're focused on the public markets right now, So that

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>chill has moved upstream to the earlier stage companies, and

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>companies are adjusting. Companies are doing inside rounds, they're doing

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>flat rounds, they're cutting back on marketing expense, they're cutting

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>head count, and they're adjusting for this new winter. And

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm old enough now to have been through

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>several cycles two thousand eight, two thousand one. Great companies

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can get created during these down cycles. They just have

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they survive. And customer behavior changes,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>corporation behavior changes during this period of change and during recessions.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of great companies, a lot of great

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>things come out of them. But you're absolutely seeing companies

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>adjust and venture capital investors adjust. No. I know, Andrews

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and Harwitz has a big presence down there, and they

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are the target of a lot of chatter in Silicon

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Valley right now, Mark Andrees in writing the firm's biggest

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>check ever to Adam Newman, the founder of we Work. UM,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some people pretty unhappy about this, and we spoke to

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a young founder, Alison Buyers, yesterday, and I want you

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to take a listen to what she had to say.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to feel that rage when you are part

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of that community that is just historically blocked from accessing

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this funding. What is a major prestigious investment house doing

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>backing fraud a second time. There is no excuse for that,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and there has to be the ability to separate what

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is a good business idea that has the potential to

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be a good investment from the person who is behind

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that idea and executing on it. Spencer, I'm just going

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave it open ended. What's your take. Well, there's

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commentary and discussion this week at l

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>A Tech Week about about this exact topic. UM, you know,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>my take is I was very surprised by the size

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the check. I mean, three or fifty million dollars

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for for a seed round. That's that's ginormous by any standards. UM,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Adam Newman. I suspect that the team

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and juries and Horowitz had a hard in the eye

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with him and said, have you been humbled? Are you

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>now coachable? Did you learn from the mistakes that you made?

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And they looked past those mistakes and said, here is

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has revolutionized a huge category commercial real estate,

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and who has created a very large, successful, publicly traded company,

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which was a roller coaster. It went up, it went down,

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, it's still a five to ten

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar public company today. And I suspect that he

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>convinced Andrews and Horowitz that he learned from his excesses

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and from his mistakes. Now, the commentary from from that

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that founder is absolutely right. It speaks to the fact

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that there is still a lack of diversity, equity inclusion.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Emily, you literally wrote the book on this, right,

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>um and and this is still a serious issue in

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>tech and um uh. And so she's right to to

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>express outrage from her perspective about it. But I think

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's when Andrews and Harwitz is thinking when they decided

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to back Adam Newman again, which is that he'll he'll

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have learned from his mistakes and uh, you know, and

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and be a different type of founder and a different

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>type of leader this second time. You know, it does

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>speak to a pattern as you say, that we have

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>seen in Silicon Valley time and again. I'm just so,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what you think of his idea as someone

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>who also founded a company in real estate. Is his

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>idea flow, this idea to revolutionize residential real estate apartments?

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Does it? Think it's a pretty visionary. Yeah, I think

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean for for viewers that that don't know.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>He's trying to create a branded multifamily products. So I think,

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like what W Hotels is to hospitality, this company flow

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>could be two apartments. And it is a good insight

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that most apartment buildings are unbranded. They're just named the

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>address and it is kind of a you know, an

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>uninteresting experience. You just take the elevator up to your

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>little box and that's that. So he's trying to create,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we work for apartment living. I think that's

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. What I don't know is if the

0:07:55.000 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>margins of managing multipamily apartment building can support the um,

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the the you know, the accouterments that he needs to

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>build to create that community. I was talking to an

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>investor last night who is much more experienced in in

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>multifamily real estate investing than I am, and this person

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>was very barish on the idea, said it will never work.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>There's not enough margin in managing multifamily apartment buildings to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, to create what he's trying to build, both

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the brand and also also other advantages to the tenants

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and so so this investor was was very negative on it.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't you know, I'm not close enough to to

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>know to have a personal opinion about it, but as

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a user, as as a you know, as a as

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a tenant, as a as a homeowner, I would agree

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that there is there does seem to be there there.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is solving a problem that that renters have. Well,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you and I could go on and on about this

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for hours, but well we can do that offline. Spencer, Um,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I do I do want to get your take on

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on the market dynamics, the housing market dynamics. Do you

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>think that the downturn that we're going through will delay

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation in the housing industry? You know, you know, the hope,

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what you were trying to do with Zulo

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Zelo is make transactions easier for homebuyers, and will all

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of this tunnel put that off um potentially, because what's

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>happening is the down turner and housing is scaring venture

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>capital investors from putting money to work in the category. So,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, seventy and Sunny, My venture firm has about

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred investments, about a quarter of which are in

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>prop tech, and so I'm a very active proc prop

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>tech investor, and I can tell you that vcs have

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are really put off and scared because the public comps

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have come down so much. I mean, Zilo is at

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a seven eight nine year low and and all the

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>other public comps have come down so much. And that

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ways on investormental, investor mindset and and sentiments. So so yes,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it could dampen innovation because there will be fewer startups

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in prop tech getting funded. Now, the good news is

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are a prop tech like Picasso one of

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>my other companies, that is funded, that has raised a

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of venture capital, that already has a product in

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the market, this is a great time to gobble up

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>market share because competitors probably won't be able to get funded.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again, like I've seen in other cycles

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight, for example, where Zillo actually benefited

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>from the two thousand eight recession because they were already

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>funded and on the racetrack and others couldn't get funding.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Great companies can be built during this down cycle. Alright,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Spencer ras Coff, I'm gonna let you get back to

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>your very hot seventy five and sunny weather over there. Um,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always for stopping by. Apple is kicking

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>off a busy fall products season September seven, with new iPhones,

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>new Max low and high end iPads, and three models

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Apple Watch. The event will only be streamed online.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get more on this with Bloombergs Marker when who

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>covers all things Apple for us? So what do we know? So?

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that the event is currently being planned for Wednesday,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>September seven, a little rare for Apple. They usually like

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to hold their events on a Tuesday, but as you know,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Labor days on that Monday, so they're you know, blocking

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>off that Tuesday as a travel day. Now what does

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that mean to me? That means that not only is

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it going to be streamed online, but they'll have an

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in person portion probably for press and others for a

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of hands on. We're probably about two weeks

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>away from this event being announced. In all likelihood, the

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>center of the event will be the iPhone fourteen line

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>along with the Apple Watch Series eight line. So looking

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>forward to both of those products and seeing what's in store.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>When will these products be available? So you'll see Apple

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do an initial launch wave on September sixte that's a Friday,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>nine days after the announcement, and that is probably going

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to be for the iPhone four teen line. You'll see

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>four models, right, You'll see entry level versions of the

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen as well as iPhone fourteen Pro models. Now, the

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>big thing this year is that the mini is going away,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>so there won't be an iPhone fourteen Mini. Instead, there'll

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>be an iPhone fourteen Max, which that means there's going

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a six point seven inch version of the

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>nonprofone for the first time, to be a little bit

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>pricier than normal for the nonprofones, but I think it

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>will be especially popular because of that enhanced screen size. Now,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously we've been talking a lot about inflation, consumers under pressure,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, difficult market dynamics. Is now the right time

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for Apple to be updating its flagship product. Yeah, absolutely right.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple updates its iPhone every September October fall. They've done

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that since shifting their release schedule back in two thousand

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and eleven. There's no way Apple is not going to

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>update their devices. The people who were able to buy

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>them are going to buy them as usual. You'll see

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new trade in deals. I think I've

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this on the show last last year. So I

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>had the iPhone twelve from I was actually able to

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get the iPhone thirteen not only for free, but I

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>think I got about seventy five dollars you know, cash

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in my pocket extra for trading in. Right. So if

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>they have aggressive trade in deals like they did last year,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna shake out pretty pretty fine. You

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>also had a story out today on Netflix some more

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>details about their AD supported plan. What will be included,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>what won't be included, what do we know? Yeah, so

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>investors and consumers of Netflix have been pretty interested in

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this AD supported UH tier for those unfamiliar. Right now,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Netflix can cost upwards of twenty a month for their

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>top tier four K plan with multiple screens. Right, they

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>want a cheaper option and the way to go cheaper

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is to add ads, right, and so it's gonna cost

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>less and they're gonna offset that with advertisements. And what

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we learned today based on code findings inside of the

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Netflix iPhone app is not only are they underway on

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>revamping their app to support this ad supported tier, but

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that they're not going to support downloads for

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>offline viewing. Super popular feature. I've used it before. If

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you're hopping on a plane, you want to download some

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Netflix movies and shows to watch on your cross country flight,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you want that feature. This won't have it. Okay, good

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to know. Thanks Mark for your great reporting, as all

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the timbers, Mark German. While with midterm elections approaching, Meta

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is rolling out its plans to tackle misinformation. After years

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of revising and updating its election strategy, the social media

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>giant is sticking with some familiar tactics, the same tactics

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the general election, which was marred by

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>conspiracies and culminated in the January six insurrection at the

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>US Capital. Bloomberg's Alex Brinka cover social media for US,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So Alex talk to us about what Meta is planning

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to do here and what if anything is different from Yeah.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So they're very much focused, like you said, on on misinformation.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So they will remove posts and ads that have to

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>do with things like wrong logistics on voting, things that

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>incite violence based on the outcome of an election. UM.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And also UM, you know, making sure that in the

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>week p fire to UM the close of the polls,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they will not actually add any new political advertisements or

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>allow any changes political advertisement means the reason, UM, that

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>will give a sufficient time for folks to kind of

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>process and potentially fact check if there's any misinformation on

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the platform. So for them, bottom line is misinformation logistics

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is the focus. The question is is it gonna work?

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Are they Are they any more prepared than they were

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in tactics that will surely have evolved. So we have

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to chat to their top policy boss, Nick Clegg,

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and he says, Look, we've spent the last you know,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>six years kind of evolving the taxes we have. We

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>feel good about what we had in We've made some iterations, UM,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he insists that the company will not

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be complacent. He also said that they're sure they'll see

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>some new things that they need to combat this year.

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So will it work well if the goal is to

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>remove misinformation from the platform and kind of stay ahead

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, I expect it will still kind of be

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this game of lackable where you see bad actors um

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>putting out information it needs to be taken down. They

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>might change the language it needs to be taken down,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>which would be you know, as the tune is for

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, um, pretty consistent with what we saw in

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And how does what Facebook is planning to do meta,

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I should say compared to for example, TikTok, So Meta

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is kind of unique compared to TikTok and say Twitter

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and that they do actually allow political advertisements. TikTok and

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter both don't allow political ads on the platform, so

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Meta also has this unique stance that they won't fact

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>check ads. That's been a bit of a controversial stance

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>um for them. So uh, that is kind of the

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>main difference there when you look at something like TikTok.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>TikTok will also vet organic posts um since they don't

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>allow those ads and basically suppress things that are unverified

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>from the platform. So fact checkers will allow good information

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that they information they deemed good to go through on

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok to the for you page. Bad information will be

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>taken down, anything that's not verified will be suppressed from

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that all important for you feed, that main kind of

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>feed where people discover things. So, um, you know that

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is probably the biggest difference here is that level of suppression.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that TikTok has to make sure that information

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not fully verified or they can't say one way

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or another doesn't necessarily garner as big of an audience

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>as as a piece of content normally could. Well, and

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hard enough in English, how are they thinking about

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>handling these issues in other languages? Say Russian? Yeah, so

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>um men I didn't talk a lot about Russian language.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Um this go around. What they did talk about was

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>adding additional Spanish language fact checkers. They have about ten

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fact checkers they're working with. Half of those are Spanish

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>because what they saw in the general election was a

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of news and commentary was in Spanish and so

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they felt they needed to add it add some external

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>partners who kind of focus on that language as well.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>So no mention of Russian, Emily um for the for

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the U S audience, but they are at least adding

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that additional language there for this election, Okay, Alex Sparenka

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as always appreciate your stopping by, thank you. Due to

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic uncertainties as well as due to high levels

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of inventories that customers have built across various end market segments.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>For US, those in mentories are being adjusted down and

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that is what is resulting in the dues demand for US.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>That was Micron Ceo San jam Rocha earlier this month.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The slowdown in semiconductor demand was tough to find, though.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>In Arms latest earnings report, the chipmaker reported record first

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter revenue and shipment, says its diversification into cars and

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure starts to pay off. Here to discuss Arms, Ceo

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Renee has So we've been hearing from a lot of

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>chipmakers that demand is going to slow down. Their numbers

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't been good. How how is it that ARM bucked

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the trend? Well? Q one was good for us. We

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>were very fortunate. We had record revenue for US in

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Q one. We had record royalties for US over four

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars and royalties We had never done anything

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>close to that before. So it's quite good, uh. I

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>think for US, Emily largely It's been the result of

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the diversification of our business. As you mentioned, ARM was

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>largely known for smartphones a number of years ago, but

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>now you know, we're in the cloud, we're in networking equipment,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we're in industrial, we're in IoT, automotive. All those markets

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>have been strong. So the result is a really good

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter for us. Are you seeing any signs of a slowdown?

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some, but largely speaking, areas like automotive, is

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like the cloud, areas like networking still really really strong.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some slow down and smartphones some in PCs,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We personally have not been impacted by it that much

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because we're seeing more and more ARM compute in each

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of these devices. So as a result, our results have

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>been really really strong. So what is this show investors

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>about the company? As you know you're getting ready to

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>go public. Not much I can say about that process,

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but the results I think speak for itself in terms

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of how well we're doing. So there's been a number

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of announcements about ARM getting into the data center. AWS

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>is obviously leading the way. What kind of progress are

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you making there and what kind of market share do

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you think ARM could potentially get to. We're growing. I

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to speculate the how large your market share

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>can get. But you know, some of the fundamentals that

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we bring are really important, and that's really around efficiency.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you build a new data center, you

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>only have so much power you can put the data

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>center and you have only so much square footage. So

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>compute performance matters, but compute efficiency really matters. It's an

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>air that's really ARMS DNA. It's an area that we're

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really really good at and we're seeing that really in

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>terms of benefits of what a WS is doing and

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>other partners. You know, we had announcements from Microsoft, Google,

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>all the major hyper scalers now have made announcements on ARM.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You've also been working a hard hard to grow PC

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>market share. Obviously Apple has helped there. What about Windows?

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>When are we going to see a big Windows breakthrough?

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing more and more of it. The

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>laptops to day they are based on ARM are terrific

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>in terms of battery life, they're terrific in terms of performance. Uh,

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't need fans. I think you'll see the Windows

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem moving to ARM in a big way pretty soon.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So UM chip stocks the market has not been kind

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to them this year. You know, what's your sort of outlook,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what will in your view, differentiate ARM from

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the pack. Yeah, I can predict what the stock market's

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. Obviously, if I was, i'd probably one of

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>your earlier shows for this are different with a different job.

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>We have two pieces to our business. We have a

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>royalty business, which is an indicator of units that ship,

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but we also have a licensing business, which is really

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about design winds. The canary in the coal mine relative

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to new design starts, that's really strong, uh, and in fact,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's strong as it's ever been. We're seeing a lot

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of investment in R and D, in automotive, in the cloud,

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in IoT and laptops and smartphones. So I think going

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>forward the secular trends are driven a lot of growth.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We're we're very very bullish on that, and we're saying

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>again our licensing activity, which is an indicator really of

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>investment in R and D, has never been better. Now.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you can't talk specifically about the I p O,

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but what has the volatility meant for your strategy and

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>your plans? I mean, you have to be watching the

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>market dynamics and wondering if now is really the right time.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, many people are saying the window, the I

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>p O window is closed right now. Yeah. I can't

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>speak about the I p O process, but what I

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>can tell you is that, you know, there's been a

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of semiconductor downturns in history, obvious we all know

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that what's different about this one is we're not seeing

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people tap the brakes relative to new investment, and we're

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not seeing people tap the brakes on our and d

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>for us, the licenses that we do today, they end

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>up in products three or four years down the road.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>The royalties that we're seeing today as a result of

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>design wins that we did three or four years ago,

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we see continued strong demand for our technology and products.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about China. Continuing tensions in U. S. China relations,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>more restrictions from the U. S side about doing business

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in China. We've seen, you know, with the ARM example,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just how difficult it is to run a joint venture there.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you navigating that? You know, given the unique

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>arms in a very unique geographic um and sort of

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical position, how do you navigate that without upsetting Washington?

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And Beijing. We're in a unique space. So when the US,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, puts down restrictions around entities or companies that

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can't be shipped to that require licenses, like any other company,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to apply for a license, will adhere to

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the compliance rules. We're a little different than traditional US

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>companies because ultimately those rules come down to the nature

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of the u S content, i e. The percentage of

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>u S engineers working on the products. The majority of

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>arms engineers are not in the United States. The majority

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>of them are are in Europe, mostly in the UK,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so we are generally not as impacted as other companies

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>around these areas. But of course when we need to comply,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we will, and we have to apply for a license,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll do what other companies do. What's your view on

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain right now and how the COVID restrictions

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in China will continue to impact supply I think it's

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a very hard thing to predict, to be honest with you,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>because the shutdowns are sudden, they don't come with much warning.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't take a whole lot for a section of

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the country to shut down, and the next thing you know,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't get a port open. You can't ship product.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>So I think the supply chain perturbations are with us.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>For for a while, the world was very accustomed to

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the old normal. World was flat, We had no pandemic,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there were no skirmishes or conflicts across borders. We live

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in a different time now, unfortunately, and I think you're

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing that manifest itself in terms of all kinds of shortages.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it will exist for a while. So what

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>have you changed about the way you do business, the

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>way you run the business to navigate that, to get

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a round that, or can you hard for us? We

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>don't build products, as you know, We license I P

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>so we ship blueprints to companies who build chips. But

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what about your customers? We watch that very closely, right

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>We we want to make sure that we can supply

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the products they need at the time they need to

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have them to ship. But ultimately we're kind of behold

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>into what the supply chain looks like. Again. What we

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to see though, is people doing more and more designs,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>doing more and more design starts, not slowing them down.

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>We're not seeing anyone say, look, I'll push a product

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>out by six months because I'm sitting on inventory our

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>partners don't think that way. It's really about innovating as

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>fast as possible because the demand cycle is so so strong. Well,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>there is concerned though that that demand cycle doesn't keep up.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>But you know, demand aside is supply are are we

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>still going to continue to see supply issues? And how

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>long do those supply issues last? I think we will

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>see it for a while, until the world gets to

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a new normal of understanding what the buying patterns are,

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>what the forecasting patterns are. You know, let's take system

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on chip for example. You may be able to get

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it enough die from t SMC, but if you can't

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>get the substrate that you're going to put the system

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on package, you're going to have a problem. So I

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I personally think it's with us for a while. So

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>where is ARM Let's say a year from now, hopefully,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean with you talking about record revenues, record royalties,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>record design wins. I'm hoping that the momentum continues. I'm

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>confident that it will and will you be public sure?

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I one more time? Okay, RM CEO d Haska to

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have you back, thank you time now for our crypto report.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And even though the market might not be as bullish

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>as it was last year. Coin fund is announcing the

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>launch of a three d million dollar early stage Web

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>three venture fund called coin fund Ventures, and it's backed

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>by institutional investors, family offices, and crypto native founders. I

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in David Pacman, managing partner at head

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Venture Investing at coin fund now for more So, David,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about how there's a lot of dry

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>powder out there with the market downturn, you know, a

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors right now having to sit on the sidelines.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Why launched this now? Well, this is not our first

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bear market in crypto, it's our third. One. Uh coin

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Funds a firm that's been investing in crypto for you know,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>since and we launched our second seed fund in the

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>depths of the team bear market. That funds done really well.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have three seed funds and now we're launching

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>this venture fund focused on early stage like Series A

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>stage venture projects and companies. Um but in our view,

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the largest economic value creation opportunity we've

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ever seen in tech. Bigger than Web one, bigger than

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Web two. You're rearranging the entire value stack of software.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna build software on top of decentralized blockchains. Crypto

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>is gonna eat the global financial system, and n f

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>T s are going to completely rebuild the way we

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>monetize intellectual property. That's a huge opportunity set and so

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>independent and of where we are in market cycles, we

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>think crypto is the best place to be making tech investments.

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>So what's your unique approach, where, where, and how do

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you plan to place your bats differently from all of

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that other dry powder out there. I think first, we

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have seen a retraction in the amount of crypto investors

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. There certainly are a group of crypto native

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>investors like us who only invest in crypto and block chains,

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>UH and all the technology around Web three, but many

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional venture firms and hedge funds that started

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>digging into crypto have pulled back, leaving ample opportunity for

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>us to make investments. We invest along the entire waterfront

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of crypto, everything from layer ones and the blockchains themselves

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to the infrastructure stack built above them. We invest at

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the n f T and gaming layer, and investors in

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Dapper Labs, the creators of the n f T standard

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and one of the most successful n f T game,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>crypto collectible companies. We invest in stable coins and payments

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and UM asset management and wallets and exchanges and really

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>defy and all the different places where crypto is starting

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to see evidence of mainstream adoption. I think the differentiating

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>factor between us and other investors is, first of all,

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we're crypto native, we only focus on crypto, And second,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we have super deep technical depth. We audit the smart

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>contracts of our portfolio companies, we help them architect the

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>token omics UM. We're value added and helpful in helping

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>people build companies here on the board of rarable, the

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>largest n f T marketplace. You also co founded the

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music group back and I'm curious what potential you

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>see at the intersection of n f t s and music.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>There's so much kind of resentment in the music industry

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about you know, sort of others having the power rather

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>than the artists themselves. Could this somehow resolve that tension

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for all of intellectual property. N f t s create

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to sell scarce assets collectibles that can become

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>more interesting or more rare, or develop more attributes over time.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>That will be true for music. It's been heavily true

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for pictures and videos where we've sold more than thirty

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of n f t s in the two

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>years since they've been created, making I think n f

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>t S the most successful consumer product released since the

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>invention of the smartphone. This is an overwhelmingly successful new

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 1>product category, but for music it's been small. We've not

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>seen significant traction around music n f t s, but

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we will. You know, going back to before the Internet,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>music was scarce. You could have only a certain number

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of pressings of vinyl or or or

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rare merch items that people collected. But once music went digital,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no scarcity anymore. A stream of music is ephemeral

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's really nothing to collect. N f t s

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>put the collectibility back into intellectual property, and music will

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not be left in the gold here. I think artists,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, are looking for ways to monetize

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>their fan base and increase engagement, and I think they'll

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do that through n f t s. But it's early.

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's only limited evidence of kind of music

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>success anywhere near the scale of what we've seen elsewhere

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in n f t S. Right. Still a lot of

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>people who listen to music don't know what crypto is,

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>don't understand and f T s, but I wonder in

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the future could musicians, could crypto be the new platform

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or potentially more valuable platform then TikTok or YouTube as

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a way to build and and amplify a following. The

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>web two business model is to sell attention right to

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pump videos and feeds and kind of keep people glued

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and monetize them through the selling their data effectively to

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>advertisers or trving them with data driven advertising. That's not

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a great all for content creators, just don't make a

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of money from it. The web three model is

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to create scarce, limited edition digital collectibles that can be

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>purchased and owned provably by your fans in any medium,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can get much higher revenue per user. One

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most exciting things about n f T s

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are that the average n f T buyer spends between

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>three and nine hundred dollars per year on n f

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>T s. That compares super favorably to people spend like

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty bucks a year on Netflix or less

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>than sixty dollars a year on Spotify. So if people

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are willing to spend more for n f T s

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for digital collectibles, then more of that can go to

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>artists and creators, and I think that's a business model

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that most people who are creators will will embrace. So

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your how do you see the music industry, let's

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>say ten years out, what will be different about it

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and what will you have potentially invested into maybe benefit

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>from it. So I think that first of all, to

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>build digital collectibles or any type of digital into actual property,

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of software that has to be built first.

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>We call that in Web three. Those software we call protocols,

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and so we're investing in a lot of the marketplaces

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and protocols on which n f T s are created

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and sold and tracked, to think of it as n

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>f T infrastructure. There are examples of n f T

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>products that have come to market that have been very

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>successful that we've also invested in, like NBA Top Shot,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a basketball collectors game created by Dapper Labs.

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think our intention is to invest up

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and down the n f T stack. But it doesn't

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that we're buying n f T s ourselves. We

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>actually have a portfolio company called Metaversal that does that.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think one of the big questions for music

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is will the artists release their own creative works digitally

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>through n f T s themselves or will they continue

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to give their rights or sell their rights to record

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>labels and have those labels do it for them. If

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they choose the latter half, they will really maintain the

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>status quo of the USIC industry value chain. But if

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they pulled back their works and they monetize it themselves

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>by selling them through very low cost marketplaces to their fans,

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they can have more control over their careers and also

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>all creators can have more money. Absolutely fascinating. Thank you

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for laying out a different view of the future. David Patman,

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>uh Coin Fund managing partner, appreciate it ten cents As

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a report that the company intends to sell all or

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>much of its twenty four billion dollar steak in the

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>food delivery company Maytowan is incorrect, Bloomberg crystal Z joins

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>us now to explain, and Crystal, as I understand it,

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually deny the report. Helps make sense of this. So,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are many reasons company deny a story,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and this tree strategy all of a ser came out

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and said that the story way that Royte has put

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday's inaccurate. UM. But if you think about the

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of strategy that Tanson has been working on since

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, they they already disclosed their plans to difester

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Stag in j D and overall in China, you're seeing

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>that anti trust is becoming a bigger issue. So the

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government had flat out say that they don't want

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>any one company, one technology company to have too much

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>influence in society. So it actually would thematically make a

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense for UM ten sent to difessor Stag

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in Matuan. But we saw Matuan uh stock absolutely just

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>tanked after the report came out, and you know now

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're inaccurate. UM statement or denial had gone out,

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually come back up. So it's not to speculate

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. We're following the story out of Asia,

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the US, but there could be most of

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the story behind if there is some truth here, if

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>something like this happened, what would be the significance of that. Yeah,

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so Chinese companies as of two years ago have not

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really had any antitrust concern. Basically, if your Chinese tech

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>company your strategy has been just to build, just to grow,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of ten cents investment has pen across

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all sectors in someone's life. You have your delivery, you

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>have grocery, you have all of these um in some

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>messaging apps. So in terms of information, in terms of reach,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Tenson has been really really strong and tapping into all

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these sectors. Um. But now you're seeing that it's taking

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a more Western approach. The government is saying that no

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 1>one company can be that big, and um, it could

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really kick off as furry of deals and ten Cent

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba, those could be the first targets. Um. So

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 1>it's Ali Baba we have already seen. You know, they're

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>run into kind of scrutiny with the government, and it

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprising if ten Cent goes into the same direction.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>How does the Chinese governments, you know, recent crackdown on tech,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's been happening over the last several years

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>play into this. So it's we are seeing this play out.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And actually, anyways, if you remember the d D I

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>p O is probably a really good example. UM. The

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>government told them, you know, for enlisting, it's not the

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>best option for you. It really manifests in many forms.

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It could be telling big tech company to die fester

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>stake in other companies, all just retaining these control in

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>China onshore instead of letting them raise capital elsewhere. So

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.919
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing we have been seeing a lot less foreignlisting.

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>There hasn't been really any Chinese listing in the US

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>after d D, and we've seen how a lot of

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>UM Actually multiple Chinese company that have US list of

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicle have announced de listing plants. So in many ways, UM,

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese counter of capital markets has become more closed off,

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and as a country they are really protecting their technology

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more we've been obviously there's been a lot

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of our atility in US markets. Is that are we

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing the same thing in in China markets when it

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to Chinese I, P O S Chinese listings is

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the window post. Yeah, if you look at Tencent and

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>may Juan, those two stocks actually are down between twenty

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>five to thirty five percent here to date. It sounds bad,

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but if you compare that to NaSTA, G S and

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>P or those tech companies UM in the same category

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US, those are probably down double of triple that.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So the US capital markets is actually um more closed

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>off than right now at least more inactive. Is more

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>inactive than the Hong Kong or the Shanghai capital markets,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 1>but that could change anytime. We've seen follow on mark

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US come back. Um, so if more of

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>these follow on block trains come back in the US,

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we could see I P are coming back as well.

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Crystal Z, thanks for that update, appreciate it.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Coming up Thursday, we're gonna hear from the co founder

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of Ulu Ventures, Miriam Rivera, talking about her investment strategy

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and how it's changing in a recession. And don't forget

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcast.

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily check in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg h