WEBVTT - The Sentry: Odds, Picks, Predictions & New Year's Resolutions (Ep. 419)

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to the Betting Pros PGA Podcast.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pat Fitzmorris. I'm joined by mister bau mcbrair and

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a brand new show where we are going

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to be going through each tournament from a betting perspective

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the PGA Tour season in twenty twenty four, and

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>that season kicks off this week with the Century the

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>season opening tournaments. Well, I guess there's a soft opening

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to the season in the fall, but we know this

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is the real start of the PGA Tour season. So yeah,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be bringing you the betting perspective, our

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>takes who we like, and we're also going to throw

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in a one and done pick at the end of

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>each show for those of you who are in one

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and done pools. So bo, it's always good to see you,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>my friend. Happy New Year to you and your family.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Juveny golf related resolutions for New Years.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I would love to play for golf, Pat.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Just play more Golf's that's the gist of it.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's I don't think I think it's been at

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>least six months since I even picked up a stick,

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>So I got any better than that?

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely mine is a volume of golf has not

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>been that big a problem. I live right next to

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a golf course and I'm out there a lot, but

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I do need to approve the game around the green,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the chipping, the short pitches, the bunker play. It just

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>has been kind of atrocious. Well it's actually gone from

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like I was the worst chipper in the world to

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>now I'm just merely bad. But I could take it

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>up yet another notch. I'm also in this one and

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>done pool, like the most elaborate one and done pool.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just me and a friend head to head, except

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to pick two golfers every week and try

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to saddle the other guy with the worst golfer in

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the field and add that to his stroke score for

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>each thing. But it's like we do it match play,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's beat me three straight years. So it is

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a resolution to finally beat him, Frenzy. If you want

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win a free one year premium Betting

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Pros subscription, you need to subscribe to the Betting Pros

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel right now, comment below on this video and

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that's it. We will be announcing a winner right here

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on the channel, so make sure to turn on those

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>notifications so you can be alerted when new episodes are

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>up and to claim your prize. All right, let's get

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to it bo. The PGA season kicking off this week

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Century formerly known as the Century Tournament Tournament

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of Champions. As always, this event will be played at

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Plantation Course at Kapalua, located on the island of

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Maui in Hawaii. The format has changed. It used to

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>be that only the players who had won a tournament

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the previous calendar year were the only ones who

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>could get in. Now it's winners in the previous calendar

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>year plus anyone who finished inside the top fifty in

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the FedEx Cup standings from their previous year. So, yeah,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the latest instance where the PGA Tour is

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get us to care about the FedEx Cup standings.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We really don't. I don't know if that's ever going

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to change, but yeah, so that that does affect qualifying

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for this They're going to be fifty nine players in

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this week's field, and as always, there's no cut in

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this event, so everyone is going to play four rounds

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at Kapalua. As for the venue, the Plantation Course, like

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing else on tour, massive fairways, huge expanse of greens.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe this is the only par seventy three course

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on tour and at just a smidge under seventy six

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards. It's a long course, but a lot of

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the longest holes played downhill, including the par five eighteenth,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a joy to watch, one of my favorite

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>holes tour. No danger to the right of hall and

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds to the left. So love watching guys

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>hit those big sweeping draws with their second shots with

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, long irons or fairway woods, fairway metals.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.799
<v Speaker 2>In the fifty yards of rollout.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, absolutely, it's it's just a great haul. Bermuda

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>greens at Capeluo tend to be on the slow side,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.679
<v Speaker 1>so players can be aggressive with Birdie Potts, and it's Hawaii,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's going to be win. The only question is

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's breeze or a gale, And if it's a

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>breeze only scores are going to be low the winning

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>scores the last three years for this tournament minus twenty seven,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty four and minus twenty five. But if the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>players do get strong wins this week, as we saw

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twenty scores are going to reflect it.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas won the winds Swept twenty twenty installation of

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this tournament with the score of minus fourteen. So what

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are some of the keys to playing Kapalua well? Helps

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a big hitter because playing the par fives

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and getting your playing the power fives well and getting

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your pro shots close are critical. And because of the

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>ultra wide fairways, the bombers have a bigger margin for

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>error with their drives, so hitting approach shots close as

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, so iron play is big less important. Scrambling

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>players are just hitting these massive greens at such a

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>high rate that it doesn't really the importance of things

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like chipping in bunker play is kind of muted at

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the century, So bo any thoughts you might have on

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the course and its effect on which players you're going

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to be buying into this week, Well.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to the bombers typically don't necessarily make

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 3>this tournament. We've seen despite all these adjustments the PGA

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Tours made to penalize people who are bomb and gouge

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 3>type players, we don't see as many of these players

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 3>qualify for this tournament, let alone dominate this tournament like

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 3>John Ram won two years in a row. He's not

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 3>in this field. He's a long hitter, but he's not

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>among the longest hitters. He's just has good distance. He's

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>a power player, but his strength is on approach. And

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you have guys like Justin Thomas who won this when

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 3>it was really windy. He's not in this field either.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 3>It's Cam Smith who won a twenty seven hunder two

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>three years ago, not in this field. So the Live

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Tour and its presence has definitely taken effect on this

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>tournament because, of course, a lot of the champions from

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>previous years are somewhere else. They're playing golf on other

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>parts of the world, and for me, it's gonna come

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 3>down to making birdies and avoiding three putt bogies. When

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>it comes down to that, you're gonna have lots of

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>opportunities to score here, especially if the wins are calm.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>From what I can tell, the forecast is pretty iffy.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>It looks pretty blustery and rainy coming up Thursday through

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Sunday so far is what they're calling for. So I

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>think that it's gonna come down to who makes the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 3>most birdie putts and it's gonna be the equalizer among

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>all these guys are gonna be hitting to the same areas.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>A lot of these shorter hitters aren't gonna be dominating

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>as much as your top golfers that are long enough.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not gonna take a bomber to win this tournament.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>It's just gonna take being long enough to put yourself

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>in position to make birdie putts, make eagle putts. So

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>with all these par fives, there's only three par fours

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>or sorry, three part three's on this course, which is

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>why it's a par seventy three birdie birdie or better

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>percentage par four scoring, par five scoring. It's gonna be

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>approach and putting For me, it's that's gonna be where

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the money is made in this tournament of fifty I'm

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 3>golfers s, which is the most they've ever had because

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>of that new caveat.

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, normally it's right around thirty. And so even with

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this bigger field, we are not going to see either

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last two champions you just alluded to it

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>bo the big Spaniard John Rahm joining the Live Tour

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>taking the Live money. Two years ago, Cam Smith won

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this tournament also on the live tour, so bo, I

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much longer we're going to have this

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bifurcation at the highest levels of professional golf, with some

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of the best players in the world taking huge sums

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of money to go and play live on a tour

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that gets a fraction of the attention and the TV

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ratings that the PGA Tour gets. You know, the PGA

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Tour Live tour dynamic reminds me a lot of the

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic between the NFL and the old USFL from the

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. I'm an old Coger, so I can remember

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the USFL and remember watching some of those games. It

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting novelty at first, but eventually I stopped

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>caring about the USFL when I was a kid and

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>only watched the NFL. But the USFL did manage to

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>have some of the best football players in the planet

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on the planet in their league at the time, Reggie White,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve Young, Jim Kelly, herschel Walker. The difference is that

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the USFL owners eventually realized the league was never going

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a moneymaker for them, But the Saudi money

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that bankrolls the live tour probably isn't going to dry

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up anytime soon. So I don't know bo any any

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>salient takes on the situation with LIV and the PGA tour.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I think long term, the health of professional golf is fine.

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 3>This investment by the Saudi Public Investment Fund.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 2>It's alarming.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 3>In the short term, we're seeing a lot of We're

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 3>seeing a lot of concern with the people worried about

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the health of the sport as a professional. But if

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 3>you just follow the dollar signs, both sides of this

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>argument care about the game of golf. The Saudi Public

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Investment Fund is an investment fund. They weren't going to

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>invest in something they didn't feel like they could get

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 3>a return on in the in the short to the

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 3>semi short to long term. So whether whatever deal happens

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 3>down the road, I think it's just going to be

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 3>a means to an end. Right now, it's all up

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>in the air in Limbo. But I think after a

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 3>couple of years of this, we're going to start to

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 3>see more serious talks of merging, kind of like what

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you said with the USFL. I'll go back even farther

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 3>to the AFL, where the AFL and the NFL were

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>co existing entities. And they eventually merged, and right now

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the merger looks dicey at best because of antitrust lawsuits

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and all that that have a lot of merit.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Day, these guys are all free agents. They're all independent contractors.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>They can play where they want to play. They can

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 3>get paid by whoever wants to pay them. When you

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 3>reach the pinnacle of a sport like golf, where the

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>level of talent between a PGA Tour professional and your

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>club pro is astronomically, it's a chasm of talent. We're

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>talking about, just a huge gap to leap to get

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 3>to where Jen ram is. So take your money, man,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 3>It's short term and in three years when everybody's going

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 3>to joke about, hey, remember when the Live Tour sniped

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>all these top golfers for hundreds of millions of dollars,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And we're back under one umbrella. Whether it's called the

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour or whatever, it's still.

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Going to be the same. We're still going to tune

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 2>in to the players we like.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I still like Jen Ram. I might even tune into

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more Live because of him being on

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 3>that tour. Cam Smith did that for me so I

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 3>just I just love watching golf. And if you love

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>watching golf and you have your favorite golfers out there,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>don't hesitate to support them and whatever they do. It's

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 3>not it's not the end of the world to like

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>something that maybe you should have some second thoughts about.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah, no, I know. I mean, I

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>guess my biggest hang up with this and not having

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>these guys on the PGA Tour, Like I'm gonna miss

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing these guys play some of my favorite courses and

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>some of my favorite venues, you know, like seeing not

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing John Rahm play Riviera. It's gonna hurt my heart

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit this year. So all right, but let's

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get down to brass TCKs and talk about player

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>odds for the century. Scottie Scheffler opens as the betting

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite at plus five point fifty to win on DraftKings.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Victor Hovland plus eight fifty, Max Homa and Colin Morikawa

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are both plus twelve hundred, and Xander Schoffley, Patrick Cantley,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and Ludvig Aberg are all at plus fourteen hundred. All right,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bo I know you're a big Scottie Scheffler guy. He

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is a phenomenal tee degreen player, which would seemingly make

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>him a great fit for this course. He finished seventh

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>year last year, and the only other start at Kapalua

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>he has had resulted in a thirteenth place finish in

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. Is he worth backing at plus five

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>point fifty.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 3>No, I wouldn't say so, just because of what I

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>said earlier. I'm putting a little bit more weight behind

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>a birdier better percentage, and that's really where he lagged

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>last year. That was what his poor putting brought us.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Is we're talking about probably the top five ball striking

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 3>season in the history of golf. But when you come

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>down to it, he's dead last in this field, er

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 3>bottom five in this field and putting and that cost

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>him a lot of birdies that cost him a lot

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of money, a lot of wins last season, and in

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>a field this strong, I don't love him. At eleven

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>to two, that seems really steep for a guy who

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't measure up well with the Victor Holin's of the world,

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>who put much better with similar to not quite as

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>good ball striking, but still world class, and even even

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Hovelin's odds give me pause. So at eleven to two

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 3>or plus five fifty, however you want to say it,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Scotty Scheffler is is a no go unless

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>you just absolutely believe that he's gonna pull himself back

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>together with the flat stick and pay off with a

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>large bet.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you, bo. I mean, supposedly Scotty has

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>worked on the putting a lot in the you know, yeah,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, man, like, you don't want to let ball

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>striking like that go to waste. And you know, apparently

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in some of the fall events he was putting a

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. But yeah, he's he's got a ways

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to go if he wants to, you know, become as

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>world class a putter as he is a ball striker.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Or what about Hoveland, bo, Like, he was just phenomenal

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>last summer, going completely nuclear in the playoff back in August.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't remember many instances where I've seen

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>someone as hot as Victor Hoveland was like during late

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>July and August. But he's played this event three other times,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>finishing thirty, first, thirtieth, and eighteenth. So not many signs

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of life at the Plantation course, any interest in Victor

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Hoveland at plus eight point fifty.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 3>No, I really I was not impressed with his a

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>few appearances after the playoff where you could tell he

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 3>was kind of still languishing in that post victory hangover.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you win fifteen million dollars, I guess

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty natural for that to hecur I just think

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>that he's going to take a little bit longer to

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>get into the swing of competitive golf. That's a big

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>difference here is a lot of these guys like Rory

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>McElroy not being in this field just simply because he

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't he's not quite mentally prepared to start his season.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And I love Hobland.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>He won me a ton of money last year writing

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>him through the playoffs made me so much money betting him.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>It was exciting for everyone involved.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>But this is not the tournament where I'm going to

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>be betting him less than ten to one odds. It's

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>just not worth it, especially with how good this field is.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the deepest invitational fields you're going

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to find on the PGA Tour, and the course is

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>specially built for neutralizing the advantages of Victor. Hoblind has

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>on difficult courses. Victor Hobland is the guy you want

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 3>to bet at plus eight fifty at Augusta National or

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.359
<v Speaker 3>at Riviera, where like you're going to see guys grinding

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 3>to make pars. When we saw him in the playoff,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the conditions were brutal, and he made it look easy.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>When the conditions are easy, it's easy for everyone. I

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 3>don't love Victor Hovlind at those odds when everybody's dealing

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 3>with a pretty pretty decent chance to go twenty five

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 3>to thirty under par.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some really good points. I'm with you. I'm not

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that interested in betting the Norwegian in Hawaii here. So

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what about some of the other guys. What about some

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of the other guys with shorter odds, the aforementioned Max Homa,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Colin Morikawa, Xander Schoffley, Patrick Cantlay, Ludwig aberg all either

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>plus twelve hundred or plus fourteen hundred. Does anyone in

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that group?

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Interesting?

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I love Patrick Cantlay at twelve to one. That

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 3>this this field is built for Patrick Cantlay to just

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fly under the radar. He's a great ball striker, he's

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 3>even better at making birdie putts. And that's that's what

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I can see him minimizing mistakes. You're not going to

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>see Patrick Cantlay three put mini birdie opportunity and turned

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 3>birdies into bogies. He's not going to be grinding for

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>pars when everybody else is.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 2>This is for me.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Can't Lay and Morikawa are my two favorites here for

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the simple fact that Maricawa's ball striking combined with how

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 3>hot he looked the last time we saw him, and

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Can'tley is just he's as good as it gets.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>He's consistent every single time we see him play. When

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't win, he's always right there to have a

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>chance to win. So those two guys at the top

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>of the board for me, with a little bit of

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 3>preference to Patrick Can'tley and.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He concerns it all that can't Lay. I don't think

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>he played in any of the fall events right just

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>got married. Has he done much at all since the

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryder cop and do you care?

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't care in the slightest. The fall season's kind

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of a joke anyway. The courses are so easy, the

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 3>fields are so easy, So.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I call him.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 3>Marikawa won his last appearance going away, but he was

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the class of that field from the beginning, and we

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>obviously cashed in there because it's so obvious. But can't

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Lay taking the time off. He's the type of guy

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 3>you could just picture rolling out of bed, not even

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 3>doing his hairy just brush his teeth real quick, hit

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the first tea with no warm up, and shoot a

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>sixty five. And so I have no qualms about playing

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>and putting money behind Patrick Can'tley because he's not the

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>type of guy that needs a lot of lead up.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you are getting me interested in can't Ley. I

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>really like the other guy at plus twelve hundred, Marikawa,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just because he is, I mean, like such an elite

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ball striker, maybe the best Irons player in the game,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and the history on this course, like he loves this course, seventh, seventh, fifth,

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and second. He's basically done everything but win here. So yeah,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>scoring average on this course is sixty eight point one,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>second best over the last five years. I really like him. Yeah,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>before we get to some of the guys with slightly

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>longer odds, I would encourage all of you out there

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to download the Betting pros app for iOS and Android,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>sink your sports books in less than a minute to

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>automatically track your bets across all sportsbooks in one spot.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>After sinking, you will enjoy access to detailed bet analytics,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>buy sports and bet type, including game picks, props, and parlays.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You'll also get insights and personalized recommendations for props, game picks,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and more. Taylor Geer interests. To enjoy the benefits of

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>sportsbooks Sync, download the Betting prosapp by visiting Bettingpros dot com,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>slash apps or search Betting Pros in the app store.

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, bo, guys in the plus twenty two hundred

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>two plus thirty five hundred range, there's some interesting names here.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Speith, Matthew Fitzpatrick, Tony Fenow, Tommy Fleetwood, Sung JM,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Fowler, anyone you like in this range.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 3>So I was hoping to see Ludwig Obeg in this group,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>but he's a shorter odds. I think he's he's trending

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 3>at fourteen hundred right this very moment, but that's down

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 3>from twelve. Tommy Fleetwood is the guy that I'm really

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>honing in on because of his ability to just put

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 3>together a crazy low round, especially if the winds freshen

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>up a bit there, Like if we get that Thursday

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 3>through Sunday trade winds blowing something fifteen to twenty mile

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 3>an hour constant, which it's very liable to do in Maui.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 3>It's we're talking to it's an island in the middle

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>of the Pacific Ocean.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 3>It's at the mercy of pretty much every squall that

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 3>could blow through there, especially right now where all the

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of weather patterns setting up in the Pacific,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 3>and we're probably gonna get some weather here. Tommy Fleetwood

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and weather on a course that's gonna kind of neutralize distance.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 3>I really like how he lines up, both in my

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>statistical model and just fitting the course. So where I

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 3>don't like the odds on Obert, even though he's one

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite golfers coming up this season, I'm going

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to predict him to win a lot of tournaments.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>He's just too short for this field.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Tommy Fleewood, A twenty eight to one is fantastic odds

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>for how well I think he matches up here.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh Berg. The other thing, like first timers not

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>traditionally strong track records at this turn whatever reason.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of strange, but it lines up where first

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 3>timers here just don't compete for the title.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it just seems like you need to get your

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get the lay of the land at this place. It's

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely a different kind of golf, and like it seems

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like you have to adapt to it a little bit.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>What about some of the long shots bore anyone you fancy?

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Further down the list, there's a couple that I'll be

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>laying smaller bets on you get down to forty five

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 3>to one. Wyndham Clark seems to match up well with

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 3>this place because he's a long hitter with kind of

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 3>sketchy accuracy off the tee, which is kind of It's okay,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>it's fine by everybody here because the fairways are eighty

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 3>yards wide in some spots the greens are gigantic. So

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Wyndom Clark is a world class putter. He's top five

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 3>in the world putting, and with his distance and not

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 3>having to worry about missing fairways here too much. I

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 3>like his upside at forty five to one, and then

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 3>going down another great putter with decent off the tee

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 3>metrics that I can see winning here, Danny McCarthy at

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 3>sixty to one. Those that's about as deep as I'll

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 3>go here because of how strong the top of this

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 3>field is.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think McCarthy had a couple of top tens

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the fall events. I know, you know, we like you.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't put a lot into the fall events ball,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's not bad to get a guy like that

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 1>who is kind of in good form coming into this.

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>And man Wyndham Clark, now you're now you're intriguing me

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>with a big hitter who can put it well and

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>like he has some pedigree to him, going to get

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>him at forty five to one, that that does seem

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty intriguing value. So yeah, kind of, So

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what's a.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Lot of people compared to this, to to the elevation,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.719
<v Speaker 3>changes in the distance, compare this place to Augusta National,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 3>obviously with lower stakes at hand. I kind of like

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the comparison to the PGA Tours or the PGA Championship

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Course last year where we saw we saw Window win,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 3>we saw Kurt Kitty Yama one at finished fourth in

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 3>that where he's he's my deep shot. I'm gonna throw

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>a couple of bucks on Kirkittyam at one hundred and

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty to one, just because he's a bomber suspect accuracy

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 3>off the tea again, but one of the best long

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>iron players in the world. And it just so happens

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to seventy six hundred yards to traverse.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>You're going to see some long iron approaches on a

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of holes. And I just like that archetype of

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 3>player here, where get a hot putter. Just get a

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 3>hot putter, and that you can win this tournament. John

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Ram not necessarily known for his putting, but you could

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>tell when he got here he got real comfortable in

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 3>a hurry.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't hurt that Kirk Kidiama is a fellow

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Northern California guy.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Bo.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my bias always shows when I pick him,

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>but I don't pick him as often as you would think.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 3>I picked him three times last year, and one was

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 3>at bay Hill when he won at two hundred and

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one. He finished fourth at the PGA when

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I picked him to I picked through a couple dollars

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 3>on him to win, and I ended up double dipping

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 3>at top five and top ten picks there. And then

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I picked him in another tournament where he lined up

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>well like that, but he missed the cut.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>So you don't.

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Always go after these guys, even if they're from the

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 3>same home town. I love rooting for him. This is

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the kind of place where, I mean the first time

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>are you're not expecting to make any noise. But his

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 3>odds are cheap enough for you. You can just say, hey,

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 3>let's root for him. With a little like five bucks

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>on the line. Who cares if he wins, you get

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 3>more than a thousand dollars payoff. I just love doing

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 3>those little those little dime drops in there, just to

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>just have some extra rooting interest.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So what is on your betting card right now? The

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>odds have been up for less than twenty four hours.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe on draftings. But what have you jumped on

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>right away?

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Subject to change? But I have can't lay at twelve

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>to one. I have half a unit bet on Xander

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Shopley at fourteen to one, but I'm gonna bet heavier

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 3>on his top five I think he's a top five lock.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 3>And then Tommy Fleetwood at twenty eight to one. Then

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna throw some Wyndham Clark.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And of course my guy Kirk Kitty.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm one hundred and thirty to one is a quarter

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>unit bet for me is five bucks.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I'm going to piggyback you with a

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>little Wyndham Clark wager here.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a fun one because you love Bruton for the guy.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 3>He's one of the best people out there.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good dude, And like you said, I mean the

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>game seems to suit this course pretty well. I am

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>betting Colin Morikawa plus twelve hundred not only to win,

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but also to finish top five at plus twe plus

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>two to eighty, so you know again the force Yeah

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>four starts seven seventh, wait, seven, seven, five and two,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and just the elite ball striking just fits this course

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so well. You know, I'm not sure the wind is

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a great thing for him. If it's you know, I've

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm terrified by the weather report, I might pull

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit, But as of now, I think

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got half a unit down on him. Jordan Speith,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I like it plus twenty two hundred bow the wide

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>fairways helping one here he's won here, and the wide

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>fairways helping the gate. The biggest achilles heel in his

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>game the arrantee shots, which can come out at any time.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Although I'm not sure if.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Steith is going to be like on a cliff side.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>On one of these shots.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 3>He was like, let's tune in with Jordan Speith. Here

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 3>is on the flip side, hanging on.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>For dear life.

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I'm not sure even the Cappelloua

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>fairways are wide enough for Jordan Speed to stay on

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>them all the time. Sung jm intrigues me at plus

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>three thousand em has played this event three times, finishing fifth, eighth,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and thirteenth, and since twenty eighteen, no player has a

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>better scoring average at Capelua than Sung Jim with his

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven point seven stroke average and then one weird

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>little bet I kind of like Shamous Power at plus

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to one to finish top ten. Power has finished

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth and twenty fifth in his two other appearances at Kapalua,

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but with a really respectable scoring average of sixty eight

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>point six. I feel like ten to one is a

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good price for a top ten, so I'm gonna

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>throw a lot, well half a unit down.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a little irishman bias going into that too.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe, Hey, you've got Kurt Kittyama, I've got Seamus Power.

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do? And you know, like for

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>those of you out there who like parlays and props,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>just gonna throw a couple out there. I have not

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>played any of these, but I'm intrigued by a top

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>five parlay with Scotti, Scheffler and Colin Morikawa at plus

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred, so you need both of those guys to

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>finish top five. And another one I'm considering is a

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>triple chance parlay where you get three guys. One of

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the three has to win with Scheffler, Morikawa and your

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>guy can't lay. That one is plus four point fifty,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so you get any of the three at plus four fifty.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty juicy.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right set of odds right there.

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not too bad, all right, Baul? How about a

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>one and done pick for the people out there in

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>one and done pool. So we're gonna keep track of these.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna repeat guys, use them and lose them.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But who do you like in a one and done

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this week?

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I think I'll stick with Can'tley. That's because I think

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that as far as this course is concerned, he's gonna

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 3>have other opportunities to be a repeat guy. But again,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 3>he's so consistent that I don't mind burning him early.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not you're not gonna regret him coming because it's

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>not like you have like, oh, I'm gonna wait for

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Detroit for to play Tony Fenow because that's smart thing

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Is what you want to do in a one and

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>done is kind of line.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 3>Up which golfers you'd like to play at every single tournament.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Just line up all the thirty six or whatever tournaments

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and put a group of guys next to that event.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Cantley is not a guy that she's specifically pigeonhole

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>into a specific event. So I don't mind burning him

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 3>right off the bat, because I know he's going to

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>be consistent. I'm not going to be yearning for him

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 3>later in the season.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. With me, I've got a guy who does play

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>certain events pretty well, Ricky Fowler. I'm gonna go with

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this week, and he's he's always good in Phoenix, He's

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>always good. Oh man, what's the course in Charlotte. I'm

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>blanking on the name right now. Quail Hollow. He's going

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to a really good Quail Hollow player. But you know,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to take Fowler because we have seen him

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>come completely off the rails before for a long stretch

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of his career. I want to get him early while

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he's playing well, while he is still in really good form.

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And oh, by the way, his last three finishes in

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>this event fifth, fourth, fifth, so he's traditionally fared well.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And the Strokes gained metrics at at Kapaalua. So and

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna grab him bow before things go haywire with

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>his game. So all right, yeah, So Patrick cantleigh for

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Bau McBrayer and Ricky Foller for Pat Fitzmorris. So that

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to do it for this installment of the

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros PGA podcast. We will be back next week

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to go over the Sony Open, as the tour stays

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in Hawaii for one more week. And good luck to

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all of you this week. Enjoy those of you like

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>me who are in the extreme upper Midwest, enjoy watching

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>guys play golf in short sleeves this week, because you

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>know it'll be us soon enough, in like five months.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So thanks again everyone, so long. We'll see you next week.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros Podcast. If you

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review. On Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at betting Pros NFL.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Also subscribe to our

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 4>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros