WEBVTT - Intel CEO Forced Out After Board Grew Frustrated With Progress

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Meser and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Joining us is Caroline High, co host of Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Here in Studio, Caroline, Let's first start with Intel felt

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 3>like this was expected and yet it feels like still

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 3>a big deal for Hey.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I will say every time we had Ian on

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 4>in the last two years, Ian King, we basically ask him, Caroline,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 4>how much patience does the board have for this turnaround plan?

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 4>And I guess we finally learned today they're out of patients.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 5>They're out of patients and actually saw that patients being strained.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 5>In August when they had their numbers, the earnings were poor.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 5>In particular, they were showing losses at the manufacturing part

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 5>of the business. The foundery is part of the business,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 5>and inking, poor guy, I think he's meant to be

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 5>taking the day off and had to come running back.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 6>To report he's down the terminal.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and when that August number hit. We saw in

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 5>particular one member of the board quit Li Bhutan and

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 5>with the frustration about the direction of travel coming from

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Pat Girl Singer because look, this pre dates Pac coming

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 5>in in twenty twenty one. To be fair, to be

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 5>fair in Video has been on AI accelerator path and

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 5>GPU focus for a long time, but they just managed

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 5>to miss this AI accelerator wave. The Galdhi offering that

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 5>they have is likely to not meet their own internal

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 5>five hundred million dollars per year revenue target. Compare that

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 5>to the one hundred billion in videos bringing in the

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 5>more than five billion the AMD is managing to do.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 5>All of this though, just shows that since Pac Girl

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Singer has been the leaders in twenty twenty one, Intel's

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 5>share prices plummeted sixty percent in Video's share price as

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 5>well as more than eight hundred percent, and Intel has

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 5>managed to try and pivot become more focusing on foundries.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Do like the opposite of AMD, which spun off global

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 5>foundriies and went fabulous. Intel went back in. But there's

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 5>a mixed reaction coming from the analyst today because City

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Group is actually saying and maybe this is why the

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 5>shares have turned negative were now off by one point

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 5>seven percent.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 7>Is that?

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Look, he Pat was the best guy for manufacturing. They

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 5>rather they just got rid of the foundries part of

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 5>the business and kept Pat, rather than get rid of

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Pat and try and still cobble together the focus that

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 5>he had in terms of getting into building chips as

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 5>well for other clients as well as themselves.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's amazing, right because the Intel was up

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>six percent of TIS as you said, now down about

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>one and a half percent. So it just shows like

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>whilst you're trying to figure out what this means, I mean,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>isn't a Pat Gelsinger problem?

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 6>Is it an Intel problem?

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 8>Like?

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 6>What is the way forward for Intel?

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 5>I think it's an Intel problem, many would say. Is

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 5>that over years, you know, they were trying to do

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 5>the biggest restructuring in four decades.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Pat did come on with a very big, bold vision.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps that was too big, too bold to cost even

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 5>with government help, with all these chips at money coming

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 5>at them, to be able to build an Ohio Arizona,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 5>they had to suddenly put on ice what was happening

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 5>in Europe, and ultimately the market ripped away from them,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 5>particularly when it came to AI and I think just

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 5>other areas of the market, plus their own clients. Remember,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 5>at the same time as in video building up strength

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 5>in AI, Apple is busy making its own chips, and

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 5>they're not making so much for their phones anymore.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 4>If this wasn't a Pat Gelsinger problem and he did

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>have a few years to attempt to turn it around,

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned what happened with the share price, especially versus Nvidia,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Then what can another leader actually come in and do

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>to save this.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Company, and particularly at the moment where they're depending on insiders,

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 5>look fair play. David Sinzner, the CFO has only been

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 5>there a few years, but Michelle Johnson Halthouse MJS is

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>known has been there for three decades. This is totally

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 5>turning to people who understand the business but are not

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 5>going to be a breath of fresh air anytime soon.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Of course, we've got Frank Eeri saying he's going to

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 5>take on the executive chair role and he's going to

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 5>find a new permanent solution. Will that be from outside

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 5>the business or will they turn to potentially starting to

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 5>bring themselves up. That was something Pat was very dead

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 5>set against. Yes, he was going to be making money

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 5>by spinning off different bits of the business, certainly particular

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 5>investments that they'd made, but he wanted to keep it intact.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 5>What about offers coming from rival suitors?

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 6>Right right? I mean Quacom was interested, right, Yeah, and

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 6>then they went off and then the deal.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but not so into you anymore kind of thing. Well,

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>what kind of leader does?

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 6>Do we have any idea?

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm just curious what kind of leader Intel needs at

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 3>this point? Yeah, I love the inside outside, right, We've

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>seen this with these incredible it's.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Almost like company. It's almost like you're talking about Boeing

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 4>right now. Yeah, exactly, I'm hearing this and I'm like

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 4>just thinking about Boeing.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Right, how many times have we talked about this story

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 3>that like maybe it's time for fresh blood to come.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 6>Into a company.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 5>And remember Pat Kelson himself was kind of fresh blood

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 5>because he came out from VM where he'd been the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 5>CEO there. He'd left Intel. He was so integral to

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Intel in the eighties.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 6>He was like literally, you know, designing the chips himself.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 5>He then left after serving a long time and ap

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 5>period as CTO is Intel, do they go and get

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 5>other experience? Then he came back and he couldn't change

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 5>it around if they go outside of say MJ. It's

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 5>interesting hearing the narrative just from the statement this morning.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>They're saying, we need the product people to lead the

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 5>business at the moment.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, that is MJ.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 5>So what are they going to do.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Are they going to bring other product.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Expertise from outside or are they going to bring someone

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 5>who can be a bit of a turnaround king or

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 5>queen after see right.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Like operate or turn around person versus somebody really understands

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the products that need to kind of move Intel going forward?

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 4>To what extent does this turn into or continue a

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 4>nasty cycle for Intel? If you're a potential customer or

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 4>a customer and you're thinking to yourself, well, do I

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 4>really want to buy it from a company that I

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 4>see reported in the press such as this, it's going

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>through this upheaval, there's again executive shake.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Up at the top.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 4>Does that turn into a terrible doom loop for the company?

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, time will tell, and I hate that sort

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 5>of an answer, But what could help.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 6>Is the PC refresh.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is a man who's also staked his

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 5>future on the AIPC taking off, and thus far we've

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 5>all talked about it, but not really known how it's

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 5>going to affect our lives and not really bought the

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 5>darn thing, right, So will we actually see I mean,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 5>this echo is the issue that Dell was having an

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 5>HP was having in the beginning of the week John

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 5>last week.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and he made the point that there are no

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 4>apps for Intel for if there are no apps for

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 4>aipcs yet, So it's like we just hear from executives

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 4>talking about them, but there's nothing to show for him.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 5>So if that starts to take up, if suddenly we

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 5>are all addicted to generative AI, we do suddenly want

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 5>to get a newer PC that we had bought just

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the time in COVID, and we will now get a

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 5>new one. Maybe that will help Intel, but then they're

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 5>going to be leaning back into the PC side rather

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 5>than trying to compete on the AI accelerator side, which

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 5>is really the bit of the market that at the

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 5>moment everyone's getting into.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's kind of like this identity crisis for a

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 3>name that was just so you know, associated with anything

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>to do with the semi world. Hey, before you go,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>we got to ask you about super micro computer. I

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 3>think it's the number one gainer and both the S

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred and nas DECK one hundred independent

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>review no evidence of miscanda.

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 6>This is a company that's had so many twists and

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 6>terms this year.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean on the high's absolutely caught up in

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 5>the AI hype because they are a competitor with Dell.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 5>They basically put in video chips within their servers and

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 5>sell them out to clients. So super Micro done phenomenally well,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 5>but then came the concern about well, no one wanting

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 5>to audit them, then getting worried about financials not putting

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 5>their ten k out, potentially being kicked off the Nasdaq.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 5>Right now, they've got a new auditor, now, they've got

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 5>a new CFO, Chief compliance Officer, General counsel. They're trying

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 5>to steady people's nerves that look, we've got different oversight

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 5>here of the business and we are going to be

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 5>able to stay listed within the Nasdaq, which I think

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 5>for many is the key.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised to see reaction today just because when EI

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 4>resigns it's not a good sign and I'm like, well,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>did they get something wrong then? And this new auditor

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 4>is different in some sense, like they're obviously sending a

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 4>different signal, but you know someone's not.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 5>In the right here, or whether EI were frustrated with

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 5>the leadership and now they're changing up the executive leadership

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 5>and showing that they're going to have a different governance

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 5>structure going through. But everyone wants to love this stock

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 5>because it is so integral to the AI hype cycle.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 5>So maybe it's just been so beaten up that people

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>are willing to buy back in. But yeah, we'll see

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 5>what BDO USA has to say about the numbers when

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 5>they eventually file them.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Not one of the big accounting firms that typically odd

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 4>at s and P five hundred.

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Company, but I KNOWDIA like video, Yeah, Simon, and you're

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 5>not going to hang your hat on. I would have thought, yeah,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 5>they're taking a big risk here, and I'm sure they

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 5>want to show the proof in the pudding.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm got to say investors certainly buying in stocks

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 3>P twenty eight percent so far in today's session.

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Caroline, thank you, Thank you so appreciate.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Co host of Bloomberg Technology Catcher on Bloomberg Television at

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>eleven am Wall Street time.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 6>Every day you're.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast Catch US Live

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from two to five pm. Easter Listen on

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Apple car Play and then Bright Otto with a Bloomberg

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Business act, or watch US live on YouTube.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Hesbilla has claimed the first strike against Israel since a

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>US back ceasefire plan came into effect that was less

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 4>than a week ago. It prompted Israeli officials to a

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>strong response and the most serious threats so far to

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 4>the truce with Lebanon. With more and what we know,

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News US National Security Team leader Nick Wadams joins

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>us from our DC bureau. Nick I was confused to

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 4>see this headline because, like you know, we see in

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the story here, less than a week ago, we saw

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 4>a ceasefire agreement between these two countries.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 9>What happened, right, Well, I mean that's that's really the issue,

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 9>and this is this is something that happens every time

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 9>there is a ceasefire, or frequently when there is a ceasefire,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 9>there are violations of it. And the question is then

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 9>at what point do you say, Okay, the ceasefire has

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 9>essentially collapsed and it no longer applies. What we gather

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 9>so far is that we have not drifted into that territory.

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 9>The US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said today

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 9>that rocket attacks went from hundreds to basically zero, and

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 9>then dozens of air strikes by Israel to one or

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 9>two per day. So what there's saying here is there

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 9>has been a dramatic reduction in violence and that's what matters,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 9>and the ceasefire still holds. But what it does tell

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 9>us more broadly is that this is very tenuous. You

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 9>had President Biden come out and say the ceasefire had

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 9>been achieved, a lot of concern about whether it will hold,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 9>and concern that things will only continue to exclate. One possibility,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 9>of course, is this is just sort of a show

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 9>of strength by the two sides. Things will quiet back down,

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 9>but certainly not looking good for the broader prospects for

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 9>that ceasefire at the moment, Nick.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 6>Why do this dance? You know, rather than ceasefire means ceasefire?

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 6>So help me understand.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I know it's always complicated when I feel like anything

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle East, But why this dance rather than Okay, ceasefire,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>this is a step forward.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it's a great question, but you know,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 9>the big issue is that so much time and effort

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 9>and energy went into establishing this ceasefire. And the really

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 9>important thing for certainly the US, but also for those

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 9>caught in the conflict, is that the violence has dramatically reduced.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 9>So there's a question of Okay, you have the ceasefire.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 9>You don't want to immediately just declare the ceasefire is dead,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 9>which means okay that everybody would then have to go

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 9>back to the negotiating table. And if you're looking at

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 9>a pure numbers game, it's like, okay, well, we have

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 9>a monitoring system in place. There may be some violations.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 9>We do not deem those violations to be to indicate

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 9>that the ceasefire has totally collapsed. I mean, and when

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 9>you look at some of the language, it seems like

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 9>the two sides also have an interest in keeping the

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 9>ceasefire in place. Has Bellowed, for example, targeted Israel in

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 9>a specific area, an area that's still contested, and they

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 9>framed their response as a defensive response to what they

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 9>said were recurrent violations by the Israeli side. So what

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 9>they're saying is this is much more of a defensive action,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 9>and they have not gone back on the offense of course,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 9>big question is whether will see things the same way.

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 9>But at this point the big question is going to

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 9>be is there escalation where we would get to a

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 9>point where we'd say, listen, the ceasefire exists in name only.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 9>So far, that's not quite yet the case.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 4>We'll tell us a little bit more about the area

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 4>that's in contention right now, Nick, because we saw after

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 4>that ceasefire deal with sign last week or reached last week,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 4>I should say, we saw people moving in Lebanon, moving

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 4>back to that area because they thought.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 7>It would be safe to do so. So there's some, right,

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean, concerns.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, I mean so there. I think a lot

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 9>of the imagery we really saw of people coming back

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 9>to their homes in Lebanon in a lot of cases

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 9>that was actually in Beirut, in the capitol where people

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 9>had fled because Israeli air strikes had really hit some

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 9>parts of Beyrout, particularly southern Beay Route quite hard, and

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 9>so people were coming back in because there was a

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 9>feeling which has largely held that the ceasefire would apply

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 9>and you start to see those strikes again. The area

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 9>really in question is this sort of strip of land

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 9>around just south of the Litani River and so this

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 9>this divides Lebanon in Israel, and this has been a

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 9>sort of hotly contested area for quite some time, and

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 9>it's believed that that has you know, has been there

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 9>for a long time, and there was a feeling that

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 9>Israel could then pull back and that would also allow

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 9>Hesbolat to pull back. So that's really where you're seeing

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the contested you know, the violations. We

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 9>have not seen major violations apply, you know to Beyroot,

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 9>which I think if you did see that, what would

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 9>indicate a real collapse of the seasfire.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>What are we hearing out of our own security operations,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 3>our own intelligence out of the White House in regards

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>to that, or we haven't heard maybe much of anything yet.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean the big thing is I mean the

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 9>US put, as as I mentioned, a lot of time

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 9>and effort and frankly credibility into getting this ceasefire. So

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 9>it is very much in their interest to try to

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 9>keep this thing from escalating much farther and keep it

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 9>in place. This is something that President Biden really wants

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 9>to keep in place through the end of his term

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>in hopes that then it would put pressure on Hamas

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 9>and Israel to come to a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 9>So it is very much in their interest to keep

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 9>this thing going. They do not want this to fail.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 9>So what you can expect to see in the next

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 9>couple of days is going to be a ton of

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 9>pressure on both Israel and Hezballah by the US and

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 9>other mediators involved in this action to really tamp things

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 9>down and not let these tit for stat tat strikes

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 9>get any worse.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Him and I are going back and forth because we're like,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 3>there's one more thing we need to ask you, and

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I feel like when you think about pressure, I think

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>about tim the President elect.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, Donald Trump posting just at the same time

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 4>we learned that Israel is actually doing this. He posted

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 4>about the Middle East hostages on True Social He said

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 4>there will be all hell to pay if the hostages

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 4>are not released by January twenty I think called on

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the hostages to be released in the Middle East. Right now,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>How does this complicate things or not complicate things?

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it's it's very interesting because the hostage

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 9>situation applies to a different situation, which is in the

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 9>Gaza Strip, and so that.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it is it that different? Well, it's all I mean,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 4>it's a two front it's a several front war.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 9>Sure, that's true. Though the issue there is that a

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 9>threat like that would not necessarily apply to Hezbollah because

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 9>they don't have any hostages that they have worked in

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 9>support of Hummas. But I mean, you're right in the

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 9>sense that when when President elect Trump issues a threat

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 9>like that, it certainly causes people to stand up and

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 9>take notice and question, Okay, what's going to be coming

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 9>down the pike. It's that sort of this this idea

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 9>they have escalate to de escalate. The question is is

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 9>this bluster or is this just something that is he's

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 9>going to actually take seriously and potentially launch some sort

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 9>of strike once he becomes president.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, as we said, you know, it's kind

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of a two steps forward, one step back, it always

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>feels like.

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 6>But a lot of moving pieces to this. Nick, you're jem.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Nick Bottom, Bloomberg News US National Security Team Leader, and

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>you can read the latest just check it out at

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com or of course, on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Not sure exactly how to set up this story for

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>our Bloomberg BusinessWeek team other than it is an incredible

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>deep dive by Bloomberg Jackie Devallos and Sophia Alexander.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 6>It's about someone.

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Who probably is about to become maybe a household name,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>and not for a good reason. It's a former billionaire

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>now disgrace tycoon. His name is Greg Glenberg. He built

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 3>a network of egg donors and surrogates and is now

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 3>facing as many as thirty years in prison. There's some legal,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>different charges. There's a lot to unpack here, so let's

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>get to it. Bloomberg News Technology Report, Jackie Devallos joining

0:16:58.120 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>us from our Washington d C.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Jackie.

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Every time I turned around with Tim, he was reading

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the story and he's like, leave me alone, Leave me alone,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>because it was just unbelievable. I do feel like we're

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>watching a little bit of a streaming.

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 6>Series reading your story. Who is Greg lin Berg.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 3>How did he and this story get on yours and

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Sophie's Sophie Alexander's radar.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, he might actually be a well known quantity if

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you've been a Bloomberg reader and listener over the last

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. He made his name and the insurance business,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and not really for a good reason.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 6>He built his.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Wealth by amassing this empire of insurance companies that then

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>got him in trouble. He was convicted of bribery and

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>some fraud charges. He actually went to jail a couple

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of years ago for the bribery charges. He wanted to

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>basically get some preferential treatment in North Carolina, where some

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of his companies were based. He got caught for it

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by the FBI and went away for a couple of

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>years in prison, but got out and kind of this

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>procedural issue with the jury instruction, so basically he was

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>able to kind of, you know, come out as a

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>free man. All the while this was happening, and even

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>before he went to jail, he had these aspirations of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>having upwards of fifty children, and what he is known

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for kind of in the business community, really had nothing

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with what he was doing in his personal life.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But what we were able to uncover Sophie and I,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, she is a reporter that knows billionaires, knows

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>how they think, and I really knew kind of the

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fertility clinic side of things. I had done some reporting

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on a company called kind Body last year and this

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>came on our radar as a kind of a combination

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of those two reporting threads. But we had no idea

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just how deep his baby project really went. Well.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 4>That firm that you mentioned is one of the two

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 4>that's implicated in a scheme. Let's back up for a second.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get to sort of the intricacies here.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 4>But why would he want fifty kids and why would

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 4>you want to do this through IVF Because there's some

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 4>custody issues here that you detail in the story.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right. He has three children with an ex wife

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that he had, you know, when he was married, and

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there was kind of an ugly custody battle there. And

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>when we sat down with him to interview him, he

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was fairly forthcoming about the reasons why kind of vacillated

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>between well, you know, I don't really want to lose

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>kids in a custody battle, which is why I wanted

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to have them on my own. He wasn't, you know,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hiding the fact that he used a network of egg donors,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but then again, he wasn't totally forthcoming about how many

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>were involved. Another reason he you know, he stated was

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that he wanted to preserve civilization, this responsibility to populate

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the earth. And we recognized a lot of those threads

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>from you know, especially Sophia Alexander's reporting on Elon Musk

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and other billionaires who are kind of obsessed with this

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of pro natalist way of thinking, and Greg Lindberg's

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>goals really echoed that that goal as well. And you know,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that kind of came up is that,

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think I don't think a lot

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is known about what it takes to build a family

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in this way. We typically think of like a couple

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>walking into a fertility clinic that can't conceive, not necessarily

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's basically trying to have as many children

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as possible on his own, and yeah, you know, there's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the issue of custody. He shares some children with this

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>woman who kind of served as a recruiter for him,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but she's not allowed back in the United States. So

0:20:55.200 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>eight children are currently in his care in Tampa while

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting in jail waiting to be sentenced for these

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>larger crimes. And that's really what's at the core of

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the story is you know, where will these children end up?

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>What happens to them? And ultimately did doctors know that

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this was a possibility.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't even know where to begin.

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 3>It's just kind of as I like to say, a wait,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 3>what moment I want to go back to. You talked

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 3>with Lindburg earlier this year. Tell us about that conversation.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>What you wanted to know, why he agreed to do

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 3>the interview, what what was I'm just curious how you

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>got him to talk to you.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, he has a pretty open presence online if you

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>google Greg Lindberg dot com. He talks a lot about longevity.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>After his legal saga, he you know, he's currently waiting

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to be sentenced, but at the time over you know,

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the spring, he was posting YouTube videos about kind

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of his new project, which is all about wellness and

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>how to get younger and stay young. And you know,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he posts a lot about these things and we were

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in that. I had gotten a tip about kind

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of his baby projects separately, but it really seemed like

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>these two things were linked, and so he wanted to

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about his longevity company called Longevity Labs, and had

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a phone call with him. Then he invited us down

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to Tampa where he lives, and this is where we

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really got to see him in his element. He came

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in with security guards. He you know, has this kind

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of very intimidating quality to him. His eye contact was

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>extremely intense, and you know, at first he was fairly

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>open about how he built his family through IVF, but

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>started to kind of clam up a little bit once

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he almost like heard himself kind of talking about the

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>unorthodox nature of it. And we were pretty forthcoming that, like, hey,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds a lot like this other guy that we've written about,

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. But you know, that's kind of what got

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the I think it cracked it open for us that

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this was real and that there were certainly a lot

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of women that you know, he didn't want to talk about.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But we had to kind of piece those those pieces

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>together because it's an incredibly important part of the story,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>which is the exploitation involved. And while this might have

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>been you know, a goal of his there were women

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>whose lives were impacted by how he carried this out.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 7>So let's talk a little bit about that.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 4>How he carried this out, who was involved, how Instagram

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 4>was used, and what women who ultimately did donate their

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 4>eggs to lind Bergh were told versus what they ended

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 4>up getting and what he ended up doing.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>The first in the first stage of the baby project,

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Greg Glenberg really targeted blonde, blue eyed, green eyed model types.

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>There were matchmaking services that he used, There were kind

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of boozy parties that he threw in his huge yacht.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>There were you know, reality TV stars, Netflix stars, I mean,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very like a specific type of woman

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that he had in mind. He had this kind of

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>obsession with Arian looks and the German quality to things.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>He himself obviously is red hair, but he really wanted

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to have you know, blonde, blue eyed boys and super

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>specific and for some of these women, you know, many

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>were vulnerable. There there was one who was not, you know,

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from American. There were several actually who were Eastern European

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable in many ways because you know, they didn't know

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what they were getting themselves into. He promised them money,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, promises that they would be in the child's life,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that they will build a home together, and was kind

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of manipulating them in a way that, you know, if

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go through with this procedure, that he would

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have cut them off basically and cut the relationship off.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>There were other women that had no idea that you know,

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he who he was, his recruiter slash fiance. You know,

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>she was going on Instagram and basically finding these women

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and offering them hundreds of thousands of dollars to donate

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>their eggs, and they thought, you know, wow, my eggs

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are just going to go to this you know, nice

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>family who can't have kids, and they weren't told the

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>truth about Greg Linberg, his legal troubles and the fact

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that he was sitting in jail while some of this

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was happening.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Jackie, your story is definitely about linn Berg and everything

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that kind of happened around him, But it's also about,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 3>as you guys you know so well, right, the booming

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 3>ten billion dollar fertility industry here in America, and you

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 3>guys have been writing a lot about this industry. It

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>continues to grow. There's demand out there. We know that

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Tim and I talk about it a lot on air.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>It also shows though, what ultimately the lack of transparency

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>over it and kind of rules governing. Is that kind

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of the other side of the story because I think

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 3>we're listening and saying, okay, some of this happens, like

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>tell us kind of where this breaks down, where the

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 3>law has been broken.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Potentially this is the big picture. Greg Lin Burton might

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>go to prison likely will, but anyone else can pull

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>this off because a lot of this was actually legal.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>There is very little regulation when it comes to the

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>fertility industry. It's this honor system. They're a self regulated

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>industry essentially that has guidelines that doctors purport to follow.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Clinics say, you know, these are the guidelines of the

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>American Society of Reproductive Medicine ASRM. It's a trade group

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that represents doctors across the country, and they say that

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>follow these these guidelines. But no one's following up on it,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>no one's policing it. The government is largely stayed out

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of regulating fertility because it's really politically fraught, as we

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know with reproductive rights just kind of at the core

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, this this debate, and you know, fertility

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is usually thought of as like a way that you

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>know someone. It's like a miracle, you know, for couples

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been able to have children. But as our

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>story shows, depending on what your intentions are and how

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wealthy you are, it can also be used as a

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>tool for exploitation. And two of the clinics are really

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>well known. Kind Body acquired this other Chicago clinic that

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>started it, but it also continued after they acquired them HRC.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a major fertility network on the West Coast. A

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>doctor who's treated celebrities was the one that Lindbergh preferred,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was open about this, and we were able

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to kind of piece together some of the concerns and

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>say clinic workers actually had specifically a kind Body with

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing. And you know that takes a

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of courage for for people who kind of see this,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing out and and I think what our

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>story does is, you know, at the end of the day,

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>these guidelines are there for a reason, but you know,

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>no one's really following up to see if doctors and

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>clinics are actually following them.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Jackie quickly, and then I'm gonna just encourage everyone

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 4>once again to go and read this story. It's the

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 4>most read on the terminal today for a reason. I

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 4>could not put it down. He participated with you to

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 4>a certain extent, but then cut off communication with you

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 4>and the reporting team behind this, and then what happened.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's still an ongoing, uh, you know, claim of defamation.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He he, you know, alleged that we were interfering with

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with one of his surrogates. You know, obviously

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a touchy situation for him, and we were

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty forthcoming about out the direction of the story once

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we really cleared up the facts. But right now he's

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a county jail in North Carolina waiting to

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be sentenced. He was denied bail multiple times this last month,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're not really sure where his story will end up.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we stand by our reporting and you know,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hope that folks out there can read it.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 3>It's an amazing read, unbelievable. Jackie, thank you so much.

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm really glad we were able to go through with you.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Devalos, she's Bloomberg News Technology reporter of this story

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>by she and Sophie Alexander of Bloomberg News.

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Check it out. At Bloomberg dot com and also on

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 6>the Bloomberg terminal. Jackie, thanks, you're.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen on Apple.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 7>Car Play and then brought auto with a Bloomberg.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, some news out of China.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 4>US is unveiling these new restrictions on China's access to

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 4>vital components for chips and AI. It escalates this campaign

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 4>to contain Beijing's tech ambitions, but it stops short of

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 4>earlier proposals that would have sanctioned more key Chinese firms.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, so curious about all of this and what

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 3>our next guest has to say.

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 6>He's Ben Harberg.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>He thinks a lot about this region and the latest

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to investing in China. Ben is found

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in portfolio manager at Core Values Alpha. His team, by

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the way, manages the CBA Great China Growth ETF TICK

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 3>or as CGROO.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 6>This year up just shy of ten and a half percent.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 3>It is down twenty percent though since October seventh, been

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>joining us from RIOD.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 6>You're always somewhere. It's the wee hours.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 7>So are either staying up late or getting up super early?

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 7>For us?

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 6>What is it?

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you wait?

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 7>What's going on in real?

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 6>Look at you exacts?

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 7>Are you on vacation a work trip? What's going on?

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm speaking at the World Football Summit here?

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 7>A right, that's pretty cool.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 10>Iota on her team in Spain. So I talk a

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 10>lot about my side. Hustle is running soccer teams.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 4>How much time do you spend doing that versus managing

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the fun?

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 7>And can you do both? Obviously you could do both

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 7>if you delegate.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'd probably spend five percent of my time on

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 10>football related.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 7>How much do you want to spend on soccer?

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 11>I'm trying to cound turn the corner.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 10>Then I'll be all in on that, But no, I

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 10>would love to spend more time. We'll slowly edge towards

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 10>that as my net worth creepsire.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess, so, Ben, is it easier to attract investors

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to invest in a sports team or soccer team than

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>it is to get investors to invest in China?

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 6>I ask you this, and I know we talk about

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 6>this a lot.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your fun is about seven point three million

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars in assets under management so I'm assuming you would.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 6>Like for it to be a lot more. So help

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 6>me around here.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, we have two over two billion dollars on

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 10>the private side, So this is you know, this, this

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.479
<v Speaker 10>public strategy is newer for us, and it's a bit

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 10>of a trial balloon, and we'll be adding new products

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 10>into it shortly in the next couple of months. So

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, it's kind of a process of seeing what

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 10>sticks to the wall on the ETF side, but we've

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 10>we've obviously done well on the on the private side,

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 10>I'd say today.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 7>It's probably easier to get people to invest in sports.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 10>Sports are hot right now, European football, particularly because the

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 10>valuations are so low relative to their US peers. It's

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 10>a highly inefficient industry and it's also one that's really

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 10>fun to get involved with, and so you've seen some

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 10>mega funds raised over the last few years in this

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 10>space in terms of.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 3>The private investors. As you said over I think two billion,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you said, is it the same similar investment strategy in

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of what you're trying to do this fun in particular,

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 3>you look for those kind of tech enabled companies in

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Greater China, the Mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong. Is it the

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 3>same type of investing or is it something different that

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 3>you're doing on the private side.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 10>It's obviously much earlier stage, so it's venture and growth investments.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 10>So company that are maybe you know, series seed, Series A,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 10>and then some pre IPO stuff and then obviously ETF

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 10>is all public.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So let's talk a little bit about now that

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 4>we've sort of established the grounding stuff here, let's talk

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 4>a little about opportunities that you see because we actually

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 4>haven't had a chance to speak to you since the

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to call it reelection, but since President

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 4>elect Donald Trump won back earlier last month, how does

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 4>that change the outlook for China? Because on one hand,

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 4>he talks incredibly tough about China. He implemented, he implemented

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that then the Biden administration kept, and he's talked

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 4>about increasing tariffs on China when he takes office.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 7>How are you thinking about all this? I think you.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 10>Should be long short term book bearish and long term

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, optimistically or cautiously bullish, let's say. And I

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 10>think that's because you're going to hear a lot of

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 10>headlines and you're going to see a lot of news

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 10>about very high tariff numbers and a whole saloop China

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 10>hawks brought into the administration. But uh, and so I

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 10>think that'll mean so really tough dealing at a very

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 10>high bar set for the Chinese that they're going to

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.280
<v Speaker 10>have to deal with as they grapple with tracking investors

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 10>back to the market. But I think in the long

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 10>term you can be slightly bullish because Trump is a businessman,

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 10>He's pragmatic, and there are things that can be done

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 10>from the Chinese side to assuage some of the issues

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 10>that he cares most about. He cares about the you know,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 10>the the reindustrialization of America, reshoring jobs, protecting American industries,

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 10>and there are things that China can give up in

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 10>an effort to appease that and to support that, and

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 10>when they do, that can lead to a much more

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 10>pragmatic dynamic in the relationship, rather than what you face

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 10>with the Democrats, which is a very intractable dynamic where

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 10>there's a whole sleet of issues that they care very

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 10>much about that that that the China will never be

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 10>able to reconcile and overcome, and therefore it just kind

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 10>of draws on indefinitely as a kind of shell game.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey Ben, you know one of the stories on the

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg today we talked about the Chinese ten year yield

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 3>dropping past the key psychological milestone of two percent. Was

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that a record low traders essentially kind of ramping up

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 3>their bets that authorities would ease monetary policy further to

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>bolster the week economy. When you think about China, what

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 3>is more important to making it more investible for investors?

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it the US China relationship, Is it China figuring

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 3>out it's real estate overhang, or is it something else?

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 10>The key number for US is consumer behavior in China

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 10>the key indicator. Everything else kind of is affected by that.

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 10>So when you know geopolitics affect stock prices and valuations,

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 10>they undercut people's home you know, kind of their savings,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 10>their portfolio, and therefore they consume less. And likewise, if

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 10>real estate prices are falling and homes are going at

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 10>lower prices and they were previously, again that undercuts people's

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 10>confidence in the market. So all these measures to stabilize

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 10>the property market to assuaye some of the geopolitical tensions,

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 10>albeit very very minute, are in an effort to get

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 10>the Chinese consumers back to the market, because the only

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 10>way that China grows and the way that it survives,

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 10>the way that it performs, the way people were hoping

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 10>it would, you know, several years ago, is to establish

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 10>it as a domestic consumption market and enable it to

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 10>absorb a lot of these products that they're exporting outward,

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 10>because they simply cannot afford to continue to run trade

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 10>deficits with every country or state surpluses. If you're sitting

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 10>on the Chinese side with every country around.

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 7>The world I've been a few years ago.

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 4>If we were talking to you, you know, the conversation

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 4>we'd be having is, so, you know, Chinese is going

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to overtake the US as the largest economy in the world,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 4>and it's going to do that very soon. That narrative

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 4>certainly has shifted. But do you think that does end

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 4>up happening eventually?

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 10>I think the numbers would say it does. And just again,

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 10>the efficiency of the Chinese economy is still quite low.

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 10>There's there's a lot more that can still be done

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 10>to brew their efficiency. Uh, they are very well positioned

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 10>in what I would call kind of the fifth Industrial Revolution,

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 10>right or you know, with you with all the types

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 10>of key hardware and even consumer facing software that's really

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 10>redefining the way we engage with technology. So mobile first,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 10>everything from entertainment, payments, commerce level, and then of course

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 10>all of the leadership across electric vehicles, you know, mobile handsets,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. So my view is that China's well positioned

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 10>for the this new age and particularly for digitally native consumers.

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 10>But there are a lot of things that are undermining that.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 10>The the anemic and population growth in China, I think,

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 10>the lack of turnover within the Chinese Central Party and

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 10>changing regimes as they had historically, and and just an

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 10>overall kind of saturated economy or under and a higher

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 10>saturation than was previously.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 11>I think there a faster.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 10>Situation than previously would have been predicted, is undermining the

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:10.280
<v Speaker 10>ability for that, uh, that prophecy to come true quickly.

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Hey listen, I'm looking at the holding has been in

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 3>your fun ten Cent Jamie, p d D.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Chip dot Com some of them b I d uh.

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 3>How often are you buying selling moving these names around?

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 3>How are you like thinking about what you want to

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 3>have in this portfolio.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 10>Our view was that China was too dynamic a market

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 10>to be passively traded. So we thought one of our

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 10>differentiers would be that we were active, and so that

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 10>enables us to move in and out for particularly across

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 10>share classes, so a shares as shares or a shares

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 10>the you know, the ad rs and the eighth shares,

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 10>and we think that in this dynamic as well, you

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 10>need to be moving in and out of those because

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 10>you're going to see the the ad rs get hit

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 10>every now and again, but the main land indexes are

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 10>flying and you know, retail buyers are pouring into those ingles.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 10>So I do think that you've got to be active.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 10>And then what we're trying to do is position ourselves

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 10>in that product for what we think will be the

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, the immediate knock on effects of some of

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 10>these stimulus policies which will help improve some of the

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 10>domestic consumption narratives. And so therefore, you know, those those

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 10>consumer facing names that we put at the top of

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 10>the holdings will probably see benefit the fastest.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Ben What stimulus policies do you think are forthcoming that

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 4>we don't like? What are you anticipating that we haven't

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 4>heard about yet?

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, I don't know if I point to anything

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 10>really specific. And I still think that a lot of

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 10>the stimulus is more narrative than it is. It's kind

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 10>of more form than function in the sense that it's

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 10>it's not truly having a material impact on the bottom line.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 10>The thing we're looking for is just that kind of

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 10>sustain momentum that people within China and externally feel that

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 10>the government is serious about growth, furious about cleaning out

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 10>some of the bad debts, some of the you know,

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 10>things that it has under his control, and of course

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 10>the geopolitics are less under its control today than ever before,

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 10>and that those would then almost kind of jump start

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 10>like sparking an engine for a spacecraft, but spark the

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 10>engine of consumer growth, and that people would kind of

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 10>return to the retail, return to High Street, start spending a.

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 7>Little bit more because the money is there.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we're sitting there in those bank accounts twenty

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 10>one trillion and counting of household savings and dollars, much

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 10>more than is in the US, and so there's a

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 10>huge potential to be unlocked. But the people have to

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 10>kind of feel that, and so I think they were

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 10>holding back of waiting for Trump and hopefully you'll see

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 10>more things from here.

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, just got one time for another question, one more

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 3>question forty seconds or so left here and going back

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 3>to your holdings. I don't think I see TSM Taiwan Semiconductor.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 6>Is there reason? Why? Is it just too big or

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 6>what I mean? It's up eighty seven percent this year.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 10>We've moved in and out of it, and we even

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 10>sometimes have had Nvidia and some of the other companies

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 10>that still have significant revenue coming out of China. But

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 10>in this current on the portfolio, it's not there.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Good to know, good to know, So appreciate it, Ben,

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Go get some sleep, Ben, Harvard,

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 3>play some.

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Soccer, talk about some soccer. Wait, wait, wait, Ben, we

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 4>have like twenty seconds. What's your team? What's your team

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 4>in Spain called.

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 10>It's called Cotti's Oh yeah, oh it's it's glorious, mister sherry,

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 10>but one plug. We have sherry just next door. But

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 10>some of the best food in the world. The oldest

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 10>continuously inhabited city in Western Europe. Our stadium is one

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 10>hundred and fifty meters from the beach. Just a glorious

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 10>place for football.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 6>Wait, so are you there for the sports? Are you

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 6>just there for the view and the food and everything.

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, everything all in all in all right, Ben Harberg,

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:48.479
<v Speaker 3>founder and portfolio manager at Core Values Alpha, joining us

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 3>from Riod on this Monday, December second.

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 6>All right, folks, we got about twenty six minutes to

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 6>go into the closing down.

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm thinking about Spain.

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 6>I want to look at this map of the soccer

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 6>teams where this place is umbrother mac.

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 7>A journal.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 8>Now about you let me drive?

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 10>No no, no, no, please, honey please, I'll do the drive gravels,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 10>excuse mate, I want to try it.

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question time.

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 7>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 11>We'll buy around Yethern.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 7>On Bluemberg Radio.

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 6>All right, everybody, TikTok.

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 3>We are about nineteen minutes away from the closing bell,

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 3>and we have seen the next one hundred just uh,

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty much hovering you near its highs of the session.

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So as we just heard about about two hundred and

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 3>forty two points, so good for a game of almost

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 3>one point two percent s and p just call it

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit higher. But I do know that we've

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 3>been hovering near some records throughout the days. We'll see

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 3>whether or not we close at a record record.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 6>Did you close on at highs on on Friday?

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 7>We did?

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 6>I really kind of tuned out.

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 7>Sorry so offended it.

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 6>I did think about you. I did the about you

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 6>while you were doing your duty here?

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 7>What do you say of thoughts? And there's like if some.

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Bets for candy nuts? We don't have fun at Christmas?

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Oh okay.

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 6>It's a friend of mine in college. She used to

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 6>say it all the time.

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, finally we're getting to Christmas season we are. Yeah,

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 4>so you know it's even more apt. Hey, uh no,

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 4>good segue here. But we always like to check in

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 4>with Jimmy Lee. He's the founder and CEO over at

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 4>the Wealth Consulting Group. They've got about five billion dollars

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 4>in assets under management.

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 7>Usually he's in Las Vegas.

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes he graces us with his presence here at the

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Interactor Brokers studio in New York. Today he's in

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 4>Costa Rica. Jimmy, what are you doing in Costa Rica.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm on a little personal vacation with some family, so

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 8>enjoying the weather.

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 6>All right, Well, it's a beautiful place, it is.

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry that you're stuck in your hotel room zooming

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 4>with us on this Monday afternoon. I hope you you know,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 4>we won't keep you for long and you can get

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 4>back down out there in Costa Rica.

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 3>It's the food, it's the environment. They don't spend money

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 3>on military. It's really cool. But the monkey's right there

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 3>in the trees. I still like, we still I'll get

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 3>up early and we call it monkey TV. We just

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 3>sit there and watch the monkeys waking up.

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 8>It was on the beach this morning, Carol, and they

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 8>were right above us having fun, hanging out.

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 11>But I would always go into my room to do

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 11>your show. I love your show.

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's Jimmy saying, all right, guys, enough about Coaster Rica.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Can we talk about the market? Where are we listen?

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, by many accounts, you know, certainly the US

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 3>equity trade is going to you know, unless something happens

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 3>in this last month, it's going to be a.

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Pretty good year. What's your take?

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Two good years now we've seen four stocks. Sometimes it's

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 3>hard to keep that momentum going after two up years.

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.479
<v Speaker 3>What are you thinking about here in terms of what's

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the most investable part of the US market?

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 6>What is not?

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's an interesting question.

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 8>And as I've been on a guest on your show

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 8>for a long time. Now, you know that I've been

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 8>fairly bullish on equities for the last years, and in

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 8>the timeframe where a lot of economists were just predicting

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 8>a recession primarily I think because of the data they

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 8>were looking at historically suggested that we're going to face

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 8>the recession.

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 11>Which hasn't occurred.

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 8>Of course, tech doocs have led the way, the Max

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:11.720
<v Speaker 8>seven have you been a big part of the story

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 8>on all the major indexes going up as much as

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 8>they have.

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 11>But recently we've seen the market broad now.

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, the.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:22.240
<v Speaker 8>Sectors that we've talked about that we're not participating are

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:27.720
<v Speaker 8>participating now, like finance, financial sector, industrials, you know, small

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 8>caps in terms of market.

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 11>Cap are doing much better now.

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 8>So across the board you're seeing a lot of different

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 8>areas participate, and I think recently that's because we've had

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 8>so much money sitting on the sidelines.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 11>We still do. One of the things that we track

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 11>on our Investment Committee.

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 8>Weekly is the amount of cash going into ETFs and

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 8>mutual funds, into equities, fixed income and money markets. And

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, people keep putting money into cash, believe or not.

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 8>I think it's probably from a lot of the treasuries

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 8>are coming to do.

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 11>And they're not sure what to do with it yet.

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 8>But the people that want to participate, I think, I think,

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, they're looking for pockets of the market that

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 8>are less expensive, like value stocks, like small cap stocks,

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 8>and I do believe that those cyclical sectors or areas

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 8>that we can invest into.

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 11>I also think that bonds now with the yields.

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 8>Climbing back up as they did after the first rate cut,

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.439
<v Speaker 8>I think there's value in bonds too, So I think

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 8>there's a few areas that investors could get value in.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Why do you think investors are still on the sidelines.

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, Tim, I think it's just this uncertainty, and you know,

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 8>I think a lot of people were fooled. You know

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 8>that the five percent treasury was the best place to go.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 8>Now again, we've talked about this before. For your money

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 8>sitting in checking account deposits that we're not earning any interest.

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 11>That was a great move.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 8>But for people that took money out of stocks to

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 8>put it into treasuries and money markets, I think we're

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 8>just listening to the headline news and not paying attention

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 8>to you know, maybe what the companies were doing that

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 8>they're invested in in terms of earnings, and you know,

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 8>for the most part, I think a lot of people

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 8>that normal investors, not retail investors, not institutional investors, you know,

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 8>just don't pay enough attention to this.

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 11>And so they look at the headline news and they

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 11>hear a violid recession.

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 8>And while the market's gone up a lot, for a

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 8>lot of Americans, it hasn't felt that great because we've

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 8>had a lot of inflation over the last couple of years.

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.879
<v Speaker 8>So I think the feeling of a bad economy kind

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:29.280
<v Speaker 8>of maybe overtook their investor. Investor behavior, which is always

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 8>what we fight against as financial advisors, is investors are

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 8>always trying to put a lot of money at the

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 8>tops and selling out when there's a little bit of panic.

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, it's I get it, I get it right.

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 3>We talked about that investor sentiment so important. I mean, ultimately, Jimmy,

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're just kind of wrapping up an earning season,

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think about you know, we go from earning

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 3>season too earning season. But that is really kind of

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 3>our gut check, right, our transparency on really how companies

0:47:56.520 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 3>are doing when it comes to growing the top line eenses.

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Are they upbeat about spending in the new year. I mean,

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 3>these are the important things that ultimately determine whether or

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 3>not investing in stocks makes sense or at what valuation

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make sense.

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 8>Yes, And as you know, earnings have been pretty darn good,

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 8>you know, in the face of higher interest rates and

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 8>all the different obstacles that we do have in the economy.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 8>And you know, certainly there's a little bit of softness

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.439
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of the data that we've seen, whether

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 8>it's manufacturing or even a little bit of softness and

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 8>the employment and data. But for the most parts, I

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 8>think post election, people you know, are thinking that things

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 8>are potentially more hopeful for next year. As you know,

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 8>everybody is going to feel a little bit better when

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 8>interest rates are lower. If you think about the kind

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 8>of you know, interest payments that consumers make, so credit

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 8>card payments, auto loans, mortgages. As rates come down, as

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 8>the tenure comes down and those interest rates on those

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 8>types of consumer debt comes down, I think people are

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 8>going to start to feel a lot better. And I

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 8>think that the jobs situation and the plumbing situation is

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 8>going to remain pretty strong, and so I'm very hopeful

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 8>about about next year. You know that we're we're going

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 8>to be going into an environment with lower rates. I

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:22.919
<v Speaker 8>think consumer sentiment is going to get better. I think

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 8>the c suite of large companies and small companies can

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 8>be a bit more bullish about cappacks and where they're

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 8>going to invest, and hopefully what we'll see is a

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:33.720
<v Speaker 8>soft landing. You know that the FED actually does engineer

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 8>soft landing. I would absolutely love to see interest rates

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 8>go lower. I don't think inflation is nearly the problem

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 8>that the headline numbers suggest. You know, if you look

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 8>at what housing, how housing plays into the headline numbers.

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 8>We know that real time rents are lower, and so

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:50.919
<v Speaker 8>once it starts getting into the numbers, I think things

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 8>will will look better and hopefully twenty twenty five ends

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 8>up being a good year.

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like we've got to get into it

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and kind of get a good feel of the policies

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that might come from administration and how that impacts, you know,

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 3>the corporate environment, certainly for those publicly held entities. Jimmy,

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much, really appreciate being able to check

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 3>in with you.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 6>Happy New year. If we don't get to you before

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 6>the end of the year, come back to you.

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Lee, He's founder and chief executive officer at Wealth

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Consulting Group, joining us on this Monday in December from

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Costa Rica, where I'm assuming it's a little warmer Costa Rica.

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if it's warmer than Las Vegas.

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 6>That's the temperature.

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm looking it up right now. You know what it is.

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 7>It's about seventy degrees there. Yeah, so it's kind of perfect.

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 7>It's kind of perfect. Yeah.

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast.

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 7>I'll available on.

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Apple and Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 2>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Journal alone.