WEBVTT - Social Media Show Trial

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Facebook CEO is down

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill answering questions from senators who don't seem

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand how a social media network works. Also fallout

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from the seizure of Trump lawyer Cohen's records. We'll get

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>into that, plus an update on our possible serial response

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and the caravan heading for the US Mexico border. That

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a more coming up. This is The Buck Sexton Show,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>where the mission or mission is to decode what really

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Ready, you're

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a great American Again? The Buck Sexton Show begins. No,

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody. Great to have

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you here with me. Always a privilege and a pleasure.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of stuff to talk about today,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>oh my, So let's start with like I said, Like

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I just said, we got Facebook, We've got the Cohen

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lawyer record seizure fallout. Our friend Andie McCarthy, the one

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and only. He'll be joining us right in the middle

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>of the show, talk about He's a former Southern District

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of New York assistant US attorney who is going to

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be talking to us about what the heck did the

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Southern District of New York do yesterday, So he's as

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>good a guys are gonna find a talk about that. Um,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into all the latest and then also later

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>on the show, they're attacking a part of my youth,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Breakfast Club. We'll discuss that the social justice warriors

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>are going after it, and also a firm of action

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and Asian Americans. That'll be a topic you want

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to stay around for. So I'm I take a very

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>different point. Producer Mike agrees with me on this one.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna assume Brandon agrees to be on this one

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just because they didn't ask him. So I'm gonna say

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the tide goes to the buck, Thank you, Brandon. But

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this whole Facebook thing is a social media

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>show trial. I really do. I'm I'm absolutely convinced that

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if Trump had not won the election, nobody would care.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>You would not have heard anything about Cambridge Analytica. Do

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not be hearing about the threat that social media platforms

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook pose for our democracy. And I think people

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are getting lost in all the all the little side

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>stories and and side shows here with what's happening. Instead

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of keeping an eye and the fact that this is

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just more liberal outrage Catharsis over Hillary's loss. Why the

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>heck is the CEO of Facebook showing up to explain

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to members of the Senate how Facebook works, what it's

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>background is. You know, don't they have Google? I mean,

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>can't they figure this stuff out? It was incredible. If

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you saw some of the hearing, there was a lot

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of like show like Sean town I made that the

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>people put the photos and they can send the messages

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to the friends. What is this with the the digital

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>photo and the face But there's no book, so it's

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>really lots of different screens, not pages. I mean, these

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the Senate, they're representing you and me, my friends.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>They are not exactly sharp when it comes to the

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>digital world. I gotta say it was pretty There was

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of whoa, I thought you guys were up.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>These are the people who are writing like cybersecurity laws.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>By the way, just remember that these are the people

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that are supposed to be protecting us from the best

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the best hackers that China and Russia and you know,

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Iran and others can throw North Korea can throw our way.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're telling me the photos are posted by the users,

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or where do we get these photos? Is there? Do

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we do? We call the d m V on a

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>rotary phone. They have no idea what is going on,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but they know that this is a moment to make

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of speeches. And they also know that

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a story that has a much greater residence

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with particularly the media, but the public at large then

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it would otherwise, because this is called this is holding

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>something to account for Hillary's loss other than Hillary. And

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but go down the list. Okay, so

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we've had Hillary loss, but because Comey. Remember that Comey

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>came out and said that we found more emails right

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>before the Life. Hillary lost because Comy. Hillary lost because sexism.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That's been a fun one. Hillary lost because Russia ran

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>some incredible international scheme of subversion and mind manipulation. Uh

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and now Hillary lost because Russia did that. But also Facebook,

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook should have done more. In fact that the ceo himself,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I was out there talking about Mark Zuckerberg, who is

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>my contemporary, unfortunately worth quite a bit more than me,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>got quite a bit of a bigger bank roll, which

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>makes me sad. But nonetheless he he said that he

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was there, and then he was being held accountable himself personally.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>It's clear now that we didn't do enough to prevent

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>these tools from being used for harm as well, and

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that goes for fake news, for foreign interference and elections

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and hate speech, as well as developers and data privacy.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We didn't take a broad enough view of our responsibility

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and that was a big mistake, and it was my mistake,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm responsible for what happens here. Now we have to

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go through are all of our relationship with people and

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're taking a broad enough view of

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>our responsibility. It's not enough to just connect people. We

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure that those connections are positive. It's

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not enough to just give people a voice. We need

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that people aren't using it to harm

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>other people or to spread misinformation. And it's not enough

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to just give people control over their information. We need

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the developers they share it with

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>protect their information too. Now, put aside for a moment

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that this guy who I feel like definitely got his

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>fair share of wedgies back in the day, Do you

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>remember that that was a thing we're gonna talk about

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>eighties movies later. Well, what's what do you call it?

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>When somebody takes that, puts them in the headlock and

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like thank you a noogie? And wedgies?

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember those that kind of no one ever talks about.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think right now you'd probably get you know, be

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's some sort of code violation in schools or something.

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I allowed to do that anymore. Forget about code red.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not even allowed to give people a wedgie anymore.

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get in, You're gonna get locked up. But anyway,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy who he's kind of the quintessential super nerd,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>as in, he's a nerd who now is like a

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>country unto himself, who's worth like eighty billion dollars or

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>something for Africa, whatever it is on paper, it's tens

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's tens of billions of dollars. But let's just put

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>aside all that. Let's put aside all the razzle dazzle

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for a second. The fact that he didn't wear his hoodie.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>He wore a suit and tie like a respectable gentleman.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Why is he doing this? Why is you know, let's

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the why for a moment. Lets let's take

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a step back, because this was the biggest story on

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill today. You know that it's this and it's

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the coin aftermath. Those are the two things that we'll

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>dig into, both of those in a way you haven't

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>heard anywhere else, and that will be I promise you

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be worth your time today. Let's start with the why,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ask why? Um The Democrats as I as I was

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioning before, they wanted take this story and run with

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it because even without having to explicitly remind the viewer

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time about this, it's all about Hillary loss

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because of and you know, fill in the blank. Now,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much that they love Hillary, as is

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that they want an excuse for why they're apparatus was

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>unable to get someone elected against Trump, who they clearly

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think is some kind of you know, evil monster from

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the deep. And then there's also Trump is illegitimate, right,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>anything that helped Trump win that was outside the boundaries

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of fair play. Further is the notion among the left

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and among Democrats that Trump is not really the president,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is what at the end of the day, Democrats belief,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>not my president. I remember the marches here in New York,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not my president and not my you know, their march

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. And I was like, actually, actually, as

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>your president, you might not like him. He's the president.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama was my president for eight years. Wasn't my choice,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but he was my president. It's called reality. I like

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to live in it, right, not my president. I remember

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all the marches. So now we look at this, we say, Okay,

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>we know why the Democrats like this story, and I

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>mean the Democrat politicians and also the general media apparatus.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to focus for for a moment

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>here on because because Facebook is incredibly powerful. Look, I

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>use Facebook every day. People are all people. Entire business

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>huge businesses are built around using Facebook as a platform.

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a company that in many ways has more

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>power over other companies than anything else on the planet,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with the exceptions of Google and Amazon, which are probably

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>right up there too. And you can make arguments as

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to which one has the most. I mean, the power

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of life and death over huge companies is in the

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>hands of these other companies like Amazon and Facebook and

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Google not so much. Twitter. Twitter is kind of the

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>runt of the litter with this stuff. Twitter is like,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for news people to spout off and and you know,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>compare who can be the wittiest or the nastiest depending

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on how you how you catch somebody on any given day.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is Zuckerberg showing up in the horse hair? So

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to speak? How many people even catch that reference? They

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>don't teach kids anything in school anymore? Why is is

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg showing up and doing this whole maya culpa I

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>always loved by. I've caught a couple of eggers that

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are like showing up for an apologia. I'm like, no,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>APOLOGI is not actually a a an apology. It's a

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>defense of something. So he's apologizing. He's not doing an apologia.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I don't teach kids anything in school anymore.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't make any sense. Really, you don't after

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it didn't really have to do this. Why

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is he doing it? Why? Why? Why? And when you

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the why, you understand that, first of all,

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he's not taking any Always be skeptical of someone who's

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>saying I take all the blame when they face no consequences. Right,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of who I forget that, Like the

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>counter terrorisms are pre nine eleven I went around in

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing about how you know he was the

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>first one that took blame for the US government. But

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean he didn't actually take any blame. No one

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>really blame him for anything. It was just a way

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of grand standing, right, Oh, I take all the blame

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>for the failure of nine eleven on my shoulders. Now

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't, dude, You're just grandstanding. Taking the blame is

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like I resign my commission. I no longer have a paycheck,

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and like, I know there's consequences here that's taken the blame.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Taking the blame is not when you're out of government, like, oh,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I could have done more. It's like the equivalent of

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's like, oh, my biggest weakness is there in

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that job interview. My biggest weaknesses, you know what they are, Brandon,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I take too much of a load on my shoulders.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I shared the credit far too much. I've I've really

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>got problems. My work ethic is just crazy. I got problems, right,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Look at this, Mark, Mark Zucker, Oh, we should have

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>done more to police content. We should have done more.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>We should have done more. A couple of things pushing

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this one. This is what is demanded of him. Even

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>someone like Mark Zuckerberg, who could retire to his private

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>island and go inside the volcano layer and just work

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on like cybernetics for the future that will keep him

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>living for the next ten thousand years, he could do that.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got that kind of cash. Goals, by the way,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>goals hashtag goals. Um. But he also wants to be

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>liked by the people that are outraged by the fact

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that Hillary Clinton lost, and those people demand some kind

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of of sacrifice. Right those people are demanding Wait a second,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was a problem here. Facebook is supposed Facebook was

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be on their side. There's a particular resentment

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>among the Democrat media, among the American left for a

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley platform, which they really take on as their

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>own in their eyes, having been used in any way

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring about not just a Republican presidency, but the

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump presidency. They they want there to be retribution for this,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and they want someone to make a public show of it.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's one phase of this. But there's also some

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>other stuff. Why zuckerberr. Why is Zuckerberg saying this right now? Um?

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>What is the purpose for Facebook? What is the purpose

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for the left, What does this mean about the way

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we get information going forward? About censorship of a a possible

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>monopoly and the breakdown of these companies by government decision

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future if and when they don't submit themselves

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to regulations. The anti competitive aspect of a company like

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook calling for regulations. Oh, there's actually a lot going

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on here that affects That affects a company that, as

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, is one of the is changing the way

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we interact with not just each other, but the way

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we interact with everything on a day to day basis,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>including national political conversation. I mean, you can't even have

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a discussion now about a media outlet without well, what's

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook strategy? So but I will break down all

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>these different layers and levels about why this matters not

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>just a Facebook, but to all of us. But I'm

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna need a little mo thomas ours, So stay with

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>me and I'll be right back. I don't think you

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>have a monopoly. It certainly doesn't feel like that to me. Okay,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So one way to regulate a companies through competition through

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>government regulation, given what's happened here, while we should let

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>your self regulate, well, Senator, my position is not that

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there should be no regulation. I think the Internet is increasing.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the real question as the Internet becomes more

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>important in people's lives is what is the right regulation,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not whether there should be. You, as a company, welcome regulation.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if it's the right regulation, then you think,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>look at that, a company that basically begging for the

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Congress to rights and regulations for them. I mean he's

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not actually begging, but he's he's keeping that door wide open. Yes,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the right regulation. Sure, and you let us see really

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>quickly pivot away from the whole notion of a monopoly

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and anti competitive practices. Isn't it fascinating, my friends, that

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>right now you've had this media outrage, I mean, hair

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on fire. Oh my gosh, there are coming for us

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about a possible merger between Tribune and Sinclair because of

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>all the oh my gosh, it's gonna have the stranglehold

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>on local local news media. And there are people that

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are trying to oppose that based on the based on

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of oh my gosh, a a right of

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>center viewpoint having more than one national level TV outlet?

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>What a what a what a crazy mad Max world

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be um Meanwhile, Facebook does not have any

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>real competition. To say it does is not true. And

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>yet you're not hear anybody say we should break up

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook if they're looking. And there's a whole other discussion

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we how to here abou whether monopoly is even possible

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of government regulation. There people say, really,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the only way monopoly is possible if the government enforces

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly, and that's a there's a whole other discussion

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>here that eventually there's always a way within the market too.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>No one can actually corner the market unless the government

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is complicit in that. And that's what I think Facebook

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to do because the company doesn't have any competition.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And whether you think companies should be broken up or

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not based on size, importance and reach in a certain sector.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>If there is such a thing as a company that

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know is too big, you know, too big to

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>stand forget too big to fail, I think Facebook falls

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>into the category. So they're trying to get ahead of

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this year by one creating a sense of political goodwill

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>among Democrats and the Congress that you know that they're

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to build political capital here. Yes, yes, we're sorry

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Russia stuff. Oh yes, we're so so sorry

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean I was picturing, like, does Mark

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg pull a Scrooge McDuck and go back to a

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>giant vault just full of gold coins and just swimming

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>them great cartoon ducktails was awesome. So and I don't know,

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he actually could if you wanted to.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a whole separate discussion. The point here is just

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get ahead of the possible breakup of

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook under monopoly concerns and regulation, as you know, is

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>inherently anti competitive. Because the regulatory caught the burden of regulation,

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>he is much heavier on smaller and emerging companies. So

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you see what Mark Zuckerberg is doing here is actually

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I give him credit. And the guy, you know, depending

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>especially on whose version you believe, he's he's willing to uh,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to shank people as they say whatn't necessary.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>He's willing to take people out of the corporate, corporate,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>competitive world around him. That's how he ended up being CEO.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So but the the guy understands and I'm sure all

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of his advisers and his he's got the highest priced

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>lawyers than legal advice on the planet understands that he

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>goes there, he does a whole maya culpa thing, he

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>gets some some uh supportive press, and he goes before

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Congress, and it's basically saying, yeah, I regulators because

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>once the once the government starts regulating them one, if

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're already regulating them, it's a lot harder

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to get the whole momentum going to actually break up

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a company. Right, you can say, no, they're all they're

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>all banging the regulation and they're playing ball with what

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the federal government demands of them. And then

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>also if they weren't a monopoly before, they're gonna be

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>one now because with the regulatory with the regulatory costs

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of say having to monitor and edit and censor content alone,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be an enormous burden, enormous challenge going forward.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's just the one other piece of this discussion

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to have you before we move on to

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Cohen lawyer seizure of records and also serio response is

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. Well,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Mr Zuckerberger, I will say there are a great many

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Americans who I think are deeply concerned that that Facebook

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive pattern

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of bias and political censorship. There have been numerous instances

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. In May of sixteen, Gizmodo reported that Facebook

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative stories from trending news,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>including stories about cepac, including stories about Mitt Romney, including

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>stories about the lowest learner i r S scandal, including

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>stories about Glenn Beck. In addition to that, Facebook has

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>initially shut down the Chick fil A Appreciation Day page,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>has blocked a post of Fox News Reporter, has blocked

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>over two dozen Catholic pages, and most recently blocked Trump

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>supporters Diamond and Silks page with one point two million

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Facebook followers after determining their content and brand were quote

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>unsafe to the community. To a great many Americans, that

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>appears to be a pervasive pattern of political bias. Ted Cruise,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>taking the CEO of Facebook to task on the issue

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of censorship. Which is what I was trying The word

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to get out before I was so

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rudely cut off by the hard break that is built

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>into our system here of the radio show. Um. Sometimes

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the first that that's happened in a a

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>while where I was just so next I'm gonna tell you, oh,

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're out of time. But censorship is the big

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>issue and the content management component of what's going on

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. This is huge. This this goes towards the

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>way that you're gonna be getting information, uh, in the

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>years to come, for decades to come. Is it a

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>platform or a publisher? The question we need to ask

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook right Is Facebook in any way endorsing or

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>verifying the information that's put up by individuals? Are they

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>going to separate out what is considered a news or

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a pub is shing u story from what it's just

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody saying stuff on their own page. I mean, how

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>are they going to break this down? That's a huge

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>set of problems they're taking on here, and they're doing

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it in part in response not to the censorship concerned

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the politicization concerns of conservatives, but because of the Russia

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook stock puppet account fiasco right with the election. If

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Hillary hadn't lost the election, none of these discussions would

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>be happening right now. Just remember that that conservatives have

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>been saying for a while now, for years Hey, why

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is it that this person's content seems to get shared

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than mine and I actually have a

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>much bigger following and much more engaged audience. Why am

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I banned or even shadow band as a conservative when,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>as we know, that doesn't happen either side, And I

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just would would note that on the on the censorship concern.

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>If this weren't just happy to conservatives, I'm pretty sure

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we would hear about some very upset liberals, some some progressives,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and some left wing news sites that would be raising

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>these problems and concerns. But we don't. We only hear

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>about it really from right wing conservative sites. Do we

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think right wing is pejorative? I was thinking about that today.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to somebody. We're describing a project we're

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>working on. We're trying to come up with different taglines,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and said, well, right, I think right wing has become

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not in vogue right now. But I feel

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like right wings should be fine to say we see it.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I say left wing, all that was wrong with the

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>right wing? All right wing? I don't know. I like,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to let the other side manage the

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of debating discussions. So I say things like right wing. Alright, So,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but back to what's going on with Facebook here. Uh,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>they clearly have been playing games with this. There's no

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>question in my mind that the people writing the algorithms

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and and you see this even with some of the

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>open policies about well what's uh, you know, anything that

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>links to a site that sells guns or anything that

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>you know. They they have taken political stands openly in

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the past, but I think there's a much more pernicious

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and a much more problematic practice of using the algorithm

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to shape discussion for political ends that's gonna benefit liberals

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of conservatives. That's what I think. I

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have spoken to people who say it's happen to them.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe them. Uh. And there have been too many

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>cases that have been publicized, and they all point the

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>same direction. And the direction is that liberals view Facebook

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as a platform that they can and should dominate the

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>same way they do Snapchat and Twitter and other other

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>social media spaces. And they're getting help. And now, once

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you start putting out there that Zuckerberg and his team

0:23:56.280 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook are supposed to be monitoring the intent, you

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>were really asking them and Congress, I think is asking

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>them to take an active hand in the curation of

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing every day. And it's not just going

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to be set by some neutral algorithm that's like you

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like this will show you that you like you like

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican stuff, We're gonna show you things associated with with

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. That's what we've all been led to

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>believe is going on with this. But I think there's

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it's many layers more complicated than that. You know, let's

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>understand if Russians, if we're supposed to believe that a

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Russians operating in some office space in in St. Petersburg,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we're able to in any way influence the election using Facebook.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Just think what the people running Facebook can do. And

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind when I say can do, I really

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>mean it as in not just the technical capability, but

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they're allowed to. It is a private service. They set

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>their own turn of service. Nobody reads them. I mean,

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you could be giving away your first born to them

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>every time you click on the terms of service. But

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we were all just like Gerbils that want to hit

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that little lever and get the little little treat, you know,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hit hit the pedal, hit the lever, Yeah, terms of service,

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sure or whatever. I mean, it's like on my iPhone

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>every time they change the terms of service, it could

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>say you need to walk around in a chicken suit

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and tell everybody that you are the worst for the

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>next week, and I would click yes, because I didn't

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>read it. I'm just clicking whatever they wanted the terms

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of service. So this is something we need to watch.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>This is something that will be increasingly important going forward.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if the answer is to form

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a more conservative friendly platform or just to try and

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and fight for a fair shake on this one, because

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>people say, well another social media network, all right, Well

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna have? Facebook has a two billion person head

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>start folks who wants to try to play the game

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of catching up to them. I mean, somebody will eventually,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're a long way away from that.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, they have so much influence on

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what we were thinking and what we were seeing. Keep

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in mind, it's not just and this is no knowing

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a matter from the publishing standpoint and how it works

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with companies and businesses. I mean, I know I have

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>friends who are building whole businesses just on using Facebook

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>to sell their products. That's how they target but that's

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>how they find them. It's competing with the old advertising model,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>right so, and it's really taking over advertising. But you

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>also have to keep in mind that the way that

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook chooses to police content on the side also it's

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like, oh, i'm you know, I'm buck,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm posting things and I want my friend Bob to

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>see my thoughts here. The sites that do well on

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook platform monetize better, and so the Facebook can

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>decide that you're going to see a lot of stuff

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from BuzzFeed, for example, And also BuzzFeed will be able

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to monetize its content much better via face this book.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Then say a conservative contender could then you know, right

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wing crazies dot com, could you know whatever? And you'll

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>never know about that. You just won't see their content.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll see BuzzFeed content in your feed. So this is

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>getting into the tech realm. And I think ultimately that

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the important takeaways from all this. And also

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a big social media show trial. Yeah, you're

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>giving away your data to them. You should already know that.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We should all know that, we should be aware any

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>safeguards that they put in place are not for are

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>not really for your benefit. Okay, they're they're gonna monetize,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna find it what to use the data you

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>give them and all this, Oh my gosh, do you

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>realize what Cambridge Analytic was doing. It's just another version

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of oh why did Hillary lose? So that's that's Those

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are my thoughts on Facebook. You got anything else you

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>want to add into the mix, though, You've got some

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>spice that you want to throw into the cauldron. Eight

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>four four eight five eight four four nine Buck producer

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike loves getting phone calls. It is true. He will

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>chat with you and chat with you, and you know

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>he likes when you call and you have limericks to

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>share if you have, if you have a high coup

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in mind, he will listen to it. So light up

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that I know he's looking at me. I'm gonna get

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get a code read later. But light up

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that board and well we're gonna come back. We'll talk

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about the Cohen fallout obviously, and then also just some

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>follow up on what's gonna happen I think with Syria

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and a whole bunch of other stuff. Stay with me.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They were that back in with Obama eliminated, they're declared No,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a very very loyally insertion of a word. They're

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>declared chemical weapons program. Well, it's a good thing that

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>work was in there, because they clearly did not eliminate

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>serious chemical weapons program, because they are still using it

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to kill men, women and children. So now we look

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to what we should do about it. If anything, it

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that there's something of a bipartisan consensus

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>right now that we have to act in response to

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this attack in Syrias I was saying to you yesterday. Um,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind a half million people have been killed

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in this civil war in ways that are brutal, beyond

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond comprehension. I mean, just all kinds of terrible things

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have been happening in this country for years and years,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and we have this line that we draw on the

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sand on the usage of chemical weapons. And I understand

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a good reason for that online, Um, but we

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>should all be very clear that our response to this attack.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>If Trump and I'm seeing now Macrawn and and and

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on others are united in this notion, you know, we

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have to do something about this in response to Assad's

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>chemic weapons attack east of Damascus in Syria. We should

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>all understand that it is a gesture. It is not

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>going to change any tactical reality. It's not going to

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>change to anything going on in this battlefield space. They

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can still drop barrel bombs which are just basically crude

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>i e. D. S dropped from the sky from helicopters

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, uh, packed with shrapnel, massive explosion, kill as

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>many people as possible. Um, that's what they've been doing

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for years. So they're they're still gonna be slaughtering civilians. This.

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying stop killing innocent people, or we're gonna

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>keep hitting you. We're saying, don't use come with the weapons.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And you you take this too, you know, you take

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this to the level of Okay, well, what are we

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really saying. And what we're saying is we're not gonna

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>do anything about the murderer of innocent civilians by the

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Assad regime in Syria unless it's with chemical weapons. That's

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying. I just think we should all be

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>quite clear on that. Um. You don't usually hear it

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>put in those terms, but that is that is the truth.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality as to what it will do. UM.

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned to you yesterday, the airfields when we

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hit them the last time, almost exactly a year ago.

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's feeling very cyclical. Um when we

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>hit them a year ago, the airfields are back up

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and running quite soon after. It was a a pin

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>prick strike you could say, didn't do didn't do anything

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to change anything, just showed, okay, we'll enforce this red line.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that has no merit. I'm not

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>saying forget about that, because it was certainly critical of

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the Obama aministration for refusing to enforce the red years ago.

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind that might have been able to

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>actually change some of the realities we've seen play out

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in Syria once the Red Line was not in force.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So then it was just open season for USAW to

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do whatever the heck you wanted. And the Iranians were

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in there and the Russians, and it was I mean,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Russians just had a campaign of extermination going on

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in Aleppo against civilians. People forget about this now, I didn't.

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>People weren't paying attention to it. You will also know

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that there was not much interest in the media in

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>showing the true level of suffering of the Syrian people

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because Obama was in office and we were told, you know,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we that that he would not allow these things to happen.

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama's chief national security advisors on a number of issues,

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we're we're actually people who built their whole career, Susan

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Rice and Samantha Power built their whole careers on our

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>two p which is the responsibility to protect. And this

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is these are people that you know, they got all

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the way up to National Security Advisor and US Ambassador

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>United Nations and well, no, no duty to protecting Syria

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>under Obama. We were like, well, I mean, that's really messy.

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna do anything there, And they didn't want

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that to become a focus of the narrative of the

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>media attention on the subject. So there just wasn't as

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>much of a of an interest in Syria as there

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>would have been if there's a Republican president with all

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the things happening that did. But now we also get

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>into the unintended consequence aside of this, because it's different

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to have US troops in Syria as we do and

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a a ground force presence and also allies that are

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>embedded and co located with the U S troops on

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground in Syria. It's different to hit Assad now

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>than it would have been before, and the Russians, i think,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's different too. Keep in mind, we've been

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ratcheting up because the media is saying, oh, you're a

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pudent puppet. You know, we've been ratcheting up pressure against

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Russia for a while now. We have given lethal aid

0:33:55.960 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Ukrainian government to use against Russian backed separatists

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Ukraine. We've been piling on the sanctions, including

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sanctions against oligarchs, very powerful Russians in Putin's immediate orbit,

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so that that stuff is rattling their cage, that's annoying them.

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>That's not nothing. And now on top of that, we

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>may and oh and by the way, there was about

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a month ago reports that we killed about a hundred

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Russians on the ground in Syria, but it was an

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>accident and they weren't Russian soldiers, so that we just

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all agreed to pretend that nobody really knew. Nobody really

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>knows what happened here, and the reports were that it

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was a hunter I've read a dozen that was a hundred,

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was a lot. Russian paramilitaries made a move

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on Kurdish US background forces, and those Kurdish forces called

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in US air strikes and just annihilated those Russian paramilitaries.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>That also ratchets up tensions. Right, these are things that

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we we got to remember. That's what's been happening. So

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people say take it to Assad game, but it's not

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the same situation now that it was a year ago.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>The battlefield realities have changed, the situation on the ground

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has changed. I'm seeing these reports about how Russia is

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>jamming jamming US drones over Syria, and let's put out

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>there the possibility that maybe Russia decides to interfere in

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some way with any US strike. I mean, what with

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Could the Russians try using the air defense systems that

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they've put in Syria to blunt to to counteract US missiles.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they able to do it? Well, you know, we

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>have to see, but would they try? Are are they

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>now going to take the position that anything against the

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Assad regime is an attack on them? They'll respond and

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll respond in kind, at least to the immediate threat. Uh,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we really don't want to wake up in a world

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>where we have to deal where the where the president

0:35:58.000 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has to sit down with Madis and and the re

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to his team and figure out what the proper response

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to a Russian you know whatever, fourth generation fighter plane

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>shooting down one of ours, What that feels like, what

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that looks like. So I know right now it seems

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like that there gathering for a response. I hope that

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they measure this response out very carefully. There's a huge

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>variation in the quality and taste of tequila's out there.

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You've got to think of tequila's like you do wine

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or beer, right. You got you get familiar with what

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you like, and all of a sudden you know that

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>some of them are great and some of them aren't

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>worth your time. G four Tequila is the best you

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to get. It is the pinnacle of master

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>distiller Felipe Camarina's passion for crafting truly great tequila. It's

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>distilled using fifty harvested rain water and fifty spring water.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The agave is age two, very clear specification. You will

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>try it. I'm telling you it is delicious. Go check

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>them out. Visit G four tequila dot com for more

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>details or give them a like on Facebook at facebook

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash G four tequilas again G four tequila

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com get more details there. So if you can

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have some ship, do you check them out team of

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>telling you it is absolutely delicious. Once you try it,

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you're be like, Wow, this is now my tequila. He's

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>back with you now, because when it comes to the

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fight for truth, the fuck never stops. To's frankly a

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>real disgrace and saying an attack on our country in

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a true sense, these people have the biggest conflicts of

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>interest I've ever seen Democrats all or just about all.

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>They're not looking at the Hillary Clinton horrible things that

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you did and all of the crimes that were committed.

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 1>They only keep looking at it us so they find

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>no collusion. And then they go from there and they say, well,

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>let's keep going, and they raid an office of a

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>personal attorney early in the morning, and I think it's

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace. You know, going after someone's personal attorney is uh,

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a great overstep I think in the authority

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecutor. And this is why I have opposed

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>really having special prosecutors for almost anything, because I think

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they abused their authority. So I think Mueller has abused

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as authority. Now they say, well he asked somebody else,

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>another U S attorney to do it. Yes, but this

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is becoming at the behest of Mueller. So I think

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this investigation no longer has much to do with Russia.

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Remember what Chuck Schumer said a couple of months ago.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He says, if you crossed the intelligence agencies, they can

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>screw you six ways to Sunday. This is about enormous power,

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor power, but also power in the intelligence communities. We

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>have to rein this in or every American citizen is

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>exposed to this kind of abuse of president's right. It's

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a witch hunt, but it's a wide open thing. It's

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a mistake to ever have these special prosecutors totally agree

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with Senator ram Paul. They're welcome to our two of

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the buck sex and show everyone thank you very much

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for being here. And the fallout from the Cohen situation continues.

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>After yesterday when we had the breaking news for you

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of the raid on Cohen's, uh well, his hotel room

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and his office and they grabbed all of this stuff.

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I note that Cohen has since made comments about this,

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he says, Uh, let me see what we got here.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Did an interview with Don Lemon over at CNN, he

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>said quote, I am unhappy to have had my personal

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>residence and office rated, but I will tell you the

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>members of the FBI conducted the search and seizure with

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>extreme works. They were extremely professional, courteous, and respectful. Um

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Don Lemon then said that Cohen told him he believed

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>everything he did in respect to Stormy Daniels was legal

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and it would be proven so in the end. When

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>asked if he was worried about the investigation, he responded, quote,

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I would be lying to you if I told you

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that I am not. Do I need this in my life? No?

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Cohen added, Do I want to be Do I want

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to be involved in this? No, that's for sure. You

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>never want to be in any way the target of

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the subject of near in the next room, in the

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>next building. From a federal criminal investigation of any kind.

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>It just destroys everything that it touches. You don't have

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to be guilty, they don't have to bring charges against you,

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily bankrupt you just on legal fees. Bankrupt You know

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that that's people forget this, But you know Yeah, our

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>legal system is great, but it's far from perfect. It's

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>just better than all the other terrible ones around the world,

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's not it's not something that you can just

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rely on all the time and do exactly what's right

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and exactly what should happen here. Um. The Cohen situation though,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>after yesterday, I think has shown that you know, one

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>side gets treated with kid gloves, that's Hillary Clinton's team,

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and our team gets treated with brass knuckles. That's it

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the way this goes. It's unfair, but a lot of

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>people don't want it to be fair. They don't really

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>care that it is unfair, that they could care less

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact. And now we have figured out what what

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>do we do about this? And I would know that,

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a degree of discretion involved here, right,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, prosecutor can and we got Anie McCarthy

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us in just a little bit of here. He'll

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>answer some of these questions in detail. And he worked

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for this other district of New York so as a prosecutor,

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>so he knows that was who went in and grab

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Cohen stuff yesterday, right, So he knows the score here

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>very very well. Um, But the choice of how to

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>go after and who to go after is everything, you know.

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The power to prosecute is the power to destroy, just

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like you know with the I. R. S. You know,

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's tax time, folks. Who gets honored it and who doesn't.

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a very powerful decision, and only people that have

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 1>no familiarity with the process have no understanding what the

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>heck they're talking about it Like, well, if you haven't

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>done anything wrong, you've got nothing to hide. Really, you know,

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you can remind people can remind themselves of that after

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been hounded by federal investigators of one kind another

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for months on end, lost countless hours of productive time,

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of nights sleep, a lot of stress, so

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that in the end you get to just go back

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to all your normal life problems. That's what it's like

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>when you're dealing with anyone on the on the on

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the criminal investigative investigative side. Uh. I agree with R.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Fleischer by the way that they better have something here

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or or this is just way too much for us

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to stomach. It's extraordinary. This is so seldom done. You

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have to believe that the only reason it was done

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because they have the goods on Cohen and that better

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be the case, because if Bob Muller in the U S.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Attorney for New York do not, they are going to

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have violated the public trust in the most fundamental way.

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So I have to believe, knowing Bob Mueller as well

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as I do, that they've got the goods. There is

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>something that led them to do this. But here's the

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem. This is all not predicated on You just

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have to believe. You have to accept the FBI's version.

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The time is quickly coming for Bob Mueller to come public.

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>He's going to start abusing the public's faith and trust

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if they don't start to explain what they're doing and

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.439
<v Speaker 1>why he does not have unlimited time and otherwise, why

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 1>should people just accept this at face value. It's starting

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to strain credibility because this is so extraordinary. Now now,

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I I I agree with Ari Fleischer there when he

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>says that this is an extraordinary step. It's a big deal,

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was my initial reaction to it, and then

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I basically disagree with all the rest of what he said. Um,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is a violation of the public trust.

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll find out that it was a violation

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of the public trust. And I think that there'll be

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>no consequences whatsoever or Mueller and the rest of that

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>squad for it. I think, what's going to happen? Okay,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have the goods, then what the answer is? Nothing?

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They they did it because they could, because it sends

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a message, because why not, because they have the power

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it. There's no accountability that will be enforced

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>here for uh Mueller choosing to go with hardball tactics

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>against a Trump person. Quite the opposite. There are a

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who think that Mueller is a hero

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. This is the nature of partisan politics.

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the nature of a partisan witch hunt. It's nice. So,

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>like I said, there's not gonna be any accountability here.

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>And I also disagree with Fleischer in terms of his

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that this is we are fast approaching the point

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at which we could no longer. I think this investigation

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is being conducted in good faith. I'm already there. I'm

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>way past that. I was way past that a while ago.

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And since I don't have any personal interaction with or

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.359
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Mueller, I I can't pretend that I'm gonna

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>give him the benefit of the doubts. I think he's

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do the right thing here. When have any

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of these Democrats that overstepped their authority but did not

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>flagrantly break a law, what if anything, faced consequences. We really,

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we really think that the government, that the Democrat deep state,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to punish people for doing what they can

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>using government authority to run up the scoreboard for the

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>left at the expense of of the GOP. No way,

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you mean all of the You mean, like

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the accountability that was enforced against Lowest Learner and Ben

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>got I mean and uh sorry, Bend Lowest Learning the

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I r S. Nope, nothing happened there, It's gonna happen here.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's wishful thanking. What it really is

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is Ari Fleischer, who was obviously a very senior guy

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in the Bush White House, I think hoping that the

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>America that he wants to believe exists still exists. So

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I'm not putting him down for that.

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying I think I think he is not

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>being cynical enough here, based on the facts and based

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 1>on everything that we have seen, what to do about this,

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Though I know that's probably the next question we we

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>should address, right, well, what is the what is the

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>real response that we should have to all of this?

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, the answer is, well, a few things have

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>been put out there. For one, um, we could uh

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and see m was just reporting on this that Trump

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>is considering taking action against Rod Rosenstein. I don't think

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:27.879
<v Speaker 1>people are saying he Kennedy can't fire Mueller. My sense

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is he can't fire Muller. He won't fire Muller. And

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's it's kind of a distraction now for most of

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the media to even be talking about it. It's just

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>not not realistic, not gonna happen. I don't think that.

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that happening. That's said. Could I see

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump saying, you know what, screw it, I'm gonna fire Rosenstein. Yeah,

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I could see that happening. I can see that happening.

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>You know. There's that professor of constitutional law, uh Presteriley

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>down to g W. He was on Fox talking about

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cohen situation and the threat that opposes for Trump.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he had to say. The president has to

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be very careful. The greatest danger that he faces is

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 1>not Michael Cohen as a defendant, but Michael Cohen is bait.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, this could be as cunning as it

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is hostile on the part of Rod Rosenstein. You know,

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he expanded the mandate for Mueller to go after Manifort

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on crimes that were far more remote than this. So

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>why would he refer to the Southern District. Well, it

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>has a real threat for the president. It expands the

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>investigation involves the Southern District that can prosecute it. But

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if the President reacts aggressively, he could end up triggering

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a far more serious problem for himself and his presidency.

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I agree with that. It depends

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on what we mean by aggressively. I don't think firing

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Mueller's in the cards, but maybe, uh, maybe firing Rosenstein.

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I also think that isn't it interesting? You see this

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>happening time and again, and people that can cover for

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republican or that can forget cover give the Republican

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt. They recused themselves. Sessions recused himself,

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the U s. Attorney in New York who originally people's like, oh,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a trumpet point. Yeah, he recused himself

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>from this decision to raid Cohen's offices yesterday? Isn't that

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting in the original talking point? Oh, it was a

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump appointee. Nope, he recused himself. Wasn't part of the process.

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't part of the discussion? Uh? Who? Who in a

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in a in a critical uh junk at a critical

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.919
<v Speaker 1>point in the major investigations affecting Democrats in recent years,

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>who are the really important Democrat prosecutors to Democrat DJ officials?

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Who stepped aside? Again? Did uh? Do you remember Eric

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Holdy recusing himself from anything that would have really affected Obama?

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And they No? Do you remember Lauretta Lynch saying, you know,

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna step aside and just kind of let justice

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 1>be done here, even if it tanks the Democrats hoped

0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for Hillard win. No, I'm just seeing a trend there.

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I see something playing out that looks like one side

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>is just in it to win it, and the other

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>side is like, wow, I think that maybe the rule

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.959
<v Speaker 1>book tells me and you can tell me, well, Buck,

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's because we have principles that we okay, but just

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>understand that the other team has has no such compunctions

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>about about making sure that they cover for themselves. Meanwhile,

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on our side of it, I said, from the beginning,

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>special Council disaster, it's a terrible idea. A lot of

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>conservatives were having a kind of moment of moral preening

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>over that one. I gotta say, ethical preening over Oh, well,

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we need a special counsel. No, we we did not

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>need a special counsel. It was it was just the

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats dream come true of a nemesis. And that's what

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Mueller and this whole Council probe has turned into and

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>has been really from the start a nemesis for the

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. Just to bog it all down. This by

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this effects not just the the enacting of policy and

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the Trump agenda. It affects our billity, affect what we

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about, what we spend our time on, our our

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 1>our energy are psychological output is affected by all the

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>time spent it all. Is he going to be impeached?

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to be by the way the answers, yes,

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats whin he's going to be impeached. I'm not

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be removed from office. He's going to be impeached.

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh so we'll say, oh, speaking of Muller by the

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>way in Democrats. One more thing here, um Chuck Schumer

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>never misses an opportunity to weigh in on this issue.

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>By his own words, it's clear the president may may

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be considering firing the Special Counsel. This Congress must respond

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 1>forcefully and on a bipartisan basis, by reaffirming our belief

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that the president cannot fire special counsel without law, without cause,

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and by passing legislation to ensure that any attempts to

0:50:56.400 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>remove Robert Mueller will be unsuccessful. We should not abide

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the president's attempted assault on the rule of law in America.

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The eyes of history, very serious, are upon us. Eyes

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of history. Who spooky Schumer? There the eyes of history.

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The president can't hand over his constitutionally delegated authority, and

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the president could fire executive branch officials. So the notion

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that the Congress is going to pass a statute that says, yeah,

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't fire people who work for the d o J,

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a big problem. Big problem. I don't think it's

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, but just shows you that how disingenuous the

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are. They want to respect the rule of law

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>by passing statutes that break down the rule of law.

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's that's not Chuck Schumer rules. Um,

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we gotta roll into a quick break here. We got

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Annie McCarthy joining us in just a few minutes. Third hour,

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, quick preview, we'll talk about a major

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action showdown through Harvard University. They could affect the

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>company you work for, the college you will you know

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you went to, or you go to, or your kids

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>might go to it. It's gonna have big, big ramifications

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Um, So there's that. And we will

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>also talk about the breakfast club. And I got some

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>other stuff too, and and and what oh yeah, gosh,

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's all these stories on sex robots. I'm just gonna

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>give you a quick take on that one later on

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 1>this I'm like, what is going on here? So we

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have quite quite a roadmap plan for you here. We'll

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>be right back. I got some of the more team

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Buck callers on a long let's get to it. Uh

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Kenny in Boston, Hey, Kenny Shield tie Buck shild listen, yes, listen,

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Um you know this, Maller. We we fail to mention

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that Mala is not only a hacking the president, but

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he's also and largely trying to demoralize his base, the

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>president's base, because he you know, he wants people. Oh

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>my god, that's never gonna end. They want it's an

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a war of attrition, you know. But if these guys

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are so brazen and unabashed with the procedural you know,

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the people in the the what do you call it,

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence cabal, the deep state intelligence cabal. If they're

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so brazen communities procedural acts, what's to stop them from

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>actually completely totally fabricating some event or crime and getting

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 1>away with it that you know that's supposedly Trump committed.

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how's that going to you know? I mean,

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:43.399
<v Speaker 1>how what's going to stop them from that? If they

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>are so all powerful? Know, well, I would say, Kenny,

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:50.399
<v Speaker 1>let's not let's not overcomplicated. Right, There's enough damage that

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the molar probe can do without putting themselves in any

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>jeopardy whatsoever. Right there, there's enough that they can do

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just using the powers that are that are in fact

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in there, uh in their arsenal right now. And so

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>that's when you say fabricating evidence. They don't need to

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:10.839
<v Speaker 1>do that, right, So why do it? I mean they

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 1>can just continue with what's going on right now. It's

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>working pretty well. They're harassing Trump, as you say, they

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>demoralizing the base. So I would say, and let's let's uh,

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>let's not go to the next level until we have

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>any evidence to show that that it's there. But I'm

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, and I'm I'm concerned too. And I appreciate

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the call from Boston, our friend Kenny Greg in Oklahoma City. Greg,

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we got it like a minute in twenty but I

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>want to bring you in make sure we can hear

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from what's up, hey, Buck? Yeah? I wanted to kind

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of talk about Syria in something that Typer Carlson brought

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>up last night on this show. Um, are we really

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that assad was the one that did these chemical

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 1>weapons attacks this time? Um? I'm sure he Obviously he's capable.

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a genocidal maniac h that has killed a million

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>people now so far in the last five or sixty years.

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I really wonder, though, why everybody's fully gung ho on

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:01.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially a ground to war in Syria, which we both

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>know is going to end with who in power we

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly. It's a quagmire. UM. I really question

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and we should really be skeptical before we start sending

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>men and women, um, more men and women. I should say,

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a series to die. Um. There are too many

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 1>actors in the arena that want us there. Whether it's

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia was just creating more chaos, or obviously the rebels

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they need our support to win, whether it's the Islamic

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>rebels or the Kurdish rebels. UM. I just really wonder

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if we're being played here in some sort Um. Obviously

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the chemical uptance attackers evil, but who was really perpetrating

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:44.839
<v Speaker 1>use as these actions? You know, Greg, it's all, it's

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these are all these are important questions and very fair questions.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know the answer is I'm not on the

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>inside anymore. And I know you're not. You're not in

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>uniform anymore. So all I can go on to the

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>press reports I see, But I think we need to

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be much more cautious to your overall point about what

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.359
<v Speaker 1>we think we should be doing short term and long

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>term in Syria. She'll tell you, my friend, team, we're

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll into a quick break. We'll be right back

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with Andy McCarthy. When lawyers think about cooperating with the prosecutors,

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to know that in exchange for cooperation, they'll

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>get treated decently. And here you have lawyers cooperating. Trump's

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>lawyers co operated completely, Cohen cooperated completely, and what did

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they get for a readingly on the office with everything

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>being taken. So this sends a powerful message that cooperation

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be rewarded by Mueller, It's not

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be rewarded by the Southern District, and I think

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the result may very well be far less cooperation. Not

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a shot across the bow, really a shot into the bow,

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, of Trump's inner circle. Here by going

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>into Cohen's hotel room, his office, going through all of

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>his stuff, season things, it has really turned up the

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:56.120
<v Speaker 1>heat quite a bit. How big a deal is this

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a tactic? What does it tell us

0:56:57.920 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>about the investigation? And what does it tell us about

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 1>any possible legal peril Cohen or Trump himself could be.

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And we have the man who could answer all of

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that and more with us right now, Andy McCarthy is

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on the line. He's a former assistant United States Attorney

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Southern District, which, by the way, was the

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>outfit that pulled off that raid yesterday. He's also a

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>calmist forward National Review Reader's latest, The Cohen Searches, and

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump's d mini mess I like that, Andy, Thanks for joining.

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks are ye, I'm good. Are you you were? You

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>were kind of what were you hanging on the beach

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>or something. You've been gone for a while. I did

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>actually have a nice vacation, which was great Dan in Florida,

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and then the week I got back. I know it's

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it. We

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>had two events in a couple of gorgeous places in

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>California for National Reviews, so I just sort of had

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Well, I'm glad you enjoyed it, Andy,

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because now you've got a presidency to say what the

0:57:51.880 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>heck is going on here with the Cohen raid. I

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>see this in Derschowitz Professor Dirshwitz. I'm sure you know, well,

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's run around saying that this is Yeah, it might

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be okay, but there's a difference between what is technically

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>legal and what is what you would expect in terms

0:58:07.720 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of how the discretion to do these kinds of things

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is used by people like the Southern District of New York. Yeah, well,

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a big fan of Alan Dershowitz, but

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought he gets out over his skis when

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>he goes into the sense lawyer mode rather than constitutional

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lawyer mode. And I disagreed with just about everything he

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:34.440
<v Speaker 1>said in that clip that you you played beginning with, UM,

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we know at all whether Colin is

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>completely cooperated or not. Um. We know that he says

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>he has cooperated. Um what his lawyer says that he's

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>cooperated with all entities of government, which suggests that he

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was cooperating with Moller. But whether he's set down with

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>those prosecutors or not, I have no idea. Maybe he

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>knows things I don't. Uh. He certainly is uh given

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>information to the congressional committee. But Buck, you know, that's

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the same situation Manafort was in. If you remember Manafort

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of cooperating, it was that it

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was the night between two different appearances before congressional committees

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>when they did the pre dawn raid on his home. So, UM,

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this has happened before, and I

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that the history bears out what Professor

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>der dersher what says about cooperation. As we saw the

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Muller gave a cooperation deal to Richard Gates,

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>which I've been quite critical of because I think he

0:59:40.000 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically sold his case. Ats first time I

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ever saw somebody had somebody charged on Friday on Thursday

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with like a hundred million dollars in financial fraud and

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 1>then on Friday you plead amount to a minor conspiracy

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in lion to an FBI agent. So, you know, I

0:59:56.200 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's plenty of people out there think that they

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can get a pretty good deal from Muller. And in

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>my experience, people cooperate because it's in their interest to

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>either cooperate or you know, they go down pretty hard

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and they can get sentenced to a lot of time. Um,

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a question of whether you'll be rewarded

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with uh, you know, whether they'll search your office and

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. But what about the lawyer component

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of this and the attorney client privilege relationship. Now, I

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>know that you know, if you're like, if someone's a

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>mob lawyer and they're and they're the guy who's like

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>passing back and forth letters about who the next HiT's

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at, you know that it's not like attorney

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>client privileges is an absolute, but isn't it kind of

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does this sort of fit in the same

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>old andy is when you have someone say that, you know,

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the the Justice Department, they'll pull a journalist's phone logs

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that they really need to find a leaguer, for example,

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but they tend to really not do that because of

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the tension here. What is the tension, if any between

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what the Southern Issue did yesterday and hey, if you

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>can just grab all of the lawyer's files and read

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>through them at will, there's not really much of an

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>attorney client privilege anymore. Yeah, well, the tension is profound, Buck,

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the U S Attorney Annual Guidelines admonished

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors that if there's any way to deal with a

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who's the subject of an investigation without doing a

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>search warrant, like if you think you can get the

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>information by some alternative like a grand jury subpoena, that's

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're supposed to do. And that's because of precisely

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional concerns you talk about about the representation by

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>counsel and the derivative the attorney client privilege. That said, um,

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>when you do have to do these things, and the

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Southern District, you know, these are not usual things to do,

1:01:46.920 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but to the extent they're they're done with some with

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>any frequency at all. The the Southern District has a

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience in this area. I had experienced in

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this area. Um, there's two things I think to bear

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in mind. One is if you're talking about the communications,

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and remember now, the only thing that sacrosancted the lawyer's

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>office are the attorney client communications. So for example, if

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you if you break into a lawyer's office with a

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>warrant and he's got a pile a heroine on the table,

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get a pass on that because he's a

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lawyer's client heroine, right, right, right, So the only thing

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here, or should be, is the communications

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that are privileged. Um, if you and your lawyer plan

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>um a scheme that's that's criminal or fraudulent, the communications

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be protected under the what's known

1:02:40.960 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as the crime fraud exception. So you know, to the

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>extent that they're interested in Trump Cohen communications on a

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>theory that they were scheming, say to get around the

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance laws and doing this hush agreement with with

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the peign Star. That's the allegation. I don't know whether

1:02:59.400 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's true or not. Those communications likely would not be

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>covered by the attorney client privilege. And as as to

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the stuff that's in the lawyer's office

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in the nature of communications that's not relevant to the case,

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>what the Justice Department does in a situation like this

1:03:16.760 --> 1:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is a clean team has to go through everything and

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>give back everything that's not relevant to the case before

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors who are handling the case and the agents

1:03:28.720 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>who handle the case will get to see any of it,

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and they'll completely litigate with the court anything that the

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and his clients claim is privileged before it gets

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:43.959
<v Speaker 1>given to the people who are doing the investigation. So

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, I can understand why a lawyer obviously

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is virtually put out of business if you take everything

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's in his office, But there are procedures to protect

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional interests. Yeah, by the way, what if you're

1:03:56.120 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody that just was represented by Michael Cohen, has nothing

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with any of this, and your stuff is

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>now in the hands and you did have privileged communications,

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but your stuff is now in the hands of of

1:04:05.360 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the FBI could could they use that just out of

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>curiosity to start another investigation? I mean, is is there

1:04:11.080 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a fruit of the poisonous tree component? But they can't

1:04:14.680 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>use it. The whole point of having the clean team

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is the first thing you do is go through everything

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and give back anything that's not relevant to the investigation

1:04:22.920 --> 1:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and anything that's in the nature of communications

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that actually is privileged. You know, it's not of prime

1:04:31.040 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>fraud excession. It's really attorney client privileged stuff. None of

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that can be used to start an investigation. All right,

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>now I want to ask him. We're speaking to Andy McCarthy.

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Everyone and check out his latest is always National Review

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Uh, Andy, what about just the this is

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty brass knuckles stuff from the southern District of New York.

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh It seems like, you know, I don't want to

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>get into the whole Look what they did with the Hillary,

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Look what they did versus Trump. I've been talking about

1:04:57.680 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. I think that that kind of speaks

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for itself. But but is it unusual to go to

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to go to this level for I mean, as you said,

1:05:06.120 --> 1:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a payoff that might be an f EC violation. I mean,

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is this is there any part of this that's troubling

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you just in terms of how heavy handed it is.

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We can't say at this point, Buck whether it's trouble

1:05:17.080 --> 1:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>or not. The the one thing that I must say,

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>between reading the reporting on this and rereading the guideline

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that applies that really admonishes prosecutors not to do this

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing unless it's a serious case and this

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is the only way to get the information. It really

1:05:33.240 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>signals to me that there's a lot more going on

1:05:36.520 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>here than just stormy Daniels. I would be I mean,

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if we get to the end of the rainbow and

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that they were looking for here is

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that, uh, of that incident, I'm going to

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be very, very surprised. And I'll agree with anybody, including

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Professor Dershowitz, who wants to say it's completely outrageous. So

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>so it would be at that point, I just I

1:05:56.560 --> 1:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just want to this is important. I think at at

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that point even you'd want to say, oh no, that's

1:06:00.840 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not illegal, but it's unethical. Plus what would

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>be the reason for it, you know, I mean, you know, well,

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's what I mean, right, If it's just if

1:06:08.880 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they find out at the end, all they had, all

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they did this for. It was the Stormy Daniels FBC thing.

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Then they did decide to you know, theoretically law enforcement,

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>right if if they think that there's some guy who's

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>growing weed in in his in his closet, they can

1:06:20.960 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>send in a squat team and you splash bangs. But

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>usually they don't do that exactly right, Yeah, So do

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that this is you know, I know you

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>wrote you wrote here in Nashal Review about the mini

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mess um? Is this? Is this a real danger to Trump?

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>He was very upset. We actually played the audio yesterday

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>right after he uh he was in that meeting. We're

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be talking about Syria, very serious national security policy.

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Instead he's talking about the raid on Cohen's office. Are

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you getting a feeling that maybe, if not Trump himself,

1:06:50.280 --> 1:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but Cohen and some other top people are are about

1:06:52.440 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to get jammed up? As we used to say in

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the p D, I think at a minimum Cohen's jammed up.

1:06:58.000 --> 1:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's remember that if if a judge issued this warrant,

1:07:02.760 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that means this a finding a probable cause that they

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to have evidence of crimes in the places

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>where they were searching, right, So I'd say Cone's got

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem at a minimum. I think the president, you know,

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the good cast I supposed to put on it is

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he's so cumulatively frustrated by the Russia investigation, which really

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's mainly a main up, made up thing,

1:07:27.880 --> 1:07:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and now this on top of it. I could see

1:07:30.520 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>him between that and the fact that he's an intemperate

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>type to begin with, and the fact that they know

1:07:37.800 --> 1:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>ransacked his lawyer's place, I can see him losing his

1:07:40.640 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>cool over that. Uh. The you know, the other alternative

1:07:43.920 --> 1:07:46.919
<v Speaker 1>is what we just discussed, which is there may be

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>more here than just Stormy Daniels that they're interested in,

1:07:53.160 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know that that obviously would be a concern

1:07:56.240 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he He and Cone have a very close relationship. Cone

1:08:00.440 --> 1:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is like a loyal six or for him, who seems

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to revel in this depiction of him as like a

1:08:06.240 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hayden type. As my friend Jonah Goldberg noted at

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>National Review Today's consiliari, Yeah, he's a kind of an

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting guyn, you know, the godfather everybody the consuliary for

1:08:18.800 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>those who might have missed the top, you know, right right,

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no spelling test here, right, Buck, I don't have

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to spell conciliary. Yeah, I know some people actually they

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>actually pronounced the G because it's like an americanization of

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the Italian. But I like, I like, yeah, like I

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>keep it the on the up and up. Andy think

1:08:36.240 --> 1:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing that is silent? Yeah, no, I know, but I

1:08:39.200 --> 1:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and I hear some some wise guys go a consigliari

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, well, you know, if you're gonna be,

1:08:43.960 --> 1:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're so attached to the homeland, you know you

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>should probably know that it's consiliary. But Andy, thank you

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>man so much for joining us as always, just just

1:08:52.160 --> 1:08:53.639
<v Speaker 1>one last one free for you that you got a

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:56.599
<v Speaker 1>a quick one. Uh is this is this mother thing

1:08:56.680 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>just gonna just gonna grind on forever. But go nowhere.

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna grind on. I don't know if

1:09:03.560 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes nowhere. Um, it probably goes nowhere. With respect

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to collusion with Russia, I don't think there's a obstruction case.

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think Mohler's in any hurry. He's got

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>two cases against Danaforth that that that won't be over

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>toward the end of this year. I don't think, all right,

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep looking at Andy. Thank you so much for

1:09:19.680 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Everybody, Andy McCarthy check out his latest at

1:09:22.000 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>National review dot com. Thanks Andy, team. All right man,

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>good to talk to you. Great to talk to you too. Good,

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>good to have any back. Um, we're gonna roll into

1:09:29.960 --> 1:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a quick break here. We'll be back and just a

1:09:32.240 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>few stay with me where beefing up the border patrol

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who has done a fantastic job. Ice has done a

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fantastic job, and we will take care of that situation.

1:09:45.200 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We need a wall, whether you're a Republican or Democrat,

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we need a wall, and it'll stop your drug flow.

1:09:52.120 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It'll knock the hell out of the drug flow, and

1:09:54.040 --> 1:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll it'll stop a lot of people that we don't

1:09:56.280 --> 1:10:00.599
<v Speaker 1>want in this country from coming into our country. So

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>right now we are to think that there's something of

1:10:04.680 --> 1:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a stand down and effect for this caravan that was

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to the US. That remember that people keep saying, oh,

1:10:11.760 --> 1:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna try to sneak to the country illegally. No,

1:10:15.200 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's worse than that they were going to hand themselves

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>or over to border patrol and claim asylum in this

1:10:21.479 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>country because they you know, there are a lot of

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.639
<v Speaker 1>people that live in El Salvador and Honduras that are

1:10:27.680 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are living there, and they're fine. I'm not saying it's

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a great place to be economically and otherwise, but so

1:10:33.120 --> 1:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>if you just happen to be from that country. There's

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:36.479
<v Speaker 1>not a war going on there. There's a lot of crime,

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>theres a lot of poverty. But if crime and poverty

1:10:39.000 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are the basis for asylum claims in Central America, then

1:10:43.400 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>don't they have to be the basis of asylent claims

1:10:45.400 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>from any Think about all the countries that all of

1:10:47.160 --> 1:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, now you show up, Oh I'm from I'm

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from Somalia, I'm from Bangladesh, I'm from of you know,

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>mean mar I mean, you know, just think of a

1:10:57.439 --> 1:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>country that's in rough shape and you're like, well, I

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>should be able to claim asylum in the States. I

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's if nothing else, a good takeaway from the

1:11:05.320 --> 1:11:08.559
<v Speaker 1>from the whole situation is that now more Americans know

1:11:08.840 --> 1:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's what our policy is. The policy is crazy,

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's being abused, it's being exploited. Uh. But this issue

1:11:16.320 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is not over at all, And in fact, I think

1:11:19.560 --> 1:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you will see a an effort to renew that. I

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think this caravan will get going again, because this is

1:11:27.040 --> 1:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a very clear visualization. It's, you know, the optics of

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the situation of this, of this immigration debate. You actually

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>had CNN. I was traveling with reproducer, traveling with one

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of some folks from this caravan, and this is how

1:11:45.360 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the conversation went. We just left Pueverla well ahead about

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>two to three hours north to Mexico City, and the

1:11:52.200 --> 1:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>plan there is to meet with immigration officials, to meet

1:11:55.479 --> 1:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with government officials, meet with those that can give them

1:11:58.800 --> 1:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of legal aid and actually, let me just

1:12:00.880 --> 1:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>ask them, cans in Mexico, who will stay in Mexico.

1:12:07.960 --> 1:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>So these are the people who say that they will

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be going to the United States, and some of them

1:12:12.200 --> 1:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>not answering. Uh, Mike told me so in the in

1:12:15.479 --> 1:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the clip of that, the video clip of that, every

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>hand went up when it was who's going to the

1:12:19.240 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. They're not not coming to the US. They

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just may have realized, oh, better for us to just

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>show up at the border as individuals and not be

1:12:29.600 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>part of this politicized and and very publicized A better

1:12:34.080 --> 1:12:38.519
<v Speaker 1>world than politicized, publicized movement. But this is not over, folks,

1:12:38.600 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 1>None of these issues, nothing has been resolved, nothing has changed,

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>nothing is better now. National garbers called down by Obama,

1:12:44.600 --> 1:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by Bush, others have done this in the past, does

1:12:47.040 --> 1:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>not solve the problem. You get a wall there, or

1:12:50.360 --> 1:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the illegal immigration continues, So just keep an eye on that.

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back on this story again um soon. And

1:12:58.880 --> 1:13:00.519
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, coming up, I want to tell you

1:13:00.560 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about how we finally break apart the regime of affirmative

1:13:05.760 --> 1:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>action in this country, but I'll have to tell you

1:13:08.680 --> 1:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>about it after this break, so stay with me. Hey, everybody,

1:13:11.439 --> 1:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome to our three of the Buck Sexton Show. Maybe

1:13:14.320 --> 1:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we should start doing a recurring, recurring segment that I

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>could just call under the Radar. I kind of I

1:13:20.520 --> 1:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the ring of that where there are

1:13:23.400 --> 1:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>stories that are being reported on but they haven't really

1:13:27.080 --> 1:13:30.879
<v Speaker 1>been packaged in a way, or they haven't been promoted

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think as quite as important as interesting as they

1:13:34.280 --> 1:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really are. And there's one of those that I want

1:13:37.439 --> 1:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about it right now. Harvard is on

1:13:40.240 --> 1:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the hot seat because there's a group of students, specifically

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Asian American students Students for a Fair Admission. For Fair

1:13:50.080 --> 1:13:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Admission is the name of the group who are suing

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Harvard University over their admissions policy. Now you don't need

1:13:57.200 --> 1:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>me to tell you Harvard's probably the most famous and

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and elite university in the world. Sorry, yalies, but Harvard

1:14:05.400 --> 1:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is by most folks, by perception at least, consider to

1:14:08.680 --> 1:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be number one, which is kind of silly. All these

1:14:10.920 --> 1:14:12.599
<v Speaker 1>schools are really when you get to a certain level,

1:14:12.600 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all the same. But anyway, consider number one. But

1:14:15.360 --> 1:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>here here's the problem with Harvard and the problem with

1:14:18.120 --> 1:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the left on on all these issues of affirmative action,

1:14:21.960 --> 1:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>which this this is where this is where the things

1:14:24.400 --> 1:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get very interesting. They are not legally allowed

1:14:29.520 --> 1:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>under under recent Supreme Court decisions, to have quotas. So

1:14:34.479 --> 1:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you cannot say that the incoming Harvard class will be,

1:14:40.000 --> 1:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve percent African American, seven Hispanic, fifteen or

1:14:45.640 --> 1:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent Asian, and the rest you know, white and

1:14:48.280 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever else they consider to be white. I can't do that. Yet, somehow, somehow,

1:14:55.320 --> 1:14:57.519
<v Speaker 1>each year, for those of us who pay attention to

1:14:57.600 --> 1:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these things, the demographic makeup of the incoming class at

1:15:03.040 --> 1:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>these schools, And it's not just Harvard. That's true at

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>schools all the way down wherever you are in the

1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:09.439
<v Speaker 1>country right now. The states school that you maybe either

1:15:09.520 --> 1:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to go to or your kids are thinking

1:15:11.160 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about going to, this plays a role there too. They've

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten rid of race as a factor in admissions in

1:15:17.080 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>California and so we actually have data on this and

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 1>what that what that all means. But in most places

1:15:22.000 --> 1:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they still do what is called a a holistic approach.

1:15:26.360 --> 1:15:30.639
<v Speaker 1>And this comes from one of the most bizarre Supreme

1:15:30.680 --> 1:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Court decisions of all time, in which Sandra Day O'Connor said, well,

1:15:35.479 --> 1:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>she was the designing vote was five four, and I

1:15:37.200 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think this was in Gruttter v. Bollinger. Was that was

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the case, although that might have been the precedent case before,

1:15:42.160 --> 1:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was Gruttter v. Bollinger had to

1:15:43.680 --> 1:15:48.479
<v Speaker 1>do with law law school admission and if memory serves,

1:15:48.479 --> 1:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong on this, and I'm just gonna

1:15:49.880 --> 1:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head, but Santaday O'Connor, in her

1:15:54.640 --> 1:15:56.719
<v Speaker 1>majority opinion was five four, said that you know, maybe

1:15:56.720 --> 1:15:59.519
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen or twenty years, we won't need to do

1:15:59.560 --> 1:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this any more, but we still think. Basically five of

1:16:02.840 --> 1:16:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the nine Supreme Court justices came down in the Yeah,

1:16:05.720 --> 1:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's discrimination, but it's discrimination that we like and we

1:16:08.280 --> 1:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good thing, So we're gonna we're gonna

1:16:10.000 --> 1:16:13.559
<v Speaker 1>pretend that it's constitutional when it's just flatly not. It's

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just not. And the argument that people like me have

1:16:17.960 --> 1:16:21.479
<v Speaker 1>been hearing and making stretching back for decades now that

1:16:21.560 --> 1:16:25.479
<v Speaker 1>even positive discrimination the basis of race is unconstitutional, and

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>then it's inherently subjective and will be abused and destroys

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>meritocracy in this country. I haven't been able to win

1:16:33.280 --> 1:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that one quite yet. The forces of the institutional left,

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the media, the academy, college campuses too powerful on that

1:16:42.200 --> 1:16:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to break through. And now they've got a couple of

1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court decisions that give them cover. Right, they've got

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot less leeway than they used to on this

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:53.799
<v Speaker 1>on admissions. But I understand this once. Admit always remember

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the colleges campuses. They are a front line in the

1:16:57.320 --> 1:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>culture war, and it spreads to the rest of siety

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:03.479
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Right, It's not like this is just oh,

1:17:03.520 --> 1:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an issue of college admissions. It will

1:17:05.400 --> 1:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>also then factor into hiring policies, government hiring policies, So

1:17:11.520 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 1>it's well beyond just who gets into what school. The

1:17:14.640 --> 1:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamental question is is the government allowed to pick within

1:17:20.040 --> 1:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a hierarchy of races who the beneficiaries are and who

1:17:24.280 --> 1:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>loses out Up to this point, and this is just

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>all fact. People can they won't like the way that

1:17:30.800 --> 1:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I put this forward, or they won't like the terminology

1:17:33.600 --> 1:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or the framing of the subject for me, if they

1:17:36.080 --> 1:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>disagree with the infirmative action. But affirmative action is discrimination

1:17:39.479 --> 1:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the basis of race. Suprema court justices have said this.

1:17:42.479 --> 1:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>This is very clear. You fall into one race category

1:17:46.080 --> 1:17:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and don't even get me start out on the whole

1:17:47.640 --> 1:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>race is a construct and races increasingly malleable as a construct.

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>And but you fall into a category and the school

1:17:55.040 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>decides based on that whether you get an advantage over

1:17:59.240 --> 1:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>other applicants or not. To me, it's so flatly and

1:18:03.160 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously unconstitutional, especially when it is extended beyond as it

1:18:09.280 --> 1:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is extended beyond African Americans. It's one thing to say

1:18:13.200 --> 1:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that there is an institutional unfair bias against African Americans

1:18:18.400 --> 1:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as a result of of actual laws on the books

1:18:21.680 --> 1:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, uh throughout the twentieth century and

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 1>before that, as we know that terrible period of the

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>ownership of human beings under slavery. It's one thing to

1:18:31.520 --> 1:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>say we gotta do something about that. That's not what

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action says now. Predominantly, affirmative action now is all

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about diversity. They're not saying this is about reparations for slavery.

1:18:43.280 --> 1:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not saying this is about um a debt ode

1:18:46.080 --> 1:18:48.519
<v Speaker 1>to the African American community in this country. I'm actually

1:18:48.560 --> 1:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic to that argument. I can hear that out. No,

1:18:52.000 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that affirmative action plays out now with schools is, well,

1:18:55.760 --> 1:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're, uh, you're Guatemalan, therefore you have a

1:19:00.680 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>big advantage over some kid who is, uh, you know,

1:19:04.000 --> 1:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>an immigrant from Romania. Why does the why does the

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Guatemalan have an advantage over the Romanian? Romania? For those

1:19:11.120 --> 1:19:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, it is actually a pretty pretty poor country,

1:19:13.600 --> 1:19:15.519
<v Speaker 1>not as poor as Guatemala, but not that far off.

1:19:16.000 --> 1:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>You know. Why is that? Oh, because one is Hispanic

1:19:18.960 --> 1:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and one is white or Latino? I guess now is

1:19:21.920 --> 1:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that preferred nomenclature. So it all falls into self contradiction,

1:19:26.280 --> 1:19:29.559
<v Speaker 1>it can't actually sustain itself. And then you also start

1:19:29.600 --> 1:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to look at the socioeconomic implications of this, and I

1:19:32.400 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>saw this myself. You know, there were, uh, there were

1:19:35.280 --> 1:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>students that I would talk to at Amherst. I went

1:19:37.280 --> 1:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to Amherst College and we were My class was forty

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three percent minority, and there were some students that I

1:19:44.080 --> 1:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>talked to who, you know, they were from very economically

1:19:50.520 --> 1:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>underprivileged backgrounds, who were white, and they had a much

1:19:53.880 --> 1:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they had a very hard time getting uh getting financial

1:19:57.479 --> 1:20:00.599
<v Speaker 1>aid at some places, whereas I had other friends who

1:20:00.600 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>were minority, particularly friends who are either black or black

1:20:03.920 --> 1:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or Latino and actually some some Native Americans too, um,

1:20:07.439 --> 1:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because we had Native Americans in my class, and they

1:20:10.160 --> 1:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, oh gosh, you know, I got there were

1:20:11.920 --> 1:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>special minority students. This is true, folks, this is what

1:20:15.360 --> 1:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>actually happened. They're minority Inclusion weekends where only minority admitted

1:20:19.960 --> 1:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>students are invited to the school, and you know they're paid.

1:20:23.360 --> 1:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not paid, but you know, they're all their expenses

1:20:25.160 --> 1:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>are paid for coming onto campus and there are special

1:20:28.600 --> 1:20:33.599
<v Speaker 1>set asides for for money for financial aid for minority students.

1:20:34.120 --> 1:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And so kids that I know who are like, yeah,

1:20:36.160 --> 1:20:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the first of my family to go to college,

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I'm like half you know, half Irish,

1:20:40.720 --> 1:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>half Greek or something from the suburbs of Boston. They

1:20:44.680 --> 1:20:46.559
<v Speaker 1>were left on the you know, they were just like

1:20:47.360 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>left on their own, whereas other kids I know who

1:20:49.600 --> 1:20:52.519
<v Speaker 1>are like, well, yes, I'm I'm African American. My father

1:20:52.560 --> 1:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>works at Goldman Sachs, and you know, they had the

1:20:55.680 --> 1:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the of diversity, Diversity inclusion weekend and and

1:20:59.080 --> 1:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>diversity practice is in the emissions office. So I get

1:21:02.880 --> 1:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>passionate about the subjectis you can tell. I think it's

1:21:04.720 --> 1:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>an area where the conservative causes uh is just clearly

1:21:07.920 --> 1:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the right, and it's just a matter of time

1:21:09.360 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>before the left loses, and then we'll have to admit

1:21:11.680 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 1>to a scheme of racial spoils as Scalia called it,

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and propping that up for a long time. The news

1:21:18.120 --> 1:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>story here, which I know has gotten lost in all this,

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:23.599
<v Speaker 1>but I thank you for staying with me through my

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>my diet tribe against these practice, the news stories that

1:21:26.400 --> 1:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>students for fair admissions. I've just found out that they're

1:21:29.320 --> 1:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna get a They're gonna get a hearing before

1:21:31.720 --> 1:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a judge in ten I think it says here right

1:21:35.520 --> 1:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, uh in January, I think is

1:21:39.360 --> 1:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when they're supposed to get there. They're hearing now it's

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:44.559
<v Speaker 1>taken years, right, this this case was filed back in

1:21:46.400 --> 1:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's what's really an issue. These schools have been

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>getting away with this for a long time because they

1:21:53.000 --> 1:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lie about their policies, they lie about what they're actually

1:21:57.760 --> 1:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>doing that they pretend that they just use a holistic process,

1:22:01.680 --> 1:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the numbers, somehow, year in

1:22:05.560 --> 1:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and year out, they're getting rough with the same proportion

1:22:09.720 --> 1:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of minorities no matter what the applicant pool is. Beyond that,

1:22:16.200 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>one reason that the argument hasn't moved all that much

1:22:19.320 --> 1:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is because the only people that were really considered to

1:22:21.640 --> 1:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be disadvantaged by this process are white, when in fact,

1:22:26.920 --> 1:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the most disadvantaged in the affirmative action process because of

1:22:31.280 --> 1:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the diversity balancing that they do for their incoming classes,

1:22:34.200 --> 1:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the most disadvantaged are Asian Americans. This is also an

1:22:38.800 --> 1:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>important place to put put in there that for our country,

1:22:41.720 --> 1:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is all about white privilege. The average Asian American

1:22:45.120 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>household has a higher income than the average Caucasian or

1:22:51.080 --> 1:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>white American household, so white privilege is apparently a thing

1:22:54.840 --> 1:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that we all get lectured on all the time. Meanwhile,

1:22:57.720 --> 1:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is there Asian privilege because they're making more money on

1:22:59.640 --> 1:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>average and white people are. So there's that. So and

1:23:02.439 --> 1:23:05.559
<v Speaker 1>these are just facts. Numbers. People can go number they

1:23:05.600 --> 1:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just start getting all angry about it, but it's just true.

1:23:09.120 --> 1:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the whole in their argument. Their argument is

1:23:11.160 --> 1:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>always that there's disadvantages against non white minorities. Meanwhile, Asian

1:23:15.400 --> 1:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Americans do incredibly well in the school application process and

1:23:18.840 --> 1:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>also are now the highest per capita earners per household

1:23:22.520 --> 1:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the country. Uh, and they have much higher hurdles

1:23:27.880 --> 1:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to get past to get entry into places like Harvard

1:23:29.960 --> 1:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>than other minorities. And they do not have quote white privilege,

1:23:33.000 --> 1:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think exists. But that's a whole other discussion.

1:23:36.280 --> 1:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So why do they get the short end of the

1:23:38.720 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>stick here? Why are they left out in the cold?

1:23:42.360 --> 1:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And the left answer is because we say so, because

1:23:46.160 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you're doing fine, because you don't need the help, because

1:23:49.120 --> 1:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly because we say so. And so this group of

1:23:52.000 --> 1:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>students is filing suit. They're saying they're being discriminated against,

1:23:55.880 --> 1:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and Harvard saying, well, we keep our we need to

1:23:58.000 --> 1:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>keep our it may sitions practices, sacro sanc. You know,

1:24:02.000 --> 1:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we we can't. So a judge is gonna look at this,

1:24:04.360 --> 1:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is why this is in the news the

1:24:05.760 --> 1:24:07.759
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four hours. A judge is going to decide

1:24:08.800 --> 1:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have to make public some of

1:24:11.320 --> 1:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>their admissions practices. Now, if this were a country club,

1:24:14.960 --> 1:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that was engaged in and keep in mind,

1:24:19.040 --> 1:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>universities get a tremendous amount of federal funding, a lot

1:24:21.360 --> 1:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of federal support, and but you know, I doubt there like, well,

1:24:24.800 --> 1:24:28.559
<v Speaker 1>we won't make our practices um public if it's were

1:24:28.560 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>a public accommodation that was discriminating on the basis of race,

1:24:31.600 --> 1:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>which is what is going on here. They are discrimining

1:24:34.160 --> 1:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the basis of race. There's no question that judge would say, Okay,

1:24:37.280 --> 1:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's see what you're doing here. But Harvard thinks.

1:24:40.120 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Harvard thinks that they should be able to make up

1:24:43.320 --> 1:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the rules as they go along and do it their

1:24:44.640 --> 1:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>own way. And uh, I can tell you this right now.

1:24:47.400 --> 1:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>If we get a look at the most elite universities

1:24:50.439 --> 1:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>books when it comes to how they do their admissions,

1:24:53.960 --> 1:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what we will find out is that they are doing

1:24:57.040 --> 1:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>de facto quotas, that they have been lying to the

1:25:00.800 --> 1:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>public about their admissions procedures, that they are entirely run

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>these admissions committees by by committed progressives and social justice warriors,

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and that they are actively discriminating on the basis of

1:25:13.800 --> 1:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>race and violation of US law. That's what we will

1:25:17.680 --> 1:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>find out, and that's why they're desperate to keep this

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>out of the public eye. And this is a big scandal.

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Is a big story that will have ramifications for you.

1:25:26.040 --> 1:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Whether you never went to college, you don't care if

1:25:27.680 --> 1:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>your kids go to college, or that doesn't matter. It'll

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it'll affect all of us. It has it's going to

1:25:32.439 --> 1:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>affect what institutions across the board are allowed to do

1:25:36.280 --> 1:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to hiring and all the rest. So

1:25:40.040 --> 1:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's our under the radar for today. The Harvard A

1:25:42.880 --> 1:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Firm of Action clash keeps going on. Um, we will

1:25:47.200 --> 1:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be back here just a few minutes. Teams, stay with me.

1:25:48.960 --> 1:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>There are some movies that if you're around my age,

1:25:51.720 --> 1:25:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it was required that you watch many many times. Right,

1:25:56.520 --> 1:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>so I was born in eighty one, and there there

1:25:59.640 --> 1:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are some films that you just if you're from that

1:26:02.240 --> 1:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>general time period, you know, ten years before me, maybe

1:26:04.840 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>five or ten years after me, probably ten years after me.

1:26:08.200 --> 1:26:11.519
<v Speaker 1>You saw and producer Mike knows what I'm talking about. Brandon,

1:26:11.560 --> 1:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>you defy age. I have no idea how old you are.

1:26:13.640 --> 1:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You could be. You could be twenty five, you could

1:26:16.000 --> 1:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be all the way up to who knows. So I

1:26:17.840 --> 1:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I'm gonna assume you were roughly the

1:26:20.240 --> 1:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>same age, right, what thirty? Oh yeah, okay, you're like,

1:26:23.000 --> 1:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you're we got a whole bunch of You got a

1:26:24.600 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of thirty four year old dudes here basically

1:26:27.120 --> 1:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in this room, or thirty something year old dudes here

1:26:29.040 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in this room. So I saw The Breakfast Club. You

1:26:33.120 --> 1:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>guys have both seen The Breakfast Club so much because

1:26:35.280 --> 1:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it was one of these movies. Also they put on TV,

1:26:37.400 --> 1:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and they put on TV. In that sense, it's kind

1:26:40.000 --> 1:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>of like Blood Sport, one of the true classics of

1:26:43.360 --> 1:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>cinema because it was made for like thirty thousand dollars

1:26:47.160 --> 1:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and they just ran it on all these different cable

1:26:49.040 --> 1:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>channels all the time. But Blood Sports very different kind

1:26:51.560 --> 1:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of movie. We'll talk, We'll have a whole hour of

1:26:54.160 --> 1:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a show one day just devoted to eighties martial arts movies,

1:26:58.080 --> 1:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and it'll be kind of a retrospective on how that's

1:27:00.800 --> 1:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>actually not how people fight. But anyway, The Breakfast Club

1:27:05.040 --> 1:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was one of them. The Fairest Bueller's Day Off is

1:27:06.960 --> 1:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>another one. You just you had to see those, you

1:27:09.240 --> 1:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had have familiarity with them. If you hadn't seen those movies,

1:27:12.920 --> 1:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you were kind of left out. You were gonna miss references.

1:27:15.520 --> 1:27:18.559
<v Speaker 1>And and what John Hughes is the director, right, he

1:27:18.600 --> 1:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was the one that was made a bunch of these

1:27:21.560 --> 1:27:24.519
<v Speaker 1>rat pack movies. What's the other one? Oh, Saint Elmo's Fire,

1:27:25.080 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>which I will admit it's a bad movie, actually does

1:27:27.479 --> 1:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not hold up. It's you know, it's a little bit

1:27:29.280 --> 1:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of nostalgia carries it for a while, and it has

1:27:31.840 --> 1:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that very upbeat theme song saying now almost fire. I

1:27:36.160 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>can't say it at all, but you don't know, it's

1:27:37.520 --> 1:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>very good for those of you know what I'm talking about.

1:27:39.320 --> 1:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>If you google uh um to say almost I don't

1:27:43.200 --> 1:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>even know what you call it. By the way, Sat

1:27:45.680 --> 1:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>tell Himbo, you know it comes from actually from ships,

1:27:48.760 --> 1:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and it has to do with the blue hue around

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the ship mass that it's from static electricity. That's right.

1:27:54.479 --> 1:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Buck knows things. So back to this, Molly Ringwold was

1:27:58.280 --> 1:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the actresses in the Breakfast Club, and she

1:28:01.760 --> 1:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>has now decided that she is entering into her own

1:28:06.120 --> 1:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>moment of me too, nous of the of the hashtag

1:28:10.040 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>me too movement, by writing about how she's revisiting the

1:28:13.520 --> 1:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Breakfast Club with our current sensibility about sexual harassment and

1:28:17.800 --> 1:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>sexual exploitation and all this kind of thing. Now, I

1:28:20.800 --> 1:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>want to be very clear about this. Now, you have

1:28:22.280 --> 1:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>an actress who, granted, look here I am talking about her,

1:28:24.840 --> 1:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the whole purpose of this, but an

1:28:27.360 --> 1:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>actress who was in some very light kind of coming

1:28:31.240 --> 1:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of age comedic fair back in the eighties. I mean,

1:28:35.160 --> 1:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think of myself as a child of the eighties.

1:28:37.160 --> 1:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I was an adolescent of the nineties, but as a

1:28:39.760 --> 1:28:41.519
<v Speaker 1>child of the eighties, you know, I saw this stuff.

1:28:42.000 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And she's right. She's written an essay. It was in

1:28:44.600 --> 1:28:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair or The New Yorker, one of those very

1:28:47.640 --> 1:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>fancy journals of opinion, and she's written this essay and

1:28:50.960 --> 1:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all about how she's uncomfortable with her own kids

1:28:55.040 --> 1:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing the stuff from the eighties. Now, look, you can

1:28:58.120 --> 1:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>all make your own decisions about you know, and you

1:29:00.840 --> 1:29:02.639
<v Speaker 1>don't need anyone to tell you that, including me about

1:29:02.680 --> 1:29:04.599
<v Speaker 1>what you think your kids should watch you should not watch.

1:29:05.160 --> 1:29:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But it's also part of this effort among the left

1:29:09.080 --> 1:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>too now be because they've got this problem. There's all

1:29:11.200 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>these people who had careers that were built celebrating certain

1:29:15.479 --> 1:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>works of art, you know, if that's what we'll call films,

1:29:18.160 --> 1:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but a certain media and entertainment properties that now are

1:29:22.920 --> 1:29:27.839
<v Speaker 1>offensive by our current stand by our current PC politically

1:29:27.880 --> 1:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>correct sensibility. And I've said for a while this is

1:29:31.600 --> 1:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like we talked with the Simpsons last night, this is

1:29:33.320 --> 1:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a recurring theme. I've told you that people complain about

1:29:36.080 --> 1:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Robin Williams retrospectives after he died because I thought they

1:29:40.280 --> 1:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>were offensive. Robin Williams, one of the great comedic minds

1:29:43.120 --> 1:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the last thirty forty years, offensive too offensive to

1:29:47.720 --> 1:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>air some of his bits on TV. And now the

1:29:51.800 --> 1:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Breakfast Club is also in the sights of the regressive,

1:29:55.479 --> 1:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet or the Soviet Left that likes to erase,

1:30:00.120 --> 1:30:03.519
<v Speaker 1>airbrush parts of history that it finds inconvenient, to airbrush

1:30:03.520 --> 1:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>parts of its own cultural uh contributions that it now

1:30:07.960 --> 1:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>finds to be too much to be child But one

1:30:12.120 --> 1:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that she talks about is you know

1:30:13.920 --> 1:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>how how in our current in our at our current moment,

1:30:17.120 --> 1:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene where one of the guys like looks

1:30:18.760 --> 1:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>up the skirt of one of the girls. And first

1:30:21.960 --> 1:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, one, this is all fictional, didn't actually happen.

1:30:25.320 --> 1:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a movie. And two, you know, they had an

1:30:28.880 --> 1:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>adult body double for the seed and there was no

1:30:31.640 --> 1:30:34.519
<v Speaker 1>one was actually naked under anything. You know, it's probably

1:30:34.560 --> 1:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>wearing basketball shorts under the skirt. Like, it's just the

1:30:37.840 --> 1:30:41.679
<v Speaker 1>depiction of this. But but the notion that a teen

1:30:42.080 --> 1:30:44.719
<v Speaker 1>would try to sneak a peek at a at a

1:30:44.720 --> 1:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>another teen in that way is too damaging for for

1:30:48.880 --> 1:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of the current generation apparently. I mean, it's

1:30:51.840 --> 1:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not even gonna leave the breakfast club alone, folks. Nothing,

1:30:54.400 --> 1:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing is sacred to these people except political correctness. Nothing.

1:30:58.439 --> 1:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>They they will find a way. Just give it time

1:31:01.360 --> 1:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back in a place where they wanna,

1:31:03.120 --> 1:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, cover up the naughty parts of of Michelangelo paintings,

1:31:07.360 --> 1:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and sculptures. Just give it time, alright, written

1:31:10.080 --> 1:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a quick break your team, We'll be back with a

1:31:12.040 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more. Stick with me. A lot of news

1:31:14.080 --> 1:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stories popping up today about sex robots. It's one of

1:31:19.439 --> 1:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the New York Posts, the one that was linked on

1:31:21.840 --> 1:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the Drudge Report. So you know, part of my job

1:31:24.320 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what I do every day is I go through just

1:31:26.400 --> 1:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the the main news sources, a lot of

1:31:29.400 --> 1:31:31.519
<v Speaker 1>you would see No Fox News, the Walstreet Journal, New

1:31:31.600 --> 1:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>York Times, you know, Washington Post. I go through all

1:31:33.760 --> 1:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that and I read up so I'm up to speed

1:31:36.040 --> 1:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on everything. But also I look for stories that are

1:31:40.160 --> 1:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of the the daily deluge of all the different

1:31:43.960 --> 1:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>news outlets that are focused on the same usually the

1:31:46.880 --> 1:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>same two or three, maybe three or four stories. But

1:31:51.200 --> 1:31:56.519
<v Speaker 1>this whole sex robot thing is very weird. Um. There's

1:31:56.520 --> 1:31:59.679
<v Speaker 1>this piece in the New York Post about how they're

1:31:59.680 --> 1:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>now marketing a uh, they're marketing robots, sex robots for couples,

1:32:08.720 --> 1:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and and there are dolls out there that are that

1:32:12.000 --> 1:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are going for seven thousand dollars. Um. You know, I

1:32:19.200 --> 1:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a as much as I can, a

1:32:24.320 --> 1:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>live and let live guy. You know, it's like, if

1:32:26.960 --> 1:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not hurting someone or taking their stuff, you know,

1:32:32.040 --> 1:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're not hurting me or taking my stuff, not

1:32:33.800 --> 1:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>hurting someone else taking their stuff. I liked it, so

1:32:36.520 --> 1:32:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know that's the old libertarian line, right,

1:32:38.479 --> 1:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But I try to approach a lot of things that way,

1:32:41.680 --> 1:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. Or to go back into my political science

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>training from years past with Professor Hadley Archy's at Amherst.

1:32:50.439 --> 1:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You gotta separate what is a question of morals, a

1:32:54.040 --> 1:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>question of of ethics, from a question of taste, you know,

1:32:57.520 --> 1:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not. For example, you could say to me

1:33:00.960 --> 1:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that the the best ice cream flavor is strawberry, and

1:33:07.320 --> 1:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we all know that that's just not right. That's just

1:33:09.400 --> 1:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a crazy thing to say. But you're can't. You're not

1:33:11.360 --> 1:33:14.959
<v Speaker 1>wrong who likes it? Used to be chocolate, vanilla, strawberry

1:33:15.000 --> 1:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>were like the three main stays. And I don't care

1:33:16.640 --> 1:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody says nobody like strawberry ice cream that much. Um,

1:33:20.360 --> 1:33:22.599
<v Speaker 1>chocolate or vanilla are the acceptable answers there. But that's

1:33:22.600 --> 1:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a question of taste, not not morals or ethics. Right.

1:33:26.560 --> 1:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>There are some people out there that order their steaks

1:33:28.520 --> 1:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>well done. They're not bad people, they just they just

1:33:33.000 --> 1:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't they don't fully embrace the glory that

1:33:37.200 --> 1:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>is a medium rare medium rare red meat, you know,

1:33:41.720 --> 1:33:44.519
<v Speaker 1>which is those you want to go rare, that's fine,

1:33:45.120 --> 1:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>medium rare I think is the sweet spot medium. Okay,

1:33:49.000 --> 1:33:51.439
<v Speaker 1>well done. I don't understand what's going on anymore now

1:33:51.520 --> 1:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>now you've lost me. But that's a question of taste,

1:33:53.200 --> 1:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not ethics when you get into the sex doll discussion,

1:33:58.560 --> 1:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>which I I usually wouldn't, but it's becoming a story, right,

1:34:02.280 --> 1:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing that they're now gonna be much more

1:34:05.720 --> 1:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of the culture. I remember years ago people

1:34:08.120 --> 1:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would make on sitcoms and make jokes about blow up dolls.

1:34:11.760 --> 1:34:15.479
<v Speaker 1>But now these dolls are uh, these they're not dolls.

1:34:15.520 --> 1:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>These um well, robots are meant to mimic real human

1:34:21.800 --> 1:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>beings as much as they can. They respond to I

1:34:26.240 --> 1:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>believe they respond to verbal commands now, and they definitely

1:34:30.280 --> 1:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can look like there's this link on

1:34:32.000 --> 1:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Drudge Report for uh, for one from the paper

1:34:36.160 --> 1:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The Sun in the UK, And there's also this link

1:34:38.880 --> 1:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>up on the New York Post is talking about this.

1:34:41.880 --> 1:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And we're just going down a very weird path here,

1:34:44.640 --> 1:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I was reading an analysis recently, and

1:34:48.120 --> 1:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean you and me, I mean the world,

1:34:51.200 --> 1:34:54.280
<v Speaker 1>because this sex robot thing is turning into a something

1:34:54.320 --> 1:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of a global market. I'm it's just look it's just

1:34:58.240 --> 1:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>too weird. I don't know what else to say. It's

1:35:00.120 --> 1:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just too weird. I don't get it, and and it

1:35:03.280 --> 1:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and it crosses over into the I don't I don't

1:35:07.160 --> 1:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>know about this, but anyway, I was reading this analysis

1:35:11.280 --> 1:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of of the problems the demographic problems that some East

1:35:16.880 --> 1:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Asian countries are having in Japan, UM most notably, but

1:35:21.040 --> 1:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>also South Korea, they're just not having enough children. And

1:35:24.360 --> 1:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the analysis was also going into a a discussion, ah,

1:35:31.240 --> 1:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive on what is the role of sexuality

1:35:36.200 --> 1:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in these cultures and and how and there's there's a

1:35:39.080 --> 1:35:41.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff that they've got to they gotta work

1:35:41.720 --> 1:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>out in Japan right now, a lot of stuff in

1:35:44.760 --> 1:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of other they're not having enough kids and it's

1:35:46.920 --> 1:35:49.599
<v Speaker 1>not enough a part of UM. There are a lot

1:35:49.640 --> 1:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of people that leave these celibate lives basically and then

1:35:52.040 --> 1:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that all but but they're celibate is and they're not

1:35:54.400 --> 1:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>with another person. But then they turned to different kinds

1:35:57.200 --> 1:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of you know, visual stimula. I and there's a huge

1:36:01.160 --> 1:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>market for all that stuff in Japan, you know, pornography

1:36:05.439 --> 1:36:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and UM. But you know, it's something that I don't understand,

1:36:11.240 --> 1:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what enough to know anything about in the Japanese context.

1:36:14.240 --> 1:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I just know that it's it's affected them at a

1:36:17.400 --> 1:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>national level. I think that's sexual Robots producer Mike sex

1:36:21.520 --> 1:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>robots too weird, just too weird, right, it's just too weird.

1:36:24.800 --> 1:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I can't say that we should. You

1:36:27.360 --> 1:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>could ban them per se, that make them illegal, But

1:36:31.880 --> 1:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just too weird, man, I don't know. That's kind

1:36:34.040 --> 1:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of my that's my analysis, just too weird. Um. But

1:36:38.400 --> 1:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, then again, I'm also somebody who thinks that

1:36:40.280 --> 1:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the only the only part of the show Billions that

1:36:42.200 --> 1:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, the fact they gotta put all

1:36:44.080 --> 1:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that STM stuff in there. I'm just like, really, the

1:36:46.000 --> 1:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>U S Attorneys into into S and M and me.

1:36:48.160 --> 1:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on. But anyway, we'll talking about Billions in their time.

1:36:51.320 --> 1:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think that's probably the only analysis of

1:36:53.760 --> 1:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>sex robots, despite all the Drudge Report and other news

1:36:56.920 --> 1:36:58.679
<v Speaker 1>stories on them that I'll give you for quite a while.

1:36:59.160 --> 1:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Bottom line, I just thing too weird, just too weird.

1:37:03.120 --> 1:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>All we got to a roll call coming up? Stay

1:37:04.880 --> 1:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>with me, Well, Team Buck, you are my sanity in

1:37:07.720 --> 1:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>an increasingly insane world. And that's why it's such an

1:37:12.360 --> 1:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>important part of my day when I get to bounce

1:37:14.200 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>in with some roll call team buck it's time for

1:37:26.640 --> 1:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>roll call, I will say, this is not part of

1:37:31.320 --> 1:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>roll call. But you know, music is just not as

1:37:33.960 --> 1:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>good now as it was for a long time. It's

1:37:35.880 --> 1:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just true. And that's not even that's like studio produced

1:37:39.200 --> 1:37:41.439
<v Speaker 1>music that we can just play over rare, but it

1:37:41.479 --> 1:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of a classic rock vibe to it.

1:37:43.920 --> 1:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is just you know, the fact of the

1:37:47.200 --> 1:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>matter is that there are not many bands that are

1:37:50.120 --> 1:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>around today that you're gonna be thinking about in five

1:37:52.960 --> 1:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or ten years. And quite honestly, even ten years ago,

1:37:55.000 --> 1:37:56.599
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of bands you'll be thinking about.

1:37:56.920 --> 1:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But do you go back years, you still got bands

1:38:01.320 --> 1:38:03.599
<v Speaker 1>that are selling out arenas and that I've really left

1:38:03.680 --> 1:38:06.439
<v Speaker 1>left their mark. I don't know if we blame this

1:38:06.520 --> 1:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on the digital era in which we live, you know,

1:38:08.840 --> 1:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the the end of the record labels. And I think

1:38:11.920 --> 1:38:15.679
<v Speaker 1>it's also in part because music now is just it's

1:38:15.720 --> 1:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>so everywhere, it's it's uh so accessible that it in

1:38:20.360 --> 1:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense has been kind of devalued. And I think

1:38:23.040 --> 1:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>back to when I got my first MP three player

1:38:27.280 --> 1:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that I could use in the gym right, So I

1:38:30.439 --> 1:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>guess that would have been right around. It was similar

1:38:33.360 --> 1:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to the time of the first big iPods. But I

1:38:36.400 --> 1:38:38.479
<v Speaker 1>had MP three player that you would plug into a

1:38:38.640 --> 1:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like a desktop computer, and it was essentially a glorified

1:38:41.840 --> 1:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>flash drive that could play songs and in one direction,

1:38:44.400 --> 1:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think anyway. But you know, I remember doing this

1:38:47.040 --> 1:38:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and this. I had like room for thirty songs on there,

1:38:50.160 --> 1:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, man, is amazing. I'm gonna look

1:38:52.400 --> 1:38:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like he Man because of all the awesome motivation I'm

1:38:55.760 --> 1:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get from this music. The he Man part didn't work,

1:38:58.080 --> 1:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but I did listen to those same thirty songs a lot.

1:39:01.920 --> 1:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Was there a lot of Creed in that mix. There

1:39:04.240 --> 1:39:07.599
<v Speaker 1>was I'm not gonna I'm not gonna pretend, uh, there

1:39:07.680 --> 1:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a fair amount of Creed. And there was

1:39:10.280 --> 1:39:13.479
<v Speaker 1>no Matchbox twenty however, so I will just I want

1:39:13.520 --> 1:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to get that on the record. But now I have

1:39:16.280 --> 1:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and I could sit here and I can listen

1:39:18.200 --> 1:39:20.519
<v Speaker 1>to just I could listen to music literally all day long.

1:39:20.760 --> 1:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, other than what I have to do work,

1:39:22.200 --> 1:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I've pay attention to, but I could do

1:39:25.760 --> 1:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I could listen to any number songs and because of that,

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it just has less I don't know,

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>less appeal now because everyone either I remember when you

1:39:35.160 --> 1:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>had certain CDs and you would take care of them,

1:39:37.960 --> 1:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>right and bred you know what I'm talking about, Like like

1:39:39.280 --> 1:39:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like that c D even though it was a mass

1:39:41.320 --> 1:39:43.559
<v Speaker 1>produced plastic disk that you could always go get another

1:39:43.560 --> 1:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>one for ten or fifteen bucks, and one CDs are

1:39:45.760 --> 1:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars, you know, seventeen an HMV sometimes if it

1:39:50.080 --> 1:39:52.519
<v Speaker 1>was like the latest, if it was like the latest

1:39:52.520 --> 1:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and greatest of Salt and Pepper or three eleven. Now

1:39:56.520 --> 1:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really dating myself here with you know, you'd pay

1:39:59.040 --> 1:40:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like seventeen bucks for a CD. Alright, alright, I know

1:40:01.360 --> 1:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>this has turned into a buck a bucalogue on music

1:40:03.800 --> 1:40:06.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of what I was just gonna say is that

1:40:06.720 --> 1:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you treated that CD like it was something that you're

1:40:08.800 --> 1:40:11.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep for decades and your you know, along with

1:40:11.880 --> 1:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>books in your library or your bookcase or whatever. And no,

1:40:16.160 --> 1:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I do not do you own it? Do you own

1:40:17.400 --> 1:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>any CDs right now? Brandon? I have them, but they're

1:40:21.080 --> 1:40:23.559
<v Speaker 1>like in my attict, I mean you basically can't give

1:40:23.600 --> 1:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>them away now, right, I mean, they're not you know,

1:40:25.160 --> 1:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you go to some of these stores and LPs have

1:40:28.200 --> 1:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of maintained a certain you know, they've maintained a

1:40:30.960 --> 1:40:36.679
<v Speaker 1>certain degree of heirloom like status, I guess, but CDs

1:40:36.760 --> 1:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>not so much. Alright, alright, roll call, roll call, I know.

1:40:40.040 --> 1:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, I get, I get all excited. Ronnie right

1:40:44.800 --> 1:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in regard to the left. Oh but if you want

1:40:47.000 --> 1:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of roll call, just remember Facebook

1:40:49.160 --> 1:40:51.679
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash buck Sexton. If you haven't heard Jersey

1:40:51.680 --> 1:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and you sent us an email, good chance, we'll get

1:40:54.200 --> 1:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to it tomorrow. I meant to do the email batch today,

1:40:57.240 --> 1:41:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but I left that one on the cutter room floor now,

1:41:00.840 --> 1:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie writes, in regard to the left, it's amazing how

1:41:03.120 --> 1:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>many attack options you have when morality is no longer considered.

1:41:08.560 --> 1:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump arrangement syndrome seems to have dissolved their last vestige

1:41:12.800 --> 1:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of integrity. Hey, look, Ronnie, you get You have no

1:41:16.960 --> 1:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>argument for me about how they have a lot of options,

1:41:19.160 --> 1:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because there's a whole lot you can do when you

1:41:22.240 --> 1:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have no integrity to to protect, when you have no

1:41:26.320 --> 1:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>principles that you have to worry about losing in a process,

1:41:30.240 --> 1:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you have freedom of action. So that's a good thing. Uh,

1:41:33.439 --> 1:41:36.599
<v Speaker 1>jen is next up here. She writes, great show, this

1:41:36.720 --> 1:41:39.479
<v Speaker 1>was from last night. I'm just listening to the show,

1:41:39.600 --> 1:41:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and for the first time, I'm really nervous about what

1:41:41.720 --> 1:41:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the establishment is doing to Trump. This is setting such

1:41:44.680 --> 1:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous precedent. Well, Jenna, I hope you've got that

1:41:47.360 --> 1:41:52.840
<v Speaker 1>sense from our discussion today of what has happened with

1:41:52.880 --> 1:41:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. And it is troubling to me to

1:41:56.560 --> 1:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>see that, you know, where's the Not that I'm not

1:42:00.200 --> 1:42:01.479
<v Speaker 1>a fan of the A C l U at all,

1:42:02.400 --> 1:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is troubling to see how quickly they will

1:42:04.760 --> 1:42:08.439
<v Speaker 1>abandon whatever principles they have all of a sudden attorney

1:42:08.479 --> 1:42:11.559
<v Speaker 1>client privilege. It's not really that big a deal. It's

1:42:11.560 --> 1:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>no longer sacred, So you know, that's that's a part

1:42:16.760 --> 1:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of what's troubling. Just overall, though, I think that there

1:42:20.960 --> 1:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is a complete lack of any willingness among those who

1:42:25.960 --> 1:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>consider themselves opposed to Trump's policies to approach any aspect

1:42:31.120 --> 1:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of Trump in good faith. So, you know, whatever, I

1:42:35.720 --> 1:42:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think there are a lot of people out there who

1:42:37.280 --> 1:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>realize And now I'm just drawing on my own context

1:42:40.840 --> 1:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>or in New York City, I know plenty of Democrats

1:42:43.439 --> 1:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>who realized that there was no Russia collusion. They know,

1:42:46.439 --> 1:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>did they know that Trump didn't come up with some

1:42:48.160 --> 1:42:50.599
<v Speaker 1>plan with Putin? And then that's all crap and it's

1:42:50.600 --> 1:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>amusing to them, but they know it's but they're happy

1:42:52.960 --> 1:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that this Muller probe is going on it because it's

1:42:55.080 --> 1:42:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a a a form of hashtag resistance. It's a drag

1:42:59.320 --> 1:43:02.559
<v Speaker 1>on Trump. It's a way to fight the administration, not

1:43:02.720 --> 1:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of policy and winning the argument, but but

1:43:05.280 --> 1:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>literally to sabotage it. And so I know people who

1:43:08.960 --> 1:43:11.479
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah, the Molar thing, it's it's not gonna

1:43:11.479 --> 1:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>find any Russia collusion, but you know, it's good sabotage

1:43:14.280 --> 1:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>against the administration, and they're they're okay with that. And

1:43:17.760 --> 1:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an unprincipled approach, but that's what you

1:43:20.680 --> 1:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of that going on. Evan. Next up here,

1:43:23.920 --> 1:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Hey Buck and talking about social media and the

1:43:25.880 --> 1:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that most or all large social media platforms are

1:43:29.000 --> 1:43:32.479
<v Speaker 1>owned and operated liberals. Are there not any conservatives that

1:43:32.479 --> 1:43:35.519
<v Speaker 1>can start up the next Facebook or Twitter? Why are

1:43:35.560 --> 1:43:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they always liberal owned? What if a situation we're backwards?

1:43:39.040 --> 1:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>What conservatives try and impose their political beliefs upon the public.

1:43:42.520 --> 1:43:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the show and keep up the great work. Well,

1:43:44.600 --> 1:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Evan. That's a great question. By the way,

1:43:47.560 --> 1:43:49.439
<v Speaker 1>why is it that we have You know, Peter Tiel,

1:43:49.520 --> 1:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, is a big Silicon Valley name. He's a libertarian.

1:43:54.720 --> 1:43:56.720
<v Speaker 1>He spoke at the RNC convention. I'm sure many of

1:43:56.760 --> 1:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you will remember that spoken favorite trump is is in

1:43:59.320 --> 1:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>good standing with Trump? Um. Why are all the social

1:44:04.000 --> 1:44:07.479
<v Speaker 1>media platforms progressive left? I'd like to say it's the

1:44:07.520 --> 1:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>same reason the media is in academia, but there's something

1:44:10.200 --> 1:44:14.639
<v Speaker 1>distinct about you know, to be a social media uh

1:44:14.840 --> 1:44:16.720
<v Speaker 1>founder or one of these companies, you had to be

1:44:16.760 --> 1:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in the computer science realm. You had to be somebody

1:44:21.400 --> 1:44:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that was look at what would have been called the

1:44:24.479 --> 1:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>computer nerd. You know, now we don't call them computer

1:44:26.320 --> 1:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>nerds anymore because they all drive Maserati's and fly around

1:44:28.840 --> 1:44:30.639
<v Speaker 1>in private jets and could buy any of us, So

1:44:30.720 --> 1:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we we instead call them, you know, social media is ours. Um.

1:44:38.160 --> 1:44:42.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I look at this and I think, uh,

1:44:42.479 --> 1:44:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a good answer. Let me think about

1:44:44.720 --> 1:44:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that one, Evan, Why is it? I could probably look

1:44:46.640 --> 1:44:49.240
<v Speaker 1>into the history of it, um, But I also think

1:44:49.240 --> 1:44:54.559
<v Speaker 1>that culturally speaking, conservatives are more willing to or maybe

1:44:54.600 --> 1:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>even better to say, right of center people are more

1:44:56.720 --> 1:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to separate their work for their political beliefs. I

1:45:01.840 --> 1:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think that to be on the left now, to be progressive,

1:45:04.120 --> 1:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be woke borrow one of their terms. To be

1:45:07.960 --> 1:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>woke is to be woke at all times. To be

1:45:10.360 --> 1:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a social justice warrior means that you don't put on

1:45:14.040 --> 1:45:17.479
<v Speaker 1>your your shield and sword, so to speak, just when

1:45:17.520 --> 1:45:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you're out and about or when you're engaging with people

1:45:20.360 --> 1:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter or Facebook. When you're in the office, you're

1:45:23.400 --> 1:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a social justice warrior. It's it's a two seven thing

1:45:27.439 --> 1:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about in my own life. I I we

1:45:29.760 --> 1:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>said laught, people said, well you were you work in politics,

1:45:31.920 --> 1:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and they want to talk to me about politics, and

1:45:34.439 --> 1:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but Buck doesn't play that game. I do this for

1:45:36.720 --> 1:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a living. You know, if somebody is uh, someone who

1:45:40.120 --> 1:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>listens to me, if anyone a team Buck, Everyone's talk politics. Yeah,

1:45:42.800 --> 1:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, right, because that's like the family. But I

1:45:44.720 --> 1:45:46.639
<v Speaker 1>mean if I'm at some New York City dinner party,

1:45:46.640 --> 1:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>which I never get invited to because I'm not fancy,

1:45:48.520 --> 1:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but occasionally or something like that, somebody will say, well,

1:45:52.200 --> 1:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you work in politics, you know, what do

1:45:54.080 --> 1:45:57.559
<v Speaker 1>you think of the Trump administration? I'm like, ah, not

1:45:57.600 --> 1:46:01.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. You think you thank you fool me. You

1:46:01.800 --> 1:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think you're slick with that one. But I prefer I

1:46:04.160 --> 1:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>prefer not to have my evening ruins so that you

1:46:06.200 --> 1:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>can share your share your political loathing of the Trump

1:46:09.880 --> 1:46:12.519
<v Speaker 1>administration with me. So those are some of them. But

1:46:12.560 --> 1:46:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying I separate out right what I do professionally

1:46:15.280 --> 1:46:18.439
<v Speaker 1>from the way I am interacting in terms of discussion,

1:46:18.479 --> 1:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at least personally. Right, I still hold my beliefs, I

1:46:20.400 --> 1:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>still have my principles, but I just don't walk around.

1:46:22.600 --> 1:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that social justice the same reason they politicize everything. Right,

1:46:27.120 --> 1:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>who's politicizing sports all the time? The left? You know

1:46:30.200 --> 1:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>who politicizes entertainment media all the time? The left? They

1:46:35.160 --> 1:46:37.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have a separation mechanism in their minds. I don't

1:46:37.479 --> 1:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>know if it's like a an actual I don't know,

1:46:40.520 --> 1:46:43.519
<v Speaker 1>something having to do with their neurochemistry. But anyway, I digress.

1:46:44.880 --> 1:46:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh William is next up. Um Sessions is not doing

1:46:49.720 --> 1:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>good job. I'm starting to think the guy's a plant

1:46:52.080 --> 1:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for the other side. And he also wrote that our

1:46:54.360 --> 1:46:57.240
<v Speaker 1>compliance rate is less than ten percent in Connecticut. That's

1:46:57.240 --> 1:47:00.559
<v Speaker 1>about turning in firearms. So I believe it uh standard.

1:47:00.600 --> 1:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Next up here, writes buck Love, the roll call music

1:47:03.360 --> 1:47:08.479
<v Speaker 1>very upbeat, helped with my case of the Monday as well.

1:47:08.520 --> 1:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope, so my friend, I certainly hope. So

1:47:11.280 --> 1:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you guys liked a little. See, it's the

1:47:13.240 --> 1:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>little thing sometimes they make the radio show that change

1:47:15.439 --> 1:47:18.639
<v Speaker 1>up in music a little, just a little sprinkling of quotes.

1:47:18.760 --> 1:47:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think of what we call actually, you know what,

1:47:23.640 --> 1:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not an actuality. That's when I play a news clip,

1:47:25.720 --> 1:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not image. Is it imaging? When I play an

1:47:27.400 --> 1:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>action movie quote, we'll call it imaging. Yeah, Imaging to

1:47:30.080 --> 1:47:32.439
<v Speaker 1>me is like spice, you know. And so you use

1:47:32.479 --> 1:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>imaging on a radio show just to give it a

1:47:34.040 --> 1:47:36.479
<v Speaker 1>little a little something there. But he used too much.

1:47:37.280 --> 1:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Any of you who have ever had the top come

1:47:39.160 --> 1:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>off the salt shaker and you're like, maybe you will

1:47:41.320 --> 1:47:44.479
<v Speaker 1>just be salty. It's gonna taste gross. You know, you

1:47:44.680 --> 1:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta control the spice. Um, So stay oh and then

1:47:48.200 --> 1:47:51.519
<v Speaker 1>sean one more your Shawn Rights, thanks for bringing the

1:47:51.560 --> 1:47:53.599
<v Speaker 1>dubstep roll call theme back. Well there you go, Sean,

1:47:53.600 --> 1:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad some people like it. I like that one

1:47:55.360 --> 1:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to actually, but dubstep is an acquired taste. We're gonna

1:47:58.400 --> 1:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>close up the Hot for tonight. Thank you all for joining.

1:48:01.320 --> 1:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Please do subscribe on iTunes if you have not already.

1:48:04.560 --> 1:48:06.599
<v Speaker 1>It's free and it just pops up in your inbox.

1:48:06.640 --> 1:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>If you ever missed the show live, you'll have it.

1:48:08.439 --> 1:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>They're waiting for you on iTunes to the Box Sexton Show.

1:48:11.920 --> 1:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Signed to be with you tomorrow. As always, my friends,

1:48:14.120 --> 1:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we have our mission shields high